[House Prints, 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
113th Congress } { No. 2
COMMITTEE PRINT
1st Session } {
_______________________________________________________________________
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014
----------
LEGISLATIVE TEXT
and
JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
to accompany
H.R. 3304
PUBLIC LAW 113-66
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
DECEMBER 2013
Printed for the use of the Committee on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives
113th Congress } { No. 2
COMMITTEE PRINT
1st Session } {
_______________________________________________________________________
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014
__________
LEGISLATIVE TEXT
and
JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
to accompany
H.R. 3304
PUBLIC LAW 113-66
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
DECEMBER 2013
Printed for the use of the Committee on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives
_____
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
86-280 WASHINGTON : 2014
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
One Hundred Thirteenth Congress
HOWARD P. ``BUCK'' McKEON, California, Chairman
MAC THORNBERRY, Texas ADAM SMITH, Washington
WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina LORETTA SANCHEZ, California
J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia MIKE McINTYRE, North Carolina
JEFF MILLER, Florida ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania
JOE WILSON, South Carolina ROBERT E. ANDREWS, New Jersey
FRANK A. LoBIONDO, New Jersey SUSAN A. DAVIS, California
ROB BISHOP, Utah JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island
MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio RICK LARSEN, Washington
JOHN KLINE, Minnesota JIM COOPER, Tennessee
MIKE ROGERS, Alabama MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam
TRENT FRANKS, Arizona JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut
BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania DAVID LOEBSACK, Iowa
K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts
DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JOHN GARAMENDI, California
ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia HENRY C. ``HANK'' JOHNSON, Jr.,
DUNCAN HUNTER, California Georgia
JOHN FLEMING, Louisiana COLLEEN W. HANABUSA, Hawaii
MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado JACKIE SPEIER, California
E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia RON BARBER, Arizona
CHRISTOPHER P. GIBSON, New York ANDRE CARSON, Indiana
VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri CAROL SHEA-PORTER, New Hampshire
JOSEPH J. HECK, Nevada DANIEL B. MAFFEI, New York
JON RUNYAN, New Jersey DEREK KILMER, Washington
AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas
STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois
MO BROOKS, Alabama SCOTT H. PETERS, California
RICHARD B. NUGENT, Florida WILLIAM L. ENYART, Illinois
KRISTI L. NOEM, South Dakota PETE P. GALLEGO, Texas
PAUL COOK, California MARC A. VEASEY, Texas
JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma
BRAD R. WENSTRUP, Ohio
JACKIE WALORSKI, Indiana
Robert L. Simmons II, Staff Director
Zach Steacy, Director, Legislative Operations
Note From the Director, Legislative Operations
This committee print consists of the enrolled text and
explanatory material for the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (H.R. 3304; Public Law 113-66).
This Act and the material found in this committee print are
the product of an agreement between the Chairman and Ranking
Member of the House Committee on Armed Services and the
Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Armed
Services on the reconciliation of H.R. 1960, as passed by the
House of Representatives on June 14, 2013, and S. 1197, as
reported out of committee on June 20, 2013. The Senate began
consideration of S. 1197 on November 18, 2013, but did not
complete consideration of S. 1197 and therefore was unable to
initiate a formal conference with the House.
In order to ensure the enactment of an annual defense bill
by the end of the calendar year, the Chairman and Ranking
Member of the House Committee on Armed Services and the
Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Armed
Services agreed to reconcile the provisions of H.R. 1960 and S.
1197, including a number of amendments submitted during the
Senate's consideration of its bill which were cleared by both
sides, but were not adopted by the Senate due to insufficient
time. The negotiated agreement was brought to the House Floor
in the form of an amendment to the Senate amendments to H.R.
3304, a Medal of Honor bill referred to the Committee on Armed
Services, which had previously passed in the House and was then
amended and passed by the Senate. On December 12, 2013,
pursuant to H. Res. 441, which provided for the concurrence by
the House in the Senate amendments to H.R. 3304, with an
amendment, the House considered and passed the negotiated
agreement by a vote of 350-69. On December 19, 2013, the Senate
agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment, and
passed the negotiated text, by recorded vote, 84-15. The
President signed the legislation on December 26, 2013, and it
became Public Law 113-66.
Because the House and Senate negotiators were unable to
convene a formal conference committee to reconcile the
differences in the respective versions of the bill, there is no
conference report and no formal ``joint explanatory statement
of the conference committee'' for H.R. 3304. Instead, Chairman
Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon submitted a ``Joint Explanatory
Statement to Accompany the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014'' in the Congressional Record on December
12, 2013 (pages H7894-H8037). The text of the joint explanatory
statement is included in this committee print. Section 4 of
H.R. 3304 specifies that this explanatory material shall have
the same effect with respect to the implementation of this
legislation as if it were a joint explanatory statement of a
committee of conference.
In this committee print, the provisions of H.R. 1960, the
House-passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014, are generally referred to as ``the House
bill.'' The provisions of S. 1197, the Senate Committee on
Armed Services committee-reported version of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and selected
manager's package amendments, are generally referred to as
``the Senate committee-reported bill.'' The final form of the
agreements reached during negotiations between the House and
the Senate are referred to as ``the agreement.''
The following pages are organized in the manner of a
traditional conference report.
C O N T E N T S
----------
Page
LEGISLATIVE TEXT................................................. 1
JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY THE NATIONAL DEFENSE
AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014......................... 509
Compliance with rules of the House of Representatives and Senate
regarding earmarks and congressionally directed spending items. 509
Summary of discretionary authorizations and budget implication... 509
DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS................. 510
TITLE I--PROCUREMENT............................................. 510
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations.................. 510
Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101)............... 510
Subtitle B--Army Programs.................................... 510
Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle
program (sec. 111)..................................... 510
Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority
for tactical vehicles (sec. 112)....................... 510
Subtitle C--Navy Programs.................................... 510
CVN-78 class aircraft carrier program (sec. 121)......... 510
Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future
surface combatants (sec. 122).......................... 511
Multiyear procurement authority for E-2D aircraft program
(sec. 123)............................................. 511
Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat
Ship (sec. 124)........................................ 511
Subtitle D--Air Force Programs............................... 512
Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired
KC-135E aircraft (sec. 131)............................ 512
Multiyear procurement authority for C-130J aircraft (sec.
132)................................................... 512
Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics
modernization program for C-130 aircraft (sec. 133).... 512
Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C-27J aircraft
by the Air Force (sec. 134)............................ 513
Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters.... 513
Personal protection equipment procurement (sec. 141)..... 513
Repeal of certain F-35 reporting requirements (sec. 142). 514
Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ-
4 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems and A-10
aircraft (sec. 143).................................... 514
MC-12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and
Reconnaissance aircraft (sec. 144)..................... 515
Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle
providers (sec. 145)................................... 515
Reports on personal protection equipment and health and
safety risks associated with ejection seats (sec. 146). 516
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 516
Modification of requirements to sustain Navy airborne
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
capabilities........................................... 516
Multiyear procurement authority for Ground-Based
Interceptors........................................... 518
Sense of Senate on the United States helicopter
industrial base........................................ 518
TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION............ 518
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations.................. 518
Authorization of appropriations (sec. 201)............... 518
Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and
Limitations................................................ 518
Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan
for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (sec.
211)................................................... 518
Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat
vehicle engineering and manufacturing phase (sec. 212). 519
Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned
carrier-launched surveillance and strike system program
(sec. 213)............................................. 519
Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force
logistics transformation (sec. 214).................... 520
Limitation on availability of funds for defensive
cyberspace operations of the Air Force (sec. 215)...... 520
Limitation on availability of funds for precision
extended range munition program (sec. 216)............. 520
Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on
availability of funds for noncompetitive procedures for
offensive anti-surface warfare weapon contracts of the
Navy (sec. 217)........................................ 520
Review of software development for F-35 aircraft (sec.
218)................................................... 521
Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common
ground system (sec. 219)............................... 521
Operationally responsive space (sec. 220)................ 522
Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities (sec.
221)................................................... 522
Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs......................... 523
Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on
ballistic missile defense system (sec. 231)............ 523
Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program (sec. 232). 523
Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of
certain missile defense systems; report on regional
ballistic missile defense (sec. 233)................... 524
Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome
short-range rocket defense system in the United States
(sec. 234)............................................. 525
Additional missile defense radar for the protection of
the United States homeland (sec. 235).................. 525
Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile
defense sensor architectures (sec. 236)................ 526
Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense
system (sec. 237)...................................... 526
Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile
defense options (sec. 238)............................. 527
Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile
defense matters (sec. 239)............................. 527
Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense
burden-sharing (sec. 240).............................. 528
Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic
missile defense capabilities (sec. 241)................ 529
Sense of Congress on procurement of capability
enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle (sec. 242).. 529
Subtitle D--Reports.......................................... 529
Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious
combat vehicle acquisition program (sec. 251).......... 529
Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on
the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential
Helicopter (sec. 252).................................. 529
Report on strategy to improve body armor (sec. 253)...... 529
Subtitle E--Other Matters.................................... 530
Establishment of Communications Security Review and
Advisory Board (sec. 261).............................. 530
Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds
for defense laboratories for research and development
of technologies for military missions (sec. 262)....... 530
Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced
technology achievements (sec. 263)..................... 530
Five-year extension of pilot program to include
technology protection features during research and
development of certain defense systems (sec. 264)...... 531
Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of
Defense (sec. 265)..................................... 531
Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common
missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement program
with the United Kingdom's Vanguard successor program
(sec. 266)............................................. 531
Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power
microwave missile project (sec. 267)................... 531
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 532
Conventional Prompt Global Strike program................ 532
Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing
requirement............................................ 532
Requirement to complete individual carbine testing....... 533
Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for a
Navy laser weapon system............................... 533
Analysis of alternatives for successor to Precision
Tracking Space System.................................. 534
Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic
Defense Initiative..................................... 534
Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the missile
defenses of the United States.......................... 534
Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency............... 534
Report on powered rail system............................ 535
Report on science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics scholarship program........................ 535
Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in
defense experimental program to stimulate competitive
research............................................... 536
Briefing on power and energy research conducted at
university-affiliated research centers................. 536
Approval of certain new uses of research, development,
test, and evaluation land.............................. 536
Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and
explosive precursors................................... 537
TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............................. 538
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations.................. 538
Operation and maintenance funding (sec. 301)............. 538
Subtitle B--Energy and Environment........................... 538
Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets
for activities relating to operational energy strategy
(sec. 311)............................................. 538
Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation
programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture,
and Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on
military readiness activities (sec. 312)............... 538
Reauthorization of Sikes Act (sec. 313).................. 539
Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in
open-air burn pits (sec. 314).......................... 539
Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of
drop-in fuels (sec. 315)............................... 539
Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment........................ 540
Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment
(sec. 321)............................................. 540
Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and
report (sec. 322)...................................... 540
Consideration of Army arsenals' capabilities to fulfill
manufacturing requirements (sec. 323).................. 540
Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and
replacement of operating forces used to support
overseas contingency operations (sec. 324)............. 541
Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan (sec.
325)................................................... 541
Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit
visibility (sec. 326).................................. 541
Subtitle D--Reports.......................................... 542
Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel
and unit readiness (sec. 331).......................... 542
Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds
for equipment readiness and strategic capability (sec.
332)................................................... 542
Revision to requirement for annual submission of
information regarding information technology capital
assets (sec. 333)...................................... 542
Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention
reporting requirements (sec. 334)...................... 543
Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority.......... 543
Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air
Force Base, Azores (sec. 341).......................... 543
Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight
demonstration teams outside the United States (sec.
342)................................................... 543
Limitation on funding for United States Special
Operations Command National Capital Region (sec. 343).. 544
Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional
Web Initiative (sec. 344).............................. 544
Subtitle F--Other Matters.................................... 545
Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units
(sec. 351)............................................. 545
Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility
uniforms (sec. 352).................................... 545
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 547
Authorization of appropriations for the Marine Corps
Embassy Security Group................................. 547
Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response Force 547
Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land
management related to Department of Defense readiness
activities............................................. 547
Exclusions from definition of ``chemical substance''
under Toxic Substances Control Act..................... 547
Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel
procurement requirement................................ 547
Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction
of biofuels refineries................................. 548
Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation... 548
Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned
and controlled by women and minorities required before
conversion of certain functions to contractor
performance............................................ 548
Ordnance related records review and reporting requirement
for Vieques and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico........... 548
Authorization to institute a centralized, automated mail
redirection system to improve the delivery of absentee
ballots to military personnel serving outside the
United States.......................................... 549
TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS...................... 549
Subtitle A--Active Forces.................................... 549
End strengths for active forces (sec. 401)............... 549
Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum
levels and in annual limitation on certain end strength
reductions (sec. 402).................................. 550
Subtitle B--Reserve Forces................................... 551
End strengths for Selected Reserve (sec. 411)............ 551
End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of
the reserves (sec. 412)................................ 551
End strengths for military technicians (dual status)
(sec. 413)............................................. 552
Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status
technicians (sec. 414)................................. 552
Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on
active duty for operational support (sec. 415)......... 553
Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations.................. 553
Military personnel (sec. 421)............................ 553
TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY............................... 553
Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally............... 553
Congressional notification requirements related to
increases in number of general and flag officers on
Active Duty or in joint duty assignments (sec. 501).... 553
Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced
education upon original appointment as a commissioned
officer (sec. 502)..................................... 554
Selective early retirement authority for regular officers
and selective early removal of officers from reserve
active-status list (sec. 503).......................... 554
Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management..................... 555
Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve
components (sec. 511).................................. 555
Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers
between the active and inactive National Guard (sec.
512)................................................... 555
Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain
reserve component units and involuntary mobilizations
of certain Reserves (sec. 513)......................... 556
Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve
component general and flag officers in an active status
(sec. 514)............................................. 556
Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard
in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands (sec. 515).................... 556
Subtitle C--General Service Authorities...................... 557
Provision of information under Transition Assistance
Program about disability-related employment and
education protections (sec. 521)....................... 557
Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic
stress disorder or traumatic brain injury before
administrative separation (sec. 522)................... 557
Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-
neutral occupational standard for military career
designators (sec. 523)................................. 557
Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service
Implementation Plan (sec. 524)......................... 558
Provision of military service records to the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs in an electronic format (sec. 525).... 558
Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System (sec.
526)................................................... 558
Subtitle D--Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual
Assault Prevention and Response and Related Reforms........ 559
Modification of eligibility for appointment as judge on
the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
(sec. 531)............................................. 559
Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of
members of the Armed Forces and chaplains of such
members (sec. 532)..................................... 559
Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces
compliance with regulations for the protection of
rights of conscience of members of the Armed Forces and
their chaplains (sec. 533)............................. 559
Survey of military chaplains views on Department of
Defense policy regarding chaplain prayers outside of
religious services (sec. 534).......................... 560
Subtitle E--Member Education and Training.................... 560
Additional requirements for approval of educational
programs for purposes of certain educational assistance
under laws administered by the Secretary of Defense
(sec. 541)............................................. 560
Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and
training for military occupational specialties with
skills and training required for civilian
certifications and licenses (sec. 542)................. 561
Report on the Troops to Teachers program (sec. 543)...... 561
Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring
automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual
of interest on direct student loans of certain members
of the Armed Forces (sec. 544)......................... 561
Subtitle F--Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family
Readiness Matters.......................................... 562
Continuation of authority to assist local educational
agencies that benefit dependents of members of the
Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian
employees (sec. 551)................................... 562
Impact aid for children with severe disabilities (sec.
552)................................................... 562
Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual
elementary and secondary education component of
Department of Defense education program (sec. 553)..... 562
Family support programs for immediate family members of
members of the Armed Forces assigned to special
operations forces (sec. 554)........................... 563
Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the
armed forces in child custody determinations (sec. 555) 563
Subtitle G--Decorations and Awards........................... 564
Repeal of limitation on number of Medals of Honor that
may be awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces
(sec. 561)............................................. 564
Standardization of time-limits for recommending and
awarding Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross,
Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service
Medal (sec. 562)....................................... 564
Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and
Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements (sec. 563) 564
Prompt replacement of military decorations (sec. 564).... 564
Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to
victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little
Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas (sec. 565)..... 565
Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former
members of the Armed Forces previously recommended for
award of the Medal of Honor (sec. 566)................. 565
Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of
valor during the Vietnam War (sec. 567)................ 566
Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service
Cross for acts of valor during the Korean and Vietnam
Wars (sec. 568)........................................ 566
Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First
Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during
the Civil War (sec. 569)............................... 566
Subtitle H--Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports.... 566
Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation
reports to include 360-degree assessment approach (sec.
571)................................................... 566
Report on Department of Defense personnel policies
regarding members of the Armed Forces with HIV or
Hepatitis B (sec. 572)................................. 567
Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of
graduates of secondary schools (sec. 573).............. 567
Comptroller General report on use of determination of
personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to
separate members from the Armed Forces (sec. 574)...... 567
Subtitle I--Other Matters.................................... 568
Accounting for members of the armed forces and Department
of Defense civilian employees listed as missing and
related reports (sec. 581)............................. 568
Expansion of privileged information authorities to
debriefing reports of certain recovered persons who
were never placed in a missing status (sec. 582)....... 568
Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect
consolidation of North Georgia College and State
University and Gainesville State College (sec. 583).... 569
Review of security of military installations, including
barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-
family residences (sec. 584)........................... 569
Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army
National Military Cemeteries (sec. 585)................ 569
Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance
by members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by
veterans (sec. 586).................................... 570
Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results
(sec. 587)............................................. 570
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 571
Designation of state student cadet corps as Department of
Defense youth organizations............................ 571
National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program................... 571
Authority for joint professional military education phase
II instruction and credit to be offered and awarded
through senior-level course of School of Advanced
Military Studies of the United States Army Command and
General Staff College.................................. 571
Authority for Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences to support undergraduate and other medical
education and training programs for military medical
personnel.............................................. 572
Command responsibility and accountability for remains of
members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps
who die outside the United States...................... 572
Expansion of eligibility for associate degree programs
under the Community College of the Air Force........... 572
Procedures for judicial review of military personnel
decisions relating to correction of military records... 573
Coverage of military occupational specialties relating to
military information technology under pilot program on
receipt of civilian credentials for skills required for
military occupational specialties...................... 573
Report on data and information collected in connection
with Department of Defense review of laws, policies,
and regulations restricting service of female members
of the Armed Forces.................................... 573
Meetings with respect to religious liberty............... 574
Proof of period of military service for purposes of
interest rate limitation under the Servicemembers Civil
Relief Act............................................. 574
Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel............... 574
Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members
of the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones.......... 575
Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces
for active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing... 575
Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their
families from military to civilian life................ 576
Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces,
surviving spouses, and certain veterans and other
improvements to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.... 576
Department of Defense recognition of dependents of
members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones.. 577
Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of
Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps Program........ 577
Requirement to continue provision of tuition assistance
for members of the Armed Forces........................ 577
Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air Force,
and Marine Corps serving in combat zones............... 577
Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and
transition of military dependent students.............. 577
Fraudulent representations about receipt of military
decorations or medals.................................. 578
Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge............ 578
Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining
to Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant
Rafael Peralta......................................... 578
Required gold content for Medal of Honor................. 578
Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations........... 578
Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining
to Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L.
Albracht............................................... 579
Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary
Issues................................................. 579
Commission on Service to the Nation...................... 579
Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains
of certain members of the Armed Forces killed in
Thurston Island, Antarctica............................ 580
TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS.............. 580
Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances............................... 580
Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in
rates of basic allowance for housing under certain
circumstances (sec. 601)............................... 580
Recognition of additional means by which members of the
National Guard called into Federal service for a period
of 30 days or less may initially report for duty for
entitlement to basic pay (sec. 602).................... 580
Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays........... 580
One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for reserve forces (sec. 611).............. 580
One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for health care professionals (sec. 612)... 581
One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities
for nuclear officers (sec. 613)........................ 581
One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37
consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus
authorities (sec. 614)................................. 581
One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of
other title 37 bonuses and special pays (sec. 615)..... 582
One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay
for members of precommissioning programs pursuing
foreign language proficiency (sec. 616)................ 582
Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and
midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers'
Training Corps (sec. 617).............................. 582
Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned
officers in the reserve components (sec. 618).......... 582
Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation Allowances............. 583
Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of
Defense travel and transportation authorities in
connection with reform of such authorities (sec. 621).. 583
Subtitle D--Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits... 583
Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in
the case of members whose retired pay is computed using
high-three (sec. 631).................................. 583
Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early
retirement credit earned for significant periods of
active Federal status or active duty (sec. 632)........ 583
Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other
dependents (sec. 633).................................. 583
Subtitle E--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund
Instrumentality Benefits and Operations.................... 584
Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated
fund instrumentalities from reprisals (sec. 641)....... 584
Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service
laws (sec. 642)........................................ 584
Subtitle F--Other Matters.................................... 585
Authority to provide certain expenses for care and
disposition of human remains that were retained by the
Department of Defense for forensic pathology
investigation (sec. 651)............................... 585
Study of the merits and feasibility of providing
transitional compensation and other transitional
benefits to dependents of members separated for
violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec.
652)................................................... 585
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 585
Fiscal year 2014 increase in military basic pay.......... 585
Correction of citation for extension of reimbursement
authority for travel expenses for inactive-duty
training outside of normal commuting distance and
additional one-year extension.......................... 586
Purchase of sustainable products, local food products,
and recyclable materials for resale in commissary and
exchange store systems................................. 586
Exchange store system participation in the Accord on Fire
and Building Safety in Bangladesh...................... 586
Effect on division of retired pay of election to receive
combat-related special compensation after previous
election to receive concurrent retirement and
disability compensation................................ 586
Provision of status under law by honoring certain members
of the reserve components as veterans.................. 587
Survey of military pay and benefits preferences.......... 587
Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available
basis for disabled veterans with a service-connected,
permanent disability rated as total.................... 587
Preservation of retiree dependent status for certain
dependents upon death or permanent incapacitation of
the retired member on whom dependent status is based... 588
Enhanced role for the Department of Justice under the
Military Lending Act................................... 588
Extension of ongoing pilot programs under temporary Army
incentive to provide additional recruitment incentives. 588
TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS................................ 589
Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits........... 589
Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain
beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime (sec. 701)..... 589
Mental health care treatment through telemedicine (sec.
702)................................................... 589
Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and
transition of members of the Armed Forces with
urotrauma (sec. 703)................................... 590
Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of
the Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-
traumatic stress disorder (sec. 704)................... 590
Subtitle B--Health Care Administration....................... 591
Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health
Sciences to enter into contracts and agreements and
make grants to other nonprofit entities (sec. 711)..... 591
Pilot program on increased third-party collection
reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities
(sec. 712)............................................. 591
Electronic health records of the Department of Defense
and the Department of Veterans Affairs (sec. 713)...... 591
Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters........................ 593
Display of budget information for embedded mental health
providers of the reserve components (sec. 721)......... 593
Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in
certain Centers of Excellence (sec. 722)............... 593
Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries
(sec. 723)............................................. 593
Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics
to members of the Armed Forces and veterans (sec. 724). 594
Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit
program and availability of compounded pharmaceuticals
(sec. 725)............................................. 594
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 595
Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces 595
Periodic mental health assessments for members of the
Armed Forces........................................... 595
Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities
under TRICARE.......................................... 595
Cooperative health care agreements between the military
departments and non-military health care entities...... 595
Limitation on availability of funds for integrated
electronic health record program....................... 596
Mental health support for military personnel and families 596
Research regarding hydrocephalus......................... 597
Traumatic brain injury research.......................... 597
Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple
negative breast cancer................................. 597
Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for members
of the Armed Forces and their families................. 597
Preliminary mental health assessments.................... 598
Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan..... 598
TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND
RELATED MATTERS................................................ 598
Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management................ 598
Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department
of Defense laboratories (sec. 801)..................... 598
Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount
available for contract services (sec. 802)............. 598
Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic
parts (sec. 803)....................................... 599
Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities,
Procedures, and Limitations................................ 599
Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for
contractor compensation (sec. 811)..................... 599
Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in
certain reports (sec. 812)............................. 599
Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving
suspension or debarment (sec. 813)..................... 600
Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military
purpose nondevelopmental items (sec. 814).............. 600
Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition
Programs................................................... 600
Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major
defense acquisition programs (sec. 821)................ 600
Assessment of dedicated ground control system before
Milestone B approval of major defense acquisition
programs constituting a space program (sec. 822)....... 601
Additional responsibility for product support managers
for major weapon systems (sec. 823).................... 601
Comptroller General review of Department of Defense
processes for the acquisition of weapons systems (sec.
824)................................................... 601
Subtitle D--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of
Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan.............. 602
Prohibition on contracting with the enemy (sec. 831)..... 602
Extension of authority to acquire products and services
produced in countries along a major route of supply to
Afghanistan (sec. 832)................................. 602
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 603
Modification of reporting requirement for Department of
Defense business system acquisition programs when
initial operating capability is not achieved within 5
years of Milestone A approval.......................... 603
Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to
multiyear defense acquisitions to be specifically
authorized by law...................................... 603
Report on program manager training and experience........ 603
Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations
relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit
electronic parts....................................... 604
Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government
be given at least equal importance as technical or
other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for
defense contracts...................................... 604
Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources.. 605
Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and
Afghanistan............................................ 606
Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities....... 606
Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned
small businesses....................................... 607
Revisions to requirements relating to justification and
approval of sole-source defense contracts.............. 607
Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation to take into account sourcing laws.......... 607
Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in the
United States.......................................... 607
Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear
furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon
their initial entry into the Armed Forces.............. 607
Implementation by Department of Defense of certain
recommendations of the Comptroller General of the
United States on oversight of pensions offered by
Department contractors................................. 608
Report on the elimination of improper payments........... 609
Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act.... 609
TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT...... 610
Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management................. 610
Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense
business enterprise architecture (sec. 901)............ 610
Comptroller General report on potential relocation of
Federal Government tenants onto military installations
in the United States (sec. 902)........................ 610
Clarification of authority for the command acquisition
executive of the United States Special Operations
Command (sec. 903)..................................... 610
Streamlining of Department of Defense management
headquarters (sec. 904)................................ 611
Update of statutory statement of functions of the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to
doctrine, training, and education (sec. 905)........... 612
Modification of reference to major Department of Defense
headquarters activities instruction (sec. 906)......... 612
Personnel security (sec. 907)............................ 612
Subtitle B--Space Activities................................. 613
National security space satellite reporting policy (sec.
911)................................................... 613
National security space defense and protection (sec. 912) 614
Space acquisition strategy (sec. 913).................... 614
Space control mission report (sec. 914).................. 615
Responsive launch (sec. 915)............................. 615
Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program
(sec. 916)............................................. 615
Eagle Vision system (sec. 917)........................... 616
Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related
Activities................................................. 616
Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in
commercial activities as security for intelligence
collection activities (sec. 921)....................... 616
Department of Defense intelligence priorities (sec. 922). 617
Defense Clandestine Service (sec. 923)................... 617
Prohibition on National Intelligence Program
consolidation (sec. 924)............................... 618
Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters....................... 618
Modification of requirement for inventory of Department
of Defense tactical data link systems (sec. 931)....... 618
Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United
States Cyber Command (sec. 932)........................ 618
Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of
Defense (sec. 933)..................................... 620
Modification of requirement for Report on Department of
Defense Progress in Defending the Department and the
Defense Industrial Base from Cyber Events (sec. 934)... 620
Additional requirements relating to the software licenses
of the Department of Defense (sec. 935)................ 620
Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses
(sec. 936)............................................. 621
Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for
the Department of Defense (sec. 937)................... 621
Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing
capabilities (sec. 938)................................ 622
Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon
systems and tactical communications systems (sec. 939). 623
Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons (sec. 940). 623
Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace
(sec. 941)............................................. 623
National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information
Assurance Education matters (sec. 942)................. 623
Subtitle E--Total Force Management........................... 624
Reviews of appropriate manpower performance (sec. 951)... 624
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 625
Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the
Department of the Navy and Marine Corps................ 625
Under Secretary of Defense for Management................ 625
Report on strategic importance of United States military
installation of the U.S. Pacific Command............... 625
Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory
Panel from Department of the Navy to National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration......................... 626
Navy broad-area maritime surveillance aircraft........... 626
Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative
cybersecurity activities with China.................... 626
Small business cybersecurity solutions office............ 626
Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of government
oversight of functions closely associated with
inherently governmental functions...................... 627
TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS...................................... 627
Budget Item.................................................. 627
Funding for New START Treaty preparatory activities...... 627
Subtitle A--Financial Matters................................ 627
General transfer authority (sec. 1001)................... 627
Budgetary effects of this Act (sec. 1002)................ 628
Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial
statements (sec. 1003)................................. 628
Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear
Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons
modernization (sec. 1004).............................. 628
Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities.......................... 628
Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug
and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (sec. 1011).. 628
Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide
support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-
terrorism activities (sec. 1012)....................... 629
Extension and expansion of authority to provide
additional support for counter-drug activities of
certain foreign governments (sec. 1013)................ 629
Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards...................... 630
Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan
for the construction of naval vessels (sec. 1021)...... 630
Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship
donations at no cost to the Navy (sec. 1022)........... 630
Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of
Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships (sec.
1023).................................................. 630
Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions
(sec. 1024)............................................ 631
Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III
ships (sec. 1025)...................................... 631
Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure
Assessment (sec. 1026)................................. 631
Modification of policy relating to major combatant
vessels of the strike forces of the Navy (sec. 1027)... 632
Subtitle D--Counterterrorism................................. 632
Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members
on military commissions (sec. 1031).................... 632
Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism
Fellowship Program reporting requirement (sec. 1032)... 632
Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify
facilities in the United States to house detainees
transferred from United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1033)....................... 633
Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or
release of individuals detained at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1034).............. 633
Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec.
1035).................................................. 633
Report on information relating to individuals detained at
Parwan, Afghanistan (sec. 1036)........................ 634
Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in
military commissions established to try individuals
detained at Guantanamo (sec. 1037)..................... 634
Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain,
rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at
Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen (sec. 1038).... 635
Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at
Guantanamo if transferred to the United States (sec.
1039).................................................. 635
Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations.................... 636
Congressional notification of sensitive military
operations (sec. 1041)................................. 636
Counterterrorism operational briefings (sec. 1042)....... 636
Report on process for determining targets of lethal or
capture operations (sec. 1043)......................... 636
Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces................................... 637
Notification required for reduction or consolidation of
dual-capable aircraft based in Europe (sec. 1051)...... 637
Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command,
Control, and Communications System (sec. 1052)......... 637
Modification of responsibilities and reporting
requirements of Nuclear Weapons Council (sec. 1053).... 638
Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear
weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear
weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command
and control system (sec. 1054)......................... 638
Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad (sec. 1055).. 638
Implementation of New START Treaty (sec. 1056)........... 639
Retention of capability to redeploy multiple
independently targetable reentry vehicles (sec. 1057).. 640
Report on New START Treaty (sec. 1058)................... 640
Report on implementation of the recommendations of the
Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose
Evaluation Report (sec. 1059).......................... 641
Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms
reductions with the Russian Federation (sec. 1060)..... 641
Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control
treaty obligations (sec. 1061)......................... 641
Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the
nuclear forces of the United States (sec. 1062)........ 642
Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations........ 642
Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government
to analyze captured records (sec. 1071)................ 642
Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic
spectrum (sec. 1072)................................... 642
Extension of authority to provide military transportation
services to certain other agencies at the Department of
Defense reimbursement rate (sec. 1073)................. 643
Notification of modifications to Army force structure
(sec. 1074)............................................ 643
Aircraft joint training (sec. 1075)...................... 644
Subtitle H--Studies and Reports.............................. 644
Online availability of reports submitted to Congress
(sec. 1081)............................................ 644
Oversight of combat support agencies (sec. 1082)......... 644
Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency
coordination relating to humanitarian demining
technology (sec. 1083)................................. 644
Repeal and modification of reporting requirements (sec.
1084).................................................. 645
Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment
of Department of Defense efficiencies (sec. 1085)...... 645
Review and assessment of United States Special Operations
Forces and United States Special Operations Command
(sec. 1086)............................................ 645
Reports on unmanned aircraft systems (sec. 1087)......... 645
Report on foreign language support contracts for the
Department of Defense (sec. 1088)...................... 646
Civil Air Patrol (sec. 1089)............................. 646
Subtitle I--Other Matters.................................... 646
Technical and clerical amendments (sec. 1091)............ 646
Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major
automated information system programs (sec. 1092)...... 646
Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to
issue non-premium aviation insurance (sec. 1093)....... 646
Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and
authority to waive reimbursement of costs of activities
for certain nongovernmental personnel (sec. 1094)...... 647
Amendments to certain national commissions (sec. 1095)... 647
Strategy for future military information operations
capabilities (sec. 1096)............................... 648
Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security
(sec. 1097)............................................ 648
Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire
suppression and other purposes; tactical airlift fleet
of the Air Force (sec. 1098)........................... 648
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 649
Department of Defense Readiness Restoration Fund......... 649
Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-
Narcotic Program....................................... 649
Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards................... 649
Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to
the United States for emergency or critical medical
treatment.............................................. 650
Assessment of affiliates and adherents of Al-Qaeda
outside the United States.............................. 650
Designation of Department of Defense senior official for
facilitating the transfer of individuals detained at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba...... 651
Summary of information relating to individuals detained
at Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist
groups................................................. 651
Procedures governing United States citizens apprehended
inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization
for Use of Military Force.............................. 651
Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational
facilities for individuals detained at Guantanamo...... 651
Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals
detained at Guantanamo to Yemen........................ 651
Department of Defense representation in dispute
resolution regarding surrender of Department of Defense
bands of electromagnetic frequencies................... 652
Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People's
Republic of China...................................... 652
Cost estimates for nuclear weapons....................... 652
Report on plans for the disposition of the Mine Resistant
Ambush Protected vehicle fleet......................... 653
Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation
activities............................................. 653
Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013
Quadrennial Defense Review............................. 653
Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency
operation plan information to Congress................. 654
Report on U.S. citizens subject to military detention.... 654
Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom and
Operation Enduring Freedom............................. 654
Report on air transportation of supplies for the United
States................................................. 654
Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces
from nonprofit organizations........................... 655
Protection of tier one task critical assets from
electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave
systems................................................ 655
Compliance of military departments with minimum safe
staffing standards..................................... 656
Determination and disclosure of transportation costs
incurred by Secretary of Defense for congressional
trips outside the United States........................ 657
Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the
Tethered Aerostat Radar System......................... 657
Sale or donation of excess personal property for border
security activities.................................... 657
Unmanned aircraft systems and National Airspace.......... 658
Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain
federal property....................................... 658
Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices........ 658
Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard and
Military Reserve force................................. 659
Access of employees of congressional support offices to
Department of Defense facilities....................... 659
Cost of wars............................................. 659
Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign
languages and cultures in the building of partner
capacity............................................... 660
Sense of Congress regarding preservation of second
amendment rights of active duty military personnel
stationed or residing in the District of Columbia...... 660
TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS............................. 660
One-year extension of authority to waive annual
limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on
pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas
(sec. 1101)............................................ 660
One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant
allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on
official duty in a combat zone (sec. 1102)............. 661
Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for
civilian employees of the Department of Defense (sec.
1103).................................................. 661
Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance
payments to Department of Defense employees (sec. 1104) 661
Revision to amount of financial assistance under
Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and
Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education
Program and assessment of STEM and other programs (sec.
1105).................................................. 661
Extension of program for exchange of information-
technology personnel (sec. 1106)....................... 662
Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department
of Defense research and engineering facilities (sec.
1107).................................................. 662
Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for
civilian personnel (sec. 1108)......................... 663
Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation
authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment
of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces
(sec. 1109)............................................ 663
Legislative Provision Not Adopted............................ 663
Flexibility in employment and compensation of civilian
faculty at certain additional Department of Defense
schools................................................ 663
TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS................... 664
Subtitle A--Assistance and Training.......................... 664
Modification and extension of authorities relating to
program to build the capacity of foreign military
forces (sec. 1201)..................................... 664
Global Security Contingency Fund (sec. 1202)............. 665
Training of general purpose forces of the United States
Armed Forces with military and other security forces of
friendly foreign countries (sec. 1203)................. 666
Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability
of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving
weapons of mass destruction (sec. 1204)................ 666
Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program
(sec. 1205)............................................ 667
United States security and assistance strategies in
Africa (sec. 1206)..................................... 668
Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border
security operations (sec. 1207)........................ 668
Support of foreign forces participating in operations to
disarm the Lord's Resistance Army (sec. 1208).......... 669
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and
Iraq....................................................... 670
Commanders' Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan
(sec. 1211)............................................ 670
One-year extension of authority to use funds for
reintegration activities in Afghanistan (sec. 1212).... 670
Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain
coalition nations for support provided to United States
military operations (sec. 1213)........................ 670
Extension and modification of authority to support
operations and activities of the Office of Security
Cooperation in Iraq (sec. 1214)........................ 671
One-year extension and modification of authority for
program to develop and carry out infrastructure
projects in Afghanistan (sec. 1215).................... 672
Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance
to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of
all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes
are not reimbursed by Afghanistan (sec. 1216).......... 672
Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign
forces supporting or participating with the United
States Armed Forces (sec. 1217)........................ 673
Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant
visa program (sec. 1218)............................... 673
Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program
(sec. 1219)............................................ 673
Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014........ 674
Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network
activities and finances (sec. 1221).................... 674
Completion of accelerated transition of security
responsibility from United States Armed Forces to the
Afghan National Security Forces (sec. 1222)............ 674
Defense Intelligence Plan (sec. 1223).................... 674
Limitation on availability of funds for certain
authorities for Afghanistan (sec. 1224)................ 675
Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran......................... 675
Report on United States military partnership with Gulf
Cooperation Council countries (sec. 1231).............. 675
Additional elements in annual report on military power of
Iran (sec. 1232)....................................... 676
Integrated air and missile defense programs at training
locations in Southwest Asia (sec. 1233)................ 676
Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters........................ 676
Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional
assisted recovery capabilities (sec. 1241)............. 676
Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual
report on military and security developments involving
the People's Republic of China (sec. 1242)............. 677
Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to
respond to an attack or other contingency against
United States diplomatic facilities overseas (sec.
1243).................................................. 677
Limitation on establishment of Regional Special
Operations Forces Coordination Centers (sec. 1244)..... 678
Additional reports on military and security developments
involving the Democratic People's Republic of Korea
(sec. 1245)............................................ 678
Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the
Russian Federation and limitations on providing certain
missile defense information to the Russian Federation
(sec. 1246)............................................ 679
Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and
Disarmament Act (sec. 1247)............................ 679
Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile
proliferation (sec. 1248).............................. 679
Reports on international agreements relating to the
Department of Defense (sec. 1249)...................... 680
Revision of statutory references to former NATO support
organizations and related NATO agreements (sec. 1250).. 680
Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating
to ballistic missile defense (sec. 1251)............... 680
Rule of construction (sec. 1252)......................... 681
Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms
Trade Treaty (sec. 1253)............................... 681
Report on military and security developments involving
the Russian Federation (sec. 1254)..................... 681
Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or
agreements with Rosoboronexport (sec. 1255)............ 682
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 682
Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian,
disaster, and civic aid programs of the Department of
Defense................................................ 682
Special Immigrant Visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan
allies................................................. 683
Sense of Congress on commencement of new long-term nation
building or large-scale infrastructure development
projects in Afghanistan................................ 683
Sense of Congress........................................ 683
Limitation on funds to establish permanent military
installations or bases in Afghanistan.................. 683
Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf..... 684
Statement of policy on condemning the Government of Iran
for its state-sponsored persecution of its Baha'i
minority............................................... 684
Technical correction relating to funding for NATO Special
Operations Headquarters................................ 684
Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national
security............................................... 684
Sense of Congress on the military developments on the
Korean peninsula....................................... 685
Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia 685
Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria............... 685
Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction
Engagement activities and United States contributions
to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty........... 685
Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation
between the United States and Burma.................... 685
Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States
forces in Europe....................................... 686
Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the
People's Republic of China............................. 686
Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan........ 687
Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah....... 687
Combating crime through intelligence capabilities........ 687
War Powers of Congress................................... 687
Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States
citizens............................................... 688
Sale of F-16 fighter aircraft to Taiwan.................. 688
Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of
Israel to self-defense................................. 688
Report on collective and national security implications
of Central Asian and South Caucasus energy development. 688
Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other
riot control items..................................... 689
Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan military 689
Israel's right to self-defense........................... 689
Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full
implementation of United States and international
sanctions on Iran and urging the President to continue
to strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation..... 689
Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons programs
of Iran and North Korea................................ 690
TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION......................... 690
Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs
and funds (sec. 1301).................................. 690
Funding allocations (sec. 1302).......................... 690
Extension of authority for utilization of contributions
to the cooperative threat reduction program (sec. 1303) 691
Strategy to modernize Cooperative Threat Reduction and
prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction and related materials in the Middle East
and North Africa region (sec. 1304).................... 691
TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.................................. 691
Subtitle A--Military Programs................................ 691
Working capital funds (sec. 1401)........................ 691
National Defense Sealift Fund (sec. 1402)................ 691
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (sec.
1403).................................................. 692
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-
wide (sec. 1404)....................................... 692
Defense Inspector General (sec. 1405).................... 692
Defense Health Program (sec. 1406)....................... 692
Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile....................... 692
Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of
a strategic and critical materials supply (sec. 1411).. 692
Authority to acquire additional materials for the
National Defense Stockpile (sec. 1412)................. 693
Subtitle C--Other Matters.................................... 693
Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of
Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility
Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health
Care Center, Illinois (sec. 1421)...................... 693
Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces
Retirement Home (sec. 1422)............................ 693
Cemeterial expenses (sec. 1423).......................... 693
TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS......................................... 693
Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations....... 693
Purpose (sec. 1501)...................................... 693
Procurement (sec. 1502).................................. 694
Research, development, test, and evaluation (sec. 1503).. 694
Operation and maintenance (sec. 1504).................... 694
Military personnel (sec. 1505)........................... 694
Working capital funds (sec. 1506)........................ 694
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-
wide (sec. 1507)....................................... 695
Defense Inspector General (sec. 1508).................... 695
Defense Health Program (sec. 1509)....................... 695
Subtitle B--Financial Matters................................ 695
Treatment as additional authorizations (sec. 1521)....... 695
Special transfer authority (sec. 1522)................... 695
Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters.......... 695
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (sec. 1531)............. 695
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund (sec. 1532) 696
Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat
Organization (sec. 1533)............................... 696
Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and
Stability Operations in Afghanistan (sec. 1534)........ 697
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 697
National Defense Sealift Fund............................ 697
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense....... 697
Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance support for Operation Observant Compass. 697
Report on U.S. force levels and costs of military
operations in Afghanistan.............................. 698
Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security Forces
Fund to acquire certain aircraft, vehicles, and
equipment.............................................. 698
TITLE XVI--INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS............................... 698
Subtitle A--Defense Industrial Base Matters.................. 698
Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector
General of Department of Defense (sec. 1601)........... 698
Foreign space activities (sec. 1602)..................... 698
Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program (sec.
1603).................................................. 699
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns...... 699
Advancing small business growth (sec. 1611).............. 699
Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance
Cooperative Agreement Program (sec. 1612).............. 700
Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to
small business concerns (sec. 1613).................... 700
Credit for certain small business subcontractors (sec.
1614).................................................. 700
Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify
certain contracts (sec. 1615).......................... 700
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 701
Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of
meals ready-to-eat..................................... 701
Program to provide federal contracts to early stage small
businesses............................................. 701
GAO study on subcontracting reporting systems............ 701
TITLE XVII--SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND RELATED
REFORMS........................................................ 702
Subtitle A--Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice....... 702
Extension of crime victims' rights to victims of offenses
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1701). 702
Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of
Military Justice (sec. 1702)........................... 702
Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial
by court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-
related crimes (sec. 1703)............................. 703
Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-
related offense in presence of trial counsel, counsel
for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate
(sec. 1704)............................................ 703
Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses
and trial of such offenses by general courts-martial
(sec. 1705)............................................ 703
Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-
martial process (sec. 1706)............................ 704
Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1707)........... 704
Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate
factor relating to character and military service of
the accused in rule on initial disposition of offenses
(sec. 1708)............................................ 705
Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed
Forces for reporting a criminal offense (sec. 1709).... 705
Subtitle B--Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code. 705
Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals
who have been convicted of certain sexual offenses
(sec. 1711)............................................ 705
Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard
regarding consideration of request for permanent change
of station or unit transfer by victim of sexual assault
(sec. 1712)............................................ 705
Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a
member of the Armed Forces on active duty who is
accused of committing a sexual assault or related
offense (sec. 1713).................................... 706
Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to
protected communications of members of the Armed Forces
and prohibited retaliatory actions (sec. 1714)......... 706
Inspector General investigation of allegations of
retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to
making protected communications regarding sexual
assault (sec. 1715).................................... 707
Designation and availability of Special Victims' Counsel
for victims of sex-related offenses (sec. 1716)........ 707
Subtitle C--Amendments to Other Laws......................... 707
Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in
conducting organizational climate assessments for
purposes of preventing and responding to sexual
assaults (sec. 1721)................................... 707
Advancement of submittal deadline for report of
independent panel on assessment of military response
systems to sexual assault (sec. 1722).................. 708
Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted
Reports and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault
involving members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1723)...... 708
Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by
members of the National Guard and Reserves (sec. 1724). 708
Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense
sexual assault prevention and response personnel and
required availability of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners
(sec. 1725)............................................ 709
Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention
and Response Office for Department of Defense sexual
assault prevention and response program (sec. 1726).... 709
Subtitle D--Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports.......... 711
Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of
Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual
assault cases (sec. 1731).............................. 711
Review and policy regarding Department of Defense
investigative practices in response to allegations of
Uniform Code of Military Justice violations (sec. 1732) 712
Review of training and education provided members of the
Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response
(sec. 1733)............................................ 712
Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy
on the retention of and access to evidence and records
relating to sexual assaults involving members of the
Armed Forces (sec. 1734)............................... 713
Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal
Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases (sec. 1735) 713
Subtitle E--Other Matters.................................... 714
Enhanced protections for prospective members and new
members of the Armed Forces during entry-level
processing and training (sec. 1741).................... 714
Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses
involving members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1742)...... 714
Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to
unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the
victim is a member of the Armed Forces (sec. 1743)..... 715
Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-
related offenses for trial by court-martial (sec. 1744) 715
Inclusion and command review of information on sex-
related offenses in personnel service records of
members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1745)................ 715
Prevention of sexual assault at military service
academies (sec. 1746).................................. 716
Required notification whenever members of the Armed
Forces are completing Standard Form 86 of the
Questionnaire for National Security Positions (sec.
1747).................................................. 716
Subtitle F--Sense of Congress Provisions..................... 717
Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility
for command climate free of retaliation (sec. 1751).... 717
Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving
certain sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform
Code of Military Justice through courts-martial (sec.
1752).................................................. 717
Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-
martial of members of the Armed Forces who commit sex-
related offenses (sec. 1753)........................... 717
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 718
Servicemembers' accountability, rights, and
responsibilities training.............................. 718
Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of
separation of members of the Armed Forces who made
unrestricted reports of sexual assault................. 718
Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in
military justice process............................... 718
Enhancement to requirements for availability of
information on sexual assault prevention and response
resources.............................................. 718
Health welfare inspections............................... 719
DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS................. 719
Summary and explanation of funding tables................ 719
Legislative Provisions Adopted............................... 719
Short title (sec. 2001).................................. 719
Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be
specified by law (sec. 2002)........................... 719
Legislative Provision Not Adopted............................ 720
Effective date........................................... 720
TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION............................ 720
Summary.................................................. 720
Legislative Provisions Adopted............................... 720
Authorized Army construction and land acquisition
projects (sec. 2101)................................... 720
Family housing (sec. 2102)............................... 720
Authorization of appropriations, Army (sec. 2103)........ 721
Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United
States Military Academy, New York (sec. 2104).......... 721
Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2004 project (sec. 2105)............................... 721
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal
year 2010 project (sec. 2106).......................... 721
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal
year 2011 project (sec. 2107).......................... 722
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010
projects (sec. 2108)................................... 722
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects (sec. 2109)................................... 722
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 722
Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Camp Frank D.
Merrill, Dahlonega, Georgia............................ 722
Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project 723
TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION........................... 723
Summary.................................................. 723
Legislative Provisions Adopted............................... 723
Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition
projects (sec. 2201)................................... 723
Family housing (sec. 2202)............................... 724
Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2203) 724
Authorization of appropriations, Navy (sec. 2204)........ 724
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal
year 2011 project (sec. 2205).......................... 724
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal
year 2012 project (sec. 2206).......................... 724
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects (sec. 2207)................................... 725
Legislative Provision Not Adopted............................ 725
Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain
fiscal year 2014 project............................... 725
TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION..................... 725
Summary.................................................. 725
Legislative Provisions Adopted............................... 726
Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition
projects (sec. 2301)................................... 726
Family housing (sec. 2302)............................... 726
Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2303) 727
Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (sec. 2304)... 727
Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain
fiscal year 2014 project (sec. 2305)................... 727
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal
year 2013 project (sec. 2306).......................... 727
Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011
project (sec. 2307).................................... 728
TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION............... 728
Budget Items................................................. 728
Summary.................................................. 728
U.S. Special Operations Command Military Construction
Requirements........................................... 729
Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations.................... 730
Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land
acquisition projects (sec. 2401)....................... 730
Authorized energy conservation projects (sec. 2402)...... 730
Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (sec.
2403).................................................. 731
Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations......... 731
Authorization of appropriations, chemical
demilitarization construction, defense-wide (sec. 2411) 731
TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM........................................................ 731
Summary.................................................. 731
Legislative Provisions Adopted............................... 731
Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition
projects (sec. 2501)................................... 731
Authorization of appropriations, NATO (sec. 2502)........ 732
TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES.................. 732
Summary.................................................. 732
Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of
Appropriations............................................. 732
Authorized Army National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects (sec. 2601)....................... 732
Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition
projects (sec. 2602)................................... 732
Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 2603). 733
Authorized Air National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects (sec. 2604)....................... 733
Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land
acquisition projects (sec. 2605)....................... 733
Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and
Reserve (sec. 2606).................................... 733
Subtitle B--Other Matters.................................... 734
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal
year 2013 project (sec. 2611).......................... 734
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects (sec. 2612)................................... 734
TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES............. 734
Summary.................................................. 734
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations.................. 734
Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and
closure activities funded through Department of Defense
Base Closure Account (sec. 2701)....................... 734
Subtitle B--Other Matters.................................... 735
Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and
Closure (BRAC) round (sec. 2711)....................... 735
Elimination of quarterly certification requirement
regarding availability of military health care in
National Capital Region (sec. 2712).................... 735
Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing
initiative (sec. 2713)................................. 735
Legislative Provision Not Adopted............................ 735
Consideration of the value of services provided by a
local community to the Armed Forces as part of the
economic analysis in making base realignment or closure
decisions.............................................. 735
TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS........... 736
Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family
Housing Changes............................................ 736
Modification and extension of authority to utilize
unspecified minor military construction authority for
laboratory revitalization projects (sec. 2801)......... 736
Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited
partnerships with private developers of housing (sec.
2802).................................................. 736
Military construction standards to improve force
protection (sec. 2803)................................. 737
Application of cash payments received for utilities and
services (sec. 2804)................................... 737
Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of
military housing investment authority (sec. 2805)...... 737
Additional element for annual report on military housing
privatization projects (sec. 2806)..................... 737
Policies and requirements regarding overseas military
construction and closure and realignment of United
States military installations in foreign countries
(sec. 2807)............................................ 737
Extension and modification of temporary, limited
authority to use operation and maintenance funds for
construction projects in certain areas outside the
United States (sec. 2808).............................. 738
Limitation on construction projects in European Command
area of responsibility (sec. 2809)..................... 739
Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration...... 739
Development of master plans for major military
installations (sec. 2811).............................. 739
Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative
expenses associated with real property leases and
easements (sec. 2812).................................. 739
Modification of authority to enter into long-term
contracts for receipt of utility services as
consideration for utility systems conveyances (sec.
2813).................................................. 739
Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense
real property (sec. 2814).............................. 740
Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pinon
Canyon Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado (sec. 2815) 740
Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military
Realignment................................................ 740
Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal
year for period covered by annual report of Interagency
Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam
Realignment (sec. 2821)................................ 740
Realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region
(sec. 2822)............................................ 740
Subtitle D--Land Conveyances................................. 741
Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County,
California (sec. 2831)................................. 741
Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura
County, California (sec. 2832)......................... 742
Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii
(sec. 2833)............................................ 742
Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (sec. 2834)................. 742
Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah (sec. 2835)......... 742
Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak,
Wasatch Mountains, Utah (sec. 2836).................... 742
Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve
Centers, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania
(sec. 2837)............................................ 743
Subtitle E--Other Matters.................................... 743
Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting
requirement (sec. 2841)................................ 743
Establishment of military divers memorial (sec. 2842).... 743
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 743
Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room
patterns and floor areas for military family housing
and submission of net floor area information........... 743
Department of Defense report on Military Housing
Privatization Initiative............................... 744
Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold or
platinum certification................................. 744
Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia... 744
Naming Provisions........................................ 744
Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National
Historical Park, Ohio.................................. 745
Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National
Memorial in Riverside, California...................... 745
Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military
memorials.............................................. 745
TITLE XXIX--WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC LANDS
TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY..................... 746
Short title (sec. 2901).................................. 746
Definitions (sec. 2902).................................. 746
Subtitle A--General Provisions............................... 746
General applicability; definitions (sec. 2911)........... 746
Maps and legal descriptions (sec. 2912).................. 746
Access restrictions (sec. 2913).......................... 746
Changes in use (sec. 2914)............................... 746
Brush and range fire prevention and suppression (sec.
2915).................................................. 746
Ongoing decontamination (sec. 2916)...................... 746
Water rights (sec. 2917)................................. 747
Hunting, fishing, and trapping (sec. 2918)............... 747
Limitation on extensions and renewals (sec. 2919)........ 747
Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation
(sec. 2920)............................................ 747
Limitation on subsequent availability of land for
appropriation (sec. 2921).............................. 747
Relinquishment (sec. 2922)............................... 748
Immunity of the United States (sec. 2923)................ 748
Subtitle B--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana........... 748
Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2931).... 748
Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2932).... 748
Special rules governing minerals management (sec. 2933).. 748
Grazing (sec. 2934)...................................... 749
Payments in lieu of taxes (sec. 2935).................... 749
Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2936)....... 749
Subtitle C--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine
Palms, California.......................................... 749
Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2941).... 749
Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2942).... 749
Public access (sec. 2943)................................ 750
Resource management group (sec. 2944).................... 750
Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area (sec.
2945).................................................. 750
Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2946)....... 750
Subtitle D--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort
Bliss, Texas............................................... 750
Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2951).... 750
Grazing (sec. 2952)...................................... 750
Subtitle E--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range,
California................................................. 750
Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land
(sec. 2961)............................................ 750
Management and use of transferred land (sec. 2962)....... 751
Effect of termination of military use (sec. 2963)........ 751
Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period (sec.
2964).................................................. 751
Water rights (sec. 2965)................................. 751
Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of
title (sec. 2966)...................................... 752
Subtitle F--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California. 752
Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2971).... 752
Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2972).... 752
Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of
the Navy (sec. 2973)................................... 752
Geothermal resources (sec. 2974)......................... 752
Wild horses and burros (sec. 2975)....................... 753
Continuation of existing agreement (sec. 2976)........... 753
Management plans (sec. 2977)............................. 753
Termination of prior withdrawals (sec. 2978)............. 753
Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2979)....... 753
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 753
Water rights............................................. 753
Withdrawal............................................... 753
Water rights............................................. 754
Withdrawal............................................... 754
Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study
Area, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine
Palms, California...................................... 754
Water rights............................................. 754
DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS
AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS....................................... 754
TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS...... 754
Overview................................................. 754
Budget Item.................................................. 756
Project 99-D-143, mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility.. 756
Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations........ 756
National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101)..... 756
Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102)................ 757
Other defense activities (sec. 3103)..................... 757
Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and
Limitations................................................ 757
Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security
Administration (sec. 3111)............................. 757
Cost estimation and program evaluation by National
Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3112)............ 757
Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain
risk (sec. 3113)....................................... 758
Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear
Security Administration (sec. 3114).................... 759
Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the
Administrator for Nuclear Security (sec. 3115)......... 760
Establishment of Center for Security Technology,
Analysis, Response, and Testing (sec. 3116)............ 760
Authorization of modular building strategy as an
alternative to the replacement project for the
Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building, Los Alamos
National Laboratory, New Mexico (sec. 3117)............ 760
Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options
(sec. 3118)............................................ 761
Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter
into transactions to carry out certain research
projects (sec. 3119)................................... 761
Increase in construction design threshold (sec. 3120).... 761
Subtitle C--Plans and Reports................................ 762
Annual report and certification on status of security of
atomic energy defense facilities (sec. 3121)........... 762
Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition
of the nuclear weapons stockpile (sec. 3122)........... 762
Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear
weapons stockpile stewardship, management, and
infrastructure plan (sec. 3123)........................ 763
Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of
management and operating contracts (sec. 3124)......... 763
Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to
program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation
(sec. 3125)............................................ 763
Modification of certain reports on cost containment for
uranium capabilities replacement project (sec. 3126)... 764
Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation
(sec. 3127)............................................ 764
Plan for improvement and integration of financial
management of nuclear security enterprise (sec. 3128).. 764
Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating
such computing into the stockpile stewardship program
(sec. 3129)............................................ 765
Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program
principles (sec. 3130)................................. 766
Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries
(sec. 3131)............................................ 766
Repeal of certain reporting requirements (sec. 3132)..... 766
Subtitle D--Other Matters.................................... 767
Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy (sec. 3141). 767
Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory
Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security
Enterprise (sec. 3142)................................. 767
Department of Energy land conveyances (sec. 3143)........ 767
Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (sec.
3144).................................................. 768
Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act (sec. 3145)......................... 768
Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act
(sec. 3146)............................................ 768
Sense of Congress on B61-12 life extension program (sec.
3147).................................................. 768
Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board
on toxic substances and worker health (sec. 3148)...... 769
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted........................... 769
Energy security and assurance............................ 769
Termination of Department of Energy Employees to Protect
National Security...................................... 769
Assessment of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the
National Nuclear Security Administration............... 770
Government Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Extension......... 771
Manhattan Project National Historic Park................. 772
TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD............. 772
Authorization (sec. 3201)................................ 772
Legislative Provision Not Adopted............................ 772
Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board.................................................. 772
TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES............................ 774
Authorization of appropriations (sec. 3401).............. 774
TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION.............................. 774
Authorization of appropriations for national security
aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014
(sec. 3501)............................................ 774
5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance
program (sec. 3502).................................... 774
Sense of Congress (sec. 3503)............................ 774
Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime
facility, Port of Anchorage, Alaska (sec. 3504)........ 774
Strategic seaports (sec. 3505)........................... 775
Legislative Provision Not Adopted............................ 775
Maritime Administration.................................. 775
DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES....................................... 775
Authorization of amounts in funding tables (sec. 4001)... 775
Summary of National Defense Authorizations for Fiscal
Year 2014.............................................. 775
National Defense Budget Authority Implication............ 780
TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT........................................... 782
Procurement (sec. 4101).................................. 782
Procurement for Overseas Contingency Operations (sec.
4102).................................................. 816
TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.......... 824
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (sec. 4201).. 824
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation for Overseas
Contingency Operations (sec. 4202)..................... 859
TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE........................... 861
Operation and Maintenance (sec. 4301).................... 861
Operation and Maintenance for Overseas Contingency
Operations (sec. 4302)................................. 881
TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL................................... 892
Military Personnel (sec. 4401)........................... 892
Military Personnel for Overseas Contingency Operations
(sec. 4402)............................................ 893
TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.................................. 894
Other Authorizations (sec. 4501)......................... 894
Other Authorizations for Overseas Contingency Operations
(sec. 4502)............................................ 898
TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION................................ 900
Military Construction (sec. 4601)........................ 900
TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS..... 917
Department of Energy National Security Programs (sec.
4701).................................................. 917
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2014
LEGISLATIVE TEXT
[Note from the Director, Legislative Operations: The
following is the enrolled legislative text of H.R. 3304, the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2014, as
passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate]
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014''.
SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Divisions.--This Act is organized into four divisions as
follows:
(1) Division A--Department of Defense Authorizations.
(2) Division B--Military Construction Authorizations.
(3) Division C--Department of Energy National
Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations.
(4) Division D--Funding Tables.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is
as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.
Sec. 4. Explanatory statement.
DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE I--PROCUREMENT
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B--Army Programs
Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle
program.
Sec. 112. Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for
tactical vehicles.
Subtitle C--Navy Programs
Sec. 121. CVN-78 class aircraft carrier program.
Sec. 122. Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future
surface combatants.
Sec. 123. Multiyear procurement authority for E-2D aircraft program.
Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship.
Subtitle D--Air Force Programs
Sec. 131. Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC-
135E aircraft.
Sec. 132. Multiyear procurement authority for C-130J aircraft.
Sec. 133. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics
modernization program for C-130 aircraft.
Sec. 134. Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C-27J aircraft by
the Air Force.
Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters
Sec. 141. Personal protection equipment procurement.
Sec. 142. Repeal of certain F-35 reporting requirements.
Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ-4
Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems and A-10 aircraft.
Sec. 144. MC-12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
aircraft.
Sec. 145. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers.
Sec. 146. Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety
risks associated with ejection seats.
TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 211. Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle
engineering and manufacturing phase.
Sec. 213. Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrier-
launched surveillance and strike system program.
Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics
transformation.
Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace
operations of the Air Force.
Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended
range munition program.
Sec. 217. Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on
availability of funds for noncompetitive procedures for
offensive anti-surface warfare weapon contracts of the Navy.
Sec. 218. Review of software development for F-35 aircraft.
Sec. 219. Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground
system.
Sec. 220. Operationally responsive space.
Sec. 221. Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.
Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs
Sec. 231. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on
ballistic missile defense system.
Sec. 232. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program.
Sec. 233. Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of
certain missile defense systems; report on regional ballistic
missile defense.
Sec. 234. Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-
range rocket defense system in the United States.
Sec. 235. Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the
United States homeland.
Sec. 236. Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense
sensor architectures.
Sec. 237. Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system.
Sec. 238. Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense
options.
Sec. 239. Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile
defense matters.
Sec. 240. Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense
burden-sharing.
Sec. 241. Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile
defense capabilities.
Sec. 242. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II
exoatmospheric kill vehicle.
Subtitle D--Reports
Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat
vehicle acquisition program.
Sec. 252. Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the
acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter.
Sec. 253. Report on strategy to improve body armor.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Sec. 261. Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory
Board.
Sec. 262. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for
defense laboratories for research and development of
technologies for military missions.
Sec. 263. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology
achievements.
Sec. 264. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology
protection features during research and development of certain
defense systems.
Sec. 265. Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of
Defense.
Sec. 266. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile
compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United
Kingdom's Vanguard successor program.
Sec. 267. Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave
missile project.
TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding.
Subtitle B--Energy and Environment
Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for
activities relating to operational energy strategy.
Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation
programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and
Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military
readiness activities.
Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act.
Sec. 314. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air
burn pits.
Sec. 315. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in
fuels.
Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment
Sec. 321. Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment.
Sec. 322. Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report.
Sec. 323. Consideration of Army arsenals' capabilities to fulfill
manufacturing requirements.
Sec. 324. Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and
replacement of operating forces used to support overseas
contingency operations.
Sec. 325. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan.
Sec. 326. Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit
visibility.
Subtitle D--Reports
Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and
unit readiness.
Sec. 332. Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for
equipment readiness and strategic capability.
Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information
regarding information technology capital assets.
Sec. 334. Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention
reporting requirements.
Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority
Sec. 341. Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force
Base, Azores.
Sec. 342. Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight
demonstration teams outside the United States.
Sec. 343. Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations
Command National Capital Region.
Sec. 344. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web
Initiative.
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Sec. 351. Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units.
Sec. 352. Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility
uniforms.
TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS
Subtitle A--Active Forces
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels
and in annual limitation on certain end strength reductions.
Subtitle B--Reserve Forces
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the
reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status
technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active
duty for operational support.
Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 421. Military personnel.
TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY
Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally
Sec. 501. Congressional notification requirements related to increases
in number of general and flag officers on active duty or in
joint duty assignments.
Sec. 502. Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education
upon original appointment as a commissioned officer.
Sec. 503. Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and
selective early removal of officers from reserve active-status
list.
Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management
Sec. 511. Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve
components.
Sec. 512. Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between
the active and inactive National Guard.
Sec. 513. Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve
component units and involuntary mobilizations of certain
Reserves.
Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve
component general and flag officers in an active status.
Sec. 515. Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in
American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
Subtitle C--General Service Authorities
Sec. 521. Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program
about disability-related employment and education protections.
Sec. 522. Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic
stress disorder or traumatic brain injury before
administrative separation.
Sec. 523. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-
neutral occupational standard for military career designators.
Sec. 524. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service
Implementation Plan.
Sec. 525. Provision of military service records to the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs in an electronic format.
Sec. 526. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System.
Subtitle D--Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response and Related Reforms
Sec. 531. Modification of eligibility for appointment as Judge on the
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Sec. 532. Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members
of the Armed Forces and chaplains of such members.
Sec. 533. Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance
with regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of
members of the Armed Forces and their chaplains.
Sec. 534. Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense
policy regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious
services.
Subtitle E--Member Education and Training
Sec. 541. Additional requirements for approval of educational programs
for purposes of certain educational assistance under laws
administered by the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 542. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for
military occupational specialties with skills and training
required for civilian certifications and licenses.
Sec. 543. Report on the Troops to Teachers program.
Sec. 544. Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring
automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual of
interest on direct student loans of certain members of the
Armed Forces.
Subtitle F--Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness
Matters
Sec. 551. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies
that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and
Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 552. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities.
Sec. 553. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary
and secondary education component of Department of Defense
education program.
Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of
members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations
forces.
Sec. 555. Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the Armed
Forces in child custody determinations.
Subtitle G--Decorations and Awards
Sec. 561. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be
awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 562. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding
Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air
Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal.
Sec. 563. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and
Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements.
Sec. 564. Prompt replacement of military decorations.
Sec. 565. Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to
victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock,
Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas.
Sec. 566. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former
members of the Armed Forces previously recommended for award
of the Medal of Honor.
Sec. 567. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of
valor during the Vietnam War.
Sec. 568. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross for
acts of valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars.
Sec. 569. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First
Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the
Civil War.
Subtitle H--Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports
Sec. 571. Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation
reports to include 360-degree assessment approach.
Sec. 572. Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding
members of the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B.
Sec. 573. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of
secondary schools.
Sec. 574. Comptroller General report on use of determination of
personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to
separate members from the Armed Forces.
Subtitle I--Other Matters
Sec. 581. Accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of
Defense civilian employees listed as missing and related
reports.
Sec. 582. Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing
reports of certain recovered persons who were never placed in
a missing status.
Sec. 583. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect
consolidation of North Georgia College and State University
and Gainesville State College.
Sec. 584. Review of security of military installations, including
barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family
residences.
Sec. 585. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National
Military Cemeteries.
Sec. 586. Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by
members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans.
Sec. 587. Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results.
TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS
Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances
Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates
of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances.
Sec. 602. Recognition of additional means by which members of the
National Guard called into Federal service for a period of 30
days or less may initially report for duty for entitlement to
basic pay.
Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for health care professionals.
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for
nuclear officers.
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37
consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus
authorities.
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other
title 37 bonuses and special pays.
Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for
members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language
proficiency.
Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen
enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.
Sec. 618. Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned
officers in the reserve components.
Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation Allowances
Sec. 621. Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of
Defense travel and transportation authorities in connection
with reform of such authorities.
Subtitle D--Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits
Sec. 631. Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the
case of members whose retired pay is computed using high-
three.
Sec. 632. Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early
retirement credit earned for significant periods of active
Federal status or active duty.
Sec. 633. Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other
dependents.
Subtitle E--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits
and Operations
Sec. 641. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities from reprisals.
Sec. 642. Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service laws.
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Sec. 651. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition
of human remains that were retained by the Department of
Defense for forensic pathology investigation.
Sec. 652. Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional
compensation and other transitional benefits to dependents of
members separated for violation of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice.
TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits
Sec. 701. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries
enrolled in TRICARE Prime.
Sec. 702. Mental health care treatment through telemedicine.
Sec. 703. Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of
members of the Armed Forces with urotrauma.
Sec. 704. Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the
Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic
stress disorder.
Subtitle B--Health Care Administration
Sec. 711. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences
to enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to
other nonprofit entities.
Sec. 712. Pilot program on increased third-party collection
reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 713. Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters
Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health
providers of the reserve components.
Sec. 722. Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain
Centers of Excellence.
Sec. 723. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries.
Sec. 724. Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to
members of the Armed Forces and veterans.
Sec. 725. Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program
and availability of compounded pharmaceuticals.
TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED
MATTERS
Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management
Sec. 801. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of
Defense laboratories.
Sec. 802. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available
for contract services.
Sec. 803. Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts.
Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures,
and Limitations
Sec. 811. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor
compensation.
Sec. 812. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain
reports.
Sec. 813. Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving
suspension or debarment.
Sec. 814. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose
nondevelopmental items.
Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs
Sec. 821. Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense
acquisition programs.
Sec. 822. Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone
B approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting
a space program.
Sec. 823. Additional responsibility for product support managers for
major weapon systems.
Sec. 824. Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes
for the acquisition of weapon systems.
Subtitle D--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency
Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan
Sec. 831. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy.
Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services
produced in countries along a major route of supply to
Afghanistan.
TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management
Sec. 901. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense
business enterprise architecture.
Sec. 902. Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal
Government tenants onto military installations in the United
States.
Sec. 903. Clarification of authority for the command acquisition
executive of the United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 904. Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters.
Sec. 905. Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and
education.
Sec. 906. Modification of reference to major Department of Defense
headquarters activities instruction.
Sec. 907. Personnel security.
Subtitle B--Space Activities
Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy.
Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection.
Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy.
Sec. 914. Space control mission report.
Sec. 915. Responsive launch.
Sec. 916. Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program.
Sec. 917. Eagle Vision system.
Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities
Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in
commercial activities as security for intelligence collection
activities.
Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities.
Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service.
Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation.
Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters
Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of
Defense tactical data link systems.
Sec. 932. Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States
Cyber Command.
Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of
Defense.
Sec. 934. Modification of requirement for Report on Department of
Defense Progress in Defending the Department and the Defense
Industrial Base from Cyber Events.
Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of
the Department of Defense.
Sec. 936. Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses.
Sec. 937. Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 938. Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing
capabilities.
Sec. 939. Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems
and tactical communications systems.
Sec. 940. Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons.
Sec. 941. Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace.
Sec. 942. National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information
Assurance Education matters.
Subtitle E--Total Force Management
Sec. 951. Reviews of appropriate manpower performance.
TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--Financial Matters
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act.
Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial
statements.
Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security
Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization.
Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities
Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and
counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.
Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide
support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-
terrorism activities.
Sec. 1013. Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional
support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign
governments.
Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards
Sec. 1021. Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for
the construction of naval vessels.
Sec. 1022. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations
at no cost to the Navy.
Sec. 1023. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of
Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships.
Sec. 1024. Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions.
Sec. 1025. Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III
ships.
Sec. 1026. Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment.
Sec. 1027. Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of
the strike forces of the Navy.
Subtitle D--Counterterrorism
Sec. 1031. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on
military commissions.
Sec. 1032. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism
Fellowship Program reporting requirement.
Sec. 1033. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities
in the United States to house detainees transferred from
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release
of individuals detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1035. Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1036. Report on information relating to individuals detained at
Parwan, Afghanistan.
Sec. 1037. Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in
military commissions established to try individuals detained
at Guantanamo.
Sec. 1038. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain,
rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo
who are transferred to Yemen.
Sec. 1039. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at
Guantanamo if transferred to the United States.
Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations
Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations.
Sec. 1042. Counterterrorism operational briefings.
Sec. 1043. Report on process for determining targets of lethal or
capture operations.
Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces
Sec. 1051. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-
capable aircraft based in Europe.
Sec. 1052. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command,
Control, and Communications System.
Sec. 1053. Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements
of Nuclear Weapons Council.
Sec. 1054. Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear
weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons
delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control
system.
Sec. 1055. Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad.
Sec. 1056. Implementation of New START Treaty.
Sec. 1057. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently
targetable reentry vehicles.
Sec. 1058. Report on New START Treaty.
Sec. 1059. Report on implementation of the recommendations of the
Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation
Report.
Sec. 1060. Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms
reductions with the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1061. Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control
treaty obligations.
Sec. 1062. Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the
nuclear forces of the United States.
Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations
Sec. 1071. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to
analyze captured records.
Sec. 1072. Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic
spectrum.
Sec. 1073. Extension of authority to provide military transportation
services to certain other agencies at the Department of
Defense reimbursement rate.
Sec. 1074. Notification of modifications to Army force structure.
Sec. 1075. Aircraft joint training.
Subtitle H--Studies and Reports
Sec. 1081. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress.
Sec. 1082. Oversight of combat support agencies.
Sec. 1083. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency
coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology.
Sec. 1084. Repeal and modification of reporting requirements.
Sec. 1085. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of
Department of Defense efficiencies.
Sec. 1086. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations
Forces and United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 1087. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems.
Sec. 1088. Report on foreign language support contracts for the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 1089. Civil Air Patrol.
Subtitle I--Other Matters
Sec. 1091. Technical and clerical amendments.
Sec. 1092. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major
automated information system programs.
Sec. 1093. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to
issue non-premium aviation insurance.
Sec. 1094. Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and
authority to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for
certain nongovernmental personnel.
Sec. 1095. Amendments to certain national commissions.
Sec. 1096. Strategy for future military information operations
capabilities.
Sec. 1097. Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security.
Sec. 1098. Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire
suppression and other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the
Air Force.
TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS
Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on
premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal
civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant
allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official
duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for
civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to
Department of Defense employees.
Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department
of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for
Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program and
assessment of STEM and other programs.
Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology
personnel.
Sec. 1107. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of
Defense research and engineering facilities.
Sec. 1108. Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for
civilian personnel.
Sec. 1109. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority
for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and
injured members of the Armed Forces.
TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS
Subtitle A--Assistance and Training
Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program
to build the capacity of foreign military forces.
Sec. 1202. Global Security Contingency Fund.
Sec. 1203. Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed
Forces with military and other security forces of friendly
foreign countries.
Sec. 1204. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of
foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of
mass destruction.
Sec. 1205. Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program.
Sec. 1206. United States security and assistance strategies in Africa.
Sec. 1207. Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security
operations.
Sec. 1208. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to
disarm the Lord's Resistance Army.
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq
Sec. 1211. Commanders' Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for
reintegration activities in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition
nations for support provided to United States military
operations.
Sec. 1214. Extension and modification of authority to support operations
and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program
to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1216. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to
Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes
assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not
reimbursed by Afghanistan.
Sec. 1217. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign
forces supporting or participating with the United States
Armed Forces.
Sec. 1218. Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa
program.
Sec. 1219. Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program.
Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014
Sec. 1221. Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network
activities and finances.
Sec. 1222. Completion of accelerated transition of security
responsibility from United States Armed Forces to the Afghan
National Security Forces.
Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan.
Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities
for Afghanistan.
Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran
Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf
Cooperation Council countries.
Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of
Iran.
Sec. 1233. Integrated air and missile defense programs at training
locations in Southwest Asia.
Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters
Sec. 1241. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional
assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1242. Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on
military and security developments involving the People's
Republic of China.
Sec. 1243. Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to
respond to an attack or other contingency against United
States diplomatic facilities overseas.
Sec. 1244. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations
Forces Coordination Centers.
Sec. 1245. Additional reports on military and security developments
involving the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Sec. 1246. Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the
Russian Federation and limitations on providing certain
missile defense information to the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and
Disarmament Act.
Sec. 1248. Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile
proliferation.
Sec. 1249. Reports on international agreements relating to the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 1250. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support
organizations and related NATO agreements.
Sec. 1251. Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to
ballistic missile defense.
Sec. 1252. Rule of construction.
Sec. 1253. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms
Trade Treaty.
Sec. 1254. Report on military and security developments involving the
Russian Federation.
Sec. 1255. Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or
agreements with Rosoboronexport.
TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION
Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and
funds.
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations.
Sec. 1303. Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to
the cooperative threat reduction program.
Sec. 1304. Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and
prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and
related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region.
TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
Subtitle A--Military Programs
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund.
Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program.
Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile
Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a
strategic and critical materials supply.
Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National
Defense Stockpile.
Subtitle C--Other Matters
Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of
Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility
Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care
Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement
Home.
Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses.
TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations
Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Procurement.
Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1505. Military personnel.
Sec. 1506. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program.
Subtitle B--Financial Matters
Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority.
Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters
Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1532. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.
Sec. 1533. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat
Organization.
Sec. 1534. Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and
Stability Operations in Afghanistan.
TITLE XVI--INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS
Subtitle A--Defense Industrial Base Matters
Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector
General of Department of Defense.
Sec. 1602. Foreign space activities.
Sec. 1603. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program.
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns
Sec. 1611. Advancing small business growth.
Sec. 1612. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance
Cooperative Agreement Program.
Sec. 1613. Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small
business concerns.
Sec. 1614. Credit for certain small business subcontractors.
Sec. 1615. Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain
contracts.
TITLE XVII--SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND RELATED REFORMS
Subtitle A--Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice
Sec. 1701. Extension of crime victims' rights to victims of offenses
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 1702. Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of
Military Justice.
Sec. 1703. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by
court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related
crimes.
Sec. 1704. Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related
offense in presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim,
or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate.
Sec. 1705. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and
trial of such offenses by general courts-martial.
Sec. 1706. Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial
process.
Sec. 1707. Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform
Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 1708. Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor
relating to character and military service of the accused in
rule on initial disposition of offenses.
Sec. 1709. Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed
Forces for reporting a criminal offense.
Subtitle B--Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code
Sec. 1711. Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who
have been convicted of certain sexual offenses.
Sec. 1712. Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard
regarding consideration of request for permanent change of
station or unit transfer by victim of sexual assault.
Sec. 1713. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member
of the Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of
committing a sexual assault or related offense.
Sec. 1714. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to
protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and
prohibited retaliatory actions.
Sec. 1715. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory
personnel actions taken in response to making protected
communications regarding sexual assault.
Sec. 1716. Designation and availability of Special Victims' Counsel for
victims of sex-related offenses.
Subtitle C--Amendments to Other Laws
Sec. 1721. Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting
organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing
and responding to sexual assaults.
Sec. 1722. Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent
panel on assessment of military response systems to sexual
assault.
Sec. 1723. Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted
Reports and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving
members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1724. Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by
members of the National Guard and Reserves.
Sec. 1725. Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual
assault prevention and response personnel and required
availability of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners.
Sec. 1726. Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and
Response Office for Department of Defense sexual assault
prevention and response program.
Subtitle D--Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports
Sec. 1731. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of
Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault
cases.
Sec. 1732. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense
investigative practices in response to allegations of Uniform
Code of Military Justice violations.
Sec. 1733. Review of training and education provided members of the
Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response.
Sec. 1734. Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on
the retention of and access to evidence and records relating
to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1735. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal
Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Sec. 1741. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members
of the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and
training.
Sec. 1742. Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses
involving members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1743. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to
unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a
member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1744. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-
related offenses for trial by court-martial.
Sec. 1745. Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related
offenses in personnel service records of members of the Armed
Forces.
Sec. 1746. Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies.
Sec. 1747. Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces
are completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for
National Security Positions.
Subtitle F--Sense of Congress Provisions
Sec. 1751. Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for
command climate free of retaliation.
Sec. 1752. Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain
sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice through courts-martial.
Sec. 1753. Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial
of members of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related
offenses.
DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS
Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be
specified by law.
TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States
Military Academy, New York.
Sec. 2105. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004
project.
Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2010 project.
Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2011 project.
Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010
projects.
Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.
TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2011 project.
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2012 project.
Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.
TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain
fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2013 project.
Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011
project.
TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization
construction, defense-wide.
TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES
Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction
and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.
Subtitle B--Other Matters
Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2013 project.
Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.
TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and
closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base
Closure Account.
Subtitle B--Other Matters
Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and
Closure (BRAC) round.
Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding
availability of military health care in National Capital
Region.
Sec. 2713. Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing
initiative.
TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes
Sec. 2801. Modification and extension of authority to utilize
unspecified minor military construction authority for
laboratory revitalization projects.
Sec. 2802. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited
partnerships with private developers of housing.
Sec. 2803. Military construction standards to improve force protection.
Sec. 2804. Application of cash payments received for utilities and
services.
Sec. 2805. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of
military housing investment authority.
Sec. 2806. Additional element for annual report on military housing
privatization projects.
Sec. 2807. Policies and requirements regarding overseas military
construction and closure and realignment of United States
military installations in foreign countries.
Sec. 2808. Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to
use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects
in certain areas outside the United States.
Sec. 2809. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area
of responsibility.
Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration
Sec. 2811. Development of master plans for major military installations.
Sec. 2812. Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative
expenses associated with real property leases and easements.
Sec. 2813. Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts
for receipt of utility services as consideration for utility
systems conveyances.
Sec. 2814. Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real
property.
Sec. 2815. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pinon Canyon
Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado.
Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment
Sec. 2821. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year
for period covered by annual report of Interagency
Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment.
Sec. 2822. Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region.
Subtitle D--Land Conveyances
Sec. 2831. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County,
California.
Sec. 2832. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura
County, California.
Sec. 2833. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.
Sec. 2834. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
Sec. 2835. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah.
Sec. 2836. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak,
Wasatch Mountains, Utah.
Sec. 2837. Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers,
Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Sec. 2841. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting
requirement.
Sec. 2842. Establishment of military divers memorial.
TITLE XXIX--WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC LANDS TO
SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY
Sec. 2901. Short title.
Sec. 2902. Definitions.
Subtitle A--General Provisions
Sec. 2911. General applicability; definitions.
Sec. 2912. Maps and legal descriptions.
Sec. 2913. Access restrictions.
Sec. 2914. Changes in use.
Sec. 2915. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression.
Sec. 2916. Ongoing decontamination.
Sec. 2917. Water rights.
Sec. 2918. Hunting, fishing, and trapping.
Sec. 2919. Limitation on extensions and renewals.
Sec. 2920. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation.
Sec. 2921. Limitation on subsequent availability of land for
appropriation.
Sec. 2922. Relinquishment.
Sec. 2923. Immunity of the United States.
Subtitle B--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana
Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land.
Sec. 2932. Management of withdrawn and reserved land.
Sec. 2933. Special rules governing minerals management.
Sec. 2934. Grazing.
Sec. 2935. Payments in lieu of taxes.
Sec. 2936. Duration of withdrawal and reservation.
Subtitle C--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms,
California
Sec. 2941. Withdrawal and reservation of public land.
Sec. 2942. Management of withdrawn and reserved land.
Sec. 2943. Public access.
Sec. 2944. Resource management group.
Sec. 2945. Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.
Sec. 2946. Duration of withdrawal and reservation.
Subtitle D--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas
Sec. 2951. Withdrawal and reservation of public land.
Sec. 2952. Grazing.
Subtitle E--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California
Sec. 2961. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land.
Sec. 2962. Management and use of transferred land.
Sec. 2963. Effect of termination of military use.
Sec. 2964. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period.
Sec. 2965. Water rights.
Sec. 2966. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title.
Subtitle F--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California
Sec. 2971. Withdrawal and reservation of public land.
Sec. 2972. Management of withdrawn and reserved land.
Sec. 2973. Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the
Navy.
Sec. 2974. Geothermal resources.
Sec. 2975. Wild horses and burros.
Sec. 2976. Continuation of existing agreement.
Sec. 2977. Management plans.
Sec. 2978. Termination of prior withdrawals.
Sec. 2979. Duration of withdrawal and reservation.
DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security
Administration.
Sec. 3112. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear
Security Administration.
Sec. 3113. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk.
Sec. 3114. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear
Security Administration.
Sec. 3115. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the
Administrator for Nuclear Security.
Sec. 3116. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis,
Response, and Testing.
Sec. 3117. Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative
to the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy
Research Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico.
Sec. 3118. Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options.
Sec. 3119. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into
transactions to carry out certain research projects.
Sec. 3120. Increase in construction design threshold.
Subtitle C--Plans and Reports
Sec. 3121. Annual report and certification on status of security of
atomic energy defense facilities.
Sec. 3122. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of
the nuclear weapons stockpile.
Sec. 3123. Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons
stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan.
Sec. 3124. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of
management and operating contracts.
Sec. 3125. Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to
program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation.
Sec. 3126. Modification of certain reports on cost containment for
uranium capabilities replacement project.
Sec. 3127. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
Sec. 3128. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management
of nuclear security enterprise.
Sec. 3129. Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such
computing into the stockpile stewardship program.
Sec. 3130. Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program
principles.
Sec. 3131. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries.
Sec. 3132. Repeal of certain reporting requirements.
Subtitle D--Other Matters
Sec. 3141. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy.
Sec. 3142. Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on
the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise.
Sec. 3143. Department of Energy land conveyance.
Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
Sec. 3145. Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act.
Sec. 3146. Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act.
Sec. 3147. Sense of Congress on B61-12 life extension program.
Sec. 3148. Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on
toxic substances and worker health.
TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
Sec. 3201. Authorization.
TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES
Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.
TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION
Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects
of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014.
Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program.
Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress.
Sec. 3504. Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime
facility, Port of Anchorage, Alaska.
Sec. 3505. Strategic seaports.
DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES
Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.
TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT
Sec. 4101. Procurement.
Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations.
TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas
contingency operations.
TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency
operations.
TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL
Sec. 4401. Military personnel.
Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations.
TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.
Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations.
TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 4601. Military construction.
TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Sec. 4701. Department of energy national security programs.
SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.
For purposes of this Act, the term ``congressional defense
committees'' has the meaning given that term in section
101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
SEC. 4. EXPLANATORY STATEMENT.
The explanatory statement regarding this Act, printed in the
House section of the Congressional Record on or about December
11, 2013, by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of
the House of Representatives, shall have the same effect with
respect to the implementation of this Act as if it were a joint
explanatory statement of a committee of conference.
DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE I--PROCUREMENT
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B--Army Programs
Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle
program.
Sec. 112. Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for
tactical vehicles.
Subtitle C--Navy Programs
Sec. 121. CVN-78 class aircraft carrier program.
Sec. 122. Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future
surface combatants.
Sec. 123. Multiyear procurement authority for E-2D aircraft program.
Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship.
Subtitle D--Air Force Programs
Sec. 131. Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC-
135E aircraft.
Sec. 132. Multiyear procurement authority for C-130J aircraft.
Sec. 133. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics
modernization program for C-130 aircraft.
Sec. 134. Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C-27J aircraft by
the Air Force.
Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters
Sec. 141. Personal protection equipment procurement.
Sec. 142. Repeal of certain F-35 reporting requirements.
Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ-4
Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems and A-10 aircraft.
Sec. 144. MC-12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
aircraft.
Sec. 145. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers.
Sec. 146. Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety
risks associated with ejection seats.
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
SEC. 101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine
Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified
in the funding table in section 4101.
Subtitle B--Army Programs
SEC. 111. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR STRYKER VEHICLE
PROGRAM.
(a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army, for the
procurement or upgrade of Stryker vehicles, not more than 75
percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days
has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the
Army submits the report under subsection (b).
(b) Report Required.--The Secretary of the Army shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a report on the status
of the Stryker vehicle spare parts inventory located in Auburn,
Washington, cited in the report of the Inspector General of the
Department of Defense (number 2013-025) dated November 30,
2012. The report submitted under this subsection shall include
the following:
(1) The status of the implementation by the Secretary
of the recommendations specified on pages 30 to 34 of
the report by the Inspector General.
(2) The value of the parts remaining in warehouse
that may still be used by the Secretary for the repair,
upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles.
(3) The value of the parts remaining in the warehouse
that are no longer usable by the Secretary for the
repair, upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles.
(4) A cost estimate of the monthly cost of
maintaining the inventory of such parts that are no
longer usable by the Secretary.
(5) Any other matters the Secretary considers
appropriate.
SEC. 112. STUDY ON MULTIYEAR, MULTIVEHICLE PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR
TACTICAL VEHICLES.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) budget uncertainty and reduced defense
procurements have had negative impacts on the tactical
vehicle industrial base; and
(2) in such environment, the Army should consider
innovative contracting and acquisition strategies to
maximize cost savings, improve the sustainment of the
tactical vehicle industrial base, and reduce risk
during this downturn in defense procurement.
(b) Study Required.--
(1) Study.--The Secretary of the Army, in
consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall conduct a
study of the desirability and feasibility of requesting
legislative authority, in accordance with section 2306b
of title 10, United States Code, to enter into one or
more multiyear, multivehicle contracts for the
procurement of tactical vehicles beginning in fiscal
year 2015 or thereafter.
(2) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in
consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the
possible multiyear, multivehicle contracting options
and other innovative contracting options considered in
the study under paragraph (1). Such report should
include the following:
(A) A business case analysis of a multiyear,
multivehicle contract for tactical vehicles,
including any potential increases in cost,
savings, or risk that may derive from such a
contract in comparison to standard contracting
methods.
(B) An evaluation of whether the Secretary
requires legislative action to enter into such
a multiyear, multivehicle contract.
(C) Any other matters the Secretary
determines appropriate.
Subtitle C--Navy Programs
SEC. 121. CVN-78 CLASS AIRCRAFT CARRIER PROGRAM.
(a) Cost Limitation Baseline for Lead Ship.--Subsection (a)
of section 122 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 120
Stat. 2104) is amended to read as follows:
``(a) Limitation.--
``(1) Lead ship.--The total amount obligated from
funds appropriated or otherwise made available for
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other
procurement account, for the aircraft carrier
designated as CVN-78 may not exceed $12,887,000,000 (as
adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)).
``(2) Follow-on ships.--The total amount obligated
from funds appropriated or otherwise made available for
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other
procurement account, for the construction of any ship
that is constructed in the CVN-78 class of aircraft
carriers after the lead ship of that class may not
exceed $11,498,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to
subsection (b)).''.
(b) Hull Number; Additional Factor for Adjustment of
Limitation Amount.--
(1) In general.--Subsection (b) of such section is
amended--
(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by
striking ``CVN-21'' and inserting ``CVN-78'';
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2006''
and inserting ``2013''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
``(7) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated
as CVN-78, the amounts of increases or decreases in
costs of that ship that are attributable solely to an
urgent and unforeseen requirement identified as a
result of the shipboard test program.''.
(2) Limitation on adjustment.--Such section is
further amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(e) Limitation on Shipboard Test Program Cost Adjustment.--
With respect to using the authority under subsection (b)(7) to
adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a)(1) for the
aircraft carrier designated as CVN-78 for reasons relating to
an urgent and unforeseen requirement identified as a result of
the shipboard test program, the Secretary may only use such
authority if--
``(1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the
congressional defense committees, that such requirement
was not known before the date of the submittal to
Congress of the budget for fiscal year 2014 (as
submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United
States Code);
``(2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the
congressional defense committees, that waiting on an
action by Congress to raise the cost cap specified in
such subsection (a)(1) to account for such requirement
will result in a delay in the delivery of that ship or
a delay in the date of initial operating capability of
that ship; and
``(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional
defense committees a report setting forth a description
of such requirement before the obligation of additional
funds pursuant to such authority.''.
(c) Requirements for CVN-79.--Such section is further amended
by adding after subsection (e), as added by subsection (b)(2),
the following new subsection:
``(f) Requirements for CVN-79.--
``(1) Quarterly cost estimate.--The Secretary of the
Navy shall submit to the congressional defense
committees on a quarterly basis a report setting forth
the most current cost estimate for the aircraft carrier
designated as CVN-79 (as estimated by the program
manager). Each cost estimate shall include the current
percentage of completion of the program, the total
costs incurred, and an estimate of costs at completion
for ship construction, Government-furnished equipment,
and engineering and support costs.
``(2) Direction for negotiating certain contracts.--
The Secretary shall ensure that each prime contract for
the aircraft carrier designated as CVN-79 includes an
incentive fee structure that will, throughout the
period of performance of the contract, provide
incentives for each contractor to meet the portion of
the cost of the ship, as limited by subsection (a)(2)
and adjusted pursuant to subsection (b), for which the
contractor is responsible.''.
(d) Conforming Amendment.--The heading of such section is
amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 122. ADHERENCE TO NAVY COST ESTIMATES FOR CVN-78 CLASS OF
AIRCRAFT CARRIERS.''.
(e) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the
beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item relating
to section 122 and inserting the following:
``Sec. 122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN-78 class of
aircraft carriers.''.
SEC. 122. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PROCUREMENT OF FUTURE
SURFACE COMBATANTS.
Section 125 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2214; 10 U.S.C.
7291 note) is repealed.
SEC. 123. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR E-2D AIRCRAFT PROGRAM.
(a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to section
2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the
Navy may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning
with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of
E-2D aircraft.
(b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any
obligation of the United States to make a payment under the
contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to
the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such
later fiscal year.
SEC. 124. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP.
(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for construction or advanced procurement of materials
for the Littoral Combat Ships designated as LCS 25 or LCS 26
may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Navy
submits to the congressional defense committees each of the
following:
(1) The report required by subsection (b)(1).
(2) A coordinated determination by the Director of
Operational Test and Evaluation and the Under Secretary
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
that successful completion of the test evaluation
master plan for both seaframes and each mission module
will demonstrate operational effectiveness and
operational suitability.
(3) A certification that the Joint Requirements
Oversight Council--
(A) has reviewed the capabilities of the
legacy systems that the Littoral Combat Ship is
planned to replace and has compared such
capabilities to the capabilities to be provided
by the Littoral Combat Ship;
(B) has assessed the adequacy of the current
capabilities development document for the
Littoral Combat Ship to meet the requirements
of the combatant commands and to address future
threats as reflected in the latest assessment
by the defense intelligence community; and
(C) has either validated the current
capabilities development document or directed
the Secretary to update the current
capabilities development document based on the
performance of the Littoral Combat Ship and
mission modules to date.
(4) A report on the expected performance of each
seaframe variant and mission module against the current
or updated capabilities development document.
(5) Certification that a capability production
document will be completed for each mission module
before operational testing.
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 60 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Naval
Operations, in coordination with the Director of
Operational Test and Evaluation, shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the
current concept of operations and expected
survivability attributes of each of the Littoral Combat
Ship seaframes.
(2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph (1)
shall set forth the following:
(A) A review of the current concept of
operations of the Littoral Combat Ship and a
comparison of such concept of operations with
the original concept of operations of the
Littoral Combat Ship.
(B) An assessment of the ability of the
Littoral Combat Ship to carry out the core
missions of the Cooperative Strategy for 21st
Century Seapower of the Navy.
(C) A comparison of the combat capabilities
for the three missions assigned to the Littoral
Combat Ship seaframes (anti-surface warfare,
mine countermeasures, and anti-submarine
warfare) with the combat capabilities for each
of such missions of the systems the Littoral
Combat Ship is replacing.
(D) An assessment of expected survivability
of the Littoral Combat Ship seaframes in the
context of the planned employment of the
Littoral Combat Ship as described in the
concept of operations.
(E) The current status of operational testing
for the seaframes and the mission modules of
the Littoral Combat Ship.
(F) An updated test and evaluation master
plan for the Littoral Combat Ship.
(G) A review of survivability testing,
modeling, and simulation conducted to date on
the two seaframes of the Littoral Combat Ship.
(H) An updated assessment of the endurance of
the Littoral Combat Ship at sea with respect to
maintenance, fuel use, and sustainment of crew
and mission modules.
(I) An assessment of the adequacy of current
ship manning plans for the Littoral Combat Ship
and an assessment of the impact that increased
manning has on design changes and the endurance
of the Littoral Combat Ship.
(J) A list of the casualty reports to date on
each Littoral Combat Ship, including a
description of the impact of such casualties on
the design or ability of that Littoral Combat
Ship to perform assigned missions.
(3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall
be submitted in classified form and unclassified form.
Subtitle D--Air Force Programs
SEC. 131. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN RETIRED KC-
135E AIRCRAFT.
Section 135 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2114),
as amended by section 131 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122
Stat. 4377), is amended--
(1) by striking ``(a) Limitation.--''; and
(2) by striking subsection (b).
SEC. 132. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR C-130J AIRCRAFT.
(a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to section
2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air
Force may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning
with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of
C-130J aircraft for the Department of the Air Force and the
Department of the Navy.
(b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any
obligation of the United States to make a payment under the
contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to
the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such
later fiscal year.
SEC. 133. PROHIBITION ON CANCELLATION OR MODIFICATION OF AVIONICS
MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FOR C-130 AIRCRAFT.
(a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for the Air Force may be used to--
(1) take any action to cancel or modify the avionics
modernization program of record for C-130 aircraft; or
(2) initiate an alternative communication,
navigation, surveillance, and air traffic management
program for C-130 aircraft that is designed or intended
to replace the avionics modernization program described
in paragraph (1).
(b) Comptroller General Report.--Not later than April 1,
2014, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a sufficiency review of
the cost-benefit analysis conducted under section 143(b) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1662), including any findings and
recommendations relating to such review.
SEC. 134. PROHIBITION OF PROCUREMENT OF UNNECESSARY C-27J AIRCRAFT BY
THE AIR FORCE.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112-81) for aircraft procurement, Air Force, that remain
available to the Secretary of the Air Force on or after the
date of the enactment of this Act may be obligated or expended
for the procurement of additional C-27J aircraft that are not
on contract as of June 1, 2013.
Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters
SEC. 141. PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT.
(a) Consolidated Budget Justification Display.--Chapter 9 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding after
section 235 the following new section:
``Sec. 236. Personal protection equipment procurement: display of
budget information
``(a) Budget Justification Display.--The Secretary of Defense
shall submit to Congress, as a part of the defense budget
materials for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2014, a
consolidated budget justification display that covers all
programs and activities associated with the procurement of
personal protection equipment during the period covered by the
future-years defense program submitted in that fiscal year
under section 221.
``(b) Requirements for Budget Display.--The consolidated
budget justification display under subsection (a) for a fiscal
year shall include the following:
``(1) The amount for personal protection equipment
included in both the base budget of the President and
any overseas contingency operations budget of the
President.
``(2) A brief description of each category of
personal protection equipment for each military
department planned to be procured and developed.
``(3) For each category planned to be procured using
funds made available for operation and maintenance
(whether under the base budget or any overseas
contingency operations budget)--
``(A) the relevant appropriations account,
budget activity, and subactivity group for the
category; and
``(B) the funding profile for the fiscal year
as requested, including cost and quantities,
and an estimate of projected investments or
procurements for each of the subsequent five
fiscal years.
``(4) For each category planned to be developed using
funds made available for research, development, test,
and evaluation (whether under the base budget or any
overseas contingency operations budget)--
``(A) the relevant appropriations account,
program, project or activity; program element
number, and line number; and
``(B) the funding profile for the fiscal year
as requested and an estimate of projected
investments for each of the subsequent five
fiscal years.
``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The terms `budget' and `defense budget
materials' have the meaning given those terms in
section 234 of this title.
``(2) The term `category of personal protection
equipment' means the following:
``(A) Body armor components.
``(B) Combat helmets.
``(C) Combat protective eyewear.
``(D) Other items as determined appropriate
by the Secretary.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item
relating to section 235 the following new item:
``236. Personal protection equipment procurement: display of budget
information.''.
SEC. 142. REPEAL OF CERTAIN F-35 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
Section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4157)
is amended--
(1) by striking subsection (b); and
(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection
(b).
SEC. 143. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT OF RQ-4
GLOBAL HAWK UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND A-10
AIRCRAFT.
(a) Limitation.--
(1) In general.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available
for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may
be obligated or expended to make significant changes to
manning levels with respect to covered aircraft or to
retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage a
covered aircraft.
(2) Covered aircraft.--In this subsection, the term
``covered aircraft'' means the following:
(A) A-10 aircraft (except for such aircraft
that the Secretary of the Air Force, as of
April 9, 2013, plans to retire).
(B) RQ-4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned
aircraft systems.
(b) Additional Limitation on Retirement of Certain A-10
Aircraft.--In addition to the limitation in subsection (a)(1),
during the period preceding December 31, 2014, the Secretary of
the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in
storage A-10 aircraft (except for such aircraft that the
Secretary, as of April 9, 2013, plans to retire).
(c) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report on all high-altitude
airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
systems operated, or planned for future operation, by
the Department of Defense.
(2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1)
shall include--
(A) the intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance capabilities of each high-
altitude intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance system covered by the report;
(B) the plans to upgrade such capabilities in
the future;
(C) the fully-burdened cost-per-flight-hour
of each such system;
(D) the number of requests for each such
system made by commanders of the combatant
commands during the five-year period prior to
the report, including the percentage of such
requests that have been fulfilled to meet the
requirements of such commanders;
(E) a description of the assumptions used by
the Secretary in carrying out this subsection;
and
(F) any other information that the Secretary
considers appropriate with respect to the
analysis of high-altitude intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance systems.
(3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
(4) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In
this section, the term ``appropriate congressional
committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Appropriations, and the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House
of Representatives.
(d) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed
to limit or otherwise affect the requirement to maintain the
operational capability of RQ-4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned
aircraft systems under section 154(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 1666).
SEC. 144. MC-12 LIBERTY INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE
AIRCRAFT.
(a) Authority.--Beginning on the date that is 60 days after
the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report
under subsection (d)(1), the Secretary may transfer MC-12
Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft
from the Air Force to the Army in accordance with the plan
developed under subsection (b)(1).
(b) Plan.--
(1) Plan required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
develop a plan for the potential transfer of MC-12
Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
aircraft from the Air Force to the Army pursuant to
subsection (a).
(2) Elements.--The plan required by paragraph (1)
shall--
(A) ensure that any transfer described in
such paragraph does not adversely affect
ongoing intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance operations, including such
operations in Afghanistan;
(B) identify the appropriate size,
composition, and configuration of the fleet of
MC-12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance aircraft required by the Army;
(C) identify the appropriate size,
composition, configuration, and disposition of
the remaining fleet of MC-12 Liberty
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
aircraft required by the Air Force;
(D) provide for the modification of the MC-12
Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance aircraft that are transferred to
the Army pursuant to the plan in order to meet
the long-term needs of the Army; and
(E) for any aircraft that are so transferred,
include a time line for the orderly transfer of
the aircraft in a manner consistent with
subparagraph (A).
(c) Effect on Other Programs.--
(1) Prohibition on availability of funds for
procurement.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available
for fiscal year 2014 for the Army may be obligated or
expended to procure additional aircraft under the
Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and
Surveillance System program during fiscal year 2014.
(2) Conversion of aircraft.--The Secretary of the
Army shall convert aircraft described in paragraph (3)
to the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and
Surveillance System program configuration to meet the
requirements of the Army. The Secretary shall carry out
this paragraph using funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available
for fiscal year 2013 or 2014 for the Enhanced Medium
Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System
program.
(3) Aircraft described.--The aircraft described in
this paragraph are the following:
(A) MC-12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance,
and reconnaissance aircraft of the Air Force
that are transferred to the Army pursuant to
subsection (a).
(B) Army Medium Altitude Multi-Intelligence
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
C-12 Quick Reaction Capability aircraft.
(d) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than the date on which the
budget of the President for fiscal year 2015 is
submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title
31, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit to
the appropriate congressional committees a report on
the plan required by subsection (b)(1).
(2) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
(3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In
this subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional
committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Appropriations, and the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House
of Representatives.
SEC. 145. COMPETITION FOR EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROVIDERS.
(a) Plan.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall
develop a plan to implement the new acquisition
strategy for the evolved expendable launch vehicle
program described in the acquisition decision
memorandum dated November 27, 2012.
(2) Matters included.--The plan to implement the new
acquisition strategy for the evolved expendable launch
vehicle program under paragraph (1) shall include a
general description of how the Secretary will conduct
competition with respect to awarding a contract to
certified evolved expendable launch vehicle providers.
Such description may include the following with respect
to such acquisition strategy:
(A) The proposed cost, schedule, and
performance.
(B) Mission assurance activities.
(C) The manner in which the contractor will
operate under the Federal Acquisition
Regulation.
(D) The effect of other contracts in which
the contractor is entered into with the Federal
Government, including the evolved expendable
launch vehicle launch capability contract, the
space station commercial resupply services
contracts, and other relevant contracts
regarding national security space and strategic
programs.
(E) Any other areas the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(b) Submission to Congress.--
(1) In general.--At the same time that the Secretary
issues a draft of the request for proposals with
respect to a contract for the evolved expendable launch
vehicle provider, the Secretary shall--
(A) submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a report that includes the plan
under subsection (a)(1); or
(B) provide to such committees a briefing on
such plan.
(2) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In
this subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional
committees'' means the following:
(A) The congressional defense committees.
(B) The Committee on Science, Space, and
Technology of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the Senate.
(C) The Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives
and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the
Senate.
SEC. 146. REPORTS ON PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT AND HEALTH AND
SAFETY RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH EJECTION SEATS.
(a) Study on Personal Protection Equipment.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall enter into a contract with a federally
funded research and development center to conduct a
study to identify and assess cost-effective and
efficient alternative means for the procurement and
research and development of personal protection
equipment that supports and promotes competition and
innovation in the personal protection equipment
industrial base.
(2) Submission.--Not later than 120 days after the
date on which the contract is entered into under
paragraph (1), the federally funded research and
development center conducting the study under such
paragraph shall submit to the Secretary the study,
including any findings and recommendations.
(3) Report.--
(A) In general.--Not later than 30 days after
the date on which the Secretary receives the
study under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall
submit to the congressional defense committees
a report that includes the study under
paragraph (1), the matters described in
subparagraph (B), and any related findings,
recommendations, comments, and plans of the
Secretary.
(B) Matters included.--The report under
subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
(i) The findings and recommendations
of the federally funded research and
development center submitted to the
Secretary under paragraph (2).
(ii) An assessment of current and
future technologies that could markedly
improve body armor, including by
decreasing weight, increasing
survivability, and making other
relevant improvements.
(iii) An analysis of the capability
of the personal protection equipment
industrial base to leverage such
technologies to produce the next
generation body armor.
(iv) An assessment of alternative
body armor acquisition models,
including different types of
contracting and budgeting practices of
the Department of Defense.
(4) Personal protection equipment.--In this
subsection, the term ``personal protection equipment''
includes--
(A) body armor components;
(B) combat helmets;
(C) combat protective eyewear;
(D) environmental and fire-resistant
clothing; and
(E) other individual equipment items as
determined appropriate by the Secretary.
(b) Report on Health and Safety Risks Associated With
Ejection Seats.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the
Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report setting forth an assessment of the
risks to the health and safety of members of the Armed
Forces of the ejection seats currently in operational
use by the Air Force.
(2) Elements.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) An assessment of whether aircrew members
wearing advanced helmets, night vision systems,
helmet-mounted cueing system, or other helmet-
mounted devices or attachments are at increased
risk of serious injury or death during a high-
speed ejection sequence.
(B) An analysis of how ejection seats
currently in operational use provide protection
against head, neck, and spinal cord injuries
during an ejection sequence.
(C) An analysis of initiatives to decrease
the risk of death or serious injury during an
ejection sequence.
(D) The status of any testing or
qualifications on upgraded ejection seats that
may reduce the risk of death or serious injury
during an ejection sequence.
TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 211. Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle
engineering and manufacturing phase.
Sec. 213. Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrier-
launched surveillance and strike system program.
Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics
transformation.
Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace
operations of the Air Force.
Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended
range munition program.
Sec. 217. Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on
availability of funds for noncompetitive procedures for
offensive anti-surface warfare weapon contracts of the Navy.
Sec. 218. Review of software development for F-35 aircraft.
Sec. 219. Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground
system.
Sec. 220. Operationally responsive space.
Sec. 221. Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.
Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs
Sec. 231. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on
ballistic missile defense system.
Sec. 232. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program.
Sec. 233. Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of
certain missile defense systems; report on regional ballistic
missile defense.
Sec. 234. Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-
range rocket defense system in the United States.
Sec. 235. Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the
United States homeland.
Sec. 236. Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense
sensor architectures.
Sec. 237. Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system.
Sec. 238. Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense
options.
Sec. 239. Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile
defense matters.
Sec. 240. Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense
burden-sharing.
Sec. 241. Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile
defense capabilities.
Sec. 242. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II
exoatmospheric kill vehicle.
Subtitle D--Reports
Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat
vehicle acquisition program.
Sec. 252. Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the
acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter.
Sec. 253. Report on strategy to improve body armor.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Sec. 261. Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory
Board.
Sec. 262. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for
defense laboratories for research and development of
technologies for military missions.
Sec. 263. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology
achievements.
Sec. 264. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology
protection features during research and development of certain
defense systems.
Sec. 265. Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of
Defense.
Sec. 266. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile
compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United
Kingdom's Vanguard successor program.
Sec. 267. Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave
missile project.
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for
research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the
funding table in section 4201.
Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations
SEC. 211. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS ON BIENNIAL STRATEGIC PLAN FOR
THE DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY.
(a) Elements of Strategic Plan.--Subsection (b) of section
2352 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows:
``(1) The strategic objectives of that agency, and
the linkage between such objectives and the missions of
the armed forces.'';
(2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ``goals'' and
inserting ``objectives'';
(3) by striking paragraph (3);
(4) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as
paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and
(5) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph
(4) of this subsection, by striking ``for the programs
of that agency'' and inserting ``for programs
demonstrating military systems to one or more of the
armed forces''.
(b) Responsibility for Submission of Plan.--Subsection (c) of
such section is amended by striking ``Secretary of Defense
shall'' and inserting ``Director shall, in coordination with
the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics,''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply with respect to biennial strategic plans submitted
under section 2352 of title 10, United States Code, as amended
by this section, after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE
ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING PHASE.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Army
may be obligated or expended for post-Milestone B engineering
and manufacturing phase development activities for the ground
combat vehicle program until a period of 30 days has elapsed
following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits
to the congressional defense committees a report that includes
the following:
(1) An independent assessment of the draft milestone
B documentation for the ground combat vehicle that--
(A) is performed by the Director of Cost
Assessment and Program Evaluation, the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and
Engineering, or other similar official; and
(B) analyzes whether there is a sufficient
business case to proceed with the engineering
and manufacturing development phase for the
ground combat vehicle using only one
contractor.
(2) A certification by the Secretary that the ground
combat vehicle program has--
(A) feasible, fully defined, and stable
requirements;
(B) been demonstrated in a relevant
environment in accordance with section
2366b(a)(3)(D) of title 10, United States Code,
and achieved technology readiness or maturity;
(C) independent and high-confidence cost
estimates;
(D) sufficient funding available during
fiscal year 2014 and sufficient funding planned
for the period covered by the current future-
years defense plan; and
(E) a realistic and achievable schedule.
SEC. 213. LIMITATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR UNMANNED CARRIER-
LAUNCHED SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE SYSTEM PROGRAM.
(a) Limitation on Number of Air Vehicles.--The Secretary of
Defense may not acquire more than six air vehicles of the
unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system prior
to receiving milestone B approval (as defined in section
2366(e)(7) of title 10, United States Code) for engineering and
manufacturing development and low-rate initial production.
(b) Quarterly Cost Reports.--Beginning 90 days after the date
on which the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike
system receives milestone A approval, and each 90-day period
thereafter until such system receives milestone B approval, the
Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report that includes, at a minimum--
(1) the current cost estimate and schedule, as of the
date of the report, for all segments of the unmanned
carrier-launched surveillance and strike system
program;
(2) any changes to such cost estimate or schedule
from the previous report; and
(3) an explanation for any changes to the cost
estimate or schedule or to the key performance
parameters or key system attributes used for such
program.
(c) Budget Documentation Requirement.--In the budget
materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of
Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant
to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget
for fiscal year 2015, and each subsequent fiscal year, the
Secretary shall include individual project lines for each
program segment of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance
and strike system, within program element 0604404N, that
articulate all costs, contractual actions, and other
information associated with technology development for each
such program segment.
(d) Annual GAO Review.--
(1) Review.--The Comptroller General of the United
States shall annually conduct a review of the
acquisition program for the unmanned carrier-launched
surveillance and strike system.
(2) Report.--Not later than March 1 of each year, the
Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the review under
paragraph (1).
(3) Elements.--Each report under paragraph (2) shall
include such matters as the Comptroller General
considers appropriate to fully inform the congressional
defense committees of the status of the unmanned
carrier-launched surveillance and strike system
program. Such matters should include, at a minimum, the
following:
(A) The extent to which the unmanned carrier-
launched surveillance and strike system program
is meeting cost, schedule, and performance
goals.
(B) The progress and results of developmental
testing.
(C) An assessment of the acquisition strategy
for the program, including whether the strategy
is consistent with acquisition management best
practices identified by the Comptroller General
for the purposes of the program.
(4) Sunset.--The Comptroller General shall carry out
this subsection until the earlier of--
(A) the date on which the Secretary of the
Navy awards a contract for the full-rate
production of the unmanned carrier-launched
surveillance and strike system; or
(B) the date on which the unmanned carrier-
launched surveillance and strike system program
is terminated.
SEC. 214. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIR FORCE LOGISTICS
TRANSFORMATION.
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement,
Air Force, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air
Force, for logistics information technology, including for the
expeditionary combat support system, not more than 85 percent
may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 days
after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits
to the congressional defense committees a report on how the
Secretary will modernize and update the logistics information
technology systems of the Air Force following the cancellation
of the expeditionary combat support system. Such report shall
include--
(1) a detailed strategy and timeline for implementing
the recommendations from the Expeditionary Combat
Support System Acquisition Investigation Review Team
Final Report; and
(2) a description of the near-term options for
maintaining or incrementally modernizing the logistics
information technology systems of the Air Force until a
replacement for the expeditionary combat support system
can be determined.
SEC. 215. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS OF THE AIR FORCE.
(a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for procurement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and
evaluation, Air Force, for Defensive Cyberspace Operations
(Program Element 0202088F), not more than 90 percent may be
obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed
following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force
submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the
Application Software Assurance Center of Excellence.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) shall
include the following:
(1) A description of how the Application Software
Assurance Center of Excellence is used to support the
software assurance activities of the Air Force and
other elements of the Department of Defense, including
pursuant to section 933 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note).
(2) A description of the resources used to support
the Center of Excellence from the beginning of the
Center through fiscal year 2014.
(3) The plan of the Secretary for sustaining the
Center of Excellence during the period covered by the
future-years defense program submitted in 2013 under
section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
SEC. 216. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PRECISION EXTENDED
RANGE MUNITION PROGRAM.
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be
obligated or expended for the precision extended range munition
program until the date on which the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff submits to the congressional defense committees
written certification that--
(1) such program is necessary to meet a valid
operational need that cannot be met by the existing
precision guided mortar munition of the Army, other
indirect fire weapons, or aerial-delivered joint fires;
and
(2) a sufficient business case exists to proceed with
the development and production of such program.
SEC. 217. LONG-RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON REQUIREMENT; PROHIBITION ON
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR NONCOMPETITIVE PROCEDURES
FOR OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON CONTRACTS
OF THE NAVY.
(a) Long-Range Standoff Weapon.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall
develop a follow-on air-launched cruise missile to the
AGM-86 that--
(A) achieves initial operating capability for
conventional missions prior to the retirement
of the conventionally armed AGM-86;
(B) achieves initial operating capability for
nuclear missions prior to the retirement of the
nuclear-armed AGM-86; and
(C) is capable of internal carriage and
employment for both conventional and nuclear
missions on the next-generation long-range
strike bomber.
(2) Consecutive development.--In developing a follow-
on air-launched cruise missile to the AGM-86 in
accordance with paragraph (1), the Secretary may carry
out development and production activities with respect
to nuclear missions prior to carrying out such
activities with respect to conventional missions if the
Secretary determines such consecutive order of
development and production activities to be cost
effective.
(b) Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare Weapon Contracts of the
Navy.--
(1) Prohibition.--Except as provided by paragraph
(2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by
this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year
2014 for the offensive anti-surface warfare weapon may
be used to enter into or modify a contract using
procedures other than competitive procedures (as
defined in section 2302(2) of title 10, United States
Code).
(2) Exemption; waiver.--
(A) Exempted activities.--The prohibition in
paragraph (1) shall not apply to funds
specified in such paragraph that are made
available for the development, testing, and
fielding of aircraft-launched offensive anti-
surface warfare weapons capabilities.
(B) National security waiver authority.--The
Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition
in paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines
that such a waiver is in the national security
interests of the United States.
SEC. 218. REVIEW OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR F-35 AIRCRAFT.
(a) Software Development Program.--
(1) Review.--The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall establish
an independent team consisting of subject matter
experts to review the development of software for the
F-35 aircraft program (in this subsection referred to
as the ``software development program''), including by
reviewing the progress made with respect to--
(A) managing the software development
program; and
(B) delivering critical software capability
in accordance with current program milestones.
(2) Report.--Not later than March 3, 2014, the Under
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the review under paragraph (1).
Such report shall include the following:
(A) An assessment by the independent team
with respect to whether the software
development program--
(i) has been successful in meeting
the key milestone dates occurring
before the date of the report; and
(ii) will be successful in meeting
the established program schedule.
(B) Any recommendations of the independent
team with respect to improving the software
development program to ensure that, in support
of the start of initial operational testing,
the established program schedule is met on
time.
(C) If the independent team determines that
the software development program will be unable
to deliver the full complement of software
within the established program schedule, any
potential alternatives that the independent
team considers appropriate to deliver such
software within such schedule.
(b) Autonomic Logistics Information System Sustainment
Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary, in consultation
with the Joint Strike Fighter Joint Program Office, shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
current plans, as of the date of the report, for long-term
sustainment of the autonomic logistics information system of F-
35 aircraft. Such report shall include the following:
(1) Current plans for acquisition of technical data
rights to autonomic logistics information system
software and the potential competitive sustainment of
elements of the autonomic logistics information system.
(2) How sustainment of the autonomic logistics
information system may take advantage of public-private
partnerships authorized by section 2474 of title 10,
United States Code, including schedules for actions
necessary for such sustainment.
(3) Any current plan to select, designate, and
activate any Government-owned and Government-operated
site to serve as the autonomic logistics operating
unit.
(4) Current plans to ensure that the autonomic
logistics information system provides total asset
visibility and accountability, including asset
valuation and tracking, and for potential integration
with other automated logistics systems.
SEC. 219. EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND
SYSTEM.
(a) Project Codes for Budget Submissions.--In the budget
submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 of
title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and each
subsequent fiscal year, each capability component within the
distributed common ground system program shall be set forth as
a separate project code within the program element line, and
each covered official shall submit supporting justification for
the project code within the program element descriptive
summary.
(b) Analysis.--
(1) Requirement.--The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct an
analysis of capability components that are compliant
with the intelligence community data standards and
could be used to meet the requirements of the
distributed common ground system program.
(2) Elements.--The analysis required under paragraph
(1) shall include the following:
(A) Revalidation of the distributed common
ground system program requirements based on
current program needs, recent operational
experience, and the requirement for
nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-
architecture principles.
(B) Market research of current commercially
available tools to determine whether any such
tools could potentially satisfy the
requirements described in subparagraph (A).
(C) Analysis of the competitive acquisition
options for any tools identified in
subparagraph (B).
(3) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary
shall submit to the congressional defense committees
the results of the analysis conducted under paragraph
(1).
(c) Covered Official Defined.--In this section, the term
``covered official'' means the following:
(1) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to
matters concerning the Army.
(2) The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to
matters concerning the Navy.
(3) The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to
matters concerning the Air Force.
(4) The Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect
to matters concerning the Marine Corps.
(5) The Commander of the United States Special
Operations Command, with respect to matters concerning
the United States Special Operations Command.
SEC. 220. OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) it remains the policy of the United States, as
expressed in section 913(a) of the John Warner National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public
Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2355), to demonstrate, acquire,
and deploy an effective capability for operationally
responsive space to support military users and
operations from space, which shall consist of--
(A) responsive satellite payloads and busses
built to common technical standards;
(B) low-cost space launch vehicles and
supporting range operations that facilitate the
timely launch and on-orbit operations of
satellites;
(C) responsive command and control
capabilities; and
(D) concepts of operations, tactics,
techniques, and procedures that permit the use
of responsive space assets for combat and
military operations other than war; and
(2) the Operationally Responsive Space Program Office
has demonstrated through multiple launches since 2009
an ability to accomplish many of the policy objectives
of the Operationally Responsive Space Program through
specific missions, but has not executed a mission that
leverages all policy objectives of such Program in a
single mission.
(b) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for the Department of Defense for the space-based infrared
systems space modernization initiative wide-field-of-view
testbed, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended
until the Executive Agent for Space of the Department of
Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that
the Secretary of Defense is carrying out the Operationally
Responsive Space Program Office in accordance with section
2273a of title 10, United States Code.
(c) Report.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Executive Agent for Space of the
Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report regarding a potential mission that would
seek to leverage all policy objectives of the Operationally
Responsive Space Program in a single mission.
SEC. 221. SUSTAINMENT OR REPLACEMENT OF BLUE DEVIL INTELLIGENCE,
SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE CAPABILITIES.
(a) Plan to Retain Capability.--The Secretary of the Air
Force shall develop a plan to sustain the operational
capabilities of the Blue Devil 1 Intelligence, Surveillance,
and Reconnaissance Systems (in this section referred to as
``Blue Devil 1 system''), including precision signal
geolocation, by--
(1) procuring the existing Blue Devil 1 system;
(2) developing a new system; or
(3) basing a new system on capabilities that are
adapted and integrated from existing programs and
programs being developed.
(b) Report Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report on--
(1) the potential cost of procuring, operating, and
sustaining current Blue Devil 1 systems for fiscal
years 2014 through 2019, including costs relating to
procurement, research and development, personnel,
operation and maintenance, and military construction;
(2) the ability of other current platforms and
subsystems as of the date of the report to provide
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support
similar to the support provided by the current Blue
Devil 1 system; and
(3) a listing of programs of the Air Force and other
programs of the Department of Defense in development as
of the date of the report that could provide such
similar support in the future.
(c) Requirement to Coordinate.--In preparing the report under
subsection (b), the Secretary shall--
(1) coordinate with the Commander of the United
States Special Operations Command regarding the
operational needs of the United States Special
Operations Command; and
(2) coordinate with the Director of the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency with respect to
information regarding the transfer to the Air Force of
the technology developed under the wide-area network
detection program for operational integration of wide-
area motion imagery and near-vertical direction-finding
data for effective target detection, identification,
and tracking for potential incorporation, as practical
and appropriate, into other platforms.
(d) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Appropriations, and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs
SEC. 231. IMPROVEMENTS TO ACQUISITION ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS ON
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM.
(a) Improvement to Operations and Sustainment Cost
Estimates.--In preparing the acquisition accountability reports
on the ballistic missile defense system required by section 225
of title 10, United States Code, the Director of the Missile
Defense Agency shall improve the quality of cost estimates
relating to operations and sustainment that are included in
such reports under subsection (b)(3)(A) of such section,
including with respect to the confidence levels of such cost
estimates.
(b) Operations and Sustainment Responsibility.--Section 225
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following new subsection:
``(e) Operations and Sustainment Cost Estimates.--The
Director shall ensure that each life-cycle cost estimate
included in an acquisition baseline pursuant to subsection
(b)(3)(A) includes--
``(1) all of the operations and sustainment costs for
which the Director is responsible; and
``(2) a description of the operations and sustainment
functions and costs for which a military department is
responsible.''.
(c) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the
Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report outlining the
plans of the Director to improve the quality of cost
estimates pursuant to subsection (a).
(2) Elements.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include--
(A) a description of the actions planned to
improve the quality of cost estimates included
in the acquisition accountability reports on
the ballistic missile defense system required
by section 225 of title 10, United States Code;
(B) the schedule for such planned actions,
including the planned schedule for meeting the
requirements of subsection (e) of such section
225, as added by subsection (b);
(C) a description of any steps taken during
the previous year to improve the quality of
such cost estimates;
(D) an assessment of how the planned
improvements compare to the best practices and
cost-estimation guidelines recommended by the
Comptroller General of the United States for
cost estimates of the ballistic missile defense
system;
(E) any other matters the Director considers
appropriate; and
(F) the views of the Comptroller General of
the United States with respect to the contents
of the report.
(3) Form.--The report under paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in unclassified form.
SEC. 232. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR MEADS PROGRAM.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the
medium extended air defense system.
SEC. 233. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INTEGRATION OF
CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS; REPORT ON REGIONAL
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE.
(a) Prohibition on Integration of Certain Systems.--
(1) Sense of congress.--It is the sense of Congress
that missile defense systems of the People's Republic
of China should not be integrated into the missile
defense systems of the United States or the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization.
(2) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available
for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may
be obligated or expended to integrate missile defense
systems of the People's Republic of China into missile
defense systems of the United States.
(b) Report on Regional Ballistic Missile Defense.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the status and progress of
regional missile defense programs and efforts.
(2) Elements.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) A description of the overall risk
assessment from the most recent Global
Ballistic Missile Defense Assessment of
regional missile defense capabilities relative
to meeting the operational needs of the
commanders of the geographic combatant
commands, including the need for force
protection of forward-deployed forces and
capabilities of the United States and for the
defense of allies and partners of the United
States.
(B) An assessment of whether and how the
currently planned phased, adaptive approach to
missile defense in Europe and other planned
regional missile defense approaches and
capabilities of the United States meet the
integrated priorities of the commanders of the
geographic combatant commands to achieve the
operational requirements of the commanders to
defend against the ballistic missile threat to
deployed forces of the United States and allies
of the United States, including a description
of planned force structure deployment options
to increase missile defense capabilities in the
area of responsibility of a commander, if
needed, in the event of warning of an imminent
ballistic missile attack.
(C) A detailed explanation of the current and
planned concept of operations for the phased,
adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe,
including--
(i) arrangements for allocating the
command of assets of such approach
between the Commander of the United
States European Command and the Supreme
Allied Commander, Europe;
(ii) an explanation of the
circumstances under which such command
would be allocated to each commander;
and
(iii) a description of the
prioritization of defense of both the
deployed forces of the United States
and the territory of the member states
of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization using available missile
defense interceptor inventory.
(D) A description of the progress made in the
development and testing of elements of systems
intended for deployment in phases 2 and 3 of
the phased, adaptive approach to missile
defense in Europe, including the standard
missile-3 block IB, the standard missile-3
block IIA interceptors, and the Aegis Ashore
system, and any areas where work remains to
ensure such phases are ready for deployment as
specified in the 2010 Ballistic Missile Defense
Review.
(E) A description of the manner in which
elements of regional missile defense
architectures, such as forward-based X-band
radars in Japan, Israel, Turkey, and the area
of responsibility of the Commander of the
United States Central Command, contribute to
the enhancement of the homeland defense of the
United States.
(F) A description of the manner in which
enhanced integration of offensive military
capabilities and defensive missile defense
capabilities, including the potential for
improved intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance, will fit into regional missile
defense planning and force structure
assessments.
(G) A description of how the contributions of
allies and partners of the United States that
have purchased missile defense technology of
the United States could aid in reducing the
costs of deployment of regional missile defense
capabilities of the United States, and how the
systems of such allies and partners could be
better networked and integrated to provide
mutual force multiplication benefits.
(H) A description of how the Secretary of
Defense is working with allies and partners of
the United States that have purchased air and
missile defense technology of the United States
to integrate the capabilities of such allies
and partners provided by such technology with
the air and missile defense systems and
networks of the United States to provide mutual
benefit.
(I) Any other matters the Secretary
determines appropriate.
(3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
SEC. 234. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CO-PRODUCTION OF IRON DOME SHORT-
RANGE ROCKET DEFENSE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES.
(a) Availability of Funds.--
(1) In general.-- Of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available
for fiscal year 2014 for research, development, test,
and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the Missile Defense
Agency, not more than $15,000,000 may be obligated or
expended for nonrecurring engineering costs in
connection with the establishment of a capacity for co-
production in the United States by industry of the
United States of parts and components for the Iron Dome
short-range rocket defense program. Such obligation or
expenditure shall be made pursuant to an agreement
described in paragraph (2).
(2) Agreement described.--An agreement described in
this paragraph is an agreement entered into by the
Government of the United States and the Government of
Israel with respect to the co-production in the United
States of parts and components for the Iron Dome short-
range rocket defense program.
(b) Report on Co-production.--Not later than 30 days after
obligating or expending funds specified in subsection (a), the
Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the plan to
implement an agreement described in paragraph (2) of such
subsection, including the following:
(1) A description of the estimated cost of
implementing the agreement, including the costs to be
paid by industry.
(2) The expected schedule to implement the agreement.
(3) A description of any efforts to minimize the
costs of the agreement to the Government of the United
States.
(c) Report on Missile Defense Cooperation.--
(1) In general.--Not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the status of missile defense
cooperation between the United States and Israel.
(2) Elements.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) A description of the current program of
ballistic missile defense cooperation between
the United States and Israel, including the
objectives and results of such cooperation as
of the date of the report.
(B) A description of steps taken during the
year prior to the report, and steps planned to
be taken during the year following the report,
by the governments of the United States and
Israel to improve the coordination,
interoperability, and integration of the
missile defense capabilities of the United
States and Israel.
(C) A description of joint missile defense
exercises and training that have been conducted
by the United States and Israel, and the
lessons learned from such exercises.
(D) A description of joint efforts of the
United States and Israel to develop ballistic
missile defense technologies and capabilities.
(E) Any other matters that the Secretary
considers appropriate.
(d) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed
to alter or affect the procurement schedule, or anticipated
procurement numbers, under the Iron Dome short-range rocket
defense program.
(e) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) second-source production of parts and components
of the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program
that is based in the United States is in the national
security interest of both Israel and the United States;
and
(2) the move towards such a second-source capacity in
the United States for integration and assembly of all-
up rounds of the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense
program will further enhance the security of Israel by
ensuring added production capability of such vital
program.
SEC. 235. ADDITIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE
UNITED STATES HOMELAND.
(a) Deployment of Long-range Discriminating Radar.--
(1) In general.--The Director of the Missile Defense
Agency shall deploy a long-range discriminating radar
against long-range ballistic missile threats from the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Such radar shall
be located at a location optimized to support the
defense of the homeland of the United States.
(2) Funding.--Of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act for research, development,
test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the Missile
Defense Agency for BMD Sensors (PE 63884C), as
specified in the funding table in section 4201,
$30,000,000 shall be available for initial costs toward
the deployment of the radar required by paragraph (1).
(b) Additional Sensor Coverage for Threats From Iran.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall
ensure that the Secretary is able to deploy additional
tracking and discrimination sensor capabilities to
support the defense of the homeland of the United
States from future long-range ballistic missile threats
that emerge from Iran.
(2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report
that details what sensor capabilities of the United
States, including re-locatable land- and sea-based
capabilities, are or will become available to support
the defense of the homeland of the United States from
future long-range ballistic missile threats that emerge
from Iran. Such report shall include the following:
(A) With respect to the capabilities included
in the report, an identification of such
capabilities that can be located on the
Atlantic-side of the United States by not later
than 2019, or sooner if long-range ballistic
missile threats from Iran are successfully
flight-tested prior to 2019.
(B) A description of the manner in which the
United States will maintain such capabilities
so as to ensure the deployment of the
capabilities in time to support the missile
defense of the United States from long-range
ballistic missile threats from Iran.
SEC. 236. EVALUATION OF OPTIONS FOR FUTURE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE
SENSOR ARCHITECTURES.
(a) Evaluation Required.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, acting
through the Commander of the United States Strategic
Command, shall conduct an evaluation of options and
alternatives for future sensor architectures for
ballistic missile defense in order to enhance the
ballistic missile defense capabilities of the United
States.
(2) Consultation.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the
Secretary shall consult with the heads of departments
and agencies of the Federal Government that the
Secretary determines appropriate.
(3) Scope of evaluation.--In conducting the
evaluation under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall
consider the following:
(A) A wide range of options for a future
sensor architecture for ballistic missile
defense, including--
(i) options regarding the future
development, integration, exploitation,
and deployment of existing or new
missile defense sensor systems and
assets; and
(ii) options regarding using
capabilities of the Federal Government
that exist or are planned as of the
date of the evaluation that are not
primarily focused on missile defense,
including such capabilities that may
require modification to be used for
missile defense.
(B) The potential costs, advantages, and
feasibility of using such future sensor
architecture for purposes other than missile
defense, including for technical intelligence
collection or space situational awareness.
(C) Whether and how such future sensor
architectures could be designed and employed to
fulfill missions other than missile defense
when not required for such missile defense
missions.
(4) Objective.--The objective of the evaluation shall
be to identify one or more future sensor architectures
for ballistic missile defense that will result in an
improvement of the performance of the ballistic missile
defense system in a cost-effective, operationally
effective, timely, and affordable manner.
(b) Elements to Be Evaluated.--The evaluation required by
subsection (a) shall include a consideration of the following:
(1) Sensor types.--At a minimum, the types of sensors
as follows:
(A) Radar.
(B) Infrared.
(C) Optical and electro-optical.
(D) Directed energy.
(2) Sensor modes.--Deployment modes of sensors as
follows:
(A) Ground-based sensors.
(B) Sea-based sensors.
(C) Airborne sensors.
(D) Space-based sensors.
(3) Sensor functions.--At a minimum, missile defense-
related sensor functions as follows:
(A) Detection.
(B) Tracking.
(C) Characterization.
(D) Classification.
(E) Discrimination.
(F) Debris mitigation.
(G) Kill assessment.
(4) Sensor architecture capabilities.--At a minimum,
maximization or improvement of sensor-related
capabilities as follows:
(A) Handling of increasing raid sizes.
(B) Precision tracking of threat missiles.
(C) Providing fire-control quality tracks of
evolving threat missiles.
(D) Enabling launch-on-remote and engage-on-
remote capabilities.
(E) Discriminating lethal objects (warheads)
from other objects.
(F) Effectively assessing the results of
engagements.
(G) Enabling enhanced shot doctrine.
(H) Other capabilities that the Secretary of
Defense determines appropriate.
(c) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report
setting forth the results of the evaluation required by
subsection (a).
(2) Elements.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the findings, conclusions, and recommendations
of the Secretary with respect to--
(A) future sensor architectures evaluated
under subsection (a)(3)(A)(i).
(B) existing or planned capabilities of the
Federal Government evaluated under subsection
(a)(3)(A)(ii);
(C) using future sensor architecture for
additional purposes as described in subsection
(a)(3)(B); and
(D) the design and employment of future
sensor architectures to fulfill missions other
than missile defense as described in subsection
(a)(3)(C).
(3) Form.--The report shall be submitted in
unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d) Conforming Repeal.--Section 224 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 1675) is repealed.
SEC. 237. PLANS TO IMPROVE THE GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SYSTEM.
(a) Improved Kill Assessment Capability.--The Director of the
Missile Defense Agency, in consultation with the Commander of
the United States Strategic Command and the Commander of the
United States Northern Command, shall develop--
(1) options to achieve an improved kill assessment
capability for the ground-based midcourse defense
system that can be developed as soon as practicable
with acceptable acquisition risk, with the objective of
achieving initial operating capability by not later
than December 31, 2019, including by improving--
(A) the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the
ground-based interceptor;
(B) the command, control, battle management,
and communications system; and
(C) the sensor and communications
architecture of the ballistic missile defense
system; and
(2) a plan to carry out such options that gives
priority to including such improved capabilities in at
least some of the 14 ground-based interceptors that
will be procured by the Director, as announced by the
Secretary of Defense on March 15, 2013.
(b) Improved Hit Assessment.--The Director, in consultation
with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command and
the Commander of the United States Northern Command, shall take
appropriate steps to develop an interim capability for improved
hit assessment for the ground-based midcourse defense system
that can be integrated into near-term exo-atmospheric kill
vehicle upgrades and refurbishment.
(c) Report on Improved Capabilities.--Not later than April 1,
2014, the Director, the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command, and the Commander of the United States
Northern Command shall jointly submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on--
(1) the development of an improved kill assessment
capability under subsection (a), including the plan
developed under paragraph (2) of such subsection; and
(2) the development of an interim capability for
improved hit assessment under subsection (b).
(d) Plan for Upgraded Enhanced Exo-atmospheric Kill
Vehicle.--
(1) Plan required.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a plan
to use covered funding to develop, test, and deploy an
upgraded enhanced exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the
ground-based midcourse defense system that--
(A) is tested under a test program
coordinated with the Director of Operational
Test and Evaluation; and
(B) following such test program, is capable
of being deployed during fiscal year 2018 or
thereafter.
(2) Priority.--In developing the plan for an upgraded
enhanced exo-atmospheric kill vehicle under paragraph
(1), the Director shall give priority to the following
attributes:
(A) Cost effectiveness and high reliability,
testability, producibility, modularity, and
maintainability.
(B) Capability across the midcourse battle
space.
(C) Ability to leverage ballistic missile
defense system data with kill vehicle on-board
capability to discriminate lethal objects.
(D) Reliable on-demand communications.
(E) Sufficient flexibility to ensure that the
potential for future enhancements, including
ballistic missile defense system interceptor
commonality and multiple and volume kill
capability, is maintained.
(3) Covered funding defined.--In this subsection, the
term ``covered funding'' means--
(A) funds authorized to be appropriated by
this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for the Missile Defense Agency, as
specified in the funding table in section 4201;
and
(B) funds authorized to be appropriated by
the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2013
that are available to the Director to carry out
the plan under paragraph (1).
SEC. 238. REPORT ON POTENTIAL FUTURE HOMELAND BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE
OPTIONS.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than 240 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
potential future options for enhancing the ballistic missile
defense of the homeland of the United States.
(b) Consultation.--The Secretary shall prepare the report
under subsection (a) in consultation with the Commander of the
United States Strategic Command, the Commander of the United
States Northern Command, and the Director of the Missile
Defense Agency.
(c) Elements.--The report under subsection (a) shall include
the following:
(1) A description of the current assessment of the
threat to the United States from limited ballistic
missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or
deliberate), particularly from countries such as North
Korea and Iran, and an assessment of the projected
future threat through 2022, including a discussion of
confidence levels and uncertainties in such threat
assessment.
(2) A description of the current capability of the
ballistic missile defense of the homeland of the United
States to defend against the current threat of limited
ballistic missile attack (whether accidental,
unauthorized, or deliberate), particularly from
countries such as North Korea and Iran.
(3) A description of the status of efforts to correct
the problems that caused the flight test failures of
the ground-based midcourse defense system in December
2010 and July 2013 and plans for future efforts,
including additional flight testing, to demonstrate
that the problems have been successfully corrected.
(4) A description of planned improvements to the
current ballistic missile defense system of the
homeland of the United States, and the enhancements to
the capability of such system that would result from
such planned improvements, including--
(A) deployment of 14 additional ground-based
interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska;
(B) missile defense upgrades of early warning
radars at Clear, Alaska, and Cape Cod,
Massachusetts;
(C) deployment of an in-flight interceptor
communications system data terminal at Fort
Drum, New York; and
(D) improvements to the effectiveness and
reliability of the ground-based interceptors
and the overall ground-based midcourse defense
system.
(5) In accordance with subsection (d), a description
of potential additional future options for the
ballistic missile defense of the homeland of the United
States, in addition to the improvements described in
paragraph (4), if future ballistic missile threats
warrant deployment of such options to increase the
capabilities of such ballistic missile defense,
including--
(A) deployment of a missile defense
interceptor site on the East Coast;
(B) deployment of a missile defense
interceptor site in another location in the
United States, other than on the East Coast;
(C) expansion of Missile Field-1 at Fort
Greely, Alaska, to an operationally available
20-silo configuration, to permit further
interceptor deployments;
(D) deployment of additional ground-based
interceptors for the ground-based midcourse
defense system at Fort Greely, Alaska, or
Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, or both;
(E) deployment of additional missile defense
sensors, including at a site in Alaska as well
as an X-band radar on or near the East Coast or
elsewhere, to enhance system tracking and
discrimination, including various sensor
options;
(F) enhancements to the operational
effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and overall
performance of the ground-based midcourse
defense system through improvements to system
reliability, discrimination, battle management,
exo-atmospheric kill vehicle capability, and
related functions;
(G) the potential for future enhancement and
deployment of the standard missile-3 block IIA
interceptor to augment the ballistic missile
defense of the homeland of the United States;
(H) missile defense options to defend the
homeland of the United States against ballistic
missiles that could be launched from vessels on
the seas around the United States, including
the Gulf of Mexico, or other ballistic missile
threats that could approach the United States
from the south, should such a threat arise in
the future; and
(I) any other options the Secretary considers
appropriate.
(d) Evaluation of Potential Options.--For each option
described under subsection (c)(5), the Secretary shall provide
an evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of such
option. The evaluation of each such option shall include
consideration of the following:
(1) Technical feasibility.
(2) Operational effectiveness and utility against the
projected future threat.
(3) Cost, cost effectiveness, and affordability.
(4) Schedule considerations.
(5) Agility to respond to changes in future threat
evolution.
(e) Conclusions and Recommendations.--Based on the
evaluations required by subsection (d), the Secretary shall
include in the report under subsection (a) such findings,
conclusions, and recommendations as the Secretary considers
appropriate for potential future options for the ballistic
missile defense of the homeland of the United States.
(f) Form.--The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted
in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
SEC. 239. BRIEFINGS ON STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN MISSILE
DEFENSE MATTERS.
Not later than 180 days after the completion of the site
evaluation study required by subsection (a) of section 227 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1678), and again one year after
such date, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the
congressional defense committees a detailed briefing on the
current status of efforts and plans to implement the
requirements of such section, including--
(1) the progress and plans toward preparation of the
environmental impact statement required by subsection
(b) of such section; and
(2) the development of the contingency plan under
subsection (d) of such section for deployment of an
additional homeland missile defense interceptor site in
case the President determines to proceed with such an
additional deployment.
SEC. 240. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT ON NATO AND MISSILE DEFENSE
BURDEN-SHARING.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that as
defense budget resources continue to decline in the United
States, including by reason of funding reductions under the
Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112-25), and the
sequestration in effect by reason of such Act, the importance
of burden-sharing among members of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization for missile defense is increasing.
(b) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the
cost of missile defense for members of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (in this section referred to as ``NATO''),
including the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in
Europe, and the contributions made by members of NATO for such
missile defense.
(c) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (b) shall
include the following:
(1) The total estimated cost directly attributable to
the various phases of the phased, adaptive approach to
missile defense in Europe, including costs relating to
research, development, testing, and evaluation,
procurement, and military construction.
(2) With respect to the cost of missile defense for
NATO, including the phased, adaptive approach to
missile defense in Europe, a description of the level
of burden-sharing among members of NATO as of the date
of the report, including through contributions made by
a member in the form of hosting elements of such
approach to missile defense in the territory of the
member.
(3) An assessment of, and recommendations for, areas
where the Secretary determines that NATO and the
members of NATO could improve the burden-sharing among
members with respect to the cost of missile defense for
NATO described in paragraph (2), including through the
possible pooling of missile defense interceptors.
(d) Form.--The report required by subsection (b) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
SEC. 241. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DEPLOYMENT OF REGIONAL BALLISTIC MISSILE
DEFENSE CAPABILITIES.
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States develops and deploys regional
ballistic missile defense capabilities to protect the
forward-deployed forces, allies, and partners of the
United States against regional ballistic missile
threats, consistent with the security obligations of
the United States and as part of the broader theater
security and military plans of the geographic combatant
commanders of the United States;
(2) in deciding on the deployment of regional missile
defense assets and capabilities of the United States,
the Secretary of Defense should give priority
consideration to the capabilities needed to deter and
defend against the ballistic missile threat, including
the recommendations of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and
the priorities of the geographic combatant commanders
for meeting the operational needs of the commanders for
ballistic missile defense;
(3) such deployment decisions should take into
account all of the ballistic missile threats to the
forces, allies, and partners of the United States in
each region;
(4) the United States should encourage the allies and
partners of the United States to acquire and contribute
to integrated and complementary regional ballistic
missile defense capabilities--including coordination,
data sharing, and networking arrangements--and such
allied and partner capabilities should be taken into
account in deciding on the deployment of regional
missile defense capabilities of the United States; and
(5) the United States should cooperate closely with
the allies and partners of the United States, including
such allies and partners in East Asia, on missile
defense deployments and cooperation that enhance the
mutual security of the United States and such allies
and partners.
SEC. 242. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT OF CAPABILITY ENHANCEMENT II
EXOATMOSPHERIC KILL VEHICLE.
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense
should not procure a Capability Enhancement II exoatmospheric
kill vehicle for deployment until after the date on which a
successful intercept flight test of the Capability Enhancement
II ground-based interceptor has occurred, unless such
procurement is for test assets or to maintain a warm line for
the industrial base.
Subtitle D--Reports
SEC. 251. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON THE AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT
VEHICLE ACQUISITION PROGRAM.
(a) Annual GAO Review.--During the period beginning on the
date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 2018,
the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an
annual review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition
program.
(b) Annual Reports.--
(1) In general.--Not later than March 1 of each year
beginning in 2014 and ending in 2018, the Comptroller
General shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the review of the amphibious
combat vehicle acquisition program conducted under
subsection (a).
(2) Matters to be included.--Each report under
paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) The extent to which the program is
meeting development and procurement cost,
schedule, performance, and risk mitigation
goals.
(B) With respect to meeting the desired
initial operational capability and full
operational capability dates for the amphibious
combat vehicle, the progress and results of--
(i) developmental and operational
testing of the vehicle; and
(ii) plans for correcting
deficiencies in vehicle performance,
operational effectiveness, reliability,
suitability, and safety.
(C) An assessment of procurement plans,
production results, and efforts to improve
manufacturing efficiency and supplier
performance.
(D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy
of the amphibious combat vehicle, including
whether such strategy is in compliance with
acquisition management best-practices and the
acquisition policy and regulations of the
Department of Defense.
(E) An assessment of the projected operations
and support costs and the viability of the
Marine Corps to afford to operate and sustain
the amphibious combat vehicle.
(3) Additional information.--In submitting to the
congressional defense committees the first report under
paragraph (1) and a report following any changes made
by the Secretary of the Navy to the baseline
documentation of the amphibious combat vehicle
acquisition program, the Comptroller General shall
include, with respect to such program, an assessment of
the sufficiency and objectivity of--
(A) the analysis of alternatives;
(B) the initial capabilities document; and
(C) the capabilities development document.
SEC. 252. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT ON THE
ACQUISITION PROGRAM FOR THE VXX PRESIDENTIAL
HELICOPTER.
(a) Annual GAO Review.--The Comptroller General of the United
States shall conduct annually a review of the acquisition
program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft.
(b) Annual Reports.--
(1) In general.--Not later than March 1 each year,
the Comptroller General shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the review
conducted under subsection (a) during the preceding
year.
(2) Elements.--Each report under paragraph (1) shall
include such matters as the Comptroller General
considers appropriate to fully inform the congressional
defense committees of the stage of the acquisition
process for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft
covered by the review described in such report. Such
matters may include the following:
(A) The extent to which the acquisition
program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter
aircraft is meeting cost, schedule, and
performance goals.
(B) The progress and results of developmental
testing.
(C) An assessment of the acquisition strategy
for the program, including whether the strategy
is consistent with acquisition management best
practices identified by the Comptroller General
for purposes of the program.
(c) Sunset.--The requirements in this section shall terminate
upon the earlier of--
(1) the date on which the Navy awards a contract for
full-rate production for the VXX Presidential
Helicopter aircraft; or
(2) the date on which the acquisition program for
such aircraft is terminated.
SEC. 253. REPORT ON STRATEGY TO IMPROVE BODY ARMOR.
(a) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the
comprehensive research and development strategy of the
Secretary to achieve significant reductions in the weight of
body armor.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) shall
include the following:
(1) A brief description of each solution for body
armor weight reduction that is being developed as of
the date of the report.
(2) For each such solution--
(A) the costs, schedules, and performance
requirements;
(B) the research and development funding
profile;
(C) a description of the materials being used
in the solution; and
(D) the feasibility and technology readiness
levels of the solution and the materials.
(3) A strategy to provide resources for future
research and development of body armor weight
reduction.
(4) An explanation of how the Secretary is using a
modular or tailorable solution to approach body armor
weight reduction.
(5) A description of how the Secretary coordinates
the research and development of body armor weight
reduction being carried out by the military
departments.
(6) Any other matter the Secretary considers
appropriate.
(c) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
SEC. 261. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY REVIEW AND ADVISORY
BOARD.
(a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 189. Communications Security Review and Advisory Board
``(a) Establishment.--There shall be in the Department of
Defense a Communications Security Review and Advisory Board (in
this section referred to as the `Board') to review and assess
the communications security, cryptographic modernization, and
related key management activities of the Department and provide
advice to the Secretary with respect to such activities.
``(b) Members.--(1) The Secretary shall determine the number
of members of the Board.
``(2) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense shall serve as chairman of the Board.
``(3) The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of
general or admiral and civilian employees of the Department of
Defense in the Senior Executive Service to serve as members of
the Board.
``(c) Responsibilities.--The Board shall--
``(1) monitor the overall communications security,
cryptographic modernization, and key management efforts
of the Department, including activities under major
defense acquisition programs (as defined in section
139c of this title), by--
``(A) requiring each Chief Information
Officer of each military department to report
the communications security activities of the
military department to the Board;
``(B) tracking compliance of each military
department with respect to communications
security modernization efforts;
``(C) validating lifecycle communications
security modernization plans for major defense
acquisition programs;
``(2) validate the need to replace cryptographic
equipment based on the expiration dates of the
equipment and evaluate the risks of continuing to use
cryptographic equipment after such expiration dates;
``(3) convene in-depth program reviews for specific
cryptographic modernization developments with respect
to validating requirements and identifying programmatic
risks;
``(4) develop a long-term roadmap for communications
security to identify potential issues and ensure
synchronization with major planning documents; and
``(5) advise the Secretary on the cryptographic
posture of the Department, including budgetary
recommendations.
``(d) Exclusion of Certain Programs.--The Board shall not
include the consideration of programs funded under the National
Intelligence Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying
out this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item
relating to section 188 the following new item:
``189. Communications Security Review and Advisory Board''.
SEC. 262. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF MECHANISMS TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR
DEFENSE LABORATORIES FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR MILITARY MISSIONS.
(a) Clarification of Availability of Funds.--Section 219 of
the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is
amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)(D), by striking ``and
recapitalization'' through the period at the end and
inserting ``recapitalization, or minor military
construction of the laboratory infrastructure, in
accordance with subsection (b).'';
(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as
subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following
new subsection (b):
``(b) Availability of Funds for Infrastructure Projects.--
``(1) In general.--Subject to the provisions of this
subsection, funds available under a mechanism under
subsection (a)(1)(D) that are solely intended to carry
out a laboratory infrastructure project shall be
available for such project until expended.
``(2) Prior notice of costs of projects.--Funds shall
be available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a
project referred to in such paragraph only if the
Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees
of the total cost of the project before the date on
which the Secretary uses a mechanism under subsection
(a)(1)(D) for such project.
``(3) Accumulation of funds for projects.--Funds may
accumulate under a mechanism under subsection (a) for a
project referred to in paragraph (1) for not more than
five years.
``(4) Cost limit compliance.--The Secretary shall
ensure that a project referred to in paragraph (1) for
which funds are made available in accordance with such
paragraph complies with the applicable cost limitations
in the following provisions of law:
``(A) Section 2805(d) of title 10, United
States Code, with respect to revitalization and
recapitalization projects.
``(B) Section 2811 of such title, with
respect to repair projects.''.
(b) Extension.--Subsection (d) of such section, as
redesignated by subsection (a)(2) of this section, is amended
by striking ``September 30, 2016'' and inserting ``September
30, 2020''.
(c) Application.--Subsection (b) of such section 219, as
added by subsection (a)(3), shall apply with respect to funds
made available under such section on or after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 263. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO AWARD PRIZES FOR ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY ACHIEVEMENTS.
Section 2374a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by striking ``September 30, 2013'' and inserting ``September
30, 2018''.
SEC. 264. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY
PROTECTION FEATURES DURING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
OF CERTAIN DEFENSE SYSTEMS.
Section 243(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10
U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2015''
and inserting ``October 1, 2020''.
SEC. 265. BRIEFING ON BIOMETRICS ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE.
(a) Briefing Required.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives on an assessment of the future
program structure for biometrics oversight and execution and
architectural requirements for biometrics-enabling capability.
(b) Matters Included.--The briefing under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the roles and responsibilities
of the principal staff assistant for biometrics, the
program manager for biometrics, and the Defense
Forensics and Biometrics Agency, including--
(A) the roles and responsibilities of each
element of the Department of Defense, including
each military department, with responsibility
for biometrics and each such element that is
responsible for requirements and testing
regarding biometrics; and
(B) whether the executive management
responsibilities of the Department of Defense
program manager for biometrics should be
retained by the Army or transferred to another
element of the Department.
(2) An assessment of the current requirements for
biometrics-enabling capability, including with respect
to--
(A) a governance process for capturing,
vetting, and validating requirements and
business processes across military department,
interagency, and international partners; and
(B) a process to determine resourcing
business rules to establish and sustain such
capabilities.
(3) An evaluation of the most appropriate element of
the Department to take responsibility for defining and
managing the end-to-end performance of the biometric
enterprise, beginning and ending at the point of
biometric encounter, as described in the report of the
Comptroller General of the United States titled
``Defense Biometrics: Additional Training for Leaders
and More Timely Transmission of Data Could Enhance the
Use of Biometrics in Afghanistan'', numbered 12-442.
SEC. 266. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPORTANCE OF ALIGNING COMMON MISSILE
COMPARTMENT OF OHIO-CLASS REPLACEMENT PROGRAM WITH
THE UNITED KINGDOM'S VANGUARD SUCCESSOR PROGRAM.
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and
the Secretary of the Navy should make every effort to ensure
that the common missile compartment associated with the Ohio-
class ballistic missile submarine replacement program stays on
schedule and is aligned with the Vanguard-successor program of
the United Kingdom in order for the United States to fulfill
its longstanding commitment to our ally and partner in sea-
based strategic deterrence.
SEC. 267. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COUNTER-ELECTRONICS HIGH POWER MICROWAVE
MISSILE PROJECT.
It is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) in carrying out the non-kinetic counter-
electronics developmental planning effort of the Air
Force, the Secretary of Defense should consider the
results of the successful joint technology capability
demonstration that the counter-electronics high power
microwave missile project conducted in 2012;
(2) an analysis of alternatives is an important step
in the long-term development of a non-kinetic counter-
electronic system;
(3) the Secretary should pursue both near- and far-
term joint non-kinetic counter-electronic systems; and
(4) the counter-electronics high power microwave
missile project (or a variant thereof) should be
considered among the options for a possible materiel
solution in response to any near-term joint urgent
operational need, joint emergent operational need, or
combatant command integrated priority for a non-kinetic
counter-electronic system.
TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding.
Subtitle B--Energy and Environment
Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for
activities relating to operational energy strategy.
Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation
programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and
Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military
readiness activities.
Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act.
Sec. 314. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air
burn pits.
Sec. 315. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in
fuels.
Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment
Sec. 321. Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment.
Sec. 322. Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report.
Sec. 323. Consideration of Army arsenals' capabilities to fulfill
manufacturing requirements.
Sec. 324. Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and
replacement of operating forces used to support overseas
contingency operations.
Sec. 325. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan.
Sec. 326. Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit
visibility.
Subtitle D--Reports
Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and
unit readiness.
Sec. 332. Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for
equipment readiness and strategic capability.
Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information
regarding information technology capital assets.
Sec. 334. Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention
reporting requirements.
Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority
Sec. 341. Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force
Base, Azores.
Sec. 342. Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight
demonstration teams outside the United States.
Sec. 343. Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations
Command National Capital Region.
Sec. 344. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web
Initiative.
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Sec. 351. Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units.
Sec. 352. Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility
uniforms.
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities
and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as
specified in the funding table in section 4301.
Subtitle B--Energy and Environment
SEC. 311. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ON PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR
ACTIVITIES RELATING TO OPERATIONAL ENERGY STRATEGY.
Section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``Not later than 30
days after the date on which the budget for a fiscal
year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105
of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
Congress a report on the proposed budgets for that
fiscal year'' and inserting ``The Secretary of Defense
shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed
budgets for a fiscal year''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(6) The report required by paragraph (4) for a fiscal year
shall be submitted by the later of the following dates:
``(A) The date that is 30 days after the date on
which the budget for that fiscal year is submitted to
Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31.
``(B) March 31 of the previous fiscal year.''.
SEC. 312. FACILITATION OF INTERAGENCY COOPERATION IN CONSERVATION
PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF DEFENSE,
AGRICULTURE, AND INTERIOR TO AVOID OR REDUCE
ADVERSE IMPACTS ON MILITARY READINESS ACTIVITIES.
(a) Use of Funds Under Certain Agreements.--Section 2684a of
title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as
subsections (i) and (j), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following
new subsection (h):
``(h) Interagency Cooperation in Conservation Programs To
Avoid or Reduce Adverse Impacts on Military Readiness
Activities.--In order to facilitate interagency cooperation and
enhance the effectiveness of actions that will protect both the
environment and military readiness, the recipient of funds
provided pursuant an agreement under this section or under the
Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. et seq.) may, with regard to the lands and
waters within the scope of the agreement, use such funds to
satisfy any matching funds or cost-sharing requirement of any
conservation program of the Department of Agriculture or the
Department of the Interior notwithstanding any limitation of
such program on the source of matching or cost-sharing
funds.''.
(b) Sunset.--This section and subsection (h) of section 2684a
of title 10, United States Code, as added by this section,
shall expire on October 1, 2019, except that any agreement
referred to in such subsection that is entered into on or
before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to its
terms and conditions as if this section has not expired.
SEC. 313. REAUTHORIZATION OF SIKES ACT.
Section 108 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670f) is amended by
striking ``fiscal years 2009 through 2014'' each place it
appears and inserting ``fiscal years 2014 through 2019''.
SEC. 314. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON DISPOSING OF WASTE IN OPEN-
AIR BURN PITS.
Section 317(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10
U.S.C. 2701 note) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'';
(2) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph
(Q); and
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following
new subparagraphs:
``(C) tires;
``(D) treated wood;
``(E) batteries;
``(F) plastics, except insignificant amounts
of plastic remaining after a good-faith effort
to remove or recover plastic materials from the
solid waste stream;
``(G) munitions and explosives, except when
disposed of in compliance with guidance on the
destruction of munitions and explosives
contained in the Department of Defense
Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards, DoD
Manual 6055.09-M;
``(H) compressed gas cylinders, unless empty
with valves removed;
``(I) fuel containers, unless completely
evacuated of its contents;
``(J) aerosol cans;
``(K) polychlorinated biphenyls;
``(L) petroleum, oils, and lubricants
products (other than waste fuel for initial
combustion);
``(M) asbestos;
``(N) mercury;
``(O) foam tent material;
``(P) any item containing any of the
materials referred to in a preceding paragraph;
and''.
SEC. 315. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PROCUREMENT OF DROP-
IN FUELS.
(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or
expended to make a bulk purchase of a drop-in fuel for
operational purposes unless the cost of that drop-in fuel is
cost-competitive with the cost of a traditional fuel available
for the same purpose.
(b) Waiver.--
(1) In general.--Subject to the requirements of
paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may waive the
limitation under subparagraph (a) with respect to a
purchase.
(2) Notice required.--Not later than 30 days after
issuing a waiver under this subsection, the Secretary
shall submit to the congressional defense committees
notice of the waiver. Any such notice shall include
each of the following:
(A) The rationale of the Secretary for
issuing the waiver
(B) A certification that the waiver is in the
national security interest of the United
States.
(C) The expected cost of the purchase for
which the waiver is issued.
(c) Definitions.--For the purposes of this section--
(1) The term ``drop-in fuel'' means a neat or blended
liquid hydrocarbon fuel designed as a direct
replacement for a traditional fuel with comparable
performance characteristics and compatible with
existing infrastructure and equipment
(2) The term ``traditional fuel'' means a liquid
hydrocarbon fuel derived or refined from petroleum.
(3) The term ``operational purposes'' means for the
purposes of conducting military operations, including
training, exercises, large scale demonstrations, and
moving and sustaining military forces and military
platforms. Such term does not include research,
development, testing, evaluation, fuel certification,
or other demonstrations.
Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment
SEC. 321. STRATEGIC POLICY FOR PREPOSITIONED MATERIEL AND EQUIPMENT.
(a) Modifications to Strategic Policy.--Section 2229(a) of
title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(a) Policy Required.--
``(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall
maintain a strategic policy on the programs of the
Department of Defense for prepositioned materiel and
equipment. Such policy shall take into account national
security threats, strategic mobility, service
requirements, and the requirements of the combatant
commands, and shall address how the Department's
prepositioning programs, both ground and afloat, align
with national defense strategies and departmental
priorities.
``(2) Elements.--The strategic policy required under
paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
``(A) Overarching strategic guidance
concerning planning and resource priorities
that link the Department of Defense's current
and future needs for prepositioned stocks, such
as desired responsiveness, to evolving national
defense objectives.
``(B) A description of the Department's
vision for prepositioning programs and the
desired end state.
``(C) Specific interim goals demonstrating
how the vision and end state will be achieved.
``(D) A description of the strategic
environment, requirements for, and challenges
associated with, prepositioning.
``(E) Metrics for how the Department will
evaluate the extent to which prepositioned
assets are achieving defense objectives.
``(F) A framework for joint departmental
oversight that reviews and synchronizes the
military services' prepositioning strategies to
minimize potentially duplicative efforts and
maximize efficiencies in prepositioned materiel
and equipment across the Department of Defense.
``(3) Joint oversight.--The Secretary of Defense
shall establish joint oversight of the military
services' prepositioning efforts to maximize
efficiencies across the Department of Defense.''.
(b) Implementation Plan.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a plan for implementation of the
prepositioning strategic policy required under section
2229(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by
subsection (a).
(2) Elements.--The implementation plan required under
paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A) Detailed guidance for how the Department
of Defense will achieve the vision, end state,
and goals outlined in the strategic policy.
(B) A comprehensive list of the Department's
prepositioned materiel and equipment programs.
(C) A detailed description of how the plan
will be implemented.
(D) A schedule with milestones for the
implementation of the plan.
(E) An assignment of roles and
responsibilities for the implementation of the
plan.
(F) A description of the resources required
to implement the plan.
(G) A description of how the plan will be
reviewed and assessed to monitor progress.
(c) Comptroller General Report.--Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually
thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall
review the implementation plan submitted under subsection (b)
and the prepositioning strategic policy required under section
2229(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by
subsection (a), and submit to the congressional defense
committees a report describing the findings of such review and
including any additional information relating to the
propositioning strategic policy and plan that the Comptroller
General determines appropriate.
SEC. 322. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANUFACTURING ARSENAL STUDY AND REPORT.
(a) Review.--
(1) Manufacturing requirements.--The Secretary of
Defense, in consultation with the military services and
Defense Agencies, shall review--
(A) current and expected manufacturing
requirements across the military services and
Defense Agencies to identify critical
manufacturing competencies and supplies,
components, end items, parts, assemblies, and
sub-assemblies for which there is no or limited
domestic commercial source and which are
appropriate for manufacturing within an arsenal
owned by the United States in order to support
critical manufacturing capabilities;
(B) how the Department of Defense can more
effectively use and manage public-private
partnerships to preserve critical industrial
capabilities at such arsenals for future
national security requirements while providing
to the Department of the Army a return on its
investment;
(C) the effectiveness of the strategy of the
Department of Defense to assign workload to
each of the arsenals and the potential for
alternative strategies that could better
identify workload for each arsenal;
(D) the impact of the rate structure driven
by the Department of the Army working-capital
funds on public-private partnerships at each
such arsenal;
(E) the extent to which operations at each
such arsenal can be streamlined, improved, or
enhanced; and
(F) the effectiveness of the implementation
by the Department of the Army of cooperative
agreements authorized at manufacturing arsenals
under section 4544 of title 10, United States
Code.
(2) Mechanisms for determining manufacturing
capabilities.--The Secretary shall review mechanisms
within the Department of Defense for ensuring that
appropriate consideration is given to the unique
manufacturing capabilities of arsenals owned by the
United States to fulfill manufacturing requirements of
the Department of Defense for which there is no or
limited domestic commercial capability.
(b) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report that
includes the results of the reviews conducted under subsection
(a) and a description of actions planned to support critical
manufacturing capabilities within arsenals owned by the United
States.
(c) Comptroller General Report.--Not later than one year
after the date on which the report required under subsection
(b) is submitted, the Comptroller General shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report containing an
assessment of the report together with the recommendations of
the Comptroller General to improve the strategy of the
Department of Defense to assign workload.
SEC. 323. CONSIDERATION OF ARMY ARSENALS' CAPABILITIES TO FULFILL
MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Consideration of Capability of Arsenals.--When
undertaking a make-or-buy analysis, a program executive officer
or program manager of a military service or Defense Agency
shall consider the capability of arsenals owned by the United
States to fulfill a manufacturing requirement.
(b) Notification of Solicitations.--Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall establish and begin implementation of a system
for ensuring that the arsenals owned by the United States are
notified of any solicitation that fulfills a manufacturing
requirement for which there is no or limited domestic
commercial source and which may be appropriate for
manufacturing within an arsenal owned by the United States.
SEC. 324. STRATEGIC POLICY FOR THE RETROGRADE, RECONSTITUTION, AND
REPLACEMENT OF OPERATING FORCES USED TO SUPPORT
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
(a) Establishment of Policy.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall
establish a policy setting forth the programs and
priorities of the Department of Defense for the
retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of units
and materiel used to support overseas contingency
operations. The policy shall take into account national
security threats, the requirements of the combatant
commands, the current readiness of the operating forces
of the military departments, and risk associated with
strategic depth and the time necessary to reestablish
required personnel, equipment, and training readiness
in such operating forces.
(2) Elements.--The policy required under paragraph
(1) shall include the following elements:
(A) Establishment and assignment of
responsibilities and authorities within the
Department for oversight and execution of the
planning, organization, and management of the
programs to reestablish the readiness of
redeployed operating forces.
(B) Guidance concerning priorities, goals,
objectives, timelines, and resources to
reestablish the readiness of redeployed
operating forces in support of national defense
objectives and combatant command requirements.
(C) Oversight reporting requirements and
metrics for the evaluation of Department of
Defense and military department progress on
restoring the readiness of redeployed operating
forces in accordance with the policy required
under paragraph (1).
(D) A framework for joint departmental
reviews of military services' annual budgets
proposed for retrograde, reconstitution, or
replacement activities, including an assessment
of the strategic and operational risk assumed
by the proposed levels of investment across the
Department of Defense.
(b) Implementation Plan.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a plan for implementation of the policy
required under this section.
(2) Elements.--The implementation plan required under
paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A) The assignment of responsibilities and
authorities for oversight and execution of the
planning, organization, and management of the
programs to reestablish the readiness of
redeployed operating forces.
(B) Establishment of priorities, goals,
objectives, timelines, and resources to
reestablish the readiness of redeployed
operating forces in support of national defense
objectives and combatant command requirements.
(C) A description of how the plan will be
implemented, including a schedule with
milestones to meet the goals of the plan.
(D) An estimate of the resources by military
service and by year required to implement the
plan, including an assessment of the risks
assumed in the plan.
(3) Updates.--Not later than one year after
submitting the plan required under paragraph (1), and
annually thereafter for two years, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees an update on progress toward meeting the
goals of the plan.
(c) Comptroller General Report.--Not later than 120 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually after
the submittal of each update to the implementation plan under
subsection (b), the Comptroller General of the United States
shall review the implementation plan submitted under subsection
(b) and the policy required by subsection (a), and submit to
the congressional defense committees a report describing the
findings of such review and progress made toward meeting the
goals of the plan and including any additional information
relating to the policy and plan that the Comptroller General
determines appropriate.
SEC. 325. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP STRATEGIC SUSTAINMENT PLAN.
(a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall
submit to the congressional defense committees and to the
Comptroller General of the United States a strategic
sustainment plan for the Littoral Combat Ship. Such plan shall
include each of the following:
(1) An estimate of the cost and schedule of
implementing the plan.
(2) An identification of the requirements and
planning for the long-term sustainment of the Littoral
Combat Ship and its mission modules in accordance with
section 2366b of title 10, United States Code, as
amended by section 801 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81; 125 Stat. 1482).
(3) A description of the current and future operating
environments of the Littoral Combat Ship, as specified
or referred to in strategic guidance and planning
documents of the Department of Defense.
(4) The facility, supply, and logistics systems
requirements, including contractor support, of the
Littoral Combat Ship when forward deployed, and an
estimate of the cost and personnel required to conduct
the necessary maintenance activities.
(5) Any required updates to host-nation agreements to
facilitate the forward-deployed maintenance
requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship, including a
discussion of overseas management of Ship ordnance and
hazardous materials and delivery of equipment and spare
parts needed for emergent repair.
(6) An evaluation of the forward-deployed maintenance
requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship and a schedule
of pier-side maintenance timelines when forward-
deployed, including requirements for multiple ships and
variants.
(7) An assessment of the total quantity of equipment,
spare parts, permanently forward-stationed personnel,
and size of fly away teams required to support forward-
deployed maintenance requirements for the U.S.S.
Freedom while in Singapore, and estimates for follow-on
deployments of Littoral Combat Ships of both variants.
(8) A detailed description of the continuity of
operations plans for the Littoral Combat Ship Squadron
and of any plans to increase the number of Squadron
personnel.
(9) An identification of mission critical single
point of failure equipment for which a sufficient
number spare parts are necessary to have on hand, and
determination of Littoral Combat Ship forward deployed
equipment and spare parts locations and levels.
(b) Form.--The plan required under subsection (a) shall be
submitted in unclassified form but may have a classified annex.
SEC. 326. STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING ASSET TRACKING AND IN-TRANSIT
VISIBILITY.
(a) Strategy and Implementation Plans.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a comprehensive strategy for improving asset
tracking and in-transit visibility across the
Department of Defense, together with the plans of the
military departments for implementing the strategy.
(2) Elements.--The strategy and implementation plans
required under paragraph (1) shall include the
following elements:
(A) The overarching goals and objectives
desired from implementation of the strategy.
(B) A description of steps to achieve those
goals and objectives, as well as milestones and
performance measures to gauge results.
(C) An estimate of the costs associated with
executing the plan, and the sources and types
of resources and investments, including skills,
technology, human capital, information, and
other resources, required to meet the goals and
objectives.
(D) A description of roles and
responsibilities for managing and overseeing
the implementation of the strategy, including
the role of program managers, and the
establishment of mechanisms for multiple
stakeholders to coordinate their efforts
throughout implementation and make necessary
adjustments to the strategy based on
performance.
(E) A description of key factors external to
the Department of Defense and beyond its
control that could significantly affect the
achievement of the long-term goals contained in
the strategy.
(F) A detailed description of asset marking
requirements and how automated information and
data capture technologies could improve
readiness, cost effectiveness, and performance.
(G) A defined list of all categories of items
that program managers are required to identify
for the purposes of asset marking.
(H) A description of steps to improve asset
tracking and in-transit visibility for
classified programs.
(I) Steps to be undertaken to facilitate
collaboration with industry designed to capture
best practices, lessons learned, and any
relevant technical matters.
(J) A description of how improved asset
tracking and in-transit visibility could
enhance audit readiness, reduce counterfeit
risk, enhance logistical processes, and
otherwise benefit the Department of Defense.
(K) An operational security assessment
designed to ensure that all Department of
Defense assets are appropriately protected
during the execution of the strategy and
implementation plan.
(b) Comptroller General Report.--Not later than one year
after the strategy is submitted under subsection (a), the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report setting forth an
assessment of the extent to which the strategy and accompanying
implementation plans--
(1) include the elements set forth under subsection
(a)(2);
(2) align to achieve the overarching asset tracking
and in-transit visibility goals and objectives of the
Department of Defense;
(3) incorporate, as appropriate, industry best
practices related to automated information and data
capture technologies for asset tracking and in-transit
visibility;
(4) effectively execute the policies prescribed in
Department of Defense Instruction 8320.04; and
(5) have been implemented.
Subtitle D--Reports
SEC. 331. ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PERSONNEL AND
UNIT READINESS.
(a) Assessment of Assigned Missions and Contractor Support.--
Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``The report for a quarter''
and inserting ``Each report''; and
(B) by striking ``(e), and (f)'' and
inserting ``(f), (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k),
and the reports for the second and fourth
quarters of a calendar year shall also contain
the information required by subsection (e)'';
(2) in subsection (d)--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking
``, including the extent'' and all that
follows through the period at the end
and inserting the following: ``,
including an assessment of the manning
of units (authorized versus assigned
numbers of personnel) for units not
scheduled for deployment and the timing
of the arrival of personnel into units
preparing for deployments.''; and
(ii) in subparagraph (B), by
inserting ``unit'' before ``personnel
strength'';
(B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as
follows:
``(2) Personnel turbulence.--
``(A) Recruit quality.
``(B) Personnel assigned to a unit but not
trained for the level of assigned
responsibility or mission.
``(C) Fitness for deployment.
``(D) Recruiting and retention status.'';
(C) by striking paragraph (3) and
redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3);
and
(D) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by
subparagraph (C), by striking ``Training
commitments'' and inserting ``Mission
rehearsals'';
(3) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g),
as subsections (f), (g), and (l), respectively;
(4) by inserting after subsection (d)(3), as
redesignated by paragraph (1)(C), the following new
subsection:
``(e) Logistics Indicators.--The reports for the second and
fourth quarters of a calendar year shall also include
information regarding the active components of the armed forces
(and an evaluation of such information) with respect to each of
the following logistics indicators:'';
(5) in subsection (e), as designated by paragraph
(4)--
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and
(7) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3),
respectively;
(B) in paragraph (1), as redesignated by
subparagraph (A), by striking subparagraph (E);
and
(C) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated--
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking
``Maintenance'' and inserting ``Depot
maintenance''; and
(ii) by inserting after subparagraph
(A) the following new subparagraph:
``(B) Equipment not available due to a lack
of supplies or parts.''; and
(6) by inserting after subsection (g), as
redesignated by paragraph (3), the following new
subsections:
``(h) Combatant Command Assigned Mission Assessments.--(1)
Each report shall also include an assessment by each commander
of a geographic or functional combatant command of the ability
of the command to successfully execute each of the assigned
missions of the command. Each such assessment for a combatant
command shall also include a list of the mission essential
tasks for each assigned mission of the command and an
assessment of the ability of the command to successfully
complete each task within prescribed timeframes.
``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `assigned
mission' means any contingency response program plan, theater
campaign plan, or named operation that is approved and assigned
by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
``(i) Risk Assessment of Dependence on Contractor Support.--
Each report shall also include an assessment by the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the level of risk incurred by
using contract support in contingency operations as required
under Department of Defense Instruction 1100.22, `Policies and
Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix'.
``(j) Combat Support Agencies Assessment.--(1) Each report
shall also include an assessment by the Secretary of Defense of
the military readiness of the combat support agencies,
including, for each such agency--
``(A) a determination with respect to the
responsiveness and readiness of the agency to support
operating forces in the event of a war or threat to
national security, including--
``(i) a list of mission essential tasks and
an assessment of the ability of the agency to
successfully perform those tasks;
``(ii) an assessment of how the ability of
the agency to accomplish the tasks referred to
in subparagraph (A) affects the ability of the
military departments and the unified and
geographic combatant commands to execute
operations and contingency plans by number;
``(iii) any readiness deficiencies and
actions recommended to address such
deficiencies; and
``(iv) key indicators and other relevant
information related to any deficiency or other
problem identified;
``(B) any recommendations that the Secretary
considers appropriate.
``(2) In this subsection, the term `combat support agency'
means any of the following Defense Agencies:
``(A) The Defense Information Systems Agency.
``(B) The Defense Intelligence Agency.
``(C) The Defense Logistics Agency.
``(D) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
(but only with respect to combat support functions that
the agencies perform for the Department of Defense).
``(E) The Defense Contract Management Agency.
``(F) The Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
``(G) The National Reconnaissance Office.
``(H) The National Security Agency (but only with
respect to combat support functions that the agencies
perform for the Department of Defense) and Central
Security Service.
``(I) Any other Defense Agency designated as a combat
support agency by the Secretary of Defense.
``(k) Major Exercise Assessments.--(1) Each report shall also
include an after-action assessment of each major exercise by
the commander of the geographic or functional combatant command
concerned or the chief of the military service concerned, as
appropriate, that includes--
``(A) a brief description of the exercise;
``(B) planned training objectives for the exercise;
``(C) a full summary of cost associated with the
exercise, including in-kind and direct contributions to
allies and partners; and
``(D) an executive summary of the lessons learned and
training objectives met by conducting the exercise.
``(2) In this subsection, the term `major exercise' means a
named major training event, an integrated or joint exercise, or
a unilateral major exercise.''.
SEC. 332. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON PRIORITIZATION OF FUNDS FOR
EQUIPMENT READINESS AND STRATEGIC CAPABILITY.
(a) Inclusion of Marine Corps in Requirements.--Section 323
of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2007 (10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (2) and
inserting the following new paragraph (2):
``(2) the Secretary of the Army to meet the
requirements of the Army, and the Secretary of the Navy
to meet the requirements of the Marine Corps, for that
fiscal year, in addition to the requirements under
paragraph (1), for the reconstitution of equipment and
materiel in prepositioned stocks in accordance with
requirements under the policy or strategy implemented
under the guidelines in section 2229 of title 10,
United States Code.''; and
(2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking subparagraph
(B) and inserting the following new subparagraph (B):
``(B) the Army and the Marine Corps for the
reconstitution of equipment and materiel in
prepositioned stocks.''.
(b) Repeal of Requirement for Annual Army Report and GAO
Review.--Such section is further amended by striking
subsections (c) through (f) and inserting the following new
subsection (c):
``(c) Contingency Operation Defined.--In this section, the
term `contingency operation' has the meaning given that term in
section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.''.
SEC. 333. REVISION TO REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION
REGARDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL ASSETS.
Section 351(a)(1) of the Bob Stump National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314; 10
U.S.C. 221 note) is amended by striking ``in excess of
$30,000,000'' and all that follows and inserting ``(as computed
in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of $32,000,000
or an estimated total cost for the future-years defense program
for which the budget is submitted (as computed in fiscal year
2000 constant dollars) in excess of $378,000,000, for all
expenditures, for all increments, regardless of the
appropriation and fund source, directly related to the assets
definition, design, development, deployment, sustainment, and
disposal.''.
SEC. 334. MODIFICATION OF ANNUAL CORROSION CONTROL AND PREVENTION
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
Section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 10
U.S.C. 2228 note) is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(5)''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(B) The report required under subparagraph (A) shall--
``(i) provide a clear linkage between the corrosion
control and prevention program of the military
department and the overarching goals and objectives of
the long-term corrosion control and prevention strategy
developed and implemented by the Secretary of Defense
under section 2228(d) of title 10, United States Code;
and
``(ii) include performance measures to ensure that
the corrosion control and prevention program is
achieving the goals and objectives described in clause
(i).''.
Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority
SEC. 341. CERTIFICATION FOR REALIGNMENT OF FORCES AT LAJES AIR FORCE
BASE, AZORES.
The Secretary of Defense shall certify to the congressional
defense committees, prior to taking any action to realign
forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, that the action is
supported by a European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment
initiated by the Secretary of Defense on January 25, 2013. The
certification shall include a specific assessment of the
efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, in support of the
United States overseas force posture.
SEC. 342. LIMITATION ON PERFORMANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FLIGHT
DEMONSTRATION TEAMS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.
If, during fiscal year 2014 or 2015, any performance by a
flight demonstration team under the jurisdiction of the
Secretary of Defense that is scheduled for a location within
the United States is cancelled by reason of budget reductions
made pursuant to an order for sequestration issued by the
President under section 251A of the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, then no such flight
demonstration team may perform at any location outside the
United States during such fiscal year.
SEC. 343. LIMITATION ON FUNDING FOR UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS
COMMAND NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION.
(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or
expended for the United States Special Operations Command
National Capital Region (USSOCOM-NCR) until 30 days after the
Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense
committees a report on the USSOCOM-NCR.
(b) Report Elements.--The report required under subsection
(a) shall include the following elements:
(1) A description of the purpose of the USSOCOM-NCR.
(2) A description of the activities to be performed
by the USSOCOM-NCR.
(3) An explanation of the impact of the USSOCOM-NCR
on existing activities at United States Special
Operations Command headquarters.
(4) A detailed, by fiscal year, breakout of the
staffing and other costs associated with the USSOCOM-
NCR over the future-years defense program.
(5) A description of the relationship between the
USSOCOM-NCR and the Office of the Assistant Secretary
of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity
Conflict.
(6) A description of the role of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-
Intensity Conflict in providing oversight of USSOCOM-
NCR activities.
(7) Any other matters the Secretary determines
appropriate.
SEC. 344. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR TRANS REGIONAL WEB
INITIATIVE.
(a) Limitation.--Except as provided in subsection (b), none
of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014
for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for
the Trans Regional Web Initiative.
(b) Exception.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), of the
amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301 for
operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, not more than
$2,000,000 may be obligated or expended for--
(1) the termination of the Trans Regional Web
Initiative as managed by Special Operations Command; or
(2) transitioning appropriate capabilities of such
Initiative to other agencies.
Subtitle F--Other Matters
SEC. 351. GIFTS MADE FOR THE BENEFIT OF MILITARY MUSICAL UNITS.
Section 974 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as
subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
``(d) Private Donations.--(1) The Secretary concerned may
accept contributions of money, personal property, or services
on the condition that such money, property, or services be used
for the benefit of a military musical unit under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary.
``(2) Any contribution of money under paragraph (1) shall be
credited to the appropriation or account providing the funds
for such military musical unit. Any amount so credited shall be
merged with amounts in the appropriation or account to which
credited, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such appropriation or account.
``(3) Not later than January 30 of each year, the Secretary
concerned shall submit to Congress a report on any
contributions of money, personal property, and services
accepted under paragraph (1) during the fiscal year preceding
the fiscal year during which the report is submitted.''.
SEC. 352. REVISED POLICY ON GROUND COMBAT AND CAMOUFLAGE UTILITY
UNIFORMS.
(a) Establishment of Policy.--It is the policy of the United
States that the Secretary of Defense shall eliminate the
development and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms in order
to adopt and field a common combat and camouflage utility
uniform or family of uniforms for specific combat environments
to be used by all members of the Armed Forces.
(b) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (c), after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of a
military department may not adopt any new camouflage pattern
design or uniform fabric for any combat or camouflage utility
uniform or family of uniforms for use by an Armed Force,
unless--
(1) the new design or fabric is a combat or
camouflage utility uniform or family of uniforms that
will be adopted by all Armed Forces;
(2) the Secretary adopts a uniform already in use by
another Armed Force; or
(3) the Secretary of Defense grants an exception
based on unique circumstances or operational
requirements.
(c) Exceptions.--Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed
as--
(1) prohibiting the development of combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms
for use by personnel assigned to or operating in
support of the unified combatant command for special
operations forces described in section 167 of title 10,
United States Code;
(2) prohibiting engineering modifications to existing
uniforms that improve the performance of combat and
camouflage utility uniforms, including power harnessing
or generating textiles, fire resistant fabrics, and
anti-vector, anti-microbial, and anti-bacterial
treatments;
(3) prohibiting the Secretary of a military
department from fielding ancillary uniform items,
including headwear, footwear, body armor, and any other
such items as determined by the Secretary;
(4) prohibiting the Secretary of a military
department from issuing vehicle crew uniforms;
(5) prohibiting cosmetic service-specific uniform
modifications to include insignia, pocket orientation,
closure devices, inserts, and undergarments; or
(6) prohibiting the continued fielding or use of pre-
existing service-specific or operation-specific combat
uniforms as long as the uniforms continue to meet
operational requirements.
(d) Registration Required.--The Secretary of a military
department shall formally register with the Joint Clothing and
Textiles Governance Board all uniforms in use by an Armed Force
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary and all such uniforms
planned for use by such an Armed Force.
(e) Limitation on Restriction.--The Secretary of a military
department may not prevent the Secretary of another military
department from authorizing the use of any combat or camouflage
utility uniform or family of uniforms.
(f) Guidance Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 60 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall issue guidance to implement this section.
(2) Content.--At a minimum, the guidance required by
paragraph (1) shall require the Secretary of each of
the military departments--
(A) in cooperation with the commanders of the
combatant commands, including the unified
combatant command for special operations
forces, to establish, by not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, joint criteria for combat and camouflage
utility uniforms and families of uniforms,
which shall be included in all new requirements
documents for such uniforms;
(B) to continually work together to assess
and develop new technologies that could be
incorporated into future combat and camouflage
utility uniforms and families of uniforms to
improve war fighter survivability;
(C) to ensure that new combat and camouflage
utility uniforms and families of uniforms meet
the geographic and operational requirements of
the commanders of the combatant commands; and
(D) to ensure that all new combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and families of
uniforms achieve interoperability with all
components of individual war fighter systems,
including body armor, organizational clothing
and individual equipment, and other individual
protective systems.
(g) Repeal of Policy.--Section 352 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84, 123
Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 771 note) is repealed.
TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS
Subtitle A--Active Forces
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels
and in annual limitation on certain end strength reductions.
Subtitle B--Reserve Forces
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the
reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status
technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active
duty for operational support.
Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 421. Military personnel.
Subtitle A--Active Forces
SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES.
The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty
personnel as of September 30, 2014, as follows:
(1) The Army, 520,000.
(2) The Navy, 323,600.
(3) The Marine Corps, 190,200.
(4) The Air Force, 327,600.
SEC. 402. REVISIONS IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH MINIMUM
LEVELS AND IN ANNUAL LIMITATION ON CERTAIN END
STRENGTH REDUCTIONS.
(a) Permanent Active Duty End Strength Minimum Levels.--
Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following
new paragraphs:
``(1) For the Army, 510,000.
``(2) For the Navy, 323,600.
``(3) For the Marine Corps, 188,000.
``(4) For the Air Force, 327,600.''.
(b) Annual Maximum Authorized Reduction in End Strengths.--
(1) Army end strengths.--Subsection (a) of section
403 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1708)
is amended by striking ``15,000 members'' and inserting
``25,000 members''.
(2) Marine corps end strengths.--Subsection (b) of
such section is amended by striking ``5,000 members''
and inserting ``7,500 members''.
Subtitle B--Reserve Forces
SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE.
(a) In General.--The Armed Forces are authorized strengths
for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of
September 30, 2014, as follows:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States,
354,200.
(2) The Army Reserve, 205,000.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 59,100.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States,
105,400.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 70,400.
(7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000.
(b) End Strength Reductions.--The end strengths prescribed by
subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve
component shall be proportionately reduced by--
(1) the total authorized strength of units organized
to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such
component which are on active duty (other than for
training) at the end of the fiscal year; and
(2) the total number of individual members not in
units organized to serve as units of the Selected
Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other
than for training or for unsatisfactory participation
in training) without their consent at the end of the
fiscal year.
(c) End Strength Increases.--Whenever units or individual
members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are
released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end
strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected
Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased
proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units
and by the total number of such individual members.
SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF THE
RESERVES.
Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the
reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of
September 30, 2014, the following number of Reserves to be
serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case
of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of
organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training
the reserve components:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States,
32,060.
(2) The Army Reserve, 16,261.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 10,159.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States,
14,734.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,911.
SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL STATUS).
The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as
of the last day of fiscal year 2014 for the reserve components
of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of
title 10, United States Code) shall be the following:
(1) For the Army National Guard of the United States,
27,210.
(2) For the Army Reserve, 8,395.
(3) For the Air National Guard of the United States,
21,875.
(4) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,429.
SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2014 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL STATUS
TECHNICIANS.
(a) Limitations.--
(1) National guard.--Within the limitation provided
in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code,
the number of non-dual status technicians employed by
the National Guard as of September 30, 2014, may not
exceed the following:
(A) For the Army National Guard of the United
States, 1,600.
(B) For the Air National Guard of the United
States, 350.
(2) Army reserve.--The number of non-dual status
technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of
September 30, 2014, may not exceed 595.
(3) Air force reserve.--The number of non-dual status
technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of
September 30, 2014, may not exceed 90.
(b) Non-dual Status Technicians Defined.--In this section,
the term ``non-dual status technician'' has the meaning given
that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code.
SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED TO BE ON
ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT.
During fiscal year 2014, the maximum number of members of the
reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at
any time on full-time operational support duty under section
115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States,
17,000.
(2) The Army Reserve, 13,000.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States,
16,000.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000.
Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations
SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use
of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the
Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for,
for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in
section 4401.
(b) Construction of Authorization.--The authorization of
appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other
authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for
such purpose for fiscal year 2014.
TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY
Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally
Sec. 501. Congressional notification requirements related to increases
in number of general and flag officers on active duty or in
joint duty assignments.
Sec. 502. Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education
upon original appointment as a commissioned officer.
Sec. 503. Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and
selective early removal of officers from reserve active-status
list.
Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management
Sec. 511. Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve
components.
Sec. 512. Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between
the active and inactive National Guard.
Sec. 513. Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve
component units and involuntary mobilizations of certain
Reserves.
Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve
component general and flag officers in an active status.
Sec. 515. Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in
American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
Subtitle C--General Service Authorities
Sec. 521. Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program
about disability-related employment and education protections.
Sec. 522. Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic
stress disorder or traumatic brain injury before
administrative separation.
Sec. 523. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-
neutral occupational standard for military career designators.
Sec. 524. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service
Implementation Plan.
Sec. 525. Provision of military service records to the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs in an electronic format.
Sec. 526. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System.
Subtitle D--Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response and Related Reforms
Sec. 531. Modification of eligibility for appointment as Judge on the
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Sec. 532. Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members
of the Armed Forces and chaplains of such members.
Sec. 533. Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance
with regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of
members of the Armed Forces and their chaplains.
Sec. 534. Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense
policy regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious
services.
Subtitle E--Member Education and Training
Sec. 541. Additional requirements for approval of educational programs
for purposes of certain educational assistance under laws
administered by the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 542. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for
military occupational specialties with skills and training
required for civilian certifications and licenses.
Sec. 543. Report on the Troops to Teachers program.
Sec. 544. Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring
automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual of
interest on direct student loans of certain members of the
Armed Forces.
Subtitle F--Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness
Matters
Sec. 551. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies
that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and
Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 552. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities.
Sec. 553. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary
and secondary education component of Department of Defense
education program.
Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of
members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations
forces.
Sec. 555. Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the Armed
Forces in child custody determinations.
Subtitle G--Decorations and Awards
Sec. 561. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be
awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 562. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding
Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air
Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal.
Sec. 563. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and
Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements.
Sec. 564. Prompt replacement of military decorations.
Sec. 565. Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to
victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock,
Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas.
Sec. 566. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former
members of the Armed Forces previously recommended for award
of the Medal of Honor.
Sec. 567. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of
valor during the Vietnam War.
Sec. 568. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross for
acts of valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars.
Sec. 569. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First
Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the
Civil War.
Subtitle H--Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports
Sec. 571. Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation
reports to include 360-degree assessment approach.
Sec. 572. Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding
members of the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B.
Sec. 573. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of
secondary schools.
Sec. 574. Comptroller General report on use of determination of
personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to
separate members from the Armed Forces.
Subtitle I--Other Matters
Sec. 581. Accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of
Defense civilian employees listed as missing and related
reports.
Sec. 582. Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing
reports of certain recovered persons who were never placed in
a missing status.
Sec. 583. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect
consolidation of North Georgia College and State University
and Gainesville State College.
Sec. 584. Review of security of military installations, including
barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family
residences.
Sec. 585. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National
Military Cemeteries.
Sec. 586. Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by
members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans.
Sec. 587. Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results.
Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally
SEC. 501. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO INCREASES
IN NUMBER OF GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS ON ACTIVE
DUTY OR IN JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENTS.
(a) Congressional Notification Required; Baselines.--Section
526 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (d) through (h) as
subsections (c) through (g), respectively; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new
subsections:
``(h) Active-duty Baseline.--
``(1) Notice and wait requirement.--If the Secretary
of a military department proposes an action that would
increase above the baseline the number of general
officers or flag officers of an armed force under the
jurisdiction of that Secretary who would be on active
duty and would count against the statutory limit
applicable to that armed force under subsection (a),
the action shall not take effect until after the end of
the 60-calendar day period beginning on the date on
which the Secretary provides notice of the proposed
action, including the rationale for the action, to the
Committees on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives and the Senate.
``(2) Baseline defined.--For purposes of paragraph
(1), the term `baseline' for an armed force means the
lower of--
``(A) the statutory limit of general officers
or flag officers of that armed force under
subsection (a); or
``(B) the actual number of general officers
or flag officers of that armed force who, as of
January 1, 2014, counted toward the statutory
limit of general officers or flag officers of
that armed force under subsection (a).
``(3) Limitation.--If, at any time, the actual number
of general officers or flag officers of an armed force
who count toward the statutory limit of general
officers or flag officers of that armed force under
subsection (a) exceeds such statutory limit, then no
increase described in paragraph (1) for that armed
force may occur until the general officer or flag
officer total for that armed force is reduced below
such statutory limit.
``(i) Joint Duty Assignment Baseline.--
``(1) Notice and wait requirement.--If the Secretary
of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, or
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposes an
action that would increase above the baseline the
number of general officers and flag officers of the
armed forces in joint duty assignments who count
against the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1),
the action shall not take effect until after the end of
the 60-calendar day period beginning on the date on
which the Secretary or Chairman, as the case may be,
provides notice of the proposed action, including the
rationale for the action, to the Committees on Armed
Services of the House of Representatives and the
Senate.
``(2) Baseline defined.--For purposes of paragraph
(1), the term `baseline' means the lower of--
``(A) the statutory limit on general officer
and flag officer positions that are joint duty
assignments under subsection (b)(1); or
``(B) the actual number of general officers
and flag officers who, as of January 1, 2014,
were in joint duty assignments counted toward
the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1).
``(3) Limitation.--If, at any time, the actual number
of general officers and flag officers in joint duty
assignments counted toward the statutory limit under
subsection (b)(1) exceeds such statutory limit, then no
increase described in paragraph (1) may occur until the
number of general officers and flag officers in joint
duty assignments is reduced below such statutory
limit.''.
(b) Reporting Requirements.--
(1) Initial report.--Not later than February 1, 2014,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and
the Senate a report specifying--
(A) the numbers of general officers and flag
officers who, as of January 1, 2014, counted
toward the service-specific limits of
subsection (a) of section 526 of title 10,
United States Code; and
(B) the number of general officers and flag
officers in joint duty assignments who, as of
January 1, 2014, counted toward the statutory
limit under subsection (b)(1) of such section.
(2) Annual reports.--Section 526 of title 10, United
States Code, is further amended by inserting after
subsection (i), as added by subsection (a)(2) of this
section, the following new subsection:
``(j) Annual Report on General Officer and Flag Officer
Numbers.--Not later than March 1, 2015, and each March 1
thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives
and the Senate a report specifying--
``(1) the numbers of general officers and flag
officers who, as of January 1 of the calendar year in
which the report is submitted, counted toward the
service-specific limits of subsection (a); and
``(2) the number of general officers and flag
officers in joint duty assignments who, as of such
January 1, counted toward the statutory limit under
subsection (b)(1).''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this is section
shall take effect on January 1, 2014.
SEC. 502. SERVICE CREDIT FOR CYBERSPACE EXPERIENCE OR ADVANCED
EDUCATION UPON ORIGINAL APPOINTMENT AS A
COMMISSIONED OFFICER.
Section 533 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsections (a)(2) and (c), by inserting ``or
(g)'' after ``subsection (b)''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(g)(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of
Defense, if the Secretary of a military department determines
that the number of commissioned officers with cyberspace-
related experience or advanced education serving on active duty
in an armed force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary is
critically below the number needed, such Secretary may credit
any person receiving an original appointment with a period of
constructive service for the following:
``(A) Special experience or training in a particular
cyberspace-related field if such experience or training
is directly related to the operational needs of the
armed force concerned.
``(B) Any period of advanced education in a
cyberspace-related field beyond the baccalaureate
degree level if such advanced education is directly
related to the operational needs of the armed force
concerned.
``(2) Constructive service credited an officer under this
subsection shall not exceed one year for each year of special
experience, training, or advanced education, and not more than
three years total constructive service may be credited.
``(3) Constructive service credited an officer under this
subsection is in addition to any service credited that officer
under subsection (a) and shall be credited at the time of the
original appointment of the officer.
``(4) The authority to award constructive service credit
under this subsection expires on December 31, 2018.''.
SEC. 503. SELECTIVE EARLY RETIREMENT AUTHORITY FOR REGULAR OFFICERS AND
SELECTIVE EARLY REMOVAL OF OFFICERS FROM RESERVE
ACTIVE-STATUS LIST.
(a) Regular Officers on the Active-duty List Considered for
Selective Early Retirement.--
(1) Lieutenant colonels and commanders.--Subparagraph
(A) of section 638a(b)(2) of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``would be subject to''
and all that follows through ``two or more times)'' and
inserting ``have failed of selection for promotion at
least one time and whose names are not on a list of
officers recommended for promotion''.
(2) Colonels and navy captains.--Subparagraph (B) of
such section is amended by striking ``would be subject
to'' and all that follows through ``not less than two
years)'' and inserting ``have served on active duty in
that grade for at least two years and whose names are
not on a list of officers recommended for promotion''.
(b) Officers Considered for Selective Early Removal From
Reserve Active-status List.--Section 14704 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Whenever'';
(B) by striking ``all officers on that list''
and inserting ``officers on the reserve active-
status list'';
(C) by striking ``the reserve active-status
list, in the number specified by the Secretary
by each grade and competitive category.'' and
inserting ``that list.''; and
(D) by adding at the end the following new
paragraphs:
``(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), the list of
officers in a reserve component whose names are submitted to a
board under paragraph (1) shall include each officer on the
reserve active-status list for that reserve component in the
same grade and competitive category whose position on the
reserve active-status list is between--
``(A) that of the most junior officer in that grade
and competitive category whose name is submitted to the
board; and
``(B) that of the most senior officer in that grade
and competitive category whose name is submitted to the
board.
``(3) A list submitted to a board under paragraph (1) may not
include an officer who--
``(A) has been approved for voluntary retirement; or
``(B) is to be involuntarily retired under any
provision of law during the fiscal year in which the
board is convened or during the following fiscal
year.'';
(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as
subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following
new subsection (b):
``(b) Specification of Number of Officers Who May Be
Recommended for Separation.--The Secretary of the military
department concerned shall specify the number of officers
described in subsection (a)(1) that a board may recommend for
separation under subsection (c).''.
Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management
SEC. 511. SUICIDE PREVENTION EFFORTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE
COMPONENTS.
(a) Improved Outreach Under Suicide Prevention and Resilience
Program.--Section 10219 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection
(g); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following
new subsection (f):
``(f) Outreach for Certain Members of the Reserve
Components.--(1) Upon the request of an adjutant general of a
State, the Secretary may share with the adjutant general the
contact information of members described in paragraph (2) who
reside in such State in order for the adjutant general to
include such members in suicide prevention efforts conducted
under this section.
``(2) Members described in this paragraph are--
``(A) members of the Individual Ready Reserve; and
``(B) members of a reserve component who are
individual mobilization augmentees.''.
(b) Inclusion in Department of Defense Community Partnerships
Pilot Program.--Section 706 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 1800; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended--
(1) in subsections (a) and (e), by striking ``and
substance use disorders and traumatic brain injury''
and inserting ``, substance use disorders, traumatic
brain injury, and suicide prevention''; and
(2) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ``and substance
use disorders and traumatic brain injury described in
paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``, substance use
disorders, traumatic brain injury, and suicide
prevention''.
SEC. 512. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS ON THE TRANSFER OF OFFICERS BETWEEN
THE ACTIVE AND INACTIVE NATIONAL GUARD.
(a) Army National Guard.--During the period ending on
December 31, 2016, under regulations prescribed by the
Secretary of the Army:
(1) An officer of the Army National Guard who fills a
vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Army
National Guard may be transferred from the active Army
National Guard to the inactive Army National Guard.
(2) An officer of the Army National Guard transferred
to the inactive Army National Guard pursuant to
paragraph (1) may be transferred from the inactive Army
National Guard to the active Army National Guard to
fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.
(b) Air National Guard.--During the period ending on December
31, 2016, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the
Air Force:
(1) An officer of the Air National Guard who fills a
vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Air
National Guard may be transferred from the active Air
National Guard to the inactive Air National Guard.
(2) An officer of the Air National Guard transferred
to the inactive Air National Guard pursuant to
paragraph (1) may be transferred from the inactive Air
National Guard to the active Air National Guard to fill
a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.
SEC. 513. LIMITATIONS ON CANCELLATIONS OF DEPLOYMENT OF CERTAIN RESERVE
COMPONENT UNITS AND INVOLUNTARY MOBILIZATIONS OF
CERTAIN RESERVES.
(a) Limitation on Cancellation of Deployment of Certain Units
Within 180 Days of Scheduled Deployment.--
(1) Limitation.--The deployment of a unit of a
reserve component of the Armed Forces described in
paragraph (2) may not be cancelled during the 180-day
period ending on the date on which the unit is
otherwise scheduled for deployment without the
approval, in writing, of the Secretary of Defense.
(2) Covered deployments.--A deployment of a unit of a
reserve component described in this paragraph is a
deployment whose cancellation as described in paragraph
(1) is due to the deployment of a unit of a regular
component of the Armed Forces to carry out the mission
for which the unit of the reserve component was
otherwise to be deployed.
(3) Notice to congress and governors on approval of
cancellation of deployment.--On approving the
cancellation of deployment of a unit under paragraph
(1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional
defense committees and the Governor concerned a notice
on the approval of cancellation of deployment of the
unit.
(b) Advance Notice to Certain Reserves on Involuntary
Mobilization.--
(1) Advance notice required.--The Secretary concerned
may not provide less than 120 days advance notice of an
involuntary mobilization to a member of the reserve
component of the Armed Forces described in paragraph
(2) without the approval, in writing, of the Secretary
of Defense.
(2) Covered reserves.--A member of a reserve
component described in this paragraph is a member as
follows:
(A) A member who is not assigned to a unit
organized to serve as a unit.
(B) A member who is to be mobilized apart
from the member's unit.
(3) Commencement of applicability.--This subsection
shall apply with respect to members who are mobilized
on or after the date that is 120 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
(4) Secretary concerned defined.--In this subsection,
the term ``Secretary concerned'' has the meaning given
that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United
States Code.
(5) Sunset.--This subsection shall cease to apply as
of the date of the completion of the withdrawal of
United States combat forces from Afghanistan.
(c) Nondelegation of Approval.--The Secretary of Defense may
not delegate the approval of cancellations of deployments of
units under subsection (a) or the approval of mobilization of
Reserves without advance notice under subsection (b).
SEC. 514. REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZATIONS FOR RESERVE
COMPONENT GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS IN AN ACTIVE
STATUS.
(a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct
a review of the general officer and flag officer requirements
for members of the reserve component in an active status.
(b) Purpose of Review.--The purpose of the review is to
ensure that the authorized strengths provided in section 12004
of title 10, United States Code, for reserve general officers
and reserve flag officers in an active status--
(1) are based on an objective requirements process
and are sufficient for the effective management,
leadership, and administration of the reserve
components;
(2) provide a qualified, sufficient pool from which
reserve component general and flag officers can
continue to be assigned on active duty in joint duty
and in-service military positions;
(3) reflect a review of the appropriateness and
number of exemptions provided by subsections (b), (c),
and (d) of section 12004 of title 10, United States
Code;
(4) reflect the efficiencies that can be achieved
through downgrading or elimination of reserve component
general or flag officer positions, including through
the conversion of certain reserve component general or
flag officer positions to senior civilian positions;
and
(5) are subjected to periodic review, control, and
adjustment.
(c) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report containing the results of the review,
including such recommendations for changes in law and policy
related to authorized reserve general and flag officers
strengths as the Secretary considers to be appropriate.
SEC. 515. FEASIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A UNIT OF THE NATIONAL GUARD IN
AMERICAN SAMOA AND IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE
NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.
(a) Determination Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
determine the feasibility of establishing--
(1) a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa;
and
(2) a unit of the National Guard in the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(b) Force Structure Elements.--In making the feasibility
determination under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense
shall consider the following:
(1) The allocation of National Guard force structure
and manpower to American Samoa and the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands in the event of the
establishment of a unit of the National Guard in
American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and the impact of this allocation on
existing National Guard units in the 50 States, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam,
and the District of Columbia.
(2) The Federal funding that would be required to
support pay, benefits, training operations, and
missions of members of a unit of the National Guard in
American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, based on the allocation derived from
paragraph (1), and the equipment, including
maintenance, required to support such force structure.
(3) The presence of existing infrastructure to
support a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa
and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
and the requirement for additional infrastructure,
including information technology infrastructure, to
support such force structure, based on the allocation
derived from paragraph (1).
(4) How a unit of the National Guard in American
Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Island would accommodate the National Guard Bureau's
``Essential Ten'' homeland defense capabilities (i.e.,
aviation, engineering, civil support teams, security,
medical, transportation, maintenance, logistics, joint
force headquarters, and communications) and reflect
regional needs.
(5) The manpower cadre, both military personnel and
full-time support, including National Guard
technicians, required to establish, maintain, and
sustain a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa
and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
and the ability of American Samoa and of the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to support
demographically a unit of the National Guard at each
location.
(6) The ability of a unit of the National Guard in
American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands to maintain unit readiness and the
logistical challenges associated with transportation,
communications, supply/resupply, and training
operations and missions.
(c) Submission of Conclusion.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall notify the congressional defense committees of the
results of the feasibility determination made under subsection
(a). If the Secretary determines that establishment of a unit
of the National Guard in American Samoa or the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands (or both) is feasible, the
Secretary shall include in the notification the following:
(1) A determination of whether the executive branch
of American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands has enacted and implemented
statutory authorization for an organized militia as a
prerequisite for establishing a unit of the National
Guard, and a description of any other steps that such
executive branches must take to request and carry out
the establishment of a National Guard unit.
(2) A list of any amendments to titles 10, 32, and
37, United States Code, that would have to be enacted
by Congress to provide for the establishment of a unit
of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(3) A description of any required Department of
Defense actions to establish a unit of the National
Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands.
(4) A suggested timeline for completion of the steps
and actions described in the preceding paragraphs.
Subtitle C--General Service Authorities
SEC. 521. PROVISION OF INFORMATION UNDER TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
ABOUT DISABILITY-RELATED EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION
PROTECTIONS.
(a) Additional Element of Program.--Section 1144(b) of title
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
``(9) Provide information about disability-related
employment and education protections.''.
(b) Deadline for Implementation.--The program carried out
under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall
comply with the requirements of subsection (b)(9) of such
section, as added by subsection (a), by not later than April 1,
2015.
SEC. 522. MEDICAL EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS REGARDING POST-TRAUMATIC
STRESS DISORDER OR TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY BEFORE
ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION.
Section 1177(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by inserting after ``honorable'' the following: ``,
including an administrative separation in lieu of court-
martial,''.
SEC. 523. ESTABLISHMENT AND USE OF CONSISTENT DEFINITION OF GENDER-
NEUTRAL OCCUPATIONAL STANDARD FOR MILITARY CAREER
DESIGNATORS.
(a) Establishment of Definitions.--Section 543 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public
Law 103-160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at the
end the following new subsection:
``(d) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Gender-neutral occupational standard.--The term
`gender-neutral occupational standard', with respect to
a military career designator, means that all members of
the Armed Forces serving in or assigned to the military
career designator must meet the same performance
outcome-based standards for the successful
accomplishment of the necessary and required specific
tasks associated with the qualifications and duties
performed while serving in or assigned to the military
career designator.
``(2) Military career designator.--The term `military
career designator' refers to--
``(A) in the case of enlisted members and
warrant officers of the Armed Forces, military
occupational specialties, specialty codes,
enlisted designators, enlisted classification
codes, additional skill identifiers, and
special qualification identifiers; and
``(B) in the case of commissioned officers
(other than commissioned warrant officers),
officer areas of concentration, occupational
specialties, specialty codes, additional skill
identifiers, and special qualification
identifiers.''.
(b) Use of Definitions.--Such section is further amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by
striking ``military occupational career field''
and inserting ``military career designator'';
and
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``common,
relevant performance standards'' and inserting
``an occupational standard'';
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ``any military
occupational specialty'' and inserting
``any military career designator''; and
(ii) by striking ``requirements for
members in that specialty and shall
ensure (in the case of an occupational
specialty'' and inserting
``requirements as part of the gender-
neutral occupational standard for
members in that career designator and
shall ensure (in the case of a career
designator''; and
(B) in paragraph (2)--
(i) by striking ``an occupational
specialty'' and inserting ``a military
career designator'';
(ii) by striking ``that occupational
specialty'' and inserting ``that
military career designator''; and
(iii) by striking ``that specialty''
and inserting ``that military career
designator''; and
(3) in subsection (c)--
(A) by striking ``the occupational standards
for a military occupational field'' and
inserting ``the gender-neutral occupational
standard for a military career designator'';
and
(B) by striking ``that occupational field''
and inserting ``that military career
designator''.
SEC. 524. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE WOMEN IN SERVICE
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretaries of the
military departments--
(1) no later than September 2015, should develop,
review, and validate individual occupational standards,
using validated gender-neutral occupational standards,
so as to assess and assign members of the Armed Forces
to units, including Special Operations Forces; and
(2) no later than January 1, 2016, should complete
all assessments.
SEC. 525. PROVISION OF MILITARY SERVICE RECORDS TO THE SECRETARY OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS IN AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT.
(a) Provision in Electronic Format.--In accordance with
subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall make the covered
records of each member of the Armed Forces available to the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format.
(b) Deadline for Provision of Records.--With respect to a
member of the Armed Forces who is discharged or released from
the Armed Forces on or after January 1, 2014, the Secretary of
Defense shall ensure that the covered records of the member are
made available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs not later
than 90 days after the date of the member's discharge or
release.
(c) Sharing of Protected Health Information.--For purposes of
the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public
Law 104-191; 42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note), making medical records
available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subsection
(a) shall be treated as a permitted disclosure.
(d) Records Currently Available to Secretary of Veterans
Affairs.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation
with the Secretary of Defense, shall ensure that the covered
records of members of the Armed Forces that are available to
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs as of the date of the
enactment of this Act are made electronically accessible and
available as soon as practicable after that date to the
Veterans Benefits Administration.
(e) Covered Records Defined.--In this section, the term
``covered records'' means, with respect to a member of the
Armed Forces--
(1) service treatment records;
(2) accompanying personal records;
(3) relevant unit records; and
(4) medical records created by reason of treatment or
services received pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10,
United States Code.
SEC. 526. REVIEW OF INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM.
(a) Review.--The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall conduct a review of--
(1) the backlog of pending cases in the Integrated
Disability Evaluation System with respect to members of
the reserve components of the Armed Forces for the
purpose of addressing the matters specified in
paragraph (1) of subsection (b); and
(2) the improvements to the Integrated Disability
Evaluation System specified in paragraph (2) of such
subsection.
(b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans' Affairs of the
House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the review
conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include the
following:
(1) With respect to the reserve components of the
Armed Forces--
(A) the number of pending cases that exist as
of the date of the report, listed by military
department, component, and, with respect to the
National Guard, State;
(B) as of the date of the report, the average
time it takes the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs to process a
case through each phase or step of the
Integrated Disability Evaluation System under
that Department's control;
(C) a description of the measures the
Secretary has taken, and will take, to resolve
the backlog of cases in the Integrated
Disability Evaluation System; and
(D) the date by which the Secretary plans to
resolve such backlog for each military
department.
(2) With respect to the regular components and
reserve components of the Armed Forces--
(A) a description of the progress being made
by both the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs to transition
the Integrated Disability Evaluation System to
an integrated and readily accessible electronic
format that a member of the Armed Forces may
access to see the status of the member during
each phase or step of the system;
(B) an estimate of the cost to complete the
transition to an integrated and readily
accessible electronic format; and
(C) an assessment of the feasibility of
improving in-transit visibility of pending
cases, including by establishing a method of
tracking a pending case when--
(i) a military treatment facility is
assigned a packet and pending case for
action regarding a member; and
(ii) a packet is at the Veterans
Tracking Application and Disability
Rating Activity Site of the Department
of Veterans Affairs.
(c) Pending Case Defined.--In this section, the term
``pending case'' means a case involving a member of the Armed
Forces who, as of the date of the review under subsection (a),
is within the Integrated Disability Evaluation System and has
been referred to a medical evaluation board.
Subtitle D--Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response and Related Reforms
SEC. 531. MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR APPOINTMENT AS JUDGE ON THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES.
(a) Modification.--Paragraph (4) of section 942(b) of title
10, United States Code (article 142(b) of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
``(4) A person may not be appointed as a judge of the court
within seven years after retirement from active duty as a
commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed
force.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a)
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and
shall apply with respect to appointments to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces that occur on or after
that date.
SEC. 532. ENHANCEMENT OF PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE OF MEMBERS
OF THE ARMED FORCES AND CHAPLAINS OF SUCH MEMBERS.
(a) In General.--Subsection (a)(1) of section 533 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) is
amended--
(1) by striking ``The Armed Forces shall accommodate
the beliefs'' and inserting ``Unless it could have an
adverse impact on military readiness, unit cohesion,
and good order and discipline, the Armed Forces shall
accommodate individual expressions of belief'';
(2) by inserting ``sincerely held'' before
``conscience''; and
(3) by striking ``use such beliefs'' and inserting
``use such expression of belief''.
(b) Regulations.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
prescribe the implementing regulations required by subsection
(c) of such section. In prescribing such regulations, the
Secretary shall consult with the official military faith-group
representatives who endorse military chaplains.
SEC. 533. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ARMED FORCES COMPLIANCE
WITH REGULATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF
CONSCIENCE OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND THEIR
CHAPLAINS.
(a) Investigation Into Compliance; Report.--Not later than 18
months after the date on which regulations are issued
implementing the protections afforded by section 533 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note), as
amended by section 532, the Inspector General of the Department
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a report--
(1) setting forth the results of an investigation by
the Inspector General during that 18-month period into
the compliance by the Armed Forces with the elements of
such regulations on adverse personnel actions,
discrimination, or denials of promotion, schooling,
training, or assignment for members of the Armed Forces
based on conscience, moral principles, or religious
beliefs; and
(2) identifying the number of times during the
investigation period that the Inspector General of the
Department of Defense or the Inspector General of a
military department was contacted regarding an incident
involving the conscience, moral principles, or
religious beliefs of a member of the Armed Forces.
(b) Consultation.--In conducting any analysis, investigation,
or survey for purposes of this section, the Inspector General
of the Department of Defense shall consult with the Armed
Forces Chaplains Board, as appropriate.
SEC. 534. SURVEY OF MILITARY CHAPLAINS VIEWS ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
POLICY REGARDING CHAPLAIN PRAYERS OUTSIDE OF
RELIGIOUS SERVICES.
(a) Survey Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct
a survey among a statistically valid sample of military
chaplains of the regular and reserve components of the Armed
Forces, to be selected at random, to assess whether--
(1) restrictions placed on prayers offered in a
public or non-religious setting have prevented military
chaplains from exercising the tenets of their faith as
prescribed by their endorsing faith group; and
(2) those restrictions have had an adverse impact on
the ability of military chaplains to fulfill their
duties to minister to members of the Armed Forces and
their dependents.
