Exploration of students' "specialized interests, aptitudes, and abilities as a basis for decisions regarding educational opportunities" and vocational decisions was long ago identified as one of the essential functions of the junior high school (Gruhn & Douglass, 1947, pp. 31-32). In 1995, the National Middle School Association (NMSA) reaffirmed the importance of exploration, calling for a "curriculum that is challenging, integrative, and exploratory" (1995, pp. 20-24). In both instances, exploration was meant to apply to the entire curriculum. In practice, in the junior high school and especially in the middle level school, the goal of exploration has been interpreted most often as a set of separate "exploratory" courses such as art, music, technology, and family and consumer science (George, 2000/2001). Many schools also include clubs, activities, and mini-courses under the exploratory banner.
Exploration is important for young adolescents because it ensures hands-on, participatory, meaningful, and engaging experiences. It has endured because it meets the most fundamental of middle level concepts-it is developmentally responsive and academically challenging. While many books on middle level education speak favorably about exploratory courses as a key component in middle level schools, the research on most aspects of "exploration" is sparse, focusing on frequency of offerings rather than on student or teacher responses to programs (Bergman, 1992).
For many students, middle school may be the last opportunity to explore new subjects and interests, the last time to learn to play the flute, learn to speak Spanish, or learn to cook a new dish.
Another benefit for many students is that exploratory courses such as art, drama, and technology actively engage students, allowing them to learn new skills and try out new ways of thinking. The purpose of exploratory courses, whatever the label and whatever the content, is to offer wide-ranging opportunities and experiences that students would not otherwise have.
Exploratory programs are varied in two other key ways-who selects the exploratory offerings and how long they last. Some schools encourage students to select from different options, some have required electives with little or no choice, and some work to gradually introduce choice to students as they progress through their middle school years. Length of time for each of these options varies as well. Some schools may offer and some students may choose short courses meeting once or twice a week; others may elect a course for a trimester or semester and then switch for the next term. Some schools devote an entire day to exploratory activities once a month (Epstein & Mac Iver, 1990).
Another problem is the lack of communication and collaboration between core and exploratory teachers. Since exploratory teachers most often form their own teams, they may be excluded from essential decision making and discussions by the academic teams. Doda and George (1999) suggest options through extended teams where exploratory teachers serve as representatives on academic teams, rotating team connections, core-exploratory liaisons, and connections through homebase/advisory alliances.
Should exploratory courses/experiences be graded? Some teachers think that grades do not support the exploratory nature of the experience and may inhibit students' willingness to try new experiences. Unfortunately, some students and parents subscribe to the idea that without a grade, an exploratory course has little value. Some middle schools include exploratory courses in grade averages while others do not, because they feel not including exploratory course grades promotes more non-threatening participation in new experiences. With more emphasis on state and national standards, high-stakes testing, and assessment, nearly every middle school is feeling pressure to use its time to optimum advantage. At the middle level, this pressure often translates into fewer exploratory courses or new "exploratory" courses that offer less exploration and look more like the usual school subjects (Jackson & Davis, 2000).
* Articulate
more clearly how exploratory courses are an integral and critical
part of the middle school curriculum. In many schools, the role and
purpose of exploratory curricula are not understood even by a
school's faculty and students. The exploratory function is too often
viewed as an extra, taking away from the core curriculum.
* Ensure
that everyone understands that exploratory and academic are
complementary, not competing or opposing concepts. Exploratory
courses or activities engage students in ways that core courses
often do not. Certainly, a middle school curriculum that is totally
exploratory-allowing students wide options from which to choose,
different ways to view the world, and various opportunities to
succeed-goes a long way to meet the needs of young adolescents.
*
Align exploratory offerings more closely with the regular
curriculum. Beane's (1993) suggestions for an integrative curriculum
arising from students' questions and concerns about themselves and
the larger world suggest a way to effectively and meaningfully
integrate both core and exploratory offerings. For example, when
students identify saving the environment as a focus for study,
exploratory areas like health, technology, and art become part of
the overall curriculum, joining language arts and science as tools
to explore this complex issue.
Bergman, S. (1992). Exploratory programs in middle level schools: A responsive idea. In J. Irvin (Ed.), TRANSFORMING MIDDLE LEVEL EDUCATION (pp. 179-192). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. ED 354 598.
Compton, M. F., & Hawn, H. C. (1993). EXPLORATION: THE TOTAL CURRICULUM. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
Doda, N., & George, P. (1999). Building whole middle school communities: Closing the gap between exploratory and core. MIDDLE SCHOOL JOURNAL, 30(5), 32-39.
Epstein, J., & Mac Iver, D. (1990). EDUCATION IN THE MIDDLE GRADES: AN OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL PRACTICES AND TRENDS. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
George, P. (2000/2001). The evolution of middle schools. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 58(4), 40-44.
Gruhn, W. T., & Douglass, H. R. (1947, 1956, 1971). THE MODERN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. New York: Ronald Press.
Jackson, A., & Davis, G. (2000). TURNING POINTS 2000--EDUCATING ADOLESCENTS IN THE 21ST CENTURY. New York: Teachers College Press.
National Middle School Association. (1995). THIS WE BELIEVE: DEVELOPMENTALLY RESPONSIVE MIDDLE LEVEL SCHOOLS. Columbus, OH: Author. ED 390 546.
Van Til, C., Vars, G., & Lounsbury, J. (1967). MODERN EDUCATION FOR THE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Wayne, B. (2000). Spotlight on exploratory courses. MIDDLE GROUND, 3(5), 33-37.
-----
References identified with an ED (ERIC document), EJ (ERIC journal), or PS number are cited in the ERIC database. Most documents are available in ERIC microfiche collections at more than 900 locations worldwide, and can be ordered through EDRS: (800) 443-ERIC. Journal articles are available from the original journal, interlibrary loan services, or article reproduction clearinghouses such as UnCover (800-787-7979) or ISI (800-523-1850).
ERIC Digests are in the public domain and may be freely reproduced.
This project has been funded at least in part with Federal funds from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, under contract no. ED-99-CO-0020. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Education, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
All ERIC/EECE Digests are available free in original printed form directly from the clearinghouse. For additional information on this topic, please contact ERIC/EECE directly at [email protected] or 1-800-583-4135.
###