[Senate Report 117-36]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 115
117th Congress } { Report
SENATE
1st Session } { 117-36
======================================================================
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2022
_______
August 4, 2021.--Ordered to be printed
_______
Mrs. Feinstein, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the
following
REPORT
[To accompany S. 2605]
The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2605)
making appropriations for energy and water development and
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022,
and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and
recommends that the bill do pass.
New obligational authority
Total of bill as reported to the Senate................. $56,865,791,000
Amount of 2021 appropriations........................... 49,524,875,000
Amount of 2021 budget estimate.......................... 55,472,849,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
2021 appropriations................................. +7,340,916,000
2022 budget estimate................................ +1,392,942,000
CONTENTS
----------
Page
Purpose.......................................................... 4
Summary of Estimates and Recommendations......................... 4
Introduction..................................................... 4
Title I:
Department of Defense--Civil: Department of the Army:
Corps of Engineers--Civil:
Investigations....................................... 11
Construction......................................... 20
Mississippi River and Tributaries.................... 30
Operation and Maintenance............................ 32
Regulatory Program................................... 54
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...... 54
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies................ 54
Expenses............................................. 54
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil
Works)............................................. 55
Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program.. 55
General Provisions--Corps of Engineers--Civil............ 56
Title II:
Department of the Interior:
Central Utah Project Completion Account.................. 57
Bureau of Reclamation:
Water and Related Resources.......................... 58
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.............. 68
Gross Appropriation.................................. 68
California Bay-Delta Restoration..................... 68
Policy and Administration............................ 69
General Provisions--Department of the Interior........... 69
Title III:
Department of Energy:
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy................... 75
Sustainable Transportation............................... 77
Renewable Energy......................................... 81
Corporate Support........................................ 90
Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response... 91
Energy Delivery Grid Operations Technology............... 94
Nuclear Energy........................................... 97
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves................... 108
Strategic Petroleum Reserve.............................. 108
SPR Petroleum Account.................................... 108
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve....................... 108
Energy Information Administration........................ 108
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 108
Science.................................................. 109
Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy................ 116
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program............. 117
Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program.. 117
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program..................... 118
Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs.............. 118
Departmental Administration.............................. 119
Office of the Inspector General.......................... 120
Weapons Activities....................................... 120
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation......................... 122
Naval Reactors........................................... 123
Federal Salaries and Expenses............................ 123
Defense Environmental Cleanup............................ 123
Defense Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and
Decommissioning........................................ 124
Other Defense Activities................................. 125
Power Marketing Administrations:
Operations and Maintenance, Southeastern Power
Administration..................................... 125
Operations and Maintenance, Southwestern Power
Administration..................................... 125
Construction, Rehabilitation, Operations and
Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration..... 125
Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund.... 125
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission..................... 126
General Provisions--Department of Energy................. 154
Title IV:
Independent Agencies:
Appalachian Regional Commission.......................... 155
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.................. 155
Delta Regional Authority................................. 156
Denali Commission........................................ 156
Northern Border Regional Commission...................... 156
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission................... 156
Southwest Border Regional Commission..................... 157
Nuclear Regulatory Commission............................ 157
Office of Inspector General.......................... 158
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board..................... 159
General Provisions........................................... 159
Title V: General Provisions...................................... 160
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 161
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules
of the
Senate......................................................... 162
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 162
Budgetary Impact of Bill......................................... 165
Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Item............. 166
Comparative Statement of Budget Authority........................ 176
PURPOSE
The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for
fiscal year 2022, beginning October 1, 2021 and ending
September 30, 2022, for energy and water development, and for
other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources
development programs and related activities of the Corps of
Engineers' civil works program in title I; for the Department
of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation and Central Utah
Project in title II; for the Department of Energy's energy
research and development activities, including environmental
restoration and waste management, and the atomic energy defense
activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in
title III; and for independent agencies and commissions,
including the Appalachian Regional Commission, Delta Regional
Authority, Denali Commission, Northern Border Regional
Commission, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in title IV.
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The fiscal year 2022 budget estimates for the bill total
$53,624,824,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The
recommendation of the Committee totals $53,625,000,000. This is
$176,000 above the budget estimates and $1,873,000,000 above
the enacted appropriation for the prior fiscal year. The bill
also recommends $450,000,000 in emergency appropriations.
Subcommittee Hearings
To develop this recommendation, the Committee held two
budget hearings in June 2021 in connection with the fiscal year
2022 budget requests. The hearings provided officials from the
agencies with an opportunity to present the administration's
most pressing priorities to the Committee.
INTRODUCTION
The Committee's recommendation includes funding for the
highest priority activities across the agencies funded in the
bill. The recommendation includes funds for critical water
infrastructure, including our Nation's inland waterways, ports,
and harbors; agricultural water supply and drought relief in
the West; groundbreaking scientific research and development,
including world-class supercomputing; support for the Nation's
nuclear weapons, non-proliferation, and nuclear Navy programs;
and critical economic development.
TITLE I
CORPS OF ENGINEERS-CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $8,700,000,000 for the Corps of
Engineers [Corps]. The Committee's recommendation sets
priorities by supporting our Nation's water infrastructure.
Specifically, for the eighth consecutive year, the Committee
recommendation provides adequate appropriations to utilize all
of the estimated fiscal year 2022 revenues from the Inland
Waterways Trust Fund [IWTF].
INTRODUCTION
The Corps' Civil Works mission is to provide quality,
responsive engineering services to the Nation in peace and war.
Approximately 23,000 civilians and about 290 military officers
are responsible for executing the Civil Works mission. This
bill only funds the Civil Works functions of the Corps.
The Corps maintains our inland waterways, keeps our ports
open, manages a portion of our drinking water supply, provides
emission-free electricity from dams, restores aquatic
ecosystems, looks after many of our recreational waters, helps
manage the river levels during flooding, provides environmental
stewardship, and provides emergency response to natural
disasters. The annual net economic benefit generated by the
Corps' civil works mission is estimated to be $89,000,000,000,
which equates to a return of about $12.00 for every $1.00
expended.
The Corps' responsibilities include:
--Navigation systems, including 13,000 miles of coastal
navigation channels, 12,000 miles of inland waterways,
239 lock chambers, and 1,067 harbors, which handle over
2.4 billion tons of cargo annually;
--Flood risk management infrastructure, including 718 dams,
12,400 miles of levees, and multiple hurricane and
storm damage risk reduction projects along the coast;
--Municipal and industrial water supply storage at 136
projects spread across 25 States;
--Environmental stewardship, infrastructure, and ecosystem
restoration;
--Recreation for approximately 262 million recreation visits
per year to Corps projects;
--Regulation of waters under Federal statutes; and
--Maintaining hydropower capacity of nearly 24,000 megawatts
at 75 projects.
BUDGET STRUCTURE CHANGES
The fiscal year 2022 budget request for the Corps proposed
numerous structural changes, including the creation of two new
accounts--Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund [HMTF] and IWTF; the
shifting of various studies and projects between accounts and
business lines; and the consolidation of certain line items.
The Committee rejects all such proposed changes and instead
recommends funding for the requested studies and projects in
the manner in which funding has traditionally been provided.
Unless expressly noted, the Committee recommends studies and
projects remain at the funding levels included in the budget
request, but in different accounts than in the budget request.
In particular:
--Projects requested in the HMTF account are shown in the
Construction, Mississippi River and Tributaries, or
Operation and Maintenance accounts, as appropriate;
--Sand mitigation projects requested in the HMTF account are
shown in the Construction account;
--Interagency and International Support activities is not
consolidated within the Coordination with Other Water
Resource Agencies remaining item in Investigations;
--Disposition studies will continue to be funded under the
remaining item line Disposition of Completed Projects
in the Investigations account;
--Tribal Partnership projects will continue to be funded
under the Tribal Partnership Program remaining item
line in the Investigations account as well as in the
remaining line item in the Construction account, and
these amounts may also be used to cover necessary
administrative expenses prior to agreement execution;
--Inspection of Completed Works, Project Condition Surveys,
and Scheduling of Reservoir Operations will continue to
be funded under States instead of consolidated into a
national program as requested in the Operation and
Maintenance account and the HMTF account; and
--Inspection of Completed Works will continue to be funded
under the individual States instead of consolidated
into a national program as requested in the Mississippi
River and Tributaries account.