(b) Deadline for Completion.--The Secretary of Defense shall
complete the survey required by subsection (a) within one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Submission of Results.--Not later than 90 days after
completing the survey required by subsection (a), the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of
the Senate and the House of Representatives a report
containing--
(1) the survey questionnaire; and
(2) the results of the survey.
Subtitle E--Member Education and Training
SEC. 541. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE
UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY THE SECRETARY OF
DEFENSE.
(a) In General.--Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by inserting after section 2006 the following new
section:
``Sec. 2006a. Assistance for education and training: availability of
certain assistance for use only for certain
programs of education
``(a) In General.--Effective as of August, 1, 2014, an
individual eligible for assistance under a Department of
Defense educational assistance program or authority covered by
this section may, except as provided in subsection (b), only
use such assistance for educational expenses incurred for a
program as follows:
``(1) An eligible program (as defined in section 481
of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088))
that is offered by an institution of higher education
that has entered into, and is complying with, a program
participation agreement under section 487 of such Act
(20 U.S.C. 1094).
``(2) In the case of a program designed to prepare
individuals for licensure or certification in any
State, if the program meets the instructional
curriculum licensure or certification requirements of
such State.
``(3) In the case of a program designed to prepare
individuals for employment pursuant to standards
developed by a State board or agency in an occupation
that requires approval or licensure for such
employment, if the program is approved or licensed by
such State board or agency.
``(b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may, by regulation,
authorize the use of educational assistance under a Department
of Defense educational assistance program or authority covered
by this chapter for educational expenses incurred for a program
of education that is not described in subsection (a) if the
program--
``(1) is accredited and approved by a nationally or
regionally recognized accrediting agency or association
recognized by the Department of Education;
``(2) was not an eligible program described in
subsection (a) at any time during the most recent two-
year period;
``(3) is a program that the Secretary determines
would further the purposes of the educational
assistance programs or authorities covered by this
chapter, or would further the education interests of
students eligible for assistance under the such
programs or authorities; and
``(4) the institution providing the program does not
provide any commission, bonus, or other incentive
payment based directly or indirectly on success in
securing enrollments or financial aid to any persons or
entities engaged in any student recruiting or admission
activities or in making decisions regarding the award
of student financial assistance, except for the
recruitment of foreign students residing in foreign
countries who are not eligible to receive Federal
student assistance.
``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `Department of Defense educational
assistance programs and authorities covered by this
section' means the programs and authorities as follows:
``(A) The programs to assist military spouses
in achieving education and training to expand
employment and portable career opportunities
under section 1784a of this title.
``(B) The authority to pay tuition for off-
duty training or education of members of the
armed forces under section 2007 of this title.
``(C) The program of educational assistance
for members of the Selected Reserve under
chapter 1606 of this title.
``(D) The program of educational assistance
for reserve component members supporting
contingency operations and certain other
operations under chapter 1607 of this title.
``(E) Any other program or authority of the
Department of Defense for assistance in
education or training carried out under the
laws administered by the Secretary of Defense
that is designated by the Secretary, by
regulation, for purposes of this section.
``(2) The term `institution of higher education' has
the meaning given that term in section 102 of the
Higher Education Act for 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002).''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 2006 the following new item:
``2006a. Assistance for education and training: availability of certain
assistance for use only for certain programs of education.''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on August 1, 2014.
SEC. 542. ENHANCEMENT OF MECHANISMS TO CORRELATE SKILLS AND TRAINING
FOR MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES WITH SKILLS
AND TRAINING REQUIRED FOR CIVILIAN CERTIFICATIONS
AND LICENSES.
(a) Improvement of Information Available to Members of the
Armed Forces About Correlation.--
(1) In general.--The Secretaries of the military
departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary
of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the
maximum extent practicable, make information on
civilian credentialing opportunities available to
members of the Armed Forces beginning with, and at
every stage of, training of members for military
occupational specialties, in order to permit members--
(A) to evaluate the extent to which such
training correlates with the skills and
training required in connection with various
civilian certifications and licenses; and
(B) to assess the suitability of such
training for obtaining or pursuing such
civilian certifications and licenses.
(2) Coordination with transition goals plans success
program.--Information shall be made available under
paragraph (1) in a manner consistent with the
Transition Goals Plans Success (GPS) program.
(3) Types of information.--The information made
available under paragraph (1) shall include, but not be
limited to, the following:
(A) Information on the civilian occupational
equivalents of military occupational
specialties (MOS).
(B) Information on civilian license or
certification requirements, including
examination requirements.
(C) Information on the availability and
opportunities for use of educational benefits
available to members of the Armed Forces, as
appropriate, corresponding training, or
continuing education that leads to a
certification exam in order to provide a
pathway to credentialing opportunities.
(4) Use and adaptation of certain programs.--In
making information available under paragraph (1), the
Secretaries of the military departments may use and
adapt appropriate portions of the Credentialing
Opportunities On-Line (COOL) programs of the Army and
the Navy and the Credentialing and Educational Research
Tool (CERT) of the Air Force.
(b) Improvement of Access of Accredited Civilian
Credentialing and Related Entities to Military Training
Content.--
(1) In general.--The Secretaries of the military
departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary
of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the
maximum extent practicable consistent with national
security and privacy requirements, make available to
entities specified in paragraph (2), upon request of
such entities, information such as military course
training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of
military advancement attained, and professional skills
developed.
(2) Entities.--The entities specified in this
paragraph are the following:
(A) Civilian credentialing agencies.
(B) Entities approved by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, or by State approving
agencies, for purposes of the use of
educational assistance benefits under the laws
administered by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs.
(3) Central repository.--The actions taken pursuant
to paragraph (1) may include the establishment of a
central repository of information on training and
training materials provided members in connection with
military occupational specialities that is readily
accessible by entities specified in paragraph (2) in
order to meet requests described in paragraph (1).
SEC. 543. REPORT ON THE TROOPS TO TEACHERS PROGRAM.
Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report on the Troops to Teachers
program that includes each of the following:
(1) An evaluation of whether there is a need to
broaden eligibility to allow service members and
veterans without a bachelor's degree admission into the
program and whether the program can be strengthened.
(2) An evaluation of whether a pilot program should
be established to demonstrate the potential benefit of
an institutional-based award for troops to teachers, as
long as any such pilot program maximizes benefits to
service members and minimizes administrative and other
overhead costs at the participating academic
institutions.
SEC. 544. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF REQUIRING
AUTOMATIC OPERATION OF CURRENT PROHIBITION ON
ACCRUAL OF INTEREST ON DIRECT STUDENT LOANS OF
CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with
relevant Federal agencies, shall submit to the Committees on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a
report addressing--
(1) the feasibility of automatic application of the
benefits provided under section 455(o) of the Higher
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(o)) for members
of the Armed Forces eligible for the benefits; and
(2) if the Secretary determines automatic application
of such benefits is feasible, how the Department of
Defense would implement the automatic operation of the
current prohibition on the accrual of interest on
direct student loans of certain members, including the
Federal agencies with which the Department of Defense
would coordinate.
Subtitle F--Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness
Matters
SEC. 551. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL EDUCATIONAL
AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS OF THE
ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CIVILIAN
EMPLOYEES.
(a) Assistance to Schools With Significant Numbers of
Military Dependent Students.--Of the amount authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and available
for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as
specified in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000
shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance
to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section
572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006 (Public Law 109-163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b) Local Educational Agency Defined.--In this section, the
term ``local educational agency'' has the meaning given that
term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).
SEC. 552. IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES.
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year
2014 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and
maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the
funding table in section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available
for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into
law by Public Law 106-398; 114 Stat. 1654A-77; 20 U.S.C.
7703a).
SEC. 553. TREATMENT OF TUITION PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR VIRTUAL ELEMENTARY
AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COMPONENT OF DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM.
(a) Crediting of Payments.--Section 2164(l) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
``(3) Any payments received by the Secretary of Defense under
this subsection shall be credited to the account designated by
the Secretary for the operation of the virtual educational
program under this subsection. Payments so credited shall be
merged with other funds in the account and shall be available,
to the extent provided in advance in appropriation Acts, for
the same purposes and the same period as other funds in the
account.''.
(b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by
subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to tuition
payments received under section 2164(l) of title 10, United
States Code, for enrollments authorized by such section, after
the date of the enactment of this Act, in the virtual
elementary and secondary education program of the Department of
Defense education program.
SEC. 554. FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS OF
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ASSIGNED TO SPECIAL
OPERATIONS FORCES.
(a) Pilot Programs Authorized.--Consistent with such
regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe to carry
out this section, the Commander of the United States Special
Operations Command may conduct up to three pilot programs to
assess the feasibility and benefits of providing family support
activities for the immediate family members of members of the
Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces. In
selecting and conducting any pilot program under this
subsection, the Commander shall coordinate with the Under
Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.
(b) Selection of Programs.--In selecting the pilot programs
to be conducted under subsection (a), the Commander shall--
(1) identify family support activities that have a
direct and concrete impact on the readiness of special
operations forces, but that are not being provided by
the Secretary of a military department to the immediate
family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned
to special operations forces; and
(2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis of each family
support activity proposed to be included in a pilot
program.
(c) Evaluation.--The Commander shall develop outcome
measurements to evaluate the success of each family support
activity included in a pilot program under subsection (a).
(d) Additional Authority.--The Commander may expend up to
$5,000,000 during each fiscal year specified in subsection (f)
to carry out the pilot programs under subsection (a).
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``Commander'' means the Commander of the
United States Special Operations Command.
(2) The term ``immediate family members'' has the
meaning given that term in section 1789(c) of title 10,
United States Code.
(3) The term ``special operations forces'' means
those forces of the Armed Forces identified as special
operations forces under section 167(i) of such title.
(f) Duration of Pilot Program Authority.--The authority
provided by subsection (a) is available to the Commander during
fiscal years 2014 through 2016.
(g) Report Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after
completing a pilot program under subsection (a), the
Commander shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report describing the results of the pilot
program. The Commander shall prepare the report in
coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness.
(2) Elements of report.--The report shall include the
following:
(A) A description of the pilot program to
address family support requirements not being
provided by the Secretary of a military
department to immediate family members of
members of the Armed Forces assigned to special
operations forces.
(B) An assessment of the impact of the pilot
program on the readiness of members of the
Armed Forces assigned to special operations
forces.
(C) A comparison of the pilot program to
other programs conducted by the Secretaries of
the military departments to provide family
support to immediate family members of members
of the Armed Forces.
(D) Recommendations for incorporating the
lessons learned from the pilot program into
family support programs conducted by the
Secretaries of the military departments.
(E) Any other matters considered appropriate
by the Commander or the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness.
SEC. 555. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PARENTAL RIGHTS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES IN CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATIONS.
It is the sense of Congress that State courts should not
consider a military deployment, including past, present, or
future deployment, as the sole factor in determining child
custody in a State court proceeding involving a parent who is a
member of the Armed Forces. The best interest of the child
should always prevail in custody cases, but members of the
Armed Forces should not lose custody of their children based
solely upon service in the Armed Forces in defense of the
United States.
Subtitle G--Decorations and Awards
SEC. 561. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF MEDALS OF HONOR THAT MAY BE
AWARDED TO THE SAME MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) Army.--Section 3744(a) of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by striking ``medal of honor, distinguished-service
cross,'' and inserting ``distinguished-service cross''.
(b) Navy and Marine Corps.--Section 6247 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by striking ``medal of honor,''.
(c) Air Force.--Section 8744(a) of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``medal of honor, Air Force
cross,'' and inserting ``Air Force Cross''.
SEC. 562. STANDARDIZATION OF TIME-LIMITS FOR RECOMMENDING AND AWARDING
MEDAL OF HONOR, DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE CROSS, NAVY
CROSS, AIR FORCE CROSS, AND DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE
MEDAL.
(a) Army.--Section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in subsection (b)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``three
years'' and inserting ``five years''; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``two
years'' and inserting ``three years''; and
(2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ``two years''
and inserting ``three years''.
(b) Air Force.--Section 8744 of such title is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``three
years'' and inserting ``five years''; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``two
years'' and inserting ``three years''; and
(2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ``two years''
and inserting ``three years''.
SEC. 563. RECODIFICATION AND REVISION OF ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, AND
COAST GUARD MEDAL OF HONOR ROLL REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Automatic Enrollment and Furnishing of Certificate.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 57 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1134
the following new section:
``Sec. 1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard
Medal of Honor Roll
``(a) Establishment.--There shall be in the Department of the
Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Air
Force, and the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating
a roll designated as the `Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast
Guard Medal of Honor Roll'.
``(b) Enrollment.--The Secretary concerned shall enter and
record on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of
Honor Roll the name of each person who has served on active
duty in the armed forces and who has been awarded a medal of
honor pursuant to section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of this title or
section 491 of title 14.
``(c) Issuance of Enrollment Certificate.--Each living person
whose name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast
Guard Medal of Honor Roll shall be issued a certificate of
enrollment on the roll.
``(d) Entitlement to Special Pension; Notice to Secretary of
Veterans Affairs.--The Secretary concerned shall deliver to the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs a certified copy of each
certificate of enrollment issued under subsection (c). The copy
of the certificate shall authorize the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs to pay the special pension provided by section 1562 of
title 38 to the person named in the certificate.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 1134 the following new
item:
``1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of
Honor Roll.''.
(b) Special Pension.--
(1) Automatic entitlement.--Subsection (a) of section
1562 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
(A) by striking ``each person'' and inserting
``each living person'';
(B) by striking ``Honor roll'' and inserting
``Honor Roll'';
(C) by striking ``subsection (c) of section
1561 of this title'' and inserting ``subsection
(d) of section 1134a of title 10''; and
(D) by striking ``date of application
therefor under section 1560 of this title'' and
inserting ``date on which the person's name is
entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast
Guard Medal of Honor Roll under subsection (b)
of such section''.
(2) Election to decline special pension.--Such
section is further amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:
``(g)(1) A person who is entitled to special pension under
subsection (a) may elect not to receive special pension by
notifying the Secretary of such election in writing.
``(2) Upon receipt of an election made by a person under
paragraph (1) not to receive special pension, the Secretary
shall cease payments of special pension to the person.''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Repeal of recodified provisions.--Sections 1560
and 1561 of title 38, United States Code, are repealed.
(2) Clerical amendments.--The table of sections at
the beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by
striking the items relating to sections 1560 and 1561.
(d) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this
section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded on
or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 564. PROMPT REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS.
Section 1135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection
(c); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following
new subsection (b):
``(b) Prompt Replacement Required.--When a request for the
replacement of a military decoration is received under this
section or section 3747, 3751, 6253, 8747, or 8751 of this
title, the Secretary concerned shall ensure that--
``(1) all actions to be taken with respect to the
request, including verification of the service record
of the recipient of the military decoration, are
completed within one year; and
``(2) the replacement military decoration is mailed
to the person requesting the replacement military
decoration within 90 days after verification of the
service record.''.
SEC. 565. REVIEW OF ELIGIBILITY FOR, AND AWARD OF, PURPLE HEART TO
VICTIMS OF THE ATTACKS AT RECRUITING STATION IN
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AND AT FORT HOOD, TEXAS.
(a) Review Regarding Specified Attacks.--
(1) Review and award required.--The Secretary of the
military department concerned shall--
(A) review the circumstances of the attacks
that occurred at the recruiting station in
Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, and at
Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, in which
members of the Armed Forces were killed and
wounded; and
(B) award the Purple Heart to each member
determined pursuant to such review to be
eligible for the award of the Purple Heart in
connection with the death or wounding of the
member in the attacks.
(2) Consideration of certain evidence.--In reviewing
all the evidence related to the incidents described in
paragraph (1) and the criteria established under
Executive Order 11016 (Authorizing the Award of the
Purple Heart), the Secretary of the military department
concerned shall specifically, but not exclusively,
assess whether the members of the Armed Forces killed
or wounded at Fort Hood and Little Rock qualify for
award of the Purple Heart under the criteria as members
of the Armed Forces who were killed or wounded as a
result of an act of an enemy of the United States.
(3) Submission.--The results of the review shall be
provided to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives within 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(4) Exception.--A Purple Heart may not be awarded
pursuant to paragraph (1)(B) to a member of the Armed
Forces whose death or wound in an attack described in
paragraph (1)(A) was the result of the willful
misconduct of the member.
(b) Review of the Criteria for Awarding Purple Heart.--
(1) Review required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
conduct a review of the criteria used to determine the
eligibility of members of the Armed Forces for the
award of the Purple Heart. The review shall include the
policies and procedures for determining eligibility for
the award of the Purple Heart to members who sustain
injuries through acts of violence. The purpose of the
review is to determine whether those criteria remain
relevant for the broad range of circumstances in and
outside the United States in which members are killed
or wounded.
(2) Submission of results.--Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report containing the results of the
review. The report shall include the findings of the
review and any recommendations the Secretary considers
appropriate regarding modifying the criteria for
eligibility for the Purple Heart.
SEC. 566. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO FORMER
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED
FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR.
Section 552(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107-107; 10 U.S.C. 3741 note) is
amended--
(1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``Honor.--''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) In addition to the authority provided by paragraph (1),
a Medal of Honor may be awarded to a veteran of the Armed
Forces who, although not a Jewish-American war veteran or
Hispanic-American war veteran described in subsection (b), was
identified during the review of service records conducted under
subsection (a) and regarding whom the Secretary of Defense
submitted, before January 1, 2014, a recommendation to the
President that the President award the Medal of Honor to that
veteran.''.
SEC. 567. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR FOR ACTS OF
VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR.
(a) Sergeant First Class Bennie G. Adkins.--
(1) Waiver of time limitations.--Notwithstanding the
time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10,
United States Code, or any other time limitation with
respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons
who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award
the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to
Bennie G. Adkins of the United States Army for the acts
of valor during the Vietnam War described in paragraph
(2).
(2) Acts of valor described.--The acts of valor
referred to in paragraph (1) are the actions of then
Sergeant First Class Bennie G. Adkins of the United
States Army serving with Special Forces Detachment A-
102 from March 9 to 12, 1966, during the Vietnam War
for which he was originally awarded the Distinguished-
Service Cross.
(b) Specialist Four Donald P. Sloat.--
(1) Waiver of time limitations.--Notwithstanding the
time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10,
United States Code, or any other time limitation with
respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons
who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award
the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to
Donald P. Sloat of the United States Army for the acts
of valor during the Vietnam War described in paragraph
(2).
(2) Acts of valor described.--The acts of valor
referred to in paragraph (1) are the actions of then
Specialist Four Donald P. Sloat of the United States
Army serving with 3rd Platoon, Delta Company, 2nd
Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th Light Infantry Brigade,
Americal Division on January 17, 1970, during the
Vietnam War.
SEC. 568. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE CROSS
FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE KOREAN AND VIETNAM
WARS.
(a) Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser.--
(1) Waiver of time limitations.--Notwithstanding the
time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10,
United States Code, or any other time limitation with
respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons
who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the
Army may award the Distinguished-Service Cross under
section 3742 of such title to Sergeant First Class
Robert F. Keiser for the acts of valor described in
paragraph (2) during the Korean War.
(2) Acts of valor described.--The acts of valor
referred to in paragraph (1) are the actions of Robert
F. Keiser's on November 30, 1950, as a member of the 2d
Military Police Company, 2d Infantry Division, United
States Army, during the Division's successful
withdrawal from the Kunuri-Sunchon Pass.
(b) Sergeant First Class Patrick N. Watkins, Jr..--
(1) Waiver of time limitations.--Notwithstanding the
time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10,
United States Code, or any other time limitation with
respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons
who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the
Army may award the Distinguished Service Cross under
section 3742 of that title to Patrick N. Watkins, Jr.,
for the acts of valor described in paragraph (2).
(2) Acts of valor described.--The acts of valor
referred to in paragraph (1) are the actions of
Sergeant First Class Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., from
August 22 to August 23, 1968, as a member of the United
States Army serving in the grade of Sergeant First
Class in the Republic of Vietnam while serving with
Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 5th Special
Forces Group (Airborne), 1st Special Forces Regiment.
(c) Specialist Four Robert L. Towles.--
(1) Waiver of time limitations.--Notwithstanding the
time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10,
United States Code, or any other time limitation with
respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons
who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the
Army may award the Distinguished Service Cross under
section 3742 of that title to Robert L. Towles for the
acts of valor described in paragraph (2).
(2) Acts of valor described.--The acts of valor
referred to in paragraph (1) are the actions of
Specialist Four Robert L. Towles, on November 17, 1965,
as a member of the United States Army serving in the
grade of Specialist Four during the Vietnam War while
serving in Company D, 2d Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st
Cavalry Division, for which he was originally awarded
the Bronze Star with ``V'' Device.
SEC. 569. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO FIRST
LIEUTENANT ALONZO H. CUSHING FOR ACTS OF VALOR
DURING THE CIVIL WAR.
(a) Authorization.--Notwithstanding the time limitations
specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or
any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of
certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the
President may award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of
such title to then First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for
conspicuous acts of gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of
life and beyond the call of duty in the Civil War, as described
in subsection (b).
(b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to
in subsection (a) are the actions of then First Lieutenant
Alonzo H. Cushing while in command of Battery A, 4th United
States Artillery, Army of the Potomac, at Gettysburg,
Pennsylvania, on July 3, 1863, during the Civil War.
Subtitle H--Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports
SEC. 571. REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF EXPANDING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
REPORTS TO INCLUDE 360-DEGREE ASSESSMENT APPROACH.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report containing the results of an
assessment of the feasibility of including a 360-degree
assessment approach, modeled after the current Department of
the Army Multi-Source Assessment and Feedback (MSAF) Program,
as part of performance evaluation reports.
SEC. 572. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL POLICIES REGARDING
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WITH HIV OR HEPATITIS
B.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on Department of Defense personnel
policies regarding members of the Armed Forces infected with
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or Hepatitis B. The report
shall include the following:
(1) A description of policies addressing the
enlistment or commissioning of individuals with these
conditions and retention policies, deployment policies,
discharge policies, and disciplinary policies regarding
individuals with these conditions.
(2) An assessment of these policies, including an
assessment of whether the policies reflect an evidence-
based, medically accurate understanding of how these
conditions are contracted, how these conditions can be
transmitted to other individuals, and the risk of
transmission.
SEC. 573. POLICY ON MILITARY RECRUITMENT AND ENLISTMENT OF GRADUATES OF
SECONDARY SCHOOLS.
(a) Conditions on Use of Test, Assessment, or Screening
Tools.--In the case of any test, assessment, or screening tool
utilized under the policy on recruitment and enlistment
required by subsection (b) of section 532 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81; 125 Stat. 1403; 10 U.S.C. 503 note) for the purpose of
identifying persons for recruitment and enlistment in the Armed
Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) implement a means for ensuring that graduates of
a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in
subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, are
required to meet the same standard on the test,
assessment, or screening tool; and
(2) use uniform testing requirements and grading
standards.
(b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in section 532(b) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 or this
section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of Defense
or the Secretary of a military department to create or use a
different grading standard on any test, assessment, or
screening tool utilized for the purpose of identifying
graduates of a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38)
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection
(a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012, for recruitment and enlistment in the
Armed Forces.
SEC. 574. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON USE OF DETERMINATION OF
PERSONALITY DISORDER OR ADJUSTMENT DISORDER AS
BASIS TO SEPARATE MEMBERS FROM THE ARMED FORCES.
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report evaluating--
(1) the use by the Secretaries of the military
departments, since January 1, 2007, of the authority to
separate members of the Armed Forces from the Armed
Forces due of unfitness for duty because of a mental
condition not amounting to disability, including
separation on the basis of a personality disorder or
adjustment disorder and the total number of members
separated on such basis;
(2) the extent to which the Secretaries failed to
comply with regulatory requirements in separating
members of the Armed Forces on the basis of a
personality or adjustment disorder; and
(3) the impact of such a separation on the ability of
veterans so separated to access service-connected
disability compensation, disability severance pay, and
disability retirement pay.
Subtitle I--Other Matters
SEC. 581. ACCOUNTING FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES LISTED AS MISSING AND
RELATED REPORTS.
(a) System for Accounting for Missing Persons.--Section
1501(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the
end;
(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at
the end and inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(D) the dissemination of appropriate information on
the status of missing persons to authorized family
members.''.
(b) Report on Accounting for POW/MIAS.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of
Congress a report on accounting for missing persons
from covered conflicts.
(2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph (1)
shall include the following:
(A) The total number of missing persons in
all covered conflicts and in each covered
conflict.
(B) The total number of missing persons in
all covered conflicts, and in each covered
conflict, that are considered unrecoverable,
including--
(i) the total number in each conflict
that are considered unrecoverable by
being lost at sea or in inaccessible
terrain;
(ii) the total number from the Korean
War that are considered to be located
in each of China, North Korea, and
Russia.
(C) The total number of missing persons in
all covered conflicts, and in each covered
conflict, that were interred without
identification, including the locations of
interment.
(D) The number of remains in the custody of
the Department of Defense that are awaiting
identification, and the number of such remains
estimated by the Department to be likely to be
identified using current technology.
(E) The total number of identifications of
remains that have been made since January 1,
1970, for all covered conflicts and for each
covered conflict.
(F) The number of instances where next of kin
have refused to provide a DNA sample for the
identification of recovered remains, for each
covered conflict.
(3) Definitions.--In this subsection:
(A) The term ``appropriate committees of
Congress'' means--
(i) the Committee on Armed Services
and the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs of the Senate;
and
(ii) the Committee on Armed Services
and the Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform of the House of
Representatives.
(B) The term ``covered conflicts'' means the
conflicts specified in or designated under
section 1509(a) of title 10, United States
Code, as of the date of the report required by
paragraph (1).
(C) The term ``missing persons'' has the
meaning given that term in section 1513(1) of
such title.
(c) Report on POW/MIA Accounting Community.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress
a report on the POW/MIA accounting community.
(2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph (1))
shall including the following:
(A) A description and assessment of the
current structure of the POW/MIA accounting
community.
(B) A description of how the Secretary of
Defense will ensure increased oversight of the
POW/MIA accounting mission regardless of
changes to the POW/MIA accounting community.
(C) An assessment of the feasibility and
advisability of reorganizing the community into
a single, central command, including--
(i) an identification of the elements
that could be organized into such
command; and
(ii) an assessment of cost-savings,
advantages, and disadvantages of--
(I) transferring the command
and control of the Joint POW/
MIA Accounting Command (JPAC)
and the Central Identification
Laboratory (CIL) from the
United States Pacific Command
to the Office of the Secretary
of Defense;
(II) merging the Joint POW/
MIA Accounting Command and the
Central Identification
Laboratory with the Defense
Prisoner of War/Missing
Personnel Office (DPMO); and
(III) merging the Central
Identification Laboratory with
the Armed Forces DNA
Identification Lab (AF-DIL).
(D) A recommendation on the element of the
Department of Defense to be responsible for
directing POW/MIA accounting activities, and on
whether all elements of the POW/MIA accounting
community should report to that element.
(E) An estimate of the costs to be incurred,
and the cost savings to be achieved--
(i) by relocating central POW/MIA
accounting activities to the
continental United States;
(ii) by closing or consolidating
existing Joint POW/MIA Accounting
Command facilities; and
(iii) through any actions with
respect to the POW/MIA accounting
community and POW/MIA accounting
activities that the Secretary considers
advisable for purposes of the report.
(F) An assessment of the feasibility and
advisability of the use by the Department of
university anthropology or archaeology programs
to conduct field work, particularly in
politically sensitive environments, including
an assessment of--
(i) the potential cost of the use of
such programs;
(ii) whether the use of such programs
would result in a greater number of
identifications; and
(iii) whether the use of such
programs would be consistent with
requirements to preserve the integrity
of the identification process.
(G) A survey of the manner in which other
countries conduct accounting for missing
persons, and an assessment whether such
practices can be used by the United States to
enhance programs to recover and identify
missing members of the United States Armed
Forces.
(H) A recommendation as to the advisability
of continuing to use a military model for
recovery operations, including the impact of
the use of such model on diplomatic relations
with countries in which the United States seeks
to conduct recovery operations.
(I) Such recommendations for the
reorganization of the POW/MIA accounting
community as the Secretary considers
appropriate in light of the other elements of
the report, including an estimate of the
additional numbers of recoveries and
identifications anticipated to be made by the
accounting community as a result of
implementation of the reorganization.
(3) Basis in previous recommendations.--The report
required by paragraph (1) shall take into account
recommendations previously made by the Director of Cost
Assessment and Program Evaluation, the Inspector
General of the Department of Defense, and the
Comptroller General of the United States regarding the
organization of the POW/MIA accounting community.
(4) Definitions.--In this subsection:
(A) The term ``appropriate committees of
Congress'' means--
(i) the Committee on Armed Services
and the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs of the Senate;
and
(ii) the Committee on Armed Services
and the Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform of the House of
Representatives.
(B) The term ``POW/MIA accounting community''
has the meaning given that term in section
1509(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code.
SEC. 582. EXPANSION OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION AUTHORITIES TO DEBRIEFING
REPORTS OF CERTAIN RECOVERED PERSONS WHO WERE NEVER
PLACED IN A MISSING STATUS.
(a) Expansion of Covered Reports.--Section 1506 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (d)--
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3)
as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the
following new paragraph (2):
``(2) The Secretary concerned shall withhold from personnel
files under this section, as privileged information, any
survival, evasion, resistance, and escape debriefing report
provided by a person described in section 1501(c) of this title
who is returned to United States control which is obtained
under a promise of confidentiality made for the purpose of
ensuring the fullest possible disclosure of information.''; and
(2) in subsection (f), by striking ``paragraphs (2)
and (3)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (3) and (4)''.
(b) Definition Applicable to Covered Reports.--Section 1513
of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
``(9) The term `survival, evasion, resistance, and
escape debriefing' means an interview conducted with a
person described in section 1501(c) of this title who
is returned to United States control in order to record
the person's experiences while surviving, evading,
resisting interrogation or exploitation, or
escaping.''.
SEC. 583. REVISION OF SPECIFIED SENIOR MILITARY COLLEGES TO REFLECT
CONSOLIDATION OF NORTH GEORGIA COLLEGE AND STATE
UNIVERSITY AND GAINESVILLE STATE COLLEGE.
Paragraph (6) of section 2111a(f) of title 10, United States
Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(6) The University of North Georgia.''.
SEC. 584. REVIEW OF SECURITY OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, INCLUDING
BARRACKS, TEMPORARY LODGING FACILITIES, AND MULTI-
FAMILY RESIDENCES.
(a) Review of Security Measures.--The Secretary of Defense
shall conduct a review of security measures on United States
military installations, specifically with regard to access to
barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family
residences on military installations, for the purpose of
ensuring the safety of members of the Armed Forces and their
dependents who reside on military installations.
(b) Elements of Study.--In conducting the review under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
(1) identify security gaps on military installations;
and
(2) evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of
using 24-hour electronic monitoring or other security
measures to protect members and their dependents.
(c) Submission of Results.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit
to Congress a report containing the results of the study
conducted under subsection (a), including proposed security
measures and an estimate of the costs--
(1) to eliminate all security gaps identified under
subsection (b)(1); and
(2) to provide 24-hour security monitoring or other
security measures as evaluated under subsection (b)(2).
SEC. 585. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONCESSIONS CONTRACTS AT ARMY
NATIONAL MILITARY CEMETERIES.
(a) In General.--Chapter 446 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 4727. Cemetery concessions contracts
``(a) Contracts Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may
enter into a contract with an appropriate entity for the
provision of transportation, interpretative, or other necessary
or appropriate concession services to visitors at the Army
National Military Cemeteries.
``(b) Special Requirements.--(1) The Secretary of the Army
shall establish and include in each concession contract such
requirements as the Secretary determines are necessary to
ensure the protection, dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery
at which services are provided under the contract.
``(2) A concession contract shall not include operation of
the gift shop at Arlington National Cemetery without the
specific prior authorization by an Act of Congress.
``(c) Franchise Fees.--A concession contract shall provide
for payment to the United States of a franchise fee or such
other monetary consideration as determined by the Secretary of
the Army. The Secretary shall ensure that the objective of
generating revenue for the United States is subordinate to the
objectives of honoring the service and sacrifices of the
deceased members of the armed forces and of providing necessary
and appropriate services for visitors to the Cemeteries at
reasonable rates.
``(d) Special Account.--All franchise fees (and other
monetary consideration) collected by the United States under
subsection (c) shall be deposited into a special account
established in the Treasury of the United States. The funds
deposited in such account shall be available for expenditure by
the Secretary of the Army, to the extent authorized and in such
amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, to
support activities at the Cemeteries. The funds deposited into
the account shall remain available until expended.
``(e) Concession Contract Defined.--In this section, the term
`concession contract' means a contract authorized and entered
into under this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:
``4727. Cemetery concessions contracts.''.
SEC. 586. MILITARY SALUTE DURING RECITATION OF PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BY
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES NOT IN UNIFORM AND BY
VETERANS.
Section 4 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``Members of the
Armed Forces not in uniform and veterans may render the
military salute in the manner provided for persons in
uniform.''.
SEC. 587. IMPROVED CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS AND DISSEMINATION OF RESULTS.
(a) Improved Dissemination of Results in Chain of Command.--
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the results of
command climate assessments are provided to the relevant
individual commander and to the next higher level of command.
(b) Evidence of Compliance.--The Secretary of each military
department shall require in the performance evaluations and
assessments used by each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of
the Secretary a statement by the commander regarding whether
the commander has conducted the required command climate
assessments.
(c) Effect of Failure to Conduct Assessment.--The failure of
a commander to conduct the required command climate assessments
shall be noted in the commander's performance evaluation.
TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS
Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances
Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates
of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances.
Sec. 602. Recognition of additional means by which members of the
National Guard called into Federal service for a period of 30
days or less may initially report for duty for entitlement to
basic pay.
Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for health care professionals.
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for
nuclear officers.
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37
consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus
authorities.
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other
title 37 bonuses and special pays.
Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for
members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language
proficiency.
Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen
enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.
Sec. 618. Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned
officers in the reserve components.
Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation Allowances
Sec. 621. Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of
Defense travel and transportation authorities in connection
with reform of such authorities.
Subtitle D--Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits
Sec. 631. Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the
case of members whose retired pay is computed using high-
three.
Sec. 632. Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early
retirement credit earned for significant periods of active
Federal status or active duty.
Sec. 633. Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other
dependents.
Subtitle E--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits
and Operations
Sec. 641. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities from reprisals.
Sec. 642. Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service laws.
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Sec. 651. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition
of human remains that were retained by the Department of
Defense for forensic pathology investigation.
Sec. 652. Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional
compensation and other transitional benefits to dependents of
members separated for violation of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice.
Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances
SEC. 601. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY INCREASE IN RATES
OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING UNDER CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES.
Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014''.
SEC. 602. RECOGNITION OF ADDITIONAL MEANS BY WHICH MEMBERS OF THE
NATIONAL GUARD CALLED INTO FEDERAL SERVICE FOR A
PERIOD OF 30 DAYS OR LESS MAY INITIALLY REPORT FOR
DUTY FOR ENTITLEMENT TO BASIC PAY.
Subsection (c) of section 204 of title 37, United States
Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(c)(1) A member of the National Guard who is called into
Federal service for a period of 30 days or less is entitled to
basic pay from the date on which the member, in person or by
authorized telephonic or electronic means, contacts the
member's unit.
``(2) Paragraph (1) does not authorize any expenditure to be
paid for a period before the date on which the unit receives
the member's contact provided under such paragraph.
``(3) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to the Army
National Guard, and the Secretary of the Air Force, with
respect to the Air National Guard, shall prescribe such
regulations as may be necessary to carry out this
subsection.''.
Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays
SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY
AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve
reenlistment bonus.
(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve
affiliation or enlistment bonus.
(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for
enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority
units.
(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve
enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve
enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with
prior service.
(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve
enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with
prior service.
(7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of
travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of
normal commuting distance.
(8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement
payments for reserve component members experiencing
extended and frequent mobilization for active duty
service.
SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY
AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS.
(a) Title 10 Authorities.--The following sections of title
10, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December 31,
2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer
candidate accession program.
(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of
education loans for certain health professionals who
serve in the Selected Reserve.
(b) Title 37 Authorities.--The following sections of title
37, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December 31,
2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and
retention bonuses for psychologists.
(2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus
for registered nurses.
(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special
pay for nurse anesthetists.
(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for
Selected Reserve health professionals in critically
short wartime specialties.
(5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus
for dental officers.
(6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for
pharmacy officers.
(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for
medical officers in critically short wartime
specialties.
(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for
dental specialist officers in critically short wartime
specialties.
SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS AUTHORITIES FOR
NUCLEAR OFFICERS.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for
nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active
service.
(2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career
accession bonus.
(3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career
annual incentive bonus.
SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE 37
CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND BONUS
AUTHORITIES.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus
authority for enlisted members.
(2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus
authority for officers.
(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and
incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers.
(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation
incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers.
(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and
incentive pay authorities for officers in health
professions.
(6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
(7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or
special duty pay.
(8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay
or proficiency bonus.
(9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives
for members qualified in critical military skills or
assigned to high priority units.
SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PAYMENT OF
OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL PAYS.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting
``December 31, 2014'':
(1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer
retention bonus.
(2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive
pay.
(3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus
for active members.
(4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
(5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for
new officers in critical skills.
(6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for
conversion to military occupational specialty to ease
personnel shortage.
(7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for
transfer between armed forces.
(8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for
officer candidates.
SEC. 616. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE INCENTIVE PAY FOR
MEMBERS OF PRECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMS PURSUING
FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY.
Section 316a(g) of title 37, United States Code is amended by
striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31,
2014''.
SEC. 617. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE BONUS TO CERTAIN CADETS AND MIDSHIPMEN
ENROLLED IN THE SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS' TRAINING
CORPS.
(a) Bonus Authorized.--Chapter 5 of title 37, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 335 the following
new section:
``Sec. 336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the
Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps
``(a) Contracting Bonus Authorized.--The Secretary concerned
may pay a bonus under this section to a cadet or midshipman
enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps who
executes a written agreement described in subsection (c).
``(b) Amount of Bonus.--The amount of a bonus under
subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000.
``(c) Agreement.--A written agreement referred to in
subsection (a) is a written agreement by the cadet or
midshipman--
``(1) to complete field training or a practice cruise
under section 2104(b)(6)(A)(ii) of title 10;
``(2) to complete advanced training under chapter 103
of title 10;
``(3) to accept a commission or appointment as an
officer of the armed forces; and
``(4) to serve on active duty.
``(d) Payment Method.--Upon acceptance of a written agreement
under subsection (a) by the Secretary concerned, the total
amount of the bonus payable under the agreement becomes fixed.
The agreement shall specify when the bonus will be paid and
whether the bonus will be paid in a lump sum or in
installments.
``(e) Repayment.--A person who, having received all or part
of a bonus under subsection (a), fails to fulfill the terms of
the written agreement required by such subsection for receipt
of the bonus shall be subject to the repayment provisions of
section 373 of this title.
``(f) Regulations.--The Secretary concerned shall issue such
regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section.
``(g) Termination of Authority.--No agreement under this
section may be entered into after December 31, 2014.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 335 the following new item:
``336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the
Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.''.
SEC. 618. HEALTH PROFESSIONS STIPEND PROGRAM TO OBTAIN COMMISSIONED
OFFICERS IN THE RESERVE COMPONENTS.
(a) Availability of Stipend for Registered Nurses in Critical
Specialties.--Subsection (d) of section 16201 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (B)
and inserting the following new subparagraph:
``(B) is eligible for appointment as a Reserve
officer for service in a reserve component in a Nurse
Corps or as a nurse; and''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (B)
and inserting the following new subparagraph:
``(B) the participant shall not be eligible to
receive such stipend before being appointed as a
Reserve officer for service in the Ready Reserve in a
Nurse Corps or as a nurse;''.
(b) Service Required in Selected Reserve.--Such section is
further amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the Ready
Reserve'' and inserting ``the Selected Reserve of the
Ready Reserve'';
(2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking subparagraph
(D) and inserting the following new subparagraph:
``(D) the participant shall agree to serve, upon
successful completion of the program, one year in the
Selected Reserve for each six months, or part thereof,
for which the stipend is provided.'';
(3) in subsection (d)(2), by striking subparagraph
(D) and inserting the following new subparagraph:
``(D) the participant shall agree to serve, upon
successful completion of the program, one year in the
Selected Reserve for each six months, or part thereof,
for which the stipend is provided.''; and
(4) in subsection (e)(2)(D), by striking ``the Ready
Reserve'' and inserting ``the Selected Reserve''.
(c) Amount of Stipend.--Subsection (g) of such section is
amended to read as follows:
``(g) Amount of Stipend.--The amount of a stipend under an
agreement under subsection (b), (c), (d), or (f) shall be the
stipend rate in effect for participants in the Armed Forces
Health Professions Scholarship Program under section 2121(d) of
this title.''.
Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation Allowances
SEC. 621. TECHNICAL AND STANDARDIZING AMENDMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES IN
CONNECTION WITH REFORM OF SUCH AUTHORITIES.
(a) Escorts of Dependents of Members.--
(1) Incorporation of escorts of dependents under
general authority.--Section 451(a)(2)(C) of title 37,
United States Code, is amended by inserting before the
period the following: ``or as an escort or attendant
for dependents of a member for necessary travel
performed not later than one year after the member is
unable to accompany the dependents who are incapable of
traveling alone''.
(2) Repeal of superseded authority.--(A) Section 1036
of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter
53 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 1036.
(b) Travel and Transportation of Dependent Patients.--Section
1040 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``round-trip
transportation'' and all that follows through ``may be
paid at the expense of the United States'' and
inserting ``travel and transportation allowances may be
furnished to necessary attendants. The dependents and
any attendants shall be furnished such travel and
transportation allowances as specified in regulations
prescribed under section 464 of title 37.''; and
(2) by striking subsection (d).
(c) Travel in Connection With Leave Cancelled Due to
Contingency Operations.--
(1) Incorporation of expenses under general
authority.--Section 453 of title 37, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(g) Reimbursement for Travel in Connection With Leave
Cancelled Due to Contingency Operations.--A member may be
reimbursed as specified in regulations prescribed under section
464 of this title for travel and related expenses incurred by
the member as a result of the cancellation of previously
approved leave when the leave is cancelled in conjunction with
the member's participation in a contingency operation and the
cancellation occurs within 48 hours of the time the leave would
have commenced. The settlement for reimbursement under this
subsection is final and conclusive.''.
(2) Repeal of superseded authority.--(A) Section
1053a of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter
53 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 1053a.
(d) Travel and Transportation for Travel for Specialty Health
Care.--Section 1074i of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``reimbursement
for reasonable travel expenses'' and inserting ``travel
and transportation allowances as specified in
regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37'';
and
(2) in subsection (b), striking ``Reimbursement for
Travel Under Exceptional Circumstances.--The Secretary
of Defense may provide reimbursement for reasonable
travel expenses of'' and inserting ``Allowable Travel
and Transportation Under Exceptional Circumstances.--
The Secretary of Defense may provide travel and
transportation allowances as specified in the
regulations referred to in subsection (a) for''.
(e) Travel and Transportation in Connection With the
Disposition of Remains of Members.--Section 1482(a)(8) of title
10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``and roundtrip
transportation and prescribed allowances'' and inserting ``and
travel and transportation allowances as specified in
regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37''.
(f) Travel and Transportation in Connection With Funeral
Honors Functions at Funerals for Veterans.--Section 1491(d)(1)
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking
``transportation (or reimbursement for transportation) and
expenses'' and inserting ``travel and transportation allowances
as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of
title 37''.
(g) Repeal of Redundant Authority on Motor Vehicle
Transportation or Storage for Members Undergoing PCS or
Extended Deployment.--
(1) Repeal.--Section 2634 of title 10, United States
Code, is repealed.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by
striking the item relating to section 2634.
(h) Clarification of Limitation on Transportation of
Household Goods.--Section 453(c)(3) of title 37, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``(including packing, crating, and
household goods in temporary storage)'' and inserting
``(including household goods in temporary storage, but
excluding packing and crating)''.
Subtitle D--Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits
SEC. 631. CLARIFICATION OF PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSION IN THE
CASE OF MEMBERS WHOSE RETIRED PAY IS COMPUTED USING
HIGH-THREE.
(a) Clarification.--Subsection (f) of section 1401a of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) by striking ``Prevention of retired pay
inversions.--Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the'' and inserting
``Prevention of retired pay inversions for
members with retired pay computed using final
basic pay.--The''; and
(B) by inserting ``who first became a member
of a uniformed service before September 8,
1980, and'' after ``of an armed force'';
(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following
new paragraph (2):
``(2) Prevention of retired pay inversions for
members with retired pay computed using high-three.--
Subject to subsections (d) and (e), the monthly retired
pay of a member or former member of an armed force who
first became a member of a uniformed service on or
after September 8, 1980, may not be less, on the date
on which the member or former member initially becomes
entitled to such pay, than the monthly retired pay to
which the member or former member would be entitled on
that date if the member or former member had become
entitled to retired pay on an earlier date, adjusted to
reflect any applicable increases in such pay under this
section. However, in the case of a member or former
member whose retired pay is computed subject to section
1407(f) of this title, paragraph (1) (rather than the
preceding sentence) shall apply in the same manner as
if the member or former member first became a member of
a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, but only
with respect to a calculation as of the date on which
the member or former member first became entitled to
retired pay.''.
(b) Cross-reference Amendments.--Such section is further
amended by striking ``subsection (f)(2)'' in subsections
(c)(1), (c)(2), (d), and (e) and inserting ``subsection
(f)(3)''.
(c) Applicability.--Paragraph (2) of section 1401a(f) of
title 10, United States Code, as added by the amendment made by
subsection (a)(3), applies to the computation of retired pay or
retainer pay of any person who first became a member of a
uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, regardless of
when the member first becomes entitled to retired or retainer
pay.
SEC. 632. PERIODIC NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE READY RESERVE ON EARLY
RETIREMENT CREDIT EARNED FOR SIGNIFICANT PERIODS OF
ACTIVE FEDERAL STATUS OR ACTIVE DUTY.
Section 12731(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) The Secretary concerned shall periodically notify each
member of the Ready Reserve described by paragraph (2) of the
current eligibility age for retired pay of such member under
this section, including any reduced eligibility age by reason
of the operation of that paragraph. Notice shall be provided by
such means as the Secretary considers appropriate taking into
account the cost of provision of notice and the convenience of
members.''.
SEC. 633. IMPROVED ASSISTANCE FOR GOLD STAR SPOUSES AND OTHER
DEPENDENTS.
(a) Advocates for Gold Star Spouses and Other Dependents.--
Each Secretary of a military department shall designate for
each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary a
member of such Armed Force or civilian employee of such
military department to assist spouses and other dependents of
members of such Armed Force (including reserve components
thereof) who die on active duty through the provision of the
following services:
(1) Addressing complaints by spouses and other
dependents of deceased members regarding casualty
assistance or receipt of benefits authorized by law for
such spouses and dependents.
(2) Providing support to such spouses and dependents
regarding such casualty assistance or receipt of such
benefits.
(3) Making reports to appropriate officers or
officials in the Department of Defense or the military
department concerned regarding resolution of such
complaints, including recommendations regarding the
settlement of claims with respect to such benefits, as
appropriate.
(4) Performing such other actions as the Secretary of
the military department concerned considers
appropriate.
(b) Training for Casualty Assistance Personnel.--
(1) Training program required.--The Secretary of
Defense shall implement a standardized comprehensive
training program on casualty assistance for the
following personnel of the Department of Defense:
(A) Casualty assistance officers.
(B) Casualty assistance calls officers.
(C) Casualty assistance representatives.
(2) General elements.--The training program required
by paragraph (1) shall include training designed to
ensure that the personnel specified in that paragraph
provide the spouse and other dependents of a deceased
member of the Armed Forces with accurate information on
the benefits to which they are entitled and other
casualty assistance available to them when the member
dies while serving on active duty in the Armed Forces.
(3) Service-specific elements.--The Secretary of the
military department concerned may, in coordination with
the Secretary of Defense, provide for the inclusion in
the training program required by paragraph (1) that is
provided to casualty assistance personnel of such
military department such elements of training that are
specific or unique to the requirements or particulars
of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such
military department as the Secretary of the military
department concerned considers appropriate.
(4) Frequency of training.--Training shall be
provided under the program required by paragraph (1)
not less often than annually.
Subtitle E--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality
Benefits and Operations
SEC. 641. EXPANSION OF PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND
INSTRUMENTALITIES FROM REPRISALS.
Section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by inserting after ``take or fail to take'' the following: ``,
or threaten to take or fail to take,''.
SEC. 642. MODERNIZATION OF TITLES OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND
INSTRUMENTALITIES FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN CIVIL
SERVICE LAWS.
Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in
the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ``Army and Air
Force Motion Picture Service, Navy Ship's Stores Ashore'' and
inserting ``Navy Ships Stores Program''.
Subtitle F--Other Matters
SEC. 651. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXPENSES FOR CARE AND
DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS THAT WERE RETAINED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR FORENSIC PATHOLOGY
INVESTIGATION.
(a) Disposition of Remains of Persons Whose Death Is
Investigated by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner.--
(1) Covered decedents.--Section 1481(a) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
``(10) To the extent authorized under section 1482(g)
of this title, any person not otherwise covered by the
preceding paragraphs whose remains (or partial remains)
have been retained by the Secretary concerned for
purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the
Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of
this title.''.
(2) Authorized expenses relating to care and
disposition of remains.--Section 1482 of such title is
amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(g)(1) The payment of expenses incident to the recovery,
care, and disposition of the remains of a decedent covered by
section 1481(a)(10) of this title is limited to those expenses
that, as determined under regulations prescribed by the
Secretary of Defense, would not have been incurred but for the
retention of those remains for purposes of a forensic pathology
investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under
section 1471 of this title.
``(2) In a case covered by paragraph (1), if the person
designated under subsection (c) to direct disposition of the
remains of a decedent does not direct disposition of the
remains that were retained for the forensic pathology
investigation, the Secretary may pay for the transportation of
those remains to, and interment or inurnment of those remains
in, an appropriate place selected by the Secretary, in lieu of
the transportation authorized to be paid under paragraph (8) of
subsection (a).
``(3) In a case covered by paragraph (1), expenses that may
be paid do not include expenses with respect to an escort under
paragraph (8) of subsection (a), whether or not on a
reimbursable basis.
``(4) The Secretary concerned may pay any other expenses
relating to the remains of such a decedent that are authorized
to be paid under this section on a reimbursable basis. Amounts
reimbursed to the Secretary concerned under this subsection
shall be credited to appropriations available at the time of
reimbursement for the payment of such expenses.''.
(b) Clarification of Coverage of Inurnment.--Section
1482(a)(9) of such title is amended by inserting ``or
inurnment'' after ``Interment''.
(c) Technical Amendment.--Section 1482(f) of such title is
amended by striking the third sentence and inserting the
following new sentence: ``The Secretary concerned may pay any
other expenses relating to the remains of such a decedent that
are authorized to be paid under this section only on a
reimbursable basis.''.
SEC. 652. STUDY OF THE MERITS AND FEASIBILITY OF PROVIDING TRANSITIONAL
COMPENSATION AND OTHER TRANSITIONAL BENEFITS TO
DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS SEPARATED FOR VIOLATION OF
THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.
(a) Study Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a
study regarding the merits and feasibility of providing
transitional compensation and other transitional benefits to
dependents or former dependents of members of the Armed Forces
who are separated from the Armed Forces for a violation of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice under the circumstances
described in subsection (b).
(b) Covered Members and Circumstances.--The scope of the
study required by subsection (a) is limited to those
circumstances in which members of the Armed Forces--
(1) are convicted by court-martial of an offense
under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the
Uniform Code of Military Justice);
(2) are separated from active duty pursuant to the
sentence of the court-martial; and
(3) forfeit all pay and allowances pursuant to such
sentence.
(c) Study Elements.--In conducting the study required by
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the
following:
(1) The appropriateness of providing transitional
compensation and other benefits, including commissary
and exchange benefits, to dependents or former
dependents of members described in subsection (b),
particularly in situations in which such dependents or
former dependents would be entitled, or soon be
entitled, to such benefits on account of the years of
service of a member.
(2) Whether there may be instances in which the
provision of such transitional compensation would not
be appropriate.
(3) Whether such transitional compensation should be
limited to dependent children of members described in
subsection (b).
(4) The appropriate duration of such transitional
compensation for such dependents or former dependents.
(5) The potential duplication of such transitional
compensation with benefits otherwise available for such
dependents or former dependents under title 10, United
States Code, or other laws.
(d) Submission of Results.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate
and the House of Representatives a report containing the
results of the study required by subsection (a), including the
Secretary's determination regarding the need for transitional
compensation.
TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits
Sec. 701. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries
enrolled in TRICARE Prime.
Sec. 702. Mental health care treatment through telemedicine.
Sec. 703. Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of
members of the Armed Forces with urotrauma.
Sec. 704. Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the
Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic
stress disorder.
Subtitle B--Health Care Administration
Sec. 711. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences
to enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to
other nonprofit entities.
Sec. 712. Pilot program on increased third-party collection
reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 713. Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters
Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health
providers of the reserve components.
Sec. 722. Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain
Centers of Excellence.
Sec. 723. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries.
Sec. 724. Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to
members of the Armed Forces and veterans.
Sec. 725. Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program
and availability of compounded pharmaceuticals.
Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits
SEC. 701. FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME FOR CERTAIN
BENEFICIARIES ENROLLED IN TRICARE PRIME.
Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1816) is
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection
(c); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following
new subsection (b):
``(b) Access to TRICARE Prime.--
``(1) One-time election.--Subject to paragraph (3),
the Secretary shall ensure that each affected eligible
beneficiary who is enrolled in TRICARE Prime as of
September 30, 2013, may make a one-time election to
continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime,
notwithstanding that a contract described in subsection
(a)(2)(A) does not allow for such enrollment based on
the location in which such beneficiary resides. The
beneficiary may continue such enrollment in TRICARE
Prime so long as the beneficiary resides in the same
ZIP code as the ZIP code in which the beneficiary
resided at the time of such election.
``(2) Enrollment in tricare standard.--If an affected
eligible beneficiary makes the one-time election under
paragraph (1), the beneficiary may thereafter elect to
enroll in TRICARE Standard at any time in accordance
with a contract described in subsection (a)(2)(A).
``(3) Residence at time of election.--An affected
eligible beneficiary may not make the one-time election
under paragraph (1) if, at the time of such election,
the beneficiary does not reside--
``(A) in a ZIP code that is in a region
described in subsection (c)(1)(B); and
``(B) within 100 miles of a military medical
treatment facility.
``(4) Network.--In continuing enrollment in TRICARE
Prime pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary may
determine whether to maintain a TRICARE network of
providers in an area that is between 40 and 100 miles
of a military medical treatment facility.''.
SEC. 702. MENTAL HEALTH CARE TREATMENT THROUGH TELEMEDICINE.
(a) Provision of Mental Health Care Via Telemedicine.--
(1) In general.--In carrying out the Transitional
Assistance Management Program, the Secretary of Defense
may extend the coverage of such program for covered
individuals for an additional 180 days for mental
health care provided through telemedicine.
(2) Report.--If the Secretary extends coverage under
paragraph (1), by not later than one year after the
date of carrying out such extension, the Secretary
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report that includes the following:
(A) The rate at which individuals are using
the extended coverage provided pursuant to
paragraph (1).
(B) A description of the mental health care
provided pursuant to such subsection.
(C) An analysis of how the Secretary and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs coordinate the
continuation of care with respect to veterans
who are no longer eligible for the Transitional
Assistance Management Program.
(D) Any other factors the Secretary of
Defense determines necessary with respect to
extending coverage of the Transitional
Assistance Management Program.
(3) Termination.--The authority of the Secretary to
carry out subsection (a) shall terminate on December
31, 2018.
(b) Report on Use of Telemedicine.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 270 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the use of telemedicine to improve the diagnosis and
treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic
brain injuries, and mental health conditions.
(2) Elements.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
address the following:
(A) The current status, as of the date of the
report, of telemedicine initiatives within the
Department of Defense to diagnose and treat
post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain
injuries, and mental health conditions.
(B) Plans for integrating telemedicine into
the military health care system, including in
health care delivery, records management,
medical education, public health, and private
sector partnerships.
(C) The status of the integration of the
telemedicine initiatives of the Department with
the telemedicine initiatives of the Department
of Veterans Affairs.
(D) A description and assessment of
challenges to the use of telemedicine as a
means of in-home treatment, outreach in rural
areas, and in settings that provide group
treatment or therapy in connection with
treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder,
traumatic brain injuries, and mental health
conditions, and a description and assessment of
efforts to address such challenges.
(E) A description of privacy issues related
to the use of telemedicine for the treatment of
post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain
injuries, and mental health conditions, and
recommendations for mechanisms to remedy any
privacy concerns relating to such use of
telemedicine.
(F) A description of professional licensing
issues with respect to licensed medical
providers who provide treatment using
telemedicine.
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``covered individual'' means an
individual who--
(A) during the initial 180-day period of
being enrolled in the Transitional Assistance
Management Program, received any mental health
care; or
(B) during the one-year period preceding
separation or discharge from the Armed Forces,
received any mental health care.
(2) The term ``telemedicine'' means the use by a
health care provider of telecommunications to assist in
the diagnosis or treatment of a patient's medical
condition.
SEC. 703. COMPREHENSIVE POLICY ON IMPROVEMENTS TO CARE AND TRANSITION
OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WITH UROTRAUMA.
(a) Comprehensive Policy Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall
jointly develop and implement a comprehensive policy on
improvements to the care, management, and transition of
recovering members of the Armed Forces with urotrauma.
(2) Scope of policy.--The policy shall cover each of
the following:
(A) The care and management of the specific
needs of members who are urotrauma patients,
including eligibility for the Recovery Care
Coordinator Program pursuant to the Wounded
Warrior Act (10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
(B) The return of members who have recovered
to active duty when appropriate.
(C) The transition of recovering members from
receipt of care and services through the
Department of Defense to receipt of care and
services through the Department of Veterans
Affairs.
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than one year after
implementing the policy under subsection (a)(1), the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report that includes--
(A) a review that identifies gaps in the care
of members who are urotrauma patients; and
(B) suggested options to respond to such
gaps.
(2) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In
this subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional
committees'' means the following:
(A) The Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives.
(B) The Committees on Veterans' Affairs of
the Senate and the House of Representatives.
SEC. 704. PILOT PROGRAM ON INVESTIGATIONAL TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE
ARMED FORCES FOR TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND POST-
TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.
(a) Pilot Program Authorized.--The Secretary of Defense shall
carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary shall
establish a process for randomized placebo-controlled clinical
trials of investigational treatments (including diagnostic
testing) of traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress
disorder received by members of the Armed Forces in health care
facilities other than military treatment facilities.
(b) Conditions for Approval.--The approval by the Secretary
for a treatment pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to
the following conditions:
(1) Any drug or device used in the treatment must be
approved, cleared, or made subject to an
investigational use exemption by the Food and Drug
Administration, and the use of the drug or device must
comply with rules of the Food and Drug Administration
applicable to investigational new drugs or
investigational devices.
(2) The treatment must be approved by the Secretary
following approval by an institutional review board
operating in accordance with regulations issued by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, in addition to
regulations issued by the Secretary of Defense
regarding institutional review boards.
(3) The patient receiving the treatment may not be a
retired member of the Armed Forces who is entitled to
benefits under part A, or eligible to enroll under part
B, of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395 et seq.).
(c) Additional Restrictions Authorized.--The Secretary may
establish additional restrictions or conditions as the
Secretary determines appropriate to ensure the protection of
human research subjects, appropriate fiscal management, and the
validity of the research results.
(d) Data Collection and Availability.--The Secretary shall
develop and maintain a database containing data from each
patient case involving the use of a treatment under this
section. The Secretary shall ensure that the database preserves
confidentiality and that any use of the database or disclosures
of such data are limited to such use and disclosures permitted
by law and applicable regulations.
(e) Reports to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after the
last day of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on the implementation of this section
and any available results on investigational treatment clinical
trials authorized under this section during such fiscal year.
(f) Termination.--The authority of the Secretary to carry out
the pilot program authorized by subsection (a) shall terminate
on December 31, 2018.
Subtitle B--Health Care Administration
SEC. 711. AUTHORITY OF UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS AND MAKE
GRANTS TO OTHER NONPROFIT ENTITIES.
Section 2113(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in subparagraph (B)--
(A) by inserting ``, or any other nonprofit
entity'' after ``Military Medicine''; and
(B) by inserting ``, or nonprofit entity,''
after ``such Foundation''; and
(2) in subparagraph (C)--
(A) by inserting ``, or any other nonprofit
entity,'' after ``Military Medicine''; and
(B) by inserting ``, or nonprofit entity,''
after ``such foundation''.
SEC. 712. PILOT PROGRAM ON INCREASED THIRD-PARTY COLLECTION
REIMBURSEMENTS IN MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT
FACILITIES.
(a) Pilot Program.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretaries of the military
departments, shall carry out a pilot program to
demonstrate and assess the feasibility of implementing
processes described in paragraph (2) to increase the
amounts collected under section 1095 of title 10,
United States Code, from a third-party payer for
charges for health care services incurred by the United
States at a military medical treatment facility.
(2) Processes described.--The processes described in
this paragraph are commercially available enhanced
recovery practices for medical payment collection,
including revenue-cycle management together with rates
and percentages of collection in accordance with
industry standards for such practices.
(b) Requirements.--In carrying out the pilot program under
subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall--
(1) identify and analyze the best practice option,
including commercial best practices, with respect to
the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that are
used in nonmilitary health care facilities; and
(2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis to assess
measurable results of the pilot program, including an
analysis of--
(A) the different processes used in the pilot
program;
(B) the amount of third-party collections
that resulted from such processes;
(C) the cost to implement and sustain such
processes; and
(D) any other factors the Secretary
determines appropriate to assess the pilot
program.
(c) Locations.--The Secretary shall carry out the pilot
program under subsection (a)(1)--
(1) at military installations that have a military
medical treatment facility with inpatient and
outpatient capabilities; and
(2) at a number of such installations of different
military departments that the Secretary determines
sufficient to fully assess the results of the pilot
program.
(d) Duration.--The Secretary shall commence the pilot program
under subsection (a)(1) by not later than 270 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act and shall carry out such
program for three years.
(e) Report.--Not later than 180 days after completing the
pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report
describing the results of the program, including--
(1) a comparison of--
(A) the processes described in subsection
(a)(2) that were used in the military medical
treatment facilities participating in the
program; and
(B) the third-party collection processes used
by military medical treatment facilities not
included in the program;
(2) a cost analysis of implementing the processes
described in subsection (a)(2) for third-party
collections at military medical treatment facilities;
(3) an assessment of the program, including any
recommendations to improve third-party collections; and
(4) an analysis of the methods employed by the
military departments prior to the program with respect
to collecting charges from third-party payers incurred
at military medical treatment facilities, including
specific data with respect to the dollar amount of
third-party collections that resulted from each method
used throughout the military departments.
SEC. 713. ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND
THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs have failed to implement a solution
that allows for seamless electronic sharing of medical
health care data; and
(2) despite the significant amount of read-only
information shared between the Department of Defense
and Department of Veterans Affairs, most of the
information shared as of the date of the enactment of
this Act is not standardized or available in real time
to support all clinical decisions.
(b) Implementation.--The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs--
(1) shall each ensure that the electronic health
record systems of the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs are interoperable with
an integrated display of data, or a single electronic
health record, by complying with the national standards
and architectural requirements identified by the
Interagency Program Office of the Departments (in this
section referred to as the ``Office''), in
collaboration with the Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information Technology of the
Department of Health and Human Services; and
(2) shall each deploy modernized electronic health
record software supporting clinicians of the
Departments by no later than December 31, 2016, while
ensuring continued support and compatibility with the
interoperability platform and full standards-based
interoperability.
(c) Design Principles.--The interoperable electronic health
records with integrated display of data, or a single electronic
health record, established under subsection (b) shall adhere to
the following principles:
(1) To the extent practicable, efforts to establish
such records shall be based on objectives, activities,
and milestones established by the Joint Executive
Committee Joint Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2013-2015,
as well as future addendums or revisions.
(2) Transition the current data exchanges between the
Departments and private sector health care providers
where practical to modern, open-architecture frameworks
that use computable data mapped to national standards
to make data available for determining medical trends
and for enhanced clinician decision support.
(3) Principles with respect to open architecture
standards, including--
(A) adoption of national data standards;
(B) if such national standards do not exist
as of the date on which the record is being
established, adoption of the articulation of
data of the Health Data Dictionary until such
national standards are established;
(C) use of enterprise investment strategies
that maximize the use of commercial best
practices to ensure robust competition and best
value;
(D) aggressive life-cycle sustainment
planning that uses proven technology insertion
strategies and product upgrade techniques;
(E) enforcement of system design
transparency, continuous design disclosure and
improvement, and peer reviews that align with
the requirements of the Federal Acquisition
Regulation; and
(F) strategies for data management rights to
ensure a level competitive playing field and
access to alternative solutions and sources
across the life-cycle of the programs.
(4) By the point of deployment, such record must be
at a generation 3 level or better for a health
information technology system.
(5) To the extent the Secretaries consider feasible
and advisable, principles with respect to--
(A) the creation of a health data
authoritative source by the Department of
Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs
that can be accessed by multiple providers and
standardizes the input of new medical
information;
(B) the ability of patients of both the
Department of Defense and the Department of
Veterans Affairs to download, or otherwise
receive electronically, the medical records of
the patient; and
(C) the feasibility of establishing a secure,
remote, network-accessible computer storage
system to provide members of the Armed Forces
and veterans the ability to upload the health
care records of the member or veteran if the
member or veteran elects to do so and allow
medical providers of the Department of Defense
and the Department of Veterans Affairs to
access such records in the course of providing
care to the member or veteran.
(d) Programs Plan.--Not later than January 31, 2014, the
Secretaries shall prepare and brief the appropriate
congressional committees with a detailed programs plan for the
oversight and execution of the interoperable electronic health
records with an integrated display of data, or a single
electronic health record, established under subsection (b).
This briefing and supporting documentation shall include--
(1) programs objectives;
(2) organization;
(3) responsibilities of the Departments;
(4) technical objectives and design principles;
(5) milestones, including a schedule for the
development, acquisition, or industry competitions for
capabilities needed to satisfy the technical system
requirements;
(6) data standards being adopted by the programs;
(7) outcome-based metrics proposed to measure the
performance and effectiveness of the programs; and
(8) the level of funding for fiscal years 2014
through 2017.
(e) Limitation on Funds.--Not more than 25 percent of the
amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise
made available for development, procurement, modernization, or
enhancement of the interoperable electronic health records with
an integrated display of data, or a single electronic health
record, established under subsection (b) for the Department of
Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs may be obligated
or expended until the date on which the Secretaries brief the
appropriate congressional committees of the programs plan under
subsection (d).
(f) Reporting.--
(1) Quarterly reporting.--On a quarterly basis, the
Secretaries shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a detailed financial summary.
(2) Notification.--The Secretary of Defense and
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees written
notification prior to obligating funds for any contract
or task order for electronic health record system
modernization efforts that is in excess of $5,000,000.
(g) Requirements.--
(1) In general.--Not later than October 1, 2014, all
health care data contained in the Department of Defense
AHLTA and the Department of Veterans Affairs VistA
systems shall be computable in real time and comply
with the existing national data standards and have a
process in place to ensure data is standardized as
national standards continue to evolve. On a quarterly
basis, the Secretaries shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees updates on the progress of
data sharing.
(2) Certification.--At such time as the operational
capability described in subsection (b)(1) is achieved,
the Secretaries shall jointly certify to the
appropriate congressional committees that the
Secretaries have complied with such data standards
described in paragraph (1).
(3) Responsible official.--The Secretaries shall each
identify a senior official to be responsible for the
modern platforms supporting an interoperable electronic
health record with an integrated display of data, or a
single electronic health record, established under
subsection (b). The Secretaries shall also each
identify a senior official to be responsible for
modernizing the electronic health record software of
the respective Department. Such official shall have
included within their performance evaluation
performance metrics related to the execution of the
responsibilities under this paragraph. Not later than
30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
each Secretary shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees the name of each senior
official selected under this paragraph.
(4) Comptroller general assessment.--If both
Secretaries do not meet the requirements under
paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United
States shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees an assessment of the performance of the
compliance of both Secretaries of such requirements.
(h) Executive Committee.--
(1) Establishment.--Not later than 60 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries
shall jointly establish an executive committee to
support the development and validation of adopted
standards, required architectural platforms and
structure, and the capacity to enforce such standards,
platforms, and structure as the Secretaries execute
requirements and develop programmatic assessment as
needed by the Secretaries to ensure interoperable
electronic health records with an integrated display of
data, or a single electronic health record, are
established pursuant to the requirements of subsection
(b). The Executive Committee shall annually certify to
the appropriate congressional committees that such
record meets the definition of ``integrated'' as
specified in subsection (k)(4).
(2) Membership.--The Executive Committee established
under paragraph (1) shall consist of not more than 6
members, appointed by the Secretaries as follows:
(A) Two co-chairs, one appointed by each of
the Secretaries.
(B) One member from the technical community
of the Department of Defense appointed by the
Secretary of Defense.
(C) One member from the technical community
of the Department of Veterans Affairs appointed
by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(D) One member from the clinical community of
the Department of Defense appointed by the
Secretary of Defense.
(E) One member from the clinical community of
the Department of Veterans Affairs appointed by
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(3) Reporting.--Not later than June 1, 2014, and on a
quarterly basis thereafter, the Executive Committee
shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a report on the activities of the Committee.
(i) Independent Review.--The Secretary of Defense shall
request the Defense Science Board to conduct an annual review
of the progress of the Secretary toward achieving the
requirements in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b). The
Defense Science Board shall submit to the Secretary a report of
the findings of the review. Not later than 30 days after
receiving the report, the Secretary shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees the report with any
comments considered appropriate by the Secretary.
(j) Deadline for Completion of Implementation of the
Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution Program.--
(1) Deadline.--The Secretary of Defense shall
complete the implementation of the Healthcare Artifact
and Image Management Solution program of the Department
of Defense by not later than the date that is 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) Report.--Upon completion of the implementation of
the Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution
program, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report describing the extent
of the interoperability between the Healthcare Artifact
and Image Management Solution program and the Veterans
Benefits Management System of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
(k) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term
``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(A) the congressional defense committees; and
(B) the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of
the Senate and the House of Representatives.
(2) Generation 3.--The term ``generation 3'' means,
with respect to an electronic health system, a system
that has the technical capability to bring evidence-
based medicine to the point of care and provide
functionality for multiple care venues.
(3) Interoperable.--The term ``interoperable'' refers
to the ability of different electronic health records
systems or software to meaningfully exchange
information in real time and provide useful results to
one or more systems.
(4) Integrated.--The term ``integrated'' refers to
the integration of health data from the Department of
Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs and
outside providers to provide clinicians with a
comprehensive medical record that allows data existing
on disparate systems to be shared or accessed across
functional or system boundaries in order to make the
most informed decisions when treating patients.
Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters
SEC. 721. DISPLAY OF BUDGET INFORMATION FOR EMBEDDED MENTAL HEALTH
PROVIDERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS.
(a) In General.--Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding after section 236, as added by section 141
of this Act, the following new section:
``Sec. 237. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components:
display of budget information
``The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a
part of the documentation that supports the President's annual
budget for the Department of Defense, a budget justification
display with respect to embedded mental health providers within
each reserve component, including the amount requested for each
such component.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:
``237. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components:
display of budget information.''.
SEC. 722. REPORT ON ROLE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS IN CERTAIN
CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE.
(a) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on
covered centers of excellence. Such report shall include the
following with respect to each covered center of excellence:
(1) The amount of resources obligated by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs in support of the center
beginning on the date on which the center was
established, including the amount of funds, personnel,
time, and functions provided in support of the center.
(2) An estimate of the amount of resources the
Secretary plans to dedicate to the center during each
of fiscal years 2014 through 2018.
(3) A description of the role of the Secretary.
(b) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means the following:
(A) The Committees on Armed Services and
Veterans' Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
(B) The Committees on Armed Services and
Veterans' Affairs of the Senate.
(2) The term ``covered centers of excellence'' means
the following:
(A) The centers established under sections
1621, 1622, and 1623 of the Wounded Warrior Act
(title XVI of Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C.
1071 note).
(B) The center established under section 721
of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public
Law 110-417; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
(C) The center established under section 723
of such Act (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat.
4508).
SEC. 723. REPORT ON MEMORANDUM REGARDING TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary
identifies, refers, and treats traumatic brain injuries with
respect to members of the Armed Forces who served in Operation
Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom before the
effective date in June 2010 of directive type memorandum 09-033
titled ``Policy Guidance for Management of Concussion/Mild
Traumatic Brain Injury in the Deployed Setting'', regarding
using a 50-meter distance from an explosion as a criterion to
properly identify, refer, and treat members for potential
traumatic brain injury.
SEC. 724. REPORT ON PROVISION OF ADVANCED PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS TO
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND VETERANS.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress a report on the plans of the
Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs,
respectively, to ensure that the most clinically appropriate
prosthetics and orthotics are made available to injured members
of the Armed Forces and veterans using technological advances
as appropriate. Such report shall include a description of the
processes of each Secretary with respect to coordinating and
identifying care in the Department of Veterans Affairs for an
injured member of the Armed Forces who, prior to the member
being discharged or released from the Armed Forces, has an
advanced technology prosthetic.
(b) Covered Prosthetics and Orthotics.--The prosthetics and
orthotics to be covered by the report under subsection (a)
shall include powered prosthetics and orthotics that will
enable members of the Armed Forces and veterans who have
suffered amputation and, in the case of orthotics wearers,
other injuries with limb salvage, to restore functionality to
the maximum extent practicable.
(c) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate committees of Congress''
means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee
on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee
on Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives.
SEC. 725. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORTS ON TRICARE RECOVERY AUDIT PROGRAM
AND AVAILABILITY OF COMPOUNDED PHARMACEUTICALS.
(a) Recovery Audit Program.--
(1) Report.--Not later than one year after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General
of the United States shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report that evaluates the
similarities and differences of Medicare and the
TRICARE program with respect to identifying and
recovering improper payments.
(2) Elements.--The report shall contain an evaluation
of the following:
(A) Claims processing efforts of both
Medicare and the TRICARE program to prevent
improper payments by denying claims prior to
payment.
(B) Claims processing efforts of both
Medicare and the TRICARE program to correct
improper payments post-payment.
(C) The effectiveness of post-payment audit
programs of both Medicare and the TRICARE
program to identify and correct improper
payments that are returned to Medicare or the
TRICARE program, respectively.
(b) Compounded Pharmaceuticals.--
(1) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2014, the
Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the availability of
compounded pharmaceuticals in the military health care
system.
(2) Elements.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) A description of the number of
prescriptions for compounded pharmaceuticals
processed, and the types of compounded
pharmaceuticals dispensed, during fiscal year
2013 in pharmacy venues.
(B) A description of the categories of
eligible beneficiaries who received compounded
pharmaceuticals in each pharmacy venue during
fiscal year 2013.
(C) A description of the claims reimbursement
methodology used by the manager of the TRICARE
pharmacy benefits program to reimburse pharmacy
providers for compounded pharmaceuticals, and
an assessment of the manner in which such
methodology compares with reimbursement
methodologies used by other health programs of
the Federal Government.
(D) A review of the existing accreditation
standards, as of the date of the report,
intended to assure the safety and efficacy of
compounded pharmaceuticals available through
the military health care system.
(3) Pharmacy venue defined.--In this subsection, the
term ``pharmacy venue'' means facilities of the
uniformed services, retail pharmacies, and the national
mail-order pharmacy program, as described in section
1074g(a)(2)(E) of title 10, United States Code.
TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED
MATTERS
Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management
Sec. 801. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of
Defense laboratories.
Sec. 802. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available
for contract services.
Sec. 803. Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts.
Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures,
and Limitations
Sec. 811. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor
compensation.
Sec. 812. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain
reports.
Sec. 813. Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving
suspension or debarment.
Sec. 814. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose
nondevelopmental items.
Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs
Sec. 821. Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense
acquisition programs.
Sec. 822. Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone
B approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting
a space program.
Sec. 823. Additional responsibility for product support managers for
major weapon systems.
Sec. 824. Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes
for the acquisition of weapon systems.
Subtitle D--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency
Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan
Sec. 831. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy.
Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services
produced in countries along a major route of supply to
Afghanistan.
Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management
SEC. 801. ENHANCED TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED AT DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE LABORATORIES.
(a) Definitions.--As used in this section:
(1) The term ``military department'' has the meaning
provided in section 101 of title 10, United States
Code.
(2) The term ``DOD laboratory'' or ``laboratory''
means any facility or group of facilities that--
(A) is owned, leased, operated, or otherwise
used by the Department of Defense; and
(B) meets the definition of ``laboratory'' as
provided in subsection (d)(2) of section 12 of
the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act
of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a).
(b) Authority.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of a military department each may authorize
the heads of DOD laboratories to grant nonexclusive,
exclusive, or partially exclusive licenses, royalty
free or for royalties or for rights to other
intellectual property, for computer software and its
related documentation developed at a DOD laboratory,
but only if--
(A) the computer software and related
documentation would be a trade secret under the
meaning of section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United
States Code, if the information had been
obtained from a non-Federal party;
(B) the public is notified of the
availability of the software and related
documentation for licensing and interested
parties have a fair opportunity to submit
applications for licensing;
(C) such licensing activities and licenses
comply with the requirements under section 209
of title 35, United States Code; and
(D) the software originally was developed to
meet the military needs of the Department of
Defense.
(2) Protections against unauthorized disclosure.--The
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military
department each shall provide appropriate precautions
against the unauthorized disclosure of any computer
software or documentation covered by paragraph (1)(A),
including exemption from section 552 of title 5, United
States Code, for a period of up to 5 years after the
development of the computer software by the DOD
laboratory.
(c) Royalties.--
(1) Use of royalties.--Except as provided in
paragraph (2), any royalties or other payments received
by the Department of Defense or a military department
from licensing computer software or documentation under
paragraph (b)(1) shall be retained by the Department of
Defense or the military department and shall be
disposed of as follows:
(A)(i) The Department of Defense or the
military department shall pay each year the
first $2,000, and thereafter at least 15
percent, of the royalties or other payments, to
be divided among the employees who developed
the computer software.
(ii) The Department of Defense or the
military department may provide appropriate
lesser incentives, from the royalties or other
payments, to laboratory employees who are not
developers of such computer software but who
substantially increased the technical value of
the software.
(iii) The Department of Defense or the
military department shall retain the royalties
and other payments received until it makes
payments to employees of a DOD laboratory under
clause (i) or (ii).
(iv) The Department of Defense or the
military department may retain an amount
reasonably necessary to pay expenses incidental
to the administration and distribution of
royalties or other payments under this section
by an organizational unit of the Department of
Defense or military department other than its
laboratories.
(B) The balance of the royalties or other payments
shall be transferred by the Department of Defense or
the military department to its laboratories, with the
majority share of the royalties or other payments going
to the laboratory where the development occurred. The
royalties or other payments so transferred to any DOD
laboratory may be used or obligated by that laboratory
during the fiscal year in which they are received or
during the 2 succeeding fiscal years--
(i) to reward scientific, engineering, and
technical employees of the DOD laboratory,
including developers of sensitive or classified
technology, regardless of whether the
technology has commercial applications;
(ii) to further scientific exchange among the
laboratories of the agency;
(iii) for education and training of employees
consistent with the research and development
missions and objectives of the Department of
Defense, military department, or DOD
laboratory, and for other activities that
increase the potential for transfer of the
technology of the DOD laboratory;
(iv) for payment of expenses incidental to
the administration and licensing of computer
software or other intellectual property made at
the DOD laboratory, including the fees or other
costs for the services of other agencies,
persons, or organizations for intellectual
property management and licensing services; or
(v) for scientific research and development
consistent with the research and development
missions and objectives of the DOD laboratory.
(C) All royalties or other payments retained by the
Department of Defense, military department, or DOD
laboratory after payments have been made pursuant to
subparagraphs (A) and (B) that are unobligated and
unexpended at the end of the second fiscal year
succeeding the fiscal year in which the royalties and
other payments were received shall be paid into the
Treasury of the United States.
(2) Exception.--If, after payments under paragraph
(1)(A), the balance of the royalties or other payments
received by the Department of Defense or the military
department in any fiscal year exceed 5 percent of the
funds received for use by the DOD laboratory for
research, development, engineering, testing, and
evaluation or other related administrative, processing,
or value-added activities for that year, 75 percent of
such excess shall be paid to the Treasury of the United
States and the remaining 25 percent may be used or
obligated under paragraph (1)(B). Any funds not so used
or obligated shall be paid into the Treasury of the
United States.
(3) Status of payments to employees.--Any payment
made to an employee under this section shall be in
addition to the regular pay of the employee and to any
other awards made to the employee, and shall not affect
the entitlement of the employee to any regular pay,
annuity, or award to which the employee is otherwise
entitled or for which the employee is otherwise
eligible or limit the amount thereof except that the
monetary value of an award for the same project or
effort shall be deducted from the amount otherwise
available under this paragraph. Payments, determined
under the terms of this paragraph and made to an
employee developer as such, may continue after the
developer leaves the DOD laboratory or the Department
of Defense or military department. Payments made under
this section shall not exceed $75,000 per year to any
one person, unless the President approves a larger
award (with the excess over $75,000 being treated as a
Presidential award under section 4504 of title 5,
United States Code).
(d) Information in Report.--The report required by section
2515(d) of title 10, United States Code, shall include
information regarding the implementation and effectiveness of
this section.
(e) Expiration.--The authority provided in this section shall
expire on December 31, 2017.
SEC. 802. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AGGREGATE ANNUAL AMOUNT AVAILABLE
FOR CONTRACT SERVICES.
Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1489) is
amended--
(1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking ``fiscal
year 2012 or 2013'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2012,
2013, or 2014'';
(2) in subsection (c)--
(A) by striking ``during fiscal years 2012
and 2013'' in the matter preceding paragraph
(1);
(B) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and
redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as
paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
(C) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by
striking ``fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' and
inserting ``fiscal years 2012, 2013, and
2014'';
(3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ``fiscal year
2012 or 2013'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2012, 2013,
or 2014''; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(e) Carryover of Reductions Required.--If the reductions
required by subsection (c)(2) for fiscal years 2012 and 2013
are not implemented, the amounts remaining for those reductions
in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 shall be implemented in fiscal
year 2014.''.
SEC. 803. IDENTIFICATION AND REPLACEMENT OF OBSOLETE ELECTRONIC PARTS.
(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
implement a process for the expedited identification and
replacement of obsolete electronic parts included in
acquisition programs of the Department of Defense.
(b) Issues To Be Addressed.--At a minimum, the expedited
process established pursuant to subsection (a) shall--
(1) include a mechanism pursuant to which
contractors, or other sources of supply, may provide to
appropriate Department of Defense officials information
that identifies--
(A) obsolete electronic parts that are
included in the specifications for an
acquisition program of the Department of
Defense; and
(B) suitable replacements for such electronic
parts;
(2) specify timelines for the expedited review and
validation of information submitted by contractors, or
other sources of supply, pursuant to paragraph (1);
(3) specify procedures and timelines for the rapid
submission and approval of engineering change proposals
needed to accomplish the substitution of replacement
parts that have been validated pursuant to paragraph
(2);
(4) provide for any incentives for contractor
participation in the expedited process that the
Secretary may determine to be appropriate; and
(5) provide that, in addition to the responsibilities
under section 2337 of title 10, United States Code, a
product support manager for a major weapon system shall
work to identify obsolete electronic parts that are
included in the specifications for an aquisition
program of the Department of Defense and approve
suitable replacements for such electronic parts.
(c) Additional Matters.--For the purposes of this section--
(1) an electronic part is obsolete if--
(A) the part is no longer in production; and
(B) the original manufacturer of the part and
its authorized dealers do not have sufficient
parts in stock to meet the requirements of such
an acquisition program; and
(2) an electronic part is a suitable replacement for
an obsolete electronic part if--
(A) the part could be substituted for an
obsolete part without incurring unreasonable
expense and without degrading system
performance; and
(B) the part is or will be available in
sufficient quantity to meet the requirements of
such an acquisition program.
Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures,
and Limitations
SEC. 811. GOVERNMENT-WIDE LIMITATIONS ON ALLOWABLE COSTS FOR CONTRACTOR
COMPENSATION.
(a) Amendment Relating to Contractor Employees Under Defense
Contracts.--Subparagraph (P) of section 2324(e)(1) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(P) Costs of compensation of any contractor
employee for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract
funding source, to the extent that such compensation
exceeds $625,000 adjusted annually for the U.S. Bureau
of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index for total
compensation for private industry workers, by
occupational and industry group not seasonally
adjusted, except that the Secretary of Defense may
establish exceptions for positions in the science,
technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and
cybersecurity fields and other fields requiring unique
areas of expertise upon a determination that such
exceptions are needed to ensure that the Department of
Defense has continued access to needed skills and
capabilities.''.
(b) Amendment Relating to Contractor Employees Under Civilian
Agency Contracts.--Paragraph (16) of section 4304(a) of title
41, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(16) Costs of compensation of any contractor
employee for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract
funding source, to the extent that such compensation
exceeds $625,000 adjusted annually for the U.S. Bureau
of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index for total
compensation for private industry workers, by
occupational and industry group not seasonally
adjusted, except that the executive agency may
establish exceptions for positions in the science,
technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and
cybersecurity fields and other fields requiring unique
areas of expertise upon a determination that such
exceptions are needed to ensure that the executive
agency has continued access to needed skills and
capabilities.''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--Chapter 11 of title 41, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking section 1127; and
(2) by striking the item relating to that section in
the table of sections at the beginning of such chapter.
(d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred
under contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 812. INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL COST ESTIMATE INFORMATION IN CERTAIN
REPORTS.
(a) Additional Information Required To Be Included in
Selected Acquisition Reports.--Section 2432(c)(1) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D)
as subparagraphs (E), (F), and (G), respectively;
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following
new subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D):
``(B) for each major defense acquisition program or
designated major subprogram included in the report--
``(i) the Baseline Estimate (as that term is
defined in section 2433(a)(2) of this title),
along with the associated risk and sensitivity
analysis of that estimate;
``(ii) the original Baseline Estimate (as
that term is defined in section 2435(d)(1) of
this title), along with the associated risk and
sensitivity analysis of that estimate;
``(iii) if the original Baseline Estimate was
adjusted or revised pursuant to section
2435(d)(2) of this title, such adjusted or
revised estimate, along with the associated
risk and sensitivity analysis of that estimate;
and
``(iv) the primary risk parameters associated
with the current procurement cost for the
program (as that term is used in section
2432(e)(4) of this title);
``(C) a summary of the history of significant
developments from the date each major defense
acquisition program or designated major subprogram
included in the report was first included in a Selected
Acquisition Report and program highlights since the
last Selected Acquisition Report;
``(D) the significant schedule and technical risks
for each such program or subprogram, identified at each
major milestone and as of the quarter for which the
current report is submitted;'';
(3) in subparagraph (E), as so redesignated--
(A) by striking ``major defense acquisition
program or designated major subprogram'' and
inserting ``such program or subprogram'';
(B) by inserting ``program acquisition cost
and'' after ``current'';
(C) by striking ``that cost'' and inserting
``those costs''; and
(D) by striking ``date the program or
subprogram was first included in a Selected
Acquisition Report'' and inserting ``December
2001 reporting period''; and
(4) in subparagraph (F), as so redesignated--
(A) by striking ``major defense acquisition
program or designated major subprogram'' and
inserting ``such program or subprogram''; and
(B) by striking ``date the program or
subprogram was first included in a Selected
Acquisition Report'' and inserting ``December
2001 reporting period''.
(b) Phase-In of Additional Information Requirements.--Section
2432(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by
subsection (a), shall apply to Selected Acquisition Reports
after the date of the enactment of this Act as follows:
(1) For the December 2014 reporting period, to
Selected Acquisition Reports for five major defense
acquisition programs or designated major subprograms,
as determined by the Secretary.
(2) For the December 2019 reporting period and each
reporting period thereafter, to Selected Acquisition
Reports for all major defense acquisition programs or
designated major subprograms.
(c) Additional Duties of Director of Cost Assessment and
Program Evaluation With Respect to Selected Acquisition
Reports.--
(1) Review required.--Section 2334(a) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(A) by striking ``and'' at the end of
paragraph (6);
(B) by striking the period and inserting ``;
and'' at the end of paragraph (7); and
(C) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph (8):
``(8) annually review the cost and associated
information required to be included, by section
2432(c)(1) of this title, in the Selected Acquisition
Reports required by that section.''.
(2) Additional information required in annual
report.--Section 2334(f)(1) of such title is amended--
(A) by striking ``report, an assessment of--
'' and inserting ``report--'';
(B) in each of subparagraphs (A), (B), and
(C), by inserting ``an assessment of'' before
the first word of the text;
(C) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and''
at the end;
(D) in subparagraph (C), by striking the
period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and
(E) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(D) a summary of the cost and associated
information reviewed under subsection (a)(8), an
identification of any trends in that information, an
aggregation of the cumulative risk of the portfolio of
systems reviewed under that subsection, and
recommendations for improving cost estimates on the
basis of the review under that subsection.''.
SEC. 813. AMENDMENT RELATING TO COMPELLING REASONS FOR WAIVING
SUSPENSION OR DEBARMENT.
Section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
in the second sentence by striking ``in a file available for
public inspection'' and inserting ``on a publicly accessible
website to the maximum extent practicable''.
SEC. 814. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM ON ACQUISITION OF MILITARY PURPOSE
NONDEVELOPMENTAL ITEMS.
Section 866(f)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124
Stat. 4296; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking ``the
date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this
Act.'' and inserting ``December 31, 2019.''.
Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs
SEC. 821. SYNCHRONIZATION OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS FOR MAJOR DEFENSE
ACQUISITION PROGRAMS.
(a) In General.--Section 2366b(a)(3) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ``and'' at the
end;
(2) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as subparagraph
(H); and
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the following
new subparagraph (G):
``(G) there is a plan to mitigate and account
for any costs in connection with any
anticipated de-certification of cryptographic
systems and components during the production
and procurement of the major defense
acquisition program to be acquired; and''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a)
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and
shall apply with respect to major defense acquisition programs
which are subject to Milestone B approval on or after the date
occurring six months after the date of the enactment of this
Act.
SEC. 822. ASSESSMENT OF DEDICATED GROUND CONTROL SYSTEM BEFORE
MILESTONE B APPROVAL OF MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION
PROGRAMS CONSTITUTING A SPACE PROGRAM.
(a) Cost Benefit Analysis Required.--Section 2366b(a) of
title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the
end and inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(4) in the case of a space system, performs a cost
benefit analysis for any new or follow-on satellite
system using a dedicated ground control system instead
of a shared ground control system, except that no cost
benefit analysis is required to be performed under this
paragraph for any Milestone B approval of a space
system after December 31, 2019.''.
(b) Requirement for Plan and Briefing.--Not later than one
year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
of Defense shall--
(1) develop a Department of Defense-wide long-term
plan for satellite ground control systems, including
the Department's Air Force Satellite Control Network;
and
(2) brief the congressional defense committees on
such plan.
SEC. 823. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT MANAGERS FOR
MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS.
Section 2337(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in subparagraph (G), by striking ``and'' at the
end;
(2) in subparagraph (H), by striking the period at
the end and inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(I) ensure that product support
arrangements for the weapon system describe how
such arrangements will ensure efficient
procurement, management, and allocation of
Government-owned parts inventories in order to
prevent unnecessary procurements of such
parts.''.
SEC. 824. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROCESSES
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF WEAPON SYSTEMS.
(a) Review Required.--The Comptroller General of the United
States shall carry out a comprehensive review of the processes
and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition
of weapon systems.
(b) Objective of Review.--The objective of the review
required by subsection (a) shall be to identify processes and
procedures for the acquisition of weapon systems that provide
little or no value added or for which any value added is
outweighed by cost or schedule delays without adding
commensurate value.
(c) Report.--Not later than January 31, 2015, the Comptroller
General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on the results of the review required by subsection (a)
and based on the objective set forth in subsection (b). The
report shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) A statement of any processes, procedures,
organizations, or layers of review that are recommended
by the Comptroller General for modification or
elimination, including the rationale for the
modification or elimination recommended based on the
objective set forth in subsection (b).
(2) Such other findings and recommendations,
including recommendations for legislative or
administrative action, as the Comptroller General
considers appropriate in light of the review required
by subsection (a) and the objective set forth in
subsection (b).
Subtitle D--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency
Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan
SEC. 831. PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY.
(a) Authority To Terminate or Void Contracts, Grants, and
Cooperative Agreements and To Restrict Future Award.--
(1) Identification of persons and entities.--The
Secretary of Defense shall establish in each covered
combatant command a program to identify persons or
entities, within the area of responsibility of such
covered combatant command, that--
(A) provide funds received under a contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement of the
Department of Defense directly or indirectly to
a covered person or entity; or
(B) fail to exercise due diligence to ensure
that none of the funds received under a
contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of
the Department of Defense are provided directly
or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(2) Notice of persons or entities identified.--Upon
the identification of a person or entity as meeting
subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1), the commander
of the combatant command concerned, and any deputies of
the commander specified by the commander for purposes
of this section, shall be notified in writing of such
identification of such person or entity.
(3) Responsive actions.--Upon receipt of a notice
under paragraph (2), the commander of the combatant
command concerned may, in consultation with the Under
Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and
the appropriate Chief of Mission, notify the heads of
appropriate contracting activities, in writing, of such
identification and request that the heads of such
contracting activities exercise the authorities
provided pursuant to paragraph (4) and the Department
of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation, as revised, with respect to any contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement that provides funding
directly or indirectly to the person or entity covered
by the notice.
(4) Authorities.--Not later than 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall revise the Department of Defense
Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to
authorize the head of a contracting activity in each
covered combatant command, pursuant to a request from
the commander of a covered combatant command under
paragraph (3)--
(A) to prohibit, limit, or otherwise place
restrictions on the award of any Department of
Defense contract, grant, or cooperative
agreement to a person or entity identified
pursuant to paragraph (1)(A);
(B) to terminate for default any Department
contract, grant, or cooperative agreement
awarded to a person or entity identified
pursuant to paragraph (1)(B); or
(C) to void in whole or in part any
Department contract, grant, or cooperative
agreement awarded to a person or entity
identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(A).
(b) Contract Clause.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of
Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation shall be revised to require that--
(A) the clause described in paragraph (2)
shall be included in each covered contract,
grant, and cooperative agreement of the
Department of Defense that is awarded on or
after the date of the enactment of this Act;
and
(B) to the maximum extent practicable, each
covered contract, grant, and cooperative
agreement of the Department of Defense that is
awarded before the date of the enactment of
this Act shall be modified to include the
clause described in paragraph (2).
(2) Clause described.--The clause described in this
paragraph is a clause that--
(A) requires the contractor, or the recipient
of the grant or cooperative agreement, to
exercise due diligence to ensure that none of
the funds received under the contract, grant,
or cooperative agreement are provided directly
or indirectly to a covered person or entity;
and
(B) notifies the contractor, or the recipient
of the grant or cooperative agreement, of the
authority of the head of the contracting
activity to terminate or void the contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement, in whole or in
part.
(3) Covered contract, grant, or cooperative
agreement.--In this subsection, the term ``covered
contract, grant, or cooperative agreement'' means a
contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with an
estimated value in excess of $50,000.
(4) Treatment as void.--For purposes of subsection
(a)(4) and the exercise under subsection (a)(3) of the
authorities in the Department of Defense Supplement to
the Federal Acquisition Regulation pursuant to this
subsection:
(A) A contract, grant, or cooperative
agreement that is void is unenforceable as
contrary to public policy.
(B) A contract, grant, or cooperative
agreement that is void in part is unenforceable
as contrary to public policy with regard to a
segregable task or effort under the contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement.
(c) Requirements Following Contract Actions.--Not later than
30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation shall be revised as follows:
(1) To require that any head of contracting activity
taking an action pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or
(a)(4) to terminate, void, or restrict a contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement notify in writing the
contractor or recipient of the grant or cooperative
agreement, as applicable, of the action.
(2) To permit, in such manner as the Department of
Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation as so revised shall provide, the contractor
or recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement
subject to an action taken pursuant to subsection
(a)(3) or (a)(4) to terminate or void the contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement, as the case may be, an
opportunity to challenge the action by requesting
administrative review within 30 days after receipt of
notice of the action.
(d) Annual Review.--The commanders of the covered combatant
commands shall, on an annual basis, review the lists of persons
and entities previously identified pursuant to subsection
(a)(1) in order to determine whether or not such persons and
entities continue to warrant identification pursuant to that
subsection. If a commander determines pursuant to such a review
that a person or entity no longer warrants identification
pursuant to subsection (a)(1), the commander shall notify the
heads of contracting activities of the Department of Defense in
writing of such determination.
(e) Protection of Classified Information.--Classified
information relied upon to make an identification pursuant to
subsection (a)(1) may not be disclosed to a contractor or a
recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement with respect to
which an action is taken pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or
(a)(4) or to their representatives, in the absence of a
protective order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction
established under Article I or Article III of the Constitution
of the United States that specifically addresses the conditions
upon which such classified information may be so disclosed.
(f) Delegation.--
(1) Responsibilities relating to identification and
review.--The commander of a covered combatant command
may delegate the responsibilities in subsection (a)(3)
to any deputies of the commander specified by the
commander pursuant to that subsection. The commander
may delegate any responsibilities under subsection (d)
to the deputy commander of the combatant command. Any
delegation of responsibilities under this paragraph
shall be made in writing.
(2) Nondelegation of responsibility for contract
actions.--The authority provided by subsections (a)(3)
and (a)(4) to terminate, void, or restrict contracts,
grants, and cooperative agreements may not be delegated
below the level of head of contracting activity.
(g) Inclusion of Information on Contract Actions in FAPIIS.--
Upon the termination, voiding, or restriction of a contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (a)(3)
or (a)(4), the head of contracting activity concerned shall
provide for the inclusion in the Federal Awardee Performance
and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other formal
system of records on contractors or entities, of appropriate
information on the termination, voiding, or restriction of the
contract, grant, or cooperative agreement.
(h) Reports.--
(1) In general.--Not later than March 1 each year
through 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the
use of the authorities in this section in the preceding
calendar year, including the following:
(A) For each instance in which a contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement was terminated
or voided, or entry into contracts, grants, and
cooperative agreements was restricted, pursuant
to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), the following:
(i) An explanation of the basis for
the action taken.
(ii) The value of the contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement
terminated or voided.
(iii) The value of all contracts,
grants, or cooperative agreements of
the Department of Defense in force with
the person or entity concerned at the
time the contract, grant, or
cooperative agreement was terminated or
voided.
(iv) Information on how the goods or
services covered by the terminated or
voided contract, grant, or cooperative
agreement were otherwise obtained by
the commander of the combatant command
concerned.
(B) For each instance in which a contract,
grant, or cooperative agreement of a person or
entity identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1)
was not terminated or voided pursuant to
subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), or the future
award of contracts, grants, and cooperative
agreements to such person or entity was not
restricted pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or
(a)(4), an explanation why such action was not
taken.
(2) Form.--Any report under this subsection may be
submitted in classified form.
(i) Other Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``covered combatant command'' means
United States Central Command, United States European
Command, United States Africa Command, United States
Southern Command, or United States Pacific Command.
(2) The term ``head of contracting activity'' has the
meaning given that term in subpart 601 of part 1 of the
Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(3) The term ``covered person or entity'' means a
person or entity that is actively opposing United
States or coalition forces involved in a contingency
operation in which members of the armed forces are
actively engaged in hostilities.
(j) Sunset.--The provisions of this section shall cease to be
effective on December 31, 2018.
SEC. 832. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
PRODUCED IN COUNTRIES ALONG A MAJOR ROUTE OF SUPPLY
TO AFGHANISTAN.
(a) Extension.--Subsection (f) of section 801 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-
84; 123 Stat. 2399), as amended by section 841(a) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1845), is further amended by striking
``December 31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
(b) Clarification of Authority.--Subsection (b)(1)(B) of such
section is amended--
(1) by striking ``and the NATO International Security
Assistance Force'' and inserting ``or NATO forces'';
and
(2) by striking ``to Afghanistan'' and inserting ``to
or from Afghanistan''.
TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management
Sec. 901. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense
business enterprise architecture.
Sec. 902. Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal
Government tenants onto military installations in the United
States.
Sec. 903. Clarification of authority for the command acquisition
executive of the United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 904. Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters.
Sec. 905. Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and
education.
Sec. 906. Modification of reference to major Department of Defense
headquarters activities instruction.
Sec. 907. Personnel security.
Subtitle B--Space Activities
Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy.
Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection.
Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy.
Sec. 914. Space control mission report.
Sec. 915. Responsive launch.
Sec. 916. Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program.
Sec. 917. Eagle Vision system.
Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities
Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in
commercial activities as security for intelligence collection
activities.
Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities.
Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service.
Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation.
Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters
Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of
Defense tactical data link systems.
Sec. 932. Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States
Cyber Command.
Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of
Defense.
Sec. 934. Modification of requirement for Report on Department of
Defense Progress in Defending the Department and the Defense
Industrial Base from Cyber Events.
Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of
the Department of Defense.
Sec. 936. Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses.
Sec. 937. Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 938. Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing
capabilities.
Sec. 939. Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems
and tactical communications systems.
Sec. 940. Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons.
Sec. 941. Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace.
Sec. 942. National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information
Assurance Education matters.
Subtitle E--Total Force Management
Sec. 951. Reviews of appropriate manpower performance.
Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management
SEC. 901. REVISIONS TO COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION PLAN FOR DEFENSE
BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.
Section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``defense business
enterprise architecture'' and inserting ``target
defense business systems computing environment
described in subsection (d)(3)'';
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) by striking ``existing as of September
30, 2011 (known as `legacy systems') that will
not be part of the defense business enterprise
architecture'' and inserting ``that will be
phased out of the defense business systems
computing environment within three years after
review and certification as `legacy systems' by
the investment management process established
under subsection (g)''; and
(B) by striking ``that provides for reducing
the use of those legacy systems in phases'';
and
(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ``legacy systems
(referred to in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part
of the target defense business systems computing
environment described in subsection (d)(3)'' and
inserting ``existing systems that are part of the
target defense business systems computing
environment''.
SEC. 902. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON POTENTIAL RELOCATION OF FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT TENANTS ONTO MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN
THE UNITED STATES.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than one year after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the
United States shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report containing the results of a review of the
potential for and obstacles to Federal agencies other than the
Department of Defense relocating onto military installations to
save costs or enhance security. At a minimum, the Comptroller
General shall answer the following questions in the report:
(1) What opportunities exist to permit non-Department
of Defense Federal agencies to locate operations onto
military installations having excess facilities
adequate for the tenant agencies' mission needs?
(2) What factors would the Department of Defense and
the potential tenant agencies need to consider in
determining whether such tenancy would be viable?
(3) What obstacles exist to the consolidation of non-
Department of Defense Federal agencies onto military
installations having adequate excess capacity?
(4) What non-Federal organizations are tenants on the
installations (such as those under the enhanced use
leasing program)?
(b) Specific Consideration of Installations That Support
Arctic Missions.--The report required under subsection (a)
shall specifically evaluate the potential for and obstacles to
consolidation of Federal tenants on installations that support
Arctic missions, focusing on Federal entities with homeland
security, defense, international trade, commerce, and other
national security-related functions that are compatible with
the missions of the military installations, or can be used to
protect national interests in the Arctic region.
SEC. 903. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE COMMAND ACQUISITION
EXECUTIVE OF THE UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS
COMMAND.
Section 167(e)(4)(C)(ii) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by inserting after ``shall be'' the following:
``responsible to the commander for rapidly delivering
acquisition solutions to meet validated special operations-
peculiar requirements, subordinate to the Defense Acquisition
Executive in matters of acquisition, subject to the same
oversight as the service acquisition executives, and''.
SEC. 904. STREAMLINING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANAGEMENT
HEADQUARTERS.
(a) Plan Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
develop a plan for streamlining Department of Defense
management headquarters by changing or reducing the size of
staffs, eliminating tiers of management, cutting functions that
provide little or no added value, and consolidating overlapping
and duplicative programs and offices.
(b) Elements of Plan.--The plan required by subsection (a)
shall include the following for each covered organization:
(1) A description of the planned changes or
reductions in staffing and services provided by
military personnel, civilian personnel, and contractor
personnel.
(2) A description of the planned changes or
reductions in management, functions, and programs and
offices.
(3) The estimated cumulative savings to be achieved
over a 10-fiscal-year period beginning with fiscal year
2015, and estimated savings to be achieved for each of
fiscal years 2015 through 2024.
(c) Covered Organization.--In this section, the term
``covered organization'' includes each of the following:
(1) The Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(2) The Joint Staff.
(3) The Defense Agencies.
(4) The Department of Defense field activities.
(5) The headquarters of the combatant commands.
(6) Headquarters, Department of the Army, including
the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the Office of
the Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff.
(7) The major command headquarters of the Army.
(8) The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the
Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, and
Headquarters, United States Marine Corps.
(9) The major command headquarters of the Navy and
the Marine Corps.
(10) Headquarters, Department of the Air Force,
including the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force,
the Office of the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Air
Staff.
(11) The major command headquarters of the Air Force.
(12) The National Guard Bureau.
(d) Reports.--
(1) Initial report.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall submit to the congressional defense committees
the plan required by subsection (a).
(2) Status report.--The Secretary shall include with
the Department of Defense materials submitted to
Congress with the budget of the President for each of
fiscal years 2016 through 2024 (as submitted to
Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United
States Code) a report describing the implementation of
the plan required by subsection (a) during the
preceding fiscal year and any modifications to the plan
required due to changing circumstances. Each such
report shall include the following:
(A) A summary of savings achieved for each
covered organization in the fiscal year covered
by such report.
(B) A description of the savings through
changes or reductions in staffing and services
provided by military personnel, civilian
personnel, and contractor personnel in the
fiscal year covered by such report.
(C) A description of the savings through
changes or reductions in management, functions,
and programs and offices in the fiscal year
covered by such report.
(D) In any case in which savings under the
plan fall short of the objective of the plan
for the fiscal year covered by such report, an
explanation of the reasons for the shortfall.
(E) A description of any modifications to the
plan made during the fiscal year covered by
such report, and an explanation of the reasons
for such modifications.
SEC. 905. UPDATE OF STATUTORY STATEMENT OF FUNCTIONS OF THE CHAIRMAN OF
THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF RELATING TO DOCTRINE,
TRAINING, AND EDUCATION.
(a) In General.--Paragraph (5) of section 153(a) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``and technical
standards, and executing actions,'' after ``policies'';
(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and
training''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraphs:
``(D) Formulating policies for concept development
and experimentation for the joint employment of the
armed forces.
``(E) Formulating policies for gathering, developing,
and disseminating joint lessons learned for the armed
forces.''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading of such paragraph is
amended by striking ``Doctrine, training, and education'' and
inserting ``Joint force development activities''.
SEC. 906. MODIFICATION OF REFERENCE TO MAJOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES INSTRUCTION.
Section 194(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking ``Directive 5100.73'' and all that follows and
inserting ``Instruction 5100.73, titled `Major DoD Headquarters
Activities'.''.
SEC. 907. PERSONNEL SECURITY.
(a) Comparative Analysis.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall, acting through the Director of Cost
Assessment and Program Evaluation and in consultation
with the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget, submit to the appropriate committees of
Congress a report setting forth a comprehensive
analysis comparing the quality, cost, and timeliness of
personnel security clearance investigations and
reinvestigations for employees and contractor personnel
of the Department of Defense that are conducted by the
Office of Personnel Management with the quality, cost,
and timeliness of personnel security clearance
investigations and reinvestigations for such personnel
that are conducted by components of the Department of
Defense.
(2) Elements of analysis.--The analysis under
paragraph (1) shall do the following:
(A) Determine and compare, for each of the
Office of Personnel Management and the
components of the Department that conduct
personnel security investigations as of the
date of the analysis, the quality, cost, and
timeliness associated with personnel security
investigations and reinvestigations of each
type and level of clearance, and identify the
elements that contribute to such cost,
schedule, and performance.
(B) Identify mechanisms for permanently
improving the transparency of the cost
structure of personnel security investigations
and reinvestigations.
(b) Personnel Security for Department of Defense Employees
and Contractors.--If the Secretary of Defense determines that
the current approach for obtaining personnel security
investigations and reinvestigations for employees and
contractor personnel of the Department of Defense is not the
most efficient and effective approach for the Department, the
Secretary shall develop a plan, by not later than October 1,
2014, for the transition of personnel security investigations
and reinvestigations to the approach preferred by the
Secretary.
(c) Strategy for Modernizing Personnel Security.--
(1) Strategy required.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, and the
Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall
jointly develop, implement, and provide to the
appropriate committees of Congress a strategy to
modernize all aspects of personnel security for the
Department of Defense with the objectives of improving
quality, providing for continuous monitoring,
decreasing unauthorized disclosures of classified
information, lowering costs, increasing efficiencies,
and enabling and encouraging reciprocity.
(2) Consideration of analysis.--In developing the
strategy under paragraph (1), the Secretary and the
Directors shall consider the results of the analysis
required by subsection (a) and the results of any
ongoing reviews of recent unauthorized disclosures of
national security information.
(3) Metrics.--
(A) Metrics required.--In developing the
strategy required by paragraph (1), the
Secretary and the Directors shall jointly
establish metrics to measure the effectiveness
of the strategy in meeting the objectives
specified in that paragraph.
(B) Report.--At the same time the budget of
the President for each of fiscal years 2016
through 2019 is submitted to Congress pursuant
to section 1105 of title 31, United States
Code, the Secretary and the Directors shall
jointly submit to the appropriate committees of
Congress a report on the metrics established
under paragraph (1), including an assessment
using the metrics of the effectiveness of the
strategy in meeting the objectives specified in
paragraph (1).
(4) Elements.--In developing the strategy required by
paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Directors shall
address issues including but not limited to the
following:
(A) Elimination of manual or inefficient
processes in investigations and
reinvestigations for personnel security,
wherever practicable, and automating and
integrating the elements of the investigation
and adjudication processes, including in the
following:
(i) The clearance application
process.
(ii) Investigation case management.
(iii) Adjudication case management.
(iv) Investigation methods for the
collection, analysis, storage,
retrieval, and transfer of data and
records from investigative sources and
between any case management systems.
(v) Records management for hiring and
clearance decisions.
(B) Elimination or reduction, where possible,
of the use of databases and information sources
that cannot be accessed and processed
automatically electronically, or modification
of such databases and information sources, if
appropriate and cost-effective, to enable
electronic access and processing.
(C) Access and analysis of government,
publically available, and commercial data
sources, including social media, that provide
independent information pertinent to
adjudication guidelines and termination
standards to improve quality and timeliness,
and reduce costs, of investigations and
reinvestigations.
(D) Use of government-developed and
commercial technology for continuous monitoring
and evaluation of government and commercial
data sources that can identify and flag
information pertinent to hiring and clearance
determinations.
(E) Standardization of forms used for routine
reporting required of cleared personnel (such
as travel, foreign contacts, and financial
disclosures) and use of continuous monitoring
technology to access databases containing such
reportable information to independently obtain
and analyze reportable data and events.
(F) Establishment of an authoritative central
repository of personnel security information
that is accessible electronically at multiple
levels of classification and eliminates
technical barriers to rapid access to
information necessary for eligibility
determinations and reciprocal recognition
thereof, including the ability to monitor the
status of an individual and any events related
to the continued eligibility of such individual
for employment or clearance during intervals
between investigations.
(G) Elimination or reduction of the scope of,
or alteration of the schedule for, periodic
reinvestigations of cleared personnel, when
such action is appropriate in light of the
information provided by continuous monitoring
or evaluation technology.
(H) Electronic integration of personnel
security processes and information systems with
insider threat detection and monitoring
systems, and pertinent law enforcement,
counterintelligence and intelligence
information, for threat detection and
correlation, including those processes and
systems operated by components of the
Department of Defense for purposes of local
security, workforce management, or other
related purposes.
(5) Risk-based monitoring.--The strategy required by
paragraph (1) shall--
(A) include the development of a risk-based
approach to monitoring and reinvestigation that
prioritizes which cleared individuals shall be
subject to frequent reinvestigations and random
checks, such as the personnel with the broadest
access to classified information or with access
to the most sensitive classified information,
including information technology specialists or
other individuals with such broad access
commonly known as ``super users'';
(B) ensure that if the system of continuous
monitoring for all cleared individuals
described in paragraph (4)(D) is implemented in
phases, such system shall be implemented on a
priority basis for the individuals prioritized
under subparagraph (A); and
(C) ensure that the activities of individuals
prioritized under subparagraph (A) shall be
monitored especially closely.
(d) Reciprocity of Clearances.--The Secretary of Defense and
the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly ensure the
reciprocity of personnel security clearances among positions
requiring personnel holding secret, top secret, or sensitive
compartmented information clearances, to the maximum extent
feasible consistent with national security requirements.
(e) Comptroller General Review.--
(1) Review required.--Not later than 150 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller
General of the United States shall carry out a review
of the personnel security process.
(2) Objective of review.--The objective of the review
required by paragraph (1) shall be to identify the
following:
(A) Differences between the metrics used by
the Department of Defense and other departments
and agencies that grant security clearances in
granting reciprocity for security clearances,
and the manner in which such differences can be
harmonized.
(B) The extent to which existing Federal
Investigative Standards are relevant, complete,
and sufficient for guiding agencies and
individual investigators as they conduct their
security clearance background investigations.
(C) The processes agencies have implemented
to ensure quality in the security clearance
background investigation process.
(D) The extent to which agencies have
developed and implemented outcome-focused
performance measures to track the quality of
security clearance investigations and any
insights from these measures.
(E) The processes agencies have implemented
for resolving incomplete or subpar
investigations, and the actions taken against
government employees and contractor personnel
who have demonstrated a consistent failure to
abide by quality assurance measures.
(3) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress
a report on the results of the review required by
paragraph (1).
(f) Task Force on Records Access for Security Clearance
Background Investigations.--
(1) Establishment.--The Suitability and Security
Clearance Performance Accountability Council, as
established by Executive Order No. 13467, shall convene
a task force to examine the different policies and
procedures that determine the level of access to public
records provided by State and local authorities in
response to investigative requests by Federal
Government employees or contracted employees carrying
out background investigations to determine an
individual's suitability for access to classified
information or secure government facilities.
(2) Membership.--The members of the task force shall
include, but need not be limited to, the following:
(A) The Chair of the Suitability and Security
Clearance Performance and Accountability
Council, who shall serve as chair of the task
force.
(B) A representative from the Office of
Personnel Management.
(C) A representative from the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence.
(D) A representative from the Department of
Defense responsible for administering security
clearance background investigations.
(E) Representatives from Federal law
enforcement agencies within the Department of
Justice and the Department of Homeland Security
involved in security clearance background
investigations.
(F) Representatives from State and local law
enforcement agencies, including--
(i) agencies in rural areas that have
limited resources and less than 500
officers; and
(ii) agencies that have more than
1,000 officers and significant
technological resources.
(G) A representative from Federal, State, and
local law enforcement associations involved
with security clearance background
administrative actions and appeals.
(H) Representatives from Federal, State, and
local judicial systems involved in the sharing
of records to support security clearance
background investigations.
(3) Initial meeting.--The task force shall convene
its initial meeting not later than 45 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
(4) Duties.--The task force shall do the following:
(A) Analyze the degree to which State and
local authorities comply with investigative
requests made by Federal Government employees
or contractor employees carrying out background
investigations to determine an individual's
suitability for access to classified
information or secure government facilities,
including the degree to which investigative
requests are required but never formally
requested.
(B) Analyze limitations on the access to
public records provided by State and local
authorities in response to investigative
requests by Federal Government employees and
contractor employees described in subparagraph
(A), including, but not be limited to,
limitations relating to budget and staffing
constraints on State and local authorities, any
procedural and legal obstacles impairing
Federal access to State and local law
enforcement records, or inadequate
investigative procedural standards for
background investigators.
(C) Provide recommendations for improving the
degree of cooperation and records-sharing
between State and local authorities and Federal
Government employees and contractor employees
described in subparagraph (A).
(5) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the task force shall
submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a
report setting forth a detailed statement of the
findings and conclusions of the task force pursuant to
this subsection, together with the recommendations of
the task force for such legislative or administrative
action as the task force considers appropriate.
(g) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate committees of Congress''
means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the
Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee
on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform, the Committee on
Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
Subtitle B--Space Activities
SEC. 911. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE SATELLITE REPORTING POLICY.
(a) Notification of Foreign Interference of National Security
Space.--Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security
space
``(a) Notice Required.--The Commander of the United States
Strategic Command shall, with respect to each intentional
attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a
United States national security space capability, provide to
the appropriate congressional committees--
``(1) not later than 48 hours after the Commander
determines that there is reason to believe such attempt
occurred, notice of such attempt; and
``(2) not later than 10 days after the date on which
the Commander determines that there is reason to
believe such attempt occurred, a notification described
in subsection (b) with respect to such attempt.
``(b) Notification Description.--A notification described in
this subsection is a written notification that includes--
``(1) the name and a brief description of the
national security space capability that was impacted by
an attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or
destroy a United States national security space
capability;
``(2) a description of such attempt, including the
foreign actor, the date and time of such attempt, and
any related capability outage and the mission impact of
such outage; and
``(3) any other information the Commander considers
relevant.
``(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term `appropriate congressional committees'
means--
``(1) the congressional defense committees; and
``(2) with respect to a notice or notification
related to an attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt,
degrade, or destroy a United States national security
space capability that is intelligence-related, the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House
of Representatives and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate.''.
(b) Table of Sections Amendment.--The table of sections at
the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end
the following item:
``2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security
space.''.
SEC. 912. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE DEFENSE AND PROTECTION.
(a) Review.--The Secretary of Defense and the Director of
National Intelligence shall jointly enter into an arrangement
with the National Research Council to respond to the near-term
and long-term threats to the national security space systems of
the United States by--
(1) conducting a review of--
(A) the range of options available to address
such threats, in terms of deterring hostile
actions, defeating hostile actions, and
surviving hostile actions until such actions
conclude;
(B) strategies and plans to counter such
threats, including resilience, reconstitution,
disaggregation, and other appropriate concepts;
and
(C) existing and planned architectures,
warfighter requirements, technology
development, systems, workforce, or other
factors related to addressing such threats; and
(2) recommending architectures, capabilities, and
courses of action to address such threats and actions
to address the affordability, technology risk, and any
other potential barriers or limiting factors in
implementing such courses of action.
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the National
Research Council shall submit to the congressional
defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the
Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a report
containing the results of the review conducted pursuant
to the arrangement under subsection (a) and the
recommended courses of action identified pursuant to
such arrangement.
(2) Form.--The report required under paragraph (1)
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may
include a classified annex.
(c) Space Protection Strategy.--Section 911(f)(1) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10
U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by striking ``including each of
the matters required by subsection (c).'' and inserting the
following: ``including--
``(A) each of the matters required by
subsection (c); and
``(B) a description of how the Department of
Defense and the intelligence community plan to
provide necessary national security
capabilities, through alternative space,
airborne, or ground systems, if a foreign actor
degrades, denies access to, or destroys United
States national security space capabilities.''.
SEC. 913. SPACE ACQUISITION STRATEGY.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) commercial satellite services, particularly
communications, are needed to satisfy Department of
Defense requirements;
(2) the Department predominately uses one-year leases
to obtain commercial satellite services, which are
often the most expensive and least strategic method to
acquire necessary commercial satellite services; and
(3) consistent with the required authorization and
appropriations, Congress encourages the Department to
pursue a variety of methods to reduce cost and meet the
necessary military requirements, including multi-year
leases and procurement of Government-owned payloads on
commercial satellites.
(b) Strategy Required.--The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense,
shall establish a strategy to enable the multi-year procurement
of commercial satellite services.
(c) Basis.--The strategy required under subsection (b) shall
include and be based on--
(1) an analysis of financial or other benefits to
acquiring satellite services through multi-year
acquisition approaches;
(2) an analysis of the risks associated with such
acquisition approaches;
(3) an identification of methods to address planning,
programming, budgeting, and execution challenges to
such approaches, including methods to address potential
termination liability or cancellation costs generally
associated with multi-year contracts;
(4) an identification of any changes needed in the
requirements development and approval processes of the
Department of Defense to facilitate effective and
efficient implementation of such strategy, including an
identification of any consolidation of requirements for
such services across the Department that may achieve
increased buying power and efficiency; and
(5) an identification of any necessary changes to
policies, procedures, regulations, or statutes.
(d) Briefings.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics,
in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of
the Department of Defense, shall provide to the
congressional defense committees a briefing regarding
the strategy required under subsection (b), including
the elements required under subsection (c).
(2) Interim briefing.--At the same time that the
budget for fiscal year 2015 is submitted to Congress
under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code,
the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the
Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense,
shall provide to the congressional defense committees
an interim briefing regarding the strategy required
under subsection (b).
SEC. 914. SPACE CONTROL MISSION REPORT.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the space control
mission of the Department of Defense. Such report shall
include--
(1) an identification of existing offensive and
defensive space control systems, policies, and
technical possibilities of future systems;
(2) an identification of any gaps or risks in
existing space control system architecture and
possibilities for improvement or mitigation of such
gaps or risks;
(3) a description of existing and future sensor
coverage and ground processing capabilities for space
situational awareness;
(4) an explanation of the extent to which all
relevant and available information is being utilized
for space situational awareness to detect, track, and
identify objects in space;
(5) a description of existing space situational
awareness data sharing practices, including what
information is being shared and what the benefits and
risks of such sharing are to the national security of
the United States; and
(6) plans for the future space control mission,
including force levels and structure.
SEC. 915. RESPONSIVE LAUNCH.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) United States Strategic Command has identified
three needs as a result of dramatically increased
demand and dependence on space capabilities as follows:
(A) To rapidly augment existing space
capabilities when needed to expand operational
capability.
(B) To rapidly reconstitute or replenish
critical space capabilities to preserve
continuity of operations capability.
(C) To rapidly exploit and infuse space
technological or operational innovations to
increase the advantage of the United States.
(2) Operationally responsive low cost launch could
assist in addressing such needs of the combatant
commands.
(b) Study.--The Department of Defense Executive Agent for
Space shall conduct a study on responsive, low-cost launch
efforts. Such study shall include--
(1) a review of existing and past operationally
responsive, low-cost launch efforts by domestic or
foreign governments or industry;
(2) an identification of the conditions or
requirements for responsive launch that would provide
the necessary military value, including the requisite
payload capacity, timelines for responsiveness, and the
target launch costs;
(3) a technology assessment of various methods to
develop an operationally responsive, low-cost launch
capability; and
(4) an assessment of the viability of greater
utilization of innovative methods, including the use of
secondary payload adapters on existing launch vehicles.
(c) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Executive
Agent for Space shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report containing--
(1) the results of the study conducted under
subsection (b); and
(2) a consolidated plan for development within the
Department of Defense of an operationally responsive,
low-cost launch capability.
(d) Government Accountability Office Review.--Not later than
60 days after the date on which the report required under
subsection (c) is submitted to the congressional defense
committees, the Comptroller General of the United States shall
submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of
such report and any related findings or recommendations that
the Comptroller General considers appropriate.
SEC. 916. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM.
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year
2014 by section 201 for the Department of Defense for research,
test, development, and evaluation, Air Force, and available for
the Space Protection Program (PE# 0603830F) as specified in the
funding table in section 4201, $10,000,000 may not be obligated
or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits to the
congressional defense committees a copy of the study conducted
at the direction of the Deputy Secretary of Defense on the
counter space strategy of the Department of Defense that
resulted in significant revisions to that strategy by the
Department.
SEC. 917. EAGLE VISION SYSTEM.
(a) Report Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Staff
of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the Eagle Vision system.
(2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph (1)
shall include a description and assessment of the
various commands, components of the Armed Forces, and
Defense Agencies to which control of the Eagle Vision
system could be transferred from the Headquarters of
the Air Force, including the actions to be completed
before transfer, potential schedules for transfer, and
the effects of transfer on the capabilities of the
system or use of the system by other elements of the
Department.
(b) Limitation on Certain Actions.--The Secretary of the Air
Force may not undertake any changes to the organization or
control of the Eagle Vision system until 90 days after the date
of the submittal to the congressional defense committees of the
report required by subsection (a).
Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities
SEC. 921. REVISION OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY TO ENGAGE IN
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AS SECURITY FOR INTELLIGENCE
COLLECTION ACTIVITIES.
(a) Congressional Submission for Required Audits.--The second
sentence of section 432(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by striking ``the intelligence committees'' and all
that follows and inserting ``the congressional defense
committees and the congressional intelligence committees (as
defined in section 437(c) of this title).''.
(b) Repeal of Designation of Defense Intelligence Agency as
Required Oversight Authority Within Department of Defense.--
Section 436(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``Defense Intelligence Agency'' and
inserting ``Department of Defense''; and
(2) by striking ``management and supervision'' and
inserting ``oversight''.
(c) Congressional Oversight.--Section 437 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the intelligence
committees'' and inserting ``congressional defense
committees and the congressional intelligence
committees'';
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) by striking ``Consistent with'' and all
that follows through ``the Secretary'' and
insert ``The Secretary''; and
(B) by striking ``the intelligence
committees'' and inserting ``congressional
defense committees and the congressional
intelligence committees''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(c) Congressional Intelligence Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term `congressional intelligence committees' has
the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National
Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).''.
SEC. 922. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PRIORITIES.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) establish a written policy governing the internal
coordination and prioritization of intelligence
priorities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense,
the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the
military departments to improve identification of the
intelligence needs of the Department of Defense;
(2) identify any significant intelligence gaps of the
Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff,
the combatant commands, and the military departments;
and
(3) provide to the congressional defense committees,
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on the policy
established under paragraph (1) and the gaps identified
under paragraph (2).
SEC. 923. DEFENSE CLANDESTINE SERVICE.
(a) Certification Required.--Not more than 50 percent of the
funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise
available to the Department of Defense for the Defense
Clandestine Service for fiscal year 2014 may be obligated or
expended for the Defense Clandestine Service until such time as
the Secretary of Defense certifies to the covered congressional
committees that--
(1) the Defense Clandestine Service is designed
primarily to--
(A) fulfill priorities of the Department of
Defense that are unique to the Department of
Defense or otherwise unmet; and
(B) provide unique capabilities to the
intelligence community (as defined in section
3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50
U.S.C. 3003(4))); and
(2) the Secretary of Defense has designed metrics
that will be used to ensure that the Defense
Clandestine Service is employed as described in
paragraph (1).
(b) Annual Assessments.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for
five years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
covered congressional committees a detailed assessment of
Defense Clandestine Service employment and performance based on
the metrics referred to in subsection (a)(2).
(c) Notification of Future Changes to Design.--Following the
submittal of the certification referred to in subsection (a),
in the event that any significant change is made to the Defense
Clandestine Service, the Secretary shall promptly notify the
covered congressional committees of the nature of such change.
(d) Quarterly Briefings.--The Secretary of Defense shall
quarterly provide to the covered congressional committees a
briefing on the deployments and collection activities of
personnel of the Defense Clandestine Service.
(e) Covered Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``covered congressional committees'' means
the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
SEC. 924. PROHIBITION ON NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM CONSOLIDATION.
(a) Prohibition.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated or
otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be
used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment
of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to execute--
(1) the separation of the National Intelligence
Program budget from the Department of Defense budget;
(2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence
Program budget within the Department of Defense budget;
or
(3) the establishment of a new appropriations account
or appropriations account structure for the National
Intelligence Program budget.
(b) Briefing Requirement.--Not later than 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and
the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly provide to
the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing
regarding any planning relating to the future execution of the
activities described in subsection (a) that has occurred during
the two-year period ending on such date and any anticipated
future planning relating to such execution or related efforts.
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) National intelligence program.--The term
``National Intelligence Program'' has the meaning given
the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of
1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(2) National intelligence program budget.--The term
``National Intelligence Program budget'' means the
portions of the Department of Defense budget designated
as part of the National Intelligence Program.
Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters
SEC. 931. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR INVENTORY OF DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE TACTICAL DATA LINK SYSTEMS.
Section 934(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1885; 10
U.S.C. 2225 note) is amended by inserting ``and an assessment
of vulnerabilities to such systems in anti-access or area-
denial environments'' before the semicolon.
SEC. 932. AUTHORITIES, CAPABILITIES, AND OVERSIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES
CYBER COMMAND.
(a) Provision of Certain Operational Capabilities.--The
Secretary of Defense shall take such actions as the Secretary
considers appropriate to provide the United States Cyber
Command operational military units with infrastructure and
equipment enabling access to the Internet and other types of
networks to permit the United States Cyber Command to conduct
the peacetime and wartime missions of the Command.
(b) Cyber Ranges.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall review existing
cyber ranges and adapt one or more such ranges, as
necessary, to support training and exercises of cyber
units that are assigned to execute offensive military
cyber operations.
(2) Elements.--Each range adapted under paragraph (1)
shall have the capability to support offensive military
operations against targets that--
(A) have not been previously identified and
prepared for attack; and
(B) must be compromised or neutralized
immediately without regard to whether the
adversary can detect or attribute the attack.
(c) Principal Advisor on Military Cyber Force Matters.--
(1) Designation.--The Secretary shall designate, from
among the personnel of the Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense for Policy, a Principal Cyber
Advisor to act as the principal advisor to the
Secretary on military cyber forces and activities. The
Secretary may only designate an official under this
paragraph if such official was appointed to the
position in which such official serves by and with the
advice and consent of the Senate.
(2) Responsibilities.--The Principal Cyber Advisor
shall be responsible for the following:
(A) Overall supervision of cyber activities
related to offensive missions, defense of the
United States, and defense of Department of
Defense networks, including oversight of policy
and operational considerations, resources,
personnel, and acquisition and technology.
(B) Such other matters relating to offensive
military cyber forces as the Secretary shall
specify for purposes of this subsection.
(3) Cross-functional team.--The Principal Cyber
Advisor shall--
(A) integrate the cyber expertise and
perspectives of appropriate organizations
within the Office of the Secretary of Defense,
Joint Staff, military departments, Defense
Agencies, and combatant commands, by
establishing and maintaining a full-time cross-
functional team of subject matter experts from
those organizations; and
(B) select team members, and designate a team
leader, from among those personnel nominated by
the heads of such organizations.
(d) Training of Cyber Personnel.--The Secretary shall
establish and maintain training capabilities and facilities in
the Armed Forces and, as the Secretary considers appropriate,
at the United States Cyber Command, to support the needs of the
Armed Forces and the United States Cyber Command for personnel
who are assigned offensive and defensive cyber missions in the
Department of Defense.
SEC. 933. MISSION ANALYSIS FOR CYBER OPERATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE.
(a) Mission Analysis Required.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall conduct a mission analysis of the cyber operations of the
Department of Defense.
(b) Elements.--The mission analysis under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) The concept of operations and concept of
employment for cyber operations forces.
(2) An assessment of the manpower needs for cyber
operations forces, including military requirements for
both active and reserve components and civilian
requirements.
(3) An assessment of the mechanisms for improving
recruitment, retention, and management of cyber
operations forces, including through focused
recruiting; educational, training, or certification
scholarships; bonuses; or the use of short-term or
virtual deployments without the need for permanent
relocation.
(4) A description of the alignment of the
organization and reporting chains of the Department,
the military departments, and the combatant commands.
(5) An assessment of the current, as of the date of
the analysis, and projected equipping needs of cyber
operations forces.
(6) An analysis of how the Secretary, for purposes of
cyber operations, depends upon organizations outside of
the Department, including industry and international
partners.
(7) Methods for ensuring resilience, mission
assurance, and continuity of operations for cyber
operations.
(8) An evaluation of the potential roles of the
reserve components in the concept of operations and
concept of employment for cyber operations forces
required under paragraph (1), including--
(A) in consultation with the Secretaries of
the military departments and the Commander of
the United States Cyber Command, an
identification of the Department of Defense
cyber mission requirements that could be
discharged by members of the reserve
components;
(B) in consultation with the Secretary of
Homeland Security, consideration of ways to
ensure that the Governors of the several
States, through the Council of Governors, as
appropriate, have an opportunity to provide the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of
Homeland Security an independent evaluation of
State cyber capabilities, and State cyber needs
that cannot be fulfilled through the private
sector;
(C) an identification of the existing
capabilities, facilities, and plans for cyber
activities of the reserve components,
including--
(i) an identification of current
positions in the reserve components
serving Department cyber missions;
(ii) an inventory of the existing
cyber skills of reserve component
personnel, including the skills of
units and elements of the reserve
components that are transitioning to
cyber missions;
(iii) an inventory of the existing
infrastructure of the reserve
components that contributes to the
cyber missions of the United States
Cyber Command, including the
infrastructure available to units and
elements of the reserve components that
are transitioning to such missions; and
(iv) an assessment of the manner in
which the military departments plan to
use the reserve components to meet
total force resource requirements, and
the effect of such plans on the
potential ability of members of the
reserve components to support the cyber
missions of the United States Cyber
Command;
(D) an assessment of whether the National
Guard, when activated in a State status (either
State Active Duty or in a duty status under
title 32, United States Code) can operate under
unique and useful authorities to support
domestic cyber missions and requirements of the
Department or the United States Cyber Command;
(E) an assessment of the appropriateness of
hiring on a part-time basis non-dual status
technicians who possess appropriate cyber
security expertise for purposes of assisting
the National Guard in protecting critical
infrastructure and carrying out cyber missions;
(F) an assessment of the current and
potential ability of the reserve components
to--
(i) attract and retain personnel with
substantial, relevant cyber technical
expertise who use those skills in the
private sector;
(ii) organize such personnel into
units at the State, regional, or
national level under appropriate
command and control arrangements for
Department cyber missions;
(iii) meet and sustain the training
standards of the United States Cyber
Command; and
(iv) establish and manage career
paths for such personnel;
(G) a determination of how the reserve
components could contribute to total force
solutions to cyber operations requirements of
the United States Cyber Command; and
(H) development of an estimate of the
personnel, infrastructure, and training
required, and the costs that would be incurred,
in connection with implementing a strategy for
integrating the reserve components into the
total force for support of the cyber missions
of the Department and United States Cyber
Command, including by taking into account the
potential savings under the strategy through
use of personnel referred to in subparagraph
(C)(i), provided that for specific cyber units
that exist or are transitioning to a cyber
mission, the estimate shall examine whether
there are misalignments in existing plans
between unit missions and facility readiness to
support such missions.
(c) Limitations on Certain Actions.--
(1) Reduction in personnel of air national guard
cyber units.--No reduction in personnel of a cyber unit
of the Air National Guard of the United States may be
implemented or carried out in fiscal year 2014 before
the submittal of the report required by subsection (d).
(2) Reduction in personnel and capacity of air
national guard red teams.--No reduction in the
personnel or capacity of a Red Team of the Air National
Guard of the United States may be implemented or
carried out unless the report required by subsection
(d) includes a certification that the personnel or
capacity to be reduced is directly related to Red Team
capabilities that are no longer required.
(d) Report Required.--Not later than 30 days after the
completion of the mission analysis under subsection (a), the
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a report containing--
(1) the results of the mission analysis;
(2) recommendations for improving or changing the
roles, organization, missions, concept of operations,
or authorities related to the cyber operations of the
Department; and
(3) any other matters concerning the mission analysis
that the Secretary considers appropriate.
(e) National Guard Assessment.--Not later than 30 days after
the date on which the Secretary submits the report required
under subsection (d), the Chief of the National Guard Bureau
shall submit to the congressional defense committees an
assessment of the role of the National Guard in supporting the
cyber operations mission of the Department of Defense as such
mission is described in such report.
(f) Form.--The report under subsection (d) shall be submitted
in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
SEC. 934. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE PROGRESS IN DEFENDING THE DEPARTMENT AND
THE DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE FROM CYBER EVENTS.
Section 935(b)(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124
Stat. 4339) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking
``capabilities.'' and inserting ``capabilities,
including estimated economic impacts.''; and
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``remediation.''
and inserting ``remediation and estimates of economic
losses resulting from such event.''.
SEC. 935. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SOFTWARE LICENSES OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) Updated Plan.--
(1) Update.--The Chief Information Officer of the
Department of the Defense shall, in consultation with
the chief information officers of the military
departments and the Defense Agencies, update the plan
for the inventory of selected software licenses of the
Department of Defense required under section 937 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 (Public Law
112-239; 10 U.S.C. 2223 note) to include a plan for the
inventory of all software licenses of the Department of
Defense for which a military department spends more
than $5,000,000 annually on any individual title,
including a comparison of licenses purchased with
licenses in use.
(2) Elements.--The update required under paragraph
(1) shall--
(A) include plans for implementing an
automated solution capable of reporting the
software license compliance position of the
Department and providing a verified audit
trail, or an audit trail otherwise produced and
verified by an independent third party;
(B) include details on the process and
business systems necessary to regularly perform
reviews, a procedure for validating and
reporting deregistering and registering new
software, and a mechanism and plan to relay
that information to the appropriate chief
information officer; and
(C) a proposed timeline for implementation of
the updated plan in accordance with paragraph
(3).
(3) Submission.--Not later than September 30, 2015,
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees the updated plan required under paragraph
(1).
(b) Performance Plan.--If the Chief Information Officer of
the Department of Defense determines through the implementation
of the process and business systems in the updated plan
required by subsection (a) that the number of software licenses
of the Department for an individual title for which a military
department spends greater than $5,000,000 annually exceeds the
needs of the Department for such software licenses, or the
inventory discloses that there is a discrepancy between the
number of software licenses purchased and those in actual use,
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense
shall implement a plan to bring the number of such software
licenses into balance with the needs of the Department and the
terms of any relevant contract.
SEC. 936. CYBER OUTREACH AND THREAT AWARENESS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES.
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the
Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives
and the Senate a briefing on options for strengthening outreach
and threat awareness programs for small businesses (as defined
in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) that
are awarded contracts by the Department of Defense to assist
such businesses to--
(1) understand the gravity and scope of cyber
threats;
(2) develop a plan to protect intellectual property;
and
(3) develop a plan to protect the networks of such
businesses.
SEC. 937. JOINT FEDERATED CENTERS FOR TRUSTED DEFENSE SYSTEMS FOR THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) Federation Required.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall
provide for the establishment of a joint federation of
capabilities to support the trusted defense system
needs of the Department of Defense (in this section
referred to as the ``federation'').
(2) Purpose.--The purpose of the federation shall be
to serve as a joint, Department-wide federation of
capabilities to support the trusted defense system
needs of the Department to ensure security in the
software and hardware developed, acquired, maintained,
and used by the Department, pursuant to the trusted
defense systems strategy of the Department and
supporting policies related to software assurance and
supply chain risk management.
(b) Discharge of Establishment.--In providing for the
establishment of the federation, the Secretary shall consider
whether the purpose of the federation can be met by existing
centers in the Department. If the Department determines that
there are capabilities gaps that cannot be satisfied by
existing centers, the Department shall devise a strategy for
creating and providing resources for such capabilities to fill
such gaps.
(c) Charter.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a charter for
the federation. The charter shall--
(1) be established pursuant to the trusted defense
systems strategy of the Department and supporting
policies related to software assurance and supply chain
risk management; and
(2) set forth--
(A) the role of the federation in supporting
program offices in implementing the trusted
defense systems strategy of the Department;
(B) the software and hardware assurance
expertise and capabilities of the federation,
including policies, standards, requirements,
best practices, contracting, training, and
testing;
(C) the requirements for the discharge by the
federation, in coordination with the Center for
Assured Software of the National Security
Agency, of a program of research and
development to improve automated software code
vulnerability analysis and testing tools;
(D) the requirements for the federation to
procure, manage, and distribute enterprise
licenses for automated software vulnerability
analysis tools; and
(E) the requirements for the discharge by the
federation, in coordination with the Defense
Microelectronics Activity, of a program of
research and development to improve hardware
vulnerability, testing, and protection tools.
(d) Report.--The Secretary shall submit to the congressional
defense committees, at the time of the submittal to Congress of
the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 pursuant to
section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, a report on the
funding and management of the federation. The report shall set
forth such recommendations as the Secretary considers
appropriate regarding the optimal placement of the federation
within the organizational structure of the Department,
including responsibility for the funding and management of the
federation.
SEC. 938. SUPERVISION OF THE ACQUISITION OF CLOUD COMPUTING
CAPABILITIES.
(a) Supervision.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall,
acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Under
Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Chief
Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and
the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight
Council, supervise the following:
(A) Review, development, modification, and
approval of requirements for cloud computing
solutions for data analysis and storage by the
Armed Forces and the Defense Agencies,
including requirements for cross-domain,
enterprise-wide discovery and correlation of
data stored in cloud and non-cloud computing
databases, relational and non-relational
databases, and hybrid databases.
(B) Review, development, modification,
approval, and implementation of plans for the
competitive acquisition of cloud computing
systems or services to meet requirements
described in subparagraph (A), including plans
for the transition from current computing
systems to systems or services acquired.
(C) Development and implementation of plans
to ensure that the cloud systems or services
acquired pursuant to subparagraph (B) are
interoperable and universally accessible and
usable through attribute-based access controls.
(D) Integration of plans under subparagraphs
(B) and (C) with enterprise-wide plans of the
Armed Forces and the Department of Defense for
the Joint Information Environment and the
Defense Intelligence Information Environment.
(2) Direction.--The Secretary shall provide direction
to the Armed Forces and the Defense Agencies on the
matters covered by paragraph (1) by not later than
March 15, 2014.
(b) Integration With Intelligence Community Efforts.--The
Secretary shall coordinate with the Director of National
Intelligence to ensure that activities under this section are
integrated with the Intelligence Community Information
Technology Enterprise in order to achieve interoperability,
information sharing, and other efficiencies.
(c) Limitation.--The requirements of subparagraphs (B), (C),
and (D) of subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to a contract for
the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities in an amount
less than $1,000,000.
(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to alter or affect the authorities or
responsibilities of the Director of National Intelligence under
section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C.
3024).
SEC. 939. CYBER VULNERABILITIES OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEMS
AND TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than one year after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to Congress a report on the status of the capability of
each military department to operate in non-permissive and
hostile cyber environments.
(b) Elements.--The report required by subsection (a) shall
include the following:
(1) A description and assessment of potential cyber
threats or threat systems to major weapon systems and
tactical communications systems that could emerge in
the next five years.
(2) A description and assessment of cyber
vulnerabilities of current major weapon and tactical
communications systems.
(3) A detailed description of the current strategy to
detect, deter, and defend against cyber attacks on
current and planned major weapon systems and tactical
communications systems.
(4) An estimate of the costs anticipated to be
incurred in addressing cyber vulnerabilities to
Department of Defense weapon systems and tactical
communications systems over the next five years.
(c) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
SEC. 940. CONTROL OF THE PROLIFERATION OF CYBER WEAPONS.
(a) Interagency Process for Establishment of Policy.--The
President shall establish an interagency process to provide for
the establishment of an integrated policy to control the
proliferation of cyber weapons through unilateral and
cooperative law enforcement activities, financial means,
diplomatic engagement, and such other means as the President
considers appropriate.
(b) Industry Participation.--The President shall include, to
the extent practicable, private industry participation in the
process established under subsection (a).
(c) Objectives.--The objectives of the interagency process
established under subsection (a) shall be as follows:
(1) To identify the intelligence, law enforcement,
and financial sanctions tools that can and should be
used to suppress the trade in cyber tools and
infrastructure that are or can be used for criminal,
terrorist, or military activities while preserving the
ability of governments and the private sector to use
such tools for legitimate purposes of self-defense.
(2) To establish a statement of principles to control
the proliferation of cyber weapons, including
principles for controlling the proliferation of cyber
weapons that can lead to expanded cooperation and
engagement with international partners.
(d) Recommendations.--The interagency process established
under subsection (a) shall develop, by not later than 270 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, recommendations on
means for the control of the proliferation of cyber weapons,
including a draft statement of principles and a review of
applicable legal authorities.
SEC. 941. INTEGRATED POLICY TO DETER ADVERSARIES IN CYBERSPACE.
(a) Integrated Policy.--The President shall establish an
interagency process to provide for the development of an
integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace.
(b) Objective.--The objective of the interagency process
established under subsection (a) shall be to develop a
deterrence policy for reducing cyber risks to the United States
and our allies.
(c) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 270 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report
setting forth the integrated policy developed pursuant
to subsection (a).
(2) Form.--The report under paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
SEC. 942. NATIONAL CENTERS OF ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE IN INFORMATION
ASSURANCE EDUCATION MATTERS.
(a) Preservation of Designation During Academic Years 2013-
2014 and 2014-2015.--Each institution of higher education that
was designated by the National Security Agency and the
Department of Homeland Security as a National Center of
Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education as of
January 1, 2013, shall continue to be designated as such a
Center through June 30, 2015, provided that such institution
maintains the standards by which such institution was
originally designated as such a Center.
(b) Assessment and Recommendation of Accreditation or
Designation Process.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the
Director of the National Security Agency, and other appropriate
departments and agencies of the Federal Government and non-
Federal organizations, shall--
(1) assess the National Centers of Academic
Excellence in Information Assurance Education program
strengths and weaknesses, including processes and
criteria used to develop curricula and designate an
institution of higher education as a National Center of
Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education;
(2) assess the maturity of information assurance as
an academic discipline;
(3) assess the role the Federal Government should
play in the future development of curricula and other
criteria for designating or accrediting information
assurance education programs of institutions of higher
education as National Centers of Academic Excellence in
Information Assurance Education;
(4) assess the advantages and disadvantages of
broadening the governance structure of such Centers;
(5) assess the extent to which existing and emerging
curricula and other criteria for designation as such a
Center is aligned with the National Initiative for
Cybersecurity Education and will provide the knowledge
and skills needed by the information assurance
workforce for existing and future employment;
(6) make recommendations for improving and evolving
the mechanisms and processes for developing the
curricula and other criteria for accrediting or
designating information assurance programs of
institutions of higher education as Centers; and
(7) make recommendations on transitioning the
responsibility for developing the curricula and other
criteria for accrediting or designating information
assurance programs of institutions of higher education
as Centers from the sole administration of the National
Security Agency.
(c) Assessment of Department of Defense Collaboration With
Centers.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall assess
the collaboration of the Department of Defense with the
National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information
Assurance Education. Such assessment shall include--
(1) the extent to which the information security
scholarship program of the Department of Defense
established under chapter 112 of title 10, United
States Code, contributes to--
(A) building the capacity to educate the
information assurance and cybersecurity
workforce needed for the future; and
(B) employing exceptional information
assurance and cybersecurity workers in the
Department; and
(2) mechanisms for increasing Department employment
of graduates of such Centers.
(d) Plan.--
(1) In general.--Not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland
Security, the Director of the National Security Agency,
and other appropriate departments and agencies of the
Federal Government and non-Federal organizations, shall
submit to Congress--
(A) a plan for implementing the
recommendations made pursuant to subsection (b)
on improving and evolving the mechanisms and
processes for developing the curricula and
other criteria for accrediting or designating
the information assurance programs of
institutions of higher education as National
Centers of Academic Excellence in Information
Assurance Education;
(B) the results of the assessments conducted
under subsections (b) and (c); and
(C) the recommendations made under subsection
(b).
(2) Consultation.--In developing the plan under
paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with
appropriate representatives of information assurance
interests in departments and agencies of the Federal
Government, State and local governments, academia, and
the private sector.
(e) Institution of Higher Education Defined.--In this
section, the term ``institution of higher education'' has the
meaning given the term in section 101 of the Higher Education
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).
Subtitle E--Total Force Management
SEC. 951. REVIEWS OF APPROPRIATE MANPOWER PERFORMANCE.
(a) Reports Required.--Section 2330a of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as
subsections (i) and (j), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following
new subsections (g) and (h):
``(g) Inspector General Report.--Not later than May 1 of each
year, beginning with 2014 and ending with 2016, the Inspector
General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report containing the
Inspector General's assessment of--
``(1) the efforts by the Department of Defense to
compile the inventory pursuant to subsection (c); and
``(2) the reviews conducted under subsection (e),
including the actions taken to resolve the findings of
the reviews in accordance with section 2463 of this
title.
``(h) Comptroller General Report.--Not later than September
30 of each year, beginning with 2014 and ending with 2016, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report containing the
Comptroller General's assessment of the efforts by the
Department of Defense to implement subsections (e) and (f).''.
(b) Extension of Comptroller General Report on Inventory.--
Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2402) is amended
by striking ``2011 and 2012'' and inserting ``2011, 2012, 2013,
2014, and 2015''.
TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--Financial Matters
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act.
Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial
statements.
Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security
Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization.
Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities
Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and
counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.
Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide
support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-
terrorism activities.
Sec. 1013. Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional
support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign
governments.
Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards
Sec. 1021. Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for
the construction of naval vessels.
Sec. 1022. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations
at no cost to the Navy.
Sec. 1023. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of
Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships.
Sec. 1024. Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions.
Sec. 1025. Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III
ships.
Sec. 1026. Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment.
Sec. 1027. Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of
the strike forces of the Navy.
Subtitle D--Counterterrorism
Sec. 1031. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on
military commissions.
Sec. 1032. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism
Fellowship Program reporting requirement.
Sec. 1033. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities
in the United States to house detainees transferred from
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release
of individuals detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1035. Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1036. Report on information relating to individuals detained at
Parwan, Afghanistan.
Sec. 1037. Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in
military commissions established to try individuals detained
at Guantanamo.
Sec. 1038. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain,
rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo
who are transferred to Yemen.
Sec. 1039. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at
Guantanamo if transferred to the United States.
Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations
Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations.
Sec. 1042. Counterterrorism operational briefings.
Sec. 1043. Report on process for determining targets of lethal or
capture operations.
Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces
Sec. 1051. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-
capable aircraft based in Europe.
Sec. 1052. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command,
Control, and Communications System.
Sec. 1053. Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements
of Nuclear Weapons Council.
Sec. 1054. Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear
weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons
delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control
system.
Sec. 1055. Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad.
Sec. 1056. Implementation of New START Treaty.
Sec. 1057. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently
targetable reentry vehicles.
Sec. 1058. Report on New START Treaty.
Sec. 1059. Report on implementation of the recommendations of the
Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation
Report.
Sec. 1060. Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms
reductions with the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1061. Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control
treaty obligations.
Sec. 1062. Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the
nuclear forces of the United States.
Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations
Sec. 1071. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to
analyze captured records.
Sec. 1072. Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic
spectrum.
Sec. 1073. Extension of authority to provide military transportation
services to certain other agencies at the Department of
Defense reimbursement rate.
Sec. 1074. Notification of modifications to Army force structure.
Sec. 1075. Aircraft joint training.
Subtitle H--Studies and Reports
Sec. 1081. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress.
Sec. 1082. Oversight of combat support agencies.
Sec. 1083. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency
coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology.
Sec. 1084. Repeal and modification of reporting requirements.
Sec. 1085. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of
Department of Defense efficiencies.
Sec. 1086. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations
Forces and United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 1087. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems.
Sec. 1088. Report on foreign language support contracts for the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 1089. Civil Air Patrol.
Subtitle I--Other Matters
Sec. 1091. Technical and clerical amendments.
Sec. 1092. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major
automated information system programs.
Sec. 1093. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to
issue non-premium aviation insurance.
Sec. 1094. Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and
authority to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for
certain nongovernmental personnel.
Sec. 1095. Amendments to certain national commissions.
Sec. 1096. Strategy for future military information operations
capabilities.
Sec. 1097. Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security.
Sec. 1098. Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire
suppression and other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the
Air Force.
Subtitle A--Financial Matters
SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.
(a) Authority to Transfer Authorizations.--
(1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary
of Defense that such action is necessary in the
national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts
of authorizations made available to the Department of
Defense in this division for fiscal year 2014 between
any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any
subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so
transferred shall be merged with and be available for
the same purposes as the authorization to which
transferred.
(2) Limitation.--Except as provided in paragraph (3),
the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary
may transfer under the authority of this section may
not exceed $5,000,000,000.
(3) Exception for transfers between military
personnel authorizations.--A transfer of funds between
military personnel authorizations under title IV shall
not be counted toward the dollar limitation in
paragraph (2).
(b) Limitations.--The authority provided by subsection (a) to
transfer authorizations--
(1) may only be used to provide authority for items
that have a higher priority than the items from which
authority is transferred; and
(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item
that has been denied authorization by Congress.
(c) Effect on Authorization Amounts.--A transfer made from
one account to another under the authority of this section
shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the
account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal
to the amount transferred.
(d) Notice to Congress.--The Secretary shall promptly notify
Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).
SEC. 1002. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT.
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall
be determined by reference to the latest statement titled
``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act,
jointly submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by
the Chairmen of the House and Senate Budget Committees,
provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the
vote on passage in the House acting first on the conference
report or amendment between the Houses.
SEC. 1003. AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FISCAL YEAR 2018 FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
(a) Audit of DOD Financial Statements.--In addition to the
requirement under section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-
84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) that the Financial Improvement and
Audit Readiness Plan describe specific actions to be taken and
the costs associated with ensuring that the financial
statements of the Department of Defense are validated as ready
for audit by not later than September 30, 2017, upon the
conclusion of fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall
ensure that a full audit is performed on the financial
statements of the Department of Defense for such fiscal year.
The Secretary shall submit to Congress the results of that
audit by not later than March 31, 2019.
(b) Inclusion of Audit in Financial Improvement Audit
Readiness Plan.--Section 1003(a)(2)(A) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10
U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended--
(1) in clause (i), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in clause (ii), by inserting ``and'' after the
semicolon; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
``(iii) ensuring the audit of the
financial statements of the Department
of Defense for fiscal year 2018 occurs
by not later than March 31, 2019.''.
SEC. 1004. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION TO SUSTAIN NUCLEAR WEAPONS
MODERNIZATION.
(a) Transfer Authorized.--If the amount authorized to be
appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear
Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made
available for fiscal year 2014 is less than $8,400,000,000 (the
amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal
year 2014 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public
Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2549)), the Secretary of Defense may
transfer, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 pursuant to this
Act, to the Secretary of Energy an amount, not to exceed
$150,000,000, to be available only for weapons activities of
the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(b) Notice to Congress.--In the event of a transfer under
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify
Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the
Department of Defense account or accounts from which funds are
transferred.
(c) Transfer Mechanism.--Any funds transferred under this
section shall be transferred in accordance with established
procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor
provisions of law.
(d) Construction of Authority.--The transfer authority
provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other
transfer authority provided under this Act.
Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities
SEC. 1011. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT UNIFIED COUNTER-DRUG AND
COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN COLOMBIA.
(a) Extension.--Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-
375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1010
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1907), is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``2013'' and
inserting ``2014''; and
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ``2013'' and
inserting ``2014''.
(b) Notice to Congress on Assistance.--Not later than 15 days
before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald W.
Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005
(as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal
year 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the
assistance to be provided, including the types of such
assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the anticipated
completion date and duration of the provision of such
assistance.
SEC. 1012. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR JOINT TASK FORCES TO PROVIDE
SUPPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES CONDUCTING
COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTIVITIES.
Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1594; 10 U.S.C.
371 note), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1907) is amended by striking ``2013''
and inserting ``2015''.
SEC. 1013. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
SUPPORT FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES OF CERTAIN
FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS.
(a) Extension.--Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public
Law 105-85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by
section 1006 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1557), is
further amended by striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2016''.
(b) Maximum Amount of Support.--Subsection (e)(2) of such
section 1033, as so amended, is further amended by striking
``2013'' and inserting ``2016''.
(c) Additional Governments Eligible To Receive Support.--
Subsection (b) of such section 1033, as so amended, is further
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
``(36) Government of Chad.
``(37) Government of Libya.
``(38) Government of Mali.
``(39) Government of Niger.''.
Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards
SEC. 1021. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL LONG-RANGE PLAN FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL VESSELS.
(a) Annual Naval Vessel Construction Plan.--Subsection (b) of
section 231 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) by striking ``should be designed'' both
places it appears and inserting ``shall be
designed''; and
(B) by striking ``is capable of supporting''
both places it appears and inserting
``supports''; and
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``and
capabilities'' after ``naval vessel force
structure''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(D) The estimated total cost of construction for
each vessel used to determine estimated levels of
annual funding under subparagraph (C).''.
(b) Assessment When Construction Plan Does Not Meet Force
Structure Requirements.--Such section is further amended by
striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new
subsection (c):
``(c) Assessment When Annual Naval Vessel Construction Plan
Does Not Meet Force Structure Requirements.--If the annual
naval vessel construction plan for a fiscal year under
subsection (b) does not result in a force structure or
capabilities that meet the requirements identified in
subsection (b)(2)(B), the Secretary shall include with the
defense budget materials for that fiscal year an assessment of
the extent of the strategic and operational risk to national
security associated with the reduced force structure of naval
vessels over the period of time that the required force
structure or capabilities are not achieved. Such assessment
shall include an analysis of whether the risks are acceptable,
and plans to mitigate such risks. Such assessment shall be
coordinated in advance with the commanders of the combatant
commands and the Nuclear Weapons Council under section 179 of
this title.''.
SEC. 1022. CLARIFICATION OF SOLE OWNERSHIP RESULTING FROM SHIP
DONATIONS AT NO COST TO THE NAVY.
(a) Clarification of Transfer Authority.--Subsection (a) of
section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to
read as follows:
``(a) Authority to Make Transfer.--The Secretary of the Navy
may convey, by donation, all right, title, and interest to any
vessel stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any captured
vessel, for use as a museum or memorial for public display in
the United States, to--
``(1) any State, the District of Columbia, any
Commonwealth or possession of the United States, or any
municipal corporation or political subdivision thereof;
or
``(2) any nonprofit entity.''.
(b) Clarification of Limitations on Liability and
Responsibility.--Subsection (b) of such section is amended to
read as follows:
``(b) Limitations on Liability and Responsibility.--(1) The
United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and
their officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity for any injury or damage to any person or property
occurring on a vessel donated under this section.
``(2) Notwithstanding any other law, the Department of
Defense, and the officers and employees of the Department of
Defense, shall have no responsibility or obligation to make,
engage in, or provide funding for, any improvement, upgrade,
modification, maintenance, preservation, or repair to a vessel
donated under this section.''.
(c) Clarification That Transfers to Be Made at No Cost to the
Department of Defense.--
(1) In general.--Subsection (c) of such section is
amended--
(A) by inserting after ``under this section''
the following: ``, the maintenance and
preservation of that vessel as a museum or
memorial, and the ultimate disposal of that
vessel, including demilitarization of Munitions
List items at the end of the useful life of the
vessel as a museum or memorial,''; and
(B) by striking ``the United States'' and
inserting ``the Department of Defense''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The heading for subsection
(c) of such section is amended by striking ``United
States'' and inserting ``Department of Defense''.
(d) Application of Environmental Laws; Definitions.--Such
section is further amended by adding at the end the following
new subsections:
``(e) Application of Environmental Laws.--Nothing in this
section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State,
interstate, and local environmental laws and regulations,
including the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et
seq.) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et
seq.), to the Department of Defense or to a donee.
``(f) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `nonprofit entity' means any entity
qualifying as an exempt organization under section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
``(2) The term `Munitions List' means the United
States Munitions List created and controlled under
section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
2778).
``(3) The term `donee' means any entity receiving a
vessel pursuant to subsection (a).''.
(e) Clerical Amendments.--
(1) Section heading.--The heading of such section is
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured
vessels: conveyance by donation''.
(2) Table of sections.--The item relating to such
section in the table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 633 of such title is amended to read as
follows:
``7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels:
conveyance by donation.' '''.
SEC. 1023. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT OR INACTIVATION OF
TICONDEROGA CLASS CRUISERS OR DOCK LANDING SHIPS.
(a) Limitation on Availability of Funds.--Except as provided
in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or
expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in
storage a cruiser or dock landing ship.
(b) Exception.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), the funds
referred to in such subsection may be obligated or expended to
retire the U.S.S. Denver, LPD9.
SEC. 1024. EXTENSION AND REMEDIATION OF NAVY CONTRACTING ACTIONS.
(a) Authority for Short-term Extension or Renewal of Leases
for Vessels Supporting the Transit Protection System Escort
Program.--
(1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 2401 of
title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy
may extend or renew the lease of not more than four
blocking vessels supporting the Transit Protection
System Escort Program after the date of the expiration
of the lease of such vessels, as in effect on the date
of the enactment of this Act. Such an extension shall
be for a term that is the shorter of--
(A) the period beginning on the date of the
expiration of the lease in effect on the date
of the enactment of this Act and ending on the
date on which the Secretary determines that a
substitute is available for the capabilities
provided by the lease, or that the capabilities
provided by the vessel are no longer required;
or
(B) 180 days.
(2) Funding.--Amounts authorized to be appropriated
by section 301 and available for operation and
maintenance, Navy, as specified in the funding tables
in section 4301, may be available for the extension or
renewal of a lease under paragraph (1).
(3) Notice to congress.--Prior to extending or
renewing a lease under paragraph (1), the Secretary of
the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense
committees notification of the proposed extension or
renewal. Such notification shall include--
(A) a detailed description of the term of the
proposed contract for the extension or renewal
of the lease and a justification for extending
or renewing the lease rather than obtaining the
capability provided for by the lease, charter,
or services involved through purchase of the
vessel; and
(B) a plan for meeting the capability
provided for by the lease upon the completion
of the term of the lease contract, as extended
or renewed under paragraph (1).
(b) Authority for Acceptance of Payment in Kind in Settlement
of A-12 Aircraft Litigation.--Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, during fiscal year 2014 and any subsequent
fiscal year, the Secretary of the Navy is authorized to accept
and retain the following consideration in lieu of a monetary
payment for purposes of the settlement of A-12 aircraft
litigation arising from the default termination of Contract No.
N00019-88-C-0050:
(1) From General Dynamics Corporation, credit in an
amount not to exceed $198,000,000 toward the design,
construction, and delivery of the steel deckhouse,
hangar, and aft missile launching system for the DDG
1002.
(2) From the Boeing Company, three EA-18G Growler
aircraft, with installed Airborne Electric Attack kits,
valued at an amount not to exceed $198,000,000, at no
cost to the Department of the Navy.
SEC. 1025. REPORT COMPARING COSTS OF DDG 1000 AND DDG 51 FLIGHT III
SHIPS.
Not later than March 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
providing an updated comparison of the costs and risks of
acquiring DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III vessels equipped for
enhanced ballistic missile defense capability. The report shall
include each of the following:
(1) An updated estimate of the total cost to develop,
procure, operate, and support ballistic missile defense
capable DDG 1000 destroyers equipped with the air and
missile defense radar.
(2) The estimate of the Secretary of the total cost
of the current plan to develop, procure, operate, and
support Flight III DDG 51 destroyers.
(3) Details on the assumed ballistic missile defense
requirements and construction schedules for both the
DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III destroyers referred to
in paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively.
(4) An updated comparison of the program risks and
the resulting ship capabilities in all dimensions (not
just ballistic missile defense) of the options referred
to in paragraphs (1) and (2).
(5) Any other information the Secretary determines
appropriate.
SEC. 1026. REPORT ON NAVAL VESSELS AND THE FORCE STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than 30 days after the date
of the submittal of the annual naval vessel construction plan
required under section 231 of title 10, United States Code, for
fiscal year 2015, the Chief of Naval Operations shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the current
requirements for combatant vessels of the Navy and the
anticipated requirements for such vessels during the 30-year
period following the submittal of the report.
(b) Elements.--The report required by subsection (a) shall
include each of the following:
(1) A description of the naval capability
requirements identified by the combatant commands in
developing the Force Structure Assessment in 2005 and
revalidating that Assessment in 2010.
(2) The capabilities for each class of vessel that
was assumed in the Force Structure Assessment.
(3) An assessment of the capabilities of the current
fleet of combatant vessels of the Navy to meet current
and anticipated requirements.
(4) An assessment of how the Navy is currently
managing deployment schedules to meet combatant
commander requirements with a smaller force than
specified in the Force Structure Assessment of 2005,
including the impact on--
(A) the material condition of the naval force
due to longer deployment times; and
(B) long-term retention rates, especially in
critical specialties.
(5) An assessment of the capabilities of the
anticipated fleet of combatant vessels of the Navy to
meet emerging threats over the next 30 years.
(6) An assessment of how the Navy will meet combatant
command requirements for forward-deployed naval
capabilities with a smaller number of ships and
submarines.
(7) An assessment of how the Navy will manage the
risk of massing a greater set of capabilities on a
smaller number of ships while facing an expanding range
of asymmetrical threats, including--
(A) anti-access/area-denial capabilities;
(B) diesel-electric submarines;
(C) mines; and
(D) anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles.
(8) The assessment of the Commandant of the Marine
Corps of--
(A) the operational risk associated with the
current and the planned number of ships of the
amphibious assault force, including vessels
designated as LHA, LHD, LPD, or LSD; and
(B) the capabilities required to meet the
needs of the Marine Corps for future ships of
the amphibious assault force.
(c) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
SEC. 1027. MODIFICATION OF POLICY RELATING TO MAJOR COMBATANT VESSELS
OF THE STRIKE FORCES OF THE NAVY.
Section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 7291 note) is amended--
(1) by striking subsection (a) and redesignating
subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (a) and (b),
respectively; and
(2) in subsection (a), as so redesignated--
(A) by striking ``the request shall be for''
and inserting ``the request shall include a
specific assessment of''; and
(B) by inserting ``in the analysis of
alternatives'' after ``nuclear power system''.
Subtitle D--Counterterrorism
SEC. 1031. CLARIFICATION OF PROCEDURES FOR USE OF ALTERNATE MEMBERS ON
MILITARY COMMISSIONS.
(a) Primary and Alternate Members.--
(1) Number of members.--Subsection (a) of section
948m of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ``at least five
members'' and inserting ``at least five
primary members and as many alternate
members as the convening authority
shall detail''; and
(ii) by adding at the end the
following new sentence: ``Alternate
members shall be designated in the
order in which they will replace an
excused primary member.''; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting
``primary'' after ``the number of''.
(2) General rules.--Such section is further amended--
(A) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c)
as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after subsection (a) the
following new subsections (b) and (c):
``(b) Primary Members.--Primary members of a military
commission under this chapter are voting members.
``(c) Alternate Members.--(1) A military commission may
include alternate members to replace primary members who are
excused from service on the commission.
``(2) Whenever a primary member is excused from service on
the commission, an alternate member, if available, shall
replace the excused primary member and the trial may
proceed.''.
(3) Excuse of members.--Subsection (d) of such
section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is
amended--
(A) in the matter before paragraph (1), by
inserting ``primary or alternate'' before
``member'';
(B) by striking ``or'' at the end of
paragraph (2);
(C) by striking the period at the end of
paragraph (3) and inserting ``; or''; and
(D) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
``(4) in the case of an alternate member, in order to
reduce the number of alternate members required for
service on the commission, as determined by the
convening authority.''.
(4) Absent and additional members.--Subsection (e) of
such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is
amended--
(A) in the first sentence--
(i) by inserting ``the number of
primary members of'' after
``Whenever'';
(ii) by inserting ``primary'' before
``members required by''; and
(iii) by inserting ``and there are no
remaining alternate members to replace
the excused primary members'' after
``subsection (a)''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new
sentence: ``An alternate member who was present
for the introduction of all evidence shall not
be considered to be a new or additional
member.''.
(b) Challenges.--Section 949f of such title is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``primary or
alternate'' before ``members''; and
(2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the
following new sentence: ``Nothing in this section
prohibits the military judge from awarding to each
party such additional peremptory challenges as may be
required in the interests of justice.''.
(c) Number of Votes Required.--Section 949m of such title is
amended--
(1) by inserting ``primary'' before ``members'' each
place it appears; and
(2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the
following new paragraph:
``(4) The primary members present for a vote on a sentence
need not be the same primary members who voted on the
conviction if the requirements of section 948m(d) of this title
are met.''.
SEC. 1032. MODIFICATION OF REGIONAL DEFENSE COMBATING TERRORISM
FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENT.
(a) In General.--Section 2249c(c) of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``, including
engagement activities for program alumni,'' after
``subsection (a)'';
(2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ``program''
the following: ``, including a list of any unfunded or
unmet training requirements and requests''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(5) A discussion and justification of how the
program fits within the theater security priorities of
each of the commanders of the geographic combatant
commands.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a)
shall apply with respect to a report submitted for a fiscal
year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 1033. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY
FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE DETAINEES
TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION,
GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.
(a) In General.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated or
otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be
used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment
of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to construct or
modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or
possessions to house any individual detained at Guantanamo for
the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or
under the control of the Department of Defense unless
authorized by Congress.
(b) Exception.--The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not
apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(c) Individual Detained at Guantanamo Defined.--In this
section, the term ``individual detained at Guantanamo'' has the
meaning given that term in section 1035(e)(2).
SEC. 1034. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER OR RELEASE
OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL
STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.
No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made
available to the Department of Defense may be used during the
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and
ending on December 31, 2014, to transfer, release, or assist in
the transfer or release to or within the United States, its
territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any
other detainee who--
(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the
Armed Forces of the United States; and
(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by
the Department of Defense.
SEC. 1035. TRANSFERS TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT
UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.
(a) Authority to Transfer Under Certain Circumstances.--The
Secretary of Defense is authorized to transfer or release any
individual detained at Guantanamo to the individual's country
of origin, or any other foreign country, if--
(1) the Secretary determines, following a review
conducted in accordance with the requirements of
section 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 801 note) and Executive
Order No. 13567, that the individual is no longer a
threat to the national security of the United States;
or
(2) such transfer or release outside the United
States is to effectuate an order affecting disposition
of the individual by a court or competent tribunal of
the United States having jurisdiction.
(b) Determination Required Prior to Transfer.--Except as
provided in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may
transfer an individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or
control of the individual's country origin, or any other
foreign country, only if the Secretary determines that--
(1) actions that have been or are planned to be taken
will substantially mitigate the risk of such individual
engaging or reengaging in any terrorist or other
hostile activity that threatens the United States or
United States persons or interests; and
(2) the transfer is in the national security interest
of the United States.
(c) Factors to Be Considered in Making Determination.--In
making the determination specified in subsection (b), the
Secretary of Defense shall specifically evaluate and take into
consideration the following factors:
(1) The recommendations of the Guantanamo Detainee
Review Task Force established pursuant to Executive
Order No. 13492 and the recommendations of the Periodic
Review Boards established pursuant to No. Executive
Order 13567, as applicable.
(2) The security situation in the foreign country to
which the individual is to be transferred, including
whether or not the country is a state sponsor of
terrorism, the presence of foreign terrorist groups,
and the threat posed by such groups to the United
States.
(3) Any confirmed case in which an individual
transferred to the foreign country to which the
individual is to be transferred subsequently engaged in
terrorist or other hostile activity that threatened the
United States or United States persons or interests.
(4) Any actions taken by the United States or the
foreign country to which the individual is to be
transferred, or change in circumstances in such
country, that reduce the risk of reengagement of the
type described in paragraph (3).
(5) Any assurances provided by the government of the
foreign country to which the individual is to be
transferred, including that--
(A) such government maintains control over
any facility at which the individual is to be
detained if the individual is to be housed in a
government-controlled facility; and
(B) such government has taken or agreed to
take actions to substantially mitigate the risk
of the individual engaging or reengaging in any
terrorist or other hostile activity that
threatens the United States or United States
persons or interests.
(6) An assessment of the capacity, willingness, and
past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country
described in paragraph (5) in meeting any assurances it
has provided, including assurances under paragraph (5)
regarding its capacity and willingness to mitigate the
risk of reengagement.
(7) Any record of cooperation by the individual to be
transferred with United States intelligence and law
enforcement authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial
agreement, while in the custody of or under the
effective control of the Department of Defense, and any
agreements and effective mechanisms that may be in
place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide
continued cooperation with United States intelligence
and law enforcement authorities.
(8) In the case of an individual who has been tried
in a court or competent tribunal of the United States
having jurisdiction on charges based on the same
conduct that serves as a basis for the determination
that the individual is an enemy combatant, whether or
not the individual has been acquitted of such charges
or has been convicted and has completed serving the
sentence pursuant to the conviction.
(d) Notification.--The Secretary of Defense shall notify the
appropriate committees of Congress of a determination of the
Secretary under subsection (a) or (b) not later than 30 days
before the transfer or release of the individual under such
subsection. Each notification shall include, at a minimum, the
following:
(1) A detailed statement of the basis for the
transfer or release.
(2) An explanation of why the transfer or release is
in the national security interests of the United
States.
(3) A description of any actions taken to mitigate
the risks of reengagement by the individual to be
transferred or released, including any actions taken to
address factors relevant to a prior case of
reengagement described in subsection (c)(3).
(4) A copy of any Periodic Review Board findings
relating to the individual.
(5) A description of the evaluation conducted
pursuant to subsection (c), including a summary of the
assessment required by paragraph (6) of such
subsection.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate committees of Congress''
means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee
on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on
Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives.
(2) The term ``individual detained at Guantanamo''
means any individual located at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009,
who--
(A) is not a citizen of the United States or
a member of the Armed Forces of the United
States; and
(B) is--
(i) in the custody or under the
control of the Department of Defense;
or
(ii) otherwise under detention at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba.
(f) Repeal of Superseded Authorities.--The following
provisions of law are repealed:
(1) Section 1028 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81; 125 Stat. 1567; 10 U.S.C. 801 note).
(2) Section 1028 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239; 126 Stat. 1914; 10 U.S.C. 801 note).
SEC. 1036. REPORT ON INFORMATION RELATING TO INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT
PARWAN, AFGHANISTAN.
(a) Classified Report.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
classified report on information relating to the individuals
detained by the Department of Defense at the Detention Facility
at Parwan, Afghanistan, pursuant to the Authorization for Use
of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) who
have been determined to represent an enduring security threat
to the United States. Such report shall cover any individual
detained at such facility as of the date of the enactment of
this Act. Such report shall include for each such covered
individual--
(1) a description of the relevant organization or
organizations with which the individual is affiliated;
(2) whether the individual had ever been in the
custody or under the effective control of the United
States at any time before being detained at such
facility and, if so, where the individual had been in
such custody or under such effective control; and
(3) whether the individual has been directly linked
to the death of any member of the United States Armed
Forces or any United States Government employee.
(b) Declassification Review.--Upon submittal of the
classified report required under subsection (a), the Secretary
of Defense shall conduct a declassification review of such
report to determine what information, if any, may be made
publicly available in an unclassified summary of the
information contained in the report. In conducting such
declassification review, the Secretary shall make such summary
information publicly available to the maximum extent
practicable, consistent with national security.
SEC. 1037. GRADE OF CHIEF PROSECUTOR AND CHIEF DEFENSE COUNSEL IN
MILITARY COMMISSIONS ESTABLISHED TO TRY INDIVIDUALS
DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO.
(a) In General.--For purposes of any military commission
established under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code,
to try an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms
are defined in section 948a of such title) who is detained at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the chief
defense counsel and the chief prosecutor shall have the same
grade (as that term is defined in section 101(b)(7) of such
title).
(b) Waiver.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may
temporarily waive the requirement specified in
subsection (a), if the Secretary determines that
compliance with such subsection would--
(A) be infeasible due to a non-availability
of qualified officers of the same grade to fill
the billets of chief defense counsel and chief
prosecutor; or
(B) cause a significant disruption to
proceedings established under chapter 47A of
title 10, United States Code.
(2) Reports.--Not later than 30 days after the
Secretary issues a waiver under paragraph (1), the
Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives
the following:
(A) A copy of the waiver and the
determination of the Secretary to issue the
waiver.
(B) A statement of the basis for the
determination, including an explanation of the
non-availability of qualified officers or the
significant disruption concerned.
(C) Notice of the time period during which
the waiver is in effect.
(c) Guidance.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue
guidance to ensure that the office of the chief defense counsel
and the office of the chief prosecutor receive equitable
resources, personnel support, and logistical support for
conducting their respective duties in connection with any
military commission established under chapter 47A of title 10,
United States Code, to try an alien unprivileged enemy
belligerent (as such terms are defined in section 948a of such
title) who is detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
SEC. 1038. REPORT ON CAPABILITY OF YEMENI GOVERNMENT TO DETAIN,
REHABILITATE, AND PROSECUTE INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT
GUANTANAMO WHO ARE TRANSFERRED TO YEMEN.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than 120 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the congressional
defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the
House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign
Relations of the Senate a report on the capability of the
government of Yemen to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute
individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to
Yemen. Such report shall include an assessment of any
humanitarian issues that may be encountered in transferring
individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen.
(b) Individual Detained at Guantanamo Defined.--In this
section, the term ``individual detained at Guantanamo'' has the
meaning given such term in section 1035(e)(2).
SEC. 1039. REPORT ON ATTACHMENT OF RIGHTS TO INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT
GUANTANAMO IF TRANSFERRED TO THE UNITED STATES.
(a) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation
with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the
congressional defense committees, the Committee on the
Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on
the Judiciary of the Senate a report on the legal rights, if
any, for which an individual detained at Guantanamo (as such
term is defined in section 1035(e)(2)), if transferred to the
United States, may become eligible, by reason of such transfer.
(b) Elements of Report.--The report required by subsection
(a) shall include each of the following:
(1) An assessment of the extent to which an
individual detained at Guantanamo, if transferred to
the United States, could become eligible, by reason of
such transfer, for--
(A) relief from removal from the United
States, including pursuant to the Convention
against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment;
(B) any required release from immigration
detention, including pursuant to the decision
of the Supreme Court in Zadvydas v. Davis;
(C) asylum or withholding of removal; or
(D) any additional constitutional right.
(2) For any right referred to in paragraph (1) for
which the Attorney General determine such an individual
could become eligible if so transferred, a description
of the reasoning behind such determination and an
explanation of the nature of the right.
(3) An analysis of the extent to which legislation or
other steps could address any legal rights described in
paragraph (1).
Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations
SEC. 1041. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE MILITARY OPERATIONS.
(a) Notification Required.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 3 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:
``Sec. 130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military
operations
``(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall promptly
submit to the congressional defense committees notice in
writing of any sensitive military operation conducted under
this title following such operation. Department of Defense
support to operations conducted under the National Security Act
of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.) is addressed in the classified
annex prepared to accompany the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
``(b) Procedures.--(1) The Secretary of Defense shall
establish and submit to the congressional defense committees
procedures for complying with the requirements of subsection
(a) consistent with the national security of the United States
and the protection of operational integrity.
``(2) The congressional defense committees shall ensure that
committee procedures designed to protect from unauthorized
disclosure classified information relating to national security
of the United States are sufficient to protect the information
that is submitted to the committees pursuant to this section.
``(c) Briefing Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall
periodically brief the congressional defense committees on
Department of Defense personnel and equipment assigned to
sensitive military operations.
``(d) Sensitive Military Operation Defined.--The term
`sensitive military operation' means a lethal operation or
capture operation conducted by the armed forces outside the
United States and outside a theater of major hostilities
pursuant to--
``(1) the Authorization for Use of Military Force
(Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note); or
``(2) any other authority except--
``(A) a declaration of war; or
``(B) a specific statutory authorization for
the use of force other than the authorization
referred to in paragraph (1).
``(e) Exception.--The notification requirement under
subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a sensitive
military operation executed within the territory of Afghanistan
pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public
Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).
``(f) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to provide any new authority or to alter or otherwise
affect the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.), the
Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50
U.S.C. 1541 note), or any requirement under the National
Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 130e the following new
item:
``130f. Congressional notification regarding sensitive military
operations.''.
(b) Effective Date.--Section 130f of title 10, United States
Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to
any sensitive military operation (as defined in subsection (d)
of such section) executed on or after the date of the enactment
of this Act.
(c) Deadline for Submittal of Procedures.--The Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
the procedures required under section 130f(b) of title 10,
United States Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later
than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 1042. COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATIONAL BRIEFINGS.
(a) Briefings Required.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 23 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 484
the following new section:
``Sec. 485. Quarterly counterterrorism operations briefings
``(a) Briefings Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly
briefings outlining Department of Defense counterterrorism
operations and related activities.
``(b) Elements.--Each briefing under subsection (a) shall
include each of the following:
``(1) A global update on activity within each
geographic combatant command and how such activity
supports the respective theater campaign plan.
``(2) An overview of authorities and legal issues,
including limitations.
``(3) An overview of interagency activities and
initiatives.
``(4) Any other matters the Secretary considers
appropriate.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 484 the following new
item:
``485. Quarterly counterterrorism operations briefings.''.
(b) Conforming Repeal.--Section 1031 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125
Stat. 1570; 10 U.S.C. 167 note) is hereby repealed.
SEC. 1043. REPORT ON PROCESS FOR DETERMINING TARGETS OF LETHAL OR
CAPTURE OPERATIONS.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report containing an
explanation of the legal and policy considerations and approval
processes used in determining whether an individual or group of
individuals could be the target of a lethal operation or
capture operation conducted by the Armed Forces of the United
States outside the United States and outside of Afghanistan.
Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces
SEC. 1051. NOTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION OR CONSOLIDATION OF
DUAL-CAPABLE AIRCRAFT BASED IN EUROPE.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
President should not reduce or consolidate the basing of dual-
capable aircraft of the United States that are based in Europe
unless--
(1) the President takes into account whether the
Russian Federation has carried out similar reductions
or consolidations with respect to dual-capable aircraft
of Russia;
(2) the Secretary of Defense has consulted with the
member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO) with respect to the planned reduction or
consolidation of dual-capable aircraft of the United
States; and
(3) there is a consensus among such member states
that the nuclear posture of NATO is not adversely
affected by such reduction or consolidation.
(b) Notification.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 24 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 497
the following new section:
``Sec. 497a. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of
dual-capable aircraft based in Europe
``(a) Notification.--Not less than 90 days before the date on
which the Secretary of Defense reduces or consolidates the
dual-capable aircraft of the United States that are based in
Europe, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a notification of such planned reduction or
consolidation, including the following:
``(1) The reasons for such planned reduction or
consolidation.
``(2) Any effects of such planned reduction or
consolidation on the extended deterrence mission of the
United States.
``(3) The manner in which the military requirements
of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) will
continue to be met in light of such planned reduction
or consolidation.
``(4) A statement by the Secretary on the response of
NATO to such planned reduction or consolidation.
``(5) Whether there is any change in the force
posture of the Russian Federation as a result of such
planned reduction or consolidation, including with
respect to the nonstrategic nuclear weapons of Russia
that are within range of the member states of NATO.
``(b) Dual-capable Aircraft Defined.--In this section, the
term `dual-capable aircraft' means aircraft that can perform
both conventional and nuclear missions.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 497 the following new
item:
``497a. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-
capable aircraft based in Europe.''.
SEC. 1052. COUNCIL ON OVERSIGHT OF THE NATIONAL LEADERSHIP COMMAND,
CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
(a) Establishment.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 7 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 171 the
following new section:
``Sec. 171a. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command,
Control, and Communications System
``(a) Establishment.--There is within the Department of
Defense a council to be known as the `Council on Oversight of
the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications
System' (in this section referred to as the `Council').
``(b) Membership.--The members of the Council shall be as
follows:
``(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy.
``(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics.
``(3) The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
``(4) The Commander of the United States Strategic
Command.
``(5) The Director of the National Security Agency.
``(6) The Chief Information Officer of the Department
of Defense.
``(7) Such other officers of the Department of
Defense as the Secretary may designate.
``(c) Co-Chair.--The Council shall be co-chaired by the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
``(d) Responsibilities.--(1) The Council shall be responsible
for oversight of the command, control, and communications
system for the national leadership of the United States,
including nuclear command, control, and communications.
``(2) In carrying out the responsibility for oversight of the
command, control, and communications system as specified in
paragraph (1), the Council shall be responsible for the
following:
``(A) Oversight of performance assessments (including
interoperability).
``(B) Vulnerability identification and mitigation.
``(C) Architecture development.
``(D) Resource prioritization.
``(E) Such other responsibilities as the Secretary of
Defense shall specify for purposes of this section.
``(e) Annual Reports.--At the same time each year that the
budget of the President is submitted to Congress pursuant to
section 1105(a) of title 31, the Council shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the activities of
the Council. Each report shall include the following:
``(1) A description and assessment of the activities
of the Council during the previous fiscal year.
``(2) A description of the activities proposed to be
undertaken by the Council during the period covered by
the current future-years defense program under section
221 of this title.
``(3) Any changes to the requirements of the command,
control, and communications system for the national
leadership of the United States made during the
previous year, along with an explanation for why the
changes were made and a description of the effects of
the changes to the capability of the system.
``(4) A breakdown of each program element in such
budget that relates to the system, including how such
program element relates to the operation and
sustainment, research and development, procurement, or
other activity of the system.
``(f) Budget and Funding Matters.--(1) Not later than 30 days
after the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal
year under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the
United States Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment of--
``(A) whether such budget allows the Federal
Government to meet the required capabilities of the
command, control, and communications system for the
national leadership of the United States during the
fiscal year covered by the budget and the four
subsequent fiscal years; and
``(B) if the Commander determines that such budget
does not allow the Federal Government to meet such
required capabilities, a description of the steps being
taken to meet such required capabilities.
``(2) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assessment
of the Commander of the United States Strategic Command under
paragraph (1), the Chairman shall submit to the congressional
defense committees--
``(A) such assessment as it was submitted to the
Chairman; and
``(B) any comments of the Chairman.
``(3) If a House of Congress adopts a bill authorizing or
appropriating funds for the activities of the command, control,
and communications system for the national leadership of the
United States that, as determined by the Council, provides
insufficient funds for such activities for the period covered
by such bill, the Council shall notify the congressional
defense committees of the determination.
``(g) Notification of Anomalies.--(1) The Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
written notification of an anomaly in the nuclear command,
control, and communications system for the national leadership
of the United States that is reported to the Secretary or the
Council by not later than 14 days after the date on which the
Secretary or the Council learns of such anomaly, as the case
may be.
``(2) In this subsection, the term `anomaly' means any
unplanned, irregular, or abnormal event, whether unexplained or
caused intentionally or unintentionally by a person or a
system.
``(h) National Leadership of the United States Defined.--In
this section, the term `national leadership of the United
States' means the following:
``(1) The President.
``(2) The Vice President.
``(3) Such other civilian officials of the United
States Government as the President shall designate for
purposes of this section.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 7 of such title is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 171 the
following new item:
``171a. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command,
Control, and Communications System.''.
(3) Report on establishment.--Not later than 60 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the Council on Oversight
of the National Leadership Command, Control, and
Communications System established by section 171a of
title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph
(1), including the following:
(A) The charter and organizational structure
of the Council.
(B) Such recommendations for legislative
action as the Secretary considers appropriate
to improve the authorities relating to the
Council.
(C) A funding plan over the period of the
current future-years defense program under
section 221 of title 10, United States Code, to
ensure a robust and modern nuclear command,
control, and communications capability.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 491 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking subsection (c); and
(2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection
(c).
SEC. 1053. MODIFICATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS COUNCIL.
(a) Responsibilities.--Subsection (d) of section 179 of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking paragraph (10); and
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (11) and (12) as
paragraphs (10) and (11), respectively.
(b) Annual Report.--Subsection (g) of such section is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(6) A description and assessment of the joint
efforts of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
of Energy to develop common security practices that
improve the security of the nuclear weapons and
facilities of the Department of Defense and the
Department of Energy.''.
(c) Technical Amendment.--Such subsection (g) is further
amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ``on
the following'' and inserting ``that includes the following''.
SEC. 1054. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINE FOR REPORT ON PLAN FOR NUCLEAR
WEAPONS STOCKPILE, NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMPLEX, NUCLEAR
WEAPONS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS
COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM.
Section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1576) is
amended--
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``on the
Plan'' and all that follows through ``Control System''
and inserting ``Required'';
(2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Together with the
budget of the President submitted to Congress'' and
inserting ``Not later than 30 days after the submission
to Congress of the budget of the President''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(4) Extension of deadline for report.--
``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph
(B), if the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Energy jointly determine that a
report required by paragraph (1) for a fiscal
year will not be able to be transmitted to the
committees specified in that paragraph by the
time required under that paragraph, such
Secretaries shall--
``(i) promptly, and before the
submission to Congress of the budget of
the President for that fiscal year
under section 1105(a) of title 31,
United States Code, notify those
committees of the expected date for the
transmission of the report; and
``(ii) not later than 30 days after
the submission of that budget to
Congress, provide a briefing to those
committees on the content of the
report.
``(B) Limitation.--In no case may the
President transmit a report required by
paragraph (1) for a fiscal year to the
committees specified in that paragraph later
than 60 days after the submission to Congress
of the budget of the President for that fiscal
year.''.
SEC. 1055. PROHIBITION ON ELIMINATION OF NUCLEAR TRIAD.
(a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or
expended to reduce, convert, or decommission any strategic
delivery system if such reduction, conversion, or
decommissioning would eliminate a leg of the nuclear triad.
(b) Nuclear Triad Defined.--In this section, the term
``nuclear triad'' means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of
the United States composed of the following:
(1) Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles.
(2) Submarine-launched ballistic missiles and
associated ballistic missile submarines.
(3) Nuclear-certified strategic bombers.
SEC. 1056. IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW START TREATY.
(a) Implementation.--
(1) Fiscal year 2014 activities.--With respect to
reductions to the nuclear forces of the United States
necessary to meet the New START Treaty levels, the
Secretary of Defense may only use funds authorized to
be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available
for fiscal year 2014 to carry out activities to prepare
for such reductions. Subject to the limitation in
subsection (b), such activities may include the
preparation of any documents needed to support an
environmental assessment process under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) that may be required to support such reductions.
(2) Consolidated budget display.--The Secretary shall
include with the defense budget materials for each
fiscal year specified in paragraph (3) a consolidated
budget justification display that individually covers
each program and activity associated with the
implementation of the New START Treaty for the period
covered by the future-years defense program submitted
under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, at
or about the time as such defense budget materials are
submitted.
(3) Fiscal year specified.--A fiscal year specified
in this paragraph is each fiscal year that occurs
during the period beginning with fiscal year 2015 and
ending on the date on which the New START Treaty is no
longer in force.
(b) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for environmental assessment activities to support reductions
to the nuclear forces of the United States, not more than 50
percent may be obligated or expended until--
(1) the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress the
plan required by subsection (a) of section 1042 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1575), including a
description of various options for the nuclear force
structure of the United States under the New START
Treaty, including the preferred force structure option
of the Secretary (such plan and options may be subject
to modification based on the results of the
environmental assessment and other subsequent
developments);
(2) the Commander of the United States Strategic
Command submits to the congressional defense committees
a report providing the assessment of the Commander with
respect to the options contained in the plan described
in paragraph (1), including the preferred force
structure option of the Secretary; and
(3) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
certifies to the congressional defense committees that
conducting such environmental assessment activities
will not imperil the ability of the military to comply
with the New START Treaty levels by February 2018.
(c) Modification of Limitation on Retirement of B-52
Aircraft.--
(1) Common conventional capability configuration.--
Subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 131 of the John Warner
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
(Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2111), as added by
section 137(a)(1)(C) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-
181; 122 Stat. 32), is amended by striking ``common
capability configuration'' and inserting ``common
conventional capability configuration''.
(2) Conversion.--Notwithstanding such section 131 or
any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense
may not convert a B-52 aircraft described in subsection
(a)(1)(C) of such section 131 to a configuration that
does not allow the aircraft to perform nuclear missions
unless the Secretary has submitted to Congress the
information required under subsection (b).
(d) Report on Collaboration Among the Strategic Forces of the
Armed Forces.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than one year after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on collaboration among the Army,
the Navy, and the Air Force on activities related to
strategic systems to provide efficiencies, improve
technology sharing, and yield other potential benefits.
(2) Elements.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) A description of current collaboration
among the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force on
strategic system programs, including strategic
missiles systems, conventional prompt global
strike, and other strategic forces as the
Secretary determines appropriate.
(B) A description and assessment of any
additional opportunities for such
collaboration, including the benefits that may
be realized by such efforts, the risks and
costs to existing programs, and potential
effects on the defense industrial base that
supports strategic systems.
(e) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the successful implementation of the New START
Treaty requires the partnership of the President and
Congress;
(2) the force structure required by the New START
Treaty should preserve Minuteman III intercontinental
ballistic missile silos that contain a deployed missile
as of the date of the enactment of this Act in, at a
minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to be
made fully operational with a deployed missile and
remain a fully functioning element of the
interconnected and redundant command and control system
of the missile field; and
(3) the distribution of any such warm-status silos
should not disproportionally affect the force structure
of any one operational intercontinental ballistic
missile wing.
(f) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``defense budget materials'' has the
meaning given that term in section 231(f) of title 10,
United States Code.
(2) The term ``New START Treaty'' means the Treaty
between the United States of America and the Russian
Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and
Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April
8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011.
SEC. 1057. RETENTION OF CAPABILITY TO REDEPLOY MULTIPLE INDEPENDENTLY
TARGETABLE REENTRY VEHICLES.
(a) Deployment Capability.--The Secretary of the Air Force
shall ensure that the Air Force is capable of--
(1) deploying multiple independently targetable
reentry vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental
ballistic missiles; and
(2) commencing such deployment not later than 180
days after the date on which the President determines
such deployment necessary.
(b) Warhead Capability.--The Nuclear Weapons Council
established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code,
shall ensure that--
(1) the nuclear weapons stockpile contains a
sufficient number of nuclear warheads that are capable
of being deployed as multiple independently targetable
reentry vehicles with respect to Minuteman III
intercontinental ballistic missiles; and
(2) such deployment is capable of being commenced not
later than 180 days after the date on which the
President determines such deployment necessary.
SEC. 1058. REPORT ON NEW START TREATY.
Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense and
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit
to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on
whether the New START Treaty (as defined in section
494(a)(2)(D)(ii) of title 10, United States Code) is in the
national security interests of the United States.
SEC. 1059. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
PALOMARES NUCLEAR WEAPONS ACCIDENT REVISED DOSE
EVALUATION REPORT.
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on the implementation of the
recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident
Revised Dose Evaluation Report released by the Air Force in
April 2001.
SEC. 1060. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON FURTHER STRATEGIC NUCLEAR ARMS
REDUCTIONS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
(a) In General.--It is the sense of Congress that, if the
United States seeks further strategic nuclear arms reductions
with the Russian Federation that are below the levels of the
New START Treaty, such reductions should--
(1) be pursued through a mutually negotiated
agreement with Russia;
(2) be verifiable;
(3) be made pursuant to the treaty-making power of
the President as set forth in Article II, section 2,
clause 2 of the Constitution; and
(4) take into account the full range of nuclear
weapon capabilities that threaten the United States and
the forward-deployed forces and allies of the United
States, including such capabilities relating to
nonstrategic nuclear weapons.
(b) New START Treaty Defined.--The term ``New START Treaty''
means the Treaty between the United States of America and the
Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and
Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8,
2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011.
SEC. 1061. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMPLIANCE WITH NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL
TREATY OBLIGATIONS.
It is the sense of Congress that, if the President determines
that a foreign nation is in substantial noncompliance with its
obligations under a nuclear arms control treaty to which the
United States is a party in a manner that adversely affects the
national security of the United States or its allies or
alliances, the President should--
(1) conduct an assessment of the effect of such
noncompliance on the national security interests of the
United States and its allies;
(2) determine what further actions are warranted by
the United States in response to such noncompliance;
(3) determine whether such noncompliance threatens
the viability of such treaty;
(4) take appropriate steps to resolve the
noncompliance issue;
(5) keep Congress informed of developments relating
to such noncompliance issue;
(6) inform Congress of the assessment and plan of the
President to resolve such noncompliance issue,
including any plans to address the issue diplomatically
with the government of the noncompliant nation and the
affected allies and alliances;
(7) consider if the United States should, in light of
such noncompliance, engage in future nuclear arms
control negotiations with the government of the
noncompliant nation; and
(8) consider the potential effect of such
noncompliance on the consideration by the Senate of a
future nuclear arms reduction treaty involving the
government of the noncompliant nation.
SEC. 1062. SENSES OF CONGRESS ON ENSURING THE MODERNIZATION OF THE
NUCLEAR FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES.
(a) Policy.--It is the policy of the United States to--
(1) modernize or replace the triad of strategic
nuclear delivery systems;
(2) proceed with a robust stockpile stewardship
program;
(3) maintain and modernize the nuclear weapons
production capabilities that will ensure the safety,
security, reliability, and performance of the nuclear
forces of the United States at the levels required by
the New START Treaty; and
(4) underpin deterrence by meeting the requirements
for hedging against possible international developments
or technical problems, in accordance with the policies
of the United States.
(b) Sense of Congress on Modernization of Nuclear Forces.--It
is the sense of Congress that--
(1) Congress is committed to providing the resources
needed to achieve the objectives stated in subsection
(a) at a minimum at the level set forth in the 10-year
plan provided to Congress on an annual basis pursuant
to section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat.
1576), as amended;
(2) Congress supports the modernization or
replacement of the triad of strategic nuclear delivery
systems consisting of--
(A) a heavy bomber and air-launched cruise
missile;
(B) an intercontinental ballistic missile;
and
(C) a ballistic missile submarine and
submarine-launched ballistic missile; and
(3) the President and Congress should work together
to meet the objectives stated in subsection (a) in the
most cost-efficient manner possible.
(b) Sense of Congress on Long-Range Strike Bomber Aircraft.--
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) advancements in air-to-air and surface-to-air
weapons systems by foreign powers will require
increasingly sophisticated long-range strike
capabilities;
(2) upgrading the existing bomber aircraft fleet of
the United States consisting of B-1B, B-2, and B-52
bomber aircraft must remain a high budget priority in
order to maintain the combat effectiveness of such
fleet; and
(3) the Air Force should continue to prioritize
development and acquisition of the long-range strike
bomber program.
Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations
SEC. 1071. ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO
ANALYZE CAPTURED RECORDS.
(a) In General.--Chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by inserting after section 426 the following new
section:
``Sec. 427. Conflict Records Research Center
``(a) Center Authorized.--The Secretary of Defense may
establish a center to be known as the `Conflict Records
Research Center' (in this section referred to as the `Center').
``(b) Purposes.--The purposes of the Center shall be the
following:
``(1) To establish a digital research database,
including translations, and to facilitate research and
analysis of records captured from countries,
organizations, and individuals, now or once hostile to
the United States, with rigid adherence to academic
freedom and integrity.
``(2) Consistent with the protection of national
security information, personally identifiable
information, and intelligence sources and methods, to
make a significant portion of these records available
to researchers as quickly and responsibly as possible
while taking into account the integrity of the academic
process and risks to innocents or third parties.
``(3) To conduct and disseminate research and
analysis to increase the understanding of factors
related to international relations, counterterrorism,
and conventional and unconventional warfare and,
ultimately, enhance national security.
``(4) To collaborate with members of academic and
broad national security communities, both domestic and
international, on research, conferences, seminars, and
other information exchanges to identify topics of
importance for the leadership of the United States
Government and the scholarly community.
``(c) Concurrence of the Director of National Intelligence.--
The Secretary of Defense shall seek the concurrence of the
Director of National Intelligence to the extent the efforts and
activities of the Center involve the entities referred to in
subsection (b)(4).
``(d) Support From Other United States Government Departments
or Agencies.--The head of any non-Department of Defense
department or agency of the United States Government may--
``(1) provide to the Secretary of Defense services,
including personnel support, to support the operations
of the Center; and
``(2) transfer funds to the Secretary of Defense to
support the operations of the Center.
``(e) Acceptance of Gifts and Donations.--(1) Subject to
paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may accept from any
source specified in paragraph (2) any gift or donation for
purposes of defraying the costs or enhancing the operations of
the Center.
``(2) The sources specified in this paragraph are the
following:
``(A) The government of a State or a political
subdivision of a State.
``(B) The government of a foreign country.
``(C) A foundation or other charitable organization,
including a foundation or charitable organization that
is organized or operates under the laws of a foreign
country.
``(D) Any source in the private sector of the United
States or a foreign country.
``(3) The Secretary may not accept a gift or donation under
this subsection if acceptance of the gift or donation would
compromise or appear to compromise--
``(A) the ability of the Department of Defense, any
employee of the Department, or any member of the armed
forces to carry out the responsibility or duty of the
Department in a fair and objective manner; or
``(B) the integrity of any program of the Department
or of any person involved in such a program.
``(4) The Secretary shall provide written guidance setting
forth the criteria to be used in determining the applicability
of paragraph (3) to any proposed gift or donation under this
subsection.
``(f) Crediting of Funds Transferred or Accepted.--Funds
transferred to or accepted by the Secretary of Defense under
this section shall be credited to appropriations available to
the Department of Defense for the Center, and shall be
available for the same purposes, and subject to the same
conditions and limitations, as the appropriations with which
merged. Any funds so transferred or accepted shall remain
available until expended.
``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `captured record' means a document,
audio file, video file, or other material captured
during combat operations from countries, organizations,
or individuals, now or once hostile to the United
States.
``(2) The term `gift or donation' means any gift or
donation of funds, materials (including research
materials), real or personal property, or services
(including lecture services and faculty services).''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 426 the following
new item:
``427. Conflict Records Research Center.''.
SEC. 1072. STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC
SPECTRUM.
(a) In General.--Section 488 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``other year, and in time for
submission to Congress under subsection (b),''
and inserting ``three years'';
(B) by inserting after ``Secretary of
Defense'' the following: ``, in consultation
with the Director of National Intelligence and
the Secretary of Commerce,'';
(C) by striking ``the mission of the
Department of Defense.'' and inserting ``the
national security of the United States. Each
such strategic plan shall include each of the
following:''; and
(D) by adding at the end the following new
paragraphs:
``(1) An inventory of the uses of the electromagnetic
spectrum for national security purposes and other
purposes.
``(2) An estimate of the need for electromagnetic
spectrum for national security and other purposes over
each of the periods specified in subsection (b).
``(3) Any other matters that the Secretary of
Defense, in consultation with the Director of National
Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce, considers
appropriate for the strategic plan.'';
(2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c)
and inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsection (b):
``(b) Periods Covered by Strategic Plan.--Each strategic plan
prepared under subsection (a) shall cover each of the following
periods (counting from the date of the issuance of the plan):
``(1) Zero to five years.
``(2) Five to ten years.
``(3) Ten to thirty years.'';
(3) in subsection (c), as so redesignated--
(A) by striking ``The Secretary'' and
inserting ``(1) The Secretary''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
``(2) Each strategic plan submitted under paragraph (1) shall
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.''.
(b) Clerical Amendments.--
(1) Heading.--The section heading for section 488 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking
``: biennial strategic plan''.
(2) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by
striking the item relating to section 488 and inserting
the following new item:
``488. Management of electromagnetic spectrum.''.
SEC. 1073. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE MILITARY TRANSPORTATION
SERVICES TO CERTAIN OTHER AGENCIES AT THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REIMBURSEMENT RATE.
(a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 2642 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``airlift'' each place it appears and
inserting ``transportation''; and
(2) in paragraph (3)--
(A) by striking ``October 28, 2014'' and
inserting ``September 30, 2019'';
(B) by inserting and ``military
transportation services provided in support of
foreign military sales'' after ``Department of
Defense''; and
(C) by striking ``air industry'' and
inserting ``transportation industry''.
(b) Technical Amendment.--The heading for such section is
amended by striking ``Airlift'' and inserting
``Transportation''.
(c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking
the item relating to section 2642 and inserting the following
new item:
``2642. Transportation services provided to certain other agencies: use
of Department of Defense reimbursement rates.''.
SEC. 1074. NOTIFICATION OF MODIFICATIONS TO ARMY FORCE STRUCTURE.
(a) Certification of Environmental Compliance.--The Secretary
of the Army shall certify to the congressional defense
committees that Army force structure modifications, reductions,
and additions authorized as of the date of the enactment of
this Act that will utilize funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for the Department of the Army are compliant with the
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
(b) Notification of Necessary Assessments or Studies.--The
Secretary of the Army, when making a congressional notification
in accordance with section 993 of title 10, United States Code,
shall include the Secretary's assessment of whether or not the
changes covered by the notification require an Environmental
Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.), and, if an assessment or study is required, the plan
for conducting such assessment or study.
SEC. 1075. AIRCRAFT JOINT TRAINING.
(a) Unmanned Aircraft Joint Training and Usage Plan.--
(1) Methods.--The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary
of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly develop
and implement plans and procedures to review the
potential of joint testing and evaluation of unmanned
aircraft equipment and systems with other appropriate
departments and agencies of the Federal Government that
may serve the dual purpose of providing capabilities to
the Department of Defense to meet the future
requirements of combatant commanders and domestically
to strengthen international border security.
(2) Report.--Not later than 270 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense,
the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration
shall jointly submit to Congress a report on the status
of the development of the plans and procedures required
under paragraph (1), including a cost-benefit analysis
of the shared expenses between the Department of
Defense and other appropriate departments and agencies
of the Federal Government to support such plans.
(b) Aircraft Simulator Training.--It is the sense of Congress
that--
(1) the use of aircraft simulators offers cost
savings and provides members of the Armed Forces cost-
effective preparation for combat; and
(2) existing synergies between the Department of
Defense and entities in the private sector should be
maintained and cultivated to provide members of the
Armed Forces with the most cost-effective aircraft
simulation capabilities possible.
Subtitle H--Studies and Reports
SEC. 1081. ONLINE AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS.
(a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 122a of title 10,
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(a) In General.--To the maximum extent practicable, on or
after the date on which each report described in subsection (b)
is submitted to Congress, the Secretary of Defense, acting
through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Public Affairs, shall ensure that the report is made available
to the public by--
``(1) posting the report on a publicly accessible
Internet website of the Department of Defense; and
``(2) upon request, transmitting the report by other
means, as long as such transmission is at no cost to
the Department.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a)
shall apply with respect to reports submitted to Congress after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 1082. OVERSIGHT OF COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES.
Section 193(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting ``and the
congressional defense committees'' after ``the Secretary of
Defense''.
SEC. 1083. INCLUSION IN ANNUAL REPORT OF DESCRIPTION OF INTERAGENCY
COORDINATION RELATING TO HUMANITARIAN DEMINING
TECHNOLOGY.
Section 407(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and
inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(5) a description of interagency efforts to
coordinate and improve research, development, test, and
evaluation for humanitarian demining technology and
mechanical clearance methods, including the transfer of
relevant counter-improvised explosive device technology
with potential humanitarian demining applications.''.
SEC. 1084. REPEAL AND MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Title 10, United States Code.--Title 10, United States
Code, is amended as follows:
(1)(A) Section 483 is repealed.
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter
23 is amended by striking the item relating to section
483.
(2) Section 2216 is amended--
(A) by striking subsection (i); and
(B) by redesignating subsections (j) and (k)
as subsections (i) and (j), respectively.
(3) Section 2885(a)(3) is amended by striking ``If a
project'' and inserting ``In the case of a project for
new construction, if the project''.
(b) Annual National Defense Authorization Acts.--
(1) Fiscal year 2009.--Section 903(b)(5) of the
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 10 U.S.C. 2228
note), as amended by section 334, is further amended by
striking subparagraph (A), as designated by such
section, and inserting the following new subparagraph
(A):
``(A) Not later than December 31 of each year, the corrosion
control and prevention executive of a military department shall
submit to the Secretary of Defense a report containing
recommendations pertaining to the corrosion control and
prevention program of the military department. Such report
shall include recommendations for the funding levels necessary
for the executive to carry out the duties of the executive
under this section.''.
(2) Fiscal year 2008.--The National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-
181) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 1074(b)(6) (10 U.S.C. 113 note)
is amended--
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking
``The Secretary'' and inserting
``Except as provided in subparagraph
(D), the Secretary''; and
(ii) by adding at the end the
following new subparagraph:
``(D) Exceptions.--Subparagraph (A) does not
apply to determinations made with respect to
the following individuals:
``(i) An individual described in
paragraph (2)(C) who is otherwise
sponsored by the Secretary of Defense,
the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
or the Vice Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff.
``(ii) An individual described in
paragraph (2)(E).''.
(B) Section 2864 (10 U.S.C. 2911 note) is
repealed.
(3) Fiscal year 2007.--Section 226 of the John Warner
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
(Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2131) is repealed.
SEC. 1085. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EFFICIENCIES.
Section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1582) is
repealed.
SEC. 1086. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS
FORCES AND UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS
COMMAND.
(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a
review of the United States Special Operations Forces
organization, capabilities, structure, and oversight.
(b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the review
conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include an
analysis and, where appropriate, an assessment of the adequacy
of each of the following:
(1) The organizational structure of the United States
Special Operations Command and each subordinate
component, as in effect as of the date of the enactment
of this Act.
(2) The policy and civilian oversight structures for
Special Operations Forces within the Department of
Defense, as in effect as of the date of the enactment
of this Act, including the statutory structures and
responsibilities of the Office of the Secretary of
Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity
Conflict and the alignment of resources, including
human capital, with regard to such responsibilities
within the Department.
(3) The roles and responsibilities of United States
Special Operations Command and Special Operations
Forces under section 167 of title 10, United States
Code.
(4) Current and future special operations peculiar
requirements of the commanders of the geographic
combatant commands and Theater Special Operations
Commands.
(5) Command relationships between United States
Special Operations Command, its subordinate component
commands, and the geographic combatant commands.
(6) The funding authorities, uses, acquisition
processes, and civilian oversight mechanisms of Major
Force Program-11.
(7) Changes to structure, authorities, acquisition
processes, oversight mechanisms, Major Force Program-11
funding, roles, and responsibilities assumed in the
2014 Quadrennial Defense Review.
(8) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense
determines are appropriate to ensure a comprehensive
review and assessment.
(c) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date on
which the report required by subsection (b) is submitted, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a review of the report. Such
review shall include an assessment of--
(1) United States Special Operations Forces
organization, force structure, capabilities,
authorities, acquisition processes, and civilian
oversight mechanisms;
(2) how the special operations force structure is
aligned with conventional force structures and national
military strategies; and
(3) any other matters the Comptroller General
determines are relevant.
SEC. 1087. REPORTS ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.
(a) Report on Collaboration, Demonstration, and Use Cases and
Data Sharing.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary
of Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation
Administration, and the Administrator of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, on behalf of the UAS
Executive Committee, shall submit jointly to the appropriate
congressional committees a report setting forth the following:
(1) The collaboration, demonstrations, and initial
fielding of unmanned aircraft systems at test sites
within and outside of restricted airspace.
(2) The progress being made to develop public and
civil sense-and-avoid and command-and-control
technology.
(3) An assessment on the sharing of operational,
programmatic, and research data relating to unmanned
aircraft systems operations by the Federal Aviation
Administration, the Department of Defense, and the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration to help
the Federal Aviation Administration establish civil
unmanned aircraft systems certification standards,
pilot certification and licensing, and air traffic
control procedures, including identifying the locations
selected to collect, analyze, and store the data.
(b) Report on Resource Requirements Needed for Unmanned
Aircraft Systems Described in the 5-year Roadmap.--Not later
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee,
shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a
report setting forth the resource requirements needed to meet
the milestones for unmanned aircraft systems integration
described in the 5-year roadmap under section 332(a)(5) of the
FAA Modernization and Reform Act (Public Law 112-95; 49 U.S.C.
40101 note).
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Commerce, Science and
Transportation, and the Committee on
Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,
the Committee on Science, Space, and
Technology, and the Committee on Appropriations
of the House of Representatives.
(2) The term ``UAS Executive Committee'' means the
Department of Defense-Federal Aviation Administration
executive committee described in section 1036(b) of the
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4596)
established by the Secretary of Defense and the
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.
SEC. 1088. REPORT ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE SUPPORT CONTRACTS FOR THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an
assessment of the current approach of the Department of Defense
to managing foreign language support contracts for the
Department.
(b) Elements.--The report required by subsection (a) shall
include each of the following:
(1) A description and analysis of the spending by the
Department on all types of foreign language support
services and products acquired by the components of the
Department.
(2) An assessment, in light of the analysis under
paragraph (1), of whether any adjustment is needed in
the management of foreign language support contracts
for the Department in order to obtain efficiencies in
contracts for all types of foreign language support for
the Department.
SEC. 1089. CIVIL AIR PATROL.
(a) Report.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the Civil Air
Patrol fleet.
(b) Elements.--The report required by subsection (a) shall
include the following:
(1) An assessment of whether the current number of
aircraft, operating locations, and types of aircraft in
the Civil Air Patrol fleet are suitable for each of the
following:
(A) Emergency missions in support of the Air
Force, the Federal Emergency Management Agency,
State and local governments, and others.
(B) Other operational missions in support of
the Air Force, other Federal agencies, State
and local governments, and others.
(C) Flight proficiency, flight training, and
operational mission training and support for
cadet orientation and cadet flight training
programs in every State Civil Air Patrol wing.
(2) An assessment of the ideal overall size of the
Civil Air Patrol aircraft fleet, including a
description of the factors used in determining that
size.
(3) An assessment of the process used by the Civil
Air Patrol and the Air Force to determine aircraft
operating locations, and whether State wing commanders
are appropriately involved in that process.
(4) An assessment of the process used by the Civil
Air Patrol, the Air Force, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and others to determine the type of
aircraft and number of aircraft to be needed to support
emergency, operational, and training missions.
Subtitle I--Other Matters
SEC. 1091. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.
(a) Title 10.--Title 10, United States Code, is amended as
follows:
(1) The table of chapters at the beginning of
subtitle A, and at the beginning of part I of such
subtitle, are each amended by striking the item
relating to chapter 24 and inserting the following:
``24. Nuclear Posture.............................................491''.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter
3 is amended by striking the item relating to section
130e and inserting the following new item:
``130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of critical
infrastructure security information.''.
(3) Section 179(a)(5) is amended by striking
``commander'' and inserting ``Commander''.
(4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter
9 is amended by striking the item relating to section
231 and inserting the following new item:
``231. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels: annual plan and
certification.''.
(5) Section 231a(a) is amended by striking ``fiscal
year of Defense'' and inserting ``fiscal year, the
Secretary of Defense''.
(6) Chapter 24 is amended by adding a period at the
end of the enumerator of section 498.
(7) Section 494(c) is amended by striking ``the date
of the enactment of this Act'' each place it appears
and inserting ``December 31, 2011''.
(8) Section 673(a) is amended by inserting ``of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice'' after ``120c''.
(9) Section 1401a is amended by striking ``before the
enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008'' in subsections (d) and (e) and
inserting ``before January 28, 2008''.
(10) Section 2359b(k)(4)(B) is amended by adding a
period at the end.
(11) Section 2461(a)(5)(E)(i) is amended by striking
``the a'' and inserting ``the''.
(b) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013.--Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included
therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) is amended as follows:
(1) Section 322(e)(2) (126 Stat. 1695) is amended by
striking ``Section 2366b(A)(3)(F)'' and inserting
``Section 2366b(a)(3)(F)''.
(2) Section 371(a)(1) (126 Stat. 1706) is amended by
striking ``subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g)
and (h), respectively'' and inserting ``subsection (f)
as subsection (g)''.
