July 1994
Professor George Mirsky
Russia in the Midst of Change
Jim Morrison
Russian Academy of Science Professor George Mirsky addressed
four issues during a roundtable discussion at the Institute for
National Strategic Studies. They were: the current situation in
Russia, nationalism and relations between Russia and its "near
abroad", great power status for Russia, and suggestions for U.S.
policy vis-a-vis Zhirinovskiy.
Situation in Russia
The Economy
Joking that things are not so bad that
they cannot get worse, Mirsky said that industrial output had
shrunk 40% since last year and oil production in the first two
months of 1994 was down 14%. Energy prices are rising but are still
only 45% of world prices. Inflation was 10% in February.
Unemployment is listed at only 1.5%, but there is much
underemployment, and many people are not working but are on
enterprise rolls in an unpaid leave status. Some 8,000 enterprises
should be declared bankrupt. About 80% of small enterprises have
already been auctioned off; 800 enterprises (1% of the total) are being privatized each month.
While there is some industrial investment taking place in smaller
cities, most money is sent out of Russia. Economic reform will
require closing giant military industrial enterprises; this will be
politically explosive as it will lead to 15% unemployment.
Crime
About 75% of private organizations pay 10-20% of
their earnings as protection money to gangs. Some 150 gangs
control most banks and other institutions; most of the 1,800 banks
pay protection money to these Russian mafias. Some 120 bank
managers were killed last year. There were 6,500 cases of theft of
weapons from military depots in 1993, and the gangs are now dealing
in explosives.
Society
There is a near total criminalization of
society, with many in the large middle class believing that if they
are not stealing they are cheating their family. The Academy of
Sciences is dying as young people leave for other ventures.
People pursue business ventures that are built on paper rather than
actual production.
Politics in a Worsening Environment -- Rutskoy and Zhirinovskiy
If the situation in Russia worsens, Rutskoy or Zhirinovskiy might
emerge as leader. Rutskoy is decent and honest but not bright. He
might win the support of many who voted for Zhirinovskiy.
Zhirinovskiy as leader would be the worst case. He is not mad but
calculating; he is as mean as a junk yard dog. Zhirinovskiy has
captured the crime issue, saying he would have criminals shot on
sight. He has also won support by playing to the sentiment against
Russia being humiliated.
Nationalism and Relations between Russia and the Near Abroad
Russian Nationalism
While Russian nationalism has existed
for centuries and there has always been a clear sense of
nationalism in Russia, Russian nationalism is the weakest of all
nationalisms in the republics of the former Soviet Union. Russian
domination in the area of the former Soviet Union had never before
been challenged by another nation. Contributing factors in the past
have been the Russian language, the Orthodox Church, and the Czar.
Since the White Army used Russian chauvinism as a weapon, the
Bolsheviks steered away from this. Later, because Russians
dominated the former Soviet Union, there was no need for Russian
chauvinism. There was no particular "Soviet" nationalism or
patriotism. But many in the USSR felt they belonged to a country
surrounded by an enemy.
The "Near Abroad"
Russians have been shocked by
developments in the "near abroad" and by rumors about treatment of
the some 25 million Russians there. As a result, Russian
nationalism has risen. Rumors of genocide of Russians in the "near
abroad" are ridiculous�no one has been killed�but perceptions are
strong. Russians have been squeezed out of jobs. Zhirinovskiy
plays on these perceptions.
Some Russians felt it would have been better to have lost the
non-Russian republics. Some view Ukraine as having "seceded."
Russians felt betrayed when Chechenia in the North Caucasus of
Russia claimed independence. There is now an anti-Caucasus campaign
in Moscow. First the Georgians and now the Azeris have captured
the fruit and vegetable markets in Moscow.
Russians have left Uzbekistan as they see no future there and
have left Tajikistan because of the war. Kazakhstan is different,
since there are almost as many Russians there as Kazakhs, although
numbers of ethnic Kazakhs are increasing faster than Russians.
Russians feel that if they were to leave Kazakhstan, they should
take part of the territory of Kazakhstan with them.
Psychologically speaking, Russians in the Baltics feel
inferior to the Balts. In Central Asia, the Russians regard the
indigenous Central Asians as inferior. There is psychological
compatibility between the Russians and the Kazakhs, and between
Russians and Tatars.