If the Corps proposes budget structure changes in future
fiscal years, the proposal shall be accompanied by a display of
the funding request in the traditional budget structure.
CONTINUING RESOLUTION APPORTIONMENT
For the purposes of continuing resolutions starting in
fiscal year 2018, the Office of Management and Budget changed
the longstanding policy by which funding is apportioned to the
Civil Works program of the Corps. Under the new policy, funding
within an individual account was apportioned separately for
amounts from the general fund of the Treasury and from various
trust funds. The Committee has long intended the Corps to have
the flexibility to address projects most in need of funding
under a continuing resolution. The creation of artificial
accounting distinctions has the potential to cause serious
impediments to the efficient and effective implementation of
the Civil Works program. For example, work on many navigation
projects is limited by environmental or other regulatory
windows. Further limitations imposed by separately apportioning
HMTF monies could cause serious disruptions to the economic
activity that depends on these navigation channels.
For these reasons, the Committee disagrees with the change
in apportionment policy and directs the Administration to
follow the previous policy during any continuing resolutions
that may occur in this or any future fiscal years.
DEEP DRAFT NAVIGATION
The CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) made certain changes to
the methods by which funds from the HMTF are treated under
discretionary budget rules. The Committee recommends an
estimated $2,050,000,000 in accordance with these changes. This
funding will enable the Corps to make significant progress on
the backlog of dredging needs. Meeting these needs, including
deeper drafts to accommodate the move toward larger ships, will
be essential if the Nation is to remain competitive in
international markets and to continue advancing economic
development and job creation domestically.
Additionally, the Water Resources Development Act [WRDA] of
2020 made certain changes to the methods by which funds for
donor and energy transfer ports under section 2106(c) of the
Water Resources Reform and Development Act [WRRDA] of 2014 are
treated under discretionary budget rules. The Committee
recommends $50,000,000 for these purposes.
INLAND WATERWAYS SYSTEM
The Committee is disappointed and perplexed by the budget
request's proposal to not fund any ongoing work and only spend
$52,150,000 of the estimated $115,000,000 of deposits for
fiscal year 2022 into the IWTF. The Corps shall continue to
prioritize funding for ongoing construction projects. The
inland waterways system is essential for national security and
for sustaining our global economic competitiveness as it serves
as an integral component of the Nation's intermodal
transportation system. Waterways are more efficient compared to
alternative forms of freight transportation because barge
transport allows for the movement of more cargo per shipment.
Barges on the inland system transport many commodities
including coal, petroleum, grain, and other farm products. The
importance of modernizing inland waterway infrastructure is so
important to these commercial users that they advocated for an
increase to the fees they pay into the IWTF in 2014. Congress
instituted this increase and took additional actions that
allowed for two priority projects, the Olmsted Lock and Dam in
Kentucky and the Lower Monongahela in Pennsylvania, to be
funded to completion in fiscal year 2020. The success of this
approach and the strategic importance of the inland waterway
system is the reason the Committee does not understand why the
administration would propose to delay progress by eliminating
funding for ongoing construction projects. The budget request
disregards the existing Capital Investment Strategy and the
advice and recommendations of industry experts and professional
engineers. Therefore, the Committee recommends appropriations
that make full use of all estimated revenues from the IWTF for
ongoing construction projects.
ADDITIONAL FUNDING
The Committee recommends funding above the budget request
for Investigations, Construction, Operation and Maintenance,
Mississippi River and Tributaries, Regulatory, and Expenses.
This funding is for additional work (including new starts) that
either was not included in the budget request or was
inadequately budgeted. A study or project may not be excluded
from evaluation for additional funding due to its inconsistency
with administration policy. None of the funds may be used for
any item for which the Committee has specifically denied
funding.
The Committee includes the seven new start Investigations
projects and four new start Construction projects proposed in
the budget request without change. The Committee also includes
additional new starts in Investigations and Construction. No
further new starts are recommended in this act.
The Administration is reminded these funds are in addition
to its budget request, and Administration budget metrics shall
not be a reason to disqualify a study or project from being
funded. The focus of the allocation process shall favor the
obligation, rather than the expenditure, of funds for work in
fiscal year 2022.
Funding associated with each category of Additional Funding
may be allocated to any eligible study or project, as
appropriate, within that category; funding associated with each
subcategory may be allocated only to eligible studies or
projects, as appropriate, within that subcategory.
Work Plan.--Not later than 60 days after the date of
enactment of this act, the Corps shall provide to the Committee
a work plan consistent with the following general guidance, as
well as the specific direction the Committee provides within
each account: (1) a detailed description of the rating
system(s) developed and used to evaluate studies and projects;
(2) delineation of how these funds are to be allocated; (3) a
summary of the work to be accomplished with each allocation,
including phase of work and the study or project's remaining
cost to complete (excluding Operation and Maintenance); and (4)
a list of all studies and projects that were considered
eligible for funding but did not receive funding, including an
explanation of whether the study or project could have used
funds in fiscal year 2022 and the specific reasons each study
or project was considered less competitive for an allocation of
funds.
The administration shall not delay apportioning the funding
for Congressionally Directed Spending while developing the work
plan for additional funding. The initiation of construction of
an individually authorized project funded within a programmatic
line item shall not require a new start designation if some
amount of construction funding under such programmatic line
item was appropriated and expended during the previous fiscal
year. A study is not completed until preconstruction
engineering and design [PED] is completed. The Committee urges
the Corps within its Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction
mission to strive for a balance between inland and coastal
projects. The Corps is encouraged to support opportunities to
restore critical habitat and enhance the Nation's economic
development, job growth, and international competitiveness.
The following shall not require a new start or new
investment decision and shall be considered ongoing work:
--When moving from feasibility to PED;
--To initiate work on a separable element of a project when
construction of one or more separable elements of that
project was initiated previously;
--Any authorized environmental infrastructure project;
--Study or construction activities related to individual
projects authorized under section 1037 of WRRDA;
--Work undertaken to correct a design deficiency on an
existing Federal project; and
--Projects that have previously received construction funding
for authorized work.
INVASIVE CARP
The Corps is undertaking multiple efforts to stop invasive
carp from reaching the Great Lakes. These actions are critical
to protecting the Great Lakes ecosystem and the $7,000,000,000
recreational fishing and $16,000,000,000 boating industries.
Last year, the Corps sent Congress an approved Chief's Report
for a plan to build a comprehensive suite of measures to
counter invasive carp at the Brandon Road Lock and Dam, a
critical choke point to halt the spread of invasive species in
the Illinois River. The Committee is encouraged to see funding
is included in the fiscal year 2022 budget request to continue
work on PED.
As the Corps prioritizes projects, it shall consider
critical projects to prevent the spread of invasive species.
The Corps is directed to provide quarterly updates to the
Committee on the progress and status of efforts to prevent the
further spread of invasive carp including the Brandon Road
Recommended Plan and the second array at the Chicago Sanitary
and Ship Canal; the location and density of carp populations;
the use of emergency procedures previously authorized by the
Congress; and the development, consideration, and
implementation of new technological and structural
countermeasures; and the progress on PED work.
The Corps shall continue to collaborate at levels
commensurate with previous years with the U.S. Coast Guard, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the State of Illinois, and
members of the Invasive Carp Regional Coordinating Committee,
including identifying navigation protocols that would be
beneficial or effective in reducing the risk of vessels
inadvertently carrying aquatic invasive species, including
invasive carp, through the Brandon Road Lock and Dam in Joliet,
Illinois. Any findings of such an evaluation shall be included
in the quarterly briefings to the Committees. The Corps is
further directed to implement navigation protocols shown to be
effective at reducing the risk of entrainment without
jeopardizing the safety of vessels and crews. The Corps shall
brief the Committee on such navigation protocols and potential
solutions within 30 days of enactment of this act.