(3) Section 611(7) (126 Stat. 1776) is amended by
striking ``Section 408a(e)'' and inserting ``Section
478a(e)''.
(4) Section 822(b) (126 Stat. 1830) is amended by
striking ``such Act'' and inserting ``such section''.
(5) Section 1031(b)(3)(B) (126 Stat. 1918) is amended
by striking the subclause (III) immediately below
clause (iv).
(6) Section 1031(b)(4) (126 Stat. 1919) is amended by
striking ``Section 1031(b)'' and inserting ``Section
1041(b)''.
(7) Section 1086(d)(1) (126 Stat. 1969) is amended by
striking ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``paragraph
(2)''.
(8) Section 1221(a)(2) (126 Stat. 1992) is amended by
striking ``fiscal'' both places it appears and
inserting ``Fiscal''.
(9) Section 1804 (126 Stat. 2111) is amended--
(A) in subsection (h)(1)(B), by striking
``inserting `; and';'' and inserting
``inserting a semicolon;''; and
(B) in subsection (i), by inserting after
``it appears'' the following: ``(except in
those places in which `Administrator of FEMA'
already appears)''.
(c) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012.--Effective as of December 31, 2011, and as if included
therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) is amended as follows:
(1) Section 312(b)(6)(F) (125 Stat. 1354) is amended
by striking ``subsection (D)'' and inserting
``subsection (d)''.
(2) Section 585(a)(1) (125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561
note) is amended by striking ``experts sexual'' and
inserting ``experts in sexual''.
(d) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2004.--Section 338(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 10 U.S.C. 5013 note),
as most recently amended by section 321 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 1694), is amended by striking ``subsection 4703'' and
inserting ``section 4703''.
(e) Amendment to Title 41.--Section 4712(i) is amended by
inserting before ``the enactment'' the following: ``that is 180
days after the date''.
(f) Coordination With Other Amendments Made by This Act.--For
purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act
other than this section, the amendments made by this section
shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any
amendment made by other provisions of this Act.
SEC. 1092. REDUCTION IN COSTS TO REPORT CRITICAL CHANGES TO MAJOR
AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAMS.
(a) Extension of a Program Defined.--Section 2445a of title
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:
``(g) Extension of a Program.--In this chapter, the term
`extension of a program' means, with respect to a major
automated information system program or other major information
technology investment program, the further deployment or
planned deployment to additional users of the system which has
already been found operationally effective and suitable by an
independent test agency or the Director of Operational Test and
Evaluation, beyond the scope planned in the original estimate
or information originally submitted on the program.''.
(b) Reports on Critical Changes in MAIS Programs.--Subsection
(d) of section 2445c of such title is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (2)''
and inserting ``paragraph (3)'';
(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following
new paragraph (2):
``(2) Certification when variance due to extension of
program.--If an official with milestone decision
authority for a program who, following receipt of a
quarterly report described in paragraph (1) and making
a determination described in paragraph (3), also
determines that the circumstances resulting in the
determination described in paragraph (3) (A) is
primarily due to an extension of a program, and (B)
involves minimal developmental risk, the official may,
in lieu of carrying out an evaluation and submitting a
report in accordance with paragraph (1), submit to the
congressional defense committees, within 45 days after
receiving the quarterly report, a certification that
the official has made those determinations. If such a
certification is submitted, the limitation in
subsection (g)(1) does not apply with respect to that
determination under paragraph (3).''.
(c) Conforming Cross-reference Amendment.--Subsection (g)(1)
of such section is amended by striking ``subsection (d)(2)''
and inserting ``subsection (d)(3)''.
(d) Total Acquisition Cost Information.--Title 10, United
States Code, is further amended--
(1) in section 2445b(b)(3), by striking ``development
costs'' and inserting ``total acquisition costs''; and
(2) in section 2445c--
(A) in subparagraph (B) of subsection (c)(2),
by striking ``program development cost'' and
inserting ``total acquisition cost''; and
(B) in subparagraph (C) of subsection (d)(3)
(as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)), by
striking ``program development cost'' and
inserting ``total acquisition cost''.
(e) Clarification of Cross-reference.--Section 2445c(g)(2) of
such title is amended by striking ``in compliance with the
requirements of subsection (d)(2)'' and inserting ``under
subsection (d)(1)(B)''.
SEC. 1093. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION TO
ISSUE NON-PREMIUM AVIATION INSURANCE.
Section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The
authority'';
(2) by striking ``this chapter'' and inserting ``any
provision of this chapter other than section 44305'';
and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(b) Insurance of United States Government Property.--The
authority of the Secretary of Transportation to provide
insurance and reinsurance for a department, agency, or
instrumentality of the United States Government under section
44305 is not effective after December 31, 2018.''.
SEC. 1094. EXTENSION OF MINISTRY OF DEFENSE ADVISOR PROGRAM AND
AUTHORITY TO WAIVE REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF
ACTIVITIES FOR CERTAIN NONGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL.
(a) Extension of Minister of Defense Advisor Program
Authority.--
(1) Subsection (b) of section 1081 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is
amended--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``September
30, 2014'' and inserting ``September 30,
2017''; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``fiscal
year 2012, 2013, or 2014'' and inserting ``a
fiscal year ending on or before that date''.
(2) Update of policy guidance on authority.--The
Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall issue an
update of the policy of the Department of Defense for
assignment of civilian employees of the Department as
advisors to foreign ministries of defense under the
authority in section 1081 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as amended by
this section.
(3) Additional annual reports.--Subsection (c) of
such section is amended by striking ``2014'' and
inserting ``2017''.
(4) Technical amendment.--Subsection (c)(4) of such
section is amended by striking ``carried out such by
such'' and inserting ``carried out by such''.
(5) Date for submittal of comptroller general of the
united states report.--Subsection (d) of such section
is amended by striking ``December 30, 2013'' and
inserting ``December 31, 2014''
(b) Extension of Authority to Waive Reimbursement of Costs of
Activities for Nongovernmental Personnel at Department of
Defense Regional Centers for Security Studies.--Section
941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 184 note) is amended by
striking ``through 2013'' and inserting ``through 2014''.
SEC. 1095. AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN NATIONAL COMMISSIONS.
(a) National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force.--
(1) Revision of members compensation.--Section 365(a)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1705) is
amended--
(A) by striking ``shall be compensated'' and
inserting ``may be compensated'';
(B) by striking ``equal to'' and inserting
``not to exceed''; and
(C) by inserting ``of $155,400'' after
``annual rate''.
(2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph
(1) shall apply with respect to compensation for a duty
performed on or after April 2, 2013.
(b) Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization
Commission.--
(1) Scope of military compensation system.--Section
671(c)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1788)
is amended by inserting before the period the following
``, and includes any other laws, policies, or practices
of the Federal Government that result in any direct
payment of authorized or appropriated funds to the
persons specified in subsection (b)(1)(A)''.
(2) Commission authorities.--Section 673 of such Act
(126 Stat. 1790) is amended by adding at the end the
following new subsections:
``(g) Use of Government Information.--The Commission may
secure directly from any department or agency of the Federal
Government such information as the Commission considers
necessary to carry out its duties. Upon such request of the
Chair of the Commission, the head of such department or agency
shall furnish such information to the Commission.
``(h) Postal Services.--The Commission may use the United
States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions
as departments and agencies of the United States.
``(i) Authority To Accept Gifts.--The Commission may accept,
use, and dispose of gifts or donations of services, goods, and
property from non-Federal entities for the purposes of aiding
and facilitating the work of the Commission. The authority in
this subsection does not extend to gifts of money.
``(j) Personal Services.--
``(1) Authority to procure.--The Commission may--
``(A) procure the services of experts or
consultants (or of organizations of experts or
consultants) in accordance with the provisions
of section 3109 of title 5, United States Code;
and
``(B) pay in connection with such services
travel expenses of individuals, including
transportation and per diem in lieu of
subsistence, while such individuals are
traveling from their homes or places of
business to duty stations.
``(2) Limitation.--The total number of experts or
consultants procured pursuant to paragraph (1) may not
exceed five experts or consultants.
``(3) Maximum daily pay rates.--The daily rate paid
an expert or consultant procured pursuant to paragraph
(1) may not exceed the daily rate paid a person
occupying a position at level IV of the Executive
Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States
Code.''.
(3) Commission report and recommendations.--Section
674(f) of such Act (126 Stat. 1792) is amended--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ``15 months'' and
inserting ``24 months''; and
(ii) by inserting ``and
recommendations for administrative
actions'' after ``legislative
language''; and
(B) in paragraph (6), by inserting ``, and
shall publish a copy of that report on an
Internet website available to the public,''
after ``its report to Congress''.
(4) Presidential consideration of commission
recommendations.--Section 675 of such Act (126 Stat.
1793) is amended by striking subsection (d).
(5) Commission staff.--
(A) Detailees receiving military retired
pay.--Subsection (b)(3) of section 677 of such
Act (126 Stat. 1794) is amended--
(i) in the paragraph heading, by
striking ``eligible for'' and inserting
``receiving''; and
(ii) by striking ``eligible for or
receiving military retired pay'' and
inserting ``who are receiving military
retired pay or who, but for being under
the eligibility age applicable under
section 12731 of title 10, United
States Code, would be eligible to
receive retired pay''.
(B) Performance reviews.--Subsection (c) of
such section is amended--
(i) in the matter preceding paragraph
(1), by inserting ``other than a member
of the uniformed services or officer or
employee who is detailed to the
Commission,'' after ``executive branch
department,''; and
(ii) in paragraph (2), by inserting
``(other than for administrative
accuracy)'' before the semicolon.
(6) Termination of commission.--Section 679 of such
Act (126 Stat. 1795) is amended by striking ``26
months'' and inserting ``35 months''.
(7) Funding.--Section 680 of such Act (126 Stat.
1795) is amended--
(A) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting
``$15,000,000''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new
sentence: ``Amounts made available under this
section after the date of the enactment of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2014 shall be derived from fiscal year
2013 balances that remain available for
obligation on that date.''.
SEC. 1096. STRATEGY FOR FUTURE MILITARY INFORMATION OPERATIONS
CAPABILITIES.
(a) Strategy Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
develop and implement a strategy for developing and sustaining
through fiscal year 2020 information operations capabilities
for future contingencies. The Secretary shall submit such
strategy to the congressional defense committees by not later
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Contents of Strategy.--The strategy required by
subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) A plan for the sustainment of existing
capabilities that have been developed during the ten-
year period prior to the date of the enactment of this
Act, including such capabilities developed using funds
authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency
operations determined to be of enduring value for
continued sustainment.
(2) A discussion of how the capabilities referred to
in paragraph (1) are integrated into policy, doctrine,
and operations.
(3) An assessment of the force structure that is
required to sustain operational planning and potential
contingency operations, including the integration
across the active and reserve components.
(4) Estimates of the steady-state resources needed to
support the force structure referred to in paragraph
(3), as well as estimates for resources that might be
needed based on selected operational plans, contingency
plans, and named operations.
(5) An assessment of the impact of how new and
emerging technologies can be incorporated into policy,
doctrine, and operations.
(6) A description of ongoing research into new
capabilities that may be needed to fill any identified
gaps and programs that might be required to develop
such capabilities.
(7) Potential policy implications or legal challenges
that may prevent the integration of new and emerging
technologies into the projected force structure.
(8) Potential policy implications or challenges to
the better leveraging of capabilities from interagency
partners.
SEC. 1097. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COLLABORATION ON BORDER SECURITY.
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and
the Secretary of Homeland Security should, consistent with
existing law and authorities, seek to collaborate on enhanced
United States border security, including by identifying excess
property of the Department of Defense, if any, that may be
suitable for use by the Department of Homeland Security to
support border security efforts.
SEC. 1098. TRANSFER OF AIRCRAFT TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS FOR WILDFIRE
SUPPRESSION AND OTHER PURPOSES; TACTICAL AIRLIFT
FLEET OF THE AIR FORCE.
(a) Transfer of HC-130H Aircraft.--
(1) Transfer by department of homeland security.--
(A) In general.--Not later than 45 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act and
subject to the certification requirement under
subsection (f), the Secretary of Homeland
Security, in consultation with the Secretary of
Agriculture and the Secretary of Defense, shall
begin transfer, without reimbursement, of--
(i) the seven demilitarized HC-130H
aircraft specified in subparagraph (C)
to the Secretary of the Air Force; and
(ii) initial spares and necessary
ground support equipment for HC-130H
aircraft to the Secretary of
Agriculture for use by the Director of
Aviation and Fire Management of the
Forest Service.
(B) Calculation of initial spares.--For
purposes of clause (ii) of subparagraph (A),
initial spares shall be calculated based on
shelf stock support for seven aircraft and each
aircraft flying 400 hours each year.
(C) Aircraft specified.--The aircraft
specified in this subparagraph are the HC-130H
Coast Guard aircraft with serial numbers 1706,
1708, 1709, 1713, 1714, 1719, and 1721.
(2) Air force actions.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Air
Force shall accept the HC-130H aircraft
transferred by the Secretary of Homeland
Security under paragraph (1) and, subject to
the availability of funds as supplemented by
transfers under paragraph (4), shall--
(i) at the first available
opportunity, promptly schedule and
serially synchronize with the Secretary
of Homeland Security and the Secretary
of Agriculture the induction of HC-130H
aircraft to minimize maintenance
induction on-ramp wait time of HC-130H
aircraft;
(ii) except as provided in
subparagraph (B), perform center and
outer wing-box replacement
modifications, programmed depot-level
maintenance, and modifications
necessary to procure and integrate a
gravity-drop aerial fire retardant
dispersal system in each such HC-130H
aircraft; and
(iii) after modifications described
in clause (ii) are completed for each
such HC-130H aircraft, transfer each
such aircraft, without reimbursement,
to the Secretary of Agriculture for use
by the Director of Aviation and Fire
Management of the Forest Service.
(B) Exceptions.--Notwithstanding subparagraph
(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may not--
(i) perform center wing-box
replacement modifications on the HC-
130H aircraft with serial numbers 1706,
1708, 1714, and 1721; or
(ii) perform an outer wing-box
replacement modification on the HC-130H
aircraft with serial number 1721.
(C) Limitations on obligation of funds.--The
Secretary of the Air Force may not obligate
more than--
(i) $5,000,000 per each HC-130H
aircraft transferred under paragraph
(1) to perform the modifications
necessary to procure and integrate a
gravity-drop aerial fire retardant
dispersal system in each such HC-130H
aircraft unless, by reimbursable order,
the Secretary of Agriculture provides
the additional funding necessary to the
Secretary of the Air Force to complete
such modifications; and
(ii) $130,000,000 to perform all
programmed depot-level maintenance and
modifications described in subparagraph
(A)(ii) for all such aircraft unless,
by reimbursable order, the Secretary of
Agriculture provides the additional
funding necessary to the Secretary of
the Air Force to complete such
modifications.
(3) Coast guard actions.--In the case of any HC-130
aircraft that is identified for transfer to the
Secretary of the Air Force and requires induction into
depot-level maintenance, the Commandant of the Coast
Guard may utilize, on a limited basis, such aircraft
prior to depot-level maintenance to fulfill high-
priority maritime patrol mission requirements of the
Coast Guard. The authority under this paragraph does
not include aircraft that are modified under paragraph
(2)(A)(ii).
(4) Transfer of funds.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may
use any appropriations or funds of the
Department of Defense available for obligation
as of the date of the enactment of this Act,
and shall make transfers as necessary to
supplement accounts of the Department of the
Air Force, to perform the HC-130H modifications
described under paragraph (2).
(B) Relationship to other authority.--
Transfer authority provided under this
paragraph is in addition to any other transfer
authority available to the Secretary of Defense
for fiscal year 2014.
(C) Notice to congress.--Not later than 15
days after making a transfer pursuant to this
paragraph, the Secretary of Defense shall
notify the congressional defense committees of
such transfer.
(b) Transfer of C-23B+ Sherpa Aircraft.--
(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, not later than 45 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, and subject to the certification
requirement under subsection (f), the Secretary of
Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of
Agriculture, shall begin transfer, without
reimbursement, of--
(A) not more than 15 demilitarized C-23B+
Sherpa aircraft to the Secretary of
Agriculture, subject to the quantity of C-23B+
Sherpa aircraft that the Director of Aviation
and Fire Management of the Forest Service
determines are required to meet fire-fighting
requirements; and
(B) initial spares and necessary ground
support equipment for operation of C-23B+Sherpa
aircraft to the Secretary of Agriculture for
use by the Director of Aviation and Fire
Management of the Forest Service.
(2) Calculation of initial spares.--For purposes of
paragraph (1), initial spares shall be calculated based
on shelf stock support for the quantity of aircraft the
Director of Aviation and Fire Management of the Forest
Service determines necessary to meet fire-fighting
requirements and each aircraft flying 300 hours each
year.
(c) Conditions of Transfers.--Aircraft transferred to the
Secretary of Agriculture under this section--
(1) may be used only for wildfire suppression
purposes;
(2) may not be flown outside of, or otherwise removed
from, the United States unless dispatched by the
National Interagency Fire Center in support of an
international agreement to assist in wildfire
suppression efforts or for other purposes approved by
the Secretary of Agriculture in writing in advance; and
(3) may not be sold by the Secretary of Agriculture
after transfer.
(d) Costs After Transfer.--Any costs of operation,
maintenance, sustainment, and disposal of excess aircraft,
initial spares, and ground support equipment transferred to the
Secretary of Agriculture under this section that are incurred
after the date of transfer shall be borne by the Secretary of
Agriculture.
(e) Transfer of C-27J Aircraft.--Promptly following the
completion of the certification requirement under subsection
(f) and notwithstanding section 1091 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 1971; 10 U.S.C. 2576 note), the Secretary of Defense
shall begin transfer, without reimbursement, of--
(1) 14 C-27J aircraft to the Secretary of Homeland
Security; and
(2) excess initial spares and necessary ground
support equipment for 14 C-27J aircraft to the
Secretary of Homeland Security for use by the
Commandant of the Coast Guard as maritime patrol
aircraft.
(f) Certification Requirement.--Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may not transfer any
aircraft to either the Secretary of Agriculture or the
Secretary of Homeland Security until the Secretary of Defense
and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget submit,
by not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, to the congressional defense committees certification
that adequate funding has been transferred to the Department of
the Air Force for the purpose of modifying HC-130H aircraft
identified for transfer pursuant to subsection (a).
(g) Transfer of Certain C-23 Aircraft.--
(1) In general.--
(A) Offer of transfer.--Not later than 30
days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, the Secretary of the Defense shall extend
to the chief executive officer of the State of
Alaska the opportunity to take title to not
more than eight C-23 aircraft with tail numbers
specified in subparagraph (B).
(B) Tail numbers.--The tail numbers of the C-
23 aircraft subject to transfer under
subparagraph (A) are as follows: 93-01319, 93-
01329, 94-00308, 94-00309, 88-01869, 90-07015,
90-07016, and 90-07012.
(2) Requirements.--Subsections (b) and (c) of section
112 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1318)
shall apply with respect to the transfer of any C-23
aircraft under this subsection in the same manner as
the transfer of aircraft under such section.
(h) Tactical Airlift Fleet of the Air Force.--
(1) Consideration of upgrades of certain aircraft in
recapitalization of fleet.--The Secretary of the Air
Force shall consider, as part of the recapitalization
of the tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force,
upgrades to C-130H aircraft designed to help such
aircraft meet the fuel efficiency goals of the
Department of the Air Force and retention of such
aircraft, as so upgraded, in the tactical airlift
fleet.
(2) Manner of upgrades.--The Secretary shall ensure
that upgrades to the C-130H aircraft fleet are made in
a manner that is proportional to the number of C-130H
aircraft in the force structure of the regular Air
Force, the Air Force Reserve, and the Air National
Guard.
TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS
Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on
premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal
civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant
allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official
duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for
civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to
Department of Defense employees.
Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department
of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for
Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program and
assessment of STEM and other programs.
Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology
personnel.
Sec. 1107. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of
Defense research and engineering facilities.
Sec. 1108. Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for
civilian personnel.
Sec. 1109. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority
for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and
injured members of the Armed Forces.
SEC. 1101. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL LIMITATION
ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE LIMITATION ON PAY FOR
FEDERAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES WORKING OVERSEAS.
Effective January 1, 2014, section 1101(a) of the Duncan
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009
(Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended
by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1973), is
further amended by striking ``through 2013'' and inserting
``through 2014''.
SEC. 1102. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO GRANT
ALLOWANCES, BENEFITS, AND GRATUITIES TO PERSONNEL
ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN A COMBAT ZONE.
Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on
Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234; 120
Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public
Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently amended by
section 1104 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 125 Stat. 1973), is
further amended by striking ``2014'' and inserting ``2015''.
SEC. 1103. EXTENSION OF VOLUNTARY REDUCTION-IN-FORCE AUTHORITY FOR
CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
Section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, is amended
by striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting ``September
30, 2018''.
SEC. 1104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE LUMP-SUM SEVERANCE PAYMENTS
TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EMPLOYEES.
Section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, is amended
by striking ``October 1, 2014'' and inserting ``October 1,
2018''.
SEC. 1105. REVISION TO AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND RESEARCH FOR
TRANSFORMATION (SMART) DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM
AND ASSESSMENT OF STEM AND OTHER PROGRAMS.
(a) Revision to Financial Assistance for SMART Program.--
(1) Revision.--Paragraph (2) of section 2192a(b) of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking
``the amount determined'' and all that follows through
``room and board'' and inserting ``an amount determined
by the Secretary of Defense''.
(2) Briefing required.--The Secretary of Defense
shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of
the Senate and the House of Representatives, within 60
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a
briefing that assesses the impacts of the rising costs
of higher education tuition on the number of students
that the Department of Defense can accept into the
Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation
(SMART) Defense Education Program under section 2192a
of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Assessment of Elementary and Secondary Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Programs of the
Department of Defense.--
(1) Assessment required.--
(A) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report
setting forth an assessment of each program as
follows:
(i) The Army Educational Outreach
Program (AEOP).
(ii) The STEM2Stern program of the
Navy.
(iii) The DoD STARBASE program
carried out by the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness.
(iv) Prekindergarten through 12th
grade activities of the National
Defense Education Program.
(B) The Secretary of Defense shall conduct
assessments under this paragraph in
consultation with the Secretary of Education
and the heads of other appropriate Federal
agencies.
(2) Elements.--The assessment of a program under
paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An assessment of the current status of
the program.
(B) A determination to retain, terminate, or
transfer the program to another agency,
together with a justification for the
determination.
(C) For a program determined under
subparagraph (B) to be terminated, a
justification why the science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics education
requirements of the program are no longer
required.
(D) For a program determined under
subparagraph (B) to be transferred to the
jurisdiction of another agency--
(i) the name of such agency;
(ii) the funding anticipated to be
provided the program by such agency
during the five-year period beginning
on the date of transfer; and
(iii) mechanisms to ensure that
education under the program will
continue to meet the science,
technology, engineering, and
mathematics education requirements of
the Department of Defense, including
requirements for the dependents covered
by the program.
(E) Metrics to assess whether a program under
subparagraph (C) or (D) is meeting the
requirements applicable to such program under
such subparagraph.
(3) Limitation on certain actions on programs pending
submittal of assessment.--A program specified in
paragraph (1)(A) may not be terminated or transferred
to the jurisdiction of another agency until 30 days
after the date on which the report required by that
paragraph is submitted to the congressional defense
committees.
(c) Assessment of the National Security Science and
Engineering Faculty Fellowship.--The Secretary of Defense shall
provide to the congressional defense committees, within 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, a briefing that
assesses the National Security Science and Engineering Faculty
Fellowship (in this subsection referred to as the
``Fellowship''). The briefing shall include an assessment of
the following:
(1) The return on investment and qualitative impact
of the research funded by Fellowship awardees.
(2) Distribution of researcher awards from the past
three years, including identification of researchers
(if any) that have not done research with the
Department of Defense in the past five years.
(3) The number of new and continuing students
supported by Fellowship funding, as well as the number
of those students that later receive employment by the
Department of Defense, Department of Defense
contractors, or other academic institutions supported
by Department of Defense grants.
(4) A description of Fellowship awards and the use of
the award funds.
(5) Recommendations for improving the effectiveness
or efficiency of the Fellowship.
SEC. 1106. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM FOR EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY
PERSONNEL.
(a) In General.--Section 1110(d) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 3702 note) is
amended by striking ``2013.'' and inserting ``2018.''.
(b) Reporting Requirement.--Section 1110(i) of such Act is
amended by striking ``2015,'' and inserting ``2019,''.
SEC. 1107. TEMPORARY AUTHORITIES FOR CERTAIN POSITIONS AT DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FACILITIES.
(a) Authority To Make Direct Appointments.--
(1) Candidates for scientific and engineering
positions at science and technology reinvention
laboratories.--The director of any Science and
Technology Reinvention Laboratory (hereinafter in this
section referred to as an ``STRL'') may appoint
qualified candidates possessing a bachelor's degree to
positions described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b)
as an employee in a laboratory described in that
paragraph without regard to the provisions of
subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States
Code (other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title).
(2) Veteran candidates for similar positions at
research and engineering facilities.--The director of
any STRL may appoint qualified veteran candidates to
positions described in paragraph (2) of subsection (b)
as an employee at a laboratory, agency, or organization
specified in that paragraph without regard to the
provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5,
United States Code.
(b) Covered Positions.--
(1) Candidates for scientific and engineering
positions.--The positions described in this paragraph
are scientific and engineering positions that may be
temporary, term, or permanent in any laboratory
designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-
84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a
Department of Defense science and technology
reinvention laboratory.
(2) Qualified veteran candidates.--The positions
described in this paragraph are scientific, technical,
engineering, and mathematics positions, including
technicians, in the following:
(A) Any laboratory referred to in paragraph
(1).
(B) Any other Department of Defense research
and engineering agency or organization
designated by the Secretary for purposes of
subsection (a)(2).
(c) Limitation on Number of Appointments Allowable in a
Calendar Year.--The authority under subsection (a) may not, in
any calendar year and with respect to any laboratory, agency,
or organization described in subsection (b), be exercised with
respect to a number of candidates greater than the following:
(1) In the case of a laboratory described in
subsection (b)(1), with respect to appointment
authority under subsection (a)(1), the number equal to
3 percent of the total number of scientific and
engineering positions in such laboratory that are
filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending
before the start of such calendar year.
(2) In the case of a laboratory, agency, or
organization described in subsection (b)(2), with
respect to appointment authority under subsection
(a)(2), the number equal to 1 percent of the total
number of scientific, technical, engineering,
mathematics, and technician positions in such
laboratory, agency, or organization that are filled as
of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the
start of such calendar year.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``employee'' has the meaning given that
term in section 2105 of title 5, United States Code.
(2) The term ``veteran'' has the meaning given that
term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
(e) Sunset.--Appointments under subsection (a) may not be
made after December 31, 2019.
(f) Senior Scientific Technical Managers.--
(1) Establishment.--There is hereby established in
each STRL a category of senior professional scientific
and technical positions, the incumbents of which shall
be designated as ``senior scientific technical
managers'' and which shall be positions classified
above GS-15 of the General Schedule, notwithstanding
section 5108(a) of title 5, United States Code. The
primary functions of such positions shall be--
(A) to engage in research and development in
the physical, biological, medical, or
engineering sciences, or another field closely
related to the mission of such STRL; and
(B) to carry out technical supervisory
responsibilities.
(2) Appointments.--The positions described in
paragraph (1) may be filled, and shall be managed, by
the director of the STRL involved, under criteria
established pursuant to section 342(b) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public
Law 103-337; 108 Stat. 2721), relating to personnel
demonstration projects at laboratories of the
Department of Defense, except that the director of the
laboratory involved shall determine the number of such
positions at such laboratory, not to exceed 1 percent
of the number of scientists and engineers employed at
such laboratory as of the close of the last fiscal year
before the fiscal year in which any appointments
subject to that numerical limitation are made.
(3) Sunset.--Appointments under this subsection may
not be made after December 31, 2019.
(g) Reporting Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report
on the operation of this section. Each such report shall
include, for the period covered by such report--
(1) the total number of individuals appointed under
subsection (a)(1) during such period;
(2) the total number of individuals appointed under
subsection (a)(2) during such period; and
(3) the total number of senior scientific technical
managers at each STRL as of the end of such period.
(h) Exclusion From Personnel Limitations.--
(1) In general.--The director of an STRL shall manage
the workforce strength, structure, positions, and
compensation of such STRL--
(A) without regard to any limitation on
appointments, positions, or funding with
respect to such STRL, subject to subparagraph
(B); and
(B) in a manner consistent with the budget
available with respect to such STRL.
(2) Exceptions.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to
Senior Executive Service positions (as defined in
section 3132(a) of title 5, United States Code) or
scientific and professional positions authorized under
section 3104 of such title.
SEC. 1108. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING FOR
CIVILIAN PERSONNEL.
(a) Regulations.--No later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe
regulations implementing the authority in subsection (a) of
section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note
prec.).
(b) Coordination.--The Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller), in consultation with the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall be responsible for
coordinating the preparation of the regulations required under
subsection (a).
(c) Limitations.--The regulations required under subsection
(a) shall not be restricted by any civilian full-time
equivalent or end-strength limitation, nor shall such
regulations require offsetting civilian pay funding, civilian
full-time equivalents, or civilian end-strengths.
SEC. 1109. EXTENSION OF ENHANCED APPOINTMENT AND COMPENSATION AUTHORITY
FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL FOR CARE AND TREATMENT OF
WOUNDED AND INJURED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) Extension.--Subsection (c) of section 1599c of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by striking ``December 31,
2015'' both places it appears and inserting ``December 31,
2020''.
(b) Repeal of Fulfilled Requirement.--Such section is further
amended--
(1) by striking subsection (b); and
(2) by redesignating subsection (c), as amended by
subsection (a), as subsection (b).
(c) Repeal of References to Certain Title 5 Authorities.--
Subsection (a)(2)(A) of such section is amended--
(1) by striking ``sections 3304, 5333, and 5753 of
title 5'' and inserting ``section 3304 of title 5'';
and
(2) in clause (ii), by striking ``the authorities in
such sections'' and inserting ``the authority in such
section''.
TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS
Subtitle A--Assistance and Training
Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program
to build the capacity of foreign military forces.
Sec. 1202. Global Security Contingency Fund.
Sec. 1203. Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed
Forces with military and other security forces of friendly
foreign countries.
Sec. 1204. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of
foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of
mass destruction.
Sec. 1205. Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program.
Sec. 1206. United States security and assistance strategies in Africa.
Sec. 1207. Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security
operations.
Sec. 1208. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to
disarm the Lord's Resistance Army.
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq
Sec. 1211. Commanders' Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for
reintegration activities in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition
nations for support provided to United States military
operations.
Sec. 1214. Extension and modification of authority to support operations
and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program
to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1216. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to
Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes
assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not
reimbursed by Afghanistan.
Sec. 1217. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign
forces supporting or participating with the United States
Armed Forces.
Sec. 1218. Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa
program.
Sec. 1219. Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program.
Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014
Sec. 1221. Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network
activities and finances.
Sec. 1222. Completion of accelerated transition of security
responsibility from United States Armed Forces to the Afghan
National Security Forces.
Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan.
Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities
for Afghanistan.
Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran
Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf
Cooperation Council countries.
Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of
Iran.
Sec. 1233. Integrated air and missile defense programs at training
locations in Southwest Asia.
Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters
Sec. 1241. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional
assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1242. Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on
military and security developments involving the People's
Republic of China.
Sec. 1243. Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to
respond to an attack or other contingency against United
States diplomatic facilities overseas.
Sec. 1244. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations
Forces Coordination Centers.
Sec. 1245. Additional reports on military and security developments
involving the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Sec. 1246. Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the
Russian Federation and limitations on providing certain
missile defense information to the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and
Disarmament Act.
Sec. 1248. Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile
proliferation.
Sec. 1249. Reports on international agreements relating to the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 1250. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support
organizations and related NATO agreements.
Sec. 1251. Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to
ballistic missile defense.
Sec. 1252. Rule of construction.
Sec. 1253. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms
Trade Treaty.
Sec. 1254. Report on military and security developments involving the
Russian Federation.
Sec. 1255. Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or
agreements with Rosoboronexport.
Subtitle A--Assistance and Training
SEC. 1201. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO
PROGRAM TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF FOREIGN MILITARY
FORCES.
(a) Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 1206 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public
Law 109-163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently amended by
section 1206 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122
Stat. 4625), is further amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
``(3) To build the capacity of a foreign country's
security forces to conduct counterterrorism
operations.''.
(b) Availability of Funds.--Subsection (c)(5) of section 1206
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006,
as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239; 126 Stat. 1979), is further amended--
(1) by striking ``not more than $75,000,000 may be
used during fiscal year 2010, not more than $75,000,000
may be used during fiscal year 2011, and''; and
(2) by striking ``each of fiscal years 2012, 2013,
and 2014'' and inserting ``each fiscal year through
fiscal year 2017''.
(c) Limitation on Fiscal Year 2015 Funds.--Of the funds
authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 1206 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015, not more than
$262,500,000 may be obligated or expended until the Secretary
of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State,
submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the
proposed planning and execution of programs intended to be
conducted or supported under subsection (a)(3) of section 1206
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006,
as added by subsection (a), during fiscal year 2015, including
a description of the proposed planning and execution of the
amount of funds to be made available for such programs.
(d) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the scope of
counterterrorism operations for which assistance is authorized
to be provided under section 1206 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006. The report shall
include the following:
(1) A statement of the purposes for which assistance
may be provided under the authority of section 1206 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006, consistent with the Presidential Policy Directive
on United States Security Sector Assistance issued on
April 5, 2013.
(2) A description of the types of activities that are
appropriately within the scope of capacity building
assistance under such authority.
(3) A description and assessment of the monitoring
and evaluation procedures for such assistance,
including measures of effectiveness applicable to
counterterrorism capacity building activities under
such authority.
(4) A prioritized list and discussion of the primary
security threats as of the date of the report against
which counterterrorism capacity building under such
authority is or may be directed, in light of the end of
combat operations in Iraq and the expected completion
of combat operations by coalition forces in Afghanistan
by December 2014.
(e) Termination of Program.--Subsection (g) of section 1206
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006,
as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further
amended by striking ``2014'' each place it appears and
inserting ``2017''.
SEC. 1202. GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY FUND.
(a) Authority.--Subsection (b) of section 1207 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended--
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by
inserting ``or regions'' after ``countries''; and
(2) in paragraph (1)--
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A),
by striking ``and other national security
forces'' and inserting ``or other national
security forces''; and
(B) in subparagraph (A)--
(i) by striking ``and
counterterrorism operations'' and
inserting ``or counterterrorism
operations''; and
(ii) by striking ``and'' at the end
and inserting ``or''.
(b) Notices to Congress.--Subsection (l) of such section is
amended to read as follows:
``(l) Notices to Congress.--Not less than 30 days before
initiating an activity under a program of assistance under
subsection (b), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Defense shall jointly submit to the specified congressional
committees a notification that includes the following:
``(1) A notification of the intent to transfer funds
into the Fund under subsection (f) or any other
authority, including the original source of the funds.
``(2) A detailed justification for the total
anticipated program for each country, including total
anticipated costs and the specific activities contained
therein.
``(3) The budget, execution plan and timeline, and
anticipated completion date for the activity.
``(4) A list of other security-related assistance or
justice sector and stabilization assistance that the
United States is currently providing the country
concerned and that is related to or supported by the
activity.
``(5) Such other information relating to the program
or activity as the Secretary of State or Secretary of
Defense considers appropriate.''.
(c) Transitional Authorities; Guidance and Processes for
Exercise of Authority.--Such section, as so amended, is further
amended--
(1) by striking subsection (n);
(2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection
(n); and
(3) by inserting after subsection (l), as so amended,
the following new subsection (m):
``(m) Guidance and Processes for Exercise of Authority.--Not
later than 15 days after the date on which guidance and
processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b)
have been issued, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Defense shall jointly submit a report to the specified
congressional committees on such guidance and processes. The
Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense shall jointly
submit additional reports not later than 15 days after the date
on which any future modifications to the guidance and processes
for implementation of the authority in subsection (b) are
issued.''.
(d) Annual Reports.--Subsection (n) of such section, as
redesignated by subsection (c)(2) of this section, is amended--
(1) by striking ``October 30, 2012, and annually
thereafter'' and inserting ``October 30 each year'';
and
(2) by striking ``subsection (q)'' and inserting
``subsection (p)''.
(e) Funding.--Such section, as so amended, is further
amended--
(1) by striking subsection (o); and
(2) by redesignating subsections (p) and (q) as
subsections (o) and (p), respectively.
SEC. 1203. TRAINING OF GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
ARMED FORCES WITH MILITARY AND OTHER SECURITY
FORCES OF FRIENDLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES.
(a) Training Authorized.--
(1) In general.--Under regulations prescribed under
subsection (f), general purpose forces of the United
States Armed Forces may train with the military forces
or other security forces of a friendly foreign country
if the Secretary of Defense determines that it is in
the national security interests of the United States to
do so. Training may be conducted under this section
only with the prior approval of the Secretary of
Defense.
(2) Concurrence.--Before conducting a training event
in or with a foreign country under this subsection, the
Secretary of Defense shall seek the concurrence of the
Secretary of State in such training event.
(b) Types of Training Authorized.--Any training conducted by
the United States Armed Forces pursuant to subsection (a)
shall, to the maximum extent practicable--
(1) support the mission essential tasks for which the
training unit providing such training is responsible;
(2) be with a foreign unit or organization with
equipment that is functionally similar to such training
unit; and
(3) include elements that promote--
(A) observance of and respect for human
rights and fundamental freedoms; and
(B) respect for legitimate civilian authority
within the foreign country or countries
concerned.
(c) Authority To Pay Expenses.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of a military
department or the commander of a combatant command may
pay, or authorize payment for, the incremental expenses
incurred by a friendly foreign country as the direct
result of training with general purpose forces of the
United States Armed Forces pursuant to subsection (a).
(2) Limitation.--The amount of incremental expenses
payable under paragraph (1) in any fiscal year may not
exceed $10,000,000.
(d) Notice Before Commencement of Training.--The Secretary of
Defense shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives not later than 15 days
before the commencement of any training event pursuant to
subsection (a). The notice on a training event shall include a
description of the event and the foreign country or countries
involved in the event.
(e) Annual Reports to Congress.--Not later than April 1 of
each year following a fiscal year in which training is
conducted pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report
on the training conducted pursuant to that subsection. Each
report shall specify the following:
(1) For the fiscal year covered by such report, the
following:
(A) Each country in which training was
conducted.
(B) The type of training conducted, the
duration of such training, and the number of
members of the United States Armed Forces
involved in such training.
(C) The extent of participation in such
training by foreign military forces and other
security forces, including the number and
service affiliation of foreign military and
other security force personnel involved and the
physical and financial contribution of each
country specified in subparagraph (A) in such
training.
(D) The relationship of such training to
other overseas training programs conducted by
the United States Armed Forces, such as
military exercise programs sponsored by the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, military exercise
programs sponsored by a combatant command, and
military training activities sponsored by a
military department (including deployments for
training, short duration exercises, and other
similar unit training events).
(E) A summary of the expenditures under
subsection (c) in connection with such
training.
(F) A description and assessment of the
unique military training benefits for members
of the United States Armed Forces involved in
such training.
(2) A list of the training events to be conducted
during the 12-month period beginning on April 1 of the
year in which such report is submitted.
(f) Regulations.--Any training conducted pursuant to
subsection (a) shall be conducted under regulations prescribed
by the Secretary of Defense for the administration of this
section. The regulations shall be prescribed not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(g) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate committees of Congress''
means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Relations, and the
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee
on Appropriations of the House of
Representatives.
(2) The term ``incremental expenses'', with respect
to a friendly foreign country, means the reasonable and
proper costs of rations, fuel, training ammunition,
transportation, and other goods and services consumed
by such country as a direct result of that country's
participation in training conducted pursuant to
subsection (a), except that such term does not include
pay, allowances, and other normal costs of such
country's military or security force personnel.
(3) The term ``other security forces'' includes
national security forces that conduct border and
maritime security, but does not include civilian
police.
(h) Expiration.--The authority under this section may not be
exercised after September 30, 2017.
SEC. 1204. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE THE CAPABILITY OF
FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO RESPOND TO INCIDENTS INVOLVING
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.
(a) Authority.--The Secretary of Defense may, with the
concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide assistance to
the military and civilian first responder organizations of
countries that share a border with Syria in order to enhance
the capability of such countries to respond effectively to
potential incidents involving weapons of mass destruction in
Syria and the surrounding region.
(b) Availability of Authority for Other Countries.--
(1) In general.--If the Secretary of Defense
determines, with the concurrence of the Secretary of
State, that the Department of Defense should provide
the assistance authorized in subsection (a) to
countries other than the countries described in
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may provide
such assistance to such other countries.
(2) Limitation.--The Secretary of Defense may not
provide assistance under paragraph (1) until the
Secretary provides written notification to the
congressional defense committees of the Secretary's
intention to provide such assistance, together with an
explanation of the scope of the assistance and the
reasons for providing the assistance.
(c) Authorized Elements.--Assistance provided under this
section may include training, equipment, and supplies.
(d) Availability of Funds.--
(1) Funds available.--Amounts for assistance under
this section in a fiscal year shall be derived from
amounts authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for Operation and Maintenance,
Defense-wide, and available for the Defense Threat
Reduction Agency for such fiscal year.
(2) Availability across fiscal years.--Amounts
available under paragraph (1) may be available for
assistance that begins in a fiscal year and ends in the
next fiscal year.
(e) Notice to Congress on Certain Assistance.--If the amount
of assistance to be provided under this section in a fiscal
year is anticipated to exceed $4,000,000, the Secretary of
Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees in
writing of that fact.
(f) Interagency Coordination.--In carrying out this section,
the Secretary of Defense shall comply with all applicable
requirements for coordination and consultation within the
Executive Branch.
(g) Reports.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the
authority in subsection (a) is first exercised and 60
days after the end of any fiscal year in which the
authority under this section is exercised, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress a report setting forth the
following:
(A) A list of the countries to which the
assistance has been or is being provided under
the authority in this section, and a
description of the assistance provided to each
country under such authority.
(B) A description of how such assistance
advances the national security interests of the
United States and is consistent with broader
United States national security policy and
strategy in each country provided assistance
and within the applicable region.
(C) The amount of funds used to provide such
assistance to each country during the fiscal
year covered by the report.
(D) Any other matters the Secretary of
Defense considers appropriate.
(2) Appropriate committees of congress defined.--In
this subsection, the term ``appropriate committees of
Congress'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Relations, and the
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee
on Appropriations of the House of
Representatives.
(h) Expiration.--The authority to provide assistance under
this section may not be exercised after September 30, 2017.
SEC. 1205. AUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GUARD STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.
(a) Authority.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, with the
concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized to
establish a program of exchanges of members of the
National Guard of a State or territory and the military
forces, or security forces or other government
organizations whose primary functions include disaster
response or emergency response, of a foreign country.
(2) State partnership program.--Each program
established under this subsection shall be known as a
``State Partnership Program''.
(b) Limitation.--An activity under a program established
under subsection (a) that involves the security forces or other
government organizations whose primary functions include
disaster response or emergency response of a foreign country,
or an activity that the Secretary of Defense determines is a
matter within the core competencies of the National Guard of a
State or territory, may be carried out only if the Secretary of
Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State,
determines and notifies the appropriate congressional
committees not less than 15 days before initiating such
activity that the activity is in the national security
interests of the United States.
(c) Regulations.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall prescribe regulations to carry out this
section. Such regulations shall establish accounting
procedures to ensure that expenditures of funds to
carry out this section are accounted for and
appropriate.
(2) Notification.--Not later than 15 days after the
date on which such regulations have been prescribed,
the Secretary of Defense--
(A) shall notify the appropriate
congressional committees that the regulations
have been prescribed; and
(B) shall provide to the appropriate
congressional committees a copy of the
regulations.
(d) Availability of Authorized Funds for Program.--
(1) In general.--Funds authorized to be appropriated
to the Department of Defense, including funds
authorized to be appropriated for the Army National
Guard and Air National Guard, are authorized to be
available--
(A) for payment of costs incurred by the
National Guard of a State or territory to
conduct activities under a program established
under subsection (a); and
(B) for payment of incremental expenses of a
foreign country to conduct activities under a
program established under subsection (a).
(2) Limitations.--
(A) Active duty requirement.--Funds shall not
be available under paragraph (1) for the
participation of a member of the National Guard
of a State or territory in activities in a
foreign country unless the member is on active
duty in the Armed Forces at the time of such
participation
(B) Incremental expenses.--The total amount
of payments for incremental expenses of foreign
countries as authorized under paragraph (1)(B)
for activities under programs established under
subsection (a) in any fiscal year may not
exceed $10,000,000.
(e) Reports and Notifications.--
(1) Review and report of existing programs.--
(A) Review.--The Secretary of Defense, with
the concurrence of the Secretary of State,
shall conduct a comprehensive review of each
program under the State Partnership Program as
in effect on the day before the date of the
enactment of this Act.
(B) Report.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report
on--
(i) the findings of the review
conducted under subparagraph (A); and
(ii) any recommendations with respect
to the review conducted under
subparagraph (A).
(2) Annual report.--
(A) In general.--Not later than January 31 of
each year following a fiscal year in which
activities under a program established under
subsection (a) are carried out, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report on such
activities under the program.
(B) Matters to be included.--Each report
shall specify, for the fiscal year covered by
such report, the following:
(i) Each foreign country in which the
activities were conducted.
(ii) The type of activities
conducted, the duration of the
activities, and the number of members
of the National Guard of each State or
territory involved in such activities.
(iii) The extent of participation in
the activities by the military forces
and security forces of such foreign
country.
(iv) A summary of expenditures to
conduct the activities, including the
annual cost of the activities, with a
breakdown of such expenditures by
geographic combatant command.
(v) With respect to activities
described in subsection (b), the
objective of the activities, and a
description of how the activities
support the theater campaign plan of
the commander of the geographic
combatant command with responsibility
for the country or countries in which
the training occurred.
(f) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to supersede any authority under title 10, United
States Code, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this
Act.
(g) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term
``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
(2) Incremental expenses.--The term ``incremental
expenses'', with respect to a foreign country--
(A) means the reasonable and proper costs of
rations, fuel, training ammunition,
transportation, and other goods and services
consumed by the country as a direct result of
the country's participation in activities
conducted under subsection (a); and
(B) does not include--
(i) any form of lethal assistance
(excluding training ammunition); or
(ii) pay, allowances, and other
normal costs of the personnel of the
country.
(h) Repeal of Superseded Authority.--Section 1210 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public
Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is repealed.
(i) Termination.--The authority granted under subsection (a)
shall terminate on September 30, 2016.
SEC. 1206. UNITED STATES SECURITY AND ASSISTANCE STRATEGIES IN AFRICA.
(a) Strategic Framework for Counterterrorism Assistance and
Cooperation in the Sahel and the Maghreb Regions.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, develop a
strategic framework for United States counterterrorism
assistance and cooperation in the Sahel and Maghreb
regions of Africa, including for programs conducted
under the Trans-Sahara Counter Terrorism Partnership,
Operation Enduring Freedom-Trans Sahara, and related
security assistance authorities.
(2) Elements.--The strategic framework required by
paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An evaluation of the threat of terrorist
organizations operating in the Sahel and
Maghreb regions to the national security of the
United States.
(B) An identification on a regional basis of
the primary objectives, priorities, and desired
end-states of United States counterterrorism
assistance and cooperation programs in the
region, and of the resources required to
achieve such objectives, priorities, and end-
states.
(C) A methodology for assessing the
effectiveness of United States counterterrorism
assistance and cooperation programs in the
region in making progress towards the
objectives and desired end-states identified
pursuant to subparagraph (B), including an
identification of key benchmarks of such
progress.
(D) Criteria for bilateral and multilateral
partnerships in the region.
(E) Plans for enhancing coordination among
United States and international agencies for
planning and implementation of United States
counterterrorism assistance and cooperation
programs for the region on a regional basis,
rather than a country-by-country basis, in
order to improve coordination among United
States regional and bilateral counterterrorism
assistance and cooperation programs in the
region.
(3) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress a report that
includes the following:
(A) A comprehensive description of the
strategic framework required by paragraph (1).
(B) A description of lessons learned
regarding the organization and implementation
of United States counterterrorism assistance
and cooperation programs for the Sahel and
Maghreb regions of Africa, including an
evaluation of the performance and commitment of
regional partners in the Sahel and Maghreb
regions, including Mali in particular, in 2012
and 2013.
(b) Strategy to Support Consolidation of Security and
Governance Gains in Somalia.--
(1) Requirement for strategy.--Not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
President shall submit to the appropriate committees of
Congress a strategy to guide future United States
policy and programs in Somalia to counter armed threats
and support regional security, and in support of Somali
and international efforts to foster economic growth and
opportunity, counter armed threats to stability, and
develop credible, transparent, and representative
government systems and institutions.
(2) Content of strategy.--The strategy required under
paragraph (1) should include the following elements:
(A) An interagency framework to plan,
coordinate and review diplomatic, military,
intelligence, development, and humanitarian
elements of the United States policy regarding
Somalia.
(B) Plans and benchmarks for strengthening
efforts, as appropriate, of the Government of
Somalia, the African Union, and regional
governments to stabilize the security situation
within Somalia and further degrade al-Shabaab's
capabilities, in order to enable the eventual
transfer of security operations to Somali
security forces capable of--
(i) maintaining and expanding
security and stability within Somalia;
(ii) confronting transnational
security threats; and
(iii) preventing human rights abuses.
(C) A plan to support the development and
professionalization of credible, civilian led,
Somali security forces that are representative
of the population, including the infrastructure
and procedures required to ensure chain of
custody and the safe storage of military
equipment and an assessment of the benefits and
risks of the provision of weaponry to the
Somali security forces by the United States.
(D) A description of United States national
security objectives addressed through military-
to-military cooperation activities with Somali
security forces.
(E) A description of security risks to any
United States personnel conducting security
cooperation activities within Somalia and plans
to assist the Somali security forces in
preventing infiltration and insider attacks,
including through the application of lessons
learned in United States military training
efforts in Afghanistan.
(F) A description of United States tools for
monitoring and responding to violations of the
United Nations Security Council arms embargo,
charcoal ban, and other international
agreements affecting the stability of Somalia.
(G) A description of mechanisms for
coordinating United States military and non-
military assistance with other international
donors, regional governments, and relevant
multilateral organizations.
(H) A plan to support the consolidation of
political gains at the national level, while
also encouraging and supporting complementary
processes at the local and regional levels and
encouraging improved collaboration among Somali
national and regional administrations.
(I) Any plans to increase United States
diplomatic engagement with Somalia, including
through the future establishment of an embassy
or other diplomatic posts in Mogadishu.
(J) Any other element the President
determines appropriate.
(3) Reports.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the submission of the strategy required under
paragraph (1), and annually thereafter for three years,
the President shall submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress an update on implementation of
the strategy and progress made in Somalia and
associated benchmarks for security, stability,
development, and governance.
(4) Form.--The strategy required under paragraph (1)
and the reports required under paragraph (3) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
(c) Intelligence Assessment and Report on Al-Shabaab.--Not
later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress a classified intelligence
assessment of the terrorist organization known as al-Shabaab.
Such assessment shall include the following:
(1) A description of organizational structure,
operational objectives, and funding sources for al-
Shabaab.
(2) An assessment of the extent to which al-Shabaab
threatens security and stability within Somalia and
surrounding countries.
(3) An assessment of the extent to which al-Shabaab
threatens the security of United States citizens or the
national security or interests of the United States.
(4) The description of the relationship between al-
Shabaab and al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda affiliates.
(5) An assessment of the capacity of the Government
of Somalia to counter the threat posed by al-Shabaab.
(6) An assessment of the capacity of regional
countries and organizations, including the African
Union, to counter the threat posed by al-Shabaab.
(d) Designation of Government Official for Africa Export
Policy.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment
of this Act, and for the following three years, the President
shall designate an existing senior United States Government
official with existing interagency authority for export policy
for Africa to coordinate among various United States Government
agencies existing export strategies with the goal of
significantly increasing United States exports to Africa in
real dollar value.
(e) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate committees of Congress''
means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives.
SEC. 1207. ASSISTANCE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF JORDAN FOR BORDER SECURITY
OPERATIONS.
(a) Authority To Provide Assistance.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may, with
the concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide
assistance on a reimbursement basis to the Government
of Jordan for purposes of supporting and maintaining
efforts of the armed forces of Jordan to increase
security and sustain increased security along the
border between Jordan and Syria.
(2) Frequency.--Assistance under this subsection may
be provided on a quarterly basis.
(3) Certification.--Assistance may be provided under
this subsection only if the Secretary of Defense
certifies to the specified congressional committees
that the Government of Jordan is continuing to support
and maintain efforts of the armed forces of Jordan to
increase security or sustain increased security along
the border between Jordan and Syria.
(b) Funds Available for Assistance.--Amounts authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by title XV and available for
reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided
to United States military operations pursuant to section 1233
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
(Public Law 110-181) as specified in the funding table in
section 4302 may be used to provide assistance under the
authority in subsection (a).
(c) Limitations.--
(1) Limitation on amount.--The total amount of
assistance provided under the authority in subsection
(a) may not exceed $150,000,000.
(2) Prohibition on contractual obligations.--The
Secretary of Defense may not enter into any contractual
obligation to provide assistance under the authority in
subsection (a).
(d) Notice Before Exercise.--Not later than 15 days before
providing assistance under the authority in subsection (a), the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified
congressional committees a report setting forth a full
description of the assistance to be provided, including the
amount of assistance to be provided, and the timeline for the
provision of such assistance.
(e) Specified Congressional Committees.--In this section, the
term ``specified congressional committees'' means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
(f) Expiration of Authority.--No assistance may be provided
under the authority in subsection (a) after December 31, 2015.
SEC. 1208. SUPPORT OF FOREIGN FORCES PARTICIPATING IN OPERATIONS TO
DISARM THE LORD'S RESISTANCE ARMY.
(a) Authority.--Pursuant to the policy established by the
Lord's Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery
Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-172; 124 Stat. 1209), the Secretary
of Defense may, with the concurrence of Secretary of State,
provide logistic support, supplies, and services, and
intelligence support, to foreign forces participating in
operations to mitigate and eliminate the threat posed by the
Lord's Resistance Army as follows:
(1) The national military forces of Uganda.
(2) The national military forces of any other country
determined by the Secretary of Defense to be
participating in such operations.
(b) Funding.--
(1) In general.--Of the amount authorized to be
appropriated for a fiscal year for the Department of
Defense for operation and maintenance, not more than
$50,000,000 may be used in such fiscal year to provide
support under subsection (a).
(2) Availability of funds across fiscal years.--
Amounts available under this subsection for a fiscal
year for support under the authority in subsection (a)
may be used for support under that authority that
begins in such fiscal year but ends in the next fiscal
year.
(c) Limitations.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may not use
the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of
support that is otherwise prohibited by any provision
of law.
(2) Availability of funds for fiscal year 2014.--Of
the amount available under subsection (b) for fiscal
year 2014, not more than $37,500,000 may be obligated
or expended to provide support under subsection (a)
until the Secretary submits to the appropriate
committees of Congress a report on Operation Observant
Compass, including the specific goals of the campaign
to counter the Lord's Resistance Army, the precise
metrics used to measure progress in the campaign, and
the actions that will be taken to transition the
campaign if it is determined that it is no longer
necessary for the United States to support the mission
of the campaign.
(d) Notice to Congress on Support To Be Provided.--Not less
than 15 days before the date on which funds are obligated to
provide support under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice
setting forth the following:
(1) The type of support to be provided.
(2) The national military forces to be supported.
(3) The objectives of such support.
(4) The estimated cost of such support.
(5) The intended duration of such support.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate committees of Congress''
means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Relations, and the
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee
on Appropriations of the House of
Representatives.
(2) The term ``logistic support, supplies, and
services'' has the meaning given that term in section
2350(1) of title 10, United States Code.
(f) Expiration.--The authority provided under this section
may not be exercised after September 30, 2017.
(g) Repeal of Superseded Authority.--Section 1206 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1624; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is repealed.
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq
SEC. 1211. COMMANDERS' EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM IN AFGHANISTAN.
(a) One Year Extension.--
(1) In general.--Section 1201 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81; 125 Stat. 1619), as amended by section 1221 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1992), is further
amended by striking ``fiscal year 2013'' each place it
appears and inserting ``fiscal year 2014''.
(2) Conforming amendment.--The heading of subsection
(a) of such section is amended by striking ``for Fiscal
Year 2013''.
(b) Funds Available During Fiscal Year 2014.--Subsection (a)
of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking
``$200,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''.
(c) Repeal of Requirement for Quarterly Briefings.--
Subsection (b) of such section is amended--
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``and
Briefings''; and
(2) by striking paragraph (3).
(d) Review Required.--Not later than one year after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Department of Defense Office of the
Inspector General, the Special Inspector General for
Afghanistan Reconstruction, the Special Inspector General for
Iraq Reconstruction, and the Government Accountability Office,
shall submit to Congress a comprehensive report on lessons
learned and best practices from execution of the Commanders'
Emergency Response Program (CERP) from Iraq and Afghanistan.
(e) Contents of Report.--The report required by subsection
(d) shall include the following:
(1) A description of any modifications to CERP since
the commencement of the program.
(2) A description of CERP best practices and lessons
learned related to the following:
(A) Requirements, training, and
certifications for CERP managers in the field
and headquarters.
(B) Project planning, execution, management,
closeout, sustainability, and transfer to host
government.
(C) Project approval process, including
appropriate approval levels for higher-value
projects.
(D) Project monitoring and evaluation.
(E) Control and accountability of funds.
(F) Procurement procedures, including local
procurement.
(G) Processes to maintain flexibility and
rapid implementation of funds, but retain
accountability of CERP projects.
(H) Reporting requirements to the Department
of Defense and Congress.
(I) Recommendations for the use of CERP in
future contingency operations.
(J) Recommendations for developing a CERP
handbook for use by future CERP administrators.
(3) A description and assessment of the application
of CERP practices in the success of reconstruction
efforts and of commanders' pursuit of their missions.
SEC. 1212. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR
REINTEGRATION ACTIVITIES IN AFGHANISTAN.
Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124
Stat. 4392), as most recently amended by section 1218 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1990), is further amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting
``$25,000,000''; and
(B) by striking ``for fiscal year 2013'' and
inserting ``for fiscal year 2014''; and
(2) in subsection (e), by striking ``December 31,
2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN
COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED TO UNITED
STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS.
(a) Extension of Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 1233
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
(Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended
by section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2000), is
further amended by striking ``fiscal year 2013'' and inserting
``fiscal year 2014''.
(b) Limitation on Amount Available.--Subsection (d)(1) of
such section 1233, as so amended, is further amended by
striking ``during fiscal year 2013 may not exceed
$1,650,000,000'' and inserting ``during fiscal year 2014 may
not exceed $1,500,000,000''.
(c) Extension of Notice Requirement Relating to Reimbursement
of Pakistan for Support Provided by Pakistan.--Section
1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section
1213(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1630), is further
amended by striking ``September 30, 2013'' and inserting
``September 30, 2014''.
(d) Extension of Limitation on Reimbursement of Pakistan
Pending Certification on Pakistan.--Subsection (d) of section
1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (126 Stat. 2000) is amended--
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``in
Fiscal Year 2013''; and
(2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Effective as of
the date of the enactment of this Act,'' and all that
follows through ``remain available for obligation'' and
inserting ``No amounts authorized to be appropriated
for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 or
any prior fiscal year''.
SEC. 1214. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT
OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE OF SECURITY
COOPERATION IN IRAQ.
(a) Extension and Modification of Authority.--Subsection (f)
of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended--
(1) by striking ``(f)'' and all that follows through
``fiscal year 2013,'' and inserting the following:
``(f) Additional Authority for Activities of OSCI.--
``(1) In general.--During fiscal year 2014,''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph
(2):
``(2) Required elements of training.--The training
conducted under paragraph (1) shall include elements
that promote the following:
``(A) Observance of and respect for human
rights and fundamental freedoms.
``(B) Military professionalism.
``(C) Respect for legitimate civilian
authority within Iraq.''.
(b) Limitation on Amount.--Subsection (c) of such section is
amended by striking ``2012'' and all that follows through the
period at the end and inserting ``2014 may not exceed
$209,000,000.''.
(c) Source of Funds.--Subsection (d) of such section is
amended--
(1) by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or fiscal year
2013'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2014''; and
(2) by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or 2013, as the
case may be,'' and inserting ``that fiscal year''.
(d) Updates of Report on Activities of OSCI.--Section
1211(d)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1983) is amended--
(1) by striking ``Update required.--Not later than
September 30, 2013,'' and inserting ``Updates
required.--Not later than September 30, 2013, and every
180 days thereafter until the authority in section 1215
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012 expires,''; and
(2) by striking ``including'' and all that follows
and inserting ``including the following:
``(A) A description of any changes to the
specific element or process described in
subparagraphs (A) through (F) of paragraph (2).
``(B) An evaluation of the activities of the
Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq based on
the measures of effectiveness described in
paragraph (2)(F) and a discussion of any
determinations to expand, alter, or terminate
specific activities of the Office based on
those measures.
``(C) An evaluation of the effectiveness of
the training provided pursuant to section
1215(f)(2) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 in
promoting respect for human rights, military
professionalism, and respect for legitimate
civilian authority in Iraq.''.
SEC. 1215. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR PROGRAM
TO DEVELOP AND CARRY OUT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN
AFGHANISTAN.
(a) Extension of Authority.--Section 1217(f) of the Ike
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4393), as most recently amended
by section 1219 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1991), is
further amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the
following new subparagraph:
``(C) Up to $250,000,000 made available to
the Department of Defense for operation and
maintenance for fiscal year 2014.'';
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A),
by inserting ``, or phase of a project,'' after
``each project'';
(B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as
subparagraph (D); and
(C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the
following new subparagraph (C):
``(C) An assessment of the capability of the
Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to
provide security for such project after January
1, 2015, including an estimate of the ANSF
force levels, if any, required to secure such
project. Such assessment should include the
estimated costs of providing security and
whether or not the Government of Afghanistan is
committed to providing such security.''; and
(3) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the
following new subparagraph:
``(D) In the case of funds for fiscal year
2014, until September 30, 2015.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on October 1, 2013.
(c) Report on Transition of Project Management.--
(1) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and
the Administrator of the United States Agency for
International Development, submit to the congressional
defense committees a plan for the transition to the
Government of Afghanistan, or a utility entity owned by
the Government of Afghanistan, of the project
management of projects funded with amounts authorized
by this Act for the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund.
Such transition shall be planned to be completed by not
later December 31, 2014.
(2) Elements.--The report required under paragraph
(1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of the projects to be
transitioned as described in that paragraph,
the cost of such projects, and the timelines
for completion and other key implementation
milestones for such projects.
(B) For each such project, the following:
(i) An estimate of the financial and
other requirements necessary to manage
such project, and sustain the
infrastructure developed through such
project, on an annual basis after the
completion of such project.
(ii) An assessment of the capacity of
the Government of Afghanistan or such
utility entity to manage such project,
and maintain and use the infrastructure
developed through such project, after
the completion of such project.
(iii) A description of any
arrangements, and an estimate of
associated costs, to support the
Government of Afghanistan or such
utility entity if the Government of
Afghanistan or such utility entity, as
the case may be, lacks the capacity (in
either financial or human resources) to
manage such project, or sustain the
infrastructure developed through such
project, after the completion of such
project.
(C) An assessment of the ministries or
organizations of Afghanistan that will be
responsible for the management of such projects
after transition, including an assessment of
any critical institutional shortfalls of such
ministries and organizations that must be
addressed for such ministries and organization
to acquire the capacity required to assume
project management responsibilities for such
projects.
SEC. 1216. REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ASSISTANCE TO
AFGHANISTAN IN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO 100 PERCENT OF
ALL TAXES ASSESSED BY AFGHANISTAN TO EXTENT SUCH
TAXES ARE NOT REIMBURSED BY AFGHANISTAN.
(a) Requirement To Withhold Assistance to Afghanistan.--An
amount equivalent to 100 percent of the total taxes assessed
during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all
Department of Defense assistance shall be withheld by the
Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated
for such assistance for fiscal year 2014 to the extent that the
Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in writing to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives that such taxes have not been reimbursed by the
Government of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense or the
grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned.
(b) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the
requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that
such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States goals in
Afghanistan.
(c) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on the total taxes assessed during
fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all
Department of Defense assistance.
(d) Department of Defense Assistance Defined.--In this
section, the term ``Department of Defense assistance'' means
funds provided during fiscal year 2013 to Afghanistan by the
Department of Defense, either directly or through grantees,
contractors, or subcontractors.
(e) Termination.--This section shall terminate at the close
of the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a notification that the United States and
Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security agreement and such
agreement has entered into force.
SEC. 1217. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN AUTHORITIES FOR SUPPORT OF FOREIGN
FORCES SUPPORTING OR PARTICIPATING WITH THE UNITED
STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) Logistical Support for Coalition Forces Supporting United
States Military Operations in Afghanistan.--Section 1234 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public
Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended by
section 1216(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1989), is
further amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``fiscal year
2013'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2014'';
(2) in subsection (d), by striking ``in fiscal year
2013'' and inserting ``during the period beginning on
October 1, 2013, and ending on December 31, 2014,'';
and
(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``of fiscal
year 2013'' and inserting ``through December 31,
2014''.
(b) Use of Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements To Lend
Certain Military Equipment to Certain Foreign Forces for
Personnel Protection and Survivability.--Section 1202(e) of the
John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2007 (Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2413), as most recently
amended by section 1202(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125
Stat. 1621), is further amended by striking ``September 30,
2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
SEC. 1218. EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE IRAQI SPECIAL IMMIGRANT
VISA PROGRAM.
The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note)
is amended--
(1) in section 1242, by striking subsection (c) and
inserting the following:
``(c) Improved Application Process.--
``(1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary
of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in
consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall
improve the efficiency by which applications for
special immigrant visas under section 1244(a), are
processed so that all steps under the control of the
respective departments incidental to the issuance of
such visas, including required screenings and
background checks, should be completed not later than 9
months after the date on which an eligible alien
submits all required materials to complete an
application for such visa.
``(2) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to limit the ability of a Secretary referred
to in paragraph (1) to take longer than 9 months to
complete those steps incidental to the issuance of such
visas in high-risk cases for which satisfaction of
national security concerns requires additional time.
``(d) Representation.--An alien applying for admission to the
United States pursuant to this subtitle may be represented
during the application process, including at relevant
interviews and examinations, by an attorney or other accredited
representative. Such representation shall not be at the expense
of the United States Government.'';
(2) in section 1244--
(A) in subsection (b)--
(i) in paragraph (4)--
(I) by striking ``A
recommendation'' and inserting
the following:
``(A) In general.--Except as provided under
subparagraph (B), a recommendation''; and
(II) by adding at the end the
following:
``(B) Review process for denial by chief of
mission.--
``(i) In general.--An applicant who
has been denied Chief of Mission
approval required by subparagraph (A)
shall--
``(I) receive a written
decision that provides, to the
maximum extent feasible,
information describing the
basis for the denial, including
the facts and inferences
underlying the individual
determination; and
``(II) be provided not more
than one written appeal--
``(aa) that shall be
submitted not more than
120 days after the date
that the applicant
receives such decision
in writing; and
``(bb) that may
request reopening of
such decision and
provide additional
information, clarify
existing information,
or explain any
unfavorable
information.
``(ii) Iraqi special immigrant visa
coordinator.--The Secretary of State
shall designate, in the Embassy of the
United States in Baghdad, Iraq, an
Iraqi Special Immigrant Visa
Coordinator responsible for overseeing
the efficiency and integrity of the
processing of special immigrant visas
under this section, who shall be
given--
``(I) sufficiently high
security clearance to review
information supporting Chief of
Mission denials if an appeal of
a denial is filed;
``(II) responsibility for
ensuring that an applicant
described in clause (i)
receives the information
described in clause (i)(I); and
``(III) responsibility for
ensuring that every applicant
is provided a reasonable
opportunity to provide
additional information, clarify
existing information, or
explain any unfavorable
information pursuant to clause
(i)(II).''; and
(ii) by adding at the end the
following:
``(5) Evidence of serious threat.--A credible sworn
statement depicting dangerous country conditions,
together with official evidence of such country
conditions from the United States Government, should be
considered as a factor in determination of whether the
alien has experienced or is experiencing an ongoing
serious threat as a consequence of the alien's
employment by the United States Government for purposes
of paragraph (1)(D).''; and
(B) in subsection (c)(3), by striking
subparagraph (C) and inserting the following:
``(C) Limitation on number of visas.--
``(i) In general.--The total number
of principal aliens who may be provided
special immigrant status under this
section after January 1, 2014, shall be
not more than 2500.
``(ii) Employment period.--The 1-year
period during which the principal alien
is required to have been employed by or
on behalf of the United States
Government in Iraq under subsection
(b)(1)(B) shall begin on or after March
20, 2003, and end on or before
September 30, 2013.
``(iii) Application deadline.--The
principal alien seeking special
immigrant status under this
subparagraph shall apply to the Chief
of Mission in accordance with
subsection (b)(4) not later than
September 30, 2014.''; and
(3) in section 1248, by adding at the end the
following:
``(f) Report on Improvements.--
``(1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary
of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in
consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall
submit a report, with a classified annex, if necessary,
to--
``(A) the Committee on the Judiciary, the
Committee on Foreign Relations, and the
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and
``(B) the Committee on the Judiciary, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee
on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives.
``(2) Contents.--The report submitted under paragraph
(1) shall describe the implementation of improvements
to the processing of applications for special immigrant
visas under section 1244(a), including information
relating to--
``(A) enhancing existing systems for
conducting background and security checks of
persons applying for special immigrant status,
which shall--
``(i) support immigration security;
and
``(ii) provide for the orderly
processing of such applications without
significant delay;
``(B) the financial, security, and personnel
considerations and resources necessary to carry
out this subtitle;
``(C) the number of aliens who have applied
for special immigrant visas under section 1244
during each month of the preceding fiscal year;
``(D) the reasons for the failure to process
any applications that have been pending for
longer than 9 months;
``(E) the total number of applications that
are pending due to the failure--
``(i) to receive approval from the
Chief of Mission;
``(ii) of U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services to complete the
adjudication of the Form I-360;
``(iii) to conduct a visa interview;
or
``(iv) to issue the visa to an
eligible alien;
``(F) the average wait times for an applicant
at each of the stages described in subparagraph
(E);
``(G) the number of denials or rejections at
each of the stages described in subparagraph
(E); and
``(H) the reasons for denials by the Chief of
Mission based on the categories already made
available to denied special immigrant visa
applicants in the denial letter sent to them by
the Chief of Mission.
``(g) Public Quarterly Reports.--Not later than 120 days
after the date of the enactment of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months
thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of
Defense, shall publish a report on the website of the
Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements
made in the process by which applications for special immigrant
visas under section 1244(a) are processed, including
information described in subparagraphs (C) through (H) of
subsection (f)(2).
``(h) Senior Coordinating Officials.--
``(1) Requirement to designate.--The Secretary of
Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, and the
Secretary of Defense shall each designate a senior
coordinating official, with sufficient expertise,
authority, and resources, to carry out the duties
described in paragraph (2), with regard to the issuance
of special immigrant visas under this subtitle and the
Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101
note).
``(2) Duties.--Each senior coordinating official
designated under paragraph (1) shall--
``(A) develop proposals to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the process for
issuing special immigrant visas under this
subtitle and the Afghan Allies Protection Act
of 2009;
``(B) coordinate and monitor the
implementation of such proposals;
``(C) include such proposals in the report
required by subsection (f) and in each
quarterly report required by subsection (g);
and
``(D) implement appropriate actions as
authorized by law to carry out the improvements
described in the report required by subsection
(f).
``(3) Submission to congress.--Not later than 30 days
after the date of the enactment of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary
of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, and the
Secretary of Defense shall each submit to the
committees set out in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of
subsection (f)(1) the name and title of the senior
coordinating official designated under paragraph (1) by
each such Secretary, along with a description of the
relevant expertise, authority, and resources of such
official.''.
SEC. 1219. IMPROVEMENT OF THE AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA PROGRAM.
Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8
U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in subparagraph (D)--
(i) by striking ``A recommendation''
and inserting the following:
``(i) In general.--Except as provided
under clause (ii), a recommendation'';
and
(ii) by adding at the end the
following:
``(ii) Review process for denial by
chief of mission.--
``(I) In general.--An
applicant who has been denied
Chief of Mission approval
shall--
``(aa) receive a
written decision that
provides, to the
maximum extent
feasible, information
describing the basis
for the denial,
including the facts and
inferences underlying
the individual
determination; and
``(bb) be provided
not more than one
written appeal--
``(AA) that
shall be
submitted not
more than 120
days after the
date that the
applicant
receives such
decision in
writing; and
``(BB) that
may request
reopening of
such decision
and provide
additional
information,
clarify
existing
information, or
explain any
unfavorable
information.
``(II) Afghan special
immigrant visa coordinator.--
The Secretary of State shall
designate, in the Embassy of
the United States in Kabul,
Afghanistan, an Afghan Special
Immigrant Visa Coordinator
responsible for overseeing the
efficiency and integrity of the
processing of special immigrant
visas under this section, who
shall be given--
``(aa) sufficiently
high security clearance
to review information
supporting Chief of
Mission denials if an
appeal of a denial is
filed;
``(bb) responsibility
for ensuring that an
applicant described in
subclause (I) receives
the information
described in subclause
(I)(aa); and
``(cc) responsibility
for ensuring that every
applicant is provided a
reasonable opportunity
to provide additional
information, clarify
existing information,
or explain any
unfavorable information
pursuant to clause
(I)(bb).''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
``(E) Evidence of serious threat.--A credible
sworn statement depicting dangerous country
conditions, together with official evidence of
such country conditions from the United States
Government, should be considered as a factor in
determination of whether the alien has
experienced or is experiencing an ongoing
serious threat as a consequence of the alien's
employment by the United States Government for
purposes of subparagraph (A)(iv).
``(F) Representation.--An alien applying for
admission to the United States pursuant to this
title may be represented during the application
process, including at relevant interviews and
examinations, by an attorney or other
accredited representative. Such representation
shall not be at the expense of the United
States Government.'';
(2) in paragraph (4)--
(A) in the heading, by striking ``Prohibition
on fees.--'' and inserting ``Application
process.--''; and
(B) by striking ``The Secretary'' and
inserting the following:
``(A) In general.--Not later than 120 days
after the date of the enactment of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014,
the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Homeland Security, in consultation with the
Secretary of Defense, shall improve the
efficiency by which applications for special
immigrant visas under paragraph (1), are
processed so that all steps under the control
of the respective departments incidental to the
issuance of such visas, including required
screenings and background checks, should be
completed not later than 9 months after the
date on which an eligible alien submits all
required materials to complete an application
for such visa.
``(B) Construction.--Nothing in this section
shall be construed to limit the ability of a
Secretary referred to in subparagraph (A) to
take longer than 9 months to complete those
steps incidental to the issuance of such visas
in high-risk cases for which satisfaction of
national security concerns requires additional
time.
``(C) Prohibition on fees.--The Secretary'';
and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(12) Report on improvements.--
``(A) Requirement for report.--Not later than
120 days after the date of the enactment of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the
Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation
with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to
the appropriate committees of Congress a
report, with a classified annex, if necessary.
``(B) Contents.--The report required by
subparagraph (A) shall describe the
implementation of improvements to the
processing of applications for special
immigrant visas under this subsection,
including information relating to--
``(i) enhancing existing systems for
conducting background and security
checks of persons applying for special
immigrant status, which shall--
``(I) support immigration
security; and
``(II) provide for the
orderly processing of such
applications without
significant delay;
``(ii) the financial, security, and
personnel considerations and resources
necessary to carry out this section;
``(iii) the number of aliens who have
applied for special immigrant visas
under this subsection during each month
of the preceding fiscal year;
``(iv) the reasons for the failure to
process any applications that have been
pending for longer than 9 months;
``(v) the total number of
applications that are pending due to
the failure--
``(I) to receive approval
from the Chief of Mission;
``(II) of U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services to
complete the adjudication of
the Form I-360;
``(III) to conduct a visa
interview; or
``(IV) to issue the visa to
an eligible alien;
``(vi) the average wait times for an
applicant at each of the stages
described in clause (v);
``(vii) the number of denials or
rejections at each of the stages
described in clause (v); and
``(viii) the reasons for denials by
the Chief of Mission based on the
categories already made available to
denied special immigrant visa
applicants in the denial letter sent to
them by the Chief of Mission.
``(13) Public quarterly reports.--Not later than 120
days after the date of the enactment of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and
every 3 months thereafter, the Secretary of State and
the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation
with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report
on the website of the Department of State that
describes the efficiency improvements made in the
process by which applications for special immigrant
visas under this subsection are processed, including
information described in clauses (iii) through (viii)
of paragraph (12)(B).''.
Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014
SEC. 1221. REPORT ON PLANS TO DISRUPT AND DEGRADE HAQQANI NETWORK
ACTIVITIES AND FINANCES.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) disrupting and degrading the Haqqani Network
should be a high priority; and
(2) the Administration should use the full extent of
its authority to deny the organization the finances
required to carry out its activities.
(b) Report on Activities and Plan to Disrupt and Degrade
Haqqani Network Activities and Finances.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than nine months
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
President shall report to the appropriate committees of
Congress on activities and the plan to disrupt and
degrade Haqqani Network activities and finances.
(2) Coordination.--The report required by paragraph
(1) shall be prepared by the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary
of the Treasury, the Attorney General, and the Director
of National Intelligence, and any other department or
agency of the United States Government that has lead
responsibility for activities directed at disrupting
and degrading the Haqqani Network.
(3) Elements.--The report required by paragraph (1)
shall include the following:
(A) A description of the current activities
of the Department of Defense, the Department of
State, the Department of the Treasury, the
Department of Justice, and the elements of the
intelligence community to disrupt and degrade
Haqqani Network activities, finances, and
resources.
(B) An assessment of the intelligence
community--
(i) of the operations of the Haqqani
Network in Afghanistan and Pakistan,
and its activities outside the region;
and
(ii) of the relationships, networks,
and vulnerabilities of the Haqqani
Network, including with Pakistan's
military, intelligence services, and
government officials, including
provincial and district officials.
(C) A review of the plans and intentions of
the Haqqani Network with respect to the
continued drawdown of United States and
coalition troops.
(D) A review of the current United States
policies, activities, and funding, and a
description of a plan, for applying sustained
and systemic pressure against the Haqqani
Network's financial infrastructure, including--
(i) identification of the agencies
that would participate in implementing
the plan;
(ii) a description of the legal
authorities under which the plan would
be conducted;
(iii) a description of the objectives
and desired outcomes of the plan,
including specific steps to achieve
these objectives and outcomes;
(iv) metrics to measure the success
of the plan; and
(v) the identity of the agency or
office to be designated as the lead
agency in implementing the plan.
(E) An examination of the extent, if any, to
which current United States and coalition
contracting processes have furthered the
financial interests of the Haqqani Network, and
how the activities and plans specified in
paragraph (1) would mitigate the unintended
consequences of such processes.
(F) An assessment of formal and informal
business sectors penetrated by the Haqqani
Network in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and other
countries, particularly in the Persian Gulf
region, and a description of steps to counter
these activities.
(G) An estimate of costs associated with the
implementation of the plan to disrupt and
degrade the Haqqani Network's financial
activities.
(H) A description of how activities and plans
specified in paragraph (1) fit in the broader
United States efforts to stabilize Afghanistan
and prevent the region from being a safe haven
for al Qaeda and its affiliates.
(4) Update of report on activities and plan.--Not
later than 180 days after the submission of the report
required by paragraph (1), the President shall submit
an update of the report to the appropriate committees
of Congress.
(5) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) and
the update required by paragraph (4) shall be submitted
in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Appropriate committees of congress.--The term
``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House
of Representatives.
(2) Intelligence community.--The term ``intelligence
community'' has the meaning given that term in section
3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C.
3003(4)).
SEC. 1222. COMPLETION OF ACCELERATED TRANSITION OF SECURITY
RESPONSIBILITY FROM UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES TO
THE AFGHAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES.
(a) In General.--It is the policy of the United States, in
coordination with the Government of Afghanistan, North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries, and other allies
in Afghanistan, that--
(1) the accelerated transition of security
responsibility from United States Armed Forces to the
Afghan National Security Forces and the associated draw
down of United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan
shall be completed by not later than December 31, 2014;
(2) the United States shall support an Afghan-led and
Afghan-owned peace negotiation process leading to a
political settlement of the conflict in Afghanistan,
with the goal of establishing a secure and independent
Afghanistan and promoting regional security and
stability; and
(3) any political settlement resulting from such
peace negotiations must result in insurgent groups
breaking ties with al Qaeda, renouncing violence, and
accepting the Afghanistan constitution, including its
protections for women and minorities.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that,
before making a public announcement regarding a decision on a
United States military presence in Afghanistan after December
31, 2014, the President should consult with Congress regarding
the size, mission, and estimated duration of such a presence.
(c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed so as to limit or prohibit any authority of the
President to modify the military strategy, tactics, and
operations of United States Armed Forces as such Armed Forces
draw down from Afghanistan.
SEC. 1223. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PLAN.
(a) Plan Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate a Department of Defense plan regarding covered
defense intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of the
United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. Such plan shall
include--
(1) a description of the covered defense intelligence
assets;
(2) a description of any such assets to remain in
Afghanistan after December 31, 2014, to continue to
support military operations;
(3) a description of any such assets that will be or
have been reallocated to other locations outside of the
United States in support of the Department of Defense;
(4) the defense intelligence priorities that will be
or have been addressed with the reallocation of such
assets from Afghanistan;
(5) the necessary logistics, operations, and
maintenance plans to operate in the locations where
such assets will be or have been reallocated, including
personnel, basing, and any host country agreements; and
(6) a description of any such assets that will be or
have been returned to the United States.
(b) Covered Defense Intelligence Assets Defined.--In this
section, the term ``covered defense intelligence assets'' means
Department of Defense intelligence assets and personnel
supporting military operations in Afghanistan at any time
during the one-year period ending on the date of the enactment
of this Act.
SEC. 1224. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN AUTHORITIES
FOR AFGHANISTAN.
(a) Limitation.--
(1) In general.--Of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available
for fiscal year 2014 to carry out each of the
provisions of law described in paragraph (2), not more
than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until 15
days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense
submits to the specified congressional committees the
certification described in subsection (b).
(2) Provisions of law.--The provisions of law
referred to in paragraph (1) are the following:
(A) Section 1201 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1619; relating to the
Commanders' Emergency Response Program in
Afghanistan).
(B) Section 1217 of the Ike Skelton National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4393; relating
to authority for program to develop and carry
out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan).
(C) Section 1513 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public
Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 428; relating to the
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund).
(b) Certification Described.--The certification referred to
in subsection (a) is a certification of the Secretary of
Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, that the
United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security
agreement that is in the national security interests of the
United States.
(c) National Security Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of
Defense may waive the applicability of the limitation in
subsection (a)(1) if the Secretary determines that the waiver
is in the national security interests of the United States.
(d) Specified Congressional Committees.--In this section, the
term ``specified congressional committees'' means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran
SEC. 1231. REPORT ON UNITED STATES MILITARY PARTNERSHIP WITH GULF
COOPERATION COUNCIL COUNTRIES.
(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report on the United States
military partnership with Gulf Cooperation Council countries.
(b) Matters To Be Included.--The report required by
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An explanation of the steps that the Department
of Defense has taken and is planning to take to improve
the coordination, effectiveness, and interoperability
of the regional missile defense systems and
capabilities of the United States and Gulf Cooperation
Council countries, both bilaterally and multilaterally.
(2) An outline of the defense agreements with Gulf
Cooperation Council countries, including caveats and
restrictions on United States operations.
(3) An outline of United States efforts in Gulf
Cooperation Council countries that are funded by
overseas contingency operations funding, an explanation
of overseas contingency operations funding for such
efforts, and a plan to transition overseas contingency
operations funding for such efforts to long-term,
sustainable funding sources.
(c) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) may be
submitted in classified or unclassified form.
SEC. 1232. ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS IN ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY POWER OF
IRAN.
(a) In General.--Section 1245(b)(3) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123
Stat. 2542) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' at the
end;
(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at
the end and inserting ``; and'' ; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(E) a description of the structure of
Iran's global network of terrorist and criminal
groups and an analysis of the capability of
such network of groups and how such network of
groups operates to support and reinforce Iran's
grand strategy.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and
shall apply with respect to reports required to be submitted
under section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010, as so amended, on or after that date.
SEC. 1233. INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS AT TRAINING
LOCATIONS IN SOUTHWEST ASIA.
Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22
U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) is amended--
(1) in the first sentence, by inserting after
``programs'' the following: ``and integrated air and
missile defense programs''; and
(2) in the second sentence, by adding at the end
before the period the following: ``and integrated air
and missile defense training''.
Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters
SEC. 1241. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-CONVENTIONAL
ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES.
Section 943(h) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122
Stat. 4579), as amended by section 1205(g) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking ``2013''
and inserting ``2015''.
SEC. 1242. ELEMENT ON 5TH GENERATION FIGHTER PROGRAM IN ANNUAL REPORT
ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.
Section 1202(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2000 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at
the end the following new paragraph:
``(20) The status of the 5th generation fighter
program of the People's Republic of China, including an
assessment of each individual aircraft type, estimated
initial and full operational capability dates, and the
ability of such aircraft to provide air superiority.''.
SEC. 1243. REPORT ON POSTURE AND READINESS OF THE ARMED FORCES TO
RESPOND TO AN ATTACK OR OTHER CONTINGENCY AGAINST
UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC FACILITIES OVERSEAS.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2014, the
Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary
of State and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit
to the congressional defense committees a report on the posture
and readiness of the United States Armed Forces to respond to a
request by the Department of State to supplement or support
existing embassy security assets in the case of an attack or
other contingency against a United States diplomatic facility
overseas.
(b) Elements.--The report required by subsection (a) shall
include the following:
(1) A description and assessment of the posture and
readiness of the United States Armed Forces that are
expected or available to be tasked to supplement or
support United States embassy security, including an
assessment of the following:
(A) Forward deployed assets that are capable
of responding to an attack or other contingency
against a United States diplomatic facility
overseas.
(B) Department of Defense support of the
efforts of the Department of State to improve
diplomatic security at United States diplomatic
facilities overseas (in terms of both personnel
and installations).
(C) Potential enhancements of intelligence
support to ensure that the United States Armed
Forces in the vicinity of high threat, high
risk United States diplomatic facilities
overseas are in an appropriate posture to
respond to an attack or other contingency
against such facilities.
(2) A description of any unfulfilled Marine Security
Detachment requirements with respect to high threat,
high risk United States diplomatic facilities overseas,
a description and assessment of mitigation efforts to
meet such requirements, and a schedule for meeting such
requirements.
(c) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) may be
submitted in classified or unclassified form.
SEC. 1244. LIMITATION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL SPECIAL OPERATIONS
FORCES COORDINATION CENTERS.
(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or
expended to establish Regional Special Operations Forces
Coordination Centers (RSCCs).
(b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the
congressional committees specified in subsection (c) a report
on the following:
(1) A detailed description of the intent and purpose
of the RSCCs concept.
(2) Defined and validated requirements justifying the
establishment of RSCCs or similar entities within each
geographic combatant command, to include how such RSCCs
or similar entities have been coordinated and de-
conflicted with existing regional and multilateral
frameworks or approaches.
(3) The relevance to and coordination with other
multilateral engagement activities and academic
institutions supported by the geographic combatant
commanders and the Department of State.
(4) Cost estimates across the Future Years Defense
Program for RSCCs or similar entities, to include
estimates of contributions of participating nations.
(5) Any legislative authorities that may be needed to
establish RSCCs or similar entities.
(6) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense
or Secretary of State determines appropriate.
(c) Specified Congressional Committees.--The congressional
committees referred to in subsection (b) are--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
SEC. 1245. ADDITIONAL REPORTS ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS
INVOLVING THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF
KOREA.
(a) Report.--Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81; 125 Stat. 1641), as amended by section 1292 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239; 126 Stat. 2042), is further amended by striking ``November
1, 2012, and November 1, 2013,'' and inserting ``November 1,
2013, November 1, 2015, and November 1, 2017,''.
(b) Update.--Section 1236 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection
(d); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following
new subsection:
``(c) Update.--The Secretary of Defense shall revise or
supplement the most recent report submitted pursuant to
subsection (a) if, in the Secretary's estimation, interim
events or developments occurring in a period between reports
required under subsection (a) warrant revision or
supplement.''.
SEC. 1246. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MISSILE DEFENSE COOPERATION WITH THE
RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND LIMITATIONS ON PROVIDING
CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION TO THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION.
(a) Finding.--Congress finds that the President certified to
the Senate on February 2, 2011, pursuant to condition (5) of
the resolution of the Senate giving the advice and consent of
the Senate to the ratification of the Treaty Between the United
States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for
the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive
Arms (commonly referred to as the ``New START Treaty''), signed
in Prague on April 8, 2010, the following: ``The New START
Treaty does not require, at any point during which it will be
in force, the United States to provide to the Russian
Federation telemetric information under Article IX of the New
START Treaty, Part Seven of the Protocol, and the Annex on
Telemetric Information to the Protocol for the launch of (a)
any missile defense interceptor, as defined in paragraph 44 of
Part One of the Protocol to the New START Treaty; (b) any
satellite launches, missile defense sensor targets, and missile
defense intercept targets, the launch of which uses the first
stage of an existing type of United States intercontinental
ballistic missile (ICBM) or submarine-launched ballistic
missile (SLBM) listed in paragraph 8 of Article III of the New
START Treaty; or (c) any missile described in clause (a) of
paragraph 7 of Article III of the New START Treaty.''.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) as stated in declaration (1) of the resolution of
the Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate
to the ratification of the New START Treaty--
(A) ``further limitations on the missile
defense capabilities of the United States are
not in the national security interest of the
United States''; and
(B) ``[t]he New START Treaty and the April 7,
2010, unilateral statement of the Russian
Federation on missile defense do not limit in
any way, and shall not be interpreted as
limiting, activities that the United States
Government currently plans or that might be
required over the duration of the New START
Treaty to protect the United States pursuant to
the National Missile Defense Act of 1999, or to
protect United States Armed Forces and United
States allies from limited ballistic missile
attack, including further planned enhancements
to the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system
and all phases of the Phased Adaptive Approach
to missile defense in Europe.'';
(2) as stated in declaration (2) of the resolution of
the Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate
to the ratification of the New START Treaty, ``the
United States will welcome steps by the Russian
Federation also to adopt a fundamentally defensive
strategic posture that no longer views robust strategic
defensive capabilities as undermining the overall
strategic balance, and stands ready to cooperate with
the Russian Federation on strategic defensive
capabilities, as long as such cooperation is aimed at
fostering and in no way constrains the defensive
capabilities of both sides'';
(3) any missile defense cooperation with the Russian
Federation should not in any way limit United States'
or NATO's missile defense capabilities, and should be
mutually beneficial and reciprocal in nature;
(4) the United States should not provide the Russian
Federation with sensitive missile defense information
that would in any way compromise United States national
security, including ``hit-to-kill'' technology and
telemetry data for missile defense interceptors or
target vehicles; and
(5) the sovereignty of the United States and its
ability to unilaterally pursue its own missile defense
program shall be protected.
(c) Limitations on Providing Certain Missile Defense
Information to the Russian Federation.--
(1) Certain ``hit-to-kill'' technology and telemetry
data.--No funds authorized to be appropriated or
otherwise made available for fiscal years 2014 through
2016 for the Department of Defense may be used to
provide the Russian Federation with ``hit-to-kill''
technology and telemetry data for missile defense
interceptors or target vehicles.
(2) Other sensitive missile defense information.--No
funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made
available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of
Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation
with sensitive missile defense information that would
in any way compromise United States national security.
(3) Congressional notification.--If the Secretary of
Defense intends to provide the Russian Federation with
any sensitive missile defense information that the
Secretary determines will not compromise United States
national security, the Secretary shall notify the
congressional defense committees of the Secretary's
intent to provide such information not less than 7 days
prior to the provision of such information, including
an explanation of the reasons for providing the
information and the reasons why providing the
information will not compromise United States national
security.
SEC. 1247. AMENDMENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT UNDER ARMS CONTROL AND
DISARMAMENT ACT.
(a) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--Section 403 of the
Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the Speaker of
the House of Representatives and to the chairman of the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate'' and
inserting ``the appropriate congressional committees'';
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ``Congress'' and
inserting ``appropriate congressional committees''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(e) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term `appropriate congressional committees'
means--
``(1) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the
Committee on Armed Services, and the Select Committee
on Intelligence of the Senate; and
``(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee
on Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee
on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.''.
(b) Congressional Briefing.--Section 403 of the Arms Control
and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), as amended by subsection
(a) of this section, is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection
(f); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following
new subsection:
``(e) Congressional Briefing.--Not later than May 15 of each
year, the President shall provide to the appropriate
congressional committees a briefing on the most-recent report
required by this section.''.
SEC. 1248. REPORT ON ACTIONS TO REDUCE SUPPORT FOR BALLISTIC MISSILE
PROLIFERATION.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States Government should develop a
plan to reduce the spread of technology and expertise
that could support the ballistic missile development
programs of Iran, North Korea, and Syria, as well as
any other nation determined by the United States
Government to be a ballistic missile proliferation
risk; and
(2) such plan should include efforts to secure the
cooperation of the Russian Federation and the People's
Republic of China to help reduce the spread of such
ballistic missile technology and expertise.
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 240 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense, in consultation with appropriate Federal
departments and agencies, shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report on steps
that have been taken, and that are planned to be taken,
to reduce the spread of technology and expertise that
could support the ballistic missile development
programs of Iran, North Korea, and Syria, as well as
any other nation the Secretary determines to be a
ballistic missile proliferation risk.
(2) Definition.--In this subsection, the term
``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(A) the congressional defense committees;
(B) the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee
on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives; and
(C) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of
the House of Representatives.
(3) Form.--The report required by this subsection
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may
contain a classified annex, if necessary.
SEC. 1249. REPORTS ON INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) Reports Required.--The Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, shall semi-annually
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report on agreements described
in subsection (b) which have entered into force, have been
amended, or have been terminated during the previous 6-month
period and with respect to which such agreements were
previously notified by the Secretary of State to the Congress
pursuant to section 112b of title 1, United States Code
(commonly known as the ``Case-Zablocki Act'').
(b) Agreements Described.--Agreements referred to in
subsection (a) are agreements relating to matters primarily or
significantly related to or involving the Department of
Defense, including, but not limited to--
(1) matters such as where the Department of Defense
will carry out activities under the agreement; and
(2) matters such as where Department of Defense
personnel are able to be present in a foreign country
in light of the status protections, exemptions, and
responsibilities afforded by the agreement.
(c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to supersede the requirements of section 112b of
title 1, United States Code.
(d) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the
date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect
to an agreement described in subsection (b) on or after that
date.
(e) Termination.--The section shall terminate at the close of
December 31, 2019.
SEC. 1250. REVISION OF STATUTORY REFERENCES TO FORMER NATO SUPPORT
ORGANIZATIONS AND RELATED NATO AGREEMENTS.
(a) Title 10, United States Code.--Section 2350d of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``NATO Maintenance and Supply
Organization'' each place it appears and inserting
``NATO Support Organization and its executive
agencies'';
(2) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) by striking ``Weapon System Partnership
Agreements'' and inserting ``Support
Partnership Agreements''; and
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``a
specific weapon system'' and inserting
``activities''; and
(3) in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), by
striking ``Weapon System Partnership Agreement'' each
place it appears and inserting ``Support Partnership
Agreement''.
(b) Arms Export Control Act.--Section 21(e)(3) of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761(e)(3)) is amended--
(1) in subparagraphs (A) and (C)(i), by striking
``Maintenance and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization'' and inserting ``North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) Support Organization and its
executive agencies'';
(2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``weapon
system partnership agreement'' and inserting ``support
partnership agreement''; and
(3) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking ``a
specific weapon system'' and inserting ``activities''.
SEC. 1251. EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION RELATING TO
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that any
executive agreement between the United States and the Russian
Federation relating to ballistic missile defense should not
limit the development or deployment of ballistic missile
defense systems or capabilities of the United States or of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
(b) Briefing.--Prior to signing an executive agreement with
the Russian Federation relating to ballistic missile defense,
the President, or the President's designee, shall brief the
congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign
Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of
the House of Representatives on the objectives and contents of
the executive agreement.
SEC. 1252. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use
of force against Syria or Iran.
SEC. 1253. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT THE ARMS
TRADE TREATY.
(a) In General.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or
expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or to make any
change to existing programs, projects, or activities as
approved by Congress in furtherance of, pursuant to, or
otherwise to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, unless the Arms
Trade Treaty has received the advice and consent of the Senate
and has been the subject of implementing legislation, as
required, by the Congress.
(b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to preclude the Department of Defense from assisting
foreign countries in bringing their laws and regulations up to
United States standards.
SEC. 1254. REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE
RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
(a) Report.--Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees
a report on the security and military strategy of the Russian
Federation.
(b) Matters To Be Included.--The report required under
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the security priorities and
objectives of Russia.
(2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security
and military strategy, including military spending and
investment priorities.
(3) An assessment of the Russian military's force
structure.
(4) Recent developments in Russian military doctrine
and training.
(5) The current state of United States military-to-
military cooperation with Russia's armed forces, which
shall include the following:
(A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy
for such military-to-military cooperation.
(B) A summary of all such military-to-
military cooperation during the one-year period
preceding the report, including a summary of
topics discussed.
(C) A description of such military-to-
military cooperation planned for the 12-month
period following such report.
(D) The Secretary's assessment of the
benefits the Russians expect to gain from such
military-to-military cooperation.
(E) The Secretary's assessment of the
benefits the Department of Defense expects to
gain from such military-to-military
cooperation, and any concerns regarding such
cooperation.
(F) The Secretary's assessment of how such
military-to-military cooperation fit into the
larger security relationship between the United
States and the Russian Federation.
(6) A description of Russia's key military-to-
military relationships with other countries, and how
these relationships fit into Russia's larger security
and military strategy.
(7) Other military and security developments
involving Russia that the Secretary of Defense
considers relevant to United States national security.
(c) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
(d) Definition.--In this section the term ``specified
congressional committees'' means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee
on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
SEC. 1255. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS OR
AGREEMENTS WITH ROSOBORONEXPORT.
(a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014
may be used to enter into a contract, memorandum of
understanding, or cooperative agreement with, to make a grant,
to, or to provide a loan or loan guarantee to Rosoboronexport.
(b) National Security Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of
Defense may waive the applicability of subsection (a) if the
Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the national
security interests of the United States.
(c) Requirements Relating to Use of Funds Pursuant to
Waiver.--
(1) Notice to congress before obligation of funds.--
Not later than 30 days before obligating funds pursuant
to the waiver under subsection (b), the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to Congress a notice on the
obligation of funds pursuant to the waiver.
(2) Report.--Not later than 15 days after the
submittal of the notice under paragraph (1), the
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report setting
forth the following:
(A) An assessment of the number, if any, of
S-300 advanced anti-aircraft missiles that
Rosoboronexport has delivered to the Assad
regime in Syria.
(B) A list of the known contracts, if any,
that Rosoboronexport has signed with the Assad
regime since January 1, 2013.
(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be
construed to prohibit the use of funds authorized to be
appropriated for the Department of Defense to enter into a
contract or other agreement with Rosoboronexport for the
purpose of supplying spare parts for the sustained maintenance
of helicopters operated by the Afghan National Security Forces.
TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION
Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and
funds.
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations.
Sec. 1303. Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to
the cooperative threat reduction program.
Sec. 1304. Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and
prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and
related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region.
SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAMS AND
FUNDS.
(a) Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction Programs.--
For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this Act,
Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs
specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
(b) Fiscal Year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction Funds
Defined.--As used in this title, the term ``fiscal year 2014
Cooperative Threat Reduction funds'' means the funds
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 301 and made available by the funding table in section
4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.
(c) Availability of Funds.--Funds appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made
available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative
Threat Reduction programs shall be available for obligation for
fiscal years 2014, 2015, and 2016.
SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS.
(a) Funding for Specific Purposes.--Of the $528,455,000
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for
fiscal year 2014 in section 301 and made available by the
funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction
programs, the following amounts may be obligated for the
purposes specified:
(1) For strategic offensive arms elimination,
$5,700,000.
(2) For chemical weapons destruction, $13,000,000.
(3) For global nuclear security, $32,808,000.
(4) For cooperative biological engagement,
$306,325,000.
(5) For proliferation prevention, $136,072,000.
(6) For threat reduction engagement, $6,375,000.
(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/
Administrative Costs, $28,175,000.
(b) Report on Obligation or Expenditure of Funds for Other
Purposes.--No fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction
funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a
purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a)
until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense
submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds
will be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be
obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall
be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of
fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a
purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds
is specifically prohibited under this title or any other
provision of law.
(c) Limited Authority to Vary Individual Amounts.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), in any
case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that
it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the
Secretary may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for a purpose listed in paragraphs (1)
through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific
amount authorized for that purpose.
(2) Notice-and-wait required.--An obligation of funds
for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of
subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount
authorized for such purpose may be made using the
authority provided in paragraph (1) only after--
(A) the Secretary submits to Congress
notification of the intent to do so together
with a complete discussion of the justification
for doing so; and
(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date
of the notification.
(d) Enhanced Authority.--
(1) In general.--The percentage limitation specified
in subsection (a) of section 1305 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (22
U.S.C. 5965) shall not apply with respect to amounts
appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2014 or 2015 for the Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program of the Department of Defense to the extent that
amounts expended in excess of such percentage
limitation for either such fiscal year are expended for
activities undertaken under that section with respect
to Syria.
(2) Quarterly briefings.--
(A) Initial briefing.--Not later than April
15, 2014, the Secretary shall provide to the
appropriate congressional committees a briefing
on activities described in subsection (a) that
includes the following:
(i) A comprehensive assessment of the
chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria,
including names, types, and quantities
of chemical weapons agents, types of
munitions, and location and form of
storage, production, and research and
development facilities.
(ii) An assessment of undeclared
chemical weapons stockpiles, munitions,
and facilities.
(iii) A detailed plan for carrying
out such activities.
(iv) Estimated costs, timelines, and
milestones for carrying out the plan,
including accounting of funds expended
between September 27, 2013, and the
date of the initial briefing.
(v) A discussion of the planned final
disposition of equipment and facilities
procured using funds authorized for
such activities.
(vi) A detailed list of pledges made
and funds received by foreign nations
and multilateral organizations.
(vii) Any other issues or events that
reflect the current status of the
efforts to remove and destroy Syria's
chemical weapons.
(B) Subsequent briefings.--Not later than 90
days after providing the briefing required by
subparagraph (A), and each 90-day period
thereafter, the Secretary shall provide to the
appropriate congressional committees a briefing
on the activities carried out under subsection
(a) that includes the following:
(i) An accounting of the funds
expended as of the date of the briefing
to carry out such activities.
(ii) An estimate of the funds that
are expected to be expended for such
activities in the 90-day period
following the briefing.
(iii) An identification of recipients
of assistance pursuant to such
activities.
(iv) A description of the types of
equipment and services procured in
carrying out such activities.
(v) A detailed list of pledges made
and funds received by foreign nations
and multilateral organizations.
(vi) Any other issues or events that
reflect the current status of the
efforts to remove and destroy Syria's
chemical weapons.
(3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In
this section, the term ``appropriate congressional
committees'' means the following:
(A) The congressional defense committees.
(B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of
the House of Representatives.
SEC. 1303. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR UTILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO
THE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAM.
Section 1303(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2557; 22 U.S.C.
5952 note) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2015'' and
inserting ``December 31, 2018''.
SEC. 1304. STRATEGY TO MODERNIZE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION AND
PREVENT THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS
DESTRUCTION AND RELATED MATERIALS IN THE MIDDLE
EAST AND NORTH AFRICA REGION.
(a) Strategy Required.--The Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Energy, shall establish a comprehensive and broad
nonproliferation strategy to advance cooperative efforts with
the governments of countries in the Middle East and North
Africa to reduce the threat from the proliferation of weapons
of mass destruction and related materials.
(b) Elements.--The strategy required by subsection (a)
shall--
(1) build upon the current activities of the
nonproliferation programs of the Department of Defense,
the Department of State, the Department of Energy, and
other departments and agencies of the Federal
Government designed to mitigate the range of threats
posed by weapons of mass destruction and related
materials in the Middle East and North Africa region;
(2) review issues relating to the threat from the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and
related materials in the Middle East and North Africa
region on a regional basis as well as on a country-by-
country basis;
(3) review the activities and achievements in the
Middle East and North Africa region of--
(A) the Cooperative Threat Reduction program
of the Department of Defense;
(B) the nonproliferation programs of the
Department of State and the Department of
Energy; and
(C) programs of other departments and
agencies of the Federal Government designed to
address nuclear, chemical, and biological
safety and security issues;
(4) ensure the continued coordination of cooperative
nonproliferation efforts within the Federal Government;
(5) mobilize and leverage additional resources from
countries that cooperate with the United States with
respect to nonproliferation efforts, nongovernmental
and multilateral organizations, and international
institutions;
(6) include an assessment of what countries are
financially, materially, or technologically supporting
proliferation in the Middle East and North Africa
region and how the strategy will prevent, stop, or
interdict such support;
(7) include an estimate of associated costs required
to plan and execute the proposed cooperative threat
reduction activities under the strategy; and
(8) include a discussion of the metrics to measure
the success of the strategy and such activities in
reducing the regional threat of the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction.
(c) Integration and Coordination.--The strategy required by
subsection (a) shall include--
(1) an assessment of gaps in current cooperative
efforts to reduce the threat from the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction and related materials in
the Middle East and North Africa region;
(2) an articulation of the priorities of the United
States with respect to reducing such threat;
(3) the establishment of appropriate metrics for
determining success with respect to reducing such
threat; and
(4) methods for ensuring that the strategy conforms
to broader efforts by the United States to reduce the
threat from weapons of mass destruction.
(d) Consultations.--In establishing the strategy required by
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with
governmental and nongovernmental experts in matters relating to
nonproliferation that present a diverse set of views.
(e) Submission of Strategy and Implementation Plan.--
(1) In general.--Not later than March 31, 2014, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees the strategy required by
subsection (a) and a plan for the implementation of the
strategy.
(2) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In
this subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional
committees'' means the following:
(A) The congressional defense committees.
(B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of
the House of Representatives.
(3) Form.--The strategy and plan required by
paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form,
but may include a classified annex.
TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
Subtitle A--Military Programs
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund.
Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program.
Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile
Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a
strategic and critical materials supply.
Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National
Defense Stockpile.
Subtitle C--Other Matters
Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of
Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility
Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care
Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement
Home.
Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses.
Subtitle A--Military Programs
SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities
and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital
for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the
funding table in section 4501.
SEC. 1402. NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified
in the funding table in section 4501.
SEC. 1403. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for
fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as
specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b) Use.--Amounts authorized to be appropriated under
subsection (a) are authorized for--
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and
munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the
Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50
U.S.C. 1521); and
(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of
the United States that is not covered by section 1412
of such Act.
SEC. 1404. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug
Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in
section 4501.
SEC. 1405. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General
of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table
in section 4501.
SEC. 1406. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the
funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and
other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in
providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries.
Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile
SEC. 1411. USE OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE FOR THE CONSERVATION OF A
STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL MATERIALS SUPPLY.
(a) Presidential Responsibility for Conservation of Stockpile
Materials.--Section 6(a) of the Strategic and Critical
Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98e(a)) is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as
paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following
new paragraph (5):
``(5) provide for the appropriate recovery of any
strategic and critical materials under section 3(a)
that may be available from excess materials made
available for recovery purposes by other Federal
agencies;''.
(b) Uses of National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund.--
Section 9(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 98h(b)(2)) is amended--
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (L) as
subparagraphs (E) through (M), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following
new subparagraph (D):
``(D) Encouraging the appropriate conservation of
strategic and critical materials.''.
(c) Development of Domestic Sources.--Section 15(a) of such
Act (50 U.S.C. 98h-6(a)) is amended, in the matter preceding
paragraph (1), by inserting ``and appropriate conservation''
after ``development''.
SEC. 1412. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE NATIONAL
DEFENSE STOCKPILE.
(a) Acquisition Authority.--Using funds available in the
National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National
Defense Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials
determined to be strategic and critical materials required to
meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of
the United States:
(1) Ferroniobium.
(2) Dysprosium Metal.
(3) Yttrium Oxide.
(4) Cadmium Zinc Tellurium Substrate Materials.
(5) Lithium Ion Precursors.
(6) Triamino-Trinitrobenzene and Insensitive High
Explosive Molding Powders.
(b) Amount of Authority.--The National Defense Stockpile
Manager may use up to $41,000,000 of the National Stockpile
Transaction Fund for acquisition of the materials specified in
subsection (a).
(c) Fiscal Year Limitation.--The authority under this section
is available for purchases during fiscal year 2014 through
fiscal year 2019.
Subtitle C--Other Matters
SEC. 1421. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL
FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR CAPTAIN JAMES A.
LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, ILLINOIS.
(a) Authority for Transfer of Funds.--Of the funds authorized
to be appropriated by section 1406 and available for the
Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance,
$143,087,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to
the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs
Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection
(a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2571).
For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any
funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and
appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(b) Use of Transferred Funds.--For the purposes of subsection
(b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds
transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of
the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center,
consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting
facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility
under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4500).
SEC. 1422. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT
HOME.
There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year
2014 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum
of $67,800,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement
Home.
SEC. 1423. CEMETERIAL EXPENSES.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial
expenses, not otherwise provided for, in the amount of
$45,800,000.
TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations
Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Procurement.
Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1505. Military personnel.
Sec. 1506. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program.
Subtitle B--Financial Matters
Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority.
Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters
Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1532. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.
Sec. 1533. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat
Organization.
Sec. 1534. Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and
Stability Operations in Afghanistan.
Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations
SEC. 1501. PURPOSE.
The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations
for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 to provide
additional funds for overseas contingency operations being
carried out by the Armed Forces.
SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and
the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities,
as specified in the funding table in section 4102.
SEC. 1503. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for
research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in
the funding table in section 4202.
SEC. 1504. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities
and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as
specified in the funding table in section 4302.
SEC. 1505. MILITARY PERSONNEL.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities
and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in
the funding table in section 4402.
SEC. 1506. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities
and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital
for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the
funding table in section 4502.
SEC. 1507. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug
Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in
section 4502.
SEC. 1508. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General
of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table
in section 4502.
SEC. 1509. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as
specified in the funding table in section 4502.
Subtitle B--Financial Matters
SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS.
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are
in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated
by this Act.
SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.
(a) Authority To Transfer Authorizations.--
(1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary
of Defense that such action is necessary in the
national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts
of authorizations made available to the Department of
Defense in this title for fiscal year 2014 between any
such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any
subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so
transferred shall be merged with and be available for
the same purposes as the authorization to which
transferred.
(2) Limitation.--The total amount of authorizations
that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of
this subsection may not exceed $4,000,000,000.
(b) Terms and Conditions.--Transfers under this section shall
be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under
section 1001.
(c) Additional Authority.--The transfer authority provided by
this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided
under section 1001.
Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters
SEC. 1531. AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND.
(a) Continuation of Existing Limitations on Use of Funds in
Fund.--Funds available to the Department of Defense for the
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014 shall be
subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through
(g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 428), as
amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124
Stat. 4424).
(b) Revision of Plan for Use of Afghanistan Security Forces
Fund.--
(1) Revision and purpose.--The Secretary of Defense
shall revise the plan required by section 1531(e) of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2056) regarding use
of the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund through
September 30, 2017, to ensure that an office or
official of the Department of Defense is identified as
responsible for each program or activity supported
using funds available to the Department of Defense
through the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
(2) Submission.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional committees
the plan as revised pursuant to paragraph (1).
(c) Promotion of Recruitment and Retention of Women.--
(1) In general.--Of the funds available to the
Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security
Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014, no less than
$25,000,000 shall be available to be used for programs
and activities to support the recruitment, integration,
retention, training, and treatment of women in the
Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF).
(2) Types of programs and activities.--Such programs
and activities may include, but are not limited to--
(A) efforts to recruit women into the ANSF,
including the special operations forces;
(B) programs and activities of the Afghan
Ministry of Defense Directorate of Human Rights
and Gender Integration and the Afghan Ministry
of Interior Office of Human Rights, Gender and
Child Rights;
(C) development and dissemination of gender
and human rights educational and training
materials and programs within the Afghan
Ministry of Defense and the Afghan Ministry of
Interior;
(D) efforts to address harassment and
violence against women within the ANSF;
(E) efforts to increase female security
personnel in connection with elections in
Afghanistan; and
(F) improvements to infrastructure that
address the requirements of women serving in
the ANSF.
(d) Equipment Disposal.--
(1) Acceptance of certain equipment.--The Secretary
of Defense may accept equipment procured using funds
authorized under prior Acts that was transferred to the
security forces of Afghanistan and returned by such
forces to the United States if the Secretary provides
written notification to the congressional defense
committees of the Secretary's intention to accept such
equipment.
(2) Treatment as department of defense stocks.--The
equipment described in paragraph (1), and equipment not
yet transferred to the security forces of Afghanistan
that is determined by the Commander, Combined Security
Transition Command-Afghanistan (or the Commander's
designee) to no longer be required for transfer to such
forces, may be treated as stocks of the Department of
Defense upon notification to the congressional defense
committees of such treatment.
(3) Reports.--
(A) Initial report.--Not later than 60 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report that
details all equipment that was transferred to
the security forces of Afghanistan and returned
by such forces to the United States, including
type of equipment and reason for its return.
(B) Subsequent reports.--Not later than 30
days after the end of the first two fiscal year
quarters of fiscal year 2014, and not later
than 30 days after the end of each fiscal half-
year thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report
on the equipment accepted under paragraph (1)
during such fiscal year quarter or half-year,
as the case may be. Each report shall include,
for the period covered by such report, a list
of all equipment accepted under paragraph (1)
that was treated as the stocks of the
Department pursuant to paragraph (2).
SEC. 1532. JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND.
(a) Use and Transfer of Funds.--Subsections (b) and (c) of
section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2439),
as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to
the funds made available to the Department of Defense for the
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year
2014.
(b) Termination of Notification Requirement.--Effective
December 31, 2014, paragraph (4) of subsection (c) of section
1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2439), as
amended by section 1503(c) of the Duncan Hunter National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-
417; 122 Stat. 4649), is repealed.
(c) Extension of Interdiction of Improvised Explosive Device
Precursor Chemicals Authority.--Section 1532(c)(4) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2057) is amended by striking ``December
31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
(d) Semiannual Obligations and Expenditure Reports.--Not
later April 15 and October 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense
shall provide to the congressional defense committees a report
on the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund explaining
commitments, obligations, and expenditures by line of operation
during the preceding six months.
SEC. 1533. FUTURE ROLE OF JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT
ORGANIZATION.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the
future plans of the Department of Defense for the Joint
Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO). The
Secretary shall prepare the report in consultation with the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
(b) Required Elements.--The report required by subsection (a)
shall include the following elements:
(1) The operational and enduring requirements
considered in determining the future plans for JIEDDO.
(2) If the Secretary of Defense plans to discontinue
JIEDDO--
(A) a description of how JIEDDO's major
programs, capabilities, and lines of operations
will be integrated into other components within
the Department of Defense or discontinued; and
(B) a statement of the estimated costs to
other components of the Department for any
JIEDDO program, capability, or line of
operations reassigned to such components.
(3) If the Secretary of Defense plans to continue
JIEDDO--
(A) a statement of the expected mission of
JIEDDO;
(B) a description of the expected
organizational structure for JIEDDO, including
the reporting structure and lines of operation
within the Department and personnel strength,
including contractors; and
(C) a statement of the estimated costs and
budgetary impacts related to implementing any
changes to the mission of JIEDDO and its
organizational structure.
(4) A timeline for implementation of the selected
alternative described in paragraph (2) or (3).
(5) A description of how the Department will identify
and incorporate lessons learned from establishing and
managing JIEDDO and its programs.
SEC. 1534. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS AND
STABILITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.
(a) Extension.--Subsection (a) of section 1535 of the Ike
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4426), as most recently amended
by section 1533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2058), is
further amended--
(1) in paragraph (6), by striking ``and October 31,
2011, October 31, 2012, and October 31, 2013'' and
inserting ``October 31 of each of 2011 through 2014'';
and
(2) in paragraph (8), by striking ``September 30,
2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
(b) Funding.--Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of such
subsection, as so amended, is further amended--
(1) in clause (i), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end
and inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
``(iii) may not exceed $63,800,000
for fiscal year 2014.''.
(c) Additional Limitation on Availability of Funds.--
Paragraph (4) of such subsection is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph
(D);
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following
new subparagraph (C):
``(C) Limitation on availability of funds for
fiscal year 2014.--None of the funds available
for fiscal year 2014 pursuant to subparagraph
(B)(iii) may be obligated to assist the
Government of Afghanistan in the purchase of
equipment, supplies, or materials for mining
and oil and gas resources during fiscal year
2014 or the installation of such equipment,
supplies, or materials, until the date on which
the Secretary of Defense certifies to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives that the
Government of Afghanistan has agreed to
reimburse the Government of the United States
for the amount of any such funds, from
royalties received from mining or oil and gas
contracts awarded by the Government of
Afghanistan.''; and
(3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph
(1), by inserting ``of funds across fiscal years''
after ``Availability''.
(d) Conversion of Update of Implementation of Transition
Action Plan From Quarterly to Biannually.--Paragraph (7)(B) of
such subsection, as so amended, is further amended by striking
``90 days'' and inserting ``180 days''.
TITLE XVI--INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS
Subtitle A--Defense Industrial Base Matters
Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector
General of Department of Defense.
Sec. 1602. Foreign space activities.
Sec. 1603. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program.
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns
Sec. 1611. Advancing small business growth.
Sec. 1612. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance
Cooperative Agreement Program.
Sec. 1613. Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small
business concerns.
Sec. 1614. Credit for certain small business subcontractors.
Sec. 1615. Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain
contracts.
Subtitle A--Defense Industrial Base Matters
SEC. 1601. PERIODIC AUDITS OF CONTRACTING COMPLIANCE BY INSPECTOR
GENERAL OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) Requirement for Periodic Audits of Contracting
Compliance.--The Inspector General of the Department of Defense
shall conduct periodic audits of contracting practices and
policies related to procurement under section 2533a of title
10, United States Code.
(b) Requirement for Additional Information in Semiannual
Reports.--The Inspector General of the Department of Defense
shall ensure that findings and other information resulting from
audits conducted pursuant to subsection (a) are included in the
semiannual report transmitted to congressional committees under
section 8(f)(1) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C.
App.).
SEC. 1602. FOREIGN SPACE ACTIVITIES.
(a) Contracts With Certain Foreign Entities.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 135 of title 10, United
States Code, as amended by section 911(a) of this Act,
is further amended by adding at the end the following
new section:
``Sec. 2279. Foreign commercial satellite services
``(a) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the
Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for
satellite services with a foreign entity if the Secretary
reasonably believes that--
``(1) the foreign entity is an entity in which the
government of a covered foreign country has an
ownership interest that enables that government to
affect satellite operations; or
``(2) the foreign entity plans to or is expected to
provide launch or other satellite services under the
contract from a covered foreign country.
``(b) Notice and Exception.--The prohibition in subsection
(a) shall not apply to a contract if--
``(1) the Secretary determines it is in the national
security of the United States to enter into such
contract; and
``(2) not later than 7 days before entering into such
contract, the Secretary, in consultation with the
Director of National Intelligence, submits to the
congressional defense committees a national security
assessment for such contract that includes the
following:
``(A) The projected period of performance
(including any period covered by options to
extend the contract), the financial terms, and
a description of the services to be provided
under the contract.
``(B) To the extent practicable, a
description of the ownership interest that a
covered foreign country has in the foreign
entity providing satellite services to the
Department of Defense under the contract and
the launch or other satellite services that
will be provided in a covered foreign country
under the contract.
``(C) A justification for entering into a
contract with such foreign entity and a
description of the actions necessary to
eliminate the need to enter into such a
contract with such foreign entity in the
future.
``(D) A risk assessment of entering into a
contract with such foreign entity, including an
assessment of mission assurance and security of
information and a description of any measures
necessary to mitigate risks found by such risk
assessment.
``(c) Delegation of Notice and Exception Authority.--The
Secretary of Defense may only delegate the authority under
subsection (b) to enter into a contract subject to the
prohibition under subsection (a) to the Deputy Secretary of
Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, or the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics and such authority may not be further delegated.
``(d) Form of Assessments.--Each assessment under subsection
(b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
``(e) Covered Foreign Country Defined.--In this section, the
term `covered foreign country' means a country described in
section 1261(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2019).''.
(2) Table of sections amendment.--The table of
sections at the beginning of such chapter, as amended
by section 911(b) of this Act, is further amended by
adding at the end the following item:
``2279. Foreign commercial satellite services.''.
(b) Limitation on Construction on United States Territory of
Satellite Positioning Ground Monitoring Stations of Foreign
Governments.--
(1) Certification.--
(A) In general.--The President may not
authorize or permit the construction of a
global navigation satellite system ground
monitoring station directly or indirectly
controlled by a foreign government (including a
ground monitoring station owned, operated, or
controlled on behalf of a foreign government)
in the territory of the United States unless
the Secretary of Defense and the Director of
National Intelligence jointly certify to the
appropriate congressional committees that such
ground monitoring station will not possess the
capability or potential to be used for the
purpose of gathering intelligence in the United
States or improving any foreign weapon system.
(B) Form.--Each certification under
subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in
unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.
(2) National security waiver.--The Secretary of
Defense and the Director of National Intelligence may
jointly waive the certification requirement in
paragraph (1) for a ground monitoring station if--
(A) the Secretary and the Director jointly
determine that the waiver is in the vital
interests of the national security of the
United States; and
(B) the Secretary and the Director ensure
that--
(i) all data collected or transmitted
from ground monitoring stations covered
by the waiver are not encrypted;
(ii) all persons involved in the
construction, operation, and
maintenance of such ground monitoring
stations are United States persons;
(iii) such ground monitoring stations
are not located in geographic proximity
to sensitive United States national
security sites;
(iv) the United States approves all
equipment to be located at such ground
monitoring stations;
(v) appropriate actions are taken to
ensure that any such ground monitoring
stations do not pose a cyber espionage
or other threat, including intelligence
or counterintelligence, to the national
security of the United States; and
(vi) any improvements to such ground
monitoring stations do not reduce or
compete with the advantages of Global
Positioning System technology for
users.
(3) Waiver report.--For each waiver under paragraph
(2), the Secretary of Defense and the Director of
National Intelligence, in consultation with the
Secretary of State, shall jointly submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report
containing--
(A) the reason why it is not possible to
provide the certification under paragraph (1)
for the ground monitoring stations covered by
such waiver;
(B) an assessment of the impact of the
exercise of authority under paragraph (2) with
respect to such ground monitoring stations on
the national security of the United States;
(C) a description of the means to be used to
mitigate any such impact to the United States
for the duration that such ground monitoring
stations are operated in the territory of the
United States; and
(D) any other information in connection with
the waiver that the Secretary of Defense and
the Director of National Intelligence, in
consultation with the Secretary of State,
consider appropriate.
(4) Notice.--Not later than 30 days before the
exercise of the authority to waive under paragraph (2)
the certification requirement under paragraph (1) for a
ground monitoring station, the Secretary of Defense and
the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly
provide to the appropriate congressional committees
notice of the exercise of such authority and the report
required under paragraph (3) with respect to such
ground monitoring station.
(5) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In
this subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional
committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the
Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the
committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House
of Representatives.
(6) Sunset.--Effective on the date that is five years
after the date of the enactment of this Act, paragraphs
(1) through (5) are repealed.
SEC. 1603. PROOF OF CONCEPT COMMERCIALIZATION PILOT PROGRAM.
(a) Pilot Program.--The Secretary of Defense, acting through
the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and
Engineering, may establish and implement a pilot program, to be
known as the ``Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot
Program'', in accordance with this section.
(b) Purpose.--The purpose of the pilot program is to
accelerate the commercialization of basic research innovations
from qualifying institutions.
(c) Awards.--
(1) In general.--Under the pilot program, the
Secretary shall make financial awards to qualifying
institutions in accordance with this subsection.
(2) Competitive, merit-based process.--An award under
the pilot program shall be made using a competitive,
merit-based process.
(3) Eligibility.--A qualifying institution shall be
eligible for an award under the pilot program if the
institution agrees to--
(A) use funds from the award for the uses
specified in paragraph (5); and
(B) oversee the use of the funds through--
(i) a rigorous, diverse review board
comprised of experts in translational
and proof of concept research,
including industry, start-up, venture
capital, technical, financial, and
business experts and university
technology transfer officials;
(ii) technology validation milestones
focused on market feasibility;
(iii) simple reporting on program
progress; and
(iv) a process to reallocate funding
from poor performing projects to those
with more potential.
(4) Criteria.--An award may be made under the pilot
program to a qualifying institution in accordance with
the following criteria:
(A) The extent to which a qualifying
institution--
(i) has an established and proven
technology transfer or
commercialization office and has a plan
for engaging that office in the
program's implementation or has
outlined an innovative approach to
technology transfer that has the
potential to increase or accelerate
technology transfer outcomes and can be
adopted by other qualifying
institutions;
(ii) can assemble a project
management board comprised of industry,
start-up, venture capital, technical,
financial, and business experts;
(iii) has an intellectual property
rights strategy or office; and
(iv) demonstrates a plan for
sustainability beyond the duration of
the funding from the award.
(B) Such other criteria as the Secretary
determines necessary.
(5) Use of award.--
(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B),
the funds from an award may be used to evaluate
the commercial potential of existing
discoveries, including activities that
contribute to determining a project's
commercialization path, including technical
validations, market research, clarifying
intellectual property rights, and investigating
commercial and business opportunities.
(B) Limitations.--
(i) The amount of an award may not
exceed $500,000 a year.
(ii) Funds from an award may not be
used for basic research, or to fund the
acquisition of research equipment or
supplies unrelated to commercialization
activities.
(d) Report.--Not later than one year after the establishment
of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the
congressional defense committees and to the Committee on
Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of
the Senate a report evaluating the effectiveness of the
activities of the pilot program. The report shall include--
(1) a detailed description of the pilot program,
including incentives and activities undertaken by
review board experts;
(2) an accounting of the funds used in the pilot
program;
(3) a detailed description of the institutional
selection process;
(4) a detailed compilation of results achieved by the
pilot program; and
(5) an analysis of the program's effectiveness, with
data supporting the analysis.
(e) Qualifying Institution Defined.--In this section, the
term ``qualifying institution'' means a nonprofit institution,
as defined in section 4(3) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology
Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(3)), or a Federal
laboratory, as defined in section 4(4) of the Stevenson-Wydler
Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(4)).
(f) Limitation.--Not more than $5,000,000 may be obligated or
expended to conduct the pilot program under this section.
(g) Termination.--The pilot program conducted under this
section shall terminate on September 30, 2018.
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns
SEC. 1611. ADVANCING SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH.
(a) Advancing Small Business Growth.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 142 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(A) by redesignating section 2419 as section
2420; and
(B) by inserting after section 2418 the
following new section 2419:
``Sec. 2419. Advancing small business growth
``(a) Contract Clause Required.--(1) The Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall
require the clause described in paragraph (2) to be included in
each covered contract awarded by the Department of Defense.
``(2) The clause described in this paragraph is a clause
that--
``(A) requires the contractor to acknowledge that
acceptance of the contract may cause the business to
exceed the applicable small business size standards
(established pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small
Business Act) for the industry concerned and that the
contractor may no longer qualify as a small business
concern for that industry; and
``(B) encourages the contractor to develop
capabilities and characteristics typically desired in
contractors that are competitive as an other-than-small
business in that industry.
``(b) Availability of Assistance.--Covered small businesses
may be provided assistance as part of any procurement technical
assistance furnished pursuant to this chapter.
``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `covered contract' means a contract--
``(A) awarded to a qualified small business
concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of
the Small Business Act; and
``(B) with an estimated annual value--
``(i) that will exceed the applicable
receipt-based small business size
standard; or
``(ii) if the contract is in an
industry with an employee-based size
standard, that will exceed $70,000,000.
``(2) The term `covered small business' means a
qualified small business concern as defined pursuant to
section 3(a) of the Small Business Act that has entered
into a contract with the Department of Defense that
includes a contract clause described in subsection
(a)(2).''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the
item relating to section 2419 and inserting the
following:
``2419. Advancing small business growth.
``2420. Regulations.''.
(b) Exception to Limitation on Funding.--Section 2414 of such
title is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``The value'' and
inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (c), the
value''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection
(c):
``(c) Exception.--The value of the assistance provided in
accordance with section 2419(b) of this title is not subject to
the limitations in subsection (a).''.
(c) Revisions to Cooperative Agreements.--
(1) Full funding allowed for certain assistance.--
Section 2413(b) of such title is amended--
(A) by striking ``except that in the case''
and inserting: ``except that--
``(1) in the case'';
(B) by striking the period at the end and
inserting ``; and''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
``(2) in the case of a program sponsored by such an
entity that provides assistance for covered small
businesses pursuant to section 2419(b) of this title,
the Secretary may agree to furnish the full cost of
such assistance.''.
(2) Additional considerations.--Section 2413 of such
title is further amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:
``(e) In determining the level of funding to provide under an
agreement under subsection (b), the Secretary shall consider
the forecast by the eligible entity of demand for procurement
technical assistance, and, in the case of an established
program under this chapter, the outlays and receipts of such
program during prior years of operation.''.
(3) Conforming amendment.--Section 2413(d) of such
title is amended by striking ``and in determining the
level of funding to provide under an agreement under
subsection (b),''.
(d) Report Required.--Not later than March 15, of 2015, 2016,
and 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the implementation
of the amendments made by this section, along with any
recommendations for improving the Procurement Technical
Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program.
SEC. 1612. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM.
(a) Increase in Government Share.--Section 2413(b) of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``one-half'' both places it appears
and inserting ``65 percent''; and
(2) by striking ``three-fourths'' and inserting ``75
percent''.
(b) Increase in Limitations on Value of Assistance.--Section
2414(a) of such title is amended--
(1) in paragraphs (1) and (4), by striking
``$600,000'' and inserting ``$750,000'';
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$300,000'' and
inserting ``$450,000''; and
(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ``$150,000'' and
inserting ``$300,000''.
SEC. 1613. REPORTING ON GOALS FOR PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS AWARDED TO
SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.
Subsection (h)(1) of section 15 of the Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 644) is amended--
(1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph
(B);
(2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph
(C) and inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(D) a remediation plan with proposed new
practices to better meet such goals, including
analysis of factors leading to any failure to
achieve such goals.''.
SEC. 1614. CREDIT FOR CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTORS.
(a) In General.--Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 637(d)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (6)(D), by adding before the
semicolon at the end the following: ``, and assurances
at a minimum that the offeror or bidder, and all
subcontractors required to maintain subcontracting
plans pursuant to this paragraph, will--
``(i) review and approve subcontracting plans
submitted by their subcontractors;
``(ii) monitor subcontractor compliance with
their approved subcontracting plans;
``(iii) ensure that subcontracting reports
are submitted by their subcontractors when
required;
``(iv) acknowledge receipt of their
subcontractors' reports;
``(v) compare the performance of their
subcontractors to subcontracting plans and
goals; and
``(vi) discuss performance with
subcontractors when necessary to ensure their
subcontractors make a good faith effort to
comply with their subcontracting plans'';
(2) in paragraph (6)(F), by striking ``and'' at the
end;
(3) by redesignating subparagraph (G) of paragraph
(6) as subparagraph (H), and inserting after
subparagraph (F) of paragraph (6) the following new
subparagraph (G):
``(G) a recitation of the types of records the
successful offeror or bidder will maintain to
demonstrate procedures which have been adopted to
ensure subcontractors at all tiers comply with the
requirements and goals set forth in the plan
established in accordance with subparagraph (D) of this
paragraph, including--
``(i) the establishment of source lists of
small business concerns, small business
concerns owned and controlled by veterans,
small business concerns owned and controlled by
service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone
small business concerns, small business
concerns owned and controlled by socially and
economically disadvantaged individuals, and
small business concerns owned and controlled by
women; and
``(ii) efforts to identify and award
subcontracts to such small business concerns;
and'';
(4) by adding at the end the following:
``(16) Credit for Certain Subcontractors.--
``(A) For purposes of determining whether or not a
prime contractor has attained the percentage goals
specified in paragraph (6)--
``(i) if the subcontracting goals pertain
only to a single contract with the executive
agency, the prime contractor shall receive
credit for small business concerns performing
as first tier subcontractors or subcontractors
at any tier pursuant to the subcontracting
plans required under paragraph (6)(D) in an
amount equal to the dollar value of work
awarded to such small business concerns; and
``(ii) if the subcontracting goals pertain to
more than one contract with one or more
executive agencies, or to one contract with
more than one executive agency, the prime
contractor may only count first tier
subcontractors that are small business
concerns.
``(B) Nothing in this paragraph shall abrogate the
responsibility of a prime contractor to make a good-
faith effort to achieve the first tier small business
subcontracting goals negotiated under paragraph (6)(A),
or the requirement for subcontractors with further
opportunities for subcontracting to make a good-faith
effort to achieve the goals established under paragraph
(6)(D).''.
(b) Definitions Pertaining to Subcontracting.--Section 3 of
the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632) is amended by adding at
the end the following:
``(dd) Definitions Pertaining to Subcontracting.--In this
Act:
``(1) Subcontract.--The term `subcontract' means a
legally binding agreement between a contractor that is
already under contract to another party to perform
work, and a third party, hereinafter referred to as the
subcontractor, for the subcontractor to perform a part,
or all, of the work that the contractor has undertaken.
``(2) First tier subcontractor.--The term `first tier
subcontractor' means a subcontractor who has a
subcontract directly with the prime contractor.
``(3) At any tier.--The term `at any tier' means any
subcontractor other than a subcontractor who is a first
tier subcontractor.''.
(c) Implementation and Effective Date.--
(1) Requirement for plan.--Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the
Secretary of Defense, and the Administrator of General
Services shall submit to the Committee on Small
Business and the Committee on Armed Services of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Small
Business and Entrepreneurship and the Committee on
Armed Services of the Senate a plan to implement this
section and the amendments made by this section. The
plan shall contain assurances that the appropriate
tracking mechanisms are in place to enable transparency
of subcontracting activities at all tiers.
(2) Completion of plan actions.--Not later than one
year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the
Secretary of Defense, and the Administrator of General
Services shall complete the actions required by the
plan.
(3) Regulations.--No later than 18 months after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of
the Small Business Administration shall promulgate any
regulations necessary, and the Federal Acquisition
Regulation shall be revised, to implement this section
and the amendments made by this section.
(4) Applicability.--Any regulations promulgated
pursuant to paragraph (3) shall apply to contracts
entered into after the last day of the fiscal year in
which the regulations are promulgated.
SEC. 1615. INAPPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENT TO REVIEW AND JUSTIFY CERTAIN
CONTRACTS.
In the case of a contract to which the provisions of section
46 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657s) apply, the
requirements under section 802 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 1824; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) do not apply.
TITLE XVII--SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND RELATED REFORMS
Subtitle A--Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice
Sec. 1701. Extension of crime victims' rights to victims of offenses
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 1702. Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of
Military Justice.
Sec. 1703. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by
court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related
crimes.
Sec. 1704. Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related
offense in presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim,
or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate.
Sec. 1705. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and
trial of such offenses by general courts-martial.
Sec. 1706. Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial
process.
Sec. 1707. Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform
Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 1708. Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor
relating to character and military service of the accused in
rule on initial disposition of offenses.
Sec. 1709. Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed
Forces for reporting a criminal offense.
Subtitle B--Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code
Sec. 1711. Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who
have been convicted of certain sexual offenses.
Sec. 1712. Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard
regarding consideration of request for permanent change of
station or unit transfer by victim of sexual assault.
Sec. 1713. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member
of the Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of
committing a sexual assault or related offense.
Sec. 1714. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to
protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and
prohibited retaliatory actions.
Sec. 1715. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory
personnel actions taken in response to making protected
communications regarding sexual assault.
Sec. 1716. Designation and availability of Special Victims' Counsel for
victims of sex-related offenses.
Subtitle C--Amendments to Other Laws
Sec. 1721. Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting
organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing
and responding to sexual assaults.
Sec. 1722. Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent
panel on assessment of military response systems to sexual
assault.
Sec. 1723. Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted
Reports and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving
members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1724. Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by
members of the National Guard and Reserves.
Sec. 1725. Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual
assault prevention and response personnel and required
availability of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners.
Sec. 1726. Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and
Response Office for Department of Defense sexual assault
prevention and response program.
Subtitle D--Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports
Sec. 1731. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of
Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault
cases.
Sec. 1732. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense
investigative practices in response to allegations of Uniform
Code of Military Justice violations.
Sec. 1733. Review of training and education provided members of the
Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response.
Sec. 1734. Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on
the retention of and access to evidence and records relating
to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1735. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal
Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Sec. 1741. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members
of the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and
training.
Sec. 1742. Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses
involving members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1743. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to
unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a
member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1744. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-
related offenses for trial by court-martial.
Sec. 1745. Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related
offenses in personnel service records of members of the Armed
Forces.
Sec. 1746. Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies.
Sec. 1747. Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces
are completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for
National Security Positions.
Subtitle F--Sense of Congress Provisions
Sec. 1751. Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for
command climate free of retaliation.
Sec. 1752. Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain
sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice through courts-martial.
Sec. 1753. Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial
of members of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related
offenses.
Subtitle A--Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice
SEC. 1701. EXTENSION OF CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS TO VICTIMS OF OFFENSES
UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.
(a) Victims' Rights.--
(1) In general.--Subchapter I of chapter 47 of title
10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following
new section (article):
``Sec. 806b. Art. 6b. Rights of the victim of an offense under this
chapter
``(a) Rights of a Victim of an Offense Under This Chapter.--A
victim of an offense under this chapter has the following
rights:
``(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the
accused.
``(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely
notice of any of the following:
``(A) A public hearing concerning the
continuation of confinement prior to trial of
the accused.
``(B) A preliminary hearing under section 832
of this title (article 32) relating to the
offense.
``(C) A court-martial relating to the
offense.
``(D) A public proceeding of the service
clemency and parole board relating to the
offense.
``(E) The release or escape of the accused,
unless such notice may endanger the safety of
any person.
``(3) The right not to be excluded from any public
hearing or proceeding described in paragraph (2) unless
the military judge or investigating officer, as
applicable, after receiving clear and convincing
evidence, determines that testimony by the victim of an
offense under this chapter would be materially altered
if the victim heard other testimony at that hearing or
proceeding.
``(4) The right to be reasonably heard at any of the
following:
``(A) A public hearing concerning the
continuation of confinement prior to trial of
the accused.
``(B) A sentencing hearing relating to the
offense.
``(C) A public proceeding of the service
clemency and parole board relating to the
offense.
``(5) The reasonable right to confer with the counsel
representing the Government at any proceeding described
in paragraph (2).
``(6) The right to receive restitution as provided in
law.
``(7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable
delay.
``(8) The right to be treated with fairness and with
respect for the dignity and privacy of the victim of an
offense under this chapter.
``(b) Victim of an Offense Under This Chapter Defined.--In
this section, the term `victim of an offense under this
chapter' means a person who has suffered direct physical,
emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of
an offense under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military
Justice).
``(c) Legal Guardian for Certain Victims.--In the case of a
victim of an offense under this chapter who is under 18 years
of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the military
judge shall designate a legal guardian from among the
representatives of the estate of the victim, a family member,
or other suitable person to assume the victim's rights under
this section. However, in no event may the person so designated
be the accused.
``(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section
(article) shall be construed--
``(1) to authorize a cause of action for damages; or
``(2) to create, to enlarge, or to imply any duty or
obligation to any victim of an offense under this
chapter or other person for the breach of which the
United States or any of its officers or employees could
be held liable in damages.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter I of chapter 47 of such title
(the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by
adding at the end the following new item:
``806b. Art. 6b. Rights of the victim of an offense under this
chapter.''.
(b) Implementation.--
(1) Issuance.--Not later than one year after the date
of the enactment of this Act--
(A) the Secretary of Defense shall recommend
to the President changes to the Manual for
Courts-Martial to implement section 806b of
title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by
subsection (a); and
(B) the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of
Homeland Security (with respect to the Coast
Guard when it is not operating as a service in
the Navy) shall prescribe such regulations as
each such Secretary considers appropriate to
implement such section.
(2) Mechanisms for affording rights.--The
recommendations and regulations required by paragraph
(1) shall include the following:
(A) Mechanisms for ensuring that victims are
notified of, and accorded, the rights specified
in section 806b of title 10, United States Code
(article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), as added by subsection (a).
(B) Mechanisms for ensuring that members of
the Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the
Department of Defense and the Coast Guard make
their best efforts to ensure that victims are
notified of, and accorded, the rights specified
in such section.
(C) Mechanisms for the enforcement of such
rights, including mechanisms for application
for such rights and for consideration and
disposition of applications for such rights.
(D) The designation of an authority within
each Armed Force to receive and investigate
complaints relating to the provision or
violation of such rights.
(E) Disciplinary sanctions for members of the
Armed Forces and other personnel of the
Department of Defense and Coast Guard who
willfully or wantonly fail to comply with
requirements relating to such rights.
SEC. 1702. REVISION OF ARTICLE 32 AND ARTICLE 60, UNIFORM CODE OF
MILITARY JUSTICE.
(a) Use of Preliminary Hearings.--
(1) In general.--Section 832 of title 10, United
States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 832. Art. 32. Preliminary hearing
``(a) Preliminary Hearing Required.--(1) No charge or
specification may be referred to a general court-martial for
trial until completion of a preliminary hearing.
``(2) The purpose of the preliminary hearing shall be limited
to the following:
``(A) Determining whether there is probable cause to
believe an offense has been committed and the accused
committed the offense.
``(B) Determining whether the convening authority has
court-martial jurisdiction over the offense and the
accused.
``(C) Considering the form of charges.
``(D) Recommending the disposition that should be
made of the case.
``(b) Hearing Officer.--(1) A preliminary hearing under
subsection (a) shall be conducted by an impartial judge
advocate certified under section 827(b) of this title (article
27(b)) whenever practicable or, in exceptional circumstances in
which the interests of justice warrant, by an impartial hearing
officer who is not a judge advocate. If the hearing officer is
not a judge advocate, a judge advocate certified under section
827(b) of this title (article 27(b)) shall be available to
provide legal advice to the hearing officer.
``(2) Whenever practicable, when the judge advocate or other
hearing officer is detailed to conduct the preliminary hearing,
the officer shall be equal to or senior in grade to military
counsel detailed to represent the accused or the Government at
the preliminary hearing.
``(c) Report of Results.--After conducting a preliminary
hearing under subsection (a), the judge advocate or other
officer conducting the preliminary hearing shall prepare a
report that addresses the matters specified in subsections
(a)(2) and (f).
``(d) Rights of Accused and Victim.--(1) The accused shall be
advised of the charges against the accused and of the accused's
right to be represented by counsel at the preliminary hearing
under subsection (a). The accused has the right to be
represented at the preliminary hearing as provided in section
838 of this title (article 38) and in regulations prescribed
under that section.
``(2) The accused may cross-examine witnesses who testify at
the preliminary hearing and present additional evidence in
defense and mitigation, relevant to the limited purposes of the
hearing, as provided for in paragraph (4) and subsection
(a)(2).
``(3) A victim may not be required to testify at the
preliminary hearing. A victim who declines to testify shall be
deemed to be not available for purposes of the preliminary
hearing.
``(4) The presentation of evidence and examination (including
cross-examination) of witnesses at a preliminary hearing shall
be limited to the matters relevant to the limited purposes of
the hearing, as provided in subsection (a)(2).
``(e) Recording of Preliminary Hearing.--A preliminary
hearing under subsection (a) shall be recorded by a suitable
recording device. The victim may request the recording and
shall have access to the recording as prescribed by the Manual
for Courts-Martial.
``(f) Effect of Evidence of Uncharged Offense.--If evidence
adduced in a preliminary hearing under subsection (a) indicates
that the accused committed an uncharged offense, the hearing
officer may consider the subject matter of that offense without
the accused having first been charged with the offense if the
accused--
``(1) is present at the preliminary hearing;
``(2) is informed of the nature of each uncharged
offense considered; and
``(3) is afforded the opportunities for
representation, cross-examination, and presentation
consistent with subsection (d).
``(g) Effect of Violation.--The requirements of this section
are binding on all persons administering this chapter, but
failure to follow the requirements does not constitute
jurisdictional error.
``(h) Victim Defined.--In this section, the term `victim'
means a person who--
``(1) is alleged to have suffered a direct physical,
emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the matters
set forth in a charge or specification being
considered; and
``(2) is named in one of the specifications.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter VI of chapter 47 of such title
is amended by striking the item relating to section 832
and inserting the following new item:
``832. Art 32. Preliminary hearing.''.
(b) Elimination of Unlimited Command Prerogative and
Discretion; Imposition of Additional Limitations.--Subsection
(c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as
follows:
``(c)(1) Under regulations of the Secretary concerned, a
commissioned officer commanding for the time being, a successor
in command, or any person exercising general court-martial
jurisdiction may act under this section in place of the
convening authority.
``(2)(A) Action on the sentence of a court-martial shall be
taken by the convening authority or by another person
authorized to act under this section. Subject to regulations of
the Secretary concerned, such action may be taken only after
consideration of any matters submitted by the accused under
subsection (b) or after the time for submitting such matters
expires, whichever is earlier.
``(B) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the convening
authority or another person authorized to act under this
section may approve, disapprove, commute, or suspend the
sentence of the court-martial in whole or in part.
``(C) If the convening authority or another person authorized
to act under this section acts to disapprove, commute, or
suspend, in whole or in part, the sentence of the court-martial
for an offense (other than a qualifying offense), the convening
authority or other person shall provide, at that same time, a
written explanation of the reasons for such action. The written
explanation shall be made a part of the record of the trial and
action thereon.
``(3)(A) Action on the findings of a court-martial by the
convening authority or by another person authorized to act
under this section is not required.
``(B) If the convening authority or another person authorized
to act under this section acts on the findings of a court-
martial, the convening authority or other person--
``(i) may not dismiss any charge or specification,
other than a charge or specification for a qualifying
offense, by setting aside a finding of guilty thereto;
or
``(ii) may not change a finding of guilty to a charge
or specification, other than a charge or specification
for a qualifying offense, to a finding of guilty to an
offense that is a lesser included offense of the
offense stated in the charge or specification.
``(C) If the convening authority or another person authorized
to act under this section acts on the findings to dismiss or
change any charge or specification for an offense (other than a
qualifying offense), the convening authority or other person
shall provide, at that same time, a written explanation of the
reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be made
a part of the record of the trial and action thereon.
``(D)(i) In this subsection, the term `qualifying offense'
means, except in the case of an offense excluded pursuant to
clause (ii), an offense under this chapter for which--
``(I) the maximum sentence of confinement that may be
adjudged does not exceed two years; and
``(II) the sentence adjudged does not include
dismissal, a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or
confinement for more than six months.
``(ii) Such term does not include any of the following:
``(I) An offense under subsection (a) or (b) of
section 920 of this title (article 120).
``(II) An offense under section 920b or 925 of this
title (articles 120b and 125).
``(III) Such other offenses as the Secretary of
Defense may specify by regulation.
``(4)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B) or (C), the
convening authority or another person authorized to act under
this section may not disapprove, commute, or suspend in whole
or in part an adjudged sentence of confinement for more than
six months or a sentence of dismissal, dishonorable discharge,
or bad conduct discharge.
``(B) Upon the recommendation of the trial counsel, in
recognition of the substantial assistance by the accused in the
investigation or prosecution of another person who has
committed an offense, the convening authority or another person
authorized to act under this section shall have the authority
to disapprove, commute, or suspend the adjudged sentence in
whole or in part, even with respect to an offense for which a
mandatory minimum sentence exists.
``(C) If a pre-trial agreement has been entered into by the
convening authority and the accused, as authorized by Rule for
Courts-Martial 705, the convening authority or another person
authorized to act under this section shall have the authority
to approve, disapprove, commute, or suspend a sentence in whole
or in part pursuant to the terms of the pre-trial agreement,
subject to the following limitations for convictions of
offenses that involve a mandatory minimum sentence:
``(i) If a mandatory minimum sentence of a
dishonorable discharge applies to an offense for which
the accused has been convicted, the convening authority
or another person authorized to act under this section
may commute the dishonorable discharge to a bad conduct
discharge pursuant to the terms of the pre-trial
agreement.
``(ii) Except as provided in clause (i), if a
mandatory minimum sentence applies to an offense for
which the accused has been convicted, the convening
authority or another person authorized to act under
this section may not disapprove, otherwise commute, or
suspend the mandatory minimum sentence in whole or in
part, unless authorized to do so under subparagraph
(B).''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) References to sole discretion and other persons
authorized to act under article 60.--Section 860 of
title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice), is further amended--
(A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``or
other person taking action under this section''
and inserting ``or another person authorized to
act under this section'';
(B) in subsection (d), by striking ``or other
person taking action under this section'' the
first place it appears and inserting ``or
another person authorized to act under this
section'';
(C) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``or
other person taking action under this section,
in his sole discretion,'' and inserting ``or
another person authorized to act under this
section''; and
(D) in subsection (e)(3), by striking ``or
other person taking action under this section''
and inserting ``or another person authorized to
act under this section''.
(2) Other authority for convening authority to
suspend sentence.--Section 871(d) of such title
(article 71(d) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice)
is amended by adding at the end the following new
sentence: ``Paragraphs (2) and (4) of subsection (c) of
section 860 of this title (article 60) shall apply to
any decision by the convening authority or another
person authorized to act under this section to suspend
the execution of any sentence or part thereof under
this subsection.''.
(3) References to article 32 investigation.--(A)
Section 802(d)(1)(A) of such title (article 2(d)(1)(A)
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by
striking ``investigation under section 832'' and
inserting ``a preliminary hearing under section 832''.
(B) Section 834(a)(2) of such title (article 34(a)(2)
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by
striking ``investigation under section 832 of this
title (article 32) (if there is such a report)'' and
inserting ``a preliminary hearing under section 832 of
this title (article 32)''.
(C) Section 838(b)(1) of such title (article 38(b)(1)
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by
striking ``an investigation under section 832'' and
inserting ``a preliminary hearing under section 832''.
(D) Section 847(a)(1) of such title (article 47(a)(1)
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by
striking ``an investigation pursuant to section 832(b)
of this title (article 32(b))'' and inserting ``a
preliminary hearing pursuant to section 832 of this
title (article 32)''.
(E) Section 948b(d)(1)(C) of such title is amended by
striking ``pretrial investigation'' and inserting
``preliminary hearing''.
(d) Effective Dates.--
(1) Article 32 amendments.--The amendments made by
subsections (a) and (c)(3) shall take effect one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall
apply with respect to offenses committed under chapter
47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), on or after that effective date.
(2) Article 60 amendments.--The amendments made by
subsection (b) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection
(c) shall take effect 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to
offenses committed under chapter 47 of title 10, United
States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), on
or after that effective date.
SEC. 1703. ELIMINATION OF FIVE-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON TRIAL BY
COURT-MARTIAL FOR ADDITIONAL OFFENSES INVOLVING
SEX-RELATED CRIMES.
(a) Inclusion of Additional Offenses.--Section 843(a) of
title 10, United States Code (article 43(a) of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice), is amended by striking ``rape, or rape of
a child'' and inserting ``rape or sexual assault, or rape or
sexual assault of a child''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 843(b)(2)(B)(i) of title
10, United States Code (article 43(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice), is amended by inserting before the
period at the end the following: ``, unless the offense is
covered by subsection (a)''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and
shall apply with respect to an offense covered by section
920(b) or 920b(b) of title 10, United States Code (article
120(b) or 120b(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice),
that is committed on or after that date.
SEC. 1704. DEFENSE COUNSEL INTERVIEW OF VICTIM OF AN ALLEGED SEX-
RELATED OFFENSE IN PRESENCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL,
COUNSEL FOR THE VICTIM, OR A SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM
ADVOCATE.
Section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46 of
the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a) Opportunity To Obtain
Witnesses and Other Evidence.--''before ``The trial
counsel'';
(2) by striking ``Process issued'' and inserting the
following:
``(c) Process.--Process issued''; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (a), as designated
by paragraph (1), the following new subsection (b):
``(b) Defense Counsel Interview of Victim of Alleged Sex-
Related Offense.--(1) Upon notice by trial counsel to defense
counsel of the name of an alleged victim of an alleged sex-
related offense who trial counsel intends to call to testify at
a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article
32) or a court-martial under this chapter, defense counsel
shall make any request to interview the victim through trial
counsel.
``(2) If requested by an alleged victim of an alleged sex-
related offense who is subject to a request for interview under
paragraph (1), any interview of the victim by defense counsel
shall take place only in the presence of trial counsel, a
counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate.
``(3) In this subsection, the term `alleged sex-related
offense' means any allegation of--
``(A) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c,
or 925 of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or
125); or
``(B) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a
paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of this
title (article 80).''.
SEC. 1705. DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL FOR CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES AND
TRIAL OF SUCH OFFENSES BY GENERAL COURTS-MARTIAL.
(a) Mandatory Discharge or Dismissal Required.--
(1) Imposition.--Section 856 of title 10, United
States Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), is amended--
(A) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The
punishment''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(b)(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is found
guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall be
punished as a general court-martial may direct, such punishment
must include, at a minimum, dismissal or dishonorable
discharge, except as provided for in section 860 of this title
(article 60).
``(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses:
``(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or
(b) of section 920 of this title (article 120(a) or
(b)).
``(B) Rape and sexual assault of a child under
subsection (a) or (b) of section 920b of this title
(article 120b).
``(C) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title
(article 125).
``(D) An attempt to commit an offense specified in
subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) that is punishable under
section 880 of this title (article 80).''.
(2) Clerical amendments.--
(A) Section heading.--The heading of such
section is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits''.
(B) Table of sections.--The table of sections
at the beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter
47 of such title is amended by striking the
item relating to section 856 and inserting the
following new item:
``856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits.''.
(b) Jurisdiction Limited to General Courts-martial.--Section
818 of title 10, United States Code (article 18 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice), is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a)'' before the first sentence;
(2) in the third sentence, by striking ``However, a
general court-martial'' and inserting the following:
``(b) A general court-martial''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(c) Consistent with sections 819, 820, and 856(b) of this
title (articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-martial
have jurisdiction over an offense specified in section
856(b)(2) of this title (article 56(b)(2)).''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section 856(b)(2)
of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection
(a)(1), committed on or after that date.
SEC. 1706. PARTICIPATION BY VICTIM IN CLEMENCY PHASE OF COURTS-MARTIAL
PROCESS.
(a) Victim Submission of Matters for Consideration by
Convening Authority.--Section 860 of title 10, United States
Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as
amended by section 1702, is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as
subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following
new subsection:
``(d)(1) In any case in which findings and sentence have been
adjudged for an offense that involved a victim, the victim
shall be provided an opportunity to submit matters for
consideration by the convening authority or by another person
authorized to act under this section before the convening
authority or such other person takes action under this section.
``(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the
submission of matters under paragraph (1) shall be made within
10 days after the later of--
``(i) the date on which the victim has been given an
authenticated record of trial in accordance with
section 854(e) of this title (article 54(e)); and
``(ii) if applicable, the date on which the victim
has been given the recommendation of the staff judge
advocate or legal officer under subsection (e).
``(B) In the case of a summary court-martial, the submission
of matters under paragraph (1) shall be made within seven days
after the date on which the sentence is announced.
``(3) If a victim shows that additional time is required for
submission of matters under paragraph (1), the convening
authority or other person taking action under this section, for
good cause, may extend the submission period under paragraph
(2) for not more than an additional 20 days.
``(4) A victim may waive the right under this subsection to
make a submission to the convening authority or other person
taking action under this section. Such a waiver shall be made
in writing and may not be revoked. For the purposes of
subsection (c)(2), the time within which a victim may make a
submission under this subsection shall be deemed to have
expired upon the submission of such waiver to the convening
authority or such other person.
``(5) In this section, the term `victim' means a person who
has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as
a result of a commission of an offense under this chapter (the
Uniform Code of Military Justice) and on which the convening
authority or other person authorized to take action under this
section is taking action under this section.''.
(b) Limitations on Consideration of Victim's Character.--
Subsection (b) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code
(article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(5) The convening authority or other person taking action
under this section shall not consider under this section any
submitted matters that relate to the character of a victim
unless such matters were presented as evidence at trial and not
excluded at trial.''.
(c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b)(1) of section 860
of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice), is amended by striking ``subsection (d)''
and inserting ``subsection (e)''.
SEC. 1707. REPEAL OF THE OFFENSE OF CONSENSUAL SODOMY UNDER THE UNIFORM
CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.
(a) Restatement of Article 125 With Consensual Sodomy
Omitted.--Section 925 of title 10, United States Code (article
125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to
read as follows:
``Sec. 925. Art 125. Forcible sodomy; bestiality
``(a) Forcible Sodomy.--Any person subject to this chapter
who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person
of the same or opposite sex by force or without the consent of
the other person is guilty of forcible sodomy and shall be
punished as a court-martial may direct.
``(b) Bestiality.--Any person subject to this chapter who
engages in unnatural carnal copulation with an animal is guilty
of bestiality and shall be punished as a court-martial may
direct.
``(c) Scope of Offenses.--Penetration, however slight, is
sufficient to complete an offense under subsection (a) or
(b).''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United
States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended
by striking the item relating to section 925 (article 125) and
inserting the following new item:
``925. Art 125. Forcible sodomy; bestiality.''.
SEC. 1708. MODIFICATION OF MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL TO ELIMINATE
FACTOR RELATING TO CHARACTER AND MILITARY SERVICE
OF THE ACCUSED IN RULE ON INITIAL DISPOSITION OF
OFFENSES.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the discussion pertaining to Rule 306 of the Manual
for Courts-Martial (relating to policy on initial disposition
of offenses) shall be amended to strike the character and
military service of the accused from the matters a commander
should consider in deciding how to dispose of an offense.
SEC. 1709. PROHIBITION OF RETALIATION AGAINST MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES FOR REPORTING A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
(a) Regulations on Prohibition of Retaliation.--
(1) Regulations required.--The Secretary of Defense
shall prescribe regulations, or require the Secretaries
of the military departments to prescribe regulations,
that prohibit retaliation against an alleged victim or
other member of the Armed Forces who reports a criminal
offense. The regulations shall prescribe that a
violation of the regulations is an offense punishable
under section 892 of title 10, United States Code
(article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(2) Deadline.--The regulations required by this
subsection shall be prescribed not later than 120 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Retaliation and Personnel Action Described.--
(1) Retaliation.--For purposes of the regulations
required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense
shall define retaliation to include, at a minimum--
(A) taking or threatening to take an adverse
personnel action, or withholding or threatening
to withhold a favorable personnel action, with
respect to a member of the Armed Forces because
the member reported a criminal offense; and
(B) ostracism and such of acts of
maltreatment, as designated by the Secretary of
Defense, committed by peers of a member of the
Armed Forces or by other persons because the
member reported a criminal offense.
(2) Personnel actions.--For purposes of paragraph
(1)(A), the Secretary of Defense shall define the
personnel actions to be covered by the regulations.
(c) Report on Separate Punitive Article.--Not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of
the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting
forth the recommendations of the Secretary regarding whether
chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), should be amended to add a new punitive
article to subchapter X of such chapter to prohibit retaliation
against an alleged victim or other member of the Armed Forces
who reports a criminal offense.
Subtitle B--Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code
SEC. 1711. PROHIBITION ON SERVICE IN THE ARMED FORCES BY INDIVIDUALS
WHO HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF CERTAIN SEXUAL OFFENSES.
(a) Prohibition.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 37 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended adding at the end the following
new section:
``Sec. 657. Prohibition on service in the armed forces by individuals
convicted of certain sexual offenses
``(a) Prohibition on Commissioning or Enlistment.--A person
who has been convicted of an offense specified in subsection
(b) under Federal or State law may not be processed for
commissioning or permitted to enlist in the armed forces.
``(b) Covered Offenses.--An offense specified in this
subsection is any felony offense as follows:
``(1) Rape or sexual assault.
``(2) Forcible sodomy.
``(3) Incest.
``(4) An attempt to commit an offense specified in
paragraph (1) through (3), as punishable under
applicable Federal or State law.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 37 of such title is amended by
adding at the end the following new item:
``657. Prohibition on service in the armed forces by individuals
convicted of certain sexual offenses.''.
(b) Repeal of Superseded Prohibition.--Section 523 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1723; 10 U.S.C. 504 note) is repealed.
SEC. 1712. ISSUANCE OF REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE COAST GUARD
REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PERMANENT
CHANGE OF STATION OR UNIT TRANSFER BY VICTIM OF
SEXUAL ASSAULT.
Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking ``The Secretaries of the military departments'' and
inserting ``The Secretary concerned''.
SEC. 1713. TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATIVE REASSIGNMENT OR REMOVAL OF A MEMBER
OF THE ARMED FORCES ON ACTIVE DUTY WHO IS ACCUSED
OF COMMITTING A SEXUAL ASSAULT OR RELATED OFFENSE.
(a) In General.--Chapter 39 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by inserting after section 673 the following new
section:
``Sec. 674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a
member on active duty accused of committing a
sexual assault or related offense
``(a) Guidance for Timely Consideration and Action.--The
Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines
provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders regarding
their authority to make a timely determination, and to take
action, regarding whether a member of the armed forces serving
on active duty who is alleged to have committed an offense
under section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of this title
(article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice) or an attempt to commit such an offense as
punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice) should be temporarily
reassigned or removed from a position of authority or from an
assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely for the
purpose of maintaining good order and discipline within the
member's unit.
``(b) Time for Determination.--A determination described in
subsection (a) may be made at any time afer receipt of
notification of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or
other sex-related offense that identifies the member as an
alleged perpetrator.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 39 of such title is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 673 the following new item:
``674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on
active duty accused of committing a sexual assault or related
offense.''.
(c) Additional Training Requirement for Commanders.--The
Secretary of Defense shall provide for the inclusion of
information and discussion regarding the availability and use
of the authority described by section 674 of title 10, United
States Code, as added by subsection (a), as part of the
training for new and prospective commanders at all levels of
command required by section 585(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10
U.S.C. 1561 note).
SEC. 1714. EXPANSION AND ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO
PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES AND PROHIBITED RETALIATORY ACTIONS.
(a) Expansion of Prohibited Retaliatory Personnel Actions.--
Subsection (b) of section 1034 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) by striking ``preparing--'' and inserting
``preparing or being perceived as making or
preparing--'';
(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or''
at the end;
(C) in subparagraph (B)--
(i) in clause (iv), by striking
``or'' at the end;
(ii) by redesignating clause (v) as
clause (vi) and, in such clause, by
striking the period at the end and
inserting ``; or''; and
(iii) by inserting after clause (iv)
the following new clause (v):
``(v) a court-martial proceeding; or''; and
(D) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(C) testimony, or otherwise participating in or
assisting in an investigation or proceeding related to
a communication under subparagraph (A) or (B), or
filing, causing to be filed, participating in, or
otherwise assisting in an action brought under this
section.''; and
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) by striking ``and'' after ``unfavorable
action'' and inserting a comma; and
(B) by inserting after ``any favorable
action'' the following: ``, or making or
threatening to make a significant change in the
duties or responsibilities of a member of the
armed forces not commensurate with the member's
grade''.
(b) Inspector General Investigations of Allegations.--
Subsection (c) of section 1034 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (3)''
and inserting ``paragraph (4)'';
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as
paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively;
(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following
new paragraph (3):
``(3) A communication described in paragraph (2) shall not be
excluded from the protections provided in this section
because--
``(A) the communication was made to a person who
participated in an activity that the member reasonably
believed to be covered by paragraph (2);
``(B) the communication revealed information that had
previously been disclosed;
``(C) of the member's motive for making the
communication;
``(D) the communication was not made in writing;
``(E) the communication was made while the member was
off duty; and
``(F) the communication was made during the normal
course of duties of the member.'';
(4) in paragraph (5), as redesignated by paragraph
(2) of this subsection--
(A) by striking ``paragraph (3)(A)'' and
inserting ``paragraph (4)(A)'';
(B) by striking ``paragraph (3)(D)'' and
inserting ``paragraph (4)(D)''; and
(C) by striking ``60 days'' and inserting
``one year''; and
(5) in paragraph (6), as redesignated by paragraph
(2) of this subsection, by striking ``outside the
immediate chain of command of both the member
submitting the allegation and the individual or
individuals alleged to have taken the retaliatory
action.'' and inserting the following: ``one or both of
the following:
``(A) Outside the immediate chain of command of both
the member submitting the allegation and the individual
or individuals alleged to have taken the retaliatory
action.
``(B) At least one organization higher in the chain
of command than the organization of the member
submitting the allegation and the individual or
individuals alleged to have taken the retaliatory
action.''.
(c) Inspector General Investigations of Underlying
Allegations.--Subsection (d) of section 1034 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by striking ``subparagraph (A)
or (B) of subsection (c)(2)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (A),
(B), or (C) of subsection (c)(2)''.
(d) Reports on Investigations.--Subsection (e) of section
1034 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) by striking ``subsection (c)(3)(E)'' both
places it appears and inserting ``subsection
(c)(4)(E)'';
(B) by inserting ``and the Secretary of the
military department concerned'' after ``the
Secretary of Defense''; and
(C) by striking ``transmitted to the
Secretary'' and inserting ``transmitted to such
Secretaries''; and
(2) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``and the
Secretary of the military department concerned'' after
``the Secretary of Defense''.
(e) Action in Case of Violations.--Section 1034 of title 10,
United States Code, is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h), and
(i) as subsections (g), (h), (i), and (j),
respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following
new subsection (f):
``(f) Action in Case of Violations.--(1) Not later than 30
days after receiving a report from the Inspector General under
subsection (e), the Secretary of Homeland Security or the
Secretary of the military department concerned, as applicable,
shall determine whether there is sufficient basis to conclude
whether a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has
occurred.
``(2) If the Secretary concerned determines under paragraph
(1) that a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has
occurred, the Secretary shall--
``(A) order such action as is necessary to correct
the record of a personnel action prohibited by
subsection (b); and
``(B) take any appropriate disciplinary action
against the individual who committed such prohibited
personnel action.
``(3) If the Secretary concerned determines under paragraph
(1) that an order for corrective or disciplinary action is not
appropriate, not later than 30 days after making the
determination, such Secretary shall--
``(A) provide to the Secretary of Defense and the
member or former member a notice of the determination
and the reasons for not taking action; and
``(B) when appropriate, refer the report to the
appropriate board for the correction of military
records for further review under subsection (g).''.
(f) Correction of Records.--Subsection (g) of section 1034 of
title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection
(e)(1) of this section, is amended in paragraph (3)--
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by
striking ``board elects to hold'' and inserting ``board
holds''; and
(2) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ``the case
is unusually complex or otherwise requires'' and
inserting ``the member or former member would benefit
from''.
SEC. 1715. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS OF
RETALIATORY PERSONNEL ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO
MAKING PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING SEXUAL
ASSAULT.
Section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``sexual harassment or'' and inserting
``rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in violation
of sections 920 through 920c of this title (articles 120
through 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), sexual
harassment, or''.
SEC. 1716. DESIGNATION AND AVAILABILITY OF SPECIAL VICTIMS' COUNSEL FOR
VICTIMS OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.
(a) Designation and Duties.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section
1044d the following new section:
``Sec. 1044e. Special Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related
offenses
``(a) Designation; Purposes.--The Secretary concerned shall
designate legal counsel (to be known as `Special Victims'
Counsel') for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an
individual eligible for military legal assistance under section
1044 of this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related
offense, regardless of whether the report of that offense is
restricted or unrestricted.
``(b) Types of Legal Assistance Authorized.--The types of
legal assistance authorized by subsection (a) include the
following:
``(1) Legal consultation regarding potential criminal
liability of the victim stemming from or in relation to
the circumstances surrounding the alleged sex-related
offense and the victim's right to seek military defense
services.
``(2) Legal consultation regarding the Victim Witness
Assistance Program, including--
``(A) the rights and benefits afforded the
victim;
``(B) the role of the Victim Witness
Assistance Program liaison and what privileges
do or do not exist between the victim and the
liaison; and
``(C) the nature of communication made to the
liaison in comparison to communication made to
a Special Victims' Counsel or a legal
assistance attorney under section 1044 of this
title.
``(3) Legal consultation regarding the
responsibilities and support provided to the victim by
the Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a unit or
installation Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, or
domestic abuse advocate, to include any privileges that
may exist regarding communications between those
persons and the victim.
``(4) Legal consultation regarding the potential for
civil litigation against other parties (other than the
Department of Defense).
``(5) Legal consultation regarding the military
justice system, including (but not limited to)--
``(A) the roles and responsibilities of the
trial counsel, the defense counsel, and
investigators;
``(B) any proceedings of the military justice
process in which the victim may observe;
``(C) the Government's authority to compel
cooperation and testimony; and
``(D) the victim's responsibility to testify,
and other duties to the court.
``(6) Accompanying the victim at any proceedings in
connection with the reporting, military investigation,
and military prosecution of the alleged sex-related
offense.
``(7) Legal consultation regarding eligibility and
requirements for services available from appropriate
agencies or offices for emotional and mental health
counseling and other medical services;
``(8) Legal consultation and assistance--
``(A) in personal civil legal matters in
accordance with section 1044 of this title;
``(B) in any proceedings of the military
justice process in which a victim can
participate as a witness or other party;
``(C) in understanding the availability of,
and obtaining any protections offered by,
civilian and military protecting or restraining
orders; and
``(D) in understanding the eligibility and
requirements for, and obtaining, any available
military and veteran benefits, such as
transitional compensation benefits found in
section 1059 of this title and other State and
Federal victims' compensation programs.
``(9) Such other legal assistance as the Secretary of
Defense (or, in the case of the Coast Guard, the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating) may authorize in the regulations prescribed
under subsection (h).
``(c) Nature of Relationship.--The relationship between a
Special Victims' Counsel and a victim in the provision of legal
advice and assistance shall be the relationship between an
attorney and client.
``(d) Qualifications.--An individual may not be designated as
a Special Victims' Counsel under this section unless the
individual--
``(1) meets the qualifications specified in section
1044(d)(2) of this title; and
``(2) is certified as competent to be designated as a
Special Victims' Counsel by the Judge Advocate General
of the armed force in which the judge advocate is a
member or by which the civilian attorney is employed.
``(e) Administrative Responsibility.--(1) Consistent with the
regulations prescribed under subsection (h), the Judge Advocate
General (as defined in section 801(1) of this title) under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary, and within the Marine Corps the
Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, is
responsible for the establishment and supervision of
individuals designated as Special Victims' Counsel.
``(2) The Secretary of Defense (and, in the case of the Coast
Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard
is operating) shall conduct a periodic evaluation of the
Special Victims' Counsel programs operated under this section.
``(f) Availability of Special Victims' Counsel.--(1) An
individual eligible for military legal assistance under section
1044 of this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related
offense shall be offered the option of receiving assistance
from a Special Victims' Counsel upon report of an alleged sex-
related offense or at the time the victim seeks assistance from
a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim
Advocate, a military criminal investigator, a victim/witness
liaison, a trial counsel, a healthcare provider, or any other
personnel designated by the Secretary concerned for purposes of
this subsection.
``(2) The assistance of a Special Victims' Counsel under this
subsection shall be available to an individual eligible for
military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title
regardless of whether the individual elects unrestricted or
restricted reporting of the alleged sex-related offense. The
individual shall also be informed that the assistance of a
Special Victims' Counsel may be declined, in whole or in part,
but that declining such assistance does not preclude the
individual from subsequently requesting the assistance of a
Special Victims' Counsel.
``(g) Alleged Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this section,
the term `alleged sex-related offense' means any allegation
of--
``(1) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c,
or 925 of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or
125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or
``(2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a
paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of this
title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice).
``(h) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this
section.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 1044d the following new
item:
``1044e. Special Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related
offenses.''.
(3) Conforming amendments.--
(A) Qualifications of persons providing legal
assistance.--Section 1044(d)(2) of such title
is amended by inserting before the period at
the end the following: ``and, for purposes of
service as a Special Victims' Counsel under
section 1044e of this title, meets the
additional qualifications specified in
subsection (d)(2) of such section.''.
(B) Inclusion in definition of military legal
assistance.--Section 1044(d)(3)(B) of such
title is amended by striking ``and 1044d'' and
inserting ``1044d, 1044e, and 1565b(a)(1)(A)''.
(C) Access to legal assistance and
services.--Section 1565b(a)(1)(A) of such title
is amended by striking ``section 1044'' and
inserting ``sections 1044 and 1044e''.
(4) Implementation.--Section 1044e of title 10,
United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be
implemented within 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
(b) Enhanced Training Requirement.--The Secretary of each
military department, and the Secretary of Homeland Security
with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a
service in the Department of the Navy, shall implement,
consistent with the guidelines provided under section 1044e of
title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), in-
depth and advanced training for all military and civilian
attorneys providing legal assistance under section 1044 or
1044e of such title to support victims of alleged sex-related
offenses.
(c) Secretary of Defense Implementation Report.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland
Security with respect to the Coast Guard, shall submit
to the Committees on Armed Services and Commerce,
Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the
Committees on Armed Services and Transportation and
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report
describing how the Armed Forces will implement the
requirements of section 1044e of title 10, United
States Code, as added by subsection (a).
(2) Additional submission requirement.--The report
required by paragraph (1) shall also be submitted to
the independent review panel established by the
Secretary of Defense under section 576(a)(1) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) and to the Joint
Services Committee on Military Justice.
Subtitle C--Amendments to Other Laws
SEC. 1721. TRACKING OF COMPLIANCE OF COMMANDING OFFICERS IN CONDUCTING
ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF
PREVENTING AND RESPONDING TO SEXUAL ASSAULTS.
Section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1753; 10 U.S.C.
1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(d) Tracking of Organizational Climate Assessment
Compliance.--The Secretary of Defense shall direct the
Secretaries of the military departments to verify and track the
compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational
climate assessments, as required by subsection (a)(3).''.
SEC. 1722. ADVANCEMENT OF SUBMITTAL DEADLINE FOR REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
PANEL ON ASSESSMENT OF MILITARY RESPONSE SYSTEMS TO
SEXUAL ASSAULT.
Section 576(c)(1)(B) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1759)
is amended by striking ``Eighteen months'' and inserting
``Twelve months''.
SEC. 1723. RETENTION OF CERTAIN FORMS IN CONNECTION WITH RESTRICTED
REPORTS AND UNRESTRICTED REPORTS ON SEXUAL ASSAULT
INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) Requirement for Retention.--Subsection (a) of section 577
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1762; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is
amended--
(1) by striking ``At the request of a member of the
Armed Forces who files a Restricted Report on an
incident of sexual assault involving the member, the
Secretary of Defense shall'' and inserting ``The
Secretary of Defense shall''; and
(2) by striking ``the Restricted Report'' and
inserting ``a Restricted Report or Unrestricted Report
on an incident of sexual assault involving a member of
the Armed Forces''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading of such section is
amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 577. RETENTION OF CERTAIN FORMS IN CONNECTION WITH RESTRICTED
REPORTS AND UNRESTRICTED REPORTS ON SEXUAL ASSAULT
INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.''.
SEC. 1724. TIMELY ACCESS TO SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS BY
MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES.
Section 584(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1433; 10 U.S.C.
1561 note) is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following
new paragraph (2):
``(2) Availability for reserve component members.--
The Secretary of the military department concerned
shall ensure the timely access to a Sexual Assault
Response Coordinator by any member of the National
Guard or Reserve who--
``(A) is the victim of a sexual assault
during the performance of duties as a member of
the National Guard or Reserves; or
``(B) is the victim of a sexual assault
committed by a member of the National Guard or
Reserves.''.
SEC. 1725. QUALIFICATIONS AND SELECTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SEXUAL
ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PERSONNEL AND
REQUIRED AVAILABILITY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT NURSE
EXAMINERS.
(a) Qualifications for Assignment.--Section 1602(e)(2) of the
Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 4431)
is amended--
(1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph
(C); and
(2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the
following new subparagraphs:
``(A) the qualifications necessary for a
member of the Armed Forces or a civilian
employee of the Department of Defense to be
selected for assignment to duty as a Sexual
Assault Response and Prevention Program
Manager, Sexual Assault Response Coordinator,
or Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, whether
assigned to such duty on a full-time or part-
time basis;
``(B) consistent with section 584(c) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561
note; 125 Stat. 1433), the training,
certification, and status of members of the
Armed Forces and civilian employees of the
department assigned to duty as Sexual Assault
Response and Prevention Program Managers,
Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, and
Sexual Assault Victim Advocates for the Armed
Forces; and''.
(b) Availability of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners at
Military Medical Treatment Facilities.--
(1) Facilities with full-time emergency department.--
The Secretary of a military department shall require
the assignment of at least one full-time sexual assault
nurse examiner to each military medical treatment
facility under the jurisdiction of that Secretary in
which an emergency department operates 24 hours per
day. The Secretary may assign additional sexual assault
nurse examiners based on the demographics of the
patients who utilize the military medical treatment
facility.
(2) Other facilities.--In the case of a military
medical treatment facility not covered by paragraph
(1), the Secretary of the military department concerned
shall require that a sexual assault nurse examiner be
made available to a patient of the facility, consistent
with the Department of Justice National Protocol for
Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations, Adult/
Adolescent, when a determination is made regarding the
patient's need for the services of a sexual assault
nurse examiner.
(3) Qualifications.--A sexual assault nurse examiner
assigned under paragraph (1) or made available under
paragraph (2) shall meet such training and
certification requirements as are prescribed by the
Secretary of Defense.
(c) Report on Training, Qualifications, and Experience of
Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Personnel.--
(1) Report required.--The Secretary shall prepare a
report on the review, conducted pursuant to the
Secretary of Defense Memorandum of May 17, 2013, of the
adequacy of the training, qualifications, and
experience of each member of the Armed Forces and
civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is
assigned to a position that includes responsibility for
sexual assault prevention and response within the Armed
Forces for the successful discharge of such
responsibility.
(2) Report elements.--The report shall include the
following:
(A) An assessment of the adequacy of the
training and certifications required for
members and employees described in paragraph
(1).
(B) The number of such members and employees
who did not have the training, qualifications,
or experience required to successfully
discharge their responsibility for sexual
assault prevention and response within the
Armed Forces.
(C) The actions taken by the Secretary of
Defense with respect to such members and
employees who were found to lack the training,
qualifications, or experience to successfully
discharge such responsibility.
(D) Such improvements as the Secretary
considers appropriate in the process used to
select and assign members and employees to
positions that include responsibility for
sexual assault prevention and response within
the Armed Forces in order to ensure the highest
caliber candidates are selected and assigned to
such positions.
(3) Submission.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit the report to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives.
SEC. 1726. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND
RESPONSE OFFICE FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SEXUAL
ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM.
(a) Additional Director Duties.--Subsection (b) of section
1611 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is
amended--
(1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (2);
(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph
(3) and inserting a semicolon; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new
paragraphs:
``(4) collect and maintain data of the military
departments on sexual assault in accordance with
subsection (e);
``(5) act as liaison between the Department of
Defense and other Federal and State agencies on
programs and efforts relating to sexual assault
prevention and response; and
``(6) oversee development of strategic program
guidance and joint planning objectives for resources in
support of the sexual assault prevention and response
program, and make recommendations on modifications to
policy, law, and regulations needed to ensure the
continuing availability of such resources.''.
(b) Collection and Maintenance of Data.--Such section is
further amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(e) Data Collection and Maintenance Metrics.--In carrying
out the requirements of subsection (b)(4), the Director of the
Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office shall develop
metrics to measure the effectiveness of, and compliance with,
training and awareness objectives of the military departments
on sexual assault prevention and response.''.
Subtitle D--Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports
SEC. 1731. INDEPENDENT REVIEWS AND ASSESSMENTS OF UNIFORM CODE OF
MILITARY JUSTICE AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SEXUAL
ASSAULT CASES.
(a) Additional Duties for Response Systems Panel.--
(1) Additional assessments specified.--The
independent panel established by the Secretary of
Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the
``response systems panel'', shall conduct the
following:
(A) An assessment of the impact, if any, that
removing from the chain of command any
disposition authority regarding charges
preferred under chapter 47 of title 10, United
States Code (the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), would have on overall reporting and
prosecution of sexual assault cases.
(B) An assessment regarding whether the
roles, responsibilities, and authorities of
Special Victims' Counsel to provide legal
assistance under section 1044e of title 10,
United States Code, as added by section 1716,
to victims of alleged sex-related offenses
should be expanded to include legal standing to
represent the victim during investigative and
military justice proceedings in connection with
the prosecution of the offense.
(C) An assessment of the feasibility and
appropriateness of extending to victims of
crimes covered by chapter 47 of title 10,
United States Code (the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), the right afforded a crime
victim in civilian criminal legal proceedings
under subsection (a)(4) of section 3771 of
title 18, United States Code, and the legal
standing to seek enforcement of crime victim
rights provided by subsection (d) of such
section.
(D) An assessment of the means by which the
name, if known, and other necessary identifying
information of an alleged offender that is
collected as part of a restricted report of a
sexual assault could be compiled into a
protected, searchable database accessible only
to military criminal investigators, Sexual
Assault Response Coordinators, or other
appropriate personnel only for the purposes of
identifying individuals who are subjects of
multiple accusations of sexual assault and
encouraging victims to make an unrestricted
report of sexual assault in those cases in
order to facilitate increased prosecutions,
particularly of serial offenders. The
assessment should include an evaluation of the
appropriate content to be included in the
database, as well as the best means to maintain
the privacy of those making a restricted
report.
(E) As part of the comparison of military and
civilian systems for the investigation,
prosecution, and adjudication of adult sexual
assault crimes, as required by subsection
(d)(1)(B) of section 576 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013,
an assessment of the opportunities for clemency
provided in the military and civilian systems,
the appropriateness of clemency proceedings in
the military system, the manner in which
clemency is used in the military system, and
whether clemency in the military justice system
could be reserved until the end of the military
appeals process.
(F) An assessment of whether the Department
of Defense should promulgate, and ensure the
understanding of and compliance with, a formal
statement of what accountability, rights, and
responsibilities a member of the Armed Forces
has with regard to matters of sexual assault
prevention and response, as a means of
addressing those issues within the Armed
Forces. If the response systems panel
recommends such a formal statement, the
response systems panel shall provide key
elements or principles that should be included
in the formal statement.
(2) Submission of results.--The response systems
panel shall include the results of the assessments
required by paragraph (1) in the report required by
subsection (c)(1) of section 576 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, as
amended by section 1722.
(b) Additional Duties for Judicial Proceedings Panel.--
(1) Additional assessments specified.--The
independent panel established by the Secretary of
Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section 576 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the
``judicial proceedings panel'', shall conduct the
following:
(A) An assessment of the likely consequences
of amending the definition of rape and sexual
assault under section 920 of title 10, United
States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), to expressly cover a
situation in which a person subject to chapter
47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform
Code of Military Justice), commits a sexual act
upon another person by abusing one's position
in the chain of command of the other person to
gain access to or coerce the other person.
(B) An assessment of the implementation and
effect of section 1044e of title 10, United
States Code, as added by section 1716, and make
such recommendations for modification of such
section 1044e as the judicial proceedings panel
considers appropriate.
(C) An assessment of the implementation and
effect of the mandatory minimum sentences
established by section 856(b) of title 10,
United States Code (article 56(b) of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by
section 1705, and the appropriateness of
statutorily mandated minimum sentencing
provisions for additional offenses under
chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the
Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(D) An assessment of the adequacy of the
provision of compensation and restitution for
victims of offenses under chapter 47 of title
10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), and develop recommendations
on expanding such compensation and restitution,
including consideration of the options as
follows:
(i) Providing the forfeited wages of
incarcerated members of the Armed
Forces to victims of offenses as
compensation.
(ii) Including bodily harm among the
injuries meriting compensation for
redress under section 939 of title 10,
United States Code (article 139 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(iii) Requiring restitution by
members of the Armed Forces to victims
of their offenses upon the direction of
a court-martial.
(2) Submission of results.--The judicial proceedings
panel shall include the results of the assessments
required by paragraph (1) in one of the reports
required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of section 576 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013.
SEC. 1732. REVIEW AND POLICY REGARDING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
INVESTIGATIVE PRACTICES IN RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS
OF UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE VIOLATIONS.
(a) Review.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a
review of the practices of the military criminal investigative
organizations (Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval
Criminal Investigative Service, and Air Force Office of Special
Investigation) in response to an allegation that a member of
the Armed Forces has committed an offense under the Uniform
Code of Military Justice, including the extent to which the
military criminal investigative organizations make a
recommendation regarding whether an allegation appears founded
or unfounded.
(b) Policy.--After conducting the review required by
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a
uniform policy for the Armed Forces, to the extent practicable,
regarding the use of case determinations to record the results
of the investigation of an alleged violation of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice. In developing the policy, the
Secretary shall consider the feasibility of adopting case
determination methods, such as the uniform crime report, used
by nonmilitary law enforcement agencies.
SEC. 1733. REVIEW OF TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROVIDED MEMBERS OF THE
ARMED FORCES ON SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND
RESPONSE.
(a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry
out a review of the adequacy of the training and education
provided members of the Armed Forces on sexual assault
prevention and response.
(b) Responsive Action.--Upon completion of the review, the
Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) identify common core elements that must be
included in any training or education provided members
of the Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and
response; and
(2) recommend such other modifications of such
training and education as the Secretary considers
appropriate to address any inadequacies identified
during the review.
(c) Report Required.--Not later than 120 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report containing the results of
the review, including the common core elements identified in
the review that will be included in any training or education
provided members of the Armed Forces on sexual assault
prevention and response.
SEC. 1734. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY ON
THE RETENTION OF AND ACCESS TO EVIDENCE AND RECORDS
RELATING TO SEXUAL ASSAULTS INVOLVING MEMBERS OF
THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) Review of Evidence and Records Retention and Access
Policy.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the
progress made in developing and implementing the comprehensive
policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records
relating to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed
Forces, which was required by section 586 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note).
(b) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report containing the results of
the review. In the report, the Secretary shall explain how the
Secretary has addressed each of the matters listed in
paragraphs (1) through (11) of subsection (c) of section 586 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
that, at a minimum, were required to be considered in the
development of the policy.
SEC. 1735. REVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY ROLE IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASES.
(a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct
a review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal
Opportunity for the purposes specified in subsection (b).
(b) Elements of Study.--In conducting the review under
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) determine whether sexual harassment cases should
be evaluated or addressed within the Office of
Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity;
(2) identify and evaluate how the Office of Diversity
Management and Equal Opportunity works with the Sexual
Assault Prevention and Response Office to address
sexual harassment in the Armed Forces and the current
role of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal
Opportunity in sexual harassment cases;
(3) identify and evaluate the resource and personnel
gaps, if any, in the Office of Diversity Management and
Equal Opportunity to adequately address sexual
harassment cases; and
(4) identify and assess the capability of the Office
of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity to track
incidences of sexual harassment cases.
(c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``sexual
harassment'' has the meaning given such term in Department of
Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military Equal
Opportunity Program.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
SEC. 1741. ENHANCED PROTECTIONS FOR PROSPECTIVE MEMBERS AND NEW MEMBERS
OF THE ARMED FORCES DURING ENTRY-LEVEL PROCESSING
AND TRAINING.
(a) Defining Inappropriate and Prohibited Relationships,
Communication, Conduct, and Contact Between Certain Members.--
(1) Policy required.--The Secretary of a military
department and the Secretary of the Department in which
the Coast Guard is operating shall maintain a policy
that defines and prescribes, for the persons described
in paragraph (2), what constitutes an inappropriate and
prohibited relationship, communication, conduct, or
contact, including when such an action is consensual,
between a member of the Armed Forces described in
paragraph (2)(A) and a prospective member or member of
the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(B).
(2) Covered members.--The policy required by
paragraph (1) shall apply to--
(A) a member of the Armed Forces who
exercises authority or control over, or
supervises, a person described in subparagraph
(B) during the entry-level processing or
training of the person; and
(B) a prospective member of the Armed Forces
or a member of the Armed Forces undergoing
entry-level processing or training.
(3) Inclusion of certain members required.--The
members of the Armed Forces covered by paragraph (2)(A)
shall include, at a minimum, military personnel
assigned or attached to duty--
(A) for the purpose of recruiting or
assessing persons for enlistment or appointment
as a commissioned officer, warrant officer, or
enlisted member of the Armed Forces;
(B) at a Military Entrance Processing
Station; or
(C) at an entry-level training facility or
school of an Armed Force.
(b) Effect of Violations.--A member of the Armed Forces who
violates the policy required by subsection (a) shall be subject
to prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
(c) Processing for Administrative Separation.--
(1) In general.--(A) The Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating shall require the processing for
administrative separation of any member of the Armed
Forces described in subsection (a)(2)(A) in response to
the first substantiated violation by the member of the
policy required by subsection (a), when the member is
not otherwise punitively discharged or dismissed from
the Armed Forces for that violation.
(B) The Secretary of a military department shall
revise regulations applicable to the Armed Forces under
the jurisdiction of that Secretary as necessary to
ensure compliance with the requirement under
subparagraph (A).
(2) Required elements.--(A) In imposing the
requirement under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall
ensure that any separation decision regarding a member
of the Armed Forces is based on the full facts of the
case and that due process procedures are provided under
existing law or regulations or additionally prescribed,
as considered necessary by the Secretaries, pursuant to
subsection (f).
(B) The requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall
not be interpreted to limit or alter the authority of
the Secretary of a military department and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating to process members of the Armed Forces for
administrative separation--
(i) for reasons other than a substantiated
violation of the policy required by subsection
(a); or
(ii) under other provisions of law or
regulation.
(3) Substantiated violation.--For purposes of
paragraph (1), a violation by a member of the Armed
Forces described in subsection (a)(2)(A) of the policy
required by subsection (a) shall be treated as
substantiated if--
(A) there has been a court-martial conviction
for violation of the policy, but the adjudged
sentence does not include discharge or
dismissal; or
(B) a nonjudicial punishment authority under
section 815 of title 10, United States Code
(article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), has determined that a member has
committed an offense in violation of the policy
and imposed nonjudicial punishment upon the
member.
(d) Report on Need for UCMJ Punitive Article.--Not later than
120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a
report containing the recommendations of the Secretary
regarding the need to amend chapter 47 of title 10, United
States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), to create
an additional article under subchapter X of such chapter to
address violations of the policy required by subsection (a).
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``entry-level processing or training'',
with respect to a member of the Armed Forces, means the
period beginning on the date on which the member became
a member of the Armed Forces and ending on the date on
which the member physically arrives at that member's
first duty assignment following completion of initial
entry training (or its equivalent), as defined by the
Secretary of the military department concerned or the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating.
(2) The term ``prospective member of the Armed
Forces'' means a person who has had a face-to-face
meeting with a member of the Armed Forces assigned or
attached to duty described in subsection (a)(3)(A)
regarding becoming a member of the Armed Forces,
regardless of whether the person eventually becomes a
member of the Armed Forces.
(f) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to
carry out this section. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure
that, to the extent practicable, the regulations are uniform
for each armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary.
SEC. 1742. COMMANDING OFFICER ACTION ON REPORTS ON SEXUAL OFFENSES
INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) Immediate Action Required.--A commanding officer who
receives a report of a sex-related offense involving a member
of the Armed Forces in the chain of command of such officer
shall act upon the report in accordance with subsection (b)
immediately after receipt of the report by the commanding
officer.
(b) Action Required.--The action required by this subsection
with respect to a report described in subsection (a) is the
referral of the report to the military criminal investigation
organization with responsibility for investigating that offense
of the military department concerned or such other
investigation service of the military department concerned as
the Secretary of the military department concerned may specify
for purposes of this section.
SEC. 1743. EIGHT-DAY INCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN RESPONSE TO
UNRESTRICTED REPORT OF SEXUAL ASSAULT IN WHICH THE
VICTIM IS A MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) Incident Reporting Policy Requirement.--The Secretary of
Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast
Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a policy to
require the submission by a designated person of a written
incident report not later than eight days after an unrestricted
report of sexual assault has been made in which a member of the
Armed Forces is the victim. At a minimum, this incident report
shall be provided to the following:
(1) The installation commander, if such incident
occurred on or in the vicinity of a military
installation.
(2) The first officer in the grade of 0-6, and the
first general officer or flag officer, in the chain of
command of the victim.
(3) The first officer in the grade of 0-6, and the
first general officer or flag officer, in the chain of
command of the alleged offender if the alleged offender
is a member of the Armed Forces.
(b) Purpose of Report.--The purpose of the required incident
report under subsection (a) is to detail the actions taken or
in progress to provide the necessary care and support to the
victim of the assault, to refer the allegation of sexual
assault to the appropriate investigatory agency, and to provide
initial notification of the serious incident when that
notification has not already taken place.
(c) Elements of Report.--
(1) In general.--The report of an incident under
subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the
following:
(A) Time/Date/Location of the alleged
incident.
(B) Type of offense alleged.
(C) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and
location of the victim.
(D) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and
location of the alleged offender, including
information regarding whether the alleged
offender has been temporarily transferred or
removed from an assigned billet or ordered to
pretrial confinement or otherwise restricted,
if applicable.
(E) Post-incident actions taken in connection
with the incident, including the following:
(i) Referral of the victim to a
Sexual Assault Response Coordinator for
referral to services available to
members of the Armed Forces who are
victims of sexual assault, including
the date of each such referral.
(ii) Notification of incident to
appropriate military criminal
investigative organization, including
the organization notified and date of
such notification.
(iii) Receipt and processing status
of a request for expedited victim
transfer, if applicable.
(iv) Issuance of any military
protective orders in connection with
the incident.
(2) Modification.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may
modify the elements required in a report under
this section regarding an incident involving a
member of the Armed Forces (including the Coast
Guard when it is operating as service in the
Department of the Navy) if the Secretary
determines that such modification will
facilitate compliance with best practices for
such reporting as identified by the Sexual
Assault Prevention and Response Office of the
Department of Defense.
(B) Coast guard.--The Secretary of the
Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating may modify the elements required in a
report under this section regarding an incident
involving a member of the Coast Guard if the
Secretary determines that such modification
will facilitate compliance with best practices
for such reporting as identified by the Coast
Guard Office of Work-Life Programs.
(d) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this
section.
SEC. 1744. REVIEW OF DECISIONS NOT TO REFER CHARGES OF CERTAIN SEX-
RELATED OFFENSES FOR TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.
(a) Review Required.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall
require the Secretaries of the military departments to
provide for review of decisions not to refer charges
for trial by court-martial in cases where a sex-related
offense has been alleged by a victim of the alleged
offense.
(2) Specific review requirements.--As part of a
review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), the
Secretary of a military department shall require that--
(A) consideration be given to the victim's
statement provided during the course of the
criminal investigation regarding the alleged
sex-related offense perpetrated against the
victim; and
(B) a determination be made whether the
victim's statement and views concerning
disposition of the alleged sex-related offense
were considered by the convening authority in
making the referral decision.
(b) Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this section, the term
``sex-related offense'' means any of the following:
(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or
(b) of section 920 of title 10, United States Code
(article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title
(article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in
paragraph (1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of
such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice).
(c) Review of Cases Not Referred to Court-martial Following
Staff Judge Advocate Recommendation of Referral for Trial.--In
any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant to section 834
of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice), recommends that charges of a sex-related
offense be referred for trial by court-martial and the
convening authority decides not to refer any charges to a
court-martial, the convening authority shall forward the case
file to the Secretary of the military department concerned for
review as a superior authorized to exercise general court-
martial convening authority.
(d) Review of Cases Not Referred to Court-martial Following
Staff Judge Advocate Recommendation Not to Refer for Trial.--In
any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant to section 834
of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice), recommends that charges of a sex-related
offense should not be referred for trial by court-martial and
the convening authority decides not to refer any charges to a
court-martial, the convening authority shall forward the case
file for review to the next superior commander authorized to
exercise general court-martial convening authority.
(e) Elements of Case File.--A case file forwarded to higher
authority for review pursuant to subsection (c) or (d) shall
include the following:
(1) All charges and specifications preferred under
section 830 of title 10, United States Code (article 30
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(2) All reports of investigations of such charges,
including the military criminal investigative
organization investigation report and the report
prepared under section 832 of title 10, United States
Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), as amended by section 1702.
(3) A certification that the victim of the alleged
sex-related offense was notified of the opportunity to
express views on the victim's preferred disposition of
the alleged offense for consideration by the convening
authority.
(4) All statements of the victim provided to the
military criminal investigative organization and to the
victim's chain of command relating to the alleged sex-
related offense and any statement provided by the
victim to the convening authority expressing the
victim's view on the victim's preferred disposition of
the alleged offense.
(5) The written advice of the staff judge advocate to
the convening authority pursuant to section 834 of
title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice).
(6) A written statement explaining the reasons for
the convening authority's decision not to refer any
charges for trial by court-martial.
(7) A certification that the victim of the alleged
sex-related offense was informed of the convening
authority's decision to forward the case as provided in
subsection (c) or (d).
(f) Notice on Results or Review.--The victim of the alleged
sex-related offense shall be notified of the results of the
review conducted under subsection (c) or (d) in the manner
prescribed by the victims and witness assistance program of the
Armed Force concerned.
(g) Victim Allegation of Sex-related Offense.--The Secretary
of Defense shall require the Secretaries of the military
departments to develop a system to ensure that a victim of a
possible sex-related offense under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice is given the opportunity to state, either at the time
of making an unrestricted report of the allegation or during
the criminal investigation of the allegation, whether or not
the victim believes that the offense alleged is a sex-related
offense subject to the requirements of this section.
SEC. 1745. INCLUSION AND COMMAND REVIEW OF INFORMATION ON SEX-RELATED
OFFENSES IN PERSONNEL SERVICE RECORDS OF MEMBERS OF
THE ARMED FORCES.
(a) Information on Reports on Sex-Related Offenses.--
(1) In general.--If a complaint of a sex-related
offense is made against a member of the Armed Forces
and the member is convicted by court-martial or
receives non-judicial punishment or punitive
administrative action for such sex-related offense, a
notation to that effect shall be placed in the
personnel service record of the member, regardless of
the member's grade.
(2) Purpose.--The purpose of the inclusion of
information in personnel service records under
paragraph (1) is to alert commanders to the members of
their command who have received courts-martial
conviction, non-judicial punishment, or punitive
administrative action for sex-related offenses in order
to reduce the likelihood that repeat offenses will
escape the notice of commanders.
(b) Limitation on Placement.--A notation under subsection (a)
may not be placed in the restricted section of the personnel
service record of a member.
(c) Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) may be
construed to prohibit or limit the capacity of a member of the
Armed Forces to challenge or appeal the placement of a
notation, or location of placement of a notation, in the
member's personnel service record in accordance with procedures
otherwise applicable to such challenges or appeals.
(d) Command Review of History of Sex-Related Offenses of
Members Upon Assignment or Transfer to New Unit.--
(1) Review required.--Under uniform regulations
prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the commanding
officer of a facility, installation, or unit to which a
member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)
is permanently assigned or transferred shall review the
history of sex-related offenses as documented in the
personnel service record of the member in order to
familiarize such officer with such history of the
member.
(2) Covered members.--A member of the Armed Forces
described in this paragraph is a member of the Armed
Forces who, at the time of assignment or transfer as
described in paragraph (1), has a history of one or
more sex-related offenses as documented in the
personnel service record of such member or such other
records or files as the Secretary shall specify in the
regulations prescribed under paragraph (1).
SEC. 1746. PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AT MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMIES.
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the United States
Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the
United States Air Force Academy include a section in the
curricula of that military service academy that outlines honor,
respect, and character development as such pertain to the issue
of preventing sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Such
curricula section shall include a brief history of the problem
of sexual assault in the Armed Forces, a definition of sexual
assault, information relating to reporting a sexual assault,
victims' rights, and dismissal and dishonorable discharge for
offenders. Training in such section in the curricula shall be
provided within 14 days after the initial arrival of a new
cadet or midshipman at that military service academy and
repeated annually thereafter.
SEC. 1747. REQUIRED NOTIFICATION WHENEVER MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES
ARE COMPLETING STANDARD FORM 86 OF THE
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POSITIONS.
(a) Notification of Policy.--Whenever a member of the Armed
Forces is required to complete Standard Form 86 of the
Questionnaire for National Security Positions in connection
with an application, investigation, or reinvestigation for a
security clearance, the member shall be notified of the policy
described in subsection (b) regarding question 21 of such form.
(b) Policy Described.--The policy referred to in subsection
(a) is the policy of instructing an individual to answer ``no''
to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for
National Security Positions with respect to consultation with a
health care professional if--
(1) the individual is a victim of a sexual assault;
and
(2) the consultation occurred with respect to an
emotional or mental health condition strictly in
relation to the sexual assault.
Subtitle F--Sense of Congress Provisions
SEC. 1751. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMMANDING OFFICER RESPONSIBILITY FOR
COMMAND CLIMATE FREE OF RETALIATION.
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) commanding officers in the Armed Forces are
responsible for establishing a command climate in which
sexual assault allegations are properly managed and
fairly evaluated and in which a victim can report
criminal activity, including sexual assault, without
fear of retaliation, including ostracism and group
pressure from other members of the command;
(2) the failure of commanding officers to maintain
such a command climate is an appropriate basis for
relief from their command positions; and
(3) senior officers should evaluate subordinate
commanding officers on their performance in
establishing a command climate as described in
paragraph (1) during the regular periodic counseling
and performance appraisal process prescribed by the
Armed Force concerned for inclusion in the systems of
records maintained and used for assignment and
promotion selection boards.
SEC. 1752. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DISPOSITION OF CHARGES INVOLVING
CERTAIN SEXUAL MISCONDUCT OFFENSES UNDER THE
UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE THROUGH COURTS-
MARTIAL.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) any charge regarding an offense specified in
subsection (b) should be disposed of by court-martial,
rather than by non-judicial punishment or
administrative action; and
(2) in the case of any charge regarding an offense
specified in subsection (b) that is disposed of by non-
judicial punishment or administrative action, rather
than by court-martial, the disposition authority should
include in the case file a justification for the
disposition of the charge by non-judicial punishment or
administrative action, rather than by court-martial.
(b) Covered Offenses.--An offense specified in this
subsection is any of the following offenses under chapter 47 of
title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military
Justice):
(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or
(b) of section 920 of such title (article 120 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title
(article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in
paragraph (1) or (2), as punishable under section 880
of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice).
SEC. 1753. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE DISCHARGE IN LIEU OF COURT-MARTIAL
OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO COMMIT SEX-
RELATED OFFENSES.
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Armed Forces should be exceedingly sparing in
discharging in lieu of court-martial members of the
Armed Forces who have committed rape, sexual assault,
forcible sodomy, or attempts to commit such offenses,
and should do so only when the facts of the case
clearly warrant such discharge;
(2) whenever possible, the victims of offenses
referred to in paragraph (1) shall be consulted prior
to the determination regarding whether to discharge the
members who committed such offenses;
(3) convening authorities should consider the views
of victims of offenses referred to in paragraph (1)
when determining whether to discharge the members who
committed such offenses in lieu of trying such members
by court-martial; and
(4) the discharge of any member who is discharged as
described in paragraph (1) should be characterized as
Other Than Honorable.
DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.
This division may be cited as the ``Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014''.
SEC. 2002. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE
SPECIFIED BY LAW.
(a) Expiration of Authorizations After Three Years.--Except
as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in
titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects,
land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and
contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program (and authorizations of
appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of--
(1) October 1, 2016; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017.
(b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to
authorizations for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and
contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program (and authorizations of
appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have
been obligated before the later of--
(1) October 1, 2016; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing
funds for fiscal year 2017 for military construction
projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and
facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.
TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States
Military Academy, New York.
Sec. 2105. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004
project.
Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2010 project.
Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2011 project.
Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010
projects.
Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.
SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103
and available for military construction projects inside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the installations
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Army: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska........................ Fort Wainwright....... $103,000,000
Colorado...................... Fort Carson, Colorado. $242,200,000
Florida....................... Eglin Air Force Base.. $4,700,000
Georgia....................... Fort Gordon........... $61,000,000
Hawaii........................ Fort Shafter.......... $70,000,000
Kansas........................ Fort Leavenworth...... $17,000,000
Kentucky...................... Fort Campbell, $4,800,000
Kentucky.
Maryland...................... Aberdeen Proving $21,000,000
Ground.
Fort Detrick.......... $7,100,000
Missouri...................... Fort Leonard Wood..... $90,700,000
North Carolina................ Fort Bragg............ $5,900,000
Texas......................... Fort Bliss............ $46,800,000
Virginia...................... Joint Base Langley- $50,000,000
Eustis.
Washington.................... Joint Base Lewis- $144,000,000
McChord.
Yakima................ $9,100,00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103
and available for military construction projects outside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and
carry out the military construction project for the
installations or locations outside the United States, and in
the amount, set forth in the following table:
Army: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Japan........................ Kyoga-Misaki............ $33,000,000
Marshall Islands............. Kwajalein Atoll......... $63,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.
(a) Construction and Acquisition.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103
and available for military family housing functions as
specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary
of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units
(including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the
installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the
amounts set forth in the following table:
Army: Family Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation Units Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany................................. South Camp Vilseck........ 29........................ $16,600,000
Wisconsin............................... Fort McCoy................ 56........................ $23,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Planning and Design.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and
available for military family housing functions as specified in
the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army
may carry out architectural and engineering services and
construction design activities with respect to the construction
or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $4,408,000.
SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after
September 30, 2013, for military construction, land
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the
Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in
section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation
authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out
under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the
following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated
under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.
(2) $64,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized
under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of
Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for cadet barracks
increment 2 at the United States Military Academy, New
York).
SEC. 2104. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION OF CADET BARRACKS AT UNITED
STATES MILITARY ACADEMY, NEW YORK.
No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction
of increment 2 of the Cadet Barracks at the United States
Military Academy, New York, as authorized by section 2101(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119), until
the Secretary of the Army certifies to the congressional
defense committees that the Secretary intends to award a
contract for the renovation of MacArthur Short Barracks at the
United States Military Academy concurrent with assuming
beneficial occupancy of the renovated Scott Barracks at the
United States Military Academy.
SEC. 2105. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2004
PROJECT.
(a) Project Authorization.--In connection with the
authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004
(division B of Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1697) for
Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for construction of a Research
and Development Loading Facility, the Secretary of the Army may
carry out a military construction project in the amount of
$4,500,000 to complete work on the facility within the initial
scope of the project.
(b) Congressional Notification.--The Secretary of the Army
shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of
title 10, United States Code, regarding the project described
in subsection (a).
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2010 PROJECT.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111-84; 123
Stat. 2629) for Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, for construction of APS
Warehouses, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to
74,976 square meters of hardstand parking, 22,741 square meters
of access roads, a 6 megawatt power plant, and 50,724 square
meters of humidity-controlled warehouses.
SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECT.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124
Stat. 4437) for Fort Lewis, Washington, for construction of a
Regional Logistic Support Complex at the installation, the
Secretary of the Army may construct up to 98,381 square yards
of Organizational Vehicle Parking.
SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010
PROJECTS.
(a) Extensions.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B
of Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2627), the authorizations set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section
2101 of that Act (126 Stat. 2628) and extended by section 2106
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2121), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction
for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:
Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia............................. Fort Belvoir............ Road and Access Control $9,500,000
Point.
Washington........................... Fort Lewis.............. Fort Lewis-McChord AFB Joint $9,000,000
Access.
Kuwait............................... Camp Arifjian........... APS Warehouses.............. $82,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011
PROJECTS.
(a) Extensions.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B
of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section
2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall remain in effect until
October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2015, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:
Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California............................. Presidio of Monterey..... Advanced Individual Training $63,000,000
Barracks.
Georgia................................ Fort Benning............. Land Acquisition.............. $12,200,000
New Mexico............................. White Sands Missile Range Barracks...................... $29,000,000
Germany................................ Wiesbaden Air Base....... Access Control Point.......... $5,100,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2011 project.
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2012 project.
Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204
and available for military construction projects inside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the installations
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Navy: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.................................... Barstow........................................ $14,998,000
Camp Pendleton................................. $13,124,000
Coronado....................................... $8,910,000
Point Mugu..................................... $24,667,000
Port Hueneme................................... $33,600,000
San Diego...................................... $34,331,000
Twentynine Palms............................... $33,437,000
Florida....................................... Jacksonville................................... $20,752,000
Key West....................................... $14,001,000
Mayport........................................ $16,093,000
Georgia....................................... Albany......................................... $16,610,000
Savannah....................................... $61,717,000
Guam.......................................... Joint Region Marianas.......................... $318,377,000
Hawaii........................................ Kaneohe Bay.................................... $236,982,000
Pearl City..................................... $30,100,000
Pearl Harbor................................... $57,998,000
Illinois...................................... Great Lakes.................................... $35,851,000
Maine......................................... Bangor......................................... $13,800,000
Kittery........................................ $11,522,000
Maryland...................................... Fort Meade..................................... $83,988,000
Nevada........................................ Fallon......................................... $11,334,000
North Carolina................................ Camp Lejeune................................... $77,999,000
New River...................................... $45,863,000
Oklahoma...................................... Tinker Air Force Base.......................... $14,144,000
Rhode Island.................................. Newport........................................ $12,422,000
South Carolina................................ Charleston..................................... $73,932,000
Virginia...................................... Dam Neck....................................... $10,587,000
Norfolk........................................ $3,380,000
Quantico....................................... $38,374,000
Yorktown....................................... $18,700,000
Washington.................................... Bremerton...................................... $18,189,000
Whidbey Island................................. $117,649,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204
and available for military construction projects outside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the installation
or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Navy: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Djibouti...................................... Camp Lemonier................................... $29,000,000
Japan......................................... Camp Butler..................................... $5,820,000
Yokosuka........................................ $7,568,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2204 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out
architectural and engineering services and construction design
activities with respect to the construction or improvement of
family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,438,000.
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2204 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing
military family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$68,969,000.
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after
September 30, 2013, for military construction, land
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the
Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in
section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation
authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out
under section 2201 of this Act and the projects described in
paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection may not exceed the
sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated
under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.
(2) $357,877,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized under section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666) for
an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap, Washington).
(3) $68,196,000 (the balance of the amount authorized
under section 2201(b) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of
Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2633) for ramp parking at
Joint Region Marianas, Guam).
SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECT.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124
Stat. 4441) for Southwest Asia, Bahrain, for construction of
Navy Central Command Ammunition Magazines, the Secretary of the
Navy may construct additional Type C earth covered magazines
(to provide a project total of eighteen), ten new modular
storage magazines, an inert storage facility, a maintenance and
ground support equipment facility, concrete pads for portable
ready service lockers, and associated supporting facilities
using appropriations available for the project.
SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2012 PROJECT.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112-81; 125
Stat. 1666) for Kitsap, Washington, for construction of
Explosives Handling Wharf No. 2, the Secretary of the Navy may
construct new hardened facilities in lieu of hardening existing
structures and a new facility to replace the existing Coast
Guard Maritime Force Protection Unit and the Naval Undersea
Warfare Command unhardened facilities using appropriations
available for the project.
SEC. 2207. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011
PROJECTS.
(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B
of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section
2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441), shall remain in effect until
October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2015, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:
Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain.................................. Southwest Asia............. Navy Central Command $89,280,000
Ammunition Magazines.
Guam..................................... Naval Activities, Guam..... Defense Access Roads $66,730,000
Improvements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain
fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2013 project.
Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011
project.
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.
(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304
and available for military construction projects inside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts, set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona......................................... Luke Air Force Base........................ $26,900,000
California...................................... Beale Air Force Base....................... $62,000,000
Florida......................................... Tyndall Air Force Base..................... $9,100,000
Guam............................................ Joint Region Marianas...................... $176,230,000
Hawaii.......................................... Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam............. $4,800,000
Kansas.......................................... McConnell Air Force Base................... $219,120,000
Kentucky........................................ Fort Campbell.............................. $8,000,000
Mariana Islands................................. Saipan..................................... $29,300,000
Maryland........................................ Fort Meade................................. $358,000,000
Joint Base Andrews......................... $30,000,000
Missouri........................................ Whiteman Air Force Base.................... $5,900,000
New Mexico...................................... Cannon Air Force Base...................... $34,100,000
Holloman Air Force Base.................... $2,250,000
Kirtland Air Force Base.................... $30,500,000
Nevada.......................................... Nellis Air Force Base...................... $78,500,000
........................................... .................
North Dakota.................................... Minot Air Force Base....................... $23,830,000
Oklahoma........................................ Altus Air Force Base....................... $30,850,000
Tinker Air Force Base...................... $8,600,000
Texas........................................... Fort Bliss................................. $3,350,000
Utah............................................ Hill Air Force Base........................ $32,000,000
Virginia........................................ Joint Base Langley-Eustis.................. $4,800,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304
and available for military construction projects outside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations outside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenland...................... Thule AB............... $43,904,000
United Kingdom................. RAF Lakenheath......... $22,047,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2304 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out
architectural and engineering services and construction design
activities with respect to the construction or improvement of
family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,267,000.
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2304 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve
existing military family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $72,093,000.
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after
September 30, 2013, for military construction, land
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the
Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation
authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out
under section 2301 of this Act and the project described in
paragraph (2) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the
following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated
under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.
(2) $69,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized
under section 2301(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of
Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1670) for the United
States Strategic Command Headquarters at Offutt Air
Force Base, Nebraska).
SEC. 2305. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT.
No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction
of a maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport
storage facility in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, as authorized by section 2301(a), until the Secretary
of the Air Force submits a report to the congressional defense
committees that provides--
(1) a summary of alternatives considered to support
divert-field operations associated with Andersen Air
Force Base;
(2) a description of the overall construction
requirements to support divert-field operations
associated with Andersen Air Force Base and any other
alternative considered; and
(3) a comparison of the costs and benefits of
leasing, as compared to purchasing real estate in fee,
that supports the entirety of the divert-field
requirement.
SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2013 PROJECT.
The table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2126) is amended in the item relating to
Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, for construction of a hangar by
striking ``$58,000,000'' in the amount column and inserting
``$128,000,000''.
SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011
PROJECT.
(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B
of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section
2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall remain in effect until
October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2015, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:
Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain............................... Southwest Asia........... North Apron Expansion....... $45,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization
construction, defense-wide.
Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403
and available for military construction projects inside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the installations
or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska.......................................... Clear Air Force Base....................... $17,204,000
Fort Greely................................ $82,000,000
California...................................... Brawley.................................... $23,095,000
Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy........... $37,554,000
Miramar.................................... $6,000,000
Colorado........................................ Fort Carson................................ $22,282,000
Florida......................................... Hurlburt Field............................. $7,900,000
Jacksonville............................... $7,500,000
Key West................................... $3,600,000
Panama City................................ $2,600,000
Tyndall Air Force Base..................... $9,500,000
Georgia......................................... Fort Benning............................... $43,335,000
Fort Stewart............................... $44,504,000
Hunter Army Airfield....................... $13,500,000
Moody Air Force Base....................... $3,800,000
Hawaii.......................................... Ford Island................................ $2,615,000
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam............. $2,800,000
Kentucky........................................ Fort Campbell.............................. $124,211,000
Fort Knox.................................. $303,023,000
Maryland........................................ Aberdeen Proving Ground.................... $210,000,000
Bethesda Naval Hospital.................... $66,800,000
Massachusetts................................... Hanscom Air Force Base..................... $36,213,000
New Jersey...................................... Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst........... $10,000,000
New Mexico...................................... Holloman Air Force Base.................... $81,400,000
North Carolina.................................. Camp Lejeune............................... $43,377,000
Fort Bragg................................. $172,065,000
North Dakota.................................... Minot Air Force Base....................... $6,400,000
Oklahoma........................................ Altus Air Force Base....................... $2,100,000
Tinker Air Force Base...................... $36,000,000
Pennsylvania.................................... Defense Distribution Depot New Cumberland.. $9,000,000
South Carolina.................................. Beaufort................................... $41,324,000
Tennessee....................................... Arnold Air Force Base...................... $2,200,000
Texas........................................... Joint Base San Antonio..................... $12,600,000
Virginia........................................ Dam Neck................................... $11,147,000
Defense Distribution Depot Richmond........ $87,000,000
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek - $30,404,000
Story.
Pentagon................................... $57,600,000
Quantico................................... $40,586,000
Washington...................................... Whidbey Island............................. $10,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403
and available for military construction projects outside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the installations
or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain Island.................................. Southwest Asia............................. $45,400,000
Belgium......................................... Brussels................................... $67,613,000
Germany......................................... Kaiserlautern Air Base..................... $49,907,000
Ramstein Air Base.......................... $98,762,000
Weisbaden.................................. $109,655,000
Japan........................................... Atsugi..................................... $4,100,000
Iwakuni.................................... $34,000,000
Kadena Air Base............................ $38,792,000
Kyoga-Misaki............................... $15,000,000
Torri Commo Station........................ $71,451,000
Yokosuka................................... $10,600,000
Korea........................................... Camp Walker................................ $52,164,000
United Kingdom.................................. Royal Air Force Lakenheath................. $69,638,000
Royal Air Force Mildenhall................. $84,629,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS.
(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403
and available for energy conservation projects inside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy
conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United
States Code, for the installations or locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:
Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................................ Anniston Army Depot......................... $2,700,000
California..................................... MCAS Miramar................................ $17,968,000
Parks DRTA.................................. $4,150,000
Florida........................................ NAS Jacksonville............................ $2,840,000
Hawaii......................................... Camp Smith.................................. $7,966,000
Hickam...................................... $3,100,000
Hickam...................................... $3,000,000
Idaho.......................................... Mountain Home............................... $2,630,000
Kansas......................................... Tokepka Readiness Center.................... $2,050,000
Massachusetts.................................. Devens...................................... $2,600,000
New York....................................... US Military Academy......................... $3,200,000
South Carolina................................. Shaw........................................ $2,500,000
Texas.......................................... NAS Corpus Christi.......................... $2,340,000
Sheppard.................................... $3,779,000
Laughlin.................................... $2,800,000
Utah........................................... Dugway Proving Ground....................... $9,966,000
Tooele Army Depot........................... $5,900,000
Tooele Army Depot........................... $5,500,000
Tooele Army Depot........................... $4,300,000
Virginia....................................... NSA Hampton Roads........................... $4,060,000
Pentagon.................................... $2,120,000
Various Locations.............................. Various Locations........................... $20,476,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403
and available for energy conservation projects outside the
United States as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy
conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United
States Code, for the installations or locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:
Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
Country Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany....................... Ramstein............. $2,140,000
Greenland..................... Thule................ $5,175,000
Italy......................... NAS Sigonella........ $3,300,000
Japan......................... CFA Sasebo........... $14,766,000
Yokota............... $5,674,000
Various Locations............. Various Locations.... $3,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after
September 30, 2013, for military construction, land
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the
Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as
specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation
authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out
under section 2401 of this Act and the projects described in
paragraphs (2) through (11) of this subsection may not exceed
the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated
under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.
(2) $190,000,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized under section 2401(a) for an Ambulatory Care
Center at Fort Knox, Kentucky).
(3) $135,000,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized under section 2401(a) for a Public Health
Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland).
(4) $45,600,000 (the balance of the amount authorized
under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of
Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2128) for NSAW
Recapitalize Building #1 at Fort Meade, Maryland).
(5) $20,800,000 (the balance of the amount authorized
under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of
Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2129) for the Aegis
Ashore Missile Defense System Complex at Deveselu,
Romania).
(6) $175,639,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1672) for a
data center at Fort Meade, Maryland).
(7) $11,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized
under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of
Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory
Care Center Phase III at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland).
(8) $134,900,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1672) for
an Ambulatory Care Center Phase III at Joint Base San
Antonio, Texas).
(9) $715,863,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized under section 2401(b) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1673) for a
hospital at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany).
(10) $412,869,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(division B of Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2640) for a
hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas).
(11) $41,913,000 (the balance of the amount
authorized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide
project by title X of the Supplemental Appropriations
Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-32; 123 Stat. 1888) for a
data center at Camp Williams, Utah).
Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations
SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION
CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after
September 30, 2013, for military construction and land
acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in the
funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853
of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation
authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out
under subsection (a) and the project described in paragraph (2)
of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated
under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.
(2) $36,433,000 (the balance of the amount authorized
for ammunition demilitarization at Blue Grass Army
Depot, Kentucky, by section 2401(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000
(division B of Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 835), as
most recently amended by section 2412 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4450).
TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in
an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be
appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount
collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a
result of construction previously financed by the United
States.
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for contributions by
the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United
States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of
projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security
Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in
the funding table in section 4601.
TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES
Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction
and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.
Subtitle B--Other Matters
Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2013 project.
Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.
Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the Army National
Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts,
set forth in the following table:
Army National Guard: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................ Decatur............... $4,000,000
Arkansas....................... Fort Chaffee.......... $21,000,000
Florida........................ Pinellas Park......... $5,700,000
Illinois....................... Kankakee.............. $42,000,000
Massachusetts.................. Camp Edwards.......... $19,000,000
Michigan....................... Camp Grayling......... $17,000,000
Minnesota...................... Stillwater............ $17,000,000
Mississippi.................... Camp Shelby........... $3,000,000
Pascagoula............ $4,500,000
Missouri....................... Macon................. $9,100,000
Whiteman AFB.......... $5,000,000
New York....................... New York.............. $31,000,000
Ohio........................... Ravenna Army $5,200,000
Ammunition Plant.
Pennsylvania................... Fort Indiantown Gap... $40,000,000
Puerto Rico.................... Camp Santiago......... $5,600,000
South Carolina................. Greenville............ $26,000,000
Texas.......................... Fort Worth............ $14,270,000
Wyoming........................ Afton................. $10,200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set
forth in the following table:
Army Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California..................... Camp Parks............ $17,500,000
Fort Hunter Liggett... $16,500,000
Maryland....................... Bowie................. $25,500,000
North Carolina................. Fort Bragg............ $24,500,000
New Jersey..................... Joint Base McGuire-Dix- $36,200,000
Lakehurst.
New York....................... Bullville............. $14,500,000
Wisconsin...................... Fort McCoy............ $23,400,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE
CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve
and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States,
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California................... March Air Force Base.... $11,086,000
Missouri..................... Kansas City............. $15,020,000
Tennessee.................... Memphis................. $4,330,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the Air
National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts, set forth in the following table:
Air National Guard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................................ Birmingham International Airport.............. $8,500,000
Indiana........................................ Hulman Regional Airport....................... $7,300,000
Maryland...................................... Fort Meade................................... $4,000,000
Martin State Airport.......................... $8,000,000
Montana........................................ Great Falls International Airport............. $22,000,000
New York....................................... Fort Drum..................................... $4,700,000
Ohio........................................... Springfield Beckley-Map....................... $7,200,000
Pennsylvania................................... Fort Indiantown Gap........................... $7,700,000
Rhode Island................................... Quonset State Airport......................... $6,000,000
Tennessee...................................... Mcghee-Tyson Airport.......................... $18,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section
4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force
Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts,
set forth in the following table:
Air Force Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California................... March Air Force Base.... $19,900,000
Florida...................... Homestead Air Reserve $9,800,000
Base.
Oklahoma..................... Tinker Air Force Base... $12,200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after
September 30, 2013, for the costs of acquisition, architectural
and engineering services, and construction of facilities for
the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor,
under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including
the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as
specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Commencing Certain Projects.--No amounts
may be obligated or expended for the projects associated with
the 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility at Fort Meade,
Maryland, or the Cyber/ISR Facility at Martin State Airport,
Maryland, as authorized by section 2604, until the date on
which the Commander of the United States Cyber Command
certifies to the congressional defense committees, and provides
adequate supporting documentation, that--
(1) the scope of the military construction projects
referred to in this subsection is consistent with the
organizational manning construct being developed by the
United States Cyber Command;
(2) units operating within such facilities will be
trained to the readiness standards set by the Armed
Force concerned and the United States Cyber Command for
the missions to which these units will be assigned;
(3) plans for proper mitigation measures will be
implemented to prevent inadvertent disclosure of
classified information; and
(4) rules exist or will be developed to control
access to classified systems operating pursuant to
authorities under title 10, United States Code, when
operations are conducted pursuant to authorities under
title 32, United States Code.
Subtitle B--Other Matters
SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2013 PROJECT.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat.
2135) for Fort Des Moines, Iowa, for construction of a Joint
Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Navy may,
instead of constructing a new facility at Camp Dodge, acquire
up to approximately 20 acres to construct a Joint Reserve
Center and associated supporting facilities in the greater Des
Moines, Iowa, area using amounts appropriated for the project
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606
of such Act (126 Stat. 2136).
SEC. 2612. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011
PROJECTS.
(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B
of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections
2601, 2602, and 2604 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452, 4453, 4454),
shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of
the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:
Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puerto Rice............................. Camp Santiago.............. Multi Purpose Machine Gun $9,200,000
Range.
Tennessee............................... Nashville International Intelligence Group and $5,500,000
Airport. Remotely Piloted Aircraft
Remote Split Operations
Group.
Virginia................................ Fort Story................. Army Reserve Center........ $11,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and
closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base
Closure Account.
Subtitle B--Other Matters
Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and
Closure (BRAC) round.
Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding
availability of military health care in National Capital
Region.
Sec. 2713. Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing
initiative.
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE REALIGNMENT AND
CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2013, for base realignment
and closure activities, including real property acquisition and
military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense
Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX
of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through
the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by
section 2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as
specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Subtitle B--Other Matters
SEC. 2711. PROHIBITION ON CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL BASE REALIGNMENT AND
CLOSURE (BRAC) ROUND.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an
additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round.
SEC. 2712. ELIMINATION OF QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT REGARDING
AVAILABILITY OF MILITARY HEALTH CARE IN NATIONAL
CAPITAL REGION.
Section 1674(c) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of
Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 483) is amended by striking ``on
a quarterly basis''.
SEC. 2713. REPORT ON 2005 BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT JOINT BASING
INITIATIVE.
(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the 2005 base
closure and realignment joint basing initiative.
(b) Elements.--The report required under subsection (a) shall
include the following elements:
(1) An analysis and explanation of the costs
necessary to implement the joint basing initiative.
(2) An analysis and explanation of any savings
achieved to date and planned in future years, including
quantifiable goals and a timeline for meeting such
goals.
(3) A description of implementation challenges and
other lessons learned.
(4) An assessment of any additional savings that
could be achieved through more rigorous management and
streamlined administration of joint bases.
(5) Any other matters the Under Secretary considers
appropriate.
TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes
Sec. 2801. Modification and extension of authority to utilize
unspecified minor military construction authority for
laboratory revitalization projects.
Sec. 2802. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited
partnerships with private developers of housing.
Sec. 2803. Military construction standards to improve force protection.
Sec. 2804. Application of cash payments received for utilities and
services.
Sec. 2805. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of
military housing investment authority.
Sec. 2806. Additional element for annual report on military housing
privatization projects.
Sec. 2807. Policies and requirements regarding overseas military
construction and closure and realignment of United States
military installations in foreign countries.
Sec. 2808. Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to
use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects
in certain areas outside the United States.
Sec. 2809. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area
of responsibility.
Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration
Sec. 2811. Development of master plans for major military installations.
Sec. 2812. Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative
expenses associated with real property leases and easements.
Sec. 2813. Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts
for receipt of utility services as consideration for utility
systems conveyances.
Sec. 2814. Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real
property.
Sec. 2815. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pinon Canyon
Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado.
Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment
Sec. 2821. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year
for period covered by annual report of Interagency
Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment.
Sec. 2822. Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region.
Subtitle D--Land Conveyances
Sec. 2831. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County,
California.
Sec. 2832. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura
County, California.
Sec. 2833. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.
Sec. 2834. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
Sec. 2835. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah.
Sec. 2836. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak,
Wasatch Mountains, Utah.
Sec. 2837. Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers,
Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Sec. 2841. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting
requirement.
Sec. 2842. Establishment of military divers memorial.
Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes
SEC. 2801. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO UTILIZE
UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY
FOR LABORATORY REVITALIZATION PROJECTS.
(a) Modification and Extension of Authority.--Section 2805(d)
of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``not more than
$2,000,000'' and inserting ``not more than $4,000,000,
notwithstanding subsection (c)'';
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the first sentence
and inserting the following: ``For purposes of this
subsection, an unspecified minor military construction
project is a military construction project that
(notwithstanding subsection (a)) has an approved cost
equal to or less than $4,000,000.''; and
(3) in paragraph (5), by striking ``2016'' and
inserting ``2018''.
(b) No Application to Current Projects.--The amendments made
by subsection (a) do not apply to any laboratory revitalization
project for which the design phase has been completed as of the
date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 2802. REPEAL OF SEPARATE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LIMITED
PARTNERSHIPS WITH PRIVATE DEVELOPERS OF HOUSING.
(a) Repeal.--
(1) In general.--Section 2837 of title 10, United
States Code, is repealed.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title
is amended by striking the item relating to section
2837.
(b) Effect on Existing Contracts.--The repeal of section 2837
of title 10, United States Code, shall not affect the validity
or terms of any contract in connection with a limited
partnership under subsection (a) or a collateral incentive
agreement under subsection (b) of such section entered into
before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Effect on Defense Housing Investment Account.--Any
unobligated amounts remaining in the Defense Housing Investment
Account on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be
transferred to the Department of Defense Family Housing
Improvement Fund. Amounts transferred shall be merged with
amounts in such fund and shall be available for the same
purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations,
as amounts in such fund.
SEC. 2803. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS TO IMPROVE FORCE PROTECTION.
(a) Consideration of Other Available Security or Force-
Protection Measures.--Section 2859(a)(2) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by striking ``develop construction
standards designed'' and inserting ``develop construction
standards that, taking into consideration other security or
force-protection measures available for the facility or
military installation concerned, are designed''.
(b) Report on Current and Additional Security Systems and
Technologies.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than June 1, 2014,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report describing
and evaluating--
(A) current expeditionary physical barrier
systems; and
(B) new systems or technologies that are
being used for, or can be adopted for use for,
force protection, including providing blast
protection for forces supporting contingency
operations.
(2) Elements.--The report required by this subsection
shall include the following:
(A) A review of current and projected threats
in connection with force protection, a
description of any recent changes to policies
on force protection, and an assessment of
current planning methods on force protection,
including standoff distances and physical
barriers, to provide consistent and adequate
levels of force protection.
(B) An assessment of the use of expeditionary
physical barrier systems to meet the goals of
the combatant commands for force protection and
force resiliency.
(C) A description of the specifications
developed by the Department of Defense to meet
requirements for effectiveness, affordability,
lifecycle management, and reuse or disposal of
expeditionary physical barrier systems.
(D) A description of the process used within
the Department to ensure appropriate
consideration of the decommissioning cost,
environmental impact, and subsequent disposal
of expeditionary physical barrier materials in
the procurement process for such materials.
(E) An assessment of the availability of new
technologies or designs that improve the
capabilities or lifecycle costs of
expeditionary physical barrier systems.
(3) Forms of report.--The report required by this
subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but
may include a classified annex.
SEC. 2804. APPLICATION OF CASH PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR UTILITIES AND
SERVICES.
Section 2872a(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by striking ``under paragraph (1) shall be'' and
all that follows through ``was paid.'' and inserting
the following: ``under paragraph (1) as reimbursement
for the cost of furnishing utilities or services
shall--
``(A) in the case of a cost paid using funds
appropriated or otherwise made available before October
1, 2014, be credited to the appropriation or working
capital account from which the cost of furnishing
utilities or services concerned was paid; or
``(B) in the case of a cost paid using funds
appropriated or otherwise made available on or after
October 1, 2014, be credited to the appropriation or
working capital account currently available for the
purpose of furnishing utilities or services under
subsection (a).''; and
(2) by striking ``Amounts so credited'' and inserting
the following:
``(3) Amounts credited under paragraph (2)''.
SEC. 2805. REPEAL OF ADVANCE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR USE OF
MILITARY HOUSING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY.
Section 2875 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking subsection (e).
SEC. 2806. ADDITIONAL ELEMENT FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY HOUSING
PRIVATIZATION PROJECTS.
Section 2884(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by inserting before the period at the end the
following: ``, to specifically include any unique variances
associated with litigation costs''.
SEC. 2807. POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS REGARDING OVERSEAS MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION AND CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT OF UNITED
STATES MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.
(a) Overseas Base Closures and Realignments and Basing Master
Plans.--Section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 2687a. Overseas base closures and realignments and basing master
plans
``(a) Annual Report on Status of Overseas Closures and
Realignments and Master Plans.--(1) At the same time that the
budget is submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31 for a
fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign
Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of
the House of Representatives a report on--
``(A) the status of overseas base closure and
realignment actions undertaken as part of a global
defense posture realignment strategy; and
``(B) the status of development and execution of
comprehensive master plans for overseas military main
operating bases, forward operating sites, and
cooperative security locations.
``(2) A report under paragraph (1) shall address the
following:
``(A) How the master plans described in paragraph
(1)(B) would support the security commitments
undertaken by the United States pursuant to any
international security treaty.
``(B) The impact of such plans on the current
security environments in the combatant commands,
including United States participation in theater
security cooperation activities and bilateral
partnership, exchanges, and training exercises.
``(C) Any comments of the Secretary of Defense
resulting from an interagency review of these plans
that includes the Department of State and other Federal
departments and agencies that the Secretary of Defense
considers necessary for national security.
``(b) Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility
Investment Recovery Account.--(1) Except as provided in
subsection (c), amounts paid to the United States, pursuant to
any treaty, status of forces agreement, or other international
agreement to which the United States is a party, for the
residual value of real property or improvements to real
property used by civilian or military personnel of the
Department of Defense shall be deposited into the Department of
Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment Recovery Account.
``(2) Money deposited in the Department of Defense Overseas
Military Facility Investment Recovery Account shall be
available to the Secretary of Defense for payment, as provided
in appropriation Acts, of costs incurred by the Department of
Defense in connection with--
``(A) military construction, facility maintenance and
repair, and environmental restoration at military
installations in the United States; and
``(B) military construction, facility maintenance and
repair, and compliance with applicable environmental
laws at military installations outside the United
States at which the Secretary anticipates the United
States will have an enduring presence.
``(3) Funds in the Department of Defense Overseas Facility
Investment Recovery Account shall remain available until
expended.
``(4) Not later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a report detailing all expenditures made from the Department of
Defense Overseas Facility Investment Recovery Account during
the preceding fiscal year.
``(c) Treatment of Amounts Corresponding to the Value of
Property Purchased With Nonappropriated Funds.--In the case of
a payment referred to in subsection (b)(1) for the residual
value of real property or improvements at an overseas military
facility, the portion of the payment that is equal to the
depreciated value of the investment made with nonappropriated
funds shall be deposited in the reserve account established
under section 204(b)(7)(C) of the Defense Authorization
Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act (Public Law
100-526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). The Secretary of Defense may use
amounts in the account (in such an aggregate amount as is
provided in advance by appropriation Acts) for the purpose of
acquiring, constructing, or improving commissary stores and
nonappropriated fund instrumentalities.
``(d) OMB Review of Proposed Overseas Basing Settlements.--
(1) The Secretary of Defense may not enter into an agreement of
settlement with a host country regarding the release to the
host country of improvements made by the United States to
facilities at an installation located in the host country until
30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the
proposed settlement to the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget. The prohibition set forth in the preceding sentence
shall apply only to agreements of settlement for improvements
having a value in excess of $10,000,000. The Director shall
evaluate the overall equity of the proposed settlement. In
evaluating the proposed settlement, the Director shall consider
such factors as the extent of the United States capital
investment in the improvements being released to the host
country, the depreciation of the improvements, the condition of
the improvements, and any applicable requirements for
environmental remediation or restoration at the installation.
``(2) Each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on each proposed agreement of
settlement that was not submitted by the Secretary to the
Director of the Office of Management and Budget in the previous
year under paragraph (1) because the value of the improvements
to be released pursuant to the proposed agreement did not
exceed $10,000,000.
``(e) Congressional Oversight of Use of Payments-In-Kind for
Construction or Operations.--(1) Before concluding an agreement
for acceptance of military construction or facility
improvements as a payment-in-kind, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
notification on the proposed agreement. Any such notification
shall contain the following:
``(A) A description of the military construction
project or facility improvement project.
``(B) An explanation of the military requirement to
be satisfied with the project.
``(C) A certification that the project is included in
the current future-years defense program.
``(2) Before concluding an agreement for acceptance of host
nation support or host nation payment of operating costs of
United States forces as a payment-in-kind, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
notification on the proposed agreement. Any such notification
shall contain the following:
``(A) A description of each activity to be covered by
the payment-in-kind.
``(B) A certification that the costs to be covered by
the payment-in-kind are included in the budget of one
or more of the military departments or that it will
otherwise be necessary to provide for payment of such
costs in a budget of one or more of the military
departments in the current or the next fiscal year.
``(3) When the Secretary of Defense submits a notification of
a proposed agreement under paragraph (1) or (2), the Secretary
may then enter into the agreement described in the notification
only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date
on which the notification is submitted or, if earlier, the end
of the 14-day period beginning on the date on which a copy of
the notification is provided in an electronic medium pursuant
to section 480 of this title.
``(f) Authorized Use of Payments-In-Kind.--(1) A military
construction project, as defined in chapter 159 of this title,
may be accepted as a payment-in-kind contribution pursuant to a
bilateral agreement with a host country only if that military
construction project is authorized by law.
``(2) Operations of United States forces may be funded
through a payment-in-kind contribution under this section only
if the costs covered by such payment are included in the budget
justification documents for the Department of Defense submitted
to Congress in connection with the budget submitted under 1105
of title 31.
``(3) If funds previously appropriated for a military
construction project, facility improvement, or operating costs
are subsequently addressed in an agreement for a payment-in-
kind contribution, the Secretary of Defense shall return to the
Treasury funds in the amount equal to the value of the
appropriated funds.
``(4) This subsection does not apply to a military
construction project that--
``(A) was specified in a bilateral agreement with a
host country that was entered into prior to the date of
the enactment of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014;
``(B) was accepted as payment-in-kind for the
residual value of improvements made by the United
States at military installations released to the host
country under section 2921 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of
Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) prior to the
date of the enactment of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014; or
``(C) subject to paragraph (5), will cost less than
the cost specified in subsection (a)(2) of section 2805
of this title for certain unspecified minor military
construction projects.
``(5) In the case of a military construction project excluded
pursuant to paragraph (4)(C) whose cost will exceed the cost
specified in subsection (b) of section 2805 of this title for
certain unspecified minor military construction projects, the
congressional notification requirements and waiting period
specified in paragraph (2) of such subsection shall apply.
``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `fair market value of the
improvements' means the value of improvements
determined by the Secretary of Defense on the basis of
their highest use.
``(2) The term `improvements' includes new
construction of facilities and all additions,
improvements, modifications, or renovations made to
existing facilities or to real property, without regard
to whether they were carried out with appropriated or
nonappropriated funds.
``(3) The term `nonappropriated funds' means funds
received from--
``(A) the adjustment of, or surcharge on,
selling prices at commissary stores fixed under
section 2685 of this title; or
``(B) a nonappropriated fund instrumentality.
``(4) The term `nonappropriated fund instrumentality'
means an instrumentality of the United States under the
jurisdiction of the armed forces (including the Army
and Air Force Exchange Service, the Navy Resale and
Services Support Office, and the Marine Corps
exchanges) which is conducted for the comfort,
pleasure, contentment, or physical or mental
improvement of members of the armed forces.''.
(b) Repeal of Superseded Provisions Related to Overseas Base
Closures and Realignments .--
(1) Repeal; retention of sense of congress.--Section
2921 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687
note) is amended--
(A) by striking ``(a) Sense of Congress.--'';
and
(B) by striking subsections (b) through (g).
(2) Treatment of special account.--The repeal of
subsection (c) of section 2921 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 by paragraph
(1)(B) shall not affect the Department of Defense
Overseas Military Facility Investment Recovery Account
established by such subsection, amounts in such
account, or the continued use of such account as
provided in section 2687a of title 10, United States
Code, as amended by subsection (a) of this section.
(c) Requirements Related to Payment-in-kind Contributions
Pursuant to Bilateral Agreements With Host Countries.--Section
2802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at
the end the following new subsection:
``(d)(1) The requirement under subsection (a) that a military
construction project must be authorized by law includes
military construction projects funded through payment-in-kind
contributions pursuant to a bilateral agreement with a host
country.
``(2) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary concerned
shall include military construction projects covered under
paragraph (1) in the budget justification documents for the
Department of Defense submitted to Congress in connection with
the budget for a fiscal year submitted under 1105 of title 31.
``(3) This subsection does not apply to a military
construction project that--
``(A) was specified in a bilateral agreement with a
host country that was entered into prior to the date of
the enactment of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014;
``(B) was accepted as payment-in-kind for the
residual value of improvements made by the United
States at military installations released to the host
country under section 2921 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of
Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) prior to the
date of the enactment of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014; or
``(C) will cost less than the cost specified in
subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of this title for
certain unspecified minor military construction
projects.
``(4) In the case of a military construction project excluded
pursuant to paragraph (3)(C) whose cost will exceed the cost
specified in subsection (b) of section 2805 of this title for
certain unspecified minor military construction projects, the
congressional notification requirements and waiting period
specified in paragraph (2) of such subsection shall apply.''.
SEC. 2808. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED AUTHORITY
TO USE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN CERTAIN AREAS OUTSIDE THE
UNITED STATES.
Section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136; 117
Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2149), is further
amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``The Secretary''
and all that follows through ``conditions:'' and
inserting ``The Secretary of Defense may obligate
appropriated funds available for operation and
maintenance to carry out, inside the area of
responsibility of the United States Central Command or
certain countries in the area of responsibility of the
United States Africa Command, a construction project
that the Secretary determines meets each of the
following conditions:'';
(2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``shall not
exceed'' and all that follows through the period at the
end and inserting ``shall not exceed $100,000,000
between October 1, 2013, and the earlier of December
31, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military activities of the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015.'';
(3) in subsection (h)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``September
30, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014'';
and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``fiscal
year 2014'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2015'';
and
(4) by striking subsection (i) and inserting the
following new subsection:
``(i) Certain Countries in the Area of Responsibility of
United States Africa Command Defined.--In this section, the
term `certain countries in the area of responsibility of the
United States Africa Command' means Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia,
Djibouti, Seychelles, Burundi, and Uganda.''.
SEC. 2809. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN EUROPEAN COMMAND AREA
OF RESPONSIBILITY.
(a) Limitation.--Except as provided in subjection (b), the
Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department
shall not award any contract in connection with a construction
project authorized by this division to be carried out at an
installation operated in the European Command area of
responsibility until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the
congressional defense committees that--
(1) the installation and specific military
construction requirement--
(A) have been assessed as part of the basing
assessment initiated by the Secretary of
Defense on January 25, 2013 (known as the
``European Infrastructure Consolidation
Assessment''); and
(B) have been determined, pursuant to such
assessment, to be of an enduring nature; and
(2) the specific military construction requirement
most effectively meets combatant commander requirements
at the authorized location.
(b) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect
to a construction project that--
(1) is authorized by law before the date of the
enactment of this Act;
(2) is carried out at an installation located in
Greenland;
(3) is funded through the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Security Investment Program or intended to
specifically support the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization; or
(4) is carried out under the authority of, and
subject to the limits specified in, section 2805 of
title 10, United States Code.
Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration
SEC. 2811. DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER PLANS FOR MAJOR MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS.
Section 2864 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``At a time'' and inserting
``(1) At a time''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
``(2) To address the requirements under paragraph (1), each
installation master plan shall include consideration of--
``(A) planning for compact and infill development;
``(B) horizontal and vertical mixed-use development;
``(C) the full lifecycle costs of real property
planning decisions; and
``(D) capacity planning through the establishment of
growth boundaries around cantonment areas to focus
development towards the core and preserve range and
training space.'';
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) by striking ``The transportation'' and
inserting ``(1) The transportation''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
``(2) To address the requirements under subsection (a) and
paragraph (1), each installation master plan shall include
consideration of ways to diversify and connect transit
systems.'';
(3) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection
(d); and
(4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following
new subsection:
``(c) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall
supersede the requirements of section 2859(a) of this title.''.
SEC. 2812. AUTHORITY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS TO COVER ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH REAL PROPERTY LEASES AND
EASEMENTS.
(a) Authority.--Subsection (e)(1)(C) of section 2667 of title
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new clause:
``(vi) Administrative expenses incurred by the
Secretary concerned under this section and for
easements under section 2668 of this title.''.
(b) Administrative Expenses Defined.--Subsection (i) of such
section is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as
paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively; and
(2) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so
redesignated, the following new paragraph (1):
``(1) The term `administrative expenses' means only
those expenses related to assessing, negotiating,
executing, and managing lease and easement
transactions. The term does not include any Government
personnel costs.''.
SEC. 2813. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LONG-TERM CONTRACTS
FOR RECEIPT OF UTILITY SERVICES AS CONSIDERATION
FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS CONVEYANCES.
Section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``The
determination of cost effectiveness shall be made using a
business case analysis that includes an independent estimate of
the level of investment that should be required to maintain
adequate operation of the utility system over the proposed term
of the contract.''.
SEC. 2814. REPORT ON EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
REAL PROPERTY.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to Congress a report on the efficient utilization of
real property across the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements of Report.--The report required by subsection
(a) shall describe the following:
(1) The strategy of the Department of Defense for
maximizing efficient utilization of existing
facilities, progress implementing this strategy, and
obstacles to implementing this strategy.
(2) The efforts of the Department of Defense to
systematically collect, process, and analyze data on
the efficient utilization of real property to aid in
the planning and implementation of the strategy
referred to in paragraph (1).
(3) The number of underutilized Department
facilities, to be defined as facilities rated less than
66 percent utilization, and unutilized Department
facilities, to be defined as facilities rated at zero
percent utilization, in the Real Property Inventory
Database of the Department of Defense.
(4) The annual cost of maintaining and improving such
underutilized and unutilized Department facilities.
(5) The efforts of the Department of Defense to
dispose of underutilized and unutilized facilities.
(c) Classified Annex.--The report required by subsection (a)
may include a classified annex if necessary to fully describe
the matters required by subsection (b).
SEC. 2815. CONDITIONS ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXPANSION OF PINON
CANYON MANEUVER SITE, FORT CARSON, COLORADO.
The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may
not acquire, by purchase, condemnation, or other means, any
land to expand the size of the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site near
Fort Carson, Colorado, unless each of the following occurs:
(1) The land acquisition is specifically authorized
in an Act of Congress enacted after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
(2) Funds are specifically appropriated for the land
acquisition.
(3) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the
Army comply with the environmental review requirements
of section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)) with respect to the
land acquisition.
Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment
SEC. 2821. CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR TO PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
FOR PERIOD COVERED BY ANNUAL REPORT OF INTERAGENCY
COORDINATION GROUP OF INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR GUAM
REALIGNMENT.
Section 2835(e)(1) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2687
note) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``calendar
year'' and inserting ``fiscal year''.
SEC. 2822. REALIGNMENT OF MARINES CORPS FORCES IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION.
(a) Restriction on Use of Funds.--Except as provided in
subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated
under this Act, and none of the amounts provided by the
Government of Japan for construction activities on land under
the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, may be obligated
to implement the realignment of Marine Corps forces from
Okinawa to Guam or Hawaii until the Secretary of Defense
submits to the congressional defense committees each of the
following:
(1) The report required by section 1068(c) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1945).
(2) Master plans for the construction of facilities
and infrastructure to execute the Marine Corps
distributed lay-down on Guam and Hawaii, including a
detailed description of costs and the schedule for such
construction.
(3) A plan, coordinated by all pertinent Federal
agencies, detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a
schedule for completion of construction, improvements,
and repairs to the non-military utilities, facilities,
and infrastructure, if any, on Guam affected by the
realignment of forces.
(b) Exceptions to Restriction on Use of Funds.--
Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may
use funds described in such subsection for the following
purposes:
(1) To complete additional analysis or studies
required under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for proposed actions on
Guam or Hawaii.
(2) To initiate planning and design of construction
projects on Guam.
(3) To carry out any military construction project
for which an authorization of appropriations is
provided in section 2204, as specified in the funding
table in section 4601.
(4) To carry out the construction of a utility and
site improvement project to support the North Ramp
expansion at Andersen Air Force Base.
(c) Restriction on Development of Public Infrastructure.--If
the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, cooperative
agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, or
supplement of funds available in fiscal year 2014 under Federal
programs administered by agencies other than the Department of
Defense will result in the development (including repair,
replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion,
acquisition, or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam,
the Secretary of Defense may not carry out such grant,
transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless
such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental
funding is specifically authorized by law.
(d) Economic Adjustment Committee Consideration of Additional
Guam Public Infrastructure Funding Sources.--
(1) Convening of committee.--Not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Defense, as the chairperson of the
Economic Adjustment Committee established in Executive
Order No. 127887 (10 U.S.C. 2391 note), shall convene
the Economic Adjustment Committee to consider
assistance, including assistance to support public
infrastructure requirements, necessary to support the
preferred alternative for the relocation of Marine
Corps forces to Guam.
(2) Report required.--Not later than the date on
which the Record of Decision for the relocation of
Marine Corps forces to Guam associated with the ``Guam
and CNMI Military Relocation (2012 Roadmap Adjustments)
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement'' is
issued, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report--
(A) describing the results of the Economic
Adjustment Committee deliberations required by
paragraph (1); and
(B) containing an implementation plan to
support the preferred alternative for the
relocation of Marine Corps forces to Guam.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Distributed lay-down.--The term ``distributed
lay-down'' refers to the planned distribution of
members of the Marine Corps in Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii,
Australia, and possibly elsewhere that is contemplated
in support of the joint statement of the United States-
Japan Security Consultative Committee issued April 26,
2012, in the District of Columbia (April 27, 2012, in
Tokyo, Japan) and revised on October 3, 2013, in Tokyo.
(2) Master plan.--The term ``master plan'' means
documentation that provides the scope, cost, and
schedule for each military construction project.
(3) Public infrastructure.--The term ``public
infrastructure'' means any utility, method of
transportation, item of equipment, or facility under
the control of a public entity or State or local
government that is used by, or constructed for the
benefit of, the general public.
(f) Repeal of Superseded Law.--Section 2832 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B
of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2155) is repealed.
Subtitle D--Land Conveyances
SEC. 2831. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION, NAVAL BASE VENTURA COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
(a) Authority.--The Secretary of the Navy may acquire all
right, title, and interest in and to real property, including
improvements thereon, located at Naval Base Ventura County,
California, that was initially constructed under the former
section 2828(g) of title 10, United States Code (commonly known
as the ``Build to Lease program''), as added by section 801 of
the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (Public Law
98-115; 97 Stat 782).
(b) Use.--Upon acquiring the real property under subsection
(a), the Secretary of the Navy may use the improvements as
provided in sections 2835 and 2835a of title 10, United States
Code.
SEC. 2832. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER OXNARD AIR FORCE BASE, VENTURA
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may
convey, without consideration, to Ventura County, California
(in this section referred to as the ``County''), all right,
title, and interest of the United States in and to the real
property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of
former Oxnard Air Force Base for the purpose of permitting the
County to use the property for public purposes.
(b) Condition on Use of Revenues.--If the property conveyed
under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such subsection,
for a public purpose that results in the generation of revenue
for the County, the County shall agree to use the generated
revenue only for airport purposes by depositing the revenues in
an airport fund designated for airport use.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Navy
shall require the County to cover costs to be incurred
by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for
such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the
conveyance under subsection (a), including survey
costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any
other administrative costs related to the conveyance.
If amounts are collected from the County in advance of
the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the
amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by
the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the
Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the County.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received
as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited
to the fund or account that was used to cover those
costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the
conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with
amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available
for the same purposes, and subject to the same
conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or
account.
(d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a)
shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary
of the Navy.
(e) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary of the Navy
determines at any time that the real property conveyed under
subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose
of the conveyance specified in subsection (a) or that the
County has violated the condition on the use of revenues
imposed by subsection (b), all right, title, and interest in
and to such real property, including any improvements thereto,
shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the
property of the United States, and the United States shall have
the right of immediate entry onto such real property. A
determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be
made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(f) Additional Terms.--The Secretary of the Navy may require
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the
conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect
the interests of the United States.
SEC. 2833. LAND CONVEYANCE, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, HAWAII.
(a) Conveyances Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may
convey to the Hale Keiki School all right, title, and interest
of the United States, or any portion thereof, in and to certain
real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting
of approximately 11 acres located at or in the nearby vicinity
of 153 Bougainville Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii (City and County of
Honolulu Tax Map Key No. 9-9-02:37), which is part of the Joint
Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, before such real property, or any
portion thereof, is made available for transfer pursuant to the
Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act (title II of Public Law 104-
42; 109 Stat. 357), for use by any other Federal agency, or for
disposal under applicable laws.
(b) Consideration.--As consideration for a conveyance under
subsection (a), the Hale Keiki School shall provide the United
States, whether by cash payment, in-kind consideration
described in section 2667(c) of title 10, United States Code,
or a combination thereof, an amount that is not less than the
fair market value of the conveyed property, as determined
pursuant to an appraisal acceptable to the Secretary.
(c) Exercise of Right to Purchase Property.--
(1) Acceptance of offer.--For a period of 180 days
beginning on the date the Secretary makes a written
offer to convey the property or any portion thereof
under subsection (a), the Hale Keiki School shall have
the exclusive right to accept such offer by providing
written notice of acceptance to the Secretary within
the specified 180-day time period. If the Secretary's
offer is not so accepted within the 180-day period, the
offer shall expire.
(2) Conveyance deadline.--If the Hale Keiki School
accepts the offer to convey the property or a portion
thereof in accordance with paragraph (1), the
conveyance shall take place not later than two years
after the date of the Hale Keiki School's written
acceptance. The Secretary and the Hale Keiki School, by
mutual agreement, may extend the two-year conveyance
deadline for a reasonable period of time, as evidenced
by a new lease or license executed by the parties
before the deadline.
(d) Payment of Costs of Conveyances.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary shall require
the Hale Keiki School to cover costs to be incurred by
the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs
incurred by the Secretary, to carry out a conveyance
under subsection (a), including survey costs, related
to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the
Hale Keiki School in advance of the Secretary incurring
the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the
costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out
the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess
amount to the Hale Keiki School. The Secretary may
collect the costs from the Hale Keiki School in advance
of incurring any costs and may pay the administrative
costs of processing the conveyance as they are incurred
or at any time thereafter.
(2) Assumption of risk of paying costs of
conveyance.--In the event that the conveyance is not
completed by the deadline set forth in subsection
(c)(2), including any extension thereof, the amounts
collected from the Hale Keiki School under paragraph
(1) will not be refunded or reimbursed. The Hale Keiki
School shall be considered to have assumed the risk of
paying all costs of processing the conveyance after the
offer has been accepted by the Hale Keiki School,
regardless of whether or not the conveyance is ever
completed.
(3) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received
under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred
by the Secretary to carry out a conveyance under
subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account
that was used to cover the costs incurred by the
Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account and shall be available for the same purposes,
and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as
amounts in such fund or account.
(e) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of any real property to be conveyed under
subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to
the Secretary.
(f) Additional Term and Conditions.--The Secretary may
require such additional terms and conditions in connection with
a conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
SEC. 2834. LAND CONVEYANCE, PHILADELPHIA NAVAL SHIPYARD, PHILADELPHIA,
PENNSYLVANIA.
(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may
convey to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority (in this
section referred to as the ``Port Authority'') all right,
title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of
real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting
of approximately .595 acres located at the Philadelphia Naval
Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Secretary may void
any land use restrictions associated with the property to be
conveyed under this subsection.
(b) Consideration.--
(1) Amount and determination.--As consideration for
the conveyance under subsection (a), the Port Authority
shall pay to the Secretary of the Navy an amount that
is not less than the fair market value of the property
conveyed, as determined by the Secretary. The
Secretary's determination of fair market value shall be
final. In lieu of all or a portion of cash payment of
consideration, the Secretary may accept in-kind
consideration.
(2) Treatment of cash consideration.--The Secretary
shall deposit any cash payment received under paragraph
(1) in the special account in the Treasury established
for that Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667
of title 10, United States Code. The entire amount
deposited shall be available for use in accordance with
paragraph (1)(D) of such subsection.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Navy
shall require the Port Authority to cover costs to be
incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the
Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry
out the conveyance under subsection (a), including
survey costs, costs related to environmental
documentation, and any other administrative costs
related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected in
advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs,
and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually
incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance,
the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the
Port Authority.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received
as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited
to the fund or account that was used to cover those
costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the
conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with
amounts in such fund or account and shall be available
for the same purposes, and subject to the same
conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or
account.
(d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the parcel of real property to be conveyed under
subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to
the Secretary of the Navy.
(e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the
Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the
United States.
SEC. 2835. LAND CONVEYANCE, CAMP WILLIAMS, UTAH.
(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Interior,
acting through the Bureau of Land Management, may convey,
without consideration, to the State of Utah all right, title,
and interest of the United States in and to certain lands
comprising approximately 420 acres, as generally depicted on a
map entitled ``Proposed Camp Williams Land Transfer'' and dated
June 14, 2011, which are located within the boundaries of the
public lands currently withdrawn for military use by the Utah
National Guard and known as Camp Williams, Utah, for the
purpose of permitting the Utah National Guard to use the
conveyed land for military purposes.
(b) Supersedence of Executive Order.--Executive Order No.
1922 of April 24, 1914, as amended by section 907 of the Camp
W.G. Williams Land Exchange Act of 1989 (title IX of Public Law
101-628; 104 Stat. 4501), is hereby superseded, only insofar as
it affects the lands conveyed to the State of Utah under
subsection (a).
(c) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary of the Army, in
consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, determines at
any time that the lands conveyed under subsection (a), or any
portion thereof, are sold or attempted to be sold, or that the
lands, or any portion thereof, are not being used in a manner
consistent with the purpose of the conveyance specified in such
subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the lands
shall, at the option of the Secretary of the Army, in
consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, revert to and
become the property of the United States, and the United States
shall have the right of immediate entry onto the lands. A
determination under this subsection shall be made on the record
after an opportunity for a hearing.
(d) Additional Terms.--The Secretary of the Interior, in
consultation with the Secretary of the Army, may require such
additional terms and conditions in connection with the
conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary of the
Interior considers appropriate to protect the interests of the
United States.
SEC. 2836. CONVEYANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD RADAR SITE, FRANCIS PEAK,
WASATCH MOUNTAINS, UTAH.
(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Air Force
may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah (in
this section referred to as the ``State''), all right, title,
and interest of the United States in and to the structures,
including equipment and any other personal property related
thereto, comprising the Air National Guard radar site located
on Francis Peak, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the State
to use the structures to support emergency public safety
communications, including 911 emergency response service for
Northern Utah.
(b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Air Force
may require the State to cover costs to be incurred by
the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs
incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance
under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs
related to environmental documentation, and other
administrative costs related to the conveyance. If
amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the
costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out
the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess
amount to the State.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received
as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited
to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs
incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the
conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with
amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available
for the same purposes, and subject to the same
conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or
account.
(c) Description of Property.--The exact inventory of
equipment and other personal property to be conveyed under
subsection (a) shall be determined by the Secretary of the Air
Force.
(d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the
Air Force may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the
United States.
(e) Continuation of Land Use Permit.--The conveyance of the
structures under subsection (a) shall not affect the validity
and continued applicability of the land use permit, in effect
on the date of the enactment of this Act, that was issued by
the Forest Service for placement and use of the structures.
(f) Duration of Authority.--The authority to make a
conveyance under this section shall expire on the later of--
(1) September 30, 2014; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015.
SEC. 2837. LAND CONVEYANCES, FORMER UNITED STATES ARMY RESERVE CENTERS,
CONNECTICUT, NEW HAMPSHIRE, AND PENNSYLVANIA.
(a) Conveyances Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may
convey, without consideration, all right, title, and interest
of the United States in and to the parcels of real property
described in paragraphs (1) through (4), including any
improvements thereon and easements related thereto, to the
entity specified in such a paragraph for the corresponding
parcel and for the purposes specified in such paragraph:
(1) Approximately 5.11 acres and improvements known
as the LT John S. Turner Army Reserve Center in
Fairfield, Connecticut, to the City of Fairfield,
Connecticut, for the public benefit of a public park or
recreational use.
(2) Approximately 6.9 acres and improvements known as
the Paul J. Sutcovoy Army Reserve Center in Waterbury,
Connecticut, to the City of Waterbury, Connecticut, for
the public benefit of emergency services and public
safety activities.
(3) Approximately 3.4 acres and improvements known as
the Paul A. Doble Army Reserve Center in Portsmouth,
New Hampshire, to the City of Portsmouth, New
Hampshire, for the public benefit of a public park or
recreational use.
(4) Approximately 4.52 acres and containing the
Mifflin County Army Reserve Center located at 73
Reserve Lane, Lewistown, Pennsylvania (parcel number
16,01-0113J) to Derry Township, Pennsylvania for a
regional police headquarters or other purposes of
public benefit.
(b) Terms Applicable to Mifflin County Army Reserve Center
Conveyance.--
(1) Interim lease.--Until such time as the real
property described in subsection (a)(4) is conveyed to
Derry Township, Pennsylvania, the Secretary of the Army
may lease the property to the Township.
(2) Conditions of conveyance.--The conveyance of the
real property under subsection (a)(4) shall be subject
to the condition that Derry Township, Pennsylvania, not
use any Federal funds to cover--
(A) any portion of the conveyance costs
required by subsection (d) to be paid by the
Township; or
(B) to cover the costs for the design or
construction of any facility on the property.
(c) Reversion; Exception.--
(1) Reversion.--The deed of conveyance for a parcel
of real property conveyed under this section shall
provide that all of the property be used and maintained
for the purpose for which it was conveyed, as specified
in subsection (a). If the Secretary of the Army
determines at any time that the real property is no
longer used or maintained in accordance with the
purpose of the conveyance, all right, title, and
interest in and to the property shall revert, at the
option of the Secretary, to the United States, and the
United States shall have the right of immediate entry
onto the property. Any determination of the Secretary
under this paragraph shall be made on the record after
an opportunity for hearing.
(2) Payment of consideration in lieu of reversion.--
In lieu of exercising the right of reversion retained
under paragraph (1) with respect to a parcel of real
property conveyed under this section, the Secretary may
require the recipient of the property to pay to the
United States an amount equal to the fair market value
of the property conveyed. The fair market value of the
property shall be determined by the Secretary.
(3) Treatment of cash consideration.--Any cash
payment received by the United States under paragraph
(2) shall be deposited in the special account in the
Treasury established under subsection (b) of section
572 of title 40, United States Code, and shall be
available in accordance with paragraph (5)(B) of such
subsection.
(d) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Army
shall require the recipient of a parcel of real
property conveyed under this section to cover costs to
be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the
Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to
carry out the conveyance of the property, including
survey costs, costs for environmental documentation,
and any other administrative costs related to the
conveyance. If amounts are collected from the recipient
of the property in advance of the Secretary incurring
the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the
costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out
the conveyance of the property, the Secretary shall
refund the excess amount to the recipient of the
property.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received
as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited
to the fund or account that was used to cover those
costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the
conveyances under this section. Amounts so credited
shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account,
and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as
amounts in such fund or account.
(e) Description of Properties.--The exact acreage and legal
description of a parcel of real property to be conveyed under
this section shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to
the Secretary of the Army.
(f) Additional Terms.--The Secretary of the Army may require
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the
conveyance of a parcel of real property under this section as
the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of
the United States.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
SEC. 2841. REPEAL OF ANNUAL ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE REPORTING
REQUIREMENT.
Subsection (d) of section 4004 of the Defense Economic
Adjustment, Diversification, Conversion, and Stabilization Act
of 1990 (division D of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2391
note), as amended by section 4212(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102-484; 106
Stat. 2664), is further amended--
(1) by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1);
(2) by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (2)
and inserting a period; and
(3) by striking paragraph (3).
SEC. 2842. ESTABLISHMENT OF MILITARY DIVERS MEMORIAL.
(a) Memorial Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may
permit a third party to establish and maintain a memorial to
honor the members of the United States Armed Forces who have
served as divers and whose service in defense of the United
States has been carried out beneath the waters of the world.
(b) Use of Federal Funds Prohibited.--Federal funds may not
be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the
memorial authorized by subsection (a), but the Secretary may
accept and expend contributions of non-Federal funds and
resources for such purposes.
(c) Location of Memorial.--
(1) In general.--Consistent with the sense of the
Congress expressed in section 2855 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2162), the Secretary may permit
the memorial authorized by subsection (a) to be
established--
(A) at a suitable location at the former Navy
Dive School at the Washington Navy Yard in the
District of Columbia; or
(B) at another suitable location under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary.
(2) Condition.--The memorial authorized by subsection
(a) may not be established at any location under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary until the Secretary
determines that an assured source of non-Federal
funding has been established for the design,
procurement, installation, and maintenance of the
memorial.
(d) Design of Memorial.--The final design of the memorial
authorized by subsection (a) shall be subject to the approval
of the Secretary.
TITLE XXIX--WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC LANDS TO
SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY
Sec. 2901. Short title.
Sec. 2902. Definitions.
Subtitle A--General Provisions
Sec. 2911. General applicability; definitions.
Sec. 2912. Maps and legal descriptions.
Sec. 2913. Access restrictions.
Sec. 2914. Changes in use.
Sec. 2915. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression.
Sec. 2916. Ongoing decontamination.
Sec. 2917. Water rights.
Sec. 2918. Hunting, fishing, and trapping.
Sec. 2919. Limitation on extensions and renewals.
Sec. 2920. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation.
Sec. 2921. Limitation on subsequent availability of land for
appropriation.
Sec. 2922. Relinquishment.
Sec. 2923. Immunity of the United States.
Subtitle B--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana
Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land.
Sec. 2932. Management of withdrawn and reserved land.
Sec. 2933. Special rules governing minerals management.
Sec. 2934. Grazing.
Sec. 2935. Payments in lieu of taxes.
Sec. 2936. Duration of withdrawal and reservation.
Subtitle C--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms,
California
Sec. 2941. Withdrawal and reservation of public land.
Sec. 2942. Management of withdrawn and reserved land.
Sec. 2943. Public access.
Sec. 2944. Resource management group.
Sec. 2945. Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.
Sec. 2946. Duration of withdrawal and reservation.
Subtitle D--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas
Sec. 2951. Withdrawal and reservation of public land.
Sec. 2952. Grazing.
Subtitle E--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California
Sec. 2961. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land.
Sec. 2962. Management and use of transferred land.
Sec. 2963. Effect of termination of military use.
Sec. 2964. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period.
Sec. 2965. Water rights.
Sec. 2966. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title.
Subtitle F--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California
Sec. 2971. Withdrawal and reservation of public land.
Sec. 2972. Management of withdrawn and reserved land.
Sec. 2973. Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the
Navy.
Sec. 2974. Geothermal resources.
Sec. 2975. Wild horses and burros.
Sec. 2976. Continuation of existing agreement.
Sec. 2977. Management plans.
Sec. 2978. Termination of prior withdrawals.
Sec. 2979. Duration of withdrawal and reservation.
SEC. 2901. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the ``Military Land Withdrawals
Act of 2013''.
SEC. 2902. DEFINITIONS.
In this title:
(1) Indian tribe.--The term ``Indian tribe'' has the
meaning given the term in section 102 of the Federally
Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C.
479a).
(2) Manage; management.--
(A) Inclusions.--The terms ``manage'' and
``management'' include the authority to
exercise jurisdiction, custody, and control
over the land withdrawn and reserved by this
title.
(B) Exclusions.--The terms ``manage'' and
``management'' do not include authority for
disposal of the land withdrawn and reserved by
this title.
(3) Secretary concerned.--The term ``Secretary
concerned'' has the meaning given the term in section
101(a) of title 10, United States Code.
Subtitle A--General Provisions
SEC. 2911. GENERAL APPLICABILITY; DEFINITIONS.
(a) Applicability.--This subtitle applies to each land
withdrawal and reservation made by this title.
(b) Rules of Construction.--Nothing in this title assigns
management of real property under the administrative
jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned to the Secretary of the
Interior.
SEC. 2912. MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.
(a) Preparation of Maps and Legal Descriptions.--As soon as
practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of the Interior shall--
(1) publish in the Federal Register a notice
containing the legal descriptions of the land withdrawn
and reserved by this title; and
(2) file maps and legal descriptions of the land
withdrawn and reserved by this title with--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of
the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Natural Resources of the House of
Representatives.
(b) Legal Effect.--The maps and legal descriptions filed
under subsection (a)(2) shall have the same force and effect as
if the maps and legal descriptions were included in this title,
except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct any
clerical and typographical errors in the maps and legal
descriptions.
(c) Availability.--Copies of the maps and legal descriptions
filed under subsection (a)(2) shall be available for public
inspection--
(1) in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land
Management;
(2) in the office of the commanding officer of the
military installation for which the land is withdrawn;
and
(3) if the military installation is under the
management of the National Guard, in the office of the
Adjutant General of the State in which the military
installation is located.
(d) Costs.--The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the
Secretary of the Interior for the costs incurred by the
Secretary of the Interior in implementing this section.
SEC. 2913. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS.
(a) Authority to Impose Restrictions.--If the Secretary
concerned determines that military operations, public safety,
or national security require the closure to the public of any
road, trail, or other portion of land withdrawn and reserved by
this title, the Secretary may take such action as the Secretary
determines to be necessary to implement and maintain the
closure.
(b) Limitation.--Any closure under subsection (a) shall be
limited to the minimum area and duration that the Secretary
concerned determines are required for the purposes of the
closure.
(c) Consultation Required.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (3), before a
closure is implemented under this section, the
Secretary concerned shall consult with the Secretary of
the Interior.
(2) Indian tribe.--Subject to paragraph (3), if a
closure proposed under this section may affect access
to or use of sacred sites or resources considered to be
important by an Indian tribe, the Secretary concerned
shall consult, at the earliest practicable date, with
the affected Indian tribe.
(3) Limitation.--No consultation shall be required
under paragraph (1) or (2)--
(A) if the closure is provided for in an
integrated natural resources management plan,
an installation cultural resources management
plan, or a land use management plan; or
(B) in the case of an emergency, as
determined by the Secretary concerned.
(d) Notice.--Immediately preceding and during any closure
implemented under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall
post appropriate warning notices and take other appropriate
actions to notify the public of the closure.
SEC. 2914. CHANGES IN USE.
(a) Other Uses Authorized.--In addition to the purposes
described in a subtitle of this title applicable to the land
withdrawal and reservation made by that subtitle, the Secretary
concerned may authorize the use of land withdrawn and reserved
by this title for defense-related purposes.
(b) Notice to Secretary of the Interior.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary concerned shall
promptly notify the Secretary of the Interior if the
land withdrawn and reserved by this title is used for
additional defense-related purposes.
(2) Requirements.--A notification under paragraph (1)
shall specify--
(A) each additional use;
(B) the planned duration of each additional
use; and
(C) the extent to which each additional use
would require that additional or more stringent
conditions or restrictions be imposed on
otherwise-permitted nondefense-related uses of
the withdrawn and reserved land or portions of
withdrawn and reserved land.
SEC. 2915. BRUSH AND RANGE FIRE PREVENTION AND SUPPRESSION.
(a) Required Activities.--Consistent with any applicable land
management plan, the Secretary concerned shall take necessary
precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and
range fires occurring as a result of military activities on the
land withdrawn and reserved by this title, including fires that
occur on other land that spread from the withdrawn and reserved
land.
(b) Cooperation of Secretary of the Interior.--
(1) In general.--At the request of the Secretary
concerned, the Secretary of the Interior shall provide
assistance in the suppression of fires under subsection
(a). The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the
Secretary of the Interior for the costs incurred by the
Secretary of the Interior in providing such assistance.
(2) Transfer of funds.--Notwithstanding section 2215
of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary
concerned may transfer to the Secretary of the
Interior, in advance, funds to be used to reimburse the
costs of the Department of the Interior in providing
assistance under this subsection.
SEC. 2916. ONGOING DECONTAMINATION.
(a) Program of Decontamination Required.--During the period
of a withdrawal and reservation of land under this title, the
Secretary concerned shall maintain, to the extent funds are
available to carry out this subsection, a program of
decontamination of contamination caused by defense-related uses
on the withdrawn land. The decontamination program shall be
carried out consistent with applicable Federal and State law.
(b) Annual Report.--The Secretary of Defense shall include in
the annual report required by section 2711 of title 10, United
States Code, a description of decontamination activities
conducted under subsection (a).
SEC. 2917. WATER RIGHTS.
(a) No Reservation of Water Rights.--Nothing in this title--
(1) establishes a reservation in favor of the United
States with respect to any water or water right on the
land withdrawn and reserved by this title; or
(2) authorizes the appropriation of water on the land
withdrawn and reserved by this title, except in
accordance with applicable State law.
(b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water Rights.--
(1) In general.--Nothing in this section affects any
water rights acquired or reserved by the United States
before the date of enactment of this Act on the land
withdrawn and reserved by this title.
(2) Authority of secretary concerned.--The Secretary
concerned may exercise any water rights described in
paragraph (1).
SEC. 2918. HUNTING, FISHING, AND TRAPPING.
Section 2671 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply to
all hunting, fishing, and trapping on the land--
(1) that is withdrawn and reserved by this title; and
(2) for which management of the land has been
assigned to the Secretary concerned.
SEC. 2919. LIMITATION ON EXTENSIONS AND RENEWALS.
The withdrawals and reservations established under this title
may not be extended or renewed except by a law enacted after
the date of enactment of this Act.
SEC. 2920. APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF A WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION.
To the extent practicable, not later than five years before
the date of termination of a withdrawal and reservation made by
a subtitle of this title, the Secretary concerned shall--
(1) notify the Secretary of the Interior as to
whether the Secretary concerned will have a continuing
defense-related need for any of the land withdrawn and
reserved by that subtitle after the termination date of
the withdrawal and reservation; and
(2) transmit a copy of the notice submitted under
paragraph (1) to--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of
the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Natural Resources of the House of
Representatives.
SEC. 2921. LIMITATION ON SUBSEQUENT AVAILABILITY OF LAND FOR
APPROPRIATION.
On the termination of a withdrawal and reservation made by
this title, the previously withdrawn land shall not be open to
any form of appropriation under the public land laws, including
the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal
leasing laws, unless the Secretary of the Interior publishes in
the Federal Register an appropriate order specifying the date
on which the land shall be--
(1) restored to the public domain; and
(2) opened for appropriation under the public land
laws.
SEC. 2922. RELINQUISHMENT.
(a) Notice of Intention To Relinquish.--If, during the period
of withdrawal and reservation made by a subtitle of this title,
the Secretary concerned decides to relinquish any or all of the
land withdrawn and reserved by that subtitle, the Secretary
concerned shall submit to the Secretary of the Interior notice
of the intention to relinquish the land.
(b) Determination of Contamination.--The Secretary concerned
shall include in the notice submitted under subsection (a) a
written determination concerning whether and to what extent the
land that is to be relinquished is contaminated with explosive
materials or toxic or hazardous substances.
(c) Public Notice.--The Secretary of the Interior shall
publish in the Federal Register the notice of intention to
relinquish the land under this section, including the
determination concerning the contaminated state of the land.
(d) Decontamination of Land To Be Relinquished.--
(1) Decontamination required.--The Secretary
concerned shall decontaminate land subject to a notice
of intention under subsection (a) to the extent that
funds are appropriated for that purpose, if--
(A) the land subject to the notice of
intention is contaminated, as determined by the
Secretary concerned; and
(B) the Secretary of the Interior, in
consultation with the Secretary concerned,
determines that--
(i) decontamination is practicable
and economically feasible, after taking
into consideration the potential future
use and value of the contaminated land;
and
(ii) on decontamination of the land,
the land could be opened to operation
of some or all of the public land laws,
including the mining laws, the mineral
leasing laws, and the geothermal
leasing laws.
(2) Alternatives to relinquishment.--The Secretary of
the Interior shall not be required to accept the land
proposed for relinquishment under subsection (a), if--
(A) the Secretary of the Interior, after
consultation with the Secretary concerned,
determines that--
(i) decontamination of the land is
not practicable or economically
feasible; or
(ii) the land cannot be
decontaminated sufficiently to be
opened to operation of some or all of
the public land laws; or
(B) sufficient funds are not appropriated for
the decontamination of the land.
(3) Status of contaminated land on termination.--If,
because of the contaminated state of the land, the
Secretary of the Interior declines to accept land
withdrawn and reserved by this title that has been
proposed for relinquishment, or if at the expiration of
the withdrawal and reservation, the Secretary of the
Interior determines that a portion of the land
withdrawn and reserved is contaminated to an extent
that prevents opening the contaminated land to
operation of the public land laws--
(A) the Secretary concerned shall take
appropriate steps to warn the public of--
(i) the contaminated state of the
land; and
(ii) any risks associated with entry
onto the land;
(B) after the expiration of the withdrawal
and reservation, the Secretary concerned shall
undertake no activities on the contaminated
land, except for activities relating to the
decontamination of the land; and
(C) the Secretary concerned shall submit to
the Secretary of the Interior and Congress a
report describing--
(i) the status of the land; and
(ii) any actions taken under this
paragraph.
(e) Revocation Authority.--
(1) In general.--If the Secretary of the Interior
determines that it is in the public interest to accept
the land proposed for relinquishment under subsection
(a), the Secretary of the Interior may order the
revocation of a withdrawal and reservation made by this
title.
(2) Revocation order.--To carry out a revocation
under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Interior
shall publish in the Federal Register a revocation
order that--
(A) terminates the withdrawal and
reservation;
(B) constitutes official acceptance of the
land by the Secretary of the Interior; and
(C) specifies the date on which the land will
be opened to the operation of some or all of
the public land laws, including the mining
laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the
geothermal leasing laws.
(f) Acceptance by Secretary of the Interior.--
(1) In general.--Nothing in this section requires the
Secretary of the Interior to accept the land proposed
for relinquishment if the Secretary determines that the
land is not suitable for return to the public domain.
(2) Notice.--If the Secretary makes a determination
that the land is not suitable for return to the public
domain, the Secretary shall provide notice of the
determination to Congress.
SEC. 2923. IMMUNITY OF THE UNITED STATES.
The United States and officers and employees of the United
States shall be held harmless and shall not be liable for any
injuries or damages to persons or property incurred as a result
of any mining or mineral or geothermal leasing activity or
other authorized nondefense-related activity conducted on land
withdrawn and reserved by this title.
Subtitle B--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana
SEC. 2931. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND.
(a) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights and except
as otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land
(including interests in land) described in subsection (b), and
all other areas within the boundaries of the land as depicted
on the map referred to in such subsection that may become
subject to the operation of the public land laws, is withdrawn
from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws,
including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the
geothermal leasing laws.
(b) Description of Land.--The public land (including
interests in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal
land comprising approximately 18,644 acres in Broadwater
County, Montana, generally depicted as ``Proposed Land
Withdrawal'' on the map entitled ``Limestone Hills Training
Area Land Withdrawal'', dated April 10, 2013, and filed in
accordance with section 2912.
(c) Reservation; Purpose.--Subject to the limitations and
restrictions contained in section 2933, the public land
withdrawn by subsection (a) is reserved for use by the
Secretary of the Army for the following purposes:
(1) The conduct of training for active and reserve
components of the Armed Forces.
(2) The construction, operation, and maintenance of
organizational support and maintenance facilities for
component units conducting training.
(3) The conduct of training by the Montana Department
of Military Affairs, provided that the training does
not interfere with the purposes specified in paragraphs
(1) and (2).
(4) The conduct of training by State and local law
enforcement agencies, civil defense organizations, and
public education institutions, provided that the
training does not interfere with the purposes specified
in paragraphs (1) and (2).
(5) Other defense-related purposes consistent with
the preceding purposes.
(d) Indian Tribes.--
(1) In general.--Nothing in this subtitle alters any
rights reserved for an Indian tribe for tribal use of
the public land withdrawn by subsection (a) by treaty
or Federal law.
(2) Consultation required.--The Secretary of the Army
shall consult with any Indian tribes in the vicinity of
the public land withdrawn by subsection (a) before
taking any action within the public land affecting
tribal rights or cultural resources protected by treaty
or Federal law.
SEC. 2932. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND.
During the period of the withdrawal and reservation of land
made by section 2931, the Secretary of the Army shall manage
the land withdrawn and reserved by such section for the
purposes described in subsection (c) of such section--
(1) subject to the limitations and restrictions
contained in section 2933; and
(2) in accordance with--
(A) an integrated natural resources
management plan prepared and implemented under
title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et
seq.);
(B) subtitle A and this subtitle; and
(C) other applicable law.
SEC. 2933. SPECIAL RULES GOVERNING MINERALS MANAGEMENT.
(a) Indian Creek Mine.--
(1) In general.--Of the land withdrawn by section
2931, locatable mineral activities in the approved
Indian Creek Mine plan of operations, MTM-78300, shall
be regulated in accordance with subparts 3715 and 3809
of title 43, Code of Federal Regulations.
(2) Restrictions on secretary of the army.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Army
shall make no determination that the
disposition of, or exploration for, minerals as
provided for in the approved plan of operations
described in paragraph (1) is inconsistent with
the defense-related uses of the land withdrawn
under section 2931.
(B) Coordination.--The coordination of the
disposition of and exploration for minerals
with defense-related uses of the land shall be
determined in accordance with procedures in an
agreement provided for under subsection (c).
(b) Removal of Unexploded Ordnance on Land to Be Mined.--
(1) Removal activities.--
(A) In general.--Subject to the availability
of funds appropriated for such purpose, the
Secretary of the Army shall remove unexploded
ordnance on land withdrawn by section 2931 that
is subject to mining under subsection (a),
consistent with applicable Federal and State
law.
(B) Phases.--The Secretary of the Army may
provide for the removal of unexploded ordnance
in phases to accommodate the development of the
Indian Creek Mine under subsection (a).
(2) Report on removal activities.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Army
shall annually submit to the Secretary of the
Interior a report regarding any unexploded
ordnance removal activities conducted during
the previous fiscal year in accordance with
this subsection.
(B) Inclusions.--The report under this
paragraph shall include--
(i) a description of the amounts
expended for unexploded ordnance
removal on the withdrawn land during
the period covered by the report; and
(ii) the identification of the land
cleared of unexploded ordnance and
approved for mining activities by the
Secretary of the Interior.
(c) Implementation Agreement for Mining Activities.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of the Army shall enter into an agreement
to implement this section with respect to the
coordination of defense-related uses and mining and the
ongoing removal of unexploded ordnance.
(2) Duration.--The duration of the agreement shall be
equal to the period of the withdrawal under section
2936, but may be amended from time to time.
(3) Requirements.--The agreement shall provide the
following:
(A) That Graymont Western US, Inc., or any
successor or assign of the approved Indian
Creek Mine mining plan of operations, MTM-
78300, shall be invited to be a party to the
agreement.
(B) Provisions regarding the day-to-day
joint-use of the Limestone Hills Training Area.
(C) Provisions addressing periods during
which military and other authorized uses of the
withdrawn land will occur.
(D) Provisions regarding when and where
military use or training with explosive
material will occur.
(E) Provisions regarding the scheduling of
training activities conducted within the
withdrawn land that restrict mining activities.
(F) Procedures for deconfliction with mining
operations, including parameters for
notification and resolution of anticipated
changes to the schedule.
(G) Procedures for access through mining
operations covered by this section to training
areas within the boundaries of the Limestone
Hills Training Area.
(H) Procedures for scheduling of the removal
of unexploded ordnance.
(d) Existing Memorandum of Agreement.--Until the date on
which the agreement under subsection (c) becomes effective, the
compatible joint use of the land withdrawn and reserved by
section 2931 shall be governed, to the extent compatible, by
the terms of the 2005 Memorandum of Agreement among the Montana
Army National Guard, Graymont Western US, Inc., and the Bureau
of Land Management.
SEC. 2934. GRAZING.
(a) Issuance and Administration of Permits and Leases.--The
Secretary of the Interior shall manage the issuance and
administration of grazing permits and leases, including the
renewal of permits and leases, on the public land withdrawn by
section 2931, consistent with all applicable laws (including
regulations) and policies of the Secretary of the Interior
relating to the permits and leases.
(b) Safety Requirements.--With respect to any grazing permit
or lease issued after the date of enactment of this Act for
land withdrawn by section 2931, the Secretary of the Interior
and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly establish
procedures that--
(1) are consistent with Department of the Army
explosive and range safety standards; and
(2) provide for the safe use of the withdrawn land.
(c) Assignment.--With the agreement of the Secretary of the
Army, the Secretary of the Interior may assign the authority to
issue and to administer grazing permits and leases to the
Secretary of the Army, except that the assignment may not
include the authority to discontinue grazing on the land
withdrawn by section 2931.
SEC. 2935. PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES.
The land withdrawn by section 2931 is deemed to be
entitlement land for purposes of chapter 69 of title 31, United
States Code.
SEC. 2936. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION.
The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section
2931 shall terminate on March 31, 2039.
Subtitle C--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms,
California
SEC. 2941. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND.
(a) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights and except
as otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land
(including interests in land) described in subsection (b), and
all other areas within the boundary of the land depicted on the
map described in such subsection that may become subject to the
operation of the public land laws, is withdrawn from all forms
of appropriation under the public land laws, including the
mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal
leasing laws.
(b) Description of Land.--The public land (including
interests in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal
land comprising approximately 150,928 acres in San Bernardino
County, California, generally depicted on the map titled
``MCAGCC 29 Palms Expansion Map-Johnson Valley Off Highway
Vehicle Recreation Area'', dated December 5, 2013, and filed in
accordance with section 2912, which is divided into the
following two areas:
(1) The Exclusive Military Use Area (in this subtitle
referred to as the ``Exclusive Military Use Area''),
consisting of the following two areas:
(A) One area to the west of the Marine Corps
Air Ground Combat Center, consisting of
approximately 78,993 acres.
(B) One area south of the Marine Corps Air
Ground Combat Center, consisting of
approximately 18,704 acres.
(2) The Shared Use Area (in this subtitle referred to
as the ``Shared Use Area''), consisting of
approximately 53,231 acres.
(c) Reservation for Secretary of the Navy; Purposes.--The
Exclusive Military Use Area is reserved for use by the
Secretary of the Navy for the following purposes:
(1) Sustained, combined arms, live-fire, and maneuver
field training for large-scale Marine air ground task
forces.
(2) Individual and unit live-fire training ranges.
(3) Equipment and tactics development.
(4) Other defense-related purposes that are--
(A) consistent with the purposes described in
the preceding paragraphs; and
(B) authorized under section 2914.
(d) Reservation for Secretary of the Interior; Purposes.--The
Shared Use Area is reserved--
(1) for use by the Secretary of the Navy for the
purposes described in subsection (c); and
(2) for use by the Secretary of the Interior for the
following purposes:
(A) Public recreation--
(i) during any period in which the
land is not being used for military
training; and
(ii) as determined to be suitable for
public use.
(B) Natural resources conservation.
(e) Adjustment.--The boundary of the Exclusive Military Use
Area at Emerson Ridge provided in subsection (b)(1) shall be
located in such as manner so as to ensure access to the pass
northwest of the ridge for purposes described in subsection
(d).
SEC. 2942. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND.
(a) Management by the Secretary of the Navy; Condition.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in subsection
(b), during the period of withdrawal and reservation of
land made by section 2941, the Secretary of the Navy
shall manage the land withdrawn and reserved by such
section for the purposes described in subsection (c) of
such section in accordance with--
(A) an integrated natural resources
management plan prepared and implemented under
title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et
seq.);
(B) subtitle A and this subtitle;
(C) a programmatic agreement between the
Marine Corps and the California State Historic
Preservation Officer regarding operation,
maintenance, training, and construction at the
United States Marine Air Ground Task Force
Training Command, Marine Corps Air Ground
Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California;
and
(D) any other applicable law.
(2) Live-fire training.--The boundary of the
Exclusive Military Use Area described in section 2941
shall be clearly identified before the Exclusive
Military Use Area is used for any live-fire military
training. The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure the
military boundary is maintained.
(b) Management by the Secretary of the Interior; Exception.--
(1) Secretary of the interior management.--
(A) In general.--Except as provided in
paragraph (2), during the period of withdrawal
and reservation of land made by section 2941,
the Secretary of the Interior shall manage the
Shared Use Area.
(B) Applicable law.--During the period of the
management by the Secretary of the Interior
under this paragraph, the Secretary of the
Interior shall manage the Shared Use Area for
the purposes described in subsection (d) of
section 2941 in accordance with--
(i) the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701
et seq.); and
(ii) any other applicable law.
(2) Secretary of the navy management.--
(A) Exception.--Twice a year during the
period of withdrawal and reservation of land by
this section, there shall be a 30-day period
during which the Secretary of the Navy shall--
(i) manage the Shared Use Area; and
(ii) exclusively use the Shared Use
Area for military training purposes.
(B) Applicable law.--During the period of the
management by the Secretary of the Navy under
this paragraph, the Secretary of the Navy shall
manage the Shared Use Area for the purposes
described in subsection (c) of section 2941 in
accordance with--
(i) an integrated natural resources
management plan prepared and
implemented in accordance with title I
of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et
seq.);
(ii) subtitle A and this subtitle;
(iii) the programmatic agreement
described in subsection (a)(3); and
(iv) any other applicable law.
(C) Limitation.--The Secretary of the Navy
shall prohibit the firing of dud-producing
ordnance into the Shared Use Area.
(c) Implementation Agreement.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of the Navy shall enter into a written
agreement to implement the management responsibilities
of the respective Secretaries with respect to the
Shared Use Area.
(2) Components.--The agreement entered into under
paragraph (1)--
(A) shall be of a duration that is equal to
the period of the withdrawal and reservation of
land under section 2941;
(B) may be amended from time to time;
(C) may provide for the integration of the
management plans required of the Secretary of
the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy;
(D) may provide for delegation, to civilian
law enforcement personnel of the Department of
the Navy, of the authority of the Secretary of
the Interior to enforce laws relating to
protection of natural and cultural resources
and fish and wildlife; and
(E) may provide for the Secretary of the
Interior and the Secretary of the Navy to share
resources so as to most efficiently and
effectively manage the Shared Use Area.
(3) Linkage.--The Secretary of the Interior shall
ensure access is provided between the two non-
contiguous Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle
Recreation Area parcels described in section 2945.
(d) Military Training.--
(1) Not conditional.--Military training within the
Shared Use Area shall not be conditioned on--
(A) the existence of, or precluded by the
lack of, a recreation management plan or land
use management plan for the area developed and
implemented by the Secretary of the Interior;
or
(B) the existence of any legal or
administrative challenge to such a recreation
management plan or land use plan.
(2) Management.--
(A) Use agreement.--The Secretary of the
Interior shall enter into an agreement with the
Secretary of the Navy within one year of the
date of the enactment of this Act for the
exclusive use by the Marine Corps of two
company objective areas, each measuring
approximately 300 meters square (approximately
22 acres), located inside the boundaries of the
Shared Use Area and totaling approximately 44
acres. These areas will be closed to all public
access for the period of the withdrawal
specified in section 2946. The purpose of this
agreement will be to accommodate the
construction, maintenance, modification, and
use of these areas for the purposes identified
in section 2941(c).
(B) Range management.--Small, static, short-
range explosives may be used in the two company
objective areas described in subparagraph (A).
Explosives that fail to function in the company
objective areas will be immediately identified
and located, training will temporarily halt,
and on-scene explosive ordnance disposal
personnel will render the munition safe before
training resumes. Existing Marine Corps range
safety policies and procedures as identified in
Marine Corps Order 3570.1X will be followed to
ensure all munitions are rendered safe and the
area will again be swept after the training
exercise by qualified personnel to further
ensure no hazards remain.
(C) Access.--The Shared Use Area shall be
managed in a manner that does not compromise
the ability of the Navy to conduct military
training in such area.
SEC. 2943. PUBLIC ACCESS.
(a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2913, the Exclusive
Military Use Area shall be closed to all public access unless
otherwise authorized by the Secretary of the Navy.
(b) Public Recreational Use.--
(1) In general.--The Shared Use Area shall be open to
public recreational use during the period in which the
area is under the management of the Secretary of the
Interior, if there is a determination by the Secretary
of the Navy that the area is suitable for public use.
(2) Determination.--A determination of suitability
under paragraph (1) shall not be withheld without a
specified reason.
(c) Utilities.--Nothing in this subtitle prohibits the
construction, operation, maintenance, inspection, and access to
existing or future utility facilities located within a utility
right of way in existence on the date of the enactment of this
Act.
SEC. 2944. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP.
(a) Establishment.--The Secretary of the Navy and the
Secretary of the Interior, by agreement, shall establish a
Resource Management Group for the land withdrawn and reserved
by section 2941 to be comprised of representatives of the
Department of the Interior and the Department of the Navy.
(b) Duties.--
(1) In general.--The Resource Management Group
shall--
(A) develop and implement a public outreach
plan to inform the public of the land uses
changes and safety restrictions affecting the
land withdrawn and reserved by section 2941;
and
(B) advise the Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of the Navy with respect to the
issues associated with the multiple uses of the
Shared Use Area.
(2) Siting process.--The Resource Management Group
shall determine the location of the company objective
areas. In siting the two areas, the Resource Management
Group will seek information from representatives of
relevant State agencies, Off Highway Vehicle and other
recreation interest groups, and environmental advocacy
groups. The Resource Management Group shall consider
potential recreational and conservation uses of the
area when making their location determination.
(c) Meetings.--The Resource Management Group shall--
(1) meet at least once a year; and
(2) solicit input from relevant State agencies,
private off-highway vehicle interest groups, event
managers, environmental advocacy groups, and others
relating to the management and facilitation of
recreational use within the Shared Use Area.
SEC. 2945. JOHNSON VALLEY OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE RECREATION AREA.
(a) Designation.--There is hereby designated the ``Johnson
Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area'', consisting of--
(1) 43,431 acres (as depicted on the map referred to
in subsection (b) of section 2941) of the existing
Bureau of Land Management-designated Johnson Valley
Off-Highway Vehicle Area that is not withdrawn and
reserved for defense-related uses by such section; and
(2) The Shared Use Area.
(b) Authorized Activities.--To the extent consistent with
applicable Federal law (including regulations) and this
subtitle, any authorized recreation activities and use
designation in effect on the date of enactment of this Act and
applicable to the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation
Area may continue, including casual off-highway vehicular use
and recreation.
(c) Administration.--The Secretary of the Interior shall
administer the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation
Area (other than the Shared Use Area, which is being managed in
accordance with the other provisions of this subtitle) in
accordance with--
(1) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and
(2) any other applicable law.
(d) Transit.--In coordination with the Secretary of the
Interior, the Secretary of the Navy may authorize transit
through the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area
for defense-related purposes supporting military training
(including military range management and management of exercise
activities) conducted on the land withdrawn and reserved by
section 2941.
SEC. 2946. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION.
The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section
2941 shall terminate on March 31, 2039.
Subtitle D--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss,
Texas
SEC. 2951. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND.
(a) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights, the
Federal land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn from--
(1) entry, appropriation, and disposal under the
public land laws;
(2) location, entry, and patent under the mining
laws; and
(3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral
materials, and geothermal leasing laws.
(b) Description of Federal Land.--The Federal land referred
to in subsection (a) consists of approximately 5,100 acres of
land depicted as ``Parcel 1'' on the map entitled ``White Sands
Missile Range/Fort Bliss/BLM Land Transfer and Withdrawal'',
dated April 3, 2012, and filed in accordance with section 2912.
(c) Reservation.--The Federal land described in subsection
(b) is reserved for use by the Secretary of the Army for
military purposes in accordance with Public Land Order 833,
dated May 27, 1952 (17 Fed. Reg. 4822).
SEC. 2952. GRAZING.
(a) Issuance and Administration of Permits and Leases.--The
Secretary of the Interior shall manage the issuance and
administration of grazing permits and leases, including the
renewal of permits and leases, on the public land withdrawn by
section 2951, consistent with all applicable laws (including
regulations) and policies of the Secretary of the Interior
relating to the permits and leases.
(b) Safety Requirements.--With respect to any grazing permit
or lease issued after the date of enactment of this Act for
land withdrawn by section 2951, the Secretary of the Interior
and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly establish
procedures that--
(1) are consistent with Department of the Army
explosive and range safety standards; and
(2) provide for the safe use of the withdrawn land.
(c) Assignment.--With the agreement of the Secretary of the
Army, the Secretary of the Interior may assign the authority to
issue and to administer grazing permits and leases to the
Secretary of the Army, except that the assignment may not
include the authority to discontinue grazing on the land
withdrawn by section 2951.
Subtitle E--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California
SEC. 2961. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION OF PUBLIC LAND.
(a) Transfer Required.--The Secretary of the Interior shall
transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of
the Navy certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land
Management in Imperial and Riverside Counties, California,
consisting of approximately 228,324 acres, as generally
depicted on the map titled ``Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery
Range-Administration's Land Withdrawal Legislation Proposal
Map'', dated October 30, 2013, and filed in accordance with
subsection (d).
(b) Valid Existing Rights.--The transfer of administrative
jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall be subject to any valid
existing rights, including any property, easements, or
improvements held by the Bureau of Reclamation and appurtenant
to the Coachella Canal. The Secretary of the Navy shall provide
for reasonable access by the Bureau of Reclamation for
inspection and maintenance purposes not inconsistent with
military training.
(c) Time for Conveyance.--The transfer of administrative
jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall occur pursuant to a
schedule agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of the Navy.
(d) Map and Legal Description.--
(1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of
the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a
legal description of the public land to be transferred
under subsection (a).
(2) Submission to congress.--The Secretary of the
Interior shall file with the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on
Natural Resources of the House of Representatives--
(A) a copy of the legal description prepared
under paragraph (1); and
(B) the map referred to in subsection (a).
(3) Availability for public inspection.--Copies of
the legal description and map filed under paragraph (2)
shall be available for public inspection in the
appropriate offices of--
(A) the Bureau of Land Management;
(B) the Office of the Commanding Officer,
Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona;
(C) the Office of the Commander, Navy Region
Southwest; and
(D) the Office of the Secretary of the Navy.
(4) Force of law.--The legal description and map
filed under paragraph (2) shall have the same force and
effect as if included in this Act, except that the
Secretary of the Interior may correct clerical and
typographical errors in the legal description or map.
(5) Reimbursement of costs.--The transfer required by
subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement,
except that the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse
the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by
the Secretary of the Interior to prepare the legal
description and map under this subsection.
SEC. 2962. MANAGEMENT AND USE OF TRANSFERRED LAND.
(a) Treatment and Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt
of the land under section 2961--
(1) the land shall be treated as property (as defined
in section 102(9) of title 40, United States Code)
under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary
of the Navy; and
(2) the Secretary of the Navy shall administer the
land as the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range,
California, and continue to authorize use of the land
for military purposes.
(b) Protection of Desert Tortoise.--Nothing in the transfer
required by section 2961 shall affect the prior designation of
certain lands within the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery
Range as critical habitat for the desert tortoise (Gopherus
Agassizii).
(c) Withdrawal of Mineral Estate.--Subject to valid existing
rights, the mineral estate of the land to be transferred under
section 2961 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under
the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral
leasing laws, and geothermal leasing laws, for as long as the
land is under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary
of the Navy.
(d) Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan.--Not later
than one year after the transfer of the land under section
2961, the Secretary of the Navy, in cooperation with the
Secretary of the Interior, shall prepare an integrated natural
resources management plan pursuant to the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C.
670a et seq.) for the transferred land and for land that, as of
the date of the enactment of this Act, is under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy underlying the
Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range.
(e) Relation to General Provisions.--Subtitle A does not
apply to the land transferred under section 2961 or to the
management of such land as provided for in this subtitle.
SEC. 2963. EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF MILITARY USE.
(a) Notice and Effect.--Upon a determination by the Secretary
of the Navy that there is no longer a military need for all or
portions of the land transferred under section 2961, the
Secretary of the Navy shall notify the Secretary of the
Interior of such determination. Subject to subsections (b),
(c), and (d), the Secretary of the Navy shall transfer the land
subject to such a notice back to the administrative
jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior.
(b) Contamination.--Before transmitting a notice under
subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall prepare a
written determination concerning whether and to what extent the
land to be transferred is contaminated with explosive materials
or toxic or hazardous substances. A copy of the determination
shall be transmitted with the notice. Copies of the notice and
the determination shall be published in the Federal Register.
(c) Decontamination.--The Secretary of the Navy shall
decontaminate any contaminated land that is the subject of a
notice under subsection (a) if--
(1) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation
with the Secretary of the Navy, determines that--
(A) decontamination is practicable and
economically feasible (taking into
consideration the potential future use and
value of the land); and
(B) upon decontamination, the land could be
opened to operation of some or all of the
public land laws, including the mining laws;
and
(2) funds are appropriated for such decontamination.
(d) Alternative.--The Secretary of the Interior is not
required to accept land proposed for transfer under subsection
(a) if the Secretary of the Interior is unable to make the
determinations under subsection (c)(1) or if Congress does not
appropriate a sufficient amount of funds for the
decontamination of the land.
SEC. 2964. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF EXISTING WITHDRAWAL PERIOD.
Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the
California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of
1994 (title VIII of Public Law 103-433; 108 Stat. 4505), the
withdrawal and reservation of the land transferred under
section 2961 shall not terminate until the date on which the
land transfer required by section 2961 is executed.
SEC. 2965. WATER RIGHTS.
(a) No Reservation of Water Rights.--Nothing in this
subtitle--
(1) establishes a reservation in favor of the United
States with respect to any water or water right on the
land transferred by this subtitle; or
(2) to authorize the appropriation of water on the
land transferred by this subtitle except in accordance
with applicable State law.
(b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water Rights.--
(1) In general.--Nothing in this subtitle affects any
water rights acquired or reserved by the United States
before the date of enactment of this Act on the land
transferred by this subtitle.
(2) Authority of secretary.--The Secretary of the
Navy may exercise any water rights described in
paragraph (1).
SEC. 2966. REALIGNMENT OF RANGE BOUNDARY AND RELATED TRANSFER OF TITLE.
(a) Realignment; Purpose.--The Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of the Navy shall realign the boundary of the
Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, as in effect on the
date of the enactment of this Act, to improve public safety and
management of the Range, consistent with the following:
(1) The northwestern boundary of the Chocolate
Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range shall be realigned to the
edge of the Bradshaw Trail so that the Trail is
entirely on public land under the jurisdiction of the
Department of the Interior.
(2) The centerline of the Bradshaw Trail shall be
delineated by the Secretary of the Interior in
consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, beginning
at its western terminus at Township 8 South, Range 12
East, Section 6 eastward to Township 8 South, Range 17
East, Section 32 where it leaves the Chocolate Mountain
Aerial Gunnery Range.
(3) The Secretary of the Navy shall relinquish to the
Secretary of the Interior the approximately 2,000 acres
of public land withdrawn for military use that is
located immediately north of the Bradshaw Trail, and
the Secretary of the Interior shall manage the land in
accordance with the applicable land use plan developed
under section of section 202 of the Federal Land Policy
and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712).
(b) Transfers Related to Realignment.--
(1) Transfers to reflect boundary realignment.--The
Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy
shall make such transfers of administrative
jurisdiction as may be necessary to reflect the results
of the boundary realignment carried out pursuant to
subsection (a).
(2) Bradshaw trail management.--The approximately 600
acres of land north of the Bradshaw Trail identified as
fee-owned lands available for disposal may be used to
establish a maximum number of acres of land that the
Secretary of the Navy may transfer to the
administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the
Interior in order to improve management of the Bradshaw
Trail.
(c) Applicability of National Environmental Policy Act of
1969.--The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) shall not apply to any transfer of land made
under subsection (b) or any decontamination actions undertaken
in connection with such a transfer.
(d) Decontamination.--The Secretary of the Navy shall
maintain, to the extent funds are available for such purpose
and consistent with applicable Federal and State law, a program
of decontamination of any contamination caused by defense-
related uses on land transferred under subsection (b). The
Secretary of Defense shall include a description of such
decontamination activities in the annual report required by
section 2711 of title 10, United States Code.
(e) Timeline.--The delineation of the Bradshaw Trail under
subsection (a) and any transfer of land under subsection (b)
shall occur pursuant to a schedule agreed to by the Secretary
of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy, but in no case
later than two years after the date of the enactment of this
Act.
Subtitle F--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California
SEC. 2971. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND.
(a) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights and except
as otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land
(including interests in land) described in subsection (b), and
all other areas within the boundary of the land depicted on the
map described in that subsection that may become subject to the
operation of the public land laws, is withdrawn from all forms
of appropriation under the public land laws, including the
mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal
leasing laws.
(b) Description of Land.--The public land (including
interests in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal
land located within the boundaries of the Naval Air Weapons
Station China Lake, California, comprising approximately
1,045,000 acres in Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties,
California, as generally depicted on the maps entitled ``Naval
Air Weapons Station China Lake Withdrawal--Renewal'', ``North
Range'', and ``South Range'', dated March 18, 2013, and filed
in accordance with section 2912.
(c) Reservation.--The land withdrawn by subsection (a) is
reserved for use by the Secretary of the Navy for the following
purposes:
(1) Use as a research, development, test, and
evaluation laboratory.
(2) Use as a range for air warfare weapons and weapon
systems.
(3) Use as a high-hazard testing and training area
for aerial gunnery, rocketry, electronic warfare and
countermeasures, tactical maneuvering and air support,
and directed energy and unmanned aerial systems.
(4) Geothermal leasing, development, and related
power production activities.
(5) Other defense-related purposes that are--
(A) consistent with the purposes described in
the preceding paragraphs; and
(B) authorized under section 2914.
SEC. 2972. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND.
(a) Applicable Laws.--Except as provided in section 2973,
during the period of the withdrawal and reservation of land by
section 2971, the Secretary of the Interior shall manage the
land withdrawn and reserved by that section in accordance
with--
(1) subtitle A and this subtitle;
(2) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and
(3) any other applicable law.
(b) Authorized Activities.--To the extent consistent with
applicable law and Executive orders, the land withdrawn by
section 2971 may be managed in a manner that permits the
following activities:
(1) Grazing.
(2) Protection of wildlife and wildlife habitat.
(3) Preservation of cultural properties.
(4) Control of predatory and other animals.
(5) Recreation and education.
(6) Prevention and appropriate suppression of brush
and range fires resulting from non-military activities.
(7) Geothermal leasing and development and related
power production activities.
(c) Nondefense Uses.--All nondefense-related uses of the land
withdrawn by this section (including the uses described in
subsection (b)), shall be subject to any conditions and
restrictions that the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of the Navy jointly determine to be necessary to
permit the defense-related use of the land for the purposes
described in this section.
(d) Issuance of Leases and Other Instruments.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior shall
be responsible for the issuance of any lease, easement,
right-of-way, permit, license, or other instrument
authorized by law with respect to any activity that
involves both--
(A) the land withdrawn and reserved by
section 2971; and
(B) any other public land in the vicinity of
the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971
that is not under the administrative
jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy.
(2) Consent required.--Subject to section 2974, any
lease, easement, right-of-way, permit, license, or
other instrument issued under paragraph (1) shall--
(A) only be issued with the consent of the
Secretary of the Navy; and
(B) be subject to such conditions as the
Secretary of the Navy may require with respect
to the land withdrawn and reserved by section
2971.
SEC. 2973. ASSIGNMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY TO SECRETARY OF THE
NAVY.
(a) Authority to Assign Management Responsibility.--The
Secretary of the Interior may assign the management
responsibility, in whole or in part, for the land withdrawn and
reserved by section 2971 to the Secretary of the Navy.
(b) Applicable Law.--On assignment of the management
responsibility under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy
shall manage the land in accordance with--
(1) subtitle A and this subtitle;
(2) title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et
seq.);
(3) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.);
(4) cooperative management arrangements entered into
by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of
the Navy; and
(5) any other applicable law.
SEC. 2974. GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES.
(a) Treatment of Existing Leases.--Nothing in this subtitle
affects--
(1) geothermal leases issued by the Secretary of the
Interior before the date of enactment of this Act; or
(2) the responsibility of the Secretary of the
Interior to administer and manage the leases described
in paragraph (1) consistent with the provisions of this
subtitle.
(b) Authority of the Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing in
this subtitle or any other provision of law prohibits the
Secretary of the Interior from issuing, subject to the
concurrence of the Secretary of the Navy, and administering any
lease under the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1001 et
seq.) and any other applicable law for the development and use
of geothermal steam and associated geothermal resources on the
land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971.
(c) Applicable Law.--Nothing in this subtitle affects the
geothermal exploration and development authority of the
Secretary of the Navy under section 2917 of title 10, United
States Code, with respect to the land withdrawn and reserved by
section 2971, except that the Secretary of the Navy shall
obtain the concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior before
taking action under section 2917 of title 10, United States
Code.
(d) Navy Contracts.--On the expiration of the withdrawal and
reservation of land under section 2971 or the relinquishment of
the land, any Navy contract for the development of geothermal
resources at Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake that is in
effect on the date of the expiration or relinquishment shall
remain in effect, except that the Secretary of the Interior,
with the consent of the Secretary of the Navy, may offer to
substitute a standard geothermal lease for the contract.
SEC. 2975. WILD HORSES AND BURROS.
(a) Management.--The Secretary of the Navy--
(1) shall be responsible for the management of wild
horses and burros located on the land withdrawn and
reserved by section 2971; and
(2) may use helicopters and motorized vehicles for
the management of wild horses and burros on such land.
(b) Requirements.--The activities authorized under subsection
(a) shall be conducted in accordance with laws applicable to
the management of wild horses and burros on public land.
(c) Agreement.--The Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of the Navy shall enter into an agreement for the
implementation of the management of wild horses and burros
under this section.
SEC. 2976. CONTINUATION OF EXISTING AGREEMENT.
The agreement between the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of the Navy entered into before the date of enactment
of this Act under section 805 of the California Military Lands
Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-433; 108
Stat. 4503) shall continue in effect until the earlier of--
(1) the date on which the Secretary of the Interior
and the Secretary of the Navy enter into a new
agreement to replace such section 805 agreement; or
(2) the date that is one year after the date of
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 2977. MANAGEMENT PLANS.
(a) Cooperation in Development of Management Plan.--The
Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall
update and maintain cooperative arrangements concerning land
resources and land uses on the land withdrawn and reserved by
section 2971.
(b) Purpose.--A cooperative arrangement entered into under
subsection (a) shall focus on and apply to sustainable
management and protection of the natural and cultural resources
and environmental values found on the land withdrawn and
reserved by section 2971, consistent with the defense-related
purposes for which the land is withdrawn and reserved.
(c) Comprehensive Land Use Management Plan.--A cooperative
arrangement entered into under subsection (a) shall include a
comprehensive land use management plan that integrates and is
consistent with any applicable law, including--
(1) subtitle A and this subtitle;
(2) title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et
seq.); and
(3) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and
(d) Annual Review.--The Secretary of the Navy and the
Secretary of the Interior shall--
(1) annually review the comprehensive land use
management plan developed under subsection (c); and
(2) update the comprehensive land use management plan
as the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the
Interior determine to be necessary--
(A) to respond to evolving management
requirements; and
(B) to complement the updates of other
applicable land use and resource management and
planning.
(e) Implementing Agreement.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a written
agreement to implement the comprehensive land use
management plan developed under subsection (c).
(2) Components.--Such an implementation agreement--
(A) shall be for a duration that is equal to
the period of the withdrawal and reservation of
land under section 2971; and
(B) may be amended from time to time.
SEC. 2978. TERMINATION OF PRIOR WITHDRAWALS.
(a) Termination.--Subject to subsection (b), the withdrawal
and reservation under section 803(a) of the California Military
Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-
433; 108 Stat. 4502) is terminated.
(b) Limitation.--Notwithstanding the termination under
subsection (a), all rules, regulations, orders, permits, and
other privileges issued or granted by the Secretary of the
Interior or the Secretary of the Navy with respect to the land
withdrawn and reserved under section 803(a) of the California
Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public
Law 103-433; 108 Stat. 4502), unless inconsistent with the
provisions of this subtitle, shall remain in force until
modified, suspended, overruled, or otherwise changed by--
(1) the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of
the Navy (as applicable);
(2) a court of competent jurisdiction; or
(3) operation of law.
SEC. 2979. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION.
The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section
2971 shall terminate on March 31, 2039.
DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security
Administration.
Sec. 3112. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear
Security Administration.
Sec. 3113. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk.
Sec. 3114. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear
Security Administration.
Sec. 3115. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the
Administrator for Nuclear Security.
Sec. 3116. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis,
Response, and Testing.
Sec. 3117. Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative
to the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy
Research Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico.
Sec. 3118. Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options.
Sec. 3119. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into
transactions to carry out certain research projects.
Sec. 3120. Increase in construction design threshold.
Subtitle C--Plans and Reports
Sec. 3121. Annual report and certification on status of security of
atomic energy defense facilities.
Sec. 3122. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of
the nuclear weapons stockpile.
Sec. 3123. Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons
stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan.
Sec. 3124. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of
management and operating contracts.
Sec. 3125. Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to
program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation.
Sec. 3126. Modification of certain reports on cost containment for
uranium capabilities replacement project.
Sec. 3127. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
Sec. 3128. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management
of nuclear security enterprise.
Sec. 3129. Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such
computing into the stockpile stewardship program.
Sec. 3130. Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program
principles.
Sec. 3131. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries.
Sec. 3132. Repeal of certain reporting requirements.
Subtitle D--Other Matters
Sec. 3141. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy.
Sec. 3142. Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on
the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise.
Sec. 3143. Department of Energy land conveyance.
Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
Sec. 3145. Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act.
Sec. 3146. Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act.
Sec. 3147. Sense of Congress on B61-12 life extension program.
Sec. 3148. Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on
toxic substances and worker health.
Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations
SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.
(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for
fiscal year 2014 for the activities of the National Nuclear
Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified
in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of New Plant Projects.--From funds referred
to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant
projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant
projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as
follows:
Project 14-D-710, Device Assembly Facility
Argus Installation Project, Nevada National
Security Site, Las Vegas, Nevada, $14,000,000.
Project 14-D-901, Spent Fueling Handling
Recapitalization Project, Naval Reactors
Facility, Idaho, $45,400,000.
Project 14-D-902, KL Materials
Characterization Laboratory, Knolls Atomic
Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York,
$1,000,000.
SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for defense
environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as
specified in the funding table in section 4701.
SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for other defense
activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding
table in section 4701.
Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
SEC. 3111. CLARIFICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION.
Subsection (c) of section 3211 of the National Nuclear
Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) is amended to read
as follows:
``(c) Operations and Activities To Be Carried Out
Consistently With Certain Principles.--In carrying out the
mission of the Administration, the Administrator shall ensure
that all operations and activities of the Administration are
consistent with the principles of--
``(1) protecting the environment;
``(2) safeguarding the safety and health of the
public and of the workforce of the Administration; and
``(3) ensuring the security of the nuclear weapons,
nuclear material, and classified information in the
custody of the Administration.''.
SEC. 3112. COST ESTIMATION AND PROGRAM EVALUATION BY NATIONAL NUCLEAR
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.
(a) Establishment of Director for Cost Estimating and Program
Evaluation.--
(1) In general.--Subtitle A of the National Nuclear
Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.) is
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``SEC. 3221. DIRECTOR FOR COST ESTIMATING AND PROGRAM EVALUATION.
``(a) Establishment.--(1) There is in the Administration a
Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation (in this
section referred to as the `Director').
``(2) The position of the Director shall be a Senior
Executive Service position (as defined in section 3132(a) of
title 5, United States Code).
``(b) Duties.--(1) The Director shall be the principal
advisor to the Administrator, the Deputy Secretary of Energy,
and the Secretary of Energy with respect to cost estimation and
program evaluation for the Administration.
``(2) The Administrator may not delegate responsibility for
receiving or acting on communications from the Director with
respect to cost estimation and program evaluation for the
Administration.
``(c) Activities for Cost Estimation.--(1) The Director shall
be the responsible for the following activities relating to
cost estimation:
``(A) Advising the Administrator on policies and
procedures for cost analysis and estimation by the
Administration, including the determination of
confidence levels with respect to cost estimates.
``(B) Reviewing cost estimates and evaluating the
performance baseline for each major atomic energy
defense acquisition program.
``(C) Advising the Administrator on policies and
procedures for developing technology readiness
assessments for major atomic energy defense acquisition
programs that are consistent with the guidelines of the
Department of Energy for technology readiness
assessments.
``(D) Reviewing technology readiness assessments for
such programs to ensure that such programs are meeting
levels of confidence associated with appropriate
overall system performance.
``(E) As directed by the Administrator, conducting
independent cost estimates for such programs.
``(2) A review, evaluation, or cost estimate conducted under
subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) shall be
considered an inherently governmental function, but the
Director may use data collected by a national security
laboratory or a management and operating contractor of the
Administration in conducting such a review, evaluation, or cost
estimate.
``(3) The Director shall submit in writing to the
Administrator the following:
``(A) The certification of the Director with respect
to each review, evaluation, and cost estimate conducted
under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1).
``(B) A statement of the confidence level of the
Director with respect to each such review, evaluation,
and cost estimate, including an identification of areas
of uncertainty, risk, and opportunity discovered in
conducting each such review, evaluation, and cost
estimate.
``(d) Activities for Program Evaluation.--(1) The Director
shall be responsible for the following activities relating to
program evaluation:
``(A) Reviewing and commenting on policies and
procedures for setting requirements for the future-
years nuclear security program under section 3253 and
for prioritizing and estimating the funding required by
the Administration for that program.
``(B) Reviewing the future-years nuclear security
program on an annual basis to ensure that the program
is accurate and thorough.
``(C) Advising the Administrator on policies and
procedures for analyses of alternatives for major
atomic energy defense acquisition programs.
``(D) As part of the planning, programming, and
budgeting process of the Administration under sections
3251 and 3252, analyzing the planning phase of that
process, advising on programmatic and fiscal year
guidance, and managing the program review phase of that
process.
``(E) Developing and managing the submittal of the
Selected Acquisition Reports and independent cost
estimates on nuclear weapons systems undergoing major
life extension under section 4217 of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537).
``(F) Reviewing cost and schedule baselines for
projects under section 4713 of that Act (50 U.S.C.
2753) and managing notifications to the congressional
defense committees of cost overruns under that section.
``(2) A review conducted under paragraph (1)(B) shall be
considered an inherently governmental function, but the
Director may use data collected by a national security
laboratory or a management and operating contractor of the
Administration in conducting such a review.
``(3) The Director shall submit to Congress a report on any
major programmatic deviations from the future-years nuclear
security program discovered in conducting a review under
paragraph (1)(B) at or about the time the budget of the
President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of
title 31, United States Code, for the next fiscal year.
``(e) Data Collection and Accessibility.--The Administrator,
acting through the Director, shall, as appropriate, seek to use
procedures, processes, and policies for collecting cost data
and making that data accessible that are similar to the
procedures, processes, and policies used by the Defense Cost
Analysis Resource Center of the Office of Cost Assessment and
Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense for those
purposes.
``(f) Staff.--The Administrator shall ensure that the
Director has sufficient numbers of personnel who have
competence in technical matters, budgetary matters, cost
estimation, technology readiness analysis, and other
appropriate matters to carry out the functions required by this
section.
``(g) Reports by Director.--The Director shall submit to
Congress at or about the time that the budget of the President
is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title
31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2015 through
2018, a report that includes the following:
``(1) A description of activities conducted by the
Director during the calendar year preceding the
submission of the report that are related to the duties
and activities described in this section.
``(2) A list of all major atomic energy defense
acquisition programs and a concise description of the
status of each such program and project in meeting cost
and critical schedule milestones.
``(h) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Major atomic energy defense acquisition
program.--
``(A) In general.--Except as provided in
subparagraph (B), the term `major atomic energy
defense acquisition program' means an atomic
energy defense acquisition program of the
Administration--
``(i) the total project cost of which
is more than $500,000,000; or
``(ii) the total lifetime cost of
which is more than $1,000,000,000.
``(B) Exclusion of capital assets acquisition
projects.--The term `major atomic energy
defense acquisition program' does not include a
project covered by Department of Energy Order
413.3 (or a successor order) for the
acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy
defense activities.
``(2) Performance baseline.--The term `performance
baseline', with respect to a major atomic energy
defense acquisition program, means the key parameters
with respect to performance, scope, cost, and schedule
for the project budget of the program.''.
(2) Implementation plan.--Not later than 270 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Director of
the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of
the Department of Defense shall jointly submit to the
congressional defense committees a plan for the
implementation of section 3221 of the National Nuclear
Security Administration Act, as added by paragraph (1),
that includes the following:
(A) An identification of the number of
personnel required to support the Director for
Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation
established under such section 3221.
(B) A description of the functions of such
personnel.
(C) A plan for training such personnel in
coordination with the Office of Cost Analysis
and Program Evaluation of the Department of
Defense with respect to the activities
described in subsections (c)(1) and (d)(1) of
such section 3221.
(D) An estimate of the time required to hire
and train such personnel.
(E) A plan for developing cost estimation and
program evaluation activities jointly with the
Department of Defense on strategic system
programs to the extent practicable and
beneficial to both the National Nuclear
Security Administration and the Department of
Defense.
(3) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents for
the National Nuclear Security Administration Act is
amended by inserting after the item relating to section
3220 the following new item:
``Sec. 3221. Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation.''.
(b) Independent Cost Estimates on Life Extension Programs and
New Nuclear Facilities.--Section 4217(b) of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``for purposes of
this subsection'' and inserting ``submitted under this
subsection before October 1, 2015,''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) Each cost estimate submitted under this subsection
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex if necessary.''.
SEC. 3113. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SUPPLY CHAIN RISK.
(a) In General.--Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is amended by
adding at the end the following new section:
``SEC. 4806. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SUPPLY CHAIN
RISK.
``(a) Authority.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of
Energy may--
``(1) carry out a covered procurement action; and
``(2) notwithstanding any other provision of law,
limit, in whole or in part, the disclosure of
information relating to the basis for carrying out a
covered procurement action.
``(b) Requirements.--The Secretary may exercise the authority
under subsection (a) only after--
``(1) obtaining a risk assessment that demonstrates
that there is a significant supply chain risk to a
covered system;
``(2) making a determination in writing, in
unclassified or classified form, that--
``(A) the use of the authority under
subsection (a) is necessary to protect national
security by reducing supply chain risk;
``(B) less restrictive measures are not
reasonably available to reduce the supply chain
risk; and
``(C) in a case in which the Secretary plans
to limit disclosure of information under
subsection (a)(2), the risk to national
security of the disclosure of the information
outweighs the risk of not disclosing the
information; and
``(3) submitting to the appropriate congressional
committees, not later than seven days after the date on
which the Secretary makes the determination under
paragraph (2), a notice of such determination, in
classified or unclassified form, that includes--
``(A) the information required by section
3304(e)(2)(A) of title 41, United States Code;
``(B) a summary of the risk assessment
required under paragraph (1); and
``(C) a summary of the basis for the
determination, including a discussion of less
restrictive measures that were considered and
why such measures were not reasonably available
to reduce supply chain risk.
``(c) Notifications.--If the Secretary has exercised the
authority under subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
``(1) notify appropriate parties of the covered
procurement action and the basis for the action only to
the extent necessary to carry out the covered
procurement action;
``(2) notify other Federal agencies responsible for
procurement that may be subject to the same or similar
supply chain risk, in a manner and to the extent
consistent with the requirements of national security;
and
``(3) ensure the confidentiality of any notifications
under paragraph (1) or (2).
``(d) Limitation of Review.--No action taken by the Secretary
under the authority under subsection (a) shall be subject to
review in any Federal court.
``(e) Review by Comptroller General of the United States.--
Not later than one year after the effective date specified in
subsection (g)(1), and annually for four years thereafter, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall--
``(1) review the authority provided under subsection
(a), including--
``(A) the adequacy of resources, such as
trained personnel, to effectively exercise that
authority during the four-year period beginning
on that effective date; and
``(B) the sufficiency of determinations under
subsection (b)(2);
``(2) review the thoroughness of the process and
systems utilized by the Office of the Chief Information
Officer and the Office of Intelligence and
Counterintelligence of the Department of Energy to
reasonably detect supply chain threats to the national
security functions of the Department; and
``(3) submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a report that includes--
``(A) the results of the reviews conducted
under paragraphs (1) and (2);
``(B) any recommendations of the Comptroller
General for improving the process and systems
described in paragraph (2); and
``(C) a description of the status of the
implementation of recommendations, if any, with
respect to that process and such systems made
by the Comptroller General in previous years.
``(f) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term
`appropriate congressional committees' means--
``(A) the congressional defense committees;
and
``(B) the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources of the Senate and the Committee on
Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives.
``(2) Covered item of supply.--The term `covered item
of supply' means an item--
``(A) that is purchased for inclusion in a
covered system; and
``(B) the loss of integrity of which could
result in a supply chain risk for a covered
system.
``(3) Covered procurement.--The term `covered
procurement' means the following:
``(A) A source selection for a covered system
or a covered item of supply involving either a
performance specification, as described in
subsection (a)(3)(B) of section 3306 of title
41, United States Code, or an evaluation
factor, as described in subsection (b)(1) of
such section, relating to supply chain risk.
``(B) The consideration of proposals for and
issuance of a task or delivery order for a
covered system or a covered item of supply, as
provided in section 4106(d)(3) of title 41,
United States Code, where the task or delivery
order contract concerned includes a contract
clause establishing a requirement relating to
supply chain risk.
``(C) Any contract action involving a
contract for a covered system or a covered item
of supply if the contract includes a clause
establishing requirements relating to supply
chain risk.
``(4) Covered procurement action.--The term `covered
procurement action' means, with respect to an action
that occurs in the course of conducting a covered
procurement, any of the following:
``(A) The exclusion of a source that fails to
meet qualification requirements established
pursuant to section 3311 of title 41, United
States Code, for the purpose of reducing supply
chain risk in the acquisition of covered
systems.
``(B) The exclusion of a source that fails to
achieve an acceptable rating with regard to an
evaluation factor providing for the
consideration of supply chain risk in the
evaluation of proposals for the award of a
contract or the issuance of a task or delivery
order.
``(C) The withholding of consent for a
contractor to subcontract with a particular
source or the direction to a contractor for a
covered system to exclude a particular source
from consideration for a subcontract under the
contract.
``(5) Covered system.--The term `covered system'
means the following:
``(A) National security systems (as defined
in section 3542(b) of title 44, United States
Code) and components of such systems.
``(B) Nuclear weapons and components of
nuclear weapons.
``(C) Items associated with the design,
development, production, and maintenance of
nuclear weapons or components of nuclear
weapons.
``(D) Items associated with the surveillance
of the nuclear weapon stockpile.
``(E) Items associated with the design and
development of nonproliferation and
counterproliferation programs and systems.
``(6) Supply chain risk.--The term `supply chain
risk' means the risk that an adversary may sabotage,
maliciously introduce unwanted function, or otherwise
subvert the design, integrity, manufacturing,
production, distribution, installation, operation, or
maintenance of a covered system or covered item of
supply so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise
degrade the function, use, or operation of the system
or item of supply.
``(g) Effective Date.--
``(1) In general.--This section shall take effect on
the date that is 180 days after the date of the
enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2014.
``(2) Applicability.--The authority under subsection
(a) shall apply to--
``(A) contracts awarded on or after the
effective date specified in paragraph (1); and
``(B) task and delivery orders issued on or
after that effective date pursuant to contracts
awarded before, on, or after that effective
date.
``(3) Termination.--The authority under this section
shall terminate on the date that is four years after
the effective date specified in paragraph (1).''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for the Atomic
Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 4805 the following new item:
``Sec. 4806. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain
risk.''.
SEC. 3114. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR NATIONAL NUCLEAR
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.
(a) Limitation.--Except as provided in subsection (d), of the
funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise
made available for fiscal year 2014 for the National Nuclear
Security Administration, the amount specified in subsection (c)
may not be obligated or expended until the date on which the
Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional
defense committees--
(1) a detailed plan to realize the planned
efficiencies; and
(2) written certification that the planned
efficiencies will be achieved during fiscal year 2014.
(b) Unrealized Efficiencies.--If the Administrator does not
submit to the congressional defense committees the matters
described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) by the
date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on--
(1) the amount of planned efficiencies that will not
be realized during fiscal year 2014; and
(2) any effects caused by such unrealized planned
efficiencies to the programs funded under the directed
stockpile work and nuclear programs accounts.
(c) Amount Specified.--The amount specified in this
subsection is $139,500,000, reduced by the amount the
Administrator certifies to the congressional defense committees
that the Administrator has saved through the planned
efficiencies realized during fiscal year 2014.
(d) Exceptions.--The limitation under subsection (a) shall
not--
(1) apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for
directed stockpile work, nuclear programs, or Naval
Reactors; or
(2) affect the authority of the Secretary of Energy
under sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751).
(e) Effect of Planned Efficiencies on Laboratory-Directed
Research and Development.--The implementation of the planned
efficiencies may not result in reductions in amounts provided
for laboratory-directed research and development under section
4811(c) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2791(c)) in
fiscal year 2014.
(f) Rule of Construction.--The limitation under subsection
(a) shall not be considered a specific denial of funds for
purposes of the authority referred to in subsection (d)(2).
(g) Planned Efficiencies Defined.--In this section, the term
``planned efficiencies'' means the $106,800,000, with respect
to directed stockpile work, and $32,700,000, with respect to
nuclear programs, that the Administrator plans to save during
fiscal year 2014 through management efficiency and workforce
restructuring reductions, as described in the budget request
for fiscal year 2014 that the President submitted to Congress
under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code.
SEC. 3115. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR OFFICE OF THE
ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY.
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year
2014 by section 3101 and available for the Office of the
Administrator as specified in the funding table in section
4701, or otherwise made available for that Office for that
fiscal year, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or
expended until--
(1) the President transmits to Congress the matters
required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 under
section 4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50
U.S.C. 2525(f)(2));
(2) the President transmits to the congressional
defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations
of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of
the House of Representatives the matters--
(A) required to be transmitted during 2013
and 2014 under section 1043 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1576); and
(B) with respect to which the Secretary of
Energy is responsible;
(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional
defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations
of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of
the House of Representatives the reports required to be
submitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 3122(b) of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1710); and
(4) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to
the congressional defense committees--
(A) the detailed report on the stockpile
stewardship, management, and infrastructure
plan required to be submitted during 2013 under
paragraph (2) of section 4203(b) of the Atomic
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)); and
(B) the summary of the plan required to be
submitted during 2014 under paragraph (1) of
such section.
SEC. 3116. ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTER FOR SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, ANALYSIS,
RESPONSE, AND TESTING.
(a) Establishment.--The Administrator for Nuclear Security
shall establish within the nuclear security enterprise (as
defined in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50
U.S.C. 2501) a Center for Security Technology, Analysis,
Response, and Testing.
(b) Duties.--The center established under subsection (a)
shall carry out the following:
(1) Provide to the Administrator, the Chief of
Defense Nuclear Security, and the management and
operating contractors of the nuclear security
enterprise a wide range of objective expertise on
security technologies, systems, analysis, testing, and
response forces.
(2) Assist the Administrator in developing standards,
requirements, analysis methods, and testing criteria
with respect to security.
(3) Collect, analyze, and distribute lessons learned
with respect to security.
(4) Support inspections and oversight activities with
respect to security.
(5) Promote professional development and training for
security professionals.
(6) Provide for advance and bulk procurement for
security-related acquisitions that affect multiple
facilities of the nuclear security enterprise.
(7) Advocate for continual improvement and security
excellence throughout the nuclear security enterprise.
(8) Such other duties as the Administrator may
assign.
SEC. 3117. AUTHORIZATION OF MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY AS AN ALTERNATIVE
TO THE REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR THE CHEMISTRY AND
METALLURGY RESEARCH BUILDING, LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL
LABORATORY, NEW MEXICO.
Section 3114(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2171; 50 U.S.C.
2535 note) is amended--
(1) by striking ``No funds'' and inserting the
following:
``(1) Limitation on use of funds.--Except as provided
in paragraph (2), no funds''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new
paragraphs:
``(2) Use of funds for modular building strategy.--
The Administrator for Nuclear Security may obligate and
expend funds referred to in paragraph (1) for
activities relating to a modular building strategy on
and after the date that is 60 days after the date on
which the Nuclear Weapons Council established under
section 179 of title 10, United States Code, notifies
the congressional defense committees that--
``(A) the modular building strategy--
``(i) meets requirements for
maintaining the nuclear weapons
stockpile over a 30-year period;
``(ii) meets requirements for
implementation of a responsive
infrastructure, including meeting
plutonium pit production requirements;
and
``(iii) will achieve full operating
capability for not less than two
modular structures by not later than
2027;
``(B) in fiscal year 2015, the National
Nuclear Security Administration will begin the
process of designing and building modular
buildings in accordance with Department of
Energy Order 413.3 (relating to relating to
program management and project management for
the acquisition of capital assets); and
``(C) the Administrator will include the
costs of the modular building strategy in the
estimated expenditures and proposed
appropriations reflected in the future-years
nuclear security program submitted under
section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453).
``(3) Modular building strategy defined.--In this
subsection, the term `modular building strategy' means
an alternative strategy to the replacement project that
consists of repurposing existing facilities and
constructing a series of modular structures, each of
which is fully useable, to complement the function of
the plutonium facility (PF-4) at Los Alamos National
Laboratory, New Mexico, in accordance with all
applicable safety and security standards of the
Department of Energy.''.
SEC. 3118. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WARHEAD LIFE EXTENSION OPTIONS.
(a) In General.--In carrying out Phase 6.2 and Phase 6.2A of
the Joint W78/88-1 Warhead Life Extension Program, the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, acting
through the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179
of title 10, United States Code, shall conduct a comparative
analysis of the feasibility of, and preliminary design
definitions and cost estimates for, each of the following life
extension options:
(1) A separate life extension option to produce a
W78-1 warhead.
(2) A separate life extension option to produce a
W88-1 warhead.
(3) An interoperable W78/88-1 life extension option.
(4) Any other life extension option the Nuclear
Weapons Council considers appropriate.
(b) Limitation on Use of Funds.--None of the funds authorized
to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended for
Phase 6.3 (development engineering) activities for the Joint
W78/88-1 Warhead Life Extension Program until the date that is
90 days after the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council
submits to the congressional defense committees a report
containing the comparative analysis required by subsection (a).
SEC. 3119. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY TO ENTER INTO
TRANSACTIONS TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN RESEARCH
PROJECTS.
Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Organization
Act (42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking ``September
30, 2015'' and inserting ``September 30, 2020''.
SEC. 3120. INCREASE IN CONSTRUCTION DESIGN THRESHOLD.
Section 4706(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2746(b)) is amended by striking ``$600,000'' both places it
appears and inserting ``$1,000,000''.
Subtitle C--Plans and Reports
SEC. 3121. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF SECURITY OF
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE FACILITIES.
(a) In General.--Section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense
Act (50 U.S.C. 2657) is amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 4506. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF SECURITY OF
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE FACILITIES.
``(a) Report and Certification on Nuclear Security
Enterprise.--(1) Not later than September 30 of each year, the
Administrator shall submit to the Secretary of Energy--
``(A) a report detailing the status of security at
facilities holding Category I and II quantities of
special nuclear material that are administered by the
Administration; and
``(B) written certification that such facilities are
secure and that the security measures at such
facilities meet the security standards and requirements
of the Administration and the Department of Energy.
``(2) If the Administrator is unable to make the
certification described in paragraph (1)(B) with respect to a
facility, the Administrator shall submit to the Secretary with
the matters required by paragraph (1) a corrective action plan
for the facility describing--
``(A) the deficiency that resulted in the
Administrator being unable to make the certification;
``(B) the actions to be taken to correct the
deficiency; and
``(C) timelines for taking such actions.
``(3) Not later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary
shall submit to the congressional defense committees the
unaltered report, certification, and any corrective action
plans submitted by the Administrator under paragraphs (1) and
(2) together with any comments of the Secretary.
``(b) Report and Certification on Atomic Energy Defense
Facilities Not Administered by the Administration.--(1) Not
later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary shall submit
to the congressional defense committees--
``(A) a report detailing the status of the security
of atomic energy defense facilities holding Category I
and II quantities of special nuclear material that are
not administered by the Administration; and
``(B) written certification that such facilities meet
the security standards and requirements of the
Department of Energy.
``(2) If the Secretary is unable to make the certification
described in paragraph (1)(B) with respect to a facility, the
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees,
together with the matters required by paragraph (1), a
corrective action plan describing--
``(A) the deficiency that resulted in the Secretary
being unable to make the certification;
``(B) the actions to be taken to correct the
deficiency; and
``(C) timelines for taking such actions.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for the Atomic
Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item relating to
section 4506 and inserting the following new item:
``Sec. 4506. Annual report and certification on status of security of
atomic energy defense facilities.''.
SEC. 3122. MODIFICATIONS TO ANNUAL REPORTS REGARDING THE CONDITION OF
THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.
(a) Report on Assessments.--Subsection (e) of section 4205 of
the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (3)--
(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``;
and'' and inserting a semicolon;
(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the
period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
``(E) a concise summary of any significant
finding investigations initiated or active
during the previous year for which the head of
the national security laboratory has full or
partial responsibility.''; and
(2) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows:
``(4) In the case of a report submitted by the
Commander of the United States Strategic Command--
``(A) a discussion of the relative merits of
other nuclear weapon types (if any), or
compensatory measures (if any) that could be
taken, that could enable accomplishment of the
missions of the nuclear weapon types to which
the assessments relate, should such assessments
identify any deficiency with respect to such
nuclear weapon types; and
``(B) a summary of all major assembly
releases in place as of the date of the report
for the active and inactive nuclear weapon
stockpiles.''.
(b) Reports Submitted to the President and Congress.--
Subsection (f) of such section is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``March 1'' and
inserting ``February 1''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) If the President does not forward to Congress the
matters required under paragraph (2) by the date required by
such paragraph, the officials specified in subsection (b) shall
provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees not
later than March 30 on the report such officials submitted to
the Secretary concerned under subsection (e).''.
SEC. 3123. INCLUSION OF INTEGRATED PLUTONIUM STRATEGY IN NUCLEAR
WEAPONS STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND
INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN.
Section 4203(d) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2523(d)) is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7);
and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following
new paragraph (6):
``(6) A strategy for the integrated management of
plutonium for stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs
over a 20-year period that includes the following:
``(A) An assessment of the baseline science
issues necessary to understand plutonium aging
under static and dynamic conditions under
manufactured and nonmanufactured plutonium
geometries.
``(B) An assessment of scientific and testing
instrumentation for plutonium at elemental and
bulk conditions.
``(C) An assessment of manufacturing and
handling technology for plutonium and plutonium
components.
``(D) An assessment of computational models
of plutonium performance under static and
dynamic loading, including manufactured and
nonmanufactured conditions.
``(E) An identification of any capability
gaps with respect to the assessments described
in subparagraphs (A) through (D).
``(F) An estimate of costs relating to the
issues, instrumentation, technology, and models
described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) over
the period covered by the future-years nuclear
security program under section 3253 of the
National Nuclear Security Administration Act
(50 U.S.C. 2453).
``(G) An estimate of the cost of eliminating
the capability gaps identified under
subparagraph (E) over the period covered by the
future-years nuclear security program.
``(H) Such other items as the Administrator
considers important for the integrated
management of plutonium for stockpile and
stockpile stewardship needs.''.
SEC. 3124. MODIFICATIONS TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS.
(a) Analyses of Bid Protests.--Subsection (a) of section 3121
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2175) is amended to read as
follows:
``(a) Reports Required.--The Administrator for Nuclear
Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report described in subsection (b) by not later than 30 days
after the later of--
``(1) the date on which the Administrator awards a
contract to manage and operate a facility of the
National Nuclear Security Administration; or
``(2) the date on which a protest concerning an
alleged violation of a procurement statute or
regulation brought under subchapter V of chapter 35 of
title 31, United States Code, with respect to such a
contract is resolved.''.
(b) Reporting on Expected Cost Savings.--Subsection (b)(1) of
such section is amended by inserting ``, including a
description of the assumptions used and analysis conducted to
determine such expected cost savings'' before the semicolon.
(c) Review by Comptroller General of the United States.--
Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:
``(c) Review by Comptroller General of the United States.--
``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph
(2), the Comptroller General of the United States shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a review
of each report required by subsection (a) or (d)(2) not
later than 180 days after the report is submitted to
such committees.
``(2) Exception.--The Comptroller General may not
conduct a review under paragraph (1) of a report
relating to a contract to manage and operate a facility
of the National Nuclear Security Administration while a
protest described in subsection (a)(2) is pending with
respect to that contract.''.
(d) Exception for Naval Reactors.--Subsection (d) of such
section is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
``(3) Naval reactors.--The requirement for reports
under subsections (a) and (d)(2) shall not apply with
respect to a management and operations contract for a
Naval Reactor facility.''.
SEC. 3125. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES FOR CERTAIN REPORTS RELATING TO
PROGRAM ON SCIENTIFIC ENGAGEMENT FOR
NONPROLIFERATION.
Section 3122 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2176; 50 U.S.C.
2562 note) is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ``, and to the
Comptroller General of the United States,'' after ``the
appropriate congressional committees'';
(2) in subsection (c)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``15'' and
inserting ``30'';
(B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as
paragraph (4);
(C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the
following new paragraph (3):
``(3) Waiver.--The Administrator may waive the
requirement under paragraph (1) to submit a report on a
modification in the program under subsection (a) not
later than 30 days before making the modification if
the Administrator--
``(A) determines that the modification is
urgent and necessary to the national security
interests of the United States; and
``(B) not later than 30 days after making the
modification, submits to the appropriate
congressional committees--
``(i) the report on the modification
required by paragraph (1); and
``(ii) a justification for exercising
the waiver authority under this
paragraph.''; and
(D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated by
subparagraph (B), by striking ``The report
under paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``Each
report submitted under paragraph (1) or
(3)(B)''; and
(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``two years
after the date of the enactment of this Act'' and
inserting ``18 months after the date of the submittal
of the report described in subsection (b)(1)''.
SEC. 3126. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN REPORTS ON COST CONTAINMENT FOR
URANIUM CAPABILITIES REPLACEMENT PROJECT.
Section 3123(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2178) is
amended--
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking
``Quarterly'';
(2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the
following new paragraph (1):
``(1) In general.--The Comptroller General of the
United States shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the project referred to in
subsection (a)--
``(A) not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act and every 90 days
thereafter through the date that is one year
after such date of enactment; and
``(B) after the date that is one year after
such date of enactment, at such times as the
Comptroller General, in consultation with the
congressional defense committees, determines
appropriate, taking into consideration the
critical decision points of the project (as
defined in orders of the Department of
Energy).''; and
(3) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and
the progress on meeting the requirements of
section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act
(50 U.S.C. 2753)''; and
(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking
``programmatic''.
SEC. 3127. PLAN FOR TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION.
(a) In General.--Subtitle D of title XLIV of the Atomic
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2621 et seq.) is amended by
adding at the end the following new section:
``SEC. 4445. PLAN FOR TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION.
``(a) Plan.--Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of
Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
plan for the initial activities (as defined in subsection (d))
for the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant and any
related, required infrastructure facilities.
``(b) Matters Included.--The plan under subsection (a) shall
include the following:
``(1) A list of significant requirements needed for
the initial activities.
``(2) A schedule of significant activities needed to
carry out the initial activities.
``(3) Actions required to accelerate, to the extent
possible, the treatment of lower risk, low-activity
waste while continuing efforts to resolve the technical
challenges associated with higher risk, high-activity
waste.
``(4) A description of how the Secretary will--
``(A) provide adequate protection to workers
and the public under the plan; and
``(B) incorporate into the plan any
significant new science and technical
information that was not available before the
development of the plan.
``(c) Determinations.--(1) For each significant requirement
identified by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1), the
Secretary shall include in the plan submitted under subsection
(a) a determination regarding whether such requirement is
finalized and will be used to inform the initial activities.
``(2) For each significant requirement that the Secretary
cannot make a finalized determination for under paragraph (1)
by the date on which the plan under subsection (a) is submitted
to the congressional defense committees, the Secretary shall--
``(A) include in the plan--
``(i) a description of the requirement;
``(ii) a list of significant activities
required to finalize the requirement; and
``(iii) the date on which the Secretary
anticipates making such determination; and
``(B) once the Secretary makes a determination that
such a significant requirement is finalized, submit to
such committees notification that the requirement is
finalized and will be used to inform the initial
activities.
``(3)(A) Notwithstanding any determination made under
paragraph (1) with respect to a significant requirement
identified by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1)--
``(i) the Secretary shall change a requirement if
necessary to provide adequate protection to workers and
the public; and
``(ii) the Secretary may change a requirement if the
Secretary determines such change is necessary.
``(B) If the Secretary authorizes a change to a requirement
under subparagraph (A) that will have a significant material
effect on the schedule or cost of the initial activities, the
Secretary shall promptly notify the congressional defense
committees of such change.
``(C) The authority of the Secretary under this paragraph may
be delegated only to the Deputy Secretary of Energy.
``(d) Initial Activities Defined.--In this section, the term
`initial activities' means activities necessary to start the
operations of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at
the Hanford Tank Farms of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation,
Richland, Washington, with respect to the design, construction,
and operating of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant
and any related, required infrastructure facilities.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for the Atomic
Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 4444 the following new item:
``Sec. 4445. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.''.
SEC. 3128. PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENT AND INTEGRATION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
OF NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.
(a) In General.--The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall
develop a plan for improving and integrating the financial
management of the nuclear security enterprise.
(b) Matters To Be Included.--The plan required by subsection
(a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the expected results of the
plan.
(2) An assessment of the feasibility of the plan.
(3) The estimated costs of carrying out the plan.
(4) A timeline for implementation of the plan.
(c) Considerations in Development of Plan.--In developing the
plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall
consider the following:
(1) Efforts to improve the structure for the
allocation of work to be used by the entities within
the nuclear security enterprise for the activities
carried out by those entities.
(2) Efforts to develop a clear and consistent cost
structure for each program and entity within the
nuclear security enterprise.
(3) Methodologies for identifying costs for programs
of record and base capabilities required for programs
carried out by the nuclear security enterprise.
(4) Mechanisms for monitoring those programs during
the execution of those programs and to provide data to
inform oversight of those programs.
(5) Reporting frameworks to be used by the entities
within the nuclear security enterprise to facilitate
analyses, projections, and comparisons of similar
activities carried out by different programs across the
nuclear security enterprise.
(6) Effects of the plan on the facilities and
management and operating contractors of the nuclear
security enterprise.
(d) Submission to Congress.--The Administrator shall submit
the plan required by subsection (a) to the congressional
defense committees not later than one year after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
(e) Nuclear Security Enterprise Defined.--In this section,
the term ``nuclear security enterprise'' has the meaning given
that term in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50
U.S.C. 2501).
SEC. 3129. PLAN FOR DEVELOPING EXASCALE COMPUTING AND INCORPORATING
SUCH COMPUTING INTO THE STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP
PROGRAM.
(a) Plan Required.--The Administrator for Nuclear Security
shall develop and carry out a plan to develop exascale
computing and incorporate such computing into the stockpile
stewardship program under section 4201 of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521) during the 10-year period
beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Milestones.--The plan required by subsection (a) shall
include major programmatic milestones in--
(1) the development of a prototype exascale computer
for the stockpile stewardship program; and
(2) mitigating disruptions resulting from the
transition to exascale computing.
(c) Coordination With Other Agencies.--In developing the plan
required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall coordinate,
as appropriate, with the Under Secretary of Energy for Science,
the Secretary of Defense, and elements of the intelligence
community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))).
(d) Inclusion of Costs in Future-Years Nuclear Security
Program.--The Administrator shall--
(1) address, in the estimated expenditures and
proposed appropriations reflected in each future-years
nuclear security program submitted under section 3253
of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50
U.S.C. 2453) during the 10-year period beginning on the
date of the enactment of this Act, the costs of--
(A) developing exascale computing and
incorporating such computing into the stockpile
stewardship program; and
(B) mitigating potential disruptions
resulting from the transition to exascale
computing; and
(2) include in each such future-years nuclear
security program a description of the costs of efforts
to develop exascale computing borne by the National
Nuclear Security Administration, the Office of Science
of the Department of Energy, other Federal agencies,
and private industry.
(e) Submission to Congress.--The Administrator shall submit
the plan required by subsection (a) to the congressional
defense committees with each summary of the plan required by
subsection (a) of section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act
(50 U.S.C. 2523) submitted under subsection (b)(1) of that
section during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the
enactment of this Act.
(f) Exascale Computing Defined.--In this section, the term
``exascale computing'' means computing through the use of a
computing machine that performs near or above 10 to the 18th
power floating point operations per second.
SEC. 3130. STUDY AND PLAN FOR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PILOT PROGRAM
PRINCIPLES.
(a) In General.--The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall
conduct a study of the feasibility of, and develop a plan for,
extending the principles of the pilot program to improve and
streamline oversight of the Kansas City Plant, Kansas City,
Missouri, initiated on or about April 2006, to additional
facilities of the nuclear security enterprise.
(b) Elements.--The study and plan required by subsection (a)
shall address the following:
(1) The applicability of all or some of the
principles of the pilot program to additional
facilities of the nuclear security enterprise.
(2) The costs, benefits, risks, opportunities, and
cost avoidances that may result from the extension of
the principles of the pilot program to additional
facilities.
(3) The cost avoidances that have been realized from
the pilot program described in subsection (a) since the
pilot program was initiated.
(4) The actions and timelines that would be required
to extend the principles of the pilot program to
additional facilities if the Administrator determines
that extending such principles is feasible.
(c) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to
the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes
the following:
(1) The results of the study and the plan required by
subsection (a).
(2) The determination of the Administrator regarding
whether the principles of the pilot program will be
extended to additional facilities of the nuclear
security enterprise.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means the following:
(A) The congressional defense committees.
(B) The Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources of the Senate and the Committee on
Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives.
(2) The term ``nuclear security enterprise'' has the
meaning given that term in section 4002 of the Atomic
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501).
(3) The term ``principles of the pilot program''
means the principles regarding the use of third-party
certification, industrial standards, best business
practices, and verification of internal procedures and
performance to improve and streamline oversight, as
demonstrated in the pilot program at the Kansas City
Plant described in subsection (a).
SEC. 3131. STUDY OF POTENTIAL REUSE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON SECONDARIES.
(a) Study.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security
shall conduct a study of the potential reuse of nuclear weapon
secondaries that includes an assessment of the potential for
reusing secondaries in future life extension programs,
including--
(1) a description of which secondaries could be
reused;
(2) the number of such secondaries available in the
stockpile as of the date of the study; and
(3) the number of such secondaries that are planned
to be available after such date as a result of the
dismantlement of nuclear weapons.
(b) Matters Included.--The study under subsection (a) shall
include the following:
(1) The feasibility and practicability of potential
full or partial reuse options with respect to nuclear
weapon secondaries.
(2) The benefits and risks of reusing such
secondaries.
(3) A list of technical challenges that must be
resolved to certify aged materials under dynamic
loading conditions and the full stockpile-to-target
sequence of weapons, including a program plan and
timeline for resolving such technical challenges and an
assessment of the importance of resolving outstanding
materials issues on certifying aged secondaries.
(4) The potential costs and cost savings of such
reuse.
(5) The effects of such reuse on the requirements for
secondaries manufacturing.
(6) An assessment of how such reuse affects plans to
build a responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure.
(c) Submission.--Not later than March 1, 2014, the
Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense
committees the study under subsection (a).
SEC. 3132. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Report on Counterintelligence and Security Practices at
National Security Laboratories.--
(1) In general.--Section 4507 of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2658) is repealed.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents for
the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking
the item relating to section 4507.
(b) Reports on Advanced Supercomputer Sales to Certain
Foreign Nations.--Section 3157 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85; 50
U.S.C. App. 2404 note) is repealed.
Subtitle D--Other Matters
SEC. 3141. CLARIFICATION OF ROLE OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY.
The amendment made by section 3113 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 2169) to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act
(50 U.S.C. 2512) may not be construed as affecting the
authority of the Secretary of Energy, in carrying out national
security programs, with respect to the management, planning,
and oversight of the National Nuclear Security Administration
or as affecting the delegation by the Secretary of authority to
carry out such activities, as set forth under subsection (a) of
such section 4102 as it existed before the amendment made by
such section 3113.
SEC. 3142. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES FOR CONGRESSIONAL ADVISORY PANEL
ON THE GOVERNANCE OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY
ENTERPRISE.
Section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2208) is
amended--
(1) in subsection (d)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act''
and inserting ``March 1, 2014''; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``February
1, 2014'' and inserting ``July 1, 2014''; and
(2) in subsection (f), by striking ``June 1, 2014''
and inserting ``September 30, 2014''.
SEC. 3143. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LAND CONVEYANCE.
(a) Consolidation of Title to Bannister Federal Complex.--
Notwithstanding sections 521 and 522 of title 40, United States
Code, the Administrator of General Services may transfer
custody of and accountability for the portion of the real
property described in subsection (b) in the custody of the
General Services Administration on the date of the enactment of
this Act to the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(b) Real Property Described.--
(1) In general.--The real property described in this
subsection is the real property, including any
improvements thereon, consisting of the Bannister
Federal Complex in Kansas City, Missouri.
(2) Further description of property.--The exact
acreage and legal description of the real property
described in this subsection shall be determined by a
survey satisfactory to the Administrator for Nuclear
Security and the Administrator of General Services.
(c) Authorities Relating to Conveyance of Bannister Federal
Complex.--After the consolidation of custody of and
accountability for the real property described in subsection
(b) in the National Nuclear Security Administration under
subsection (a), the Administrator for Nuclear Security may--
(1) negotiate an agreement to convey to an eligible
entity all right, title, and interest of the United
States in and to the real property described in
subsection (b); and
(2) enter into an agreement, on a reimbursable basis
or otherwise, with the eligible entity to provide
funding for the costs of--
(A) the negotiation of the agreement
described in paragraph (1);
(B) planning for the disposition of the
property; and
(C) carrying out the responsibilities of the
Administrator under section 120(h) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42
U.S.C. 9620(h)) with respect to the property,
including--
(i) identification, investigation,
and clean up of, and research and
development with respect to,
contamination from a hazardous
substance or pollutant or contaminant;
(ii) correction of other
environmental damage that creates an
imminent and substantial endangerment
to the public health or welfare or to
the environment; and
(iii) demolition and removal of
buildings and structures as required to
clean up contamination or as required
for completion of the responsibilities
of the Administrator under that
section.
(d) Limitations.--
(1) Price.--The Administrator for Nuclear Security
shall select, through a public process provided for
under the regulations of the Department of Energy, the
eligible entity to which the real property described in
subsection (b) is to be conveyed under subsection (c).
The Administrator shall use good faith efforts to
ensure the greatest possible return on such conveyance
considering the conditions described in paragraphs (2)
and (3).
(2) Condition on conveyance.--The conveyance under
subsection (c) shall be subject to the requirements
relating to transfer of property by the Federal
Government under section 120(h) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)).
(3) Occupancy by national oceanic and atmospheric
administration.--The conveyance under subsection (c)
shall be subject to the condition that the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may continue to
occupy until December 31, 2015, the space in the real
property described in subsection (b) that the
Administration occupies as of the date of the enactment
of this Act.
(e) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Reimbursement of costs of conveyance.--The
Administrator for Nuclear Security shall use any funds
received from the conveyance under subsection (c) to
reimburse the Administrator for costs (other than costs
referred to in paragraph (2) of that subsection)
incurred by the Administrator to carry out the
conveyance, including survey costs, costs for
environmental documentation, and any other
administrative costs related to the conveyance.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received
as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited
to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs
referred to in that paragraph. Amounts so credited
shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account
and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as
amounts in such fund or account.
(f) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Administrator for
Nuclear Security may require such additional terms and
conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection
(c) as the Administrator considers appropriate to protect the
interests of the United States.
(g) Eligible Entity Defined.--In this section, the term
``eligible entity'' means a nongovernmental entity that has
demonstrated to the Administrator for Nuclear Security, in the
Administrator's sole discretion, that the entity has the
capability to operate and maintain the real property described
in subsection (b).
SEC. 3144. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954.
Chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131
et seq.), as amended by section 3176 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 2215), is amended in the matter following section 111 by
inserting before ``a. The Commission'' the following: ``Sec.
112. Domestic Medical Isotope Production.--''.
SEC. 3145. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION ACT.
(a) Administrator for Nuclear Security.--Section 3212(c) of
the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C.
2402(c)) is amended by striking ``section 16(3) of the Office
of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))'' and
inserting ``section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code''.
(b) Status of Administration and Contractor Personnel.--
Section 3220 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2410) is amended in
subsection (a)(1)(A) and subsection (b) by inserting ``(42
U.S.C. 7132(c)(3))'' after ``section 202(c)(3) of the
Department of Energy Organization Act''.
(c) Government Access to Information and Computers.--Section
3235(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2425(b)) is amended by inserting
``(Public Law 99-508; 100 Stat. 1848)'' after ``of 1986''.
(d) Authority To Establish Certain Positions.--Section 3241
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2441) is amended in the last sentence--
(1) by striking ``excepted positions established''
and inserting ``positions established'';
(2) by striking ``an excepted position'' and
inserting ``a position''; and
(3) by striking ``nonexcepted position'' and
inserting ``position not established under this
section''.
(e) Separate Treatment in Budget.--Section 3251(a) of such
Act (50 U.S.C. 2451(a)) is amended by striking ``the Congress''
and inserting ``Congress''.
(f) Future-Years Nuclear Security Program.--Section 3253(b)
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2453(b)) is amended--
(1) by striking ``five-fiscal year'' each place it
appears and inserting ``five-fiscal-year'';
(2) by striking paragraph (5) and by redesignating
paragraph (6) as paragraph (5); and
(3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (5), as
redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking ``National
Nuclear Security''.
(g) Compliance With Federal Acquisition Regulation.--Section
3262 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2462) is amended by striking ``the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et
seq.)'' and inserting ``section 1303(a)(1) of title 41, United
States Code''.
(h) Use of Capabilities of National Security Laboratories.--
Section 3264 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2464) is amended by
inserting ``of Energy'' after ``Secretary''.
(i) Definitions.--Section 3281(2)(F) of such Act (50 U.S.C.
2471(2)(F)) is amended by striking ``the Congress'' and
inserting ``Congress''.
(j) Functions Transferred.--Section 3291(d)(1) of such Act
(50 U.S.C. 2481(d)(1)) is amended by moving the flush text
after subparagraph (B) 2 ems to the left.
SEC. 3146. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACT.
(a) Definitions.--
(1) In general.--Section 4002 of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501) is amended--
(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by
striking ``In this division'' and inserting
``Except as otherwise provided, in this
division'';
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6),
(7), and (8) as paragraphs (6), (7), (9), and
(10), respectively;
(C) by inserting after paragraph (4) the
following new paragraph (5):
``(5) The terms `defense nuclear facility' and
`Department of Energy defense nuclear facility' have
the meaning given the term `Department of Energy
defense nuclear facility' in section 318 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286g).'';
(D) by inserting after paragraph (7), as
redesignated by subparagraph (B), the following
new paragraph (8):
``(8) The term `Nuclear Weapons Council' means the
Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of
title 10, United States Code.''; and
(E) in paragraph (10), as redesignated by
subparagraph (B), by striking ``restricted
data'' and inserting ``Restricted Data''.
(2) Conforming amendments.--
(A) Nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship
plan.--Section 4203(e)(1) of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2523(e)(1)) is amended in the matter
preceding subparagraph (A) by striking
``established by section 179 of title 10,
United States Code,''.
(B) Reports on life extension programs.--
Section 4216(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2536(a))
is amended in the matter preceding paragraph
(1) by striking ``established by section 179 of
title 10, United States Code,''.
(C) Selected acquisition reports.--Section
4217(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)(1))
is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph
(A) by striking ``established under section 179
of title 10, United States Code,''.
(D) Advice on nuclear weapons stockpile.--
Section 4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is
amended--
(i) in subsection (e), by striking
``Joint''; and
(ii) in subsection (f)(1), in the
matter preceding subparagraph (A), by
striking ``established under section
179 of title 10, United States Code''.
(E) Reports on permanent closures of defense
nuclear facilities.--Section 4422(a) of such
Act (50 U.S.C. 2602(a)) is amended by striking
``(as defined in section 318 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286(g))''.
(F) Prohibition on international
inspections.--Section 4501(a) of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended by striking
``restricted data'' and inserting ``Restricted
Data''.
(G) Review of certain documents before
declassification and release.--Section 4521 of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2671) is amended by
striking ``restricted data'' each place it
appears and inserting ``Restricted Data''.
(H) Protection against inadvertent release of
restricted data and formerly restricted data.--
Section 4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is
amended by striking subsection (g).
(I) Definitions.--Section 4701 of such Act
(50 U.S.C. 2741) is amended--
(i) by striking paragraph (2); and
(ii) by redesignating paragraph (3)
as paragraph (2).
(J) Prohibition and report on bonuses to
contractors.--Section 4802 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2782) is amended--
(i) by striking subsection (b); and
(ii) by redesignating subsection (c)
as subsection (b).
(K) Transfers of real property.--Section
4831(f) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2811(f)) is
amended by striking ``section:'' and all that
follows through ``(2) The terms'' and inserting
``section, the terms''.
(b) Restriction on Certain Licensing Requirement.--Section
4103 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2513) is amended by inserting ``;
94 Stat. 3197'' after ``Public Law 96-540''.
(c) Nuclear Weapons Stockpile Matters.--
(1) Stockpile stewardship program.--Section 4201 of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2521) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a), in the matter
preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``for
Nuclear Security''; and
(B) in subsection (b)--
(i) in paragraph (4)(D), by striking
``Nevada national security site'' and
inserting ``Nevada National Security
Site''; and
(ii) in paragraph (5)--
(I) by striking subparagraphs
(A) through (D) and inserting
the following new subparagraph
(A):
``(A) the nuclear weapons production
facilities; and''; and
(II) by redesignating
subparagraph (E) as
subparagraph (B).
(2) Stockpile management program.--Section 4204(a) of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2524(a)) is amended by striking
``for Nuclear Security''.
(3) Annual assessments of nuclear weapons
stockpile.--Section 4205 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2525)
is amended--
(A) in subsection (c), in the matter
preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``for
Nuclear Security''; and
(B) in subsection (h)--
(i) in the subsection heading, by
striking ``Definitions'' and inserting
``Definition'';
(ii) by striking ``section:'' and all
that follows through ``(2) The term''
and inserting ``section, the term'';
and
(iii) by redesignating subparagraphs
(A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2),
respectively, and by moving such
paragraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems
to the left.
(4) Nuclear test ban readiness program.--Section 4207
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2527) is amended--
(A) by striking subsection (a);
(B) by redesignating subsections (b), (c),
and (d) as subsections (a), (b), and (c),
respectively;
(C) in subsection (a), as redesignated by
subparagraph (B), by striking ``Soviet Union''
and inserting ``Russian Federation'';
(D) in subsection (b), as redesignated by
subparagraph (B), by striking ``subsection
(b)'' and inserting ``subsection (a)''; and
(E) in subsection (c), as redesignated by
subparagraph (B)--
(i) by striking ``subsection (b)''
and inserting ``subsection (a)''; and
(ii) by striking ``national nuclear
weapons laboratories'' and inserting
``national security laboratories''.
(5) Requirements for specific request for new or
modified nuclear weapons.--Section 4209(d) of such Act
(50 U.S.C. 2529(d)) is amended by striking ``the date
of the enactment of this Act'' each place it appears
and inserting ``December 2, 2002''.
(6) Manufacturing infrastructure.--Section 4212 of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2532) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking
``Review'' and inserting ``Memorandum''; and
(B) in subsection (c), by striking ``the
Congress'' and inserting ``Congress''.
(7) Reports on critical difficulties.--Section 4213
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2533) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a)--
(i) in the subsection heading, by
striking ``Plants'' and inserting
``Facilities''; and
(ii) by striking ``plant'' each place
it appears and inserting ``facility'';
and
(B) in subsection (d)--
(i) in the subsection heading, by
striking ``Certification'' and
inserting ``Assessment''; and
(ii) by striking ``included with the
decision documents'' and all that
follows through ``the President'' and
inserting ``submitted to the President
and Congress with the matters required
to be submitted under section
4205(f)''.
(8) Plan for transformation of nuclear security
enterprise.--
(A) Repeal.--Section 4214 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2534) is repealed.
(B) Clerical amendment.--The table of
contents for such Act is amended by striking
the item relating to section 4214.
(9) Replacement project for chemistry and metallurgy
research building.--Section 4215(d)(2) of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2535(d)(2)) is amended by striking ``National
Nuclear Security''.
(10) Advice on nuclear weapons stockpile.--Section
4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538), as amended by
subsection (a)(2)(D), is further amended--
(A) by striking subsection (a);
(B) by redesignating subsections (b) through
(g) as subsections (a) through (f),
respectively; and
(C) in subsection (d), as redesignated by
subparagraph (B), by striking ``(under section
3159 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104-201; 42
U.S.C. 7274o))'' and inserting ``under section
4213''.
(11) Tritium production program.--
(A) In general.--Subsection (b) of section
4233 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2543) is--
(i) transferred to the end of section
4231 (50 U.S.C. 2541); and
(ii) redesignated as subsection (c).
(B) Conforming repeal.--Section 4233 of such
Act (50 U.S.C. 2543) is repealed.
(C) Clerical amendment.--The table of
contents for such Act is amended by striking
the item relating to section 4233.
(d) Proliferation Matters.--
(1) Nonproliferation initiatives and activities.--
(A) Repeal.--Section 4302 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2562) is repealed.
(B) Clerical amendment.--The table of
contents for such Act is amended by striking
the item relating to section 4302.
(2) Nuclear cities initiative.--
(A) Repeal.--Section 4304 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2564) is repealed.
(B) Clerical amendment.--The table of
contents for such Act is amended by striking
the item relating to section 4304.
(e) Defense Environmental Cleanup.--
(1) Defense environmental cleanup account.--Section
4401 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2581) is amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking
``restoration and waste management'' and
inserting ``cleanup'';
(B) in subsection (a), by striking
``Restoration and Waste Management'' and
inserting ``Cleanup''; and
(C) in subsection (b), by striking
``environmental restoration and waste
management'' and inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup''.
(2) Future use plans for defense environmental
cleanup.--Section 4402 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2582) is
amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking
``environmental management program'' and
inserting ``defense environmental cleanup'';
(B) in subsection (a), by striking
``environmental restoration and waste
management'' and inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup'';
(C) in subsection (b)--
(i) by striking paragraph (2); and
(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (3)
and (4) as paragraphs (2) and (3),
respectively;
(D) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``for
program direction in carrying out environmental
restoration and waste management'' and
inserting ``for defense environmental
cleanup'';
(E) by striking subsection (f);
(F) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h)
as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and
(G) in paragraph (2) of subsection (g), as
redesignated by subparagraph (F)--
(i) by striking ``an environmental
restoration or waste management'' and
inserting ``a defense environmental
cleanup''; and
(ii) by striking ``environmental
restoration and waste management'' and
inserting ``defense environmental
cleanup''.
(3) Future-years defense environmental cleanup
plan.--Section 4402A of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2582A) is
amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking
``management'' and inserting ``cleanup'';
(B) in subsection (a)--
(i) in the matter preceding paragraph
(1), by striking ``management'' and
inserting ``cleanup''; and
(ii) in paragraph (1), by striking
``environmental management'' and
inserting ``defense environmental
cleanup''; and
(C) in subsection (b), by striking
``management'' each place it appears and
inserting ``cleanup''.
(4) Integrated fissile materials management plan.--
Section 4403 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2583) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a)(1)--
(i) by striking ``the Office of
Fissile Materials Disposition, the
Office of Nuclear Energy, and the
Office of Defense Programs'' and
inserting ``the Office of Nuclear
Energy, and the Administration''; and
(ii) by striking ``storage'' and
inserting ``storage,''; and
(B) in subsection (b), by striking ``March
31, 2000'' and inserting ``March 31, 2014''.
(5) Baseline environmental management reports.--
Section 4404 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2584) is repealed.
(6) Accelerated schedule for defense environmental
cleanup activities.--Section 4405 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2585) is amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking
``environmental restoration and waste
management'' and inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup'';
(B) in subsection (a), by striking
``environmental restoration and waste
management'' and inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup'';
(C) in subsection (b)--
(i) by striking paragraph (2); and
(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (3),
(4), and (5) as paragraphs (2), (3),
and (4), respectively;
(D) by striking subsection (c);
(E) by redesignating subsection (d) as
subsection (c); and
(F) in subsection (c), as redesignated by
subparagraph (E)--
(i) by striking ``environmental
restoration or waste management'' and
inserting ``defense environmental
cleanup''; and
(ii) by striking ``environmental
restoration and waste management'' and
inserting ``defense environmental
cleanup''.
(7) Defense environmental cleanup technology
program.--Section 4406 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2586) is
amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking
``waste'' and inserting ``environmental'';
(B) by striking subsections (b) and (c); and
(C) by redesignating subsection (d) as
subsection (b).
(8) Report on defense environmental cleanup
expenditures.--Section 4407 of such Act (50 U.S.C.
2587) is amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking
``environmental restoration'' and inserting
``defense environmental cleanup''; and
(B) by striking ``environmental restoration
and waste management funds for defense
activities'' and inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup funds''.
(9) Public participation in planning for defense
environmental cleanup.--Section 4408 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2588) is amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking
``environmental restoration and waste
management at defense nuclear facilities'' and
inserting ``defense environmental cleanup'';
(B) by striking ``Attorneys General'' and
inserting ``attorneys general''; and
(C) by striking ``environmental restoration
and waste management'' and inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup activities''.
(10) Projects to accelerate closure activities.--
Section 4421 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2601) is repealed.
(11) Reports in connection with closures.--Section
4422 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2602) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a), as amended by
subsection (a)(2)(E)--
(i) by striking ``must'' and
inserting ``shall''; and
(ii) by striking ``environmental
remediation and cleanup'' and inserting
``defense environmental cleanup''; and
(B) in subsection (b)(2), by striking
``environmental restoration and other
remediation and cleanup efforts'' and inserting
``defense environmental cleanup activities''.
(12) Defense environmental management privatization
projects.--Subtitle C of title XLIV of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2611) is repealed.
(13) Hanford waste tank cleanup program.--Section
4442(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2622(b)(2)) is
amended by striking ``responsible for'' and all that
follows through ``aspects'' and inserting ``responsible
for managing all aspects''.
(14) Funding for termination costs of river
protection project.--Section 4444(2) of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2624(2)) is amended by striking ``environmental
restoration and waste management'' and inserting
``defense environmental cleanup''.
(15) Savannah river site.--Subtitle E of title XLIV
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2631 et seq.) is amended by
striking sections 4453A, 4453B, 4453C, and 4453D.
(16) Conforming amendments.--Title XLIV of such Act
(50 U.S.C. 2581 et seq.) is amended--
(A) in the title heading, by striking
``ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT'' and inserting ``DEFENSE
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP'';
(B) in the subtitle heading for subtitle A,
by striking ``Environmental Restoration and
Waste Management'' and inserting ``Defense
Environmental Cleanup''; and
(C) by redesignating subtitles D and E as
subtitles C and D, respectively.
(17) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents for
such Act is amended by striking the items relating to
title XLIV and inserting the following new items:
``TITLE XLIV--DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP MATTERS
``Subtitle A--Defense Environmental Cleanup
``Sec. 4401. Defense Environmental Cleanup Account.
``Sec. 4402. Requirement to develop future use plans for defense
environmental cleanup.
``Sec. 4402A. Future-years defense environmental cleanup plan.
``Sec. 4403. Integrated fissile materials management plan.
``Sec. 4405. Accelerated schedule for defense environmental cleanup
activities.
``Sec. 4406. Defense environmental cleanup technology program.
``Sec. 4407. Report on defense environmental cleanup expenditures.
``Sec. 4408. Public participation in planning for defense environmental
cleanup.
``Subtitle B--Closure of Facilities
``Sec. 4422. Reports in connection with permanent closures of Department
of Energy defense nuclear facilities.
``Subtitle C--Hanford Reservation, Washington
``Sec. 4441. Safety measures for waste tanks at Hanford nuclear
reservation.
``Sec. 4442. Hanford waste tank cleanup program reforms.
``Sec. 4443. River Protection Project.
``Sec. 4444. Funding for termination costs of River Protection Project,
Richland, Washington.
``Subtitle D--Savannah River Site, South Carolina
``Sec. 4451. Accelerated schedule for isolating high-level nuclear waste
at the defense waste processing facility, Savannah River Site.
``Sec. 4452. Multi-year plan for clean-up.
``Sec. 4453. Continuation of processing, treatment, and disposal of
legacy nuclear materials.
``Sec. 4454. Limitation on use of funds for decommissioning F-canyon
facility.''.
(f) Safeguards and Security Matters.--
(1) Restrictions on access to national security
laboratories.--Section 4502 of such Act (50 U.S.C.
2652) is amended--
(A) by striking subsections (b), (c), (d),
and (e);
(B) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g)
as subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and
(C) in paragraph (2) of subsection (c), as
redesignated by subparagraph (B), by striking
``as in effect on January 1, 1999''.
(2) Counterintelligence polygraph program.--Section
4504 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2654) is amended--
(A) by striking subsection (d); and
(B) by redesignating subsection (e) as
subsection (d).
(3) Notice to congress of certain security and
counterintelligence failures.--Section 4505(e)(2) of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2656(e)(2)) is amended by striking
``the Congress'' and inserting ``Congress''.
(4) Amounts for declassification activities.--Section
4525 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675) is amended by
striking subsection (c).
(5) Responsibility for defense programs emergency
response program.--
(A) Repeal.--Subtitle C of title XLV of such
Act (50 U.S.C. 2691) is repealed.
(B) Clerical amendment.--The table of
contents for such Act is amended by striking
the items relating to subtitle C of title XLV.
(g) Personnel Matters.--
(1) Appointment of certain personnel.--Section
4601(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2701(a)) is amended by
striking paragraph (4).
(2) Whistleblower protection program.--Section 4602
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2702) is amended--
(A) in subsection (l), by striking ``Public
Law 101-512'' and inserting ``Public Law 101-
12; 103 Stat. 16''; and
(B) by striking subsection (n).
(3) Incentives for employees at closure project
facilities.--
(A) Repeal.--Section 4603 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2703) is repealed.
(B) Clerical amendment.--The table of
contents for such Act is amended by striking
the item relating to section 4603.
(4) Workforce restructuring place.--Section 4604 of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704) is amended--
(A) in subsection (c)(6)(A), by inserting
``(29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.)'' after ``of 1998'';
and
(B) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ``the
236 H facility at Savannah River, South
Carolina; and the Mound Laboratory, Ohio'' and
inserting ``and the 236 H facility at Savannah
River, South Carolina''.
(5) Certificates of commendation.--Section 4605(b) of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2705(b)) is amended by striking
``Cold War'' and inserting ``cold war''.
(6) Executive management training.--Section
4621(b)(6) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2721(b)(6)) is
amended by striking ``environmental restoration and
defense waste management'' and inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup''.
(7) Stockpile stewardship recruitment and training
program.--Section 4622 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2722) is
amended--
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ``Sandia''
and all that follows through ``Los Alamos
National Laboratory'' and inserting ``national
security laboratories''; and
(B) in subsections (b) and (c), by striking
``laboratories referred to in subsection
(a)(1)'' each place it appears and inserting
``national security laboratories''.
(8) Fellowship program.--Section 4623(b) of such Act
(50 U.S.C. 2723(b)) is amended in the matter preceding
paragraph (1) by inserting ``either of'' after ``who
are''.
(9) Worker protection.--Section 4641 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2731) is amended by striking subsection (e).
(10) Safety oversight and enforcement.--Section 4642
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2732) is amended--
(A) by striking ``(a) Safety at Defense
Nuclear Facilities.--''; and
(B) by striking subsection (b).
(11) Monitoring workers exposed to hazardous and
radioactive substances.--Section 4643 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2733) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a), by inserting ``of
Energy'' after ``Secretary''; and
(B) in subsection (b)--
(i) in paragraph (2)(B)--
(I) by inserting ``and
Prevention'' after ``Disease
Control''; and
(II) by striking the
semicolon at the end and
inserting a period;
(ii) in paragraph (3)(C), by
inserting ``and Measurements'' after
``Radiation Protection'';
(iii) in paragraph (4)--
(I) by striking ``paragraph
(1)(D)'' and inserting
``paragraph (1)(B)''; and
(II) by striking ``paragraph
(1)(E)'' and inserting
``paragraph (1)''; and
(iv) in paragraph (5), by striking
``paragraph (1)(E)'' and inserting
``paragraph (1)''.
(12) Programs relating to exposure on hanford
reservation.--Section 4644(c) of such Act (50 U.S.C.
2734(c)) is amended--
(A) by striking ``the Congress'' each place
it appears and inserting ``Congress''; and
(B) in paragraph (4), by inserting ``and
Prevention'' after ``Disease Control''.
(13) Notification of nuclear criticality and non-
nuclear incidents.--Section 4646(a) of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2736(a)) is amended by striking ``Energy and''
and inserting ``Energy or''.
(h) Budget and Financial Matters.--
(1) Reprogramming.--Section 4702(c) of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2742(c)) is amended by striking ``subsection
(a)'' and insert ``this subsection''.
(2) Transfer of defense environmental cleanup
funds.--Section 4710 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750) is
amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking
``management'' and inserting ``cleanup'';
(B) in subsection (a)--
(i) in the subsection heading, by
striking ``Management'' and inserting
``Cleanup''; and
(ii) by striking ``management'' and
inserting ``cleanup''; and
(C) in subsection (e)--
(i) in paragraph (1)--
(I) by striking
``environmental restoration or
waste management'' and
inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup''; and
(II) by striking
``environmental management''
and inserting ``environmental
cleanup''; and
(ii) in paragraph (2)--
(I) by striking
``environmental management''
and inserting ``environmental
cleanup''; and
(II) by striking
``environmental restoration and
waste management'' and
inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup''.
(3) Transfer of weapons activities funds.--Section
4711(d) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2751(d)) is amended by
striking ``for Nuclear Security''.
(4) Notification of cost overruns.--Section
4713(a)(3) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2753(a)(3)) is
amended--
(A) in the paragraph heading, by striking
``management'' and inserting ``cleanup''; and
(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking
``environmental management'' and inserting
``environmental cleanup''.
(5) Use of funds for penalties under environmental
laws.--Section 4721(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C.
2761(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``the Congress'' and
inserting ``Congress''.
(6) Restriction on use of funds to pay certain
penalties.--Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762)
is amended--
(A) by inserting ``; 94 Stat. 3197'' after
``Public Law 96-540''; and
(B) by striking ``the Congress'' and
inserting ``Congress''.
(i) Administrative Matters.--
(1) Costs not allowed under covered contracts.--
Section 4801(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2781(b)(1))
is amended by striking ``section 22 of the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 418b)'' and
inserting ``section 1707 of title 41, United States
Code''.
(2) Contractor liability for certain injuries or loss
of property.--Section 4803(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C.
2783(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``by the Act of
March 9, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 741-752), or by the Act
of March 3, 1925 (46 U.S.C. App. 781-790)'' and
inserting ``or by chapter 309 or 311 of title 46,
United States Code''.
(3) Use of funds for laboratory-directed research and
development.--Section 4812 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2792)
is amended--
(A) by striking subsection (b);
(B) by striking ``General Limitations.--(1)''
and inserting ``Limitation on Use of Weapons
Activities Funds.--'';
(C) by striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(b)
Limitation on Use of Certain Other Funds.--'';
and
(D) in subsection (b), as redesignated by
subparagraph (C)--
(i) by striking ``environmental
restoration, waste management, or
nuclear materials and facilities
stabilization'' and inserting ``defense
environmental cleanup''; and
(ii) by striking ``environmental
restoration mission, waste management
mission, or materials stabilization
mission, as the case may be,'' and
inserting ``defense environmental
cleanup mission''.
(4) Report on laboratory-directed research and
development funds.--
(A) In general.--Section 4812A of such Act
(50 U.S.C. 2793) is amended--
(i) in the section heading, by
striking ``limitation'' and inserting
``report'';
(ii) by striking subsection (a);
(iii) by striking ``(b) Annual
Report.--(1)'' and inserting ``(a)
Report Required.--'';
(iv) by striking ``(2)'' and
inserting ``(b) Preparation of
Report.--''; and
(v) by striking ``(3)'' and inserting
``(c) Criteria Used in Preparation of
Report.--''.
(B) Clerical amendment.--The table of
contents for such Act is amended by striking
the item relating to section 4812A and
inserting the following new item:
``Sec. 4812A. Report on use of funds for certain research and
development purposes.''.
(5) Critical technology partnerships.--Section 4813
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794) is amended--
(A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``for
Nuclear Security''; and
(B) in subsection (c)--
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking
subparagraph (C) and inserting the
following new subparagraph (C):
``(C) that is a defense critical technology
(as defined in section 2500 of title 10, United
States Code).''; and
(ii) in paragraph (3)(B)(iii), by
striking ``Governments'' and inserting
``governments''.
(6) Certain transfers of real property.--Section 4831
of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2811), as amended by subsection
(a)(2)(K), is further amended--
(A) by striking ``Secretary of Energy'' each
place it appears (other than in subsection
(a)(1)) and inserting ``Secretary''; and
(B) in subsection (d), in the subsection
heading, by striking ``of Energy''.
(7) Engineering and manufacturing research,
development, and demonstration.--
(A) In general.--Section 4832 of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2812) is amended in the section heading
by striking ``plant managers of certain nuclear
weapons production plants'' and inserting
``managers of certain nuclear weapons
production facilities''.
(B) Clerical amendment.--The table of
contents for such Act is amended by striking
the item relating to section 4832 and inserting
the following new item:
``Sec. 4832. Engineering and manufacturing research, development, and
demonstration by managers of certain nuclear weapons
production facilities.''.
SEC. 3147. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON B61-12 LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM.
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the B61-12 life extension program must be a high
priority of the National Nuclear Security
Administration;
(2) the B61-12 life extension program must be given
top priority in the budget of the Administration and,
if necessary, funding should be shifted from other
programs of the Administration to ensure that the B61-
12 life extension program stays on schedule to begin
delivering B61-12 nuclear bombs to the military by not
later than fiscal year 2020; and
(3) further delays to the B61-12 life extension
program would undermine the credibility and reliability
of the nuclear deterrent of the United States and the
assurances provided to allies of the United States.
SEC. 3148. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADVISORY BOARD ON
TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND WORKER HEALTH.
It is the sense of Congress that the President should
establish an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker
Health, as described in the report of the Comptroller General
of the United States titled ``Energy Employees Compensation:
Additional Independent Oversight and Transparency Would Improve
Program's Credibility'', numbered GAO-10-302, to--
(1) advise the President concerning the review and
approval of the Department of Labor site exposure
matrix;
(2) conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve,
medical guidance for part E claims examiners with
respect to the weighing of a claimant's medical
evidence;
(3) obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary
requirements for part B claims related to lung disease
regardless of approval;
(4) provide oversight over industrial hygienists,
Department of Labor staff physicians, and Department of
Labor's consulting physicians and their reports to
ensure quality, objectivity, and consistency; and
(5) coordinate exchanges of data and findings with
the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health
(under section 3624 the Energy Employees Occupational
Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C.
7384o)) to the extent necessary.
TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
Sec. 3201. Authorization.
SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION.
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014,
$29,915,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954
(42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).
TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES
Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.
SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) Amount.--There are hereby authorized to be appropriated
to the Secretary of Energy $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 for
the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of
title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum
reserves.
(b) Period of Availability.--Funds appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall
remain available until expended.
TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION
Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects
of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014.
Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program.
Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress.
Sec. 3504. Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime
facility, Port of Anchorage, Alaska.
Sec. 3505. Strategic seaports.
SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY
ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR FISCAL YEAR
2014.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2014, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so
provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department
of Transportation for Maritime Administration programs
associated with maintaining national security aspects of the
merchant marine, as follows:
(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the
United States Merchant Marine Academy, $81,268,000, of
which--
(A) $67,268,000 shall remain available until
expended for Academy operations; and
(B) $14,000,000 shall remain available until
expended for capital asset management at the
Academy.
(2) For expenses necessary to support the State
maritime academies, $17,100,000, of which--
(A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until
expended for student incentive payments;
(B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until
expended for direct payments to such academies;
and
(C) $11,100,000 shall remain available until
expended for maintenance and repair of State
maritime academy training vessels.
(3) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in
the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $2,000,000, to
remain available until expended.
(4) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United
States-flag merchant marine to serve the national
security needs of the United States under chapter 531
of title 46, United States Code, $186,000,000.
(5) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the
Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of
loan guarantees under the program authorized by chapter
537 of title 46, United States Code, $72,655,000, of
which $2,655,000 shall remain available until expended
for administrative expenses of the program.
SEC. 3502. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF VESSEL WAR RISK INSURANCE PROGRAM.
Section 53912 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by
striking ``December 31, 2015'' and inserting ``December 31,
2020''.
SEC. 3503. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) It is in the interest of United States national
security that the United States merchant marine, both
ships and mariners, serve as a naval auxiliary in times
of war or national emergency.
(2) The readiness of the United States merchant fleet
should be augmented by a Government-owned reserve fleet
comprised of ships with national defense features that
may not be available immediately in sufficient numbers
or types in the active United States-owned, United
States-flagged, and United States-crewed commercial
industry.
(3) The Ready Reserve Force of the Maritime
Administration, a component of the National Defense
Reserve Fleet, plays an important role in United States
national security by providing necessary readiness and
efficiency in the form of a Government-owned sealift
fleet.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) maintaining a United States shipbuilding base is
critical to meeting United States national security
requirements;
(2) it is of vital importance that the Ready Reserve
Force of the Maritime Administration remains capable,
modern, and efficient in order to best serve the
national security needs of the United States in times
of war or national emergency;
(3) Federal agencies must consider investment options
for replacing aging vessels within the Ready Reserve
Force to meet future operational commitments;
(4) investment in recapitalizing the Ready Reserve
Force may include--
(A) construction of dual-use vessels, based
on need, for use in the America's Marine
Highway Program of the Department of
Transportation, as a recent study performed
under a cooperative agreement between the
Maritime Administration and the Navy
demonstrated that dual-use vessels transporting
domestic freight between United States ports
could be called upon to supplement sealift
capacity;
(B) construction of tanker vessels to meet
military transport needs; and
(C) construction of vessels for use in
transporting potential new energy exports; and
(5) the Department of Transportation, in consultation
with the Navy, should pursue the most cost-effective
means of recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force,
including by promoting the building of new vessels that
are militarily useful and commercially viable.
SEC. 3504. TREATMENT OF FUNDS FOR INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION MARITIME
FACILITY, PORT OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA.
Section 10205 of Public Law 109-59 (119 Stat. 1934) is
amended by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may''.
SEC. 3505. STRATEGIC SEAPORTS.
(a) Priority.--
(1) In general.--Under the port infrastructure
development program established under section 50302(c)
of title 46, United States Code, the Maritime
Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of
Defense, may give priority to providing funding to
strategic seaports in support of national security
requirements.
(2) Strategic seaport defined.--In this subsection
the term ``strategic seaport'' means a military port or
and commercial port that is subject to a port planning
order or Basic Ordering Agreement (or both) that is
projected to be used for the deployment of forces and
shipment of ammunition or sustainment supplies in
support of military operations.
(b) Financial Assistance.--Section 50302(c)(2)(D) of title
46, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``and financial
assistance, including grants,'' after ``technical assistance''.
DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES
Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.
TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT
Sec. 4101. Procurement.
Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations.
TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas
contingency operations.
TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency
operations.
TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL
Sec. 4401. Military personnel.
Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations.
TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.
Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations.
TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 4601. Military construction.
TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Sec. 4701. Department of energy national security programs.
SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TABLES.
(a) In General.--Whenever a funding table in this division
specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or
activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified
dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby
authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
(b) Merit-Based Decisions.--A decision to commit, obligate,
or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a
dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall--
(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in
accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k)
and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on
competitive procedures; and
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of law.
(c) Relationship to Transfer and Programming Authority.--An
amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be
transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming
authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other
law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in
such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such
transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522
of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer
or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation
accounts.
(d) Applicability to Classified Annex.--This section applies
to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.
(e) Oral and Written Communications.--No oral or written
communication concerning any amount specified in the funding
tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of
this section.
TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Line Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
FIXED WING
001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT. 19,730 19,730
003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR 142,050 85,050
(ACS) (MIP).
Reduction of [-57,000]
EMARSS LRIP
aircraft.
004 MQ-1 UAV............. 518,460 518,460
005 RQ-11 (RAVEN)........ 10,772 10,772
ROTARY
006 HELICOPTER, LIGHT 96,227 171,227
UTILITY (LUH).
Program increase [75,000]
for additional
aircraft.
007 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK 608,469 608,469
IIIA REMAN.
008 ADVANCE 150,931 150,931
PROCUREMENT (CY).
012 UH-60 BLACKHAWK M 1,046,976 1,032,915
MODEL (MYP).
Transfer to PE [-14,061]
0203774A at Army
request.
013 ADVANCE 116,001 116,001
PROCUREMENT (CY).
014 CH-47 HELICOPTER..... 801,650 801,650
015 ADVANCE 98,376 98,376
PROCUREMENT (CY).
MODIFICATION OF
AIRCRAFT
016 MQ-1 PAYLOAD--UAS.... 97,781 97,781
017 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP). 10,262 10,262
018 MULTI SENSOR ABN 12,467 12,467
RECON (MIP).
019 AH-64 MODS........... 53,559 53,559
020 CH-47 CARGO 149,764 149,764
HELICOPTER MODS
(MYP).
021 UTILITY/CARGO 17,500 17,500
AIRPLANE MODS.
022 UTILITY HELICOPTER 74,095 74,095
MODS.
023 KIOWA MODS WARRIOR... 184,044 184,044
024 NETWORK AND MISSION 152,569 152,569
PLAN.
025 COMMS, NAV 92,779 92,779
SURVEILLANCE.
026 GATM ROLLUP.......... 65,613 65,613
027 RQ-7 UAV MODS........ 121,902 121,902
GROUND SUPPORT
AVIONICS
028 AIRCRAFT 47,610 47,610
SURVIVABILITY
EQUIPMENT.
029 SURVIVABILITY CM..... 5,700 5,700
030 CMWS................. 126,869 126,869
OTHER SUPPORT
031 AVIONICS SUPPORT 6,809 6,809
EQUIPMENT.
032 COMMON GROUND 65,397 65,397
EQUIPMENT.
033 AIRCREW INTEGRATED 45,841 45,841
SYSTEMS.
034 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.. 79,692 79,692
035 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 1,615 1,615
036 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET 2,877 2,877
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 5,024,387 5,028,326
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.
MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
SURFACE-TO-AIR
MISSILE SYSTEM
002 MSE MISSILE.......... 540,401 540,401
AIR-TO-SURFACE
MISSILE SYSTEM
003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY. 4,464 4,464
ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT
MISSILE SYS
004 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) 110,510 110,510
SYSTEM SUMMARY.
005 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY. 49,354 49,354
006 ADVANCE 19,965 19,965
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET 237,216 237,216
(GMLRS).
008 MLRS REDUCED RANGE 19,022 19,022
PRACTICE ROCKETS
(RRPR).
MODIFICATIONS
011 PATRIOT MODS......... 256,438 256,438
012 STINGER MODS......... 37,252 37,252
013 ITAS/TOW MODS........ 20,000 20,000
014 MLRS MODS............ 11,571 11,571
015 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS. 6,105 6,105
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
016 SPARES AND REPAIR 11,222 11,222
PARTS.
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
017 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS.. 3,530 3,530
018 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 1,748 1,748
(MISSILES).
019 PRODUCTION BASE 5,285 5,285
SUPPORT.
TOTAL MISSILE 1,334,083 1,334,083
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.
PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV,
ARMY
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
001 STRYKER VEHICLE...... 374,100 374,100
MODIFICATION OF
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
002 STRYKER (MOD)........ 20,522 20,522
003 FIST VEHICLE (MOD)... 29,965 29,965
004 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) 158,000 158,000
005 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 4,769 4,769
155MM M109A6 (MOD).
006 PALADIN INTEGRATED 260,177 219,477
MANAGEMENT (PIM).
Transfer to PE [-40,700]
0604854A at Army
Request.
007 IMPROVED RECOVERY 111,031 186,031
VEHICLE (M88A2
HERCULES).
Program increase. [75,000]
008 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD). 2,500 2,500
009 ASSAULT BREACHER 62,951 62,951
VEHICLE.
010 M88 FOV MODS......... 28,469 28,469
011 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE. 2,002 2,002
012 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD). 178,100 178,100
013 ABRAMS UPGRADE 90,000
PROGRAM.
Program increase. [90,000]
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
014 PRODUCTION BASE 1,544 1,544
SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV).
WEAPONS & OTHER
COMBAT VEHICLES
015 INTEGRATED AIR BURST 69,147 0
WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY.
Transfer to PE [-11,000]
0604601A per
Army's request.
XM25 Counter [-58,147]
Defilade Target
Engagement.
018 MORTAR SYSTEMS....... 5,310 5,310
019 XM320 GRENADE 24,049 24,049
LAUNCHER MODULE
(GLM).
021 CARBINE.............. 70,846 21,254
Individual [-49,592]
Carbine program
cancelation.
023 COMMON REMOTELY 56,580 56,580
OPERATED WEAPONS
STATION.
024 HANDGUN.............. 300 300
MOD OF WEAPONS AND
OTHER COMBAT VEH
026 M777 MODS............ 39,300 39,300
027 M4 CARBINE MODS...... 10,300 10,300
028 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN 33,691 33,691
MODS.
029 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN 7,608 7,608
MODS.
030 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE 2,719 2,719
GUN MODS.
031 SNIPER RIFLES 7,017 7,017
MODIFICATIONS.
032 M119 MODIFICATIONS... 18,707 18,707
033 M16 RIFLE MODS....... 2,136 2,136
034 MODIFICATIONS LESS 1,569 1,569
THAN $5.0M (WOCV-
WTCV).
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
035 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 2,024 2,024
(WOCV-WTCV).
036 PRODUCTION BASE 10,108 10,108
SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV).
037 INDUSTRIAL 459 459
PREPAREDNESS.
038 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT 1,267 1,267
(SOLDIER ENH PROG).
TOTAL 1,597,267 1,602,828
PROCUREMENT OF
W&TCV, ARMY.
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY
SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
AMMUNITION
002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL 112,167 87,167
TYPES.
Unit cost [-25,000]
efficiencies--Arm
y requested
reduction.
003 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL 58,571 53,571
TYPES.
Unit cost [-5,000]
efficiencies--Arm
y requested
reduction.
004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL 9,858 9,858
TYPES.
005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL 80,037 55,037
TYPES.
Unit cost [-25,000]
efficiencies--Arm
y requested
reduction.
007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES. 16,496 6,196
Program decrease. [-10,300]
008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES. 69,533 50,033
Unit cost [-19,500]
efficiencies--Arm
y requested
reduction.
009 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES. 55,781 55,781
MORTAR AMMUNITION
010 60MM MORTAR, ALL 38,029 38,029
TYPES.
011 81MM MORTAR, ALL 24,656 24,656
TYPES.
012 120MM MORTAR, ALL 60,781 60,781
TYPES.
TANK AMMUNITION
013 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 121,551 121,551
105MM AND 120MM, ALL
TYPES.
ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 39,825 39,825
75MM & 105MM, ALL
TYPES.
015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 37,902 37,902
155MM, ALL TYPES.
016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED 67,896 67,896
RANGE M982.
017 ARTILLERY 71,205 71,205
PROPELLANTS, FUZES
AND PRIMERS, ALL.
ROCKETS
020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED 1,012 1,012
MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES.
021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL 108,476 108,476
TYPES.
OTHER AMMUNITION
022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, 24,074 24,074
ALL TYPES.
023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 33,242 33,242
024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES... 7,609 7,609
025 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES 5,228 5,228
MISCELLANEOUS
026 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL 16,700 16,700
TYPES.
027 NON-LETHAL 7,366 7,366
AMMUNITION, ALL
TYPES.
028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES.... 3,614 3,614
029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 12,423 12,423
MILLION (AMMO).
030 AMMUNITION PECULIAR 16,604 16,604
EQUIPMENT.
031 FIRST DESTINATION 14,328 14,328
TRANSPORTATION
(AMMO).
032 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES. 108 108
PRODUCTION BASE
SUPPORT
033 PROVISION OF 242,324 242,324
INDUSTRIAL
FACILITIES.
034 CONVENTIONAL 179,605 179,605
MUNITIONS
DEMILITARIZATION.
035 ARMS INITIATIVE...... 3,436 3,436
TOTAL 1,540,437 1,455,637
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY. OTHER PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
TACTICAL VEHICLES
001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/ 4,000 4,000
DOLLY SETS.
002 SEMITRAILERS, 6,841 6,841
FLATBED:.
003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM 223,910 223,910
TACTICAL VEH (FMTV).
004 FIRETRUCKS & 11,880 11,880
ASSOCIATED
FIREFIGHTING EQUIP.
005 FAMILY OF HEAVY 14,731 14,731
TACTICAL VEHICLES
(FHTV).
006 PLS ESP.............. 44,252 44,252
009 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE 39,525 39,525
TACTICAL TRUCK EXT
SERV.
011 TACTICAL WHEELED 51,258 25,958
VEHICLE PROTECTION
KITS.
Funding ahead of [-25,300]
need.
012 MODIFICATION OF IN 49,904 49,904
SVC EQUIP.
013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH- 2,200 2,200
PROTECTED (MRAP)
MODS.
NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
014 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN.. 400 400
015 PASSENGER CARRYING 716 716
VEHICLES.
016 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, 5,619 5,619
OTHER.
COMM--JOINT
COMMUNICATIONS
018 WIN-T--GROUND FORCES 973,477 973,477
TACTICAL NETWORK.
019 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION 14,120 14,120
PROGRAM.
020 JOINT INCIDENT SITE 7,869 7,869
COMMUNICATIONS
CAPABILITY.
021 JCSE EQUIPMENT 5,296 5,296
(USREDCOM).
COMM--SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
022 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE 147,212 147,212
WIDEBAND SATCOM
SYSTEMS.
023 TRANSPORTABLE 7,998 7,998
TACTICAL COMMAND
COMMUNICATIONS.
024 SHF TERM............. 7,232 7,232
025 NAVSTAR GLOBAL 3,308 3,308
POSITIONING SYSTEM
(SPACE).
026 SMART-T (SPACE)...... 13,992 13,992
028 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC-- 28,206 28,206
GBS.
029 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 2,778 2,778
(TAC SAT).
COMM--C3 SYSTEM
031 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & 17,590 17,590
CONTROL SYS (AGCCS).
COMM--COMBAT
COMMUNICATIONS
032 ARMY DATA 786 786
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
(DATA RADIO).
033 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO 382,930 382,930
SYSTEM.
034 MID-TIER NETWORKING 19,200 19,200
VEHICULAR RADIO
(MNVR).
035 RADIO TERMINAL SET, 1,438 1,438
MIDS LVT(2).
036 SINCGARS FAMILY...... 9,856 9,856
037 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS-- 14,184 14,184
OPA2.
038 TRACTOR DESK......... 6,271 6,271
040 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT 1,030 1,030
PROGRAM COMM/
ELECTRONICS.
041 TACTICAL 31,868 31,868
COMMUNICATIONS AND
PROTECTIVE SYSTEM.
042 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE 18,000 18,000
044 RADIO, IMPROVED HF 1,166 1,166
(COTS) FAMILY.
045 FAMILY OF MED COMM 22,867 22,867
FOR COMBAT CASUALTY
CARE.
COMM--INTELLIGENCE
COMM
048 CI AUTOMATION 1,512 1,512
ARCHITECTURE.
049 ARMY CA/MISO GPF 61,096 61,096
EQUIPMENT.
INFORMATION SECURITY
050 TSEC--ARMY KEY MGT 13,890 13,890
SYS (AKMS).
051 INFORMATION SYSTEM 23,245 23,245
SECURITY PROGRAM-
ISSP.
052 BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE 3,800 3,800
053 COMMUNICATIONS 24,711 24,711
SECURITY (COMSEC).
COMM--LONG HAUL
COMMUNICATIONS
055 BASE SUPPORT 43,395 43,395
COMMUNICATIONS.
COMM--BASE
COMMUNICATIONS
057 INFORMATION SYSTEMS.. 104,577 104,577
058 DEFENSE MESSAGE 612 612
SYSTEM (DMS).
059 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 39,000 39,000
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
060 INSTALLATION INFO 248,477 248,477
INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
PROGRAM.
ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT
REL ACT (TIARA)
064 JTT/CIBS-M........... 824 824
065 PROPHET GROUND....... 59,198 59,198
067 DCGS-A (MIP)......... 267,214 267,214
068 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND 9,899 9,899
STATION (JTAGS).
069 TROJAN (MIP)......... 24,598 24,598
070 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 1,927 1,927
(INTEL SPT) (MIP).
071 CI HUMINT AUTO 6,169 6,169
REPRTING AND
COLL(CHARCS).
072 MACHINE FOREIGN 2,924 2,924
LANGUAGE TRANSLATION
SYSTEM-M.
ELECT EQUIP--
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
(EW)
074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER 40,735 40,735
MORTAR RADAR.
075 EW PLANNING & 13 13
MANAGEMENT TOOLS
(EWPMT).
076 ENEMY UAS............ 2,800 2,800
079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/ 1,237 1,237
SECURITY
COUNTERMEASURES.
080 CI MODERNIZATION..... 1,399 1,399
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
SURV. (TAC SURV)
082 SENTINEL MODS........ 47,983 47,983
083 SENSE THROUGH THE 142 142
WALL (STTW).
084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES. 202,428 202,428
085 LONG RANGE ADVANCED 5,183 5,183
SCOUT SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
086 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL 14,074 14,074
WPN SIGHT.
087 SMALL TACTICAL 22,300 22,300
OPTICAL RIFLE
MOUNTED MLRF.
089 GREEN LASER 1,016 1,016
INTERDICTION SYSTEM
(GLIS).
090 INDIRECT FIRE 55,354 55,354
PROTECTION FAMILY OF
SYSTEMS.
091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY 800 800
EQUIP.
092 PROFILER............. 3,027 3,027
093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 1,185 1,185
(FIREFINDER RADARS).
094 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND-- 103,214 103,214
PLATFORM (JBC-P).
096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 26,037 26,037
(LLDR).
097 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL 23,100 23,100
SYSTEM.
098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS... 312,727 312,727
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
C2 SYSTEMS
101 FIRE SUPPORT C2 43,228 43,228
FAMILY.
102 BATTLE COMMAND 14,446 14,446
SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT
SYSTEM.
103 FAAD C2.............. 4,607 4,607
104 AIR & MSL DEFENSE 33,090 33,090
PLANNING & CONTROL
SYS.
105 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND 21,200 21,200
SYSTEM.
107 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE 1,795 1,795
SUPPORT (LCSS).
109 NETWORK MANAGEMENT 54,327 54,327
INITIALIZATION AND
SERVICE.
110 MANEUVER CONTROL 59,171 59,171
SYSTEM (MCS).
111 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT 83,936 83,936
SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A).
113 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION. 25,476 25,476
114 RECONNAISSANCE AND 19,341 19,341
SURVEYING INSTRUMENT
SET.
ELECT EQUIP--
AUTOMATION
115 ARMY TRAINING 11,865 11,865
MODERNIZATION.
116 AUTOMATED DATA 219,431 219,431
PROCESSING EQUIP.
117 GENERAL FUND 6,414 6,414
ENTERPRISE BUSINESS
SYSTEMS FAM.
118 HIGH PERF COMPUTING 62,683 62,683
MOD PGM (HPCMP).
120 RESERVE COMPONENT 34,951 34,951
AUTOMATION SYS
(RCAS).
ELECT EQUIP--AUDIO
VISUAL SYS (A/V)
121 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 7,440 7,440
(A/V).
122 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M 1,615 1,615
(SURVEYING
EQUIPMENT).
ELECT EQUIP--SUPPORT
123 PRODUCTION BASE 554 554
SUPPORT (C-E).
124 BCT EMERGING 20,000 20,000
TECHNOLOGIES.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
124A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 3,558 3,558
CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
EQUIPMENT
126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL 762 762
EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS 20,630 20,630
(BDS).
128 CBRN DEFENSE......... 22,151 22,151
BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
130 TACTICAL BRIDGING.... 14,188 14,188
131 TACTICAL BRIDGE, 23,101 23,101
FLOAT-RIBBON.
132 COMMON BRIDGE 15,416 15,416
TRANSPORTER (CBT)
RECAP.
ENGINEER (NON-
CONSTRUCTION)
EQUIPMENT
134 GRND STANDOFF MINE 50,465 50,465
DETECTN SYSM
(GSTAMIDS).
135 ROBOTIC COMBAT 6,490 6,490
SUPPORT SYSTEM
(RCSS).
136 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS 1,563 1,563
RECAPITALIZATION.
137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 20,921 20,921
DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
EQPMT).
138 REMOTE DEMOLITION 100 100
SYSTEMS.
139 < $5M, COUNTERMINE 2,271 2,271
EQUIPMENT.
COMBAT SERVICE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
140 HEATERS AND ECU'S.... 7,269 7,269
141 LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS 200 200
AND LATRINES.
142 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT.. 1,468 1,468
143 PERSONNEL RECOVERY 26,526 26,526
SUPPORT SYSTEM
(PRSS).
144 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 81,680 71,680
Unjustified unit [-10,000]
cost growth.
147 FIELD FEEDING 28,096 28,096
EQUIPMENT.
148 CARGO AERIAL DEL & 56,150 56,150
PERSONNEL PARACHUTE
SYSTEM.
149 MORTUARY AFFAIRS 3,242 3,242
SYSTEMS.
150 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT 38,141 38,141
AND CONSTRUCTION
SETS.
151 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M 5,859 5,859
(ENG SPT).
PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, 60,612 60,612
PETROLEUM & WATER.
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
153 COMBAT SUPPORT 22,042 22,042
MEDICAL.
154 MEDEVAC MISSON 35,318 35,318
EQUIPMENT PACKAGE
(MEP).
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
155 MOBILE MAINTENANCE 19,427 19,427
EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS.
156 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 3,860 3,860
(MAINT EQ).
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT
157 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, 2,000 2,000
HVY, 6X4 (CCE).
159 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING 36,078 36,078
160 MISSION MODULES-- 9,721 9,721
ENGINEERING.
162 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR.. 50,122 50,122
163 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 28,828 28,828
164 ALL TERRAIN CRANES... 19,863 19,863
166 HIGH MOBILITY 23,465 23,465
ENGINEER EXCAVATOR
(HMEE).
168 ENHANCED RAPID 13,590 13,590
AIRFIELD
CONSTRUCTION CAPAP.
169 CONST EQUIP ESP...... 16,088 16,088
170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 6,850 6,850
(CONST EQUIP).
RAIL FLOAT
CONTAINERIZATION
EQUIPMENT
171 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP.. 38,007 19,007
Funding ahead of [-19,000]
need.
172 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 10,605 10,605
(FLOAT/RAIL).
GENERATORS
173 GENERATORS AND 129,437 129,437
ASSOCIATED EQUIP.
MATERIAL HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
174 ROUGH TERRAIN 1,250 1,250
CONTAINER HANDLER
(RTCH).
175 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS.. 8,260 8,260
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
176 COMBAT TRAINING 121,710 121,710
CENTERS SUPPORT.
177 TRAINING DEVICES, 225,200 225,200
NONSYSTEM.
178 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL 30,063 30,063
TRAINER.
179 AVIATION COMBINED 34,913 34,913
ARMS TACTICAL
TRAINER.
180 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN 9,955 9,955
SUPPORT OF ARMY
TRAINING.
TEST MEASURE AND DIG
EQUIPMENT (TMD)
181 CALIBRATION SETS 8,241 8,241
EQUIPMENT.
182 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF 67,506 67,506
TEST EQUIPMENT
(IFTE).
183 TEST EQUIPMENT 18,755 18,755
MODERNIZATION
(TEMOD).
OTHER SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
184 M25 STABILIZED 5,110 5,110
BINOCULAR.
185 RAPID EQUIPPING 5,110 5,110
SOLDIER SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT.
186 PHYSICAL SECURITY 62,904 62,904
SYSTEMS (OPA3).
187 BASE LEVEL COMMON 1,427 1,427
EQUIPMENT.
188 MODIFICATION OF IN- 96,661 96,661
SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-
3).
189 PRODUCTION BASE 2,450 2,450
SUPPORT (OTH).
190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR 11,593 11,593
USER TESTING.
191 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS 8,948 8,948
OPA3.
192 TRACTOR YARD......... 8,000 8,000
OPA2
195 INITIAL SPARES--C&E.. 59,700 59,700
TOTAL OTHER 6,465,218 6,410,918
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
COMBAT AIRCRAFT
001 EA-18G............... 2,001,787 1,940,874
Excess [-8,790]
engineering
change order
funding.
GFE electronics [-5,943]
cost growth.
Other GFE cost [-1,180]
growth.
Program [-45,000]
adjustment.
003 F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) 206,551 206,551
HORNET.
004 ADVANCE 75,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
Program increase. [75,000]
005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 1,135,444 1,135,444
CV.
006 ADVANCE 94,766 94,766
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 JSF STOVL............ 1,267,260 1,267,260
008 ADVANCE 103,195 103,195
PROCUREMENT (CY).
009 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT)... 1,432,573 1,432,573
010 ADVANCE 55,196 55,196
PROCUREMENT (CY).
011 H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/ 749,962 749,962
AH-1Z).
012 ADVANCE 71,000 71,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
013 MH-60S (MYP)......... 383,831 383,831
014 ADVANCE 37,278 37,278
PROCUREMENT (CY).
015 MH-60R (MYP)......... 599,237 599,237
016 ADVANCE 231,834 231,834
PROCUREMENT (CY).
017 P-8A POSEIDON........ 3,189,989 3,189,989
018 ADVANCE 313,160 313,160
PROCUREMENT (CY).
019 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE..... 997,107 997,107
020 ADVANCE 266,542 266,542
PROCUREMENT (CY).
TRAINER AIRCRAFT
021 JPATS................ 249,080 249,080
OTHER AIRCRAFT
022 KC-130J.............. 134,358 134,358
023 ADVANCE 32,288 32,288
PROCUREMENT (CY).
025 ADVANCE 52,002 4,802
PROCUREMENT (CY).
Advance [-47,200]
procurement
appropriated in
fiscal year 2013.
026 MQ-8 UAV............. 60,980 60,980
028 OTHER SUPPORT 14,958 14,958
AIRCRAFT.
MODIFICATION OF
AIRCRAFT
029 EA-6 SERIES.......... 18,577 18,577
030 AEA SYSTEMS.......... 48,502 48,502
031 AV-8 SERIES.......... 41,575 41,575
032 ADVERSARY............ 2,992 2,992
033 F-18 SERIES.......... 875,371 833,530
ECP 6038 radome [-2,952]
kits cost growth
(OSIP 002-07).
Integrated [-8,000]
logistics support
growth (OSIP 14-
03).
Other support and [-20,989]
ILS ahead of need
(OSIP 04-14).
Retrofit radars [-9,900]
(APG-79B) cost
growth (OSIP 002-
07).
034 H-46 SERIES.......... 2,127 2,127
036 H-53 SERIES.......... 67,675 67,675
037 SH-60 SERIES......... 135,054 135,054
038 H-1 SERIES........... 41,706 41,706
039 EP-3 SERIES.......... 55,903 77,903
12th aircraft to [8,000]
Spiral 3.
Sensor [14,000]
obsolescence.
040 P-3 SERIES........... 37,436 37,436
041 E-2 SERIES........... 31,044 31,044
042 TRAINER A/C SERIES... 43,720 40,520
Avionics [-3,200]
Obsolescence
installation cost
growth.
043 C-2A................. 902 902
044 C-130 SERIES......... 47,587 47,587
045 FEWSG................ 665 665
046 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C 14,587 14,587
SERIES.
047 E-6 SERIES........... 189,312 183,218
FAB-T funding [-6,094]
previously
appropriated
(OSIP 014-14).
048 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS 85,537 85,537
SERIES.
049 SPECIAL PROJECT 3,684 13,684
AIRCRAFT.
Program office [5,000]
sustainment.
Sensor [5,000]
obsolescence.
050 T-45 SERIES.......... 98,128 98,128
051 POWER PLANT CHANGES.. 22,999 22,999
052 JPATS SERIES......... 1,576 1,576
053 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT 6,267 6,267
MODS.
054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT. 141,685 141,685
055 COMMON AVIONICS 120,660 120,660
CHANGES.
056 COMMON DEFENSIVE 3,554 3,554
WEAPON SYSTEM.
057 ID SYSTEMS........... 41,800 41,800
058 P-8 SERIES........... 9,485 9,485
059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 14,431 14,431
060 MQ-8 SERIES.......... 1,001 1,001
061 RQ-7 SERIES.......... 26,433 26,433
062 V-22 (TILT/ROTOR 160,834 160,834
ACFT) OSPREY.
063 F-35 STOVL SERIES.... 147,130 147,130
064 F-35 CV SERIES....... 31,100 31,100
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
065 SPARES AND REPAIR 1,142,461 1,142,461
PARTS.
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
EQUIP & FACILITIES
066 COMMON GROUND 410,044 410,044
EQUIPMENT.
067 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL 27,450 27,450
FACILITIES.
068 WAR CONSUMABLES...... 28,930 28,930
069 OTHER PRODUCTION 5,268 5,268
CHARGES.
070 SPECIAL SUPPORT 60,306 60,306
EQUIPMENT.
071 FIRST DESTINATION 1,775 1,775
TRANSPORTATION.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 17,927,651 17,875,403
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY. WEAPONS PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
MODIFICATION OF
MISSILES
001 TRIDENT II MODS...... 1,140,865 1,140,865
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL 7,617 7,617
FACILITIES.
STRATEGIC MISSILES
003 TOMAHAWK............. 312,456 312,456
TACTICAL MISSILES
004 AMRAAM............... 95,413 95,413
005 SIDEWINDER........... 117,208 117,208
006 JSOW................. 136,794 136,794
007 STANDARD MISSILE..... 367,985 367,985
008 RAM.................. 67,596 65,984
Guidance and [-1,612]
control assembly
contract savings.
009 HELLFIRE............. 33,916 33,916
011 STAND OFF PRECISION 6,278 6,278
GUIDED MUNITIONS
(SOPGM).
012 AERIAL TARGETS....... 41,799 41,799
013 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT 3,538 3,538
MODIFICATION OF
MISSILES
014 ESSM................. 76,749 76,749
015 HARM MODS............ 111,902 111,902
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL 1,138 1,138
FACILITIES.
017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM 23,014 23,014
FOLLOW-ON.
ORDNANCE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
018 ORDNANCE SUPPORT 84,318 84,318
EQUIPMENT.
TORPEDOES AND RELATED
EQUIP
019 SSTD................. 3,978 3,978
020 ASW TARGETS.......... 8,031 8,031
MOD OF TORPEDOES AND
RELATED EQUIP
021 MK-54 TORPEDO MODS... 125,898 125,898
022 MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP 53,203 53,203
MODS.
023 QUICKSTRIKE MINE..... 7,800 7,800
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
024 TORPEDO SUPPORT 59,730 59,730
EQUIPMENT.
025 ASW RANGE SUPPORT.... 4,222 4,222
DESTINATION
TRANSPORTATION
026 FIRST DESTINATION 3,963 3,963
TRANSPORTATION.
GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
027 SMALL ARMS AND 12,513 12,513
WEAPONS.
MODIFICATION OF GUNS
AND GUN MOUNTS
028 CIWS MODS............ 56,308 62,708
Additional RMA [6,400]
kits.
029 COAST GUARD WEAPONS.. 10,727 7,269
Machine gun [-3,458]
equipment cost
growth.
030 GUN MOUNT MODS....... 72,901 59,521
MK38 gun kits [-13,380]
cost growth.
031 CRUISER MODERNIZATION 1,943 1,943
WEAPONS.
032 AIRBORNE MINE 19,758 19,758
NEUTRALIZATION
SYSTEMS.
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
034 SPARES AND REPAIR 52,632 52,632
PARTS.
TOTAL WEAPONS 3,122,193 3,110,143
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY. PROCUREMENT OF AMMO,
NAVY & MC
NAVY AMMUNITION
001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 37,703 37,703
002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL 65,411 65,411
TYPES.
003 MACHINE GUN 20,284 20,284
AMMUNITION.
004 PRACTICE BOMBS....... 37,870 37,870
005 CARTRIDGES & CART 53,764 53,764
ACTUATED DEVICES.
006 AIR EXPENDABLE 67,194 67,194
COUNTERMEASURES.
007 JATOS................ 2,749 2,749
008 LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE 3,906 3,906
ATTACK PROJECTILE.
009 5 INCH/54 GUN 24,151 24,151
AMMUNITION.
010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER 33,080 33,080
GUN AMMUNITION.
011 OTHER SHIP GUN 40,398 40,398
AMMUNITION.
012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING 61,219 61,219
PARTY AMMO.
013 PYROTECHNIC AND 10,637 10,637
DEMOLITION.
014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN 4,578 4,578
$5 MILLION.
MARINE CORPS
AMMUNITION
015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION 26,297 26,297
016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL 6,088 6,088
TYPES.
017 40 MM, ALL TYPES..... 7,644 7,644
018 60MM, ALL TYPES...... 3,349 3,349
020 120MM, ALL TYPES..... 13,361 13,361
022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 2,149 2,149
023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES... 27,465 27,465
026 FUZE, ALL TYPES...... 26,366 26,366
028 AMMO MODERNIZATION... 8,403 8,403
029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 5,201 5,201
MILLION.
TOTAL 589,267 589,267
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMO, NAVY & MC. SHIPBUILDING &
CONVERSION, NAVY
OTHER WARSHIPS
001 CARRIER REPLACEMENT 944,866 944,866
PROGRAM.
003 VIRGINIA CLASS 2,930,704 3,422,704
SUBMARINE.
Increase to [492,000]
Virginia class.
004 ADVANCE 2,354,612 2,354,612
PROCUREMENT (CY).
005 CVN REFUELING 1,705,424 1,683,353
OVERHAULS.
CVN 72 [-22,071]
requirement
previously funded
in Fiscal Year
2012
reprogramming.
006 ADVANCE 245,793 245,793
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 DDG 1000............. 231,694 231,694
008 DDG-51............... 1,615,564 1,615,564
009 ADVANCE 388,551 388,551
PROCUREMENT (CY).
010 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP. 1,793,014 1,793,014
AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
012 AFLOAT FORWARD 524,000 579,300
STAGING BASE.
Navy requested [55,300]
adjustment.
014 JOINT HIGH SPEED 2,732 2,732
VESSEL.
AUXILIARIES, CRAFT
AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM
COST
016 ADVANCE 183,900 207,300
PROCUREMENT (CY).
Program shortfall [23,400]
017 OUTFITTING........... 450,163 450,163
019 LCAC SLEP............ 80,987 80,987
020 COMPLETION OF PY 625,800 733,400
SHIPBUILDING
PROGRAMS.
DDG-51........... [100,000]
Joint High Speed [7,600]
Vessel.
TOTAL 14,077,804 14,734,033
SHIPBUILDING &
CONVERSION, NAVY. OTHER PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
SHIP PROPULSION
EQUIPMENT
001 LM-2500 GAS TURBINE.. 10,180 10,180
002 ALLISON 501K GAS 5,536 5,536
TURBINE.
003 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE 16,956 3,956
(HED).
Contract delay... [-13,000]
GENERATORS
004 SURFACE COMBATANT 19,782 19,782
HM&E.
NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
005 OTHER NAVIGATION 39,509 39,509
EQUIPMENT.
PERISCOPES
006 SUB PERISCOPES & 52,515 52,515
IMAGING EQUIP.
OTHER SHIPBOARD
EQUIPMENT
007 DDG MOD.............. 285,994 285,994
008 FIREFIGHTING 14,389 14,389
EQUIPMENT.
009 COMMAND AND CONTROL 2,436 2,436
SWITCHBOARD.
010 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE...... 12,700 12,700
011 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED 40,329 40,329
SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM.
012 POLLUTION CONTROL 19,603 19,603
EQUIPMENT.
013 SUBMARINE SUPPORT 8,678 8,678
EQUIPMENT.
014 VIRGINIA CLASS 74,209 74,209
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
015 LCS CLASS SUPPORT 47,078 47,078
EQUIPMENT.
016 SUBMARINE BATTERIES.. 37,000 37,000
017 LPD CLASS SUPPORT 25,053 25,053
EQUIPMENT.
018 STRATEGIC PLATFORM 12,986 12,986
SUPPORT EQUIP.
019 DSSP EQUIPMENT....... 2,455 2,455
020 CG MODERNIZATION..... 10,539 10,539
021 LCAC................. 14,431 14,431
022 UNDERWATER EOD 36,700 36,700
PROGRAMS.
023 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 119,902 119,902
MILLION.
024 CHEMICAL WARFARE 3,678 3,678
DETECTORS.
025 SUBMARINE LIFE 8,292 8,292
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
REACTOR PLANT
EQUIPMENT
027 REACTOR COMPONENTS... 286,744 286,744
OCEAN ENGINEERING
028 DIVING AND SALVAGE 8,780 8,780
EQUIPMENT.
SMALL BOATS
029 STANDARD BOATS....... 36,452 33,056
CNIC force [-3,396]
protection medium
contract delay.
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
030 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING 36,145 36,145
EQUIPMENT.
PRODUCTION FACILITIES
EQUIPMENT
031 OPERATING FORCES IPE. 69,368 49,868
Emergent repair [-19,500]
facility
outfitting ahead
of need.
OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
032 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS.. 106,328 106,328
033 LCS COMMON MISSION 45,966 45,966
MODULES EQUIPMENT.
034 LCS MCM MISSION 59,885 59,885
MODULES.
035 LCS SUW MISSION 37,168 37,168
MODULES.
LOGISTIC SUPPORT
036 LSD MIDLIFE.......... 77,974 77,974
SHIP SONARS
038 SPQ-9B RADAR......... 27,934 27,934
039 AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW 83,231 83,231
COMBAT SYSTEM.
040 SSN ACOUSTICS........ 199,438 199,438
041 UNDERSEA WARFARE 9,394 9,394
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
042 SONAR SWITCHES AND 12,953 12,953
TRANSDUCERS.
043 ELECTRONIC WARFARE 8,958 8,958
MILDEC.
ASW ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
044 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC 24,077 24,077
WARFARE SYSTEM.
045 SSTD................. 11,925 8,500
AN/SLQ-25X [-3,425]
cancellation.
046 FIXED SURVEILLANCE 94,338 94,338
SYSTEM.
047 SURTASS.............. 9,680 9,680
048 MARITIME PATROL AND 18,130 18,130
RECONNSAISANCE FORCE.
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
EQUIPMENT
049 AN/SLQ-32............ 203,375 199,691
Excess block 2 [-3,684]
support funding.
RECONNAISSANCE
EQUIPMENT
050 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT. 123,656 123,656
051 AUTOMATED 896 896
IDENTIFICATION
SYSTEM (AIS).
SUBMARINE
SURVEILLANCE
EQUIPMENT
052 SUBMARINE SUPPORT 49,475 49,475
EQUIPMENT PROG.
OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
053 COOPERATIVE 34,692 34,692
ENGAGEMENT
CAPABILITY.
054 TRUSTED INFORMATION 396 396
SYSTEM (TIS).
055 NAVAL TACTICAL 15,703 15,703
COMMAND SUPPORT
SYSTEM (NTCSS).
056 ATDLS................ 3,836 3,836
057 NAVY COMMAND AND 7,201 7,201
CONTROL SYSTEM
(NCCS).
058 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM 54,400 54,400
REPLACEMENT.
059 SHALLOW WATER MCM.... 8,548 8,548
060 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS 11,765 11,765
(SPACE).
061 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO 6,483 6,483
AND TV SERVICE.
062 STRATEGIC PLATFORM 7,631 7,631
SUPPORT EQUIP.
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
063 OTHER TRAINING 53,644 53,644
EQUIPMENT.
AVIATION ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
064 MATCALS.............. 7,461 7,461
065 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC 9,140 9,140
CONTROL.
066 AUTOMATIC CARRIER 20,798 20,798
LANDING SYSTEM.
067 NATIONAL AIR SPACE 19,754 19,754
SYSTEM.
068 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC 8,909 8,909
CONTROL SYSTEMS.
069 LANDING SYSTEMS...... 13,554 13,554
070 ID SYSTEMS........... 38,934 38,934
071 NAVAL MISSION 14,131 14,131
PLANNING SYSTEMS.
OTHER SHORE
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
072 DEPLOYABLE JOINT 3,249 3,249
COMMAND & CONTROL.
073 MARITIME INTEGRATED 11,646 11,646
BROADCAST SYSTEM.
074 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I 18,189 18,189
SYSTEMS.
075 DCGS-N............... 17,350 17,350
076 CANES................ 340,567 340,567
077 RADIAC............... 9,835 9,835
078 CANES-INTELL......... 59,652 59,652
079 GPETE................ 6,253 6,253
080 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM 4,963 4,963
TEST FACILITY.
081 EMI CONTROL 4,664 4,664
INSTRUMENTATION.
082 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 66,889 66,889
MILLION.
SHIPBOARD
COMMUNICATIONS
084 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS 23,877 23,877
AUTOMATION.
086 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS 28,001 28,001
UNDER $5M.
SUBMARINE
COMMUNICATIONS
087 SUBMARINE BROADCAST 7,856 7,856
SUPPORT.
088 SUBMARINE 74,376 74,376
COMMUNICATION
EQUIPMENT.
SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
089 SATELLITE 27,381 27,381
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
090 NAVY MULTIBAND 215,952 215,952
TERMINAL (NMT).
SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
091 JCS COMMUNICATIONS 4,463 4,463
EQUIPMENT.
092 ELECTRICAL POWER 778 778
SYSTEMS.
CRYPTOGRAPHIC
EQUIPMENT
094 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY 133,530 133,530
PROGRAM (ISSP).
095 MIO INTEL 1,000 1,000
EXPLOITATION TEAM.
CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
096 CRYPTOLOGIC 12,251 12,251
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP.
OTHER ELECTRONIC
SUPPORT
097 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT 2,893 2,893
SONOBUOYS
099 SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES. 179,927 179,927
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT 55,279 55,279
EQUIPMENT.
101 EXPEDITIONARY 8,792 8,792
AIRFIELDS.
102 AIRCRAFT REARMING 11,364 11,364
EQUIPMENT.
103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & 59,502 59,502
RECOVERY EQUIPMENT.
104 METEOROLOGICAL 19,118 19,118
EQUIPMENT.
105 DCRS/DPL............. 1,425 1,425
106 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT 29,670 29,670
107 AIRBORNE MINE 101,554 101,554
COUNTERMEASURES.
108 LAMPS MK III 18,293 18,293
SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT.
109 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC 7,969 7,969
MAINTENANCE AIDS.
110 OTHER AVIATION 5,215 5,215
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS 4,827 4,827
INFORMATION SYSTEM
(ALIS).
SHIP GUN SYSTEM
EQUIPMENT
112 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL 1,188 1,188
SYSTEM.
113 GUN FIRE CONTROL 4,447 4,447
EQUIPMENT.
SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS
EQUIPMENT
114 NATO SEASPARROW...... 58,368 58,368
115 RAM GMLS............. 491 491
116 SHIP SELF DEFENSE 51,858 51,858
SYSTEM.
117 AEGIS SUPPORT 59,757 59,757
EQUIPMENT.
118 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT 71,559 71,559
EQUIPMENT.
119 VERTICAL LAUNCH 626 626
SYSTEMS.
120 MARITIME INTEGRATED 2,779 2,779
PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS.
FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
121 STRATEGIC MISSILE 224,484 224,484
SYSTEMS EQUIP.
ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
122 SSN COMBAT CONTROL 85,678 85,678
SYSTEMS.
123 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT 3,913 3,913
EQUIPMENT.
124 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT 3,909 3,909
EQUIPMENT.
125 ASW RANGE SUPPORT 28,694 28,694
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER ORDNANCE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
126 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 46,586 46,586
DISPOSAL EQUIP.
127 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 11,933 11,933
MILLION.
OTHER EXPENDABLE
ORDNANCE
128 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE 62,361 62,361
DECOY SYSTEM.
129 SURFACE TRAINING 41,813 41,813
DEVICE MODS.
130 SUBMARINE TRAINING 26,672 26,672
DEVICE MODS.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
131 PASSENGER CARRYING 5,600 5,600
VEHICLES.
132 GENERAL PURPOSE 3,717 3,717
TRUCKS.
133 CONSTRUCTION & 10,881 10,881
MAINTENANCE EQUIP.
