Home
> NRC Library
> Document Collections
> Generic Communications
> Information Notices
> 1982
> IN 82-17
Information Notice No. 82-17: Overpressurization of Reactor Coolant System
SSINS No.: 6835 IN 82-17 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 June 11, 1982 Information Notice No. 82-17: OVERPRESSURIZATION OF REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM Addressees: All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or construction permit (CP). Purpose: This information notice is provided as a notification of two events that may have safety significance. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities. No specific action or response is required. Description of Circumstances: On November 30, 1981, Florida Power and Light .Company r .@ported that the Turkey Point Unit 4 reactor coolant system (RCS) was overpressurized on November,28 and 29 during startup following a refueling outage. The reactor was shut down and the RCS was in a water solid condition with a pressure and temperature of approximately 310 psig and 1100F, respectively. Two separate transients that resulted in overpressure conditions of 1100 and 750 psig at 1100F occurred for which the overpressure mitigating system-(OMS) failed to operate. These events exceeded the pressure limit of 480 psig at 1100F specified in Technical Specifications which prescribe the allowable pressure and temperature limits to prevent reactor vessel brittle fracture. The OMS is specifically designed to prevent this type of overpressurization. The OMS did not operate as designed because: 1. After the first event a pressure transmitter isolation valve was found closed and was opened. This transmitter provides input into the OMS circuit to automatically open a power operated relief valve (PORV) if the reactor coolant system exceeds the allowable pressure for RCS temperature; 2. The summator failed in the electrical circuitry which prescribes the pressure at which the OMS is to initiate PORV actuation. The failed summator was identified and corrected after the second event. The OMS surveillance procedure in use before the event did not include testing the summator, in that the test signal bypassed the summator; and 3. The redundant OMS circuit was out of service for calibration. 8204210383 . IN 82-17 June 11, 1982 Page 2 of 3 Before each event the reactor coolant system inventory was being maintained by charging from the chemical and volume control system and letdown through the residual heat removal (RHR) system. Each event was initiated with a pressure spike caused by the start of a reactor coolant pump which resulted in isolation of letdown by automatic closure of the RHR system isolation valve. During both occurrences, the operator took immediate action to stop the charging pump which was providing the source of rapid pressurization. Within two minutes the operator decreased pressure to the desired level by manually opening the PORV and securing the pressurizer heaters in addition to securing the charging flow. Timely operator action to completely prevent the overpressurization was precluded by the rapidity of the transient. Following the events, OMS surveillance procedures were revised to include testing of the summator. Other procedural changes include additional equipment checks to ensure OMS operability. Westinghouse performed a fracture mechanics analysis based on the method of Appendix G, Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The analysis showed that these transients had neither impaired the integrity of the reactor vessel, nor significantly affected the fatigue life of the vessel. A Florida Power and Light Company consultant reviewed the analysis and concurred with the Westinghouse conclusion. In a separate event, on May 23, 1982 Virginia Electric Power Company (VEPCO) reported that the overpressure protection system (OPS) at North Anna was inoperable from May 19-22. The OPS had not been called upon to operate during this time. The reactor was in cold shutdown and for two days the reactor coolant system was in the water solid condition. Initially, one OPS system was declared inoperable when the pressure in the "A" nitrogen supply, reservoir dropped below the minimum pressure required to maintain the PORV operable. Two days later, a low pressure alarm occurred on the "B" nitrogen supply reservoir. An isolation valve between the reservoir and the "B" OPS system had been closed for an indeterminant period (possibly as long as eight days), isolating the nitrogen supply to the "B" PORV. Therefore both PORVs were inoperable. Initial investigation discovered that system procedure did not include OPS valve lineups, and the incorrectly positioned valve was not shown on plant drawings in use at that time. VEPCO is presently taking action to correct these problems. Each of the above events involved failure of two redundant systems designed to provide overpressure protection. The concern is that without prompt operator action such failures increase the potential for brittle fracture of the reactor pressure vessel from overstress during pressure transients. . IN 82-17 June 11, 1982 Page 3 of 3 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator of the appropriate NRC Regional Office, or this office. Edward L. Jordan, Director Division of Engineering and Quality Assurance Office of Inspection and Enforcement Technical Contact: R. A. Holland 301-492-4791 W. R. Mills 301-492-4791 Attachment: List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 22, 2015
Home
About Us
Popular Documents
Stay Connected