ADVANCED FUNDS AGREEMENTS
Under the advanced funds authority, the Corps is authorized
to accept, from a State or political subdivision thereof, all
funds covering both the Federal and non-Federal share of total
project costs required to construct an authorized water
resources development project or separable element thereof.
Based on the non-Federal sponsor's commitment to provide all
funds required to construct a project, or separable element
thereof, the Corps may undertake construction of the project
prior to a new start determination related to Federal funding
for the project. In light of a non-Federal sponsor's commitment
to provide all funding required for construction of the
project, or separable element thereof, the Committee directs
that Federal funds shall not be provided for such construction.
Instead, for such projects, any Federal funding may be provided
only after completion of construction, as repayment of the
Federal share of such construction, from funding provided in
this or subsequent acts for reimbursements or repayments, and
would be subject to a new start designation. The Committee does
not intend that this direction apply to any project with an
advanced funds project partnership agreement was in place prior
to December 20, 2019.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING
The Committee included congressionally directed spending,
as defined in section 5(a) of rule XLIV of the Standing Rules
of the Senate. The Committee funded only projects and studies
that are authorized by law. In the interest of providing full
disclosure of funding provided in this Title, all projects
requested and funded are listed in a table accompanying this
report. All of the projects funded in this report have gone
through the same rigorous process and approvals as those
proposed by the President.
CONTINUING CONTRACTS
The Corps is authorized by section 621 of title 33, United
States Code to execute its Civil Works projects through the use
of a Special Continuing Contract Clause as described in
Engineering Circulars 11-2-221 and 11-2-222. This permits the
Corps to award the entire contract and fund the contract
incrementally until completion. This acquisition strategy is
well-suited to large, multi-year projects, including those with
life safety, national security, or legal concerns, and is being
used successfully at multiple projects nationwide. The
Administration is directed to resume using its existing
continuing contract authorities in accordance with the general
provisions in this act as an efficient approach to managing
large, multi-year projects.
UPDATED CAPABILITIES
Given the nature of the Civil Works program, the Committee
understands the assumptions made in the budget request
regarding the amount of work that can be accomplished in fiscal
year 2022 for a particular project can change for a number of
unforeseen reasons. The Committee expects updated capabilities
will be addressed and adjusted during conference using the
latest data available at that time.
REPROGRAMMING
The Committee is retaining the reprogramming legislation
provided in the Energy and Water Development and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 116-94).
REPORTING REQUIREMENT
The Corps shall provide a quarterly report to the
Committee, which includes the total budget authority and
unobligated balances by year for each program, project, or
activity, including any prior year appropriations.
The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) shall
provide a quarterly report to the Committee, which includes the
total budget authority and unobligated balances by year for
each activity funded in the Office of the Assistant Secretary
of the Army (Civil Works) account, including any prior year
appropriations.
INVESTIGATIONS
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $153,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 105,837,000
Committee recommendation................................ 153,000,000
The Committee recommends $153,000,000 for Investigations.
Funding in this account is used to develop feasibility studies
and conduct PED to address the Nation's water infrastructure
needs, in support of project authorization.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The table below displays the budget request and the
Committee's recommendation for Investigations:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--INVESTIGATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget Committee
Project title estimate recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
CLAIRBORNE AND MILLERS FERRY LOCKS 600 600
AND DAMS (FISH PASSAGE), LOWER
ALABAMA RIVER, AL.................
TENNESSEE TOMBIGBEE AND BLACK .............. 400
WARRIOR TOMBIGBEE DEEPENING STUDY,
AL & MS...........................
ALASKA
AKUTAN HARBOR NAVIGATIONAL 100 ..............
IMPROVEMENTS, AK..................
ELIM SUBSISTENCE HARBOR, AK........ 2,000 2,000
LOWELL CREEK FLOOD DIVERSION, AK... .............. 3,000
ARIZONA
LITTLE COLORADO RIVER, WINSLOW, AZ. .............. 500
CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA 565 ..............
(CHANNELS), CA....................
LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM 1,693 1,693
RESTORATION, CA...................
LOWER CACHE CREEK, CA.............. .............. 2,000
LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA (GENERAL 600 600
REEVALUATION REPORT)..............
LOWER SAN JOAQUIN (LATHROP & .............. 200
MANTECA), CA......................
MURRIETA CREEK, CA (GENERAL 600 600
REEVALUATION REPORT)..............
IMPERIAL STREAMS SALTON SEA, CA.... .............. 200
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE .............. 750
(OCEANSIDE), CA...................
SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA.............. .............. 200
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE .............. 1,600
(SANTA CLARA COUNTY), CA..........
CONNECTICUT
HARTFORD, CT & EAST HARTFORD, CT... .............. 200
COLORADO
ADAMS & DENVER SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, .............. 400
CO................................
FLORIDA
CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA (C&SF) 500 500
FLOOD RESILIENCY (SECTION 216)
STUDY, FL.........................
HAWAII
HONOLULU HARBOR MODIFICATION .............. 800
FEASIBILITY STUDY, HI.............
IDAHO
BOISE RIVER, GARDEN CITY, ADA 500 500
COUNTY, ID........................
ILLINOIS
CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL (GENERAL 500 500
REEVALUATION REPORT)..............
IL RIVER 519 FOX RIVER DAMS .............. 250
RESTORATION, IL...................
GREAT LAKES COASTAL RESILIENCY 500 500
STUDY, IL, IN, MI, MN, NY, OH, PA
and WI............................
INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES-- 4,940 4,940
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AQUATIC NUISANCE
SPECIES, IL, IN, OH & WI..........
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 700 ..............
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR
PORTION), IL......................
UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER FLOODING & .............. 1,525
RESTORATION, IL...................
KANSAS
LOWER MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, KS, MO 600 600
and IA............................
LOUISIANA
PORT FOURCHON BELLE PASS CHANNEL, .............. 1,500
LA................................
MICHIGAN
ALTAMAHA RIVER, OCONEE RIVER AND 100 ..............
OCMULGEE RIVERS, BELLVILLE POINT
HARBOR, DARIEN HARBOR, FANCY BLUFF
CREEK, SAPELO HARBOR, SATILLA
RIVER AND ST MARYS RIVER
WATERWAYS, MI.....................
MINNESOTA
ST ANTHONY FALLS, MISSISSIPPI 250 ..............
RIVER, MN.........................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 1,650 ..............
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP
PORTION), MN......................
MISSOURI
LITTLE BLUE RIVER BASIN, JACKSON 600 600
COUNTY, MO........................
LOWER MISSOURI BASIN--BRUNSWICK L- .............. 500
246, MO...........................
LOWER MISSOURI BASIN--HOLT COUNTY, .............. 300
MO, DONIPHAN COUNTY, KS...........
LOWER MISSOURI BASIN--JEFFERSON .............. 300
CITY L-142, MO....................
NEW JERSEY
NEW JERSEY BACK BAYS, NJ........... 750 750
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY .............. 1,125
& NJ..............................
PECKMAN RIVER BASIN, NJ............ .............. 500
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, .............. 750
HIGHLANDS, NJ.....................
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK .............. 300
SUB-BASIN, NJ.....................
NEW YORK
HUDSON RARITAN ESTUARY ECOSYSTEM .............. 1,200
RESTORATION, NY & NJ..............
NEW YORK--NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND 1,450 1,450
TRIBUTARIES, NY and NJ............
SPRING CREEK SOUTH, JAMAICA BAY 500 500
(HOWARD BEACH), QUEENS, NY........
NORTH CAROLINA
WILMINGTON NAVIGATION HARBOR .............. 500
IMPROVEMENTS, NC..................
OHIO
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH............... 300 ..............
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH............... 300 ..............
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH................ 300 ..............
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH................ 300 ..............
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH................ 300 ..............
OKLAHOMA
ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION, MKARNS .............. 500
12-FT CHANNEL, OK.................
OPTIMA LAKE, OK.................... 200 ..............
OREGON
COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY 2024 10,000 ..............
IMPLEMENTATION, OR & WA...........
WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL .............. 732
DREDGING, OR......................
PUERTO RICO
CANO MARTIN PENA ECOSYSTEM 2,150 2,150
RESTORATION, PR...................
