July 1999
In 1995, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health-care system
began to transform itself from a confederation of individual medical
centers and clinics focused primarily on inpatient care to a fully
integrated system that promotes and expands primary and ambulatory
health care. To accomplish this, 22 management hubs, called Veterans
Integrated Service Networks (VISNs), were created to administer
the patient-centered health-care services VA provides to the nation's
25 million veterans.
This transformation, along with the shift in the veterans' population
and tighter budgets, called for a new approach in allocating the
department's $17 billion medical care budget. The new funding
distribution methodology, the Veterans Equitable Resource Allocation
(VERA), corrects historic geographic funding imbalances by allocating
funds fairly according to the number of veterans having the highest
priority for health care. To minimize impact and aid management
of the change, the full shift of resources is being phased in,
depending on the VISN, and is expected to be completed in FY 2002.
The new funding system replaced VA's Resource Planning and Management
system, which had projected workload to determine funding for
each VA medical facility. In 1996, VA began to move resource allocation
away from facility-specific prices for workload reimbursement
to national prices as a first step toward capitated (per-patient)
rates. A blended rate was used in 1996, reflecting a combination
of local unit prices for care, regional rates, a national unit
price, and other factors.
Effective April 1, 1997, under VERA, funds allocated to the 22
networks were based on two different types of patients -- those
with "routine" health-care needs (Basic Care) and those
with special, typically long-term, needs that are more expensive
(Special Care). For FY 1999, the Basic Care component was divided
into two sub-components, each assigned a different price. One
category, consisting of single outpatient visits, is funded at
the rate of $66. All other Basic Care has a price of $2,857. The
"Special Care" component of VERA was renamed as "Complex
Care" to more accurately reflect the fact that it includes
more than VA's traditional "Special Care" patients.
The FY 1999 price for Complex Care is $36,955.
Other improvements were made in FY 1999, including refinement
of the geographic price adjustment, research support, education
support, equipment funding and non-recurring maintenance adjustments.
The geographic price adjustment is based on labor costs paid by
VA facilities as they compare to a VA national average salary.
For FY 1999, the adjustment for labor is based on the most recent
four pay periods during FY 1998. This is being used in place of
cumulative actual year-end FY 1997 personal services data because
it more accurately reflects current staffing levels among the
networks. The geographic price index does not include the effect
of holiday, standby, and overtime pay, so that the index
reflects more truly the network's controllable payroll.
Resource Allocation--Page 2
In 1997 and 1998, research support was computed by determining
each network's portion of VA and non-VA research dollars, based
on the previous year's total research dollars. Starting in FY
1999, the workload allocation factor for the distribution of the
VERA research support dollars changed from crediting 100 percent
of the total amount of the funded research reported by the networks
to a revision that rewards VA-administered research. This change
credits VA-administered research at 100 percent; non-VA funded,
non-VA administered, peer-reviewed research at 75 percent; and
other non-VA sponsored research at 25 percent. VA-administered
research is encouraged by VERA so that an incentive exists to
have VA administer more of the non-VA research dollars. This results
in better accountability, and in an increased likelihood that
VA will recover indirect costs.
The VERA system also accounts for veterans who receive care in
more than one network during the year. Seasonal moves by veterans
mean higher usage of medical centers in warmer climates during
the winter months. Network budgets are adjusted accordingly, based
on the historical usage patterns and cost for these veterans.
As a result of VERA, veterans will have improved access to care,
improved quality of care and a wider spectrum of services available.
No veteran currently receiving care will be denied care as a result
of VERA's implementation.
The VERA system supports VA's goals of:
-- treating the greatest number of veterans who have the highest priority for health care, and allocating funds equitably based on the number of veterans having the highest priority;
-- recognizing the sometimes special health-care needs of veterans;
-- improving accountability in expenditures for research and education support;
-- complying with congressional mandates;
-- creating an understandable resource allocation system that is reasonably predictable; and
-- aligning resource allocation policies to the best practices in health care.