134 FIRE FIGHTING 14,748 14,748
EQUIPMENT.
135 TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 5,540 5,540
136 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT. 5,741 5,741
137 POLLUTION CONTROL 3,852 3,852
EQUIPMENT.
138 ITEMS UNDER $5 25,757 25,757
MILLION.
139 PHYSICAL SECURITY 1,182 1,182
VEHICLES.
SUPPLY SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
140 MATERIALS HANDLING 14,250 14,250
EQUIPMENT.
141 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT 6,401 6,401
EQUIPMENT.
142 FIRST DESTINATION 5,718 5,718
TRANSPORTATION.
143 SPECIAL PURPOSE 22,597 22,597
SUPPLY SYSTEMS.
TRAINING DEVICES
144 TRAINING SUPPORT 22,527 22,527
EQUIPMENT.
COMMAND SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
145 COMMAND SUPPORT 50,428 50,428
EQUIPMENT.
146 EDUCATION SUPPORT 2,292 2,292
EQUIPMENT.
147 MEDICAL SUPPORT 4,925 4,925
EQUIPMENT.
149 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT 3,202 3,202
EQUIPMENT.
151 OPERATING FORCES 24,294 24,294
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
152 C4ISR EQUIPMENT...... 4,287 4,287
153 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT 18,276 18,276
EQUIPMENT.
154 PHYSICAL SECURITY 134,495 134,495
EQUIPMENT.
155 ENTERPRISE 324,327 324,327
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
156A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 12,140 12,140
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
157 SPARES AND REPAIR 317,234 317,234
PARTS.
TOTAL OTHER 6,310,257 6,267,252
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY. PROCUREMENT, MARINE
CORPS
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
001 AAV7A1 PIP........... 32,360 32,360
002 LAV PIP.............. 6,003 6,003
ARTILLERY AND OTHER
WEAPONS
003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE 589 589
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT 3,655 3,655
TOWED HOWITZER.
005 HIGH MOBILITY 5,467 5,467
ARTILLERY ROCKET
SYSTEM.
006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT 20,354 20,354
VEHICLES UNDER $5
MILLION.
OTHER SUPPORT
007 MODIFICATION KITS.... 38,446 38,446
008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT 4,734 4,734
PROGRAM.
GUIDED MISSILES
009 GROUND BASED AIR 15,713 15,713
DEFENSE.
010 JAVELIN.............. 36,175 36,175
012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS 1,136 1,136
SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-
H).
OTHER SUPPORT
013 MODIFICATION KITS.... 33,976 30,078
TOW Unit Cost [-3,898]
Growth.
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEMS
014 UNIT OPERATIONS 16,273 16,273
CENTER.
REPAIR AND TEST
EQUIPMENT
015 REPAIR AND TEST 41,063 41,063
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 2,930 2,930
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
018 ITEMS UNDER $5 1,637 1,637
MILLION (COMM &
ELEC).
019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 18,394 18,394
SYSTEMS.
RADAR + EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
020 RADAR SYSTEMS........ 114,051 101,941
Previously funded [-12,110]
EDM refurbishment.
021 RQ-21 UAS............ 66,612 66,612
INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
022 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM.. 3,749 3,749
023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 75,979 75,979
EQUIPMENT.
026 RQ-11 UAV............ 1,653 1,653
027 DCGS-MC.............. 9,494 9,494
OTHER COMM/ELEC
EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
028 NIGHT VISION 6,171 6,171
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT (NON-
TEL)
029 COMMON COMPUTER 121,955 119,955
RESOURCES.
Unit cost growth. [-2,000]
030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS. 83,294 83,294
031 RADIO SYSTEMS........ 74,718 74,718
032 COMM SWITCHING & 47,613 47,613
CONTROL SYSTEMS.
033 COMM & ELEC 19,573 19,573
INFRASTRUCTURE
SUPPORT.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 5,659 5,659
ADMINISTRATIVE
VEHICLES
034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER 1,039 1,039
VEHICLES.
035 COMMERCIAL CARGO 31,050 31,050
VEHICLES.
TACTICAL VEHICLES
036 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV 36,333 36,333
(MYP).
037 MOTOR TRANSPORT 3,137 3,137
MODIFICATIONS.
040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL 27,385 27,385
TRAILERS.
OTHER SUPPORT
041 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 7,016 7,016
MILLION.
ENGINEER AND OTHER
EQUIPMENT
042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 14,377 14,377
EQUIP ASSORT.
043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT 24,864 24,864
044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS 21,592 21,592
045 POWER EQUIPMENT 61,353 61,353
ASSORTED.
046 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT 4,827 4,827
EQUIPMENT.
047 EOD SYSTEMS.......... 40,011 40,011
MATERIALS HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
048 PHYSICAL SECURITY 16,809 16,809
EQUIPMENT.
049 GARRISON MOBILE 3,408 3,408
ENGINEER EQUIPMENT
(GMEE).
050 MATERIAL HANDLING 48,549 48,549
EQUIP.
051 FIRST DESTINATION 190 190
TRANSPORTATION.
GENERAL PROPERTY
052 FIELD MEDICAL 23,129 23,129
EQUIPMENT.
053 TRAINING DEVICES..... 8,346 8,346
054 CONTAINER FAMILY..... 1,857 1,857
055 FAMILY OF 36,198 36,198
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT.
056 RAPID DEPLOYABLE 2,390 2,390
KITCHEN.
OTHER SUPPORT
057 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 6,525 6,525
MILLION.
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
058 SPARES AND REPAIR 13,700 13,700
PARTS.
TOTAL 1,343,511 1,325,503
PROCUREMENT,
MARINE CORPS. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
TACTICAL FORCES
001 F-35................. 3,060,770 2,989,270
Decrease non- [-71,500]
recurring
engineering
initiatives.
002 ADVANCE 363,783 363,783
PROCUREMENT (CY).
OTHER AIRLIFT
005 C-130J............... 537,517 537,517
006 ADVANCE 162,000 162,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 HC-130J.............. 132,121 132,121
008 ADVANCE 88,000 88,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
009 MC-130J.............. 389,434 389,434
010 ADVANCE 104,000 104,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
HELICOPTERS
015 CV-22 (MYP).......... 230,798 230,798
MISSION SUPPORT
AIRCRAFT
017 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C. 2,541 2,541
OTHER AIRCRAFT
020 TARGET DRONES........ 138,669 138,669
022 AC-130J.............. 470,019 470,019
024 RQ-4................. 27,000 11,000
Production [-16,000]
closeout.
027 MQ-9................. 272,217 352,217
Program increase. [80,000]
028 RQ-4 BLOCK 40 PROC... 1,747 1,747
STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
029 B-2A................. 20,019 20,019
030 B-1B................. 132,222 132,222
031 B-52................. 111,002 105,882
Internal Weapons [-5,120]
Bay Upgrade defer
low rate initial
production.
032 LARGE AIRCRAFT 27,197 27,197
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURES.
TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
033 A-10................. 47,598 47,598
034 F-15................. 354,624 354,624
035 F-16................. 11,794 11,794
036 F-22A................ 285,830 285,830
037 F-35 MODIFICATIONS... 157,777 157,777
AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
038 C-5.................. 2,456 2,456
039 C-5M................. 1,021,967 983,967
Program excess... [-38,000]
042 C-17A................ 143,197 143,197
043 C-21................. 103 103
044 C-32A................ 9,780 9,780
045 C-37A................ 452 452
LRIP Kit [47,300]
Procurement.
Transfer to Title [-47,300]
II, RDAF, line
230.
TRAINER AIRCRAFT
047 GLIDER MODS.......... 128 128
048 T-6.................. 6,427 6,427
049 T-1.................. 277 277
050 T-38................. 28,686 28,686
OTHER AIRCRAFT
052 U-2 MODS............. 45,591 45,591
053 KC-10A (ATCA)........ 70,918 70,918
054 C-12................. 1,876 1,876
055 MC-12W............... 5,000 5,000
056 C-20 MODS............ 192 192
057 VC-25A MOD........... 263 263
058 C-40................. 6,119 6,119
059 C-130................ 58,577 74,277
C-130H Propulsion [15,700]
System Engine
Upgrades.
061 C-130J MODS.......... 10,475 10,475
062 C-135................ 46,556 46,556
063 COMPASS CALL MODS.... 34,494 34,494
064 RC-135............... 171,813 171,813
065 E-3.................. 197,087 197,087
066 E-4.................. 14,304 14,304
067 E-8.................. 57,472 57,472
068 H-1.................. 6,627 6,627
069 H-60................. 27,654 27,654
070 RQ-4 MODS............ 9,313 9,313
071 HC/MC-130 16,300 16,300
MODIFICATIONS.
072 OTHER AIRCRAFT....... 6,948 6,948
073 MQ-1 MODS............ 9,734 9,734
074 MQ-9 MODS............ 102,970 62,970
Anti-ice [-5,520]
production ahead
of need.
Lynx radar [-34,480]
reduction.
076 RQ-4 GSRA/CSRA MODS.. 30,000 30,000
077 CV-22 MODS........... 23,310 23,310
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
078 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR 463,285 463,285
PARTS.
COMMON SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT 49,140 49,140
SUPPORT EQUIP.
POST PRODUCTION
SUPPORT
081 B-1.................. 3,683 3,683
083 B-2A................. 43,786 43,786
084 B-52................. 7,000 7,000
087 C-17A................ 81,952 81,952
089 C-135................ 8,597 8,597
090 F-15................. 2,403 2,403
091 F-16................. 3,455 3,455
092 F-22A................ 5,911 5,911
INDUSTRIAL
PREPAREDNESS
094 INDUSTRIAL 21,148 21,148
RESPONSIVENESS.
WAR CONSUMABLES
095 WAR CONSUMABLES...... 94,947 94,947
OTHER PRODUCTION
CHARGES
096 OTHER PRODUCTION 1,242,004 1,242,004
CHARGES.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
101A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 75,845 75,845
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 11,398,901 11,323,981
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
MISSILE REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT--BALLISTIC
001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT 39,104 39,104
EQ-BALLISTIC.
TACTICAL
002 JASSM................ 291,151 291,151
003 SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X).. 119,904 119,904
004 AMRAAM............... 340,015 340,015
005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE 48,548 48,548
MISSILE.
006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB.. 42,347 42,347
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
007 INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/ 752 752
POL PREVENTION.
CLASS IV
009 MM III MODIFICATIONS. 21,635 21,635
010 AGM-65D MAVERICK..... 276 276
011 AGM-88A HARM......... 580 580
012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE 6,888 6,888
MISSILE (ALCM).
013 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB.. 5,000 5,000
MISSILE SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
014 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR 72,080 72,080
PARTS.
SPACE PROGRAMS
015 ADVANCED EHF......... 379,586 379,586
016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER 38,398 38,398
SATELLITES(SPACE).
017 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 403,431 403,431
018 ADVANCE 74,167 74,167
PROCUREMENT (CY).
019 SPACEBORNE EQUIP 5,244 5,244
(COMSEC).
020 GLOBAL POSITIONING 55,997 55,997
(SPACE).
021 DEF METEOROLOGICAL 95,673 95,673
SAT PROG(SPACE).
022 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE 1,852,900 1,852,900
LAUNCH VEH(SPACE).
023 SBIR HIGH (SPACE).... 583,192 583,192
SPECIAL PROGRAMS
029 SPECIAL UPDATE 36,716 36,716
PROGRAMS.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
029A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 829,702 829,702
TOTAL MISSILE 5,343,286 5,343,286
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE
ROCKETS
001 ROCKETS.............. 15,735 15,735
CARTRIDGES
002 CARTRIDGES........... 129,921 129,921
BOMBS
003 PRACTICE BOMBS....... 30,840 30,840
004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 187,397 187,397
005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK 188,510 188,510
MUNITION.
OTHER ITEMS
006 CAD/PAD.............. 35,837 35,837
007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 7,531 7,531
DISPOSAL (EOD).
008 SPARES AND REPAIR 499 499
PARTS.
009 MODIFICATIONS........ 480 480
010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 9,765 9,765
MILLION.
FLARES
011 FLARES............... 55,864 55,864
FUZES
013 FUZES................ 76,037 76,037
SMALL ARMS
014 SMALL ARMS........... 21,026 21,026
TOTAL 759,442 759,442
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE. OTHER PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
PASSENGER CARRYING
VEHICLES
001 PASSENGER CARRYING 2,048 2,048
VEHICLES.
CARGO AND UTILITY
VEHICLES
002 MEDIUM TACTICAL 8,019 8,019
VEHICLE.
003 CAP VEHICLES......... 946 946
004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 7,138 7,138
MILLION.
SPECIAL PURPOSE
VEHICLES
005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL 13,093 13,093
VEHICLES.
006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 13,983 13,983
MILLION.
FIRE FIGHTING
EQUIPMENT
007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH 23,794 23,794
RESCUE VEHICLES.
MATERIALS HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
008 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 8,669 8,669
MILLION.
BASE MAINTENANCE
SUPPORT
009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & 6,144 6,144
CLEANING EQUIP.
010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 1,580 1,580
MILLION.
COMM SECURITY
EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
012 COMSEC EQUIPMENT..... 149,661 149,661
013 MODIFICATIONS 726 726
(COMSEC).
INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING 2,789 2,789
EQUIPMENT.
015 INTELLIGENCE COMM 31,875 31,875
EQUIPMENT.
016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS. 452 452
017 MISSION PLANNING 14,203 14,203
SYSTEMS.
ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & 46,232 46,232
LANDING SYS.
019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE 11,685 11,685
SYSTEM.
020 BATTLE CONTROL 19,248 19,248
SYSTEM--FIXED.
021 THEATER AIR CONTROL 19,292 19,292
SYS IMPROVEMENTS.
022 WEATHER OBSERVATION 17,166 17,166
FORECAST.
023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND 22,723 22,723
CONTROL.
024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN 27,930 27,930
COMPLEX.
025 TAC SIGNIT SPT....... 217 217
SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS
PROJECTS
027 GENERAL INFORMATION 49,627 49,627
TECHNOLOGY.
028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & 13,559 13,559
CONTROL SYS.
029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND 11,186 11,186
CONTROL.
030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL 43,238 43,238
SECURITY SYSTEM.
031 COMBAT TRAINING 10,431 10,431
RANGES.
032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES... 13,769 13,769
033 GCSS-AF FOS.......... 19,138 19,138
034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 8,809 8,809
SYSTEM.
035 AIR & SPACE 26,935 26,935
OPERATIONS CTR-WPN
SYS.
AIR FORCE
COMMUNICATIONS
036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT 80,558 80,558
SYSTEMS.
038 AFNET................ 97,588 97,588
039 VOICE SYSTEMS........ 8,419 8,419
040 USCENTCOM............ 34,276 34,276
SPACE PROGRAMS
041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR 28,235 28,235
PGM SPACE.
042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE.... 2,061 2,061
043 NUDET DETECTION SYS 4,415 4,415
SPACE.
044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL 30,237 30,237
NETWORK SPACE.
045 SPACELIFT RANGE 98,062 98,062
SYSTEM SPACE.
046 MILSATCOM SPACE...... 105,935 105,935
047 SPACE MODS SPACE..... 37,861 37,861
048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM.. 7,171 7,171
ORGANIZATION AND BASE
049 TACTICAL C-E 83,537 83,537
EQUIPMENT.
050 COMBAT SURVIVOR 11,884 8,634
EVADER LOCATER.
Unjustified unit [-3,250]
cost growth for
batteries.
051 RADIO EQUIPMENT...... 14,711 14,711
052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL 10,275 10,275
EQUIPMENT.
053 BASE COMM 50,907 50,907
INFRASTRUCTURE.
MODIFICATIONS
054 COMM ELECT MODS...... 55,701 55,701
PERSONAL SAFETY &
RESCUE EQUIP
055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES. 14,524 4,036
Night Vision [-10,488]
Cueing and
Display
termination.
056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 28,655 28,655
MILLION.
DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS
HANDLING EQ
057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL 9,332 9,332
HANDLING EQUIP.
BASE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
058 BASE PROCURED 16,762 16,762
EQUIPMENT.
059 CONTINGENCY 33,768 33,768
OPERATIONS.
060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL 2,495 2,495
INVESTMENT.
061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT... 12,859 12,859
062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 1,954 1,954
MILLION.
SPECIAL SUPPORT
PROJECTS
064 DARP RC135........... 24,528 24,528
065 DCGS-AF.............. 137,819 137,819
067 SPECIAL UPDATE 479,586 479,586
PROGRAM.
068 DEFENSE SPACE 45,159 45,159
RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 14,519,256 14,519,256
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
069 SPARES AND REPAIR 25,746 25,746
PARTS.
TOTAL OTHER 16,760,581 16,746,843
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-
WIDE
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
001 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 1,291 1,291
MILLION.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 5,711 5,711
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
003 PERSONNEL 47,201 47,201
ADMINISTRATION.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
009 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 16,189 16,189
SECURITY.
012 TELEPORT PROGRAM..... 66,075 66,075
013 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 83,881 83,881
MILLION.
014 NET CENTRIC 2,572 2,572
ENTERPRISE SERVICES
(NCES).
015 DEFENSE INFORMATION 125,557 125,557
SYSTEM NETWORK.
017 CYBER SECURITY 16,941 16,941
INITIATIVE.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
018 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 13,137 13,137
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DMACT
019 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 15,414 15,414
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DODEA
020 AUTOMATION/ 1,454 1,454
EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT
& LOGISTICS.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DEFENSE SECURITY
COOPERATION AGENCY
021 EQUIPMENT............ 978 978
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
022 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 5,020 5,020
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DEFENSE THREAT
REDUCTION AGENCY
023 VEHICLES............. 100 100
024 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 13,395 13,395
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
MISSILE DEFENSE
AGENCY
026 THAAD................ 581,005 581,005
027 AEGIS BMD............ 580,814 580,814
028 BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS. 62,000 62,000
029 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE 131,400 131,400
III.
031 IRON DOME............ 220,309 220,309
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
039 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 14,363 14,363
SECURITY PROGRAM
(ISSP).
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
040 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD. 37,345 37,345
041 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, 16,678 16,678
INTELLIGENCE.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
042 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS. 14,792 14,792
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
043 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS. 35,259 35,259
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 544,272 544,272
AVIATION PROGRAMS
045 ROTARY WING UPGRADES 112,456 112,456
AND SUSTAINMENT.
046 MH-60 MODERNIZATION 81,457 81,457
PROGRAM.
047 NON-STANDARD AVIATION 2,650 2,650
048 U-28................. 56,208 56,208
049 MH-47 CHINOOK........ 19,766 19,766
050 RQ-11 UNMANNED AERIAL 850 850
VEHICLE.
051 CV-22 MODIFICATION... 98,927 98,927
052 MQ-1 UNMANNED AERIAL 20,576 20,576
VEHICLE.
053 MQ-9 UNMANNED AERIAL 1,893 14,893
VEHICLE.
Capability [13,000]
Improvements.
055 STUASL0.............. 13,166 13,166
056 PRECISION STRIKE 107,687 107,687
PACKAGE.
057 AC/MC-130J........... 51,870 51,870
059 C-130 MODIFICATIONS.. 71,940 61,317
C-130 TF/TA-- [-10,623]
early to need.
SHIPBUILDING
061 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS... 37,439 37,439
AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
063 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M.. 159,029 159,029
OTHER PROCUREMENT
PROGRAMS
066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS. 79,819 79,819
068 DISTRIBUTED COMMON 14,906 14,906
GROUND/SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
070 OTHER ITEMS <$5M..... 81,711 81,711
071 COMBATANT CRAFT 35,053 33,897
SYSTEMS.
CCFLIR--Transfer [-1,156]
at USSOCOM
Request.
074 SPECIAL PROGRAMS..... 41,526 41,526
075 TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 43,353 43,353
076 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M. 210,540 210,540
078 COMBAT MISSION 20,000 20,000
REQUIREMENTS.
082 GLOBAL VIDEO 6,645 6,645
SURVEILLANCE
ACTIVITIES.
083 OPERATIONAL 25,581 25,581
ENHANCEMENTS
INTELLIGENCE.
089 OPERATIONAL 191,061 191,061
ENHANCEMENTS.
CBDP
091 INSTALLATION FORCE 14,271 14,271
PROTECTION.
092 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION 101,667 101,667
094 JOINT BIO DEFENSE 13,447 13,447
PROGRAM (MEDICAL).
095 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION 20,896 20,896
096 CONTAMINATION 144,540 144,540
AVOIDANCE.
TOTAL 4,534,083 4,535,304
PROCUREMENT,
DEFENSE-WIDE. JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
001 JOINT URGENT 98,800 0
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND.
Program reduction [-98,800]
TOTAL JOINT 98,800 0
URGENT
OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND. TOTAL 98,227,168 98,442,249
PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands
of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Line Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
FIXED WING
002 SATURN ARCH (MIP).... 48,000 48,000
004 MQ-1 UAV............. 31,988 31,988
ROTARY
009 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK 142,000 142,000
IIIB NEW BUILD.
011 KIOWA WARRIOR WRA.... 163,800 163,800
014 CH-47 HELICOPTER..... 386,000 386,000
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 771,788 771,788
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY. MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
AIR-TO-SURFACE
MISSILE SYSTEM
003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY. 54,000 54,000
ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT
MISSILE SYS
007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET 39,045 39,045
(GMLRS).
010 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS 35,600 35,600
(ATACMS)--SYS SUM.
TOTAL MISSILE 128,645 128,645
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY. PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY
SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
AMMUNITION
002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL 4,400 4,400
TYPES.
004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL 1,500 1,500
TYPES.
005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL 5,000 5,000
TYPES.
008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES. 60,000 60,000
MORTAR AMMUNITION
010 60MM MORTAR, ALL 5,000 5,000
TYPES.
ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 10,000 10,000
75MM & 105MM, ALL
TYPES.
015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 10,000 10,000
155MM, ALL TYPES.
016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED 11,000 11,000
RANGE M982.
ROCKETS
021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL 57,000 57,000
TYPES.
OTHER AMMUNITION
022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, 4,000 4,000
ALL TYPES.
023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 3,000 3,000
024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES... 8,000 8,000
MISCELLANEOUS
028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES.... 2,000 2,000
TOTAL 180,900 180,900
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY. OTHER PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH- 321,040 321,040
PROTECTED (MRAP)
MODS.
COMM--BASE
COMMUNICATIONS
060 INSTALLATION INFO 25,000 25,000
INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
PROGRAM.
ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT
REL ACT (TIARA)
067 DCGS-A (MIP)......... 7,200 7,200
071 CI HUMINT AUTO 5,980 5,980
REPRTING AND
COLL(CHARCS).
ELECT EQUIP--
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
(EW)
074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER 57,800 57,800
MORTAR RADAR.
078 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT 15,300 15,300
SURVEILLANCE
CAPABILITIE.
079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/ 4,221 4,221
SECURITY
COUNTERMEASURES.
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
SURV. (TAC SURV)
091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY 1,834 1,834
EQUIP.
096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 21,000 21,000
(LLDR).
098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS... 85,830 85,830
COMBAT SERVICE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
146 FORCE PROVIDER....... 51,654 51,654
147 FIELD FEEDING 6,264 6,264
EQUIPMENT.
TOTAL OTHER 603,123 603,123
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY. JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE
DEV DEFEAT FUND
NETWORK ATTACK
001 ATTACK THE NETWORK... 417,700 417,700
JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT
002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE.... 248,886 248,886
FORCE TRAINING
003 TRAIN THE FORCE...... 106,000 106,000
STAFF AND
INFRASTRUCTURE
004 OPERATIONS........... 227,414 182,414
Program decrease. [-45,000]
TOTAL JOINT IMPR 1,000,000 955,000
EXPLOSIVE DEV
DEFEAT FUND. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
COMBAT AIRCRAFT
011 H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/ 29,520 29,520
AH-1Z).
OTHER AIRCRAFT
026 MQ-8 UAV............. 13,100 13,100
MODIFICATION OF
AIRCRAFT
031 AV-8 SERIES.......... 57,652 57,652
033 F-18 SERIES.......... 35,500 35,500
039 EP-3 SERIES.......... 2,700 2,700
049 SPECIAL PROJECT 3,375 3,375
AIRCRAFT.
054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT. 49,183 49,183
055 COMMON AVIONICS 4,190 4,190
CHANGES.
059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 20,700 20,700
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
065 SPARES AND REPAIR 24,776 24,776
PARTS.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 240,696 240,696
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY. WEAPONS PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
TACTICAL MISSILES
009 HELLFIRE............. 27,000 27,000
010 LASER MAVERICK....... 58,000 58,000
011 STAND OFF PRECISION 1,500 1,500
GUIDED MUNITIONS
(SOPGM).
TOTAL WEAPONS 86,500 86,500
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY. PROCUREMENT OF AMMO,
NAVY & MC
NAVY AMMUNITION
001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 11,424 11,424
002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL 30,332 30,332
TYPES.
003 MACHINE GUN 8,282 8,282
AMMUNITION.
006 AIR EXPENDABLE 31,884 31,884
COUNTERMEASURES.
011 OTHER SHIP GUN 409 409
AMMUNITION.
012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING 11,976 11,976
PARTY AMMO.
013 PYROTECHNIC AND 2,447 2,447
DEMOLITION.
014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN 7,692 7,692
$5 MILLION.
MARINE CORPS
AMMUNITION
015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION 13,461 13,461
016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL 3,310 3,310
TYPES.
017 40 MM, ALL TYPES..... 6,244 6,244
018 60MM, ALL TYPES...... 3,368 3,368
019 81MM, ALL TYPES...... 9,162 9,162
020 120MM, ALL TYPES..... 10,266 10,266
021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES.. 1,887 1,887
022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 1,611 1,611
023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES... 37,459 37,459
024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES. 970 970
025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, 418 418
ALL TYPES.
026 FUZE, ALL TYPES...... 14,219 14,219
TOTAL 206,821 206,821
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMO, NAVY & MC. OTHER PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
CIVIL ENGINEERING
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
135 TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 17,968 17,968
TOTAL OTHER 17,968 17,968
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY. PROCUREMENT, MARINE
CORPS
GUIDED MISSILES
010 JAVELIN.............. 29,334 29,334
011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW.... 105 105
OTHER SUPPORT
013 MODIFICATION KITS.... 16,081 13,183
TOW Unit Cost [-2,898]
Growth.
REPAIR AND TEST
EQUIPMENT
015 REPAIR AND TEST 16,081 16,081
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
017 MODIFICATION KITS.... 2,831 2,831
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
018 ITEMS UNDER $5 8,170 8,170
MILLION (COMM &
ELEC).
INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 2,700 2,700
EQUIPMENT.
026 RQ-11 UAV............ 2,830 2,830
OTHER SUPPORT (NON-
TEL)
029 COMMON COMPUTER 4,866 4,866
RESOURCES.
030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS. 265 265
ENGINEER AND OTHER
EQUIPMENT
042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 114 114
EQUIP ASSORT.
043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT 523 523
044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS 365 365
045 POWER EQUIPMENT 2,004 2,004
ASSORTED.
047 EOD SYSTEMS.......... 42,930 42,930
GENERAL PROPERTY
055 FAMILY OF 385 385
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT.
TOTAL 129,584 126,686
PROCUREMENT,
MARINE CORPS. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
032 LARGE AIRCRAFT 94,050 94,050
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURES.
OTHER AIRCRAFT
052 U-2 MODS............. 11,300 11,300
059 C-130................ 1,618 1,618
064 RC-135............... 2,700 2,700
COMMON SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT 6,000 6,000
SUPPORT EQUIP.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 115,668 115,668
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
TACTICAL
005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE 24,200 24,200
MISSILE.
TOTAL MISSILE 24,200 24,200
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE
ROCKETS
001 ROCKETS.............. 326 326
CARTRIDGES
002 CARTRIDGES........... 17,634 17,634
BOMBS
004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 37,514 37,514
005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK 84,459 84,459
MUNITION.
FLARES
011 FLARES............... 14,973 14,973
012 FUZES................ 3,859 3,859
SMALL ARMS
014 SMALL ARMS........... 1,200 1,200
TOTAL 159,965 159,965
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE. OTHER PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
022 WEATHER OBSERVATION 1,800 1,800
FORECAST.
SPACE PROGRAMS
046 MILSATCOM SPACE...... 5,695 5,695
BASE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
059 CONTINGENCY 60,600 60,600
OPERATIONS.
061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT... 68,000 68,000
SPECIAL SUPPORT
PROJECTS
068 DEFENSE SPACE 58,250 58,250
RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 2,380,501 2,380,501
TOTAL OTHER 2,574,846 2,574,846
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-
WIDE
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
012 TELEPORT PROGRAM..... 4,760 4,760
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 78,986 78,986
AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
062 ORDNANCE 2,841 2,841
REPLENISHMENT.
OTHER PROCUREMENT
PROGRAMS
066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS. 13,300 13,300
084 SOLDIER PROTECTION 8,034 8,034
AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS.
089 OPERATIONAL 3,354 3,354
ENHANCEMENTS.
TOTAL 111,275 111,275
PROCUREMENT,
DEFENSE-WIDE. JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
001 JOINT URGENT 15,000 0
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND.
Program reduction [-15,000]
TOTAL JOINT 15,000 0
URGENT
OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND. NATIONAL GUARD &
RESERVE EQUIPMENT
UNDISTRIBUTED
999 MISCELLANEOUS 400,000
EQUIPMENT.
Program increase. [400,000]
TOTAL NATIONAL 400,000
GUARD & RESERVE
EQUIPMENT. TOTAL 6,366,979 6,704,081
PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION (In Thousands of
Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Line Program Element Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
............... RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
ARMY
............... BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601101A IN-HOUSE 21,803 21,803
LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH.
002 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH 221,901 221,901
SCIENCES.
003 0601103A UNIVERSITY 79,359 79,359
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND 113,662 113,662
INDUSTRY
RESEARCH
CENTERS.
............... SUBTOTAL 436,725 436,725
BASIC
RESEARCH.
...............
............... APPLIED RESEARCH
005 0602105A MATERIALS 26,585 26,585
TECHNOLOGY.
006 0602120A SENSORS AND 43,170 43,170
ELECTRONIC
SURVIVABILITY.
007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP..... 36,293 36,293
008 0602211A AVIATION 55,615 55,615
TECHNOLOGY.
009 0602270A ELECTRONIC 17,585 17,585
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
010 0602303A MISSILE 51,528 51,528
TECHNOLOGY.
011 0602307A ADVANCED WEAPONS 26,162 26,162
TECHNOLOGY.
012 0602308A ADVANCED 24,063 24,063
CONCEPTS AND
SIMULATION.
013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE 64,589 64,589
AND AUTOMOTIVE
TECHNOLOGY.
014 0602618A BALLISTICS 68,300 76,300
TECHNOLOGY.
............... WIAMan [8,000]
schedule
adjustment.
015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE 4,490 4,490
AND EQUIPMENT
DEFEATING
TECHNOLOGY.
016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE 7,818 7,818
SMALL ARMS
PROGRAM.
017 0602624A WEAPONS AND 37,798 37,798
MUNITIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND 59,021 59,021
ELECTRONIC
DEVICES.
019 0602709A NIGHT VISION 43,426 43,426
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0602712A COUNTERMINE 20,574 20,574
SYSTEMS.
021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS 21,339 21,339
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY.
022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL 20,316 20,316
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0602782A COMMAND, 34,209 34,209
CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0602783A COMPUTER AND 10,439 10,439
SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0602784A MILITARY 70,064 70,064
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY.
026 0602785A MANPOWER/ 17,654 17,654
PERSONNEL/
TRAINING
TECHNOLOGY.
027 0602786A WARFIGHTER 31,546 31,546
TECHNOLOGY.
028 0602787A MEDICAL 93,340 93,340
TECHNOLOGY.
............... SUBTOTAL 885,924 893,924
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
...............
............... ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
029 0603001A WARFIGHTER 56,056 56,056
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
030 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED 62,032 62,032
TECHNOLOGY.
031 0603003A AVIATION 81,080 81,080
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
032 0603004A WEAPONS AND 63,919 63,919
MUNITIONS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE 97,043 97,043
AND AUTOMOTIVE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603006A SPACE 5,866 5,866
APPLICATION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
035 0603007A MANPOWER, 7,800 7,800
PERSONNEL AND
TRAINING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
036 0603008A ELECTRONIC 40,416 40,416
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE.... 9,166 9,166
038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION 13,627 13,627
TRAINING &
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS.
039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE.... 10,667 10,667
041 0603125A COMBATING 15,054 15,054
TERRORISM--TECH
NOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL.... 3,194 3,194
043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS.... 2,367 2,367
044 0603270A ELECTRONIC 25,348 25,348
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
045 0603313A MISSILE AND 64,009 64,009
ROCKET ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE.... 11,083 11,083
047 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE 180,662 180,662
COMPUTING
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
048 0603606A LANDMINE WARFARE 22,806 22,806
AND BARRIER
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE 5,030 5,030
SMALL ARMS
PROGRAM.
050 0603710A NIGHT VISION 36,407 36,407
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL 11,745 11,745
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
052 0603734A MILITARY 23,717 23,717
ENGINEERING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
053 0603772A ADVANCED 33,012 33,012
TACTICAL
COMPUTER
SCIENCE AND
SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY.
............... SUBTOTAL 882,106 882,106
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
054 0603305A ARMY MISSLE 15,301 15,301
DEFENSE SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
055 0603308A ARMY SPACE 13,592 13,592
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
056 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE 10,625 0
AND BARRIER--
ADV DEV.
............... Program [-10,625]
deferred to
fiscal year
2019.
058 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM 30,612 30,612
CALIBER
AMMUNITION.
059 0603653A ADVANCED TANK 49,989 49,989
ARMAMENT SYSTEM
(ATAS).
060 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT 6,703 6,703
AND
SURVIVABILITY.
061 0603766A TACTICAL 6,894 6,894
ELECTRONIC
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM--ADV DEV.
062 0603774A NIGHT VISION 9,066 9,066
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
063 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL 2,633 2,633
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY--DEM/
VAL.
064 0603782A WARFIGHTER 272,384 235,384
INFORMATION
NETWORK-
TACTICAL--DEM/
VAL.
............... Excess [-37,000]
program
growth.
065 0603790A NATO RESEARCH 3,874 3,874
AND DEVELOPMENT.
066 0603801A AVIATION--ADV 5,018 5,018
DEV.
067 0603804A LOGISTICS AND 11,556 11,556
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT--ADV
DEV.
069 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS-- 15,603 15,603
ADV DEV.
070 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS-- 14,159 14,159
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
071 0603850A INTEGRATED 79 79
BROADCAST
SERVICE.
072 0604115A TECHNOLOGY 55,605 55,605
MATURATION
INITIATIVES.
074 0604319A INDIRECT FIRE 79,232 79,232
PROTECTION
CAPABILITY
INCREMENT 2-
INTERCEPT
(IFPC2).
075 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE 4,476 4,476
DEFENSE (BUDGET
ACTIVITY 4).
076 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS.. 28,991 0
............... LEMV [-28,991]
termination.
............... SUBTOTAL 636,392 559,776
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES.
...............
............... SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
077 0604201A AIRCRAFT 76,588 76,588
AVIONICS.
078 0604220A ARMED, 73,309 73,309
DEPLOYABLE
HELOS.
079 0604270A ELECTRONIC 154,621 154,621
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
080 0604280A JOINT TACTICAL 31,826 31,826
RADIO.
081 0604290A MID-TIER 23,341 23,341
NETWORKING
VEHICULAR RADIO
(MNVR).
082 0604321A ALL SOURCE 4,839 4,839
ANALYSIS SYSTEM.
083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE.... 23,841 23,841
084 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT 79,855 90,855
WEAPONS.
............... Transfer [11,000]
from WTCV
line 15--
XM25
development.
085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL 2,140 2,140
VEHICLES.
086 0604611A JAVELIN......... 5,002 5,002
087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY 21,321 21,321
TACTICAL
VEHICLES.
088 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC 514 514
CONTROL.
093 0604710A NIGHT VISION 43,405 43,405
SYSTEMS--ENG
DEV.
094 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, 1,939 1,939
CLOTHING, AND
EQUIPMENT.
095 0604715A NON-SYSTEM 18,980 18,980
TRAINING
DEVICES--ENG
DEV.
097 0604741A AIR DEFENSE 18,294 18,294
COMMAND,
CONTROL AND
INTELLIGENCE--E
NG DEV.
098 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE 17,013 17,013
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
099 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST 6,701 6,701
EQUIPMENT
DEVELOPMENT.
100 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE 14,575 14,575
INTERACTIVE
SIMULATIONS
(DIS)--ENG DEV.
101 0604780A COMBINED ARMS 27,634 27,634
TACTICAL
TRAINER (CATT)
CORE.
102 0604798A BRIGADE 193,748 193,748
ANALYSIS,
INTEGRATION AND
EVALUATION.
103 0604802A WEAPONS AND 15,721 15,721
MUNITIONS--ENG
DEV.
104 0604804A LOGISTICS AND 41,703 41,703
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT--ENG
DEV.
105 0604805A COMMAND, 7,379 7,379
CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS--ENG
DEV.
106 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/ 39,468 39,468
MEDICAL
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
EQUIPMENT--ENG
DEV.
107 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/ 92,285 92,285
BARRIER--ENG
DEV.
108 0604814A ARTILLERY 8,209 8,209
MUNITIONS--EMD.
109 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL 22,958 22,958
COMMAND &
CONTROL
HARDWARE &
SOFTWARE.
110 0604820A RADAR 1,549 1,549
DEVELOPMENT.
111 0604822A GENERAL FUND 17,342 227
ENTERPRISE
BUSINESS SYSTEM
(GFEBS).
............... Excess to [-17,115]
requirement.
112 0604823A FIREFINDER...... 47,221 47,221
113 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS-- 48,477 48,477
WARRIOR DEM/VAL.
114 0604854A ARTILLERY 80,613 121,313
SYSTEMS--EMD.
............... Transfer [40,700]
from WTCV 6
at Army
Request.
117 0605013A INFORMATION 68,814 68,814
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
118 0605018A INTEGRATED 137,290 137,290
PERSONNEL AND
PAY SYSTEM-ARMY
(IPPS-A).
119 0605028A ARMORED MULTI- 116,298 116,298
PURPOSE VEHICLE
(AMPV).
120 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL 68,148 68,148
NETWORK CENTER
(JTNC).
121 0605380A AMF JOINT 33,219 33,219
TACTICAL RADIO
SYSTEM (JTRS).
122 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO- 15,127 15,127
GROUND MISSILE
(JAGM).
124 0605456A PAC-3/MSE 68,843 68,843
MISSILE.
125 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED 364,649 364,649
AIR AND MISSILE
DEFENSE (AIAMD).
126 0605625A MANNED GROUND 592,201 592,201
VEHICLE.
127 0605626A AERIAL COMMON 10,382 10,382
SENSOR.
128 0605766A NATIONAL 21,143 21,143
CAPABILITIES
INTEGRATION
(MIP).
129 0605812A JOINT LIGHT 84,230 84,230
TACTICAL
VEHICLE (JLTV)
ENGINEERING AND
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT PH.
130 0303032A TROJAN--RH12.... 3,465 3,465
131 0304270A ELECTRONIC 10,806 10,806
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
............... SUBTOTAL 2,857,026 2,891,611
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION.
...............
............... RDT&E MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
132 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR 16,934 16,934
DEVELOPMENT.
133 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS 13,488 13,488
DEVELOPMENT.
134 0604759A MAJOR T&E 46,672 46,672
INVESTMENT.
135 0605103A RAND ARROYO 11,919 11,919
CENTER.
136 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN 193,658 193,658
ATOLL.
137 0605326A CONCEPTS 37,158 37,158
EXPERIMENTATION
PROGRAM.
139 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES 340,659 340,659
AND FACILITIES.
140 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL 66,061 66,061
TEST
INSTRUMENTATION
AND TARGETS.
141 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/ 43,280 43,280
LETHALITY
ANALYSIS.
143 0605606A AIRCRAFT 6,025 6,025
CERTIFICATION.
144 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL 7,349 7,349
SUPPORT TO
RDT&E
ACTIVITIES.
145 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS 19,809 19,809
ANALYSIS.
146 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF 5,941 5,941
FOREIGN ITEMS.
147 0605712A SUPPORT OF 55,504 55,504
OPERATIONAL
TESTING.
148 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION 65,274 65,274
CENTER.
149 0605718A ARMY MODELING & 1,283 1,283
SIM X-CMD
COLLABORATION &
INTEG.
150 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE 82,035 82,035
ACTIVITIES.
151 0605803A TECHNICAL 33,853 33,853
INFORMATION
ACTIVITIES.
152 0605805A MUNITIONS 53,340 53,340
STANDARDIZATION
, EFFECTIVENESS
AND SAFETY.
153 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL 5,193 5,193
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY MGMT
SUPPORT.
154 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ-- 54,175 54,175
R&D.
............... SUBTOTAL 1,159,610 1,159,610
RDT&E
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
...............
............... OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
156 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT 110,576 110,576
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
157 0607141A LOGISTICS 3,717 3,717
AUTOMATION.
159 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT 70,053 70,053
IMPROVEMENT.
160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT 98,450 83,450
PROJECT OFFICE.
............... JLENS [-15,000]
program
reduction.
161 0203726A ADV FIELD 30,940 30,940
ARTILLERY
TACTICAL DATA
SYSTEM.
162 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE 177,532 177,532
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
163 0203740A MANEUVER CONTROL 36,495 36,495
SYSTEM.
164 0203744A AIRCRAFT 257,187 271,248
MODIFICATIONS/
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
............... Transfer [14,061]
from APA 11
at Army
request.
165 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE 315 315
COMPONENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
166 0203758A DIGITIZATION.... 6,186 6,186
167 0203801A MISSILE/AIR 1,578 1,578
DEFENSE PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
168 0203802A OTHER MISSILE 62,100 62,100
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
169 0203808A TRACTOR CARD.... 18,778 18,778
170 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL 7,108 7,108
GROUND SYSTEM.
173 0303028A SECURITY AND 7,600 7,600
INTELLIGENCE
ACTIVITIES.
174 0303140A INFORMATION 9,357 9,357
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
175 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT 41,225 41,225
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
176 0303142A SATCOM GROUND 18,197 18,197
ENVIRONMENT
(SPACE).
177 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL 14,215 14,215
COMMAND AND
CONTROL SYSTEM.
179 0305204A TACTICAL 33,533 33,533
UNMANNED AERIAL
VEHICLES.
180 0305208A DISTRIBUTED 27,622 27,622
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
181 0305219A MQ-1C GRAY EAGLE 10,901 10,901
UAS.
182 0305232A RQ-11 UAV....... 2,321 2,321
183 0305233A RQ-7 UAV........ 12,031 12,031
185 0307665A BIOMETRICS 12,449 12,449
ENABLED
INTELLIGENCE.
186 0708045A END ITEM 56,136 56,136
INDUSTRIAL
PREPAREDNESS
ACTIVITIES.
186A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 4,717 4,717
PROGRAMS.
............... SUBTOTAL 1,131,319 1,130,380
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... TOTAL 7,989,102 7,954,132
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
, TEST &
EVAL, ARMY.
...............
............... RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
NAVY
............... BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601103N UNIVERSITY 112,617 112,617
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
002 0601152N IN-HOUSE 18,230 18,230
LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH.
003 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH 484,459 484,459
SCIENCES.
............... SUBTOTAL 615,306 615,306
BASIC
RESEARCH.
...............
............... APPLIED RESEARCH
004 0602114N POWER PROJECTION 104,513 104,513
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
005 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION 145,307 145,307
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
006 0602131M MARINE CORPS 47,334 47,334
LANDING FORCE
TECHNOLOGY.
007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE 34,163 34,163
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
008 0602236N WARFIGHTER 49,689 49,689
SUSTAINMENT
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC 97,701 97,701
SYSTEMS APPLIED
RESEARCH.
010 0602435N OCEAN 45,685 60,685
WARFIGHTING
ENVIRONMENT
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
............... AGOR mid [15,000]
life refit.
011 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL 6,060 6,060
WEAPONS APPLIED
RESEARCH.
012 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE 103,050 103,050
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL 169,710 169,710
CAPABILITIES
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
014 0602782N MINE AND 31,326 31,326
EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE APPLIED
RESEARCH.
............... SUBTOTAL 834,538 849,538
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
...............
............... ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
015 0603114N POWER PROJECTION 48,201 48,201
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
016 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION 28,328 28,328
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC 56,179 56,179
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED 132,400 132,400
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATION
(ATD).
021 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL 11,854 11,854
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
022 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL 247,931 247,931
CAPABILITIES
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
023 0603729N WARFIGHTER 4,760 4,760
PROTECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING 51,463 51,463
EXPERIMENTS AND
DEMONSTRATIONS.
026 0603782N MINE AND 2,000 2,000
EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
............... SUBTOTAL 583,116 583,116
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
027 0603207N AIR/OCEAN 42,246 42,246
TACTICAL
APPLICATIONS.
028 0603216N AVIATION 5,591 5,591
SURVIVABILITY.
029 0603237N DEPLOYABLE JOINT 3,262 3,262
COMMAND AND
CONTROL.
030 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 74 74
031 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS 7,964 7,964
DEVELOPMENT.
032 0603261N TACTICAL 5,257 5,257
AIRBORNE
RECONNAISSANCE.
033 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT 1,570 1,570
SYSTEMS
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603502N SURFACE AND 168,040 168,040
SHALLOW WATER
MINE
COUNTERMEASURES.
035 0603506N SURFACE SHIP 88,649 88,649
TORPEDO DEFENSE.
036 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS 83,902 83,902
DEVELOPMENT.
037 0603525N PILOT FISH...... 108,713 108,713
038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH... 9,316 9,316
039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER. 77,108 77,108
040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL 762 762
CONTROL.
041 0603553N SURFACE ASW..... 2,349 2,349
042 0603561N ADVANCED 852,977 852,977
SUBMARINE
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
043 0603562N SUBMARINE 8,764 8,764
TACTICAL
WARFARE SYSTEMS.
044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT 20,501 20,501
ADVANCED DESIGN.
045 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY 27,052 27,052
DESIGN &
FEASIBILITY
STUDIES.
046 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR 428,933 428,933
POWER SYSTEMS.
047 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE 27,154 22,902
MACHINERY
SYSTEMS.
............... Program [-4,252]
execution.
048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE..... 519,140 519,140
049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT 406,389 406,389
SHIP (LCS).
050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM 36,570 18,530
INTEGRATION.
............... Late [-18,040]
contract
awards.
051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL 8,404 8,404
MUNITIONS.
052 0603611M MARINE CORPS 136,967 122,967
ASSAULT
VEHICLES.
............... Program [-14,000]
delay.
053 0603635M MARINE CORPS 1,489 1,489
GROUND COMBAT/
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE 38,422 38,422
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
055 0603658N COOPERATIVE 69,312 64,012
ENGAGEMENT.
............... Common array [-5,300]
block
antenna
contract
delay.
056 0603713N OCEAN 9,196 9,196
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL 18,850 18,850
PROTECTION.
058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY 45,618 45,618
PROGRAM.
059 0603725N FACILITIES 3,019 3,019
IMPROVEMENT.
060 0603734N CHALK CORAL..... 144,951 144,951
061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC 5,797 5,797
PRODUCTIVITY.
062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE... 308,131 308,131
063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA... 195,189 195,189
064 0603751N RETRACT ELM..... 56,358 56,358
065 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN.. 55,378 55,378
066 0603787N SPECIAL 48,842 48,842
PROCESSES.
067 0603790N NATO RESEARCH 7,509 7,509
AND DEVELOPMENT.
068 0603795N LAND ATTACK 5,075 0
TECHNOLOGY.
............... Early to [-5,075]
need.
069 0603851M JOINT NON-LETHAL 51,178 51,178
WEAPONS TESTING.
070 0603860N JOINT PRECISION 205,615 194,719
APPROACH AND
LANDING
SYSTEMS--DEM/
VAL.
............... JPALS 1B [-7,437]
follow-on
platform
integration
delay.
............... JPALS 1B [-3,459]
test early
to need.
072 0604272N TACTICAL AIR 37,227 37,227
DIRECTIONAL
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURES
(TADIRCM).
073 0604279N ASE SELF- 169 169
PROTECTION
OPTIMIZATION.
074 0604653N JOINT COUNTER 20,874 17,874
RADIO
CONTROLLED IED
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (JCREW).
............... Schedule [-3,000]
delay.
075 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE 2,257 2,257
WEAPONS
DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM.
076 0604707N SPACE AND 38,327 38,327
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (SEW)
ARCHITECTURE/
ENGINEERING
SUPPORT.
077 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI- 135,985 105,985
SURFACE WARFARE
WEAPON
DEVELOPMENT.
............... Adjust [-30,000]
program to
more
realistic
schedule.
078 0605812M JOINT LIGHT 50,362 50,362
TACTICAL
VEHICLE (JLTV)
ENGINEERING AND
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT PH.
079 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS 8,448 4,908
DEVELOPMENT--MI
P.
............... Program [-3,540]
delay.
080 0304270N ELECTRONIC 153 153
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT--MI
P.
............... SUBTOTAL 4,641,385 4,547,282
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES.
...............
............... SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
081 0604212N OTHER HELO 40,558 40,558
DEVELOPMENT.
082 0604214N AV-8B AIRCRAFT-- 35,825 33,325
ENG DEV.
............... Excess [-2,500]
program
management.
083 0604215N STANDARDS 99,891 99,891
DEVELOPMENT.
084 0604216N MULTI-MISSION 17,565 17,565
HELICOPTER
UPGRADE
DEVELOPMENT.
085 0604218N AIR/OCEAN 4,026 4,026
EQUIPMENT
ENGINEERING.
086 0604221N P-3 1,791 1,791
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
087 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT 11,725 11,725
SYSTEM.
088 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND 68,463 68,463
SYSTEM.
089 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE 152,041 152,041
090 0604245N H-1 UPGRADES.... 47,123 47,123
091 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH 30,208 30,208
SENSORS.
092 0604262N V-22A........... 43,084 43,084
093 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS 11,401 11,401
DEVELOPMENT.
094 0604269N EA-18........... 11,138 11,138
095 0604270N ELECTRONIC 34,964 34,964
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
096 0604273N VH-71A EXECUTIVE 94,238 94,238
HELO
DEVELOPMENT.
097 0604274N NEXT GENERATION 257,796 257,796
JAMMER (NGJ).
098 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL 3,302 3,302
RADIO SYSTEM--
NAVY (JTRS-
NAVY).
099 0604307N SURFACE 240,298 240,298
COMBATANT
COMBAT SYSTEM
ENGINEERING.
100 0604311N LPD-17 CLASS 1,214 1,214
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
101 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER 46,007 46,007
BOMB (SDB).
102 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE 75,592 75,592
IMPROVEMENTS.
103 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM.... 117,854 117,854
104 0604376M MARINE AIR 10,080 10,080
GROUND TASK
FORCE (MAGTF)
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (EW)
FOR AVIATION.
105 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED 21,413 21,413
FIRE CONTROL--
COUNTER AIR
SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING.
106 0604404N UNMANNED CARRIER 146,683 133,683
LAUNCHED
AIRBORNE
SURVEILLANCE
AND STRIKE
(UCLASS) SYSTEM.
............... Schedule [-13,000]
delay.
107 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE 275,871 196,071
WATER SENSORS.
............... Air and [-79,800]
missile
defense
radar
contract
delay.
108 0604503N SSN-688 AND 89,672 89,672
TRIDENT
MODERNIZATION.
109 0604504N AIR CONTROL..... 13,754 13,754
110 0604512N SHIPBOARD 69,615 69,615
AVIATION
SYSTEMS.
112 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN.. 121,566 121,566
113 0604562N SUBMARINE 49,143 49,143
TACTICAL
WARFARE SYSTEM.
114 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT 155,254 175,254
DESIGN/ LIVE
FIRE T&E.
............... Increased [20,000]
LHA-8 design
efforts.
115 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL 3,689 3,689
COMPUTER
RESOURCES.
116 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT 5,041 5,041
117 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT 26,444 26,444
TORPEDO
DEVELOPMENT.
118 0604654N JOINT SERVICE 8,897 8,897
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
119 0604703N PERSONNEL, 6,233 6,233
TRAINING,
SIMULATION, AND
HUMAN FACTORS.
120 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF 442 442
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
121 0604755N SHIP SELF 130,360 130,360
DEFENSE (DETECT
& CONTROL).
122 0604756N SHIP SELF 50,209 50,209
DEFENSE
(ENGAGE: HARD
KILL).
123 0604757N SHIP SELF 164,799 114,799
DEFENSE
(ENGAGE: SOFT
KILL/EW).
............... SEWIP block [-50,000]
3 program
delay.
124 0604761N INTELLIGENCE 1,984 1,984
ENGINEERING.
125 0604771N MEDICAL 9,458 9,458
DEVELOPMENT.
126 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID 51,430 51,430
SYSTEM.
127 0604800M JOINT STRIKE 512,631 502,631
FIGHTER (JSF)--
EMD.
............... F-35B follow- [-10,000]
on
development
ahead of
need.
128 0604800N JOINT STRIKE 534,187 524,187
FIGHTER (JSF)--
EMD.
............... F-35B follow- [-10,000]
on
development
ahead of
need.
129 0605013M INFORMATION 5,564 5,564
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
130 0605013N INFORMATION 69,659 62,823
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
............... Unjustified [-6,836]
request.
132 0605212N CH-53K RDTE..... 503,180 503,180
133 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO- 5,500 0
GROUND MISSILE
(JAGM).
............... Program [-5,500]
uncertainty.
134 0605500N MULTI-MISSION 317,358 287,358
MARITIME
AIRCRAFT (MMA).
............... P-8A spiral [-30,000]
2
development
milestone B
slip.
135 0204202N DDG-1000........ 187,910 187,910
136 0304231N TACTICAL COMMAND 2,140 2,140
SYSTEM--MIP.
137 0304785N TACTICAL 9,406 9,406
CRYPTOLOGIC
SYSTEMS.
138 0305124N SPECIAL 22,800 22,800
APPLICATIONS
PROGRAM.
............... SUBTOTAL 5,028,476 4,840,840
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION.
...............
............... MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
139 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR 43,261 43,261
DEVELOPMENT.
140 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS 71,872 71,872
DEVELOPMENT.
141 0604759N MAJOR T&E 38,033 38,033
INVESTMENT.
142 0605126N JOINT THEATER 1,352 1,352
AIR AND MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION.
143 0605152N STUDIES AND 5,566 5,566
ANALYSIS
SUPPORT--NAVY.
144 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL 48,345 48,345
ANALYSES.
146 0605804N TECHNICAL 637 637
INFORMATION
SERVICES.
147 0605853N MANAGEMENT, 76,585 76,585
TECHNICAL &
INTERNATIONAL
SUPPORT.
148 0605856N STRATEGIC 3,221 3,221
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT.
149 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE 72,725 72,725
AND TECHNOLOGY
MANAGEMENT.
150 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND 141,778 141,778
AIRCRAFT
SUPPORT.
151 0605864N TEST AND 331,219 331,219
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
152 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST 16,565 16,565
AND EVALUATION
CAPABILITY.
153 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND 3,265 3,265
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (SEW)
SUPPORT.
154 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/ 7,134 7,134
RECONNAISSANCE
SUPPORT.
155 0605873M MARINE CORPS 24,082 24,082
PROGRAM WIDE
SUPPORT.
156 0305885N TACTICAL 497 497
CRYPTOLOGIC
ACTIVITIES.
............... SUBTOTAL 886,137 886,137
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
...............
............... OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
159 0604227N HARPOON 699 699
MODIFICATIONS.
160 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT 20,961 20,961
AIR VEHICLE
(UCAV) ADVANCED
COMPONENT AND
PROTOTYPE
DEVELOPMENT.
162 0604766M MARINE CORPS 35 35
DATA SYSTEMS.
163 0605525N CARRIER ONBOARD 2,460 2,460
DELIVERY (COD)
FOLLOW ON.
164 0605555N STRIKE WEAPONS 9,757 9,757
DEVELOPMENT.
165 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & 98,057 98,057
WEAPONS SYSTEM
SUPPORT.
166 0101224N SSBN SECURITY 31,768 31,768
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
167 0101226N SUBMARINE 1,464 1,464
ACOUSTIC
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
168 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC 21,729 21,729
COMMUNICATIONS.
169 0203761N RAPID TECHNOLOGY 13,561 13,561
TRANSITION
(RTT).
170 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS 131,118 131,118
171 0204152N E-2 SQUADRONS... 1,971 1,971
172 0204163N FLEET 46,155 34,423
TELECOMMUNICATI
ONS (TACTICAL).
............... Joint Aerial [-11,732]
Layer
Network
program
delay.
173 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT. 2,374 2,374
174 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND 12,407 12,407
TOMAHAWK
MISSION
PLANNING CENTER
(TMPC).
175 0204311N INTEGRATED 41,609 41,609
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
176 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS 7,240 7,240
TACTICAL
SUPPORT UNITS
(DISPLACEMENT
CRAFT).
177 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK 78,208 78,208
ORIENTED RADAR
(G/ATOR).
178 0204571N CONSOLIDATED 45,124 45,124
TRAINING
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
179 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC 2,703 2,703
DIRECT SUPPORT.
180 0204575N ELECTRONIC 19,563 19,563
WARFARE (EW)
READINESS
SUPPORT.
181 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT 13,586 13,586
182 0205604N TACTICAL DATA 197,538 197,538
LINKS.
183 0205620N SURFACE ASW 31,863 31,863
COMBAT SYSTEM
INTEGRATION.
184 0205632N MK-48 ADCAP..... 12,806 12,806
185 0205633N AVIATION 88,607 88,607
IMPROVEMENTS.
187 0205675N OPERATIONAL 116,928 116,928
NUCLEAR POWER
SYSTEMS.
188 0206313M MARINE CORPS 178,753 178,753
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
189 0206623M MARINE CORPS 139,594 118,719
GROUND COMBAT/
SUPPORTING ARMS
SYSTEMS.
............... Marine [-20,875]
Personnel
Carrier
program
deferred.
190 0206624M MARINE CORPS 42,647 37,034
COMBAT SERVICES
SUPPORT.
............... Prior year [-5,613]
carry over.
191 0206625M USMC 34,394 34,394
INTELLIGENCE/
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE SYSTEMS
(MIP).
192 0207161N TACTICAL AIM 39,159 31,159
MISSILES.
............... Program [-8,000]
delay.
193 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM 2,613 2,613
RANGE AIR-TO-
AIR MISSILE
(AMRAAM).
194 0208058N JOINT HIGH SPEED 986 986
VESSEL (JHSV).
199 0303109N SATELLITE 66,231 66,231
COMMUNICATIONS
(SPACE).
200 0303138N CONSOLIDATED 24,476 24,476
AFLOAT NETWORK
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES
(CANES).
201 0303140N INFORMATION 23,531 23,531
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
206 0305160N NAVY 742 742
METEOROLOGICAL
AND OCEAN
SENSORS-SPACE
(METOC).
207 0305192N MILITARY 4,804 4,804
INTELLIGENCE
PROGRAM (MIP)
ACTIVITIES.
208 0305204N TACTICAL 8,381 8,381
UNMANNED AERIAL
VEHICLES.
211 0305208M DISTRIBUTED 5,535 5,535
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
212 0305208N DISTRIBUTED 19,718 19,718
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
213 0305220N RQ-4 UAV........ 375,235 375,235
214 0305231N MQ-8 UAV........ 48,713 48,713
215 0305232M RQ-11 UAV....... 102 102
216 0305233N RQ-7 UAV........ 710 710
217 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) 5,013 5,013
TACTICAL UAS
(STUASL0).
219 0305239M RQ-21A.......... 11,122 11,122
220 0305241N MULTI- 28,851 28,851
INTELLIGENCE
SENSOR
DEVELOPMENT.
221 0308601N MODELING AND 5,116 5,116
SIMULATION
SUPPORT.
222 0702207N DEPOT 28,042 28,042
MAINTENANCE
(NON-IF).
223 0708011N INDUSTRIAL 50,933 50,933
PREPAREDNESS.
224 0708730N MARITIME 4,998 4,998
TECHNOLOGY
(MARITECH).
224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 1,185,132 1,185,132
PROGRAMS.
............... SUBTOTAL 3,385,822 3,339,602
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... TOTAL 15,974,780 15,661,821
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
, TEST &
EVAL, NAVY.
...............
............... RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL, AF
............... BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH 373,151 373,151
SCIENCES.
002 0601103F UNIVERSITY 138,333 138,333
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY 13,286 13,286
LASER RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
............... SUBTOTAL 524,770 524,770
BASIC
RESEARCH.
...............
............... APPLIED RESEARCH
004 0602102F MATERIALS....... 116,846 116,846
005 0602201F AEROSPACE 119,672 119,672
VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGIES.
006 0602202F HUMAN 89,483 89,483
EFFECTIVENESS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
007 0602203F AEROSPACE 197,546 197,546
PROPULSION.
008 0602204F AEROSPACE 127,539 127,539
SENSORS.
009 0602601F SPACE TECHNOLOGY 104,063 104,063
010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL 81,521 81,521
MUNITIONS.
011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY 112,845 112,845
TECHNOLOGY.
012 0602788F DOMINANT 138,161 138,161
INFORMATION
SCIENCES AND
METHODS.
013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY 40,217 40,217
LASER RESEARCH.
............... SUBTOTAL 1,127,893 1,127,893
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
...............
............... ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
014 0603112F ADVANCED 39,572 49,572
MATERIALS FOR
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
............... Program [10,000]
increase.
015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT 12,800 12,800
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
(S&T).
016 0603203F ADVANCED 30,579 30,579
AEROSPACE
SENSORS.
017 0603211F AEROSPACE 77,347 77,347
TECHNOLOGY DEV/
DEMO.
018 0603216F AEROSPACE 149,321 149,321
PROPULSION AND
POWER
TECHNOLOGY.
019 0603270F ELECTRONIC 49,128 49,128
COMBAT
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0603401F ADVANCED 68,071 68,071
SPACECRAFT
TECHNOLOGY.
021 0603444F MAUI SPACE 26,299 26,299
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM (MSSS).
022 0603456F HUMAN 20,967 20,967
EFFECTIVENESS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL 33,996 33,996
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS 19,000 19,000
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0603680F MANUFACTURING 41,353 41,353
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
026 0603788F BATTLESPACE 49,093 49,093
KNOWLEDGE
DEVELOPMENT AND
DEMONSTRATION.
............... SUBTOTAL 617,526 627,526
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE 3,983 3,983
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
029 0603287F PHYSICAL 3,874 3,874
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT.
032 0603438F SPACE CONTROL 27,024 27,024
TECHNOLOGY.
033 0603742F COMBAT 15,899 15,899
IDENTIFICATION
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603790F NATO RESEARCH 4,568 4,568
AND DEVELOPMENT.
035 0603791F INTERNATIONAL 379 379
SPACE
COOPERATIVE R&D.
036 0603830F SPACE PROTECTION 28,764 28,764
PROGRAM (SPP).
038 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL 86,737 86,737
BALLISTIC
MISSILE--DEM/
VAL.
040 0603859F POLLUTION 953 953
PREVENTION--DEM/
VAL.
042 0604015F LONG RANGE 379,437 379,437
STRIKE.
044 0604317F TECHNOLOGY 2,606 2,606
TRANSFER.
045 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY 103 103
BURIED TARGET
DEFEAT SYSTEM
(HDBTDS)
PROGRAM.
047 0604337F REQUIREMENTS 16,018 16,018
ANALYSIS AND
MATURATION.
049 0604458F AIR & SPACE OPS 58,861 58,861
CENTER.
050 0604618F JOINT DIRECT 2,500 2,500
ATTACK MUNITION.
051 0604635F GROUND ATTACK 21,175 21,175
WEAPONS FUZE
DEVELOPMENT.
052 0604857F OPERATIONALLY 10,000
RESPONSIVE
SPACE.
............... Program [10,000]
increase.
053 0604858F TECH TRANSITION 13,636 13,636
PROGRAM.
054 0105921F SERVICE SUPPORT 2,799 2,799
TO STRATCOM--
SPACE
ACTIVITIES.
055 0207455F THREE 70,160 70,160
DIMENSIONAL
LONG-RANGE
RADAR (3DELRR).
056 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL 137,233 137,233
POSITIONING
SYSTEM (USER
EQUIPMENT)
(SPACE).
............... SUBTOTAL 876,709 886,709
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES.
...............
............... SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
058 0603260F INTELLIGENCE 977 977
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
061 0604233F SPECIALIZED 3,601 3,601
UNDERGRADUATE
FLIGHT TRAINING.
062 0604270F ELECTRONIC 1,971 1,971
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
064 0604281F TACTICAL DATA 51,456 51,456
NETWORKS
ENTERPRISE.
065 0604287F PHYSICAL 50 50
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT.
066 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER 115,000 115,000
BOMB (SDB)--EMD.
067 0604421F COUNTERSPACE 23,930 23,930
SYSTEMS.
068 0604425F SPACE SITUATION 400,258 400,258
AWARENESS
SYSTEMS.
069 0604429F AIRBORNE 4,575 4,575
ELECTRONIC
ATTACK.
070 0604441F SPACE BASED 352,532 322,832
INFRARED SYSTEM
(SBIRS) HIGH
EMD.
............... Modernizatio [-29,700]
n projects
execution
delays
excluding
exploitation
efforts.
071 0604602F ARMAMENT/ 16,284 16,284
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
072 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS.... 2,564 2,564
073 0604617F AGILE COMBAT 17,036 17,036
SUPPORT.
074 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT 7,273 7,273
SYSTEMS.
075 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING 33,200 33,200
RANGES.
078 0604800F F-35--EMD....... 816,335 816,335
079 0604851F INTERCONTINENTAL 145,442 145,442
BALLISTIC
MISSILE--EMD.
080 0604853F EVOLVED 27,963 27,963
EXPENDABLE
LAUNCH VEHICLE
PROGRAM
(SPACE)--EMD.
081 0604932F LONG RANGE 5,000 5,000
STANDOFF WEAPON.
082 0604933F ICBM FUZE 129,411 129,411
MODERNIZATION.
083 0605213F F-22 131,100 131,100
MODERNIZATION
INCREMENT 3.2B.
084 0605221F KC-46........... 1,558,590 1,558,590
085 0605229F CSAR HH-60 393,558 333,558
RECAPITALIZATIO
N.
............... Program [-60,000]
delays /
projected
savings
pending
updated
program
estimate.
086 0605278F HC/MC-130 RECAP 6,242 6,242
RDT&E.
087 0605431F ADVANCED EHF 272,872 272,872
MILSATCOM
(SPACE).
088 0605432F POLAR MILSATCOM 124,805 124,805
(SPACE).
089 0605433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL 13,948 13,948
SATCOM (SPACE).
090 0605931F B-2 DEFENSIVE 303,500 303,500
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM.
091 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS 67,874 67,874
MODERNIZATION.
094 0207701F FULL COMBAT 4,663 4,663
MISSION
TRAINING.
097 0401318F CV-22........... 46,705 46,705
............... SUBTOTAL 5,078,715 4,989,015
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION.
...............
............... MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
099 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR 17,690 17,690
DEVELOPMENT.
100 0604759F MAJOR T&E 34,841 34,841
INVESTMENT.
101 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR 32,956 32,956
FORCE.
103 0605712F INITIAL 13,610 13,610
OPERATIONAL
TEST &
EVALUATION.
104 0605807F TEST AND 742,658 742,658
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
105 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS 14,203 14,203
LAUNCH PROGRAM
(SPACE).
106 0605864F SPACE TEST 13,000 13,000
PROGRAM (STP).
107 0605976F FACILITIES 44,160 44,160
RESTORATION AND
MODERNIZATION--
TEST AND
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
108 0605978F FACILITIES 27,643 27,643
SUSTAINMENT--TE
ST AND
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
109 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE 13,935 13,935
SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING
INITIATIVE.
110 0606392F SPACE AND 192,348 192,348
MISSILE CENTER
(SMC) CIVILIAN
WORKFORCE.
111 0702806F ACQUISITION AND 28,647 28,647
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
112 0804731F GENERAL SKILL 315 315
TRAINING.
114 1001004F INTERNATIONAL 3,785 3,785
ACTIVITIES.
............... SUBTOTAL 1,179,791 1,179,791
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
...............
............... OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
115 0603423F GLOBAL 383,500 383,500
POSITIONING
SYSTEM III--
OPERATIONAL
CONTROL SEGMENT.
117 0604445F WIDE AREA 5,000 5,000
SURVEILLANCE.
118 0605018F AF INTEGRATED 90,097 90,097
PERSONNEL AND
PAY SYSTEM (AF-
IPPS).
119 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER 32,086 32,086
TECHNOLOGY
EXECUTIVE
AGENCY.
121 0101113F B-52 SQUADRONS.. 24,007 24,007
122 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED 450 450
CRUISE MISSILE
(ALCM).
123 0101126F B-1B SQUADRONS.. 19,589 19,589
124 0101127F B-2 SQUADRONS... 100,194 100,194
125 0101313F STRAT WAR 37,448 37,448
PLANNING
SYSTEM--USSTRAT
COM.
128 0102326F REGION/SECTOR 1,700 1,700
OPERATION
CONTROL CENTER
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
130 0203761F WARFIGHTER RAPID 3,844 3,844
ACQUISITION
PROCESS (WRAP)
RAPID
TRANSITION FUND.
131 0205219F MQ-9 UAV........ 128,328 128,328
133 0207131F A-10 SQUADRONS.. 9,614 9,614
134 0207133F F-16 SQUADRONS.. 177,298 177,298
135 0207134F F-15E SQUADRONS. 244,289 244,289
136 0207136F MANNED 13,138 13,138
DESTRUCTIVE
SUPPRESSION.
137 0207138F F-22A SQUADRONS. 328,542 328,542
138 0207142F F-35 SQUADRONS.. 33,000 33,000
139 0207161F TACTICAL AIM 15,460 15,460
MISSILES.
140 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM 84,172 84,172
RANGE AIR-TO-
AIR MISSILE
(AMRAAM).
142 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE 2,582 2,582
AND RECOVERY.
143 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE-- 542 542
PARARESCUE.
144 0207247F AF TENCAP....... 89,816 89,816
145 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK 1,075 1,075
SYSTEMS
PROCUREMENT.
146 0207253F COMPASS CALL.... 10,782 10,782
147 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE 139,369 139,369
COMPONENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
149 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO- 6,373 6,373
SURFACE
STANDOFF
MISSILE (JASSM).
150 0207410F AIR & SPACE 22,820 22,820
OPERATIONS
CENTER (AOC).
151 0207412F CONTROL AND 7,029 7,029
REPORTING
CENTER (CRC).
152 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING 186,256 186,256
AND CONTROL
SYSTEM (AWACS).
153 0207418F TACTICAL 743 743
AIRBORNE
CONTROL SYSTEMS.
156 0207431F COMBAT AIR 4,471 4,471
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEM
ACTIVITIES.
158 0207444F TACTICAL AIR 10,250 10,250
CONTROL PARTY-
MOD.
159 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL 1,431 1,431
DATA LINK.
160 0207449F COMMAND AND 7,329 7,329
CONTROL (C2)
CONSTELLATION.
161 0207452F DCAPES.......... 15,081 15,081
162 0207581F JOINT 13,248 23,148
SURVEILLANCE/
TARGET ATTACK
RADAR SYSTEM
(JSTARS).
............... Continue T-3 [9,900]
testing
operations.
163 0207590F SEEK EAGLE...... 24,342 24,342
164 0207601F USAF MODELING 10,448 10,448
AND SIMULATION.
165 0207605F WARGAMING AND 5,512 5,512
SIMULATION
CENTERS.
166 0207697F DISTRIBUTED 3,301 3,301
TRAINING AND
EXERCISES.
167 0208006F MISSION PLANNING 62,605 62,605
SYSTEMS.
169 0208059F CYBER COMMAND 68,099 68,099
ACTIVITIES.
170 0208087F AF OFFENSIVE 14,047 14,047
CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS.
171 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE 5,853 5,853
CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS.
179 0301400F SPACE 12,197 12,197
SUPERIORITY
INTELLIGENCE.
180 0302015F E-4B NATIONAL 18,267 18,267
AIRBORNE
OPERATIONS
CENTER (NAOC).
181 0303131F MINIMUM 36,288 36,288
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK (MEECN).
182 0303140F INFORMATION 90,231 100,231
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
............... ASACoE [10,000]
program.
183 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT 725 725
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
185 0303601F MILSATCOM 140,170 140,170
TERMINALS.
187 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT 117,110 117,110
ENTERPRISE.
190 0305099F GLOBAL AIR 4,430 4,430
TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT
(GATM).
191 0305103F CYBER SECURITY 2,048 2,048
INITIATIVE.
192 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME 288 288
CENTER.
193 0305110F SATELLITE 35,698 35,698
CONTROL NETWORK
(SPACE).
194 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE. 24,667 24,667
195 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC 35,674 35,674
CONTROL,
APPROACH, AND
LANDING SYSTEM
(ATCALS).
196 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS.. 21,186 21,186
199 0305128F SECURITY AND 195 195
INVESTIGATIVE
ACTIVITIES.
200 0305145F ARMS CONTROL 1,430 1,430
IMPLEMENTATION.
201 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT 330 330
COUNTERINTELLIG
ENCE ACTIVITIES.
206 0305173F SPACE AND 3,696 3,696
MISSILE TEST
AND EVALUATION
CENTER.
207 0305174F SPACE 2,469 2,469
INNOVATION,
INTEGRATION AND
RAPID
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
208 0305179F INTEGRATED 8,289 8,289
BROADCAST
SERVICE (IBS).
209 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE 13,345 13,345
SYSTEM (SPACE).
211 0305202F DRAGON U-2...... 18,700 18,700
212 0305205F ENDURANCE 3,000 3,000
UNMANNED AERIAL
VEHICLES.
213 0305206F AIRBORNE 37,828 50,328
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
............... Blue Devil [12,500]
Replacement
WAMI/NVDF.
214 0305207F MANNED 13,491 13,491
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
215 0305208F DISTRIBUTED 7,498 7,498
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
216 0305219F MQ-1 PREDATOR A 3,326 3,326
UAV.
217 0305220F RQ-4 UAV........ 134,406 114,406
............... Multiple [-20,000]
execution
delays.
218 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC 7,413 7,413
COLLABORATIVE
TARGETING.
219 0305236F COMMON DATA LINK 40,503 40,503
(CDL).
220 0305238F NATO AGS........ 264,134 264,134
221 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS 23,016 23,016
ENTERPRISE.
222 0305265F GPS III SPACE 221,276 221,276
SEGMENT.
223 0305614F JSPOC MISSION 58,523 58,523
SYSTEM.
224 0305881F RAPID CYBER 2,218 2,218
ACQUISITION.
226 0305913F NUDET DETECTION 50,547 50,547
SYSTEM (SPACE).
227 0305940F SPACE SITUATION 18,807 18,807
AWARENESS
OPERATIONS.
229 0308699F SHARED EARLY 1,079 1,079
WARNING (SEW).
230 0401115F C-130 AIRLIFT 400 73,700
SQUADRON.
............... C-130 AMP... [47,300]
............... C-130H [26,000]
Propulsion
System
Propeller
Upgrades.
231 0401119F C-5 AIRLIFT 61,492 61,492
SQUADRONS (IF).
232 0401130F C-17 AIRCRAFT 109,134 109,134
(IF).
233 0401132F C-130J PROGRAM.. 22,443 22,443
234 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT 4,116 4,116
IR
COUNTERMEASURES
(LAIRCM).
238 0401314F OPERATIONAL 44,553 44,553
SUPPORT AIRLIFT.
239 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / 6,213 6,213
COMBAT CONTROL.
240 0702207F DEPOT 1,605 1,605
MAINTENANCE
(NON-IF).
242 0708610F LOGISTICS 95,238 95,238
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
(LOGIT).
243 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS 10,925 10,925
DEVELOPMENT.
244 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT 1,347 1,347
TRAINING.
245 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL 65 65
ACTIVITIES.
246 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL 1,083 1,083
RECOVERY AGENCY.
247 0901218F CIVILIAN 1,577 1,577
COMPENSATION
PROGRAM.
248 0901220F PERSONNEL 5,990 5,990
ADMINISTRATION.
249 0901226F AIR FORCE 786 786
STUDIES AND
ANALYSIS AGENCY.
250 0901279F FACILITIES 654 654
OPERATION--ADMI
NISTRATIVE.
251 0901538F FINANCIAL 135,735 135,735
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 11,874,528 11,874,528
PROGRAMS.
............... SUBTOTAL 16,297,542 16,383,242
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... TOTAL 25,702,946 25,718,946
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
, TEST &
EVAL, AF.
...............
............... RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL, DW
............... BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC 45,837 45,837
RESEARCH
INITIATIVE.
002 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH 315,033 315,033
SCIENCES.
003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH 11,171 11,171
INITIATIVES.
004 0601117E BASIC 49,500 49,500
OPERATIONAL
MEDICAL
RESEARCH
SCIENCE.
005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE 84,271 84,271
EDUCATION
PROGRAM.
006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY 30,895 35,895
BLACK COLLEGES
AND
UNIVERSITIES/
MINORITY
INSTITUTIONS.
............... Program [5,000]
increase.
007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND 51,426 51,426
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE PROGRAM.
............... SUBTOTAL 588,133 593,133
BASIC
RESEARCH.
...............
............... APPLIED RESEARCH
008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS 20,065 20,065
TECHNOLOGY.
009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL 114,790 114,790
TECHNOLOGY.
011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN 46,875 41,875
LABORATORY
RESEARCH
PROGRAM.
............... MIT LL [-5,000]
reduction.
013 0602251D8Z APPLIED RESEARCH 45,000 40,000
FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF
S&T PRIORITIES.
............... PSC S&T [-5,000]
reduction.
014 0602303E INFORMATION & 413,260 415,760
COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
............... Plan X [2,500]
increase.
015 0602304E COGNITIVE 16,330 16,330
COMPUTING
SYSTEMS.
017 0602383E BIOLOGICAL 24,537 24,537
WARFARE DEFENSE.
018 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND 227,065 217,065
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE PROGRAM.
............... Program [-10,000]
decrease.
020 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY 18,908 18,908
RESEARCH.
021 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL 2,500
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING (HSCB)
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
............... HSCB Apl Res [2,500]
extension.
022 0602702E TACTICAL 225,977 225,977
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0602715E MATERIALS AND 166,654 166,654
BIOLOGICAL
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0602716E ELECTRONICS 243,469 243,469
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS 175,282 175,282
DESTRUCTION
DEFEAT
TECHNOLOGIES.
026 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE 11,107 11,107
ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE (SEI)
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
027 1160401BB SPECIAL 29,246 29,246
OPERATIONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
............... SUBTOTAL 1,778,565 1,763,565
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
...............
............... ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
028 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS 26,646 21,646
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
............... Program [-5,000]
decrease.
029 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED 19,420 19,420
DEVELOPMENT.
030 0603122D8Z COMBATING 77,792 77,792
TERRORISM
TECHNOLOGY
SUPPORT.
031 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFERA 274,033 274,033
TION
INITIATIVES--PR
OLIFERATION
PREVENTION AND
DEFEAT.
032 0603175C BALLISTIC 309,203 214,203
MISSILE DEFENSE
TECHNOLOGY.
............... Advanced [-20,000]
Technology--
unsustainabl
e growth.
............... Common Kill [-70,000]
VehicleTechn
ology--trans
fer to line
032X.
............... Directed [-5,000]
energy--DPAL
S.
032X 0603XXXC COMMON KILL 100,000
VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGY.
............... Common Kill [70,000]
Vehicle
Technology--
transfer
from line
032.
............... Increase for [30,000]
CKVT design
and
development.
034 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE 19,305 19,305
MUNITIONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
035 0603264S AGILE 7,565 7,565
TRANSPORTATION
FOR THE 21ST
CENTURY (AT21)--
THEATER
CAPABILITY.
036 0603274C SPECIAL PROGRAM-- 40,426 40,426
MDA TECHNOLOGY.
037 0603286E ADVANCED 149,804 149,804
AEROSPACE
SYSTEMS.
038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS 172,546 172,546
AND TECHNOLOGY.
039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND 170,847 170,847
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--ADVANC
ED DEVELOPMENT.
040 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC 9,009 9,009
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
041 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY 174,428 167,428
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
............... Decrease to [-7,000]
Strategic
Capabilities
Office
efforts.
042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED 20,000 5,000
COMMUNICATIONS
CAPABILITIES.
............... Net Comm [-15,000]
reduction.
045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY 19,668 19,668
ADVANCED
RESEARCH.
046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL 2,500
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING (HSCB)
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
............... HSCB Adv Dev [2,500]
extension.
047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE 34,041 59,041
MANUFACTURING
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
............... IBIF........ [25,000]
048 0603699D8Z EMERGING 61,971 53,971
CAPABILITIES
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
............... Decrease to [-8,000]
Strategic
Capabilities
Office
efforts.
050 0603712S GENERIC 20,000 20,000
LOGISTICS R&D
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND 30,256 30,256
DISTRIBUTION
ENTERPRISE
TECHNOLOGY.
052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC 72,324 72,324
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH
PROGRAM.
053 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS 82,700 82,700
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT AND
SUPPORT.
054 0603727D8Z JOINT 8,431 8,431
WARFIGHTING
PROGRAM.
055 0603739E ADVANCED 117,080 117,080
ELECTRONICS
TECHNOLOGIES.
057 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL 239,078 239,078
AND
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
059 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC 259,006 259,006
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
060 0603767E SENSOR 286,364 286,364
TECHNOLOGY.
061 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED 12,116 12,116
LEARNING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
062 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE 19,008 19,008
ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE.
063 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION 78,532 68,532
SPECIAL
PROJECTS.
............... Quick & [-10,000]
Rapid
Reaction
Fund
reduction.
065 0603828J JOINT 12,667 12,667
EXPERIMENTATION.
066 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING AND 41,370 41,370
SIMULATION
MANAGEMENT
OFFICE.
069 0603941D8Z TEST & 92,508 92,508
EVALUATION
SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY.
070 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL 52,001 52,001
ENERGY
CAPABILITY
IMPROVEMENT.
071 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS.... 52,053 55,053
............... Program [3,000]
increase.
072 1160402BB SPECIAL 46,809 46,809
OPERATIONS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
............... SUBTOTAL 3,109,007 3,099,507
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT AND
PROTOTYPES
075 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND 63,641 63,641
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT RDT&E
ADC&P.
076 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH... 19,152 19,152
077 0603600D8Z WALKOFF......... 70,763 70,763
079 0603714D8Z ADVANCED SENSORS 17,230 19,230
APPLICATION
PROGRAM.
............... Sustain [2,000]
testing
effort.
080 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL 71,453 71,453
SECURITY
TECHNICAL
CERTIFICATION
PROGRAM.
081 0603881C BALLISTIC 268,990 268,990
MISSILE DEFENSE
TERMINAL
DEFENSE SEGMENT.
082 0603882C BALLISTIC 1,033,903 1,133,903
MISSILE DEFENSE
MIDCOURSE
DEFENSE SEGMENT.
............... Continue [20,000]
activities
relative to
site
evaluation,
EIS, and
planning.
............... FTG-07 [80,000]
failure
review board
and return
to flight.
083 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND 196,237 196,237
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--DEM/
VAL.
084 0603884C BALLISTIC 315,183 395,183
MISSILE DEFENSE
SENSORS.
............... Additional [30,000]
homeland
missile
defense
radar.
............... Enhanced [50,000]
discriminati
on
capability.
086 0603890C BMD ENABLING 377,605 377,605
PROGRAMS.
087 0603891C SPECIAL 286,613 286,613
PROGRAMS--MDA.
088 0603892C AEGIS BMD....... 937,056 937,056
089 0603893C SPACE TRACKING & 44,947 44,947
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
090 0603895C BALLISTIC 6,515 6,515
MISSILE DEFENSE
SYSTEM SPACE
PROGRAMS.
091 0603896C BALLISTIC 418,355 418,355
MISSILE DEFENSE
COMMAND AND
CONTROL, BATTLE
MANAGEMENT AND
COMMUNICATI.
092 0603898C BALLISTIC 47,419 47,419
MISSILE DEFENSE
JOINT
WARFIGHTER
SUPPORT.
093 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE 52,131 52,131
INTEGRATION &
OPERATIONS
CENTER (MDIOC).
094 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH 13,864 13,864
095 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND 44,478 44,478
RADAR (SBX).
096 0603913C ISRAELI 95,782 283,782
COOPERATIVE
PROGRAMS.
............... Arrow Weapon [33,700]
System
Improvements.
............... Arrow-3 [22,100]
Interceptor.
............... David's [117,200]
Sling short-
range BMD.
............... US co- [15,000]
production
capability
for Iron
Dome parts
and
components.
097 0603914C BALLISTIC 375,866 375,866
MISSILE DEFENSE
TEST.
098 0603915C BALLISTIC 495,257 495,257
MISSILE DEFENSE
TARGETS.
099 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN 11,704 11,704
DEMINING.
100 0603923D8Z COALITION 9,842 9,842
WARFARE.
101 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF 3,312 13,312
DEFENSE
CORROSION
PROGRAM.
............... Corrosion [10,000]
Prevention,
Control, and
Mitigation.
102 0604250D8Z ADVANCED 130,000 100,000
INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGIES.
............... Decrease to [-30,000]
SCO efforts.
103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF 8,300 8,300
DEFENSE (DOD)
UNMANNED
AIRCRAFT SYSTEM
(UAS) COMMON
DEVELOPMENT.
104 0604445J WIDE AREA 30,000 30,000
SURVEILLANCE.
105 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL 2,500
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING (HSCB)
RESEARCH AND
ENGINEERING.
............... HSCB [2,500]
Modeling R&E
extension.
106 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID 200,000
INNOVATION
PROGRAM.
............... Rapid [200,000]
Innovation
Program.
108 0604787J JOINT SYSTEMS 7,402 7,402
INTEGRATION.
110 0604828J JOINT FIRES 7,506 7,506
INTEGRATION AND
INTEROPERABILIT
Y TEAM.
111 0604880C LAND-BASED SM-3 129,374 129,374
(LBSM3).
112 0604881C AEGIS SM-3 BLOCK 308,522 308,522
IIA CO-
DEVELOPMENT.
115 0303191D8Z JOINT 3,169 3,169
ELECTROMAGNETIC
TECHNOLOGY
(JET) PROGRAM.
116 0305103C CYBER SECURITY 946 946
INITIATIVE.
............... SUBTOTAL 5,902,517 6,455,017
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
AND
PROTOTYPES.
...............
............... SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT AND
DEMONSTRATION
118 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND 8,155 8,155
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT RDT&E
SDD.
119 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL 65,440 65,440
STRIKE
CAPABILITY
DEVELOPMENT.
120 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND 451,306 451,306
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--EMD.
122 0604764K ADVANCED IT 29,138 29,138
SERVICES JOINT
PROGRAM OFFICE
(AITS-JPO).
123 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL 19,475 19,475
INFORMATION
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM (JTIDS).
124 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS 12,901 12,901
DESTRUCTION
DEFEAT
CAPABILITIES.
125 0605013BL INFORMATION 13,812 13,812
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
126 0605021SE HOMELAND 386 386
PERSONNEL
SECURITY
INITIATIVE.
127 0605022D8Z DEFENSE 3,763 3,763
EXPORTABILITY
PROGRAM.
128 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT 6,788 6,788
DEVELOPMENT
INITIATIVES.
129 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE 27,917 27,917
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT AND
DEMONSTRATION.
130 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND 22,297 22,297
INTEGRATION.
131 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY 51,689 51,689
INTIATIVES
(DAI)--FINANCIA
L SYSTEM.
132 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE 6,184 6,184
ELECTRONIC
PROCUREMENT
CAPABILITIES.
133 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT 12,083 12,083
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
134 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE 3,302 3,302
ENERGY
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
(EEIM).
............... SUBTOTAL 734,636 734,636
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION.
...............
............... MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
135 0604774D8Z DEFENSE 6,393 6,393
READINESS
REPORTING
SYSTEM (DRRS).
136 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS 2,479 2,479
ARCHITECTURE
DEVELOPMENT.
137 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND 240,213 240,213
EVALUATION
INVESTMENT
DEVELOPMENT
(CTEIP).
138 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND 2,127 2,127
EVALUATIONS.
139 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR... 8,287 8,287
140 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION 31,000 31,000
ENVIRONMENT
TEST CAPABILITY
(JMETC).
141 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL 24,379 24,379
STUDIES,
SUPPORT AND
ANALYSIS.
143 0605117D8Z FOREIGN MATERIEL 54,311 54,311
ACQUISITION AND
EXPLOITATION.
144 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED 47,462 47,462
AIR AND MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION
(JIAMDO).
146 0605130D8Z FOREIGN 12,134 12,134
COMPARATIVE
TESTING.
147 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS 44,237 44,237
ENGINEERING.
148 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND 5,871 5,871
ANALYSIS
SUPPORT--OSD.
149 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS- 5,028 5,028
PHYSICAL
SECURITY.
150 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO 6,301 6,301
NETWORKS AND
INFORMATION
INTEGRATION.
151 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT 6,504 6,504
TO USD
(INTELLIGENCE).
152 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND 92,046 92,046
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE PROGRAM.
158 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS 1,868 1,868
INNOVATION
RESEARCH (SBIR)/
SMALL BUSINESS
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER (S.
159 0605798D8Z DEFENSE 8,362 8,362
TECHNOLOGY
ANALYSIS.
160 0605801KA DEFENSE 56,024 56,024
TECHNICAL
INFORMATION
CENTER (DTIC).
161 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT 6,908 6,908
OF DOD
ENLISTMENT,
TESTING AND
EVALUATION.
162 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST 15,451 19,451
AND EVALUATION.
............... Program [4,000]
increase.
164 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ-- 71,659 71,659
R&D.
165 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND 4,083 4,083
PROGRAM
ASSESSMENTS.
167 0203345D8Z DEFENSE 5,306 5,306
OPERATIONS
SECURITY
INITIATIVE
(DOSI).
168 0204571J JOINT STAFF 2,097 2,097
ANALYTICAL
SUPPORT.
172 0303166J SUPPORT TO 8,394 8,394
INFORMATION
OPERATIONS (IO)
CAPABILITIES.
175 0305193D8Z CYBER 7,624 7,624
INTELLIGENCE.
178 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE 43,247 43,247
ENGAGEMENT AND
TRAINING
TRANSFORMATION
(CE2T2).
179 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ-- 37,712 37,712
MDA.
180 0901598D8W MANAGEMENT 607 607
HEADQUARTERS
WHS.
181A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 54,914 54,914
PROGRAMS.
............... SUBTOTAL 913,028 917,028
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
...............
............... OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
182 0604130V ENTERPRISE 7,552 7,552
SECURITY SYSTEM
(ESS).
183 0605127T REGIONAL 3,270 3,270
INTERNATIONAL
OUTREACH (RIO)
AND PARTNERSHIP
FOR PEACE
INFORMATION
MANA.
184 0605147T OVERSEAS 287 287
HUMANITARIAN
ASSISTANCE
SHARED
INFORMATION
SYSTEM (OHASIS).
185 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE 14,000 14,000
ANALYSIS AND
SUSTAINMENT
SUPPORT.
186 0607310D8Z OPERATIONAL 1,955 1,955
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
187 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER 13,250 13,250
SECURITY
COOPERATION
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS (G-
TSCMIS).
188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND 13,026 13,026
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
(OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT).
190 0607828J JOINT 12,652 12,652
INTEGRATION AND
INTEROPERABILIT
Y.
191 0208043J PLANNING AND 3,061 3,061
DECISION AID
SYSTEM (PDAS).
192 0208045K C4I 72,726 72,726
INTEROPERABILIT
Y.
194 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED 6,524 6,524
COALITION
INFORMATION
SHARING.
201 0302016K NATIONAL 512 512
MILITARY
COMMAND SYSTEM-
WIDE SUPPORT.
202 0302019K DEFENSE INFO 12,867 12,867
INFRASTRUCTURE
ENGINEERING AND
INTEGRATION.
203 0303126K LONG-HAUL 36,565 36,565
COMMUNICATIONS-
-DCS.
204 0303131K MINIMUM 13,144 13,144
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK (MEECN).
205 0303135G PUBLIC KEY 1,060 1,060
INFRASTRUCTURE
(PKI).
206 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT 33,279 33,279
INFRASTRUCTURE
(KMI).
207 0303140D8Z INFORMATION 10,673 10,673
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
208 0303140G INFORMATION 181,567 181,567
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
210 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND 34,288 34,288
AND CONTROL
SYSTEM.
211 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM 7,741 7,741
ORGANIZATION.
212 0303170K NET-CENTRIC 3,325 3,325
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES (NCES).
213 0303260D8Z DEFENSE MILITARY 1,246 1,246
DECEPTION
PROGRAM OFFICE
(DMDPO).
214 0303610K TELEPORT PROGRAM 5,147 5,147
216 0304210BB SPECIAL 17,352 17,352
APPLICATIONS
FOR
CONTINGENCIES.
220 0305103K CYBER SECURITY 3,658 3,658
INITIATIVE.
221 0305125D8Z CRITICAL 9,752 9,752
INFRASTRUCTURE
PROTECTION
(CIP).
225 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D 3,210 4,210
PROGRAMS.
............... CRRC [1,000]
extension.
227 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY.. 21,602 21,602
230 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED 5,195 5,195
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
233 0305208K DISTRIBUTED 3,348 3,348
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
235 0305219BB MQ-1 PREDATOR A 641 641
UAV.
238 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE 2,338 2,338
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER
PROGRAM.
239 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL 4,372 4,372
INTELLIGENCE
TECHNOLOGY AND
ARCHITECTURES.
247 0708011S INDUSTRIAL 24,691 24,691
PREPAREDNESS.
248 0708012S LOGISTICS 4,659 4,659
SUPPORT
ACTIVITIES.
249 0902298J MANAGEMENT HQ-- 3,533 3,533
OJCS.
250 1105219BB MQ-9 UAV........ 1,314 13,314
............... Capability [12,000]
Improvements.
254 1160403BB AVIATION SYSTEMS 156,561 156,561
256 1160405BB SPECIAL 7,705 7,705
OPERATIONS
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
257 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL 42,620 42,620
ENHANCEMENTS.
261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS. 17,970 17,970
262 1160432BB SPECIAL PROGRAMS 7,424 7,424
268 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL 2,206 2,206
VEHICLES.
271 1160483BB MARITIME SYSTEMS 18,325 19,481
............... CCFLIR--Tran [1,156]
sfer at
USSOCOM
Request.
274 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL VIDEO 3,304 3,304
SURVEILLANCE
ACTIVITIES.
275 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL 16,021 16,021
ENHANCEMENTS
INTELLIGENCE.
275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 3,773,704 3,773,704
PROGRAMS.
............... SUBTOTAL 4,641,222 4,655,378
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... TOTAL 17,667,108 18,218,264
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
, TEST &
EVAL, DW.
...............
............... OPERATIONAL TEST
& EVAL, DEFENSE
............... MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST 75,720 75,720
AND EVALUATION.
002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST 48,423 48,423
AND EVALUATION.
003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST 62,157 62,157
ACTIVITIES AND
ANALYSES.
............... SUBTOTAL 186,300 186,300
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
...............
............... TOTAL 186,300 186,300
OPERATIONAL
TEST &
EVAL,
DEFENSE.
...............
............... TOTAL RDT&E 67,520,236 67,739,463
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Line Program Element Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
............... SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY 7,000 7,000
TACTICAL
VEHICLES.
............... SUBTOTAL 7,000 7,000
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION.
...............
............... TOTAL 7,000 7,000
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
ARMY.
...............
............... OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 34,426 34,426
PROGRAMS.
............... SUBTOTAL 34,426 34,426
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... TOTAL 34,426 34,426
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
NAVY.
...............
............... OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 9,000 9,000
PROGRAMS.
............... SUBTOTAL 9,000 9,000
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... TOTAL 9,000 9,000
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
AF.
...............
............... OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 66,208 66,208
PROGRAMS.
............... SUBTOTAL 66,208 66,208
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
...............
............... TOTAL 66,208 66,208
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
DW.
...............
............... TOTAL RDT&E. 116,634 116,634
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Line Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS................ 888,114 1,059,114
Readiness funding increase [171,000]
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES...... 72,624 72,624
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE........ 617,402 617,402
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.......... 602,262 602,262
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,032,484 1,032,484
060 AVIATION ASSETS............... 1,287,462 1,303,262
Readiness funding increase [15,800]
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 3,559,656 3,768,656
SUPPORT......................
Readiness funding increase [209,000]
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS. 454,477 454,477
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 1,481,156 1,706,156
Readiness funding increase [225,000]
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT....... 7,278,154 7,278,154
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 2,754,712 3,011,712
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
Realignment of Arlington [-25,000]
National Cemetary
operations................
Sustainment to 90%........ [282,000]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL 425,271 425,271
HQ'S.........................
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE 185,064 185,064
OPERATIONS...................
170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY 463,270 463,270
MISSIONS.....................
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 21,102,108 21,979,908 MOBILIZATION
180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY............ 360,240 360,240
190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS.... 192,105 192,105
200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS....... 7,101 7,101
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION..... 559,446 559,446 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
210 OFFICER ACQUISITION........... 115,992 115,992
220 RECRUIT TRAINING.............. 52,323 52,323
230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING..... 43,589 43,589
240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS 453,745 453,745
TRAINING CORPS...............
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.... 1,034,495 1,034,495
260 FLIGHT TRAINING............... 1,016,876 1,016,876
270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 186,565 186,565
EDUCATION....................
280 TRAINING SUPPORT.............. 652,514 652,514
290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 485,500 485,500
300 EXAMINING..................... 170,912 170,912
310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY 251,523 251,523
EDUCATION....................
320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND 184,422 184,422
TRAINING.....................
330 JUNIOR ROTC................... 181,105 181,105
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 4,829,561 4,829,561
RECRUITING................ ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.... 690,089 690,089
360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES..... 774,120 774,120
370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES... 651,765 651,765
380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT......... 453,051 453,051
390 ADMINISTRATION................ 487,737 487,737
400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.... 1,563,115 1,563,115
410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT........... 326,853 326,853
420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT....... 234,364 234,364
430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT......... 1,212,091 1,212,091
440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES........ 243,540 243,540
450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT........ 241,101 241,101
460 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT....... 226,291 226,291
470 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS.... 426,651 457,851
Realignment of NATO [31,200]
Special Operations
Headquarters from O&M
Defense-wide..............
480 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 27,248 27,248
525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS........... 1,023,946 1,023,946
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE 8,581,962 8,613,162
ACTIVITIES................ UNDISTRIBUTED
530 UNDISTRIBUTED................. -284,300
Average civilian end [-284,300]
strength above projection.
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.... -284,300 TOTAL OPERATION & 35,073,077 35,697,777
MAINTENANCE, ARMY........ OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS................ 1,621 1,621
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES...... 24,429 24,429
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE........ 657,099 657,099
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.......... 122,485 122,485
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 584,058 584,058
060 AVIATION ASSETS............... 79,380 79,380
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 471,616 471,616
SUPPORT......................
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS. 74,243 74,243
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 70,894 146,694
Army Reserve identified [75,800]
shortfall--restore
unjustified efficiency
reduction.................
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT....... 569,801 569,801
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 294,145 330,545
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
Readiness funding increase [36,400]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL 51,853 51,853
HQ'S.........................
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 3,001,624 3,113,824 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.... 10,735 10,735
140 ADMINISTRATION................ 24,197 24,197
150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.... 10,304 10,304
160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT........... 10,319 10,319
170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 37,857 37,857
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 93,412 93,412
ACTIVITIES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 3,095,036 3,207,236
MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES.... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS................ 800,880 800,880
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES...... 178,650 178,650
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE........ 771,503 771,503
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.......... 98,699 98,699
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 38,779 38,779
060 AVIATION ASSETS............... 922,503 922,503
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 761,056 761,056
SUPPORT......................
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS. 62,971 62,971
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 233,105 233,105
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT....... 1,019,059 1,019,059
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 712,139 786,339
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
Readiness funding increase [74,200]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL 1,013,715 1,000,418
HQ'S.........................
Army National Guard [-13,297]
identified severance pay
excess to requirement.....
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 6,613,059 6,673,962 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.... 10,812 10,812
140 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT........ 1,551 1,551
150 ADMINISTRATION................ 78,284 78,284
160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.... 46,995 46,995
170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT........... 6,390 6,390
180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 297,105 297,105
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 441,137 441,137
ACTIVITIES................ UNDISTRIBUTED
190 UNDISTRIBUTED................. -15,000
Unjustified Growth For [-15,000]
Civilian Personnel
Compensation..............
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.... -15,000 TOTAL OPERATION & 7,054,196 7,100,099
MAINTENANCE, ARNG........ OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT 4,952,522 4,985,022
OPERATIONS...................
Readiness funding increase [32,500]
020 FLEET AIR TRAINING............ 1,826,404 1,826,404
030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & 38,639 38,639
ENGINEERING SERVICES.........
040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY 90,030 90,030
SUPPORT......................
050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT........... 362,700 362,700
060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE.... 915,881 955,881
Navy Unfunded Requirement [40,000]
for Air Depot Maintenance.
070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS 35,838 35,838
SUPPORT......................
080 AVIATION LOGISTICS............ 379,914 379,914
090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP 3,884,836 3,995,736
OPERATIONS...................
Readiness funding increase [99,500]
Spares.................... [11,400]
100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & 734,852 734,852
TRAINING.....................
110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE........ 5,191,511 5,191,511
120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 1,351,274 1,381,274
Readiness funding increase [30,000]
130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS......... 701,316 701,316
140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE............ 97,710 97,710
150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 172,330 172,330
160 WARFARE TACTICS............... 454,682 454,682
170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND 328,406 328,406
OCEANOGRAPHY.................
180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES......... 946,429 1,083,297
Navy Unfunded Requirement [148,000]
for Navy Expeditionary
Combat Enterprise Reset/
Depot.....................
Unjustified growth for [-11,132]
human resources functions.
190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE......... 142,249 142,249
200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT...... 2,603 2,603
210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE 102,970 102,970
OPERATIONS...................
220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT 199,128 199,128
MISSION SUPPORT..............
230 CRUISE MISSILE................ 92,671 92,671
240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE....... 1,193,188 1,193,188
250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS 105,985 105,985
SUPPORT......................
260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE........... 532,627 532,627
270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT.. 304,160 304,160
280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION........ 1,011,528 1,011,528
290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND 1,996,821 2,132,821
MODERNIZATION................
Readiness funding increase [136,000]
300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT........ 4,460,918 4,460,918
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 32,610,122 33,096,390 MOBILIZATION
310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE. 331,576 331,576
320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/ 6,638 6,638
INACTIVATIONS................
330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 222,752 222,752
340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES 73,310 73,310
SYSTEMS......................
350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS.......... 2,675 2,675
360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT........... 23,794 23,794
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION..... 660,745 660,745 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
370 OFFICER ACQUISITION........... 148,516 148,516
380 RECRUIT TRAINING.............. 9,384 9,384
390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING 139,876 139,876
CORPS........................
400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.... 630,069 630,069
410 FLIGHT TRAINING............... 9,294 9,294
420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 169,082 169,082
EDUCATION....................
430 TRAINING SUPPORT.............. 164,368 164,368
440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 241,733 242,833
Naval Sea Cadets.......... [1,100]
450 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY 139,815 139,815
EDUCATION....................
460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND 94,632 94,632
TRAINING.....................
470 JUNIOR ROTC................... 51,373 51,373
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 1,798,142 1,799,242
RECRUITING................ ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480 ADMINISTRATION................ 886,088 886,088
490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS............ 13,131 13,131
500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND 115,742 115,742
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.........
510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND 382,150 382,150
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.........
520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT....... 268,403 268,403
530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.... 317,293 317,293
550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.... 207,128 207,128
570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND 295,855 295,855
DESIGN.......................
580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM 1,140,484 1,140,484
MANAGEMENT...................
590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND 52,873 52,873
ELECTRICAL SUPPORT...........
600 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS........ 27,587 27,587
610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE 75,728 75,728
SYSTEMS......................
620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE... 543,026 543,026
680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND 4,965 4,965
AGENCIES.....................
705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS........... 545,775 545,775
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 4,876,228 4,876,228
ACTIVITIES................ UNDISTRIBUTED
710 UNDISTRIBUTED................. -30,000
Average civilian end [-30,000]
strength above projection.
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.... -30,000 TOTAL OPERATION & 39,945,237 40,402,605
MAINTENANCE, NAVY........ OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
MARINE CORPS
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATIONAL FORCES............ 837,012 912,012
Crisis Response Force..... [40,000]
Marine Security Guard..... [35,000]
020 FIELD LOGISTICS............... 894,555 894,555
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE............. 223,337 279,337
Readiness funding increase [56,000]
040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING....... 97,878 97,878
050 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 774,619 774,619
MODERNIZATION................
060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT........ 2,166,661 2,166,661
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 4,994,062 5,125,062 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
070 RECRUIT TRAINING.............. 17,693 17,693
080 OFFICER ACQUISITION........... 896 896
090 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.... 100,806 100,806
100 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 46,928 46,928
EDUCATION....................
110 TRAINING SUPPORT.............. 356,426 356,426
120 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 179,747 179,747
130 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY 52,255 52,255
EDUCATION....................
140 JUNIOR ROTC................... 23,138 23,138
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 777,889 777,889
RECRUITING................ ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.... 43,816 43,816
160 ADMINISTRATION................ 305,107 305,107
180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM 87,500 87,500
MANAGEMENT...................
185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS........... 46,276 46,276
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 482,699 482,699
ACTIVITIES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 6,254,650 6,385,650
MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT 586,620 588,520
OPERATIONS...................
Readiness funding increase [1,900]
020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE...... 7,008 7,008
040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE.... 100,657 109,557
Readiness funding increase [8,900]
050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS 305 305
SUPPORT......................
060 AVIATION LOGISTICS............ 3,927 3,927
070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP 75,933 75,933
OPERATIONS...................
080 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & 601 601
TRAINING.....................
090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE........ 44,364 44,364
100 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS......... 15,477 15,477
110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES......... 115,608 115,608
120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE........... 1,967 1,967
130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION........ 43,726 43,726
140 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND 69,011 74,011
MODERNIZATION................
Sustainment to 90%........ [5,000]
150 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT........ 109,604 109,604
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 1,174,808 1,190,608 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
160 ADMINISTRATION................ 2,905 2,905
170 MILITARY MANPOWER AND 14,425 14,425
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.........
180 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.... 2,485 2,485
190 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM 3,129 3,129
MANAGEMENT...................
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 22,944 22,944
ACTIVITIES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 1,197,752 1,213,552
MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES.... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC
RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATING FORCES.............. 96,244 96,244
020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE............. 17,581 17,581
030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND 32,438 32,738
MODERNIZATION................
Sustainment to 90%........ [300]
040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT........ 95,259 95,259
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 241,522 241,822 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
050 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.... 894 894
060 ADMINISTRATION................ 11,743 11,743
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 9,158 9,158
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 21,795 21,795
ACTIVITIES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 263,317 263,617
MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE.. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR
FORCE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES......... 3,295,814 3,442,614
Readiness funding increase [146,800]
020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES..... 1,875,095 1,875,095
030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, 1,559,109 1,579,109
MAINTAIN SKILLS).............
Increase for ranges....... [20,000]
040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE............. 5,956,304 6,146,304
Readiness funding increase [190,000]
050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 1,834,424 1,934,738
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
Readiness funding increase [100,314]
060 BASE SUPPORT.................. 2,779,811 2,779,811
070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING.. 913,841 911,329
Remove program growth for [-2,512]
foreign currency
fluctuation...............
080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS. 916,837 916,837
100 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER 720,349 720,349
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES...........
110 LAUNCH FACILITIES............. 305,275 305,275
120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS......... 433,658 433,658
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT 1,146,016 1,146,016
MISSION SUPPORT..............
140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE 231,830 231,830
OPERATIONS...................
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 21,968,363 22,422,965 MOBILIZATION
150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS............ 2,015,902 2,015,902
160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS..... 147,216 147,216
170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE............. 1,556,232 1,556,232
180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 167,402 167,402
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
190 BASE SUPPORT.................. 707,040 707,040
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION..... 4,593,792 4,593,792 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
200 OFFICER ACQUISITION........... 102,334 102,334
210 RECRUIT TRAINING.............. 17,733 17,733
220 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING 94,600 94,600
CORPS (ROTC).................
230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 217,011 217,011
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
240 BASE SUPPORT.................. 800,327 800,327
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.... 399,364 399,364
260 FLIGHT TRAINING............... 792,275 792,275
270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 248,958 248,958
EDUCATION....................
280 TRAINING SUPPORT.............. 106,741 106,741
290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE............. 319,331 339,331
Readiness funding increase [20,000]
300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 122,736 122,736
310 EXAMINING..................... 3,679 3,679
320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY 137,255 137,255
EDUCATION....................
330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND 176,153 176,153
TRAINING.....................
340 JUNIOR ROTC................... 67,018 67,018
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 3,605,515 3,625,515
RECRUITING................ ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS.......... 1,103,684 1,103,684
360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES.. 919,923 919,923
370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE............. 56,601 56,601
380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 281,061 281,061
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
390 BASE SUPPORT.................. 1,203,305 1,198,128
Unjustified increase for [-5,177]
public-private
competitions..............
400 ADMINISTRATION................ 593,865 593,865
410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.... 574,609 574,609
420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES.. 1,028,600 1,028,600
430 CIVIL AIR PATROL.............. 24,720 24,720
460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT......... 89,008 89,008
465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS........... 1,227,796 1,227,796
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 7,103,172 7,097,995
ACTIVITIES................ UNDISTRIBUTED
470 UNDISTRIBUTED................. -200,000
Average civilian end [-200,000]
strength above projection.
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.... -200,000 TOTAL OPERATION & 37,270,842 37,540,267
MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF
RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES......... 1,857,951 1,857,951
020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS.... 224,462 220,062
Unjustified growth in [-4,400]
civilian personnel
compensation..............
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE............. 521,182 521,182
040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 89,704 98,674
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
Readiness funding increase [8,970]
050 BASE SUPPORT.................. 360,836 360,836
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 3,054,135 3,058,705 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES
060 ADMINISTRATION................ 64,362 64,362
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 15,056 15,056
080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS 23,617 23,617
MGMT (ARPC)..................
090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY 6,618 6,618
COMP)........................
100 AUDIOVISUAL................... 819 819
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION 110,472 110,472
AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES TOTAL OPERATION & 3,164,607 3,169,177
MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE.. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
OPERATING FORCES
010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS........... 3,371,871 3,371,871
020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS.... 720,305 720,305
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE............. 1,514,870 1,514,870
040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 296,953 325,153
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..
Readiness funding increase [28,200]
050 BASE SUPPORT.................. 597,303 597,303
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 6,501,302 6,529,502 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-
WIDE ACTIVITIES
060 ADMINISTRATION................ 32,117 32,117
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.... 32,585 32,585
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION 64,702 64,702
AND SERVICE-WIDE
ACTIVITIES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 6,566,004 6,594,204
MAINTENANCE, ANG......... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATING FORCES
010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF......... 472,239 472,239
020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND.... 5,261,463 5,233,611
AFSOC Flying Hour Program. [70,100]
International SOF [-7,017]
Information Sharing System
Ongoing baseline [-35,519]
contingency operations....
Other Operations--military [-5,000]
construction collateral
equipment non-recurring
costs.....................
Pilot program for SOF [5,000]
family members............
Preserve the force and [-11,605]
families--human
performance program.......
Preserve the force and [-8,786]
families--resiliency......
Realignment of NATO [-31,200]
Special Operations
Headquarters to O&M, Army.
Regional SOF Coordination [-14,725]
Centers...................
USASOC Flying Hour Program [18,000]
USSOCOM NCR Contractor [-7,100]
Support...................
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES. 5,733,702 5,705,850 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
040 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY 157,397 157,397
050 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY... 84,899 84,899
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 242,296 242,296
RECRUITING................ ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES
060 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS....... 144,443 166,142
STARBASE.................. [21,699]
080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY. 612,207 583,207
Overestimation of Civilian [-29,000]
Full Time Equivalent
Targets...................
090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT 1,378,606 1,319,606
AGENCY.......................
Overestimation of Civilian [-59,000]
Full Time Equivalent
Targets...................
110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES 763,091 763,091
ACTIVITY.....................
120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,326,243 1,326,243
AGENCY.......................
140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY. 29,933 29,933
150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY...... 462,545 451,517
Cost of DISA computing [-11,028]
service rates.............
160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY........ 222,979 222,979
170 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE........ 21,594 21,594
180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION 788,389 761,589
AGENCY.......................
Combating terrorism [-7,000]
fellowship program........
Global Train and Equip.... [-7,800]
Regional centers for [-12,000]
security centers--
undistributed decrease....
190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE...... 546,603 546,603
210 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY 35,151 35,151
ADMINISTRATION...............
220 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION 438,033 438,033
AGENCY.......................
240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 2,713,756 2,713,756
EDUCATION ACTIVITY...........
250 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY........ 256,201 254,801
THAAD excess to [-1,400]
requirement...............
270 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT. 371,615 217,715
Program decrease.......... [-273,300]
Rephasing of Guam civilian [119,400]
water and waste water
infrastructure projects...
280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF 2,010,176 1,995,176
DEFENSE......................
BRAC 2015 Initiative...... [-8,000]
OUSD(P) program decrease.. [-7,000]
290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS 616,572 611,572
SERVICES.....................
Price Growth Requested as [-5,000]
Program Growth............
295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS........... 14,283,558 14,323,558
Classified adjustment..... [10,000]
Increase to Operation [30,000]
Observant Compass.........
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION 27,021,695 26,782,266
AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES UNDISTRIBUTED
305 UNDISTRIBUTED................. 30,000
Impact Aid................ [25,000]
Impact Aid for Children [5,000]
with Severe Disabilities..
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.... 30,000 TOTAL OPERATION & 32,997,693 32,760,412
MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
040 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 13,606 13,606
ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE........
050 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, 109,500 109,500
DISASTER AND CIVIC AID.......
060 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION.. 528,455 528,455
080 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD.......... 256,031 131,331
Program decrease.......... [-124,700]
090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, 298,815 298,815
ARMY.........................
100 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, 316,103 316,103
NAVY.........................
110 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR 439,820 439,820
FORCE........................
120 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, 10,757 10,757
DEFENSE......................
130 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 237,443 237,443
FORMERLY USED SITES..........
160 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 5,000 0
OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND.....
Program reduction......... [-5,000] TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 2,215,530 2,085,830
APPROPRIATIONS........... TOTAL OPERATION & 175,097,941 176,420,426
MAINTENANCE..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY
OPERATIONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
(In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Line Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS................. 217,571 217,571
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES....... 8,266 8,266
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE......... 56,626 56,626
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS........... 4,209,942 4,209,942
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 950,567 950,567
060 AVIATION ASSETS................ 474,288 474,288
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 1,349,152 1,349,152
SUPPORT.......................
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS.. 655,000 655,000
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE.. 301,563 301,563
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT........ 706,214 706,214
140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES.......... 11,519,498 11,519,498
150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE 60,000 60,000
PROGRAM.......................
160 RESET.......................... 2,240,358 3,340,358
Restore Critical Army Reset [1,100,000]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 22,749,045 23,849,045 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION..... 4,601,356 4,601,356
380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT.......... 17,418 17,418
400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS..... 110,000 110,000
420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT........ 94,820 94,820
430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT.......... 54,000 54,000
450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT......... 250,000 250,000
525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............ 1,402,994 1,402,994
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE 6,530,588 6,530,588
ACTIVITIES................. TOTAL OPERATION & 29,279,633 30,379,633
MAINTENANCE, ARMY......... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
RES
OPERATING FORCES
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE......... 6,995 6,995
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 2,332 2,332
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 608 608
SUPPORT.......................
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT........ 33,000 33,000
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 42,935 42,935 TOTAL OPERATION & 42,935 42,935
MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES..... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS................. 29,314 29,314
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES....... 1,494 1,494
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE......... 15,343 15,343
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS........... 1,549 1,549
060 AVIATION ASSETS................ 64,504 64,504
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 31,512 31,512
SUPPORT.......................
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT........ 42,179 42,179
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S 11,996 11,996
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 197,891 197,891 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS..... 1,480 1,480
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 1,480 1,480
ACTIVITIES................. TOTAL OPERATION & 199,371 199,371
MAINTENANCE, ARNG......... AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES
FUND
MINISTRY OF DEFENSE
010 SUSTAINMENT.................... 2,735,603 2,735,603
020 INFRASTRUCTURE................. 278,650 278,650
030 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION... 2,180,382 2,180,382
040 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS........ 626,550 626,550
SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF 5,821,185 5,821,185
DEFENSE.................... MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
060 SUSTAINMENT.................... 1,214,995 1,214,995
080 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION... 54,696 54,696
090 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS........ 626,119 626,119
SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF 1,895,810 1,895,810
INTERIOR................... DETAINEE OPS
110 SUSTAINMENT.................... 7,225 7,225
140 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS........ 2,500 2,500
SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS...... 9,725 9,725 UNDISTRIBUTED
160 UNDISTRIBUTED.................. -1,500,000
Program decrease........... [-1,500,000]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED..... -1,500,000 TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY 7,726,720 6,226,720
FORCES FUND............... AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
010 POWER.......................... 279,000 250,000
Unjustified expenditure.... [-29,000]
SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN 279,000 250,000
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND........ TOTAL AFGHANISTAN 279,000 250,000
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND....... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT 845,169 845,169
OPERATIONS....................
030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & 600 600
ENGINEERING SERVICES..........
040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY 17,489 17,489
SUPPORT.......................
050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT............ 78,491 78,491
060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE..... 162,420 162,420
070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS 2,700 2,700
SUPPORT.......................
080 AVIATION LOGISTICS............. 50,130 50,130
090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP 949,539 949,539
OPERATIONS....................
100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & 20,226 20,226
TRAINING......................
110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE......... 1,679,660 1,679,660
130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS.......... 37,760 37,760
160 WARFARE TACTICS................ 25,351 25,351
170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND 20,045 20,045
OCEANOGRAPHY..................
180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES.......... 1,212,296 1,212,296
190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.......... 10,203 10,203
250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS 127,972 127,972
SUPPORT.......................
260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE............ 221,427 221,427
290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND 13,386 13,386
MODERNIZATION.................
300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT......... 110,940 110,940
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 5,585,804 5,585,804 MOBILIZATION
340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES 18,460 18,460
SYSTEMS.......................
360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT............ 227,033 227,033
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION...... 245,493 245,493 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING..... 50,269 50,269
430 TRAINING SUPPORT............... 5,400 5,400
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 55,669 55,669
RECRUITING................. ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480 ADMINISTRATION................. 2,418 2,418
490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS............. 516 516
510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 5,107 5,107
MANAGEMENT....................
520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT........ 1,411 1,411
530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS..... 2,545 2,545
550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION..... 153,427 153,427
580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM 8,570 8,570
MANAGEMENT....................
620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE.... 1,425 1,425
705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............ 5,608 5,608
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 181,027 181,027
ACTIVITIES................. TOTAL OPERATION & 6,067,993 6,067,993
MAINTENANCE, NAVY......... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE
CORPS
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATIONAL FORCES............. 992,190 992,190
020 FIELD LOGISTICS................ 559,574 559,574
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.............. 570,000 570,000
060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT......... 69,726 69,726
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 2,191,490 2,191,490 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
110 TRAINING SUPPORT............... 108,270 108,270
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 108,270 108,270
RECRUITING................. ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION..... 365,555 365,555
160 ADMINISTRATION................. 3,675 3,675
185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............ 825 825
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 370,055 370,055
ACTIVITIES................. TOTAL OPERATION & 2,669,815 2,669,815
MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT 17,196 17,196
OPERATIONS....................
020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE....... 200 200
040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE..... 6,000 6,000
070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP 12,304 12,304
OPERATIONS....................
090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE......... 6,790 6,790
110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES.......... 13,210 13,210
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 55,700 55,700 TOTAL OPERATION & 55,700 55,700
MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES..... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC
RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATING FORCES............... 11,124 11,124
040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT......... 1,410 1,410
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 12,534 12,534 TOTAL OPERATION & 12,534 12,534
MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR
FORCE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES.......... 1,712,393 1,712,393
020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES...... 836,104 836,104
030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, 14,118 14,118
MAINTAIN SKILLS)..............
040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.............. 1,373,480 1,373,480
050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 122,712 122,712
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...
060 BASE SUPPORT................... 1,520,333 1,520,333
070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING... 31,582 31,582
080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS.. 147,524 147,524
110 LAUNCH FACILITIES.............. 857 857
120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS.......... 8,353 8,353
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT 50,495 50,495
MISSION SUPPORT...............
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 5,817,951 5,817,951 MOBILIZATION
150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS............. 3,091,133 3,091,133
160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS...... 47,897 47,897
170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.............. 387,179 517,179
Program increase........... [130,000]
180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 7,043 7,043
RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...
190 BASE SUPPORT................... 68,382 68,382
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION...... 3,601,634 3,731,634 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
200 OFFICER ACQUISITION............ 100 100
210 RECRUIT TRAINING............... 478 478
240 BASE SUPPORT................... 19,256 19,256
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING..... 12,845 12,845
260 FLIGHT TRAINING................ 731 731
270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 607 607
EDUCATION.....................
280 TRAINING SUPPORT............... 720 720
320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY 152 152
EDUCATION.....................
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 34,889 34,889
RECRUITING................. ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS........... 86,273 86,273
360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES... 2,511 2,511
390 BASE SUPPORT................... 19,887 19,887
400 ADMINISTRATION................. 3,493 3,493
410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS..... 152,086 152,086
420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES... 269,825 269,825
460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT.......... 117 117
465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............ 16,558 16,558
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 550,750 550,750
ACTIVITIES................. TOTAL OPERATION & 10,005,224 10,135,224
MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE.... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF
RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE.............. 26,599 26,599
050 BASE SUPPORT................... 6,250 6,250
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 32,849 32,849 TOTAL OPERATION & 32,849 32,849
MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
OPERATING FORCES
020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS..... 22,200 22,200
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 22,200 22,200 TOTAL OPERATION & 22,200 22,200
MAINTENANCE, ANG.......... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATING FORCES
020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND..... 2,222,868 2,222,868
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.. 2,222,868 2,222,868 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES
080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY.. 27,781 27,781
090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT 45,746 45,746
AGENCY........................
120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 76,348 76,348
AGENCY........................
140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY.. 99,538 99,538
160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY......... 9,620 9,620
180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION 1,950,000 1,950,000
AGENCY........................
240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION 100,100 100,100
ACTIVITY......................
280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF 38,227 38,227
DEFENSE.......................
290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS 2,784 2,784
SERVICES......................
295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............ 1,862,066 1,862,066
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND 4,212,210 4,212,210
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES..... TOTAL OPERATION & 6,435,078 6,435,078
MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE. TOTAL OPERATION & 62,829,052 62,530,052
MAINTENANCE...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel Appropriations..... 130,399,881 129,716,981
Enlistment bonuses excess to [-38,000]
requirement........................
Excess to requirement.............. [-64,300]
Full Time Pay and Allowances [-10,000]
projected underexecution...........
Full Time Support projected [-1,000]
underexecution.....................
Military Personnel unobligated..... [-186,000]
Permanent Change of Station Travel-- [-150,000]
Army...............................
Recruiting and Retention programs [-1,800]
excess to requirement..............
Reenlistment bonuses excess to [-68,300]
requirement........................
Reserve Incentive Programs excess [-7,750]
to requirement.....................
Travel, Active Duty for Training, [-18,000]
projected underexecution...........
Undistributed reduction consistent [-137,750]
with pace of drawdown..............
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund 6,676,750 6,676,750
Contributions........................ Total, Military Personnel........... 137,076,631 136,393,731
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In
Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel Appropriations..... 9,689,307 9,648,807
Projected underexecution........... [-40,500]
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund 164,033 164,033
Contributions........................ Total, Military Personnel........... 9,853,340 9,812,840
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Program Title Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS...... 25,158 25,158
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY... 25,158 25,158WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
FUEL COSTS
SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/ 61,731 61,731
DENTAL)..............................
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR 61,731 61,731
FORCE..............................WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)........ 46,428 46,428
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE- 46,428 46,428
WIDE...............................WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA............ 1,412,510 1,412,510
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA... 1,412,510 1,412,510NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND
LMSR
MPF MLP............................... 134,917 22,717
Navy requested adjustment........ [-112,200]
POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING.......... 43,404 43,404
NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL
LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE.......... 116,784 116,784
DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS.......... 60,703 60,703
TAH MAINTENANCE....................... 19,809 19,809
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.............. 56,058 56,058
READY RESERVE FORCE................... 299,025 299,025
TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND 730,700 618,500CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE............... 451,572 451,572
RDT&E................................. 604,183 604,183
PROCUREMENT........................... 1,368 1,368
TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS 1,057,123 1,057,123
DESTRUCTION........................DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG
ACTIVITIES, DEF
OPERATING FORCES...................... 815,965 815,965
DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM......... 122,580 122,580
TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG 938,545 938,545
ACTIVITIES, DEF....................OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............. 311,131 346,000
Program increase................. [34,869]
RDT&E
PROCUREMENT........................... 1,000 1,000
TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR 312,131 347,000
GENERAL............................DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
IN-HOUSE CARE......................... 8,880,738 8,880,738
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE................... 15,842,732 15,775,732
Pharmaceutical drugs excess [-67,000]
growth...........................
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT........... 2,505,640 2,505,640
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT................ 1,450,619 1,450,619
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES................. 368,248 368,248
EDUCATION AND TRAINING................ 733,097 733,097
BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS........ 1,872,660 1,872,660
R&D RESEARCH.......................... 9,162 9,162
R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT............ 47,977 47,977
R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.............. 291,156 291,156
R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION.......... 132,430 132,430
R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT........... 161,674 161,674
R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT............ 72,568 72,568
R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT.......... 14,646 14,646
RDT&E UNDISTRIBUTED
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING............... 89,404 89,404
PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION...... 377,577 377,577
PROC IEHR............................. 204,200 204,200
UNDISTRIBUTED......................... -57,000
DHP Unobligated.................. [-275,000]
Restore Tricare savings.......... [218,000]
TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM....... 33,054,528 32,930,528 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS......... 37,638,854 37,437,523
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In
Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Program Title Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS............ 44,732 44,732
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY......... 44,732 44,732WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
C-17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR...................... 78,500 78,500
TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES................ 10,000 10,000
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE.... 88,500 88,500WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA).............. 131,678 131,678
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE. 131,678 131,678DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF
OPERATING FORCES............................ 376,305 376,305
TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG 376,305 376,305
ACTIVITIES, DEF..........................OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE................... 10,766 10,766
TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.... 10,766 10,766DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
IN-HOUSE CARE............................... 375,958 375,958
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE......................... 382,560 382,560
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT................. 132,749 132,749
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT...................... 2,238 2,238
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES....................... 460 460
EDUCATION AND TRAINING...................... 10,236 10,236
TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM............. 904,201 904,201 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS............... 1,556,182 1,556,182
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country and FY 2014 Agreement
Account Installation Project Title Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska
Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Battalion Complex. 45,000 45,000
Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Storage Hangar.... 58,000 58,000
Colorado
Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 66,000 66,000
Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 73,000 73,000
Army Fort Carson Central Energy Plant....... 34,000 34,000
Army Fort Carson Fire Station............... 12,000 12,000
Army Fort Carson Headquarters Building...... 33,000 33,000
Army Fort Carson Runway..................... 12,000 12,000
Army Fort Carson Simulator Building......... 12,200 12,200
Florida
Army Eglin AFB Automated Sniper Field Fire 4,700 4,700
Range.
Georgia
Army Fort Gordon Adv Individual Training 61,000 61,000
Barracks Cplx, Ph2.
Hawaii
Army Fort Shafter Command and Control 75,000 70,000
Facility--Admin.
Kansas
Army Fort Leavenworth Simulations Center......... 17,000 17,000
Kentucky
Army Fort Campbell Battlefield Weather Support 4,800 4,800
Facility.
Maryland
Army Aberdeen Proving Operations and Maintenance 21,000 21,000
Ground Facilities.
Army Fort Detrick Entry Control Point........ 2,500 2,500
Army Fort Detrick Hazardous Material Storage 4,600 4,600
Building.
Missouri
Army Fort Leonard Wood Adv Individual Training 86,000 86,000
Barracks Cplx, Ph1.
Army Fort Leonard Wood Simulator Building......... 4,700 4,700
New York
Army U.S. Military Academy Cadet Barracks, Incr 2..... 42,000 42,000
North Carolina
Army Fort Bragg Command and Control 5,900 5,900
Facility.
Texas
Army Fort Bliss Control Tower.............. 10,800 10,800
Army Fort Bliss Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 36,000 36,000
Complex.
Virginia
Army Joint Base Langley- Adv Individual Training 50,000 50,000
Eustis Barracks Cplx, Ph3.
Washington
Army Joint Base Lewis- Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 79,000 79,000
Mcchord
Army Joint Base Lewis- Airfield Operations Complex 37,000 37,000
Mcchord
Army Joint Base Lewis- Aviation Battalion Complex. 28,000 28,000
Mcchord
Army Yakima Automated Multipurpose 9,100 9,100
Machine Gun Range.
Worldwide Classified
Army Classified Location Company Operations Complex. 33,000 0
Japan
Army Kyoga Misaki Company Operations Complex. 0 33,000
Kwajalein
Army Kwajalein Atoll Pier....................... 63,000 63,000
Worldwide Unspecified
Army Unspecified Worldwide Host Nation Support Fy14... 33,000 28,000
Locations
Army Unspecified Worldwide Minor Construction Fy14.... 25,000 25,000
Locations
Army Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design Fy14... 41,575 41,575
Locations
........................
Total Military Construction, Army 1,119,875 1,109,875
......................
California
Navy Barstow Engine Dynamometer Facility 14,998 14,998
Navy Camp Pendleton Ammunition Supply Point 13,124 13,124
Upgrade.
Navy Coronado H-60 Trainer Facility...... 8,910 8,910
Navy Point Mugu Aircraft Engine Test Pads.. 7,198 7,198
Navy Point Mugu Bams Consolidated 17,469 17,469
Maintenance Hangar.
Navy Port Hueneme Unaccompanied Housing 33,600 33,600
Conversion.
Navy San Diego Steam Plant 34,331 34,331
Decentralization.
Navy Twentynine Palms Camp Wilson Infrastructure 33,437 33,437
Upgrades.
Florida
Navy Jacksonville P-8a Training & Parking 20,752 20,752
Apron Expansion.
Navy Key West Aircraft Crash/Rescue & 14,001 14,001
Fire Headquarters.
Navy Mayport Lcs Logistics Support 16,093 16,093
Facility.
Georgia
Navy Albany Cers Dispatch Facility..... 1,010 1,010
Navy Albany Weapons Storage and 15,600 15,600
Inspection Facility.
Navy Savannah Townsend Bombing Range Land 61,717 61,717
Acq--Phase 1.
Guam
Navy Joint Region Marianas Aircraft Maintenance 85,673 85,673
Hangar--North Ramp.
Navy Joint Region Marianas Bams Forward Operational & 61,702 61,702
Maintenance Hangar.
Navy Joint Region Marianas Dehumidified Supply Storage 17,170 17,170
Facility.
Navy Joint Region Marianas Emergent Repair Facility 35,860 35,860
Expansion.
Navy Joint Region Marianas Modular Storage Magazines.. 63,382 63,382
Navy Joint Region Marianas Sierra Wharf Improvements.. 1,170 1,170
Navy Joint Region Marianas X-Ray Wharf Improvements... 53,420 53,420
Hawaii
Navy Kaneohe Bay 3rd Radio Bn Maintenance/ 25,336 25,336
Operations Complex.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Aircraft Maintenance 16,968 16,968
Expansion.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 31,820 31,820
Upgrades.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Armory Addition and 12,952 12,952
Renovation.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Aviation Simulator 17,724 17,724
Modernization/Addition.
Navy Kaneohe Bay Mv-22 Hangar............... 57,517 57,517
Navy Kaneohe Bay Mv-22 Parking Apron and 74,665 74,665
Infrastructure.
Navy Pearl City Water Transmission Line.... 30,100 30,100
Navy Pearl Harbor Drydock Waterfront Facility 22,721 22,721
Navy Pearl Harbor Submarine Production 35,277 35,277
Support Facility.
Illinois
Navy Great Lakes Unaccompanied Housing...... 35,851 35,851
Maine
Navy Bangor Nctams Vlf Commercial Power 13,800 13,800
Connection.
Navy Kittery Structural Shops 11,522 11,522
Consolidation.
Maryland
Navy Fort Meade Marforcybercom HQ-Ops 83,988 83,988
Building.
Nevada
Navy Fallon Wastewater Treatment Plant. 11,334 11,334
North Carolina
Navy Camp Lejeune Landfill--Phase 4.......... 20,795 20,795
Navy Camp Lejeune Operations Training Complex 22,515 22,515
Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization--BEQ 18,679 18,679
Nodes.
Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization-- 2,620 2,620
Camp Johnson.
Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization-- 13,390 13,390
Hadnot Point.
Navy New River Ch-53k Maintenance Training 13,218 13,218
Facility.
Navy New River Corrosion Control Hangar... 12,547 12,547
Navy New River Regional Communication 20,098 20,098
Station.
Oklahoma
Navy Tinker AFB Tacamo E-6B Hangar......... 14,144 14,144
Rhode Island
Navy Newport Hewitt Hall Research Center 12,422 12,422
South Carolina
Navy Charleston Nuclear Power Operational 73,932 73,932
Training Facility.
Virginia
Navy Dam Neck Aerial Target Operation 10,587 10,587
Consolidation.
Navy Norfolk Pier 11 Power Upgrades for 3,380 3,380
Cvn-78.
Navy Quantico Academic Instruction 25,731 25,731
Facility Tecom Schools.
Navy Quantico Atc Transmitter/Receiver 3,630 3,630
Relocation.
Navy Quantico Fuller Road Improvements... 9,013 9,013
Navy Yorktown Small Arms Ranges.......... 18,700 18,700
Washington
Navy Bremerton Integrated Water Treatment 18,189 18,189
Sys Dry Docks 3&4.
Navy Kitsap Explosives Handling Wharf 24,880 24,880
#2 (Inc).
Navy Whidbey Island Ea-18g Facility 32,482 32,482
Improvements.
Navy Whidbey Island P-8a Hangar and Training 85,167 85,167
Facilities.
Djibouti
Navy Camp Lemonier Armory..................... 6,420 6,420
Navy Camp Lemonier Unaccompanied Housing...... 22,580 22,580
Japan
Navy Camp Butler Airfield Security Upgrades. 5,820 5,820
Navy Yokosuka Communication System 7,568 7,568
Upgrade.
Worldwide Unspecified
Navy Unspecified Worldwide Mcon Design Funds.......... 89,830 89,830
Locations
Navy Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 19,740 19,740
Locations Construction.
Navy Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Worldwide 0 0
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Navy 1,700,269 1,700,269
......................
Arizona
AF Luke AFB F-35 Field Training 5,500 5,500
Detachment.
AF Luke AFB F-35 Sq Ops/Aircraft 21,400 21,400
Maintenance Unit #3.
California
AF Beale AFB Distributed Common Ground 62,000 62,000
Station Ops Bldg.
Florida
AF Tyndall AFB F-22 Munitions Storage 9,100 9,100
Complex.
Guam
AF Joint Region Marianas Par--Fuel Sys Hardened 20,000 20,000
Bldgs.
AF Joint Region Marianas Par--Strike Tactical 10,530 10,530
Missile Mxs Facility.
AF Joint Region Marianas Par--Tanker Gp Mx Hangar/ 132,600 132,600
AMU/Sqd Ops.
AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc Red Horse Airfield 8,500 8,500
Operations Facility.
AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc Sf Fire Rescue & 4,600 4,600
Emergency Mgt.
Hawaii
AF Joint Base Pearl C-17 Modernize Hgr 35, 4,800 4,800
Harbor-Hickam Docks 1&2.
Kansas
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a 2-Bay Corrosion 0 82,000
Control/Fuel Cell Hangar.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a 3-Bay General 0 80,000
Purpose Maintenance Hangar.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Aircraft Parking 0 2,200
Apron Alteration.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Aprons Fuels 0 12,800
Distribution System.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Flight Simulator 0 2,150
Facility Phase 1.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a General Maintenance 0 32,000
Hangar.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Miscellaneous 0 970
Facilities Alteration.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Pipeline Student 0 7,000
Dormatory.
Kentucky
AF Fort Campbell 19th Air Support Operations 8,000 8,000
Sqdrn Expansion.
Maryland
AF Fort Meade Cybercom Joint Operations 85,000 85,000
Center, Increment 1.
AF Joint Base Andrews Helicopter Operations 30,000 30,000
Facility.
Missouri
AF Whiteman AFB Wsa Mop Igloos and Assembly 5,900 5,900
Facility.
Nebraska
AF Offutt AFB Usstratcom Replacement 136,000 136,000
Facility, Incr 3.
Nevada
AF Nellis AFB Add Rpa Weapons School 20,000 20,000
Facility.
AF Nellis AFB Dormitory (240 Rm)......... 35,000 35,000
AF Nellis AFB F-35 Alt Mission Equip 5,000 5,000
(Ame) Storage.
AF Nellis AFB F-35 Fuel Cell Hangar...... 9,400 9,400
AF Nellis AFB F-35 Parts Store........... 9,100 9,100
New Mexico
AF Cannon AFB Airmen and Family Readiness 5,500 5,500
Center.
AF Cannon AFB Dormitory (144 Rm)......... 22,000 22,000
AF Cannon AFB Satellite Dining Facility.. 6,600 6,600
AF Holloman AFB F-16 Aircraft Covered 2,250 2,250
Washrack and Pad.
AF Kirtland AFB Nuclear Systems Wing & 30,500 30,500
Sustainment Center (Ph.
North Dakota
AF Minot AFB B-52 Adal Aircraft 15,530 15,530
Maintenance Unit.
AF Minot AFB B-52 Munitions Storage 8,300 8,300
Igloos.
Oklahoma
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Adal Fuel 0 3,350
Systems Maintenance Dock.
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Adal Squad Ops/ 0 7,400
AMU.
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Flight Training 0 12,600
Center Simulators Facility
Phase 1.
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Fuselage Trainer 0 6,300
Phase 1.
AF Altus AFB KC-46a Ftu Renovate 0 1,200
Facility.
AF Tinker AFB KC-46a Land Acquisition.... 8,600 8,600
Texas
AF Fort Bliss F-16 Bak 12/14 Aircraft 3,350 3,350
Arresting System.
Utah
AF Hill AFB F-35 Aircraft Mx Unit 13,500 13,500
Hangar 45e Ops #1.
AF Hill AFB Fire Crash Rescue Station.. 18,500 18,500
Virginia
AF Joint Base Langley- 4-Bay Conventional 4,800 4,800
Eustis Munitions Inspection Bldg.
Greenland
AF Thule Ab Thule Consolidation, Phase 43,904 43,904
2.
Mariana Islands
AF Saipan Par--Airport Pol/Bulk 18,500 18,500
Storage Ast.
AF Saipan Par--Hazardous Cargo Pad... 8,000 8,000
AF Saipan Par--Maintenance Facility.. 2,800 2,800
United Kingdom
AF Croughton Raf Main Gate Complex.......... 12,000 0
AF Varlocs Guardian Angel Operations 22,047 22,047
Facility.
Worldwide Unspecified
AF Unspecified Worldwide KC-46a Ftu Facility 63,000 0
Locations Projects.
AF Unspecified Worldwide KC-46a Mob #1 Facility 192,700 0
Locations Projects.
AF Unspecified Worldwide Planning & Design.......... 11,314 11,314
Locations
AF Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 20,448 20,448
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air Force 1,156,573 1,138,843
......................
Alaska
Def-Wide Clear AFS Bmds Upgrade Early Warning 17,204 17,204
Radar.
Def-Wide Fort Greely Mechanical-Electrical Bldg 82,000 82,000
Missile Field #1.
California
Def-Wide Brawley SOF Desert Warfare Training 23,095 23,095
Center.
Def-Wide Defense Distribution General Purpose Warehouse.. 37,554 37,554
Depot-Tracy
Def-Wide Miramar Replace Fuel Pipeline...... 6,000 6,000
Colorado
Def-Wide Fort Carson SOF Group Support Battalion 22,282 22,282
Florida
Def-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF Add/Alter Operations 7,900 7,900
Facility.
Def-Wide Jacksonville Replace Fuel Pipeline...... 7,500 7,500
Def-Wide Key West SOF Boat Docks............. 3,600 3,600
Def-Wide Panama City Replace Ground Vehicle 2,600 2,600
Fueling Facility.
Def-Wide Tyndall AFB Replace Fuel Pipeline...... 9,500 9,500
Georgia
Def-Wide Fort Benning Faith Middle School 6,031 6,031
Addition.
Def-Wide Fort Benning White Elemtary School 37,304 37,304
Replacement.
Def-Wide Fort Stewart Diamond Elementary School 44,504 44,504
Replacement.
Def-Wide Hunter Army Airfield Replace Fuel Island........ 13,500 13,500
Def-Wide Moody AFB Replace Ground Vehicle 3,800 3,800
Fueling Facility.
Hawaii
Def-Wide Ford Island DISA Pacific Facility 2,615 2,615
Upgrades.
Def-Wide Joint Base Pearl Alter Warehouse Space...... 2,800 2,800
Harbor-Hickam
Kentucky
Def-Wide Fort Campbell Fort Campbell High School 59,278 59,278
Replacement.
Def-Wide Fort Campbell Marshall Elementary School 38,591 38,591
Replacement.
Def-Wide Fort Campbell SOF Group Special Troops 26,342 26,342
Battalion.
Def-Wide Fort Knox Ambulatory Health Center... 265,000 145,000
Def-Wide Fort Knox Consolidate/Replace Van 38,023 38,023
Voorhis-Mudge Es.
Maryland
Def-Wide Aberdeen Proving Public Health Command Lab 210,000 75,000
Ground Replacement.
Def-Wide Bethesda Naval Mech & Electrical 46,800 46,800
Hospital Improvements.
Def-Wide Bethesda Naval Parking Garage............. 20,000 20,000
Hospital
Def-Wide Fort Detrick USAMRIID Replacement Stage 13,000 13,000
1, Incr 8.
Def-Wide Fort Meade High Performance Computing 431,000 396,000
Capacity Inc 3.
Def-Wide Fort Meade NSAW Recapitalize Building 58,000 58,000
#1/Site M Inc 2.
Def-Wide Joint Base Andrews Ambulatory Care Center Inc 76,200 38,100
2.
Massachusetts
Def-Wide Hanscom AFB Hanscom Primary School 36,213 36,213
Replacement.
New Jersey
Def-Wide Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Replace Fuel Distribution 10,000 10,000
Lakehurst Components.
New Mexico
Def-Wide Holloman AFB Medical Clinic Replacement. 60,000 60,000
Def-Wide Holloman AFB Replace Hydrant Fuel System 21,400 21,400
North Carolina
Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Performance Resiliency 14,400 14,400
Center.
Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Sustainment Training 28,977 28,977
Complex.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg Consolidate/Replace Pope 37,032 37,032
Holbrook Elementary.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Civil Affairs Battalion 37,689 37,689
Annex.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Combat Medic Skills 7,600 7,600
Sustain. Course Bldg.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Engineer Training 10,419 10,419
Facility.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Language and Cultural 64,606 64,606
Center.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Upgrade Training 14,719 14,719
Facility.
North Dakota
Def-Wide Minot AFB Replace Fuel Pipeline...... 6,400 6,400
Oklahoma
Def-Wide Altus AFB Replace Refueler Parking... 2,100 2,100
Def-Wide Tinker AFB Replace Fuel Distribution 36,000 36,000
Facilities.
Pennsylvania
Def-Wide Def Distribution Depot Upgrade Hazardous Material 3,100 3,100
New Cumberland Warehouse.
Def-Wide Def Distribution Depot Upgrade Public Safety 5,900 5,900
New Cumberland Facility.
South Carolina
Def-Wide Beaufort Bolden Elementary/Middle 41,324 41,324
School Replacement.
Tennessee
Def-Wide Arnold Air Force Base Replace Ground Vehicle 2,200 2,200
Fueling Facility.
Texas
Def-Wide Fort Bliss Hospital Replacement Incr 5 252,100 100,000
Def-Wide Joint Base San Antonio Sammc Hyperbaric Facility 12,600 12,600
Addition.
Virginia
Def-Wide Dam Neck SOF Human Performance 11,147 11,147
Center.
Def-Wide Def Distribution Depot Operations Center Phase 1.. 87,000 87,000
Richmond
Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary SOF Logsu Two Operations 30,404 30,404
Base Little Creek-- Facility.
Story
Def-Wide Pentagon Boundary Channel Access 6,700 6,700
Control Point.
Def-Wide Pentagon Army Navy Drive Tour Bus 1,850 0
Drop Off.
Def-Wide Pentagon Pfpa Support Operations 14,800 14,800
Center.
Def-Wide Pentagon Raven Rock Administrative 32,000 32,000
Facility Upgrade.
Def-Wide Pentagon Raven Rock Exterior Cooling 4,100 4,100
Tower.
Def-Wide Quantico Quantico Middle/High School 40,586 40,586
Replacement.
Washington
Def-Wide Whidbey Island Replace Fuel Pier 10,000 10,000
Breakwater.
Worldwide Classified
Def-Wide Classified Location an/Tpy-2 Radar Site........ 15,000 0
Bahrain Island
Def-Wide Sw Asia Medical/Dental Clinic 45,400 45,400
Replacement.
Belgium
Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Facility. 38,513 38,513
Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Fit-Out.. 29,100 29,100
Germany
Def-Wide Kaiserlautern Ab Kaiserslautern Elementary 49,907 49,907
School Replacement.
Def-Wide Ramstein Ab Ramstein High School 98,762 98,762
Replacement.
Def-Wide Rhine Ordnance Medical Center Replacement, 151,545 76,545
Barracks Incr 3.
Def-Wide Weisbaden Hainerberg Elementary 58,899 58,899
School Replacement.
Def-Wide Weisbaden Wiesbaden Middle School 50,756 50,756
Replacement.
Japan
Def-Wide Atsugi Replace Ground Vehicle 4,100 4,100
Fueling Facility.
Def-Wide Iwakuni Construct Hydrant Fuel 34,000 34,000
System.
Def-Wide Kadena Ab Kadena Middle School 38,792 38,792
Addition/Renovation.
Def-Wide Kyoga Misaki an/Tpy-2 Radar Site........ 0 15,000
Def-Wide Torri Commo Station SOF Facility Augmentation.. 71,451 71,451
Def-Wide Yokosuka Upgrade Fuel Pumps......... 10,600 10,600
Korea
Def-Wide Camp Walker Daegu Middle/High School 52,164 52,164
Replacement.
Romania
Def-Wide Deveselu Aegis Ashore Missile Def 85,000 80,000
Sys Cmplx, Increm. 2.
United Kingdom
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall Replace Fuel Storage....... 17,732 17,732
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Airfield Pavements and 0 48,448
Hangar/AMU.
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Airfiled Pavements..... 24,077 0
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Hangar/AMU............. 24,371 0
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Mrsp and Parts Storage. 6,797 6,797
Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Squadron Operations 11,652 11,652
Facility.
Def-Wide Royal Air Force Lakenheath High School 69,638 69,638
Lakenheath Replacement.
Worldwide Unspecified
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Contingency Construction... 10,000 0
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Energy Conservation 150,000 150,000
Locations Investment Program.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Exercise Related Minor 9,730 9,730
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning & Design.......... 10,891 10,891
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 50,192 50,192
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 75,905 75,905
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 57,053 57,053
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 36,866 36,866
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 6,931 6,931
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 3,000 3,000
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 7,430 7,430
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 5,409 5,409
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 5,170 5,170
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 9,578 9,578
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 2,000 2,000
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 1,500 1,500
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide 3,985,300 3,413,250
......................
Kentucky
Chem Demil Blue Grass Army Depot Ammunition Demilitarization 122,536 122,536
Facility, Ph Xiv.
........................
Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense 122,536 122,536
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
NATO NATO Security NATO Security Investment 239,700 199,700
Investment Program Program.
........................
Total NATO Security Investment Program 239,700 199,700
......................
Alabama
Army NG Decatur National Guard Readiness 4,000 4,000
Center Add/Alt.
Arkansas
Army NG Fort Chaffee Scout/Recce Gunnery Complex 21,000 21,000
Florida
Army NG Pinellas Park Ready Building............. 5,700 5,700
Illinois
Army NG Kankakee Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 28,000 28,000
Army NG Kankakee Readiness Center........... 14,000 14,000
Massachusetts
Army NG Camp Edwards Enlisted Barracks, 19,000 19,000
Transient Training Add.
Michigan
Army NG Camp Grayling Enlisted Barracks, 17,000 17,000
Transient Training.
Minnesota
Army NG Stillwater Readiness Center........... 17,000 17,000
Mississippi
Army NG Camp Shelby Water Supply/Treatment 3,000 3,000
Building, Potable.
Army NG Pascagoula Readiness Center........... 4,500 4,500
Missouri
Army NG Macon Vehicle Maintenance Shop... 9,100 9,100
Army NG Whiteman AFB Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 5,000 5,000
New York
Army NG New York Readiness Center Add/Alt... 31,000 31,000
Ohio
Army NG Ravenna Army Sanitary Sewer............. 5,200 5,200
Ammunition Plant
Pennsylvania
Army NG Fort Indiantown Gap Aircraft Maintenance 40,000 40,000
Instructional Building.
Puerto Rico
Army NG Camp Santiago Maneuver Area Training & 5,600 5,600
Equipment Site Addit.
South Carolina
Army NG Greenville Readiness Center........... 13,000 13,000
Army NG Greenville Vehicle Maintenance Shop... 13,000 13,000
Texas
Army NG Fort Worth Armed Forces Reserve Center 14,270 14,270
Add.
Wyoming
Army NG Afton National Guard Readiness 10,200 10,200
Center.
Worldwide Unspecified
Army NG Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 29,005 24,005
Locations
Army NG Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 12,240 12,240
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Army National Guard 320,815 315,815
......................
California
Army Res Camp Parks Army Reserve Center........ 17,500 17,500
Army Res Fort Hunter Liggett Tass Training Center (Ttc). 16,500 16,500
Maryland
Army Res Bowie Army Reserve Center........ 25,500 25,500
New Jersey
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Automated Multipurpose 9,500 9,500
Lakehurst Machine Gun (Mpmg).
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Central Issue Facility..... 7,900 7,900
Lakehurst
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Consolidated Dining 13,400 13,400
Lakehurst Facility.
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Modified Record Fire Range. 5,400 5,400
Lakehurst
New York
Army Res Bullville Army Reserve Center........ 14,500 14,500
North Carolina
Army Res Fort Bragg Army Reserve Center........ 24,500 24,500
Wisconsin
Army Res Fort Mccoy Access Control Point/Mail/ 17,500 17,500
Freight Center.
Army Res Fort Mccoy Nco Academy Dining Facility 5,900 5,900
Worldwide Unspecified
Army Res Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 14,212 14,212
Locations
Army Res Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 1,748 1,748
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Army Reserve 174,060 174,060
......................
California
N/MC Res March AFB NOSC Moreno Valley Reserve 11,086 11,086
Training Center.
Missouri
N/MC Res Kansas City Reserve Training Center-- 15,020 15,020
Belton, Missouri.
Tennessee
N/MC Res Memphis Reserve Boat Maintenance 4,330 4,330
and Storage Facility.
Worldwide Unspecified
N/MC Res Unspecified Worldwide Mcnr Planning & Design..... 1,500 1,500
Locations
N/MC Res Unspecified Worldwide Usmcr Planning and Design.. 1,040 1,040
Locations
........................
Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve 32,976 32,976
......................
Alabama
Air NG Birmingham IAP Add to and Alter 8,500 8,500
Distributed Ground Station
F.
Indiana
Air NG Hulman Regional Add/Alter Bldg 37 for Dist 7,300 7,300
Airport Common Ground Sta.
Maryland
Air NG Fort Meade 175th Network Warfare 4,000 4,000
Squadron Facility.
Air NG Martin State Airport Cyber/ISR Facility......... 8,000 8,000
Montana
Air NG Great Falls IAP Intra-Theater Airlift 22,000 22,000
Conversion.
New York
Air NG Fort Drum Mq-9 Flight Training Unit 4,700 4,700
Hangar.
Ohio
Air NG Springfield Beckley- Alter Intelligence 7,200 7,200
Map Operations Facility.
Pennsylvania
Air NG Fort Indiantown Gap Communications Operations 7,700 7,700
and Training Facili.
Rhode Island
Air NG Quonset State Airport C-130J Flight Simulator 6,000 6,000
Training Facility.
Tennessee
Air NG Mcghee-Tyson Airport Tec Expansion- Dormitory & 18,000 18,000
Classroom Facility.
Worldwide Unspecified
Air NG Various Worldwide Planning and Design........ 13,400 13,400
Locations
Air NG Various Worldwide Unspecified Minor 13,000 13,000
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air National Guard 119,800 119,800
......................
California
AF Res March AFB Joint Regional Deployment 19,900 19,900
Processing Center,.
Florida
AF Res Homestead AFS Entry Control Complex...... 9,800 9,800
Oklahoma
AF Res Tinker AFB Air Control Group Squadron 12,200 12,200
Operations.
Worldwide Unspecified
AF Res Various Worldwide Planning and Design........ 2,229 2,229
Locations
AF Res Various Worldwide Unspecified Minor 1,530 1,530
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 45,659 45,659
......................
Wisconsin
FH Con Army Fort Mccoy Family Housing New 23,000 23,000
Construction (56 Units).
Germany
FH Con Army South Camp Vilseck Family Housing New 16,600 16,600
Construction (29 Units).
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Army Unspecified Worldwide Family Housing P & D....... 4,408 4,408
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Army 44,008 44,008
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings................ 33,125 33,125
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Leased Housing............. 180,924 180,924
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 107,639 107,639
Locations Property Facilities.
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Management Account......... 54,433 54,433
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Military Housing 25,661 25,661
Locations Privitization Initiative.
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous.............. 646 646
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Services................... 13,536 13,536
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Utilities.................. 96,907 96,907
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army 512,871 512,871
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con AF Unspecified Worldwide Improvements............... 72,093 72,093
Locations
FH Con AF Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design........ 4,267 4,267
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force 76,360 76,360
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 39,470 39,470
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Housing Privatization...... 41,436 41,436
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Leasing.................... 54,514 54,514
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance (Rpma Rpmc).... 110,786 110,786
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Management Account......... 53,044 53,044
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous Account...... 1,954 1,954
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Services Account........... 16,862 16,862
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account.......... 70,532 70,532
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force 388,598 388,598
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Design..................... 4,438 4,438
Locations
FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Improvements............... 68,969 68,969
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps 73,407 73,407
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 21,073 21,073
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Leasing.................... 74,962 74,962
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 90,122 90,122
Locations Property.
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Management Account......... 60,782 60,782
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous Account...... 362 362
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Privatization Support Costs 27,634 27,634
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Services Account........... 20,596 20,596
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account.......... 94,313 94,313
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps 389,844 389,844
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 67 67
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 3,196 3,196
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account........ 20 20
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Leasing.................... 10,994 10,994
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Leasing.................... 40,433 40,433
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 311 311
Locations Property.
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 74 74
Locations Property.
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Management Account......... 418 418
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Services Account........... 32 32
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account.......... 12 12
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account.......... 288 288
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide 55,845 55,845
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FHIF Unspecified Worldwide Family Housing Improvement 1,780 1,780
Locations Fund.
........................
Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund 1,780 1,780
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC Base Realignment & Base Realignment and 180,401 180,401
Closure, Army Closure.
BRAC Base Realignment & Base Realignment & Closure. 108,300 108,300
Closure, Navy
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Dod BRAC Activities--Air 126,376 126,376
Locations Force.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-100: Planing, Design 7,277 7,277
Locations and Management.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-101: Various Locations. 20,988 20,988
Locations
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-138: NAS Brunswick, ME. 993 993
Locations
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-157: Mcsa Kansas City, 40 40
Locations MO.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-172: NWS Seal Beach, 5,766 5,766
Locations Concord, CA.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-84: JRB Willow Grove & 1,216 1,216
Locations Cambria Reg Ap.
........................
Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 451,357 451,357
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--ANG 0 0
Locations Unspecified Minor
Construction.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Army 0 0
Locations Bid Savings.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Army 0 0
Locations Planning and Design Fy12.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Defense 0 0
Locations Wide Bid Savings.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Defense 0 0
Locations Wide Unspecified Minor
Construction.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Navy 0 0
Locations Bid Savings.
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Prior Year Savings--Section 0 0
Locations 1013 of the Demonstration
Cities and Metropolitan
Development Act of 1966,
AS Amended.
........................
Total Prior Year Savings 0 0
......................
Total Military Construction 11,011,633 10,366,853
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS (In Thousands
of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement
Program Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
Energy And Water Development, And
Related Agencies
Appropriation Summary:
Energy Programs
Electricity delivery and energy 16,000 0
reliability........................
Nuclear Energy...................... 94,000 94,000 Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National nuclear security
administration:
Weapons activities................ 7,868,409 7,909,252
Defense nuclear nonproliferation.. 2,140,142 2,180,142
Naval reactors.................... 1,246,134 1,246,134
Office of the administrator....... 397,784 389,784
Total, National nuclear security 11,652,469 11,725,312
administration..................... Environmental and other defense
activities:
Defense environmental cleanup..... 5,316,909 5,015,409
Other defense activities.......... 749,080 758,658
Total, Environmental & other defense 6,065,989 5,774,067
activities.........................
Total, Atomic Energy Defense 17,718,458 17,499,379
Activities...........................
Total, Discretionary Funding.............. 17,828,458 17,593,379Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability
Electricity Delivery & Energy
Reliability
Infrastructure security & energy 16,000 0
restoration (HS).....................Nuclear Energy
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security.. 94,000 94,000Weapons Activities
Life extension programs and major
alterations
B61 Life extension program.......... 537,044 537,044
W76 Life extension program.......... 235,382 245,082
W78/88-1 Life extension program..... 72,691 72,691
W88 ALT 370......................... 169,487 169,487
Total, Stockpile assessment and design 1,014,604 1,024,304 Stockpile systems
B61 Stockpile systems............... 83,536 83,536
W76 Stockpile systems............... 47,187 47,187
W78 Stockpile systems............... 54,381 54,381
W80 Stockpile systems............... 50,330 50,330
B83 Stockpile systems............... 54,948 54,948
W87 Stockpile systems............... 101,506 101,506
W88 Stockpile systems............... 62,600 62,600
Stockpile systems
Total, Stockpile systems.............. 454,488 454,488 Surveillance Weapons dismantlement and disposition
Operations and maintenance.......... 49,264 55,264 Stockpile services
Production support.................. 321,416 345,000
Research and development support.... 26,349 26,349
R&D certification and safety........ 191,259 191,259
Management, technology, and 214,187 214,187
production.........................
Plutonium sustainment............... 156,949 156,949
Total, Stockpile services............. 910,160 933,744
Total, Directed stockpile work.......... 2,428,516 2,467,800 Campaigns:
Science campaign
Advanced certification.............. 54,730 54,730
Primary assessment technologies..... 109,231 109,231
Dynamic materials properties........ 116,965 116,965
Advanced radiography................ 30,509 30,509
Secondary assessment technologies... 86,467 86,467
Total, Science campaign............... 397,902 397,902 Engineering campaign
Enhanced surety..................... 51,771 51,771
Weapon systems engineering 23,727 23,727
assessment technology..............
Nuclear survivability............... 19,504 19,504
Enhanced surveillance............... 54,909 54,909
Total, Engineering campaign........... 149,911 149,911 Inertial confinement fusion ignition
and high yield campaign
Ignition............................ 80,245 80,245
Support of other stockpile programs. 15,001 15,001
Diagnostics, cryogenics and 59,897 59,897
experimental support...............
Pulsed power inertial confinement 5,024 5,024
fusion.............................
Joint program in high energy density 8,198 8,198
laboratory plasmas.................
Facility operations and target 232,678 232,678
production.........................
Total, Inertial confinement fusion and 401,043 401,043
high yield campaign.................. Advanced simulation and computing 564,329 564,329
campaign............................. Technology Maturation Campaign Readiness Campaign
Component manufacturing development. 106,085 106,085
Tritium readiness................... 91,695 91,695
Total, Readiness campaign............. 197,780 197,780
Total, Campaigns........................ 1,710,965 1,710,965 Nuclear programs
Nuclear operations capability......... 265,937 265,937
Capabilities based investments........ 39,558 39,558
Construction:
12-D-301 TRU waste facilities, LANL. 26,722 26,722
11-D-801 TA-55 Reinvestment project 30,679 30,679
Phase 2, LANL......................
07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste 55,719 55,719
treatment facility upgrade project,
LANL...............................
06-D-141 PED/Construction, Uranium 325,835 325,835
Capabilities Replacement Project Y-
12.................................
Total, Construction................... 438,955 438,955
Total, Nuclear programs................. 744,450 744,450 Secure transportation asset
Operations and equipment.............. 122,072 122,072
Program direction..................... 97,118 97,118
Total, Secure transportation asset...... 219,190 219,190 Site stewardship
Nuclear materials integration......... 17,679 17,679
Corporate project management.......... 13,017 13,017 Minority serving institution 14,531 14,531
partnerships program................. Enterprise infrastructure
Site Operations..................... 1,112,455 1,112,455
Site Support........................ 109,561 109,561
Sustainment......................... 433,764 433,764
Facilities disposition.............. 5,000 5,000
Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure... 1,660,780 1,660,780
Total, Site stewardship................. 1,706,007 1,706,007
Defense nuclear security
Operations and maintenance............ 664,981 664,981
Construction:
14-D-710 DAF Argus, NNSS............ 14,000
Total, Defense nuclear security......... 678,981 678,981 NNSA CIO activities..................... 148,441 150,000 Legacy contractor pensions.............. 279,597 279,597
Subtotal, Weapons activities.............. 7,916,147 7,956,990 Adjustments
Use of prior year balances............ -47,738 -47,738
Total, Adjustments...................... -47,738 -47,738
Total, Weapons Activities................. 7,868,409 7,909,252
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Programs
Global threat reduction initiative.... 424,487 424,487 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
Operations and maintenance.......... 388,838 388,838 Nonproliferation and international 141,675 141,675
security............................. International material protection and 369,625 369,625
cooperation.......................... Fissile materials disposition
U.S. surplus fissile materials
disposition
Operations and maintenance
U.S. plutonium disposition...... 157,557 157,557
U.S. uranium disposition........ 25,000 25,000
Total, Operations and maintenance. 182,557 182,557
Construction:
99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel 320,000 360,000
fabrication facility, Savannah
River, SC......................
Total, Construction............... 320,000 360,000
Total, U.S. surplus fissile 502,557 542,557
materials disposition..............
Total, Fissile materials disposition.. 502,557 542,557 Legacy contractor pensions............ 93,703 93,703
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 1,920,885 1,962,444
Programs............................... Nuclear counterterrorism incident 181,293 181,293
response program....................... Counterterrorism and 74,666 74,666
counterproliferation programs..........
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear 2,176,844 2,216,844
Nonproliferation....................... Adjustments
Use of prior year balances............ -36,702 -36,702
Total, Adjustments...................... -36,702 -36,702
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation... 2,140,142 2,180,142
Naval Reactors
Naval reactors operations and 455,740 453,740
infrastructure.........................
Naval reactors development.............. 419,400 419,400
Ohio replacement reactor systems 126,400 126,400
development............................
S8G Prototype refueling................. 144,400 144,400
Program direction....................... 44,404 44,404
Construction:
14-D-902 KL Materials characterization 1,000 1,000
laboratory expansion, KAPL...........
14-D-901 Spent fuel handling 45,400 45,400
recapitalization project, NRF........
13-D-905 Remote-handled low-level 21,073 21,073
waste facility, INL..................
13-D-904 KS Radiological work and 600 2,600
storage building, KSO................
Naval Reactor Facility, ID............ 1,700 1,700
Total, Construction..................... 69,773 71,773
Subtotal, Naval Reactors.................. 1,260,117 1,260,117 Adjustments:
Use of prior year balances (Naval -13,983 -13,983
reactors)............................
Total, Naval Reactors..................... 1,246,134 1,246,134
Office Of The Administrator
Office of the administrator............. 397,784 389,784
Total, Office Of The Administrator........ 397,784 389,784
Defense Environmental Cleanup
Closure sites:
Closure sites administration.......... 4,702 4,702 Hanford site:
River corridor and other cleanup 393,634 408,634
operations...........................
Central plateau remediation........... 513,450 513,450
Richland community and regulatory 14,701 14,701
support..............................
Total, Hanford site..................... 921,785 936,785 Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho cleanup and waste disposition... 362,100 372,600
Idaho community and regulatory support 2,910 2,910
Total, Idaho National Laboratory........ 365,010 375,510 NNSA sites
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1,476 1,476
Nuclear facility D & D Separations 23,700 23,700
Process Research Unit................
Nevada................................ 61,897 61,897
Sandia National Laboratories.......... 2,814 2,814
Los Alamos National Laboratory........ 219,789 234,789
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites.. 309,676 324,676 Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear facility D & D............. 73,716 73,716
OR cleanup and disposition............ 115,855 115,855
OR reservation community and 4,365 4,365
regulatory support...................
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation............ 193,936 193,936 Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment and immobilization
plant
01-D-416 A-E/ORP-0060 / Major 690,000 690,000
construction....................... Tank farm activities
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization 520,216 520,216
and disposition....................
Total, Office of River protection....... 1,210,216 1,210,216 Savannah River sites:
Savannah River risk management 432,491 432,491
operations...........................
SR community and regulatory support... 11,210 11,210 Radioactive liquid tank waste:
Radioactive liquid tank waste 552,560 657,560
stabilization and disposition......
Construction:
05-D-405 Salt waste processing 92,000 92,000
facility, Savannah River.........
Total, Construction................. 92,000 92,000
Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste.. 644,560 749,560
Total, Savannah River site.............. 1,088,261 1,193,261 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Waste isolation pilot plant........... 203,390 219,390
Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant...... 203,390 219,390 Program direction....................... 280,784 280,784
Program support......................... 17,979 17,979 Safeguards and Security:
Oak Ridge Reservation................. 18,800 18,800
Paducah............................... 9,435 9,435
Portsmouth............................ 8,578 8,578
Richland/Hanford Site................. 69,078 69,078
Savannah River Site................... 121,196 121,196
Waste Isolation Pilot Project......... 4,977 4,977
West Valley........................... 2,015 2,015
Technology development.................. 24,091 24,091
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup... 4,853,909 5,015,409 Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution 463,000 0Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup...... 5,316,909 5,015,409
Other Defense Activities
Health, safety and security
Health, safety and security........... 143,616 143,616
Program direction..................... 108,301 108,301
Total, Health, safety and security...... 251,917 251,917 Specialized security activities......... 196,322 205,900 Office of Legacy Management
Legacy management..................... 163,271 163,271
Program direction..................... 13,712 13,712
Total, Office of Legacy Management...... 176,983 176,983 Defense-related activities
Defense related administrative support
Chief financial officer............... 38,979 38,979
Chief information officer............. 79,857 79,857
Total, Defense related administrative 118,836 118,836
support................................ Office of hearings and appeals.......... 5,022 5,022
Subtotal, Other defense activities........ 749,080 758,658
Total, Other Defense Activities........... 749,080 758,658
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY THE NATIONAL DEFENSE
AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014
[Note from the Director, Legislative Operations: The
following is the text of the Joint Explanatory Statement to
Accompany the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2014, as printed in the Congressional Record on December
12, 2013]
Compliance with rules of the House of Representatives and Senate
regarding earmarks and congressionally directed spending items
Consistent with the intent of clause 9 of rule XXI of the
Rules of the House of Representatives and rule XLIV of the
Standing Rules of the Senate, neither the bill nor the
accompanying joint explanatory statement contains any
congressional earmarks, congressionally directed spending
items, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits, as
defined in such rules.
Summary of discretionary authorizations and budget implication
The administration's budget request for national defense
discretionary programs within the jurisdiction of the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives for fiscal year 2014 was $625.2 billion. Of
this amount, $526.6 billion was requested for base Department
of Defense (DOD) programs, $80.7 billion was requested for
overseas contingency operations (OCO), and $17.9 billion was
requested for national security programs in the Department of
Energy (DOE) and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
(DNFSB).
The bill authorizes $625.1 billion in fiscal year 2014,
including $526.8 billion for base DOD programs, $80.7 billion
for OCO, and $17.6 billion for national security programs in
the DOE and the DNFSB.
The two tables preceding the detailed program adjustments
in Division D of this Joint Explanatory Statement summarize the
direct discretionary authorizations in the agreement and the
equivalent budget authority levels for fiscal year 2014 defense
programs. The first table summarizes the agreement on
authorizations within the jurisdiction of the Armed Services
Committees. The second table details the budget authority
implication of the discretionary authorizations in the
agreement when accounting for national defense items that are
not in the jurisdiction of the Armed Services Committees.
DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS
Title I--Procurement
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 101) authorizing
appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for procurement for the
Army, the Navy and Marine Corps, the Air Force, and defense-
wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section
4101.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 101).
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle B--Army Programs
Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program (sec.
111)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 111) that would
limit the availability of funds for the Stryker vehicle program
to not more than 75 percent until the Secretary of the Army
submits a report on Stryker spare parts inventories.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for tactical
vehicles (sec. 112)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 142) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense to enter into a 5-year pilot
program for the multiyear multivehicle procurement of tactical
wheeled vehicles.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would express a sense of Congress and require a study and
report on multiyear multivehicle procurement.
Subtitle C--Navy Programs
CVN-78 class aircraft carrier program (sec. 121)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 122) that would
amend section 122 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364) by:
(1) Adjusting the cap for CVN-78 from $10,500.0 million to
$12,887.0 million; (2) Adjusting the cost cap for subsequent
ships in the class from $8,100.0 million to $11,411.0 million;
and (3) Adding a new factor for adjustment, allowing increases
or decreases in the cost of CVN-78 that are attributable to the
shipboard test program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 122) that would amend section 122 by: (1)
Adjusting the cost cap for CVN-78 from $10,500.0 million to
$12,887.0 million; (2) Adding a new factor for adjustment,
allowing increases or decreases in the cost of the CVN-78 class
that are attributable to the shipboard test program; (3)
Requiring quarterly updates on the cost of CVN-79; and (4)
Preventing the Navy from paying fees under any cost-type or
incentive fee contract if the program manager's estimate of the
total cost of CVN-79 exceeds the cost cap for CVN-79.
The agreement includes a provision that would amend section
122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364) by: (1) Adjusting the cap
for CVN-78 from $10,500.0 million to $12,887.0 million; (2)
Adjusting the cost cap for subsequent ships in the class from
$8,100.0 million to $11,498.0 million; (3) Adding a new factor
for adjustment, allowing increases or decreases in the cost of
CVN-78 that are attributable to the shipboard test program, but
only when the changes result for urgent and unforeseen testing
problems that would delay delivery or initial operating
capability of the ship; (4) Requiring quarterly updates on the
cost of CVN-79; and (5) Directing the Secretary of the Navy to
ensure that each prime contract for CVN-79 includes an
incentive fee structure that will, throughout the entire period
of performance of the contract, provide incentives for each
contractor to meet the portion of the cost of the ship for
which the contractor is responsible.
Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface
combatants (sec. 122)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 123) that would repeal a reporting requirement in section
125 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (Public Law 111-84). The report submitted by the Secretary
of the Navy to Congress of February 2010 provided the
Department of the Navy's implementation plan to complete these
reports.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Multiyear procurement authority for E-2D aircraft program (sec. 123)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 121) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Navy to buy E-2D aircraft and E-
2D mission equipment under one or more multiyear procurement
contracts.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 121) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to
buy E-2D aircraft under one or more multiyear procurement
contracts.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship (sec. 124)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 125) that would require that the Chief of Naval
Operations (CNO), in coordination with the Director of
Operational Test and Evaluation, to submit a report to the
congressional defense committees on the current concept of
operations and expected survivability attributes of each of the
Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) sea frames when they would be
employed according to the concept of operations.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would fence funding for LCS-25 and LCS-26 until:
(1) The Navy provides certain reports about the LCS program;
and (2) The Joint Requirements Oversight Council makes certain
certifications about the LCS program.
Subtitle D--Air Force Programs
Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC-135E
aircraft (sec. 131)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 133) that would repeal section 135(b) of the John Warner
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public
Law 109-364). Section 135(b) requires that the Secretary of the
Air Force maintain at least 74 of the KC-135E aircraft retired
after September 30, 2006 in a condition that would allow recall
of the aircraft to future service in the Air Force Reserve, Air
National Guard, or active forces aerial refueling force
structure.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The House bill, however, contained a provision (sec. 133)
that would require that the Secretary of the Air Force maintain
any retired KC-135R aircraft in a condition that would allow
recall of the aircraft to future service in the Air Force
Reserve, Air National Guard, or active forces aerial refueling
force structure.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical/clarifying amendment.
Multiyear procurement authority for C-130J aircraft (sec. 132)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 131) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to enter into one or
more multiyear contracts to procure multiple variants of the C-
130J aircraft.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 151) that would allow the Secretary of the Air
Force to enter into one or more multiyear contracts to procure
C-130J aircraft.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization
program for C-130 aircraft (sec. 133)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 132) that would
prohibit the Secretary of the Air Force from terminating the
legacy C-130H Avionics Modernization Program (AMP). The House
report accompanying H.R. 1960 (H. Rept. 113-102) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
recommended an increase of $47.3 million in Aircraft
Procurement, Air Force (APAF), to fund modifications of legacy
C-130 with the original AMP upgrade.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision. The Senate report accompanying S. 1197 (S. Rept.
113-44) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2014 recommended an increase of $47.3 million in APAF to
fund modifications of legacy C-130 with either: (1) the
original AMP upgrade; or (2) an alternative program that would
upgrade and modernize the legacy C-130 airlift fleet using a
reduced scope program for avionics and mission planning
systems.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would add a requirement that the Comptroller
General conduct a sufficiency review of the cost-benefit
analysis conducted under section 143(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239),
including any findings and recommendations relating to such
review. The agreement also recommends an increase of $47.3
million for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air
Force, in PE 41115F for C-130 Airlift Squadrons, pending
completion of that sufficiency review. This is in lieu of a
recommendation for additional procurement funding in fiscal
year 2014, since procurement funding for modernizing C-130
avionics would be premature.
Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C-27J aircraft by the Air
Force (sec. 134)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 134) that would prevent the Secretary of the Air Force
from obligating or expending any funds for the procurement of
C-27J aircraft not on contract as of June 1, 2013.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the provision with an amendment that
would narrow the prohibition to the use of funds authorized in
fiscal year 2012, since all C-27J funds except the fiscal year
2012 funds have been obligated or transferred to other
programs.
Subtitle E--Defense-Wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters
Personal protection equipment procurement (sec. 141)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 144) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that within each
military service procurement account, a separate procurement
budget line item is designated for personal protection
equipment (PPE) investment and funding transparency.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would direct the Secretary of Defense to submit with the
annual budget request a consolidated budget display that
describes and justifies all programs and activities, in the
appropriations accounts for operation and maintenance as well
as research, development, test, and evaluation, associated with
the development and procurement of PPE.
After 12 years of war and billions of dollars spent to
develop, produce, and field the best available individual PPE,
such as body armor and helmets, the Department of Defense
should not lose momentum in its search for better protection at
lower weight and cost for individual soldiers, marines, airmen,
and sailors. One of the most important lessons of the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan is that research, development, and
acquisition (RDA) of improved ballistic protection for our
troops must anticipate, not react, to likely threats. In this
regard, budget visibility must be sufficient to allow for
comprehensive oversight of the Department's RDA efforts as
reflected in the annual budget request accompanied by spending
estimates projected over the subsequent 5 years. Subject to the
completeness and usefulness of the information provided in the
budget exhibits that would be required by this provision,
Congress may consider other budgetary methods for ensuring the
Department's investments over time sustain the importance of
and momentum for achieving technological improvements in PPE
into the future.
We also note that the Department categorizes PPE, including
body armor, as an ``expendable'' item consistent with current
acquisition and financial management policy definitions.
Nonetheless, given the military's experiences during operations
in Iraq and Afghanistan, the significant RDA investment for
body armor, and the fact that body armor is now an essential
part of individual combat equipment, one could question whether
the categorization of PPE, and body armor in particular, should
change from ``expendable'' to another category that could
improve resource stability and provide for better management
throughout the RDA process. Accordingly, the Secretary of
Defense is encouraged to reassess the Department's
categorization of PPE and body armor as ``expendable'' items.
Repeal of certain F-35 reporting requirements (sec. 142)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 145) that would
amend section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to
eliminate the requirement to provide an annual update to the F-
35 system maturity matrix.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ-4 Global Hawk
unmanned aircraft systems and A-10 aircraft (sec. 143)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 143) that would
limit the use of funds to retire Global Hawk Block 30 unmanned
aircraft systems and would require the Secretary of the Air
Force to take all actions necessary to maintain the operational
capability of the RQ-4 Block 30 Global Hawk through December
31, 2016.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would: (1) Prohibit spending funds authorized to
be appropriated or otherwise made available during fiscal year
2014 to retire Global Hawk Block 30 unmanned aircraft systems
or A-10 aircraft (except for A-10s planned for retirement on or
before April 9, 2013); (2) Modify the prohibited spending to
include making significant changes to Global Hawk and A-10
manning levels during fiscal year 2014; (3) Prohibit the
Secretary of the Air Force from retiring or planning to retire
A-10 aircraft (except for A-10s planned for retirement on or
before April 9, 2013) between October 1, 2014 and December 31,
2014; and (4) Add a requirement that the Secretary of Defense
provide a report on all high-altitude intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance systems that the Department of
Defense is operating or plans to operate in the future.
We intend that the prohibition on making additional A-10
aircraft retirements before December 31, 2014, be to provide
breathing space for Congress to conduct oversight and to
consider what actions to take on any force structure changes
the Air Force may propose in fiscal year 2015.
MC-12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft
(sec. 144)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 934) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
develop and carry out a plan for the transfer of Air Force MC-
12 aircraft to the Army. The provision would also prohibit the
Army from acquiring the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance
and Surveillance System (EMARSS) in fiscal year 2014.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that directs the Secretary of Defense to develop a
plan for the potential transfer of MC-12 Liberty aircraft from
the Air Force to the Army. In addition, the provision prohibits
the Army from using fiscal year 2014 funds to procure
additional aircraft under the EMARSS program, but does allow
the Army to use fiscal year 2014 funds to complete conversion
efforts of existing aircraft that have already been procured,
and to convert transferred Liberty aircraft to the EMARSS
configuration.
Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers (sec. 145)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 134) that would
require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop and implement
a plan to ensure the fair evaluation of competing contractors
in awarding a contract to a certified evolved expendable launch
vehicle provider. This plan would include descriptions of how
the following areas would be addressed in the evaluation: the
proposed cost, schedule, and performance; mission assurance
activities; the manner in which the contractor will operate
under the Federal Acquisition Regulation; the effect of other
contracts in which the contractor is entered into with the
Federal Government, such as the Evolved Expendable Launch
Vehicle (EELV) launch capability and the space station
commercial resupply services contracts; and any other areas
determined appropriate by the Secretary.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that requires the plan at the same time that the
Secretary issues a draft request for proposals for a contract
on the EELV with respect to how the Secretary will conduct
competition in awarding the contract in addition to the
specific areas listed in the original House bill.
We note that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is
conducting ongoing work regarding the EELV competition. We
request that GAO conduct a review of the Air Force EELV
acquisition strategy, which should include an assessment of the
methodology, potential challenges, gaps, and acquisition
planning process of the Air Force for evaluating competitors,
and that GAO brief the defense and intelligence committees on
its review. We request that this briefing be provided before a
draft request for proposal is released by the Air Force.
This legislative provision should not be construed as
direction regarding ongoing procurement or any aspect of source
selection criteria.
Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety risks
associated with ejection seats (sec. 146)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 146) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to enter into a contract with
a federally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) to
conduct a study to identify and assess alternative and
effective means for stimulating competition and innovation in
the personal protection equipment industrial base.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would also require the Secretary of the Air Force to
conduct a study to assess the safety of ejection seats
currently in operational use by the Air Force.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Modification of requirements to sustain Navy airborne intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 124) that would amend section 112 of the Ike Skelton
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public
Law 111-383) to require the Secretary of the Navy to maintain
sufficient numbers of EP-3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated
Electronic System II (ARIES II) Spiral 3 aircraft and Special
Projects Aircraft (SPA) version P909 to support the wartime
operational plans of U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM), and to
maintain the capacity to support five EP-3s for allocation to
the combatant commands under the Global Force Management
Allocation Plan (GFMAP), until the Navy's multi-intelligence
(Multi-INT) Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) System
TRITON aircraft with signals intelligence (SIGINT) capabilities
reaches initial operational capability (IOC). The provision
also would require the Secretary to upgrade the final (12th)
EP-3 ARIES II aircraft to the Spiral 3 configuration, and to
correct electronic intelligence (ELINT) obsolescence problems
on both the EP-3 and the SPA aircraft. Finally, the provision
would require the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight
Council (JROC) to coordinate with the Commanders of PACOM and
the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) to determine
requirements for the special capabilities provided by the SPA
aircraft, and would require the Secretary to sustain sufficient
numbers of SPA aircraft to meet those requirements until the
Navy achieves IOC of a system with capabilities greater than or
equal to the SPA.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Section 112 of Public Law 111-383 is intended to prevent a
capacity decline in capabilities as the Navy developed
replacements for the EP-3 and the SPA intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems. The Navy budget
request, which is counter to congressional intent, creates a
plan for transitioning from the EP-3/SPA systems to the TRITON
Multi-INT and P-8 Quick Reaction Capability (QRC) that would
result in a capacity decline beginning in fiscal year 2015.
The Navy also informed Congress that the JROC supports the
Navy's transition plan, but in fact the JROC Memorandum (JROCM)
on this issue expresses concern about the Navy's plan and
requires numerous follow-up actions. In addition, the JROCM
instructs the Navy to develop requirements for the Multi-INT
TRITON prior to the program's next acquisition milestone
review. Congressional review of the TRITON Capabilities
Development Document confirms that a robust SIGNIT capability
is documented only as a ``potential future capability,'' and
not a validated requirement as implied by Navy officials to
Congress.
The Navy also proposes to prematurely remove highly-skilled
personnel from the EP-3/SPA programs, resulting in a reduction
of the number of available aircraft to support GFMAP and
wartime requirements. Congress is concerned that harvesting
these personnel to support an early version of TRITON that
provides only optical and radar sensing, but little or no
SIGINT capability, does not maximize utilization of highly-
skilled personnel with perishable skill sets. Furthermore, the
lack of a validated requirement for a robust SIGINT capability
for TRITON raises concerns that the capacity and capability
decline will turn out to be a permanent ISR capability loss.
We have serious concerns about the Navy's non-compliant EP-
3/SPA to P-8 QRC/TRITON Multi-INT transition plan. Therefore,
we direct that:
(1) The JROC review and report to Congress the
combatant commander requirements for the simultaneous
ISR collection capability provided by EP-3/SPA assets
under current Operational Plans and for the GFMAP;
(2) The Joint Staff and the Under Secretary of
Defense for Intelligence (USDI) identify and report to
Congress alternative EP-3/SPA to P-8 QRC/TRITON Multi-
INT transition options that do not result in a capacity
decline or capability gap, including such options as
using Navy reserve personnel to stand up the baseline
TRITON system;
(3) The JROC collaborate with the Navy to develop and
document a formal requirement for TRITON Multi-INT;
(4) The USDI develop, and report to Congress, a
mitigation plan to address the ELINT obsolescence
issues identified in the Senate report accompanying S.
1197 (S. Rept. 113-44) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014; and,
(5) The JROC and USDI to determine, and report to
Congress, the force structure quantity and type of
federated ISR systems and sensors required to wholly
replace the EP-3/SPA force structure of aircraft to
meet or exceed the current capacity and diversity of
ISR collection capability inherently resident on the
EP-3/SPA aircraft.
Multiyear procurement authority for Ground-Based Interceptors
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 141) that would
provide multi-year procurement authority and advance
procurement authority to the Director of the Missile Defense
Agency for the procurement of 14 Ground-Based Interceptors.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Senate on the United States helicopter industrial base
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 152) that would express the sense of Senate on the health
of the helicopter industrial base.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Title II--Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Authorization of appropriations (sec. 201)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 201) authorizing
appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the
Department of Defense for research, development, test, and
evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 201).
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations
Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (sec. 211)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 212) that would modify the biennial strategic plan
requirement for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA) to make more explicit the linkages between the
strategic objections of the agency with the missions of the
armed forces. Additionally, the provision would reassign
responsibility for submission of the plan from the Secretary of
Defense to the Director of DARPA, in coordination with the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
We recognize the value that DARPA brings to the Department
of Defense, especially in terms of high risk research that can
be potentially game changing. We believe that such research has
the highest probability of successful transition when it is
linked early with the operational defense community.
For example, DARPA's Phoenix program has the potential to
change radically how the United States approaches space systems
development and servicing. As the only program looking at
satellite servicing and advanced robotics for geosynchronous
earth orbit systems, this program has significant national
security, civil, and as well as, commercial potential. However,
we note that the development of such capabilities may raise
complex policy issues, as well as pose as a disruptive
technology to established approaches and operations. We
encourage DARPA to not only continue its technical leadership
in this field, but to also work with other entities in the
Department of Defense--such as the Air Force, the National
Reconnaissance Office, and the Under Secretaries of Defense for
Policy and Intelligence--to ensure the development of
operational concepts for this capability.
Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle
engineering and manufacturing phase (sec. 212)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 211) that would
prohibit the Army from obligating post-Milestone B funds for
the Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) program until the Secretary of
the Army submits a report to the congressional defense
committees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with technical and
clarifying amendments.
Additionally, the Comptroller General of the United States
is directed to submit to the congressional defense committees a
report setting forth an assessment by the Comptroller General
of the study of the Army on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle
industrial base submitted to Congress pursuant to the
Conference Report to accompany H.R. 4310 (112th Congress), the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (House
Report 112-705). The report required shall include an
assessment of the reasonableness of the study's methods
including, but not limited to, the sufficiency, validity, and
reliability of the data used to conduct the study, and include
findings and recommendations, if any, on the combat vehicle
industrial base. In conducting this review the Comptroller
General should not replicate the Army study.
Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrier-launched
surveillance and strike system program (sec. 213)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 212) that would
prohibit the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics from approving a Milestone. A
technology development contract award for the Unmanned Carrier-
Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) program
until 30 days after the Under Secretary certifies to the
congressional defense committees that the software and system
engineering designs for the control system and connectivity
segment and the aircraft carrier segment of the UCLASS system
can achieve, at a low level of integration risk, successful
compatibility and operability with the air vehicle segment
planned for selection at Milestone A contract award.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would modify the language to require that: (1)
The Navy to limit the number of air vehicle segments acquired
prior to receiving Milestone B approval for UCLASS; (2) The
Navy provide periodic reports on cost, schedule and
requirements changes for UCLASS; and (3) The Comptroller
General conduct annual reviews of the UCLASS program.
Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics
transformation (sec. 214)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 213) that would
restrict the obligation and expenditure of Air Force
procurement and research, development, test, and evaluation
funds for logistics information technology programs until 30
days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force
submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the
modernization and update of Air Force logistics information
technology systems following the cancellation of the
expeditionary combat support system.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations
of the Air Force (sec. 215)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 214) that would
limit the funds the Air Force may obligate or expend for
Defensive Cyberspace Operations in PE 0202088F to not more than
90 percent until a period of 30 days after the date on which
the Secretary of the Air Force submits a report to the
congressional defense committees detailing the Air Force's plan
for sustainment of the Application Software Assurance Center of
Excellence (ASACOE) across the Future Years Defense Program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision but included elsewhere in the committee-reported bill
is $10.0 million in PE 33140F for sustainment of the ASACOE.
The agreement includes this provision.
Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range
munition program (sec. 216)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 215) that would
limit funds for the precision extended range munition program
until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics provides the congressional defense
committees with certain written certifications and a sufficient
business case analysis.
The Senate committee-report bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on availability of
funds for noncompetitive procedures for offensive anti-surface
warfare weapon contracts of the Navy (sec. 217)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 218) that would
require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop a follow-on
air-launched cruise missile, Long Range Stand Off (LRSO) weapon
to the AGM-86 that achieves initial operating capability for
both conventional and nuclear missions by not later than 2030
and is certified for internal carriage and employment for both
conventional and nuclear missions on the next-generation long-
range strike bomber by not later than 2034.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that requires the LRSO to achieve initial operating
capability for conventional missions prior to the retirement of
the AGM-86, for nuclear missions prior to the retirement of the
nuclear armed AGM-86 and is capable of internal carriage and
employment for both missions in the long-range strike bomber.
The amendment provides that the Secretary may carry out the
consecutive development of the nuclear and conventional
capabilities, with the nuclear capability first, if it is
determined to be cost effective.
The amendment further includes a provision that would
prohibit, during fiscal year 2014, using available funds to
contract for Navy offensive anti-surface warfare weapons using
other than through competitive procedures. Development,
testing, and fielding of aircraft-launched offensive anti-
surface warfare weapons would be exempted from that
prohibition. Included in the provision is a waiver of the
prohibition by the Secretary of Defense if the Secretary
determines that waiving this prohibition is in the national
security interests of the United States.
Review of software development for F-35 aircraft (sec. 218)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 219) that would
require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) to establish an
independent team consisting of subject matter experts to review
the development of software for the F-35 aircraft program and
to report on the results of that review.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the USD(AT&L) to provide a plan
for the sustainment of the Autonomic Logistics Information
System for the F-35 aircraft.
Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground system (sec.
219)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 220) that would
require that: (1) Beginning with the budget request for fiscal
year 2015, future budget submissions include separate project
codes for each capability component within each program element
for each service version of the Distributed Common Ground
System (DCGS); (2) The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) conduct an
analysis of commercial link analysis tools that could be used
to meet the requirements of each of the service versions of the
DCGS; and (3) If one or more commercial link analysis tools
were found to meet the requirements of the program, the
responsible service secretary would be required to initiate a
request for proposals to purchase those tools.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would include the requirement that: (1) The
services' budget submissions include separate project codes for
each capability component within each program element for each
service version of the DCGS; and (2) The USD(AT&L) conduct an
analysis of capability components of DCGS that are compliant
with the intelligence community data standards and could be
used to meet the requirements of the DCGS program. The
provision would require the USD(AT&L) to submit a report of
that analysis within 180 days of enactment of this Act. We
expect that the USD(AT&L) will adjust the acquisition plans for
DCGS if his analysis of the competitive acquisition options for
capability components within DCGS shows that expanded
competition shows promise.
Operationally responsive space (sec. 220)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 225) that would
prohibit expending more than 50 percent of the funds authorized
or expended for the space-based infrared system modernization
initiative wide field of view test bed until the Executive
Agent for Space certifies to the congressional defense
committees that the Secretary of Defense is carrying out the
Operationally Responsive Space program office in accordance
with 10 U.S.C. 2273a.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes an amendment requiring a report no
later than 60 days from the date of enactment regarding a
potential mission that would seek to leverage all the policy
objectives of the Operationally Responsive Space Program in a
single mission.
Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, surveillance,
and reconnaissance capabilities (sec. 221)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 216) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to
procure the currently deployed Blue Devil intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) system or to develop a
plan to replace that system with a comparable or improved
system.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to
develop a plan to sustain the operational capabilities of the
Blue Devil I ISR Systems, including precision signal
geolocation, by procuring the existing Blue Devil I aircraft,
developing a new system, or adapting and integrating
capabilities from existing and development programs. The
Secretary is required to submit a report that addresses the
cost of procuring, operating, and sustaining Blue Devil I
aircraft system; the ability of other platforms to provide
similar intelligence capabilities; and a listing of related
U.S. Air Force and Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency
(DARPA) programs. The report should be coordinated with the
Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command and the Director
of DARPA.
We agree that the necessary capability to sustain is both
wide-area motion imagery combined with precision signal
geolocation. The integration of these two capabilities provides
significant operational utility.
Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs
Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile
defense system (sec. 231)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 234) that would
require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to
make certain improvements to the cost estimates included in its
annual acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic
missile defense system (BMDS), and to provide a report on the
plans and schedule for making such improvements.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would clarify that
each cost estimate shall include all of the operation and
sustainment (O&S) costs for which the Director is responsible,
and also include a summary description of the O&S functions and
costs for which the military departments are responsible,
consistent with the Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum of
June 10, 2011, on funding responsibilities for BMDS elements.
We note that, although the MDA is required to provide life-
cycle cost estimates of its acquisition programs--including O&S
costs--it does not include in those cost estimates the O&S
costs for which the military departments that own and operate
elements of the BMDS are responsible. As the Government
Accountability Office has noted, this makes it difficult to
understand the comprehensive life-cycle costs of BMDS elements.
Therefore, we direct the Director of the MDA to work with the
military departments that own or operate elements of the BMDS
to make a recommendation for how those functions and related
costs should be reported in either future annual BMDS
Accountability Reports or other similar reports to Congress,
including annual budget submission justification materials. We
believe that the military departments should provide to the
congressional defense committees the life-cycle cost estimates
for the O&S functions of the BMDS elements for which they are
responsible, and urge them to do so as soon as possible.
Furthermore, we expect the Director of the MDA to take steps to
ensure that the cost estimate improvements required by the
provision are made in a manner as consistent as practicable
with the guidance issued pursuant to section 832 of Public Law
112-81, relative to O&S costs, and with the guidance issued
pursuant to section 2334(d) of title 10, United States Code,
relative to confidence levels of baseline cost estimates.
Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program (sec. 232)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 231) that would
prohibit the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2014
funds for the Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), and
would also place conditions on the harvesting of MEADS
technology.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 236) that would prohibit the use of fiscal year
2014 funds for MEADS.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
We note that the Department of Defense has invested more
than $2.5 billion in the development of MEADS technology, and
has a substantial interest in making constructive use of any
MEADS data and technology owned by the United States. We direct
the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the
congressional defense committees, not later than 180 days after
the enactment of this Act, providing: (1) An explanation of who
owns the technology and data developed under the tri-national
MEADS development program; (2) How the Secretary intends to
ensure that the Department gets the maximum benefit from the
U.S. investment in MEADS, including by making such technology
and data appropriately available for ``technology harvesting''
for improvements to the Integrated Air and Missile Defense
(IAMD) system program of record, taking into account the report
required by House Report 113-102, ``Technology harvesting of
the Medium Extended Air Defense System''; and (3) U.S. policy
regarding 3rd Party Sales of such technology, which we believe
could be of benefit to the United States and its allies.
Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of certain missile
defense systems; report on regional ballistic missile defense
(sec. 233)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 232) that would express the sense of Congress regarding
regional ballistic missile defenses and would require the
Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the status and progress of regional
missile defense programs and efforts.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would clarify the elements of the required
report. It would also include a prohibition on the use of
fiscal year 2014 funds to integrate missile defense systems of
the People's Republic of China into U.S. missile defense
systems.
We are concerned that the Government of Turkey made an
initial decision to purchase a Chinese air and missile defense
system for its territorial use. Such a system would not be
compatible with, and should not be integrated with, missile
defense systems of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
We direct that, not later than 60 days after submission of
the report required by the provision, the Government
Accountability Office shall provide a briefing to the
congressional defense committees providing its views on the
report.
We further direct that, not later than 90 days after the
enactment of this Act, the Joint Staff and Joint Force
Component Command for Integrated Missile Defense (JFCC-IMD)
shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense
committees with respect to any significant changes in the
regional missile defense environment since the April 2011 Joint
Capability Mix (JCM) III Study was completed, and whether and
how the study could be updated to provide useful insights for
future force structure levels and employment plans. The
briefing should be based on updated intelligence information,
updated missile defense systems efficacy and reliability
information, and current and planned future budget levels, and
any other matters the Joint Staff and JFCC-IMD consider useful.
Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-range rocket
defense system in the United States (sec. 234)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 237) that would
authorize $15.0 million to enhance the capability for producing
the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system in the United
States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would authorize up
to $15.0 million for non-recurring engineering costs associated
with establishing the capacity for United States industry to
produce parts and components of the Iron Dome system in the
United States, subject to an agreement between the United
States and Israel for co-production of Iron Dome parts and
components. The provision would also require the Director of
the Missile Defense Agency to submit a report to Congress on
the plan to implement such agreement, including the estimated
costs, schedule, and steps to minimize costs to the government
of the United States to implement the agreement. The provision
would also clarify that it is not intended to alter the planned
Iron Dome procurement schedule or numbers, and would express
the sense of Congress on the importance of a second production
source in the United States. The provision would also require
the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the status of missile defense
cooperation between the United States and Israel.
We believe it is important for industry to pay for a
substantial share of the cost of establishing a co-production
capacity in the United States. Further, we direct that the
Missile Defense Agency not use funds from other programs of
record to pay for establishing an Iron Dome production capacity
in the United States.
Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the United
States homeland (sec. 235)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 234) that would require the Missile Defense Agency to
deploy an additional missile defense radar for homeland missile
defense, and would authorize $30.0 million for initial costs
toward such deployment.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Missile Defense Agency to deploy a missile defense radar at a
location optimized to support defense of the homeland against
long-range missile threats from North Korea, and would
authorize $30.0 million for initial costs toward such
deployment. The provision would also require the Secretary of
Defense to ensure that the United States is able to deploy
additional tracking and discrimination sensor capabilities to
support defense of the United States from future long-range
ballistic missile threats that emerge from Iran. The provision
would require the Secretary to submit a report on what sensor
capabilities will be available for deployment on the Atlantic
side of the United States by 2019, or sooner if Iran flight
tests long-range missiles before then, and the manner in which
such capabilities will be maintained to ensure they can be
deployed in time to support the missile defense of the United
States from long-range ballistic missile threats from Iran. We
note that the sea-based X-band radar platform and the Cobra
Judy ship-based radar platform could serve as interim or surge
sensor capabilities in the Atlantic region to support homeland
defense against future long-range missile threats that emerge
from Iran.
The agreement also authorizes an additional $50.0 million
for the Missile Defense Agency to develop enhanced
discrimination capability for the Ballistic Missile Defense
System, as reflected in the tables in section 4201. The Missile
Defense Agency and the missile defense operational community
have identified such discrimination enhancement as a priority
for improving the future effectiveness of missile defenses,
particularly for homeland missile defense.
Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense sensor
architectures (sec. 236)
The Senate committee-reported bill included a provision
(sec. 235) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
evaluate options for future ballistic missile defense sensor
architectures and to report to the congressional defense
committees the results of the evaluation.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would include consideration of options for
maximizing the use of various sensors for missile defense and
for other missions.
Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system (sec. 237)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 236) that would
require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the
Commander of the U.S. Northern Command to develop options and a
plan to improve the kill assessment capability and the hit
assessment capability of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense
(GMD) system, and to submit a report on the development of such
capabilities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would also require the Director of the Missile
Defense Agency to submit a plan for the use of fiscal years
2013 and 2014 funds to develop, test, and deploy an upgraded
enhanced exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the GMD system.
If the report required by the provision is not submitted by
April 1, 2014, we direct the Department of Defense to provide a
briefing to the congressional defense committees on the subject
matter required in the report not later than April 1, 2014.
The agreement authorizes $100.0 million for design and
development of common kill vehicle technology for an upgraded
enhanced exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the GMD system, an
increase of $30.0 million above the budget request, to
accelerate design and development efforts, as reflected in the
tables in section 4201.
Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense options
(sec. 238)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 231) that would express the sense of Congress concerning
the importance of homeland ballistic missile defense against
the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea
and Iran, and would require the Secretary of Defense to submit
a report on potential future options for enhancing homeland
ballistic missile defense.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision requiring the
report, with a clarifying amendment.
The agreement authorizes an additional $80.0 million for
the Missile Defense Agency to continue efforts to understand
the cause of the problem that resulted in the Ground-based
Midcourse Defense system flight test failure on July 5, 2013,
using the Capability Enhancement-I (CE-I) kill vehicle, and
take the necessary steps to correct the problem and demonstrate
the correction in an intercept flight test.
The CE-I flight test failure occurred after the budget was
submitted, and no funds were planned or budgeted to analyze and
correct the problem, or to conduct another intercept flight
test to demonstrate the correction of the problem. The Missile
Defense Agency has stated that its highest priority is
correcting the problems associated with the flight test
failures of the CE-II and CE-I kill vehicles, and demonstrating
the successful corrections through additional intercept flight
tests.
We direct that, not later than 60 days after the submission
of the report required by the provision, the Government
Accountability Office provide a briefing to the congressional
defense committees providing its views on the report.
Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile defense
matters (sec. 239)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 232) that would
require the Missile Defense Agency to construct and make
operational in fiscal year 2018 an additional homeland missile
defense site, designed to complement the existing sites in
Alaska and California, to deal more effectively with missile
threats from the Middle East.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to provide, not later than 180 days after
the completion of the site evaluation study required by section
227(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239), and 1 year later, a briefing to
the congressional defense committees on the status of current
efforts and plans to implement the requirements of section 227,
including progress and plans toward preparation of the
Environmental Impact Statement required by section 227(b), and
the development of the contingency plan for the deployment of
an additional homeland missile defense interceptor site, in
case the President determines to proceed with such an
additional deployment, as required by section 227(d).
The agreement authorizes an additional $20.0 million for
the Missile Defense Agency to continue activities relative to
the site evaluation study, the Environmental Impact Statement,
and planning activities consistent with the requirements of
section 227(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013, including the development of the contingency
plan for the deployment of an additional homeland missile
defense interceptor site. Such planning activities should
include efforts to update the relevant planning documents from
the deployment of missile fields at Fort Greely, Alaska, and
plans for the possible deployment of a ground-based-interceptor
site in Europe, to prepare for the potential deployment of an
additional missile defense site in the continental United
States, as well as such other preliminary planning activities
as can practicably be commenced prior to site selection, or
updated upon site selection.
Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense burden-sharing
(sec. 240)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 238) that would
require the President to seek specific levels of funding from
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for various
phases of the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) to
missile defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would express the
sense of Congress concerning the increasing importance of
burden-sharing among the NATO allies for missile defense, and
would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to
the congressional defense committees providing: (1) The
estimated costs for the EPAA; (2) A description of the level of
NATO burden-sharing for the costs of NATO missile defense,
including the EPAA; and (3) An assessment of, and
recommendations for, areas where the Secretary believes NATO
and its members could make additional burden-sharing
contributions to NATO missile defense, including the EPAA.
We note that, as declared at the 2010 Lisbon Summit, the
United States and its NATO allies share a strong interest in
developing and deploying an operationally-effective and cost-
effective missile defense capability to defend the territory,
population, and military forces of NATO--including forward
deployed United States forces--in Europe. The United States and
its NATO partners are making a variety of contributions, both
individually and collectively, to NATO missile defense,
including through national contributions, host-nation basing
agreements, and collective funding arrangements. The United
States is contributing to the EPAA as its national contribution
to NATO missile defense, and a number of NATO allies are
providing important support for the EPAA, as well as other
support for NATO missile defense. The cancellation of Phase 4
of the EPAA eliminated the contribution that the EPAA would
have made toward augmenting U.S. homeland missile defenses
against potential Iranian intercontinental ballistic missiles.
We believe that burden-sharing is an important NATO
principle, and is important to the recently adopted NATO
mission of missile defense of NATO territory, population, and
military forces. Therefore, while recognizing the important
support provided by a number of NATO allies for key aspects of
the EPAA, we believe the U.S. Government should encourage other
NATO members to provide additional support for NATO missile
defense, including the EPAA, to ensure an appropriate level of
burden-sharing.
Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile defense
capabilities (sec. 241)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 233) that would
limit the use of funds to remove United States missile defense
equipment in East Asia until after certain conditions are met.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would express the
sense of Congress concerning the deployment of regional
ballistic missile defense capabilities.
Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II
exoatmospheric kill vehicle (sec. 242)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 239) that would
express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense
should not procure additional Capability Enhancement II (CE-II)
exo-atmospheric kill vehicles for deployment until after the
date on which a successful operational flight test of the CE-II
has occurred.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Subtitle D--Reports
Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle
acquisition program (sec. 251)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 251) that would
require the Comptroller General to provide an annual report on
the Marine Corps' amphibious combat vehicle acquisition
program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the
acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter (sec.
252)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 251) that would require the Comptroller General to
produce an annual report on the VXX presidential helicopter
program until the program enters full-rate production or is
cancelled, whichever comes first.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical/clarifying amendment.
Report on strategy to improve body armor (sec. 253)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 252) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional
defense committees a comprehensive research and development
strategy for achieving significant weight reductions for body
armor components.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with a technical
amendment.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory Board
(sec. 261)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 261) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to establish a senior-level
body, to be known as the Cryptographic Modernization Review and
Advisory Board, to assess and advise the cryptographic
modernization activities of the Department of Defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Chief Information Officer to
chair the Board, with the Board monitoring overall
communications security, cryptographic modernization, and key
management efforts of the Department.
Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense
laboratories for research and development of technologies for
military missions (sec. 262)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 263) that would
extend section 219 of the National Defense Authorization Act of
2009 (Public Law 110-417) to September 2020. In addition, this
provision would allow for funds to be accumulated for not more
than 5 years for individual Department of Defense laboratory
revitalization projects with costs up to $4 million, provided
prior notification of the total project cost is provided to the
congressional defense committees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 215) that extended section 219 of the National Defense
Authorization Act of 2009 (Public Law 110-417) to September
2020.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that requires an annual report on the use of the
authority granted by this provision, as well as some other
clarifying elements.
Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology
achievements (sec. 263)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 264) that would
extend the authority of the Department of Defense to award
prizes for advanced technology achievements until September
2018.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 213) that would extend this authority until
September 2017.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection
features during research and development of certain defense
systems (sec. 264)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 265) that would
extend the Defense Exportability Features pilot program until
October 1, 2020.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 214).
The agreement includes this provision.
Briefing on biometrics of the Department of Defense (sec. 265)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 216) that would
place limitations on the Department of Defense to obligate or
expend more than 75 percent of funds for future biometric
architectures or systems until 30 days after the Secretary of
Defense submits a report to the congressional defense
committees assessing the future program structure and
architectural requirements for biometrics enabling capability.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would remove the funding limitation and request
a briefing, including an assessment of the governance process
for requirements across the Department of Defense, as well as
interagency and international partners.
Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment
of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom's
Vanguard successor program (sec. 266)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 223) that would
make a series of findings and express the sense of Congress
regarding the importance of aligning the common missile
compartment of the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine
program with the Vanguard-class successor program of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that eliminates the findings contained in the House provision.
Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile
project (sec. 267)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 224) that
expressed a sense of Congress urging the Air Force to consider
the Counter-electronics High Power Microwave Advanced Missile
Program (CHAMP) technology capability demonstration as a
potential weapon option available to combatant commanders by
2016.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment clarifying the need to complete developmental
planning for such weapons systems if requirements are
established by the combatant commanders in the future.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Conventional Prompt Global Strike Program
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 211) that would prohibit the Department of Defense from
executing any funds for the Conventional Prompt Global Strike
(CPGS) program until 60 days after they deliver a report to the
congressional defense committees addressing the policy
consideration concerning the ambiguity problems regarding the
launch of CPGS missiles from submarine platforms.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We agree that no more than 75 percent of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made
available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense
for research, development, test and evaluation and available
for the Prompt Global Strike Capability Development program
(PE#64165D8Z) for the CPGS program should be obligated or
expended for any activities relating to the development of a
submarine-launched capability under that program until 60 days
after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the
congressional defense committees a report that addresses the
policy considerations concerning any potential ambiguity
problems regarding the launch of a conventionally-armed missile
from submarine platforms, potential verification measures, any
target sets the Secretary believes a submarine-launched
conventionally-armed missile could reach that a missile on
board another platform could not reach, the comparative cost
considerations of submarine-launched conventional missiles and
such systems launched by other platforms.
We also note that in congressional testimony, the
Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, stated that ``[t]oday, the
only prompt global strike capability to engage potentially
time-sensitive, fleeting targets continues to be ballistic
missile systems armed with nuclear weapons. We continue to
require a deployed conventional prompt strike capability to
provide the President a range of flexible military options to
address a small number of highest-value targets, including in
an anti-access and area denial environment.''
Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 217) that would
require the Secretary of the Navy to demonstrate unmanned,
autonomous aerial refueling within the X-47B aircraft testing
and evaluation program. The X-47B is an unmanned aircraft being
tested under the Unmanned Combat Air System (UCAS)
demonstration program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We understand that the Chief of Naval Operations has
decided that, unlike the original Navy plan, the Navy will
continue flying the X-47B during fiscal year 2014, and will
pursue a number of risk reduction activities. We support these
Navy plans for continuing risk reduction activities for UCAS,
and encourage the Navy to consider performing the aerial
refueling demonstration as part of these additional risk
reduction activities.
Requirement to complete individual carbine testing
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 221) that would
require the Department of the Army to complete planned testing
for an individual carbine.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain this provision.
We understand that during the Army's testing of eight
candidate carbines under the individual carbine program that
none of the carbines met the Army's target for improved
reliability requirements. We further understand that these
results may be attributable to the interactions between the
carbines and the recently introduced M855A1 standard 5.56mm
rounds that were used during the test and evaluation. These
test results suggest the Army may have used an unrealistically
high reliability standard.
Accordingly, we urge the Army to re-evaluate the
reliability standard used for this test, as well as other
standards as appropriate. We encourage the Secretary of the
Army to consider a process for continuous test and evaluation
of alternatives to the M4A1 carbine that is based on realistic
operational requirements and with significantly improved, but
reasonably achievable, performance and reliability. We note
that, while the Army may have reduced needs and limited funds
to procure large numbers of new rifles or carbines in the near
future, maintaining research and development efforts for new
small arms in this class is essential to ensure that the
industrial base can respond to sudden increases in demand as it
did during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring
Freedom. In this regard, the Secretary of the Army, or
designee, is directed to provide the congressional defense
committees a briefing that details the Army's long range
standard rifle and carbine modernization strategy. This
briefing shall be provided not later than April 1, 2014, and
shall include the Army's plans, including where appropriate,
schedules and funding profiles, for requirements development,
technology research and development, procurement, and test and
evaluation of commercially available and militarily suitable
alternatives.
Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser weapon
system
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 222) that would
establish a funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser
weapon system for fiscal year 2018 and beyond.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We are supportive of accelerating the development and
transition of directed energy weapons to programs of record, in
the Navy as well as the other military departments. However, we
believe that it is premature to create such a funding line. We
also note that many of the current activities supporting
development of directed energy weapons are already embedded in
existing research and development program elements, and
therefore the creation of a consolidated funding line at this
stage could be disruptive to those efforts and potentially
detrimental to overall efforts to develop and field a
militarily-relevant system.
Analysis of alternatives for successor to Precision Tracking Space
System
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 235) that would
require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency to perform
an analysis of alternatives for a successor sensor system to
the Precision Tracking Space System.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense
Initiative
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 240) that would
express the sense of Congress concerning the 30th anniversary
of the Strategic Defense Initiative.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the missile defenses of the
United States
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 242) that would
express the sense of Congress concerning negotiations with the
Russian Federation that would affect the missile defenses of
the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 253) that would
require the Secretary of the Army to submit a report to the
congressional defense committees on an investment strategy to
accelerate fuel efficiency improvements to the engine and
transmission of the M1 Abrams tank.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the Army and Marine Corps currently have no
plan to replace the M1A2 or M1A1 Abrams main battle tank. We
are also aware that the Army intends to proceed with a series
of engineering change proposals that will incrementally enhance
the platform's capabilities. We believe that the Army should
accelerate the next series of Abrams upgrades where warranted
by capability gaps or opportunities, technological maturity,
and affordability. In this regard, the Army and Marine Corps
should consider replacement of the current engine with a
modern, fuel efficient power train. Therefore, the Secretary of
the Army, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, is
directed to submit a report to the congressional defense
committees, not later than June 1, 2014, on a business case
analysis and an investment strategy that could accelerate the
technology development and engineering change proposal
processes to include a modern fuel efficient engine and
transmission for the M1 Abrams series main battle tank.
Report on powered rail system
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 254) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the
congressional defense committees that comprehensively reviews
and compares powered rail systems for the M4 Carbine system.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
The Secretary of the Army, or designee, is directed to
provide a report to the congressional defense committees not
later than April 1, 2014 on an assessment of the current M4/
M16-mounted battery requirements associated with a 3-day
dismounted mission for an Army infantry platoon compared to the
same unit and mission if the members were equipped with an
integrated weapon-mounted power source. The assessment should
compare the battery requirements, numbers, weight, costs, as
well as the likely impact on the operational functionality of
the M4/M16 configured with an integrated power source,
including weapons system effectiveness, efficiency, ergonomics,
maintainability, reliability, and related risk. The assessment
should also include a business case analysis of the potential
acquisition and sustainment costs and savings associated with
transitioning to an integrated M4/M16-mounted power technology
to replace batteries for individual weapon-mounted components.
Finally, the assessment should address the potential utility,
if any, of incorporating a data link via such a weapon-mounted
power source between soldier communications systems and soldier
and weapon sensors. The Director, Operational Test and
Evaluation is also directed to oversee the Army's live fire or
other operational testing, if any, conducted as part of
gathering data for this report.
Report on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics scholarship
program
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 255) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to assess whether the
Department of Defense Science, Mathematics and Research for
Transformation (SMART) scholarship program, or similar
programs, could meet the undergraduate and graduate science,
technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) workforce needs
of the intelligence community (IC).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
We note that the national security community, in general,
faces growing challenges with meeting its STEM workforce needs,
in particular, attracting top-level U.S. citizens that are
eligible for security clearances. The SMART program was
established by the Department of Defense to attract and retain
promising candidates and STEM leaders into the Department,
including components of the IC. SMART provides scholarships to
students pursuing technical degrees in disciplines of interest
to the Department and the IC. We recognize that the SMART
program has been useful in meeting its intent and believe that
data provided on the program shows that the SMART program could
be used by a broader community within the IC, but any further
expansion would require further socialization to increase
participation, as well as additional resources to fund any
additional students supporting the needs of the IC.
Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in defense
experimental program to stimulate competitive research
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 262) that would
modify the eligibility requirements for the Defense
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
(DEPSCOR) to bring it more in line with the eligibility
requirements of the Experimental Program to Stimulate
Competitive Research (EPSCOR) under the National Science
Foundation (NSF).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that while the Department of Defense maintains the
statutory authority for DEPSCOR, the Department has not
included funds to support the program since 2009 due to
changing research needs and priorities. Additionally, even
should funds be made available for DEPSCOR in the future, we
would be concerned about potential duplication with NSF's
EPSCOR. DEPSCOR was originally established as a separate
activity from EPSCOR in section 257 of the National Defense
Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103-337)
because the needs of the Department were not being met by the
EPSCOR. Should the Department choose to revitalize the DEPSCOR
activity, we believe it should maintain a separate and distinct
eligibility requirement to ensure that it is able to meet the
separate and distinct research needs of the Department of
Defense.
Briefing on power and energy research conducted at university-
affiliated research centers
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 266) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to brief the congressional
defense authorizing committees on power and energy research
conducted at university-affiliated research centers.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Approval of certain new uses of research, development, test, and
evaluation land
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 267) that would
prohibit the Secretary of Defense or the head of any other
department or agency of the Federal Government from finalizing
any decision regarding new land use activity on ranges, test
areas, or other land used by the Department of Defense (DOD)
for activities related to research, development, test, and
evaluation and determined to be critical to national security
unless the secretary concerned approves such activity in
writing.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the DOD Siting Clearinghouse was created to
preserve military readiness and protect DOD capabilities from
incompatible energy infrastructure development by collaborating
with DOD components and external stakeholders to prevent,
minimize, or mitigate adverse impacts on military operations,
readiness, and testing. The Clearinghouse is intended to be the
single point of contact and principal advocate for DOD equities
in all such deliberations.
We understand that as a result of the Clearinghouse review
of the Sun Zia Southwest Transmission Project, DOD raised
significant concerns and identified potential impacts on the
capabilities of the White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) in New
Mexico. According to an August 7, 2013, letter from the Acting
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and
Environment to the Principal Deputy Director of the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), the route of the proposed transmission
line, without mitigation, ``would result in an unacceptable
risk to national security. If a bulk power transmission line is
constructed along the selected route, it would preclude our
capability to fully test the Joint Integrated Air and Missile
Defense Architecture and other weapon systems under realistic
threat environments at WSMR. This testing is absolutely
necessary and it should be clearly understood that no other
location exists in the United States where it is possible to
conduct flight tests with the footprint requirements these
weapons systems present. Critical to fully testing joint
military weapons are the preservation of the restricted
airspace (from the surface to unlimited) on the range area on
WSMR, and the permanently-designated and specially-allocated
restricted airspace in the northern extension area.''
We expect that as the Sun Zia Southwest Transmission
project approval request proceeds, DOD concerns will be
addressed by the executive branch to preserve this critical
resource. We expect that appropriate mitigation measures will
be included concurrent to the issuance of a Record of Decision
by BLM.
Should DOD concerns not be addressed in this case, we
direct the Secretary of Defense to review the processes and
effectiveness of the DOD Siting Clearinghouse and to provide a
report to the congressional defense committees not later than
90 days after a Record of Decision with proposals that will
improve the ability of the Clearinghouse to assess impacts to
national security in a timely manner and ultimately preserve
military readiness and protect DOD capabilities from
incompatible energy infrastructure development.
Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 268) that would
require the Department of Defense (DOD) to provide a report on
the capability and infrastructure required to support canines
as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives no later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this Act. The report shall make a determination
based on requirements if the DOD, and each military service,
intends to develop and maintain the capability and
infrastructure required to support canines as stand-off
detection of explosives and explosive precursors. If deemed
appropriate by the Secretary, the report shall also detail: (1)
The acquisition process with respect to canines as stand-off
detection of explosives and explosive precursors; (2) The
procedures established by the DOD to ensure that canines reach
or exceed the appropriate performance standards; (3) A plan to
ensure that the latest data and information regarding canine
capabilities are distributed throughout the DOD; (4) Any
technologies capable of replacing the canine as a stand-off
detection capability; and (5) A determination of the relevant
office to oversee the above elements.
Title III--Operation and Maintenance
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Operation and maintenance funding (sec. 301)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 301) authorizing
appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the armed
forces and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses,
not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as
specified in the funding table in section 4301.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 301).
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle B--Energy and Environment
Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities
relating to operational energy strategy (sec. 311)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 311) that would
amend section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, to
revise the date of submission for the report on the proposed
budgets that were not certified for that fiscal year.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of the
Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or
reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities (sec.
312)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 312) that would
amend section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, to permit
a recipient of funds under the Sikes Act to be able to use the
funds for matching funds or cost-sharing requirements of
conservation programs. This section would also expire the
authority on October 1, 2019, but permit any agreements that
were entered into prior to September 30, 2019, to continue
according to its terms and conditions.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Reauthorization of Sikes Act (sec. 313)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 313) that would
extend the authority of the Sikes Act through 2019.
The Senate committee-reported bill amendment contained no
similar provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn
pits (sec. 314)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 317) that would
codify the definition of covered waste as it relates to the
requirements established by section 317 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, title 10 of United
States Code 2701 note (Public Law 111-84).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels
(sec. 315)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 319) that would
limit the Department of Defense's (DOD) ability to purchase or
produce biofuels until the earlier of either the date on which
the Budget Control Act of 2011 is no longer in effect, or the
date on which the cost of biofuel is equal to the cost of
conventional fuels. The provision would provide an exception
for biofuel test and certification and research and
development.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment that would prohibit DOD funds to be used
for bulk purchases of drop-in fuel for operational purposes
during fiscal year 2014, unless the cost of that drop-in fuel
is cost competitive with traditional fuel, subject to a
national security waiver. We note that the phrase ``cost
competitive'' in this section generally refers to prices that
are equal to or lower than prices offered by competitors for
similar goods or services. However, we note that terms and
conditions for particular purchases may vary; in particular,
long-term energy purchases are likely to have different pricing
structures from short-term or spot-market purchases.
Accordingly, some flexibility in the application of this phrase
is anticipated, where necessary to address such differences. We
understand that average prices over the period of a long-term
contract would be cost competitive.
Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment
Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment (sec. 321)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 312) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to
develop an overarching strategy, along with an implementation
plan, to integrate and synchronize at a Department-wide level,
the services' prepositioning programs. The strategy and
implementation plan would ensure that the Department of Defense
(DOD) prepositioning programs, both ground and afloat, align
with national defense strategies and new DOD priorities, and
emphasize joint oversight to maximize effectiveness and
efficiencies in prepositioned materiel and equipment across the
DOD.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report (sec. 322)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 322) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to review current and expected
manufacturing requirements across the Department of Defense to
identify critical manufacturing capabilities which could be
executed by the government-owned arsenals, and to brief the
results of the review to the congressional defense committees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 311) that would require the Secretary of
Defense, in consultation with the military services and defense
agencies, to review current and expected manufacturing
requirements for which there is no or limited domestic
commercial source and which are appropriate for manufacturing
within an arsenal owned by the United States in order to
support critical manufacturing capabilities.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to review
arsenals owned by the United States in order to support
critical manufacturing capabilities. The agreement also directs
the Government Accountability Office to report and assess the
Department's review with recommendations.
Consideration of Army arsenals' capabilities to fulfill manufacturing
requirements (sec. 323)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 323) that would
require program executive officers and program managers to
solicit information from government-owned arsenals when
undertaking a make-or-buy analysis, notify government-owned
arsenals of the requirement, and allow arsenals that have the
capability to fulfill a manufacturing requirement to submit a
proposal for the requirement.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of
operating forces used to support overseas contingency
operations (sec. 324)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 322) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to
establish a policy setting forth the program and priorities of
the Department of Defense for the retrograde, reconstitution,
and replacement of units and materiel used to support overseas
contingency operations. The provision directed that the policy
shall take into account national security threats, the
requirements of the combatant commands, the current readiness
of the operational forces of the military departments, and risk
associated with strategic depth and the time necessary to
reestablish required personnel, equipment, and training
readiness in such operating forces.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical amendment.
Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan (sec. 325)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 321) that would
require the Secretary of the Navy to submit a strategic
sustainment plan for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program to
the congressional defense committees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would clarify that the strategic sustainment
plan would have to identify specifically any contractor support
needed by the LCS vessels when they are forward deployed.
Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility (sec.
326)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 836) that would
direct the Secretary of Defense to improve the management of
defense equipment and supplies throughout their lifecycles by
adopting and implementing item unique identification, radio
frequency identification, biometrics, and other automated
information and data capture technologies for the tracking,
management, and accountability for deployed assets.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 331) that would direct the Secretary of Defense
to complete a comprehensive strategy and implementation plan
for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility across
the Department of Defense.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment that would include an operational security
assessment to ensure all DOD assets are appropriately protected
during the execution of the comprehensive strategy and
implementation plan.
We recognize the challenges in supply chain management,
including asset tracking and in-transit visibility
capabilities. We see this posing an acute near-term challenge,
especially in light of the experience with retrograde
operations from the Republic of Iraq and the on-going
operations in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
Furthermore, we note that supply chain management
challenges have been an on-going source of concern for the
Department of Defense, from the emergence of the Government
Accountability Office's high risk list in 1990, to the current
need to achieve auditability and financial management goals set
by the Secretary of Defense and Congress.
We believe that the strategy called for by this provision
is an important step to improving the Department's supply chain
management shortfalls. In developing and implementing this
strategy, we urge the Department to look at how it can better
leverage new technologies. For example, item unique
identification, radio frequency identification, and biometrics
could be more effectively used to interface with enterprise
resource planning systems and improve the tracking, management,
and accountability for all Department assets.
Subtitle D--Reports
Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit
readiness (sec. 331)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 331) that would
amend the report required under section 482 of title 10, United
States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to report to
the congressional defense committees on the ability of the
geographic and functional combatant commanders to successfully
meet their respective contingency and operational plans and key
mission essential tasks.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 332) that would amend section 482 of title 10,
United States Code, to update and streamline the quarterly
readiness report to Congress.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment that would combine both provisions and
would amend section 482 of title 10, United States Code.
Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for equipment
readiness and strategic capability (sec. 332)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 332) that would
repeal the requirement that the Comptroller General of the
United States report on the Army's progress in moving to a
modular force design.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 321) that would repeal the requirement for
modularity reports by both the Army and the Government
Accountability Office and would also add a requirement that the
Marine Corps report budget information regarding funding for
the reset of equipment and reconstitution of prepositioned
stocks.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding
information technology capital assets (sec. 333)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 333) that would
amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2003 (Public Law 107-314; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) to align
Department of Defense high-threshold information technology
Capital Asset reporting with the Department's Major Automated
Information Systems reporting and its Exhibit 300 reporting to
the Office of Management and Budget.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 333).
The agreement includes this provision.
Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention reporting
requirements (sec. 334)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 334) that would amend section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009
(P.L. 110-417; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note) to update the military
departments' strategic plans with performance measures and show
clear linkage to the Department of Defense's overarching goals
and objectives as described in the Department's strategic plan
for corrosion control and prevention.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority
Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores
(sec. 341)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 341) that would
restrict the Secretary of the Air Force from reducing the force
structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, (Lajes) until 30
days after the European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment
is completed and is briefed to the congressional defense
committees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contains no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision requiring that, prior to
taking any action to realign forces at Lajes, the Secretary of
Defense must certify to the congressional defense committees
that the realignment is supported by a European Infrastructure
Consolidation Assessment.
Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration
teams outside the United States (sec. 342)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 342) that would
prohibit the Secretary of Defense from using any fiscal year
2014 or 2015 funds to allow flight demonstration teams to
perform at any location outside the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision. The Senate report accompanying S. 1197 (S. Rpt. 113-
44) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014 commented on Department of Defense (DOD) guidance
prohibiting all aerial demonstrations, including flyovers, jump
team demonstrations, and participation in civilian air shows
and military open houses. The report observed that: (1) There
may be certain circumstances where an exception to this general
policy could provide some level of community engagement as a
no-cost addition to activities that are required for training
or readiness; and (2) DOD should reconsider whether this policy
should be enforced on a blanket basis or whether the policy
should allow for community engagement if that engagement can be
completed as a no-cost adjunct to missions fulfilling other
required operational or training activities.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would prohibit spending funds for performances
of flight demonstration teams outside the United States if the
Department has cancelled any performances of flight
demonstration teams inside the United States by reason of
insufficient funds due to a sequestration. We are intending
that this provision cover the Air Force Thunderbirds, the Navy
Blue Angels and the Army Golden Knights.
Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations Command
National Capital Region (sec. 343)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 341) that would prohibit the expenditure of any funds for
the U.S. Special Operations Command National Capital Region
(USSOCOM-NCR) until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense
provides the congressional defense committees a report which
describes, at a minimum: (1) The purpose of the USSOCOM-NCR;
(2) The activities to be performed by the USSOCOM-NCR; (3) An
explanation of the impact of the USSOCOM-NCR on existing
activities at USSOCOM headquarters; (4) A detailed breakout, by
fiscal year, of the staffing and other costs associated with
the USSOCOM-NCR over the future years defense program; (5) A
description of the relationship between the USSOCOM-NCR and the
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special
Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict (ASD SOLIC); (6) The role
of the ASD SOLIC in providing oversight of USSOCOM-NCR
activities; and (7) Any other matters the Secretary deems
appropriate.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative
(sec. 344)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 343) that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from
expending any funds in Operation and Maintenance, defense-wide
(OMDW), for the Trans Regional Web Initiative (TRWI).
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from
expending more than $2.0 million in OMDW for TRWI and restrict
the use of such funds for the termination of the program as
managed by U.S. Special Operations Command or for purposes of
transitioning appropriate TRWI capabilities to other agencies.
In light of budget concerns for the U.S. Government,
resource constraints for the Department of Defense, and shifts
in the geopolitical environment and security strategies, we
note our concern with regard to the Department's direction for
strategically engaging in the information environment. We
remain skeptical of the effectiveness of the websites
established under the TRWI and believe that available resources
may better be used to support tactical and operational military
information support activities. We believe strategic
information operations activities, like TRWI, may more
appropriately be managed by other relevant U.S. Government
agencies, with the Department of Defense focused on
contributing to an interagency approach that is responsive to
military-specific operational requirements.
If the Secretary of Defense deems it to be in the national
security interests of the United States and appropriate under
current fiscal pressures, we note the Department of Defense may
use funds authorized by this Act for TRWI to conduct a pilot
project using existing authorities with an appropriate U.S.
Government agency, such as the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
Such a pilot could be used to demonstrate the transition of
appropriate TRWI capabilities to such agency and support the
strategic information operations requirements of the Geographic
Combatant Commanders. We believe that any such pilot should
seek to demonstrate responsiveness to the time sensitive needs
of the Department of Defense while integrating such activities
with broader U.S. strategic communications objectives.
Consistent with this provision, we expect that the Department
of Defense will not request additional funding for TRWI in
fiscal year 2015 and beyond.
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units (sec. 351)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 599) that would
amend section 974 of title 10, United States Code, to require
that any gift made on the condition that the gift be used for
the benefit of a military musical unit be credited to the
appropriation or account providing the funds for such musical
unit.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would authorize
service secretaries to accept contributions of money, personal
property, or services on the condition that such money,
property, or services be used for the benefit of a military
musical unit, and requiring that such contributions be credited
to the appropriation or account for that musical unit.
Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms (sec.
352)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 351) that would
establish as national policy a requirement for all the U.S.
military services to use a joint combat camouflage uniform by
October 1, 2018, with certain exceptions.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 351) that would direct the Secretary of Defense
to reduce the separate development and fielding of service-
specific combat and camouflage utility uniforms in order to
collectively adopt and field the same combat and camouflage
utility uniforms for use by all members of the Armed Forces.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment that would combine both provisions and
eliminate the 2018 deadline.
We note the provision adopted makes it the policy of the
United States for the Secretary of Defense to eliminate the
development and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms, in order
to adopt and field a common combat and camouflage utility
uniform, or family of uniforms, for specific combat
environments, to be used by all members of the Armed Forces.
Each Armed Force will be prohibited from adopting new combat
and camouflage utility uniforms unless: (1) All the Armed
Forces adopt the same uniform or family of uniforms; (2) An
Armed Force adopts a uniform currently in use by another Armed
Force; or (3) The Secretary of Defense grants an exception,
based on unique circumstances or operational requirements.
We note that exceptions granted to this policy include: (1)
Combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms
for use by special operations personnel; (2) Engineering
modifications to existing combat and camouflage utility
uniforms and families of uniforms such as power harnessing or
generating textiles, fire resistant fabrics, and anti-vector,
anti-microbial, and anti-bacterial treatments; (3) Ancillary
uniform items such as headwear, footwear, body armor, and other
items designated by the secretaries of the military
departments; (4) Vehicle crew uniforms; (5) Service-specific
cosmetic modifications; or (6) existing Service-specific
uniforms that meet operational requirements.
We note that a secretary of a military department may not
prevent the secretary of another military department from
authorizing the use of any combat or camouflage utility uniform
or family of uniforms approved for use by an Armed Force under
the jurisdiction of the secretary. Furthermore, the secretary
of a military department shall formally register with the Joint
Clothing and Textiles Governance Board all current and future
combat uniforms, camouflage utility uniforms, and families of
uniforms.
We also note that 60 days after the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary of Defense shall issue implementation guidance
that requires the secretaries of the military departments to:
(1) Establish joint performance criteria for the design,
development, fielding, and characteristics of combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms and
include that criteria in all new requirements documents; (2)
Continue to work together to assess and develop new
technologies that could be incorporated into future combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms to improve
warfighter survivability; (3) Ensure that new combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms meet the
geographic and operational requirements of the commanders of
the combatant commands; and (4) Ensure that all new combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms achieve
interoperability with all components of individual warfighter
systems, including body armor, organizational clothing and
equipment, and other individual protective systems.
We fully expect the Secretary of Defense to enforce this
policy and not deviate from its intent to reduce the separate
development and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and
camouflage uniforms and families of uniforms.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Authorization of appropriations for the Marine Corps Embassy Security
Group
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 302) that would
increase funding for the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group by
$13.4 million.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note the funding tables reflect an increase of $35.0
million for the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group.
Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response Force
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 303) that would
increase funding for Crisis Response Force by $10.6 million.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note the funding tables reflect an increase of $40.0
million for Crisis Response Force.
Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management related to
Department of Defense readiness activities
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 314) that would
amend section 103A of the Sikes Act, section 670c-1 of title
16, United States Code, to permit lump sum payment and accrual
of interest used for the purposes of the original agreement.
This section would also permit the cooperative agreements to be
used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or
use of the U.S. Government, and sets limitations on agreements
that are not on military installations. Finally, this section
would also expire the authority on October 1, 2019, but permit
any agreements that were entered into prior to September 30,
2019, to continue according to its terms and conditions.
The Senate committee-reported bill amendment contained no
similar provision.
The agreement does not contain this provision.
Exclusions from definition of ``chemical substance'' under Toxic
Substances Control Act
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 315) that would
modify section 2602(2)(B) of title 15, United States Code, to
add to the exclusions any component of any article including
shot, bullets and other projectiles, propellants when
manufactured for or used in such an article, and primers.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement
requirement
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 316) that would
amend section 526 of the Energy Independence Security Act
(Section 42 of United States Code 17142) to exempt the
Department of Defense from the requirements related to
contracts for alternative or synthetic fuel in that section.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels
refineries
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 318) that would
require the Department of Defense to obtain a congressional
authorization before entering into a contract for the planning,
design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 320) that would
amend section 631 of title 10, United States Code, by adding a
provision permitting the Secretary of the Defense to establish
``Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas.'' This provision
would exempt southern sea otters from the Endangered Species
Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) and the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain this provision.
Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned and controlled
by women and minorities required before conversion of certain
functions to contractor performance
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 324) that would
forbid a Department of Defense function performed by Department
of Defense civilian employees and tied to a military base from
being converted into a contractor function until the Secretary
of Defense conducts an assessment to determine if the
Department of Defense has carried out sufficient outreach
programs to assist small businesses owned and controlled by
women and socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain this provision.
Ordnance related records review and reporting requirement for Vieques
and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 334) that would
require the Secretary of Defense conduct a review of all
Department of Defense records detailing the historical use of
military munitions and training on Vieques and Culebra Islands,
Puerto Rico.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain this provision.
We note that the Department of Defense, for land and water
sites on Culebra Island for which the Department is
responsible, has completed historical research under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) process and issued Preliminary
Assessment reports concerning the Department's former use of
sites on Culebra Island for live-fire training.
We also note that for these sites, the Army has completed
site inspections and is currently conducting remedial
investigations that will determine whether an environmental
response action is required at specific sites.
Finally, we note that the Department of Defense is in the
process of cleaning up portions of the former operational
ranges on Vieques and also is conducting preliminary
assessments, site inspections, and remedial investigations to
determine whether a response action is required under CERCLA at
Vieques. Therefore, we encourage the Department of Defense to
work with the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to ensure the
documents and reports from the historical records reviews and
investigations that the Department of Defense and the Army
completed for those former military sites on Culebra and
Vieques are made available to the public.
Authorization to institute a centralized, automated mail redirection
system to improve the delivery of absentee ballots to military
personnel serving outside the United States
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 352) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to
transfer up to $4.5 million from defense-wide operation and
maintenance to the Postal Service Fund for purposes of
implementing the modernization of the U.S. Postal Service's
mail delivery system to improve the delivery of absentee
ballots to military personnel serving outside the United
States.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We understand that alternate funding has been used to
modernize the U.S. Postal Service's mail delivery system to
improve the delivery of absentee ballots to military personnel
serving outside the United States.
Title IV--Military Personnel Authorizations
Subtitle A--Active Forces
End strengths for active forces (sec. 401)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 401) that would
authorize the following end strengths for active duty personnel
of the armed forces as of September 30, 2014: Army, 520,000;
Navy, 323,600; Marine Corps, 190,200; and Air Force, 327,600.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 401).
The agreement includes this provision.
End strength levels for the active forces for fiscal year
2014 are set forth in the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Change from
FY 2013 ------------------------------------------------------
Service Authorized FY 2014 FY 2013
Request Recommendation Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army........................................ 552,100 520,000 520,000 0 -32,100
Navy........................................ 322,700 323,600 323,600 0 900
Marine Corps................................ 197,300 190,200 190,200 0 -7,100
Air Force................................... 329,460 327,600 327,600 0 -1,860
DOD Total............................... 1,401,560 1,361,400 1,361,400 0 -40,160
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels and in
annual limitation on certain end strength reductions (sec. 402)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 402) that would
establish the following minimum end strengths for active-duty
personnel as of September 30, 2014: Army, 520,000; Navy,
323,600; Marine Corps, 190,200; and Air Force, 327,600.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would establish minimum active-duty end
strengths for the Army of 510,000 and the Marine Corps of
188,000, and would amend section 403 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to
increase the maximum annual reduction in end strength
authorized by that section for the Army to 25,000 and for the
Marine Corps to 7,500.
Minimum end strength levels for active-duty personnel for
fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Change from
Service FY 2013 -------------------------------
Authorized Recommendation FY 2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army............................................................ 542,700 510,000 -32,700
Navy............................................................ 322,700 323,600 900
Marine Corps.................................................... 193,500 188,000 -5,500
Air Force....................................................... 329,460 327,600 -1,860
DOD Total................................................... 1,388,360 1,349,200 -39,160
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We note that continued fiscal constraints have forced the
Army and the Marine Corps to alter their end strength reduction
plans to reach their pre-sequester end strength targets of
490,000 for the Army and 182,100 for the Marine Corps by the
end of fiscal year 2015, 2 years before originally anticipated.
In order to maintain a balance between end strength, readiness
of the force, and modernization, we will support this altered
reduction plan. However, we remain concerned that unfettered
reductions in end strength will have a detrimental impact on
force structure and, ultimately, operational mission capability
and capacity among the services, and harm the morale of the
force. The services should be very cautious in their efforts to
further reduce the force to ensure that we do not break faith
with those who continue to serve in the current conflicts, and
those who have served our nation in war.
Subtitle B--Reserve Forces
End strengths for Selected Reserve (sec. 411)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 411) that would
authorize the following end strengths for Selected Reserve
personnel, including the end strengths for reserves on active
duty in support of the reserves, as of September 30, 2014: the
Army National Guard of the United States, 354,200; the Army
Reserve, 205,000; the Navy Reserve, 59,100; the Marine Corps
Reserve, 39,600; the Air National Guard of the United States,
105,400; the Air Force Reserve, 70,400; and the Coast Guard
Reserve, 9,000.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 411).
The agreement includes this provision.
End strength levels for the Selected Reserve for fiscal
year 2014 are set forth in the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Change from
FY 2013 ------------------------------------------------------
Service Authorized FY 2014 FY 2013
Request Recommendation Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard......................... 358,200 354,200 354,200 0 -4,000
Army Reserve................................ 205,000 205,000 205,000 0 0
Navy Reserve................................ 62,500 59,100 59,100 0 -3,400
Marine Corps Reserve........................ 39,600 39,600 39,600 0 0
Air National Guard.......................... 105,700 105,400 105,400 0 -300
Air Force Reserve........................... 70,880 70,400 70,400 0 -480
DOD Total............................... 841,880 833,700 833,700 0 -8,180
Coast Guard Reserve......................... 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves
(sec. 412)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 412) that would
authorize the following end strengths for reserves on active
duty in support of the reserve components as of September 30,
2014: the Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060; the
Army Reserve, 16,261; the Navy Reserve, 10,159; the Marine
Corps Reserve, 2,261; the Air National Guard of the United
States, 14,734; and the Air Force Reserve, 2,911.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 412).
The agreement includes this provision.
End strength levels for reserves on active duty in support
of the reserves for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the
following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Change from
FY 2013 ------------------------------------------------------
Service Authorized FY 2014 FY 2013
Request Recommendation Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard......................... 32,060 32,060 32,060 0 0
Army Reserve................................ 16,277 16,261 16,261 0 -16
Navy Reserve................................ 10,114 10,159 10,159 0 45
Marine Corps Reserve........................ 2,261 2,261 2,261 0 0
Air National Guard.......................... 14,765 14,734 14,734 0 -31
Air Force Reserve........................... 2,888 2,911 2,911 0 23
DOD Total............................... 78,365 78,386 78,386 0 21
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End strengths for military technicians (dual status) (sec. 413)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 413) that would
authorize the following end strengths for military technicians
(dual status) as of September 30, 2014: the Army National Guard
of the United States, 27,210; the Army Reserve, 8,395; the Air
National Guard of the United States, 21,875; and the Air Force
Reserve, 10,429.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 413).
The agreement includes this provision.
End strength levels for military technicians (dual status)
for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Change from
FY 2013 ------------------------------------------------------
Service Authorized FY 2014 FY 2013
Request Recommendation Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard......................... 27,210 27,210 27,210 0 0
Army Reserve................................ 8,395 8,395 8,395 0 0
Air National Guard.......................... 22,180 21,875 21,875 0 -305
Air Force Reserve........................... 10,400 10,429 10,429 0 29
DOD Total............................... 68,185 67,909 67,909 0 -276
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians
(sec. 414)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 414) that would
establish the following personnel limits for the reserve
components of the Army and Air Force for non-dual status
technicians as of September 30, 2014: the Army National Guard
of the United States, 1,600; the Air National Guard of the
United States, 350; the Army Reserve, 595; and the Air Force
Reserve, 90.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 414).
The agreement includes this provision.
Personnel limitations for non-dual status technicians for
fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Change from
FY 2013 ------------------------------------------------------
Service Authorized FY 2014 FY 2013
Request Recommendation Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard......................... 1,600 1,600 1,600 0 0
Air National Guard.......................... 350 350 350 0 0
Army Reserve................................ 595 595 595 0 0
Air Force Reserve........................... 90 90 90 0 0
DOD Total............................... 2,635 2,635 2,635 0 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for
operational support (sec. 415)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 415) that would
authorize the maximum number of reserve component personnel who
may be on active duty or full-time National Guard duty under
section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal
year 2014 to provide operational support.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 415).
The agreement includes this provision.
The maximum number of reserve component personnel who may
be on active duty or full-time National Guard duty under
section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal
year 2014 is set forth in the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Change from
FY 2013 ------------------------------------------------------
Service Authorized FY 2014 FY 2013
Request Recommendation Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard......................... 17,000 17,000 17,000 0 0
Army Reserve................................ 13,000 13,000 13,000 0 0
Navy Reserve................................ 6,200 6,200 6,200 0 0
Marine Corps Reserve........................ 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0
Air National Guard.......................... 16,000 16,000 16,000 0 0
Air Force Reserve........................... 14,000 14,000 14,000 0 0
DOD Total............................... 69,200 69,200 69,200 0 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations
Military personnel (sec. 421)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 421) that would
authorize appropriations for military personnel at the levels
identified in section 4401 of division D of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 421).
The agreement includes this provision.
Title V--Military Personnel Policy
Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally
Congressional notification requirements related to increases in number
of general and flag officers on Active Duty or in joint duty
assignments (sec. 501)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 501) that would
amend sections 526 of title 10, United States Code, to reduce
by 14 the total of the number of general and flag officers
authorized to be on active duty in the military services, and
by 10 the number of general and flag officers authorized to be
assigned to joint duty assignments.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would amend section
526 of title 10, United States Code, to require the secretary
of a military department to provide notice and rationale to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives whenever the secretary proposes to increase the
number of general or flag officers above the lower of the
statutory limit on the number of general or flag officers on
active duty or the number of general or flag officers on active
duty on January 1, 2014. The provision would also require the
Secretary of Defense, the secretary of a military department,
or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to provide notice
and rationale to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate
and the House of Representatives whenever the secretary or
Chairman proposes to increase the number of general or flag
officers above the lower of the statutory limit of general or
flag officers in joint duty assignments or the number of
general or flag officers in joint duty assignments on January
1, 2014. The proposed increases will not take place until after
the end of the 60-calendar day beginning on the date that
notice is provided. The provision would also require the
Secretary of Defense, beginning on March 1, 2015, to submit to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives an annual report on the number of general and
flag officers on Active Duty and in joint duty assignments on
January 1 of the year in which the report is submitted.
Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education upon
original appointment as a commissioned officer (sec. 502)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 501) that would authorize service secretaries to award
constructive service credit upon original appointment as a
commissioned officer for special experience or training in
certain cyberspace-related fields and for periods of advanced
education in certain cyberspace-related fields beyond the
baccalaureate degree level. Constructive service credited under
this provision is limited to 1 year for each year of special
experience, training or advanced education, and 3 years total
of constructive service credit.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and selective
early removal of officers from reserve active-status list (sec.
503)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 512) that would
amend section 14704 of title 10, United States Code, to require
service secretaries to submit to selection boards considering
officers for selective early removal from the reserve active-
status list a list of reserve component officers that includes
the name of each officer on the reserve active-status list in
the same grade and competitive category in the zone of
consideration except for officers who have been approved for
voluntary retirement or who will be involuntarily retired. The
provision would also require service secretaries to specify the
number of officers that a selection board may recommend for
removal from the reserve active-status list.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 506).
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment and would also amend section 638a(b)(2) of title 10,
United States Code, to authorize consideration for selective
early retirement of: (1) officers in the regular grade of
lieutenant colonel or commander who have failed to be selected
for promotion at least one time, and (2) officers in the grade
of colonel, or in the case of the Navy, captain, who have
served on active duty in that grade for at least 2 years and
whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for
promotion.
Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management
Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve components (sec.
511)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 726) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to share with any adjutant
general of a state the contact information of members of the
Individual Ready Reserve and individual mobilization augmentees
who reside in the state of such adjutant general for the
purpose of conducting suicide prevention outreach efforts.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would amend section 10219 of title 10, United
States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Defense to share
with the adjutant general of a state, upon request, the contact
information of members of the Individual Ready Reserve and
individual mobilization augmentees in order for the adjutant
general to include those members in suicide prevention efforts.
The amendment would also amend section 706 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239) to authorize education and outreach for suicide prevention
in the existing pilot program on enhancements of Department of
Defense efforts on mental health in the National Guard and
reserves through community partnerships.
Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active
and inactive National Guard (sec. 512)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 513) that would
provide temporary authority for the Secretary of the Army and
Secretary of the Air Force to maintain an active status and an
inactive status list of members in the inactive National Guard.
The provision would also authorize the transfer of officers of
the Army and Air National Guard from the Selected Reserve to
the inactive National Guard and from the inactive National
Guard to the Selected Reserve.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 507) that would authorize the transfer of officers of the
Army and Air National Guard from the Selected Reserve to the
inactive National Guard and from the inactive National Guard to
the Selected Reserve during the period ending on December 31,
2016.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve component
units and involuntary mobilizations of certain Reserves (sec.
513)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 511) that would
require the service secretaries to provide at least 120 days
advance notice to reserve component units, and individuals not
part of a unit, prior to an order to active duty for deployment
in connection with a contingency operation, and 120 days
advance notice to such units if their deployments are canceled,
postponed, or altered. In the event such notice was not
provided, the provision would require the Secretary concerned
to report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives explaining the reasons for such
failure.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 508) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
personally approve of any decision to cancel the deployment of
a reserve component unit within 180 days of its scheduled
deployment date when an active-duty unit would be sent instead
to perform the same mission, and to notify the congressional
defense committees and governors concerned whenever such a
decision is made. The agreement includes the Senate provision
with an amendment that would add the requirement for the
service secretaries to provide at least 120 days advance notice
of an involuntary mobilization of a member of a reserve
component who is not assigned to a unit or who is to be
mobilized apart from the member's unit. This requirement would
apply to individual members mobilized on or after the date that
is 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act and would
sunset on the date of the completion of the withdrawal of
United States combat forces from Afghanistan.
Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component general
and flag officers in an active status (sec. 514)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 514) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the
general officer and flag officer requirements for members of
the reserve component in an active status, and to submit a
report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives containing the results of the
review not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of
this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in American
Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
(sec. 515)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 515) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study to
determine the feasibility of establishing a unit of the
National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to report on the feasibility of
establishing a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and
in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Subtitle C--General Service Authorities
Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program about
disability-related employment and education protections (sec.
521)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 524) that would
expand the training required under the transition assistance
program to include information about disability-related
employment and education protections available to service
members and information on eligibility for certain education
assistance programs administered by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs. The provision would also require the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs to submit a report to the Committees on
Veterans' Affairs and the Committees on Armed Services of the
House of Representatives and the Senate assessing the
feasibility of providing certain transition assistance program
instruction at overseas locations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would expand transition assistance program
training to include information on disability-related
employment and education protections, but would strike the rest
of section 524 of the House bill.
Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic stress
disorder or traumatic brain injury before administrative
separation (sec. 522)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 528) that would
amend section 1177 of title 10, United States Code, to remove
the exception for proceedings under the Uniform Code of
Military Justice from the requirement for a medical examination
of certain members diagnosed with post-traumatic stress
disorder or traumatic brain injury, or who otherwise reasonably
alleges the influence of such a condition.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would amend section
1177 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that an
administrative separation in lieu of court-martial is an
administrative separation within the meaning of this statute.
Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral
occupational standard for military career designators (sec.
523)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 526) that would
amend section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103-160) to establish a consistent
definition of ``gender-neutral occupational standard'' for use
pursuant to the requirements of that section.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation Plan
(sec. 524)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530D) that would
express the sense of the Congress that no later than September
2015 the service secretaries should develop, review, and
validate individual occupational standards to assess and assign
members of the armed forces to units, including special
operation forces, and that they should complete all assessments
relating to the women in service implementation review by
January 1, 2016.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Provision of military service records to the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs in an electronic format (sec. 525)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 597) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, to make specified records of
each member of the armed forces who was discharged or released
from the armed forces on or after September 11, 2001, available
to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require that
the specified records of service members discharged or released
from the armed forces on or after January 1, 2014, be made
available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic
format.
Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System (sec. 526)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 521) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the
backlog of pending reserve component cases in the Integrated
Disability Evaluation System (IDES) and provide a description
of the progress being made to improve the tracking and
visibility of pending cases by both active duty and reserve
component members during each phase or step of the IDES.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, to conduct
a review of the backlog of pending reserve component cases in
the IDES and provide a description of the progress being made
to improve the tracking and visibility of pending cases by both
active duty and reserve component members during each phase or
step of the IDES, to include when a military treatment facility
is assigned a packet and pending case for action regarding a
service member and when a packet is at the Veterans Tracking
Application and Disability Rating Activity Site of the
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Subtitle D--Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response and Related Reforms
Modification of eligibility for appointment as judge on the United
States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (sec. 531)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 561) that would amend Article 142 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice (section 942 of title 10, United States Code)
to authorize appointment of former commissioned officers of a
regular component of an armed force as judges on the United
States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. However, these
former officers could not be appointed as a judge of the court
within 7 years after relief from active duty.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would amend Article
142 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (section 942 of
title 10, United States Code) to provide that a person may not
be appointed as a judge of the court within seven years after
retirement from active duty as a commissioned officer of a
regular component of an armed force.
Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of the
Armed Forces and chaplains of such members (sec. 532)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530) that would
amend section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) (``section 533'') to
expand the required accommodation of the moral and religious
beliefs of service members to include actions and speech, and
would limit disciplinary and administrative action to those
beliefs, actions, and speech that cause actual harm to good
order and discipline.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 512) that would amend section 533 to require the
accommodation of individual expressions of belief by service
members unless such expressions of belief could have an adverse
impact on military readiness, unit cohesion, and good order and
discipline. The Senate provision would also require that
regulations implementing section 533 be prescribed within 120
days of enactment of this Act.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the regulations implementing
section 533 be prescribed within 90 days of the date of
enactment of this Act.
Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance with
regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of
members of the Armed Forces and their chaplains (sec. 533)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 513) that would require the Department of Defense
Inspector General (DOD IG) to assess and report to the
congressional defense committees on the compliance of the
Department of Defense with regulations promulgated under
section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239), within 180 days of
promulgation. The provision would also require the DOD IG to
investigate the Department's and the services' compliance with
those regulations with respect to adverse personnel actions
within 18 months of promulgating the regulations.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would strike the first report required within
180 days of the regulatory promulgation.
Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense policy
regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious services (sec.
534)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 529) that would
amend sections 3547, 4337, 6031, 8547, and 9337 of title 10,
United States Code, to provide that a chaplain, if called upon
to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, had the
prerogative to close such prayer according to the traditions,
expressions, and religious exercises of that chaplain's
endorsing faith group.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to conduct a survey of military chaplains
to assess whether restrictions placed on prayers offered in
public or non-religious settings have prevented them from
exercising the tenets of their faith as prescribed by their
endorsing faith group, and whether those restrictions have had
an adverse impact on their ability to fulfill their duties to
minister to members of the armed forces and their families.
Subtitle E--Member Education and Training
Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for
purposes of certain educational assistance under laws
administered by the Secretary of Defense (sec. 541)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 567) that would
place limitations on when educational assistance may be used to
pursue civilian certifications and licenses, and would
authorize the use of various educational assistance benefits
under the administration of the Secretary of Defense to pursue
civilian certifications and licenses.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 524) that would establish a new section 2006a of title
10, United States Code, to require that educational
institutions participating in certain Department of Defense
education assistance programs enter into and comply with
program participation agreements under title IV of the Higher
Education Act, and to meet certain other standards. The
provision would authorize the Secretary of Defense to waive
these requirements in certain cases.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would modify the conditions under which the
Secretary may authorize education assistance for programs that
do not meet the standards specified in the provision.
Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military
occupational specialties with skills and training required for
civilian certifications and licenses (sec. 542)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 566) that would
require the service secretaries to make information on civilian
credentialing opportunities available to members of the armed
forces during all stages of their military occupational
specialty training. The provision would also require the
service secretaries to provide information on military course
training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of military
advancement attained, and professional skills developed by
service members, to civilian credentialing agencies, for the
purposes of the administration of education benefits under the
purview of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 525) that would require the information on
course materials, levels of military advancement attained, and
professional skills to be provided to entities approved by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or by state approving agencies,
in addition to civilian credentialing agencies.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Report on the Troops to Teachers program (sec. 543)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 570) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives
not later than March 1, 2014, a report on the Troops to
Teachers program that includes an evaluation of whether: (1)
there is a need to broaden eligibility to allow service members
and veterans without a bachelor's degree admission into the
program and whether the program can be strengthened, and (2) a
pilot program should be established to demonstrate the
potential benefit of an institution-based award for troops to
teachers.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 527) that would express the sense of the Senate to
strongly urge the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the
Troops to Teachers program is a priority of the Nation's
commitment to the higher education of members of the armed
forces, and to provide funds to the Troops to Teachers program
in order to help separating members of the armed forces and
veterans who wish to transition into a teaching career.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic
operation of current prohibition on accrual of interest on
direct student loans of certain members of the Armed Forces
(sec. 544)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 570A) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress
within 90 days assessing the feasibility of automatically
applying the prohibition on accrual of interest on student
loans for certain deployed service members, and how the
Department would implement such automatic application.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment to require the report within 180 days after the date
of enactment of this Act.
Subtitle F--Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness
Matters
Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that
benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and
Department of Defense civilian employees (sec. 551)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 571) that would
authorize $20.0 million for continuation of the Department of
Defense (DOD) assistance program to local educational agencies
(LEAs) that are impacted by the enrollment of dependent
children of military members and DOD civilian employees. The
provision would also authorize $5.0 million for assistance to
LEAs with significant changes in enrollment of school-aged
dependents of military members and civilian employees due to
base closures, force structure changes, or force relocations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 571) that would authorize $25.0 million for the
assistance program to LEAs impacted by the enrollment of
dependent children of military members and civilian employees.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Impact aid for children with severe disabilities (sec. 552)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 572) that would authorize $5.0 million in defense-wide
operation and maintenance for impact aid payments for children
with disabilities under section 8003(d) of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(d)), using the
formula set forth in section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public
Law 106-398), for continuation of Department of Defense
assistance to local educational agencies that benefit eligible
dependents with severe disabilities.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and
secondary education component of Department of Defense
education program (sec. 553)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 573) that would
amend section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, to allow
the Secretary of Defense to retain the tuition payments made by
participants in the Department of Defense virtual elementary
and secondary education programs. The retained tuition would be
used to provide support for the virtual education programs
authorized by section 2164(l).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Family support programs for immediate family members of members of the
Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces (sec. 554)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 554) that would
authorize the Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, to
conduct up to three pilot programs to assess the feasibility
and benefits of providing family support activities for the
immediate family members of the armed forces assigned to
special operations forces. The provision would require that
family support programs provided under the pilot not duplicate
those family support programs being provided by the secretary
of a military department. The provision would limit
authorization for any program conducted under the pilot to
fiscal years 2014 through 2016, and limit to $5.0 million the
amount that may be spent on the pilot programs in a fiscal
year. The provision would also require the Commander, U.S.
Special Operations Command, to provide a report to the
congressional defense committees within 180 days of the
completion of a program conducted under this pilot.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would authorize the Commander, U.S. Special
Operations Command, to conduct up to three pilot programs to
assess the feasibility and benefits of providing family support
activities for the immediate family members of the armed forces
assigned to special operations forces. In selecting and
conducting any pilot program, the Commander would be required
to coordinate with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel
and Readiness. The amendment would require that family support
programs provided under the pilot not duplicate those family
support programs being provided by the secretary of a military
department. The amendment would limit authorization for any
program conducted under the pilot to fiscal years 2014 through
2016, and limit to $5.0 million the amount that may be spent on
the pilot programs in a fiscal year. The amendment would also
require the Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, in
coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel
and Readiness, to provide a detailed report to the
congressional defense committees within 180 days of the
completion of a program conducted under this pilot.
Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the armed forces in
child custody determinations (sec. 555)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 552) that would
amend title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50
U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) to provide that if a court renders a
temporary custody order based solely on the deployment or
anticipated deployment of a service member, the court shall
require the reinstatement of the prior custody order upon the
return of the service member from deployment, unless the court
finds that reinstatement is not in the best interest of the
child. The provision would also prohibit a court from
considering the absence of a servicemember by reason of
deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole
factor in determining the best interest of a child.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1053) that would express the sense of the Senate that
State courts should not consider military deployment as the
sole factor in determining child custody in a State court
proceeding involving a parent who is a member of the armed
forces. The best interest of the child should always prevail in
custody cases, but members of the armed forces should not lose
custody of their children based solely upon service to our
country.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would make it a sense of Congress.
Subtitle G--Decorations and Awards
Repeal of limitation on number of Medals of Honor that may be awarded
to the same member of the Armed Forces (sec. 561)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 582) that would
amend sections 3744, 6247, and 8744 of title 10, United States
Code, to authorize the award of more than one Medal of Honor to
a person whose subsequent acts justify an additional award.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 581(a)).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of
Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force
Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal (sec. 562)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 583) that would
amend sections 3744 and 8744 of title 10, United States Code,
to require that recommendations for the award of the Medal of
Honor, Distinguished Service Cross, Air Force Cross, or
Distinguished Service Medal for members of the Army and Air
Force be made within 3 years and that the award be made within
5 years after the date of the act justifying the award.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 581(b)).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard
Medal of Honor roll requirements (sec. 563)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 584) that would
amend chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to establish
a roll designated as the ``Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast
Guard Medal of Honor Roll'' and require the service secretaries
to record on this roll the name of each person who has been
awarded a Medal of Honor. The provision would also amend
section 1562 of title 38, United States Code, to provide for
the automatic enrollment and payment of the special pension to
living Medal of Honor recipients.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 582).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Prompt replacement of military decorations (sec. 564)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590B) that would
amend section 1135 of title 10, United States Code, to require
service secretaries, upon receipt of a request for the
replacement of a military decoration, to ensure that: (1) all
actions to be taken with respect to the request, including
verification of the service record of the recipient of the
military decoration, are completed within one year; and (2) the
replacement military decoration is mailed to the person
requesting the replacement military decoration within 60 days
after the verification of the service record. The provision
would also require an annual report on compliance with this
requirement
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require mailing of the replacement
military decoration within 90 days of verification of the
service record and that would delete the requirement for an
annual report.
Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to victims of the
attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at
Fort Hood, Texas (sec. 565)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 585) that would
require the award of the Purple Heart to the victims of the
attacks that occurred at the recruiting station in Little Rock,
Arkansas on June 1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas on November
5, 2009.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
service secretary concerned to review the circumstances of and
available evidence pertaining to the attacks at the recruiting
station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas; to
award the Purple Heart to victims of those attacks determined
pursuant to that review to be eligible for the award; and to
report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives within 180 days of the date of
enactment of this Act on the results of that review. The
included provision would also require the Secretary of Defense
to review the eligibility criteria for the Purple Heart to
establish the actions or conditions for which the Purple Heart
shall be awarded to a member of an armed force who has been
wounded in such action. The included provision would require
the Secretary to report to the Committees on Armed Services of
the Senate and the House of Representatives within 180 days of
the date of enactment of this Act on the results of that
review, including any recommendations for change to the Purple
Heart criteria the Secretary considers appropriate.
Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former members of the
Armed Forces previously recommended for award of the Medal of
Honor (sec. 566)
The agreement includes a provision that would amend section
552(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2002 (Public Law 107-107), to authorize the award of the
Medal of Honor to veterans of the armed forces who, although
they were not Jewish-American or Hispanic-American war
veterans, were recommended for award of the Medal of Honor as a
result of the required review of service records of certain
Jewish-American war veterans and Hispanic-American war
veterans.
Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of valor during
the Vietnam War (sec. 567)
The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the
President to award the Medal of Honor to Sergeant First Class
Bennie G. Adkins, United States Army, and to Specialist Four
Donald P. Sloat, United States Army, for acts of valor during
the Vietnam War.
Authorization for award of the Distinguished Service Cross for acts of
valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars (sec. 568)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 588) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished
Service Cross to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts
of valor during the Korean War.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 583) and a provision (sec. 584) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished
Service Cross to Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., for acts of valor
during the Vietnam War.
The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the
Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished Service Cross
to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor
during the Korean War; to Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., for acts of
valor during the Vietnam War; and to Specialist Four Robert L.
Towles for acts of valor during the Vietnam War.
Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant
Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War (sec.
569)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590C) that would
authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to then
First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the
Civil War, effective upon receipt by the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of a
report providing information on the process and materials used
by review boards for the consideration of Medal of Honor
recommendations for acts of heroism that occurred during the
Civil War.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would remove the requirement for receipt of the
report as the report has already been received by the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives.
Subtitle H--Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports
Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation reports to
include 360-degree assessment approach (sec. 571)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 563) that would
require service secretaries to develop an assessment program
modeled after the current Department of the Army Multi-Source
Assessment and Feedback Program, known as the ``360-degree
approach,'' and would require the Secretary of Defense to
submit to Congress, not later than 90 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, a report containing the results of an
assessment of the feasibility of including the 360-degree
approach as part of the performance evaluation reports.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, not
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a
report containing the results of an assessment of the
feasibility of including a 360-degree assessment approach as
part of performance evaluation reports.
Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members of
the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B (sec. 572)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550F) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report
on the use of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual
for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles,
and regulations with regard to service members living with or
at risk of contracting HIV.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to submit, not later than 180 days after
the date of enactment of this Act, a report to the Committees
on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives on Department of Defense personnel policies
regarding members of the armed forces infected with human
immunodeficiency virus or Hepatitis B. The report shall include
an assessment of whether the policies reflect an evidence-
based, medically accurate understanding of how these conditions
are contracted, how they can be transmitted to others, and the
risk of transmission.
Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary
schools (sec. 573)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530G) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to implement a means for
ensuring that graduates of a secondary school, including
graduates who receive diplomas from secondary schools that are
legally operating or who otherwise complete a program of
secondary education in compliance with state law, are required
to meet the same standard of any test, assessment, or screening
tool used to identify persons for recruitment and enlistment in
the armed forces.
The Senate committee-passed bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality
disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members
from the Armed Forces (sec. 574)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530H) that would
require the Comptroller General of the United States, not later
than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, to
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report evaluating: (1) the use
by the secretaries of the military departments, since January
1, 2007, of the authority to separate members due to unfitness
for duty because of a mental condition not amounting to
disability, including separation on the basis of a personality
disorder or adjustment disorder and the number of members
separated on such basis; (2) the extent to which the
secretaries failed to comply with regulatory requirements in
separating members of the armed forces on the basis of a
personality or adjustment disorder; and (3) the impact of such
a separation on the ability of veterans so separated to access
service-connected disability compensation, disability severance
pay, and disability retirement pay.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Comptroller General to submit
the report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate
and the House of Representatives not later than one year after
the date of enactment of this Act.
Subtitle I--Other Matters
Accounting for members of the armed forces and Department of Defense
civilian employees listed as missing and related reports (sec.
581)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 591) that would amend section 1501 of title 10, United
States Code, to require the Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Affairs to
conduct periodic briefings for families of missing persons on
Department activities to account for those persons.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Affairs to
disseminate appropriate information on the status of missing
persons to authorized family members. The provision would also
require the Secretary of Defense, by no later than 180 days
after the date of enactment of this Act, to submit a report to
the appropriate committees of the Senate and the House of
Representatives detailing certain statistical data relative to
the recovery of remains of missing service members from various
conflicts, including those that remain missing, and a report
assessing the organization of the prisoner of war/missing in
action accounting community, including command and control over
its constituent elements, whether certain of those elements
should be reorganized, moved, or consolidated, and how the
Secretary will ensure greater oversight of the community.
Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing reports
of certain recovered persons who were never placed in a missing
status (sec. 582)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 592) that would amend sections 1506 and 1513 of title 10,
United States Code, to include as privileged information, for
the purposes of personnel files maintained under the system for
accounting for missing persons, any survival, evasion,
resistance, and escape debriefing reports by certain persons
returned to United States control under a promise of
confidentiality.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation
of North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville
State College (sec. 583)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 591) that would
amend section 2111a(f) of title 10, United States Code, to
reflect the name change of North Georgia College and State
University to The University of North Georgia.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 528).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Review of security of military installations, including barracks,
temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family residences (sec.
584)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 565) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of
security measures on military installations, specifically with
regard to barracks and multi-family housing units on military
installations, for the purpose of ensuring the safety of
members of the armed forces and their dependents who reside on
military installations, and to submit a report containing the
results of the review to Congress not later than 90 days after
the date of enactment of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of security measures
on military installations, specifically with regard to access
to barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family
housing units on military installations, for the purpose of
ensuring the safety of members of the armed forces and their
dependents who reside on military installations, and to submit
a report containing the results of the review to Congress not
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
We intend for the Secretary's review to consider a wide
range of access and security issues, including but not limited
to issues regarding sexual assault prevention and response. We
expect the Secretary to take into consideration the findings of
the three reviews of security measures at U.S. military
installations worldwide by the Department of the Navy, the
Department of Defense, and the independent panel following the
shooting at the Washington Navy Yard.
Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military
Cemeteries (sec. 585)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 592) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Army to enter into concession
contracts for transportation, interpretative, and other
services in support of visitors at Arlington National Cemetery
and the United States Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National
Cemetery. This section would also require that each concession
contract ensure the protection, dignity, and solemnity of the
cemetery at which services are provided. Furthermore, the
section would prohibit the Secretary of the Army from
instituting a concession contract for operation of the gift
shop at Arlington National Cemetery without subsequent
authorization. In providing for transportation services at
Arlington National Cemetery, the provision directs the
Secretary of the Army to ensure that service provides visitors
with access to the Custis Lee Mansion.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a technical
amendment.
Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members of
the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans (sec. 586)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 596) that would
amend section 4 of title 4, United States Code, to authorize
members of the armed forces not in uniform and veterans to
render the military salute in the manner provided for persons
in uniform.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results (sec. 587)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 562) that would
direct the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the results of
command climate assessments are provided to the relevant
individual commander and to the next higher level of command;
require service secretaries to include in the performance
evaluation of commanders a designated form where senior
commanders can indicate whether the commander has conducted the
required climate assessments; require the Inspector General of
the Department of Defense to develop a system to track whether
commanders are conducting command climate assessments; and
require unit commanders to develop a compliance report that
includes a comprehensive overview of the concerns that unit
members expressed in climate assessments, data showing how
leadership is perceived in the unit, and a detailed strategic
plan on how leadership plans to address the expressed concerns.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure
that the results of command climate assessments are provided to
the relevant individual commander and to the next higher level
of command; require service secretaries to include in the
performance evaluation of commanders a statement by the
commander regarding whether the commander has conducted the
required command climate assessments; and require that the
failure of a commander to conduct the required command climate
assessments be noted in the commander's performance evaluation.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Designation of state student cadet corps as Department of Defense youth
organizations
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 516) that would
amend section 508(d) of title 32, United States Code, to add to
the list of youth and charitable organizations eligible to
receive certain services from the National Guard any state
student cadet corps authorized under state law.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 509) that would amend section 509 of title 32, United
States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to use the
National Guard to conduct the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe
Program, and require the Chief of the National Guard Bureau to
conduct the program in such states as the Chief considers
appropriate, to prescribe the standards and procedures for
selecting program participants, and to submit a report to
Congress annually on the program.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Authority for joint professional military education phase II
instruction and credit to be offered and awarded through
senior-level course of School of Advanced Military Studies of
the United States Army Command and General Staff College
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 521) that would amend section 2151(b) of title 10, United
States Code, to authorize the School of Advanced Military
Studies senior-level course at the Army Command and General
Staff College to offer joint professional military education
(JPME) phase II instruction and credit.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the conference report to accompany the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239) recommended that JPME II credit for participation
in the senior-level course of the School of Advanced Military
Studies of the United States Army Command and General Staff
College be awarded through the Army War College. This is a
senior service college level course and attendance is
determined through the selection process for Senior Service
College. We direct the Army to work with the Middle States
Commission on Higher Learning to designate the School of
Advanced Military Studies to be an additional location of study
for the U.S. Army War College in order to award JPME II credit
to students who successfully complete this course.
Authority for Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences to
support undergraduate and other medical education and training
programs for military medical personnel
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 522) that would amend sections 2112(a) and 2113 of title
10, United States Code, to provide greater flexibility to the
Secretary of Defense, through the Uniformed Services University
of the Health Sciences (USUHS), to access federal resources
outside of the National Capital Region and to enable the USUHS
to grant undergraduate degrees, certificates, and
certifications in addition to advanced degrees.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We believe that further analysis and review of the
authorities and support that may be necessary to allow the
Medical Education and Training Campus (METC), the tri-service
medical training center in San Antonio, Texas, to upgrade its
health education programs is required. We understand that the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs has
established a working group to address several of these issues.
We direct the Secretary of Defense to expand this working
group to include the Director of Training Readiness and
Strategy of the Department of Defense, and other appropriate
representatives outside of the health communities that may be
impacted, to develop a consensus on a way forward that meets
the needs of the services and the service members in a cost-
efficient manner. We will await the results of such a consensus
before considering expanding authorities to various
organizations to support the METC.
Command responsibility and accountability for remains of members of the
Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who die outside the
United States
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 523) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, within 60 days of enactment
of this Act, to take such steps as necessary to ensure that
there is continuous, designated military command responsibility
and accountability for the care, handling, and transportation
of the remains of each deceased member of the armed services
who dies outside the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We expect the Department of Defense and the military
services to ensure the effective exercise of command oversight
over the process of returning the remains of service members to
their families.
Expansion of eligibility for associate degree programs under the
Community College of the Air Force
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 523) that would amend section 9315(b) of title 10, United
States Code, to authorize the Community College of the Air
Force to award associate degrees to enlisted members of armed
forces other than the Air Force who participate in joint-
service medical training and education or instructors in such
joint-service medical training and education.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We believe that further analysis and review of the
authorities and support is required before the Medical
Education and Training Campus (METC), the tri-Service medical
training center in San Antonio, Texas, upgrades its health
education programs. We understand that the Assistant Secretary
of Defense for Health Affairs has established a working group
to address several of these issues.
We direct the Secretary of Defense to expand the working
group to include representatives from the Department's Office
of Transition Assistance and other appropriate representatives
outside of the health communities that may be impacted to
develop a plan that meets the needs of the Services and the
service members in a cost-efficient manner. We will await the
completion of the plan before authorizing additional
authorities for the various organizations that support the
METC.
Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating
to correction of military records
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 525) that would
amend chapter 79 and sections 1034 and 1552 of title 10, United
States Code, to revise procedures for judicial review of final
military personnel decisions relating to correction of military
records.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Coverage of military occupational specialties relating to military
information technology under pilot program on receipt of
civilian credentials for skills required for military
occupational specialties
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 526) that would require that the military occupational
specialties designated for the purposes of the pilot program on
receipt of civilian credentials authorized by section 558 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81) include those specialties relating to the
military information technology workforce.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Report on data and information collected in connection with Department
of Defense review of laws, policies, and regulations
restricting service of female members of the Armed Forces
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530C) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide the Committees on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a
report containing the specific results and data produced during
the research programs, tests, surveys, consultant reports,
assessments, and similar projects conducted in support of the
requirement in section 535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to
review laws, policies, and regulations restricting the service
of female members of the armed forces.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the Department of Defense has provided the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives RAND's 2012 technical report entitled ``A New
Look at Gender and Minority Differences in Officer Career
Progression in the Military'' prepared for the Office of the
Secretary of Defense as part of the review required by section
535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011.
Meetings with respect to religious liberty
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530E) that would
require the Department of Defense to provide to the Committees
on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives advance written notice of any meeting held
between Department employees and civilians for the purpose of
writing, revising, implementing, enforcing, or seeking advice,
input, or counsel regarding military policy related to
religious liberty.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We believe the Department and the military services should
proactively reach out to and meet with religious groups of all
faiths when formulating and revising policies that impact
religious freedom and tolerance within the military. We are
becoming increasingly concerned over reports that the
Department and the services appear more responsive to some
religious groups and interests than others. The Department and
the services must be proactive in their efforts to overcome
this perception and to ensure the fairness and equity of
policies and regulations that address the religious liberty of
service members and their families.
Proof of period of military service for purposes of interest rate
limitation under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530F) that would
amend section 207 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50
U.S.C. App. 527) to expand the ways in which a servicemember
may prove a period of military service for the purposes of the
interest rate limitation under that Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550C) that would
establish the Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel to
provide recommendations to the service secretaries on the
development of policies, programs, and procedures to prevent
and respond to hazing in the armed forces.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that section 534 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, Public Law 112-239,
required the Services, along with the Coast Guard, to review
the treatment of hazing and report the results of the reviews
to the appropriate congressional committees. As a result of the
review, the Marine Corps revised its hazing policy on May 20,
2013, to prohibit all forms of hazing. The Army established a
Hazing Policy Assessment Team to review all hazing cases from
2006 through 2013, and the Navy established the Office of
Hazing Prevention.
In addition, the Services are either tracking or in the
process of tracking hazing incidents, and are continuing
efforts to address prevention of hazing in their force. We
understand that the Joint Service Committee on Military Justice
recommended changes to specifically address hazing under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). We expect the
Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security
for the Coast Guard, to continue to monitor this issue to
ensure that the recommended changes to the UCMJ are
implemented, and that all the Services have the ability to
track hazing incidents within their Service.
Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the Armed
Forces who serve in combat zones
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 551) that would
amend chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to require
the design of a spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button,
approved by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize
the spouse of a member of the armed forces who is serving or
has served in a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that section 901(b) of title 36, United States
Code, authorizes the wearing of a service lapel button approved
by the Secretary of Defense by the immediate family of an
individual serving in the armed forces of the United States
during any period of war or hostilities in which the armed
forces of the United States are engaged.
Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for active duty
for purposes of mortgage refinancing
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 553) that would
amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501
et seq.) to authorize a service member to refinance a principal
residence in circumstances where the service member was unable
to continue residing in the residence by virtue of receiving
permanent change of station orders, or when deployed or
mobilized in support of a military operation for a period of at
least 18 months.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their families from
military to civilian life
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 555) that would
express the sense of the Congress on the role of federal and
State governments in ensuring a seamless transition back to
civilian life for service members and their families.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We believe that members of the armed forces and their
families make great sacrifices on behalf of the country, and
their transition from military to civilian life should be as
seamless as possible by providing them opportunities to earn
civilian occupational credentials and licenses. State and local
governments and industries should streamline methods for
assessing the equivalency of military training and experience,
and accelerate occupational and professional licensure and
certifications for members and spouses. Further, we believe
that private employers should, to the extent practicable, do
their utmost to educate and inform their managers, supervisors,
and human resource departments on the advantages of hiring
qualified veterans who have service-connected permanent total
disabilities, as well as qualified surviving spouses of service
members killed in action.
We note that the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) required the Department of
Defense to carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility
and advisability of permitting enlisted members of the armed
forces to obtain civilian credentialing or licensing for skills
required for military occupational specialties or qualification
for duty specialty codes. The Department recently successfully
completed the initial phase which had selected five civilian
occupations for the pilot, which included aircraft mechanics,
automotive mechanics, healthcare support, logistics and supply,
and truck drivers. These occupations were chosen because the
labor market outlook projects medium to high wages, high
employment, and significant growth for civilian jobs in these
occupations. As a result of the initial results, the Department
recommends continuing and expanding the pilot program,
expanding credentialing opportunities to military occupational
codes in law enforcement, and including greater participation
by the reserve components as well as wounded, ill, or injured
service members.
Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces, surviving spouses,
and certain veterans and other improvements to the
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 556) that would
amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501
et seq.) to enhance mortgage protections under that Act for
service members, surviving spouses, and certain veterans.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Department of Defense recognition of dependents of members of the Armed
Forces who serve in combat zones
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 557) that would
amend chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to require
the design of a dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button,
approved by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize
the dependent of a member of the armed forces who is serving or
has served in a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that section 901(b) of title 36, United States
Code, authorizes the wearing of a service lapel button approved
by the Secretary of Defense by the immediate family of an
individual serving in the armed forces of the United States
during any period of war or hostilities in which the armed
forces of the United States are engaged.
Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior Reserve
Officers' Training Corps Program
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 561) that would
amend section 2031(a) of title 10, United States Code, to
authorize the Secretary of a military department to establish
and maintain a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training
Corps at a secondary education institution in the Freely
Associated States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Requirement to continue provision of tuition assistance for members of
the Armed Forces
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 568) that would
require the service secretaries to fund tuition assistance
programs at appropriated levels for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine
Corps serving in combat zones
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 569) that would
require the secretaries of the military departments to ensure
that members of the armed forces deployed in an area for which
imminent danger pay or hazardous duty pay is authorized have
reasonable access to the Internet.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition of
military dependent students
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 572) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense to make grants to non-profit
organizations that provide services to improve the academic
achievement of military dependent students, including those
organizations whose programs focus on improving the civic
responsibility of military dependent students and their
understanding of the Federal Government through direct exposure
to government operations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations or
medals
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 581) that would
amend title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulently
claiming to be a recipient of certain decorations or medals
with the intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible
benefits a crime.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that this provision has already been enacted in the
Stolen Valor Act of 2013 (Public Law 113-12).
Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 586) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Army Combat
Action Badge to a person who, while a member of the Army,
participated in combat during which the person personally
engaged, or was personally engaged by, the enemy at any time
during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on
September 18, 2001.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of
Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 587) that would
require the Secretary of the Navy to submit a report on the
Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of
Honor nomination of Sergeant Rafael Peralta to the Committees
on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Required gold content for Medal of Honor
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 589) that would
require the metal content of the Medal of Honor to be 90
percent gold and 10 percent alloy.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590) that would
require the Secretary of the Army to consider the nominations
for the Silver Star Award, as previously submitted, for retired
Master Sergeants Michael McElhiney, Ronnie Raikes, Gilbert
Magallanes, and Staff Sergeant Wesley McGirr.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We are aware of the errors contained in the Valor Awards
Database established by the Department of Defense in July 2012.
These errors led to confusion regarding individuals whose names
appear on the database as having earned a particular award for
valor but have never received such award. We expect the
Department of Defense and the military services to review their
procedures for validating the information contained in the
Valor Awards Database to eliminate the possibility of clerical
errors in the future.
Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of
Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590A) that would
require the Secretary of the Army to submit to the Committee on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report
pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William
L. Albracht.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 593) that would
establish a commission to study whether the Department of
Defense mechanisms for disciplinary action adequately address
the impact of service-connected mental disorders and traumatic
brain injury on the basis for the disciplinary action.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Commission on Service to the Nation
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 594) that would
establish the Commission on Service to the Nation to study the
effect of warfare on service members, their families, and their
communities; the outgoing experience and transition between
military and civilian life; and the gaps between the military
and those Americans who do not participate directly in the
military community.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this
Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall provide
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House
of Representatives a comprehensive listing of Department of
Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs programs that
address (1) the effect of warfare, focusing on recent wars and
conflicts, on members of the armed forces, the families of
members of the armed forces, and the communities of members of
the armed forces; (2) the outgoing experience and transition
between military and civilian life; and (3) the gaps between
the military and those Americans who do not participate
directly in the military community.
Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain
members of the Armed Forces killed in Thurston Island,
Antarctica
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 598) that would
express the sense of Congress that the remains of service
members killed at Thurston Island, Antarctica should be
recovered and repatriated.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Title VI--Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits
Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances
Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic
allowance for housing under certain circumstances (sec. 601)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 601) that would
extend for 1 year the authority of the Secretary of Defense to
temporarily increase the rate of basic allowance for housing in
areas impacted by natural disasters or experiencing a sudden
influx of personnel.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 603).
The agreement includes this provision.
Recognition of additional means by which members of the National Guard
called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less may
initially report for duty for entitlement to basic pay (sec.
602)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 602) that would
amend section 204(c) of title 37, United States Code, to
provide additional means by which members of the National Guard
called into federal service for a period of 30 days or less may
become entitled to basic pay by including the date on which a
member contacts their unit through authorized telephonic or
electronic means.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 602) that would repeal section 204(c) of title 37, United
States Code.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays
One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for
reserve forces (sec. 611)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 611) that would
extend for 1 year the authority to pay the Selected Reserve
reenlistment bonus, the Selected Reserve affiliation or
enlistment bonus, special pay for enlisted members assigned to
certain high-priority units, the Ready Reserve enlistment bonus
for persons without prior service, the Ready Reserve enlistment
and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service, the
Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons
with prior service, reimbursement of travel expenses for
inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance,
and income replacement for reserve component members
experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty
service.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 611).
The agreement includes the House provision.
One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for
health care professionals (sec. 612)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 612) that would
extend for 1 year the authority to pay the nurse officer
candidate accession bonus, education loan repayment for certain
health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve,
accession and retention bonuses for psychologists, the
accession bonus for registered nurses, incentive special pay
for nurse anesthetists, special pay for Selected Reserve health
professionals in critically short wartime specialties, the
accession bonus for dental officers, the accession bonus for
pharmacy officers, the accession bonus for medical officers in
critically short wartime specialties, and the accession bonus
for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime
specialties.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 612).
The agreement includes this provision.
One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear
officers (sec. 613)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 613) that would
extend for 1 year the authority to pay the special pay for
nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service,
the nuclear career accession bonus, and the nuclear career
annual incentive bonus.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 613).
The agreement includes this provision.
One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated
special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities (sec. 614)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 614) that would
extend for 1 year the general bonus authority for enlisted
members, the general bonus authority for officers, special
bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers,
special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for
officers, and special bonus and incentive pay authorities for
officers in health professions. The provision would also extend
for 1 year the authority to pay hazardous duty pay, assignment
or special duty pay, skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus,
and retention incentives for members qualified in critical
military skills or assigned to high priority units.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 614).
The agreement includes this provision.
One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37
bonuses and special pays (sec. 615)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 615) that would
extend for 1 year the authority to pay the aviation officer
retention bonus, assignment incentive pay, the reenlistment
bonus for active members, the enlistment bonus, the accession
bonus for new officers in critical skills, the incentive bonus
for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease
personnel shortage, the incentive bonus for transfer between
armed forces, and the accession bonus for officer candidates.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 615).
The agreement includes this provision.
One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of
precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency
(sec. 616)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 616) that would
extend for 1 year the authority to provide incentive pay for
members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language
proficiency.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in
the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (sec. 617)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 617) that would
create a new section 336 in title 37, United States Code, to
authorize a bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in
the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned officers in
the reserve components (sec. 618)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 617) that would amend section 16201(d) of title 10,
United States Code, to authorize payment of the health
professions stipend to a nurse enrolled in an accredited
program of nursing in a specialty designated as critical by the
Secretary of Defense who is eligible for appointment as a
Reserve officer in any of the reserve components.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require all individuals receiving stipends
under the authority of section 16201 of title 10, United States
Code, to agree to serve in the Selected Reserve for 1 year for
each 6 months for which the stipend is provided.
Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation Allowances
Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense travel
and transportation authorities in connection with reform of
such authorities (sec. 621)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 631) that would amend sections 1040, 1074i, 1482, and
1491 of title 10, United States Code, and sections 451 and 453
of title 37, United States Code, to make technical changes to
those sections to conform with the travel consolidation reform
enacted in sections 631 and 632 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81). The
provision would also repeal sections 1036, 1053a, and 2634 of
title 10, United States Code, as superseded.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical amendment.
Subtitle D--Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits
Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case of
members whose retired pay is computed using high-three (sec.
631)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 622) that would
make a technical amendment to section 1401a of title 10, United
States Code, to clarify that certain provisions of subsection
(f) of that section do not apply to the computation of retired
pay of members who first entered active duty on or after
September 8, 1980.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 641).
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical amendment.
Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early retirement
credit earned for significant periods of active Federal status
or active duty (sec. 632)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 595) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to establish an electronic
means by which members of the Ready Reserve could track
qualifying service performed under section 12731(f)(2) of title
10, United States Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 644) that would require the secretary concerned to
periodically notify members of the Ready Reserve having
performed qualifying duty under section 12731(f)(2) of title
10, United States Code, of their current eligibility age for
retired pay by such means as the secretary concerned considers
appropriate accounting for the cost of providing notice and the
convenience of service members.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other dependents (sec.
633)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 643) that would amend sections 1450 and 1455 of title 10,
United States Code, to authorize the payment of the Survivor
Benefit Plan annuity to a special needs trust created under
subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1396p(d)(4) of title 42,
United States Code, for the sole benefit of a disabled
dependent child incapable of self-support because of mental or
physical incapacity.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
service secretaries to designate a military member or civilian
employee to provide certain assistance to spouses and other
dependents of service members who die on active duty.
We direct the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with
the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, to assess the needs of Survivor Benefit Plan
participants who have dependent children and spouses with
special needs, and the feasibility and advisability of
authorizing such participants to direct their annuity to a
special needs trust for the benefit of the disabled child or
spouse. The assessment should include a review of the number of
dependents who would be potentially affected by such a change,
the laws and regulations under which special needs trusts
operate, and obstacles to efficient and transparent
implementation of any such change, should the Secretary
determine it is feasible and advisable. We direct the Secretary
to submit the results of this review to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives by no
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
Subtitle E--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality
Benefits and Operations
Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities from reprisals (sec. 641)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 631) that would
amend section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, to align
protections from reprisals for employees of nonappropriated
fund instrumentalities with protections from reprisals for
other Department of Defense civilian personnel.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1103).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities for
purposes of certain civil service laws (sec. 642)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 633) that would
amend section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, to remove
the reference to Army and Air Force Motion Picture Service and
Navy Ship's Stores Ashore and replace it with the Navy Ships
Stores Program in order to provide a more accurate and current
definition of nonappropriated fund instrumentality employees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1108).
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical amendment.
Subtitle F--Other Matters
Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human
remains that were retained by the Department of Defense for
forensic pathology investigation (sec. 651)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 641) that would
authorize the payment of certain expenses for the care and
disposition of human remains retained by a service secretary
pursuant to a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed
Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of title 10, United
States Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 671).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional
compensation and other transitional benefits to dependents of
members separated for violation of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (sec. 652)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 621) that would
establish a new section 1059a of title 10, United States Code,
to authorize a monthly transitional compensation benefit for
dependents of service members with more than 20 years of
service who are convicted by court-martial of an offense under
the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and who, as a
result of the sentence of the court-martial, are separated from
active duty and forfeit all pay and allowances.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to conduct a study regarding the merits
and feasibility of providing transitional compensation benefits
to dependents or former dependents of members of the armed
forces who are convicted by court-martial under the UCMJ, and
who, as a result of the sentence of the court-martial, are
separated from active duty and forfeit all pays and allowances,
and to report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate
and the House of Representatives on the results of that study
by no later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this
Act.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Fiscal year 2014 increase in military basic pay
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 601) that would authorize an across-the-board pay raise
for members of the uniformed services of 1 percent effective
January 1, 2014.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that on August 30, 2013, the President transmitted
to Congress an alternative pay plan establishing an across-the-
board pay increase of 1 percent for members of the uniformed
services for calendar year 2014 rather than the 1.8 percent
that would otherwise have taken effect under current law.
Correction of citation for extension of reimbursement authority for
travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal
commuting distance and additional one-year extension
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 616) that would correct an erroneous citation in section
611(7) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) that extended authority to pay
travel expenses for certain inactive-duty training outside of
normal commuting distances. The provision would further extend
the authority to December 31, 2014.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the technical correction contained in this
section and further extension of authority appear elsewhere in
this Act.
Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable
materials for resale in commissary and exchange store systems
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 632) that would
require the governing body providing oversight and management
direction to the military exchange and commissary systems to
establish guidelines for the identification of fresh meat,
poultry, seafood, produce, and other products raised or
produced through sustainable methods. The provision would also
require the governing body to establish, not later than
September 30, 2018, goals for all exchange and commissary
stores to purchase sustainable products, local food products,
and recyclable materials.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Exchange store system participation in the Accord on Fire and Building
Safety in Bangladesh
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 634) that would
require the defense commissary system and the exchange store
system comply with the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in
Bangladesh and give preference to signatories to the Accord on
Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. The Department of
Defense must notify Congress of garments sold in defense
commissaries or exchanges that are manufactured in Bangladesh
by manufacturers who are not signatories to the Accord on Fire
and Building Safety in Bangladesh.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Effect on division of retired pay of election to receive combat-related
special compensation after previous election to receive
concurrent retirement and disability compensation
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 642) that would amend section 1414 of title 10, United
States Code, to clarify the effect of an election to receive
combat-related special compensation (CRSC) after a previous
election to receive concurrent retirement and disability
compensation (CRDP) was made relative to the division of
retired pay under section 1408 of title 10, United States Code.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We understand that a retiree's decision to receive CRSC may
have significant consequences on a former spouse who has been
receiving a division of retired pay, including a division of
CRDP. Such a decision can leave a former spouse with a sizable
debt to the Federal Government for the past divisions of CRDP
already paid. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)
has the authority to waive those debts upon application. We
expect DFAS to waive those debts relative to past divisions of
CRDP when requested, and to make retirees, spouses, and former
spouses aware of their options in seeking debt forgiveness in
this circumstance.
Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of the
reserve components as veterans
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 642) that would
add a new section 107A to title 38, United States Code, to
honor as a veteran any person entitled to retired pay for
nonregular service under chapter 1223 of title 10, United
States Code, or who, but for age, would be entitled to such
retired pay.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Survey of military pay and benefits preferences
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 643) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to carry out an anonymous
survey of random service members regarding military pay and
benefit preferences.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available basis for
disabled veterans with a service-connected, permanent
disability rated as total
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 644) that would
amend section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, to require
the Secretary of Defense to provide space-available travel on
military aircraft to veterans with service-connected, permanent
disabilities rated as total.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics issued a letter, dated
November 12, 2013, acknowledging the authority provided by
section 622 of the National Defense Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239), regarding the space-available
transportation program. The Department is currently conducting
a detailed review of the program, to include the authorities
established under section 622, and will update the appropriate
regulatory issuances upon completion.
Preservation of retiree dependent status for certain dependents upon
death or permanent incapacitation of the retired member on whom
dependent status is based
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 645) that would amend section 1060b of title 10, United
States Code, to clarify that no further certification of a
dependent for financial support shall be required or carried
out in the case of a dependent who has been granted a permanent
identification card by reason of permanent disability when the
member or retiree providing the basis for dependency dies or
becomes permanently incapacitated.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Enhanced role for the Department of Justice under the Military Lending
Act
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 661) that would amend section 987 of title 10, United
States Code, to provide civil enforcement authority over the
Military Lending Act (MLA) to the Department of Justice.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We remain concerned about reports that predatory lenders
continue to prey on service members and their families using
forms of credit designed specifically to evade coverage of the
MLA under the rules promulgated by the Department of Defense.
We strongly encourage agencies with either explicit or implied
enforcement authority over the MLA to enforce the MLA to the
maximum extent possible. In the conference report accompanying
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239), the conferees expressed concern over the
evolution of these predatory products and practices since 2006.
The conferees thus directed the Secretary of Defense to review
the evolution of predatory products and practices since 2006
and ``to determine if changes to rules implementing section 987
are necessary to protect covered borrowers from continuing and
evolving predatory lending practices, and to report to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of
Representatives'' by January 2, 2014, on the results of this
review. In furtherance of this effort, the Department issued an
advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on June 17, 2013. We
expect the Department to issue its report by the end of the
year together with new rules implementing the MLA that will
address lending products crafted to evade coverage under
existing MLA regulations, and all agencies with enforcement
powers over the MLA to exercise those powers under these new
rules to protect service members and their families from
predatory lending practices.
Extension of ongoing pilot programs under temporary Army incentive to
provide additional recruitment incentives
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 672) that would amend section 681 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109-163) to
authorize the Secretary of the Army to continue through
December 31, 2015, any pilot program carried out under that
section that was ongoing as of December 31, 2012.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Title VII--Health Care Provisions
Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits
Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled
in TRICARE Prime (sec. 701)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 711) that would
authorize a one-time opt-in to TRICARE Prime for beneficiaries
who were eligible for TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013,
provided the beneficiary remains in the same ZIP code as the
ZIP code the beneficiary resided in at the time of the opt-in,
notwithstanding eligibility for enrollment based on the
location at which the beneficiary resides.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would authorize a beneficiary who was enrolled in TRICARE
Prime as of September 30, 2013, to make a one-time election to
continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding
eligibility for enrollment based on the location at which the
beneficiary resides, provided the beneficiary remains in the
same ZIP code as the ZIP code the beneficiary resided in at the
time of the opt-in, and the beneficiary lives within 100 miles
of a military medical treatment facility. The amendment would
also clarify that the Secretary may determine whether to
maintain a TRICARE network of providers in an area that is
between 40 and 100 miles of a military medical treatment
facility.
Mental health care treatment through telemedicine (sec. 702)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 704) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to extend coverage of the
Transitional Assistance Management Program (TAMP) to
individuals by an additional 180 days for treatment provided
through telemedicine. The provision would also require the
Secretary to extend coverage under TAMP for behavioral health
services provided through telemedicine for certain individuals
for an indefinite period of time. This authority would
terminate on December 31, 2018.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to
extend TAMP coverage for certain individuals for an additional
180 days for mental health care provided through telemedicine.
If the Secretary chooses to extend such coverage, the amendment
would require the Secretary to report to the congressional
defense committees on the rates of utilization of this
coverage, the types of mental health care provided, and an
analysis of how the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs coordinate the continuation of care for
veterans who are no longer eligible for TAMP. This authority
would terminate on December 31, 2018. The amendment would also
require the Secretary of Defense, not later than 270 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, to submit a report to
the congressional defense committees on the use of telemedicine
to improve the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic stress
disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental health
conditions.
Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of members
of the Armed Forces with urotrauma (sec. 703)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 705) that would
require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs to, not later than January 1, 2014, jointly develop and
implement a comprehensive policy on improvements to the care,
management, and transition of recovering service members with
urotrauma. The provision would also require the secretaries to
develop the policy in consultation with the heads of other
appropriate federal agencies, representatives of military
service organizations, and nongovernmental organizations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to, not later than 180 days after
the enactment of this Act, jointly develop and implement a
comprehensive policy on improvements to the care, management,
and transition of recovering service members with urotrauma.
In developing the comprehensive policy, we encourage the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to
consult with the heads of other appropriate departments and
agencies of the Federal Government, representatives of military
service organizations representing the interests of service
members who are urotrauma patients, and appropriate
nongovernmental organizations with expertise in matters
relating to urotrauma.
Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the Armed
Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress
disorder (sec. 704)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 733) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a 5-year pilot
program to establish a process to provide payment for
investigational treatments of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for service members in
health care facilities other than military treatment
facilities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to carry
out a pilot program under which the Secretary establishes a
process for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of
investigational treatments of TBI or PTSD for service members
in health care facilities other than military treatment
facilities. The authority to carry out the pilot program would
terminate on December 31, 2018.
Subtitle B--Health Care Administration
Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to enter
into contracts and agreements and make grants to other
nonprofit entities (sec. 711)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 722) that would
clarify the authority of the Secretary of Defense, with regard
to the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, to
enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to
nonprofit entities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in
military medical treatment facilities (sec. 712)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 714) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the
service secretaries, to carry out a pilot program to assess the
feasibility of using revenue-cycle management processes,
including cash-flow management and accounts-receivable
processes, for medical payment collection at military medical
treatment facilities. The provision would also require the
Secretary to submit a report on the pilot program not later
than 180 days after completion of the program, as well as a
report on the current methods employed by the military
departments to collect charges from third-party payers incurred
at military medical treatment facilities not later than 180
days after the enactment of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 711).
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the service secretaries, to carry out a pilot
program to assess the feasibility of using commercially-
available enhanced recovery practices for medical payment
collection, including revenue-cycle management together with
rates and percentages of collection in accordance with industry
standards, for medical payment collection at military medical
treatment facilities. The amendment would also require the
Secretary to submit a report on the pilot program not later
than 180 days after completion of the program.
Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs (sec. 713)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 734) that would
require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs to implement an integrated electronic health record to
be used by each of the secretaries, by not later than October
1, 2016. The provision would also prescribe design principles,
technical objectives, activities, and milestones that must be
met and require the secretaries to jointly develop and submit
to the appropriate congressional committees a programs plan for
the oversight and execution of the integrated electronic health
record program. In addition, the provision would limit funding
for the integrated electronic health record until programs plan
and certification requirements are completed. The provision
would also require the secretaries to jointly establish an
advisory panel to support the development and validation of
requirements, programmatic assessment, and other actions with
respect to the integrated electronic health record.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 712) that would express the sense of the Senate that: (1)
Despite years of effort and the expenditure of significant
resources, full electronic interoperability between the health
record systems of the Department of Defense and the Department
of Veterans Affairs has not yet been achieved; (2) The
Secretary of Defense, in collaboration with the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, should fully staff the Interagency Program
Office and establish challenging, but achievable, deadlines for
development and implementation of measures and goals for
electronic health record interoperability; and (3) The
Interagency Program Office should establish a secure, remote,
and network-accessible computer storage system.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that the departments'
electronic health record systems are interoperable with
integrated display of data, or a single electronic health
record, and that each complies with national standards and
architectural requirements. The provision would require each
department to deploy modernized electronic health record
software supporting clinicians by no later than December 31,
2016. The provision would also prescribe design principles,
technical objectives, activities, and milestones that must be
met, as well as suggest design elements for the secretaries to
consider. The amendment would require the secretaries to
prepare and brief the appropriate congressional committees with
a programs plan for the oversight and execution of the
interoperable electronic health records with integrated display
of data, or single electronic health record, and would limit
funding for the records or record until the programs plan is
submitted. The amendment would require the secretaries to
jointly establish an executive committee to support the
development and validation of adopted standards, required
architectural platforms and structure, and the capacity to
enforce them.
In addition, the amendment would require the Secretary of
Defense to request the Defense Science Board to conduct an
annual review of the progress of the Secretary of Defense in
achieving the mandates prescribed by the amendment. The
amendment would also require the Secretary of Defense to
complete the implementation of the Healthcare Artifact and
Image Management Solution (HAIMS) program not later than 180
days after the enactment of this Act and, upon completion of
such implementation, to provide a report to the appropriate
congressional committees describing the extent of the
interoperability between HAIMS and the Veterans Benefit
Management System of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters
Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of
the reserve components (sec. 721)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 721) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress, as a
part of the documentation that supports the President's annual
budget for the Department of Defense, a budget justification
display for embedded mental health providers within each
reserve component, including the amount requested for each
reserve component.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain Centers of
Excellence (sec. 722)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 729) that would
require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, not later than 60
days after the enactment of this Act, to report to the
Committees on Armed Services and Veterans Affairs of the House
of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and
Veterans Affairs of the Senate, on the centers of excellence in
the prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and
rehabilitation of: traumatic brain injury; post-traumatic
stress disorder and other mental health conditions; and
military eye injuries established under sections 1621, 1622,
and 1623, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, not later
than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, to report to the
Committees on Armed Services and Veterans Affairs of the House
of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and
Veterans Affairs of the Senate on the centers of excellence in
the prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and
rehabilitation of: traumatic brain injury; post-traumatic
stress disorder and other mental health conditions; and
military eye injuries established under sections 1621, 1622,
and 1623, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181). The amendment would also
require the Secretary to report on the center of excellence in
prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and
rehabilitation of hearing loss and auditory system injuries
established under section 721 of the Duncan Hunter National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-
417), as well as the center of excellence in the mitigation,
treatment, and rehabilitation of traumatic extremity injuries
and amputations established under section 723 of Public Law
110-417.
Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries (sec. 723)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 732) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on how the Secretary will identify,
refer, and treat traumatic brain injuries with respect to
service members who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or
Operation Iraqi Freedom before the effective date in June 2010
of the directive type memorandum regarding using a 50-meter
distance from an explosion as a criterion to properly identify,
refer, and treat members for potential traumatic brain injury.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary
identifies, refers, and treats traumatic brain injuries with
respect to service members who served in Operation Enduring
Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom before the effective date in
June 2010 of directive type memorandum 09-033 regarding using a
50-meter distance from an explosion as a criterion to properly
identify, refer, and treat members for potential traumatic
brain injury.
Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to members of
the Armed Forces and veterans (sec. 724)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 721) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to report, not later than 180
days after the enactment of this Act, on the plans of the
Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) to ensure that the most clinically appropriate
prosthetics and orthotics are made available to injured service
members and veterans using technological advances as
appropriate.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs to report, not later than 180 days after
the enactment of this Act, on the plans of the DOD and VA to
ensure that the most clinically appropriate prosthetics and
orthotics are made available to injured service members and
veterans using technological advances as appropriate; and to
include a description of the processes of each Secretary to
coordinate and identify care in the VA for an injured service
member who, prior to being discharged or released from the
armed forces, has an advanced technology prosthetic.
Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program and
availability of compounded pharmaceuticals (sec. 725)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 735) that would
require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit
to the congressional defense committees a report, not later
than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, that evaluates
the similarities and differences in the approaches to
identifying and recovering improper payments across Medicare
and TRICARE.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would require the Comptroller General of the United States
to submit to the congressional defense committees a report, not
later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act,
that evaluates the similarities and differences of Medicare and
the TRICARE program with respect to identifying and recovering
improper payments. The amendment would also require the
Comptroller General to submit a report not later than September
30, 2014, to the congressional defense committees on the
availability of compounded pharmaceuticals in the military
health care system.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 701) that would
amend section 1074m of title 10, United States Code, to require
the Secretary of Defense to provide person-to-person mental
health assessments once during each 180-day period during which
a service member is deployed.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that each of the military departments has embedded
behavioral health care providers in certain operational and
deployable units whose purpose is to provide increased access
to behavioral health care for service members in theater.
Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 702) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide periodic person-to-
person mental health assessments to each member of the armed
forces serving on active duty.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under TRICARE
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 703) that would
amend section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, to
authorize behavioral health treatment, including applied
behavior analysis therapy, for all developmental disabilities
as defined by section 15002(8) of title 42, United States Code,
including autism spectrum disorders, when prescribed by a
physician to be covered under the basic TRICARE program for
certain beneficiaries.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Cooperative health care agreements between the military departments and
non-military health care entities
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 712) that would
authorize the secretaries of the military departments to
establish cooperative health care agreements between military
installations and local or regional non-military health care
entities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
We note that the Secretary of Defense was provided the
authority to enter into cooperative health care agreements
under section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note), and that the Secretary
may delegate this authority. We believe that in circumstances
where the Secretary deems it appropriate, the Secretary should
utilize or delegate this authority.
Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic health
record program
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 713) that would
limit the amount of funds the Secretary of Defense may obligate
or expend for procurement or research, development, test and
evaluation for the integrated electronic health record program
until 30 days after the date that the Secretary submits a
report detailing an analysis of alternatives for the plan.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Mental health support for military personnel and families
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 723) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out collaborative
programs to: respond to suicide and combat stress-related
arrest rates of service members; train active-duty members to
recognize and respond to combat stress disorder, suicide risk,
substance addiction, risk-taking behaviors, and family
violence; and determine the effectiveness of Department of
Defense (DOD) efforts to reduce military suicide rates.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that in December 2012, the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) published in the Federal Register a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking to implement the Secure and Responsible
Drug Disposal Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-273). We believe that
the proposed rule severely hampers DOD efforts to collect and
safely dispose of unused prescription drugs. The Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs has expressed concern
that DEA's proposed rule will ``limit DOD's ability to accept
unused patient medications in a routine setting and reduce the
potential effectiveness of efforts to eliminate opportunities
for medication misuse, abuse and tragic adverse events.'' We
understand that the DEA has been in discussions with the
Department to develop workable, accessible, readily-available
means for service members, retirees, and their dependents to
dispose of unused or unwanted controlled substances
efficiently, but we are discouraged that substantial progress
has not yet been made. We expect that the DEA's final rule,
once published, will provide the Department with the means to
establish a meaningful drug take-back program for its
beneficiaries to reduce prescription drug misuse, abuse and
potential tragic adverse events.
Research regarding hydrocephalus
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 724) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense, in conducting the Peer
Reviewed Medical Research Program, to consider selecting
medical research projects relating to hydrocephalus.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We encourage the Secretary of Defense to consider including
medical research on hydrocephalus in Department of Defense
research efforts.
Traumatic brain injury research
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 725) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to carry out research,
development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to
traumatic brain injury and psychological health, including
activities regarding drug development to halt neurodegeneration
following traumatic brain injury.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple negative breast
cancer
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 727) that would
require the Department of Defense to work in collaboration with
the National Institutes of Health to identify specific genetic
and molecular targets and biomarkers for triple negative breast
cancer and to provide information that will enable triple
negative breast cancer patients to be identified earlier and
aid the development of therapies for the disease.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We urge the Secretary of Defense to consider conducting
research to identify specific genetic and molecular targets and
biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer.
Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for members of the Armed
Forces and their families
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 728) that would
express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense
should develop a plan to ensure a sustainable flow of qualified
counselors to meet the long-term needs of service members and
their families for counselors, to include the participation of
accredited schools and universities, health care providers,
professional counselors, family service or support centers,
chaplains, and other appropriate Department of Defense
resources.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Preliminary mental health assessments
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 730) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide a mental health
assessment to any individual enlisting or being commissioned as
an officer in the armed forces prior to such enlistment or
commissioning, and to use the results of such an assessment as
a baseline for any subsequent mental health examinations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 731) that would
express the sense of Congress that section 739(b) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239) requires the Secretary of Defense, not later than
180 days after the enactment of such Act, to submit a plan to
Congress to improve the coordination and integration of
Department of Defense programs that address traumatic brain
injury and the psychological health of service members, and
that the Secretary should deliver the report within the
required time frame.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We expect the Secretary of Defense to submit the plan
required by section 739(b) to the Committees on Armed Services
of the Senate and the House of Representatives as soon as
possible.
Title VIII--Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related
Matters
Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management
Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense
laboratories (sec. 801)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 802) that would
establish a pilot program to allow Department of Defense (DOD)
laboratories to license DOD-owned intellectual property that
may or may not be patented, and to retain associated royalties
consistent with existing statues on patent licensing.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for
contract services (sec. 802)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 803) that would
extend limitations on contract services under section 808 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 111-84), through 2015.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that
would extend the provision for 1 year.
Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts (sec. 803)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 812) that would
amend section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) to expand the conditions
under which covered contractors can qualify for exemption from
strict liability associated with rework and corrective action
related to counterfeits of obsolete electronic parts.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that
would require the Department to work with contractors or other
sources of supply to identify obsolete parts and replace them
through an expedited engineering change process.
Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures,
and Limitations
Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor
compensation (sec. 811)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 813) that would
amend section 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, United States Code,
and section 4304(a) of title 41, United States Code, to replace
the current statutory benchmark compensation formula used to
determine the amount of contractor compensation that is
considered an allowable cost for a federal contract, with the
current compensation benchmark amount for fiscal year 2013 of
$763,209. This section would also make unallowable the entire
cost of compensation for the five most-highly compensated
employees of a contractor that was awarded more than $500.0
million in federal contracts in the previous fiscal year.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 841) that would reduce the cap on allowable
costs of compensation of contractor employees to an amount
consistent with the original legislative cap, adjusted for
inflation, and provide for future annual adjustments by
reflecting the change in the Employment Cost Index for all
workers, as calculated by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics.
According to this calculation, the cap for fiscal year 2014
would be at $487,325.
The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that
would revise the cap on compensation of contractor employees
and provide for future annual adjustments.
Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports
(sec. 812)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 814) that would
amend section 2432 of title 10, United States Code, to require
that the program's baseline cost estimate, along with the
associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate be
provided in the quarterly selected acquisition reports. In
addition, this section would require that the reports include
the current point estimate bounded by the low-end and high-end
estimates and the associated sensitivity of those estimates,
and identification of the primary risk parameters associated
with the estimate. Furthermore, this section would require
reporting of estimated termination liability remaining on the
contract. Finally, this section would amend section 2334(f) of
title 10, United States Code, to require the Director, Cost
Assessment and Program Evaluation, to review the information
required by this section and to include trend information, a
summary of findings and recommendations to improve the cost
estimates of the Department of Defense in the annual report to
Congress on cost assessment activities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a technical
amendment. We encourage the Secretary of Defense to include at
least three programs designated as Acquisition Category I
programs in the December 2014 reporting period.
Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension or
debarment (sec. 813)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 815) that would
amend section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, by
requiring the Secretary of Defense to make available on a
publicly accessible website any determination that there is a
compelling reason to solicit an offer from, award a contract
to, extend a contract with, or approve a subcontract with an
offeror or contractor that has been debarred or suspended by a
federal agency.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a technical
amendment.
Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose
nondevelopmental items (sec. 814)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 831) that would
amend section 866 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383), by extending the program
authority to December 31, 2019. Furthermore, the committee
encouraged the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics to review the military purpose non-
developmental items implementation guidance and to exercise the
authority provided in section 866.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision.
Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs
Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense acquisition
programs (sec. 821)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 821) that as part of a milestone B decision for a major
defense acquisition program, would require that there be a plan
in place to mitigate and account for costs in connection with
decertification of cryptographic equipment during production
and procurement of the system. The provision includes a waiver
based on national security needs.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that changes the date of applying this provision to 6
months after the date of enactment.
Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone B
approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a
space program (sec. 822)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 822) that would implement a recommendation from the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, Satellite
Control Operations, GAO-13-315, concerning the use of dedicated
satellite control systems.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that modified title 10, United States Code, and
requires the Secretary of Defense to develop a long-term plan
for satellite ground control systems. The plan must be
submitted to the congressional defense committees 1 year after
the date of enactment.
We expect that the cost-benefit analysis be based on life-
cycle cost estimates found within the DOD 5000 directive and
instructions.
The Comptroller General of the United States shall review
the implementation plan and submit its views no later than 90
days after the plan is submitted to the congressional defense
committees.
Additional responsibility for product support managers for major weapon
systems (sec. 823)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 823) that would amend section 2337 of title 10, United
States Code, and section 823 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239), to
provide an assurance that all product support arrangements
explicitly state how the arrangement will maximize use of
government-owned inventory before obtaining inventory from
commercial sources. This provision is a result of a Department
of Defense Inspector General investigation into the Defense
Logistics Agency.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a technical
amendment.
Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes for the
acquisition of weapons systems (sec. 824)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 824) requiring the Comptroller General to carry out a
comprehensive review of the processes and procedures of the
Department of Defense for the acquisition of weapon systems.
The objective of the review is to identify processes and
procedures for the acquisition of weapon systems that provide
little or no value or for which any value added is outweighed
by cost or schedule delays without adding commensurate value.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement contains this provision with a clarifying
amendment.
We direct the Comptroller General to provide the
congressional defense committees with the required report no
later than January 31, 2015.
Subtitle D--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency
Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan
Prohibition on contracting with the enemy (sec. 831)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 821) that would
amend section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), regarding the authority
of the Secretary of Defense to void a contract that is directly
or indirectly funding a person or entity who actively supports
an insurgency or otherwise actively opposes the United States
or its coalition partners in a contingency operation in the
United States Central Command theater of operations , to: (1)
Lower the threshold for covered contracts from $0.1 million to
$0.05 million; (2) Provide the authority to certain other
geographic combatant commands during a contingency operation as
defined by section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code;
and (3) Make the authority permanent.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 861) that would amend section 841 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112-81) by striking ``the date that is three years after
the date of the enactment of this Act'' and inserting
``December 31, 2016.''
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an additional
similar provision (section 862) that would expand section 841
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81) to all combatant commanders.
The agreement contains that provision with an amendment
that would amend section 841 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81),
making the authorities provided in section 841 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81) available to certain other combatant commanders.
We intend that the definition of a ``covered person or
entity'' would not mean a person or entity that is engaged in
speech activities but rather actions involving hostile
opposition to United States or coalition forces.
Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in
countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan (sec.
832)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 832) that would
extend through December 31, 2015, the authority under section
801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (Public Law 111-84), as amended, to procure products and
services produced in countries along a major route of supply to
Afghanistan.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 802).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Modification of reporting requirement for Department of Defense
business system acquisition programs when initial operating
capability is not achieved within 5 years of Milestone A
approval
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 801) that would
amend the reporting requirement imposed on defense business
systems (DBS) acquisition programs by section 811 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public
Law 109-364) by clarifying the separate treatment of Major
Automated Information Systems (MAIS) DBS and non-MAIS DBS.
Specifically, this section would clarify that section 811 is
inapplicable to MAIS DBS acquisition programs because such
programs are independently subject to critical change reporting
under section 2445c of title 10, United States Code. This
section would also modify the requirement for non-MAIS DBS
reporting a failure to achieve initial operational capacity
(IOC) within 5 years of milestone A approval from a critical
change report to a report to the Department of Defense pre-
certification authority explaining the causes and circumstances
surrounding the failure to achieve IOC within the required
time.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to multiyear
defense acquisitions to be specifically authorized by law
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 801) that would clarify and reorganize the reporting and
certification requirements of the Department of Defense when
requesting specific authorization for multiyear contract
authority.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Report on program manager training and experience
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 803) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
submit an updated version of the 2009 Department of Defense
report titled: ``OSD [Office of the Secretary of Defense] Study
of Program Manager Training and Experience'' not later than 120
days from enactment of this Act.
The report found senior military officers, including
general officers, and civilians in charge of acquisition
programs did not believe their acquisition training was
``sufficiently practical and comprehensive'' regarding a number
of fundamental areas of acquisition management. For example,
the following is a partial list of responses showing the
percent of program managers polled at that time who believed
their acquisition training was sufficiently practical and
comprehensive:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overseeing Contractor Performance.......................... 31%
Cost Estimating Challenges................................. 27%
Software Management Challenges............................. 25%
Cost Control Challenges.................................... 25%
Unexpected Cost Growth..................................... 14%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not contain this provision.
We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide to the
congressional defense committees a comprehensive update of the
2009 report not later than 120 days after the date of enactment
of this Act.
The update should also identify, describe, and analyze
trends in the training and experience of personnel acquisition
program management since the issuance of the 2009 report, and
should provide recommendations for improving the training and
experience of personnel performing acquisition program
management functions.
We further direct the Secretary to specifically examine the
training, qualifications, and experience of personnel
performing acquisition program management functions on programs
designated as Acquisition Category I, IA, and II and provide
recommendations on the ways to improve the practicality and
comprehensiveness of the acquisition training provided to such
personnel.
Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations relating to
detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 811) that would
amend section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) to provide that the costs
associated with the use of counterfeit electronic parts, and
the subsequent cost of rework or corrective action that may be
required to remedy the use of inclusion of such parts, are
allowable costs under Department of Defense contracts if the
counterfeit electronic parts were procured from an original
manufacturer or its authorized dealer, or from a trusted
supplier.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain this provision.
Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be given at
least equal importance as technical or other criteria in
evaluating competitive proposals for defense contracts
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 816) that would
amend section 2305(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, to
require that the head of an agency of the Department of
Defense, in prescribing the evaluation factors to be included
in each solicitation for competitive proposals, assign
importance to cost or price at least equal to all evaluation
factors other than cost or price when combined. This section
would allow the head of an agency to waive the requirement, and
it would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to
Congress, not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal
year, a report containing a list of each waiver issued during
the preceding fiscal year.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 15 permits the use
of several best value competitive source selection techniques.
Within the best value continuum, the government should utilize
the technique that is most advantageous to its interests.
The government may choose to use the lowest price
technically acceptable source selection process for
acquisitions in which best value can be expected to result from
the selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the
lowest evaluated price.
The government may also choose to use a trade-off source
selection process for acquisitions in which it may be in the
best interest of the government to grant an award to an offeror
other than the lowest priced offeror or the highest technically
rated offeror. In such cases, non-cost or price evaluation
factors may be weighed against cost or price factors in
competitive source selections.
We are concerned that best value competitive source
selection processes are not always properly implemented.
Therefore, we direct the Comptroller General of the United
States to conduct a study on Department of Defense procurements
that use best value competitive source selection techniques.
The study shall include, at a minimum, an assessment of:
(1) The frequency with which evaluation factors other
than cost or price, when combined, are given more
weight than cost or price in solicitations for
competitive proposals;
(2) The types of contracts for products or services
for which such evaluation factors are most frequently
used;
(3) The reasons why the Department of Defense chooses
to use such evaluation factors;
(4) The extent to which the use of such factors is or
is not in the interest of the Department of Defense;
(5) The efficacy with which the Department of
Defense's acquisition workforce implements best value
competitive source selection techniques;
(6) The Department of Defense's guidance and
directives on the appropriate use of best value
competitive source selection techniques; and
(7) The extent to which budgetary constraints affect
the use of best value competitive source selection
techniques.
We direct the Comptroller General to submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on the results of this study not later
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 817) that would
amend section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code, to
include ``a flag of the United States of America'' to the list
of items that the Department of Defense may not procure unless
the item is grown, processed, reused, or produced in the United
States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
We note that flags of the United States procured by the
Department of Defense are procured in accordance with section
2533a(b)(1)(D) of title 10, United States Code.
Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 822) that would
amend section 861 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as amended, to allow
contracts in Afghanistan entered into after the enactment of
this Act to include a clause requiring the imposition of a
penalty on any contractor that does not comply with the
policies, guidance, or regulations issued pursuant to that
section. This section would also amend section 863 of Public
Law 110-181 to require that the Annual Joint Report on
Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan include information on any
penalties imposed on contractors for failing to comply with
requirements under section 861(e) of Public Law 110-181.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
We are concerned about reports of contractor noncompliance
with relevant policies, guidance, and regulations in
Afghanistan, including contractor noncompliance with
requirements to provide information for the common databases
identified by section 861(b)(4) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as
amended.
We direct the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with
the Secretary of State and the Administrator for the United
States Agency for International Development, to submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives, not later than 180 days after enactment of
this Act, a report on contractor compliance in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
At a minimum, the report shall include a detailed
discussion of any outstanding contractor compliance issues or
concerns, including any issues or concerns pertaining to the
provision of information to common databases or the management
thereof; a discussion of any lessons learned in Iraq or
Afghanistan for improving contractor compliance in a
contingency environment; and best practice recommendations for
ensuring contractor compliance in future contingency
contracting operations.
Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 833) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report regarding
how sole source suppliers of components to the Department of
Defense procurement supply chain creates vulnerabilities to
military attack, terrorism, natural disaster, industrial shock,
financial crisis, or geopolitical crisis, such as an embargo of
key raw materials or industrial inputs.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned small businesses
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 834) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report regarding
impacts of the Department of Defense contracting with small
businesses owned and controlled by veterans and service-
disabled veterans on veteran entrepreneurship and unemployment;
impact on veteran suicide and homelessness; and the feasibility
and expected impacts of implementation of the small business
goals and preferences detailed in section 8127, title 38,
United States Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The provision does not contain the agreement.
Revisions to requirements relating to justification and approval of
sole-source defense contracts
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 835) that would
modify the provisions of the Department of Defense Supplement
to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that implement section
811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (Public Law 111-84), clarifying the delegable authority of
the head of an agency to make an award.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to
take into account sourcing laws
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 837) that would
revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation to implement requirements imposed by
sections 129, 129a, 2330a, 2461, and 2463 of title 10, United
States Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in the United States
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 838) that would
prohibit the purchase of any military coins not produced in the
United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
We note military coins are generally purchased with unit-
level morale funds or funds personally contributed by the
members of the unit and not with appropriated funds.
Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to
enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry
into the Armed Forces
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 839) that would
amend section 418 of title 37, United States Code, by requiring
the Department of Defense to issue athletic footwear compliant
with the requirement detailed in section 2533a of title 10,
United States Code, to members of the Armed Forces upon their
initial entry in lieu of a cash allowance.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
We note that Congress passed the Berry Amendment in 1941 to
ensure that American soldiers train and operate, to the
greatest extent practicable, in American-made materials. The
Berry Amendment specifically covers footwear listed in Federal
Supply Class 8430 or 8435.
The Army, in 2001, and the Air Force, in 2008, have moved
away from issuing athletic footwear to new recruits. Instead,
new recruits are given an allowance to acquire athletic
footwear from the service exchange.
During this period of time, no athletic footwear was
available that could have met the requirements of the Berry
Amendment without a waiver. It has been reported that at least
one domestic contractor is now producing such footwear.
Therefore, we direct the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to issue a Sources Sought
to determine whether there are any domestic manufacturers of
Berry Amendment-compliant athletic footwear that meets the
Department's requirements.
We further direct that any responses to the Sources Sought
be evaluated by the Defense Logistics Agency and an independent
entity to determine whether (1) such offered athletic footwear
meets the requirements of the Berry Amendment and (2) whether
Department requirements are actually met. Such review should
consider the various sizes and fits of athletic shoes offered,
cost, and capacity of suppliers to meet military requirements.
Implementation by Department of Defense of certain recommendations of
the Comptroller General of the United States on oversight of
pensions offered by Department contractors
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 842) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
assign responsibility within the Department of Defense (DOD)
for oversight of the reasonableness of the pension plans
offered by Department contractors and issue certain guidance on
pension benefits.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
We note that, according to the Government Accountability
Office (GAO), DOD contractors are among the largest sponsors of
defined benefit pension plans in the United States and also
factor pension costs into the price of DOD contracts. We also
note that in its January 2013 report, GAO made the following
recommendations to the Secretary of Defense in order to improve
oversight, management, and accountability of such pension
plans:
(1) Assign responsibility within the DOD for oversight of
the reasonableness of the pension plans offered by Department
contractors, specifically the value of benefits earned by
participants in such pension plans;
(2) Issue guidance on the measurement of the value of
pension benefits that participants earn in a given year, in
order to permit the Department to obtain a comprehensive
understanding of the total compensation provided to employees
by Department contractors;
(3) Issue guidance on the extent to which defined benefit
pension plans will be included in assessments of the
reasonableness of compensation for executives of Department
contractors; and
(4) Issue guidance for the acquisition organizations of
the Department, including the Defense Contract Management
Activity and Defense Contract Audit Activity, in regards to the
discount rate or rates that are acceptable for Department
contractors to use in calculating person costs for forward
pricing purposes.
We are pleased that the Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy, concurred with all such recommendations in
his January 2, 2013 response letter and note that he also
expressed clear intent to implement them. However, we are
concerned that according to GAO, all four recommendations are
yet to be closed. Therefore, we encourage the Secretary of
Defense to move expeditiously to close out implementation of
the recommendations, and to keep the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives
informed of the progress.
Report on the elimination of improper payments
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 863) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
report on the Department's plan to implement the
recommendations of the Comptroller General regarding the
elimination of improper payments.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act
The House bill contained a set of provisions (sec. 5001-
5506) that would increase the authority of Chief Information
Officers (CIO) regarding information technology (IT) investment
practices for the 16 major civilian agencies, including the
Department of Defense. The purpose of these provisions was to
increase efficiencies government-wide by streamlining the
acquisition process, increasing transparency, eliminating
duplication and waste, and strengthening public-private
partnerships by empowering the CIO with greater responsibility
for IT systems within a government agency.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the acquisition of information technology is a
challenge across the Federal Government and that reform of the
information technology acquisition process remains a priority
in the defense committees and the Congress. We expect to
continue working on improvements in this area and hope to bring
a set of comprehensive reforms forward in the next fiscal year.
Title IX--Department of Defense Organization and Management
Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management
Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business
enterprise architecture (sec. 901)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 902) that would
revise the definition for legacy systems in section 2222 of
title 10, United States Code, to align with the updated
business systems investment review process.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does contain the provision.
Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal
Government tenants onto military installations in the United
States (sec. 902)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 904) that would
require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit
a report to Congress regarding potential consolidation of
federal agency facilities onto military installations, with
specific consideration of installations that support Arctic
missions.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment.
Clarification of authority for the command acquisition executive of the
United States Special Operations Command (sec. 903)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 902) that would make the U.S. Special Operations Command
(USSOCOM) Acquisition Executive subject to the direction of the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics (USD (AT&L)). The provision would also require the
USD (AT&L) to designate an appropriate official within the
Office of the USD (AT&L) to provide such oversight and
direction for those programs.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would modify the provision to make clear that
the USSOCOM Acquisition Executive is responsible to the
Commander of USSOCOM for the acquisition of special operations-
peculiar equipment and subordinate to the USD (AT&L) for all
acquisition matters. The provision would not alter the
relationship between the USSOCOM Acquisition Executive and the
Commander of USSOCOM. Further, it is not the intent of the
provision to delay, unnecessarily impede, or undermine the
flexibility of USSOCOM development and acquisition efforts.
We remain supportive of USSOCOM's unique acquisition
authorities to provide for the special operations-peculiar
requirements of its forces, including rapid acquisition of
urgently needed capabilities for deployed or deploying special
operations forces. Further, we note that the flexibility
inherent in these authorities is important to ensuring that
special operations forces can adapt to the rapidly evolving
nature of global threats. However, given the significant growth
in USSOCOM's budget in recent years and current fiscal
pressures, we believe it is necessary to clarify civilian
oversight of USSOCOM investment programs, particularly the
development and acquisition of special operations-peculiar
platforms.
We note that the John Warner National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364), as amended,
requires the Secretary of Defense to designate a senior
acquisition official within USD (AT&L) to oversee the exercise
of acquisition authority by USSOCOM, among others.
Additionally, section 138 of title 10, United States Code,
states that the ``principal duty'' of the Assistant Secretary
of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict
(ASD SOLIC) is ``overall supervision (including oversight of
policy and resources) of special operations activities.'' We
believe appropriate civilian oversight by USD (AT&L) and ASD
SOLIC of USSOCOM acquisition activities is critical to ensuring
effective use of taxpayer funds, particularly with regard to
the development and acquisition of special operations-peculiar
platforms and advanced technology programs that are at greatest
risk of incurring delays and additional costs. Therefore, we
direct the Secretary of Defense to provide the congressional
defense committees, not later than 90 days after enactment of
this act, a directive type memorandum outlining the respective
roles and responsibilities of the USD (AT&L) and ASD SOLIC with
regard to the oversight of USSOCOM acquisition activities and
the mechanisms through which such oversight will occur.
Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters (sec.
904)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 905) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
develop a plan for streamlining Department of Defense
management headquarters by reducing the size of staffs,
eliminating tiers of management, cutting functions that provide
little or no added value, and consolidating overlapping and
duplicative program offices. The objective is to reduce
aggregate spending for management headquarters by not less than
$100.0 billion over a 10 fiscal-year period beginning with
fiscal year 2015.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that
would remove the savings objective from bill language. We note
the Secretary of Defense's recent announcement that he is
seeking $40.0 billion in savings in these areas. We expect that
the Secretary's goal will be met.
We also note that section 113 of title 10, United States
Code, requires the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress
each year a report that contains a comprehensive net assessment
of the defense capabilities and programs of the armed forces of
the United States and its allies as compared with those of
their potential adversaries.
We are concerned that in the course of a review intended to
identify potential efficiencies and cost savings in the Office
of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) the recommendation has been
made to make the net assessment function subordinate to another
OSD office. Such a change would risk compromising the
independence of the Office of Net Assessment without achieving
significant efficiencies.
Accordingly, we direct the Secretary of Defense to provide
to the congressional defense committees, not later than March
1, 2014, a report that identifies the estimated savings and
efficiencies that would be achieved through the reorganization
or realignment of the Office of Net Assessment and explains how
the Secretary of Defense would ensure the continuing
independence of net assessment and the ability to report
directly to the Secretary, in the event that a decision were
made to modify the organizational structure or reporting
arrangements of the office.
Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and education
(sec. 905)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 906), as requested by the Department of Defense, that
would codify the responsibility of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) by amending section 153 of title 10,
United States Code, to reflect the current joint training,
doctrine, education, and force development functions that are
overseen by the CJCS.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Modification of reference to major Department of Defense headquarters
activities instruction (sec. 906)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 907) that would amend section 194(f) of title 10, United
States Code, to update the reference to Department of Defense
Instruction 5100.73, titled ``Major DOD Headquarters
Activities.''
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement contains the provision.
Personnel security (sec. 907)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 931) that would require major reform of the personnel
security clearance investigation, adjudication, and transfer
processes to improve security and reduce costs. Specifically,
the provision would require:
(1) The Director of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation
to conduct a comprehensive, comparative analysis of the cost,
schedule, and performance of personnel security investigations
acquired through the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and
through components of the Department of Defense (DOD);
(2) The Secretary of Defense to develop a plan by October
1, 2014, to acquire investigations through the approach most
advantageous to DOD;
(3) The Secretary and the Director of National
Intelligence (DNI) to develop a joint strategy to modernize all
aspects of personnel security to lower costs and improve
security, and to develop and report annually on metrics that
will demonstrate progress in achieving those objectives;
(4) The Secretary and the DNI to consider, and allow them
to adopt, a series of innovations in security investigation
methods and data sources that have been shown to be effective
through analysis and/or demonstrations;
(5) The Secretary and the DNI to ensure, to the maximum
extent practicable, reciprocal acceptance of clearances; and
(6) Development of benchmarks by which to measure the
current level of reciprocity in clearance transfers and the
costs imposed by delays.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would (1) include the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget along with the Secretary of Defense and
the DNI in the requirement to develop and implement a strategy
to modernize the personnel security process; (2) require the
Secretary and the Directors to consider the results of ongoing
reviews occasioned by unauthorized disclosures of classified
information and by the events at the Washington Navy Yard; (3)
require the strategy to include a risk-based monitoring
approach based on the responsibilities and accesses of cleared
personnel; require the Comptroller General to conduct a review
of the personnel security process; and require the Suitability
and Security Performance Accountability Council to convene a
task force to examine access to State and local public records
of Federal Government and contractor investigators.
Subtitle B--Space Activities
National security space satellite reporting policy (sec. 911)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 911) that would
amend chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, to add a
notification, required of the Secretary of Defense, of each
attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a
U.S. national security space capability. The notification shall
be submitted to the appropriate congressional committees not
later than 48 hours after the Secretary determines that there
is reason to believe such an attempt occurred. Not later than
10 days after the date on which the Secretary determines that
there is reason to believe such an attempt occurred, further
information should be provided including the name and a brief
description of the national security space capability that was
impacted by such an attempt; a description of the attempt,
including the foreign actor, the date and time of the attempt,
and any related capability outage and the mission impact of
such outage; and any other information considered relevant by
the Secretary.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that strikes the sense of Congress, provides that the
Commander of U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) provide the
notice instead of the Secretary, and adds other information the
Commander considers relevant to the notice.
We note that the notice is not intended to be a duplicative
process and should leverage existing STRATCOM anomaly
processes. We further note that this notice is not intended to
be notification of every anomaly instance; this is only
notification when there is reason to believe that there was an
intentional attempt to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a national
security space capability.
National security space defense and protection (sec. 912)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 912) that would
require the Secretary of the Air Force to enter into an
arrangement with the National Research Council to conduct a
review in response to the near-term and long-term threats to
the national security space systems of the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense and the
Director of National Intelligence to enter into an arrangement
with the National Research Council while requiring, in addition
to other elements of the study, the Council take into account
the affordability and technical risk of recommended courses of
action.
Space acquisition strategy (sec. 913)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 913) that would
require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief
Information Officer of the Department of Defense, to establish
a strategy for the multi-year procurement of commercial
satellite services.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that changes the report to a briefing within 90 days
after the date of enactment with an interim briefing at the
time of the fiscal year 2015 budget submission.
Consistent with the Defense Business Board report, ``Taking
Advantage of Opportunities for Commercial Satellite Services,''
Report FY13-02, February 2013, we direct the Executive Agent
for Space to report back to the congressional defense
committees before March 1, 2014, on how this office will take a
more active role in implementing recommendation 10 of the
report titled, ``Facilitate future governance by designating a
single DoD organization for procuring all SATCOM assets and
services.''
We understand the U.S. Strategic Command, through the
Defense Information Systems Agency, is involved with developing
a long-term strategy for satellite communications titled, ``Mix
of Media Study.'' We direct the Director of the Defense
Information Systems Agency to brief the congressional defense
committees on this study.
We are concerned about the Department's reliance on 1-year
high-cost commercial satellite communications leases, and
encourage the Department to continue to pursue innovative
acquisition approaches, including multi-year leases and the
procurement of government-owned transponders and payloads on
commercial communication satellites.
Space control mission report (sec. 914)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 914) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the
congressional defense committees on the space control mission
of the Department of Defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that requires an additional element of the report
regarding force levels and structure of the future space
control missions.
We believe the nature of the Department's space control
mission is fundamentally changing from purely collision
avoidance and cataloging space objects, to additionally
ensuring that the United States has, according to section 4(b)
of the October 18, 2012, Department of Defense Directive on
Space Policy, ``the capabilities to respond at the time and
place of our choosing'' to ``purposeful interference with U.S.
space systems, including their supporting infrastructure'' in
ensuring the right of ``free access and use of space.''
Consistent with the space policy directive, it is incumbent
upon the Department to ensure there is a clear and concise
concept of operations which supports the directive and that the
congressional defense committees are updated on any significant
developments as this additional mission evolves.
Responsive launch (sec. 915)
The House amendment contained a provision (sec. 915) that
would require a study by the Department of Defense
Executive Agent for Space on responsive, low-cost launch
efforts to include a review of existing and past operationally
responsive, low-cost launch capabilities; a technology
assessment of various methods to develop an operationally
responsive, low-cost launch capability; and an assessment of
the viability of any other innovative methods, such as
secondary payload adapters on existing launch vehicles. In
addition, this section would require a report from the
Executive Agent for Space regarding the results of the above
mentioned study, as well as a consolidated plan for development
within the Department of an operationally responsive, low-cost
launch capability.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would add as one of the factors the Executive
Agent for Space to consider as part of the study to be the
identification of the conditions or requirements for responsive
launch, which would provide the necessary military value, such
as the requisite payload capacity, timelines for
responsiveness, and the target launch costs. The amendment
would also require a Government Accountability Office (GAO)
review of the report by the Executive Agent for Space. The GAO
may present the results of their review in the form of a
briefing to the congressional defense committees.
Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program (sec. 916)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 921) that would limit the amount of money able to be
obligated or expended for the Space Protection Program by $10
million until the Secretary of Defense submitted to the
congressional defense committees a copy of all materials
presented to inform the decision of the Deputy Secretary of
Defense on the counter space strategy of the Department of
Defense during the 3-year period ending on the date of the
enactment of this Act that resulted in significant revisions to
said strategy.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
We agree that the Secretary of Defense should provide the
briefing, report, or other materials that were presented to the
Deputy Secretary of Defense, which includes the Deputy
Secretary Management Action Group briefing materials. We do not
expect new work product to be produced. We expect the
Department of Defense to submit only the materials that were
presented to the Secretary to inform his decision on the way
forward for the counterspace strategy, which would not include
preliminary or background materials.
Eagle Vision system (sec. 917)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1065) that would require the Chief of Staff of the Air
Force, within 180 days of the enactment of this Act, to submit
to the congressional defense committees a report on the Eagle
Vision imagery ground station. The report elements would
include a description and assessment of the Department of
Defense organizations to which the Eagle Vision system could be
transferred, as well as the actions that would need to be taken
prior to a transfer; the potential schedule for a transfer; and
the possible effects of a transfer on the capabilities or use
of the system. The provision would prohibit the Air Force from
making changes to the organization and management of the
program until 90 days after the submission of the report to
Congress.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported
provision.
Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities
Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial
activities as security for intelligence collection activities
(sec. 921)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 921) that would
modify current statutory authority for the Secretary of Defense
to conduct commercial activities that are necessary to provide
security for authorized intelligence collection activities
abroad undertaken by the Department of Defense. The provision
would remove the requirement that the Secretary of Defense
designate a single office within the Defense Intelligence
Agency to be responsible for the management and supervision of
all commercial activities authorized by the intelligence
commercial activity statute; change the annual audit
requirement to a biennial audit requirement; and add the
congressional defense committees to the reporting requirement.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would maintain the annual audit requirement.
Department of Defense intelligence priorities (sec. 922)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 922) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to establish a written policy
governing the internal coordination and prioritization of
intelligence priorities of the Office of the Secretary of
Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the
military departments to improve identification of the
intelligence needs of the Department of Defense. This section
would also require the Secretary of Defense to identify any
significant intelligence gaps of the Office of the Secretary of
Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the
military departments.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Defense Clandestine Service (sec. 923)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 923) that would
prohibit the use of 50 percent of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise available to the
Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2014 for the
Defense Clandestine Service (DCS) to be obligated or expended
for the DCS until such time as the Secretary of Defense
certifies to the congressional defense committees, the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate, that the DCS is designed primarily to fulfill
priorities of the DOD that are unique to the DOD or otherwise
unmet; and provide unique capabilities to the intelligence
community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))).
This section would also require the Secretary of Defense to
design metrics that will be used to ensure that the DCS is
employed in the manner certified; provide annual assessments
for 5 years based on the metrics established; submit prompt
notifications of any significant changes; and provide quarterly
briefings on deployments and collection activities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 932) that would require the Secretary of Defense, acting
through the Director of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation,
and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence,
acting through the Cost Analysis Improvement Group, and the
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), to assess
the potential cost savings and effectiveness improvements from
consolidating clandestine human intelligence collection in the
National Clandestine Service managed by the CIA.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation (sec. 924)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 924) that would
prohibit the Secretary of Defense from using any of the funds
authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the
Department of Defense during the period beginning on the date
of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014,
to execute: the separation of the portion of the Department of
Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence
Program from the rest of the Department of Defense budget; the
consolidation of the portion of the Department of Defense
budget designated as part of the National Intelligence Program
within the Department of Defense budget; or the establishment
of a new appropriations account or appropriations account
structure for such funds. The provision would also require the
Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence
to jointly brief the congressional defense and intelligence
committees not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act
on any planning relating to future execution that has occurred
during the past 2 years and any anticipated future planning and
related efforts.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters
Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense
tactical data link systems (sec. 931)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 931) that would
amend section 934 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to include a requirement
that the vulnerabilities of data link systems be assessed in
anti-access or area-denial environments.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States Cyber
Command (sec. 932)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 932) that would
require the Defense Science Board to conduct an independent
assessment of the organization, missions, and authorities of
U.S. Cyber Command (CYBERCOM).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 941) that would require the Secretary of
Defense to delegate signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection
authorities to CYBERCOM; provide CYBERCOM with the
infrastructure and equipment to operate independently of the
National Security Agency (NSA) to conduct operations in
cyberspace; provide range capabilities to meet CYBERCOM's
unique requirements for wartime offensive operations; designate
an official within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense
for Policy to serve as the Secretary's principal advisor on
offensive military cyber operations and to supervise the
organization, manning, and equipping of such forces; and to
establish appropriate training facilities for cyber personnel.
In addition, the provision would express the sense of Congress
that CYBERCOM personnel assigned to support offensive cyber
missions should be funded and managed outside of the Military
Intelligence Program (MIP) and Information Systems Security
Program (ISSP).
The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported
provision with an amendment. The amendment would assign to the
principal advisor responsibility for the overall supervision of
cyber activities in the Department, including oversight of
policy and operational matters, resources, personnel,
acquisition, and technology. In carrying out these
responsibilities, the principal advisor shall create a full-
time cross-functional team of subject-matter experts from the
Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the
military departments, defense agencies, and combatant commands.
We stress that this construct of an interdepartmental team
under the direction of the principal advisor for cyber is not
intended to be merely a coordinating committee, but will
provide strong leadership through a joint mechanism to achieve
a common purpose and unity of effort in policy, planning,
programming, and oversight to support a complex mission that
spans the entire Department of Defense. We believe there are
good models for effective cross-functional teams, such as the
Joint Inter Agency Task Force-South, which successfully brings
stakeholders together, including their specific authorities and
capabilities, under a single organization. This team concept
requires that members operate and think holistically, without
regard to home institution loyalties, and receive training in
team dynamics and conflict resolution.
With regard to cyber acquisitions, we note that there is an
existing congressionally-mandated joint entity, the Cyber
Investment Management Board, which is chaired by the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and the
Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. We believe such
organizations should be leveraged to the extent possible in
organizing this cross functional team.
The amendment does not include the requirement for the
Secretary of Defense to delegate SIGINT authority to CYBERCOM,
because the NSA Director has already made such a delegation. If
a decision is made in the future to separate the positions of
NSA Director and Commander of CYBERCOM, it would be appropriate
for this delegation to come directly from the Secretary of
Defense.
The amendment also does not include the sense of the
Congress that CYBERCOM personnel assigned to support offensive
missions should be funded and managed outside of the MIP and
ISSP. We expect the Secretary of Defense to devise means to
ensure that CYBERCOM personnel include non-career intelligence
and cybersecurity officers and enlisted personnel with
experience in combat arms.
We are aware that there are renewed deliberations about the
potential of elevating U.S. Cyber Command from a sub-unified
command to a full unified command. As noted by section 940 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239), we expect to be briefed and consulted on
any such proposal at the time when the Secretary of Defense
makes such a decision. As these policy discussions progress, we
expect the Department to keep the Committees on Armed Services
of the Senate and the House of Representatives informed, upon
request, during the quarterly cyber operations briefings,
particularly as they relate to the estimated costs and policy
implications associated with making the U.S. Cyber Command a
unified command.
Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense (sec.
933)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 933) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a mission analysis
of Department of Defense cyber operations and to provide a
report on the results of the mission analysis to the
congressional defense committees. It would also require the
Chief of the National Guard Bureau to provide an assessment of
the role of the National Guard in supporting Department of
Defense cyber missions.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 945) that would require the Secretary of
Defense to develop a strategy for using the reserve components
of the armed forces to support the cyber missions of U.S. Cyber
Command, including in support of civil authorities, and to
report to the congressional defense committees on this strategy
within 180 days of the enactment of this Act.
The agreement merges these provisions with minor
modifications to each.
Modification of requirement for Report on Department of Defense
Progress in Defending the Department and the Defense Industrial
Base from Cyber Events (sec. 934)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 934) that would
require that the Secretary of Defense provide written
notification to the congressional defense committees within 30
days of the initiation of any investigations carried out
related to the potential compromise of Department of Defense
critical program information related to weapon systems and
other developmental activities, and within 30 days of the
completion of any such investigations. Additionally, the
provision would require a report to be submitted to the
congressional defense committees within 60 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, on all of the known network cyber
intrusions from January 1, 2000, until August 1, 2013,
resulting in compromise of critical program information.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would modify section 935(b)(3) of the Ike
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(Public Law 111-383) to include an element in the existing
reporting requirement to address the economic impacts of
reported network intrusions.
Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the
Department of Defense (sec. 935)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 935) that would
require the Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense to revise the reporting requirements of section 937 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 (Public Law
112-239) to include new elements that would verify that the
format of the process was verified by an independent third
party, implement processes for validating and reporting
registration and deregistration of new software, and update the
timeline for implementation based on these new requirements.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a technical
amendment.
Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses (sec. 936)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 938) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to establish an outreach and
education program to assist small businesses to help them
understand the cyber threat, and develop plans to protect their
intellectual property and networks.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require a briefing to the congressional
defense committees within 60 days of the enactment of this Act
on options for strengthening outreach and threat awareness
activities for small businesses.
We recognize the challenges faced by industry, especially
small businesses, when it comes to understanding and defending
against advanced cyber threats. There are a number of
initiatives and mechanisms within the Department that address
aspects of this challenge, such as the Defense Industrial Base
Information Assurance/Cyber Security program. Because these
other efforts exist, we believe that new programs are not
needed. We believe, though, that inadequate attention has been
paid to effectively coordinate those initiatives, focus them on
supporting the needs of small businesses, or attempt to measure
the strategic effectiveness of those programs.
Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the Department
of Defense (sec. 937)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 942) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
establish a joint software assurance center to serve as a
resource for securing the software acquired, developed,
maintained, and used in the Department of Defense (DOD). The
provision would require the Secretary to consider whether an
existing center could fulfill the purposes of the required
center.
The provision would require the Secretary, within 180 days
after the date of enactment of this Act, to issue a charter for
the center that lays out: (1) The center's role in supporting
program offices in implementing DOD's supply chain risk
management strategy and policies; (2) The center's expertise
and capabilities; (3) The center's management, in coordination
with the Center for Assured Software (CAS) of the National
Security Agency, of a research and development program to
improve the capability of automated software analysis tools;
and (4) The center's management of the procurement and
distribution of enterprise licenses for such analysis tools.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would create a federation of capabilities,
rather than a single center, as well as link existing resources
and centers of excellence, for hardware as well as software
assurance. Additionally, the amendment would emphasize
supporting the trusted defense systems strategy, which includes
both software assurance activities, as well as assurance of
hardware components. In assessing the capabilities that exist
throughout the Department that could be used to support the
trusted defense strategy, the Department shall only create new
centers or new resources when it has conducted a gap analysis
that indicates the need for new resources or capabilities.
We believe that the trusted defense systems strategy
provides a good foundation for guiding the work of these
centers in supporting the acquisition and testing community. As
it relates specifically to software assurance, we further note
that the DOD is in the process of developing a baseline
software assurance policy for the entire life cycle of covered
systems in response to section 933 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239). We
believe that any such guidance and direction for Department
program managers should, where possible, and where consistent
with adequate security for covered systems and the national
security, be consistent with recognized standards, and should
explore options for accepting self-certification or third-party
certification for compliance purposes.
Furthermore, we believe that this software assurance policy
should, where possible, and where consistent with adequate
security for covered systems and the national security, be
developed in compliance with the Office of Management and
Budget Memorandum for Chief Information Officers and Senior
Procurement Executive's titled ``Technology Neutrality,'' dated
January 7, 2011. We also believe that any future software
assurance policy that includes requirements concerning Federal
participation in the development and use of voluntary consensus
standards should be conducted in accordance with the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, section 272 of
title 15, United States Code, and the Office of Management and
Budget Circular A-119.
Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities (sec.
938)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 943) that would require the Secretary of Defense, through
the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics, the Under Secretary of the Defense for Intelligence,
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and
the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, to
supervise the development and implementation of plans for the
acquisition of cloud computing capabilities for intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance data analysis in the military
services and defense agencies.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that
would make the supervisory requirements apply to all cloud
computing acquisition decisions in excess of $1.0 million.
Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems and
tactical communications systems (sec. 939)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 944) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
provide an assessment of the cyber threats to major weapons
systems and tactical communications systems that could emerge
within the next years; an assessment of the cyber
vulnerabilities of major weapons systems and tactical
communications systems; a description of the current strategy
to defend against battlefield cyber attacks; and an estimate of
the costs to correct the vulnerabilities in the future. That
report would be required within 180 days.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the report within 1 year.
Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons (sec. 940)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 946) that would require the President to establish an
interagency process to develop policy to control the
proliferation of cyber weapons through unilateral and
cooperative export controls, law enforcement activities,
financial means, diplomatic engagement, and other means that
the President considers appropriate. The provision would also
require the President to develop a statement of principles
regarding U.S. positions on controlling the proliferation of
cyber weapons to create new opportunities for bilateral and
multilateral cooperation to address this shared threat. The
provision would require the interagency process to produce
recommendations within 270 days of the enactment of this Act.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the President, to the extent
practicable, to provide for industry participation in the
interagency process.
Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace (sec. 941)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 947) that would require the President to establish an
interagency process to develop an integrated policy to deter
adversaries in cyberspace. The provision would require the
President to provide a report to the congressional defense
committees on this policy within 270 days after the enactment
of this Act.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance
Education matters (sec. 942)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 948) that would ensure that Centers of Academic
Excellence (CAEs) in Information Assurance do not lose their
certification as CAEs in fiscal year 2014 as a result of recent
changes in the certification criteria developed by the National
Security Agency (NSA). The provision also would require the
President, in consultation with the Secretary of Education and
with the advice of the National Advisory Committee on
Institutional Quality and Integrity, to: (1) Determine whether
information assurance has matured to the point where the
Federal Government should no longer serve as the accrediting
authority for information assurance programs at institutions of
higher education; and (2) Based on that determination, reform
the current practice of NSA developing the criteria to guide
the curricula and certifying the status of the CAEs.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would: (1) Extend the period through which the
current CAEs would preserve their designation to June 30, 2015;
(2) Task the Secretary of Defense to thoroughly assess the CAEs
program, the maturity of cybersecurity as an academic
discipline, the role that the Federal Government should
continue to play in developing curricula and accrediting
programs, and the alignment of current processes with the
National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education; (3) Require
the Secretary to make recommendations for improving the
curricula and designation process and for transitioning that
process from the sole administration of NSA; (4) Require the
Secretary to assess the Department's scholarship for service
program with the CAEs; and (5) Require the Secretary to submit
to Congress a plan for implementing his recommendations and the
results of his assessments. The provision requires the
Secretary to consult with the Secretary of Homeland Security, a
wide variety of others, including the Director of NSA, and
other government organizations, academia, and the private
sector.
Subtitle E--Total Force Management
Reviews of appropriate manpower performance (sec. 951)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 942) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to certify that all contractor
positions performing inherently governmental functions have
been eliminated.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that
would extend the requirement contained in section 803(c) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010 (P.L.
111-84) for 3 years and require the Department of Defense (DOD)
Inspector General to report to the congressional defense
committees the Inspector General's assessment of DOD's efforts
to compile the inventory, including the actions taken to
resolve the findings of the reviews, pursuant to section 2463
of this title.
Six years beyond the original requirement to implement an
inventory of contracted services, DOD has taken its first steps
to implement a November 2011 plan to collect contractor
manpower data from contractors. These steps included directing
components to start collecting direct labor hours and
associated costs from contractors and initiating efforts to
develop and implement a department-wide data collection system
based on the Army's Contractor Manpower Reporting Application
(CMRA) to collect and store inventory data, including
contractor manpower data. Reportedly, DOD officials estimate
that the new system will be available in fiscal year 2014, with
DOD components reporting on most of their contracted services
by fiscal year 2016.
We expect DOD to continue to make progress towards
implementing these goals, and therefore, have continued the
reporting requirements in section 803(c) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010 (P.L. 111-84)
for 3 years. We expect the Comptroller General to submit a
report consistent with that section including a review of
progress made to develop and implement a department-wide data
collection system based on CMRA.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the
Navy and Marine Corps
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 901) that would
redesignate the Department of the Navy as the Department of the
Navy and Marine Corps, and redesignate the position of the
Secretary of the Navy as the Secretary of the Navy and the
Marine Corps.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Under Secretary of Defense for Management
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 901) that would convert the position of Deputy Chief
Management Officer (DCMO) to Under Secretary of Defense for
Management (USD(M)) and to designate that position as the Chief
Information Officer (CIO) of the Department of Defense. This
provision would mandate the USD(M) exercise authority,
direction, and control over the Information Assurance
Directorate of the National Security Agency. Additionally, this
provision would unify roles and functions traditionally formed
by the CIO and strengthen the office by making it a Senate-
confirmed position again, but without creating a new position.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
We note that the Department has recently made the
congressional defense committees aware of a proposal that
addresses the concerns raised by the Senate committee-reported
bill. We will evaluate this proposal before making a decision
on elevating the DCMO and designating that new position as
responsible for the CIO roles.
Report on strategic importance of United States military installation
of the U.S. Pacific Command
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 903) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on the
strategic value of each major installation that supports
operations in the U.S. Pacific Command area of responsibility.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory Panel from
Department of the Navy to National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 904) that would transfer responsibility for
administration of the Ocean Research Advisory Panel from the
Department of the Navy to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Navy broad-area maritime surveillance aircraft
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 933) that would require the Secretary of Defense to take
appropriate actions to modify the Navy's Broad Area Maritime
Surveillance (BAMS) aircraft fleet to provide a ground moving
target indicator (GMTI) collection, processing, and
dissemination capability that is comparable to the performance
of the Air Force's Global Hawk Block 40 Multi-Platform Radar
Insertion Program. The provision would also require the
Secretary to designate the BAMS aircraft fleet as a joint asset
available to support the operational requirements of the
unified combatant commands.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We agree, however, that the Department of Defense should
determine whether a GMTI capability should be integrated into
the Navy's BAMS aircraft fleet, and whether this system should
be a joint asset for the combatant commands. Therefore, we
direct the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his
capacity as the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight
Council (JROC), to conduct a study and provide a report to the
appropriate congressional committees on the JROC's assessment
of whether adding a GMTI capability to the Navy's BAMS aircraft
fleet is feasible, affordable, and advisable by June 2, 2014.
For this report, the appropriate congressional defense
committees are the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee
on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate; and the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee
on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative cybersecurity
activities with China
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 936) that would
prevent appropriated funds to be used for collaborative
cybersecurity activities with the People's Republic of China.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Small business cybersecurity solutions office
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 937) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress
on the feasibility of establishing a small business cyber
technology office to assist small businesses in providing
cybersecurity solutions to the Federal Government.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We recognize the challenges faced by the government in
gaining access to truly innovative solutions for cybersecurity
threats. Many of the most innovative technologies available to
the government come from small businesses. However, it is also
clear that the defense acquisition system, which can be
difficult to navigate even for large businesses, can pose acute
difficulties for small businesses to be able to find
opportunities, respond effectively to lengthy contracting
paperwork, and maintain compliance with arcane acquisition
regulations. Within the Department of Defense, there exist
offices for small and disadvantaged businesses which have been
established to help support small businesses specifically to
navigate these problems. We recognize the value these
organizations already provide in supporting small businesses,
and believe it would be redundant to create new offices to
focus solely on cybersecurity solutions.
Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of government oversight of
functions closely associated with inherently governmental
functions
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 941) that would
amend sections 129a and 2330a of title 10, United States Code,
to ensure that sufficient levels of government oversight are in
place for contracted services and aligns current Department of
Defense policies related to Total Force Management.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Title X--General Provisions
Budget Item
Funding for New START Treaty preparatory activities
The funding authorized by this Act would include funds for
activities to prepare to implement nuclear force reductions to
meet the levels prescribed by the New START Treaty. Elsewhere
in this Act, a limitation is included that would ensure only
preparatory activities for such reductions may be carried out
in fiscal year 2014.
Subtitle A--Financial Matters
General transfer authority (sec. 1001)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1001) that would
provide the Department of Defense with $3.5 billion of general
transfer authority in fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1001) that would provide the Department of
Defense with $4.0 billion of general transfer authority in
fiscal year 2014.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would provide the Department of Defense with
$5.0 billion of general transfer authority in fiscal year 2014.
Budgetary effects of this Act (sec. 1002)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1002) that would
determine the budgetary effects of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 4).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements
(sec. 1003)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1003) that would
express the sense of Congress regarding the Department of
Defense's ongoing Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness
process and support the goal of audit readiness across the
Department by 2017. This section would also require that a full
and complete audit takes place for fiscal year 2018.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a technical
amendment.
Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security
Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization (sec.
1004)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1004) that would
provide the Secretary of Defense the authority to transfer up
to $150.0 million to the nuclear weapons program of the
National Nuclear Security Administration if the amount
authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for
that program is less than $8.4 billion (the amount specified
for fiscal year 2014 in the report required by section 1251 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111-84)).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities
Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and
counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (sec. 1011)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1011) that would
extend, by 1 year, the unified counter-drug and
counterterrorism campaign in the Republic of Colombia
originally authorized by section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public
Law 108-375), and most recently amended by section 1013 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112-239).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1011) that would extend, for 2 fiscal years,
the authority of the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance
to support the unified counter-drug and counterterrorism
campaign of the Government of Colombia. The provision would
also incorporate a notification to Congress to improve
transparency of the Department of Defense's use of this
authority.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would modify the extension of the underlying
authority by 1 fiscal year and modify elements of the
notification requirement.
We note that the Government of Colombia has made and
continues to make progress combating narcotics trafficking and
designated foreign terrorist organizations. This type of
flexible authority remains required to assist the Government of
Colombia consolidate its hard-fought gains.
Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law
enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities
(sec. 1012)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1012) that would
extend, by 1 fiscal year, the support by joint task forces
under section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136), as most recently
amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1012) to extend by 2 fiscal years the support
under section 1022(b).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for
counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments (sec.
1013)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1013) that would
extend, by 2 years, the authority to provide support for
counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments,
originally authorized by subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998
(Public Law 105-85), and most recently amended by section 1006
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1013) that would extend, by 5 years, the authority to
provide support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign
governments under subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public
Law 105-85), as most recently amended by section 1006 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112-81). The provision would also expand the list of
countries eligible to receive support to include the
Governments of Chad, Libya, Mali, and Niger.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would extend the underlying authority for 3
years and expand the list of countries eligible to receive
support.
We direct the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Counternarcotics and Global Threats (DASD CN/GT) to provide a
briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives in fiscal year 2014 on the country
plans associated with the four additional countries under this
authority, including a description of the status of any
assistance to be provided or planned to be provided, how the
effectiveness of this assistance is to be measured, and how
this assistance will reinforce other related Department of
Defense activities in the region. The committee further directs
the DASD CN/GT to submit a report updating the aforementioned
committees on the status of these matters in fiscal year 2015.
Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards
Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the
construction of naval vessels (sec. 1021)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1026) that would modify section 231 of title 10, United
States Code, to include a requirement to report on the total
cost of construction for each vessel used to determine
estimated levels of annual funding in the report, and an
assessment of the extent of the strategic and operational risk
to national security whenever the number or capabilities of the
naval vessels in the plan do not meet requirements.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical/clarifying amendment.
Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no
cost to the Navy (sec. 1022)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1021) would
amend subsection (a) of section 7306 of title 10, United States
Code, to clarify that ship donations would be only to operate
the vessel as a museum or memorial for public display in the
United States. This language would provide the Navy with the
flexibility to oversee a vessel donee's actions, without any
implication that the Navy retains ownership of the vessel. The
provision would also prevent the Federal Government from
providing funding for any improvement, upgrade, modification,
maintenance, preservation, or repair to a vessel donated under
this section.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1024).
The agreement includes this provision, but with
modifications that would prevent the Department of Defense from
providing additional funding for any donated vessel, not the
Federal Government as a whole. These modifications would allow
other federal departments to contribute to ship museums or ship
memorials to the extent that the departments have authorization
to do so.
Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga
class cruisers or dock landing ships (sec. 1023)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1022) that would
limit the obligation and expenditure of funds authorized to be
appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for the retirement, inactivation, or storage of a cruiser or
dock landing ship. This section would provide an exception for
the retirement of the U.S.S. Denver (LPD-9). The provision
would also provide additional transfer authority for the
purpose of providing sufficient appropriations to support the
modernization of seven cruisers.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would delete the additional transfer authority.
Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions (sec. 1024)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1025) that would
allow the Secretary of the Navy to extend or renew the lease of
not more than four blocking vessels supporting the Transit
Protection System Escort Program. The provision would also
require the Secretary, prior to extending or renewing such a
lease, to submit to the congressional defense committees a
notification of the proposed extension or renewal, along with a
detailed description of the term of the proposed contract and a
justification for extending or renewing the lease, as opposed
to obtaining the capability through purchase of such vessels.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would allow the Secretary of the Navy to accept
and retain payment-in-kind in lieu of monetary payment for
purposes of settling the litigation arising from the default
termination on contract number N00019-88-C-0050 for development
and production of the A-12 aircraft. Also, it is understood
that the Secretary of the Navy is authorized to enter into
agreements to modify contracts in order to effect a settlement
to the litigation.
Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships (sec.
1025)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1026) that would
require the Secretary of the Navy to submit to the
congressional defense committees a report providing an updated
comparison of the costs and risks of acquiring DDG-1000 and
DDG-51 Flight III vessels equipped for enhanced ballistic
missile defense capability.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
technical/clarifying amendment.
Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment (sec. 1026)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1022) that would direct the Chief of Naval Operations
(CNO) to provide a report to the congressional defense
committees no later than February 1, 2014, that would assess
the current fleet capabilities compared to the threat and the
likely situation over the next 30 years. The CNO should produce
an unclassified report, as well as a classified annex to that
report.
The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 1024)
that would express the sense of Congress that additional
funding should be prioritized toward shipbuilding efforts and
that Department of the Navy budget projections should
realistically anticipate the true investment to meet force
structure goals.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would add several items to the list of issues to
be addressed in the report, including an assessment by the
Commandant of the Marine Corps of: (1) The operational risk
associated with the current and the planned number of ships of
the amphibious assault force; and (2) The capabilities required
to meet the needs of the Marine Corps for future ships of the
amphibious assault force. The amendment would also delay the
required date for the report until 30 days after the Secretary
of Defense submits the annual naval vessel construction plan
required by section 231 of title 10, United States Code.
Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of the
strike forces of the Navy (sec. 1027)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1023) that would repeal section 1012 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-
181). That section requires that the Navy build any new class
of major surface combatant and amphibious assault ship with an
integrated nuclear power system, unless the Secretary of the
Navy notifies the congressional defense committees that, as a
result of a cost-benefit analysis, it would not be practical
for the Navy to design the class of ships with an integrated
nuclear power system.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would amend section 1021 to: (1) delete the
requirement to include integrated nuclear power systems in any
new ship class, and (2) add the requirement that the Navy
analyze integrated nuclear power alternative in its analysis of
alternatives for new ship classes, and report the results of
that analysis in the budget request.
Subtitle D--Counterterrorism
Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military
commissions (sec. 1031)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1030) that would
amend chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to clarify
the procedures for the convening authority to detail alternate
members to a military commission.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1034).
The agreement contains the House provision.
Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program
reporting requirement (sec. 1032)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1031) that would
modify the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship
Program to require additional annual reporting requirements.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the
United States to house detainees transferred from United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1033)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1032) that would
prohibit the use of Department of Defense (DOD) funds through
December 31, 2014, to construct or modify facilities in the
United States, its territories, or possessions, to house any
detainee transferred from U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in DOD
custody or control unless authorized by Congress.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of
individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba (sec. 1034)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1034) that would
prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to transfer or
release any detainee at U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, to or within the United States, its territories, or
possessions through December 31, 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1033) that would prohibit the transfer or release of
Guantanamo detainees to the United States during fiscal year
2014, except that the Secretary of Defense could authorize such
a transfer for detention and trial if the Secretary determines
that doing so would be in the U.S. national security interest
and that appropriate actions have been or will be taken to
address any public safety risks that could arise in connection
with the transfer.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1035)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1033) that would
restrict the Secretary of Defense from transferring or
releasing individuals detained at U.S. Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, (GTMO) to a foreign country or foreign
entity unless the Secretary makes certain specified
certifications to Congress not later than 30 days prior to any
such transfer or release. The restrictions of this provision
would apply through December 31, 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1031) that would authorize two procedures for the
transfer or release of Guantanamo detainees to their country of
origin or another country other than the United States. The
first part of the provision would authorize such transfers or
releases under certain specified circumstances, specifically:
(1) If following a review by a Periodic Review Board, the
detainee is determined to no longer be a threat to U.S.
national security; (2) In order to effectuate a court order; or
(3) If a detainee has been tried and acquitted or tried,
convicted, and has served his sentence. The second part of the
provision would allow the Secretary of Defense to authorize the
transfer of Guantanamo detainees overseas only if he
determines, following a rigorous assessment of a number of
specified factors, that doing so would be in the U.S. national
security interest and steps have been or will be taken to
mitigate the risk of recidivism by the individual to be
transferred. The provision would require the Secretary of
Defense to notify Congress of a determination to transfer or
release a Guantanamo detainee not later than 30 days prior to
the transfer or release, and specifies the information that
must be provided as part of such notifications.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would:
(a) narrow the specified circumstances under which
transfers or releases are authorized under the first
part of the provision to only (1) and (2) above;
(b) expand the factors that the Secretary of Defense
must specifically evaluate and consider in making his
determination whether to transfer a Guantanamo detainee
overseas, including the security situation in the
country to which the detainee would be transferred, the
presence of foreign terrorist groups in the recipient
country, whether the recipient country is a state
sponsor of terrorism, and whether the detainee has been
tried and acquitted or tried, convicted, and completed
his sentence; and
(c) expand the information that must be included in
the congressional notification provided not later than
30 days prior to the transfer, including information on
any actions taken to address the risk of reengagement
by the detainee in terrorist activities, a copy of any
Periodic Review Board findings, an assessment of the
capacity of the receiving country, and a description of
the Secretary of Defense's evaluation of the factors to
be considered in making the Secretary's determination
in support of the transfer.
Report on information relating to individuals detained at Parwan,
Afghanistan (sec. 1036)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1035) that would
require the public disclosure of an unclassified summary of
certain information relating to individuals held at the
Detention Facility in Parwan, Afghanistan, that have been
designated as enduring security threats to the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense
committees a classified report containing certain specified
information relating to detainees at Parwan that have been
designated as enduring security threats. The Secretary would
also be required to review the classified report to determine
what summary information, if any, can be declassified and made
publicly available, to the maximum extent practicable
consistent with national security.
Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military
commissions established to try individuals detained at
Guantanamo (sec. 1037)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1038) that would
require that, for purposes of any military commission trial of
an individual detained at the U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, the chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor
must have the same rank.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require that for purposes of any such
military commission trial, the chief defense counsel and the
chief prosecutor must have the same grade. The amendment would
also provide that the Secretary of Defense may temporarily
waive this requirement if the Secretary determines that
compliance with the requirement either would be infeasible due
to the non-availability of qualified officers of the same grade
to fill the billets or would cause significant disruption to
the trial proceedings. The amendment would also require the
Secretary of Defense to issue guidance to ensure that the
offices of the chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor
receive equitable resources, personnel support, and logistical
support for conducting their duties in connection with any such
military commission trial. We note that the intent of this
requirement is to ensure fairness and impartiality in the
resources and support provided to each of these offices.
Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, and
prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are
transferred to Yemen (sec. 1038)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1039) that would
require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to
jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives,
and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, a report
on the capability of the Republic of Yemen to detain,
rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals transferred there from
U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo if
transferred to the United States (sec. 1039)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040) that would
require the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General to
jointly submit to the congressional defense committees and the
Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of
Representatives, a report on whether detainees, if transferred
to the United States from the Guantanamo Bay Detention
Facility, would become eligible for certain legal rights by
reason of their transfer.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of
Defense, to submit to the congressional defense committees and
the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of
Representatives, a report on the legal rights, if any, for
which a Guantanamo detainee, if transferred to the United
States, may become eligible, by reason of such transfer. The
report would also include an analysis of the extent to which
legislation or other steps could address any such legal rights.
Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations
Congressional notification of sensitive military operations (sec. 1041)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1041) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional
defense committees notice in writing of any sensitive military
operation following such operation. This section would also
require the Secretary of Defense to establish procedures not
later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act
for providing such notice in a manner consistent with the
national security of the United States and the protection of
operational integrity.
The Senate committee-passed bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Counterterrorism operational briefings (sec. 1042)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1043) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide quarterly briefings
to the congressional defense committees outlining Department of
Defense counterterrorism operations and related activities.
Each briefing would include: a global update on activity within
each geographic combatant command; an overview of authorities
and legal issues including limitations; an outline of
interagency activities and initiatives; and any other matters
the Secretary considers appropriate.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would: (1) modify the elements required as part
of the briefings and (2) repeal section 1031 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81)--a nearly identical requirement.
Report on process for determining targets of lethal or capture
operations (sec. 1043)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1042) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report within 60
days after the date of the enactment of this Act containing an
explanation of the legal and policy considerations and approval
processes used in determining whether an individual or group of
individuals could be the target of a lethal operation or
capture operation conducted by the Armed Forces of the United
States outside the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would provide 90 days for the Secretary of
Defense to provide the required report and make a number of
technical modifications.
Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces
Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable
aircraft based in Europe (sec. 1051)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1053) that would
provide that funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available may not be used to reduce or
consolidate U.S. dual-capable aircraft in Europe until 90 days
after the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional
defense committees that the Russian Federation has carried out
similar actions; the Secretary has consulted with the member
states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) about
the proposed action with respect to U.S. dual capable aircraft;
and, there is a consensus among NATO member states in support
of such action.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment replacing the provisions with a sense of Congress
regarding reductions or consolidations of dual-capable
aircraft. The amendment also requires a notification 90 days
before the date on which the Secretary reduces or consolidates
dual capable aircraft that includes the reason for the
reduction or consolidation, any effects from such action on the
extended deterrence mission of the United States, the manner in
which the military requirements of the NATO will be met
following such actions, a statement by the Secretary on the
response of NATO to such actions, and whether there is any
change in the force posture of Russia from such actions
including nonstrategic nuclear weapons.
Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and
Communications System (sec. 1052)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 903) that would establish a council to coordinate
activities related to national leadership command, control, and
communications systems, including the nuclear command, control,
and communications system.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would change the co-chairs of the Council to the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics, the Vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and
would add the Director of the National Security Agency to the
Council. The amendment requires an annual report by the
Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, through the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff on the adequacy of the President's budget
to meet required capabilities of the nuclear command and
control communications system for national leadership of the
United States and the impact, if any, if annual appropriations
do not meet the President's budget request. The amendment would
also seek to add more transparency to the budget for Nuclear
Command and Control activities. A clerical amendment is made
transferring a provision from 10 U.S.C. 491 regarding anomalies
in the Nuclear Command and Control system to this new
provision.
Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of Nuclear
Weapons Council (sec. 1053)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1041) that would amend section 179 of title 10, United
States Code, by striking the responsibilities for nuclear
command, control, and communications since another section of
this Act establishes a Council on Oversight of the National
Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System. The
Senate committee-reported bill also contained a provision
adding a new requirement to report on joint activities between
the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy on
nuclear security.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that clarifies the nature of the joint report by the
Department of Defense and the Department of Energy. We believe
the information required to be provided in this joint report
should be substantially similar as that provided in the Joint
Surety Report pursuant to National Security Presidential
Directive 28.
Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons
stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery
systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system (sec.
1054)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1042) that would amend section 1043 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2012 (Public Law 112-
81), which provides for a report to the congressional defense
committees with a 10-year funding profile for the Department of
Energy's (DOE) and the Department of Defense's (DOD) strategic
deterrent modernization program. Specifically, the provision
would give both departments 60 days after budget submission to
deliver the section 1043 report. If a delay is anticipated that
is greater than 60 days, DOE and DOD must notify the
congressional defense committees before the President's budget
submission and provide a briefing no later than 30 days after
budget submission.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would move the report deadline to 30 days after
the President's budget submission. The amendment would also
provide that, if it is determined that the report submission
will require longer than 30 days, a briefing will be provided
to the congressional defense committees within 30 days after
submission of the budget request. Regardless of any such
determination or briefing, the report would be required to be
submitted no later than 60 days after submission of the budget
request.
Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad (sec. 1055)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1051) that would
prohibit any of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this
Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of Defense from being obligated or expended to
reduce, convert, or decommission any strategic delivery system
of the United States if such reduction, conversion, or
decommissioning would eliminate a leg of the nuclear triad.
This section defines ``nuclear triad'' as: (1) land-based
intercontinental ballistic missiles; (2) submarine-launched
ballistic missiles and their associated ballistic missile
submarines; and (3) nuclear-certified strategic bombers.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment containing technical corrections.
Implementation of New START Treaty (sec. 1056)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 132) that would amend section 131(a)(1) of the John
Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
(P.L. 109-364) by striking the term in a common capability
configuration.
The House bill (section 241) contained a provision that
requires the Secretary of Defense to keep each Minuteman III
silo as of the date of enactment of this Act in a warm status
and that it remains a functioning element of the missile field
and can be made functional with a deployed missile.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1045) that states the Secretary of Defense may,
in a manner consistent with international obligations, retain
missile launch facilities currently supporting up to 800
deployed and non-deployed strategic launchers, maintain
intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) on alert or
operationally deployed status, and preserve ICBM silos in
operational or warm status.
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1052) that would
provide that none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by
this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for
the Department of Defense or the National Nuclear Security
Administration may be obligated or expended to carry out
reductions to the nuclear forces of the United States required
by the New START Treaty until the Secretary of Defense provides
the plan required by section 1042(a) of the National Defense
Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) and
the President certifies that any reductions to U.S. nuclear
forces below the level required by the New START Treaty will be
carried out only pursuant to a treaty or international
agreement approved according to the Treaty Clause of the
Constitution of the United States or an affirmative act of
Congress.
The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the
use of fiscal year 2014 funds for the purpose of preparing to
implement reductions in nuclear forces necessary to meet the
levels required by the New START Treaty subject to additional
limitations as found in subsection (b) of the agreement. The
agreement requires the Secretary of Defense to include with the
defense budget materials a consolidated budget justification
display that covers each activity associated with
implementation of the New START Treaty. Subsection (b) of the
provision would limit amounts spent for an environmental
assessment for any proposed reduction in ICBM silos to 50
percent subject to receiving the nuclear force structure plan
required by section 1042(a) of the Fiscal Year 2012 National
Defense Authorization Act, which is unacceptably almost 2 full
years late. That plan would be required to include the various
options under consideration for treaty implementation, along
with a preferred final force structure option, which may be
modified upon the conclusion of the environmental assessment.
That plan would be accompanied by a report from the Commander
of U.S. Strategic Command on his assessment of the force
structure options provided by the Secretary of Defense,
including the preferred final force structure option. Lastly,
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff would be required to
certify to the congressional defense committees that conducting
the environmental assessment will not imperil the ability of
the military to comply with the deployed or non-deployed force
levels of the New START Treaty by February 2018.
The agreement would prohibit the conversion of nuclear
capable B-52 aircraft to conventional aircraft until the
information required under subsection (b) is submitted, and
requires that all B-52s in the inventory remain in a common
conventional weapons employment capability configuration once
nuclear decertification and modification commences for
currently an undetermined quantity of B-52 aircraft.
The agreement would further require a report on
collaboration between the Army, Navy, and Air Force on
activities related to strategic systems to improve
efficiencies, technology sharing, and other benefits.
The agreement would also express a sense of the Congress
that the force structure required by the New START Treaty
should preserve Minuteman III ballistic missile silos in a warm
status and any non-deployed missiles and silos should be spread
amongst the three missile wings in the Air Force ICBM force.
Finally, the agreement would also include, in another
section of this report accompanying section 4201, an
explanatory statement on the budget for activities to prepare
for the implementation of the New START Treaty.
Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable
reentry vehicles (sec. 1057)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1056) that would
require the Secretary of the Air Force to ensure that the Air
Force is capable of deploying multiple independently targetable
reentry vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic
missiles (ICBM) and any ground-based strategic deterrent
follow-on to such missiles. This section would require the
Secretary to ensure that the Air Force is capable of commencing
such deployment not later than 270 days after the date on which
the President determines such deployment is necessary.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that changes the 270 days to 180 days and narrows the
requirement to apply only to the Minuteman III ICBM system.
Report on New START Treaty (sec. 1058)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1059) that would
require the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman, Joint Chiefs
of Staff to jointly submit to the congressional defense
committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate, a report on whether the New START Treaty is in the
national security interests of the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares
Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report (sec.
1059)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080A) that
would require the Secretary of the Air Force to report on the
implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear
Weapons Accident Dose Evaluation Report released by the Air
Force in April 2001.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would modify the deadline for the report from
180 days to 1 year.
Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms reductions with the
Russian Federation (sec. 1060)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1054) that would
provide a statement of policy concerning implementation of
further nuclear arms reductions below the levels of the New
START Treaty, and would limit funds to make such reductions
unless certain conditions are met.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would express the
sense of Congress that, if the United States seeks further
strategic nuclear arms reductions with the Russian Federation
that are below the levels of the New START Treaty, such
reductions should: (1) Be pursued through a mutually negotiated
agreement; (2) Be verifiable; (3) Be pursued through the
treaty-making power of the President; and (4) Take into account
the full range of nuclear weapon capabilities that threaten the
United States and its allies, including non-strategic nuclear
weapon capabilities.
Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control treaty
obligations (sec. 1061)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1055) that would
express the sense of Congress that the President should
consider not seeking further nuclear arms reductions with a
foreign country that is in noncompliance with its nuclear arms
control treaty obligations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would express the
sense of Congress that, if the President determines that a
foreign nation is in substantial noncompliance with its nuclear
arms control treaty obligations in a manner that adversely
affects the national security of the United States or its
allies or alliances, the President should take certain
specified steps. These steps include informing Congress of the
President's assessment of the effect of such noncompliance and
the President's plans to resolve such noncompliance. They also
include considering whether, in light of the noncompliance, the
United States should engage in future nuclear arms control
negotiations with the noncompliant government, and considering
the potential effect of the noncompliance on the consideration
by the Senate of a future nuclear arms reduction treaty with
the noncompliant government.
Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the nuclear forces
of the United States (sec. 1062)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1044) that states it is the policy of the United States
to modernize the nuclear triad and sustain the nuclear
stockpile, its production facilities, and science base, and a
sense of Congress expressing that Congress is committed to
providing the resources needed for this modernization and that
Congress supports the modernization or replacement of the triad
of strategic nuclear delivery systems.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes an amendment that includes an
additional sense of Congress supporting continued upgrades of
the existing B-1B, B-2, and B-52 bomber aircraft, and that the
Air Force should continue to prioritize the continued
development and acquisition of the long-range strike bomber
program.
Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations
Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze
captured records (sec. 1071)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1061) that would
provide the statutory authority to the Secretary of Defense to
establish a Conflict Records Research Center to facilitate
research and analysis of records captured from countries,
organizations, and individuals, now or once hostile, to the
United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision, but recommended funding of the current center, which
already exists at the National Defense University, for $1
million in the budget request for fiscal year 2014.
The agreement includes the House provision.
We note that while such a center currently exists,
additional statutory authorization would allow the center to be
funded collectively by the Department of Defense, the Office of
the Director of National Intelligence, and other departments
and agencies, rather than rely on discrete partner funding for
each activity. This authorization would also allow the center
to receive funding from other agencies, states, or other
foreign and domestic entities, including academic and
philanthropic organizations, to support important research in
international relations, counterterrorism, conventional warfare
and unconventional warfare.
Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic spectrum (sec.
1072)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1051) that would require a national security spectrum
strategy to be performed at least once every 5 years. The
strategy is to provide near-term (5 years), mid-term (10
years), and long-term (30 years) assessments of the need for
national security spectrum.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment to title 10 of the United States Code, section 488,
``Management of Electromagnetic spectrum: biennial strategic
plan,'' that requires the plan be submitted in consultation
with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of
Commerce. The plan shall include an inventory of the
electromagnetic spectrum uses for national security and other
purposes, an estimate of the need for electromagnetic spectrum
over the time periods of the Senate committee-reported
provision, and any additional matters the Secretary of Defense,
in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and
the Secretary of Commerce, considers appropriate.
Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to
certain other agencies at the Department of Defense
reimbursement rate (sec. 1073)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1062) that would
amend section 2642(a) of title 10, United States Code, to
extend the authority to provide to other federal agencies
airlift transportation at the same rate the Department of
Defense (DOD) charges its own units for similar transportation
and to expand the authority to include all means of
transportation, not just airlift. The DOD currently uses this
authority to: (1) provide transportation support to other
departments and agencies to increase peacetime business, and
(2) promote the improved use of airlift by filling excess
capacity with paying cargo.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 313).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Notification of modifications to Army force structure (sec. 1074)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1063) that would
prevent the Department of the Army from spending any fiscal
year 2014 funds to modify the force structure or basing
strategy of the Army until the Secretary of the Army submits
the report required by section 1066 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 1943).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement would require the Secretary of the Army to
certify that Army force structure changes authorized as of the
date of the enactment of this Act comply with the provisions of
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.). The provision would also require that as part of any
congressional notifications of future force structure changes,
in accordance with section 993 of title 10, United States Code,
the Secretary should include an assessment whether or not such
changes require an Environmental Assessment or Environmental
Impact Statement.
Aircraft joint training (sec. 1075)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1065) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland
Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation
Administration to develop and implement plans and procedures to
review the potential of joint testing and evaluation of
unmanned aircraft equipment and systems with other appropriate
departments and agencies of the Federal Government that may
serve the dual purpose of providing capabilities to the
Department of Defense (DOD) to meet the future requirements of
combatant commanders and, domestically, to strengthen
international border security. The two secretaries and the
Administrator would also be required to submit a report on the
status of the plans within 270 days of the date of enactment of
this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would express the sense of Congress that
simulators offer cost savings to DOD, can contribute to
training members of the armed services for combat, and
highlights the need for synergy between the DOD and private
sector.
Subtitle H--Studies and Reports
Online availability of reports submitted to Congress (sec. 1081)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1078) that would
amend section 122a of title 10, United States Code, to require
certain unclassified reports be made available on a publicly
accessible website of the Department of Defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a technical
amendment.
Oversight of combat support agencies (sec. 1082)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1071) that would
require that assessments of combat support agencies undertaken
pursuant to section 193(a) of title 10, United States Code, be
submitted to the congressional defense committees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination
relating to humanitarian demining technology (sec. 1083)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1072) that would
modify current reporting requirements for humanitarian demining
as defined within section 407(d) of title 10, United States
Code, to include interagency, research, and development
activities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Repeal and modification of reporting requirements (sec. 1084)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1061) that would repeal or modify a number of reporting
requirements that have been included in law in past years. The
requirements recommended for repeal or modification in this
provision are requirements identified by the committee as being
no longer relevant or necessary and that can be repealed or
modified without adversely affecting the committee's oversight
responsibilities.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying
amendment.
Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department
of Defense efficiencies (sec. 1085)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1074) that would
repeal section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), relating to the
implementation of the efficiencies undertaken in 2010 by the
Department of Defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision.
Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces and
United States Special Operations Command (sec. 1086)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1076) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to review and assess the
organization, missions, and authorities related to U.S. Special
Operations Forces and U.S. Special Operations Command and to
provide a report to the congressional defense committees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Reports on unmanned aircraft systems (sec. 1087)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1077) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of
Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation
Administration, and the Administrator of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, on behalf of the Unmanned
Aircraft Systems (UAS) Executive Committee, to jointly submit a
report on unmanned aircraft system collaboration,
demonstration, use cases and data sharing to the appropriate
committees of Congress within 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would extend the reporting deadline to 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department of
Defense (sec. 1088)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1063) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to
assess the Department's current approach for managing foreign
language support contracts.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
We note that at a minimum, the assessment shall include an
analysis of spending for all the types of foreign language
support services and products that have been acquired by the
Department of Defense (DOD) components. Additionally, the
assessment shall include a reevaluation, based on the results
of the analysis of spending, of the scope of the DOD executive
agent's management of foreign language support contracts to
determine whether any adjustments are needed.
Civil Air Patrol (sec. 1089)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1064) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force
to produce a report on the Civil Air Patrol (CAP) that would,
among other things, identify the requirement for the total
fleet of CAP aircraft.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle I--Other Matters
Technical and clerical amendments (sec. 1091)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1081) that would
make a number of technical and clerical amendments of a non-
substantive nature to existing law.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated
information system programs (sec. 1092)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1083) that would
give Department of Defense senior officials responsible for
major automated information system programs the option of
submitting to the congressional defense committees either a
critical change report when required, or a streamlined
notification when the official further concludes that the
critical change occurred primarily due to congressional action,
such as a reduction in program funding.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying
amendment.
Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-
premium aviation insurance (sec. 1093)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1084) that would
amend section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, relating
to the expiration of non-premium insurance under chapter 443 of
that title, to extend the authority of the Secretary of
Transportation to provide insurance and reinsurance.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and authority to waive
reimbursement of costs of activities for certain
nongovernmental personnel (sec. 1094)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1073) that would
modify section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), to extend the
deadline for the required report of the Comptroller General of
the United States from December 30, 2013, to December 30, 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
that would modify section 1081 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) to
extend the authority of the Secretary of Defense to advise
foreign defense ministries for an additional 5 fiscal years.
The provision would also extend the requirement of the
Secretary of Defense to provide an annual report to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives, and would provide the Comptroller General of
the United States an additional year to conduct the evaluation
of the effectiveness of the program under the original
authority.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would extend the program through the end of
fiscal year 2017. The agreement also extends, for 1 fiscal
year, the authority of the Secretary of Defense to waive the
reimbursement of costs requirement for certain nongovernmental
personnel at the Department of Defense regional centers for
security studies (as most recently amended section 941(b) of
the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2009).
Amendments to certain national commissions (sec. 1095)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1085) that would
enable parity for compensation and ethics workday computations
by decreasing and making optional the annual compensation rate
for commissioners appointed to the National Commission on the
Structure of the Air Force that was established in subtitle G
of title III of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would make various technical changes to the
Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission,
enacted in sections 671 through 680 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239),
including additional authorities for the Commission, extended
timelines and milestones, and increased funding.
Strategy for future military information operations capabilities (sec.
1096)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1087) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a
strategy for developing and sustaining military information
operations capabilities for future contingencies.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security (sec. 1097)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1090) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense to coordinate with the
Secretary of Homeland Security on the transfer or long-term
loan to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of excess
Department of Defense (DOD) equipment that may be appropriate
for use in efforts related to improving U.S. border security.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would express the
sense of Congress that DOD and DHS should, consistent with
existing laws and authorities, seek to collaborate on enhanced
U.S. border security, including by identifying excess property
of DOD, if any, that may be suitable for use by the DHS to
support border security efforts. We believe such collaboration
could be useful to increase situational awareness and to help
achieve operational control of the international borders of the
United States.
Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire suppression and
other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force (sec.
1098)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 131) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to
consider, as part of the recapitalization of the tactical
airlift fleet of the Air Force: (1) Upgrades to legacy C-130H
aircraft designed to help such aircraft meet the fuel economy
goals of the Air Force; and (2) Retention of such upgraded
aircraft in the tactical airlift fleet. It would also require
that the Secretary ensure that upgrades to the C-130H fleet are
made in a manner that is proportional to the number of C-130H
aircraft in the force structure of the active Air Force, the
Air Force Reserve, and the Air National Guard.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would add direction that: (1) The Secretary of
the Army offer to transfer eight specific C-23Bs to the
Governor of Alaska; (2) The Secretary of Defense transfer up to
15 C-23Bs to the Forest Service; (3) The Coast Guard transfer
seven C-130s to the Air Force; (4) The Air Force modify the
Coast Guard C-130s to serve as firefighting tanker aircraft for
the Forest Service; and (5) The Secretary of Defense transfer
14 C-27J aircraft to the Coast Guard upon completion of these
actions.
We also direct the Secretary of the Air Force and the
Secretary of the Army to provide the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, not
later than January 30, 2014, a quarterly report or briefing on
the cost, schedule, and execution of notable events related to
the aircraft transfers and modifications required within the
provision.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Department of Defense Readiness Restoration Fund
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1002) that would establish a Department of Defense (DOD)
Readiness Restoration Fund in order to provide the DOD with
increased flexibility to transfer funds that may be available
to high priority readiness accounts, where necessary to address
significant shortfalls in funding otherwise available for the
training activities of the armed forces (including flying hours
and steaming days) and the maintenance of military equipment.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the reductions in discretionary appropriations
and direct spending accounts under section 251A of the Balanced
Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C.
901a) were never intended to take effect, the readiness of the
Nation's military is weakened by sequestration, sequestration
has budgetary and cost impacts beyond the programmatic level,
and there is limited information about these indirect costs to
the Federal Government. It is the sense of Congress that the
Government Accountability Office should report on the long-term
budgetary costs and effects of sequestration, including on
procurement activities and contracts with the Federal
Government.
Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-Narcotic Program
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1014) that would
express the sense of Congress regarding the importance of the
National Guard Counterdrug Program (CDP) as a tool in combating
drug trafficking into the United States and the need for
continued support and funding of such programs, especially
along the Southwest border.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the Department of Defense requests funding
annually to support the National Guard CDP. We believe that the
CDP plays an important role in providing military-specific
capabilities and expertise resident within the National Guard
to support the counterdrug activities of federal, state, and
local authorities. We believe this support has proven effective
in helping to meet national counterdrug objectives.
Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1023) that would
amend section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, to require
that naval vessels that do not have a designated homeport to be
treated as homeported in the United States or Guam, and to
change the definition of voyage repair.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We direct the Secretary of the Navy, not later than June
30, 2014, to submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on ship repair capabilities in Guam--including skilled
personnel, equipment, and facilities--in support of Department
of the Navy capabilities needed to sustain United States naval
forces readiness in the Guam region.
Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States for
emergency or critical medical treatment
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1032) that would provide the Secretary of Defense the
authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at the
Guantanamo detention facility (GTMO) to a Department of Defense
medical facility for the sole purpose of providing emergency or
critical medical treatment if such treatment is not available
at GTMO and is necessary to prevent death or imminent
significant injury or harm to the individual's health.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Assessment of affiliates and adherents of Al-Qaeda outside the United
States
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1036) that would
require an assessment of any group operating outside the United
States that is an affiliate or adherent of, or otherwise
related to, Al Qaeda; a summary of relevant information
relating to each such group; an assessment of whether each
group is part of or substantially supporting Al Qaeda or the
Taliban, or constitutes an associated force that is engaged in
hostilities against the United States or its coalition
partners; and the criteria used to determine the nature and
extent of each group's relationship to Al Qaeda.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We direct the Secretary of Defense, not later than 120 days
after the enactment of this Act, to provide a briefing to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives that provides definitions and the processes to
determine if an entity is an affiliate, associated force and/or
an adherent of al Qaeda or the Taliban; and an assessment of
the groups or entities that the Department considers to be
affiliates or adherents of al Qaeda.
In consultation with the committees of jurisdiction over
the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 110-
40), we direct the Secretary of State to provide the same
briefing to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives on the aforementioned matters.
Designation of Department of Defense senior official for facilitating
the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1037) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to designate a senior official
within the Department of Defense (DOD) with principal
responsibility for the coordination and management of the
transfer of individuals detained at U.S. Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision. We note that
the Secretary of Defense appointed the senior DOD official
responsible for coordinating and managing transfers of
Guantanamo detainees in October 2013.
Summary of information relating to individuals detained at Guantanamo
who became leaders of foreign terrorist groups
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040A) that
would require the public release of summary information on
individuals formerly detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who have, since being transferred or
released from such detention, become leaders or involved in the
leadership structure of a foreign terrorist group.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Procedures governing United States citizens apprehended inside the
United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military
Force
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040B) that
would affirm the availability of the writ of habeas corpus for
any U.S. citizen apprehended inside the United States pursuant
to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-
40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), and set out certain procedural
requirements for any habeas proceeding brought by such a U.S.
citizen.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational facilities for
individuals detained at Guantanamo
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040C) that
would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to
provide additional or upgraded recreational facilities for
individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals detained at
Guantanamo to Yemen
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040D) that
would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to
transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release, of any
individual detained at Guantanamo to the Republic of Yemen or
any entity within Yemen during the period beginning on the date
of enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Department of Defense representation in dispute resolution regarding
surrender of Department of Defense bands of electromagnetic
frequencies
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1052) that would amend section 1062(b)(1) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106-
65) to require that the Department of Defense be adequately
represented to convey its views with the interagency process
for spectrum allocation.
The House bill contained no similar amendment.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People's Republic of China
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1057) that would
amend section 1045(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to extend the date of
the required assessment until August 15, 2014. The section
would also provide not more than 75 percent of the funds made
available to the Office of the Secretary of Defense for travel
may be obligated or expended until 30 days after the Secretary
notifies the appropriate congressional committees that the
assessment has begun.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Subsequent to passage by the House of H.R. 1960, the
Department of Defense entered into a contract with the
Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) to carry out the
requirement of section 1045(b). We have been informed that IDA
was given notice to proceed on this work on September 18, 2013,
and will be required to submit to the Department its draft
report on July 1, 2014, with a formal final report to be
submitted by August 29, 2014. We look forward to the report
assembled by IDA and its panel of independent experts.
Cost estimates for nuclear weapons
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1058) that would
amend section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) to include in the
annual report required by such section a detailed estimate of
the personnel costs associated with sustaining and modernizing
the nuclear deterrent and nuclear weapons stockpile of the
United States. The annual report would also be required to
describe how and which locations were included in the cost
estimate.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Report on plans for the disposition of the Mine Resistant Ambush
Protected vehicle fleet
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1062) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
provide a report on the Department's analysis and plans for the
disposition and sustainment of its fleet of Mine Resistant
Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation activities
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1064) that would
prohibit the obligation or expenditure of funds for any public-
private cooperation activity by a combatant command until the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives receive the Defense Business Board report that
the Secretary of Defense was directed to provide under the
committee report accompanying H.R. 4310 of the 112th Congress
(H. Rept. 112-479).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision. We note that
the specified report was received by the committees in October
2013. We encourage the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the
proper guidance and procedures are in place for such public-
private cooperation activities by the combatant commands and to
consult regularly with the committees regarding the proper
scope and implementation of such activities.
Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 Quadrennial Defense
Review
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1075) that would
require the National Defense Panel (NDP) established pursuant
to subsection 118(f) of title 10, United States Code, to assess
the recommendation of the 2009 Quadrennial Defense Review
Independent Panel (QDRIP), to establish a standing, independent
strategic review panel.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Under the provisions of section 118(f)(9)(A) of title 10,
United States Code, the heads of departments and agencies of
the Department of Defense are required, upon request, to
cooperate with the NDP to ensure that information it considers
necessary to carry out its duties is promptly provided to the
maximum extent practical. It is particularly important for the
NDP to have access, upon request, to information, including
appropriate access to previous studies, data, assumptions,
scenarios, analysis, and recommendations related to the
Department's series of recent strategy and program reviews such
as the Defense Strategic Guidance, Strategic Choices and
Management Review, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Risk Assessment.
Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency operation plan
information to Congress
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1079) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide to the
congressional defense committees an annual report containing
summaries of the Secretary's defense planning guidance and
guidance to the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff for contingency
operation plans. This provision would also prohibit the
obligation or expenditure of 75 percent of the funds,
authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance,
defense-wide, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, until
the Secretary of Defense submits the first report.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Last year's statement of managers to accompany the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239) directs the Secretary of Defense, upon request, to provide
the congressional defense committees with a briefing that
describes the defense planning guidance, as required by section
113 of title 10, United States Code, and from which the budget
request submitted was developed. Such a briefing is
particularly important now given the significant changes in the
strategic and fiscal plans currently under consideration by the
Department. For this reason we expect the Department to provide
the required briefing, upon request, with regard to existing
defense policy guidance used for the Department's fiscal year
2014 budget request. This briefing will serve as a baseline to
help the committees understand any changes to the guidance that
may be adopted in the course of the current review and to
assist with the oversight and assessment of any subsequent
strategic or budgetary changes.
Report on U.S. citizens subject to military detention
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide an annual report on
U.S. citizens subject to military detention.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation
Enduring Freedom
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080B) that
would require the President to submit to Congress a report
containing an estimate of the previous costs of Operation New
Dawn and the long-term costs of Operation Enduring Freedom.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Report on air transportation of supplies for the United States
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1082) that
would: (1) Modify section 2631a of title 10, United States
Code, to provide a preference for Civil Reserve Air Fleet
(CRAF) aircraft for the transportation of Department of Defense
(DOD) supplies; (2) Require the DOD to submit an annual report
regarding use of outsize and oversize cargo flights; and (3)
Amend chapter 401 of title 49, United States Code, to direct at
least 50 percent of the gross tonnage of the equipment,
materials, or commodities that are procured, contracted, or
subcontracted for by the U.S. Government to be transported by
CRAF aircraft.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We agree that the Secretary of Defense should provide a
report to the congressional defense committees within 180 days
of enactment of this Act that includes assessments of the
following:
(1) The effects on CRAF carriers of section 41106 of
title 49, United States Code, and that section's
ability to help the Secretary of Defense support the
goals of the National Airlift Policy and maintain an
adequate industrial base for CRAF carriers;
(2) The percentages of the gross tonnage of the
equipment, materials, or commodities transported on
fixed wing aircraft broken out by organic airlift and
specific commercial carriers;
(4) The volume of outsize and oversize cargo flights,
to include requirements and procedures;
(5) The ability of CRAF carriers to meet requirements
to transport any equipment, materials, or commodities
for the use of U.S. military operations and respond to
a humanitarian disaster; and
(6) Current waiver authorities and whether there is
any need to change those authorities to help the
Secretary of Defense support the goals of the National
Airlift Policy and maintain an adequate industrial base
for CRAF carriers.
Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces from
nonprofit organizations
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1082A) that
would insert a new section after section 402 in title 10,
United States Code, to allow the Secretary of Defense to
transport, on a space available basis and without charge,
supplies that have been furnished by a nonprofit organization
and that are intended for distribution to members of the armed
forces.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
The Secretary of Defense informed us that he already has
the authority to accept donations and gifts for the benefit of
our armed forces, but that the Department of Defense has very
limited resources to receive, screen, and transport donations
and gifts.
Protection of tier one task critical assets from electromagnetic pulse
and high-powered microwave systems
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1086) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to certify to the
congressional defense committees that certain defense critical
assets are protected from the adverse effects of
electromagnetic pulses (EMP) and high-powered microwave (HPM)
systems, and to prepare a plan to ensure protected electrical
power for any such assets that are not certified.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
We note that the Department of Defense (DOD) has in place
well-documented policies and practices for the protection of
defense critical infrastructure against a wide variety of
potential threats and hazards. This all-hazards risk mitigation
and protection approach covers both natural phenomena and man-
made hazards and attacks, including EMP and potential
electrical power disruption, and considers both the probability
and severity of potential hazards.
The Department's Defense Critical Infrastructure Protection
(DCIP) program is focused on mission assurance to meet DOD
needs. It performs recurring analyses of infrastructure
vulnerability and risk mitigation options to reduce
vulnerability and enhance mission assurance in a cost-effective
manner. These assessments result in prioritized plans to
mitigate risks to defense critical infrastructure, which
changes as mission requirements change and as additional
redundancy is established. The Department then takes
appropriate risk mitigation steps according to these
prioritized plans.
In reviewing the methodology supporting this
prioritization, we believe DCIP has institutionalized a process
that can address the type of certification process called for
in the House provision, without injecting unwarranted redundant
assessment or planning processes. We expect the DOD to continue
using the DCIP program to review its assets against EMP and
other emerging threats to ensure ongoing protection efforts
supporting mission assurance. We expect the Department to keep
the congressional defense committees apprised of any
significant updates or changes to the DCIP program, as well as
to the status of any specific infrastructure assets assessed to
have a critical vulnerability to EMP, as they conduct future
assessments.
While we believe the Department has a good process for
evaluating the risks and mitigation measures for EMP through
the DCIP program, we believe that a better understanding of the
intelligence community's views on the threats posed by EMP or
HPM systems would be helpful in understanding what more might
be done by DOD to enhance its protective posture. Therefore, we
direct the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency to
provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives, within 60 days of the
enactment of this Act, on the threats posed to DOD
infrastructure by the natural occurrence or intentional use of
EMP or HPM effects.
Compliance of military departments with minimum safe staffing standards
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1088) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that all military
departments comply with Department of Defense Fire and
Emergency Services Program policy requirements on safe
staffing.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
Determination and disclosure of transportation costs incurred by
Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United
States
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1089) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to determine the cost of the
transportation provided in the case of a trip taken by a
member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or
Senate in carrying out official duties outside the United
States for which the Department of Defense provides
transportation and to provide a written statement of the cost
not later than 10 days after completion of the trip to the
member, officer, or employee involved and to the Committee on
Armed Services of the Senate or the House of Representatives.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We support public disclosure of official foreign travel by
members, officers, and employees of the House of
Representatives and Senate. To this end, we note that section
1754 (b) of title 22, United States Code, contains reporting
and disclosure requirements for congressional travel outside
the United States, including a requirement for reports to be
open to public inspection and published in the Congressional
Record. We recognize there are circumstances under which
transportation provided by the Department of Defense best meets
the needs of congressional delegations, ranging from protecting
the safety and security of the delegation to expediency and
accessing destinations that have little to no commercial air
service. We further note that the Committees on Armed Services
of the Senate and the House of Representatives each maintain
policies and processes to provide further oversight of travel
requests by members and employees of the committees.
Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the Tethered
Aerostat Radar System
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1091) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer to the
Department of Homeland Security the Tethered Aerostat Radar
System (TARS).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the transfer of the TARS program took place
after the House bill was written.
Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security
activities
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1092) that would
amend section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, to permit
the Secretary of Defense to transfer personal property to
border security activities in consultation with the Secretary
of Homeland Security.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
We note that that the Department of Homeland Security can
participate in the sale or donation of excess personal property
for border security activities under the current law.
We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to
conduct a study of the Department of Defense's process for
disposing of surplus personal property, focusing on: (1) an
overview of how the disposal process works in practice; (2) the
means used to dispose of surplus property; and (3)
recommendations to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of
the current disposal process.
Unmanned aircraft systems and National Airspace
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1093) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense to enter into a memorandum
of understanding with a non-Department of Defense entity that
is engaged in the test range program authorized under section
332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public
Law 112-95) to allow such entity access to non-regulatory
special use airspace if such access: (1) is used by the entity
as part of such test range program; and (2) does not interfere
with the activities of the Secretary or otherwise interrupt or
delay missions or training of the Department of Defense (DOD).
The underlying Act authorized the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to identify up to six test ranges at which
interested parties could develop and test procedures under
which the FAA might allow access to the National Airspace
System on a routine basis.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
However, we agree that: (1) developing established
procedures to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the
National Airspace System will be very important in allowing
both DOD and non-DOD entities to train with and operate these
systems on a routine basis; and (2) developing these procedures
could include the use of FAA-designated DOD non-regulatory
special use airspace.
Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain federal property
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1094) that would
require that, on federal installations, the National League of
Families POW/MIA Flag be displayed on all days on which the
flag of the United States is displayed.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1095) that would
express the sense of Congress on the use of improvised
explosive devices against members of the United States Armed
Forces or people of the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard and Military
Reserve force
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1096) that would
express the sense of Congress that (1) the Secretary of Defense
should make every effort to ensure the Military Reserve and
National Guard forces are sustained by a fully-manned and
fully-funded force and that the United States fulfill its
longstanding commitment to unyielding readiness in terms of
defense; (2) the Secretary of Defense should act with the
knowledge that the National Guard and Reserves are critical
components of the armed forces, particularly as a means of
preserving combat power during a time of budget austerity; and
(3) Congress repudiates proposals to diminish the National
Guard or Reserves and affirms the growth of these components as
circumstances warrant.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Access of employees of congressional support offices to Department of
Defense facilities
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1097) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide employees of any
congressional support office who work on issues related to
national security with access to facilities of the Department
of Defense in the same manner, and subject to the same terms
and conditions, as employees of the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We encourage the Secretary of Defense to implement
procedures for providing Pentagon access to employees of
congressional support offices similar to the procedures
currently used to provide access to Government Accountability
Office employees and to keep the Committees on Armed Services
of the Senate and the House of Representatives informed of the
progress of implementing such procedures.
Cost of wars
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1098) that would
require the Department of Defense to post on its public web
site the costs of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that reports on the costs of the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq have been published by the Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) and the Congressional Research Service
(CRS). We further note that CBO reports are publicly available
and published on the Internet, and CRS reports are available to
Members of Congress.
Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign languages and
cultures in the building of partner capacity
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099) that would
express the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense
(DOD) should take into consideration foreign languages and
cultures in DOD's training, tools and methodologies for
military-to-military activities and building partner capacity.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision. We encourage
the DOD to incorporate the consideration of foreign languages
and cultures into its training and procedures for engaging in
and benefiting from military-to-military cooperation and
building partner capacity activities.
Sense of Congress regarding preservation of second amendment rights of
active duty military personnel stationed or residing in the
District of Columbia
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099A) that
would express the sense of Congress that active duty military
personnel who are stationed or residing in the District of
Columbia should be permitted to exercise fully their rights
under the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States and therefore should be exempt from the District of
Columbia's restrictions on the possession of firearms.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Title XI--Civilian Personnel Matters
One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium
pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian
employees working overseas (sec. 1101)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1101) that would
authorize the head of an executive agency to waive limitations
on the aggregate of basic and premium pay payable through
calendar year 2014 to an employee who performs work in an
overseas location that is in the area of responsibility of the
Commander, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), or a location that
was formerly in CENTCOM but has been moved to an area of
responsibility of the Commander, U.S. Africa Command, in
support of a contingency operation or an operation in response
to a declared emergency. The amount payable may not exceed the
total annual compensation payable to the Vice President under
section 104 of title 3, United States Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances,
benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a
combat zone (sec. 1102)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1102) that would
authorize temporary discretionary authority to federal agencies
to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities comparable to
those provided to members of the foreign service to an agency's
civilian employees on official duty in a combat zone. This
authority would expire at the end of fiscal year 2015.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian
employees of the Department of Defense (sec. 1103)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1103) that would
amend section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, to
extend through September 30, 2015, the authority of the
Secretary of Defense or the secretary of a military department
to allow certain civilian employees to volunteer for reduction-
in-force separations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1101) that would amend section 3502(f)(5) of title 5,
United States Code, to extend through September 30, 2018, the
authority of the Secretary of Defense or the secretary of a
military department to allow certain civilian employees to
volunteer for reduction-in-force separations.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to
Department of Defense employees (sec. 1104)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1104) that would
amend section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, to
extend until October 1, 2018, the authority for the Secretary
of Defense or the secretary of a military department to pay the
total amount of severance pay to an eligible civilian employee
in one lump sum.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1102).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense
Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART)
Defense Education Program and assessment of STEM and other
programs (sec. 1105)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1105) that would
increase the flexibility of the Secretary of Defense to
determine the amount of the financial assistance delivered by
the Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation
(SMART) program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1105).
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment requiring an assessment of the SMART program, as well
as for the National Security Science and Engineering Faculty
Fellowship (NSSEFF) program, and a number of Department of
Defense Pre-Kindergarten through 12th grade Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) programs.
Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel
(sec. 1106)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1106) that would
authorize for an additional 10 years the Information Technology
Exchange Program for the Department of Defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would authorize for an additional 5 years the Information
Technology Exchange Program for the Department of Defense.
Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense
research and engineering facilities (sec. 1107)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1107) that would
establish new authorities for the direct hiring and management
of personnel at Department of Defense (DOD) Science and
Technology Reinvention Laboratories. Specific elements
addressed qualified candidates possessing a bachelor's degree,
qualified veterans, students, members of the Senior Executive
Service (SES), Senior Scientific Technical Managers (SSTM), and
specially qualified scientific and professional personnel
(known as ST).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1107) that contained a number of similar elements of the
House provision, namely the direct hiring authority for
qualified candidates possessing a bachelor's degree as well as
qualified veteran candidates.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that removes elements relating to students, SESs, and
STs.
We note that there have been concerns raised about the
management of the senior scientific and technical workforce
within DOD laboratories. Therefore, we direct the Under
Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to submit a
briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives within 90 days of the enactment of
this Act on challenges to the management of the scientific and
technical workforce of the Department, and recommendations for
possible actions to improve such management. In preparing this
briefing, the Under Secretary shall work with the relevant
science and technology executives and personnel leadership in
the Services to identify challenges to this workforce and
examine opportunities to change policies and practices to
improve the effectiveness and efficiencies of management
procedures and practices. We note that DOD laboratories need to
have streamlined, effective, and efficient personnel system
practices in order to be competitive employers of world-class
scientific and technical talent.
Furthermore, as a subset of this review, we believe that
the Department should also examine the mechanisms for bringing
in interns and other undergraduate students from cooperative
education programs into the Department's laboratories to
determine if existing means are effective, and to propose any
changes that might be necessary to improve those programs.
Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian
personnel (sec. 1108)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1108) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations, no
later than 45 days after the enactment of this Act,
implementing the authority provided in subsection (a) of
section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision with an amendment
that would require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe
regulations, no later than 90 days after the enactment of this
Act, implementing the authority provided in subsection (a) of
section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010.
Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for
civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and
injured members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1109)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1109) that would
amend section 1599c of title 10, United States Code, to extend
through December 31, 2020, the existing authority of the
Secretary of Defense to exercise any authority for the
appointment and pay of health care personnel under chapter 74
of title 38, United States Code, for purposes of recruitment,
employment, and retention of civilian health care professionals
for the Department of Defense. The provision would repeal the
now-obsolete section 1599c requirement for the service
secretaries to develop and implement a strategy to disseminate
the authorities and best practices for the recruitment of
medical and health professionals.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1104).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Legislative Provision Not Adopted
Flexibility in employment and compensation of civilian faculty at
certain additional Department of Defense schools
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1106) that would amend section 1595(c) of title 10,
United States Code, to add the Defense Institute for Security
Assistance Management and the Joint Special Operations
University to the list of Department of Defense schools at
which the Secretary of Defense may employ and compensate
civilian faculty as the Secretary considers necessary.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the Department of Defense and the military
departments have proposed changes over the past several years
to extend the use of civilian faculty employed under title 10,
United States Code, at Department of Defense schools and
Professional Military Education (PME) programs that provide
less than 10 months of academic instruction. We believe the
Department and the Services have not applied adequate rigorous
analysis of and justification for these requests. Section 1124
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990
and 1991 (Public Law 101-189) expanded the authority to employ
civilian faculty at PME schools beyond the Naval War College to
the National Defense University, the Army War College and
United States Army Command and General Staff College, the
Marine Corps Command and Staff College and Air University for
principal courses of instruction of at least 10 months. As
stated in the Report of the Panel on Military Education of the
One Hundredth Congress of the Committee on Armed Services,
House of Representatives, the intent of the expansion was that
intermediate and senior PME schools were graduate level
programs of instruction and civilian instructors were key to
maintaining a high quality of instruction. The panel believed
competitive civilian faculty could help attract other quality
faculty from civilian education institutions and add depth to
the curriculum, thus improving the quality of instruction. We
believe this principle still applies in today's environment and
that the employment of civilian faculty under title 10, United
States Code, at PME institutions and schools should be reserved
for courses of instruction that are graduate level in nature.
Therefore, we direct the Secretary of Defense to review the
civilian faculty requirements for all Department of Defense and
PME schools, universities, and institutes to determine if there
are graduate level courses of instruction that are less than 10
months in duration that may be authorized the employment of
civilian faculty under title 10, United States Code. The review
should include by-program justification for the utilization of
civilian instructors rather than military instructors or
contract instructors, and an accompanying cost-benefit
analysis. The Secretary of Defense shall submit the findings of
the review and any recommendations for changes to the
employment of civilian faculty to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives no
later than March 1, 2015.
Title XII--Matters Relating to Foreign Nations
Subtitle A--Assistance and Training
Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build
the capacity of foreign military forces (sec. 1201)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1201) that would
extend and modify the authority under section 1206 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public
Law 109-163), as amended, to conduct a program to build the
capacity of foreign military forces to conduct counterterrorism
operations or stability operations (the ``global train and
equip program''). The provision would expand the purposes for
which train and equip assistance may be provided under this
program, and expand the types of security forces that may
receive such assistance. The provision would also require that
information be submitted, as part of the annual budget
justification materials, on the planning and execution of the
global train and equip program for the coming fiscal year. The
limitation on funds available for the program would be
increased from $350.0 million to $425.0 million per fiscal
year, and the termination of the program would be extended
until September 30, 2016. Finally, the House provision would
repeal existing authorities for training and equipping
counterterrorism forces in Yemen and East Africa.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1201) that would extend the authority for the global
train and equip program through fiscal year 2018 and require a
report on counterterrorism-related assistance under the
program.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would maintain the current purposes for which
train and equip assistance may be provided under the program,
specifically building capability relating to the conduct of
counterterrorism operations, and military and stability
operations in conjunction with U.S. forces. The amendment would
expand the types of forces that may receive assistance under
the program to include a foreign country's security forces with
a counterterrorism mission. We recognize that in certain
countries the lead counterterrorism unit is not located in the
Ministry of Defense (MOD).
The provision included in the agreement would also limit
the level of funding available annually for the global train
and equip program to $350.0 million and extend the authority
for the program through fiscal year 2017. In addition, funds
available for fiscal year 2015 would be restricted to no more
than $262.5 million until the Secretary of Defense, with the
concurrence of the Secretary of State, submits a non-binding
report on the proposed planning and execution of fiscal year
2015 programs intended to be conducted or supported under the
authority to build the capacity of a foreign country's security
forces, other than MOD forces, to conduct counterterrorism
operations.
The provision in the agreement would include the reporting
requirement from the Senate provision regarding
counterterrorism-related assistance, but would not include the
House provision's repeal of existing authorities for training
and equipping security forces in Yemen and East Africa.
Global Security Contingency Fund (sec. 1202)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1203) that would
make certain technical amendments to the authority for the
Global Security Contingency Fund (GSCF) under section 1207 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81), including changes to the notification
requirements. The provision would also require a report to the
specified congressional committees on the guidance and
processes for the GSCF.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1202) making technical changes to GSCF.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
and clarifying amendment.
We are concerned about the procedures and processes for
implementation of the GSCF program and the coordination of GSCF
activities with other programs for building partner capacity.
Therefore, the Comptroller General is directed to conduct a
review of the procedures and processes established by the
Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of State (DOS) to
administer and implement activities funded by GSCF.
Specifically, the Comptroller General is directed to review:
(1) The process for the DOS and DOD, including the
defense agencies and the combatant commands, to
identify proposed GSCF activities;
(2) The extent to which DOD, in conjunction with DOS,
has procedures in place to review, prioritize, and
approve activities to be funded through GSCF and
coordinate those activities with other programs to
build partner capacity; and
(3) The extent to which DOD, in conjunction with DOS,
has developed a monitoring and evaluation framework to
measure the effectiveness of the activities implemented
and funded by the GSCF.
The Comptroller General is directed to submit the report
containing the findings of this review to the relevant
congressional committees by October 1, 2014. For purposes of
this requirement, the relevant congressional committees are the
Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Relations, and
Appropriations of the Senate and the Committees on Armed
Services, Foreign Affairs, and Appropriations of the House of
Representatives.
Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces
with military and other security forces of friendly foreign
countries (sec. 1203)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1203) that would permit the Secretary of Defense to
authorize training with the military forces or other security
forces of a friendly foreign country in order to prepare the
U.S. armed forces to train the military forces or other
security forces of a friendly foreign country and enhance
interoperability. Training with foreign military forces under
this authority must be in the U.S. national interest and
consistent with U.S. national security strategy as well as the
recent presidential guidance on security sector assistance.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would: (1) Modify elements of the annual
reporting requirement; (2) Add a section relating to the types
of training authorized; (3) Provide for coordination and
concurrence of the Secretary of State; (4) Establish a
notification requirement; and (5) Define for purposes of the
delivery of the annual report the appropriate congressional
committees.
We are concerned about the deteriorating readiness of U.S.
general purpose forces, particularly ground forces, to conduct
their mission-essential tasks. We intend to monitor the
execution of this authority closely and expect activities
authorized by this provision to be used in a way that most
effectively supports the readiness requirements of U.S. forces.
Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign
countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass
destruction (sec. 1204)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1205) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense, in concurrence with the
Secretary of State, to provide assistance to the military and
civilian response organizations of certain foreign countries in
the region around Syria in order for such countries to respond
effectively to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1206) that would authorize the Secretary of
Defense to provide such assistance to foreign nations, without
limiting the assistance to countries in the region around
Syria.
The agreement includes a provision that would incorporate
elements of each bill provision. It would provide the authority
for the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance to the
military and civilian first responder organizations of the
nations that border Syria, and to provide such assistance to
other nations if the Secretary notifies the congressional
defense committees of the Secretary's intention to do so. The
provision would also require reports for each year in which the
authority is used, including details on the assistance provided
and the costs incurred. The provision would also require the
Secretary to provide notification if the Secretary plans to use
more than $4.0 million for the program in a fiscal year.
Finally, the authority provided in the provision would expire
after September 30, 2017.
Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program (sec. 1205)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1204) that would
codify the National Guard State Partnership Program in chapter
1 of title 32, United States Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, to establish a
program for bilateral or multilateral military-to-military
exchanges with the National Guard of a State or territory and
the national military forces of a foreign nation (``State
Partnership Program''). The provision would also require the
publication of new regulations to modify existing regulation to
conform to this new authority; provide certain authorization
for the payment of expenses; require a series of notifications
and reports; repeal Section 1210 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123
Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note); and establish a sunset of the
underlying authority at the end of fiscal year 2016.
We intend for engagement with other than the military
forces to be focused--to the maximum extent--on disaster
response or emergency response. For military-to-military
engagement, we anticipate that annual reporting may be done in
tabular format, but that the Department of Defense should
provide a sufficient level of information so that extensive
follow-up is not required. This authority is in no way intended
to preclude National Guard personnel from engaging with
partnered forces under other Department of Defense and State
Department authorities, for example, Joint Combined Exchange
Training (10 U.S.C. 2011) and implementation of Foreign
Military Financing programs (22 U.S.C. 2752).
United States security and assistance strategies in Africa (sec. 1206)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1204) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to
develop a strategic framework for U.S. counterterrorism
assistance and cooperation in North Africa, including but not
limited to programs conducted under the Trans-Sahara Counter
Terrorism Partnership, Operation Enduring Freedom-Trans Sahara,
and other related security assistance activities. The provision
would also require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report
to Congress on the details of this framework, as well as on
lessons-learned from recent developments in Mali and the
region.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical and clarifying amendment. The agreement also includes
provisions that would: (1) Require an interagency strategy that
supports the recent security and political gains in Somalia;
(2) Require a classified intelligence assessment on al Shabaab;
and (3) Designate an existing senior U.S. Government official
with existing interagency authority for export policy for
Africa to coordinate among various U.S. Government agencies
existing export strategies with the goal of significantly
increasing U.S. exports to Africa.
We also acknowledge that the number of armed robbery at sea
and piracy attacks in the Gulf of Guinea are increasing, with
an ongoing pattern of cargo thefts and robbery, often occurring
in the territorial waters of West and Central African states.
Ongoing piracy and armed robbery at sea in the Gulf of Guinea
pose a threat to international navigation, security, and the
economic development of states in the region. It has been the
U.S. strategy to improve the region's trade competitiveness and
encourage the diversification of exports beyond natural
resources. No later than 90 days after enactment of this Act,
we direct the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives on the Department of Defense strategy to use
its existing authorities to build capacity to combat armed
robbery at sea, piracy, and other maritime threats.
We further note the importance of bringing to justice those
individuals who committed, conspired to commit, attempted to
commit, or aided or abetted in the commission of the September
11-12, 2012, terrorist attack on the Special Mission Compound
and Annex in Benghazi, Libya. We note that, in January 2013,
the Secretary of State has authorized a reward of up to $10
million for information leading to the arrest of those
individuals.
Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations
(sec. 1207)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1205) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, upon
a determination from the President that it is in the national
security interests of the United States, to use up to $75.0
million of amounts authorized for the Coalition Support Fund
account in fiscal years 2013 and 2014 to support the border
security operations of the Jordanian Armed Forces.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, with
the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to provide
assistance--on a reimbursable basis--to the Government of
Jordan for purposes of supporting their armed forces efforts to
increase security along the border between Jordan and Syria.
Prior to any reimbursement, the provision would require the
Secretary of Defense that the Government of Jordan is
continuing to support and maintain efforts of the armed forces
of Jordan to increase security or sustain increased security
along the border between Jordan and Syria. Upon such
certification, the Secretary of Defense may provide up to
$150.0 million from fiscal year 2014 funds, to be expended in
fiscal years 2014 and 2015.
Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the
Lord's Resistance Army (sec. 1208)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1207) that would authorize the Department of Defense to
obligate not more than $50.0 million in each fiscal year in
operation and maintenance funding to provide logistical
support, services and supplies, and intelligence support to:
(1) The national military forces of Uganda participating in
operations to mitigate or eliminate the threat posed by the
Lord's Resistance Army (LRA); and (2) The national military
forces of any other countries determined by the Secretary of
Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to be
participating in operations to mitigate or eliminate the threat
posed by the LRA. The Secretary's authority would expire upon
the termination of Operation Observant Compass.
The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 1206).
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would: (1) Extend the underlying authority
through the end of fiscal year 2017; (2) Require the Secretary
of Defense to submit a report relating to various matters
associated with the ongoing operation to support foreign
forces; and (3) Prohibit utilizing 25 percent of the underlying
provision until the Secretary submits the required report to
Congress.
We note that the support provided by U.S. military advisors
was unnecessarily restricted due to interpretation of a combat
exclusion clause and therefore removed it from the existing
authority. We believe that U.S. military advisers should assist
their partners with the full-range of activities short of
direct combat. We note this provision expands the previous
authority and increases the authorized funding level to $50.0
million to provide in-the-field advice, assistance and support
to foreign forces searching for Joseph Kony and his senior
lieutenants, thereby strengthening the training and
capabilities of the foreign forces to counter the LRA's
capabilities in the region. With this expanded authority, we
expect the Department of Defense to continue their progress
towards the mission objectives of Operation Observant Compass.
We remain fully supportive of this advise and assist operation.
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq
Commanders' Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan (sec. 1211)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1213) that would
extend through fiscal year 2014 the authority under section
1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1619), as amended, for the
Commanders' Emergency Response Program (CERP). The provision
would limit the amount of funds available for the program to
$60.0 million.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1211) that would extend the CERP authority for
one year and would require a report on lessons learned and best
practices from the execution of CERP in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration
activities in Afghanistan (sec. 1212)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1212) that would
amend section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383), as
amended, to extend the authority to use Department of Defense
funds to support reintegration activities in Afghanistan and
authorize the use of up to $25.0 million for these purposes.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1213).
The agreement includes this provision.
Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations
for support provided to United States military operations (sec.
1213)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1211) that would
extend for fiscal year 2014 and modify the authority under
section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as amended, to provide
reimbursements to certain nations for support provided to U.S.
military operations in Operation Enduring Freedom. The
provision would limit funds available under this authority
(``Coalition Support Funds'') for fiscal year 2014 to $1.5
billion. The provision would also require that, prior to making
reimbursements to Pakistan, the Secretary of Defense must make
certain certifications to the congressional defense committees,
or invoke a national security waiver.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1215) that would extend the authority under
section 1233 of Public Law 110-181, as amended, for fiscal year
2014. The provision would also extend through fiscal year 2014
the notification requirements, under section 1232(b)(6) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122
Stat. 393) as amended, relating to Coalition Support Funds
reimbursements for Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan.
The provision would further extend the limitations, under
section 1227(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2000), on
reimbursements of Pakistan pending certain certifications
regarding Pakistan.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical amendment.
Extension and modification of authority to support operations and
activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (sec.
1214)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1214) that would
extend for fiscal year 2014 the authority under section 1215 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81), as amended by section 1211 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
329), for the Secretary of Defense to use up to $209.0 million
in funds to support the operations and activities of the Office
of Security Cooperation in Iraq (OSC-I). The provision would
also authorize the OSC-I during fiscal year 2014 to conduct
non-operational training of Iraqi Ministry of Defense (MOD)
personnel in an institutional environment to build certain
capabilities of the Iraqi security forces.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1212) that would extend for fiscal year 2014
the authority to fund the OSC-I under section 1215 of Public
Law 112-81, as amended. The provision would also authorize the
OSC-I during fiscal year 2014 to conduct non-operational,
institution-based training of Iraqi MOD and Counter Terrorism
Service personnel. Such training would be required to include
elements that promote the observance of and respect for human
rights and fundamental freedoms, military professionalism, and
respect for legitimate civilian authority within Iraq.
The agreement includes the provision in the Senate
committee-reported bill.
An issue of concern is the safety and security of the
residents of Camp Liberty (Hurriya), Iraq, and impediments to
their resettlement in other countries. We direct the Secretary
of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the
Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Attorney General, to
submit a report on the current security situation at Camp
Liberty and efforts to relocate the camp residents to other
countries. The report should include:
(1) A description of the current security situation
at Camp Liberty, the disposition of security resources
such as T-walls and sandbags, and decisions by camp
residents on how to use those resources;
(2) A description of the status review and
resettlement process conducted by the United Nations
High Commissioner on Refugees (UNHCR), a discussion of
the degree of cooperation by camp residents with that
process, and an estimate of when that process is
expected to be completed;
(3) An estimate as of the date of the report on the
number of residents still at Camp Liberty, the number
of residents that have received refugee status, the
number of residents that have been relocated (including
to which countries), and the countries that have
indicated a willingness to receive resettled residents;
and
(4) A discussion of the steps that would need to be
taken by recipient countries, the UNHCR, and the camp
residents to relocate the residents to other countries.
The report should be provided not later than 120 days after
the date of enactment of this Act to the Committees on Foreign
Relations, Armed Services, Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs and Judiciary of the Senate and the Committees on
Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, Homeland Security, and
Judiciary of the House of Representatives.
One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop
and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan (sec.
1215)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1215) that would
extend the authority under section 1217 of the Ike Skelton
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public
Law 111-383), as amended, for the program to build large-scale
infrastructure projects funded by the Afghanistan
Infrastructure Fund (AIF). The provision would limit the amount
available for the AIF in fiscal year 2014 to $279.0 million.
The provision would also amend the reporting elements of the
plan that must be submitted to the appropriate congressional
committees prior to the use of AIF funds in any given fiscal
year.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1214) that would extend the authority under section 1217
of Public Law 111-383 and limit AIF funding during fiscal year
2014 to $250.0 million. It would also require a report on the
plan for transitioning to the Government of Afghanistan, or a
utility owned by the Government of Afghanistan, the project
management of any projects funded with fiscal year 2014 AIF
funds.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with technical
and clarifying amendments. We believe that with the drawdown of
U.S. troops in Afghanistan and the approaching conclusion of
the International Security Assistance Force mission at the end
of December 2014, the justification for the Department of
Defense funding large-scale infrastructure projects in
Afghanistan is increasingly attenuated. We expect that the
Department of Defense will cease AIF funding for any new large-
scale infrastructure projects after fiscal year 2014.
Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan
in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by
Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by
Afghanistan (sec. 1216)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1217) that would
require the withholding of Department of Defense (DOD)
assistance for Afghanistan during fiscal year 2014 in an amount
equal to the total of all taxes assessed during fiscal year
2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on assistance provided by
DOD. The Secretary of Defense would be able to waive this
requirement if the Secretary determines that doing so is
necessary to achieve U.S. goals in Afghanistan.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would provide that the requirements of this
section terminate on the date when the Secretary of Defense
notifies the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
House of Representatives that a bilateral security agreement
between the United States and Afghanistan has entered into
force.
Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces
supporting or participating with the United States Armed Forces
(sec. 1217)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1216) that would extend through fiscal year 2014 the
authority under section 1234 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as
amended, to provide logistical support to coalition partners in
Afghanistan.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would extend
through December 31, 2014, two authorities for supporting
foreign forces participating in coalition operations with U.S.
armed forces. First, the provision would extend the authority
under section 1234 of Public Law 110-181 to provide logistical
support to coalition partners in Afghanistan. Second, the
provision would extend the authority under section 1202 of the
John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2007 (Public Law 109-364), as amended, to use acquisition and
cross-servicing agreements to loan personnel protection
equipment to partner nations in coalition operations and in
connection with training for deployment to such operations. The
Department has requested the extension of both of these
authorities in connection with coalition operations in
Afghanistan.
Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program
(sec. 1218)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1218) that would
make certain improvements to the Iraq Special Immigrant Visa
program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1217).
The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported bill
provision with a technical/clarifying amendment.
Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program (sec. 1219)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1219) that would
make improvements to Afghan Special Immigrant Visa program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1218).
The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported bill
provision with a technical/clarifying amendment.
Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014
Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities and
finances (sec. 1221)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1221) that would
modify the report required under section 1230 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-
181), as amended, to require additional reporting semi-annually
on: The redeployment of U.S. armed forces from Afghanistan; the
transfer of Department of Defense tasks and functions to other
entities as part of the transition; and the long-term
capability of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to
sustain infrastructure projects constructed for the ANSF.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
President to submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a
report on U.S. Government activities and plans to disrupt and
degrade Haqqani Network activities and finances. The provision
sets out specific elements of the report, which would be
required to be submitted not later than 9 months after the date
of enactment of this Act.
Completion of accelerated transition of security responsibility from
United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security
Forces (sec. 1222)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1222) that would
set out the policy of the United States and a sense of Congress
relating to the security transition and the post-2014 U.S.
military presence in Afghanistan.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
We expect the Department of Defense to note the cost of any
post-2014 presence in its budget request so that Congress can
appropriately consider the presence and maintain oversight of
U.S. efforts in Afghanistan.