RHODE ISLAND
LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY, RI........ 500 500
SOUTH CAROLINA
PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC.............. 342 ..............
WACCAMAW RIVER, HORRY COUNTY, SC... 500 500
SOUTH DAKOTA
WATERTOWN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, SD .............. 200
TENNESSEE
HATCHIE/LOOSAHATCHIE, MISSISSIPPI 600 600
RIVER MILE 775-736 HABITAT
RESTORATION, TN & AR..............
TEXAS
ARKANSAS-RED RIVER CHLORIDE 343 ..............
CONTROL, AREA VIII, TX............
CITY OF EL PASO, TX................ 600 600
ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL 200 ..............
PROJECT, TX.......................
GIWW--BRAZOS RIVER FLOODGATES & 6,932 6,932
COLORADO RIVER LOCKS, TX..........
WESTSIDE CREEKS ECOSYSTEM 2,340 2,340
RESTORATION, SAN ANTONIO, TX......
VIRGIN ISLANDS
SAVAN GUT PHASE II, ST THOMAS, VI.. 3,777 3,777
WASHINGTON
COLUMBIA RIVER TURNING BASIN .............. 200
NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, WA & OR..
PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE .............. 250
HABITAT RESTORATION, WA...........
WEST VIRGINIA
KANAWHA RIVER BASIN FEASIBILITY, WV .............. 500
WISCONSIN
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI................ 300 ..............
MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI............... 300 ..............
MENOMINEE RIVER DEEPENING, WI...... .............. 200
OTTER CREEK WATERSHED WETLAND 75 ..............
RESTORATION, WI...................
WYOMING
LITTLE GOOSE CREEK, SHERIDAN, WY... 500 500
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, ITEMS UNDER STATES. 50,857 55,814
REMAINING ITEMS
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK .............. 9,513
FLOOD AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION... .............. ..............
FLOOD CONTROL...................... .............. ..............
SHORE PROTECTION................... .............. ..............
NAVIGATION......................... .............. ..............
COASTAL AND DEEP-DRAFT............. .............. ..............
INLAND............................. .............. ..............
OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSES.. .............. ..............
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OR .............. ..............
COMPLIANCE........................
ACCESS TO WATER DATA............... 325 325
AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS 250 250
SUPPORT TRI-CADD..................
COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION...... 1,500 3,000
COORDINATION WITH OTHER WATER 450 450
RESOURCE AGENCIES.................
DISPOSITION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS.. .............. 1,657
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES......... 80 80
FERC LICENSING..................... 100 100
FLOOD DAMAGE DATA.................. 275 275
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES.... 15,400 15,400
HYDROLOGIC STUDIES................. 500 500
INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES........ 100 100
INTERAGENCY WATER RESOURCE 75 75
DEVELOPMENT.......................
INVENTORY OF DAMS.................. 400 400
NATIONAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT 6,500 6,500
PROGRAM...........................
NATIONAL SHORELINE MANAGEMENT STUDY .............. 1,500
PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES...... 7,000 11,000
PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM........... 3,500 3,500
PRECIPITATION STUDIES.............. 150 150
REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHIC 75 75
INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT........
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........... 15,000 35,000
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL 50 50
INFORMATION CENTERS...............
SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS............. 750 750
STREAM GAGING...................... 1,500 1,500
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS............. 1,000 1,000
TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM......... .............. 4,036
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS.... 54,980 97,186
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
GRAND TOTAL.................. 105,837 153,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funded in remaining items
Funded in a remaining item in another account
*Includes funds requested in Projects Listed Under States within this
account
Arkansas Red River Chloride.--The Committee rejects the
budget request to fund a disposition study of this project. The
Corps is directed to brief the Committee within 60 days of
enactment on the status of the project.
Bubbly Creek.--The Committee is disappointed that
negotiations between the Corps, the Environmental Protection
Agency, and the Department of Justice over remaining liability
concerns have yet to produce an outcome that will allow the
project to move forward. The Committee urges the parties to
expedite a resolution and directs the Corps to brief the
Committee within 90 days of enactment.
Chicago River.--The Committee urges the Corps to work with
the City of Chicago River Ecology and Governance Task Force
towards a comprehensive ecosystem restoration project for the
restoration of the Chicago River. The Corps is encouraged to
consider including funding for this study in future budget
submissions.
Chicago Shoreline.--The Committee remains concerned that
lake levels in the Great Lakes are predicted to surpass record
high levels and strongly encourages the Corps to reevaluate the
conclusions of the original feasibility report to assess
Federal interest in providing additional coastal protection
along the Chicago shoreline. The Committee reminds the Corps
that the Chicago Shoreline can be a focus area of the Great
Lakes Resiliency Study.
Coastal Field Data Collection.--The Committee strongly
supports this program and the Corps' commitment to collect and
maintain wave data, water level data, and other data critical
to making informed decisions in our coastal areas. The
Committee is concerned about the ability of the Corps to meets
its obligation to maintain this critical capability at the
proposed funding levels. Therefore, the Committee recommends an
additional $1,500,000 above the budget request amount of
$1,500,000 to continue data collection and research on the
impact of extreme storms in coastal regions. Additionally, with
the funds provided, the committee encourages the Corps to
evaluate the readiness of the unique facilities and equipment
necessary to support this effort and to include increased
funding in future budget submissions in order to revitalize and
modernize facilities and equipment in support of this program.
Flood Policy in Urban Areas.--The Committee has continually
requested the Flood Policy in Urban Areas report as detailed in
by section 1211 of America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018
(Public Law 115-270) [AWIA 2018]. The Corps is reminded that
this report can be completed using existing funds and
encourages the Corps to include reporting requirements in
future budget submissions, if needed. The Committee directs the
Corps, to provide a briefing on the findings of this report
within 45 days of enactment.
Inland Navigation Modernization Projects.--The Corps is
urged to continue PED activities on inland modernization
projects to prevent delays to project delivery and prepare
projects for construction.
McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System [MKARNS].--
The MKARNS is an established Marine Highway for waterborne
commerce, relieving our Nation's highways and bridges from
additional congestion and wear and tear. MKARNS supports
economic activity across a 12-State region, moving 11 million
tons of commerce worth $4,000,000,000 annually. MKARNS is a
vital corridor for agriculture commerce (soybeans and wheat)
and aggregate commodities (sand, gravel, and rock) from the
Gulf Coast to the Mid-West. Farmers and ranchers rely on its
availability year round to move crops to markets in all seasons
and facilitate the movement of fertilizer domestically to
prepare for the growing season each year.
MKARNS needs to be deepened with a consistent 12-foot
navigation channel to provide tow drafts that are more
compatible with navigation on the Mississippi River. The
current disparity results in less efficient barge operations
and higher transportation costs. The Committee understands this
project has capability to complete economic impacts and
environmental updates and strongly urges the Corps to
prioritize this effort in fiscal year 2022 to continue
construction as soon as practicable. The Committee continues to
encourage the Corps to provide funds for non-structural
activities, such as channel deepening, with low annual funding
needs in years where appropriated funds for IWTF cost shared
projects are sufficient to accommodate such projects without
impacting ongoing construction projects. The Corps shall brief
the Committee within 90 days of enactment of this act on
section 159 of WRDA 2020.
Finally, the Committee encourages the Corps to prioritize
inland waterways projects consistent with the update to the
Capital Investment Strategy, pursuant to section 2002(d) of
WRRDA 2014.
McMicken Dam, Arizona.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of the McMicken Dam project in providing flood
protection to the region, including Luke Air Force Base, which
delivers national security benefits to the Nation. The Corps is
reminded to consider the value of national security in
prioritizing and formulating studies and projects.
New York-New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries Study.--The
Committee appreciates that the budget request includes
$1,450,000 to continue this study. The Committee expects the
Corps to vigorously engage community groups and incorporate
impacts of low-frequency precipitation and impacts of sea level
rise in the study. The Corps is directed to brief the Committee
within 45 days of enactment of this act on how it plans to
follow these steps.