|
||
Network Site |
|
|
1. | Boston | Massachusetts: Bedford, Boston, Brockton, Northampton; Connecticut: Newington, West Haven; Maine: Togus; New Hampshire: Manchester; Rhode Island: Providence; Vermont: White River Junction |
2. |
Albany, N.Y. | New York: Albany, Batavia, Bath, Buffalo, Canandaigua, Syracuse |
3. |
Bronx, N.Y. | New York: Bronx, Brooklyn, Castle Point, Montrose, Manchester, Northport; New Jersey: East Orange, Lyons |
4. |
Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania: Altoona, Butler, Coatesville, Erie, Lebanon, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh (Highland Drive, Pittsburgh (University Drive), Wilkes-Barre; Delaware: Wilmington; West Virginia: Clarksburg |
5. |
Baltimore | Maryland: Baltimore, Fort Howard, Perry Point; District of Columbia: Washington; West Virginia: Martinsburg |
6. |
Durham, N.C. | North Carolina: Asheville, Fayetteville, Salisbury; Virginia: Hampton, Richmond, Salem; West Virginia: Beckley |
7. |
Atlanta | Georgia: Atlanta, Augusta, Dublin; Alabama: Birmingham, Montgomery, Tuscaloosa, Tuskegee; South Carolina: Charleston, Columbia |
8. |
Bay Pines, Fla. | Florida: Bay Pines, Gainesville, Lake City, Miami, Tampa, West Palm Beach; Puerto Rico: San Juan |
9. |
Nashville, Tenn. | Tennessee: Memphis, Mountain Home, Murfreesboro, Nashville; Kentucky: Lexington, Louisville; West Virginia: Huntington |
10. |
Cincinnati | Ohio: Chillicothe, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton |
11. |
Ann Arbor, Mich. | Michigan: Allen Park, Ann Arbor, Battle Creek, Saginaw; Illinois: Danville; Indiana: Fort Wayne, Indianapolis, Marion |
12. |
Chicago | Illinois: Chicago (Lakeside), Chicago (Westside), Hines, North Chicago; Michigan: Iron Mountain; Wisconsin: Madison, Milwaukee, Tomah |
13. |
Minneapolis | Minnesota: Minneapolis, St. Cloud; North Dakota: Fargo; South Dakota: Fort Meade, Hot Springs, Sioux Falls |
14. |
Omaha, Neb. | Nebraska: Grand Island, Lincoln, Omaha; Iowa: Des Moines, Iowa City, Knoxville |
15. |
Kansas City, Mo. | Missouri: Columbia, Kansas City, Poplar Bluff, St. Louis; Illinois: Marion; Kansas: Leavenworth, Topeka, Wichita |
16. |
Jackson, Miss. | Mississippi: Jackson; Arkansas: Fayetteville, Little Rock; Louisiana: Alexandria, New Orleans, Shreveport; Oklahoma: Muskogee, Oklahoma City Texas: Houston |
17. |
Dallas, Texas | Bonham, Dallas, Kerrville, Marlin, San Antonio, Temple, Waco |
18. |
Phoenix, Ariz. | Arizona: Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson; New Mexico: Albuquerque; Texas: Amarillo, Big Spring, El Paso |
19. |
Denver | Colorado: Denver, Fort Lyon, Grand Junction; Montana: Fort Harrison, Miles City; Utah: Salt Lake City; Wyoming: Cheyenne, Sheridan |
20. |
Portland, Ore. | Oregon: Portland, Roseburg, White City; Alaska: Anchorage; Idaho: Boise; Washington: American Lake/Tacoma, Seattle, Spokane, Walla Walla |
21. |
San Francisco | California: Fresno, Martinez, Palo Alto, San Francisco; Hawaii: Honolulu; Nevada: Reno; Philippines: Manila |
22. |
Long Beach, Calif. | California: Loma Linda, Long Beach, Los Angeles, San Diego, Sepulveda, West Los Angeles; Nevada: Las Vegas |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
1. Boston |
$809 |
$785 |
|
|
2. Albany |
$416 |
$411 |
|
|
3. Bronx |
$974 |
$952 |
|
|
4. Pittsburgh |
$779 |
$790 |
|
|
5. Baltimore |
$460 |
$471 |
|
|
6. Durham |
$704 |
$716 |
|
|
7. Atlanta |
$856 |
$884 |
|
|
8. Bay Pines |
$1,071 |
$1,114 |
|
|
9. Nashville |
$704 |
$705 |
|
|
10. Cincinnati |
$535 |
$555 |
|
|
11. Ann Arbor |
$632 |
$656 |
|
|
12. Chicago |
$795 |
$781 |
|
|
13. Minneapolis |
$415 |
$427 |
|
|
14. Omaha |
$277 |
$285 |
|
|
15. Kansas City |
$616 |
$608 |
|
|
16. Jackson |
$1,194 |
$1,238 |
|
|
17. Dallas |
$652 |
$654 |
|
|
18. Phoenix |
$545 |
$567 |
|
|
19. Denver |
$394 |
$388 |
|
|
20. Portland |
$652 |
$677 |
|
|
21. San Francisco |
$733 |
$749 |
|
|
22. Long Beach |
$943 |
$936 |
|
|
![]() Home Page |
![]() Complaints, and Concerns |
![]() |
Please send your comments on this page to VA Office of Public Affairs.