Home
> NRC Library
> Document Collections
> Generic Communications
> Information Notices
> 1984 > IN 84-12
Information Notice No. 84-12: Failure of Soft Seat Valve Seals
SSINS No.: 6835 IN 84-12 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 February 27, 1984 Information Notice No. 84-12: FAILURE OF SOFT SEAT VALVE SEALS Addressees: All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or a construction permit (CP). Purpose: This information notice is provided as a notification of the failure of soft seat valve seals to meet the leakage limits of Appendix J of 10 CFR Part 50. No specific action is required in response to this information notice, but it is expected that recipients will review the information presented for applicability to their facilities. Description of Circumstances: The Anchor/Darling Valve Company has provided a number of valves to nuclear power plants that have a combination of soft and hard seats. Prior to October 1981, Anchor/Darling procured molded ethylene-propylene rubber seals from the Stillman Rubber Company. After that date, Anchor/Darling procured extruded-vulcanized soft seals from Stevens Associates. As described in more detail below, check valves with both types of seals failed to meet 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, requirements at the LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station. Specifically, on September 29, 1983, the Commonwealth Edison Company reported (LER 83-107) that the inboard feedwater check valves at LaSalle Unit 1 had failed to meet the leakage limits of Appendix J of 10 CFR Part 50. When the check valves were opened for inspection, the soft seat showed damage around the pressure-relieving vent grooves, some wear on the soft seat face, and slight wear on the body seat. These check valves had been modified before initial plant operation from a hard seat valve to a combination soft and hard seat configuration. This was accomplished by modifying the valve discs to allow the installation of the soft seat seals. The seals were of molded ethylene-propylene rubber obtained through the valve manufacturer, Anchor/Darling Valve Company, from the Stillman Rubber Company. . IN 84-12 February 27, 1984 Page 2 of 3 The reason these soft seat valve seals failed has not been definitely determined at this time, but failure is believed ;o be due to one or more of the following: 1. Sharp edges around the pressure equalizing ports located in the discs had cut the soft seal material in many locations. The sharp edges apparently had not been properly removed when the valve discs were modified. It is possible that local leak rate air bypassed the seal through these cuts. 2. The machining of the soft seals for proper fit may have affected their sealing capability. 3. The service conditions encountered by the valves during plant startup and shutdown may have damaged the soft seals. The damaged molded seals were replaced in September with new soft seals of an extruded-vulcanized design obtained through the valve manufacturer from Stevens Associates. These seals were ground at the site to obtain proper fit. The valves subsequently passed the local leak rate tests. Since the cause of the failure of the original molded seals had not definitely been determined, the licensee agreed to perform a local leak rate test on the valves during a subsequent outage. On December 9, 1983, the licensee reported (LER 83-146) that, following approximately a month of operation, the inboard feedwater check valves again failed to pass the local leak rate tests. It was determined that the excessive leakage was a result of gaps on the perimeter of the disc seal material, one about one-half inch long and the other about one and one-half inches in length. These gaps appeared at the seam, or "vulcanized," points of the seal. It was also noticed that one of the seals appeared to be hardened slightly with multiple minute cracks. In addition, alignment problems were identified that would have prevented the discs from closing squarely against the seal. The utility has replaced the vulcanized seals with molded (one piece) seals similar to those in the original design. In addition, with the assistance of a manufacturer's representative, the clearances within the valve have been adjusted to within the manufacturer's specifications. In its December 14, 1983, response to a November 28, 1983, Confirmatory Action Letter, the utility indicated that the molded "seals lasted, as a minimum, one refueling cycle" when used in similar applications at other facilities. The utility based this conclusion on telephone conversations with: 1. Pilgrim Station where the seals were initially installed during the 1976-77 refueling outage. At the first subsequent refueling outage (1979), two seals were replaced in order to pass the local leak rate test. The next refueling outage (1981-82) required replacement of four seals in order to pass the local leak rate test. 2. Brunswick Unit 1 where the seals were initially installed during the refueling outage in January 1980. The seals passed their local leak rate tests in August 1982 as well as the tests during the first subsequent refueling outage (1982-83). . IN 84-12 February 27, 1984 Page 3 of 3 3. Brunswick Unit 2 where the seals were initially installed during the refueling outage in June 