North Atlantic Division Report on Hurricane Barriers and
Harbors of Refuge.--The Committee continues to express the
importance of the North Atlantic Division report on hurricane
barriers and harbors of refuge mandated under Section 1218 of
AWIA 2018. The Corps is reminded that this report can be
completed using existing funds and encourages the Corps to
include reporting requirements in future budget requests, if
needed. Within 90 days of enactment of this act, the Corps
shall brief the Committee on the status and path forward for
the report.
Planning Assistance to States.--The Corps is reminded that
this program encompasses many types of studies and technical
assistance dealing with a number of water resource issues,
including but not limited to, sediment management, coastal
resilience, State water planning, water distribution, and water
supply evaluations.
Puget Sound Nearshore Study.--The Committee encourages the
Corps to proceed with the tiered implementation strategy using
all existing authorities as outlined in the Puget Sound
Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project Feasibility Study,
Completion Strategy Guidance dated June 2015. The Corps is
directed to recognize the Puget Sound Nearshore Study as the
feasibility component for the purposes of section 544 of WRDA
2000 (Public Law 106-541). The Committee notes that the Water
Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (Public Law 114-
332) [WIIN Act] authorized construction of the Puget Sound
Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project. The Committee reminds
the Corps that consistent with the direction in this report no
new start, new investment decision, or new phase decision shall
be required to continue this project in PED.
Research and Development--Future Work.--The Committee
appreciates and recognizes the value of research topics
currently being addressed by the Army Engineer Research and
Development Center [ERDC] towards advancing the Civil Works
missions of the Corps. The Committee understands that the ERDC
and the Corps have identified a series of critical research
categories that will advance the efficient implementation of
the Civil Works mission and provide value to the Nation. The
Committee also understands that responding to these research
needs can benefit the Corps by leveraging the expertise of
universities through partnerships. The Committee directs the
ERDC, within 90 days of enactment of this act, to brief the
Committee on future research needs (including multi-year
funding requirements) and potential university partnerships
related to its strategic goals.
Research and Development--Biopolymers.--The Committee
recommends $6,000,000 of additional funding to continue
research on the use of biopolymers to rehabilitate civil works
structures, reduce the costs of rehabilitating and maintaining
these structures, and increase resiliency of these structures
against potential threats. With continued funding, the
Committee understands this effort will be completed in 2 years.
Research and Development--Flood and Coastal Systems.--The
Committee recognizes the importance of ensuring the integrity
of our Nation's flood control systems and employing the most
effective technologies to identify potential deficiencies in
these systems. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 to utilize
partnerships to research and develop advanced technology to
automate assessment and inspection of flood control systems for
the purpose of identifying levee deficiencies, such as slope
instability, settlement and seepage, and ensuring the safety of
the surrounding areas and communities. Within 90 days of
enactment of this act, the Corps shall provide to the Committee
a proposal for this effort including a detailed scope of work
with a breakdown of research activities, work to be performed
by the Corps and academia, specific deliverables, and schedule
and funding requirements. Additionally, the Committee is
interested in how this work can contribute to existing
operations and maintenance activities and how potential
cybersecurity concerns can be addressed.
Research and Development--Freshwater Intrusion.--The
Committee recognizes the need to develop tools to assess,
forecast, and proactively manage the hydrodynamic and
environmental impacts of large-scale freshwater intrusion into
the Mississippi Sound and surrounding waters. These consistent
freshwater intrusions have been detrimental to the Mississippi
Sound and the U.S. blue economy. The Corps is encouraged to
partner with academia with expertise in coastal processes and
ocean and hydrodynamic modeling to develop these tools.
Research and Development--Geophysical Modeling.--Rising sea
levels and the increasing severity and frequency of weather
events continues to impact coastlines, rivers, and related
habitats. Additional funding of $4,000,000 is provided to
continue research using geophysical computational modeling. The
Committee understands that with continued funding this effort
will be completed in 3 years.
Research and Development--Oyster Restoration.--The
Committee recognizes the importance of sustainable oyster reefs
for maintaining healthy ecosystems, protecting coastal
infrastructure and supporting commercial fisheries. Recent
restoration efforts have not achieved the intended success for
U.S. oyster populations, and the identification of effective
restoration strategies remains a critical gap. The Committee
recommends additional funding of $2,600,000 to continue the
oyster reef restoration research and understands this effort
will be completed in fiscal year 2022.
Research and Development--Polymer Composites.--The
Committee recognizes that polymer composites have wide-ranging
proven characteristics including lightweight, high strength,
corrosion resistance, and long-term durability that could
translate to increased safety for inland waterways
infrastructure. The Committee supports investigating the value
of incorporating polymer composites into infrastructure
applications in navigable waterways. Within 90 days of
enactment of this act, the Corps shall provide to the Committee
a proposal for this effort including a detailed scope of work,
a breakdown of research activities, work to be performed by the
Corps and academia, specific deliverables, and schedule and
funding requirements.
Research and Development--Subsurface Drains.--The Committee
understands the use of subsurface drain systems as a flood risk
reduction measure or coastal storm risk reduction measure are
currently not considered during project development. Within 90
days of enactment of this act, the Corps shall brief the
Committee on research and development opportunities of
subsurface drain systems pursuant to section 227 of WRDA 2020.
Research and Development--Urban Flood Damage Reduction and
Stream Restoration in Arid Regions.--The Committee recommends
additional funds of $2,000,000 to continue the work on the
management of water resources projects that promote public
safety, reduce risk, improve operational efficiencies, reduce
flood damage in arid and semi-arid regions, sustain the
environment, and position our water resources systems to be
managed as systems that are adaptable to the implications of a
changing climate. The research and development program shall
also continue its focus on science and technology efforts to
address needs for resilient water resources infrastructure. The
Committee understands that with continued funding this effort
will be complete in 3 years.
Shore Protection Easements.--The Committee notes the
importance of periodic restoration of the Shore Protection
Projects and their significance for the protection of public
safety, public infrastructure, native vegetation and wildlife,
as well as economy stability in oceanfront communities. The
Committee understands the challenges facing local governments
in obtaining the necessary approvals for required easements
when no work will be performed on the property for which the
easement is being required. The Committee encourages the Corps
to work with local governments to incorporate flexibility in
project agreement language that allows for incremental
acquisition of easements necessary for scheduled nourishments.
South Atlantic Coastal Study.--The Committee acknowledges
the importance of engaging state, local, and tribal officials
throughout the study process to ensure the methodology, focus,
and results are implementable by states and communities. The
Corps shall consult with industry groups, academia, and non-
governmental organizations who can provide specialized
expertise and coordinate appropriate attention and interest in
the study's design and implementation from relevant
stakeholders, including coastal state agencies, local
officials, and private coastal scientists and engineers. The
Committee encourages the Corps to consider near-shore marine
habitats including coral reefs and oyster reefs, as well as the
current and projected effects of authorized Corps environmental
restoration programs and projects, including South Florida
Ecosystem Restoration, within the scope of this comprehensive
study.
Upper Des Plaines River and Tributaries Project.--The
Committee is aware the project area was flooded with record
high crests overflowing the Des Plaines River, resulting in
damage to more than 3,200 residents. The Committee urges the
Corps to cooperate with the non-Federal sponsor to advance work
on the flood features of this project.
Tenkiller Ferry Lake.--Nothing in Section 204(b)(2)(H) of
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116-260)
is to be construed as to require a water reallocation study.
Water Quality and Salinity Impacts on Oyster Reefs.--The
Committee encourages the Corps, when conducting or reviewing
environmental assessments or environmental impact statements
for navigation or coastal restoration projects in areas where
oyster reefs exist, to consider water quality and salinity
impacts on those reefs and, when appropriate, to mitigate any
negative impacts.