The Tatars, however, are starting to take charge of the police
and other organizations in Tatarstan, a republic in the Russian
Federation, and Kazakhs may take charge in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan
President Nazarbayev is trying to walk a tightrope between the
Kazakhs and Russians in Kazakhstan.
CIS
Russia is working to reassert its influence and to
reintegrate the former republics under a restored Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS), which is viewed as a viable entity. A
year ago the CIS was an organization for orderly disintegration,
but no more. Pan-Slavism is dead, and the Slavic states are not
going their own way. The Central Asians would vote for integration
if it meant an increase in the standard of living. The economic
situation is ugly except in Turkmenistan and Estonia.
Russian Forces in the "Near Abroad"
Russian troops are
deployed in South Ossetia and Moldova, and people there are
grateful to Moscow but still fear they will be double-crossed by
these forces. People do not see an imminent danger while Yeltsin is
in charge, but they would if Rutskoy or Zhirinovskiy were in
charge. Russians do not want Russian boys killed there.
Islamic Threat
The concept of "Islam is the solution"
could become a rallying cry in Central Asia. Moscow has deployed
forces to Tajikistan and attempted to draw a line there. If the
Russians pull out of Tajikistan, the Muslims would take over. There
is a domino theory�if Tajikistan falls, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan
would fall, and eventually Muslim fundamentalism would have to be
fought in Russia itself.
Georgia
Some of Yeltsin's generals probably pressed to
have Russia help the Abkhazians against the Georgians. There may
have been concern that, if the Abkhazians lost, Georgian
Parliamentary leader Shevardnadze would drive the Russians out of
Georgia, and seaports and bases would be lost. On the other hand,
if the Georgians were allowed to run over the Abkhazians, the
people in the North Caucasus area of Russia would see this as a
betrayal by Russia and this might trigger a conflict in the North
Caucasus and the Russians might lose bases there. The Russians then
helped Shevardnadze against the Gamsakhurdiya opposition in
Georgia, and Shevardnadze agreed to having Russian bases in
Georgia.
Ukraine
Disputes between Ukraine and Russia over the
Black Sea Fleet could poison relations. Ukraine will be independent
but aligned; it will be politically independent but economically
tied to Russia. The Ukrainians have an inferiority complex. Ukraine
lacks qualified people, and many have left Ukraine for Moscow.
Russia will attempt economic integration with Ukraine but not
total integration, as with Belarus. Russian experience in Belarus
has shown total integration to be too costly. It will cost a
billion dollars to incorporate Belarus into Russia. Some in Moscow
encourage close contacts between Russia and Ukraine's Kharkov and
Donbas areas.
Great Power Status for Russia
Russian national pride has been hurt with the loss of great
power status. This helps explain the Russian stance on Serbia, as
well as on the Kuril Islands and Sevastopol. Russians say they want
Russia to be restored to the position of a great power, not
a superpower. This restoration would begin with increasing
Russian influence in the "near abroad." Some believe that
Russia's throwing its weight around in the Transcaucasus and
Central Asia will show the world that Russia is still a great
power. Any perception that efforts will be made to restore the
Soviet Union is an exaggeration.
The West should make a distinction between the area west of
Russia, where any attempts to interfere in the Baltics or Poland
should be opposed, and south of Russia. Russians see Europe as
lost. But the West must be careful regarding Russian relations
with the zone of influence in Ukraine, the Transcaucasus, and
Central Asia. If the West tries to interfere, this will be
counterproductive and play into Zhirinovskiy's hands.
Suggestion for Policy vis-a-vis Zhirinovskiy
In response to a question, Mirsky said developing policy vis-
a-vis Zhirinovskiy required real skill. It would be a mistake to
over-emphasize his importance and include him in receptions and the
like, but he should be criticized. A subtle strategy of criticism
is needed. Some positions Zhirinovskiy emphasizes are shared by
many Russians, e.g., opposition to Russian humiliation. Mirsky
agreed with sending a message to Russians that Russia would be
isolated if Zhirinovskiy acceded to power; he further suggested
indicating that Zhirinovskiy might lead Russia into a war.