1980. At the first subsequent refueling outage (1982) all the seals were changed to pass the local leak rate tests. Also in accordance with the Confirmatory Action Letter, the licensee is developing an augmented testing and inspection program and a program for obtaining and installing soft seals that are fully environmentally qualified. As a minimum, the augmented testing and inspection program will include another local leak rate test and an inspection of the accessible portions of the seals within 90 days of achieving power operation. Conversations with Anchor/Darling Valve Company, indicated that the company believes the failure of the extruded-vulcanized seals resulted from improper vulcanizing of the seal joints. Additionally, the valve manufacturer is of the opinion that the problem is probably limited to one batch of seals and only affects the LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station. However, Anchor/Darling is now recommending the use of the molded ethylene-propylene rubber seals. Attachment 1 is a chronological listing of those nuclear plants to which Anchor/Darling provided soft valve seals. The dates of delivery are also shown. All soft seals, both initial and replacement, furnished after October 1981 are of the extruded-vulcanized type. At this time we do not know which of the valves listed in Attachment 1 may have replaced seals since that date. Also, we do not know which of the valves have applications that are safety related or important to safety. No written response to this information notice is required. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator of the appropriate NRC Regional Office, or this office. Edward L. Jordan, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement Technical Contacts: D. R. Hunter, Region III (312) 790-5555 R. J. Kiessel, IE (301) 492-8119 Attachments: 1. Anchor/Darling Check Valves with Dual Seat Design 2. List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices . Attachment 1 IN 84-12 February 27, 1984 Page 1 of 4 ANCHOR/DARLING CHECK VALVES WITH DUAL SEAT DESIGN VALVE DESCRIPTION ANSI UTILITY, DATE, PRESSURE AND FACILITY QUANTITY SIZE CLASS (NO.) DESIGN BOSTON EDISON 3-77, Pilgrim 1 4 18" 900 Tilting Disc Check CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT 9-79, Brunswick 1 & 2 2 18" 900 Tilting Disc Check 3-80, Brunswick 1 & 2 2 18" 900 Tilting Disc Check COMMONWEALTH EDISON 8-80, LaSalle 1 & 2 4 24" 1500 Tilting Disc Check NORTHEAST UTILITIES 9-80, Millstone 1 4 18" 1500 Swing Check NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER 1-81, Cooper Nuclear 4 18" 900 Tilting Disc Check FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT 1-81, Turkey Point 2 2 1/2" 150 Swing Check DUKE POWER 6-81, Oconee 6 24" 900 Tilting Disc Check PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT 6-81, Susquehanna 4 24" 900 Tilting Disc Check . Attachment 1 IN 84-12 February 27, 1984 Page 2 of 4 ANCHOR/DARLING CHECK VALVES WITH DUAL SEAT DESIGN VALVE DESCRIPTION ANSI UTILITY, DATE, PRESSURE AND FACILITY QUANTITY SIZE CLASS (NO.) DESIGN COMMONWEALTH EDISON 6-81, LaSalle 1 & 2 2 10" 150 T-Globe VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER 8-81, Vermont Yankee 4 16" 900 Swing Check TVA 10-81, Sequoyah 1 & 2 4 8" 150 Tilting Disc Check 4 6" 150 Tilting Disc Check 10-81, Watts Bar 1 & 2 4 8" 150 Tilting Disc Check 4 6" 150 Tilting Disc Check ILLINOIS POWER 7-82, Clinton 2 18" 1500 Tilting Disc Check CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT 7-82, Brunswick 1 & 2 2 8" 150 Angle Globe GEORGIA POWER 9-82, Hatch 1 & 2 2 20" x 16" x 20" 150 Y-Globe 2 10" x 8" x 10" 150 Y-Globe . Attachment 1 IN 84-12 February 27, 1984 Page 3 of 4 ANCHOR/DARLING CHECK VALVES WITH DUAL SEAT DESIGN VALVE DESCRIPTION ANSI UTILITY, DATE, PRESSURE AND FACILITY QUANTITY SIZE CLASS (NO.) DESIGN BOSTON EDISON 9-82, Pilgrim 1 1 20" 150 Y-Globe Stop 1 8" 150 Y-Globe Stop SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9-82, San Onofre 1 2 1/2" 150 T-Globe ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT 11-82, Arkansas Nuclear 2 4" 600 T-Globe One PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT 12-82, Susquehanna 1 20" 150 T-Globe 1 10" 150 T-Globe LONG ISLAND LIGHTING 1-83, Shoreham 2 18" 150 Y-Globe 2 8" 150 Y-Globe WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1-83, WNP-2 4 24" 900 Swing Check CONSUMERS POWER 1-83, Big Rock Point 1 10" 1500 Swing Check DETROIT EDISON 2-83, Enrico Fermi 2 1 20" 150 Y-Globe 1 10" 150 Y-Globe . Attachment 1 IN 84-12 February 27, 1984 Page 4 of 4 ANCHOR/DARLING CHECK VALVES WITH DUAL SEAT DESIGN VALVE DESCRIPTION ANSI UTILITY, DATE, PRESSURE AND FACILITY QUANTITY SIZE CLASS (NO.) DESIGN DUKE POWER 2-83, Oconee 3 6" 630 Swing Check TVA 3-83, Browns Ferry 12 3/4" 1500 Swing Check WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM 4-83, WNP-2 1 10" 150 T-Globe DETROIT EDISON 5-83, Enrico Fermi 2 2 24" 900 Swing Check 4 20" 900 Swing Check 2 12" 900 Swing Check CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC 6-83, W. H. Zimmer 1 8" 150 T-Globe 6-83, W. H. Zimmer 1 6" 1500 Tilting Disc Check DETROIT EDISON 10-83, Enrico Fermi 2 1 4" 900 Swing Check 2 1 1/2" 900 Swing Check 2 6" 150 Swing Check
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 22, 2015
Home
About Us
Popular Documents
Stay Connected