Additional Funding.--The Corps is directed to allocate
these additional funds in accordance with the direction in the
front matter under the heading ``Additional Funding''. The
Corps is reminded that activities related to innovative
materials, as required under section 1208 of AWIA 2018, are
eligible for funding under the Research and Development
remaining item. The Committee urges the Corps to prioritize any
authorized projects that would reduce flood risks to vulnerable
communities, have been authorized based on their ability to
reduce life safety risks, have been classified by the Corps as
having a high risk of levee failure and life loss in the last
five fiscal years, and whose failure would cause a release of
hazardous materials from a Superfund site. Additionally, the
Corps shall comply with the following direction in allocating
funds recommended for Investigations:
--When evaluating ongoing studies for funding, the Corps
shall consider completing or accelerating ongoing
studies or initiating new studies that will enhance the
Nation's economic development, job growth, and
international competitiveness; are for projects located
in areas that have suffered recent natural disasters;
are for projects that protect life and property; or are
for projects to address legal requirements;
--The Corps is urged to consider any national security
benefits a project may provide when allocating this
funding; and
--The Corps shall include appropriate requests for funding in
future budget submissions for PED and new feasibility
studies initiated in fiscal year 2022. The Corps shall
prepare the budget to reflect study completions,
defined as completion of PED.
CONSTRUCTION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $2,692,645,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 1,792,378,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,002,003,000
The Committee recommends $3,002,003,000 for Construction.
Funding in this account is used for construction, major
rehabilitation, and related activities for water resources
development projects having navigation, flood and storm damage
reduction, water supply, hydroelectric, environmental
restoration, and other attendant benefits to the Nation. Funds
to be derived from the HMTF will be applied to cover the
Federal share of the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities
Program.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The table below displays the budget request and Committee's
recommendation for Construction:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS-CONSTRUCTION
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget Committee
Project title estimate recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ARKANSAS
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 96,850 149,000 *
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, THREE RIVERS,
AR................................
CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN RIVER COMMON FEATURES, 156,915 156,915
NATOMAS BASIN, CA.................
CALAVERAS COUNTY, SECTION 219, CA.. .............. 1,300
CITY OF NORWALK, SECTION 219, CA... .............. 250
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA............. .............. 250
HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS .............. 1,000
RESTORATION, CA...................
MILLS MEMORIAL PARK RECYCLED WATER, .............. 3,790
SECTION 219, CA...................
NEW RIVER, IMPERIAL COUNTY, CA..... .............. 650
ROSEVILLE-PCWA COOPERATIVE WATER .............. 75
RALIABILITY, CA...................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN 15,000 15,000
JOAQUIN, CA.......................
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA................ 17,900 17,900
WHITTIER NARROWS, CA (DAM SAFETY).. 219,591 219,591
COLORADO
SECTION 219, CROWLEY COUNTY, CO.... .............. 7,000
DELAWARE
DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE...... .............. 1,200
DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO .............. 4,000
FENWICK ISLAND, DE................
DELAWARE COAST, REHOBOTH BEACH TO .............. 7,650
DEWEY BEACH, DE...................
FLORIDA
SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 350,000 350,000
(EVERGLADES), FL..................
GEORGIA
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA...... 24,000 24,000
ILLINOIS
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN .............. 9,100 *
CHICAGO SANITARY & SHIP CANAL 12,948 12,948
DISPERSAL BARRIERS, IL............
MADISON & ST CLAIR COUNTIES, IL.... .............. 6,025
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER--ILLINOIS .............. 45,100
WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI....
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER 33,170 33,170
RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO and WI
INDIANA
INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL .............. 18,395 *
FACILITY, IN......................
IOWA
MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 8,075 8,075
RECOVERY, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE, ND &
SD................................
LOUISIANA
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA....... .............. 9,000 *
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM 6,000 6,000
RESTORATION, LA...................
SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA .............. 10,000
HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA..........
MARYLAND
ANACOSTIA WATERSHED RESTORATION, 30,000 30,000
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MD........
ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD.............. .............. 600 *
CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL .............. 5,750
RESTORATION & PROTECTION, MD, VA &
PA................................
CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD 3,880 3,880
and VA............................
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL, .............. 390
CUMBERLAND, MD & RIDGELEY, WV.....
MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD...... .............. 37,500
POPLAR ISLAND, MD.................. .............. 4,200 *
MICHIGAN
SAULT STE MARIE (REPLACEMENT LOCK), 480,000 480,000
MI................................
MINNESOTA
SECTION 596, ENVIRONMENTAL .............. 2,000
INFRASTRUCTURE, CITY OF BIWABIK,
MN................................
SECTION 596, ENVIRONMENTAL .............. 2,000
INFRASTRUCTURE, VIRGINIA STREET,
MN................................
MISSOURI
MONARCH CHESTERFIELD, MO........... .............. 12,600
NEW JERSEY
DELWARE BAY COASTLINE, OAKWOOD .............. 5,000
BEACH, NJ.........................
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET AND PECK .............. 17,000
BEACH, NJ.........................
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK 30,000 30,000
SUB-BASIN, NJ.....................
TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, .............. 15,500
NJ................................
NEW MEXICO
ACEQUIAS ENVIRONMENTAL .............. 9,060
INFRASTRUCTURE, NM................
NORTH CAROLINA
CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, NC.... .............. 11,550
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC.............. .............. 22,000 *
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC............. .............. 9,295
NORTH DAKOTA
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND.................. 136,496 136,496
OHIO
OHIO RIVERFRONT, CINCINNATI, OH.... .............. 600
OKLAHOMA
TULSA AND WEST TULSA LEVEE SYSTEM.. .............. 13,789
OREGON
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & 25,609 25,609
WA................................
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE .............. 6,200
FALLS, OR.........................
PENNSYLVANIA
UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION (MONTGOMERY .............. 20,100
LOCK), PA.........................
SOUTH CAROLINA
LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SC...... .............. 18,000
VERMONT
LAKE CHAMPLAIN BASIN (SECTION 542), .............. 5,500
VT................................
VIRGINIA
NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VA 83,700 83,700
(DEEPENING).......................
WASHINGTON
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, 3,575 38,375
OR & ID (CRFM)....................
DALLES TRIBAL VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT .............. 1,200
PLAN, WA..........................
MOUNT ST HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, 29,749 29,749
WA................................
PUGET SOUND & ADAJACENT WATER .............. 5,000
RESTORATION (SPENCER ISLAND), WA..
WEST VIRGINIA
SHEPHERDSTOWN WATER WORKS .............. 1,668
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, SECTION 571,
WV................................
MARRTOWN SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION, .............. 3,200
SECTION 219, WV...................
WHEELING ELM RUN, WV............... .............. 546
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, ITEMS UNDER STATES. 1,750,510 2,205,441
REMAINING ITEMS
ADDITIONAL FUNDING
FLOOD AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION... .............. 154,000
FLOOD CONTROL.................. .............. 91,975
SHORE PROTECTION............... .............. 20,000
NAVIGATION......................... .............. 190,000
INLAND WATERWAYS TRUST FUND .............. 56,945
REVENUES......................
OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSES.. .............. 35,000
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OR .............. 60,000
COMPLIANCE........................
ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE....... .............. 50,000
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM...... .............. 26,000
BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL .............. 4,300
PILOT PROGRAM (SEC 1122)..........
SAN FRANCISCO BAY, CA.......... .............. (3600)
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 1,000 15,000
(SECTION 206).....................
BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL 1,000 10,000 *
(SECTION 204).....................
EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE .............. 10,000
PROTECTION (SECTION 14)...........
GLOUCESTER CITY SEAWALL (CAMDEN .............. (100)
COUNTY), NJ...................
GRAND RIVER BANK STREET, CITY .............. (2600)
OF PLAINESVILLE, OH...........
KANAWHA RIVER STREAMBANK .............. (4780)
STABILIZATION, WV.............
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SLOPE .............. (100)
STABILIZATION, MD.............
URI NARRAGANSETT EROSION .............. (150)
PROTECTION....................
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 1,000 17,000
205)..............................
LOWER SANTA CRUZ RIVER, ELOY .............. (100)
LEVEE, AZ.....................
MCCORMICK WASH, GLOBE, AZ...... .............. (100)
RIVER ROAD, TOWN OF ROSENDALE, .............. (100)
NY............................
ROSE AND PALM GARDEN WASHES .............. (200)
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, AZ.....
NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)... .............. 5,000
PORT OF MUSKEGON, MI........... .............. (100)
STURGEON POINT, TOWN OF EVANS, .............. (100)
NY............................
PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR 1,533 11,000
IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
(SECTION 1135)....................
SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)..... .............. 2,000
ROSE LARISA PARK, RI........... .............. (50)
ROUNDOUT RIVERPORT, CITY OF .............. (100)
KINGSTON, NY..................
WATCH HILL LIGHTHOUSE, RI...... .............. (50)
DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY 13,000 13,000
CORRECTION PROGRAM................
EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION............ 15,000 15,000
INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--BOARD 60 60
EXPENSE...........................
INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--CORPS 275 275
EXPENSE...........................
INNOVATIVE FUNDING PARTNERSHIPS.... 10,000 ..............
RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINES..... .............. 2,000
TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM......... .............. 8,007
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL................... 42,868 796,562
--------------------------------
TOTAL...................... 1,793,378 3,002,003
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Includes funds requested in other lines or accounts.
Alternative Delivery.--The Committee continues to support
alternative delivery approaches such as Public Private
Partnerships [P3s] and split delivery methods that leverage
public and private resources to reduce costs and risk to
populations by delivering infrastructure sooner. The use of P3s
and split delivery methods demonstrates a viable strategy to
help address the Corps' backlog of projects while reducing
scheduling and funding risk to the Federal Government. The
Committee encourages the Corps to continue the rulemaking
process for the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act
[WIFIA]. The Corps is reminded that projects which use an
alternative delivery approach are eligible to compete for
additional funding recommended in this account.
Advanced Measures.--The Corps is encouraged to fully use
the authorities granted to it under the Advanced Measures
program to mitigate impacts expected to occur in the Great
Lakes Basin as a result of record-high and near-record-high
water levels.
Aquatic Plant Control Program.--Of the funding recommended
for the Aquatic Plant Control Program, $1,000,000 shall be for
activities for monitoring, surveys, and control of flowering
rush and hydrilla. Additionally, $7,000,000 shall be for
nationwide research and development to address invasive aquatic
plants, within which the Corps is encouraged to support cost-
shared aquatic plant management programs. Particularly, the
Corps is encouraged to evaluate and address prevention, of new
infestations of hydrilla in the Connecticut River Basin.
Finally, $15,000,000 shall be for watercraft inspection
stations and rapid response as authorized in section 104 of the
River and Harbor Act of 1958, equally distributed to carry out
subsections (d)(1)(A)(i), (d)(1)(A)(ii), and (d)(1)(A)(iii),
and $3,000,000 shall be for related monitoring.
Barrow Alaska Coastal Erosion.--The Committee is pleased
the Corps reprogrammed funding to continue PED work for this
critical project in fiscal year 2021 and urges the Corps to
expeditiously complete PED to address the significant risks to
life and safety, threats to the community's only drinking water
source, and risks from contamination to the environment.
Beneficial Use of Dredged Material Pilot Program.--The
Committee is pleased to see the Corps' selection of ten pilot
projects under section 1122 of the WIIN Act to carry out
beneficial use of dredged material including the Resilient San
Francisco Bay Pilot project. The Committee recommends
$4,300,000 for the ten pilot projects selected to date within
the ``Beneficial Use of Dredged Material Pilot Program.'' The
Corps is further directed to brief the Committee prior to any
effort to solicit or select any additional pilot projects as
authorized by AWIA 2018.
Bipartisan Budget Act [BBA] of 2018.--The Committee is
frustrated with the lack of urgency in completing the BBA 2018
construction projects. The purpose of the supplemental disaster
funding was to accelerate completion of high-priority flood
control projects nationwide, including areas affected by
hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria. The Committee does not
understand why the full cost of the project must be available
before starting any construction especially when discrete
elements are ready and there are funds to complete them. The
Corps has never been funded in this manner and this
interpretation does not align with the intent of Congress--to
accelerate construction. The Committee has received only one of
the required quarterly reports on the obligation of funds and
this lack of transparency and collaboration is unacceptable. As
the BBA 2018 program progresses, it is possible that projects
will not be completed within supplemental funds available; the
Committee does not intend for those projects to be delayed. The
Corps shall brief the Committee no later than 30 days of this
act enactment of this act on the status of the program and the
plan for completion of projects.
Bird Drive Basin Conveyance, Seepage Collection, and
Recharge.--The Committee acknowledges the unique opportunity
for Miami-Dade County and the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority
[MDX] to assist in land purchases and swaps to protect a vital
project footprint to implement the Bird Drive Basin Conveyance,
Seepage Collection, and Recharge concept and achieve the goals
of the original Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan
[CERP] Bird Drive Recharge Area project. The Committee
encourages the Corps to work with the Department of the
Interior and the South Florida Water Management District to
quickly identify a consensus project footprint between SW 8th
Street and the C-1W Canal to the south, immediately east of
Krome Avenue, to enable Miami-Dade County and MDX to begin
necessary land acquisitions in support of the creation of a
West Kendall Everglades Buffer and progress towards completing
an important element of the CERP.
Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Project.--The Committee
continues to support this vital project to protect drinking
water supplies in eastern Miami-Dade County from saltwater
intrusion and to enhance the coastal and marine ecology of
Biscayne Bay and the offshore coral reef system. The Committee
notes support from Miami-Dade County and the South Florida
Water Management District to incorporate highly treated,
reclaimed wastewater as an additional source of freshwater to
assist the rehydration of these coastal wetlands. The Committee
encourages the Corps to consider the incorporation of this
potential source of freshwater into further study, design, and
construction of the project and to evaluate the potential to
use additional volumes of reclaimed wastewater to restore
freshwater artesian springs within the Bay through underground
injection to the shallow, underlying aquifer.
Camp Ellis Beach, Saco, Maine.--The Committee is pleased
the Corps has accepted a letter of support from the City of
Saco making them the non-Federal sponsor of the Camp Ellis
Project. The Committee directs the Secretary to finalize a
Project Partnership Agreement between the City of Saco and the
Corps and to continue the collaborative effort to address the
continued erosion at Camp Ellis Beach.
Cano Martin Pena Ecosystem Restoration Project, San Juan,
Puerto Rico.--The Committee renews its focus on the Cano Martin
Pena Ecosystem Restoration Project planned for urban San Juan,
Puerto Rico. The Committee continues to recognize the
significance of this project for the economic revitalization,
public health, and incidental flood protection of the eight
surrounding communities. This historically important tidal
channel will re-establish the natural tidal exchange between
the San Jose Lagoon and the San Juan Bay, two bodies of water
with ecologically significant habitat for native species and
ecosystem function. The Committee further recognizes the
substantial time and effort dedicated across the past three
decades by the non-Federal sponsor to plan this project in
coordination with the Corps and the meaningful progress made in
recent years to secure its authorization and ready it for the
construction phase. The Committee is concerned over lost
opportunities and delays arising with the absence of funds
being allocated to start construction of this critical project.
Accordingly, the Committee encourages the Corps to prioritize
funding for this project in future budget requests and to work
with the non-Federal sponsor to advance the project to the next
phase at the earliest practicable opportunity.
Central Everglades Planning Project [CEPP].--The Committee
recognizes the importance of restoring America's Everglades,
and urges the Corps to expedite the required validation reports
for PPA North and PPA New Water, and to begin design and
construction of components for PPA South and PPA New Water as
soon as practicable to complement the efforts of the South
Florida Water District. The Committee urges the Corps to design
and construct the recently-authorized Everglades Agricultural
Area Storage Reservoir as quickly as possible to utilize the
expanded water delivery capabilities of completed PPA South
elements.
Central and South Florida Project.--The Committee
recognizes the importance of the Central and South Florida
Project and urges the Corps to maintain continued attention to
the need of the South Florida economy and environment for a
functioning flood control system.
Chesapeake Bay Comprehensive Water Resources Restoration
Plan and Oyster Recovery.--The Committee supports the Corps'
Chesapeake Bay Comprehensive Water Resources and Restoration
Plan and the Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery Program and
encourages the Corps to provide sufficient funding in future
budget requests and the fiscal year 2022 work plan.