Defense Intelligence Plan (sec. 1223)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1223) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional
defense and intelligence committees a plan regarding defense
intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of U.S. forces
in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. The provision would
require the plan to include a description of the defense
intelligence assets; a description of any such assets that are
slated to remain in Afghanistan after December 31, 2014; a
description of any such assets that will be, or have been,
reallocated to other locations outside of the United States;
the defense intelligence priorities that will be, or have been,
addressed with the reallocation of such assets; the necessary
logistics, and operation and maintenance plans, to operate in
the locations where such assets will be, or have been,
reallocated, including personnel, basing, and any host country
agreements; and a description of any such assets that will be,
or have been, returned to the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for
Afghanistan (sec. 1224)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1224) that would
restrict the availability of funds for certain authorities in
Afghanistan until 15 days after the Secretary of Defense
certifies that the United States and the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan have concluded a Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA)
that meets certain specified criteria.
The Senate committee-reported bill contains no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would limit the availability of funds for
certain authorities in Afghanistan to no more than 50 percent
of the amount authorized to be appropriated until 15 days after
the Secretary of Defense certifies that a BSA has been signed
that is in the national security interest of the United States.
The Secretary of Defense would be authorized to waive the
requirements of this provision if the Secretary determines that
doing so is in the U.S. national security interest. If the
waiver is invoked, the Secretary of Defense is directed to
brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the
House of Representatives on the basis for the determination.
We believe that such a BSA should ensure that:
(1) the Department of Defense, its military and
civilian personnel, and its contractors are protected
from liability to pay taxes or other similar charges
associated with efforts to carry out missions in
Afghanistan that have been mutually agreed to between
the U.S. Government and the Afghan Government;
(2) the United States has exclusive legal
jurisdiction over U.S. Armed Forces deployed in
Afghanistan;
(3) the right of self-defense of the U.S. military
mission and of U.S. military personnel is not
infringed;
(4) the U.S. military in Afghanistan is able to take
the necessary measures to protect other U.S. Government
offices and personnel in Afghanistan; and
(5) the U.S. military has sufficient access to bases
and freedom of movement to carry out such missions and
activities as the President assigns the military in
Afghanistan, including the continuing effort to counter
al Qaeda and its associated forces.
Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran
Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation
Council countries (sec. 1231)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1231) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the
congressional defense committees, within 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, on the United States military
partnership with the Gulf Cooperation Council countries.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
technical/clarifying amendment.
Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran (sec.
1232)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1232) that would
amend section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84) by requiring the
Secretary of Defense to provide information on the global
Iranian threat network and how the Iranian threat network
reinforces the grand strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Additionally, this section would require the Secretary of
Defense to provide a list of gaps in intelligence and to
prioritize those gaps by operational need.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the report to include a section on
Iran's global network of terrorist and criminal groups and the
associated capabilities of those entities.
We urge the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to
describe the Department of Defense's gaps in intelligence
associated with Iran's global network of terrorist and criminal
groups when the Chairman prepares the report required under
section 1231 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239).
Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in
Southwest Asia (sec. 1233)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1234) that would
amend Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961
(22 U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) to allow for multilateral missile
defense exercises.
The Senate committee-reported bill included no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters
Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted
recovery capabilities (sec. 1241)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1202) that would
extend the authority of the Department of Defense to establish,
develop, and maintain non-conventional assisted recovery (NAR)
capabilities for 3 additional years.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1231) that would extend the authority of the
Department of Defense to establish, develop, and maintain non-
conventional assisted recovery capabilities for 2 additional
years.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
We remain concerned about the lack of clarity in the
reporting of NAR activities to include planning,
prioritization, and execution and have included a statement on
their concerns in the classified annex accompanying this
report.
Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on military
and security developments involving the People's Republic of
China (sec. 1242)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1232) that would add a requirement for the Department of
Defense to include information on China's 5th generation
fighter programs in the congressionally-mandated Annual Report
on Military and Security Developments Involving the People's
Republic of China.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
To improve insight into the dynamics of the relationship
and interactions between the United States and the People's
Republic of China and their impact on security, we direct the
Chairman of the United States-China Economic and Security
Review Commission, not later than March 15, 2014, to submit a
report on the mandate and purpose of the Commission to the
appropriate congressional committees.
The report shall include: (1) A summary and description of
the changes that have occurred in the relationship between the
United States and China since December 31, 2000, with respect
to those national security and economic issues that would
impact the mandate of the Commission; and (2) Recommendations
of the Commission for statutory changes to update the mandate
and purpose of the Commission, taking into the account changes
in the relationship between the United States and China.
The appropriate congressional committees include (1) the
Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign
Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee
on Finance of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed
Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on
Appropriations, and the Committee on Ways and Means of the
House of Representatives.
Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond to an
attack or other contingency against United States diplomatic
facilities overseas (sec. 1243)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1241) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, to submit a report, not later
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, to
the Senate Committee on Armed Services, the House Committee on
Armed Services, the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, and
the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, that assesses the
terrorist groups that threaten the United States in Africa and
a description of the readiness, posture, and alert status of
relevant U.S. Armed Forces in Europe, the Middle East, Africa,
and the United States; and any changes implemented since the
terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would make modifications to the required
contents of the report.
Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces
Coordination Centers (sec. 1244)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1245) that would
prohibit the expenditure of funds for the establishment of
Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers (RSCC)
or similar regional entities and require a joint report by the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to be submitted
to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign
Affairs of the House of Representatives.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 342) that would prohibit the expenditure of any
funds for the RSCCs in fiscal year 2014 and direct the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-
Intensity Conflict, in coordination with the Commander of U.S.
Special Operations Command, not later than September 30, 2013,
to submit a report to the congressional defense committees
outlining, at a minimum: (1) the requirement and justification
for the establishment of RSCCs; (2) the number and locations of
planned RSCCs; (3) the projected cost to establish and maintain
the proposed RSCCs in future years; (4) the relevance to and
coordination with other multilateral engagement activities and
academic institutes supported by the geographic combatant
commanders and State Department; and (5) any legislative
authorities that may be needed to establish RSCCs.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Additional reports on military and security developments involving the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (sec. 1245)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1246) that would
amend the report on Military and Security Developments
Involving the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), as
originally required by section 1236 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), to
require the Secretary of Defense to submit the report every 2
years beginning on November 1, 2013, through November 1, 2017.
The section would also require the Secretary of Defense to
submit an update to the report if, in the Secretary of
Defense's estimation, interim events or developments occurring
during the 2-year period between reports requires an update.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
We note that the only change to section 1236 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is that
the report will be submitted every 2 years instead of every
year, and interim reports may be submitted, as needed.
We direct the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with
the Secretary of State, to provide a classified briefing to the
appropriate congressional committees, not later than 270 days
after the date of enactment of this Act, on the following
issues related to the DPRK:
(1) A description of the governmental and economic
activities, including bilateral trade, economic
development, and financial investment, between the
People's Republic of China and the DPRK.
(2) A description of the entities and individuals of
the People's Republic of China engaged in the
activities described under subparagraph (1).
(3) An assessment of the impact of the activities
described under subparagraph (1) on the weapons of mass
destruction program and ballistic missile program of
the DPRK.
The appropriate congressional committees are (1) the
Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Finance, and the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the
Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs,
and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of
Representatives.
Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the Russian
Federation and limitations on providing certain missile defense
information to the Russian Federation (sec. 1246)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1248) that would
limit funds to provide the Russian Federation with access to
certain missile defense information.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 233) that would express the sense of Congress
concerning missile defense cooperation with Russia and would
also limit funds to provide the Russian Federation access to
certain missile defense information.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would express the sense of Congress concerning
missile defense cooperation with the Russian Federation and
would establish several limitations on providing the Russian
Federation with access to certain missile defense information.
Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament Act
(sec. 1247)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1247) that would
modify section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act
(Title 22, United States Code, section 2593a) to define the
appropriate congressional committees to which the annual report
required under section 2593a would be provided. Those
committees are: the Committee on Foreign Relations, the
Committee on Armed Services, and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign
Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives. The provision would also require a briefing to
the appropriate congressional committees each spring on the
most recent version of the report.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile proliferation
(sec. 1248)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1249) that would
require reports on efforts to gain the cooperation of Russia
and China to reduce the spread of technology and expertise that
supports the ballistic missile programs of Iran, North Korea,
Syria, and other nations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to submit a report on steps that have been
taken, and that are planned to be taken, to reduce the spread
of technology and expertise that could support the ballistic
missile development programs of Iran, North Korea, Syria, and
other nations.
We expect the appropriate elements of the Intelligence
Community to brief the appropriate committees of Congress on
the ballistic missile development programs of Iran, North
Korea, and Syria, as well as other nations of proliferation
concern, and the spread of technology and expertise that
supports those programs.
Reports on international agreements relating to the Department of
Defense (sec. 1249)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1250) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Secretary of State, to notify the congressional defense
committees, and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, not later than 15 days
after the date on which a Status of Forces Agreement between
the United States and a foreign nation is signed, renewed,
amended, otherwise revised, or terminated. This section would
apply to such agreements that are signed on or after the date
of the enactment of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit
semi-annually a report on certain agreements pertaining to
matters primarily or significantly related to or involving the
Department of Defense. The amendment would also terminate the
requirement established in this provision on December 31, 2019.
We note that nothing in this section shall be construed to
supersede section 112b of title 1 United States Code (commonly
known as the ``Case-Zablocki Act'').
Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations
and related NATO agreements (sec. 1250)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1252) that would
revise certain references in titles 10 and 22, United States
Code, to reflect recent changes to the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization organizational structure.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1234).
The agreement includes this provision.
Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to ballistic
missile defense (sec. 1251)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1253) that would
limit funds to implement executive agreements relating to the
ballistic missile defense capabilities of the United States,
unless certain conditions are met.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would express the
sense of Congress that any executive agreement between the
United States and the Russian Federation relating to ballistic
missile defense should not limit the development or deployment
of missile defense systems or capabilities of the United States
or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It would also
require the President, or the President's designee, to brief
the appropriate committees of Congress prior to signing an
executive agreement with Russia relating to ballistic missile
defense.
Rule of construction (sec. 1252)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1258) that would
set forth that nothing in this Act shall be construed as
authorizing the use of force against the Syrian Arab Republic
or the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
We note that this provision shall not be construed to
infringe on the President's constitutional authorities to
preserve, protect, and defend the Nation.
Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty
(sec. 1253)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1262) that would
limit the availability of funds available to the Department of
Defense for the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would add a clause stating that nothing in this
provision would preclude the Department of Defense from
assisting foreign countries in bringing their laws and
regulations up to U.S. standards. Should the Secretary of
Defense determine such activities are required and appropriate,
we encourage the Secretary to coordinate, to the maximum extent
practicable, on such activities with the Secretary of State.
Report on military and security developments involving the Russian
Federation (sec. 1254)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1268) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, not later than June 1, 2014,
and annually thereafter through 2017, to submit to the
specified congressional committees a report on the current and
future military power of the Russian Federation. The report
would address the current and probable future course of
military-technological development of the Russian military, the
tenets and probable development of Russian security and
military strategy, and military organizations and operational
concepts, for the 20-year period following the report.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require a one-time report by the Secretary
of Defense to the specified congressional committees on the
security and military strategy of the Russian Federation. The
amendment would require that the report include certain
specified matters.
Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with
Rosoboronexport (sec. 1255)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1274) that would
prohibit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense after fiscal year 2013 for the purchase
of any equipment from the Russian state corporation,
Rosoboronexport, until the Secretary of Defense makes certain
specified certifications to the congressional defense
committees. The Secretary of Defense would be authorized to
waive this restriction if the Secretary certifies that doing so
is in the national security interests of the United States. If
the waiver is invoked, the Secretary is required to submit a
report to Congress not later than 30 days before purchasing
equipment from Rosoboronexport.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1233).
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would clarify that nothing in the Act would
prohibit the supply of spare parts for the sustained
maintenance of helicopters operated by the Afghan National
Security Forces.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic
aid programs of the Department of Defense
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1207) that would
permit that up to 5 percent of funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act to carry out sections 401, 402, 404,
407, 2557, and 2561 of title 10, United States Code, may be
made available to conduct monitoring and evaluation of programs
conducted pursuant to such authorities during fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We understand the Department of Defense is in the process
of developing metrics and incorporating them into existing
program management tools to better monitor and evaluate
overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs of the
Department. However, according to the Department, such efforts
are not expected to be fully implemented for at least 1 to 2
years.
We, therefore, direct the Under Secretary of Defense for
Policy to provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House Representatives on the
status of the Department's implementation efforts no later than
180 days after enactment of this Act. The briefing shall
include, but not be limited to, a status update on metrics
development and implementation, a description of how the
Department plans to evaluate program and project outcomes and
impact, including cost effectiveness and the extent to which
programs meet designated goals, and an analysis of steps taken
to implement the recommendations from the following reports:
(1) The Government Accountability Office's Report titled
``Project Evaluations and Better Information Sharing Needed to
Manage the Military's Efforts''; (2) The Department of Defense
Inspector General Report numbered ``DODIG-2012-119''; and (3)
The RAND Corporation's Report prepared for the Office of the
Secretary of Defense titled ``Developing a Prototype Handbook
for Monitoring and Evaluating Department of Defense
Humanitarian Assistance Projects.''
Special Immigrant Visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1216) that would
make certain amendments to section 602(b) of Afghan Allies
Protection Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-8) and section 1244 of
the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-181).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress on commencement of new long-term nation building or
large-scale infrastructure development projects in Afghanistan
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1219) that would express the sense of Congress that the
Department of Defense should seek not to commence any new long-
term nation building or large-scale infrastructure development
project in Afghanistan after 2014.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision. We expect
that, with the conclusion of the International Security
Assistance Force mission at the end of 2014, the Department of
Defense should no longer seek to begin new large-scale
infrastructure development projects in Afghanistan.
Sense of Congress
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1220) expressing
the Sense of the House of Representatives that the Special
Immigration Visa programs for Iraqis and Afghans are critical
to the U.S. national security, and that these programs must be
reformed and extended in order to meet the congressional intent
with which they were created.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or
bases in Afghanistan
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1225) that would
prohibit the use of funds to establish any military
installation or base for the permanent stationing of U.S. armed
forces in Afghanistan.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1233) that would
express the sense of Congress with respect to the importance of
the defense of the Arabian Gulf.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We believe that the United States should continue to
maintain the appropriate posture to defend the Arabian Gulf.
Statement of policy on condemning the Government of Iran for its state-
sponsored persecution of its Baha'i minority
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1235) that would
condemn the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its
persecution of its Baha'i minority in Iran.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that both the U.S. House of Representatives and the
U.S. Senate have passed similar resolutions condemning the
actions of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran as it
relates to the Baha'i minority.
Technical correction relating to funding for NATO Special Operations
Headquarters
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1235) that would make technical modifications to section
1244 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (Public Law 111-84), as amended, that would authorize the
Secretary of Defense to use up to $50.0 million from Operation
and Maintenance in any fiscal year to support the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Special Operations Headquarters.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national security
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1242) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Secretary of State, to submit a report that contains a plan for
United States military assistance and cooperation with Egypt.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note the continuing national security interests of the
United States in ensuring that the Government of Egypt enhances
its ability to detect, disrupt, dismantle, and defeat terrorist
organizations and that Egypt remains a stable, strategic
partner in the region. We urge the Secretary of Defense to
ensure that any plan to modernize and improve U.S. security
cooperation with and assistance to Egypt addresses these
matters.
Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean peninsula
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1243) that would
express certain findings and the sense of Congress regarding
the military developments on the Korean peninsula.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1244) that would
express findings and a statement of Congress with respect to
the Republic of Georgia.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1251) that would
express the sense of Congress with respect to the situation in
Syria.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction Engagement
activities and United States contributions to the Comprehensive
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1254) that would
provide that none of the funds made available for fiscal year
2014 for Threat Reduction Engagement activities may be
obligated or expended until the President certifies to Congress
that no state party to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban
Treaty (CTBT) has undertaken nuclear weapons test activities in
fiscal year 2013 that are inconsistent with U.S.
interpretations regarding obligations under such Treaty.
This section would also provide that none of the funds made
available for fiscal year 2014 for contributions to the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization may be used for
lobbying or advocacy in the United States relating to the CTBT.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that regarding lobbying and advocacy activities in
the United States by the Comprehensive Ban Treaty Organization
(18 U.S.C. 1913) prohibits such activities.
Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation between the
United States and Burma
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1255) that would
express the sense of Congress regarding military-to-military
cooperation between the United States and the Union of Burma.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
We have a pronounced interest in the status of military-to-
military relations between the United States and the Union of
Burma and support efforts to enhance military professionalism,
accountability, and civilian controls. We recognize that high
standards of military professionalism, strict accountability,
and effective civilian controls reduce the risks of abuse
committed by military forces and encourage the Secretary of
Defense to keep the congressional defense committees informed
of military-to-military engagements between the United States
and the Union of Burma.
Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces in Europe
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1256) that would
express certain findings and the sense of Congress with respect
to the stationing of U.S. armed forces in Europe.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that an enduring U.S. presence and engagement with
allies and other partners across Europe and Eurasia provides
critical access and infrastructure necessary to accomplish U.S.
strategic priorities and to facilitate a rapid U.S. response
for complex contingencies in Europe, Eurasia, the Middle East,
Africa as well as the Mediterranean and Atlantic Ocean. We
further note that the United States continues to have an
interest in supporting the stability and security of Europe.
Accordingly, we direct the Secretary of Defense, not later
than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, to
provide the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the
House of Representatives a report on:
(1) The plans, if any, of the Department of Defense
to maintain and enhance the capabilities of the
forward-stationed active duty service members, forward-
deployed rotational units, and reserve forces assigned
to U.S. European Command to fulfill U.S. commitments
under Article V of the North Atlantic Charter and other
missions vital to protecting U.S. national security
interests;
(2) The plans, if any, of the Department of Defense
to maintain and enhance the capabilities of such forces
to provide logistical and operational support to U.S.
Central Command, U.S. Africa Command, and U.S.
Strategic Command; and
(3) The steps, if any, that the Department of Defense
has taken to implement the recommendations of the
Government Accountability Office with regard to
improved cost estimation to support informed force
posture decisions with regard to the stationing of U.S.
armed forces in Europe.
Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People's Republic of
China
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1257) that would
express certain findings and the sense of Congress regarding
the military developments of the People's Republic of China.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
We reaffirm our interest in the Asia-Pacific region and the
implementation of the rebalance to that region, as described in
the Defense Strategic Guidance, dated January 2012. We
encourage the Secretary of Defense to continue engaging with
the congressional defense committees to facilitate the
successful implementation of the strategic rebalance and to
continue to support the national security interests of the
United States and its allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific
region.
Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1259) that would
express the sense of Congress regarding the diplomatic
allowances granted to high-level Taiwanese officials and
commercial interests.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1260) that would
express the sense of Congress with respect to the threat posed
by Hezbollah.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Combating crime through intelligence capabilities
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1261) that would
authorize the supply of intelligence resources to the Joint
Interagency Task Force South (JIATF-S) in coordination with
U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) to combat crime.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note sequestration and budget restrictions are having a
negative impact not only on readiness and modernization
accounts, but also on the ability of the Department of Defense
(DOD) to carry out ongoing missions.
Budgetary restrictions have drastically reduced the ability
of DOD and partner agencies to allocate assets--particularly as
it pertains to intelligence capabilities to the JIATF-S mission
of countering illicit drug trafficking and disruption of
transnational criminal organizations in the SOUTHCOM area of
responsibility.
We believe that the across-the-board sequestration cuts to
the DOD budget are arbitrary and undermine the national
security of the United States. We encourage the Secretary of
Defense to do as much as practicable to continue key operations
of the geographic combatant commands, such as the
counternarcotics missions of SOUTHCOM and JIATF-S.
War Powers of Congress
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1263) that would
set forth that nothing in this Act shall be construed to
authorize any use of military force.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States citizens
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1264) that would
prohibit the Department of Defense from using drones to kill
U.S. citizens.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sale of F-16 fighter aircraft to Taiwan
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1265) that would
require the sale of no fewer than 66 F-16C/D multirole fighter
aircraft to Taiwan.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
We recognize that the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96-
8) states that ``the United States will make available to
Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such
quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a
sufficient self-defense capability'' and that ``the President
and the Congress shall determine the nature and quantity of
such defense articles based solely upon their judgment on the
needs of Taiwan, in accordance with procedures established by
law.'' We believe the President should continue to take steps,
consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act, to enable the Taiwan
air forces to contribute to a sufficient self-defense
capability.
Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of Israel to self-
defense
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1266) that would
make a statement of policy and require a report on the inherent
right of Israel to self-defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We reaffirm the U.S. commitment to the security of the
State of Israel to help the Government of Israel preserve its
qualitative military edge.
Report on collective and national security implications of Central
Asian and South Caucasus energy development
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1267) that would
require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, to submit to
the appropriate congressional committees a detailed report on
the implications of new energy resource development and
distribution networks, in the areas surrounding the Caspian
Sea, for energy security strategies of the United States and
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives, not later than 90 days after enactment of the
Act, on regional security in the Caucasus region and its
implications for the security interests of the United States
and NATO.
Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other riot control
items
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1269) that would
prohibit funds authorized or appropriated by the House bill
from being used to provide tear gas or other riot control items
to the government of a country undergoing a transition to
democracy in the Middle East or North Africa without
certification from the Secretary of Defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan military
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1270) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress on
measures to monitor and ensure that U.S. financial assistance
to the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) is not being used
to purchase fuel from Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision. We direct
the Secretary of Defense to provide the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a
briefing, within 90 days of the enactment of this Act, on the
Department's measures to monitor and ensure that U.S. financial
assistance to the ANSF is not being used to purchase Iranian
fuel in violation of U.S. sanctions.
Israel's right to self-defense
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1271) that would
express the support of Congress for Israel's lawful exercise of
self-defense including actions to halt regional aggression.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full implementation of United
States and international sanctions on Iran and urging the
President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions
legislation
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1272) that would
express Congress' support for full implementation of U.S. and
international sanctions against Iran and would urge the
President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions
legislation.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons programs of Iran and
North Korea
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1273) that would
express the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed by
nuclear proliferation in North Korea and Iran.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
Title XIII--Cooperative Threat Reduction
Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds (sec.
1301)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1301) that would
define the programs and funds that are Cooperative Threat
Reduction (CTR) programs and funds as those authorized to be
appropriated in section 301 of this Act and specify that CTR
funds shall remain available for obligation for 3 fiscal years.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1301).
The agreement includes this provision.
Funding allocations (sec. 1302)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1302) that would
allocate specific amounts for each program element under the
Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR)
Program from within the overall $528.5 million that the
committee would authorize for the CTR program. This section
would also require notification to Congress 15 days before the
Secretary of Defense obligates and expends fiscal year 2014
funds for purposes other than those specifically authorized. In
addition, this section would provide limited authority to
obligate amounts for a program element under the CTR program in
excess of the amount specifically authorized for that purpose.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1302).
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that provides that for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 the
Department may exceed the 10-percent limitation of section 5965
of title 22, United States Code for activities with respect to
Syria. This enhanced authority is an extraordinary measure that
is without precedent in the CTR program, and we will exercise
congressional oversight to ensure the enhanced authority is
properly and effectively used. We expect the Department to
balance the need for destroying the Syrian chemical weapons
stockpile, an urgent national security threat, with the
expediency of using the CTR funds to assist in this effort.
Given the fluid and urgent nature of this endeavor, the
amendment contains enhanced briefing requirements rather than
detailed reports. We expect these briefings to provide the
appropriate congressional committees with the necessary
detailed information to ensure an accounting of the funding
provided under the program while achieving the ultimate goal of
destroying Syria's chemical stockpile. We expect the Department
to provide, without delay, thorough answers to questions that
might arise during these briefings to ensure adequate oversight
in the use of this enhanced authority.
Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the
cooperative threat reduction program (sec. 1303)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1303) that would
extend the authority of the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR)
program to accept monetary contributions from partner nations,
as set forth in the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84), from December 31, 2015,
to December 31, 2018.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1303).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Strategy to modernize Cooperative Threat Reduction and prevent the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related
materials in the Middle East and North Africa region (sec.
1304)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1304) that would
direct the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the
Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, to prepare a
strategy and implementation plan for preventing the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related
materials in the Middle East and North Africa not later than
March 31, 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1236) requiring the President to prepare such
report and strategy.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would make technical changes.
Title XIV--Other Authorizations
Subtitle A--Military Programs
Working capital funds (sec. 1401)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1401)
authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of
the armed forces and agencies of the Department of Defense for
working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the
funding table in section 4501.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1401).
The agreement includes this provision.
National Defense Sealift Fund (sec. 1402)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1402)
authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the
National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding
table in section 4501.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1402).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (sec. 1403)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1403)
authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of Defense for chemical agents and munitions
destruction, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1403).
The agreement includes this provision.
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug activities, Defense-wide (sec. 1404)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1404)
authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of Defense for drug interdiction and counterdrug
activities, defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in
section 4501.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1404).
The agreement includes this provision.
Defense Inspector General (sec. 1405)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1405)
authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the
Department of Defense for the Office of the Inspector General,
as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1405).
The agreement includes this provision.
Defense Health Program (sec. 1406)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1406)
authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Defense
Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section
4501.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1406).
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile
Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic
and critical materials supply (sec. 1411)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1411) that would
modify certain provisions of the President's authority to
maintain and manage a national defense stockpile to allow the
Defense Logistics Agency to more proactively engage in the
market.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense
Stockpile (sec. 1412)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1412) that would
provide authority to acquire certain additional strategic and
critical materials for the National Defense Stockpile.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Subtitle C--Other Matters
Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration
Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois
(sec. 1421)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1421) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer $143.1 million
from the Defense Health Program to the Joint Department of
Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility
Demonstration Fund created by section 1704 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-
84) for the operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal
Health Care Center.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1422).
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical amendment.
Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home (sec.
1422)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1422) that would
authorize $67.8 million to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014
from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund for the
operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1421).
The agreement includes this provision.
Cemeterial expenses (sec. 1423)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1423) that would
authorize $45.8 million to be appropriated for the Department
of the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial expenses.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Title XV--Authorization of Additional Appropriations For Overseas
Contingency Operations
Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations
Purpose (sec. 1501)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1501) stating
the purpose of the title.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1501).
The agreement includes this provision.
Procurement (sec. 1502)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1502)
authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for
procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine
Corps, the Air Force, and defense-wide activities, as specified
in the funding table in section 4102.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1502).
The agreement includes this provision.
Research, development, test, and evaluation (sec. 1503)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1503)
authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for
the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and
evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1503).
The agreement includes this provision.
Operation and maintenance (sec. 1504)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1504)
authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for
the use of the Armed Forces and other agencies of the
Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, as
specified in the funding table in section 4302.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1504).
The agreement includes this provision.
Military personnel (sec. 1505)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1505)
authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for
the use of the armed forces and other agencies of the
Department of Defense for military personnel, as specified in
the funding table in section 4402.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1505).
The agreement includes this provision.
Working capital funds (sec. 1506)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1506)
authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for
the use of the armed forces and other agencies of the
Department of Defense for working capital and revolving funds,
as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1506).
The agreement includes this provision.
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide (sec. 1507)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1507)
authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for
the Department of Defense for drug interdiction and counterdrug
activities, defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in
section 4502.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1509).
The agreement includes this provision.
Defense Inspector General (sec. 1508)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1508)
authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for
the Department of Defense for the Office of the Inspector
General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the
funding table in section 4502.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1510).
The agreement includes this provision.
Defense Health Program (sec. 1509)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1509)
authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for
the use of the armed forces and other agencies of the
Department of Defense for the Defense Health Program, as
specified in the funding table in section 4502.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1511).
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle B--Financial Matters
Treatment as additional authorizations (sec. 1521)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1521) stating
that the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title
are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be
appropriated by this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 1521).
The agreement includes this provision.
Special transfer authority (sec. 1522)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1522) that would
provide the Department of Defense with $3.0 billion of special
transfer authority in fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1522) that would provide the Department of
Defense with $4.0 billion of special transfer authority in
fiscal year 2014.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (sec. 1531)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1531) that would
require that funds available to the Department of Defense for
the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (ASFF) for fiscal year
2014 be subject to the specified conditions contained in
section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as amended. The
provision would also require that an office or official be
identified as responsible for each program or activity
supported with ASFF. In addition, the provision would require
that not less than $47.3 million of ASFF for fiscal year 2014
be used for the recruitment and retention of women in the
Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1532) that would require that ASFF for fiscal year 2014
be subject to the specified conditions contained in section
1513 of Public Law 110-181. The provision would also provide
the Secretary of Defense certain authorities for the disposal
of equipment in Afghanistan.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require that not less than $25.0 million
of ASFF for fiscal year 2014 be available to be used for
programs and activities to support the recruitment,
integration, retention, training, and treatment of women in the
ANSF. The amendment would also include certain authorities for
the Secretary of Defense relating to the disposal of equipment
in Afghanistan. In this regard, we direct the Secretary of
Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on the Department's plans for the final disposition of
the C-27A aircraft acquired to build the capabilities of the
ANSF. The report should be submitted not later than 180 days
after the enactment of this Act.
A key objective of the ASFF is to build the capacity of the
ANSF, specifically the Afghan Air Force and the Special Mission
Wing, to operate, maintain, and sustain rotary wing aircraft.
We direct the Secretary of Defense, not later than 180 days
after the date of enactment of this Act, to submit to the
congressional defense committees a report assessing the
potential to incorporate U.S.-manufactured rotary wing aircraft
into the ANSF after the current program of record is completed.
The report should include an estimate of the anticipated costs
(including costs associated with procurement and sustainment),
schedule, and a description of the training required for
potentially incorporating U.S.-manufactured rotary wing
aircraft into the ANSF. The report should also include a
description of any other actions required to be undertaken to
facilitate incorporating such aircraft into the ANSF.
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund (sec. 1532)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1531) that would authorize annual transfer authorities,
current reporting requirements, and other associated activities
for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical/clarifying amendment.
Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization
(sec. 1533)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1532) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to
Congress on the future role of the Joint Improvised Explosive
Device Defeat Organization.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
technical/clarifying amendment.
Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability
Operations in Afghanistan (sec. 1534)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1533) that would extend the authority under section 1535
of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) for the Task Force for
Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. The provision
would limit funding available for the programs of the Task
Force to $63.8 million during fiscal year 2014.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
National Defense Sealift Fund
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1507) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal
year 2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund as specified in
the funding table in section 4502.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 1508) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal
year 2014 for chemical agents and munitions destruction as
specified in the funding table in section 4502.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support
for Operation Observant Compass
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1533) that would
require that none of the amounts authorized to be appropriated
for operation and maintenance by section 1504, as specified in
the funding table in section 4302 of this Act, may be obligated
or expended for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
support for Operation Observant Compass until the Secretary of
Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a
report, required elsewhere in this Act, on Operation Observant
Compass.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Report on U.S. force levels and costs of military operations in
Afghanistan
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1534) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to report to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives
on U.S. forces levels in Afghanistan and the estimated costs of
U.S. military operations in Afghanistan for each of fiscal
years 2015 through 2020.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund to acquire
certain aircraft, vehicles, and equipment
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1535) that would
limit the availability of $2.6 billion of the funds authorized
to be appropriated for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund
(ASFF) until the Secretary of Defense submits a report to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives on the aircraft, vehicles, and equipment to be
purchased with ASFF authorized to be appropriated by this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision. We note that
the Department of Defense has revised its requested funding for
the ASFF, resulting in a reduction of $1.45 billion from the
budget request.
Title XVI--Industrial Base Matters
Subtitle A--Defense Industrial Base Matters
Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of
Department of Defense (sec. 1601)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1601) that would
require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to
conduct an audit of the Department's compliance with
contracting practices and policies related to procurement under
section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, which pertains
to the requirement to buy certain articles from American
sources and is frequently referred to as the ``Berry
Amendment.'' This section would also require the Inspector
General to include the findings of such periodic audits as part
of the semiannual report transmitted to congressional
committees as required by the Inspector General Act of 1978
(Public Law 95-452).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying
amendment.
Foreign space activities (sec. 1602)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1605) that would
prevent the Secretary of Defense from entering into contracts
for commercial satellite services with a covered foreign entity
in a covered foreign country.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would add a determination standard (of
reasonable belief) that the covered foreign entity has an
ownership interest that enables that government to affect
satellite operations. The notice and exception provision has
also been adjusted to require a 7-day notice-and-wait to the
congressional defense committee.
The amendment further contains a provision that prohibits
the President from authorizing or permitting the construction
of a global navigation satellite system ground monitoring
station owned or operated on behalf of a foreign government on
U.S. territory unless the Secretary of Defense and Director of
National Intelligence certify that the ground station will not
be capable of being used to gather intelligence in the United
States or to improve a foreign weapons system. The amendment
contains a national security waiver if certain conditions are
met, and a report to accompany the waiver with a notice to the
appropriate congressional committees 30 days before such waiver
is used. The provision has a sunset period of 5 years following
the date of enactment.
We do not intend this provision to affect general private
or scientific cooperation with other parties.
Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program (sec. 1603)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1606) that would
allow the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and
Engineering to establish a 5-year pilot program to accelerate
the commercialization of basic research innovations from
qualifying institutions.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying
amendment.
Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns
Advancing small business growth (sec. 1611)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1602) that would
require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics to publish, and update annually, a
list of capabilities and characteristics that would enable a
qualified small business concern to become competitive as an
other-than-small business for future contracts awarded by the
Department of Defense.
This section would also require any contract awarded to a
qualified small business concern that would exceed the
applicable receipt-based small business size standard (or if
the contract would exceed $70.0 million in an industry with an
employee based size standard) to include a contract clause that
would encourage the small business to develop the capabilities
and characteristics identified by the Under Secretary if they
desire to remain competitive as other-than-small business in
that industry.
In addition, this section would amend chapter 142 of title
10, United States Code, to enable Procurement Technical
Assistance Centers (PTAC) to provide additional support to
these businesses without the funding and cost-share limitations
that are otherwise applicable to PTAC support.
Finally, this section would require the Secretary of
Defense to submit three annual reports to the congressional
defense committees beginning on March 1, 2015, on the
implementation of the amendments made by this section, along
with any recommendations for improving the Procurement
Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying
amendment.
Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative
Agreement Program (sec. 1612)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1603) that would
amend section 2413 of title 10, United States Code, to allow
the Secretary of Defense to defray up to 65 percent of the
eligible entity's cost of furnishing assistance under the
program and would also amend section 2414 of title 10, United
States Code, to increase limitations on the value of assistance
that may be provided under the program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision.
Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business
concerns (sec. 1613)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1607) that would
amend section 644 of title 15, United States Code, to require
each federal agency to submit a report detailing small business
concerns. This report would include information regarding,
among other concerns, veteran and service-disabled veteran-
owned small businesses.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying
amendment.
Credit for certain small business subcontractors (sec. 1614)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1609) that would
amend section 637d of title 15, United States Code, redefining
pertaining to subcontracting.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying
amendment.
Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts
(sec. 1615)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1611) that would
dismiss the requirements stated in section 802 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 pertaining to
the provisions of section 46 of the Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 657s). The purpose of this provision is to reduce the
number of unnecessarily duplicative reports.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the provision.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-
to-eat
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1604) that would
require the Administrator of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)
not to make any reductions in requirements for war reserve
stocks of meals ready-to-eat (MRE) until a comprehensive
strategy is developed and briefed to the congressional defense
committees.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
We note that the DLA has developed a comprehensive
strategic plan that: ensures an adequate MRE inventory for each
of the Services; maintains the appropriate levels of MRE war
reserves; and provides for a surge capability to support
unforeseen contingencies. We also acknowledge that the DLA has
decided to hold current MRE stock levels steady through the end
of combat operations in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
until the enduring requirement can be fully established.
Program to provide federal contracts to early stage small businesses
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1608) that would
amend section 631 of title 15, United States Code, which would
provide improved access to federal contract opportunities for
early stage small business concerns.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
GAO study on subcontracting reporting systems
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1610) that would
require the Comptroller General to submit a report to the
Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and
to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the
Senate regarding the feasibility of using federal
subcontracting reporting systems.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not contain the provision.
We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to
submit not later than 365 days after enactment of this Act a
report studying the feasibility of using federal subcontracting
reporting systems, including the federal subcontracting
reporting system required by section 2 of the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 and any electronic
subcontracting reporting award system used by the Small
Business Administration, to attribute subcontractors to any
particular contracts in the case of contractors that have
subcontracting plans under section 8(d) of the Small Business
Act that pertain to multiple contracts with executive agencies.
Title XVII--Sexual Assault Prevention and Response and Related Reforms
Subtitle A--Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice
Extension of crime victims' rights to victims of offenses under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1701)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 542) that would
amend chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, to include in
the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) specified rights
for victims of offenses under the UCMJ.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 564) that would require the Secretary of
Defense to recommend modifications to the Manual for Courts-
Martial (MCM) to include in the MCM specified rights for
victims of offenses under the UCMJ.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice
(sec. 1702)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 531) that would
amend Article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
(10 U.S.C. 860) to limit the authority of a court-martial
convening authority to modify the findings and sentence imposed
by a court-martial.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 555).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment and a provision that would amend Article
32, UCMJ, (10 U.S.C. 832) to require the completion of a
preliminary hearing, normally conducted by a judge advocate,
prior to referral to general court-martial for trial of any
charge or specification.
The changes to Article 60, UCMJ, included in the agreement
significantly restrict the ability of a convening authority to
modify the adjudged findings and sentence of a court-martial,
except in limited circumstances.
The provision included in the agreement changes Article 32,
UCMJ, proceedings from an investigation to a preliminary
hearing. Under current law and Rule 405 of the Rules for Court-
Martial, an Article 32, UCMJ, investigation includes inquiry
into the truth of the matters set forth in the charges,
provides a means to ascertain and impartially weigh all
available facts in arriving at conclusions and recommendations,
and serves as a tool of discovery. The agreement establishes
that an Article 32, UCMJ, preliminary hearing has a narrower
objective: (1) To determine whether there is probable cause to
believe an offense has been committed and the accused committed
the offense; (2) Determine whether the convening authority has
court-martial jurisdiction over the offense and the accused;
(3) Consider the form of the charges; and (4) Recommend the
disposition that should be made of the case.
The Secretary of Defense is directed to recommend changes
to Rule 405 of the Rules for Court-Martial and other rules, if
appropriate, in the Manual for Courts-Martial to facilitate the
purposes of the Article 32, UCMJ, preliminary investigation, as
revised by the agreement. Changes to the Manual for Courts-
Martial shall be completed in time to coincide with the
effective date of changes to Article 32, UCMJ, effectuated by
this Act.
Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-
martial for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes
(sec. 1703)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 532) that would
amend Article 43 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice
(section 843 of title 10, United States Code) to eliminate the
5-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for
sexual assault and sexual assault of a child.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 551).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense
in presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim, or a
Sexual Assault Victim Advocate (sec. 1704)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 543) that would
amend Article 46 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10
U.S.C. 846) to require that, upon notice by trial counsel to
defense counsel that trial counsel intends to call a
complaining witness to testify at an investigation under
Article 32, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 842) or
court-martial, the defense counsel shall make all requests to
interview the complaining witness through the trial counsel,
and, if requested by the complaining witness, the defense
counsel interview shall take place only in the presence of the
counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual Assault Victim
Advocate.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 553).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment that would require that, if requested by
an alleged victim of an alleged sex-related offense who is
subject to a request for interview by defense counsel, such
interview shall take place only in the presence of trial
counsel, a counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim
Advocate.
Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of
such offenses by general courts-martial (sec. 1705)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 533) that would
amend article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10
U.S.C. 856) to require that the sentence for a person found
guilty of specified sex-related offenses include, at a minimum,
a dismissal or dishonorable discharge.
The House bill also contained a provision (sec. 550A) that
would amend article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice
(10 U.S.C. 856) to require that the sentence for a person found
guilty of specified sex-related offenses include, at a minimum,
a dismissal or dishonorable discharge and confinement for 2
years.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 554) that would amend article 56 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 856) to require that the sentence
for a person found guilty of specified sex-related offenses
include, at a minimum, a dismissal or dishonorable discharge,
and would limit jurisdiction over these specified sex-related
offenses to a general court-martial.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical amendment.
Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial process
(sec. 1706)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 544) that would
amend Article 60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10
U.S.C. 860(b)) to require that complaining witnesses be
provided an opportunity to submit matters for consideration by
the convening authority before the convening authority acts on
the findings and sentence of a court-martial.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 556) that would amend Article 60(b) of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 860(b)) to: (1) Afford a
complaining witness an opportunity to respond to any clemency
matters submitted by an accused to the convening authority that
refer to the complaining witness; (2) Afford a complaining
witness an opportunity to submit matters to the convening
authority in any case in which findings and sentence have been
adjudged for an offense involving the complaining witness; and
(3) Prohibit the convening authority from considering matters
that go to the character of a complaining witness unless the
matters were presented at the court-martial.
The agreement includes a provision that would amend Article
60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C.
860(b)) to require that a victim be provided an opportunity to
submit matters for consideration by the convening authority
before the convening authority takes action on the findings or
sentence of a court-martial that involved the victim, and to
provide that the convening authority shall not consider any
submitted matters that relate to the character of a victim
unless such matters were presented as evidence at trial and not
excluded at trial.
Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of
Military Justice (sec. 1707)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 562) that would amend Article 125 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice (section 925 of title 10, United States Code)
to prohibit forcible sodomy and bestiality.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor relating
to character and military service of the accused in rule on
initial disposition of offenses (sec. 1708)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 546) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to recommend to the President
a change to the Manual for Courts-Martial that would strike the
character and the military service of the accused from the
factors a commander should consider when deciding how to
dispose of sex-related offenses under the Uniform Code of
Military Justice.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 565) that would require that the discussion
pertaining to Rule 306 of the Manual for Courts-Martial be
amended, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of
this Act, to strike the character and military service of the
accused from the factors a commander should consider in
deciding how to dispose of any offense.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed Forces for
reporting a criminal offense (sec. 1709)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 563) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
prescribe regulations, not later than 120 days after the
enactment of this Act, that prohibit retaliation against an
alleged victim or other member of the armed forces who reports
a criminal offense. This provision would also require the
Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress, not later
than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, setting forth
recommendations as to whether the Uniform Code of Military
Justice should be amended to prohibit retaliation against an
alleged victim or other member of the armed forces who reports
a criminal offense.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Subtitle B--Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code
Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who have been
convicted of certain sexual offenses (sec. 1711)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 531) that would amend chapter 37 of title 10, United
States Code, to prohibit the commissioning or enlistment in the
armed forces of individuals who have been convicted of felony
offenses of rape or sexual assault, forcible sodomy, incest, or
of an attempt to commit these offenses.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding
consideration of request for permanent change of station or
unit transfer by victim of sexual assault (sec. 1712)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 534) that would
amend section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, to
clarify that the requirement for timely determination and
action on an application by a victim of certain sexual offenses
for a change of station or unit transfer applies to the Coast
Guard.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 533).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of the
Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of committing a
sexual assault or related offense (sec. 1713)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 535) that would
authorize service secretaries to provide guidance for
commanders regarding their authority to make a timely
determination and to take action regarding whether a service
member serving on active duty who is alleged to have committed
specified sexual offenses under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice should be temporarily reassigned or removed from a
position of authority or from an assignment, not as a punitive
measure, but solely for the purpose of maintaining good order
and discipline within the unit.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 532).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected
communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited
retaliatory actions (sec. 1714)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 527) that would
amend section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, to enhance
protections for military whistleblowers. The House provision
would: expand the categories of prohibited personnel actions;
expand the class of communications protected under the statute;
increase the time period during which an allegation of reprisal
must be investigated from 60 days to 1 year; require Department
of Defense Inspectors General to make explicit determinations
as to whether a prohibited personnel action had occurred, a
determination that is now made by the Secretary concerned;
require the Secretary concerned, in cases where a violation
occurred, to take corrective action on behalf of the
whistleblower and appropriate disciplinary action against the
individual who committed the prohibited personnel action;
require military legal assistance before a board for correction
of military records on behalf of whistleblowers; and apply the
burdens of proof applicable in civilian whistleblower cases
under title 5, United States Code, to military whistleblower
cases.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 511) that would amend section 1034 of title 10,
United States Code, to: expand the categories of prohibited
personnel actions and class of protected communications under
the statute; increase the time period during which an
allegation of reprisal must be investigated from 60 days to 180
days; retain the authority of the Secretary concerned to make
the determination as to whether reprisal occurred, but require
such Secretary to make such a determination within 30 days of
receiving a report from an Inspector General, and if so
determined, to take corrective action on behalf of the
whistleblower and appropriate disciplinary action against the
individual who committed the prohibited personnel action; and
retain the current burdens of proof applicable to military
whistleblower cases.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would: increase the time period during which an
allegation of reprisal must be investigated from 60 days to 1
year; authorize military legal assistance before a board for
correction of military records on behalf of a whistleblower in
cases where the Judge Advocate General concerned determines
that the whistleblower would benefit from such assistance; and
require that the Inspector General investigation be conducted
outside the immediate chain of command, or at least one
organization higher in the chain of command, relative to the
whistleblower and the person alleged to have taken the
retaliatory action.
Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel
actions taken in response to making protected communications
regarding sexual assault (sec. 1715)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 537) that would
amend section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, to
require the Inspector General to review and investigate
allegations of retaliatory personnel actions for making a
protected communication regarding violations of law or
regulation that prohibit rape, sexual assault, or other sexual
misconduct.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 542).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Designation and availability of Special Victims' Counsel for victims of
sex-related offenses (sec. 1716)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 536) that would
amend chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, to require
service secretaries to designate legal counsel (to be known as
``Victims' Counsel'') for the purpose of providing legal
assistance to an individual eligible for legal assistance who
is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of
whether the report of that offense is restricted or
unrestricted.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 539) that would require the service secretaries
to implement a program to provide a Special Victims' Counsel to
service members who are victims of a sexual assault committed
by a member of the armed forces.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment clarifying the types of legal assistance that may be
provided under this provision.
Subtitle C--Amendments to Other Laws
Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting
organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing
and responding to sexual assaults (sec. 1721)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 522) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to direct service secretaries
to verify and track the compliance of commanding officers in
conducting organizational climate assessments required as part
of the comprehensive policy for the Department of Defense
sexual assault prevention and response program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would amend section 572 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to
require the Secretary of Defense to direct the service
secretaries to verify and track the compliance of commanding
officers in conducting organizational climate assessments.
Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent panel on
assessment of military response systems to sexual assault (sec.
1722)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 549(b)) that
would amend section 576(c)(1)(B) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to
provide that the panel established to conduct an independent
review and assessment of the systems used to investigate,
prosecute, and adjudicate crimes involving sexual assault and
related offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice
would terminate no later than one year after the first meeting
of the panel.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 543).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports and
Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of the
Armed Forces (sec. 1723)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 538) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
ensure that copies of Department of Defense Forms 2910 and 2911
filed in connection with Restricted Reports and Unrestricted
Reports of sexual assault are retained for the longer of 50
years or the period that such forms are required to be retained
pursuant to Department of Defense directives.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by members of the
National Guard and Reserves (sec. 1724)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 537) that would require service secretaries to ensure
that each member of the National Guard or Reserves who is the
victim of a sexual assault either during the performance of
duties as a member of the National Guard or Reserves, or is a
victim of a sexual assault by another member of the National
Guard or Reserves, has access to a Sexual Assault Response
Coordinator not later than 2 business days following a request
for such assistance.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require that each member of the National
Guard or Reserves who is the victim of a sexual assault either
during the performance of duties as a member of the National
Guard or Reserves, or is a victim of a sexual assault by
another member of the National Guard or Reserves, has timely
access to a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator.
Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual assault
prevention and response personnel and required availability of
Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (sec. 1725)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 541) that would
amend section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to
require the Secretary of Defense to establish selection
qualifications for members of the armed forces or civilian
employees for assignment to duty as Sexual Assault Response and
Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response
Coordinators, and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates. In addition,
this provision would require the Secretary of each military
department to assign at least one Sexual Assault Nurse
Examiner-Adult/Adolescent to each brigade or equivalent unit
level unless the Secretary determines that compliance would
impose an undue burden.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 536(b)) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
review the adequacy of the training, qualifications, and
experience of service members and civilian employees assigned
to a position that includes responsibility for sexual assault
prevention and response.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would: (1) Require the assignment of at least
one full-time sexual assault nurse examiner to each military
medical treatment facility in which an emergency department
operates 24 hours per day; (2) Require that a sexual assault
nurse examiner be made available at other military medical
treatment facilities, consistent with the Department of Justice
National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic
Examinations, Adult/Adolescent; and (3) Require that the
Secretary of Defense submit a report to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, not
later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, on
the review of the adequacy of the training, qualifications, and
experience of service members and civilian employees assigned
to positions that include responsibility for sexual assault
prevention and response in the armed forces.
We encourage the Department of Defense to include board
certification to the extent possible as part of the training
and certification requirement for sexual assault nurse
examiners.
Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response
Office for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and
response program (sec. 1726)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 535) that would amend section 1611(b) of the Ike Skelton
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public
Law 111-383) to require the Director of the Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response Office (the Director) to: (1) oversee
development and implementation of the comprehensive policy for
the Department of Defense (DOD) sexual assault prevention and
response program; (2) serve as the single point of authority,
accountability, and oversight for the sexual assault prevention
and response program; (3) undertake responsibility for the
oversight of the implementation of the sexual assault
prevention and response program by the armed forces; (4)
collect and maintain data of the military departments on sexual
assault; (5) provide oversight to ensure that the military
departments maintain documents relating to allegations and
complaints of sexual assault involving service members and
courts-martial or trials of service members for sexual assault
offenses; (6) act as a liaison between DOD and other federal
and state agencies on programs and efforts relating to sexual
assault prevention and response; (7) oversee development of
strategic program guidance and joint planning objectives for
resources in support of the sexual assault prevention and
response program, and make recommendations on modifications to
policy, law, and regulations needed to ensure the continuing
availability of such resources; and (8) provide the Secretary
of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) any records or
documents on sexual assault in the armed forces, including
restricted reports with the approval of the individuals who
filed such reports, that are required for the purposes of the
administration of the laws administered by the Secretary of the
VA.
The provision would amend subtitle A of title XVI of the
Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2011 (Public Law 111-383) to require the Director to collect
and maintain data from the services on sexual assaults
involving service members and to develop metrics to measure the
effectiveness of, and compliance with, the training and
awareness objectives on sexual assault and prevention.
The provision would also amend section 1631(f) of the Ike
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(Public Law 111-383) to require the service secretaries to
include in the case synopsis portion of the annual report
regarding sexual assaults involving members of the armed forces
the unit of each service member accused of committing a sexual
assault and the unit of each service member who is a victim of
a sexual assault.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would amend section
1611(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to require the
Director to collect and maintain data of the military
departments on sexual assault; act as a liaison between DOD and
other federal and state agencies on programs and efforts
relating to sexual assault prevention and response; oversee
development of strategic program guidance and joint planning
objectives for resources in support of the sexual assault
prevention and response program, and make recommendations on
modifications to policy, law, and regulations needed to ensure
the continuing availability of such resources; and develop
metrics to measure the effectiveness of, and compliance with,
training and awareness objectives of the military departments
on sexual assault prevention and response.
Subtitle D--Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports
Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military Justice
and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases (sec. 1731)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 533(c)) that
would require the Response Systems Panel established under
subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239)
(FY13 NDAA) to assess the appropriateness of statutorily
mandated minimum sentencing provisions for additional offenses
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and would
require the Judicial Proceedings Panel established under
subsection (a)(2) of the FY13 NDAA to assess the implementation
and effect of the mandatory minimum sentences established
elsewhere in this bill.
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 536(c)) that
would require the Response Systems Panel to conduct an
assessment regarding whether the roles, responsibilities, and
authorities of Victims' Counsel to provide legal assistance to
victims of alleged sex-related offenses should be expanded to
include legal standing to represent the victim during
investigative and military justice proceedings in connection
with the prosecution of the offense; and would require the
Judicial Proceedings Panel to conduct an assessment of the
implementation and effect of authorizing Victims' Counsel to
provide legal assistance to victims of alleged sex-related
offenses.
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 542(c)) that
would require the Response Systems Panel to assess the
feasibility and appropriateness of extending to victims of
military crimes the additional right afforded a crime victim in
civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection (a)(4) of
section 3771 of title 18, United States Code, and the legal
standing to seek enforcement of crime victim rights provided by
subsection (d) of such section.
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 549 (a),(c), and
(d)) that would require the Response Systems Panel to conduct
an assessment of the impact, if any, that removing from the
chain of command any disposition authority regarding charges
preferred under the UCMJ would have on overall reporting and
prosecution of sexual assault cases, and to review and provide
comment on the report of the Secretary of Defense on the role
of military commanders in the military justice process required
elsewhere in this Act; and would require the Judicial
Proceedings Panel to assess the likely consequences of amending
of the definition of rape and sexual assault under Article 120
of the UCMJ to expressly cover a situation in which a person
subject to the UCMJ commits a sexual act upon another person by
abusing one's position in the chain of command of the other
person to gain access to or coerce the other person.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 544) that would require the Response Systems Panel to
include in the comparison of military and civilian systems for
the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of adult
sexual assault crimes, required by section 576(d)(1)(B), an
assessment of the opportunities for clemency provided in the
military and civilian systems, the appropriateness of clemency
proceedings in the military system, the manner in which
clemency is used in the military system, and whether clemency
in the military justice system could be reserved until the end
of the military appeals process. The provision would also
require the Response Systems Panel to assess the means by which
the name, if known, and other necessary identifying information
of an alleged offender that is collected as part of a
restricted report of a sexual assault could be compiled into a
protected, searchable database.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 546) that would require the Judicial Proceedings Panel to
assess the adequacy of the provision of compensation and
restitution for victims of offenses under the UCMJ, and develop
recommendations on expanding such compensation and restitution.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 545) that would require the Response Systems Panel and
the Judicial Proceedings Panel to assess the effectiveness of
provisions of law on sexual assault prevention and response
adopted and provisions offered but not adopted during the
markup by the Senate Committee on Armed Services of the bill to
enact the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014.
The agreement includes a provision that would consolidate
the provisions, delete redundant provisions, and align the
additional responsibilities as appropriate under the Response
Systems Panel and the Judicial Proceedings Panel.
Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative
practices in response to allegations of Uniform Code of
Military Justice violations (sec. 1732)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 539) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to review the practices of
military criminal investigative organizations (MCIO) regarding
the investigation of alleged sex-related offenses involving
members of the armed forces, including the extent to which the
MCIOs make a recommendation regarding whether an allegation of
a sex-related offense appears founded or unfounded, and to
develop a uniform policy regarding the use of case
determinations to record the results of investigations of
violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would expand the scope of the review to MCIO
investigations of allegations of any offense under the Uniform
Code of Military Justice.
Review of training and education provided members of the Armed Forces
on sexual assault prevention and response (sec. 1733)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 540) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to develop a uniform
curriculum, to include lesson plans, to ensure that sexual
assault prevention and response training and education for
members of the armed forces are uniform across the Department
of Defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 536(a)) that would require the Secretary to review the
adequacy of the training provided to service members on sexual
assault prevention and response, and to prescribe any
modifications necessary to the training provided members of the
armed forces on sexual assault prevention and response.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to
identify common core elements that must be included in any
training or education provided to service members on sexual
assault prevention and response and to submit a report
containing the results of the review, including the common core
elements identified in the review, to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not
later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on the
retention of and access to evidence and records relating to
sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces (sec.
1734)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550G) that would
amend section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to
require service secretaries to include in their annual reports
to the Secretary of Defense on sexual assaults: (1) A
description of the implementation of the comprehensive policy
on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating
to sexual assaults involving service members; and (2) The
policies, procedures, and the processes implemented by the
secretary concerned to ensure detailed evidence and records are
transmitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs for sexual
trauma that occurred during active duty service.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the progress made
in developing and implementing the comprehensive policy on the
retention and access to evidence and records relating to sexual
assaults involving service members and to submit a report
containing the results of the review to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role
in sexual harassment cases (sec. 1735)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the
Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity for the
purposes of identifying resource and personnel gaps in the
office, the role of the office in sexual harassment cases, and
evaluating how the office works with the Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response Office to address sexual assault in the
armed forces.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to
determine whether sexual harassment cases should be evaluated
or addressed within the Office of Diversity Management and
Equal Opportunity and to identify and assess the capability of
the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity to
track sexual harassment cases.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of the
Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training (sec.
1741)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 548) that would
require the Secretary of Defense and the secretary of the
department in which the Coast Guard is operating to maintain a
policy that defines and prescribes what constitutes an
inappropriate relationship, communication, conduct, or contact,
including when such an action is consensual, between a service
member who exercises authority or control over, or supervises a
prospective member of the armed forces undergoing entry-level
processing or training. The provision would also require that a
service member who violates this policy be processed for
administrative separation when the member is not otherwise
punitively discharged or dismissed from the armed forces for
that violation, and would require the Secretary of Defense to
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a proposed amendment to chapter 47
of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), to create an additional article regarding violations
of the policy described above.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 557) that would require the Secretary of Defense to
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives, not later than 120 days after the
enactment of this act, a report on whether legislative action
is required to modify the Uniform Code of Military Justice
(chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code), to prohibit
sexual acts and contacts between military instructors and their
trainees.
The agreement includes a provision that would combine the
House and Senate provisions.
Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses involving
members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1742)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 541) that would require commanding officers to
immediately refer to the appropriate military criminal
investigation organization reports of sex-related offenses
involving members of the commander's chain of command.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted
report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the
Armed Forces (sec. 1743)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 545) that would
require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the
Department in which the Coast Guard is operating to establish
and maintain a policy for a written incident report to detail
actions taken or in progress to provide the victim of a sexual
assault with necessary care and support, to refer the
allegation of sexual assault to the appropriate investigative
agency, and to provide initial notification to the chain of
command above the unit in which the victim served when such
notification had not already taken place. This provision would
require the incident report to be provided within 8 days of the
unrestricted report of a sexual assault, and would require the
Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations to carry out the
policy within 180 days of the date of enactment of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related
offenses for trial by court-martial (sec. 1744)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 552) that would require review of decisions not to refer
charges of rape or sexual assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts
to commit these offenses to trial by court-martial. In any case
in which the staff judge advocate recommends that the charges
be referred to trial by court-martial and the convening
authority decides not to refer the charges to trial by court-
martial, the convening authority would be required to forward
the case file to the service secretary for review. In cases
where the staff judge advocate recommends that the charges not
be referred to trial by court-martial and the convening
authority agrees, the convening authority would be required to
forward the case file to a superior commander authorized to
exercise general court-martial convening authority for review.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related offenses in
personnel service records of members of the Armed Forces (sec.
1745)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 547) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to require commanders to
include letters of reprimand, nonpunitive letters of actions
and counseling statements involving substantiated cases of
sexual harassment or sexual assault in the performance
evaluation reports of service members.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 534) that would require that complaints of a sex-related
offense resulting in a court-martial conviction, non-judicial
punishment, or administrative action be noted in the personnel
service record of the service member, regardless of the
member's grade. The provision would also require the Secretary
of Defense to prescribe regulations requiring commanders to
review the history of substantiated sexual offenses of service
members permanently assigned to the commander's facility,
installation, or unit.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies (sec. 1746)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550D) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that each of the
military service academies adds a section in the ethics
curricula of such academies that outlines honor, respect, and
character development as such pertain to the issue of
preventing sexual assault in the armed forces.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
curricula of each of the military service academies to include
a section that outlines honor, respect, and character
development as such pertain to the issue of preventing sexual
assault in the armed forces and that the training included in
the curricula be provided within 14 days after the initial
arrival of a new cadet or midshipman at the military service
academy and repeated annually thereafter.
Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces are
completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National
Security Positions (sec. 1747)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550E) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to inform service members at
the earliest time possible, such as upon enlistment and
commissioning, and during sexual assault awareness training and
service member interactions with sexual assault response
coordinators, of the policy of instructing an individual to
answer ``no'' to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the
Questionnaire for National Security Positions with respect to
consultation with a health care professional if the individual
is a victim of sexual assault and the consultation occurred
with respect to an emotional or mental health condition
strictly in relation to the sexual assault.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require that a service member be notified
of the policy of instructing an individual to answer ``no'' to
question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for
National Security Positions with respect to consultation with a
health care professional if the individual is a victim of
sexual assault and the consultation occurred with respect to an
emotional or mental health condition strictly in relation to
the sexual assault whenever the member is required to complete
Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security
Positions.
Subtitle F--Sense of Congress Provisions
Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for command
climate free of retaliation (sec. 1751)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 540) that would express the sense of Congress that: (1)
commanding officers are responsible for establishing a command
climate in which sexual assault allegations are properly
managed and fairly evaluated and a victim can report criminal
activity, including sexual assault, without fear of
retaliation, including ostracism and group pressure from other
members of the command; (2) the failure of commanding officers
to maintain such a command climate is an appropriate basis for
relief from their command positions; and (3) senior officers
should evaluate subordinate commanding officers on their
performance in establishing a command climate free of
retaliation.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
technical amendment.
Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain sexual
misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice
through courts-martial (sec. 1752)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 558) that would express the sense of the Senate that
charges of rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts
to commit these offenses should be disposed of by court-martial
rather than by non-judicial punishment or administrative
action, and that the disposition authority should include in
the case file a justification in any case where these charges
are disposed of by non-judicial punishment or administrative
action.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would express the sense of Congress.
Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of members
of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related offenses (sec. 1753)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 559) that would express the sense of the Senate that: (1)
the armed forces should be sparing in discharging in lieu of
court-martial service members who have committed rape, sexual
assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts to commit such offenses,
and should do so only when the facts of the case clearly
warrant such discharge; (2) whenever possible, victims of these
offenses should be consulted about the discharge of the service
member; (3) commanding officers should consider the views of
these victims when determining whether to discharge service
members in lieu of court-martial; and (4) discharges of service
members in lieu of court-martial for the specified offenses
should be characterized as Other Than Honorable.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment that would express a sense of Congress.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Servicemembers' accountability, rights, and responsibilities training
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530A) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that all service
members understand and comply with specified rights and
responsibilities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of separation of
members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted reports of
sexual assault
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530B) that would
require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to
conduct a review to identify all members of the armed forces
who, since January 1, 2002, were separated from the armed
forces after making an unrestricted report of sexual assault.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military justice
process
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 538) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to assess the current role and
authorities of commanders in the administration of military
justice and the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of
offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Enhancement to requirements for availability of information on sexual
assault prevention and response resources
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550B) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that information
relating to sexual assault prevention and response and resource
information is prominently posted in specified locations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that section 572(a)(4) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239)
requires the Department of Defense to ``post and widely
disseminate information about the resources available to report
and respond to sexual assaults, including the establishment of
a hotline phone number and Internet websites available to all
members of the armed forces.'' We further understand that the
Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office is currently
updating existing policy to include this requirement, and look
forward to the final policy being published as soon as
possible.
Health welfare inspections
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 564) that would
require the secretary of each military department to conduct
health and welfare inspections on a monthly basis to ensure and
maintain security, military readiness, and good order and
discipline.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS
Summary and explanation of funding tables
Division B of this Act authorizes funding for military
construction projects of the Department of Defense. It includes
funding authorizations for the construction and operation of
military family housing as well as military construction for
the reserve components, the defense agencies, and the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. It
also provides authorization for the base closure accounts that
fund military construction, environmental cleanup, and other
activities required to implement the decisions in base closure
rounds.
The following tables provide the project-level
authorizations for the military construction funding authorized
in Division B of this Act and summarize that funding by
account. Funding for base closure projects is summarized in the
table that follows, and is explained in additional detail in
the table included in title XXVII of this report.
Legislative Provisions Adopted
Short title (sec. 2001)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2001) that would
designate division B of this Act as the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 2001).
The agreement includes this provision.
Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by
law (sec. 2002)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2002) that would
ensure that the authorizations provided in titles XXI through
XXVII and XXIX shall expire on October 1, 2016, or the date of
enactment of an act authorizing funds for military construction
for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2002).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Legislative Provision Not Adopted
Effective date
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2003) that would
provide that titles XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, XXVI, XXVII,
and XXIX of this Act take effect on October 1, 2013, or the
date of enactment of this Act, whichever is later.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Title XXI--Army Military Construction
Summary
The Department of Defense requested authorization of
appropriations of $1.1 billion for military construction and
$556.9 million for family housing for the Army for fiscal year
2014. The agreement includes authorization of appropriations of
$1.1 billion for military construction and $556.9 million for
family housing for the Army for fiscal year 2014.
The budget request included $75.0 million for a Command and
Control facility for U.S. Army Pacific. While we support the
requirement for this facility, we are concerned that the unit
cost for this facility is high compared to a standard design
even when accounting for Area Cost Factors. Additionally, we
believe the full amount requested by the Department is not
necessary in light of efforts to reduce the size of
headquarters staffs across the Department. Therefore, the
agreement includes $70.0 million, a reduction of $5.0 million,
for this facility.
The budget request included $33.0 million for Host Nation
Support Planning and Design. In light of unobligated balances
in the Planning and Design accounts from previous years, the
agreement reflects a $5.0 million reduction.
Legislative Provisions Adopted
Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 2101)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2101) that would
authorize military construction projects for the active
component of the Army for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2101).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Family housing (sec. 2102)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2102) that would
authorize new construction and planning and design of family
housing units for the Army for fiscal year 2014. It would also
authorize funds for facilities that support family housing,
including housing management offices and housing maintenance
and storage facilities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2102).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Authorization of appropriations, Army (sec. 2103)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2103) that would
authorize appropriations for the active component military
construction and family housing projects of the Army for fiscal
year 2014. This provision would also provide an overall
limitation on the cost of the fiscal year 2014 military
construction and family housing projects authorized for the
active duty component of the Army.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2103).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military
Academy, New York (sec. 2104)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2109) that would prohibit the obligation or expenditure
of funds for the second increment of barracks construction at
the U.S. Military Academy (USMA), New York, as requested, until
the Secretary of the Army certifies to the congressional
defense committees that the Secretary has entered into a
contract for the renovation of MacArthur Short Barracks at the
USMA, consistent with the plan provided to the congressional
defense committees in March 2013.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of the Army to
certify to the congressional defense committees that the
Secretary intends to award a contract for the renovation of
MacArthur Short Barracks concurrent with assuming beneficial
occupancy of the renovated Scott Barracks.
Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project
(sec. 2105)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2104) that would
provide additional authority for a project initially provided
in section 2101 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136) at
Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for construction of a Research
and Development Loading Facility.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2106).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project
(sec. 2106)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2105) that would
modify the authorization contained in section 2101(b) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(division B of Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2629) for
construction of an APS Warehouses at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2105).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project
(sec. 2107)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2106) that would
modify the authorization contained in section 2101(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4437) for
construction of a Regional Logistic Support Complex at Fort
Lewis, Washington.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2104).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects (sec.
2108)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2107) that would
extend the authorizations for three projects originally
authorized by section 2002 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public
Law 11-84) until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment
of an act authorizing funds for military construction for
fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2108).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec.
2109)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2108) that would
extend the authorizations listed until October 1, 2014, or the
date of the enactment of an act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 2107).
The agreement includes this provision.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill,
Dahlonega, Georgia
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2109) that would
require the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer certain
Federal land administered as part of the Chattahoochee National
Forest to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of
the Army.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We believe that the current agreement between the
Department of Agriculture and the Department of the Army
related to an Army Ranger training area at Camp Frank D.
Merrill in Dahlonega, Georgia, is inadequate to support the
existing missions of the Department of the Army. We note that
Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture have
entered into discussions to address procedures for management
and administration of the property that we expect will
ameliorate these concerns. We urge the Secretary of the Army
and the Secretary of Agriculture to expeditiously conclude
these discussions to preserve and enhance the training and
military readiness capacity at Camp Frank D. Merrill. Lastly,
we direct the Secretary of the Army to submit a report to the
congressional defense committees on the status of negotiations
not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act and
summarizing the results of the negotiations not later than 90
days after an agreement is reached.
Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2901) that would
authorize Army construction projects for fiscal year 2014 at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The provision would also require the
Secretary of Defense to provide a brief to the congressional
defense committees on infrastructure costs associated with
continued detention operations at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and
would require the President to provide a plan relating to
detainees at Guantanamo Bay, future terrorist captures, and
detainees held at the detention Facility at Parwan,
Afghanistan.
The Senate committee-reported bill did not contain a
similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Title XXII--Navy Military Construction
Summary
The Department of Defense requested authorization of
appropriations of $1.7 billion for military construction and
$463.2 million for family housing for the Department of the
Navy for fiscal year 2014. The agreement includes the requested
amounts.
Legislative Provisions Adopted
Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 2201)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2201) that would
authorize military construction projects for the active
component of the Navy for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2201).
The agreement includes the House provision.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Family housing (sec. 2202)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2202) that would
authorize new construction and planning and design of family
housing units for the Navy for fiscal year 2014. It would also
authorize funds for facilities that support family housing,
including housing management offices and housing maintenance
and storage facilities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2202).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2203)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2203) that would
authorize funding for fiscal year 2014 to improve existing Navy
family housing.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2203).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Authorization of appropriations, Navy (sec. 2204)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2204) that would
authorize appropriations for the active component military
construction and family housing projects of the Navy for fiscal
year 2014. This provision would also provide an overall
limitation on the cost of the fiscal year 2014 military
construction and family housing projects authorized for the
active duty component of the Navy.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2204).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project
(sec. 2205)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2206) that would
modify the authorization contained in section 2201(b) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4441), for
construction of Navy Central Command ammunition magazines in
Bahrain.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2206).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project
(sec. 2206)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2207) that would
modify the authorization contained in section 2201(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666) for
construction of Explosives Handling Wharf No. 2 at Kitsap,
Washington.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2205).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec.
2207)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2208) that would
extend the fiscal year 2011 authorization for two projects
until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2015, whichever is later.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2207) that would extend the fiscal year 2011
authorization for one project until October 1, 2014, or the
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later and
another similar provision (sec. 2208) that would extend the
fiscal year 2011 authorization for one project until October 1,
2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is
later.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Legislative Provision Not Adopted
Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year
2014 project
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2205) that would
prohibit the Secretary of the Navy from obligating or expending
any funds authorized for land acquisition related to the
Townsend Bombing Range near Savannah, Georgia, until the
Secretary certifies in writing to the congressional defense
committees that the Secretary has entered into mutually-
acceptable agreements with the governments of Long and McIntosh
Counties, Georgia.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
The agreement includes an authorization of $61.7 million to
acquire real estate interests as the first phase of an
expansion of the Townsend Bombing Range in Georgia in order to
support the training of Navy and Marine Corps aviators in air-
to-ground employment of precision guided munitions. Considering
the fact that the first phase of the expansion will require the
purchase of approximately 20,000 acres from private entities,
we expect that the Department of the Navy will continue efforts
to engage community representatives from Long County, Georgia
and McIntosh County, Georgia with the goal of achieving a
mutually acceptable agreement regarding terms for the real
property to be acquired for the expansion of the Townsend
Bombing Range that protects and supports the mission of the
range.
Title XXIII--Air Force Military Construction
Summary
The Department of Defense requested authorization of
appropriations of $1.1 billion for military construction and
$464.9 million for family housing for the Air Force in fiscal
year 2014. The agreement includes authorization of
appropriations of $1.1 billion for military construction and
$464.9 million for family housing for fiscal year 2014.
The budget request included $192.7 million for KC-46A Main
Operating Base (MOB) #1 facilities and $63.0 million for KC-46A
Formal Training Unit (FTU) facilities at unspecified locations.
On May 22, 2013, the Air Force announced McConnell Air Force
Base, Kansas, as its preferred alternative for the KC-46A MOB
#1 and Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, as its preferred
alternative for the KC-46A FTU. Concurrent with this
announcement, the Air Force also requested an amendment to its
budget request specifying location-specific requirements for
KC-46A bed down, including $219.1 million for eight military
construction projects at McConnell Air Force Base and $30.9
million for five military construction projects at Altus Air
Force Base. The agreement reflects these amounts.
The budget request included $12.0 million for a Main Gate
Complex at Royal Air Force Station Croughton, United Kingdom.
The House bill included no funding for this project and the
report accompanying the House bill (H. Rept. 113-102) directed
the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the
congressional defense committees by September 30, 2013,
regarding the costs and benefits of locating various
intelligence functions at the installation. The required report
has not been provided to the congressional defense committees
and, therefore, the agreement includes no funding for this
project.
Legislative Provisions Adopted
Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (sec.
2301)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2301) that would
authorize military construction projects for the active
component of the Air Force for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2301).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Family housing (sec. 2302)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2302) that would
authorize new construction and planning and design of family
housing units for the Air Force for fiscal year 2014. It would
also authorize funds for facilities that support family
housing, including housing management offices and housing
maintenance and storage facilities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2302).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2303)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2303) that would
authorize funding for fiscal year 2014 to improve existing Air
Force family housing.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2303).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (sec. 2304)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2304) that would
authorize appropriations for the active component military
construction and family housing projects of the Air Force for
fiscal year 2014. This provision would also provide an overall
limitation on the cost of the fiscal year 2014 military
construction and family housing projects authorized for the
active duty component of the Air Force.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2304).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year
2014 project (sec. 2305)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2306) that would
limit the Secretary of the Air Force from expending any funds
authorized by this title that are associated with the
construction of a maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad,
or an airport storage facility at Saipan, Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, until the Secretary certifies that
the Department of the Air Force will purchase the requisite
real estate necessary to support these projects.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would limit funds for the construction of
projects in fiscal year 2014 to support divert field operations
in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands until the
Secretary of the Air Force provides a summary of alternatives
considered, a description of the overall construction
requirements, and a comparison of the costs and benefits of
leasing compared to purchasing real estate to support the
divert field requirements.
In addition, we note that the Governor of the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands has expressed concerns
regarding the proposed location of the divert field and whether
it should be sited on Saipan or Tinian. As such, we expect the
Secretary of the Air Force to consult with the Governor of the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands regarding the
location of projects to support divert field operations with
the goal of achieving a mutually agreeable solution.
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project
(sec. 2306)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2305) that would
increase the construction scope associated with a Fuel Systems
Maintenance Hangar authorization at Andersen Air Force Base,
Guam, provided in the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239), to
$128.0 million.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project (sec.
2307)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2307) that would
extend the authorization listed until October 1, 2014, or the
date of the enactment of an act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2305).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Title XXIV--Defense Agencies Military Construction
Budget Items
Summary
The Department of Defense (DOD) requested authorization of
appropriations of $4.0 billion for military construction for
the defense agencies, $150.0 million for energy conservation
projects, $122.5 million for chemical demilitarization
construction, and $57.6 million for family housing for the
defense agencies for fiscal year 2014. The agreement includes
authorization of appropriations of $3.4 billion for military
construction, $150.0 million for energy conservation projects,
$122.5 million for chemical demilitarization construction, and
$57.6 million for family housing for the defense agencies for
fiscal year 2014.
The budget request included $431.0 million for the third
increment of the High Performance Computing Center at Fort
Meade, Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend
the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and,
therefore, the agreement reflects a $35.0 million reduction.
The budget request included $265.0 million for an
Ambulatory Health Center at Fort Knox, Kentucky. We understand
DOD would be unable to expend the full amount of the budget
request in fiscal year 2014 and, therefore, the agreement
reflects a $120.0 million reduction.
The budget request included $210.0 million for replacement
of the Public Health Command Laboratory at Aberdeen Proving
Ground, Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend
the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and,
therefore, the agreement reflects a $135.0 million reduction.
The budget request included $76.2 million for the second
increment of the Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base Andrews,
Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend the full
amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and,
therefore, the agreement reflects a $38.1 million reduction.
The budget request included $251.2 million for the fifth
increment of the Hospital Replacement at Fort Bliss, Texas. We
understand DOD would be unable to expend the full amount of the
budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, therefore, the
agreement reflects a $152.1 million reduction.
The budget request included $151.5 million for the third
increment of the Medical Center Replacement at Rhine Ordnance
Barracks, Germany. We understand DOD would be unable to expend
the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and,
therefore, the agreement reflects a $75.0 million reduction.
The budget request included $1.8 million for a Tour Bus
Drop Off at the Pentagon Reservation, Virginia. We believe this
project is unjustified given the current fiscal pressures
facing DOD and does little to improve the safety of visitors to
the Pentagon and, therefore, the agreement includes no funding
for this project.
The budget request included $85.0 million for the second
increment of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Systems Complex
in Deveselu, Romania. We understand that this project was
awarded significantly below the authorized level and,
therefore, the agreement reflects a $5.0 million reduction.
The budget request included $10.0 million for Contingency
Construction. In light of unobligated balances in the
Contingency Construction account from previous years, the
agreement reflects a $10.0 million reduction.
U.S. Special Operations Command Military Construction Requirements
The budget request included a total of $32.9 million for
three military construction projects that support Special
Operations Forces (SOF) Resiliency and Human Performance
Centers.
The House bill did not authorize the three military
construction projects because of concerns about duplication of
existing physical fitness facilities provided by the military
services and potential conflicts with medical care provided by
the TRICARE Management Activity.
The Senate committee-reported bill included the requested
funds.
The agreement includes the requested funds.
We fully support the intent of the U.S. Special Operations
Command (USSOCOM) Preservation of the Force and Families
(POTFF) initiative. However, we are concerned about the
affordability of USSOCOM's current plan for the POTFF and,
specifically, its projected cost of almost $500.0 million,
including $200.0 million for military construction, across the
future year's defense plan (FYDP) in light of current budgetary
pressures. We are also concerned about the adverse impact of
prioritizing military construction investments to support the
POTFF at the expense of other longstanding USSOCOM military
construction requirements to recapitalize old and failing
facilities. Lastly, we believe that USSOCOM Major Force Program
11 (MFP-11) military construction funds should only be used to
fulfill ``special operations-peculiar'' facility requirements
and should not be used to duplicate facilities provided by the
military services.
In order to better assess USSOCOM's future military
construction requirements, we direct the Secretary of Defense,
concurrent with the budget request for fiscal year 2015, to
provide the congressional defense committees with an assessment
of military construction requirements for USSOCOM and those
necessary to support the USSOCOM POTFF across the FYDP. This
assessment shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) The definition of ``SOF-peculiar'' as it applies
to the use of USSOCOM MFP-11 funding to meet military
construction requirements;
(2) A description of the decision making process for
determining whether a military construction project
should be funded through MFP-11 or by the military
services;
(3) An assessment of the feasibility of military
construction investments to support the POTFF
initiative, as outlined in the FYDP, in light of
current budgetary pressures;
(4) The rationale for funding military construction
projects in support of the POTFF initiative, as
outlined in the FYDP, through MFP-11 as opposed to the
budgets of the military services, including a
description of any POTFF military construction
requirements that can be satisfied by the military
services;
(5) A prioritized list, by component, of military
construction projects included in the FYDP that support
the POTFF initiative, including cost and location; and
(6) A detailed listing of all military construction
facilities within USSOCOM that are failing or have
exceeded their lifetime of use by component, by
function, and by military base, and a detailed listing
of all unfunded USSOCOM military construction
requirements by component, function and military base.
Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations
Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects
(sec. 2401)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2401) that would
authorize military construction projects for the defense
agencies for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2401).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Authorized energy conservation projects (sec. 2402)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2402) that would
authorize energy conservation projects for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2402).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (sec. 2403)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2403) that would
authorize appropriations for the construction and family
housing projects of the defense agencies for fiscal year 2014.
This provision would also provide an overall limitation on the
cost of the fiscal year 2014 military construction and family
housing projects authorized for the defense agencies.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2403).
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations
Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization
construction, defense-wide (sec. 2411)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2411) that would
authorize appropriations for military construction projects for
the chemical demilitarization program for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2411).
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Title XXV--North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment
Program
Summary
The Department of Defense requested authorization of
appropriations of $239.7 million for military construction in
fiscal year 2014 for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program. The agreement includes
authorization of appropriations of $200.0 million for military
construction in fiscal year 2014 for the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Security Investment Program.
We understand that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program has expended prior year funds more
slowly than anticipated and does not require the full requested
amount for fiscal year 2014. Therefore, the agreement reflects
a $40.0 million reduction.
Legislative Provisions Adopted
Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 2501)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2501) that would
authorize the Secretary of Defense to make contributions to the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
in an amount equal to the sum of the amount specifically
authorized in section 2502 of this title and the amount of
recoupment due to the United States for construction previously
financed by the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 2501).
The agreement includes this provision.
Authorization of appropriations, NATO (sec. 2502)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2502) that would
authorize the U.S. contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Security Investment Program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2502).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Title XXVI--Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities
Summary
The Department of Defense requested authorization of
appropriations of $693.3 million for military construction in
fiscal year 2014 for facilities for the guard and reserve
components. The agreement includes authorization of
appropriations of $688.3 million for military construction in
fiscal year 2014 for facilities for the guard and reserve
components.
The budget request included $29.0 million for Planning and
Design for Army National Guard facilities. In light of
unobligated balances in the Planning and Design accounts from
previous years, the agreement reflects a $5.0 million
reduction.
Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations
Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition
projects (sec. 2601)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2601) that would
authorize military construction projects for the Army National
Guard for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2601).
The agreement includes the House provision.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects
(sec. 2602)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2602) that would
authorize military construction projects for the Army Reserve
for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2602).
The agreement includes the House provision.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land
acquisition projects (sec. 2603)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2603) that would
authorize military construction projects for the Navy Reserve
and the Marine Corps Reserve for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2603).
The agreement includes the House provision.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition
projects (sec. 2604)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2604) that would
authorize military construction projects for the Air National
Guard for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2604).
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects
(sec. 2605)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2605) that would
authorize military construction projects for the Air Force
Reserve for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2605).
The agreement includes the House provision.
We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision
on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of
projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act
provides the binding list of specific construction projects
authorized at each location.
Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve (sec. 2606)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2606) that would
authorize appropriations for the reserve component military
construction projects for fiscal year 2014. This provision
would also provide an overall limitation on the cost of the
fiscal year 2014 military construction projects authorized for
the reserve components.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2606).
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would prohibit obligation or expenditure of
authorized funds for military construction projects associated
with the 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility at Fort Meade,
Maryland, or the Cyber/ISR Facility at Martin State Airport,
Maryland, until the Secretary of Defense makes several
certifications to the congressional defense committees.
Subtitle B--Other Matters
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project
(sec. 2611)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2611) that would
modify the authority provided by section 2603 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B
of Public Law 112-239) and authorize the Secretary of the Navy
to make certain modifications to the scope of a previously
authorized construction project.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2611).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec.
2612)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2612) that would
extend the authorizations for three fiscal year 2011 projects
until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2015, whichever is later.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained two similar
provisions (sec. 2612 and sec. 2613) that would extend the
fiscal year 2011 authorization for two projects until October
1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an act authorizing
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever
is later.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Title XXVII--Base Realignment and Closure Activities
Summary
The Department of Defense requested $451.4 million for the
ongoing cost of environmental remediation and other activities
necessary to continue implementation of the 1988, 1991, 1993,
1995, and 2005 Base Realignment and Closure rounds. The
agreement includes the requested amount.
Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations
Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure
activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure
Account (sec. 2701)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2701) that would
authorize appropriations for ongoing activities that are
required to implement the decision of base realignment and
closure activities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2701).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Subtitle B--Other Matters
Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure
(BRAC) round (sec. 2711)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2711) that would
prohibit funds, appropriated pursuant to an authorization of
appropriations contained in this Act, to be used to propose,
plan for, or execute an additional Base Realignment and Closure
(BRAC) round.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2702) that would establish, as a precondition for the
authorization of a future BRAC round, a requirement for the
Department of Defense to submit to Congress a formal review of
overseas military facility structure.
The agreement includes a provision that would make clear
that nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize a
future BRAC round.
We note that the agreement also reduces the budget request
by $8.0 million in Operation and Maintenance, defense-wide
requested by the Department to ``develop recommendations and
manage a new BRAC round.''
Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding
availability of military health care in National Capital Region
(sec. 2712)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2712) that would
repeal a quarterly reporting requirement regarding the capacity
of the military health care system in the National Capital
Region.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative
(sec. 2713)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2703) that would require the Deputy Under Secretary of
Defense for Installations and Environment to submit a report to
the congressional defense committees on the 2005 BRAC joint
basing initiative.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment.
Legislative Provision Not Adopted
Consideration of the value of services provided by a local community to
the Armed Forces as part of the economic analysis in making
base realignment or closure decisions
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2713) that would
require the Secretary of Defense to include an accounting of
the value of services that are provided by the local community
to the military as part of the economic analysis conducted in
making any base realignment or closure decision.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We believe that to the extent services provided by a local
community directly reduce the cost of Department of Defense
operations at a particular installation, such savings should be
included in the evaluation of the fiscal consequences of
proposed base closures and realignments under sections 993 and
2687 of title 10, United States Code. We note that sections 993
and 2687 of title 10, United States Code, apply to the
Department's authorities to carry out base closures and
realignments below certain thresholds, not a formal base
realignment and closure process which would have to be
specifically authorized by Congress.
Title XXVIII--Military Construction General Provisions
Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes
Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified minor
military construction authority for laboratory revitalization
projects (sec. 2801)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2801) that would
modify section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, and allow
the threshold of the unspecified minor construction (UMMC)
project to be adjusted based on area cost factors and modify
several unspecified minor military construction thresholds.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would modify the UMMC threshold for the use of
Operation and Maintenance funds for laboratory revitalization
projects from $2.0 million to $4.0 million and extend the
underlying authority from 2016 to 2018. The agreement does not
include any other changes to UMMC thresholds or area cost
factor adjustments.
We note that, historically, the Department of Defense
laboratory enterprise has not received adequate attention with
regard to the revitalization of its infrastructure. Given that
the laboratory enterprise is crucial to the development of
future technologies that provide our warfighters a decisive
technological edge on the battlefield, we strongly encourage
the Department to place a higher priority on the revitalization
and modernization of infrastructure across the laboratory
enterprise.
Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with
private developers of housing (sec. 2802)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2803) that would
repeal the limited authority of the Department of Defense to
enter into partnerships with private developers for the purpose
of providing family housing construction.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Military construction standards to improve force protection (sec. 2803)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2804) that would
provide additional latitude to the Department of Defense (DOD)
to apply local threat criteria in the design and construction
of DOD facilities.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit
a report to the congressional defense committees on current
expeditionary physical barrier systems and new technologies
that can be used for force protection and to provide blast
protection.
Application of cash payments received for utilities and services (sec.
2804)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2805) that would
authorize the secretaries of the military departments,
beginning fiscal year 2014, to credit cash payments received as
compensation for utilities or services provided to eligible
entities that operate family or military unaccompanied housing
projects to the appropriation or working capital account
currently available for the purpose of furnishing such
utilities or services.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2812).
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing
investment authority (sec. 2805)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2806) that would
repeal a notification required by section 2875 of title 10,
United States Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization
projects (sec. 2806)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2807) that would
provide additional oversight and accountability in the pursuit
of military family housing privatization projects to include an
assessment of litigation costs that are being pursued by the
privatization partners.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Policies and requirements regarding overseas military construction and
closure and realignment of United States military installations
in foreign countries (sec. 2807)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2801) that would require all future military construction
projects funded using in-kind payments pursuant to bilateral
agreements with partner nations be submitted for congressional
authorization in the Military Construction Authorization Act.
The provision would also require that DOD include operational
expenses funded through residual value payments in-kind in the
budget justification documents submitted to Congress in
connection with the annual budget request.
The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 2811)
that would repeal section 2921 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510) and
consolidate the requirements of overseas basing notification
process in section 2687a of title 10, United States Code. This
section would also remove a redundant reporting requirement
associated with the proposed residual value of foreign military
closure determinations.
The agreement includes a provision that would combine the
two provisions and make other clarifying and technical
modifications to sections 2802 and 2867a of title 10, United
States Code, relating to overseas basing.
Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use
operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in
certain areas outside the United States (sec. 2808)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2808) that would
amend section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136) and
extend the Department of Defense's ability to use operation and
maintenance appropriations for military construction purposes
in the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) area of
responsibility (AOR) and certain countries in the United States
United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) AOR until September 30,
2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2802) that would extend the authority and
revise the list of countries in the AFRICOM AOR in which the
authority may be used.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Additionally, we note that the process by which the
Department of Defense receives an authorization from Congress
for military construction projects required to support overseas
contingency operations can be cumbersome and extend over a long
period of time. We also note that the fast pace of contingency
operations, changes in the number of military forces in
theater, and the contributions of partner countries may result
in a change to or elimination of a military construction
requirement in the time between the request to Congress for an
authorization and the actual award of a construction contract.
In order to ensure that funds are not expended on projects that
no longer satisfy a valid military requirement, we believe the
Secretary of Defense should review the process by which
contracts for military construction projects overseas in
connection with a contingency operation, as defined in section
101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code, are awarded and how
such projects are carried out. This review should be conducted
with the objective of developing a methodology to ensure that
any changes in military requirements are taken into account
when making decisions to construct, or continue constructing, a
project.
Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of
responsibility (sec. 2809)
The Senate committee-reported bill decreased authorization
of appropriations from the budget request for military
construction by $463.3 million for certain new military
construction and family housing projects in the U.S. European
Command (EUCOM) area of responsibility.
The House bill contained no similar funding cuts.
The agreement contains authorization of appropriations of
$463.3 million for the projects in EUCOM and includes a new
provision that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense or a
Secretary of a military department from awarding a contract for
any new military construction and family housing project, with
certain exceptions, in the EUCOM area of responsibility until
the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense
committees that the installations and specific military
construction requirements authorized in this Act have been
examined as part of the ongoing European Infrastructure
Consolidation Assessment, have been determined to be of an
enduring nature, and most effectively meet military
requirements at the authorized location.
Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration
Development of master plans for major military installations (sec.
2811)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2809) that would
require the consideration of additional elements as part of
master plans for major military installations.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses
associated with real property leases and easements (sec. 2812)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2811) that would amend section 2667 of title 10, United
States Code, to allow for the use of proceeds from leases and
easements to be used to offset administrative costs incurred by
the military departments in entering into and managing such
leases and easements.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt
of utility services as consideration for utility systems
conveyances (sec. 2813)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2813) that would amend section 2688(d)(2) of title 10,
United States Code, by requiring the Secretary of a military
department, prior to conveying a utility system under this
section, to obtain an independent estimate of the level of
investment that should be required to maintain adequate
operation of the utility system over the term of the
conveyance.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real property
(sec. 2814)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2809) that would
require a report on the utilization of real property across the
Department of Defense.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pinon Canyon Maneuver
Site, Fort Carson, Colorado (sec. 2815)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would
place conditions on the expansion of the Pinon Canyon Maneuver
Site in Fort Carson, Colorado.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment
Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period
covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of
Inspectors General for Guam Realignment (sec. 2821)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2831) that would
modify the reporting period for the annual Guam realignment
report from calendar year to fiscal year.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2822).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region (sec. 2822)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2832) that would
repeal section 2832 of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2821) that would extend the prohibition on funds for
construction activities to implement the realignment of Marine
Corps forces from Okinawa, Japan, with certain exceptions.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would modify the conditions that must be met
before funds may be obligated to implement the realignment of
Marine Corps forces, provide specific exceptions for the use of
U.S. and Japanese funds, and direct the Secretary of Defense,
as chairperson of the Economic Adjustment Committee (EAC), to
convene the EAC to consider assistance necessary to support the
preferred alternative for the relocation of Marine Corps forces
to Guam.
We note that the agreement includes $85.7 million for an
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar for the Marine Corps at Andersen
Air Force Base and provides a specific exception for the use of
Japanese funds to carry out the construction of a utility and
site improvement project based on assurances from the Navy that
both projects have military value independent of the movement
of Marines from Okinawa to Guam. Specifically, the construction
description of the Aircraft Maintenance Hangar indicates the
project ``supports an enduring support requirement for 1st MAW
[Marine Aircraft Wing] squadrons that frequently deploy to Guam
for training as part of the bilateral ``Aviation Training
Relocation'' (ATR) agreement.'' With regard to the Japanese-
funded utility and site improvement project on the North ramp
of Andersen Air Force Base, the Principal Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations, and
Environment indicated in an October 28, 2013, letter that the
``project supports current and future training requirements
that will increase the operational readiness of units in the
Pacific Command Area of Responsibility consistent with the
Combatant Commander's theater objectives and requirements while
depressurizing training airspace in Japan.''
We note that the draft Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for the siting of a cantonment area and training
range to support the 4,700 Marines to be stationed or deployed
to Guam on a rotational basis should be released in early 2014.
As such, we strongly encourage the Department to complete, as
quickly as possible, the master plan for Guam, including
detailed descriptions of scope, cost estimates, and timing for
each military construction project needed to support the
relocation of Marines to Guam so that Congress will be able to
assess the affordability, feasibility, and strategic value of
the plan. Until then, we believe it is important to ensure that
any funds provided by the Governments of Japan or the United
States are spent on new facilities that will satisfy valid
military requirements. We believe this approach mitigates the
risk of approving the construction of facilities that have not
yet been justified within the context of a master plan or for
which an Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision
have not been rendered.
Subtitle D--Land Conveyances
Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California (sec.
2831)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2841) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Navy to acquire 300 units of
military family housing constructed under section 801 of the
Military Construction Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-115) at Naval
Base Ventura County, California.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 2814).
The agreement includes the House provision.
Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County,
California (sec. 2832)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2842) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey, without
consideration, the Oxnard Air Force Base at Ventura,
California, the Ventura County for public purposes.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would ensure that any revenue resulting from the
conveyance be used only for public airport purposes and provide
for the reversion of such property to the Navy if it is
determined it is not being used in accordance with the
conveyance.
Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii (sec. 2833)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2831) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to
convey approximately 11 acres of Joint Base Pearl Harbor-
Hickam, Hawaii, to the Hale Keiki School in return for a cash
payment, in-kind consideration, or a combination thereof, in an
amount that is not less than the fair market value of the
conveyed property.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision.
Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania (sec. 2834)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2843) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey certain
properties and improvements at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard,
Pennsylvania, to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority for
fair market value.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah (sec. 2835)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2844) that would
require the Secretary of the Interior to transfer 420 acres to
the State of Utah for the purpose of permitting the Utah
National Guard to use the conveyed land for military use.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would make the conveyance permissive and make
other clarifying changes.
Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch
Mountains, Utah (sec. 2836)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2845) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to convey, without
consideration, certain Air National Guard facilities at Francis
Peak, Utah, for purposes of permitting the State of Utah to use
the structures to support emergency public safety
communications.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers,
Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania (sec. 2837)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2847) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey, without
consideration, to Derry Township, Pennsylvania, certain
properties for the purpose of permitting the Township to use
these properties for public purposes.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to
convey other properties supporting former Army Reserve Centers.
Subtitle E--Other Matters
Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement
(sec. 2841)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2861) that would
repeal an annual Economic Adjustment Committee report required
by section 4004 of the Defense Economic Adjustment,
Diversification, and Stabilization Act of 1990 (division D of
Public Law 101-510).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Establishment of military divers memorial (sec. 2842)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2866) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Navy to permit a third party to
establish and maintain at the former Navy Dive School at the
Washington Navy Yard a memorial to honor divers in the United
States Armed Forces. Federal funds may not be used to design,
procure, prepare, install, or maintain the memorial.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room patterns and
floor areas for military family housing and submission of net
floor area information
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2802) that would
repeal section 2826 of title 10, United States Code, that
required the Secretary concerned to acquire military family
housing that is comparable in structure to family housing
available in the local community.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Department of Defense report on Military Housing Privatization
Initiative
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2807A) that
would require the Secretary of Defense to issue a report to
Congress on the Military Housing Privatization Initiative,
including the details of any project where the project owner
has outstanding local, county, city, town, or state tax
obligations dating back over 12 months.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) gold or platinum certification
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2821) that would
continue the prohibition on the use of funds for Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design gold or platinum certifications
for fiscal year 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We commend the Department for formalizing its new
sustainable design criteria and policy governing investments in
energy and water efficiency initiatives. As a result of the new
policy, we expect all such investments going forward will be
underpinned by a cost-benefit analysis and reflective of local
conditions. We believe that such an approach is critical to
ensuring the cost-effective use of taxpayer dollars, especially
in light of current budgetary pressures.
Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2846) that would
require the Secretary of the Army to convey certain properties
at Fort Monroe, Virginia, to the Commonwealth of Virginia.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that the Fort Monroe Authority has completed a
reuse plan and is preparing an Economic Development Conveyance
for consideration by the Secretary of the Army. We expect that
continued active dialogue between both parties will result in a
compromise for the timely conveyance of the remaining parcels
at Fort Monroe to the Fort Monroe Authority.
Naming Provisions
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2862) that would
name the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies at Honolulu,
Hawaii, as the ``Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for
Security Studies'' and make other conforming changes. The House
bill also contained a provision (sec. 2863) that would rename
the Graduate School of Nursing at the Uniformed Services
University of the Health Sciences, as the ``Daniel K. Inouye
Graduate School of Nursing'' and make other conforming changes.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision that would name the Asia-Pacific Center for Security
Studies at Honolulu, Hawaii, as the ``Daniel K. Inouye Asia-
Pacific Center for Security Studies'' and make other conforming
changes (sec. 2841).
The agreement does not include these provisions.
We believe the naming of facilities, infrastructure, and/or
programs is appropriately accomplished under existing
Department of Defense (DOD) policies and procedures, including
the request for legislative action, when necessary. We believe
the naming of appropriate facilities, infrastructure, and/or
programs would be a fitting tribute to the late Senator Daniel
K. Inouye and would look favorably upon a request from DOD for
legislative action to that effect, if required.
Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park,
Ohio
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2864) that would
modify the name of the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers
Aviation Center to the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers
National Museum, Dayton, Ohio.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial in
Riverside, California
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2865) that would
authorize a memorial to members of the Armed Forces who have
been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross. The memorial is
located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, and
would hereby be designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross
National Memorial.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military memorials
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2867) that would
amend chapter 21 of title 36, United States Code, allowing
emblems of belief to be included in military memorials. Emblems
of belief include all emblems authorized by the National
Cemetery Administration.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 2832) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to
sell or exchange the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in San
Diego, California, to an eligible entity on the condition that
it continues to be maintained as a veterans' memorial.
The agreement does not include these provisions.
Title XXIX--Withdrawal, Reservation, and Transfer of Public Lands To
Support Military Readiness and Security
Short title (sec. 2901)
The agreement includes a provision that would designate
title XXIX of this Act as the ``Military Land Withdrawals Act
of 2013.''
Definitions (sec. 2902)
The agreement includes a provision that would provide
definitions for title XXIX of this Act.
Subtitle A--General Provisions
General applicability; definitions (sec. 2911)
The agreement includes a provision that would provide for
the applicability and rules of construction of title XXIX of
this Act.
Maps and legal descriptions (sec. 2912)
The agreement includes a provision that would provide for
the preparation of maps, legal descriptions, and other
processes related to lands covered by this title.
Access restrictions (sec. 2913)
The agreement includes a provision that would provide
authority for the Secretary concerned to impose certain
restrictions on access to lands withdrawn and reserved by this
title if required for military operations, public safety, or
national security.
Changes in use (sec. 2914)
The agreement includes a provision that would provide
authority for the Secretary concerned to authorize additional
defense-related purposes for land withdrawn and reserved by
this title.
Brush and range fire prevention and suppression (sec. 2915)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3009) that would
require the Secretary of the Army to take necessary precautions
to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range fires
occurring as a result of military activities on the lands
withdrawn by section 3001.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary concerned to take necessary precautions to prevent,
and actions to suppress, brush and range fires occurring as a
result of military activities on land withdrawn and reserved by
this title.
Ongoing decontamination (sec. 2916)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3010) that would
require the Secretary of the Army to maintain a program of
decontamination on the withdrawn land provided by section 3001.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary concerned to maintain, to the extent funds are
available for such purposes, a program of decontamination of
contamination caused by defense-related uses of land withdrawn
and reserved by this title.
Water rights (sec. 2917)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3008) that would
retain water rights in existence prior to the withdrawal
authorized in section 3001.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would make clear
nothing in this title establishes a new reservation of the
United States with respect to any water or water right on land
withdrawn and reserved by this title or affects any water
rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the
date of enactment of this Act.
Hunting, fishing, and trapping (sec. 2918)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3007) that would
require hunting, fishing and trapping on the lands withdrawn in
section 3001 to be conducted in accordance with section 2671 of
title 10, United States Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would apply section
2671 of title 10, United States Code, to land withdrawn and
reserved by this title.
Limitation on extensions and renewals (sec. 2919)
The agreement includes a provision that would require
withdrawals and reservations established under this title to be
extended or renewed only through a law enacted after the date
of enactment of this Act.
Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2920)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3011) that would
require the Secretary of the Army, not later than 5 years
before the termination of the withdrawal and reservation, to
notify the Secretary of the Interior of a continuing defense-
related need after the termination date for any land withdrawn
and reserved by section 3011.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary concerned, not later than 5 years before the
termination of the withdrawal and reservation, to notify the
Secretary of the Interior of a continuing defense-related need
after the termination date for any land withdrawn and reserved
by this title.
Limitation on subsequent availability of land for appropriation (sec.
2921)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3012) that would
withdraw the lands transferred in section 3001 from all forms
of appropriation under public land laws.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that prohibits
previously withdrawn and reserved land from being open to any
form of appropriation under the public land laws unless the
Secretary of the Interior publishes an appropriate order in the
Federal Register.
Relinquishment (sec. 2922)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3013) that would
provide authority and procedures for the Secretary of the Army
to relinquish any or all of the lands withdrawn or reserved
authorized in section 3001.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that provides a process
for the Secretary concerned to relinquish land withdrawn and
reserved by this title.
Immunity of the United States (sec. 2923)
The agreement includes a provision that would provide that
the United States and its officers or employees shall be held
harmless and shall not be liable for any injuries or damages to
persons or property as a result of nondefense-related
activities conducted on land withdrawn and reserved by this
title.
Subtitle B--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana
Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2931)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3001) that would
withdraw the lands described at Limestone Hills Training Area,
Montana, for use by the Department of the Army.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would provide for
the withdrawal and reservation of public lands for Limestone
Hills Training Area, Montana.
Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2932)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3002) that would
require the Secretary of the Army to manage the lands withdrawn
in section 3001 in accordance with the limitations and
restrictions of section 3003.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Special rules governing minerals management (sec. 2933)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3003) that would
establish additional rules governing mineral management at
Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Grazing (sec. 2934)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3004) that would
require the Secretary of the Interior to continue and manage
grazing permits and leases. The Secretary of the Interior, with
the agreement of the Secretary of the Army, may delegate such
authority to the Secretary of the Army.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Payments in lieu of taxes (sec. 2935)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3006) that would
authorize the lands withdrawn in section 3001 to remain
entitlement land under section 6901 of title 31, United States
Code.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would deem land
withdrawn by section 2931 to be entitlement land for purposes
of section 6901 of title 31, United States Code.
Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2936)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3005) that would
terminate the land withdrawal authorized in this subtitle on
March 31, 2039.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Subtitle C--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms,
California
Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2941)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3052) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide for the
Secretary of the Navy's use of the Johnson Valley National Off-
Highway Vehicle Recreation Area twice in each calendar year for
up to a total of 60 days per year for certain purposes. Any
agreement for the military use of the Johnson Valley National
Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area shall terminate not later
than March 31, 2039.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains a provision that would provide for
the withdrawal and reservation of public land for the Marine
Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California.
Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2942)
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of the Navy to manage the land withdrawn by section
2941.
Public access (sec. 2943)
The agreement includes a provision that would prohibit
public access to the Exclusive Military Use Area unless
otherwise authorized by the Secretary of the Navy.
Resource management group (sec. 2944)
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy to establish a
Resource Management Group for the land withdrawn and reserved
by section 2941.
Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area (sec. 2945)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3051) that would
designate certain lands administered by the Secretary of the
Interior in San Bernardino County, California, as the ``Johnson
Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.'' This
section would further withdraw the lands designated in this
section from all forms of appropriation under public land laws.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2946)
The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the
withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 2941
on March 31, 2039.
Subtitle D--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss,
Texas
Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2951)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3021) that would
transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands
located in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, from the Secretary of
the Interior to the Secretary of the Army.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes a provision that would provide for
the withdrawal of public land for White Sands Missile Range,
New Mexico.
Grazing (sec. 2952)
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretary of the Interior to continue and manage grazing
permits and leases. The Secretary of the Interior, with the
agreement of the Secretary of the Army, may delegate such
authority to the Secretary of the Army.
Subtitle E--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California
Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land (sec. 2961)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3041) that would
transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands
located in Imperial and Riverside Counties, California, from
the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Management and use of transferred land (sec. 2962)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3042) that would
authorize the Secretary of the Navy to use the lands
transferred in section 3041 for military purposes. This section
would also limit any diminution of these lands as critical
habitat for the desert tortoise. Finally, this section would
withdraw the lands transferred in section 3041 from all forms
of appropriation under public land laws so long as the lands
remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary
of the Navy.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Effect of termination of military use (sec. 2963)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3044) that would
require that if the Secretary of the Navy determines that there
is no longer a military need for the lands transferred by
section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy shall assess the level
of contamination and determine, in consultation with the
Secretary of the Interior, whether decontamination is practical
and economically feasible. If the Secretary of the Navy
determines that decontamination is practical, the Secretary of
the Navy shall provide funds for such decontamination.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period (sec. 2964)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3045) that would
find that notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the
California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflight Act of 1994
(title VIII of Public Law 103-433), the withdrawal and
reservation of land transferred under section 3041 shall not
terminate until the date on which the land transfer required by
section 3041 is executed.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Water rights (sec. 2965)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3046) that would
retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of
administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3041.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a
clarifying amendment.
Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title (sec. 2966)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3043) that would
authorize the realignment of the range boundary to ensure that
the northwestern boundary of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial
Gunnery Range shall be realigned to the edge of the Bradshaw
trail so that the trail remains entirely under the jurisdiction
of the Department of the Interior. The National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall not apply to
any transfer provided by this section.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement contains the House provision with a
clarifying amendment. We note that the redrawn range boundary
would include approximately 200 acres formerly acquired through
the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) or donation. It is
our intent that the Secretary of the Navy transfer to the
Secretary of the Interior acreage at least equal to the lands
formerly acquired through the LWCF or donation.
Subtitle F--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California
Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2971)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3031) that would
transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands
located in Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California,
from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the
Navy.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes provisions that would provide for
the withdrawal and reservation of public land for Naval Air
Weapons Station China Lake, California.
Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2972)
The agreement includes a provision that would provide for
the management of withdrawn and reserved land for Naval Air
Weapons Station China Lake, California.
Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the Navy (sec.
2973)
The agreement includes a provision that would allow the
Secretary of the Interior to assign management responsibility
for withdrawn and reserved land for Naval Air Weapons Station
China Lake, California, to the Secretary of the Navy.
Geothermal resources (sec. 2974)
The agreement includes a provision that would make clear
that nothing in this subtitle affects geothermal leases issued
by the Secretary of the Interior before the date of enactment
of this Act or the responsibility of the Secretary of the
Interior to manage and administer such leases. The provision
would also clarify other authorities and responsibilities of
the Secretary of the Navy with regard to geothermal exploration
and development.
Wild horses and burros (sec. 2975)
The agreement includes a provision that would make the
Secretary of the Navy responsible for the management of wild
horses and burros on land withdrawn and reserved by section
2971.
Continuation of existing agreement (sec. 2976)
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
agreement between the Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy
under section 805 of the California Military Lands Withdrawal
and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-433) to continue
until the earlier of a new agreement being reached or 1 year
after the date of enactment of this Act.
Management plans (sec. 2977)
The agreement includes a provision that would require the
Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy to update and maintain
cooperative arrangements concerning land resources and land
uses on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971.
Termination of prior withdrawals (sec. 2978)
The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the
prior withdrawal and reservation of land under section 803(a)
of the California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act
of 1994 (Public Law 103-433).
Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2979)
The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the
withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 2971
on March 31, 2039.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Water rights
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3022) that would
retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of
administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3021.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Withdrawal
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3023) that would
withdraw the lands transferred in section 3021 from all forms
of appropriation under public land laws so long as the lands
remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary
of the Army.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Water rights
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3032) that would
retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of
administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3031.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Withdrawal
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3033) that would
withdraw the lands transferred in section 3031 from all forms
of appropriation under public land laws so long as the lands
remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary
of the Navy.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study Area, Marine
Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3053) that would
transfer certain lands in San Bernardino County, California, as
generally depicted as the ``Southern Study Area,'' to be
transferred from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary
of the Navy for military purposes.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Water rights
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3054) that would
retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of
administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3051.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
Title XXXI--Department of Energy National Security Programs
Overview
Title XXXI authorizes appropriations for atomic energy
defense activities of the Department of Energy for fiscal year
2014, including: the purchase, construction, and acquisition of
plant and capital equipment; research and development; nuclear
weapons activities; nuclear nonproliferation activities; naval
nuclear propulsion; environmental cleanup; operating expenses;
and other expenses necessary to carry out the purposes of the
Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95-91). This
title authorizes appropriations in five categories: (1)
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); (2) Defense
environmental cleanup; (3) Other defense activities; (4)
Defense nuclear waste disposal; and (5) Energy security and
assurance.
National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3101) that would
authorize $11.8 billion for the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA), an increase of $212.0 million above the
budget request. The Senate committee-reported bill contained a
similar provision (sec. 3101) that would authorize $11.5
billion for the NNSA, an increase of $80.0 million above the
budget request.
We agree to include a provision that would authorize $11.7
billion, an increase of $72.8 million above the budget request.
Within NNSA, the provision would authorize $7.9 billion for
weapons activities, an increase of $40.8 million above the
budget request; $2.2 billion for defense nuclear
nonproliferation, an increase of $40.0 million above the budget
request; $1.2 billion for naval reactors, the amount of the
budget request; and $387.7 million for the Office of the
Administrator, a decrease of $8.0 million below the budget
request.
Within weapons activities, for directed stockpile work the
provision would authorize $2.5 billion, an increase of $39.2
million above the budget request. For campaigns, the provision
would authorize $1.7 billion, the amount of the budget request.
For nuclear programs, the provision would authorize $744.5
million, the amount of the budget request.
Within defense nuclear nonproliferation, for
nonproliferation and verification research and development the
provision would authorize $388.8 million, the amount of the
budget request. For nonproliferation and international
security, the provision would authorize $141.7 million, the
amount of the budget request. For international nuclear
materials protection and cooperation, the provision would
authorize $369.6 million, the amount of the budget request. For
fissile materials disposition, the provision would authorize
$542.6 million, $40.0 million above the amount of the budget
request. For the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, the
provision would authorize $424.5 million, the amount of the
budget request.
Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3102) that would
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 defense
environmental cleanup activities at $4.9 billion.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 3102) that authorized appropriations at $5.0
billion.
We agree to include a provision that would authorize
appropriations at $5.0 billion.
Other defense activities (sec. 3103)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3103) that would
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 other defense
activities at $749.1 million.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 3103) that authorized appropriations at $749.1
million.
We agree to include a provision that would authorize
appropriations at $758.7 million, $9.6 million above the budget
request.
BUDGET ITEM
Project 99-D-143, mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility
The House bill proposed funding the mixed oxide (MOX) fuel
fabrication facility at the fiscal year 2014 request of $320
million.
The Senate committee-reported bill proposed funding the
project at $80.0 million above the fiscal year budget 2014
request as a way to stabilize the program at the fiscal year
2013 levels while a strategic review is being conducted.
We agree to fund the construction project at $360.0
million, $40.0 million above the fiscal year 2014 budget
request. We note that this project has been fraught with cost
overruns and program delays. In fiscal year 2012, a decision
was made to cancel the feedstock facility, which was to reduce
old pits from nuclear weapons into feedstock for the MOX fuel
plant, at a cost of some $730.0 million being spent in
designing the facility. The MOX fuel plant and related support
facilities has risen from an initial cost estimate of $1.0
billion to $7.7 billion, and it is projected to be at least 3
years late in its initial operation in 2020. The Government
Accountability Office estimates, through fiscal year 2036, that
the total life cycle cost will exceed $24.2 billion, including
actual costs of $5.2 billion for prior years (fiscal year 1999
to fiscal year 2012). Despite years of outreach to the nuclear
industry, there is currently no agreement with any utility to
use the MOX fuel and it is not yet clear whether commercial
nuclear power plants will even accept the MOX fuel at market
rates or whether the Department of Energy will have to
subsidize, at taxpayers' expense, the sale of the fuel to make
it competitive with commercially produced low-enriched uranium.
We believe the rising costs associated with the program,
canceled facilities, missed deadlines, and questionable ability
to produce fuel at market prices are unacceptable. We caution
that further cost increases would undermine the feasibility and
affordability of the program. We understand the Department is
now undertaking a strategic review of the program and other
alternatives. We expect to be fully briefed on this strategic
review, including the new cost estimates and projected
construction timeline, and what actions the Department is
taking or will take to reign in the program costs and, if
necessary, consider less costly alternatives for disposing of
the plutonium from retire nuclear weapons. If the Department of
Energy considers any future increases to the MOX facility, we
expect those proposed increases to come from outside of budget
function 050, which funds the Nation's critical national
security priorities. We believe the Department must make its
national security activities its top priority in budgeting, and
expect that critical National Nuclear Security Administration
programs should not become the source of funds for future
increases to the MOX program.
Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations
National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3101) that would
authorize appropriations for the National Nuclear Security
Administration for fiscal year 2014, including funds for
weapons activities, defense nuclear nonproliferation programs,
naval reactor programs, and the Office of the Administrator, at
the levels identified in section 4701 of division D of this
Act. This section would also authorize several new plant
projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3102)
authorizing appropriations for the Department of Energy for
fiscal year 2014 for defense environmental cleanup activities
as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 3102).
The agreement includes this provision.
Other defense activities (sec. 3103)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3103)
authorizing appropriations for the Department of Energy for
fiscal year 2014 for other defense activities as specified in
the funding table in section 4701.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 3103).
The agreement includes this provision.
Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration
(sec. 3111)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3111) that would
amend section 3211 of the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) to clarify the set of
principles with which the National Nuclear Security
Administration must carry out its operations and activities.
Specifically, this section would add the requirement that all
operations and activities of the Administration be conducted
consistent with the principle of ``ensuring the security of the
nuclear weapons, nuclear material, and classified information
in the custody of the Administration.''
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security
Administration (sec. 3112)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3113) that would
amend section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2537) to require that any independent cost estimate carried out
pursuant to section 4217 be conducted by the Secretary of
Defense, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and
Program Evaluation (CAPE). The Director would be authorized to
delegate carrying out such cost estimates to other elements of
the Department of Defense. This section would also provide the
Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator
for Nuclear Security and acting through the Director of CAPE,
the authority to conduct an independent cost assessment of any
initiative or program of the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA) that is estimated to cost more than
$500.0 million.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3111) that would amend the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.) to establish an
Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation within NNSA
whose director would be Senate-confirmed. The Senate committee-
reported bill also contained a provision (sec. 3118) that would
require any cost estimates submitted pursuant to section 4217
of the Atomic Energy Defense Act be submitted in unclassified
form, with a classified annex if necessary.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that changes the Director of the new office from a
Senate-confirmed position to a Senior Executive Service
position. The amendment eliminates the requirement for two
deputy directors, and modifies several of the responsibilities
and authorities of the Director, and would require a joint
implementation plan for the new office to be submitted by the
NNSA Administrator and the Director of DOD's CAPE.
Given the size of the NNSA's Office of the Administrator of
approximately 1,800 personnel, we believe that requiring the
Director to be a Senior Executive Service officer is adequate
to ensure seniority and credibility within the NNSA. Further,
we believe that the joint NNSA-DOD implementation plan will be
important to standing up this new office. We expect the DOD
CAPE to play an active role in not only training personnel of
the new NNSA office, but helping shape and ensure quality cost
estimates and program evaluations during the early years of the
new NNSA office. We understand that the work for cost
estimation at the NNSA will have periods between major projects
where the personnel from this office can assist the DOD CAPE on
subject matter unique to the NNSA that is not present in the
DOD CAPE office. We encourage as a matter of good government
such collaboration.
The credibility of the NNSA with Congress and other
agencies of the Executive Branch has been hurt by high-profile
failures in cost estimation and program evaluation. We expect
the NNSA to embrace this new Cost Estimation and Program
Evaluation office as a means to help regain its credibility.
Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk (sec. 3113)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3115) that would
provide the Secretary of Energy, given the critical national
security function of the National Nuclear Security
Administration and the Department's Office of Intelligence
functions, with the authority to take certain actions with
regard to the protection of the supply chain of the Department
of Energy (DOE). This authority would replicate the authority
provided to the Department of Defense in section 806 of the Ike
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(Public Law 111-383) and to the intelligence community in
section 309 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012 (Public Law 112-87).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment containing technical changes. The amendment includes
a sunset of the authority 4 years after the date of enactment,
a notice to the appropriate committees within 7 days after a
supply chain source exclusion determination is made, and a
review on an annual basis (for 4 years) by the Comptroller
General on the implementation of this section by the Department
of Energy, including on the adequacy of resources available to
perform supply chain source exclusion determinations.
We note this authority is intended to be used when existing
supply chain management authorities are not sufficient to
protect the national security of the United States. Use of this
authority by DOE is expected to be limited in frequency. We
encourage DOE to partner with supply chain sources, to the
extent practicable, to implement this authority.
Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security
Administration (sec. 3114)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3116) that would
limit the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the National
Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) such that $139.5 million
may not be obligated or expended until the Administrator for
Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense
committees a detailed plan to achieve certain planned
efficiencies and written certification that the planned
efficiencies will be achieved. If the Administrator does not
submit the plan or is unable to certify within 60 days of the
date of the enactment of this Act that the efficiencies will be
achieved, the Administrator would be required to submit a
report to the congressional defense committees on the amount of
planned efficiencies that will not be realized and any effects
caused by planned but unrealized efficiencies in the Directed
Stockpile Work and Nuclear Programs accounts. The limitation of
funds for NNSA would not apply to funds authorized to be
appropriated for Directed Stockpile Work, Nuclear Programs, or
Naval Reactors, and should not result in reductions in
Laboratory Directed Research and Development funding. Finally,
the limitation on obligation of funds would not affect the
authority of the Secretary of Energy to reprogram or transfer
funding under sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic
Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that provides a rule of construction that the funds
limitation shall not be considered a specific denial of funds
relative to the authorities associated with subsection (d)(2).
The amendment also provides that the amount of funds limited by
this section would be reduced by the amount the Administrator
is able to certify has been saved through the planned
efficiencies.
Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for
Nuclear Security (sec. 3115)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3117) that would
limit the availability of funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014
for the National Nuclear Security Administration's Office of
the Administrator to not more than 75 percent until several
statutorily required reports are submitted to Congress in 2013
and 2014.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment containing technical and clarifying changes.
Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response,
and Testing (sec. 3116)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3119) that would
require the Administrator for Nuclear Security to establish a
Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Testing, and Response
within the nuclear security enterprise. The Center would be
responsible for a range of activities, but would primarily
serve to provide the Administrator, the Chief of Defense
Nuclear Security, and the management and operating contractors
of the nuclear security enterprise, a wide range of objective
expertise on security technologies, systems, analysis, testing,
and response forces.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would modify the name of the organization to the
Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, and Testing
(CSTART) and authorize the Administrator to provide additional
duties to the center.
Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the
replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research
Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico (sec.
3117)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3116) that would extend section 3144(c) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239) to permit consideration of a modular building strategy for
engineering and design if it meets long term stockpile
requirements.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would change the notice and wait requirement
from 30 to 60 days. The amendment would also add to the
notification required by the Nuclear Weapons Council to the
congressional defense committees such that it includes
notification that the modular strategy: (1) meets requirements
for implementation of a responsive infrastructure, including
meeting plutonium pit production requirements; and (2) will
achieve full operating capability for not less than two modular
structures by not later than 2027.
We are aware that further detail on requirements and plans
for the modular approach are being developed and refined. We
expect the Nuclear Weapons Council to keep Congress informed as
the modular approach is developed and implemented to meet
requirements for pit production and a responsive
infrastructure. Furthermore, we encourage the Administrator for
Nuclear Security and the Nuclear Weapons Council to
expeditiously carry out such efforts to both ensure
construction of a responsive nuclear infrastructure and to
enable a timely transition of nuclear operations out of
decaying and increasingly unsafe facilities such as the
Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building. Finally, we note
the reprogramming action concerning unobligated funds for the
Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility
is still pending, and look forward to working with the Nuclear
Weapons Council to resolve the deferred reprogramming proposal.
Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options (sec. 3118)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3121) that would
require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy,
acting through the Nuclear Weapons Council, to include several
warhead life extension options through all of Phase 6.2 and all
of Phase 6.2A of the Joint W78/88-1 Warhead Life Extension
Program. The options are the W78-1 life extension and the W88-1
life extension.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 1043) that would require the Director of Cost
Analysis and Program Evaluation to conduct a similar analysis
of alternatives for the Joint W78/88-1 Warhead Life Extension
Program.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that none of the funds may be obligated or expended
for phase 6.3 of the combined W78/88-1 warhead until 90 days
after the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council submits a
comparative analysis of the alternative options of life
extending the W78-1 and the W88-1 systems individually, so as
to compare to the cost to the combined W78/88-1 warhead system.
We encourage the Administrator to leverage, for the
purposes of this section, the NNSA Director for Cost Estimating
and Program Evaluation created elsewhere in this Act, and,
during the transition period when the capabilities of such
Director are being stood up, to work jointly with the
Department of Defense Office of Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation.
Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into
transactions to carry out certain research projects (sec. 3119)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3123) that would
extend section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy
Organization Act (P.L. 95-91, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
7256(g)(10)), from September 30, 2015 to September 30, 2020.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Increase in construction design threshold (sec. 3120)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3117) that would increase the major capital construction
design threshold for the National Nuclear Security
Administration from $600,000 to $1.2 million to account for
increased construction costs.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would increase the capital construction design
threshold to $1.0 million.
Subtitle C--Plans and Reports
Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy
defense facilities (sec. 3121)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3131) that would
amend section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act to require
that, not later than September 30 of each year, the
Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA) submit to the Secretary of Energy and to the
congressional defense committees, a report detailing and
certifying the status of the security of the nuclear security
enterprise, including the status of the security of special
nuclear material, nuclear weapons, and classified information
at each nuclear weapons production facility and national
security laboratory.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar
provision (sec. 3113) that would require the Secretary of
Energy to certify the that atomic energy defense facilities of
the Department of Energy containing quantities of category I
and II special nuclear material meet Department security
requirements.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Administrator to certify to
the Secretary of Energy that the NNSA facilities containing
quantities of Category I and II special nuclear material meet
NNSA and Department of Energy security standards and
requirements and for those that do not, actions and timelines
to correct any deficiency. The Secretary would be required to
transmit this certification to the congressional defense
committees with any comments of the Secretary by December 1 of
each year. The amendment also requires the Secretary to certify
to the congressional defense committees by December 1 each year
that atomic energy defense facilities other than those of the
NNSA containing quantities of category I and II special nuclear
materials shall meet Department security standards and
requirements and for those facilities that do not to develop a
correction action plan with timelines to correct any
deficiency.
Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear
weapons stockpile (sec. 3122)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3132) that would
amend section 4205 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2525) to clarify requirements related to the statutorily
required annual assessments regarding the condition of the
nuclear weapons stockpile.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would modify the date that such assessments are
due from the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy
to the President to February 1 of each year. The amendment
would also require that, if the report containing such
assessments is not be received by the Congress by March 15, the
covered officials under section 4205(b) of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(b)) shall provide a briefing to the
congressional defense committees to ensure information
regarding the status of the stockpile is available to inform
congressional oversight and provide timely input to the annual
legislative cycle.
Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons stockpile
stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan (sec. 3123)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3115) that would amend the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50
U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) to provide for a long-term plutonium
strategy for the National Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA) as part of its Stockpile Stewardship and Management
Plan. Plutonium sustainment is at the core of the NNSA
stockpile mission. This integrated plan would ensure the NNSA
remains focused on its plutonium mission.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would eliminate the external review and
incorporate the requirement for an integrated plutonium
strategy into section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50
U.S.C. 2523).
Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management
and operating contracts (sec. 3124)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3120) that would
amend section 3121 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to clarify that, if a
management and operating contract awarded by the Administrator
for Nuclear Security is protested, the report required by such
section to be submitted to Congress shall be submitted not
later than 30 days after such protest is resolved. This section
would also require any report under section 3121 to include a
description of the assumptions used and analysis conducted to
determine cost savings expected from the competition of the
contract and exempt contracts for managing and operating
facilities of the Naval Reactors Program from the requirements
of section 3121.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3122) that would amend section 3121(e) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239) to reduce the number of reports by the Government
Accountability Office (GAO).
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that combines the two provisions, changes the
existing 90-day reporting requirement for the GAO to 180 days,
and provides flexibility to ensure the reporting requirements
for both the National Nuclear Security Administration and the
GAO do not interfere with any award protests.
Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to program on
scientific engagement for nonproliferation (sec. 3125)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3123) that would amend section 3122(e) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239) to require a 30-day notice for extending the program on
scientific engagement for non-proliferation to a new country.
The provision gives the Administrator of the National Nuclear
Security Administration a national security waiver of the
requirement as long as there is a report filed within 30 days.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would add the Comptroller General to the program
commencement report with its analysis by the Comptroller
General due no later than 18 months after receipt of the
report.
Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium
capabilities replacement project (sec. 3126)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3124) that would amend section 3123(f) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (P.L. 112-239)
to change the Government Accountability Office reporting
requirement from the end of project life to 1 year after the
date of enactment in consultation with the congressional
defense committees.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation (sec. 3127)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3114) that would
require the Secretary of Energy to submit a comprehensive plan
through 2025 to the congressional defense committees by March
1, 2014, for the safe and effective retrieval, treatment, and
disposition of nuclear waste contained in the tank farms of the
Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Richland, Washington.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would require the Secretary of Energy to submit
a plan for tank farm waste at Hanford, including the activities
necessary to start operations at the Waste Treatment and
Immobilization Plant (WTP) and activities necessary to design,
construct, and operate the WTP and any related infrastructure
facilities. The amendment would require the Secretary to
identify any significant requirements needed to inform such
activities and require the Secretary to determine whether such
requirements are finalized. The Secretary would be authorized
to change any such significant requirements that are determined
to be finalized, but would require prompt congressional
notification of such changes if they have significant material
effect on the schedule or cost of the project. The plan would
be required to be submitted to the congressional defense
committees by June 1, 2014.
Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear
security enterprise (sec. 3128)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3112) that would require the Administrator of the
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to develop a
plan for a common cost structure between activities at
different sites with the purpose of comparing how efficiently
different sites within the NNSA complex are carrying out
similar activities.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the Administrator to submit a plan
for improving and integrating financial management of the
nuclear security enterprise to the congressional defense
committees not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of
this Act.
We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to
review the plan submitted by the Administrator and brief the
congressional defense committees within 60 days of submission
of such plan by the Administrator on the adequacy of this plan
in meeting the objectives set forth in this section and offer
recommendations for improvement.
Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such computing
into the stockpile stewardship program (sec. 3129)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3114) that would add a new section to the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) requiring the
Administrator for Nuclear Security to develop and carry out a
plan to incorporate exascale computing in the stockpile
stewardship program. Such plan would be required to cover the
20-year period after the date of enactment of this Act, and
would be submitted to the congressional defense committees
annually.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment that would require the plan to include information on
developing exascale computing, alter the timeframe for the plan
to 10 years after enactment of this Act, and require inclusion
of milestones to be achieved to mitigate disruptions resulting
from the transition to exascale computing. The amendment would
also require that the Future-Years Nuclear Security Program,
report submitted pursuant to section 3253 of the National
Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Act (50 U.S.C. 2453),
include a description of the costs borne by the NNSA, the
Department of Energy's Office of Science, other federal
agencies, and industry to develop exascale computing. Finally,
the amendment would eliminate the requirement for annual
reporting on advances outside the United States in exascale
computing and require that the plan required by this section be
submitted with each summary of the Stockpile Stewardship and
Management Plan submitted to the congressional defense
committees in each even-numbered year pursuant to section 4203
of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523).
We understand the value of maintaining U.S. leadership in
high performance computing and believe achieving exascale
computing within the next decade must be a national goal.
However, we note that NNSA's top priority must remain
sustainment and modernization of the nuclear weapons stockpile.
High performance computing is an important capability that
underpins these efforts via the stockpile stewardship program,
but the costs of achieving exascale computing must not be borne
by NNSA alone. Due to the broad benefits exascale would bring
to the Federal Government and the U.S. economy in general, we
encourage the Administrator to partner with and leverage other
stakeholders in government and industry.
Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles (sec.
3130)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3122) that would
make a series of findings related to a pilot program conducted
by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) at the
Kansas City Plant (KCP) starting in April 2006, and would
require the Administrator for Nuclear Security to extend the
principles of such pilot program. The Administrator would be
required to implement the principles of the pilot program
permanently at the Kansas City Plant and extend the principles
of the pilot program, with modifications as the Administrator
determines appropriate, to not less than two additional
facilities of the nuclear security enterprise within 1 year
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment requiring a study of the feasibility of extending the
Kansas City Plant pilot program to other National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA) sites with a report to Congress
within 180 days after enactment on the results of the study and
a determination of whether the principles will be extended. We
do not mandate extending the principles. We also note the on-
going work by Comptroller General of the United States to
assess the risks, benefits and applicability of extending the
pilot program to other facilities.
Given the success of the pilot program at the Kansas City
Plant, we direct the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the
Secretary of Energy to ensure, to the greatest extent possible,
that these principles are permanently implemented at the Kansas
City Plant.
Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries (sec. 3131)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3142) that would
require the Administrator for Nuclear Security, not later than
60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, to conduct
a study of the potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Repeal of certain reporting requirements (sec. 3132)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3133) that would
repeal two statutes requiring submission of annual, recurring
reports: (1) a report on Counterintelligence and Security
Practices at National Laboratories required by section 4507 of
the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2658); and (2) a
report on Advanced Supercomputer Sales to Certain Foreign
Nations contained in section 3157 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment containing technical corrections.
Subtitle D--Other Matters
Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy (sec. 3141)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3143) that would
clarify that the amendment made by section 3113 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239) to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50
U.S.C. 2512) may not be construed to affect the authority of
the Secretary of Energy, in carrying out national security
programs, with respect to the management, planning, and
oversight of the National Nuclear Security Administration, or
as affecting the delegation by the Secretary of Energy of
authority to carry out such activities, as set forth under
subsection (a) of section 4102, as it existed before the
amendment made by section 3113.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with a technical
amendment.
Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on the
Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise (sec. 3142)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3141) that would
amend section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to modify statutory
deadlines regarding the Congressional Advisory Panel on the
Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise. The advisory
panel's interim report would be due by October 1, 2013, instead
of 180 days after enactment of Public Law 112-239. Also, the
advisory panel's full report would be due March 1, 2014,
instead of February 1, 2014. Finally, the advisory panel would
terminate not later than September 30, 2014, instead of June 1,
2014. This section would also enable the advisory panel to
submit a final report on its activities and recommendations
prior to termination.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3125) that would amend section 3166(d)(1) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
239) to extend the date of the interim report from 180 days
after the date of enactment to 180 days after the first meeting
of the advisory panel.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would change the interim report due date to
March 1, 2014 with the full report due by July 1, 2014.
Department of Energy land conveyance (sec. 3143)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3146) that would
convey in fee simple, excess land from the Hanford Reservation
to the Hanford Community Re-Use Organization.
The Senate committee-passed bill had no similar provision.
The agreement includes a provision authorizing the transfer
of the Bannister Federal Complex, Kansas City Missouri, from
the General Services Administration to the National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), which may convey for
consideration the real property using existing Department of
Energy regulations.
We request monthly reports on the status of the conveyance
of Hanford land to the Hanford Community Re-Use Organization.
In addition, we request a monthly report on the status of
conveying the land at the Hanford reservation to the Hanford
Community Re-Use Organization.
Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (sec. 3144)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3144) that would
make a technical amendment to chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.).
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration
Act (sec. 3145)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3131) that would amend the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et. seq.) with technical and
clarifying corrections.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act (sec. 3146)
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3132) that would amend the Atomic Energy Defense Act (42
U.S.C. 2501 et. seq.) with technical and clarifying
corrections.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement includes the Senate provision with an
amendment containing technical and conforming changes.
Sense of Congress on B61-12 life extension program (sec. 3147)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3118) that would
express the sense of Congress that, particularly in a
constrained budget environment, the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA) should prioritize its primary mission of
sustaining and modernizing the nuclear weapons stockpile and,
if required, shift funding from secondary missions to ensure
critical nuclear weapons modernization programs stay on
schedule and deliver nuclear warheads needed to support
military requirements. This section would also require that, of
the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Global
Threat Reduction Initiative of the NNSA, not more than 80
percent may be obligated or expended unless, by not later than
60 days after the date of enactment, the NNSA Administrator
certifies to the congressional defense committees that the B61
Life Extension Program will deliver a first production unit in
fiscal year 2019.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision with an
amendment that would express a sense of Congress that the B61-
12 Life Extension Program is a high priority of the NNSA; that,
if necessary to avoid delays, funds should be shifted from
other programs to ensure the B61-12 Life Extension Program
stays on schedule; and that further delays to the program would
undermine the credibility and reliability of the nation's
nuclear deterrent and the extended deterrent provided by the
United States to allies.
Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic
substances and worker health (sec. 3148)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1027) that would
express the sense of Congress that the President should
establish an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker
Health as part of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness
Program.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Energy security and assurance
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3104) that would
authorize appropriations for energy security and assurance
programs for fiscal year 2014, at the levels identified in
section 4701 of division D of this Act.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision as both
budget tables in section 4701 authorized no funding for the
program.
Termination of Department of Energy Employees to Protect National
Security
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3112) that would
authorize the Secretary of Energy to terminate an employee of
the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) or any
element of the Department of Energy (DOE) that involves nuclear
security if the Secretary determines the employee acted in a
manner that endangers the security of special nuclear material
or classified information. To exercise such authority, the
Secretary would have to consider the termination to be in the
interests of the United States and determine that the
termination procedures prescribed by other provisions of law
cannot be invoked in a manner that the Secretary considers
consistent with national security.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include the provision.
We understand that, following the July 2012 security breach
at the Y-12 National Security Complex by several anti-nuclear
activists, including an octogenarian nun, several federal
employees were reassigned or allowed to retire. However, no
federal employees have been terminated from federal service. We
find this lack of robust accountability to be unacceptable and
dangerous. Multiple reviews since the incident have found
failures at every level contributed to this incident, and that
there has been a distinct failure to take corrective actions
identified by previous security incidents.
For example, senior leaders in the Department of Energy's
Office of Health, Safety, and Security have held top security
policy and oversight positions for well over a decade despite
repeated security failures during this tenure. These same
senior leaders are now inexplicably being counted on to
implement reforms. This is despite the fact that this same
office conducted a review of Y-12's physical security systems
just 2 months prior to the July 2012 break-in and gave Y-12's
security a clean bill of health. This lack of accountability,
whether at senior levels or throughout the DOE, is outrageous
and must not be tolerated.
It is also contrary to the strong leadership and
accountability example set by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
in 2008 when he fired several top Air Force officials for
significant and repeated nuclear weapon security failures.
Unlike DOE, Secretary Gates sent a strong message to the Air
Force that continuation of the failures would not be tolerated
and officials at all levels were accountable for failure.
Senior officials from the Department of Energy have indicated
that federal employment laws and regulations prevented or
severely impeded termination of any federal employees in
response to the Y-12 incident. If true, we believe the
inability of the Secretary of Energy to fire federal employees
for major security failures would represent a critical problem
and national security risk. Therefore, we direct the Secretary
of Energy to submit a report to the congressional defense
committees by March 15, 2014, on the authorities available to
the Secretary to terminate federal employees. Such report
should include a description of the authorities available and
describe in detail why such authorities were insufficient to
terminate employees in the aftermath of the Y-12 incident. The
report should also include a list of the officials in the DOE
and NNSA structure that had responsibility for security at Y-12
in July 2012, a description of any disciplinary actions taken
with respect to such officials, and such officials' current
positions. Finally, the report should also provide a
description of the Secretary's views on accountability for
security failures, whether actions taken in response to the Y-
12 incident conform to these views, and how these views will be
applied in the future.
Assessment of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear
Security Administration
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3121) that would require the National Nuclear Security
Administration to undergo a review of their nuclear
nonproliferation programs by the National Academies of Science.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
The Comptroller General of the United States is directed to
provide a report to the congressional defense committees
assessing the existing and future nuclear nonproliferation
programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration. The
report shall include the following elements:
(1) An assessment of the threat of nuclear
proliferation, including fissile materials, technology
and expertise related to nuclear weapons, plutonium
reprocessing and uranium enrichment.
(2) The status of nuclear nonproliferation programs
of the National Nuclear Security Administration as of
the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) An assessment of whether those programs are
meeting the goals of those programs and reducing the
assessed threat of nuclear proliferation including:
Preventing nuclear terrorism by securing and removing
highly-enriched uranium and plutonium worldwide;
converting research reactors from highly-enriched
uranium to low-enriched uranium in Russia and other
countries; providing radiation detection capability at
ports and borders; securing and removing radiological
materials worldwide; developing and improving
technology to detect nuclear proliferation and nuclear
weapons detonation, to verify foreign commitments to
treaties and agreements with respect to nuclear
weapons, and detect the diversion of materials,
including safeguards technology; and preventing and
countering the proliferation and use of nuclear weapons
(including materials, technology and expertise).
(4) The extent of the work remaining for those
programs to meet those goals, including an estimated
timeline and costs and what gaps remain in those goals.
(5) The nuclear nonproliferation programs of the
National Nuclear Security Administration and nuclear
cooperation agreements with countries that have
obtained nuclear weapons and are not parties to the
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,
done at Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968,
and entered into force March 5, 1970 (21 UST 483)
(commonly known as the ``Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty'').
(6) The nuclear nonproliferation programs of the
National Nuclear Security Administration and nuclear
cooperation agreements with countries that are non-
nuclear weapon state parties to the Nuclear Non-
Proliferation Treaty and are acquiring nuclear
materials in violation of commitments under the Treaty.
(7) The status, level of, and gaps related to,
coordination of the programs of the NNSA and the
Department of Energy with other agencies and
departments of the Federal Government that have nuclear
nonproliferation responsibilities.
(8) In addition, the report shall include an
assessment of the budget requirements of the NNSA,
including the costs associated with the implementation
of nuclear nonproliferation programs, to reduce the
threat of nuclear proliferation.
We are cognizant that this report may require a significant
effort by the Government Accountability Office. The Comptroller
General of the United States shall provide quarterly updates on
the status of the report with a final report due no later than
August 31, 2015.
Government Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Extension
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3145) that would
permit government owned non-defense transuranic waste to be
disposed of in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant subject to
meeting the waste acceptance criteria outlined in ``Transuranic
Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot
Plant,'' dated April 21, 2011, published by the Department of
Energy.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Manhattan Project National Historic Park
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3147) that would
establish as a unit of the National Park System a series of
historical sites associated with the Manhattan Project at
facilities administered by the Department of Energy.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
Title XXXII--Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Authorization (sec. 3201)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3201) that would
authorize the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board at
$29.915 million.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Legislative Provision Not Adopted
Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3202) that would
amend section 315 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C.
2286d) to enable the Secretary of Energy to request an analysis
regarding the costs and benefits of any draft or final
recommendation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
(DNFSB). If the Secretary requests such an analysis, the Board
would be required to transmit such an analysis to the
Department of Energy (DOE) within 30 days and make such
analysis public when the associated recommendation is made
available to the public. Additionally, if the Secretary
requests such an analysis from the Board, the Secretary would
be required to conduct a similar analysis of the costs and
benefits of the recommendation and make such analysis available
to the public. The provision would also amend section 312 of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (U.S.C. 2286a) to clarify that,
in making recommendations to the Secretary of Energy, the Board
must use rigorous, quantitative analysis and specifically
assess the use of various administrative, passive, and
engineered controls for implementing the recommended measures.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
We note that a variety of independent assessments in recent
years have indicated that DNFSB oversight, coupled with DOE's
history of not challenging DNFSB recommendations, have
contributed to increasing costs within the nuclear security
enterprise that may achieve comparatively small safety
benefits. For instance, a 2011 study of two major DOE defense
nuclear facility construction projects by the Under Secretary
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD
AT&L) found that ``the current process involving oversight by
the DNFSB is not working well. Differing interpretations of DOE
regulations between the DNFSB, and the DOE and its contractors
have diverted attention and resources for arguably increased
safety.'' The study found that, ``in certain cases, the DOE has
failed to `push back' on DNFSB recommendations that don't cost-
effectively buy down risk, creating conditions in which the
DFNSB becomes a de facto program manager.'' The USD AT&L report
and the 2009 report of the bipartisan Commission on the
Strategic Posture of the United States ultimately recommended
eliminating DNFSB oversight in favor of regulation of DOE
facilities by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
In 2005, a report by the Secretary of Energy's Advisory
Board (SEAB) concluded that, although the DNFSB only issues
recommendations and not requirements, ``their recommendations
have the implicit status of requirements because of the current
lack of a specific mechanism for implementation assessment.''
The SEAB emphasized that an analysis of the costs of
implementation, safety benefits, and risks of an idea should
drive every decision and recommendation made to and within the
enterprise, and suggested the DNFSB use this mechanism every
time they make recommendations. In its Phase I report on
Managing for High Quality Science and Engineering at the
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) laboratories,
the National Academies of Science (NAS) concluded that ``the
role that non-regulatory agencies (particularly the DNFSB) have
had on the laboratories is excessive. Although the Board lacks
independent regulatory enforcement authority, it has issued
more than 30 formal recommendations to the Secretary of Energy
since 1990.'' In its Phase II report in 2013, the NAS pointed
out that ``the DNFSB is an advisory body that does not directly
impose regulations, although DOE and NNSA usually accept DNFSB
recommendations.'' The 2013 report also stated that safety
assessments by overlapping oversight bodies, including the
DNFSB, ``adds to the cost of conducting experiments and can
slow or deter experimental work . . . Moreover, these
assessments generally focus on the safety risks associated with
particular experiments rather than weighing those risks against
the benefits to be derived from the experiments and the risks
to the nuclear weapons program from not conducting the
experiments.'' Most recently, in September 2013 an assessment
of the safety culture at NNSA found a perception among NNSA
employees that ``NNSA leadership is very reactive to the DNFSB
and will make sudden changes rather than question or say no to
the Board.'' While we do not comment on individual cases or
circumstances, we believe it is imperative that the Secretary
of Energy assess the costs and benefits of any recommendation
made by the DNFSB. We believe it is incumbent upon the
Secretary to reject or request modifications to DNFSB
recommendations if the costs of implementing the
recommendations are not commensurate with the safety benefits
gained. We note that existing statute provides the Secretary
with this authority, and encourage the Secretary to use it,
when appropriate. Risk acceptance, if considered carefully and
transparently, is an important risk management practice.
Title XXXIV--Naval Petroleum Reserves
Authorization of appropriations (sec. 3401)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3401) that would
authorize $20.0 million for fiscal year 2014 for the purpose of
carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United
States Code, relating to the Naval Petroleum and Oil Reserves.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes the House provision.
Title XXXV--Maritime Administration
Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the
Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014 (sec. 3501)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3501) that would
authorize appropriations for the Maritime Administration of the
Department of Transportation for those activities of the
Maritime Administration associated with maintaining national
defense sealift.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program (sec. 3502)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3502) that would
extend the sunset date on the authorization to issue war risk
insurance from December 31, 2015, to December 31, 2020.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Sense of Congress (sec. 3503)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3503) that would
express the sense of Congress on the importance of the United
States shipbuilding industry and specifically the Ready Reserve
Force of the Maritime Administration to the national security
needs of the United States.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility,
Port of Anchorage, Alaska (sec. 3504)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3504) that would
modify the current language requiring that any funds provided
for the federal share, and any funds provided for the non-
federal share, for an intermodal transportation maritime
facility at the Port of Anchorage, Alaska, must be transferred
to the Administrator of the Maritime Administration. The
provision would change current laws to a permission to transfer
the funds, rather than a requirement to transfer the funds.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Strategic seaports (sec. 3505)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3505) that would
allow the Maritime Administrator, in consultation with the
Secretary of Defense, to give priority to providing funding to
strategic seaports in support of national security
requirements.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar
provision.
The agreement includes this provision.
Legislative Provision Not Adopted
Maritime Administration
The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision
(sec. 3501) that would re-authorize certain aspects of the
Maritime Administration.
The House bill contained no similar provision.
The agreement does not include this provision.
DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES
Authorization of appropriations (sec. 4001)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 4001) that would
provide for the authorization of projects, programs, and
activities in accordance with the tables in division D.
The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical
provision (sec. 4001).
The agreement includes this provision.
SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014
(In Thousands of Dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Agreement
FY 2014 Request Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCRETIONARY AUTHORIZATIONS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEEFunction 051, Department of Defense-Military Division A: Department of Defense AuthorizationsTitle I--Procurement
Aircraft Procurement, Army................................... 5,024,387 3,939 5,028,326
Missile Procurement, Army.................................... 1,334,083 1,334,083
Weapons & Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army...................... 1,597,267 5,561 1,602,828
Procurement of Ammunition, Army.............................. 1,540,437 -84,800 1,455,637
Other Procurement, Army...................................... 6,465,218 -54,300 6,410,918
Aircraft Procurement, Navy................................... 17,927,651 -52,248 17,875,403
Weapons Procurement, Navy.................................... 3,122,193 -12,050 3,110,143
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy & Marine Corps............... 589,267 589,267
Shipbuilding & Conversion, Navy.............................. 14,077,804 656,229 14,734,033
Other Procurement, Navy...................................... 6,310,257 -43,005 6,267,252
Procurement, Marine Corps.................................... 1,343,511 -18,008 1,325,503
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force.............................. 11,398,901 -74,920 11,323,981
Missile Procurement, Air Force............................... 5,343,286 5,343,286
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force......................... 759,442 759,442
Other Procurement, Air Force................................. 16,760,581 -13,738 16,746,843
Procurement, Defense-Wide.................................... 4,534,083 1,221 4,535,304
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.......................... 98,800 -98,800 0
Subtotal, Title I--Procurement............................... 98,227,168 215,081 98,442,249Title II--Research, Development, Test and Evaluation
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army............... 7,989,102 -34,970 7,954,132
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy............... 15,974,780 -312,959 15,661,821
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force.......... 25,702,946 16,000 25,718,946
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide....... 17,667,108 551,156 18,218,264
Operational Test & Evaluation, Defense....................... 186,300 186,300
Subtotal, Title II--Research, Development, Test and 67,520,236 219,227 67,739,463
Evaluation..................................................Title III--Operation and Maintenance
Operation & Maintenance, Army................................ 35,073,077 624,700 35,697,777
Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve........................ 3,095,036 112,200 3,207,236
Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard................. 7,054,196 45,903 7,100,099
Operation & Maintenance, Navy................................ 39,945,237 457,368 40,402,605
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps........................ 6,254,650 131,000 6,385,650
Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve........................ 1,197,752 15,800 1,213,552
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve................ 263,317 300 263,617
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force........................... 37,270,842 269,425 37,540,267
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve................... 3,164,607 4,570 3,169,177
Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard.................. 6,566,004 28,200 6,594,204
Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide........................ 32,997,693 -237,281 32,760,412
US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, Defense............ 13,606 13,606
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid................ 109,500 109,500
Cooperative Threat Reduction................................. 528,455 528,455
Defense Acquisition Development Workforce Fund............... 256,031 -124,700 131,331
Environmental Restoration, Army.............................. 298,815 298,815
Environmental Restoration, Navy.............................. 316,103 316,103
Environmental Restoration, Air Force......................... 439,820 439,820
Environmental Restoration, Defense........................... 10,757 10,757
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Sites............... 237,443 237,443
Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund................ 5,000 -5,000 0
Subtotal, Title III--Operation and Maintenance............... 175,097,941 1,322,485 176,420,426Title IV--Military Personnel
Military Personnel Appropriations............................ 130,399,881 -682,900 129,716,981
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions.......... 6,676,750 6,676,750
Subtotal, Title IV--Military Personnel....................... 137,076,631 -682,900 136,393,731Title XIV--Other Authorizations
Working Capital Fund, Army................................... 25,158 25,158
Working Capital Fund, Air Force.............................. 61,731 61,731
Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide........................... 46,428 46,428
Working Capital Fund, DECA................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510
National Defense Sealift Fund................................ 730,700 -112,200 618,500
Defense Health Program....................................... 33,054,528 -124,000 32,930,528
Chemical Agents & Munitions Destruction...................... 1,057,123 1,057,123
Drug Interdiction and Counter Drug Activities................ 938,545 938,545
Office of the Inspector General.............................. 312,131 34,869 347,000
Subtotal, Title XIV--Other Authorizations.................... 37,638,854 -201,331 37,437,523Total, Division A: Department of Defense Authorizations...... 515,560,830 872,562 516,433,392 Division B: Military Construction AuthorizationsMilitary Construction
Army......................................................... 1,119,875 -10,000 1,109,875
Navy......................................................... 1,700,269 1,700,269
Air Force.................................................... 1,156,573 -17,730 1,138,843
Defense-Wide................................................. 3,985,300 -572,050 3,413,250
Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense.............. 122,536 122,536
NATO Security Investment Program............................. 239,700 -40,000 199,700
Army National Guard.......................................... 320,815 -5,000 315,815
Army Reserve................................................. 174,060 174,060
Navy and Marine Corps Reserve................................ 32,976 32,976
Air National Guard........................................... 119,800 119,800
Air Force Reserve............................................ 45,659 45,659
Subtotal, Military Construction.............................. 9,017,563 -644,780 8,372,783Family Housing
Construction, Army........................................... 44,008 44,008
Operation & Maintenance, Army................................ 512,871 512,871
Construction, Navy and Marine Corps.......................... 73,407 73,407
Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps............... 389,844 389,844
Construction, Air Force...................................... 76,360 76,360
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force........................... 388,598 388,598
Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide........................ 55,845 55,845
Family Housing Improvement Fund.............................. 1,780 1,780
Subtotal, Family Housing..................................... 1,542,713 1,542,713Base Realignment and Closure
Base Realignment and Closure--Army........................... 180,401 180,401
Base Realignment and Closure--Navy........................... 144,580 144,580
Base Realignment and Closure--Air Force...................... 126,376 126,376
Subtotal, Base Realignment and Closure....................... 451,357 451,357Total, Division B: Military Construction Authorizations...... 11,011,633 -644,780 10,366,853Total, 051, Department of Defense-Military................... 526,572,463 227,782 526,800,245Function 053, Atomic Energy Defense Activities Division C: Department of Energy National Security Authorization and Other AuthorizationsDepartment of Energy Authorizations
Energy Programs
Electricity delivery and energy reliability.................. 16,000 -16,000 0
Nuclear Energy............................................... 94,000 94,000
Subtotal, Energy Programs.................................... 110,000 -16,000 94,000National Nuclear Security Administration
Weapons Activities........................................... 7,868,409 40,843 7,909,252
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation............................. 2,140,142 40,000 2,180,142
Naval Reactors............................................... 1,246,134 1,246,134
Office of the Administrator.................................. 397,784 -8,000 389,784
Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration........... 11,652,469 72,843 11,725,312Environmental and Other Defense Activities:
Defense Environmental Cleanup................................ 5,316,909 -301,500 5,015,409
Other Defense Activities..................................... 749,080 9,578 758,658
Subtotal, Environmental and Other Defense Activities......... 6,065,989 -291,922 5,774,067
Subtotal, Department of Energy Authorizations................ 17,828,458 -235,079 17,593,379Independent Federal Agency Authorization
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board...................... 29,915 29,915
Subtotal, Independent Federal Agency Authorization........... 29,915 29,915Subtotal, Division C: Department of Energy National Security 17,858,373 -235,079 17,623,294
Authorization and Other Authorizations......................Subtotal, 053, Atomic Energy Defense Activities.............. 17,858,373 -235,079 17,623,294Total, National Defense Funding, Base Budget Request......... 544,430,836 -7,297 544,423,539National Defense Funding, OCO Budget RequestFunction 051, Department of Defense-MilitaryProcurement
Aircraft Procurement, Army................................... 771,788 771,788
Missile Procurement, Army.................................... 128,645 128,645
Procurement of Ammunition, Army.............................. 180,900 180,900
Other Procurement, Army...................................... 603,123 603,123
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund................ 1,000,000 -45,000 955,000
Aircraft Procurement, Navy................................... 240,696 240,696
Weapons Procurement, Navy.................................... 86,500 86,500
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy & Marine Corps............... 206,821 206,821
Other Procurement, Navy...................................... 17,968 17,968
Procurement, Marine Corps.................................... 129,584 -2,898 126,686
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force.............................. 115,668 115,668
Missile Procurement, Air Force............................... 24,200 24,200
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force......................... 159,965 159,965
Other Procurement, Air Force................................. 2,574,846 2,574,846
Procurement, Defense-Wide.................................... 111,275 111,275
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.......................... 15,000 -15,000 0
National Guard & Reserve Equipment........................... 0 400,000 400,000
Subtotal, Procurement........................................ 6,366,979 337,102 6,704,081Research, Development, Test and Evaluation
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army............... 7,000 7,000
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy............... 34,426 34,426
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force.......... 9,000 9,000
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide....... 66,208 66,208
Subtotal, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation......... 116,634 116,634Operation and Maintenance
Operation & Maintenance, Army................................ 29,279,633 1,100,000 30,379,633
Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve........................ 42,935 42,935
Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard................. 199,371 199,371
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund............................. 7,726,720 -1,500,000 6,226,720
Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund.............................. 279,000 -29,000 250,000
Operation & Maintenance, Navy................................ 6,067,993 6,067,993
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps........................ 2,669,815 2,669,815
Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve........................ 55,700 55,700
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve................ 12,534 12,534
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force........................... 10,005,224 130,000 10,135,224
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve................... 32,849 32,849
Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard.................. 22,200 22,200
Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide........................ 6,435,078 6,435,078
Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance.......................... 62,829,052 -299,000 62,530,052Military Personnel
Military Personnel Appropriations............................ 9,689,307 -40,500 9,648,807
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions.......... 164,033 164,033
Subtotal, Military Personnel................................. 9,853,340 -40,500 9,812,840Other Authorizations
Working Capital Fund, Army................................... 44,732 44,732
Working Capital Fund, Air Force.............................. 88,500 88,500
Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide........................... 131,678 131,678
Defense Health Program....................................... 904,201 904,201
Drug Interdiction and Counter Drug Activities................ 376,305 376,305
Office of the Inspector General.............................. 10,766 10,766
Subtotal, Other Authorizations............................... 1,556,182 1,556,182Total, National Defense Funding, OCO Budget Request.......... 80,722,187 -2,398 80,719,789Total, National Defense...................................... 625,153,023 -9,695 625,143,328MEMORANDUM: NON-DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS
Title XIV--Armed Forces Retirement Home (Function 600)....... 67,800 67,800
Title XIV--Cemeterial Expenses, Army (Function 700).......... 45,800 25,000 70,800
Title XXXIV--Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves (Function 20,000 20,000
270)........................................................
Title XXXV--Maritime Administration (Function 400)........... 152,168 45,000 197,168MEMORANDUM: TRANSFER AUTHORITIES (NON-ADD)
Title X--General Transfer Authority.......................... [4,000,000] [1,000,000] [5,000,000]
Title XV--Special Transfer Authority......................... [4,000,000] [4,000,000]MEMORANDUM: DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS NOT UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE (NON-ADD)
Defense Production Act....................................... [25,135] [25,135]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET AUTHORITY IMPLICATION
(In Thousands of Dollars)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Agreement Agreement
Request Change Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary, Discretionary Authorizations Within the Jurisdiction of the
Armed Services Committee
SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 526,572,463 227,782 526,800,245
(051).........................
SUBTOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE 17,858,373 -235,079 17,623,294
PROGRAMS (053)................
TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE (050)-- 544,430,836 -7,297 544,423,539
BASE BILL.....................
TOTAL, OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 80,722,187 -2,398 80,719,789
OPERATIONS....................
GRAND TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE.. 625,153,023 -9,695 625,143,328 Base National Defense Discretionary Programs that are
Not In the Jurisdiction of the Armed Services Committee or Do Not
Require Additional Authorization
Defense Production Act 25,135 25,135
Purchases.....................
Indefinite Account: Disposal Of 10,000 10,000
DOD Real Property.............
Indefinite Account: Lease Of 30,000 30,000
DOD Real Property.............
Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 65,135 65,135
051...........................Formerly Utilized Sites 104,000 104,000
Remedial Action Program.......
Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 104,000 104,000
053...........................Other Discretionary Programs... 7,407,000 7,407,000
Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 7,407,000 7,407,000
054...........................
Total Defense Discretionary 7,576,135 7,576,135
Adjustments (050)............. Budget Authority Implication, National Defense Discretionary
Department of Defense--Military 607,359,785 225,384 607,585,169
(051).........................
Atomic Energy Defense 17,962,373 -235,079 17,727,294
Activities (053)..............
Defense-Related Activities 7,407,000 7,407,000
(054).........................
Total BA Implication, National 632,729,158 -9,695 632,719,463
Defense Discretionary......... National Defense Mandatory Programs, Current Law
Concurrent receipt accrual 6,970,000 6,970,000
payments to the Military
Retirement Fund (OMB Estimate)
Revolving, trust and other DOD 1,156,000 1,156,000
Mandatory.....................
Offsetting receipts............ -1,752,000 -1,752,000
Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 6,374,000 6,374,000
051...........................
Energy employees occupational 1,281,000 1,281,000
illness compensation programs
and other.....................
Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 1,281,000 1,281,000
053...........................
Radiation exposure compensation 76,000 76,000
trust fund....................
Payment to CIA retirement fund 514,000 514,000
and other.....................
Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 590,000 590,000
054...........................
Total National Defense 8,245,000 8,245,000
Mandatory (050)............... Budget Authority Implication, National Defense Discretionary and
Mandatory
Department of Defense--Military 613,733,785 225,384 613,959,169
(051).........................
Atomic Energy Defense 19,243,373 -235,079 19,008,294
Activities (053)..............
Defense-Related Activities 7,997,000 7,997,000
(054).........................
Total BA Implication, National 640,974,158 -9,695 640,964,463
Defense Discretionary and
Mandatory.....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized
Line Item ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
FIXED WING
001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT...... 1 19,730 1 19,730 1 19,730 1 19,730
003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) 4 142,050 4 142,050 4 142,050 -57,000 4 85,050
(MIP).
Modification of 12 [114,700]
transferred Liberty A/
C.
Reduction of EMARSS [-114,700] [-57,000]
LRIP aircraft.
004 MQ-1 UAV.................. 15 518,460 19 518,460 15 518,460 15 518,460
005 RQ-11 (RAVEN)............. 10,772 10,772 10,772 10,772
ROTARY
006 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY 10 96,227 31 231,327 10 96,227 10 75,000 20 171,227
(LUH).
Program increase for [21] [115,100] [10] [75,000]
additional aircraft.
Program increase for [20,000]
fielding.
007 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA 42 608,469 42 608,469 42 608,469 42 608,469
REMAN.
008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 150,931 150,931 150,931 150,931
(CY).
012 UH-60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL 65 1,046,976 65 1,046,976 65 1,026,992 -14,061 65 1,032,915
(MYP).
Transfer to PE [-19,984] [-14,061]
0203774A at Army
request.
013 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 116,001 116,001 116,001 116,001
(CY).
014 CH-47 HELICOPTER.......... 28 801,650 28 801,650 28 801,650 28 801,650
015 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 98,376 98,376 98,376 98,376
(CY).
MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
016 MQ-1 PAYLOAD--UAS......... 97,781 97,781 97,781 97,781
017 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP)...... 10,262 10,262 10,262 10,262
018 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON 12,467 12,467 12,467 12,467
(MIP).
019 AH-64 MODS................ 53,559 53,559 53,559 53,559
020 CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER 149,764 149,764 149,764 149,764
MODS (MYP).
021 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500
MODS.
022 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS... 167 74,095 167 74,095 167 74,095 167 74,095
023 KIOWA MODS WARRIOR........ 3 184,044 3 184,044 3 184,044 3 184,044
024 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN.. 152,569 152,569 152,569 152,569
025 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE... 92,779 92,779 92,779 92,779
026 GATM ROLLUP............... 65,613 65,613 65,613 65,613
027 RQ-7 UAV MODS............. 121,902 121,902 121,902 121,902
GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS
028 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY 47,610 47,610 47,610 47,610
EQUIPMENT.
029 SURVIVABILITY CM.......... 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700
030 CMWS...................... 126,869 126,869 126,869 126,869
OTHER SUPPORT
031 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 705 6,809 705 6,809 705 6,809 705 6,809
032 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT... 65,397 65,397 65,397 65,397
033 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 45,841 45,841 45,841 45,841
034 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL....... 79,692 79,692 79,692 79,692
035 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES..... 1,615 1,615 1,615 1,615
036 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET..... 2,877 2,877 2,877 2,877
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 1,040 5,024,387 1,065 5,159,487 1,040 5,004,403 10 3,939 1,050 5,028,326
PROCUREMENT, ARMY. MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE
SYSTEM
002 MSE MISSILE............... 56 540,401 56 540,401 56 540,401 56 540,401
AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE
SYSTEM
003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY...... 4,464 4,464 4,464 4,464
ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE
SYS
004 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM 449 110,510 449 110,510 449 110,510 449 110,510
SUMMARY.
005 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY...... 988 49,354 988 49,354 988 49,354 988 49,354
006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 19,965 19,965 19,965 19,965
(CY).
007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216
008 MLRS REDUCED RANGE 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022
PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR).
MODIFICATIONS
011 PATRIOT MODS.............. 256,438 256,438 256,438 256,438
012 STINGER MODS.............. 37,252 37,252 37,252 37,252
013 ITAS/TOW MODS............. 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
014 MLRS MODS................. 11,571 11,571 11,571 11,571
015 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS...... 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
016 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS... 11,222 11,222 11,222 11,222
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
017 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS....... 3,530 3,530 3,530 3,530
018 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 1,748 1,748 1,748 1,748
(MISSILES).
019 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT... 5,285 5,285 5,285 5,285
TOTAL MISSILE 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083
PROCUREMENT, ARMY. PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY
TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
001 STRYKER VEHICLE........... 374,100 374,100 374,100 374,100
MODIFICATION OF TRACKED
COMBAT VEHICLES
002 STRYKER (MOD)............. 20,522 20,522 20,522 20,522
003 FIST VEHICLE (MOD)........ 29,965 29,965 29,965 29,965
004 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)..... 158,000 158,000 158,000 158,000
005 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM 4,769 4,769 4,769 4,769
M109A6 (MOD).
006 PALADIN INTEGRATED 18 260,177 18 260,177 18 219,477 -40,700 18 219,477
MANAGEMENT (PIM).
Transfer to PE [-40,700] [-40,700]
0604854A at Army
Request.
007 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE 111,031 186,031 111,031 75,000 186,031
(M88A2 HERCULES).
Program increase...... [75,000] [75,000]
008 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD)...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
009 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE.. 14 62,951 21 93,951 14 62,951 14 62,951
Program increase...... [7] [31,000]
010 M88 FOV MODS.............. 28,469 28,469 28,469 28,469
011 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE...... 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002
012 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD)...... 178,100 178,100 178,100 178,100
013 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM.... 168,000 90,000 90,000
Program increase...... [168,000] [90,000]
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
014 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 1,544 1,544 1,544 1,544
(TCV-WTCV).
WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT
VEHICLES
015 INTEGRATED AIR BURST 1,424 69,147 8,147 -1424 -69,147 0
WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY.
Transfer to PE [-11,000] [-11,000]
0604601A per Army's
request.
XM25 Counter Defilade [-1,424] [-50,000] [-1,424] [-69,147] [-1,424] [-58,147]
Target Engagement.
018 MORTAR SYSTEMS............ 5,310 5,310 5,310 5,310
019 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049
MODULE (GLM).
021 CARBINE................... 41,897 70,846 41,897 48,846 12,000 21,254 -29897 -49,592 12,000 21,254
Individual Carbine [-22,000] [-29,897] [-49,592] [-29,897] [-49,592]
program cancelation.
023 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED 242 56,580 242 56,580 242 56,580 242 56,580
WEAPONS STATION.
024 HANDGUN................... 300 300 300 300
MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER
COMBAT VEH
026 M777 MODS................. 39,300 39,300 39,300 39,300
027 M4 CARBINE MODS........... 10,300 10,300 10,300 10,300
028 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS 33,691 33,691 33,691 33,691
029 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS. 7,608 7,608 7,608 7,608
030 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN 2,719 2,719 2,719 2,719
MODS.
031 SNIPER RIFLES 7,017 7,017 7,017 7,017
MODIFICATIONS.
032 M119 MODIFICATIONS........ 18,707 18,707 18,707 18,707
033 M16 RIFLE MODS............ 2,136 2,136 2,136 2,136
034 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN 1,569 1,569 1,569 1,569
$5.0M (WOCV-WTCV).
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
035 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 2,024 2,024 2,024 2,024
(WOCV-WTCV).
036 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 10,108 10,108 10,108 10,108
(WOCV-WTCV).
037 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS... 459 459 459 459
038 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT 1,267 1,267 1,267 1,267
(SOLDIER ENH PROG).
TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF 48,656 1,597,267 47,239 1,788,267 17,335 1,437,828 -31,321 5,561 17,335 1,602,828
W&TCV, ARMY. PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION,
ARMY
SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
AMMUNITION
002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES.... 112,167 87,167 87,167 -25,000 87,167
Unit cost [-25,000] [-25,000] [-25,000]
efficiencies--Army
requested reduction.
003 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES.... 58,571 53,571 53,571 -5,000 53,571
Unit cost [-5,000] [-5,000] [-5,000]
efficiencies--Army
requested reduction.
004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES... 9,858 9,858 9,858 9,858
005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES... 80,037 55,037 55,037 -25,000 55,037
Unit cost [-25,000] [-25,000] [-25,000]
efficiencies--Army
requested reduction.
007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES...... 16,496 16,496 6,196 -10,300 6,196
Program decrease...... [-10,300] [-10,300]
008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES...... 69,533 50,033 50,033 -19,500 50,033
Unit cost [-19,500] [-19,500] [-19,500]
efficiencies--Army
requested reduction.
009 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES...... 55,781 55,781 55,781 55,781
MORTAR AMMUNITION
010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES.... 38,029 38,029 38,029 38,029
011 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES.... 24,656 24,656 24,656 24,656
012 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES... 60,781 60,781 60,781 60,781
TANK AMMUNITION
013 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM 121,551 121,551 121,551 121,551
AND 120MM, ALL TYPES.
ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM 39,825 39,825 39,825 39,825
& 105MM, ALL TYPES.
015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 37,902 37,902 37,902 37,902
155MM, ALL TYPES.
016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE 802 67,896 802 67,896 802 67,896 802 67,896
M982.
017 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, 71,205 71,205 71,205 71,205
FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL.
ROCKETS
020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED 1,012 1,012 1,012 1,012
MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES.
021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL 108,476 108,476 108,476 108,476
TYPES.
OTHER AMMUNITION
022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL 24,074 24,074 24,074 24,074
TYPES.
023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES....... 33,242 33,242 33,242 33,242
024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES........ 7,609 7,609 7,609 7,609
025 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES..... 5,228 5,228 5,228 5,228
MISCELLANEOUS
026 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES 16,700 16,700 16,700 16,700
027 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL 7,366 7,366 7,366 7,366
TYPES.
028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES......... 3,614 3,614 3,614 3,614
029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 12,423 12,423 12,423 12,423
(AMMO).
030 AMMUNITION PECULIAR 16,604 16,604 16,604 16,604
EQUIPMENT.
031 FIRST DESTINATION 14,328 14,328 14,328 14,328
TRANSPORTATION (AMMO).
032 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES...... 108 108 108 108
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT
033 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL 242,324 242,324 242,324 242,324
FACILITIES.
034 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 179,605 179,605 179,605 179,605
DEMILITARIZATION.
035 ARMS INITIATIVE........... 3,436 3,436 3,436 3,436
TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF 802 1,540,437 802 1,465,937 802 1,455,637 -84,800 802 1,455,637
AMMUNITION, ARMY. OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
TACTICAL VEHICLES
001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY 25 4,000 25 4,000 25 4,000 25 4,000
SETS.
002 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:.... 40 6,841 40 6,841 40 6,841 40 6,841
003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL 837 223,910 837 223,910 837 223,910 837 223,910
VEH (FMTV).
004 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED 11,880 11,880 11,880 11,880
FIREFIGHTING EQUIP.
005 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL 220 14,731 220 14,731 220 14,731 220 14,731
VEHICLES (FHTV).
006 PLS ESP................... 74 44,252 74 44,252 74 44,252 74 44,252
009 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE 77 39,525 77 39,525 77 39,525 77 39,525
TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV.
011 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE 746 51,258 746 25,958 746 51,258 -25,300 746 25,958
PROTECTION KITS.
Funding ahead of need. [-25,300] [-25,300]
012 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC 34 49,904 34 49,904 34 49,904 34 49,904
EQUIP.
013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH- 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200
PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS.
NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
014 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN....... 400 400 400 400
015 PASSENGER CARRYING 716 716 716 716
VEHICLES.
016 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619
OTHER.
COMM--JOINT COMMUNICATIONS
018 WIN-T--GROUND FORCES 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477
TACTICAL NETWORK.
019 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION 14,120 14,120 14,120 14,120
PROGRAM.
020 JOINT INCIDENT SITE 7,869 7,869 7,869 7,869
COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY.
021 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM). 5,296 5,296 5,296 5,296
COMM--SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
022 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE 31 147,212 31 147,212 31 147,212 31 147,212
WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS.
023 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL 7,998 7,998 7,998 7,998
COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS.
024 SHF TERM.................. 7,232 7,232 7,232 7,232
025 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING 3,308 3,308 3,308 3,308
SYSTEM (SPACE).
026 SMART-T (SPACE)........... 13,992 13,992 13,992 13,992
028 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC--GBS.... 94 28,206 94 28,206 94 28,206 94 28,206
029 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC 15 2,778 15 2,778 15 2,778 15 2,778
SAT).
COMM--C3 SYSTEM
031 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL 17,590 17,590 17,590 17,590
SYS (AGCCS).
COMM--COMBAT
COMMUNICATIONS
032 ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION 786 786 786 786
SYSTEM (DATA RADIO).
033 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930
SYSTEM.
034 MID-TIER NETWORKING 130 19,200 130 19,200 130 19,200 130 19,200
VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR).
035 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS 1,438 1,438 1,438 1,438
LVT(2).
036 SINCGARS FAMILY........... 9,856 9,856 9,856 9,856
037 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS--OPA2.. 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184
038 TRACTOR DESK.............. 6,271 6,271 6,271 6,271
040 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030
PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS.
041 TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868
AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM.
042 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE..... 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000
044 RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166
FAMILY.
045 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR 22,867 22,867 22,867 22,867
COMBAT CASUALTY CARE.
COMM--INTELLIGENCE COMM
048 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512
049 ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT 323 61,096 323 61,096 323 61,096 323 61,096
INFORMATION SECURITY
050 TSEC--ARMY KEY MGT SYS 13,890 13,890 13,890 13,890
(AKMS).
051 INFORMATION SYSTEM 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245
SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP.
052 BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE..... 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800
053 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY 877 24,711 877 24,711 877 24,711 877 24,711
(COMSEC).
COMM--LONG HAUL
COMMUNICATIONS
055 BASE SUPPORT 43,395 43,395 43,395 43,395
COMMUNICATIONS.
COMM--BASE COMMUNICATIONS
057 INFORMATION SYSTEMS....... 104,577 104,577 104,577 104,577
058 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM 612 612 612 612
(DMS).
059 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000
MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.
060 INSTALLATION INFO 248,477 248,477 248,477 248,477
INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
PROGRAM.
ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT REL
ACT (TIARA)
064 JTT/CIBS-M................ 824 824 824 824
065 PROPHET GROUND............ 10 59,198 10 59,198 10 59,198 10 59,198
067 DCGS-A (MIP).............. 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214
068 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND 5 9,899 5 9,899 5 9,899 5 9,899
STATION (JTAGS).
069 TROJAN (MIP).............. 24,598 24,598 24,598 24,598
070 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL 1,927 1,927 1,927 1,927
SPT) (MIP).
071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING 6,169 6,169 6,169 6,169
AND COLL(CHARCS).
072 MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE 2,924 2,924 2,924 2,924
TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M.
ELECT EQUIP--ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (EW)
074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR 18 40,735 18 40,735 18 40,735 18 40,735
RADAR.
075 EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT 13 13 13 13
TOOLS (EWPMT).
076 ENEMY UAS................. 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800
079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/ 1,237 1,237 1,237 1,237
SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES.
080 CI MODERNIZATION.......... 1,399 1,399 1,399 1,399
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
SURV. (TAC SURV)
082 SENTINEL MODS............. 86 47,983 86 47,983 86 47,983 86 47,983
083 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL 142 142 142 142
(STTW).
084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES...... 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428
085 LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT 5,183 5,183 5,183 5,183
SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM.
086 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN 14,074 14,074 14,074 14,074
SIGHT.
087 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300
RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF.
089 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION 1,016 1,016 1,016 1,016
SYSTEM (GLIS).
090 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION 5 55,354 5 55,354 5 55,354 5 55,354
FAMILY OF SYSTEMS.
091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP.. 800 800 800 800
092 PROFILER.................. 3,027 3,027 3,027 3,027
093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 1,185 1,185 1,185 1,185
(FIREFINDER RADARS).
094 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND-- 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214
PLATFORM (JBC-P).
096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) 167 26,037 167 26,037 167 26,037 167 26,037
097 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM 120 23,100 120 23,100 120 23,100 120 23,100
098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS........ 19 312,727 19 312,727 19 312,727 19 312,727
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL C2
SYSTEMS
101 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY.... 574 43,228 574 43,228 574 43,228 574 43,228
102 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT 167 14,446 167 14,446 167 14,446 167 14,446
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
103 FAAD C2................... 4,607 4,607 4,607 4,607
104 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING 8 33,090 8 33,090 8 33,090 8 33,090
& CONTROL SYS.
105 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM 21,200 21,200 21,200 21,200
107 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE 1,795 1,795 1,795 1,795
SUPPORT (LCSS).
109 NETWORK MANAGEMENT 54,327 54,327 54,327 54,327
INITIALIZATION AND
SERVICE.
110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171
(MCS).
111 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT 83,936 83,936 83,936 83,936
SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A).
113 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION...... 25,476 25,476 25,476 25,476
114 RECONNAISSANCE AND 212 19,341 212 19,341 212 19,341 212 19,341
SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET.
ELECT EQUIP--AUTOMATION
115 ARMY TRAINING 11,865 11,865 11,865 11,865
MODERNIZATION.
116 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING 219,431 219,431 219,431 219,431
EQUIP.
117 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE 6,414 6,414 6,414 6,414
BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM.
118 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD 62,683 62,683 62,683 62,683
PGM (HPCMP).
120 RESERVE COMPONENT 34,951 34,951 34,951 34,951
AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS).
ELECT EQUIP--AUDIO VISUAL
SYS (A/V)
121 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/ 7,440 7,440 7,440 7,440
V).
122 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M 16 1,615 16 1,615 16 1,615 16 1,615
(SURVEYING EQUIPMENT).
ELECT EQUIP--SUPPORT
123 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C- 554 554 554 554
E).
124 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES. 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
124A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 3,558 3,558 3,558 3,558
CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
EQUIPMENT
126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL 762 762 762 762
EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630
128 CBRN DEFENSE.............. 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151
BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
130 TACTICAL BRIDGING......... 2 14,188 2 14,188 2 14,188 2 14,188
131 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT- 34 23,101 34 23,101 34 23,101 34 23,101
RIBBON.
132 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER 15,416 15,416 15,416 15,416
(CBT) RECAP.
ENGINEER (NON-
CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
134 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN 311 50,465 311 50,465 311 50,465 311 50,465
SYSM (GSTAMIDS).
135 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490
SYSTEM (RCSS).
136 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS 1,563 1,563 1,563 1,563
RECAPITALIZATION.
137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921
DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
EQPMT).
138 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS. 100 100 100 100
139 < $5M, COUNTERMINE 70 2,271 70 2,271 70 2,271 70 2,271
EQUIPMENT.
COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
140 HEATERS AND ECU'S......... 464 7,269 464 7,269 464 7,269 464 7,269
141 LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND 200 200 200 200
LATRINES.
142 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT....... 1,468 1,468 1,468 1,468
143 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526
SYSTEM (PRSS).
144 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM..... 5,547 81,680 5,547 71,680 5,547 81,680 -10,000 5,547 71,680
Unjustified unit cost [-10,000] [-10,000]
growth.
147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT... 217 28,096 217 28,096 217 28,096 217 28,096
148 CARGO AERIAL DEL & 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150
PERSONNEL PARACHUTE
SYSTEM.
149 MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS.. 248 3,242 248 3,242 248 3,242 248 3,242
150 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND 289 38,141 289 38,141 289 38,141 289 38,141
CONSTRUCTION SETS.
151 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG 210 5,859 210 5,859 210 5,859 210 5,859
SPT).
PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, 508 60,612 508 60,612 508 60,612 508 60,612
PETROLEUM & WATER.
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
153 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL.... 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042
154 MEDEVAC MISSON EQUIPMENT 88 35,318 88 35,318 88 35,318 88 35,318
PACKAGE (MEP).
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
155 MOBILE MAINTENANCE 25 19,427 25 19,427 25 19,427 25 19,427
EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS.
156 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 347 3,860 347 3,860 347 3,860 347 3,860
(MAINT EQ).
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
157 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
6X4 (CCE).
159 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING..... 52 36,078 52 36,078 52 36,078 52 36,078
160 MISSION MODULES-- 13 9,721 13 9,721 13 9,721 13 9,721
ENGINEERING.
162 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR....... 109 50,122 109 50,122 109 50,122 109 50,122
163 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED..... 84 28,828 84 28,828 84 28,828 84 28,828
164 ALL TERRAIN CRANES........ 19 19,863 19 19,863 19 19,863 19 19,863
166 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER 34 23,465 34 23,465 34 23,465 34 23,465
EXCAVATOR (HMEE).
168 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD 109 13,590 109 13,590 109 13,590 109 13,590
CONSTRUCTION CAPAP.
169 CONST EQUIP ESP........... 80 16,088 80 16,088 80 16,088 80 16,088
170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 66 6,850 66 6,850 66 6,850 66 6,850
(CONST EQUIP).
RAIL FLOAT
CONTAINERIZATION
EQUIPMENT
171 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP....... 38,007 19,007 38,007 -19,000 19,007
Funding ahead of need. [-19,000] [-19,000]
172 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 10,605 10,605 10,605 10,605
(FLOAT/RAIL).
GENERATORS
173 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437
EQUIP.
MATERIAL HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
174 ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250
HANDLER (RTCH).
175 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS....... 60 8,260 60 8,260 60 8,260 60 8,260
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS 309 121,710 309 121,710 309 121,710 309 121,710
SUPPORT.
177 TRAINING DEVICES, 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200
NONSYSTEM.
178 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL 15 30,063 15 30,063 15 30,063 15 30,063
TRAINER.
179 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS 2 34,913 2 34,913 2 34,913 2 34,913
TACTICAL TRAINER.
180 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN 9,955 9,955 9,955 9,955
SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING.
TEST MEASURE AND DIG
EQUIPMENT (TMD)
181 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT 3 8,241 3 8,241 3 8,241 3 8,241
182 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506
EQUIPMENT (IFTE).
183 TEST EQUIPMENT 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755
MODERNIZATION (TEMOD).
OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
184 M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR.. 647 5,110 647 5,110 647 5,110 647 5,110
185 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER 5,110 5,110 5,110 5,110
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
186 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS 62,904 62,904 62,904 62,904
(OPA3).
187 BASE LEVEL COMMON 1,427 1,427 1,427 1,427
EQUIPMENT.
188 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661
EQUIPMENT (OPA-3).
189 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450
(OTH).
190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER 69 11,593 69 11,593 69 11,593 69 11,593
TESTING.
191 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3... 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948
192 TRACTOR YARD.............. 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
OPA2
195 INITIAL SPARES--C&E....... 15 59,700 15 59,700 15 59,700 15 59,700
TOTAL OTHER 162,339 6,465,218 162,339 6,410,918 162,339 6,465,218 -54,300 162,339 6,410,918
PROCUREMENT, ARMY. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
COMBAT AIRCRAFT
001 EA-18G.................... 21 2,001,787 21 1,956,787 21 2,001,787 -60,913 21 1,940,874
Excess engineering [-8,790]
change order funding.
GFE electronics cost [-5,943]
growth.
Other GFE cost growth. [-1,180]
Program adjustment.... [-45,000] [-45,000]
003 F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET 206,551 206,551 206,551 206,551
004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 75,000 75,000 75,000
(CY).
Program increase...... [75,000] [75,000]
005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV... 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444
006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 94,766 94,766 94,766 94,766
(CY).
007 JSF STOVL................. 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260
008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 103,195 103,195 103,195 103,195
(CY).
009 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT)........ 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573
010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 55,196 55,196 55,196 55,196
(CY).
011 H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/AH-1Z) 25 749,962 25 749,962 25 749,962 25 749,962
012 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 71,000 71,000 71,000 71,000
(CY).
013 MH-60S (MYP).............. 18 383,831 18 383,831 18 383,831 18 383,831
014 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 37,278 37,278 37,278 37,278
(CY).
015 MH-60R (MYP).............. 19 599,237 20 599,237 19 599,237 19 599,237
016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 231,834 231,834 231,834 231,834
(CY).
017 P-8A POSEIDON............. 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989
018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 313,160 313,160 313,160 313,160
(CY).
019 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE.......... 5 997,107 5 962,107 5 997,107 5 997,107
Unjustified CRI [-35,000]
Funding.
020 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 266,542 266,542 266,542 266,542
(CY).
TRAINER AIRCRAFT
021 JPATS..................... 29 249,080 29 249,080 29 249,080 29 249,080
OTHER AIRCRAFT
022 KC-130J................... 2 134,358 2 134,358 2 134,358 2 134,358
023 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 32,288 32,288 32,288 32,288
(CY).
025 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 52,002 52,002 52,002 -47,200 4,802
(CY).
Advance procurement [-47,200]
appropriated in fiscal
year 2013.
026 MQ-8 UAV.................. 1 60,980 1 60,980 1 60,980 1 60,980
028 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT.... 1 14,958 1 14,958 1 14,958 1 14,958
MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
029 EA-6 SERIES............... 18,577 18,577 18,577 18,577
030 AEA SYSTEMS............... 48,502 48,502 48,502 48,502
031 AV-8 SERIES............... 41,575 41,575 41,575 41,575
032 ADVERSARY................. 2,992 2,992 2,992 2,992
033 F-18 SERIES............... 875,371 875,371 875,371 -41,841 833,530
ECP 6038 radome kits [-2,952]
cost growth (OSIP 002-
07).
Integrated logistics [-8,000]
support growth (OSIP
14-03).
Other support and ILS [-20,989]
ahead of need (OSIP 04-
14).
Retrofit radars (APG- [-9,900]
79B) cost growth (OSIP
002-07).
034 H-46 SERIES............... 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127
036 H-53 SERIES............... 67,675 67,675 67,675 67,675
037 SH-60 SERIES.............. 135,054 135,054 135,054 135,054
038 H-1 SERIES................ 41,706 41,706 41,706 41,706
039 EP-3 SERIES............... 55,903 12 77,903 77,903 22,000 77,903
12th aircraft to [8,000] [8,000] [8,000]
Spiral 3.
Sensor obsolescence... [12] [14,000] [14,000] [14,000]
040 P-3 SERIES................ 37,436 37,436 37,436 37,436
041 E-2 SERIES................ 31,044 31,044 31,044 31,044
042 TRAINER A/C SERIES........ 43,720 43,720 43,720 -3,200 40,520
Avionics Obsolescence [-3,200]
installation cost
growth.
043 C-2A...................... 902 902 902 902
044 C-130 SERIES.............. 47,587 47,587 47,587 47,587
045 FEWSG..................... 665 665 665 665
046 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES 14,587 14,587 14,587 14,587
047 E-6 SERIES................ 189,312 189,312 189,312 -6,094 183,218
FAB-T funding [-6,094]
previously
appropriated (OSIP 014-
14).
048 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS 85,537 85,537 85,537 85,537
SERIES.
049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT.. 3,684 4 16,684 13,684 10,000 13,684
Program office [8,000] [5,000] [5,000]
sustainment.
Sensor obsolescence... [4] [5,000] [5,000] [5,000]
050 T-45 SERIES............... 98,128 98,128 98,128 98,128
051 POWER PLANT CHANGES....... 22,999 22,999 22,999 22,999
052 JPATS SERIES.............. 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576
053 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS 6,267 6,267 6,267 6,267
054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT...... 141,685 141,685 141,685 141,685
055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES... 120,660 120,660 120,660 120,660
056 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON 3,554 3,554 3,554 3,554
SYSTEM.
057 ID SYSTEMS................ 41,800 41,800 41,800 41,800
058 P-8 SERIES................ 9,485 9,485 9,485 9,485
059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION..... 14,431 14,431 14,431 14,431
060 MQ-8 SERIES............... 1,001 1,001 1,001 1,001
061 RQ-7 SERIES............... 26,433 26,433 26,433 26,433
062 V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) 160,834 160,834 160,834 160,834
OSPREY.
063 F-35 STOVL SERIES......... 147,130 147,130 147,130 147,130
064 F-35 CV SERIES............ 31,100 31,100 31,100 31,100
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS... 1,142,461 1,142,461 1,142,461 1,142,461
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP &
FACILITIES
066 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT... 410,044 410,044 410,044 410,044
067 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL 27,450 27,450 27,450 27,450
FACILITIES.
068 WAR CONSUMABLES........... 28,930 28,930 28,930 28,930
069 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES.. 5,268 5,268 5,268 5,268
070 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 60,306 60,306 60,306 60,306
071 FIRST DESTINATION 1,775 1,775 1,775 1,775
TRANSPORTATION.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 165 17,927,651 182 17,957,651 165 17,959,651 -52,248 165 17,875,403
PROCUREMENT, NAVY. WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
001 TRIDENT II MODS........... 1,140,865 1,126,765 1,140,865 1,140,865
Equipment related to [-14,100]
New START treaty
implementation.
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL 7,617 7,617 7,617 7,617
FACILITIES.
STRATEGIC MISSILES
003 TOMAHAWK.................. 196 312,456 196 312,456 196 312,456 196 312,456
TACTICAL MISSILES
004 AMRAAM.................... 54 95,413 54 95,413 54 95,413 54 95,413
005 SIDEWINDER................ 225 117,208 225 117,208 225 117,208 225 117,208
006 JSOW...................... 328 136,794 328 136,794 328 136,794 328 136,794
007 STANDARD MISSILE.......... 81 367,985 81 367,985 81 367,985 81 367,985
008 RAM....................... 66 67,596 66 67,596 66 67,596 -1,612 66 65,984
Guidance and control [-1,612]
assembly contract
savings.
009 HELLFIRE.................. 363 33,916 363 33,916 363 33,916 363 33,916
011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED 50 6,278 50 6,278 50 6,278 50 6,278
MUNITIONS (SOPGM).
012 AERIAL TARGETS............ 41,799 41,799 41,799 41,799
013 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT..... 3,538 3,538 3,538 3,538
MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
014 ESSM...................... 53 76,749 53 76,749 53 76,749 53 76,749
015 HARM MODS................. 143 111,902 143 111,902 143 111,902 143 111,902
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL 1,138 1,138 1,138 1,138
FACILITIES.
017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM 23,014 23,014 23,014 23,014
FOLLOW-ON.
ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
018 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 84,318 84,318 84,318 84,318
TORPEDOES AND RELATED
EQUIP
019 SSTD...................... 3,978 3,978 3,978 3,978
020 ASW TARGETS............... 8,031 8,031 8,031 8,031
MOD OF TORPEDOES AND
RELATED EQUIP
021 MK-54 TORPEDO MODS........ 150 125,898 150 125,898 150 125,898 150 125,898
022 MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS.. 108 53,203 108 53,203 108 53,203 108 53,203
023 QUICKSTRIKE MINE.......... 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
024 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 59,730 59,730 59,730 59,730
025 ASW RANGE SUPPORT......... 4,222 4,222 4,222 4,222
DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION
026 FIRST DESTINATION 3,963 3,963 3,963 3,963
TRANSPORTATION.
GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS.... 12,513 12,513 12,513 12,513
MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND
GUN MOUNTS
028 CIWS MODS................. 56,308 56,308 62,708 6,400 62,708
Additional RMA kits... [6,400] [6,400]
029 COAST GUARD WEAPONS....... 10,727 10,727 10,727 -3,458 7,269
Machine gun equipment [-3,458]
cost growth.
030 GUN MOUNT MODS............ 72,901 72,901 72,901 -13,380 59,521
MK38 gun kits cost [-13,380]
growth.
031 CRUISER MODERNIZATION 1,943 1 1,943 1,943 1,943
WEAPONS.
032 AIRBORNE MINE 19,758 19,758 19,758 19,758
NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS.
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
034 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS... 52,632 52,632 52,632 52,632
TOTAL WEAPONS 1,817 3,122,193 1,818 3,108,093 1,817 3,128,593 -12,050 1,817 3,110,143
PROCUREMENT, NAVY. PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY
& MC
NAVY AMMUNITION
001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS..... 37,703 37,703 37,703 37,703
002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL 65,411 65,411 65,411 65,411
TYPES.
003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION.... 20,284 20,284 20,284 20,284
004 PRACTICE BOMBS............ 37,870 37,870 37,870 37,870
005 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED 53,764 53,764 53,764 53,764
DEVICES.
006 AIR EXPENDABLE 67,194 67,194 67,194 67,194
COUNTERMEASURES.
007 JATOS..................... 2,749 2,749 2,749 2,749
008 LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE ATTACK 3,906 3,906 3,906 3,906
PROJECTILE.
009 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION.. 24,151 24,151 24,151 24,151
010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN 33,080 33,080 33,080 33,080
AMMUNITION.
011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION. 40,398 40,398 40,398 40,398
012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY 61,219 61,219 61,219 61,219
AMMO.
013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637
014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 4,578 4,578 4,578 4,578
MILLION.
MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION..... 26,297 26,297 26,297 26,297
016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES. 6,088 6,088 6,088 6,088
017 40 MM, ALL TYPES.......... 7,644 7,644 7,644 7,644
018 60MM, ALL TYPES........... 3,349 3,349 3,349 3,349
020 120MM, ALL TYPES.......... 13,361 13,361 13,361 13,361
022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES....... 2,149 2,149 2,149 2,149
023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES........ 27,465 27,465 27,465 27,465
026 FUZE, ALL TYPES........... 26,366 26,366 26,366 26,366
028 AMMO MODERNIZATION........ 8,403 8,403 8,403 8,403
029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 5,201 5,201 5,201 5,201
TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF 589,267 589,267 589,267 589,267
AMMO, NAVY & MC. SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION,
NAVY
OTHER WARSHIPS
001 CARRIER REPLACEMENT 944,866 944,866 944,866 944,866
PROGRAM.
003 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE.. 2 2,930,704 2 3,422,704 2 2,930,704 492,000 2 3,422,704
Increase to Virginia [492,000] [492,000]
class.
004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 2,354,612 2,354,612 2,354,612 2,354,612
(CY).
005 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS... 1,705,424 1,705,424 1,705,424 -22,071 1,683,353
CVN 72 requirement [-22,071]
previously funded in
Fiscal Year 2012
reprogramming.
006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 245,793 245,793 245,793 245,793
(CY).
007 DDG 1000.................. 231,694 310,994 231,694 231,694
Increase to DDG 1000.. [79,300]
008 DDG-51.................... 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564
009 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 388,551 388,551 388,551 388,551
(CY).
010 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP...... 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014
AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
012 AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING 1 524,000 1 524,000 1 579,300 55,300 1 579,300
BASE.
Navy requested [55,300] [55,300]
adjustment.
014 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL... 2,732 2,732 2,732 2,732
AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND
PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST
016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 183,900 183,900 183,900 23,400 207,300
(CY).
Program shortfall..... [23,400]
017 OUTFITTING................ 450,163 450,163 450,163 450,163
019 LCAC SLEP................. 4 80,987 4 80,987 4 80,987 4 80,987
020 COMPLETION OF PY 625,800 988,800 725,800 107,600 733,400
SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS.
DDG-51................ [332,000] [100,000]
Help buy 3rd DDG-51 in [100,000]
FY 13.
Joint High Speed [7,600] [7,600]
Vessel.
MTS................... [23,400]
TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & 12 14,077,804 12 15,012,104 12 14,233,104 656,229 12 14,734,033
CONVERSION, NAVY. OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT
001 LM-2500 GAS TURBINE....... 10,180 10,180 10,180 10,180
002 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE.. 5,536 5,536 5,536 5,536
003 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE 16,956 16,956 16,956 -13,000 3,956
(HED).
Contract delay........ [-13,000]
GENERATORS
004 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E.... 19,782 19,782 19,782 19,782
NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
005 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 39,509 39,509 39,509 39,509
PERISCOPES
006 SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING 52,515 52,515 52,515 52,515
EQUIP.
OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT
007 DDG MOD................... 285,994 285,994 285,994 285,994
008 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT.... 14,389 14,389 14,389 14,389
009 COMMAND AND CONTROL 2,436 2,436 2,436 2,436
SWITCHBOARD.
010 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE........... 12,700 12,700 12,700 12,700
011 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE 40,329 40,329 40,329 40,329
LIFE PROGRAM.
012 POLLUTION CONTROL 19,603 19,603 19,603 19,603
EQUIPMENT.
013 SUBMARINE SUPPORT 8,678 8,678 8,678 8,678
EQUIPMENT.
014 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT 74,209 74,209 74,209 74,209
EQUIPMENT.
015 LCS CLASS SUPPORT 47,078 47,078 47,078 47,078
EQUIPMENT.
016 SUBMARINE BATTERIES....... 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000
017 LPD CLASS SUPPORT 25,053 25,053 25,053 25,053
EQUIPMENT.
018 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT 12,986 12,986 12,986 12,986
EQUIP.
019 DSSP EQUIPMENT............ 2,455 2,455 2,455 2,455
020 CG MODERNIZATION.......... 10,539 1 10,539 10,539 10,539
021 LCAC...................... 14,431 14,431 14,431 14,431
022 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS... 36,700 36,700 36,700 36,700
023 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 119,902 119,902 119,902 119,902
024 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS 3,678 3,678 3,678 3,678
025 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT 8,292 8,292 8,292 8,292
SYSTEM.
REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT
027 REACTOR COMPONENTS........ 286,744 286,744 286,744 286,744
OCEAN ENGINEERING
028 DIVING AND SALVAGE 8,780 8,780 8,780 8,780
EQUIPMENT.
SMALL BOATS
029 STANDARD BOATS............ 36,452 36,452 36,452 -3,396 33,056
CNIC force protection [-3,396]
medium contract delay.
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
030 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING 36,145 36,145 36,145 36,145
EQUIPMENT.
PRODUCTION FACILITIES
EQUIPMENT
031 OPERATING FORCES IPE...... 69,368 69,368 69,368 -19,500 49,868
Emergent repair [-19,500]
facility outfitting
ahead of need.
OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
032 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS....... 106,328 106,328 106,328 106,328
033 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES 45,966 45,966 45,966 45,966
EQUIPMENT.
034 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES... 59,885 59,885 59,885 59,885
035 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES... 37,168 37,168 37,168 37,168
LOGISTIC SUPPORT
036 LSD MIDLIFE............... 77,974 1 77,974 77,974 77,974
SHIP SONARS
038 SPQ-9B RADAR.............. 27,934 27,934 27,934 27,934
039 AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW COMBAT 83,231 83,231 83,231 83,231
SYSTEM.
040 SSN ACOUSTICS............. 199,438 199,438 199,438 199,438
041 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT 9,394 9,394 9,394 9,394
EQUIPMENT.
042 SONAR SWITCHES AND 12,953 12,953 12,953 12,953
TRANSDUCERS.
043 ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC. 8,958 8,958 8,958 8,958
ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
044 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE 24,077 24,077 24,077 24,077
SYSTEM.
045 SSTD...................... 11,925 11,925 11,925 -3,425 8,500
AN/SLQ-25X [-3,425]
cancellation.
046 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM. 94,338 94,338 94,338 94,338
047 SURTASS................... 9,680 9,680 9,680 9,680
048 MARITIME PATROL AND 18,130 18,130 18,130 18,130
RECONNSAISANCE FORCE.
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
EQUIPMENT
049 AN/SLQ-32................. 203,375 1 203,375 203,375 -3,684 199,691
Excess block 2 support [-3,684]
funding.
RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT
050 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT...... 123,656 1 123,656 123,656 123,656
051 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION 896 896 896 896
SYSTEM (AIS).
SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE
EQUIPMENT
052 SUBMARINE SUPPORT 49,475 49,475 49,475 49,475
EQUIPMENT PROG.
OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
053 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT 34,692 34,692 34,692 34,692
CAPABILITY.
054 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM 396 396 396 396
(TIS).
055 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND 15,703 15,703 15,703 15,703
SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS).
056 ATDLS..................... 3,836 3,836 3,836 3,836
057 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL 7,201 7,201 7,201 7,201
SYSTEM (NCCS).
058 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM 54,400 54,400 54,400 54,400
REPLACEMENT.
059 SHALLOW WATER MCM......... 8,548 8,548 8,548 8,548
060 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS 11,765 11,765 11,765 11,765
(SPACE).
061 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND 6,483 6,483 6,483 6,483
TV SERVICE.
062 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631
EQUIP.
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
063 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT.. 53,644 53,644 53,644 53,644
AVIATION ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
064 MATCALS................... 7,461 7,461 7,461 7,461
065 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC 9,140 9,140 9,140 9,140
CONTROL.
066 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING 20,798 20,798 20,798 20,798
SYSTEM.
067 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM. 19,754 19,754 19,754 19,754
068 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 8,909 8,909 8,909 8,909
SYSTEMS.
069 LANDING SYSTEMS........... 13,554 13,554 13,554 13,554
070 ID SYSTEMS................ 38,934 38,934 38,934 38,934
071 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING 14,131 14,131 14,131 14,131
SYSTEMS.
OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
072 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & 3,249 3,249 3,249 3,249
CONTROL.
073 MARITIME INTEGRATED 11,646 11,646 11,646 11,646
BROADCAST SYSTEM.
074 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I 18,189 18,189 18,189 18,189
SYSTEMS.
075 DCGS-N.................... 17,350 17,350 17,350 17,350
076 CANES..................... 340,567 1 340,567 340,567 340,567
077 RADIAC.................... 9,835 9,835 9,835 9,835
078 CANES-INTELL.............. 59,652 59,652 59,652 59,652
079 GPETE..................... 6,253 6,253 6,253 6,253
080 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST 4,963 4,963 4,963 4,963
FACILITY.
081 EMI CONTROL 4,664 4,664 4,664 4,664
INSTRUMENTATION.
082 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 66,889 66,889 66,889 66,889
SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS
084 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS 23,877 1 23,877 23,877 23,877
AUTOMATION.
086 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER 28,001 28,001 28,001 28,001
$5M.
SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS
087 SUBMARINE BROADCAST 7,856 7,856 7,856 7,856
SUPPORT.
088 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION 74,376 74,376 74,376 74,376
EQUIPMENT.
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
089 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 27,381 27,381 27,381 27,381
SYSTEMS.
090 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL 215,952 1 215,952 215,952 215,952
(NMT).
SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
091 JCS COMMUNICATIONS 4,463 4,463 4,463 4,463
EQUIPMENT.
092 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS.. 778 778 778 778
CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
094 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY 133,530 133,530 133,530 133,530
PROGRAM (ISSP).
095 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
TEAM.
CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
096 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS 12,251 12,251 12,251 12,251
EQUIP.
OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT
097 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT..... 2,893 2,893 2,893 2,893
SONOBUOYS
099 SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES...... 179,927 179,927 179,927 179,927
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT 55,279 55,279 55,279 55,279
EQUIPMENT.
101 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS... 8,792 8,792 8,792 8,792
102 AIRCRAFT REARMING 11,364 11,364 11,364 11,364
EQUIPMENT.
103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY 59,502 59,502 59,502 59,502
EQUIPMENT.
104 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT.. 19,118 19,118 19,118 19,118
105 DCRS/DPL.................. 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425
106 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT..... 29,670 29,670 29,670 29,670
107 AIRBORNE MINE 101,554 101,554 101,554 101,554
COUNTERMEASURES.
108 LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD 18,293 18,293 18,293 18,293
EQUIPMENT.
109 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC 7,969 7,969 7,969 7,969
MAINTENANCE AIDS.
110 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT 5,215 5,215 5,215 5,215
EQUIPMENT.
111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS 4,827 4,827 4,827 4,827
INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS).
SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
112 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188
113 GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT 4,447 4,447 4,447 4,447
SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS
EQUIPMENT
114 NATO SEASPARROW........... 58,368 58,368 58,368 58,368
115 RAM GMLS.................. 491 491 491 491
116 SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM.. 51,858 51,858 51,858 51,858
117 AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 59,757 59,757 59,757 59,757
118 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 71,559 71,559 71,559 71,559
119 VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS... 626 626 626 626
120 MARITIME INTEGRATED 2,779 2,779 2,779 2,779
PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS.
FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
121 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS 224,484 198,565 224,484 224,484
EQUIP.
New START treaty [-25,919]
implementation.
ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
122 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS 85,678 85,678 85,678 85,678
123 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT 3,913 3,913 3,913 3,913
EQUIPMENT.
124 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT 3,909 3,909 3,909 3,909
EQUIPMENT.
125 ASW RANGE SUPPORT 28,694 28,694 28,694 28,694
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
126 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 46,586 46,586 46,586 46,586
DISPOSAL EQUIP.
127 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 11,933 11,933 11,933 11,933
OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE
128 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY 62,361 1 62,361 62,361 62,361
SYSTEM.
129 SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE 41,813 41,813 41,813 41,813
MODS.
130 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE 26,672 26,672 26,672 26,672
MODS.
CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
131 PASSENGER CARRYING 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600
VEHICLES.
132 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS.... 3,717 3,717 3,717 3,717
133 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE 10,881 10,881 10,881 10,881
EQUIP.
134 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT... 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748
135 TACTICAL VEHICLES......... 5,540 5,540 5,540 5,540
136 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT...... 5,741 5,741 5,741 5,741
137 POLLUTION CONTROL 3,852 3,852 3,852 3,852
EQUIPMENT.
138 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION.... 25,757 25,757 25,757 25,757
139 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES 1,182 1,182 1,182 1,182
SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
140 MATERIALS HANDLING 14,250 14,250 14,250 14,250
EQUIPMENT.
141 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT 6,401 6,401 6,401 6,401
EQUIPMENT.
142 FIRST DESTINATION 5,718 5,718 5,718 5,718
TRANSPORTATION.
143 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY 22,597 22,597 22,597 22,597
SYSTEMS.
TRAINING DEVICES
144 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 22,527 22,527 22,527 22,527
COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
145 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 50,428 50,428 50,428 50,428
146 EDUCATION SUPPORT 2,292 2,292 2,292 2,292
EQUIPMENT.
147 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 4,925 4,925 4,925 4,925
149 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT 3,202 3,202 3,202 3,202
EQUIPMENT.
151 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT 24,294 24,294 24,294 24,294
EQUIPMENT.
152 C4ISR EQUIPMENT........... 4,287 4,287 4,287 4,287
153 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT 18,276 18,276 18,276 18,276
EQUIPMENT.
154 PHYSICAL SECURITY 134,495 134,495 134,495 134,495
EQUIPMENT.
155 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION 324,327 324,327 324,327 324,327
TECHNOLOGY.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
156A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 12,140 12,140 12,140 12,140
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
157 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS... 317,234 316,959 317,234 317,234
New START treaty [-275]
implementation.
TOTAL OTHER 6,310,257 8 6,284,063 6,310,257 -43,005 6,267,252
PROCUREMENT, NAVY. PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
001 AAV7A1 PIP................ 32,360 32,360 32,360 32,360
002 LAV PIP................... 6,003 6,003 6,003 6,003
ARTILLERY AND OTHER
WEAPONS
003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT 589 589 589 589
SYSTEM.
004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655
HOWITZER.
005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY 5,467 5,467 5,467 5,467
ROCKET SYSTEM.
006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT 20,354 20,354 20,354 20,354
VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION.
OTHER SUPPORT
007 MODIFICATION KITS......... 38,446 38,446 38,446 38,446
008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT 4,734 4,734 4,734 4,734
PROGRAM.
GUIDED MISSILES
009 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE.. 15,713 15,713 15,713 15,713
010 JAVELIN................... 219 36,175 219 36,175 219 36,175 219 36,175
012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM- 1,136 1,136 1,136 1,136
HEAVY (AAWS-H).
OTHER SUPPORT
013 MODIFICATION KITS......... 33,976 33,976 33,976 -3,898 30,078
TOW Unit Cost Growth.. [-3,898]
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEMS
014 UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER.... 16,273 16,273 16,273 16,273
REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT. 41,063 41,063 41,063 41,063
OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM..... 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930
COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
(NON-TEL)
018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION 1,637 1,637 1,637 1,637
(COMM & ELEC).
019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS. 18,394 18,394 18,394 18,394
RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-
TEL)
020 RADAR SYSTEMS............. 114,051 114,051 114,051 -12,110 101,941
Previously funded EDM [-12,110]
refurbishment.
021 RQ-21 UAS................. 25 66,612 25 66,612 25 66,612 25 66,612
INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-
TEL)
022 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM....... 3,749 3,749 3,749 3,749
023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 75,979 75,979 75,979 75,979
EQUIPMENT.
026 RQ-11 UAV................. 1,653 1,653 1,653 1,653
027 DCGS-MC................... 9,494 9,494 9,494 9,494
OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT.... 6,171 6,171 6,171 6,171
OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL)
029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES. 121,955 121,955 121,955 -2,000 119,955
Unit cost growth...... [-2,000]
030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS...... 83,294 83,294 83,294 83,294
031 RADIO SYSTEMS............. 74,718 74,718 74,718 74,718
032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL 47,613 47,613 47,613 47,613
SYSTEMS.
033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE 19,573 19,573 19,573 19,573
SUPPORT.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 5,659 5,659 5,659 5,659
ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES
034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER 1,039 1,039 1,039 1,039
VEHICLES.
035 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES. 31,050 31,050 31,050 31,050
TACTICAL VEHICLES
036 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP).... 36,333 36,333 36,333 36,333
037 MOTOR TRANSPORT 3,137 3,137 3,137 3,137
MODIFICATIONS.
040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL 27,385 27,385 27,385 27,385
TRAILERS.
OTHER SUPPORT
041 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 7,016 7,016 7,016 7,016
ENGINEER AND OTHER
EQUIPMENT
042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 14,377 14,377 14,377 14,377
EQUIP ASSORT.
043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT..... 24,864 24,864 24,864 24,864
044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS..... 21,592 21,592 21,592 21,592
045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED.. 61,353 61,353 61,353 61,353
046 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT 4,827 4,827 4,827 4,827
EQUIPMENT.
047 EOD SYSTEMS............... 40,011 40,011 40,011 40,011
MATERIALS HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
048 PHYSICAL SECURITY 16,809 16,809 16,809 16,809
EQUIPMENT.
049 GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER 3,408 3,408 3,408 3,408
EQUIPMENT (GMEE).
050 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP... 48,549 48,549 48,549 48,549
051 FIRST DESTINATION 190 190 190 190
TRANSPORTATION.
GENERAL PROPERTY
052 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT... 23,129 23,129 23,129 23,129
053 TRAINING DEVICES.......... 8,346 8,346 8,346 8,346
054 CONTAINER FAMILY.......... 1,857 1,857 1,857 1,857
055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION 36,198 36,198 36,198 36,198
EQUIPMENT.
056 RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN.. 2,390 2,390 2,390 2,390
OTHER SUPPORT
057 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 6,525 6,525 6,525 6,525
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
058 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS... 13,700 13,700 13,700 13,700
TOTAL PROCUREMENT, 244 1,343,511 244 1,343,511 244 1,343,511 -18,008 244 1,325,503
MARINE CORPS. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE
TACTICAL FORCES
001 F-35...................... 19 3,060,770 19 3,060,770 19 3,060,770 -71,500 19 2,989,270
Decrease non-recurring [-71,500]
engineering
initiatives.
002 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 363,783 363,783 363,783 363,783
(CY).
OTHER AIRLIFT
005 C-130J.................... 6 537,517 6 537,517 6 537,517 6 537,517
006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 162,000 162,000 162,000 162,000
(CY).
007 HC-130J................... 1 132,121 1 132,121 1 132,121 1 132,121
008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 88,000 88,000 88,000 88,000
(CY).
009 MC-130J................... 4 389,434 4 389,434 4 389,434 4 389,434
010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000
(CY).
HELICOPTERS
015 CV-22 (MYP)............... 3 230,798 3 230,798 3 230,798 3 230,798
MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT
017 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C...... 6 2,541 6 2,541 6 2,541 6 2,541
OTHER AIRCRAFT
020 TARGET DRONES............. 41 138,669 41 138,669 41 138,669 41 138,669
022 AC-130J................... 5 470,019 5 470,019 5 470,019 5 470,019
024 RQ-4...................... 27,000 27,000 27,000 -16,000 11,000
Production closeout... [-16,000]
027 MQ-9...................... 12 272,217 18 352,217 12 242,217 6 80,000 18 352,217
Prior year savings.... [-30,000]
Program increase...... [6] [80,000] [6] [80,000]
028 RQ-4 BLOCK 40 PROC........ 1,747 1,747 1,747 1,747
STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
029 B-2A...................... 20,019 20,019 20,019 20,019
030 B-1B...................... 132,222 132,222 132,222 132,222
031 B-52...................... 111,002 110,502 111,002 -5,120 105,882
B-52 conversions [-500]
related to New START
treaty implementation.
Internal Weapons Bay [-5,120]
Upgrade defer low rate
initial production.
032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED 27,197 27,197 27,197 27,197
COUNTERMEASURES.
TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
033 A-10...................... 47,598 47,598 47,598 47,598
034 F-15...................... 354,624 354,624 354,624 354,624
035 F-16...................... 11,794 11,794 11,794 11,794
036 F-22A..................... 285,830 285,830 285,830 285,830
037 F-35 MODIFICATIONS........ 157,777 157,777 157,777 157,777
AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
038 C-5....................... 2,456 2,456 2,456 2,456
039 C-5M...................... 1,021,967 1,021,967 1,021,967 -38,000 983,967
Program excess........ [-38,000]
042 C-17A..................... 143,197 143,197 143,197 143,197
043 C-21...................... 103 103 103 103
044 C-32A..................... 9,780 9,780 9,780 9,780
045 C-37A..................... 452 452 452 452
046 C-130 AMP................. 8 47,300 0
LRIP Kit Procurement.. [8] [47,300] [47,300]
Transfer to Title II, [-47,300]
RDAF, line 230.
TRAINER AIRCRAFT
047 GLIDER MODS............... 128 128 128 128
048 T-6....................... 6,427 6,427 6,427 6,427
049 T-1....................... 277 277 277 277
050 T-38...................... 28,686 28,686 28,686 28,686
OTHER AIRCRAFT
052 U-2 MODS.................. 45,591 45,591 45,591 45,591
053 KC-10A (ATCA)............. 70,918 70,918 70,918 70,918
054 C-12...................... 1,876 1,876 1,876 1,876
055 MC-12W.................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
056 C-20 MODS................. 192 192 192 192
057 VC-25A MOD................ 263 263 263 263
058 C-40...................... 6,119 6,119 6,119 6,119
059 C-130..................... 58,577 74,277 105,877 15,700 74,277
C-130 avionics [47,300]
upgrades.
C-130H Propulsion [15,700] [15,700]
System Engine Upgrades.
061 C-130J MODS............... 10,475 10,475 10,475 10,475
062 C-135..................... 46,556 46,556 46,556 46,556
063 COMPASS CALL MODS......... 34,494 34,494 34,494 34,494
064 RC-135.................... 171,813 171,813 171,813 171,813
065 E-3....................... 197,087 197,087 197,087 197,087
066 E-4....................... 14,304 14,304 14,304 14,304
067 E-8....................... 57,472 57,472 57,472 57,472
068 H-1....................... 6,627 6,627 6,627 6,627
069 H-60...................... 27,654 27,654 27,654 27,654
070 RQ-4 MODS................. 9,313 9,313 9,313 9,313
071 HC/MC-130 MODIFICATIONS... 16,300 16,300 16,300 16,300
072 OTHER AIRCRAFT............ 6,948 6,948 6,948 6,948
073 MQ-1 MODS................. 9,734 9,734 9,734 9,734
074 MQ-9 MODS................. 102,970 102,970 68,470 -40,000 62,970
Anti-ice production [-5,520]
ahead of need.
Lynx radar reduction.. [-34,500] [-34,480]
076 RQ-4 GSRA/CSRA MODS....... 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
077 CV-22 MODS................ 23,310 23,310 23,310 23,310
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
078 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR 463,285 25 639,285 463,285 463,285
PARTS.
F100-229 spare engine [25] [165,000]
shortfall.
MQ-9 spares........... [11,000]
COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT 49,140 49,140 49,140 49,140
SUPPORT EQUIP.
POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT
081 B-1....................... 3,683 3,683 3,683 3,683
083 B-2A...................... 43,786 43,786 43,786 43,786
084 B-52...................... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000
087 C-17A..................... 81,952 81,952 81,952 81,952
089 C-135..................... 8,597 8,597 8,597 8,597
090 F-15...................... 2,403 2,403 2,403 2,403
091 F-16...................... 3,455 3,455 3,455 3,455
092 F-22A..................... 5,911 5,911 5,911 5,911
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS
094 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS. 21,148 21,148 21,148 21,148
WAR CONSUMABLES
095 WAR CONSUMABLES........... 94,947 94,947 94,947 94,947
OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES
096 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES.. 1,242,004 1,242,004 1,242,004 1,242,004
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
101A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 75,845 67,545 75,845 75,845
Program Decrease...... [-8,300]
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 97 11,398,901 136 11,709,101 97 11,381,701 6 -74,920 103 11,323,981
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE
MISSILE REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT--BALLISTIC
001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ- 39,104 39,104 39,104 39,104
BALLISTIC.
TACTICAL
002 JASSM..................... 183 291,151 183 291,151 183 291,151 183 291,151
003 SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X)....... 225 119,904 225 119,904 225 119,904 225 119,904
004 AMRAAM.................... 199 340,015 199 340,015 199 340,015 199 340,015
005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE. 413 48,548 413 48,548 413 48,548 413 48,548
006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB....... 144 42,347 144 42,347 144 42,347 144 42,347
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
007 INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL 752 752 752 752
PREVENTION.
CLASS IV
009 MM III MODIFICATIONS...... 21,635 21,635 21,635 21,635
010 AGM-65D MAVERICK.......... 276 276 276 276
011 AGM-88A HARM.............. 580 580 580 580
012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE 6,888 6,888 6,888 6,888
(ALCM).
013 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB....... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
014 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR 72,080 71,377 72,080 72,080
PARTS.
Spares and repair [-703]
parts related to New
START treaty
implementation.
SPACE PROGRAMS
015 ADVANCED EHF.............. 379,586 379,586 379,586 379,586
016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER 38,398 38,398 38,398 38,398
SATELLITES(SPACE).
017 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT..... 2 403,431 2 403,431 2 403,431 2 403,431
018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 74,167 74,167 74,167 74,167
(CY).
019 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC). 5,244 5,244 5,244 5,244
020 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) 55,997 55,997 55,997 55,997
021 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT 95,673 95,673 95,673 95,673
PROG(SPACE).
022 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900
VEH(SPACE).
023 SBIR HIGH (SPACE)......... 583,192 583,192 583,192 583,192
SPECIAL PROGRAMS
029 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS... 36,716 36,716 36,716 36,716
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
029A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 829,702 829,702 829,702 829,702
TOTAL MISSILE 1,171 5,343,286 1,171 5,342,583 1,171 5,343,286 1,171 5,343,286
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION,
AIR FORCE
ROCKETS
001 ROCKETS................... 15,735 15,735 15,735 15,735
CARTRIDGES
002 CARTRIDGES................ 129,921 129,921 129,921 129,921
BOMBS
003 PRACTICE BOMBS............ 30,840 30,840 30,840 30,840
004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS..... 187,397 187,397 187,397 187,397
005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510
MUNITION.
OTHER ITEMS
006 CAD/PAD................... 35,837 35,837 35,837 35,837
007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 7,531 7,531 7,531 7,531
DISPOSAL (EOD).
008 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS... 499 499 499 499
009 MODIFICATIONS............. 480 480 480 480
010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 9,765 9,765 9,765 9,765
FLARES
011 FLARES.................... 55,864 55,864 55,864 55,864
FUZES
013 FUZES..................... 76,037 76,037 76,037 76,037
SMALL ARMS
014 SMALL ARMS................ 21,026 21,026 21,026 21,026
TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442
AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE. OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE
PASSENGER CARRYING
VEHICLES
001 PASSENGER CARRYING 2,048 2,048 2,048 2,048
VEHICLES.
CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES
002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE... 8,019 8,019 8,019 8,019
003 CAP VEHICLES.............. 946 946 946 946
004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138
SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES
005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL 13,093 13,093 13,093 13,093
VEHICLES.
006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 13,983 13,983 13,983 13,983
FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE 23,794 23,794 23,794 23,794
VEHICLES.
MATERIALS HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
008 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 8,669 8,669 8,669 8,669
BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & 6,144 6,144 6,144 6,144
CLEANING EQUIP.
010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580
COMM SECURITY
EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
012 COMSEC EQUIPMENT.......... 149,661 149,661 149,661 149,661
013 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC).... 726 726 726 726
INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING 2,789 2,789 2,789 2,789
EQUIPMENT.
015 INTELLIGENCE COMM 31,875 31,875 31,875 31,875
EQUIPMENT.
016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS...... 452 452 452 452
017 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS.. 14,203 14,203 14,203 14,203
ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & 46,232 46,232 46,232 46,232
LANDING SYS.
019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM.. 11,685 11,685 11,685 11,685
020 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM-- 19,248 19,248 19,248 19,248
FIXED.
021 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS 19,292 19,292 19,292 19,292
IMPROVEMENTS.
022 WEATHER OBSERVATION 17,166 17,166 17,166 17,166
FORECAST.
023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND 22,723 22,723 22,723 22,723
CONTROL.
024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX. 27,930 27,930 27,930 27,930
025 TAC SIGNIT SPT............ 217 217 217 217
SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS
PROJECTS
027 GENERAL INFORMATION 49,627 49,627 49,627 49,627
TECHNOLOGY.
028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & 13,559 13,559 13,559 13,559
CONTROL SYS.
029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND 11,186 11,186 11,186 11,186
CONTROL.
030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL 43,238 43,238 43,238 43,238
SECURITY SYSTEM.
031 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES.... 10,431 10,431 10,431 10,431
032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES........ 13,769 13,769 13,769 13,769
033 GCSS-AF FOS............... 19,138 19,138 19,138 19,138
034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 8,809 8,809 8,809 8,809
SYSTEM.
035 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR- 26,935 26,935 26,935 26,935
WPN SYS.
AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT 80,558 80,558 80,558 80,558
SYSTEMS.
038 AFNET..................... 97,588 97,588 97,588 97,588
039 VOICE SYSTEMS............. 8,419 8,419 8,419 8,419
040 USCENTCOM................. 34,276 34,276 34,276 34,276
SPACE PROGRAMS
041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM 28,235 28,235 28,235 28,235
SPACE.
042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE......... 2,061 2,061 2,061 2,061
043 NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE. 4,415 4,415 4,415 4,415
044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL 30,237 30,237 30,237 30,237
NETWORK SPACE.
045 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM 98,062 98,062 98,062 98,062
SPACE.
046 MILSATCOM SPACE........... 105,935 105,935 105,935 105,935
047 SPACE MODS SPACE.......... 37,861 37,861 37,861 37,861
048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM....... 7,171 7,171 7,171 7,171
ORGANIZATION AND BASE
049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT.... 83,537 83,537 83,537 83,537
050 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER 11,884 11,884 11,884 -3,250 8,634
LOCATER.
Unjustified unit cost [-3,250]
growth for batteries.
051 RADIO EQUIPMENT........... 14,711 14,711 14,711 14,711
052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT 10,275 10,275 10,275 10,275
053 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE.. 50,907 50,907 50,907 50,907
MODIFICATIONS
054 COMM ELECT MODS........... 55,701 55,701 55,701 55,701
PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE
EQUIP
055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES...... 14,524 14,524 14,524 -10,488 4,036
Night Vision Cueing [-10,488]
and Display
termination.
056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 28,655 28,655 28,655 28,655
DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING
EQ
057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL 9,332 9,332 9,332 9,332
HANDLING EQUIP.
BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
058 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT... 16,762 16,762 16,762 16,762
059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.... 33,768 33,768 33,768 33,768
060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL 2,495 2,495 2,495 2,495
INVESTMENT.
061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT........ 12,859 12,859 12,859 12,859
062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,954
SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
064 DARP RC135................ 24,528 24,528 24,528 24,528
065 DCGS-AF................... 137,819 137,819 137,819 137,819
067 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM.... 479,586 479,586 479,586 479,586
068 DEFENSE SPACE 45,159 45,159 45,159 45,159
RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 14,519,256 14,519,256 14,519,256 14,519,256
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
069 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS... 25,746 25,746 25,746 25,746
TOTAL OTHER 16,760,581 16,760,581 16,760,581 -13,738 16,746,843
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
001 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 1,291 1,291 1,291 1,291
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT........... 5,711 5,711 5,711 5,711
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
003 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION.. 47,201 47,201 47,201 47,201
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
009 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 16,189 16,189 16,189 16,189
SECURITY.
012 TELEPORT PROGRAM.......... 66,075 66,075 66,075 66,075
013 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 83,881 83,881 83,881 83,881
014 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572
SERVICES (NCES).
015 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM 125,557 125,557 125,557 125,557
NETWORK.
017 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE. 16,941 16,941 16,941 16,941
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
018 MAJOR EQUIPMENT........... 13,137 13,137 13,137 13,137
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT
019 MAJOR EQUIPMENT........... 5 15,414 5 15,414 5 15,414 5 15,414
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA
020 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL 1,454 1,454 1,454 1,454
SUPPORT & LOGISTICS.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE
SECURITY COOPERATION
AGENCY
021 EQUIPMENT................. 978 978 978 978
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
022 MAJOR EQUIPMENT........... 5,020 5,020 5,020 5,020
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE
THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
023 VEHICLES.................. 2 100 2 100 2 100 2 100
024 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT..... 3 13,395 3 13,395 3 13,395 3 13,395
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE
DEFENSE AGENCY
026 THAAD..................... 36 581,005 36 581,005 36 581,005 36 581,005
027 AEGIS BMD................. 52 580,814 52 580,814 52 580,814 52 580,814
028 BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS...... 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000
029 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III.... 1 131,400 1 131,400 1 131,400 1 131,400
031 IRON DOME................. 1 220,309 1 220,309 1 220,309 1 220,309
033 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 107,000 0
(CY).
Advance Procurement of [107,000]
14 GBIs, beginning
with booster motor
sets.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
039 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 14,363 14,363 14,363 14,363
SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP).
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
040 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD...... 37,345 37,345 37,345 37,345
041 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, 16,678 16,678 16,678 16,678
INTELLIGENCE.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
042 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS...... 14,792 14,792 14,792 14,792
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
043 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS...... 35,259 35,259 35,259 35,259
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 544,272 544,272 544,272 544,272
AVIATION PROGRAMS
045 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND 112,456 112,456 112,456 112,456
SUSTAINMENT.
046 MH-60 MODERNIZATION 81,457 81,457 81,457 81,457
PROGRAM.
047 NON-STANDARD AVIATION..... 2,650 2,650 2,650 2,650
048 U-28...................... 56,208 56,208 56,208 56,208
049 MH-47 CHINOOK............. 19,766 19,766 19,766 19,766
050 RQ-11 UNMANNED AERIAL 850 850 850 850
VEHICLE.
051 CV-22 MODIFICATION........ 3 98,927 3 98,927 3 98,927 3 98,927
052 MQ-1 UNMANNED AERIAL 20,576 20,576 20,576 20,576
VEHICLE.
053 MQ-9 UNMANNED AERIAL 1,893 1,893 14,893 13,000 14,893
VEHICLE.
Capability [13,000] [13,000]
Improvements.
055 STUASL0................... 13,166 13,166 13,166 13,166
056 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE.. 107,687 107,687 107,687 107,687
057 AC/MC-130J................ 51,870 51,870 51,870 51,870
059 C-130 MODIFICATIONS....... 71,940 71,940 71,940 -10,623 61,317
C-130 TF/TA--early to [-10,623]
need.
SHIPBUILDING
061 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS........ 37,439 37,439 37,439 37,439
AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
063 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M....... 159,029 159,029 159,029 159,029
OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS...... 79,819 79,819 79,819 79,819
068 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/ 14,906 14,906 14,906 14,906
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
070 OTHER ITEMS <$5M.......... 81,711 81,711 81,711 81,711
071 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS... 35,053 35,053 33,897 -1,156 33,897
CCFLIR--Transfer at [-1,156] [-1,156]
USSOCOM Request.
074 SPECIAL PROGRAMS.......... 41,526 41,526 41,526 41,526
075 TACTICAL VEHICLES......... 43,353 43,353 43,353 43,353
076 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M...... 210,540 210,540 210,540 210,540
078 COMBAT MISSION 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
REQUIREMENTS.
082 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE 6,645 6,645 6,645 6,645
ACTIVITIES.
083 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 25,581 25,581 25,581 25,581
INTELLIGENCE.
089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS.. 191,061 191,061 191,061 191,061
CBDP
091 INSTALLATION FORCE 14,271 14,271 14,271 14,271
PROTECTION.
092 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION..... 101,667 101,667 101,667 101,667
094 JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM 13,447 13,447 13,447 13,447
(MEDICAL).
095 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION..... 20,896 20,896 20,896 20,896
096 CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE... 144,540 144,540 144,540 144,540
TOTAL PROCUREMENT, 103 4,534,083 103 4,641,083 103 4,545,927 1,221 103 4,535,304
DEFENSE-WIDE. JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND
JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND
001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL 98,800 98,800 -98,800 0
NEEDS FUND.
Program reduction..... [-98,800] [-98,800]
TOTAL JOINT URGENT 98,800 98,800 -98,800 0
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND. TOTAL PROCUREMENT.... 229,104 98,227,168 227,777 99,666,171 197,783 98,151,289 -31,305 215,081 197,799 98,442,249
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized
Line Item ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
FIXED WING
002 SATURN ARCH (MIP)......... 4 48,000 4 48,000 4 48,000 4 48,000
004 MQ-1 UAV.................. 4 31,988 4 31,988 4 31,988 4 31,988
ROTARY
009 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB 4 142,000 4 142,000 4 142,000 4 142,000
NEW BUILD.
011 KIOWA WARRIOR WRA......... 14 163,800 14 163,800 14 163,800 14 163,800
014 CH-47 HELICOPTER.......... 10 386,000 10 386,000 10 386,000 10 386,000
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 36 771,788 36 771,788 36 771,788 36 771,788
PROCUREMENT, ARMY. MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE
SYSTEM
003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY...... 550 54,000 550 79,887 550 54,000 550 54,000
Restoral of funds [25,887]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE
SYS
007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 383 39,045 383 39,045 383 39,045 383 39,045
010 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS 38 35,600 38 35,600 38 35,600 38 35,600
(ATACMS)--SYS SUM.
TOTAL MISSILE 971 128,645 971 154,532 971 128,645 971 128,645
PROCUREMENT, ARMY. PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY
MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER
COMBAT VEH
033 M16 RIFLE MODS............ 15,422 0
Restoral of funds [15,422]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF 15,422 0
W&TCV, ARMY. PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION,
ARMY
SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
AMMUNITION
002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES.... 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400
004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES... 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES... 5,000 10,000 5,000 5,000
Restoral of funds [5,000]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES...... 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000
MORTAR AMMUNITION
010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES.... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM 10,000 30,000 10,000 10,000
& 105MM, ALL TYPES.
Restoral of funds [20,000]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
155MM, ALL TYPES.
016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE 120 11,000 120 11,000 120 11,000 120 11,000
M982.
MINES
018 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, 9,482 0
ALL TYPES.
Restoral of funds [9,482]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
ROCKETS
021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL 57,000 57,000 57,000 57,000
TYPES.
OTHER AMMUNITION
022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
TYPES.
023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES....... 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES........ 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
MISCELLANEOUS
028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES......... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF 120 180,900 120 215,382 120 180,900 120 180,900
AMMUNITION, ARMY. OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
TACTICAL VEHICLES
003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL 2,500 0
VEH (FMTV).
Restoral of funds [2,500]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
005 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL 2,050 0
VEHICLES (FHTV).
Restoral of funds [2,050]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH- 321,040 562,596 321,040 321,040
PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS.
Restoral of funds [241,556]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
COMM--BASE COMMUNICATIONS
060 INSTALLATION INFO 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
PROGRAM.
ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT REL
ACT (TIARA)
067 DCGS-A (MIP).............. 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200
071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING 5,980 5,980 5,980 5,980
AND COLL(CHARCS).
ELECT EQUIP--ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (EW)
074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR 67 57,800 67 83,255 67 57,800 67 57,800
RADAR.
Restoral of funds [25,455]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
078 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT 15,300 15,300 15,300 15,300
SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE.
079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/ 4,221 4,221 4,221 4,221
SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES.
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
SURV. (TAC SURV)
091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP.. 34 1,834 34 1,834 34 1,834 34 1,834
093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 8,400 0
(FIREFINDER RADARS).
Restoral of funds [8,400]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) 137 21,000 137 21,000 137 21,000 137 21,000
098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS........ 4 85,830 4 85,830 4 85,830 4 85,830
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL C2
SYSTEMS
110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM 3,200 0
(MCS).
Restoral of funds [3,200]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
112 SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS 5,160 0
ENTERPRISE (SALE).
Restoral of funds [5,160]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
EQUIPMENT
126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL 15,000 0
EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
Restoral of funds [15,000]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) 24,932 0
Restoral of funds [24,932]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
ENGINEER (NON-
CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 3,565 0
DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
EQPMT).
Restoral of funds [3,565]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
146 FORCE PROVIDER............ 3 51,654 3 51,654 3 51,654 3 51,654
147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT... 18 6,264 18 6,264 18 6,264 18 6,264
PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, 2,119 0
PETROLEUM & WATER.
Restoral of funds [2,119]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS 7,000 0
SUPPORT.
Restoral of funds [7,000]
based on offsets used
for April 2013
reprogramming.
TOTAL OTHER 263 603,123 263 944,060 263 603,123 263 603,123
PROCUREMENT, ARMY. JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV
DEFEAT FUND
NETWORK ATTACK
001 ATTACK THE NETWORK........ 417,700 417,700 417,700 417,700
JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT
002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE......... 248,886 248,886 248,886 248,886
FORCE TRAINING
003 TRAIN THE FORCE........... 106,000 106,000 106,000
Program decrease...... [-106,000]
STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE
004 OPERATIONS................ 227,414 227,414 182,414 -45,000 182,414
Program decrease...... [-45,000] [-45,000]
TOTAL JOINT IMPR 1,000,000 1,000,000 849,000 -45,000 955,000
EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT
FUND. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
COMBAT AIRCRAFT
011 H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/AH-1Z) 1 29,520 1 29,520 1 29,520 1 29,520
OTHER AIRCRAFT
026 MQ-8 UAV.................. 1 13,100 1 13,100 1 13,100 1 13,100
MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
031 AV-8 SERIES............... 57,652 57,652 57,652 57,652
033 F-18 SERIES............... 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500
039 EP-3 SERIES............... 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700
049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT.. 3,375 3,375 3,375 3,375
054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT...... 49,183 49,183 49,183 49,183
055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES... 4,190 4,190 4,190 4,190
059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION..... 20,700 20,700 20,700 20,700
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS... 24,776 24,776 24,776 24,776
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 2 240,696 2 240,696 2 240,696 2 240,696
PROCUREMENT, NAVY. WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
TACTICAL MISSILES
009 HELLFIRE.................. 270 27,000 270 27,000 270 27,000 270 27,000
010 LASER MAVERICK............ 500 58,000 500 58,000 500 58,000 500 58,000
011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED 9 1,500 9 1,500 9 1,500 9 1,500
MUNITIONS (SOPGM).
TOTAL WEAPONS 779 86,500 779 86,500 779 86,500 779 86,500
PROCUREMENT, NAVY. PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY
& MC
NAVY AMMUNITION
001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS..... 11,424 11,424 11,424 11,424
002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL 30,332 30,332 30,332 30,332
TYPES.
003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION.... 8,282 8,282 8,282 8,282
006 AIR EXPENDABLE 31,884 31,884 31,884 31,884
COUNTERMEASURES.
011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION. 409 409 409 409
012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY 11,976 11,976 11,976 11,976
AMMO.
013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447
014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 7,692 7,692 7,692 7,692
MILLION.
MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION..... 13,461 13,461 13,461 13,461
016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES. 3,310 3,310 3,310 3,310
017 40 MM, ALL TYPES.......... 6,244 6,244 6,244 6,244
018 60MM, ALL TYPES........... 3,368 3,368 3,368 3,368
019 81MM, ALL TYPES........... 9,162 9,162 9,162 9,162
020 120MM, ALL TYPES.......... 10,266 10,266 10,266 10,266
021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES....... 1,887 1,887 1,887 1,887
022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES....... 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611
023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES........ 37,459 37,459 37,459 37,459
024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES...... 970 970 970 970
025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL 418 418 418 418
TYPES.
026 FUZE, ALL TYPES........... 14,219 14,219 14,219 14,219
TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF 206,821 206,821 206,821 206,821
AMMO, NAVY & MC. OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
135 TACTICAL VEHICLES......... 17,968 17,968 17,968 17,968
TOTAL OTHER 17,968 17,968 17,968 17,968
PROCUREMENT, NAVY. PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
GUIDED MISSILES
010 JAVELIN................... 180 29,334 180 29,334 180 29,334 180 29,334
011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW......... 105 105 105 105
OTHER SUPPORT
013 MODIFICATION KITS......... 16,081 16,081 16,081 -2,898 13,183
TOW Unit Cost Growth.. [-2,898]
REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT. 16,081 16,081 16,081 16,081
OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
017 MODIFICATION KITS......... 2,831 2,831 2,831 2,831
COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
(NON-TEL)
018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION 8,170 8,170 8,170 8,170
(COMM & ELEC).
INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-
TEL)
023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700
EQUIPMENT.
026 RQ-11 UAV................. 2,830 2,830 2,830 2,830
OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL)
029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES. 4,866 4,866 4,866 4,866
030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS...... 265 265 265 265
ENGINEER AND OTHER
EQUIPMENT
042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 114 114 114 114
EQUIP ASSORT.
043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT..... 523 523 523 523
044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS..... 365 365 365 365
045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED.. 2,004 2,004 2,004 2,004
047 EOD SYSTEMS............... 42,930 42,930 42,930 42,930
GENERAL PROPERTY
055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION 385 385 385 385
EQUIPMENT.
TOTAL PROCUREMENT, 180 129,584 180 129,584 180 129,584 -2,898 180 126,686
MARINE CORPS. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE
STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED 94,050 94,050 94,050 94,050
COUNTERMEASURES.
OTHER AIRCRAFT
052 U-2 MODS.................. 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300
059 C-130..................... 1,618 1,618 1,618 1,618
064 RC-135.................... 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700
COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
SUPPORT EQUIP.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 115,668 115,668 115,668 115,668
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE
TACTICAL
005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE. 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200
TOTAL MISSILE 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION,
AIR FORCE
ROCKETS
001 ROCKETS................... 326 326 326 326
CARTRIDGES
002 CARTRIDGES................ 17,634 17,634 17,634 17,634
BOMBS
004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS..... 37,514 37,514 37,514 37,514
005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459
MUNITION.
FLARES
011 FLARES.................... 14,973 14,973 14,973 14,973
012 FUZES..................... 3,859 3,859 3,859 3,859
SMALL ARMS
014 SMALL ARMS................ 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965
AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE. OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE
ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
022 WEATHER OBSERVATION 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800
FORECAST.
SPACE PROGRAMS
046 MILSATCOM SPACE........... 5,695 5,695 5,695 5,695
BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.... 60,600 60,600 60,600 60,600
061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT........ 68,000 68,000 68,000 68,000
SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
068 DEFENSE SPACE 58,250 58,250 58,250 58,250
RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 2,380,501 2,380,501 2,380,501 2,380,501
TOTAL OTHER 2,574,846 2,574,846 2,574,846 2,574,846
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE. PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
012 TELEPORT PROGRAM.......... 4,760 4,760 4,760 4,760
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 78,986 78,986 78,986 78,986
AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
062 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT.... 25 2,841 25 2,841 25 2,841 25 2,841
OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS...... 1 13,300 1 13,300 1 13,300 1 13,300
084 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND 53 8,034 53 8,034 53 8,034 53 8,034
SURVIVAL SYSTEMS.
089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS.. 126 3,354 126 3,354 126 3,354 126 3,354
TOTAL PROCUREMENT, 205 111,275 205 111,275 205 111,275 205 111,275
DEFENSE-WIDE. JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND
JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND
001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL 15,000 15,000 -15,000 0
NEEDS FUND.
Program reduction..... [-15,000] [-15,000]
TOTAL JOINT URGENT 15,000 15,000 -15,000 0
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND. NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE
EQUIPMENT
UNDISTRIBUTED
999 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT... 400,000 400,000 400,000
Program increase...... [400,000] [400,000]
TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD 400,000 400,000 400,000
& RESERVE EQUIPMENT. TOTAL PROCUREMENT.... 5,646 6,366,979 5,646 7,168,707 5,646 6,215,979 337,102 5,646 6,704,081
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND
EVALUATION
SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Line Program Element Item Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
................ RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
ARMY
................ BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601101A IN-HOUSE 21,803 21,803 21,803 21,803
LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH.
002 0601102A DEFENSE 221,901 221,901 221,901 221,901
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
003 0601103A UNIVERSITY 79,359 79,359 79,359 79,359
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND 113,662 113,662 113,662 113,662
INDUSTRY
RESEARCH
CENTERS.
................ SUBTOTAL 436,725 436,725 436,725 436,725
BASIC
RESEARCH.
................
................ APPLIED
RESEARCH
005 0602105A MATERIALS 26,585 26,585 26,585 26,585
TECHNOLOGY.
006 0602120A SENSORS AND 43,170 43,170 43,170 43,170
ELECTRONIC
SURVIVABILITY.
007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP.... 36,293 36,293 36,293 36,293
008 0602211A AVIATION 55,615 55,615 55,615 55,615
TECHNOLOGY.
009 0602270A ELECTRONIC 17,585 17,585 17,585 17,585
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
010 0602303A MISSILE 51,528 51,528 51,528 51,528
TECHNOLOGY.
011 0602307A ADVANCED 26,162 26,162 26,162 26,162
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
012 0602308A ADVANCED 24,063 24,063 24,063 24,063
CONCEPTS AND
SIMULATION.
013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE 64,589 64,589 64,589 64,589
AND AUTOMOTIVE
TECHNOLOGY.
014 0602618A BALLISTICS 68,300 68,300 78,300 8,000 76,300
TECHNOLOGY.
................ WIAMan [10,000] [8,000]
schedule
adjustment.
015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE 4,490 4,490 4,490 4,490
AND EQUIPMENT
DEFEATING
TECHNOLOGY.
016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE 7,818 7,818 7,818 7,818
SMALL ARMS
PROGRAM.
017 0602624A WEAPONS AND 37,798 37,798 37,798 37,798
MUNITIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND 59,021 59,021 59,021 59,021
ELECTRONIC
DEVICES.
019 0602709A NIGHT VISION 43,426 43,426 43,426 43,426
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0602712A COUNTERMINE 20,574 20,574 20,574 20,574
SYSTEMS.
021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS 21,339 21,339 21,339 21,339
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY.
022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL 20,316 20,316 20,316 20,316
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0602782A COMMAND, 34,209 34,209 34,209 34,209
CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0602783A COMPUTER AND 10,439 10,439 10,439 10,439
SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0602784A MILITARY 70,064 70,064 70,064 70,064
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY.
026 0602785A MANPOWER/ 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654
PERSONNEL/
TRAINING
TECHNOLOGY.
027 0602786A WARFIGHTER 31,546 31,546 31,546 31,546
TECHNOLOGY.
028 0602787A MEDICAL 93,340 93,340 93,340 93,340
TECHNOLOGY.
................ SUBTOTAL 885,924 885,924 895,924 8,000 893,924
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
................
................ ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
029 0603001A WARFIGHTER 56,056 56,056 56,056 56,056
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
030 0603002A MEDICAL 62,032 62,032 62,032 62,032
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
031 0603003A AVIATION 81,080 81,080 81,080 81,080
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
032 0603004A WEAPONS AND 63,919 63,919 63,919 63,919
MUNITIONS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE 97,043 97,043 97,043 97,043
AND AUTOMOTIVE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603006A SPACE 5,866 5,866 5,866 5,866
APPLICATION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
035 0603007A MANPOWER, 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800
PERSONNEL AND
TRAINING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
036 0603008A ELECTRONIC 40,416 40,416 40,416 40,416
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE... 9,166 9,166 9,166 9,166
038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION 13,627 13,627 13,627 13,627
TRAINING &
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS.
039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE... 10,667 10,667 10,667 10,667
041 0603125A COMBATING 15,054 15,054 15,054 15,054
TERRORISM--TEC
HNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL... 3,194 3,194 3,194 3,194
043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS... 2,367 2,367 2,367 2,367
044 0603270A ELECTRONIC 25,348 25,348 25,348 25,348
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
045 0603313A MISSILE AND 64,009 64,009 64,009 64,009
ROCKET
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE... 11,083 11,083 11,083 11,083
047 0603461A HIGH 180,662 180,662 180,662 180,662
PERFORMANCE
COMPUTING
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
048 0603606A LANDMINE 22,806 22,806 22,806 22,806
WARFARE AND
BARRIER
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE 5,030 5,030 5,030 5,030
SMALL ARMS
PROGRAM.
050 0603710A NIGHT VISION 36,407 36,407 36,407 36,407
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL 11,745 11,745 11,745 11,745
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
052 0603734A MILITARY 23,717 23,717 23,717 23,717
ENGINEERING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
053 0603772A ADVANCED 33,012 33,012 33,012 33,012
TACTICAL
COMPUTER
SCIENCE AND
SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY.
................ SUBTOTAL 882,106 882,106 882,106 882,106
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
054 0603305A ARMY MISSLE 15,301 15,301 15,301 15,301
DEFENSE
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
055 0603308A ARMY SPACE 13,592 13,592 13,592 13,592
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
056 0603619A LANDMINE 10,625 10,625 10,625 -10,625 0
WARFARE AND
BARRIER--ADV
DEV.
................ Program [-10,625]
deferred to
fiscal year
2019.
058 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM 30,612 30,612 30,612 30,612
CALIBER
AMMUNITION.
059 0603653A ADVANCED TANK 49,989 49,989 49,989 49,989
ARMAMENT
SYSTEM (ATAS).
060 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT 6,703 6,703 6,703 6,703
AND
SURVIVABILITY.
061 0603766A TACTICAL 6,894 6,894 6,894 6,894
ELECTRONIC
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM--ADV
DEV.
062 0603774A NIGHT VISION 9,066 9,066 9,066 9,066
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
063 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL 2,633 2,633 2,633 2,633
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY--DE
M/VAL.
064 0603782A WARFIGHTER 272,384 272,384 272,384 -37,000 235,384
INFORMATION
NETWORK-
TACTICAL--DEM/
VAL.
................ Excess [-37,000]
program
growth.
065 0603790A NATO RESEARCH 3,874 3,874 3,874 3,874
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
066 0603801A AVIATION--ADV 5,018 5,018 5,018 5,018
DEV.
067 0603804A LOGISTICS AND 11,556 11,556 11,556 11,556
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT--ADV
DEV.
069 0603807A MEDICAL 15,603 15,603 15,603 15,603
SYSTEMS--ADV
DEV.
070 0603827A SOLDIER 14,159 14,159 14,159 14,159
SYSTEMS--ADVAN
CED
DEVELOPMENT.
071 0603850A INTEGRATED 79 79 79 79
BROADCAST
SERVICE.
072 0604115A TECHNOLOGY 55,605 55,605 55,605 55,605
MATURATION
INITIATIVES.
074 0604319A INDIRECT FIRE 79,232 79,232 79,232 79,232
PROTECTION
CAPABILITY
INCREMENT 2-
INTERCEPT
(IFPC2).
075 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE 4,476 4,476 4,476 4,476
DEFENSE
(BUDGET
ACTIVITY 4).
076 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS. 28,991 991 -28,991 0
................ LEMV [-28,000] [-28,991] [-28,991]
termination.
................ SUBTOTAL 636,392 608,392 607,401 -76,616 559,776
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
................
................ SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
077 0604201A AIRCRAFT 76,588 76,588 76,588 76,588
AVIONICS.
078 0604220A ARMED, 73,309 73,309 73,309 73,309
DEPLOYABLE
HELOS.
079 0604270A ELECTRONIC 154,621 154,621 154,621 154,621
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
080 0604280A JOINT TACTICAL 31,826 31,826 31,826 31,826
RADIO.
081 0604290A MID-TIER 23,341 23,341 23,341 23,341
NETWORKING
VEHICULAR
RADIO (MNVR).
082 0604321A ALL SOURCE 4,839 4,839 4,839 4,839
ANALYSIS
SYSTEM.
083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE... 23,841 23,841 23,841 23,841
084 0604601A INFANTRY 79,855 90,855 79,855 11,000 90,855
SUPPORT
WEAPONS.
................ Transfer [11,000] [11,000]
from WTCV
line 15--
XM25
development.
085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140
VEHICLES.
086 0604611A JAVELIN........ 5,002 5,002 5,002 5,002
087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY 21,321 21,321 21,321 21,321
TACTICAL
VEHICLES.
088 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC 514 514 514 514
CONTROL.
093 0604710A NIGHT VISION 43,405 43,405 43,405 43,405
SYSTEMS--ENG
DEV.
094 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, 1,939 1,939 1,939 1,939
CLOTHING, AND
EQUIPMENT.
095 0604715A NON-SYSTEM 18,980 18,980 18,980 18,980
TRAINING
DEVICES--ENG
DEV.
097 0604741A AIR DEFENSE 18,294 18,294 18,294 18,294
COMMAND,
CONTROL AND
INTELLIGENCE--
ENG DEV.
098 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE 17,013 17,013 17,013 17,013
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
099 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST 6,701 6,701 6,701 6,701
EQUIPMENT
DEVELOPMENT.
100 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE 14,575 14,575 14,575 14,575
INTERACTIVE
SIMULATIONS
(DIS)--ENG DEV.
101 0604780A COMBINED ARMS 27,634 27,634 27,634 27,634
TACTICAL
TRAINER (CATT)
CORE.
102 0604798A BRIGADE 193,748 193,748 193,748 193,748
ANALYSIS,
INTEGRATION
AND EVALUATION.
103 0604802A WEAPONS AND 15,721 15,721 15,721 15,721
MUNITIONS--ENG
DEV.
104 0604804A LOGISTICS AND 41,703 41,703 41,703 41,703
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT--ENG
DEV.
105 0604805A COMMAND, 7,379 7,379 7,379 7,379
CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS--ENG
DEV.
106 0604807A MEDICAL 39,468 39,468 39,468 39,468
MATERIEL/
MEDICAL
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
EQUIPMENT--ENG
DEV.
107 0604808A LANDMINE 92,285 92,285 92,285 92,285
WARFARE/
BARRIER--ENG
DEV.
108 0604814A ARTILLERY 8,209 8,209 8,209 8,209
MUNITIONS--EMD.
109 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL 22,958 22,958 22,958 22,958
COMMAND &
CONTROL
HARDWARE &
SOFTWARE.
110 0604820A RADAR 1,549 1,549 1,549 1,549
DEVELOPMENT.
111 0604822A GENERAL FUND 17,342 17,342 227 -17,115 227
ENTERPRISE
BUSINESS
SYSTEM (GFEBS).
................ Excess to [-17,115] [-17,115]
requirement.
112 0604823A FIREFINDER..... 47,221 47,221 47,221 47,221
113 0604827A SOLDIER 48,477 48,477 48,477 48,477
SYSTEMS--WARRI
OR DEM/VAL.
114 0604854A ARTILLERY 80,613 80,613 121,313 40,700 121,313
SYSTEMS--EMD.
................ Transfer [40,700] [40,700]
from WTCV 6
at Army
Request.
117 0605013A INFORMATION 68,814 68,814 68,814 68,814
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
118 0605018A INTEGRATED 137,290 137,290 137,290 137,290
PERSONNEL AND
PAY SYSTEM-
ARMY (IPPS-A).
119 0605028A ARMORED MULTI- 116,298 116,298 116,298 116,298
PURPOSE
VEHICLE (AMPV).
120 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL 68,148 68,148 68,148 68,148
NETWORK CENTER
(JTNC).
121 0605380A AMF JOINT 33,219 33,219 33,219 33,219
TACTICAL RADIO
SYSTEM (JTRS).
122 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO- 15,127 15,127 15,127 15,127
GROUND MISSILE
(JAGM).
124 0605456A PAC-3/MSE 68,843 68,843 68,843 68,843
MISSILE.
125 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED 364,649 364,649 364,649 364,649
AIR AND
MISSILE
DEFENSE
(AIAMD).
126 0605625A MANNED GROUND 592,201 592,201 592,201 592,201
VEHICLE.
127 0605626A AERIAL COMMON 10,382 10,382 10,382 10,382
SENSOR.
128 0605766A NATIONAL 21,143 21,143 21,143 21,143
CAPABILITIES
INTEGRATION
(MIP).
129 0605812A JOINT LIGHT 84,230 84,230 84,230 84,230
TACTICAL
VEHICLE (JLTV)
ENGINEERING
AND
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT PH.
130 0303032A TROJAN--RH12... 3,465 3,465 3,465 3,465
131 0304270A ELECTRONIC 10,806 10,806 10,806 10,806
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
................ SUBTOTAL 2,857,026 2,868,026 2,880,611 34,585 2,891,611
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
................
................ RDT&E
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
132 0604256A THREAT 16,934 16,934 16,934 16,934
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
133 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS 13,488 13,488 13,488 13,488
DEVELOPMENT.
134 0604759A MAJOR T&E 46,672 46,672 46,672 46,672
INVESTMENT.
135 0605103A RAND ARROYO 11,919 11,919 11,919 11,919
CENTER.
136 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN 193,658 193,658 193,658 193,658
ATOLL.
137 0605326A CONCEPTS 37,158 37,158 37,158 37,158
EXPERIMENTATIO
N PROGRAM.
139 0605601A ARMY TEST 340,659 340,659 340,659 340,659
RANGES AND
FACILITIES.
140 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL 66,061 66,061 66,061 66,061
TEST
INSTRUMENTATIO
N AND TARGETS.
141 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/ 43,280 43,280 43,280 43,280
LETHALITY
ANALYSIS.
143 0605606A AIRCRAFT 6,025 6,025 6,025 6,025
CERTIFICATION.
144 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL 7,349 7,349 7,349 7,349
SUPPORT TO
RDT&E
ACTIVITIES.
145 0605706A MATERIEL 19,809 19,809 19,809 19,809
SYSTEMS
ANALYSIS.
146 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF 5,941 5,941 5,941 5,941
FOREIGN ITEMS.
147 0605712A SUPPORT OF 55,504 55,504 55,504 55,504
OPERATIONAL
TESTING.
148 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION 65,274 65,274 65,274 65,274
CENTER.
149 0605718A ARMY MODELING & 1,283 1,283 1,283 1,283
SIM X-CMD
COLLABORATION
& INTEG.
150 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE 82,035 82,035 82,035 82,035
ACTIVITIES.
151 0605803A TECHNICAL 33,853 33,853 38,853 33,853
INFORMATION
ACTIVITIES.
................ Internet [5,000]
mapping.
152 0605805A MUNITIONS 53,340 53,340 53,340 53,340
STANDARDIZATIO
N,
EFFECTIVENESS
AND SAFETY.
153 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL 5,193 5,193 5,193 5,193
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY
MGMT SUPPORT.
154 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ-- 54,175 54,175 54,175 54,175
R&D.
................ SUBTOTAL 1,159,610 1,159,610 1,164,610 1,159,610
RDT&E
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
................
................ OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
156 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT 110,576 110,576 110,576 110,576
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
157 0607141A LOGISTICS 3,717 3,717 3,717 3,717
AUTOMATION.
159 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT 70,053 70,053 70,053 70,053
IMPROVEMENT.
160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT 98,450 68,450 98,450 -15,000 83,450
PROJECT OFFICE.
................ JLENS [-30,000] [-15,000]
program
reduction.
161 0203726A ADV FIELD 30,940 30,940 30,940 30,940
ARTILLERY
TACTICAL DATA
SYSTEM.
162 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE 177,532 177,532 177,532 177,532
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
163 0203740A MANEUVER 36,495 36,495 36,495 36,495
CONTROL SYSTEM.
164 0203744A AIRCRAFT 257,187 257,187 277,171 14,061 271,248
MODIFICATIONS/
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
................ Transfer [19,984] [14,061]
from APA 11
at Army
request.
165 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE 315 315 315 315
COMPONENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
166 0203758A DIGITIZATION... 6,186 6,186 6,186 6,186
167 0203801A MISSILE/AIR 1,578 1,578 1,578 1,578
DEFENSE
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
168 0203802A OTHER MISSILE 62,100 62,100 62,100 62,100
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
169 0203808A TRACTOR CARD... 18,778 18,778 18,778 18,778
170 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL 7,108 7,108 7,108 7,108
GROUND SYSTEM.
173 0303028A SECURITY AND 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600
INTELLIGENCE
ACTIVITIES.
174 0303140A INFORMATION 9,357 9,357 9,357 9,357
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
175 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT 41,225 41,225 41,225 41,225
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
176 0303142A SATCOM GROUND 18,197 18,197 18,197 18,197
ENVIRONMENT
(SPACE).
177 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL 14,215 14,215 14,215 14,215
COMMAND AND
CONTROL SYSTEM.
179 0305204A TACTICAL 33,533 33,533 33,533 33,533
UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLES.
180 0305208A DISTRIBUTED 27,622 27,622 27,622 27,622
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
181 0305219A MQ-1C GRAY 10,901 10,901 10,901 10,901
EAGLE UAS.
182 0305232A RQ-11 UAV...... 2,321 2,321 2,321 2,321
183 0305233A RQ-7 UAV....... 12,031 12,031 12,031 12,031
185 0307665A BIOMETRICS 12,449 12,449 12,449 12,449
ENABLED
INTELLIGENCE.
186 0708045A END ITEM 56,136 56,136 56,136 56,136
INDUSTRIAL
PREPAREDNESS
ACTIVITIES.
186A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 4,717 4,717 4,717 4,717
PROGRAMS.
................ SUBTOTAL 1,131,319 1,101,319 1,151,303 -939 1,130,380
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ TOTAL 7,989,102 7,942,102 8,018,680 -34,970 7,954,132
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, ARMY.
................
................ RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
NAVY
................ BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601103N UNIVERSITY 112,617 122,617 112,617 112,617
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
................ Program [10,000]
increase.
002 0601152N IN-HOUSE 18,230 18,230 18,230 18,230
LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH.
003 0601153N DEFENSE 484,459 484,459 484,459 484,459
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
................ SUBTOTAL 615,306 625,306 615,306 615,306
BASIC
RESEARCH.
................
................ APPLIED
RESEARCH
004 0602114N POWER 104,513 104,513 104,513 104,513
PROJECTION
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
005 0602123N FORCE 145,307 145,307 145,307 145,307
PROTECTION
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
006 0602131M MARINE CORPS 47,334 47,334 47,334 47,334
LANDING FORCE
TECHNOLOGY.
007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE 34,163 34,163 34,163 34,163
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
008 0602236N WARFIGHTER 49,689 49,689 49,689 49,689
SUSTAINMENT
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC 97,701 97,701 97,701 97,701
SYSTEMS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
010 0602435N OCEAN 45,685 63,685 45,685 15,000 60,685
WARFIGHTING
ENVIRONMENT
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
................ AGOR mid [18,000] [15,000]
life refit.
011 0602651M JOINT NON- 6,060 6,060 6,060 6,060
LETHAL WEAPONS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
012 0602747N UNDERSEA 103,050 103,050 103,050 103,050
WARFARE
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL 169,710 169,710 169,710 169,710
CAPABILITIES
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
014 0602782N MINE AND 31,326 31,326 31,326 31,326
EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
................ SUBTOTAL 834,538 852,538 834,538 15,000 849,538
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
................
................ ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
015 0603114N POWER 48,201 48,201 48,201 48,201
PROJECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
016 0603123N FORCE 28,328 28,328 28,328 28,328
PROTECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC 56,179 56,179 56,179 56,179
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED 132,400 132,400 132,400 132,400
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATION
(ATD).
021 0603651M JOINT NON- 11,854 11,854 11,854 11,854
LETHAL WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
022 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL 247,931 247,931 247,931 247,931
CAPABILITIES
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
023 0603729N WARFIGHTER 4,760 4,760 4,760 4,760
PROTECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0603758N NAVY 51,463 51,463 51,463 51,463
WARFIGHTING
EXPERIMENTS
AND
DEMONSTRATIONS.
026 0603782N MINE AND 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
................ SUBTOTAL 583,116 583,116 583,116 583,116
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
027 0603207N AIR/OCEAN 42,246 42,246 42,246 42,246
TACTICAL
APPLICATIONS.
028 0603216N AVIATION 5,591 5,591 5,591 5,591
SURVIVABILITY.
029 0603237N DEPLOYABLE 3,262 3,262 3,262 3,262
JOINT COMMAND
AND CONTROL.
030 0603251N AIRCRAFT 74 74 74 74
SYSTEMS.
031 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS 7,964 7,964 7,964 7,964
DEVELOPMENT.
032 0603261N TACTICAL 5,257 5,257 5,257 5,257
AIRBORNE
RECONNAISSANCE.
033 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570
SYSTEMS
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603502N SURFACE AND 168,040 168,040 168,040 168,040
SHALLOW WATER
MINE
COUNTERMEASURE
S.
035 0603506N SURFACE SHIP 88,649 88,649 88,649 88,649
TORPEDO
DEFENSE.
036 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS 83,902 83,902 83,902 83,902
DEVELOPMENT.
037 0603525N PILOT FISH..... 108,713 108,713 108,713 108,713
038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH.. 9,316 9,316 9,316 9,316
039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER 77,108 77,108 77,108 77,108
040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL 762 762 762 762
CONTROL.
041 0603553N SURFACE ASW.... 2,349 2,349 2,349 2,349
042 0603561N ADVANCED 852,977 874,977 852,977 852,977
SUBMARINE
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
................ Unmanned [22,000]
Underwater
Vehicle
Development.
043 0603562N SUBMARINE 8,764 8,764 8,764 8,764
TACTICAL
WARFARE
SYSTEMS.
044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT 20,501 20,501 20,501 20,501
ADVANCED
DESIGN.
045 0603564N SHIP 27,052 27,052 27,052 27,052
PRELIMINARY
DESIGN &
FEASIBILITY
STUDIES.
046 0603570N ADVANCED 428,933 428,933 428,933 428,933
NUCLEAR POWER
SYSTEMS.
047 0603573N ADVANCED 27,154 27,154 27,154 -4,252 22,902
SURFACE
MACHINERY
SYSTEMS.
................ Program [-4,252]
execution.
048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE.... 519,140 519,140 519,140 519,140
049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT 406,389 406,389 406,389 406,389
SHIP (LCS).
050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM 36,570 36,570 36,570 -18,040 18,530
INTEGRATION.
................ Late [-18,040]
contract
awards.
051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL 8,404 8,404 8,404 8,404
MUNITIONS.
052 0603611M MARINE CORPS 136,967 136,967 136,967 -14,000 122,967
ASSAULT
VEHICLES.
................ Program [-14,000]
delay.
053 0603635M MARINE CORPS 1,489 1,489 1,489 1,489
GROUND COMBAT/
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE 38,422 38,422 38,422 38,422
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
055 0603658N COOPERATIVE 69,312 69,312 69,312 -5,300 64,012
ENGAGEMENT.
................ Common [-5,300]
array block
antenna
contract
delay.
056 0603713N OCEAN 9,196 9,196 9,196 9,196
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL 18,850 18,850 18,850 18,850
PROTECTION.
058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY 45,618 45,618 45,618 45,618
PROGRAM.
059 0603725N FACILITIES 3,019 3,019 3,019 3,019
IMPROVEMENT.
060 0603734N CHALK CORAL.... 144,951 144,951 144,951 144,951
061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC 5,797 5,797 5,797 5,797
PRODUCTIVITY.
062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE.. 308,131 308,131 308,131 308,131
063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA.. 195,189 195,189 195,189 195,189
064 0603751N RETRACT ELM.... 56,358 56,358 56,358 56,358
065 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN. 55,378 55,378 55,378 55,378
066 0603787N SPECIAL 48,842 48,842 48,842 48,842
PROCESSES.
067 0603790N NATO RESEARCH 7,509 7,509 7,509 7,509
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
068 0603795N LAND ATTACK 5,075 5,075 5,075 -5,075 0
TECHNOLOGY.
................ Early to [-5,075]
need.
069 0603851M JOINT NON- 51,178 51,178 51,178 51,178
LETHAL WEAPONS
TESTING.
070 0603860N JOINT PRECISION 205,615 205,615 205,615 -10,896 194,719
APPROACH AND
LANDING
SYSTEMS--DEM/
VAL.
................ JPALS 1B [-7,437]
follow-on
platform
integration
delay.
................ JPALS 1B [-3,459]
test early
to need.
072 0604272N TACTICAL AIR 37,227 37,227 37,227 37,227
DIRECTIONAL
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURE
S (TADIRCM).
073 0604279N ASE SELF- 169 169 169 169
PROTECTION
OPTIMIZATION.
074 0604653N JOINT COUNTER 20,874 10,874 20,874 -3,000 17,874
RADIO
CONTROLLED IED
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE
(JCREW).
................ Schedule [-10,000] [-3,000]
delay.
075 0604659N PRECISION 2,257 2,257 2,257 2,257
STRIKE WEAPONS
DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM.
076 0604707N SPACE AND 38,327 38,327 38,327 38,327
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (SEW)
ARCHITECTURE/
ENGINEERING
SUPPORT.
077 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI- 135,985 135,985 35,985 -30,000 105,985
SURFACE
WARFARE WEAPON
DEVELOPMENT.
................ Adjust [-100,000] [-30,000]
program to
more
realistic
schedule.
078 0605812M JOINT LIGHT 50,362 50,362 50,362 50,362
TACTICAL
VEHICLE (JLTV)
ENGINEERING
AND
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT PH.
079 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS 8,448 8,448 8,448 -3,540 4,908
DEVELOPMENT--M
IP.
................ Program [-3,540]
delay.
080 0304270N ELECTRONIC 153 153 153 153
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT--M
IP.
................ SUBTOTAL 4,641,385 4,653,385 4,541,385 -94,103 4,547,282
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
................
................ SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
081 0604212N OTHER HELO 40,558 40,558 40,558 40,558
DEVELOPMENT.
082 0604214N AV-8B AIRCRAFT-- 35,825 35,825 35,825 -2,500 33,325
ENG DEV.
................ Excess [-2,500]
program
management.
083 0604215N STANDARDS 99,891 99,891 99,891 99,891
DEVELOPMENT.
084 0604216N MULTI-MISSION 17,565 17,565 17,565 17,565
HELICOPTER
UPGRADE
DEVELOPMENT.
085 0604218N AIR/OCEAN 4,026 4,026 4,026 4,026
EQUIPMENT
ENGINEERING.
086 0604221N P-3 1,791 1,791 1,791 1,791
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
087 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT 11,725 11,725 11,725 11,725
SYSTEM.
088 0604231N TACTICAL 68,463 68,463 68,463 68,463
COMMAND SYSTEM.
089 0604234N ADVANCED 152,041 152,041 152,041 152,041
HAWKEYE.
090 0604245N H-1 UPGRADES... 47,123 47,123 47,123 47,123
091 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH 30,208 30,208 30,208 30,208
SENSORS.
092 0604262N V-22A.......... 43,084 43,084 43,084 43,084
093 0604264N AIR CREW 11,401 11,401 11,401 11,401
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
094 0604269N EA-18.......... 11,138 11,138 11,138 11,138
095 0604270N ELECTRONIC 34,964 34,964 34,964 34,964
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
096 0604273N VH-71A 94,238 94,238 94,238 94,238
EXECUTIVE HELO
DEVELOPMENT.
097 0604274N NEXT GENERATION 257,796 257,796 257,796 257,796
JAMMER (NGJ).
098 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL 3,302 3,302 3,302 3,302
RADIO SYSTEM--
NAVY (JTRS-
NAVY).
099 0604307N SURFACE 240,298 240,298 240,298 240,298
COMBATANT
COMBAT SYSTEM
ENGINEERING.
100 0604311N LPD-17 CLASS 1,214 1,214 1,214 1,214
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
101 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER 46,007 46,007 46,007 46,007
BOMB (SDB).
102 0604366N STANDARD 75,592 75,592 75,592 75,592
MISSILE
IMPROVEMENTS.
103 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM... 117,854 117,854 117,854 117,854
104 0604376M MARINE AIR 10,080 10,080 10,080 10,080
GROUND TASK
FORCE (MAGTF)
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (EW)
FOR AVIATION.
105 0604378N NAVAL 21,413 21,413 21,413 21,413
INTEGRATED
FIRE CONTROL--
COUNTER AIR
SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING.
106 0604404N UNMANNED 146,683 146,683 146,683 -13,000 133,683
CARRIER
LAUNCHED
AIRBORNE
SURVEILLANCE
AND STRIKE
(UCLASS)
SYSTEM.
................ Schedule [-13,000]
delay.
107 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE 275,871 275,871 275,871 -79,800 196,071
WATER SENSORS.
................ Air and [-79,800]
missile
defense
radar
contract
delay.
108 0604503N SSN-688 AND 89,672 89,672 89,672 89,672
TRIDENT
MODERNIZATION.
109 0604504N AIR CONTROL.... 13,754 13,754 13,754 13,754
110 0604512N SHIPBOARD 69,615 69,615 69,615 69,615
AVIATION
SYSTEMS.
112 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN. 121,566 121,566 121,566 121,566
113 0604562N SUBMARINE 49,143 49,143 49,143 49,143
TACTICAL
WARFARE SYSTEM.
114 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT 155,254 155,254 175,254 20,000 175,254
DESIGN/ LIVE
FIRE T&E.
................ Increased [20,000] [20,000]
LHA-8
design
efforts.
115 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL 3,689 3,689 3,689 3,689
COMPUTER
RESOURCES.
116 0604601N MINE 5,041 5,041 5,041 5,041
DEVELOPMENT.
117 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT 26,444 26,444 26,444 26,444
TORPEDO
DEVELOPMENT.
118 0604654N JOINT SERVICE 8,897 8,897 8,897 8,897
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
119 0604703N PERSONNEL, 6,233 6,233 6,233 6,233
TRAINING,
SIMULATION,
AND HUMAN
FACTORS.
120 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF 442 442 442 442
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
121 0604755N SHIP SELF 130,360 130,360 130,360 130,360
DEFENSE
(DETECT &
CONTROL).
122 0604756N SHIP SELF 50,209 50,209 50,209 50,209
DEFENSE
(ENGAGE: HARD
KILL).
123 0604757N SHIP SELF 164,799 164,799 164,799 -50,000 114,799
DEFENSE
(ENGAGE: SOFT
KILL/EW).
................ SEWIP block [-50,000]
3 program
delay.
124 0604761N INTELLIGENCE 1,984 1,984 1,984 1,984
ENGINEERING.
125 0604771N MEDICAL 9,458 9,458 9,458 9,458
DEVELOPMENT.
126 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID 51,430 51,430 51,430 51,430
SYSTEM.
127 0604800M JOINT STRIKE 512,631 512,631 512,631 -10,000 502,631
FIGHTER (JSF)--
EMD.
................ F-35B [-10,000]
follow-on
development
ahead of
need.
128 0604800N JOINT STRIKE 534,187 534,187 534,187 -10,000 524,187
FIGHTER (JSF)--
EMD.
................ F-35B [-10,000]
follow-on
development
ahead of
need.
129 0605013M INFORMATION 5,564 5,564 5,564 5,564
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
130 0605013N INFORMATION 69,659 69,659 69,659 -6,836 62,823
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
................ Unjustified [-6,836]
request.
132 0605212N CH-53K RDTE.... 503,180 503,180 503,180 503,180
133 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO- 5,500 5,500 5,500 -5,500 0
GROUND MISSILE
(JAGM).
................ Program [-5,500]
uncertainty.
134 0605500N MULTI-MISSION 317,358 317,358 317,358 -30,000 287,358
MARITIME
AIRCRAFT (MMA).
................ P-8A spiral [-30,000]
2
development
milestone B
slip.
135 0204202N DDG-1000....... 187,910 187,910 187,910 187,910
136 0304231N TACTICAL 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140
COMMAND
SYSTEM--MIP.
137 0304785N TACTICAL 9,406 9,406 9,406 9,406
CRYPTOLOGIC
SYSTEMS.
138 0305124N SPECIAL 22,800 22,800 22,800 22,800
APPLICATIONS
PROGRAM.
................ SUBTOTAL 5,028,476 5,028,476 5,048,476 -187,636 4,840,840
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
................
................ MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
139 0604256N THREAT 43,261 43,261 43,261 43,261
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
140 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS 71,872 71,872 71,872 71,872
DEVELOPMENT.
141 0604759N MAJOR T&E 38,033 38,033 38,033 38,033
INVESTMENT.
142 0605126N JOINT THEATER 1,352 1,352 1,352 1,352
AIR AND
MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION.
143 0605152N STUDIES AND 5,566 5,566 5,566 5,566
ANALYSIS
SUPPORT--NAVY.
144 0605154N CENTER FOR 48,345 48,345 48,345 48,345
NAVAL ANALYSES.
146 0605804N TECHNICAL 637 637 637 637
INFORMATION
SERVICES.
147 0605853N MANAGEMENT, 76,585 76,585 76,585 76,585
TECHNICAL &
INTERNATIONAL
SUPPORT.
148 0605856N STRATEGIC 3,221 3,221 3,221 3,221
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT.
149 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE 72,725 72,725 72,725 72,725
AND TECHNOLOGY
MANAGEMENT.
150 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND 141,778 141,778 141,778 141,778
AIRCRAFT
SUPPORT.
151 0605864N TEST AND 331,219 331,219 331,219 331,219
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
152 0605865N OPERATIONAL 16,565 16,565 16,565 16,565
TEST AND
EVALUATION
CAPABILITY.
153 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND 3,265 3,265 3,265 3,265
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (SEW)
SUPPORT.
154 0605867N SEW 7,134 7,134 7,134 7,134
SURVEILLANCE/
RECONNAISSANCE
SUPPORT.
155 0605873M MARINE CORPS 24,082 24,082 24,082 24,082
PROGRAM WIDE
SUPPORT.
156 0305885N TACTICAL 497 497 497 497
CRYPTOLOGIC
ACTIVITIES.
................ SUBTOTAL 886,137 886,137 886,137 886,137
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
................
................ OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
159 0604227N HARPOON 699 699 699 699
MODIFICATIONS.
160 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT 20,961 40,961 20,961 20,961
AIR VEHICLE
(UCAV)
ADVANCED
COMPONENT AND
PROTOTYPE
DEVELOPMENT.
................ X-47B [20,000]
Aerial
Refueling
Test &
Evaluation.
162 0604766M MARINE CORPS 35 35 35 35
DATA SYSTEMS.
163 0605525N CARRIER ONBOARD 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460
DELIVERY (COD)
FOLLOW ON.
164 0605555N STRIKE WEAPONS 9,757 9,757 9,757 9,757
DEVELOPMENT.
165 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & 98,057 121,957 98,057 98,057
WEAPONS SYSTEM
SUPPORT.
................ Reentry [23,900]
System
Application
s and
Strategic
Guidance
Application
s.
166 0101224N SSBN SECURITY 31,768 31,768 31,768 31,768
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
167 0101226N SUBMARINE 1,464 1,464 1,464 1,464
ACOUSTIC
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
168 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC 21,729 21,729 21,729 21,729
COMMUNICATIONS.
169 0203761N RAPID 13,561 13,561 13,561 13,561
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSITION
(RTT).
170 0204136N F/A-18 131,118 131,118 131,118 131,118
SQUADRONS.
171 0204152N E-2 SQUADRONS.. 1,971 1,971 1,971 1,971
172 0204163N FLEET 46,155 46,155 46,155 -11,732 34,423
TELECOMMUNICAT
IONS
(TACTICAL).
................ Joint [-11,732]
Aerial
Layer
Network
program
delay.
173 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT 2,374 2,374 2,374 2,374
174 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND 12,407 12,407 12,407 12,407
TOMAHAWK
MISSION
PLANNING
CENTER (TMPC).
175 0204311N INTEGRATED 41,609 41,609 41,609 41,609
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
176 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS 7,240 7,240 7,240 7,240
TACTICAL
SUPPORT UNITS
(DISPLACEMENT
CRAFT).
177 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK 78,208 78,208 78,208 78,208
ORIENTED RADAR
(G/ATOR).
178 0204571N CONSOLIDATED 45,124 45,124 45,124 45,124
TRAINING
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
179 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC 2,703 2,703 2,703 2,703
DIRECT SUPPORT.
180 0204575N ELECTRONIC 19,563 19,563 19,563 19,563
WARFARE (EW)
READINESS
SUPPORT.
181 0205601N HARM 13,586 13,586 13,586 13,586
IMPROVEMENT.
182 0205604N TACTICAL DATA 197,538 197,538 197,538 197,538
LINKS.
183 0205620N SURFACE ASW 31,863 31,863 31,863 31,863
COMBAT SYSTEM
INTEGRATION.
184 0205632N MK-48 ADCAP.... 12,806 12,806 12,806 12,806
185 0205633N AVIATION 88,607 88,607 88,607 88,607
IMPROVEMENTS.
187 0205675N OPERATIONAL 116,928 116,928 116,928 116,928
NUCLEAR POWER
SYSTEMS.
188 0206313M MARINE CORPS 178,753 178,753 178,753 178,753
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
189 0206623M MARINE CORPS 139,594 113,794 118,719 -20,875 118,719
GROUND COMBAT/
SUPPORTING
ARMS SYSTEMS.
................ Marine [-20,800] [-20,875] [-20,875]
Personnel
Carrier
program
deferred.
................ Precision [-5,000]
extended
range
munition
program
reduction.
190 0206624M MARINE CORPS 42,647 42,647 42,647 -5,613 37,034
COMBAT
SERVICES
SUPPORT.
................ Prior year [-5,613]
carry over.
191 0206625M USMC 34,394 34,394 34,394 34,394
INTELLIGENCE/
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE
SYSTEMS (MIP).
192 0207161N TACTICAL AIM 39,159 39,159 39,159 -8,000 31,159
MISSILES.
................ Program [-8,000]
delay.
193 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM 2,613 2,613 2,613 2,613
RANGE AIR-TO-
AIR MISSILE
(AMRAAM).
194 0208058N JOINT HIGH 986 986 986 986
SPEED VESSEL
(JHSV).
199 0303109N SATELLITE 66,231 66,231 66,231 66,231
COMMUNICATIONS
(SPACE).
200 0303138N CONSOLIDATED 24,476 24,476 24,476 24,476
AFLOAT NETWORK
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES
(CANES).
201 0303140N INFORMATION 23,531 23,531 23,531 23,531
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
206 0305160N NAVY 742 742 742 742
METEOROLOGICAL
AND OCEAN
SENSORS-SPACE
(METOC).
207 0305192N MILITARY 4,804 4,804 4,804 4,804
INTELLIGENCE
PROGRAM (MIP)
ACTIVITIES.
208 0305204N TACTICAL 8,381 8,381 8,381 8,381
UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLES.
211 0305208M DISTRIBUTED 5,535 5,535 5,535 5,535
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
212 0305208N DISTRIBUTED 19,718 19,718 19,718 19,718
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
213 0305220N RQ-4 UAV....... 375,235 375,235 375,235 375,235
214 0305231N MQ-8 UAV....... 48,713 48,713 48,713 48,713
215 0305232M RQ-11 UAV...... 102 102 102 102
216 0305233N RQ-7 UAV....... 710 710 710 710
217 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) 5,013 5,013 5,013 5,013
TACTICAL UAS
(STUASL0).
219 0305239M RQ-21A......... 11,122 11,122 11,122 11,122
220 0305241N MULTI- 28,851 28,851 28,851 28,851
INTELLIGENCE
SENSOR
DEVELOPMENT.
221 0308601N MODELING AND 5,116 5,116 5,116 5,116
SIMULATION
SUPPORT.
222 0702207N DEPOT 28,042 28,042 28,042 28,042
MAINTENANCE
(NON-IF).
223 0708011N INDUSTRIAL 50,933 50,933 50,933 50,933
PREPAREDNESS.
224 0708730N MARITIME 4,998 4,998 4,998 4,998
TECHNOLOGY
(MARITECH).
224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 1,185,132 1,185,132 1,185,132 1,185,132
PROGRAMS.
................ SUBTOTAL 3,385,822 3,403,922 3,364,947 -46,220 3,339,602
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ TOTAL 15,974,780 16,032,880 15,873,905 -312,959 15,661,821
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, NAVY.
................
................ RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
AF
................ BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601102F DEFENSE 373,151 373,151 373,151 373,151
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
002 0601103F UNIVERSITY 138,333 138,333 138,333 138,333
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY 13,286 13,286 13,286 13,286
LASER RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
................ SUBTOTAL 524,770 524,770 524,770 524,770
BASIC
RESEARCH.
................
................ APPLIED
RESEARCH
004 0602102F MATERIALS...... 116,846 116,846 116,846 116,846
005 0602201F AEROSPACE 119,672 119,672 119,672 119,672
VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGIES.
006 0602202F HUMAN 89,483 89,483 89,483 89,483
EFFECTIVENESS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
007 0602203F AEROSPACE 197,546 197,546 197,546 197,546
PROPULSION.
008 0602204F AEROSPACE 127,539 127,539 127,539 127,539
SENSORS.
009 0602601F SPACE 104,063 104,063 104,063 104,063
TECHNOLOGY.
010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL 81,521 81,521 81,521 81,521
MUNITIONS.
011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY 112,845 112,845 112,845 112,845
TECHNOLOGY.
012 0602788F DOMINANT 138,161 138,161 138,161 138,161
INFORMATION
SCIENCES AND
METHODS.
013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY 40,217 40,217 40,217 40,217
LASER RESEARCH.
................ SUBTOTAL 1,127,893 1,127,893 1,127,893 1,127,893
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
................
................ ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
014 0603112F ADVANCED 39,572 49,572 39,572 10,000 49,572
MATERIALS FOR
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
................ Program [10,000] [10,000]
increase.
015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT 12,800 12,800 12,800 12,800
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
(S&T).
016 0603203F ADVANCED 30,579 30,579 30,579 30,579
AEROSPACE
SENSORS.
017 0603211F AEROSPACE 77,347 77,347 77,347 77,347
TECHNOLOGY DEV/
DEMO.
018 0603216F AEROSPACE 149,321 149,321 149,321 149,321
PROPULSION AND
POWER
TECHNOLOGY.
019 0603270F ELECTRONIC 49,128 49,128 49,128 49,128
COMBAT
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0603401F ADVANCED 68,071 68,071 68,071 68,071
SPACECRAFT
TECHNOLOGY.
021 0603444F MAUI SPACE 26,299 26,299 26,299 26,299
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM (MSSS).
022 0603456F HUMAN 20,967 20,967 20,967 20,967
EFFECTIVENESS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL 33,996 33,996 33,996 33,996
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0603605F ADVANCED 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0603680F MANUFACTURING 41,353 41,353 41,353 41,353
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
026 0603788F BATTLESPACE 49,093 49,093 49,093 49,093
KNOWLEDGE
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION.
................ SUBTOTAL 617,526 627,526 617,526 10,000 627,526
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE 3,983 3,983 3,983 3,983
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
029 0603287F PHYSICAL 3,874 3,874 3,874 3,874
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT.
032 0603438F SPACE CONTROL 27,024 27,024 27,024 27,024
TECHNOLOGY.
033 0603742F COMBAT 15,899 15,899 15,899 15,899
IDENTIFICATION
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603790F NATO RESEARCH 4,568 4,568 4,568 4,568
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
035 0603791F INTERNATIONAL 379 379 379 379
SPACE
COOPERATIVE
R&D.
036 0603830F SPACE 28,764 28,764 28,764 28,764
PROTECTION
PROGRAM (SPP).
038 0603851F INTERCONTINENTA 86,737 86,737 86,737 86,737
L BALLISTIC
MISSILE--DEM/
VAL.
040 0603859F POLLUTION 953 953 953 953
PREVENTION--DE
M/VAL.
042 0604015F LONG RANGE 379,437 379,437 379,437 379,437
STRIKE.
044 0604317F TECHNOLOGY 2,606 2,606 2,606 2,606
TRANSFER.
045 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY 103 103 103 103
BURIED TARGET
DEFEAT SYSTEM
(HDBTDS)
PROGRAM.
047 0604337F REQUIREMENTS 16,018 16,018 16,018 16,018
ANALYSIS AND
MATURATION.
049 0604458F AIR & SPACE OPS 58,861 58,861 58,861 58,861
CENTER.
050 0604618F JOINT DIRECT 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
ATTACK
MUNITION.
051 0604635F GROUND ATTACK 21,175 21,175 21,175 21,175
WEAPONS FUZE
DEVELOPMENT.
052 0604857F OPERATIONALLY 10,000 10,000 10,000
RESPONSIVE
SPACE.
................ Program [10,000] [10,000]
increase.
053 0604858F TECH TRANSITION 13,636 13,636 13,636 13,636
PROGRAM.
054 0105921F SERVICE SUPPORT 2,799 2,799 2,799 2,799
TO STRATCOM--
SPACE
ACTIVITIES.
055 0207455F THREE 70,160 70,160 70,160 70,160
DIMENSIONAL
LONG-RANGE
RADAR (3DELRR).
056 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL 137,233 137,233 137,233 137,233
POSITIONING
SYSTEM (USER
EQUIPMENT)
(SPACE).
................ SUBTOTAL 876,709 876,709 886,709 10,000 886,709
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
................
................ SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
058 0603260F INTELLIGENCE 977 977 977 977
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
061 0604233F SPECIALIZED 3,601 3,601 3,601 3,601
UNDERGRADUATE
FLIGHT
TRAINING.
062 0604270F ELECTRONIC 1,971 1,971 1,971 1,971
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
064 0604281F TACTICAL DATA 51,456 51,456 36,256 51,456
NETWORKS
ENTERPRISE.
................ Unjustified [-15,200]
request.
065 0604287F PHYSICAL 50 50 50 50
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT.
066 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000
BOMB (SDB)--
EMD.
067 0604421F COUNTERSPACE 23,930 23,930 23,930 23,930
SYSTEMS.
068 0604425F SPACE SITUATION 400,258 400,258 400,258 400,258
AWARENESS
SYSTEMS.
069 0604429F AIRBORNE 4,575 4,575 4,575 4,575
ELECTRONIC
ATTACK.
070 0604441F SPACE BASED 352,532 372,532 352,532 -29,700 322,832
INFRARED
SYSTEM (SBIRS)
HIGH EMD.
................ Modernizati [-29,700]
on projects
execution
delays
excluding
exploitatio
n efforts.
................ Space Based [20,000]
Infrared
Systems
(SBIRS)
Data
Exploitatio
n.
071 0604602F ARMAMENT/ 16,284 16,284 16,284 16,284
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
072 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS... 2,564 2,564 2,564 2,564
073 0604617F AGILE COMBAT 17,036 17,036 17,036 17,036
SUPPORT.
074 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT 7,273 7,273 7,273 7,273
SYSTEMS.
075 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING 33,200 33,200 33,200 33,200
RANGES.
078 0604800F F-35--EMD...... 816,335 816,335 816,335 816,335
079 0604851F INTERCONTINENTA 145,442 145,442 145,442 145,442
L BALLISTIC
MISSILE--EMD.
080 0604853F EVOLVED 27,963 27,963 27,963 27,963
EXPENDABLE
LAUNCH VEHICLE
PROGRAM
(SPACE)--EMD.
081 0604932F LONG RANGE 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
STANDOFF
WEAPON.
082 0604933F ICBM FUZE 129,411 129,411 129,411 129,411
MODERNIZATION.
083 0605213F F-22 131,100 131,100 131,100 131,100
MODERNIZATION
INCREMENT 3.2B.
084 0605221F KC-46.......... 1,558,590 1,558,590 1,558,590 1,558,590
085 0605229F CSAR HH-60 393,558 393,558 393,558 -60,000 333,558
RECAPITALIZATI
ON.
................ Program [-60,000]
delays /
projected
savings
pending
updated
program
estimate.
086 0605278F HC/MC-130 RECAP 6,242 6,242 6,242 6,242
RDT&E.
087 0605431F ADVANCED EHF 272,872 272,872 272,872 272,872
MILSATCOM
(SPACE).
088 0605432F POLAR MILSATCOM 124,805 124,805 124,805 124,805
(SPACE).
089 0605433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL 13,948 13,948 13,948 13,948
SATCOM (SPACE).
090 0605931F B-2 DEFENSIVE 303,500 303,500 303,500 303,500
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM.
091 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS 67,874 67,874 67,874 67,874
MODERNIZATION.
094 0207701F FULL COMBAT 4,663 4,663 4,663 4,663
MISSION
TRAINING.
097 0401318F CV-22.......... 46,705 46,705 46,705 46,705
................ SUBTOTAL 5,078,715 5,098,715 5,063,515 -89,700 4,989,015
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
................
................ MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
099 0604256F THREAT 17,690 17,690 17,690 17,690
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
100 0604759F MAJOR T&E 34,841 34,841 34,841 34,841
INVESTMENT.
101 0605101F RAND PROJECT 32,956 32,956 32,956 32,956
AIR FORCE.
103 0605712F INITIAL 13,610 13,610 13,610 13,610
OPERATIONAL
TEST &
EVALUATION.
104 0605807F TEST AND 742,658 742,658 742,658 742,658
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
105 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS 14,203 14,203 14,203 14,203
LAUNCH PROGRAM
(SPACE).
106 0605864F SPACE TEST 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000
PROGRAM (STP).
107 0605976F FACILITIES 44,160 44,160 44,160 44,160
RESTORATION
AND
MODERNIZATION-
-TEST AND
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
108 0605978F FACILITIES 27,643 27,643 27,643 27,643
SUSTAINMENT--T
EST AND
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
109 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE 13,935 13,935 13,935 13,935
SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING
INITIATIVE.
110 0606392F SPACE AND 192,348 192,348 192,348 192,348
MISSILE CENTER
(SMC) CIVILIAN
WORKFORCE.
111 0702806F ACQUISITION AND 28,647 28,647 28,647 28,647
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
112 0804731F GENERAL SKILL 315 315 315 315
TRAINING.
114 1001004F INTERNATIONAL 3,785 3,785 3,785 3,785
ACTIVITIES.
................ SUBTOTAL 1,179,791 1,179,791 1,179,791 1,179,791
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
................
................ OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
115 0603423F GLOBAL 383,500 383,500 383,500 383,500
POSITIONING
SYSTEM III--
OPERATIONAL
CONTROL
SEGMENT.
117 0604445F WIDE AREA 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
SURVEILLANCE.
118 0605018F AF INTEGRATED 90,097 90,097 90,097 90,097
PERSONNEL AND
PAY SYSTEM (AF-
IPPS).
119 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER 32,086 32,086 32,086 32,086
TECHNOLOGY
EXECUTIVE
AGENCY.
121 0101113F B-52 SQUADRONS. 24,007 24,007 24,007 24,007
122 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED 450 450 450 450
CRUISE MISSILE
(ALCM).
123 0101126F B-1B SQUADRONS. 19,589 19,589 19,589 19,589
124 0101127F B-2 SQUADRONS.. 100,194 100,194 100,194 100,194
125 0101313F STRAT WAR 37,448 37,448 37,448 37,448
PLANNING
SYSTEM--USSTRA
TCOM.
128 0102326F REGION/SECTOR 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700
OPERATION
CONTROL CENTER
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
130 0203761F WARFIGHTER 3,844 3,844 3,844 3,844
RAPID
ACQUISITION
PROCESS (WRAP)
RAPID
TRANSITION
FUND.
131 0205219F MQ-9 UAV....... 128,328 128,328 128,328 128,328
133 0207131F A-10 SQUADRONS. 9,614 9,614 9,614 9,614
134 0207133F F-16 SQUADRONS. 177,298 177,298 177,298 177,298
135 0207134F F-15E SQUADRONS 244,289 244,289 244,289 244,289
136 0207136F MANNED 13,138 13,138 13,138 13,138
DESTRUCTIVE
SUPPRESSION.
137 0207138F F-22A SQUADRONS 328,542 328,542 328,542 328,542
138 0207142F F-35 SQUADRONS. 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000
139 0207161F TACTICAL AIM 15,460 15,460 15,460 15,460
MISSILES.
140 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM 84,172 84,172 84,172 84,172
RANGE AIR-TO-
AIR MISSILE
(AMRAAM).
142 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE 2,582 2,582 2,582 2,582
AND RECOVERY.
143 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE-- 542 542 542 542
PARARESCUE.
144 0207247F AF TENCAP...... 89,816 89,816 13,016 89,816
................ Reduction [-76,800]
fighter
communicati
ons POD.
145 0207249F PRECISION 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075
ATTACK SYSTEMS
PROCUREMENT.
146 0207253F COMPASS CALL... 10,782 10,782 10,782 10,782
147 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE 139,369 139,369 139,369 139,369
COMPONENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
149 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO- 6,373 6,373 6,373 6,373
SURFACE
STANDOFF
MISSILE
(JASSM).
150 0207410F AIR & SPACE 22,820 22,820 22,820 22,820
OPERATIONS
CENTER (AOC).
151 0207412F CONTROL AND 7,029 7,029 7,029 7,029
REPORTING
CENTER (CRC).
152 0207417F AIRBORNE 186,256 186,256 186,256 186,256
WARNING AND
CONTROL SYSTEM
(AWACS).
153 0207418F TACTICAL 743 743 743 743
AIRBORNE
CONTROL
SYSTEMS.
156 0207431F COMBAT AIR 4,471 4,471 4,471 4,471
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEM
ACTIVITIES.
158 0207444F TACTICAL AIR 10,250 10,250 10,250 10,250
CONTROL PARTY-
MOD.
159 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431
DATA LINK.
160 0207449F COMMAND AND 7,329 7,329 7,329 7,329
CONTROL (C2)
CONSTELLATION.
161 0207452F DCAPES......... 15,081 15,081 15,081 15,081
162 0207581F JOINT 13,248 13,248 23,148 9,900 23,148
SURVEILLANCE/
TARGET ATTACK
RADAR SYSTEM
(JSTARS).
................ Continue T- [9,900] [9,900]
3 testing
operations.
163 0207590F SEEK EAGLE..... 24,342 24,342 24,342 24,342
164 0207601F USAF MODELING 10,448 10,448 10,448 10,448
AND SIMULATION.
165 0207605F WARGAMING AND 5,512 5,512 5,512 5,512
SIMULATION
CENTERS.
166 0207697F DISTRIBUTED 3,301 3,301 3,301 3,301
TRAINING AND
EXERCISES.
167 0208006F MISSION 62,605 62,605 62,605 62,605
PLANNING
SYSTEMS.
169 0208059F CYBER COMMAND 68,099 68,099 68,099 68,099
ACTIVITIES.
170 0208087F AF OFFENSIVE 14,047 14,047 14,047 14,047
CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS.
171 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE 5,853 5,853 5,853 5,853
CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS.
179 0301400F SPACE 12,197 12,197 12,197 12,197
SUPERIORITY
INTELLIGENCE.
180 0302015F E-4B NATIONAL 18,267 18,267 18,267 18,267
AIRBORNE
OPERATIONS
CENTER (NAOC).
181 0303131F MINIMUM 36,288 36,288 36,288 36,288
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK
(MEECN).
182 0303140F INFORMATION 90,231 90,231 100,231 10,000 100,231
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
................ ASACoE [10,000] [10,000]
program.
183 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT 725 725 725 725
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
185 0303601F MILSATCOM 140,170 140,170 140,170 140,170
TERMINALS.
187 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT 117,110 117,110 117,110 117,110
ENTERPRISE.
190 0305099F GLOBAL AIR 4,430 4,430 4,430 4,430
TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT
(GATM).
191 0305103F CYBER SECURITY 2,048 2,048 2,048 2,048
INITIATIVE.
192 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME 288 288 288 288
CENTER.
193 0305110F SATELLITE 35,698 35,698 35,698 35,698
CONTROL
NETWORK
(SPACE).
194 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE 24,667 24,667 24,667 24,667
195 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC 35,674 35,674 35,674 35,674
CONTROL,
APPROACH, AND
LANDING SYSTEM
(ATCALS).
196 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS. 21,186 21,186 21,186 21,186
199 0305128F SECURITY AND 195 195 195 195
INVESTIGATIVE
ACTIVITIES.
200 0305145F ARMS CONTROL 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430
IMPLEMENTATION.
201 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT 330 330 330 330
COUNTERINTELLI
GENCE
ACTIVITIES.
206 0305173F SPACE AND 3,696 3,696 3,696 3,696
MISSILE TEST
AND EVALUATION
CENTER.
207 0305174F SPACE 2,469 2,469 2,469 2,469
INNOVATION,
INTEGRATION
AND RAPID
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
208 0305179F INTEGRATED 8,289 8,289 8,289 8,289
BROADCAST
SERVICE (IBS).
209 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE 13,345 13,345 13,345 13,345
SYSTEM (SPACE).
211 0305202F DRAGON U-2..... 18,700 18,700 18,700 18,700
212 0305205F ENDURANCE 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLES.
213 0305206F AIRBORNE 37,828 37,828 50,328 12,500 50,328
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
................ Blue Devil [15,000] [12,500]
Replacement
WAMI/NVDF.
................ Unjustified [-2,500]
amount.
214 0305207F MANNED 13,491 13,491 13,491 13,491
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
215 0305208F DISTRIBUTED 7,498 7,498 7,498 7,498
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
216 0305219F MQ-1 PREDATOR A 3,326 3,326 3,326 3,326
UAV.
217 0305220F RQ-4 UAV....... 134,406 134,406 134,406 -20,000 114,406
................ Multiple [-20,000]
execution
delays.
218 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC 7,413 7,413 7,413 7,413
COLLABORATIVE
TARGETING.
219 0305236F COMMON DATA 40,503 40,503 40,503 40,503
LINK (CDL).
220 0305238F NATO AGS....... 264,134 264,134 264,134 264,134
221 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS 23,016 23,016 23,016 23,016
ENTERPRISE.
222 0305265F GPS III SPACE 221,276 221,276 221,276 221,276
SEGMENT.
223 0305614F JSPOC MISSION 58,523 58,523 58,523 58,523
SYSTEM.
224 0305881F RAPID CYBER 2,218 2,218 2,218 2,218
ACQUISITION.
226 0305913F NUDET DETECTION 50,547 50,547 50,547 50,547
SYSTEM (SPACE).
227 0305940F SPACE SITUATION 18,807 18,807 18,807 18,807
AWARENESS
OPERATIONS.
229 0308699F SHARED EARLY 1,079 1,079 1,079 1,079
WARNING (SEW).
230 0401115F C-130 AIRLIFT 400 26,400 400 73,300 73,700
SQUADRON.
................ C-130 AMP.. [47,300]
................ C-130H [26,000] [26,000]
Propulsion
System
Propeller
Upgrades.
231 0401119F C-5 AIRLIFT 61,492 61,492 61,492 61,492
SQUADRONS (IF).
232 0401130F C-17 AIRCRAFT 109,134 109,134 109,134 109,134
(IF).
233 0401132F C-130J PROGRAM. 22,443 22,443 22,443 22,443
234 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT 4,116 4,116 4,116 4,116
IR
COUNTERMEASURE
S (LAIRCM).
238 0401314F OPERATIONAL 44,553 44,553 44,553 44,553
SUPPORT
AIRLIFT.
239 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS 6,213 6,213 6,213 6,213
/ COMBAT
CONTROL.
240 0702207F DEPOT 1,605 1,605 1,605 1,605
MAINTENANCE
(NON-IF).
242 0708610F LOGISTICS 95,238 95,238 95,238 95,238
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
(LOGIT).
243 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS 10,925 10,925 10,925 10,925
DEVELOPMENT.
244 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT 1,347 1,347 1,347 1,347
TRAINING.
245 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL 65 65 65 65
ACTIVITIES.
246 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083
RECOVERY
AGENCY.
247 0901218F CIVILIAN 1,577 1,577 1,577 1,577
COMPENSATION
PROGRAM.
248 0901220F PERSONNEL 5,990 5,990 5,990 5,990
ADMINISTRATION.
249 0901226F AIR FORCE 786 786 786 786
STUDIES AND
ANALYSIS
AGENCY.
250 0901279F FACILITIES 654 654 654 654
OPERATION--ADM
INISTRATIVE.
251 0901538F FINANCIAL 135,735 135,735 135,735 135,735
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 11,874,528 11,894,528 11,874,528 11,874,528
PROGRAMS.
................ Increase to [70,000]
classified
program.
................ Program [20,000]
Increase.
................ Reduction [-70,000]
to
classified
program.
................ SUBTOTAL 16,297,542 16,343,542 16,253,142 85,700 16,383,242
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ TOTAL 25,702,946 25,778,946 25,653,346 16,000 25,718,946
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, AF.
................
................ RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
DW
................ BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC 45,837 45,837 45,837 45,837
RESEARCH
INITIATIVE.
002 0601101E DEFENSE 315,033 315,033 315,033 315,033
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH 11,171 11,171 11,171 11,171
INITIATIVES.
004 0601117E BASIC 49,500 49,500 49,500 49,500
OPERATIONAL
MEDICAL
RESEARCH
SCIENCE.
005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL 84,271 89,271 84,271 84,271
DEFENSE
EDUCATION
PROGRAM.
................ Restore PK- [5,000]
12 funding.
006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY 30,895 35,895 30,895 5,000 35,895
BLACK COLLEGES
AND
UNIVERSITIES/
MINORITY
INSTITUTIONS.
................ Program [5,000] [5,000]
increase.
007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND 51,426 51,426 51,426 51,426
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
................ SUBTOTAL 588,133 598,133 588,133 5,000 593,133
BASIC
RESEARCH.
................
................ APPLIED
RESEARCH
008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS 20,065 13,565 20,065 20,065
TECHNOLOGY.
................ Decrease to [-6,500]
insensitive
munitions
program.
009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL 114,790 114,790 114,790 114,790
TECHNOLOGY.
011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN 46,875 46,875 41,875 -5,000 41,875
LABORATORY
RESEARCH
PROGRAM.
................ MIT LL [-5,000] [-5,000]
reduction.
013 0602251D8Z APPLIED 45,000 45,000 30,000 -5,000 40,000
RESEARCH FOR
THE
ADVANCEMENT OF
S&T PRIORITIES.
................ PSC S&T [-15,000] [-5,000]
reduction.
014 0602303E INFORMATION & 413,260 413,260 418,260 2,500 415,760
COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
................ Plan X [5,000] [2,500]
increase.
015 0602304E COGNITIVE 16,330 16,330 16,330 16,330
COMPUTING
SYSTEMS.
017 0602383E BIOLOGICAL 24,537 24,537 24,537 24,537
WARFARE
DEFENSE.
018 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND 227,065 217,065 227,065 -10,000 217,065
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
................ Program [-10,000] [-10,000]
decrease.
020 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY 18,908 18,908 18,908 18,908
RESEARCH.
................ Assuring [-2,000]
effective
missions.
................ Automated [2,000]
software
analysis
tools.
021 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL 5,000 2,500 2,500
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING
(HSCB) APPLIED
RESEARCH.
................ HSCB Apl [5,000] [2,500]
Res
extension.
022 0602702E TACTICAL 225,977 225,977 225,977 225,977
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0602715E MATERIALS AND 166,654 166,654 166,654 166,654
BIOLOGICAL
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0602716E ELECTRONICS 243,469 243,469 243,469 243,469
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS 175,282 175,282 175,282 175,282
DESTRUCTION
DEFEAT
TECHNOLOGIES.
026 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE 11,107 11,107 11,107 11,107
ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE
(SEI) APPLIED
RESEARCH.
027 1160401BB SPECIAL 29,246 29,246 29,246 29,246
OPERATIONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
................ SUBTOTAL 1,778,565 1,762,065 1,768,565 -15,000 1,763,565
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
................
................ ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
028 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS 26,646 26,646 26,646 -5,000 21,646
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
................ Program [-5,000]
decrease.
029 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED 19,420 19,920 19,420 19,420
DEVELOPMENT.
................ Program [500]
increase
for future
information
operations
strategy.
030 0603122D8Z COMBATING 77,792 77,792 60,792 77,792
TERRORISM
TECHNOLOGY
SUPPORT.
................ Reduction [-17,000]
due to
redundancy.
031 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFER 274,033 274,033 274,033 274,033
ATION
INITIATIVES--P
ROLIFERATION
PREVENTION AND
DEFEAT.
032 0603175C BALLISTIC 309,203 239,203 279,203 -95,000 214,203
MISSILE
DEFENSE
TECHNOLOGY.
................ Advanced [-25,000] [-20,000]
Technology-
-unsustaina
ble growth.
................ Common Kill [-70,000] [-70,000]
VehicleTech
nology--tra
nsfer to
line 032X.
................ Directed [-5,000] [-5,000]
energy--DPA
LS.
032X 0603XXXC COMMON KILL 70,000 100,000 100,000
VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGY.
................ Common Kill [70,000] [70,000]
Vehicle
Technology-
-transfer
from line
032.
................ Increase [30,000]
for CKVT
design and
development.
034 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE 19,305 19,305 19,305 19,305
MUNITIONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
035 0603264S AGILE 7,565 7,565 7,565 7,565
TRANSPORTATION
FOR THE 21ST
CENTURY
(AT21)--THEATE
R CAPABILITY.
036 0603274C SPECIAL 40,426 40,426 40,426 40,426
PROGRAM--MDA
TECHNOLOGY.
037 0603286E ADVANCED 149,804 149,804 149,804 149,804
AEROSPACE
SYSTEMS.
038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS 172,546 172,546 172,546 172,546
AND TECHNOLOGY.
039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND 170,847 170,847 170,847 170,847
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--ADVAN
CED
DEVELOPMENT.
040 0603618D8Z JOINT 9,009 9,009 9,009 9,009
ELECTRONIC
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
041 0603648D8Z JOINT 174,428 167,428 164,428 -7,000 167,428
CAPABILITY
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
................ Decrease to [-7,000] [-10,000] [-7,000]
Strategic
Capabilitie
s Office
efforts.
042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED 20,000 20,000 5,000 -15,000 5,000
COMMUNICATIONS
CAPABILITIES.
................ Net Comm [-15,000] [-15,000]
reduction.
045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY 19,668 19,668 19,668 19,668
ADVANCED
RESEARCH.
................ Assuring [-3,000]
effective
missions.
................ Automated [3,000]
software
analysis
tools.
046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL 5,000 2,500 2,500
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING
(HSCB)
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
................ HSCB Adv [5,000] [2,500]
Dev
extension.
047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE 34,041 34,041 59,041 25,000 59,041
MANUFACTURING
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
................ IBIF....... [25,000] [25,000]
048 0603699D8Z EMERGING 61,971 53,971 61,971 -8,000 53,971
CAPABILITIES
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
................ Decrease to [-8,000] [-8,000]
Strategic
Capabilitie
s Office
efforts.
050 0603712S GENERIC 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
LOGISTICS R&D
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND 30,256 30,256 30,256 30,256
DISTRIBUTION
ENTERPRISE
TECHNOLOGY.
052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC 72,324 72,324 72,324 72,324
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH
PROGRAM.
053 0603720S MICROELECTRONIC 82,700 82,700 82,700 82,700
S TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
AND SUPPORT.
054 0603727D8Z JOINT 8,431 8,431 8,431 8,431
WARFIGHTING
PROGRAM.
055 0603739E ADVANCED 117,080 117,080 117,080 117,080
ELECTRONICS
TECHNOLOGIES.
057 0603760E COMMAND, 239,078 239,078 239,078 239,078
CONTROL AND
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
059 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC 259,006 259,006 259,006 259,006
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
060 0603767E SENSOR 286,364 286,364 286,364 286,364
TECHNOLOGY.
061 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED 12,116 12,116 12,116 12,116
LEARNING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
062 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE 19,008 19,008 19,008 19,008
ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE.
063 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION 78,532 78,532 58,532 -10,000 68,532
SPECIAL
PROJECTS.
................ Quick & [-20,000] [-10,000]
Rapid
Reaction
Fund
reduction.
065 0603828J JOINT 12,667 12,667 12,667 12,667
EXPERIMENTATIO
N.
066 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING 41,370 41,370 41,370 41,370
AND SIMULATION
MANAGEMENT
OFFICE.
069 0603941D8Z TEST & 92,508 92,508 92,508 92,508
EVALUATION
SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY.
070 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL 52,001 60,001 52,001 52,001
ENERGY
CAPABILITY
IMPROVEMENT.
................ Operational [8,000]
Energy
Capability
Improvement
Fund.
071 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS... 52,053 52,053 55,053 3,000 55,053
................ Program [3,000] [3,000]
increase.
072 1160402BB SPECIAL 46,809 46,809 46,809 46,809
OPERATIONS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
................ SUBTOTAL 3,109,007 3,102,507 3,050,007 -9,500 3,099,507
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
AND PROTOTYPES
075 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND 63,641 63,641 63,641 63,641
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT
RDT&E ADC&P.
076 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH.. 19,152 19,152 19,152 19,152
077 0603600D8Z WALKOFF........ 70,763 70,763 70,763 70,763
079 0603714D8Z ADVANCED 17,230 17,230 19,230 2,000 19,230
SENSORS
APPLICATION
PROGRAM.
................ Sustain [2,000] [2,000]
testing
effort.
080 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL 71,453 71,453 71,453 71,453
SECURITY
TECHNICAL
CERTIFICATION
PROGRAM.
081 0603881C BALLISTIC 268,990 268,990 268,990 268,990
MISSILE
DEFENSE
TERMINAL
DEFENSE
SEGMENT.
082 0603882C BALLISTIC 1,033,903 1,174,303 1,033,903 100,000 1,133,903
MISSILE
DEFENSE
MIDCOURSE
DEFENSE
SEGMENT.
................ Continue [20,400] [20,000]
activities
relative to
site
evaluation,
EIS, and
planning.
................ FTG-07 [80,000]
failure
review
board and
return to
flight.
................ Planning [50,000]
and Design
(35% to
100%
design).
................ RDT&E [70,000]
Ground
Systems
Development.
083 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND 196,237 196,237 196,237 196,237
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--DEM/
VAL.
084 0603884C BALLISTIC 315,183 315,183 345,183 80,000 395,183
MISSILE
DEFENSE
SENSORS.
................ Additional [30,000] [30,000]
homeland
missile
defense
radar.
................ Enhanced [50,000]
discriminat
ion
capability.
086 0603890C BMD ENABLING 377,605 377,605 377,605 377,605
PROGRAMS.
087 0603891C SPECIAL 286,613 286,613 286,613 286,613
PROGRAMS--MDA.
088 0603892C AEGIS BMD...... 937,056 937,056 937,056 937,056
089 0603893C SPACE TRACKING 44,947 44,947 44,947 44,947
& SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
090 0603895C BALLISTIC 6,515 6,515 6,515 6,515
MISSILE
DEFENSE SYSTEM
SPACE PROGRAMS.
091 0603896C BALLISTIC 418,355 418,355 418,355 418,355
MISSILE
DEFENSE
COMMAND AND
CONTROL,
BATTLE
MANAGEMENT AND
COMMUNICATI.
092 0603898C BALLISTIC 47,419 47,419 47,419 47,419
MISSILE
DEFENSE JOINT
WARFIGHTER
SUPPORT.
093 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE 52,131 52,131 52,131 52,131
INTEGRATION &
OPERATIONS
CENTER (MDIOC).
094 0603906C REGARDING 13,864 13,864 13,864 13,864
TRENCH.
095 0603907C SEA BASED X- 44,478 44,478 44,478 44,478
BAND RADAR
(SBX).
096 0603913C ISRAELI 95,782 283,782 245,782 188,000 283,782
COOPERATIVE
PROGRAMS.
................ Arrow [30,000] [33,700]
Weapon
System
Improvement
s.
................ Arrow-3 [20,000] [22,100]
Interceptor.
................ David's [100,000] [117,200]
Sling short-
range BMD.
................ Increase [173,000]
Israeli
Cooperative
Programs.
................ US co- [15,000] [15,000]
production
capability
for Iron
Dome parts
and
components.
097 0603914C BALLISTIC 375,866 375,866 375,866 375,866
MISSILE
DEFENSE TEST.
098 0603915C BALLISTIC 495,257 495,257 495,257 495,257
MISSILE
DEFENSE
TARGETS.
099 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN 11,704 11,704 11,704 11,704
DEMINING.
100 0603923D8Z COALITION 9,842 9,842 9,842 9,842
WARFARE.
101 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF 3,312 13,312 3,312 10,000 13,312
DEFENSE
CORROSION
PROGRAM.
................ Corrosion [10,000] [10,000]
Prevention,
Control,
and
Mitigation.
102 0604250D8Z ADVANCED 130,000 25,000 100,000 -30,000 100,000
INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGIES.
................ Decrease to [-105,000] [-30,000] [-30,000]
SCO efforts.
103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF 8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300
DEFENSE (DOD)
UNMANNED
AIRCRAFT
SYSTEM (UAS)
COMMON
DEVELOPMENT.
104 0604445J WIDE AREA 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
SURVEILLANCE.
105 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL 5,000 2,500 2,500
AND CULTURE
BEHAVIOR
MODELING
(HSCB)
RESEARCH AND
ENGINEERING.
................ HSCB [5,000] [2,500]
Modeling
R&E
extension.
106 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID 250,000 150,000 200,000 200,000
INNOVATION
PROGRAM.
................ Rapid [250,000] [150,000] [200,000]
Innovation
Program.
108 0604787J JOINT SYSTEMS 7,402 7,402 7,402 7,402
INTEGRATION.
110 0604828J JOINT FIRES 7,506 7,506 7,506 7,506
INTEGRATION
AND
INTEROPERABILI
TY TEAM.
111 0604880C LAND-BASED SM-3 129,374 129,374 129,374 129,374
(LBSM3).
112 0604881C AEGIS SM-3 308,522 308,522 308,522 308,522
BLOCK IIA CO-
DEVELOPMENT.
115 0303191D8Z JOINT 3,169 3,169 3,169 3,169
ELECTROMAGNETI
C TECHNOLOGY
(JET) PROGRAM.
116 0305103C CYBER SECURITY 946 946 946 946
INITIATIVE.
................ SUBTOTAL 5,902,517 6,385,917 6,209,517 552,500 6,455,017
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
AND
PROTOTYPES.
................
................ SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION
118 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND 8,155 8,155 8,155 8,155
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT
RDT&E SDD.
119 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL 65,440 65,440 65,440 65,440
STRIKE
CAPABILITY
DEVELOPMENT.
120 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND 451,306 451,306 451,306 451,306
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--EMD.
122 0604764K ADVANCED IT 29,138 29,138 29,138 29,138
SERVICES JOINT
PROGRAM OFFICE
(AITS-JPO).
123 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL 19,475 19,475 19,475 19,475
INFORMATION
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM (JTIDS).
124 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS 12,901 12,901 12,901 12,901
DESTRUCTION
DEFEAT
CAPABILITIES.
125 0605013BL INFORMATION 13,812 13,812 13,812 13,812
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
126 0605021SE HOMELAND 386 386 386 386
PERSONNEL
SECURITY
INITIATIVE.
127 0605022D8Z DEFENSE 3,763 3,763 3,763 3,763
EXPORTABILITY
PROGRAM.
128 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT 6,788 6,788 6,788 6,788
DEVELOPMENT
INITIATIVES.
129 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE 27,917 27,917 27,917 27,917
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION.
130 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND 22,297 22,297 22,297 22,297
INTEGRATION.
131 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY 51,689 51,689 51,689 51,689
INTIATIVES
(DAI)--FINANCI
AL SYSTEM.
132 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE 6,184 6,184 6,184 6,184
ELECTRONIC
PROCUREMENT
CAPABILITIES.
133 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT 12,083 12,083 12,083 12,083
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
134 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE 3,302 3,302 3,302 3,302
ENERGY
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
(EEIM).
................ SUBTOTAL 734,636 734,636 734,636 734,636
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
................
................ MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
135 0604774D8Z DEFENSE 6,393 6,393 6,393 6,393
READINESS
REPORTING
SYSTEM (DRRS).
136 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS 2,479 2,479 2,479 2,479
ARCHITECTURE
DEVELOPMENT.
137 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST 240,213 240,213 240,213 240,213
AND EVALUATION
INVESTMENT
DEVELOPMENT
(CTEIP).
138 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127
EVALUATIONS.
139 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR.. 8,287 8,287 8,287 8,287
140 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000
ENVIRONMENT
TEST
CAPABILITY
(JMETC).
141 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL 24,379 24,379 24,379 24,379
STUDIES,
SUPPORT AND
ANALYSIS.
143 0605117D8Z FOREIGN 54,311 54,311 54,311 54,311
MATERIEL
ACQUISITION
AND
EXPLOITATION.
144 0605126J JOINT 47,462 47,462 47,462 47,462
INTEGRATED AIR
AND MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION
(JIAMDO).
146 0605130D8Z FOREIGN 12,134 12,134 12,134 12,134
COMPARATIVE
TESTING.
147 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS 44,237 44,237 39,237 44,237
ENGINEERING.
................ SE transfer [-5,000]
to DT&E.
148 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND 5,871 5,871 5,871 5,871
ANALYSIS
SUPPORT--OSD.
149 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS- 5,028 5,028 5,028 5,028
PHYSICAL
SECURITY.
150 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO 6,301 6,301 6,301 6,301
NETWORKS AND
INFORMATION
INTEGRATION.
151 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT 6,504 6,504 6,504 6,504
TO USD
(INTELLIGENCE).
152 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND 92,046 92,046 92,046 92,046
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
158 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS 1,868 1,868 1,868 1,868
INNOVATION
RESEARCH
(SBIR)/ SMALL
BUSINESS
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER (S.
159 0605798D8Z DEFENSE 8,362 8,362 8,362 8,362
TECHNOLOGY
ANALYSIS.
160 0605801KA DEFENSE 56,024 56,024 46,024 56,024
TECHNICAL
INFORMATION
CENTER (DTIC).
................ DTIC [-10,000]
reduction.
161 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT 6,908 6,908 6,908 6,908
OF DOD
ENLISTMENT,
TESTING AND
EVALUATION.
162 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT 15,451 19,451 20,451 4,000 19,451
TEST AND
EVALUATION.
................ DT&E [5,000]
transfer
from SE.
................ Program [4,000] [4,000]
increase.
164 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ-- 71,659 71,659 71,659 71,659
R&D.
165 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND 4,083 4,083 4,083 4,083
PROGRAM
ASSESSMENTS.
167 0203345D8Z DEFENSE 5,306 5,306 5,306 5,306
OPERATIONS
SECURITY
INITIATIVE
(DOSI).
168 0204571J JOINT STAFF 2,097 2,097 2,097 2,097
ANALYTICAL
SUPPORT.
172 0303166J SUPPORT TO 8,394 8,394 8,394 8,394
INFORMATION
OPERATIONS
(IO)
CAPABILITIES.
175 0305193D8Z CYBER 7,624 7,624 7,624 7,624
INTELLIGENCE.
178 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE 43,247 43,247 43,247 43,247
ENGAGEMENT AND
TRAINING
TRANSFORMATION
(CE2T2).
179 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ-- 37,712 37,712 37,712 37,712
MDA.
180 0901598D8W MANAGEMENT 607 607 607 607
HEADQUARTERS
WHS.
181A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 54,914 54,914 54,914 54,914
PROGRAMS.
................ SUBTOTAL 913,028 917,028 903,028 4,000 917,028
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
................
................ OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
182 0604130V ENTERPRISE 7,552 7,552 7,552 7,552
SECURITY
SYSTEM (ESS).
183 0605127T REGIONAL 3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270
INTERNATIONAL
OUTREACH (RIO)
AND
PARTNERSHIP
FOR PEACE
INFORMATION
MANA.
184 0605147T OVERSEAS 287 287 287 287
HUMANITARIAN
ASSISTANCE
SHARED
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
(OHASIS).
185 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000
ANALYSIS AND
SUSTAINMENT
SUPPORT.
186 0607310D8Z OPERATIONAL 1,955 1,955 1,955 1,955
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
187 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER 13,250 13,250 13,250 13,250
SECURITY
COOPERATION
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS (G-
TSCMIS).
188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND 13,026 13,026 13,026 13,026
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
(OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT).
190 0607828J JOINT 12,652 12,652 12,652 12,652
INTEGRATION
AND
INTEROPERABILI
TY.
191 0208043J PLANNING AND 3,061 3,061 3,061 3,061
DECISION AID
SYSTEM (PDAS).
192 0208045K C4I 72,726 72,726 72,726 72,726
INTEROPERABILI
TY.
194 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524
COALITION
INFORMATION
SHARING.
201 0302016K NATIONAL 512 512 512 512
MILITARY
COMMAND SYSTEM-
WIDE SUPPORT.
202 0302019K DEFENSE INFO 12,867 12,867 12,867 12,867
INFRASTRUCTURE
ENGINEERING
AND
INTEGRATION.
203 0303126K LONG-HAUL 36,565 36,565 36,565 36,565
COMMUNICATIONS
-DCS.
204 0303131K MINIMUM 13,144 13,144 13,144 13,144
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK
(MEECN).
205 0303135G PUBLIC KEY 1,060 1,060 1,060 1,060
INFRASTRUCTURE
(PKI).
206 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT 33,279 33,279 33,279 33,279
INFRASTRUCTURE
(KMI).
207 0303140D8Z INFORMATION 10,673 10,673 10,673 10,673
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
208 0303140G INFORMATION 181,567 179,291 181,567 181,567
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
................ Excess to [-2,276]
need.
210 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND 34,288 34,288 34,288 34,288
AND CONTROL
SYSTEM.
211 0303153K DEFENSE 7,741 7,741 7,741 7,741
SPECTRUM
ORGANIZATION.
212 0303170K NET-CENTRIC 3,325 3,325 3,325 3,325
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES
(NCES).
213 0303260D8Z DEFENSE 1,246 1,246 1,246 1,246
MILITARY
DECEPTION
PROGRAM OFFICE
(DMDPO).
214 0303610K TELEPORT 5,147 5,147 5,147 5,147
PROGRAM.
216 0304210BB SPECIAL 17,352 17,352 17,352 17,352
APPLICATIONS
FOR
CONTINGENCIES.
220 0305103K CYBER SECURITY 3,658 3,658 3,658 3,658
INITIATIVE.
221 0305125D8Z CRITICAL 9,752 9,752 9,752 9,752
INFRASTRUCTURE
PROTECTION
(CIP).
225 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D 3,210 3,210 4,210 1,000 4,210
PROGRAMS.
................ CRRC [1,000] [1,000]
extension.
227 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY. 21,602 21,602 21,602 21,602
230 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED 5,195 5,195 5,195 5,195
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
233 0305208K DISTRIBUTED 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
235 0305219BB MQ-1 PREDATOR A 641 641 641 641
UAV.
238 0305387D8Z HOMELAND 2,338 2,338 2,338 2,338
DEFENSE
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER
PROGRAM.
239 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL 4,372 4,372 4,372 4,372
INTELLIGENCE
TECHNOLOGY AND
ARCHITECTURES.
247 0708011S INDUSTRIAL 24,691 24,691 24,691 24,691
PREPAREDNESS.
248 0708012S LOGISTICS 4,659 4,659 4,659 4,659
SUPPORT
ACTIVITIES.
249 0902298J MANAGEMENT HQ-- 3,533 3,533 3,533 3,533
OJCS.
250 1105219BB MQ-9 UAV....... 1,314 1,314 13,314 12,000 13,314
................ Capability [12,000] [12,000]
Improvement
s.
254 1160403BB AVIATION 156,561 156,561 156,561 156,561
SYSTEMS.
256 1160405BB SPECIAL 7,705 7,705 7,705 7,705
OPERATIONS
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
257 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL 42,620 42,620 42,620 42,620
ENHANCEMENTS.
261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS 17,970 17,970 17,970 17,970
262 1160432BB SPECIAL 7,424 7,424 7,424 7,424
PROGRAMS.
268 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL 2,206 2,206 2,206 2,206
VEHICLES.
271 1160483BB MARITIME 18,325 18,325 19,481 1,156 19,481
SYSTEMS.
................ CCFLIR--Tra [1,156] [1,156]
nsfer at
USSOCOM
Request.
274 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL 3,304 3,304 3,304 3,304
VIDEO
SURVEILLANCE
ACTIVITIES.
275 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL 16,021 16,021 16,021 16,021
ENHANCEMENTS
INTELLIGENCE.
275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 3,773,704 3,773,704 3,773,704 3,773,704
PROGRAMS.
................ SUBTOTAL 4,641,222 4,638,946 4,655,378 14,156 4,655,378
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
................
................ UNDISTRIBUTED
276 999999999 UNDISTRIBUTED.. -100,000 0
................ DARPA [-100,000]
undistribut
ed
reduction.
................ SUBTOTAL -100,000 0
UNDISTRIBUTE
D.
................
................ TOTAL 17,667,108 18,139,232 17,809,264 551,156 18,218,264
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, DW.
................
................ OPERATIONAL
TEST & EVAL,
DEFENSE
................ MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL 75,720 75,720 75,720 75,720
TEST AND
EVALUATION.
002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST 48,423 48,423 48,423 48,423
AND EVALUATION.
003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL 62,157 62,157 62,157 62,157
TEST
ACTIVITIES AND
ANALYSES.
................ SUBTOTAL 186,300 186,300 186,300 186,300
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
................
................ TOTAL 186,300 186,300 186,300 186,300
OPERATIONA
L TEST &
EVAL,
DEFENSE.
................
................ TOTAL 67,520,236 68,079,460 67,541,495 219,227 67,739,463
RDT&E.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of
Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Line Program Element Item Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
................. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000
TACTICAL
VEHICLES.
................. SUBTOTAL 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATI
ON.
.................
................. TOTAL 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, ARMY.
.................
................. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426
PROGRAMS.
................. SUBTOTAL 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
.................
................. TOTAL 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, NAVY.
.................
................. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000
PROGRAMS.
................. SUBTOTAL 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
.................
................. TOTAL 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, AF.
.................
................. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208
PROGRAMS.
................. SUBTOTAL 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
.................
................. TOTAL 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, DW.
.................
................. TOTAL 116,634 116,634 116,634 116,634
RDT&E.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Line Item Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, ARMY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS...... 888,114 1,072,714 1,084,014 171,000 1,059,114
Missile Defense [13,100]
Deployment to
Guam............
Program decrease [-24,000]
Readiness [195,500] [195,900] [171,000]
funding increase
020 MODULAR SUPPORT 72,624 72,624 72,624 72,624
BRIGADES...........
030 ECHELONS ABOVE 617,402 617,402 617,402 617,402
BRIGADE............
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 602,262 602,262 602,262 602,262
050 LAND FORCES 1,032,484 1,032,484 1,032,484 1,032,484
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
060 AVIATION ASSETS..... 1,287,462 1,303,262 1,303,262 15,800 1,303,262
Readiness [15,800] [15,800] [15,800]
funding increase
070 FORCE READINESS 3,559,656 3,559,656 3,769,556 209,000 3,768,656
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
Readiness [209,900] [209,000]
funding increase
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS 454,477 454,477 454,477 454,477
READINESS..........
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT 1,481,156 1,481,156 1,681,156 225,000 1,706,156
MAINTENANCE........
Readiness [200,000] [225,000]
funding increase
100 BASE OPERATIONS 7,278,154 7,278,154 7,278,154 7,278,154
SUPPORT............
110 FACILITIES 2,754,712 3,011,712 2,754,712 257,000 3,011,712
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
Realignment of [-25,000] [-25,000]
Arlington
National
Cemetary
operations......
Sustainment to [282,000] [282,000]
90%.............
120 MANAGEMENT AND 425,271 425,271 425,271 425,271
OPERATIONAL HQ'S...
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS 185,064 185,064 180,064 185,064
CORE OPERATIONS....
Unjustified [-5,000]
growth..........
170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS 463,270 456,594 463,270 463,270
ANCILLARY MISSIONS.
Realignment of [3,100]
SOUTHCOM
Information
Operations......
Unjustified [-9,776]
EUCOM Growth....
SUBTOTAL 21,102,108 21,552,832 21,718,708 877,800 21,979,908
OPERATING FORCES MOBILIZATION
180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY.. 360,240 360,240 360,240 360,240
190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING 192,105 192,105 192,105 192,105
STOCKS.............
200 INDUSTRIAL 7,101 7,101 7,101 7,101
PREPAREDNESS.......
SUBTOTAL 559,446 559,446 559,446 559,446
MOBILIZATION.... TRAINING AND
RECRUITING
210 OFFICER ACQUISITION. 115,992 115,992 115,992 115,992
220 RECRUIT TRAINING.... 52,323 52,323 52,323 52,323
230 ONE STATION UNIT 43,589 43,589 43,589 43,589
TRAINING...........
240 SENIOR RESERVE 453,745 453,745 453,745 453,745
OFFICERS TRAINING
CORPS..............
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL 1,034,495 1,034,495 1,034,495 1,034,495
TRAINING...........
260 FLIGHT TRAINING..... 1,016,876 1,016,876 1,016,876 1,016,876
270 PROFESSIONAL 186,565 186,565 186,565 186,565
DEVELOPMENT
EDUCATION..........
280 TRAINING SUPPORT.... 652,514 652,514 652,514 652,514
290 RECRUITING AND 485,500 485,500 485,500 485,500
ADVERTISING........
300 EXAMINING........... 170,912 170,912 170,912 170,912
310 OFF-DUTY AND 251,523 251,523 251,523 251,523
VOLUNTARY EDUCATION
320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION 184,422 184,422 184,422 184,422
AND TRAINING.......
330 JUNIOR ROTC......... 181,105 181,105 181,105 181,105
SUBTOTAL 4,829,561 4,829,561 4,829,561 4,829,561
TRAINING AND
RECRUITING...... ADMIN & SRVWIDE
ACTIVITIES
350 SERVICEWIDE 690,089 690,089 690,089 690,089
TRANSPORTATION.....
360 CENTRAL SUPPLY 774,120 779,120 774,120 774,120
ACTIVITIES.........
Corrosion [5,000]
Prevention,
Control, and
Mitigation......
370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT 651,765 651,765 651,765 651,765
ACTIVITIES.........
380 AMMUNITION 453,051 453,051 453,051 453,051
MANAGEMENT.........
390 ADMINISTRATION...... 487,737 487,737 487,737 487,737
400 SERVICEWIDE 1,563,115 1,563,115 1,563,115 1,563,115
COMMUNICATIONS.....
410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT. 326,853 326,853 326,853 326,853
420 OTHER PERSONNEL 234,364 234,364 234,364 234,364
SUPPORT............
430 OTHER SERVICE 1,212,091 1,212,091 1,212,091 1,212,091
SUPPORT............
440 ARMY CLAIMS 243,540 243,540 243,540 243,540
ACTIVITIES.........
450 REAL ESTATE 241,101 241,101 241,101 241,101
MANAGEMENT.........
460 BASE OPERATIONS 226,291 226,291 226,291 226,291
SUPPORT............
470 SUPPORT OF NATO 426,651 457,851 426,651 31,200 457,851
OPERATIONS.........
Realignment of [31,200] [31,200]
NATO Special
Operations
Headquarters
from O&M Defense-
wide............
480 MISC. SUPPORT OF 27,248 24,148 27,248 27,248
OTHER NATIONS......
Realignment of [-3,100]
SOUTHCOM
Information
Operations......
525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 1,023,946 1,023,946 1,023,946 1,023,946
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 8,581,962 8,615,062 8,581,962 31,200 8,613,162
SRVWIDE
ACTIVITIES...... UNDISTRIBUTED
530 UNDISTRIBUTED....... -740,300 -284,300 -284,300
Average civilian [-284,300] [-284,300]
end strength
above projection
Unobligated [-456,000]
balances........
SUBTOTAL -740,300 -284,300 -284,300
UNDISTRIBUTED... TOTAL OPERATION 35,073,077 34,816,601 35,689,677 624,700 35,697,777
& MAINTENANCE,
ARMY........... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, ARMY
RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS...... 1,621 1,621 1,621 1,621
020 MODULAR SUPPORT 24,429 24,429 24,429 24,429
BRIGADES...........
030 ECHELONS ABOVE 657,099 657,099 657,099 657,099
BRIGADE............
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 122,485 122,485 122,485 122,485
050 LAND FORCES 584,058 584,058 584,058 584,058
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
060 AVIATION ASSETS..... 79,380 79,380 79,380 79,380
070 FORCE READINESS 471,616 471,616 471,616 471,616
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS 74,243 74,243 74,243 74,243
READINESS..........
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT 70,894 70,894 70,894 75,800 146,694
MAINTENANCE........
Army Reserve [75,800]
identified
shortfall--resto
re unjustified
efficiency
reduction.......
100 BASE OPERATIONS 569,801 569,801 569,801 569,801
SUPPORT............
110 FACILITIES 294,145 323,245 330,545 36,400 330,545
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
Readiness [29,100] [36,400] [36,400]
funding increase
120 MANAGEMENT AND 51,853 51,853 51,853 51,853
OPERATIONAL HQ'S...
SUBTOTAL 3,001,624 3,030,724 3,038,024 112,200 3,113,824
OPERATING FORCES ADMIN & SRVWD
ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE 10,735 10,735 10,735 10,735
TRANSPORTATION.....
140 ADMINISTRATION...... 24,197 24,197 24,197 24,197
150 SERVICEWIDE 10,304 10,304 10,304 10,304
COMMUNICATIONS.....
160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT. 10,319 10,319 10,319 10,319
170 RECRUITING AND 37,857 37,857 37,857 37,857
ADVERTISING........
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 93,412 93,412 93,412 93,412
SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL OPERATION 3,095,036 3,124,136 3,131,436 112,200 3,207,236
& MAINTENANCE,
ARMY RES....... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, ARNG
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS...... 800,880 800,880 800,880 800,880
020 MODULAR SUPPORT 178,650 178,650 178,650 178,650
BRIGADES...........
030 ECHELONS ABOVE 771,503 771,503 771,503 771,503
BRIGADE............
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 98,699 98,699 98,699 98,699
050 LAND FORCES 38,779 38,779 38,779 38,779
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
060 AVIATION ASSETS..... 922,503 922,503 922,503 922,503
070 FORCE READINESS 761,056 761,056 761,056 761,056
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS 62,971 62,971 62,971 62,971
READINESS..........
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT 233,105 233,105 233,105 233,105
MAINTENANCE........
100 BASE OPERATIONS 1,019,059 1,019,059 1,019,059 1,019,059
SUPPORT............
110 FACILITIES 712,139 786,339 786,339 74,200 786,339
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
Readiness [74,200] [74,200] [74,200]
funding increase
120 MANAGEMENT AND 1,013,715 1,013,715 1,013,715 -13,297 1,000,418
OPERATIONAL HQ'S...
Army National [-13,297]
Guard identified
severance pay
excess to
requirement.....
SUBTOTAL 6,613,059 6,687,259 6,687,259 60,903 6,673,962
OPERATING FORCES ADMIN & SRVWD
ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE 10,812 10,812 10,812 10,812
TRANSPORTATION.....
140 REAL ESTATE 1,551 1,551 1,551 1,551
MANAGEMENT.........
150 ADMINISTRATION...... 78,284 78,284 78,284 78,284
160 SERVICEWIDE 46,995 46,995 46,995 46,995
COMMUNICATIONS.....
170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT. 6,390 6,390 6,390 6,390
180 RECRUITING AND 297,105 297,105 297,105 297,105
ADVERTISING........
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 441,137 441,137 441,137 441,137
SRVWD ACTIVITIES UNDISTRIBUTED
190 UNDISTRIBUTED....... -15,000 -15,000
Unjustified [-15,000]
Growth For
Civilian
Personnel
Compensation....
SUBTOTAL -15,000 -15,000
UNDISTRIBUTED... TOTAL OPERATION 7,054,196 7,128,396 7,128,396 45,903 7,100,099
& MAINTENANCE,
ARNG........... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, NAVY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER 4,952,522 4,952,522 4,985,022 32,500 4,985,022
FLIGHT OPERATIONS..
Readiness [32,500] [32,500]
funding increase
020 FLEET AIR TRAINING.. 1,826,404 1,826,404 1,837,604 1,826,404
Readiness [11,200]
funding increase
030 AVIATION TECHNICAL 38,639 38,639 38,639 38,639
DATA & ENGINEERING
SERVICES...........
040 AIR OPERATIONS AND 90,030 90,030 90,030 90,030
SAFETY SUPPORT.....
050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT. 362,700 362,700 362,700 362,700
060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT 915,881 915,881 915,881 40,000 955,881
MAINTENANCE........
Navy Unfunded [40,000]
Requirement for
Air Depot
Maintenance.....
070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT 35,838 35,838 36,446 35,838
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
Readiness [608]
funding increase
080 AVIATION LOGISTICS.. 379,914 448,414 379,914 379,914
CLS for AVN [68,500]
Logistics.......
090 MISSION AND OTHER 3,884,836 3,884,836 3,984,336 110,900 3,995,736
SHIP OPERATIONS....
Readiness [99,500] [99,500]
funding increase
Spares.......... [11,400]
100 SHIP OPERATIONS 734,852 734,852 796,252 734,852
SUPPORT & TRAINING.
Readiness [61,400]
funding increase
110 SHIP DEPOT 5,191,511 5,191,511 5,197,211 5,191,511
MAINTENANCE........
Readiness [5,700]
funding increase
120 SHIP DEPOT 1,351,274 1,351,274 1,477,474 30,000 1,381,274
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
Readiness [126,200] [30,000]
funding increase
130 COMBAT 701,316 691,722 701,316 701,316
COMMUNICATIONS.....
New START treaty [-9,594]
implementation,
excluding
verification and
inspection
activities......
140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE.. 97,710 97,710 97,710 97,710
150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND 172,330 172,330 172,330 172,330
SURVEILLANCE.......
160 WARFARE TACTICS..... 454,682 454,682 454,682 454,682
170 OPERATIONAL 328,406 328,406 328,406 328,406
METEOROLOGY AND
OCEANOGRAPHY.......
180 COMBAT SUPPORT 946,429 946,429 946,429 136,868 1,083,297
FORCES.............
Navy Unfunded [148,000]
Requirement for
Navy
Expeditionary
Combat
Enterprise Reset/
Depot...........
Unjustified [-11,132]
growth for human
resources
functions.......
190 EQUIPMENT 142,249 148,249 142,249 142,249
MAINTENANCE........
Corrosion [6,000]
Prevention,
Control, and
Mitigation......
200 DEPOT OPERATIONS 2,603 2,603 3,263 2,603
SUPPORT............
Readiness [660]
funding increase
210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS 102,970 102,970 102,970 102,970
CORE OPERATIONS....
220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS 199,128 199,128 196,128 199,128
DIRECT MISSION
SUPPORT............
Classified [-3,000]
program decrease
230 CRUISE MISSILE...... 92,671 92,671 92,671 92,671
240 FLEET BALLISTIC 1,193,188 1,193,188 1,193,188 1,193,188
MISSILE............
250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS 105,985 105,985 105,985 105,985
SYSTEMS SUPPORT....
260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE. 532,627 532,627 532,627 532,627
270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS 304,160 304,160 304,160 304,160
SUPPORT............
280 ENTERPRISE 1,011,528 1,011,528 1,011,528 1,011,528
INFORMATION........
290 SUSTAINMENT, 1,996,821 2,182,021 2,096,821 136,000 2,132,821
RESTORATION AND
MODERNIZATION......
Readiness [185,200] [100,000] [136,000]
funding increase
300 BASE OPERATING 4,460,918 4,460,918 4,460,918 4,460,918
SUPPORT............
SUBTOTAL 32,610,122 32,860,228 33,044,890 486,268 33,096,390
OPERATING FORCES MOBILIZATION
310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING 331,576 331,576 331,576 331,576
AND SURGE..........
320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/ 6,638 6,638 6,638 6,638
INACTIVATIONS......
330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/ 222,752 222,752 222,752 222,752
INACTIVATIONS......
340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH 73,310 73,310 73,310 73,310
SERVICES SYSTEMS...
350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675
360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT. 23,794 23,794 23,794 23,794
SUBTOTAL 660,745 660,745 660,745 660,745
MOBILIZATION.... TRAINING AND
RECRUITING
370 OFFICER ACQUISITION. 148,516 148,516 148,516 148,516
380 RECRUIT TRAINING.... 9,384 9,384 9,384 9,384
390 RESERVE OFFICERS 139,876 139,876 139,876 139,876
TRAINING CORPS.....
400 SPECIALIZED SKILL 630,069 630,069 630,069 630,069
TRAINING...........
410 FLIGHT TRAINING..... 9,294 9,294 9,294 9,294
420 PROFESSIONAL 169,082 169,082 169,082 169,082
DEVELOPMENT
EDUCATION..........
430 TRAINING SUPPORT.... 164,368 164,368 164,368 164,368
440 RECRUITING AND 241,733 242,833 241,733 1,100 242,833
ADVERTISING........
Naval Sea Cadets [1,100] [1,100]
450 OFF-DUTY AND 139,815 139,815 139,815 139,815
VOLUNTARY EDUCATION
460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION 94,632 94,632 94,632 94,632
AND TRAINING.......
470 JUNIOR ROTC......... 51,373 51,373 51,373 51,373
SUBTOTAL 1,798,142 1,799,242 1,798,142 1,100 1,799,242
TRAINING AND
RECRUITING...... ADMIN & SRVWD
ACTIVITIES
480 ADMINISTRATION...... 886,088 886,088 886,088 886,088
490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS.. 13,131 13,131 13,131 13,131
500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER 115,742 115,742 115,742 115,742
AND PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT.........
510 MILITARY MANPOWER 382,150 382,150 382,150 382,150
AND PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT.........
520 OTHER PERSONNEL 268,403 268,403 268,403 268,403
SUPPORT............
530 SERVICEWIDE 317,293 317,293 317,293 317,293
COMMUNICATIONS.....
550 SERVICEWIDE 207,128 207,128 207,128 207,128
TRANSPORTATION.....
570 PLANNING, 295,855 295,855 295,855 295,855
ENGINEERING AND
DESIGN.............
580 ACQUISITION AND 1,140,484 1,140,484 1,140,484 1,140,484
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.
590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND 52,873 52,873 52,873 52,873
ELECTRICAL SUPPORT.
600 COMBAT/WEAPONS 27,587 27,587 27,587 27,587
SYSTEMS............
610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC 75,728 75,728 75,728 75,728
WARFARE SYSTEMS....
620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE 543,026 543,026 543,026 543,026
SERVICE............
680 INTERNATIONAL 4,965 4,965 4,965 4,965
HEADQUARTERS AND
AGENCIES...........
705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 545,775 545,775 545,775 545,775
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 4,876,228 4,876,228 4,876,228 4,876,228
SRVWD ACTIVITIES UNDISTRIBUTED
710 UNDISTRIBUTED....... -278,200 -30,000 -30,000
Average civilian [-38,500] [-30,000]
end strength
above projection
Unobligated [-239,700]
balances........
SUBTOTAL -278,200 -30,000 -30,000
UNDISTRIBUTED... TOTAL OPERATION 39,945,237 39,918,243 40,380,005 457,368 40,402,605
& MAINTENANCE,
NAVY........... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, MARINE
CORPS
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATIONAL FORCES.. 837,012 926,012 837,012 75,000 912,012
Crisis Response [40,600] [40,000]
Force...........
Marine Security [48,400] [35,000]
Guard...........
020 FIELD LOGISTICS..... 894,555 898,555 894,555 894,555
Corrosion [4,000]
Prevention,
Control, and
Mitigation......
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 223,337 221,337 279,337 56,000 279,337
Readiness [56,000] [56,000]
funding increase
Unjustified [-2,000]
Growth HUMVEE
Modifications...
040 MARITIME 97,878 97,878 97,878 97,878
PREPOSITIONING.....
050 SUSTAINMENT, 774,619 781,719 774,619 774,619
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
Sustainment to [7,100]
90%.............
060 BASE OPERATING 2,166,661 2,166,661 2,166,661 2,166,661
SUPPORT............
SUBTOTAL 4,994,062 5,092,162 5,050,062 131,000 5,125,062
OPERATING FORCES TRAINING AND
RECRUITING
070 RECRUIT TRAINING.... 17,693 17,693 17,693 17,693
080 OFFICER ACQUISITION. 896 896 896 896
090 SPECIALIZED SKILL 100,806 100,806 100,806 100,806
TRAINING...........
100 PROFESSIONAL 46,928 46,928 46,928 46,928
DEVELOPMENT
EDUCATION..........
110 TRAINING SUPPORT.... 356,426 356,426 356,426 356,426
120 RECRUITING AND 179,747 179,747 179,747 179,747
ADVERTISING........
130 OFF-DUTY AND 52,255 52,255 52,255 52,255
VOLUNTARY EDUCATION
140 JUNIOR ROTC......... 23,138 23,138 23,138 23,138
SUBTOTAL 777,889 777,889 777,889 777,889
TRAINING AND
RECRUITING...... ADMIN & SRVWD
ACTIVITIES
150 SERVICEWIDE 43,816 43,816 43,816 43,816
TRANSPORTATION.....
160 ADMINISTRATION...... 305,107 305,107 305,107 305,107
180 ACQUISITION AND 87,500 87,500 87,500 87,500
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.
185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 46,276 46,276 46,276 46,276
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 482,699 482,699 482,699 482,699
SRVWD ACTIVITIES UNDISTRIBUTED
190 UNDISTRIBUTED....... -50,000 0
Unobligated [-50,000]
balances........
SUBTOTAL -50,000 0
UNDISTRIBUTED... TOTAL OPERATION 6,254,650 6,302,750 6,310,650 131,000 6,385,650
& MAINTENANCE,
MARINE CORPS... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, NAVY
RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER 586,620 586,620 588,520 1,900 588,520
FLIGHT OPERATIONS..
Readiness [1,900] [1,900]
funding increase
020 INTERMEDIATE 7,008 7,008 7,008 7,008
MAINTENANCE........
040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT 100,657 100,657 109,557 8,900 109,557
MAINTENANCE........
Readiness [8,900] [8,900]
funding increase
050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT 305 305 305 305
OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
060 AVIATION LOGISTICS.. 3,927 3,927 3,927 3,927
070 MISSION AND OTHER 75,933 75,933 75,933 75,933
SHIP OPERATIONS....
080 SHIP OPERATIONS 601 601 601 601
SUPPORT & TRAINING.
090 SHIP DEPOT 44,364 44,364 44,364 44,364
MAINTENANCE........
100 COMBAT 15,477 15,477 15,477 15,477
COMMUNICATIONS.....
110 COMBAT SUPPORT 115,608 115,608 115,608 115,608
FORCES.............
120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE. 1,967 1,967 1,967 1,967
130 ENTERPRISE 43,726 43,726 43,726 43,726
INFORMATION........
140 SUSTAINMENT, 69,011 74,011 69,011 5,000 74,011
RESTORATION AND
MODERNIZATION......
Sustainment to [5,000] [5,000]
90%.............
150 BASE OPERATING 109,604 109,604 109,604 109,604
SUPPORT............
SUBTOTAL 1,174,808 1,179,808 1,185,608 15,800 1,190,608
OPERATING FORCES ADMIN & SRVWD
ACTIVITIES
160 ADMINISTRATION...... 2,905 2,905 2,905 2,905
170 MILITARY MANPOWER 14,425 14,425 14,425 14,425
AND PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT.........
180 SERVICEWIDE 2,485 2,485 2,485 2,485
COMMUNICATIONS.....
190 ACQUISITION AND 3,129 3,129 3,129 3,129
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 22,944 22,944 22,944 22,944
SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL OPERATION 1,197,752 1,202,752 1,208,552 15,800 1,213,552
& MAINTENANCE,
NAVY RES....... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, MC
RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATING FORCES.... 96,244 96,244 96,244 96,244
020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 17,581 19,081 17,581 17,581
Restore Critical [1,500]
Depot
Maintenance.....
030 SUSTAINMENT, 32,438 32,738 32,438 300 32,738
RESTORATION AND
MODERNIZATION......
Sustainment to [300] [300]
90%.............
040 BASE OPERATING 95,259 95,259 95,259 95,259
SUPPORT............
SUBTOTAL 241,522 243,322 241,522 300 241,822
OPERATING FORCES ADMIN & SRVWD
ACTIVITIES
050 SERVICEWIDE 894 894 894 894
TRANSPORTATION.....
060 ADMINISTRATION...... 11,743 11,743 11,743 11,743
070 RECRUITING AND 9,158 9,158 9,158 9,158
ADVERTISING........
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 21,795 21,795 21,795 21,795
SRVWD ACTIVITIES TOTAL OPERATION 263,317 265,117 263,317 300 263,617
& MAINTENANCE,
MC RESERVE..... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, AIR
FORCE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT 3,295,814 3,295,814 3,515,814 146,800 3,442,614
FORCES.............
Readiness [220,000] [146,800]
funding increase
020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT 1,875,095 1,875,095 1,875,095 1,875,095
FORCES.............
030 AIR OPERATIONS 1,559,109 1,559,109 1,589,109 20,000 1,579,109
TRAINING (OJT,
MAINTAIN SKILLS)...
Increase for [30,000] [20,000]
ranges..........
040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 5,956,304 5,961,304 6,146,304 190,000 6,146,304
Corrosion [5,000]
Prevention,
Control, and
Mitigation......
Readiness [190,000] [190,000]
funding increase
050 FACILITIES 1,834,424 2,224,454 1,909,424 100,314 1,934,738
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
Readiness [219,500] [75,000] [100,314]
funding increase
Restoration, [170,530]
Modernization,
and Demolition
project
shortfalls......
060 BASE SUPPORT........ 2,779,811 2,779,811 2,779,811 2,779,811
070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY 913,841 913,841 913,841 -2,512 911,329
WARNING............
Remove program [-2,512]
growth for
foreign currency
fluctuation.....
080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT 916,837 916,837 916,837 916,837
PROGRAMS...........
100 TACTICAL INTEL AND 720,349 720,349 720,349 720,349
OTHER SPECIAL
ACTIVITIES.........
110 LAUNCH FACILITIES... 305,275 305,275 305,275 305,275
120 SPACE CONTROL 433,658 433,658 433,658 433,658
SYSTEMS............
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS 1,146,016 1,147,116 1,123,616 1,146,016
DIRECT MISSION
SUPPORT............
Classified [-22,400]
program decrease
NORTHCOM VOICE [1,100]
program.........
140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS 231,830 231,830 231,830 231,830
CORE OPERATIONS....
SUBTOTAL 21,968,363 22,364,493 22,460,963 454,602 22,422,965
OPERATING FORCES MOBILIZATION
150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS.. 2,015,902 2,015,902 2,015,902 2,015,902
160 MOBILIZATION 147,216 147,216 147,216 147,216
PREPAREDNESS.......
170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 1,556,232 1,556,232 1,556,232 1,556,232
180 FACILITIES 167,402 167,402 167,402 167,402
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
190 BASE SUPPORT........ 707,040 707,040 707,040 707,040
SUBTOTAL 4,593,792 4,593,792 4,593,792 4,593,792
MOBILIZATION.... TRAINING AND
RECRUITING
200 OFFICER ACQUISITION. 102,334 102,334 102,334 102,334
210 RECRUIT TRAINING.... 17,733 17,733 17,733 17,733
220 RESERVE OFFICERS 94,600 94,600 94,600 94,600
TRAINING CORPS
(ROTC).............
230 FACILITIES 217,011 217,011 217,011 217,011
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
240 BASE SUPPORT........ 800,327 800,327 800,327 800,327
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL 399,364 399,364 399,364 399,364
TRAINING...........
260 FLIGHT TRAINING..... 792,275 792,275 792,275 792,275
270 PROFESSIONAL 248,958 248,958 248,958 248,958
DEVELOPMENT
EDUCATION..........
280 TRAINING SUPPORT.... 106,741 106,741 106,741 106,741
290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 319,331 319,331 339,331 20,000 339,331
Readiness [20,000] [20,000]
funding increase
300 RECRUITING AND 122,736 122,736 122,736 122,736
ADVERTISING........
310 EXAMINING........... 3,679 3,679 3,679 3,679
320 OFF-DUTY AND 137,255 137,255 137,255 137,255
VOLUNTARY EDUCATION
330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION 176,153 176,153 176,153 176,153
AND TRAINING.......
340 JUNIOR ROTC......... 67,018 67,018 67,018 67,018
SUBTOTAL 3,605,515 3,605,515 3,625,515 20,000 3,625,515
TRAINING AND
RECRUITING...... ADMIN & SRVWD
ACTIVITIES
350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 1,103,684 1,103,684 1,103,684 1,103,684
360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 919,923 919,923 919,923 919,923
ACTIVITIES.........
370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 56,601 52,601 56,601 56,601
Heavy bomber [-400]
eliminations
related to New
START treaty
implementation..
ICBM reductions [-3,600]
related to New
START
implementation..
380 FACILITIES 281,061 281,061 281,061 281,061
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
390 BASE SUPPORT........ 1,203,305 1,203,305 1,203,305 -5,177 1,198,128
Unjustified [-5,177]
increase for
public-private
competitions....
400 ADMINISTRATION...... 593,865 593,865 593,865 593,865
410 SERVICEWIDE 574,609 574,609 574,609 574,609
COMMUNICATIONS.....
420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE 1,028,600 1,013,200 1,028,600 1,028,600
ACTIVITIES.........
De-MIRVing ICBMs [-700]
related to New
START treaty
implementation..
ICBM [-14,700]
eliminations and
Environmental
Impact Study
related to New
START treaty
implementation..
430 CIVIL AIR PATROL.... 24,720 24,720 24,720 24,720
460 INTERNATIONAL 89,008 89,008 89,008 89,008
SUPPORT............
465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 1,227,796 1,222,996 1,227,796 1,227,796
Classified [-4,800]
Adjustment......
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 7,103,172 7,078,972 7,103,172 -5,177 7,097,995
SRVWD ACTIVITIES UNDISTRIBUTED
470 UNDISTRIBUTED....... -205,100 -200,000 -200,000
Average civilian [-18,700] [-200,000]
end strength
above projection
Unobligated [-186,400]
balances........
SUBTOTAL -205,100 -200,000 -200,000
UNDISTRIBUTED... TOTAL OPERATION 37,270,842 37,437,672 37,783,442 269,425 37,540,267
& MAINTENANCE,
AIR FORCE...... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, AF
RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT 1,857,951 1,857,951 1,857,951 1,857,951
FORCES.............
020 MISSION SUPPORT 224,462 224,462 224,462 -4,400 220,062
OPERATIONS.........
Unjustified [-4,400]
growth in
civilian
personnel
compensation....
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 521,182 521,182 521,182 521,182
040 FACILITIES 89,704 98,804 98,404 8,970 98,674
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
Readiness [9,100] [8,700] [8,970]
funding increase
050 BASE SUPPORT........ 360,836 360,836 360,836 360,836
SUBTOTAL 3,054,135 3,063,235 3,062,835 4,570 3,058,705
OPERATING FORCES ADMINISTRATION AND
SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES
060 ADMINISTRATION...... 64,362 64,362 64,362 64,362
070 RECRUITING AND 15,056 15,056 15,056 15,056
ADVERTISING........
080 MILITARY MANPOWER 23,617 23,617 23,617 23,617
AND PERS MGMT
(ARPC).............
090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT 6,618 6,618 6,618 6,618
(DISABILITY COMP)..
100 AUDIOVISUAL......... 819 819 819 819
SUBTOTAL 110,472 110,472 110,472 110,472
ADMINISTRATION
AND SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES...... TOTAL OPERATION 3,164,607 3,173,707 3,173,307 4,570 3,169,177
& MAINTENANCE,
AF RESERVE..... OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE, ANG
OPERATING FORCES
010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS. 3,371,871 3,371,871 3,371,871 3,371,871
020 MISSION SUPPORT 720,305 720,305 720,305 720,305
OPERATIONS.........
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 1,514,870 1,514,870 1,514,870 1,514,870
040 FACILITIES 296,953 323,853 325,153 28,200 325,153
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION......
Readiness [26,900] [28,200] [28,200]
funding increase
050 BASE SUPPORT........ 597,303 597,303 597,303 597,303
SUBTOTAL 6,501,302 6,528,202 6,529,502 28,200 6,529,502
OPERATING FORCES ADMINISTRATION AND
SERVICE-WIDE
ACTIVITIES
060 ADMINISTRATION...... 32,117 32,117 32,117 32,117
070 RECRUITING AND 32,585 32,585 32,585 32,585
ADVERTISING........
SUBTOTAL 64,702 64,702 64,702 64,702
ADMINISTRATION
AND SERVICE-WIDE
ACTIVITIES...... TOTAL OPERATION 6,566,004 6,592,904 6,594,204 28,200 6,594,204
& MAINTENANCE,
ANG............ OPERATION &
MAINTENANCE,
DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATING FORCES
010 JOINT CHIEFS OF 472,239 472,239 472,239 472,239
STAFF..............
020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS 5,261,463 5,230,711 5,239,663 -27,852 5,233,611
COMMAND............
AFSOC Flying [70,100] [70,100]
Hour Program....
International [-7,017] [-7,017]
SOF Information
Sharing System..
Ongoing baseline [-35,519] [-35,519]
contingency
operations......
Other [-5,000]
Operations--mili
tary
construction
collateral
equipment non-
recurring costs.
Pilot program [5,000] [5,000]
for SOF family
members.........
Preserve the [-16,605] [-11,605]
force and
families--human
performance
program.........
Preserve the [-8,786] [-8,786]
force and
families--resili
ency............
Realignment of [-31,200] [-31,200]
NATO Special
Operations
Headquarters to
O&M, Army.......
Regional SOF [-14,725] [-14,725]
Coordination
Centers.........
USASOC Flying [18,000] [18,000]
Hour Program....
USSOCOM NCR [-10,000] [-7,100] [-7,100]
Contractor
Support.........
USSOCOM RSCC.... [-14,700]
SUBTOTAL 5,733,702 5,702,950 5,711,902 -27,852 5,705,850
OPERATING FORCES TRAINING AND
RECRUITING
040 DEFENSE ACQUISITION 157,397 157,397 157,397 157,397
UNIVERSITY.........
050 NATIONAL DEFENSE 84,899 84,899 84,899 84,899
UNIVERSITY.........
SUBTOTAL 242,296 242,296 242,296 242,296
TRAINING AND
RECRUITING...... ADMINISTRATION AND
SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES
060 CIVIL MILITARY 144,443 165,443 166,142 21,699 166,142
PROGRAMS...........
STARBASE........ [21,000] [21,699] [21,699]
080 DEFENSE CONTRACT 612,207 612,207 612,207 -29,000 583,207
AUDIT AGENCY.......
Overestimation [-29,000]
of Civilian Full
Time Equivalent
Targets.........
090 DEFENSE CONTRACT 1,378,606 1,378,606 1,378,606 -59,000 1,319,606
MANAGEMENT AGENCY..
Overestimation [-59,000]
of Civilian Full
Time Equivalent
Targets.........
110 DEFENSE HUMAN 763,091 763,091 763,091 763,091
RESOURCES ACTIVITY.
120 DEFENSE INFORMATION 1,326,243 1,326,243 1,326,243 1,326,243
SYSTEMS AGENCY.....
140 DEFENSE LEGAL 29,933 29,933 29,933 29,933
SERVICES AGENCY....
150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS 462,545 462,545 462,545 -11,028 451,517
AGENCY.............
Cost of DISA [-11,028]
computing
service rates...
160 DEFENSE MEDIA 222,979 222,979 222,979 222,979
ACTIVITY...........
170 DEFENSE POW/MIA 21,594 21,594 21,594 21,594
OFFICE.............
180 DEFENSE SECURITY 788,389 788,389 769,389 -26,800 761,589
COOPERATION AGENCY.
Combating [-7,000] [-7,000]
terrorism
fellowship
program.........
Global Train and [-7,800]
Equip...........
Regional centers [-12,000] [-12,000]
for security
centers--undistr
ibuted decrease.
190 DEFENSE SECURITY 546,603 546,603 546,603 546,603
SERVICE............
210 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 35,151 35,151 35,151 35,151
SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION.....
220 DEFENSE THREAT 438,033 438,033 438,033 438,033
REDUCTION AGENCY...
240 DEPARTMENT OF 2,713,756 2,713,756 2,743,756 2,713,756
DEFENSE EDUCATION
ACTIVITY...........
Disability [5,000]
Impact Aid......
Supplemental [25,000]
Impact Aid......
250 MISSILE DEFENSE 256,201 256,201 256,201 -1,400 254,801
AGENCY.............
THAAD excess to [-1,400]
requirement.....
270 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC 371,615 217,715 98,315 -153,900 217,715
ADJUSTMENT.........
Program decrease [-273,300] [-273,300]
Program [-153,900]
reduction.......
Rephasing of [119,400]
Guam civilian
water and waste
water
infrastructure
projects........
280 OFFICE OF THE 2,010,176 1,922,676 2,003,176 -15,000 1,995,176
SECRETARY OF
DEFENSE............
BRAC 2015 [-8,000] [-8,000]
Initiative......
Combatant [90,500]
Commanders
Exercise
Engagement
Training
Transformation..
OUSD(P) program [-10,000] [-7,000] [-7,000]
decrease........
Procurement [10,000]
Technical
Assistance
Program--Enhance
d Business
Support.........
Program decrease [-60,000]
Realignment to [-35,000]
Building
Partnership
Capacity
authorities.....
Reduction to [-75,000]
Building
Partnership
Capacity
authorities.....
290 WASHINGTON 616,572 616,572 616,572 -5,000 611,572
HEADQUARTERS
SERVICES...........
Price Growth [-5,000]
Requested as
Program Growth..
295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 14,283,558 14,287,648 14,308,558 40,000 14,323,558
Classified [4,090] [10,000]
adjustment......
Increase to [40,000] [30,000]
Operation
Observant
Compass.........
Reduction to [-15,000]
Operation
Observant
Compass.........
SUBTOTAL 27,021,695 26,805,385 26,799,094 -239,429 26,782,266
ADMINISTRATION
AND SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES...... UNDISTRIBUTED
305 UNDISTRIBUTED....... -320,000 30,000 30,000
Impact Aid...... [25,000] [25,000]
Impact Aid for [5,000] [5,000]
Children with
Severe
Disabilities....
Section 514. [3,000]
Study of Reserve
Component
General and Flag
Officers........
Section 621. [10,000]
Expand the
victims
transitional
compensation
benefit.........
Unobligated [-363,000]
balances........
SUBTOTAL -320,000 30,000 30,000
UNDISTRIBUTED... TOTAL OPERATION 32,997,693 32,430,631 32,753,292 -237,281 32,760,412
& MAINTENANCE,
DEFENSE-WIDE... MISCELLANEOUS
APPROPRIATIONS
040 US COURT OF APPEALS 13,606 12,626 13,606 13,606
FOR THE ARMED
FORCES, DEFENSE
Unjustified [-980]
Growth..........
050 OVERSEAS 109,500 109,500 109,500 109,500
HUMANITARIAN,
DISASTER AND CIVIC
AID................
060 COOPERATIVE THREAT 528,455 528,455 528,455 528,455
REDUCTION..........
080 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD 256,031 256,031 256,031 -124,700 131,331
Program decrease [-124,700]
090 ENVIRONMENTAL 298,815 298,815 298,815 298,815
RESTORATION, ARMY..
100 ENVIRONMENTAL 316,103 316,103 316,103 316,103
RESTORATION, NAVY..
110 ENVIRONMENTAL 439,820 439,820 439,820 439,820
RESTORATION, AIR
FORCE..............
120 ENVIRONMENTAL 10,757 10,757 10,757 10,757
RESTORATION,
DEFENSE............
130 ENVIRONMENTAL 237,443 237,443 237,443 237,443
RESTORATION
FORMERLY USED SITES
160 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 5,000 5,000 -5,000 0
OPERATIONS TRANSFER
FUND...............
Program [-5,000] [-5,000]
reduction....... TOTAL 2,215,530 2,209,550 2,215,530 -129,700 2,085,830
MISCELLANEOUS
APPROPRIATIONS. TOTAL OPERATION 175,097,941 174,602,459 176,631,808 1,322,485 176,420,426
& MAINTENANCE..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Line Item Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
ARMY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS............ 217,571 247,571 217,571 217,571
Missile Defense [15,000]
Deployment--Other.....
Missile Defense [15,000]
Deployment to Turkey..
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES.. 8,266 8,266 8,266 8,266
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.... 56,626 56,626 56,626 56,626
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS...... 4,209,942 4,209,942 4,209,942 4,209,942
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS 950,567 950,567 943,567 950,567
SUPPORT..................
NSHQ--Transfer at DoD [-7,000]
Request...............
060 AVIATION ASSETS........... 474,288 474,288 474,288 474,288
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 1,349,152 1,349,152 1,485,452 1,349,152
SUPPORT..................
BuckEye terrain data [56,300]
increase..............
Transfer from JIEDDO-- [80,000]
Train the Force.......
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS 655,000 655,000 655,000 655,000
READINESS................
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT 301,563 796,563 301,563 301,563
MAINTENANCE..............
Restore High Priority [495,000]
Depot Maintenance.....
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 706,214 706,214 706,214 706,214
140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES..... 11,519,498 11,519,498 11,519,498 11,519,498
150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000
RESPONSE PROGRAM.........
160 RESET..................... 2,240,358 3,740,358 2,240,358 1,100,000 3,340,358
Restore Critical Army [1,500,000] [1,100,000]
Reset.................
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 22,749,045 24,774,045 22,878,345 1,100,000 23,849,045
FORCES................ ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 4,601,356 4,601,356 4,601,356 4,601,356
380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT..... 17,418 17,418 17,418 17,418
400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000
420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT... 94,820 94,820 94,820 94,820
430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT..... 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000
450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT.... 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 1,402,994 1,402,994 1,402,994 1,402,994
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & 6,530,588 6,530,588 6,530,588 6,530,588
SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES.... UNDISTRIBUTED
530 UNDISTRIBUTED............. 91,100
Increase to support [91,100]
higher fuel rates.....
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 91,100 TOTAL OPERATION & 29,279,633 31,395,733 29,408,933 1,100,000 30,379,633
MAINTENANCE, ARMY.... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
ARMY RES
OPERATING FORCES
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.... 6,995 6,995 6,995 6,995
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS 2,332 2,332 2,332 2,332
SUPPORT..................
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 608 608 608 608
SUPPORT..................
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT 75,800
MAINTENANCE..............
Restore High Priority [75,800]
Depot Maintenance.....
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 42,935 118,735 42,935 42,935
FORCES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 42,935 118,735 42,935 42,935
MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
ARNG
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS............ 29,314 29,314 29,314 29,314
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES.. 1,494 1,494 1,494 1,494
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.... 15,343 15,343 15,343 15,343
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS...... 1,549 1,549 1,549 1,549
060 AVIATION ASSETS........... 64,504 64,504 64,504 64,504
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS 31,512 31,512 31,512 31,512
SUPPORT..................
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 42,179 42,179 42,179 42,179
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL 11,996 11,996 11,996 11,996
HQ'S.....................
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 197,891 197,891 197,891 197,891
FORCES................ ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 1,480 1,480 1,480 1,480
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 1,480 1,480 1,480 1,480
ACTIVITIES............ TOTAL OPERATION & 199,371 199,371 199,371 199,371
MAINTENANCE, ARNG.... AFGHANISTAN SECURITY
FORCES FUND
MINISTRY OF DEFENSE
010 SUSTAINMENT............... 2,735,603 2,735,603 2,735,603 2,735,603
020 INFRASTRUCTURE............ 278,650 278,650 278,650 278,650
030 EQUIPMENT AND 2,180,382 2,180,382 2,180,382 2,180,382
TRANSPORTATION...........
040 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS... 626,550 626,550 626,550 626,550
SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF 5,821,185 5,821,185 5,821,185 5,821,185
DEFENSE............... MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
060 SUSTAINMENT............... 1,214,995 1,214,995 1,214,995 1,214,995
080 EQUIPMENT AND 54,696 54,696 54,696 54,696
TRANSPORTATION...........
090 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS... 626,119 626,119 626,119 626,119
SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF 1,895,810 1,895,810 1,895,810 1,895,810
INTERIOR.............. DETAINEE OPS
110 SUSTAINMENT............... 7,225 7,225 7,225 7,225
140 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS. 9,725 9,725 9,725 9,725 UNDISTRIBUTED
160 UNDISTRIBUTED............. -1,500,000 -1,500,000
Program decrease...... [-1,500,000]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED -1,500,000 -1,500,000 TOTAL AFGHANISTAN 7,726,720 7,726,720 7,726,720 -1,500,000 6,226,720
SECURITY FORCES FUND. AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE
FUND
AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE
FUND
010 POWER..................... 279,000 279,000 250,000 -29,000 250,000
Unjustified [-29,000] [-29,000]
expenditure...........
SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN 279,000 279,000 250,000 -29,000 250,000
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND... TOTAL AFGHANISTAN 279,000 279,000 250,000 -29,000 250,000
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND.. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
NAVY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT 845,169 845,169 845,169 845,169
OPERATIONS...............
030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & 600 600 600 600
ENGINEERING SERVICES.....
040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY 17,489 17,489 17,489 17,489
SUPPORT..................
050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT....... 78,491 78,491 78,491 78,491
060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 162,420 202,420 162,420 162,420
Restore critical depot [40,000]
maintenance...........
070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700
SUPPORT..................
080 AVIATION LOGISTICS........ 50,130 50,130 50,130 50,130
090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP 949,539 960,939 949,539 949,539
OPERATIONS...............
Spares................ [11,400]
100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & 20,226 20,226 20,226 20,226
TRAINING.................
110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE.... 1,679,660 1,843,660 1,679,660 1,679,660
Program increase...... [164,000]
120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS 126,000
SUPPORT..................
Program increase...... [126,000]
130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS..... 37,760 37,760 37,760 37,760
160 WARFARE TACTICS........... 25,351 25,351 25,351 25,351
170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY 20,045 20,045 20,045 20,045
AND OCEANOGRAPHY.........
180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES..... 1,212,296 1,665,296 1,212,296 1,212,296
Combat forces [148,000]
equipment.............
Combat forces [305,000]
shortfall.............
190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE..... 10,203 10,203 10,203 10,203
250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS 127,972 127,972 127,972 127,972
SUPPORT..................
260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE....... 221,427 221,427 221,427 221,427
290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION 13,386 13,386 13,386 13,386
AND MODERNIZATION........
300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.... 110,940 110,940 110,940 110,940
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 5,585,804 6,380,204 5,585,804 5,585,804
FORCES................ MOBILIZATION
340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH 18,460 18,460 18,460 18,460
SERVICES SYSTEMS.........
360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT....... 227,033 227,033 227,033 227,033
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION. 245,493 245,493 245,493 245,493 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 50,269 50,269 50,269 50,269
430 TRAINING SUPPORT.......... 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 55,669 55,669 55,669 55,669
RECRUITING............ ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480 ADMINISTRATION............ 2,418 2,418 2,418 2,418
490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS........ 516 516 516 516
510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND 5,107 5,107 5,107 5,107
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.....
520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT... 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411
530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545
550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 153,427 153,427 153,427 153,427
580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM 8,570 8,570 8,570 8,570
MANAGEMENT...............
620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425
SERVICE..................
705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 5,608 5,608 5,608 5,608
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 181,027 181,027 181,027 181,027
ACTIVITIES............ UNDISTRIBUTED
710 UNDISTRIBUTED............. 155,400
Increase to support [155,400]
higher fuel rates.....
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 155,400 TOTAL OPERATION & 6,067,993 7,017,793 6,067,993 6,067,993
MAINTENANCE, NAVY.... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
MARINE CORPS
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATIONAL FORCES........ 992,190 992,190 992,190 992,190
020 FIELD LOGISTICS........... 559,574 559,574 559,574 559,574
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE......... 570,000 626,000 570,000 570,000
Restore High Priority [56,000]
Depot Maintenance.....
060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.... 69,726 69,726 69,726 69,726
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 2,191,490 2,247,490 2,191,490 2,191,490
FORCES................ TRAINING AND RECRUITING
110 TRAINING SUPPORT.......... 108,270 108,270 134,270 108,270
Transfer from JIEDDO-- [26,000]
Train the Force.......
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 108,270 108,270 134,270 108,270
RECRUITING............ ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 365,555 365,555 365,555 365,555
160 ADMINISTRATION............ 3,675 3,675 3,675 3,675
185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 825 825 825 825
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 370,055 370,055 370,055 370,055
ACTIVITIES............ UNDISTRIBUTED
190 UNDISTRIBUTED............. 5,400
Increase to support [5,400]
higher fuel rates.....
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 5,400 TOTAL OPERATION & 2,669,815 2,731,215 2,695,815 2,669,815
MAINTENANCE, MARINE
CORPS................ OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
NAVY RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT 17,196 17,196 17,196 17,196
OPERATIONS...............
020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE.. 200 200 200 200
040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP 12,304 12,304 12,304 12,304
OPERATIONS...............
090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE.... 6,790 6,790 6,790 6,790
110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES..... 13,210 13,210 13,210 13,210
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 55,700 55,700 55,700 55,700
FORCES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 55,700 55,700 55,700 55,700
MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
MC RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATING FORCES.......... 11,124 11,124 11,124 11,124
040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.... 1,410 1,410 1,410 1,410
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 12,534 12,534 12,534 12,534
FORCES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 12,534 12,534 12,534 12,534
MAINTENANCE, MC
RESERVE.............. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
AIR FORCE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES..... 1,712,393 1,782,393 1,712,393 1,712,393
Restore Critical Depot [70,000]
Maintenance...........
020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES. 836,104 836,104 836,104 836,104
030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING 14,118 14,118 14,118 14,118
(OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)...
040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE......... 1,373,480 1,473,480 1,373,480 1,373,480
Program increase...... [100,000]
050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 122,712 122,712 122,712 122,712
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION............
060 BASE SUPPORT.............. 1,520,333 1,520,333 1,520,333 1,520,333
070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY 31,582 31,582 31,582 31,582
WARNING..................
080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT 147,524 147,524 147,524 147,524
PROGRAMS.................
110 LAUNCH FACILITIES......... 857 857 857 857
120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS..... 8,353 8,353 8,353 8,353
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS 50,495 50,495 50,495 50,495
DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT...
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 5,817,951 5,987,951 5,817,951 5,817,951
FORCES................ MOBILIZATION
150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS........ 3,091,133 3,141,133 3,091,133 3,091,133
Restore Critical Depot [50,000]
Maintenance...........
160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS. 47,897 47,897 47,897 47,897
170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE......... 387,179 887,179 387,179 130,000 517,179
Program increase...... [500,000] [130,000]
180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, 7,043 7,043 7,043 7,043
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZATION............
190 BASE SUPPORT.............. 68,382 68,382 68,382 68,382
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION. 3,601,634 4,151,634 3,601,634 130,000 3,731,634 TRAINING AND RECRUITING
200 OFFICER ACQUISITION....... 100 100 100 100
210 RECRUIT TRAINING.......... 478 478 478 478
240 BASE SUPPORT.............. 19,256 19,256 19,256 19,256
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 12,845 12,845 12,845 12,845
260 FLIGHT TRAINING........... 731 731 731 731
270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 607 607 607 607
EDUCATION................
280 TRAINING SUPPORT.......... 720 720 720 720
320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY 152 152 152 152
EDUCATION................
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND 34,889 34,889 34,889 34,889
RECRUITING............ ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS...... 86,273 86,273 86,273 86,273
360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 2,511 2,511 2,511 2,511
ACTIVITIES...............
390 BASE SUPPORT.............. 19,887 19,887 19,887 19,887
400 ADMINISTRATION............ 3,493 3,493 3,493 3,493
410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 152,086 152,086 152,086 152,086
420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE 269,825 269,825 269,825 269,825
ACTIVITIES...............
460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT..... 117 117 117 117
465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 16,558 16,558 16,558 16,558
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD 550,750 550,750 550,750 550,750
ACTIVITIES............ UNDISTRIBUTED
470 UNDISTRIBUTED............. 284,000
Increase to support [284,000]
higher fuel rates.....
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 284,000 TOTAL OPERATION & 10,005,224 11,009,224 10,005,224 130,000 10,135,224
MAINTENANCE, AIR
FORCE................ OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
AF RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE......... 26,599 26,599 26,599 26,599
050 BASE SUPPORT.............. 6,250 6,250 6,250 6,250
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 32,849 32,849 32,849 32,849
FORCES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 32,849 32,849 32,849 32,849
MAINTENANCE, AF
RESERVE.............. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
ANG
OPERATING FORCES
020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200
FORCES................ TOTAL OPERATION & 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200
MAINTENANCE, ANG..... OPERATION & MAINTENANCE,
DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATING FORCES
020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 2,222,868 2,222,868 2,229,868 2,222,868
NSHQ--Transfer at DoD [7,000]
Request...............
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 2,222,868 2,222,868 2,229,868 2,222,868
FORCES................ ADMINISTRATION AND
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT 27,781 27,781 27,781 27,781
AGENCY...................
090 DEFENSE CONTRACT 45,746 45,746 45,746 45,746
MANAGEMENT AGENCY........
120 DEFENSE INFORMATION 76,348 76,348 76,348 76,348
SYSTEMS AGENCY...........
140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES 99,538 99,538 99,538 99,538
AGENCY...................
160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY.... 9,620 9,620 9,620 9,620
180 DEFENSE SECURITY 1,950,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 1,950,000
COOPERATION AGENCY.......
240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 100,100 100,100 100,100 100,100
EDUCATION ACTIVITY.......
280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF 38,227 73,227 38,227 38,227
DEFENSE..................
Realignment to [35,000]
Building Partnership
Capacity authories....
290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS 2,784 2,784 2,784 2,784
SERVICES.................
295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS....... 1,862,066 1,862,066 1,862,066 1,862,066
SUBTOTAL 4,212,210 4,247,210 4,212,210 4,212,210
ADMINISTRATION AND
SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES TOTAL OPERATION & 6,435,078 6,470,078 6,442,078 6,435,078
MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-
WIDE................. TOTAL OPERATION & 62,829,052 67,071,152 62,962,352 -299,000 62,530,052
MAINTENANCE..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Item Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel 130,399,881 130,219,281 130,129,881 -682,900 129,716,981
Appropriations.............
Enlistment bonuses excess [-38,000]
to requirement...........
Excess to requirement.... [-64,300]
Flight Paramedic Training [4,500]
Pay and Allowances--Army
Guard....................
Flight Paramedic Training [900]
Pay and Allowances--Army
Reserve..................
Full Time Pay and [-10,000]
Allowances projected
underexecution...........
Full Time Support [-1,000]
projected underexecution.
Military Personnel [-186,000] [-186,000]
unobligated..............
Permanent Change of [-150,000] [-150,000]
Station Travel--Army.....
Recruiting and Retention [-1,800]
programs excess to
requirement..............
Reenlistment bonuses [-68,300]
excess to requirement....
Reserve Incentive [-7,750]
Programs excess to
requirement..............
Travel, Active Duty for [-18,000]
Training, projected
underexecution...........
Undistributed reduction [-120,000] [-137,750]
consistent with pace of
drawdown.................
Medicare-Eligible Retiree 6,676,750 6,676,750 6,676,750 6,676,750
Health Fund Contributions..Total, Military Personnel... 137,076,631 136,896,031 136,806,631 -682,900 136,393,731
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Item Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel 9,689,307 9,689,307 9,689,307 -40,500 9,648,807
Appropriations.............
Projected underexecution. [-40,500]
Medicare-Eligible Retiree 164,033 164,033 164,033 164,033
Health Fund Contributions..Total, Military Personnel... 9,853,340 9,853,340 9,853,340 -40,500 9,812,840
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Program Title Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE 25,158 25,158 25,158 25,158
STOCKS.....................
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL 25,158 25,158 25,158 25,158
FUND, ARMY...........WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR
FORCE
FUEL COSTS
SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 61,731 61,731 61,731 61,731
(MEDICAL/DENTAL)...........
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL 61,731 61,731 61,731 61,731
FUND, AIR FORCE......WORKING CAPITAL FUND,
DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 46,428 46,428 46,428 46,428
(DLA)......................
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL 46,428 46,428 46,428 46,428
FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE...WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA.. 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510
FUND, DECA...........NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT
FUND
LMSR
MPF MLP..................... 134,917 134,917 22,717 -112,200 22,717
Navy requested [-112,200] [-112,200]
adjustment.............
POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING 43,404 43,404 43,404 43,404
NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL
LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE 116,784 116,784 116,784 116,784
DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS 60,703 60,703 60,703 60,703
TAH MAINTENANCE............. 19,809 19,809 19,809 19,809
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.... 56,058 56,058 56,058 56,058
READY RESERVE FORCE......... 299,025 299,025 299,025 299,025
TOTAL NATIONAL 730,700 730,700 618,500 -112,200 618,500
DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND.CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS
DESTRUCTION
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE..... 451,572 451,572 451,572 451,572
RDT&E....................... 604,183 604,183 604,183 604,183
PROCUREMENT................. 1,368 1,368 1,368 1,368
TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & 1,057,123 1,057,123 1,057,123 1,057,123
MUNITIONS DESTRUCTIONDRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG
ACTIVITIES, DEF
OPERATING FORCES............ 815,965 815,965 810,125 815,965
Joint Interagency Task [-3,000]
Force--West (PC3309)...
U.S. European Comman [-1,640]
Counternarcotics
Hedquaters Support
(PC2346)...............
U.S. Special Operations [-1,200]
Forces Support to U.S.
European Command
(PC6505)...............
DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION 122,580 122,580 122,580 122,580
PROGRAM....................
TOTAL DRUG 938,545 938,545 932,705 938,545
INTERDICTION & CTR-
DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF.OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR
GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE... 311,131 311,131 347,031 34,869 346,000
Program increase....... [35,900] [34,869]
RDT&E
PROCUREMENT................. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
TOTAL OFFICE OF THE 312,131 312,131 348,031 34,869 347,000
INSPECTOR GENERAL....DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
IN-HOUSE CARE............... 8,880,738 8,880,738 8,880,738 8,880,738
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE......... 15,842,732 15,912,732 15,842,732 -67,000 15,775,732
Behavioral health [60,000]
treatment of
developmental
disabilities...........
Pharmaceutical drugs [-67,000]
excess growth..........
Pilot program for [10,000]
investigational
treatment of members of
the Armed Forces for
TBI and PTSD...........
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT. 2,505,640 2,505,640 2,505,640 2,505,640
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT...... 1,450,619 1,450,619 1,450,619 1,450,619
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES....... 368,248 368,248 368,248 368,248
EDUCATION AND TRAINING...... 733,097 733,097 733,097 733,097
BASE OPERATIONS/ 1,872,660 1,872,660 1,872,660 1,872,660
COMMUNICATIONS.............
R&D RESEARCH................ 9,162 9,162 9,162 9,162
R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT.. 47,977 47,977 47,977 47,977
R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.... 291,156 291,156 291,156 291,156
R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION 132,430 132,430 132,430 132,430
R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT. 161,674 161,674 161,674 161,674
R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT.. 72,568 72,568 72,568 72,568
R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT 14,646 14,646 14,646 14,646
RDT&E UNDISTRIBUTED
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING..... 89,404 89,404 89,404 89,404
PROC REPLACEMENT & 377,577 377,577 377,577 377,577
MODERNIZATION..............
PROC IEHR................... 204,200 204,200 204,200 204,200
UNDISTRIBUTED............... -276,800 218,000 -57,000 -57,000
DHP Unobligated........ [-440,800] [-275,000]
Restore Tricare savings [164,000] [218,000] [218,000]
TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH 33,054,528 32,847,728 33,272,528 -124,000 32,930,528
PROGRAM.............. TOTAL OTHER 37,638,854 37,432,054 37,774,714 -201,331 37,437,523
AUTHORIZATIONS.......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Program Title Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE 44,732 44,732 44,732 44,732
STOCKS.....................
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL 44,732 44,732 44,732 44,732
FUND, ARMY...........WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR
FORCE
C-17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR...... 78,500 78,500 78,500 78,500
TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL 88,500 88,500 88,500 88,500
FUND, AIR FORCE......WORKING CAPITAL FUND,
DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 131,678 131,678 131,678 131,678
(DLA)......................
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL 131,678 131,678 131,678 131,678
FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE...DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG
ACTIVITIES, DEF
OPERATING FORCES............ 376,305 376,305 376,305 376,305
TOTAL DRUG 376,305 376,305 376,305 376,305
INTERDICTION & CTR-
DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF.OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR
GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE... 10,766 10,766 10,766 10,766
TOTAL OFFICE OF THE 10,766 10,766 10,766 10,766
INSPECTOR GENERAL....DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
IN-HOUSE CARE............... 375,958 375,958 375,958 375,958
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE......... 382,560 382,560 382,560 382,560
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT. 132,749 132,749 132,749 132,749
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT...... 2,238 2,238 2,238 2,238
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES....... 460 460 460 460
EDUCATION AND TRAINING...... 10,236 10,236 10,236 10,236
TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH 904,201 904,201 904,201 904,201
PROGRAM.............. TOTAL OTHER 1,556,182 1,556,182 1,556,182 1,556,182
AUTHORIZATIONS.......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army ALASKA Fort Wainwright AVIATION BATTALION COMPLEX 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000
Army ALASKA Fort Wainwright AVIATION STORAGE HANGAR 58,000 58,000 58,000 58,000
Army COLORADO Fort Carson AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000
Army COLORADO Fort Carson AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 73,000 73,000 73,000 73,000
Army COLORADO Fort Carson CENTRAL ENERGY PLANT 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000
Army COLORADO Fort Carson FIRE STATION 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000
Army COLORADO Fort Carson HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000
Army COLORADO Fort Carson RUNWAY 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000
Army COLORADO Fort Carson SIMULATOR BUILDING 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200
Army FLORIDA Eglin AFB AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700
Army GEORGIA Fort Gordon ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS 61,000 61,000 61,000 61,000
CPLX, PH2
Army HAWAII Fort Shafter COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY-- 75,000 65,000 75,000 -5,000 70,000
ADMIN
Army KANSAS Fort Leavenworth SIMULATIONS CENTER 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000
Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell BATTLEFIELD WEATHER SUPPORT 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800
FACILITY
Army MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000
Ground FACILITIES
Army MARYLAND Fort Detrick ENTRY CONTROL POINT 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
Army MARYLAND Fort Detrick HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600
BUILDING
Army MISSOURI Fort Leonard Wood ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS 86,000 86,000 86,000 86,000
CPLX, PH1
Army MISSOURI Fort Leonard Wood SIMULATOR BUILDING 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700
Army NEW YORK U.S. Military Academy CADET BARRACKS, INCR 2 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000
Army NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900
Army TEXAS Fort Bliss CONTROL TOWER 10,800 10,800 10,800 10,800
Army TEXAS Fort Bliss UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE COMPLEX 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000
Army VIRGINIA Joint Base Langley- ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Eustis CPLX, PH3
Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis- AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 79,000 79,000 79,000 79,000
McChord
Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis- AIRFIELD OPERATIONS COMPLEX 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000
McChord
Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis- AVIATION BATTALION COMPLEX 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000
McChord
Army WASHINGTON Yakima AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100
RANGE
Army WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED Classified Location COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX 33,000 33,000 33,000 -33,000 0
Army JAPAN Kyoga Misaki COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX 0 0 0 33,000 33,000
Army KWAJALEIN Kwajalein Atoll PIER 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000
Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide HOST NATION SUPPORT FY14 33,000 23,000 33,000 -5,000 28,000
Locations
Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MINOR CONSTRUCTION FY14 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Locations
Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN FY14 41,575 41,575 41,575 41,575
Locations
Total Military Construction, Army 1,119,875 1,099,875 1,119,875 -10,000 1,109,875
........................ ...................... ..................................
Navy CALIFORNIA Barstow ENGINE DYNAMOMETER FACILITY 14,998 14,998 14,998 14,998
Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT UPGRADE 13,124 13,124 13,124 13,124
Navy CALIFORNIA Coronado H-60 TRAINER FACILITY 8,910 8,910 8,910 8,910
Navy CALIFORNIA Point Mugu AIRCRAFT ENGINE TEST PADS 7,198 7,198 7,198 7,198
Navy CALIFORNIA Point Mugu BAMS CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE 17,469 17,469 17,469 17,469
HANGAR
Navy CALIFORNIA Port Hueneme UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING CONVERSION 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600
Navy CALIFORNIA San Diego STEAM PLANT DECENTRALIZATION 34,331 34,331 34,331 34,331
Navy CALIFORNIA Twentynine Palms CAMP WILSON INFRASTRUCTURE 33,437 33,437 33,437 33,437
UPGRADES
Navy FLORIDA Jacksonville P-8A TRAINING & PARKING APRON 20,752 20,752 20,752 20,752
EXPANSION
Navy FLORIDA Key West AIRCRAFT CRASH/RESCUE & FIRE 14,001 14,001 14,001 14,001
HEADQUARTERS
Navy FLORIDA Mayport LCS LOGISTICS SUPPORT FACILITY 16,093 16,093 16,093 16,093
Navy GEORGIA Albany CERS DISPATCH FACILITY 1,010 1,010 1,010 1,010
Navy GEORGIA Albany WEAPONS STORAGE AND INSPECTION 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600
FACILITY
Navy GEORGIA Savannah TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE LAND ACQ-- 61,717 61,717 61,717 61,717
PHASE 1
Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR--NORTH 85,673 85,673 0 85,673
RAMP
Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas BAMS FORWARD OPERATIONAL & 61,702 61,702 61,702 61,702
MAINTENANCE HANGAR
Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas DEHUMIDIFIED SUPPLY STORAGE 17,170 17,170 17,170 17,170
FACILITY
Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas EMERGENT REPAIR FACILITY EXPANSION 35,860 35,860 35,860 35,860
Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas MODULAR STORAGE MAGAZINES 63,382 63,382 63,382 63,382
Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas SIERRA WHARF IMPROVEMENTS 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170
Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas X-RAY WHARF IMPROVEMENTS 53,420 53,420 53,420 53,420
Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay 3RD RADIO BN MAINTENANCE/ 25,336 25,336 25,336 25,336
OPERATIONS COMPLEX
Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE EXPANSION 16,968 16,968 16,968 16,968
Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 31,820 31,820 31,820 31,820
UPGRADES
Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay ARMORY ADDITION AND RENOVATION 12,952 12,952 12,952 12,952
Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AVIATION SIMULATOR MODERNIZATION/ 17,724 17,724 17,724 17,724
ADDITION
Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay MV-22 HANGAR 57,517 57,517 57,517 57,517
Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay MV-22 PARKING APRON AND 74,665 74,665 74,665 74,665
INFRASTRUCTURE
Navy HAWAII Pearl City WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 30,100 30,100 30,100 30,100
Navy HAWAII Pearl Harbor DRYDOCK WATERFRONT FACILITY 22,721 22,721 22,721 22,721
Navy HAWAII Pearl Harbor SUBMARINE PRODUCTION SUPPORT 35,277 35,277 35,277 35,277
FACILITY
Navy ILLINOIS Great Lakes UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING 35,851 35,851 35,851 35,851
Navy MAINE Bangor NCTAMS VLF COMMERCIAL POWER 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800
CONNECTION
Navy MAINE Kittery STRUCTURAL SHOPS CONSOLIDATION 11,522 11,522 11,522 11,522
Navy MARYLAND Fort Meade MARFORCYBERCOM HQ-OPS BUILDING 83,988 83,988 83,988 83,988
Navy NEVADA Fallon WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 11,334 11,334 11,334 11,334
Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune LANDFILL--PHASE 4 20,795 20,795 20,795 20,795
Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune OPERATIONS TRAINING COMPLEX 22,515 22,515 22,515 22,515
Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION--BEQ NODES 18,679 18,679 18,679 18,679
Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION--CAMP 2,620 2,620 2,620 2,620
JOHNSON
Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION--HADNOT 13,390 13,390 13,390 13,390
POINT
Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River CH-53K MAINTENANCE TRAINING 13,218 13,218 13,218 13,218
FACILITY
Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR 12,547 12,547 12,547 12,547
Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River REGIONAL COMMUNICATION STATION 20,098 20,098 20,098 20,098
Navy OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB TACAMO E-6B HANGAR 14,144 14,144 14,144 14,144
Navy RHODE ISLAND Newport HEWITT HALL RESEARCH CENTER 12,422 12,422 12,422 12,422
Navy SOUTH CAROLINA Charleston NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONAL TRAINING 73,932 73,932 73,932 73,932
FACILITY
Navy VIRGINIA Dam Neck AERIAL TARGET OPERATION 10,587 10,587 10,587 10,587
CONSOLIDATION
Navy VIRGINIA Norfolk PIER 11 POWER UPGRADES FOR CVN-78 3,380 3,380 3,380 3,380
Navy VIRGINIA Quantico ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY 25,731 25,731 25,731 25,731
TECOM SCHOOLS
Navy VIRGINIA Quantico ATC TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER 3,630 3,630 3,630 3,630
RELOCATION
Navy VIRGINIA Quantico FULLER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 9,013 9,013 9,013 9,013
Navy VIRGINIA Yorktown SMALL ARMS RANGES 18,700 18,700 18,700 18,700
Navy WASHINGTON Bremerton INTEGRATED WATER TREATMENT SYS DRY 18,189 18,189 18,189 18,189
DOCKS 3&4
Navy WASHINGTON Kitsap EXPLOSIVES HANDLING WHARF #2 (INC) 24,880 24,880 24,880 24,880
Navy WASHINGTON Whidbey Island EA-18G FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 32,482 32,482 32,482 32,482
Navy WASHINGTON Whidbey Island P-8A HANGAR AND TRAINING 85,167 85,167 85,167 85,167
FACILITIES
Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier ARMORY 6,420 6,420 6,420 6,420
Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING 22,580 22,580 22,580 22,580
Navy JAPAN Camp Butler AIRFIELD SECURITY UPGRADES 5,820 5,820 5,820 5,820
Navy JAPAN Yokosuka COMMUNICATION SYSTEM UPGRADE 7,568 7,568 7,568 7,568
Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MCON DESIGN FUNDS 89,830 89,830 89,830 89,830
Locations
Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 19,740 19,740 19,740 19,740
Locations
Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0
Locations
Total Military Construction, Navy 1,700,269 1,700,269 1,614,596 0 1,700,269
........................ ...................... ..................................
AF ARIZONA Luke AFB F-35 FIELD TRAINING DETACHMENT 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500
AF ARIZONA Luke AFB F-35 SQ OPS/AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 21,400 21,400 21,400 21,400
UNIT #3
AF CALIFORNIA Beale AFB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND STATION 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000
OPS BLDG
AF FLORIDA Tyndall AFB F-22 MUNITIONS STORAGE COMPLEX 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100
AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR--FUEL SYS HARDENED BLDGS 20,000 20,000 0 20,000
AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR--STRIKE TACTICAL MISSILE MXS 10,530 10,530 10,530 10,530
FACILITY
AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR--TANKER GP MX HANGAR/AMU/SQD 132,600 132,600 0 132,600
OPS
AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC RED HORSE AIRFIELD OPERATIONS 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500
FACILITY
AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC SF FIRE RESCUE & EMERGENCY 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600
MGT
AF HAWAII Joint Base Pearl C-17 MODERNIZE HGR 35, DOCKS 1&2 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800
Harbor-Hickam
AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC-46A 2-Bay Corrosion Control/ 0 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000
Fuel Cell Hangar
AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC-46A 3-Bay General Purpose 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
Maintenance Hangar
AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC-46A Aircraft Parking Apron 0 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200
Alteration
AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC-46A Aprons Fuels Distribution 0 12,800 12,800 12,800 12,800
System
AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC-46A Flight Simulator Facility 0 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150
Phase 1
AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC-46A General Maintenance Hangar 0 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000
AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC-46A Miscellaneous Facilities 0 970 970 970 970
Alteration
AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC-46A Pipeline Student Dormatory 0 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000
AF KENTUCKY Fort Campbell 19TH AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQDRN 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
EXPANSION
AF MARYLAND Fort Meade CYBERCOM JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER, 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000
INCREMENT 1
AF MARYLAND Joint Base Andrews HELICOPTER OPERATIONS FACILITY 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
AF MISSOURI Whiteman AFB WSA MOP IGLOOS AND ASSEMBLY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900
FACILITY
AF NEBRASKA Offutt AFB USSTRATCOM REPLACEMENT FACILITY, 136,000 136,000 136,000 136,000
INCR 3
AF NEVADA Nellis AFB ADD RPA WEAPONS SCHOOL FACILITY 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
AF NEVADA Nellis AFB DORMITORY (240 RM) 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F-35 ALT MISSION EQUIP (AME) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
STORAGE
AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F-35 FUEL CELL HANGAR 9,400 9,400 9,400 9,400
AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F-35 PARTS STORE 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100
AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB AIRMEN AND FAMILY READINESS CENTER 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500
AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB DORMITORY (144 RM) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000
AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SATELLITE DINING FACILITY 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600
AF NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB F-16 AIRCRAFT COVERED WASHRACK AND 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250
PAD
AF NEW MEXICO Kirtland AFB NUCLEAR SYSTEMS WING & SUSTAINMENT 30,500 30,500 30,500 30,500
CENTER (PH
AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB B-52 ADAL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 15,530 15,530 15,530 15,530
UNIT
AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB B-52 MUNITIONS STORAGE IGLOOS 8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300
AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC-46A FTU ADAL Fuel Systems 0 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350
Maintenance Dock
AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC-46A FTU ADAL Squad Ops/AMU 0 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400
AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC-46A FTU Flight Training Center 0 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600
Simulators Facility Phase 1
AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC-46A FTU Fuselage Trainer Phase 0 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300
1
AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC-46A FTU Renovate Facility 0 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
AF OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB KC-46A LAND ACQUISITION 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600
AF TEXAS Fort Bliss F-16 BAK 12/14 AIRCRAFT ARRESTING 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350
SYSTEM
AF UTAH Hill AFB F-35 AIRCRAFT MX UNIT HANGAR 45E 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500
OPS #1
AF UTAH Hill AFB FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION 18,500 18,500 18,500 18,500
AF VIRGINIA Joint Base Langley- 4-BAY CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800
Eustis INSPECTION BLDG
AF GREENLAND Thule AB THULE CONSOLIDATION, PHASE 2 43,904 43,904 43,904 43,904
AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR--AIRPORT POL/BULK STORAGE AST 18,500 18,500 18,500 18,500
AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR--HAZARDOUS CARGO PAD 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR--MAINTENANCE FACILITY 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800
AF UNITED KINGDOM Croughton RAF MAIN GATE COMPLEX 12,000 0 0 -12,000 0
AF UNITED KINGDOM VARLOCS GUARDIAN ANGEL OPERATIONS FACILITY 22,047 22,047 0 22,047
AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide KC-46A FTU FACILITY PROJECTS 63,000 0 0 -63,000 0
Locations
AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide KC-46A MOB #1 FACILITY PROJECTS 192,700 0 0 -192,700 0
Locations
AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING & DESIGN 11,314 11,314 11,314 11,314
Locations
AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 20,448 20,448 20,448 20,448
Locations
Total Military Construction, Air Force 1,156,573 1,138,843 964,196 -17,730 1,138,843
........................ ...................... ..................................
Def-Wide ALASKA Clear AFS BMDS UPGRADE EARLY WARNING RADAR 17,204 17,204 17,204 17,204
Def-Wide ALASKA Fort Greely MECHANICAL-ELECTRICAL BLDG MISSILE 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000
FIELD #1
Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Brawley SOF DESERT WARFARE TRAINING CENTER 23,095 23,095 23,095 23,095
Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Defense Distribution GENERAL PURPOSE WAREHOUSE 37,554 37,554 37,554 37,554
Depot-Tracy
Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Miramar REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
Def-Wide COLORADO Fort Carson SOF GROUP SUPPORT BATTALION 22,282 22,282 22,282 22,282
Def-Wide FLORIDA Hurlburt Field SOF ADD/ALTER OPERATIONS FACILITY 7,900 7,900 7,900 7,900
Def-Wide FLORIDA Jacksonville REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500
Def-Wide FLORIDA Key West SOF BOAT DOCKS 3,600 0 3,600 3,600
Def-Wide FLORIDA Panama City REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600
FACILITY
Def-Wide FLORIDA Tyndall AFB REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500
Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Benning FAITH MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITION 6,031 6,031 6,031 6,031
Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Benning WHITE ELEMTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 37,304 37,304 37,304 37,304
Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Stewart DIAMOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 44,504 44,504 44,504 44,504
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide GEORGIA Hunter Army Airfield REPLACE FUEL ISLAND 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500
Def-Wide GEORGIA Moody AFB REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800
FACILITY
Def-Wide HAWAII Ford Island DISA PACIFIC FACILITY UPGRADES 2,615 2,615 2,615 2,615
Def-Wide HAWAII Joint Base Pearl ALTER WAREHOUSE SPACE 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800
Harbor-Hickam
Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell FORT CAMPBELL HIGH SCHOOL 59,278 59,278 59,278 59,278
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell MARSHALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 38,591 38,591 38,591 38,591
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell SOF GROUP SPECIAL TROOPS BATTALION 26,342 26,342 26,342 26,342
Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Knox AMBULATORY HEALTH CENTER 265,000 265,000 75,000 -120,000 145,000
Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Knox CONSOLIDATE/REPLACE VAN VOORHIS- 38,023 38,023 38,023 38,023
MUDGE ES
Def-Wide MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving PUBLIC HEALTH COMMAND LAB 210,000 110,000 75,000 -135,000 75,000
Ground REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide MARYLAND Bethesda Naval MECH & ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS 46,800 46,800 46,800 46,800
Hospital
Def-Wide MARYLAND Bethesda Naval PARKING GARAGE 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Hospital
Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Detrick USAMRIID REPLACEMENT STAGE 1, INCR 13,000 0 13,000 13,000
8
Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Meade HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING 431,000 431,000 381,000 -35,000 396,000
CAPACITY INC 3
Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Meade NSAW RECAPITALIZE BUILDING #1/SITE 58,000 58,000 58,000 58,000
M INC 2
Def-Wide MARYLAND Joint Base Andrews AMBULATORY CARE CENTER INC 2 76,200 63,800 38,100 -38,100 38,100
Def-Wide MASSACHUSETTS Hanscom AFB HANSCOM PRIMARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 36,213 36,213 36,213 36,213
Def-Wide NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-Dix- REPLACE FUEL DISTRIBUTION 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Lakehurst COMPONENTS
Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB MEDICAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000
Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 21,400 21,400 21,400 21,400
Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune SOF PERFORMANCE RESILIENCY CENTER 14,400 0 14,400 14,400
Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune SOF SUSTAINMENT TRAINING COMPLEX 28,977 28,977 28,977 28,977
Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg CONSOLIDATE/REPLACE POPE HOLBROOK 37,032 37,032 37,032 37,032
ELEMENTARY
Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF CIVIL AFFAIRS BATTALION ANNEX 37,689 37,689 37,689 37,689
Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF COMBAT MEDIC SKILLS SUSTAIN. 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600
COURSE BLDG
Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF ENGINEER TRAINING FACILITY 10,419 10,419 10,419 10,419
Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF LANGUAGE AND CULTURAL CENTER 64,606 64,606 64,606 64,606
Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF UPGRADE TRAINING FACILITY 14,719 14,719 14,719 14,719
Def-Wide NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,400
Def-Wide OKLAHOMA Altus AFB REPLACE REFUELER PARKING 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100
Def-Wide OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB REPLACE FUEL DISTRIBUTION 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000
FACILITIES
Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA Def Distribution Depot UPGRADE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100
New Cumberland WAREHOUSE
Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA Def Distribution Depot UPGRADE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900
New Cumberland
Def-Wide SOUTH CAROLINA Beaufort BOLDEN ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL 41,324 41,324 41,324 41,324
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide TENNESSEE Arnold Air Force Base REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200
FACILITY
Def-Wide TEXAS Fort Bliss HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT INCR 5 252,100 152,100 100,000 -152,100 100,000
Def-Wide TEXAS Joint Base San Antonio SAMMC HYPERBARIC FACILITY ADDITION 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Dam Neck SOF HUMAN PERFORMANCE CENTER 11,147 0 11,147 11,147
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Def Distribution Depot OPERATIONS CENTER PHASE 1 87,000 87,000 87,000 87,000
Richmond
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Joint Expeditionary SOF LOGSU TWO OPERATIONS FACILITY 30,404 30,404 30,404 30,404
Base Little Creek--
Story
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon BOUNDARY CHANNEL ACCESS CONTROL 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700
POINT
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon ARMY NAVY DRIVE TOUR BUS DROP OFF 1,850 1,850 0 -1,850 0
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon PFPA SUPPORT OPERATIONS CENTER 14,800 14,800 14,800 14,800
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon RAVEN ROCK ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITY 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000
UPGRADE
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon RAVEN ROCK EXTERIOR COOLING TOWER 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100
Def-Wide VIRGINIA Quantico QUANTICO MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL 40,586 40,586 40,586 40,586
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide WASHINGTON Whidbey Island REPLACE FUEL PIER BREAKWATER 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED Classified Location AN/TPY-2 RADAR SITE 15,000 15,000 15,000 -15,000 0
Def-Wide BAHRAIN ISLAND SW Asia MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT 45,400 45,400 45,400 45,400
Def-Wide BELGIUM Brussels NATO HEADQUARTERS FACILITY 38,513 38,513 38,513 38,513
Def-Wide BELGIUM Brussels NATO HEADQUARTERS FIT-OUT 29,100 29,100 29,100 29,100
Def-Wide GERMANY Kaiserlautern AB KAISERSLAUTERN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 49,907 49,907 0 49,907
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide GERMANY Ramstein AB RAMSTEIN HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 98,762 98,762 0 98,762
Def-Wide GERMANY Rhine Ordnance MEDICAL CENTER REPLACEMENT, INCR 3 151,545 151,545 76,545 -75,000 76,545
Barracks
Def-Wide GERMANY Weisbaden HAINERBERG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 58,899 58,899 0 58,899
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide GERMANY Weisbaden WIESBADEN MIDDLE SCHOOL 50,756 50,756 0 50,756
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide JAPAN Atsugi REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100
FACILITY
Def-Wide JAPAN Iwakuni CONSTRUCT HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000
Def-Wide JAPAN Kadena AB KADENA MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITION/ 38,792 38,792 38,792 38,792
RENOVATION
Def-Wide JAPAN Kyoga Misaki AN/TPY-2 RADAR SITE 0 0 0 15,000 15,000
Def-Wide JAPAN Torri Commo Station SOF FACILITY AUGMENTATION 71,451 64,071 71,451 71,451
Def-Wide JAPAN Yokosuka UPGRADE FUEL PUMPS 10,600 10,600 10,600 10,600
Def-Wide KOREA Camp Walker DAEGU MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL 52,164 52,164 52,164 52,164
REPLACEMENT
Def-Wide ROMANIA Deveselu AEGIS ASHORE MISSILE DEF SYS 85,000 80,000 85,000 -5,000 80,000
CMPLX, INCREM. 2
Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall REPLACE FUEL STORAGE 17,732 17,732 0 17,732
Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS AND HANGAR/ 0 48,448 0 48,448 48,448
AMU
Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF AIRFILED PAVEMENTS 24,077 0 0 -24,077 0
Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF HANGAR/AMU 24,371 0 0 -24,371 0
Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF MRSP AND PARTS STORAGE 6,797 6,797 0 6,797
Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY 11,652 11,652 0 11,652
Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Royal Air Force LAKENHEATH HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 69,638 69,638 0 69,638
Lakenheath
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION 10,000 0 10,000 -10,000 0
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
Locations PROGRAM
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide EXERCISE RELATED MINOR 9,730 9,730 9,730 9,730
Locations CONSTRUCTION
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING & DESIGN 10,891 10,891 10,891 10,891
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 50,192 50,192 50,192 50,192
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 75,905 75,905 75,905 75,905
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 57,053 57,053 57,053 57,053
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 36,866 36,866 36,866 36,866
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 6,931 6,931 6,931 6,931
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 7,430 7,430 7,430 7,430
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 5,409 5,409 5,409 5,409
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 5,170 5,170 5,170 5,170
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 9,578 9,578 9,578 9,578
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Locations
Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
Locations
Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide 3,985,300 3,708,373 2,930,659 -572,050 3,413,250
........................ ...................... ..................................
Chem Demil KENTUCKY Blue Grass Army Depot AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION 122,536 122,536 122,536 122,536
FACILITY, PH XIV
Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense 122,536 122,536 122,536 0 122,536
........................ ...................... ..................................
NATO WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Nato Security NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 239,700 199,700 239,700 -40,000 199,700
Investment Program
Total NATO Security Investment Program 239,700 199,700 239,700 -40,000 199,700
........................ ...................... ..................................
Army NG ALABAMA Decatur NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
ADD/ALT
Army NG ARKANSAS Fort Chaffee SCOUT/RECCE GUNNERY COMPLEX 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000
Army NG FLORIDA Pinellas Park READY BUILDING 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700
Army NG ILLINOIS Kankakee AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000
Army NG ILLINOIS Kankakee READINESS CENTER 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000
Army NG MASSACHUSETTS Camp Edwards ENLISTED BARRACKS, TRANSIENT 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000
TRAINING ADD
Army NG MICHIGAN Camp Grayling ENLISTED BARRACKS, TRANSIENT 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000
TRAINING
Army NG MINNESOTA Stillwater READINESS CENTER 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000
Army NG MISSISSIPPI Camp Shelby WATER SUPPLY/TREATMENT BUILDING, 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
POTABLE
Army NG MISSISSIPPI Pascagoula READINESS CENTER 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500
Army NG MISSOURI Macon VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100
Army NG MISSOURI Whiteman AFB AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Army NG NEW YORK New York READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000
Army NG OHIO Ravenna Army SANITARY SEWER 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200
Ammunition Plant
Army NG PENNSYLVANIA Fort Indiantown Gap AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONAL 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
BUILDING
Army NG PUERTO RICO Camp Santiago MANEUVER AREA TRAINING & EQUIPMENT 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600
SITE ADDIT
Army NG SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville READINESS CENTER 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000
Army NG SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000
Army NG TEXAS Fort Worth ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER ADD 14,270 14,270 14,270 14,270
Army NG WYOMING Afton NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200
Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 29,005 24,005 29,005 -5,000 24,005
Locations
Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 12,240 12,240 12,240 12,240
Locations
Total Military Construction, Army National Guard 320,815 315,815 320,815 -5,000 315,815
........................ ...................... ..................................
Army Res CALIFORNIA Camp Parks ARMY RESERVE CENTER 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500
Army Res CALIFORNIA Fort Hunter Liggett TASS TRAINING CENTER (TTC) 16,500 16,500 16,500 16,500
Army Res MARYLAND Bowie ARMY RESERVE CENTER 25,500 25,500 25,500 25,500
Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-Dix- AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500
Lakehurst (MPMG)
Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-Dix- CENTRAL ISSUE FACILITY 7,900 7,900 7,900 7,900
Lakehurst
Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-Dix- CONSOLIDATED DINING FACILITY 13,400 13,400 13,400 13,400
Lakehurst
Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-Dix- MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400
Lakehurst
Army Res NEW YORK Bullville ARMY RESERVE CENTER 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500
Army Res NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg ARMY RESERVE CENTER 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500
Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy ACCESS CONTROL POINT/MAIL/FREIGHT 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500
CENTER
Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy NCO ACADEMY DINING FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900
Army Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 14,212 14,212 14,212 14,212
Locations
Army Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,748 1,748 1,748 1,748
Locations
Total Military Construction, Army Reserve 174,060 174,060 174,060 0 174,060
........................ ...................... ..................................
N/MC Res CALIFORNIA March AFB NOSC MORENO VALLEY RESERVE 11,086 11,086 11,086 11,086
TRAINING CENTER
N/MC Res MISSOURI Kansas City RESERVE TRAINING CENTER--BELTON, 15,020 15,020 15,020 15,020
MISSOURI
N/MC Res TENNESSEE Memphis RESERVE BOAT MAINTENANCE AND 4,330 4,330 4,330 4,330
STORAGE FACILITY
N/MC Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MCNR PLANNING & DESIGN 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
Locations
N/MC Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide USMCR PLANNING AND DESIGN 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040
Locations
Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve 32,976 32,976 32,976 0 32,976
........................ ...................... ..................................
Air NG ALABAMA Birmingham IAP ADD TO AND ALTER DISTRIBUTED 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500
GROUND STATION F
Air NG INDIANA Hulman Regional ADD/ALTER BLDG 37 FOR DIST COMMON 7,300 7,300 7,300 7,300
Airport GROUND STA
Air NG MARYLAND Fort Meade 175TH NETWORK WARFARE SQUADRON 4,000 0 4,000 4,000
FACILITY
Air NG MARYLAND Martin State Airport CYBER/ISR FACILITY 8,000 0 8,000 8,000
Air NG MONTANA Great Falls IAP INTRA-THEATER AIRLIFT CONVERSION 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000
Air NG NEW YORK Fort Drum MQ-9 FLIGHT TRAINING UNIT HANGAR 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700
Air NG OHIO Springfield Beckley- ALTER INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200
Map FACILITY
Air NG PENNSYLVANIA Fort Indiantown Gap COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS AND 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700
TRAINING FACILI
Air NG RHODE ISLAND Quonset State Airport C-130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
FACILITY
Air NG TENNESSEE McGhee-Tyson Airport TEC EXPANSION- DORMITORY & 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000
CLASSROOM FACILITY
Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 13,400 13,400 13,400 13,400
Locations
Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000
Locations
Total Military Construction, Air National Guard 119,800 107,800 119,800 0 119,800
........................ ...................... ..................................
AF Res CALIFORNIA March AFB JOINT REGIONAL DEPLOYMENT 19,900 19,900 19,900 19,900
PROCESSING CENTER,
AF Res FLORIDA Homestead AFS ENTRY CONTROL COMPLEX 9,800 9,800 9,800 9,800
AF Res OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB AIR CONTROL GROUP SQUADRON 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200
OPERATIONS
AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 2,229 2,229 2,229 2,229
Locations
AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,530 1,530 1,530 1,530
Locations
Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 45,659 45,659 45,659 0 45,659
........................ ...................... ..................................
FH Con Army WISCONSIN Fort McCoy FAMILY HOUSING NEW CONSTRUCTION 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000
(56 UNITS)
FH Con Army GERMANY South Camp Vilseck FAMILY HOUSING NEW CONSTRUCTION 16,600 16,600 0 16,600
(29 UNITS)
FH Con Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide FAMILY HOUSING P & D 4,408 4,408 4,408 4,408
Locations
Total Family Housing Construction, Army 44,008 44,008 27,408 0 44,008
........................ ...................... ..................................
FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide FURNISHINGS 33,125 33,125 33,125 33,125
Locations
FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide LEASED HOUSING 180,924 180,924 180,924 180,924
Locations
FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 107,639 107,639 107,639 107,639
Locations FACILITIES
FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 54,433 54,433 54,433 54,433
Locations
FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MILITARY HOUSING PRIVITIZATION 25,661 25,661 25,661 25,661
Locations INITIATIVE
FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MISCELLANEOUS 646 646 646 646
Locations
FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide SERVICES 13,536 13,536 13,536 13,536
Locations
FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UTILITIES 96,907 96,907 96,907 96,907
Locations
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army 512,871 512,871 512,871 0 512,871
........................ ...................... ..................................
FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide IMPROVEMENTS 72,093 72,093 72,093 72,093
Locations
FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PLANNING AND DESIGN 4,267 4,267 4,267 4,267
Locations
Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force 76,360 76,360 76,360 0 76,360
........................ ...................... ..................................
FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 39,470 39,470 39,470 39,470
Locations
FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide HOUSING PRIVATIZATION 41,436 41,436 41,436 41,436
Locations
FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide LEASING 54,514 54,514 54,514 54,514
Locations
FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MAINTENANCE (RPMA RPMC) 110,786 110,786 110,786 110,786
Locations
FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 53,044 53,044 53,044 53,044
Locations
FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,954
Locations
FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide SERVICES ACCOUNT 16,862 16,862 16,862 16,862
Locations
FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UTILITIES ACCOUNT 70,532 70,532 70,532 70,532
Locations
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force 388,598 388,598 388,598 0 388,598
........................ ...................... ..................................
FH Con Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide DESIGN 4,438 4,438 4,438 4,438
Locations
FH Con Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide IMPROVEMENTS 68,969 68,969 68,969 68,969
Locations
Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps 73,407 73,407 73,407 0 73,407
........................ ...................... ..................................
FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 21,073 21,073 21,073 21,073
Locations
FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide LEASING 74,962 74,962 74,962 74,962
Locations
FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 90,122 90,122 90,122 90,122
Locations
FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 60,782 60,782 60,782 60,782
Locations
FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 362 362 362 362
Locations
FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS 27,634 27,634 27,634 27,634
Locations
FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide SERVICES ACCOUNT 20,596 20,596 20,596 20,596
Locations
FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UTILITIES ACCOUNT 94,313 94,313 94,313 94,313
Locations
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps 389,844 389,844 389,844 0 389,844
........................ ...................... ..................................
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 67 67 67 67
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 3,196 3,196 3,196 3,196
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 20 20 20 20
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide LEASING 10,994 10,994 10,994 10,994
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide LEASING 40,433 40,433 40,433 40,433
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 311 311 311 311
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 74 74 74 74
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 418 418 418 418
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide SERVICES ACCOUNT 32 32 32 32
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UTILITIES ACCOUNT 12 12 12 12
Locations
FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide UTILITIES ACCOUNT 288 288 288 288
Locations
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide 55,845 55,845 55,845 0 55,845
........................ ...................... ..................................
FHIF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND 1,780 1,780 1,780 1,780
Locations
Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund 1,780 1,780 1,780 0 1,780
........................ ...................... ..................................
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Base Realignment & BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 180,401 180,401 180,401 180,401
Closure, Army
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Base Realignment & BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE 108,300 108,300 108,300 108,300
Closure, Navy
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide DOD BRAC ACTIVITIES--AIR FORCE 126,376 126,376 126,376 126,376
Locations
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide DON-100: PLANING, DESIGN AND 7,277 7,277 7,277 7,277
Locations MANAGEMENT
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide DON-101: VARIOUS LOCATIONS 20,988 20,988 20,988 20,988
Locations
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide DON-138: NAS BRUNSWICK, ME 993 993 993 993
Locations
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide DON-157: MCSA KANSAS CITY, MO 40 40 40 40
Locations
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide DON-172: NWS SEAL BEACH, CONCORD, 5,766 5,766 5,766 5,766
Locations CA
BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide DON-84: JRB WILLOW GROVE & CAMBRIA 1,216 1,216 1,216 1,216
Locations REG AP
Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 451,357 451,357 451,357 0 451,357
........................ ...................... ..................................
PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS--ANG 0 -45,623 0 0
Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION
PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS--ARMY BID 0 -14,000 0 0
Locations SAVINGS
PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS--ARMY PLANNING 0 -50,000 0 0
Locations AND DESIGN FY12
PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS--DEFENSE WIDE 0 -358,400 0 0
Locations BID SAVINGS
PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS--DEFENSE WIDE 0 -16,470 0 0
Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION
PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS--NAVY BID 0 -49,920 0 0
Locations SAVINGS
PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS--SECTION 1013 0 -50,000 0 0
Locations OF THE DEMONSTRATION CITIES AND
METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT ACT OF
1966, AS AMENDED
Total Prior Year Savings 0 -584,413 0 0 0
........................ ...................... ..................................
Total Military Construction 11,011,633 10,055,563 9,662,342 -644,780 10,366,853
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL
SECURITY PROGRAMS
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 House Senate Agreement Agreement
Program Request Authorized Authorized Change Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
Energy And Water Development, And Related
Agencies
Appropriation Summary:
Energy Programs
Electricity delivery and energy 16,000 -16,000 -16,000 -16,000 0
reliability...........................
Nuclear Energy......................... 94,000 0 0 0 94,000 Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National nuclear security
administration:
Weapons activities................... 7,868,409 220,000 0 40,843 7,909,252
Defense nuclear nonproliferation..... 2,140,142 0 80,000 40,000 2,180,142
Naval reactors....................... 1,246,134 0 0 0 1,246,134
Office of the administrator.......... 397,784 -8,000 0 -8,000 389,784
Total, National nuclear security 11,652,469 212,000 80,000 72,843 11,725,312
administration........................ Environmental and other defense
activities:
Defense environmental cleanup........ 5,316,909 -358,000 -80,000 -301,500 5,015,409
Other defense activities............. 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658
Total, Environmental & other defense 6,065,989 -358,000 -80,000 -291,922 5,774,067
activities............................
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities.. 17,718,458 -146,000 0 -219,079 17,499,379
Total, Discretionary Funding................. 17,828,458 -162,000 -16,000 -235,079 17,593,379Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability
Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability
Infrastructure security & energy 16,000 -16,000 -16,000 -16,000 0
restoration (HS)........................Nuclear Energy
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security..... 94,000 94,000Weapons Activities
Life extension programs and major
alterations
B61 Life extension program............. 537,044 44,000 537,044
W76 Life extension program............. 235,382 9,700 9,700 245,082
W78/88-1 Life extension program........ 72,691 5,600 72,691
W88 ALT 370............................ 169,487 169,487
Total, Stockpile assessment and design... 1,014,604 59,300 0 9,700 1,024,304 Stockpile systems
B61 Stockpile systems.................. 83,536 83,536
W76 Stockpile systems.................. 47,187 47,187
W78 Stockpile systems.................. 54,381 54,381
W80 Stockpile systems.................. 50,330 50,330
B83 Stockpile systems.................. 54,948 6,000 54,948
W87 Stockpile systems.................. 101,506 101,506
W88 Stockpile systems.................. 62,600 62,600
Stockpile systems
Total, Stockpile systems................. 454,488 6,000 0 0 454,488 Surveillance Weapons dismantlement and disposition
Operations and maintenance............. 49,264 6,000 55,264 Stockpile services
Production support..................... 321,416 29,600 23,584 345,000
Research and development support....... 26,349 3,200 26,349
R&D certification and safety........... 191,259 18,300 191,259
Management, technology, and production. 214,187 214,187
Plutonium sustainment.................. 156,949 9,500 156,949
Total, Stockpile services................ 910,160 60,600 0 23,584 933,744
Total, Directed stockpile work............. 2,428,516 125,900 0 39,284 2,467,800 Campaigns:
Science campaign
Advanced certification................. 54,730 54,730
Primary assessment technologies........ 109,231 109,231
Dynamic materials properties........... 116,965 116,965
Advanced radiography................... 30,509 30,509
Secondary assessment technologies...... 86,467 86,467
Total, Science campaign.................. 397,902 0 0 0 397,902 Engineering campaign
Enhanced surety........................ 51,771 2,500 51,771
Weapon systems engineering assessment 23,727 23,727
technology............................
Nuclear survivability.................. 19,504 19,504
Enhanced surveillance.................. 54,909 4,000 54,909
Total, Engineering campaign.............. 149,911 6,500 0 0 149,911 Inertial confinement fusion ignition and
high yield campaign
Ignition............................... 80,245 80,245
Support of other stockpile programs.... 15,001 15,001
Diagnostics, cryogenics and 59,897 59,897
experimental support..................
Pulsed power inertial confinement 5,024 5,024
fusion................................
Joint program in high energy density 8,198 8,198
laboratory plasmas....................
Facility operations and target 232,678 232,678
production............................
Total, Inertial confinement fusion and 401,043 0 0 0 401,043
high yield campaign..................... Advanced simulation and computing 564,329 564,329
campaign................................ Technology Maturation Campaign Readiness Campaign
Component manufacturing development.... 106,085 106,085
Tritium readiness...................... 91,695 91,695
Total, Readiness campaign................ 197,780 0 0 0 197,780
Total, Campaigns........................... 1,710,965 6,500 0 0 1,710,965 Nuclear programs
Nuclear operations capability............ 265,937 265,937
Capabilities based investments........... 39,558 39,558
Construction:
12-D-301 TRU waste facilities, LANL.... 26,722 26,722
11-D-801 TA-55 Reinvestment project 30,679 30,679
Phase 2, LANL.........................
07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste 55,719 55,719
treatment facility upgrade project,
LANL..................................
06-D-141 PED/Construction, Uranium 325,835 325,835
Capabilities Replacement Project Y-12.
Total, Construction...................... 438,955 0 0 0 438,955
Total, Nuclear programs.................... 744,450 0 0 0 744,450 Secure transportation asset
Operations and equipment................. 122,072 122,072
Program direction........................ 97,118 97,118
Total, Secure transportation asset......... 219,190 0 0 0 219,190 Site stewardship
Nuclear materials integration............ 17,679 17,679
Corporate project management............. 13,017 13,017 Minority serving institution partnerships 14,531 14,531
program................................. Enterprise infrastructure
Site Operations........................ 1,112,455 1,112,455
Site Support........................... 109,561 109,561
Sustainment............................ 433,764 65,100 433,764
Facilities disposition................. 5,000 5,000
Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure...... 1,660,780 65,100 0 0 1,660,780
Total, Site stewardship.................... 1,706,007 65,100 0 0 1,706,007
Defense nuclear security
Operations and maintenance............... 664,981 664,981
Construction:
14-D-710 DAF Argus, NNSS............... 14,000
Total, Defense nuclear security............ 678,981 0 0 0 678,981 NNSA CIO activities........................ 148,441 22,500 1,559 150,000 Legacy contractor pensions................. 279,597 279,597
Subtotal, Weapons activities................. 7,916,147 220,000 0 40,843 7,956,990 Adjustments
Use of prior year balances............... -47,738 -47,738
Total, Adjustments......................... -47,738 0 0 0 -47,738
Total, Weapons Activities.................... 7,868,409 220,000 0 40,843 7,909,252
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs
Global threat reduction initiative....... 424,487 23,000 424,487 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
Operations and maintenance............. 388,838 388,838 Nonproliferation and international 141,675 141,675
security................................ International material protection and 369,625 -23,000 369,625
cooperation............................. Fissile materials disposition
U.S. surplus fissile materials
disposition
Operations and maintenance
U.S. plutonium disposition......... 157,557 157,557
U.S. uranium disposition........... 25,000 25,000
Total, Operations and maintenance.... 182,557 0 0 0 182,557
Construction:
99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel 320,000 80,000 40,000 360,000
fabrication facility, Savannah
River, SC.........................
Total, Construction.................. 320,000 0 80,000 40,000 360,000
Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials 502,557 0 80,000 40,000 542,557
disposition...........................
Total, Fissile materials disposition..... 502,557 0 80,000 40,000 542,557 Legacy contractor pensions............... 93,703 93,703
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 1,920,885 0 80,000 41,559 1,962,444
Programs.................................. Nuclear counterterrorism incident response 181,293 181,293
program................................... Counterterrorism and counterproliferation 74,666 74,666
programs..................................
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation. 2,176,844 0 80,000 40,000 2,216,844 Adjustments
Use of prior year balances............... -36,702 -36,702
Total, Adjustments......................... -36,702 0 0 0 -36,702
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation...... 2,140,142 0 80,000 40,000 2,180,142
Naval Reactors
Naval reactors operations and 455,740 -2,000 -2,000 -2,000 453,740
infrastructure............................
Naval reactors development................. 419,400 419,400
Ohio replacement reactor systems 126,400 126,400
development...............................
S8G Prototype refueling.................... 144,400 144,400
Program direction.......................... 44,404 44,404
Construction:
14-D-902 KL Materials characterization 1,000 1,000
laboratory expansion, KAPL..............
14-D-901 Spent fuel handling 45,400 45,400
recapitalization project, NRF...........
13-D-905 Remote-handled low-level waste 21,073 21,073
facility, INL...........................
13-D-904 KS Radiological work and storage 600 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,600
building, KSO...........................
Naval Reactor Facility, ID............... 1,700 1,700
Total, Construction........................ 69,773 2,000 2,000 2,000 71,773
Subtotal, Naval Reactors..................... 1,260,117 0 0 0 1,260,117 Adjustments:
Use of prior year balances (Naval -13,983 -13,983
reactors)...............................
Total, Naval Reactors........................ 1,246,134 0 0 0 1,246,134
Office Of The Administrator
Office of the administrator................ 397,784 -8,000 -8,000 389,784
Total, Office Of The Administrator........... 397,784 -8,000 0 -8,000 389,784
Defense Environmental Cleanup
Closure sites:
Closure sites administration............. 4,702 4,702 Hanford site:
River corridor and other cleanup 393,634 20,000 15,000 408,634
operations..............................
Central plateau remediation.............. 513,450 513,450
Richland community and regulatory support 14,701 14,701
Total, Hanford site........................ 921,785 0 20,000 15,000 936,785 Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho cleanup and waste disposition...... 362,100 30,000 10,500 372,600
Idaho community and regulatory support... 2,910 2,910
Total, Idaho National Laboratory........... 365,010 0 30,000 10,500 375,510 NNSA sites
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory... 1,476 1,476
Nuclear facility D & D Separations 23,700 23,700
Process Research Unit...................
Nevada................................... 61,897 61,897
Sandia National Laboratories............. 2,814 2,814
Los Alamos National Laboratory........... 219,789 40,000 15,000 234,789
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites..... 309,676 0 40,000 15,000 324,676 Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear facility D & D................ 73,716 73,716
OR cleanup and disposition............... 115,855 10,000 115,855
OR reservation community and regulatory 4,365 4,365
support.................................
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation............... 193,936 0 10,000 0 193,936 Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment and immobilization plant
01-D-416 A-E/ORP-0060 / Major 690,000 690,000
construction.......................... Tank farm activities
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and 520,216 50,000 520,216
disposition...........................
Total, Office of River protection.......... 1,210,216 0 50,000 0 1,210,216 Savannah River sites:
Savannah River risk management operations 432,491 432,491
SR community and regulatory support...... 11,210 11,210 Radioactive liquid tank waste:
Radioactive liquid tank waste 552,560 95,000 150,000 105,000 657,560
stabilization and disposition.........
Construction:
05-D-405 Salt waste processing 92,000 92,000
facility, Savannah River............
Total, Construction.................... 92,000 0 0 0 92,000
Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste..... 644,560 95,000 150,000 105,000 749,560
Total, Savannah River site................. 1,088,261 95,000 150,000 105,000 1,193,261 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Waste isolation pilot plant.............. 203,390 33,000 16,000 219,390
Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant......... 203,390 0 33,000 16,000 219,390 Program direction.......................... 280,784 20,000 280,784
Program support............................ 17,979 17,979 Safeguards and Security:
Oak Ridge Reservation.................... 18,800 18,800
Paducah.................................. 9,435 9,435
Portsmouth............................... 8,578 8,578
Richland/Hanford Site.................... 69,078 10,000 69,078
Savannah River Site...................... 121,196 10,000 121,196
Waste Isolation Pilot Project............ 4,977 4,977
West Valley.............................. 2,015 2,015
Technology development..................... 24,091 10,000 10,000 24,091
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup...... 4,853,909 105,000 383,000 161,500 5,015,409 Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution... 463,000 -463,000 -463,000 -463,000 0Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup......... 5,316,909 -358,000 -80,000 -301,500 5,015,409
Other Defense Activities
Health, safety and security
Health, safety and security.............. 143,616 143,616
Program direction........................ 108,301 108,301
Total, Health, safety and security......... 251,917 0 0 0 251,917 Specialized security activities............ 196,322 9,578 205,900 Office of Legacy Management
Legacy management........................ 163,271 163,271
Program direction........................ 13,712 13,712
Total, Office of Legacy Management......... 176,983 0 0 0 176,983 Defense-related activities
Defense related administrative support
Chief financial officer.................. 38,979 38,979
Chief information officer................ 79,857 79,857
Total, Defense related administrative 118,836 0 0 0 118,836
support................................... Office of hearings and appeals............. 5,022 5,022
Subtotal, Other defense activities........... 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658
Total, Other Defense Activities.............. 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------