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier,
Illinois.--No funds recommended in this act may be used for
construction of hydrologic separation measures.
CERP-Indian River Lagoon-South.--The Committee recognizes
the importance of restoring America's Everglades, and the
challenge of balancing discharges from Lake Okeechobee and
harmful algal blooms in the St. Lucie River and Indian River
Lagoon. The Committee urges the Corps to move on the final
construction of the C-44 Reservoir and to expedite design work
on the C-23 and C-24 Reservoirs that, along with the C-44
Reservoir, will serve as crucial elements of the Indian River
Lagoon-South CERP project to collect and clean discharges and
runoff before they enter the Lagoon.
Columbia River Treaty.--The Corps is directed to brief, in
a classified setting and in coordination with the Department of
State, within 60 days after enactment of this act on the
execution plan for post-fiscal year 2023 for flood control
operations as dictated by the modernized agreement. Further,
not later than 90 days after enactment of this act the Corps
shall provide a classified detailed assessment, in coordination
with Department of State, of its funding requirements and plan
for post-fiscal year 2023 for flood control operations as
dictated by the Columbia River Treaty.
Construction Funding Schedules.--A complete and reliable
cost estimate with an out-year funding schedule is essential to
understanding current funding and future funding requirements
within the Corps' construction portfolio. A comprehensive
outlook of these dynamic requirements is necessary for Congress
to consider and balance funding allocations annually, and to
assess the long-term effects of new investment decisions.
Therefore, within 90 days of enactment of this act and annually
thereafter, the Chief of Engineers shall submit directly to the
Committee on Appropriations of both houses of Congress, a
breakdown, by fiscal year, of the full and efficient Federal
funding needs for each ongoing construction project in the
Corps' Civil Works program. For each project identified, the
Corps shall also provide the total project cost with a
breakdown between the Federal and non-Federal costs, and any
applicable authorization ceiling. For the purposes of this
report, an active project shall mean any project which has
received construction account appropriations, including those
funded in a supplemental, and has remaining costs to be funded
from the Construction account. These funding requirements shall
be based on technical construction sequencing, and realistic
workflow and shall not be altered to reflect administrative
policies and priorities or any assumed limitation on funding
available.
Continuing Authorities Program.--The Committee recommends
$70,000,000 for the Continuing Authorities Program [CAP]. CAP
is a useful tool for the Corps to undertake small localized
projects without being encumbered by the lengthy study and
authorization phases typical of most Corps projects. The
management of CAP shall continue consistent with direction
provided in previous fiscal years.
The Corps shall allow for the advancement of flood control
projects in combination with ecological benefits using natural
and nature-based solutions alone, or in combination with, built
infrastructure where appropriate for reliable risk reduction
during the development of projects under section 205 of CAP.
Additionally, within the section 1135 CAP authority, and to the
extent already authorized by law, the Committee encourages the
Corps to consider projects that restore degraded wetland
habitat and stream habitat impacted by construction of Corps
levees with executed Feasibility Cost Share Agreements.
Environmental Infrastructure.--Authorized Environmental
Infrastructure projects shall not require a new start
designation. This includes projects in regional authorities
that have not received funding and projects authorized under
section 219 of the WRDA of 1992 (Public Law 102-580), as
amended. The Committee reminds the Corps that Environmental
Infrastructure authorities include caps on Federal
participation, but do not provide a guarantee that the project
authorization level will be met. Environmental Infrastructure
projects shall only receive funding if there is a separable
element that can be funded to completion in a fiscal year
without the requirement for continued funding in future years.
Howard Hanson Dam--Additional Water Storage Project [HAHD-
AWSP].--The Committee supports continued efforts to fully
implement the jeopardy Biological Opinion (BiOp) determining
the impact of ongoing operations of Howard Hanson Dam,
including the HAHD-AWSP on ESA-listed species, and specifically
the ongoing work to construct a downstream fish passage
facility.
Innovative Funding Partnerships Program.--The budget
request includes $10,000,000 for an Innovative Funding
Partnerships Program to be used along with funds from non-
Federal interests ``in excess of the non-Federal sponsor's
statutory cost share requirements'' to accelerate certain
authorized projects. The Committee is troubled by what appears
to be an avenue to circumvent the performance based budgeting
approach the Corps uses to evaluate projects. It is unclear how
equity will be maintained if funding in excess of legally
required cost share is used as a criterion for funding
decisions allowing non-Federal sponsors to contribute funds and
jump the line is contrary to long-standing congressional
direction. The Committee recommends no funds for this proposal.
The Committee notes, however, that any project that could have
received funding under such a program is eligible to compete
for the additional funding provided in this account based on
the project performance criteria described in this report.
Lake Champlain Watershed.--The Lake Champlain Watershed is
an officially designated resource of national significance that
spans the States of New York and Vermont and into Canada. The
Committee reminds the Corps that section 542 of WRDA of 2000
(Public Law 106-541) as amended, authorizes the Corps to
provide assistance to non-Federal interests to address a range
of environmental issues in the Lake Champlain Watershed in
Vermont and New York.
New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam, Georgia and South
Carolina.--The Committee maintains interest in the New Savannah
Bluff Lock and Dam and recognizes the long standing challenges
of the project. The Committee encourages the Corps to work with
all stakeholders towards a mutually beneficial resolution that
will ensure waters levels for existing activities and functions
are maintained, as detailed in section 1319 of the WIIN Act.
Non-Federal Implementation Pilot Program.--Due to ongoing
concerns initially expressed in the fiscal year 2020 Senate
Report, the Corps shall notify the Committee upon receiving any
proposal from a non-Federal interest requesting to utilize the
section 1043(b) of WRRDA authority. The Corps shall not
negotiate or enter into a project partnership agreement to
transfer funds to a non-Federal interest utilizing this
authority unless approval is received from the Committee on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress. None of the funds
recommended in this act shall be used under this authority for
a project where construction has been started but not
completed. The Corps shall brief the Committees not later than
45 days after enactment of this act on activities carried out
under the section 1043 pilot program, including the Corps'
implementation guidance and any existing or potential
agreements.
Prioritization of Projects in Drought-Stricken Areas.--The
Committee urges the Corps to prioritize any authorized projects
that would alleviate water supply issues in areas that have
been afflicted by severe droughts in the last four fiscal
years, to include projects focused on the treatment of brackish
water.
South Florida Ecosystem Restoration [SFER].--For fiscal
year 2022, the Committee directs the Corps to make publicly
available a comprehensive snapshot of all SFER cost share
accounting down to the project level and directs the Corps to
ensure the accuracy of all budget justification sheets that
inform SFER Integrated Financial Plan documents by September
30, 2022.
The Dalles Dam, Tribal Housing.--The Committee is aware
that the work on the Village Development Plan is partially
complete. The Corps is encouraged to complete the Village
Development Plan in consultation with affected Columbia River
tribes and the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Tulsa and West-Tulsa Levee System [TWTLS].--The Committee
recognizes that TWTLS-protected area is home to a substantial
population of elderly and low income residents, and the TWTLS
was classified by the Corps as a high risk of failure and life
loss in 2019. Therefore, the Committee has provided additional
funding and urges the Corps to expeditiously continue progress
on this critical project.
Upper Mississippi River Restoration Program [UMRR], Quincy
Bay.--Over the past 70 years, river traffic has led to the
environmental degradation of Quincy Bay. Therefore the
Committee encourages the Corps to prioritize the environmental
restoration project in Quincy Bay near Quincy, Illinois as a
Tier 1 project for immediate commencement through the UMMR
Program.
Upper St. Anthony Falls.--The Committee is concerned that
the Corps is attempting to divest the entire Federal project at
once and encourages the Corps to continue to operate and
maintain the lock. The Corps is further reminded that the Upper
St. Anthony Falls project remains an authorized Federal project
until there is a willing non-Federal partner for the
disposition study.
Additional Funding.--The Corps shall allocate these
additional funds in accordance with the direction in the front
matter under the heading ``Additional Funding''. The Corps
shall not condition these funds, or any funds appropriated in
this act, on a non-Federal interest paying more than their
required share in any phase of a project. Of the additional
funds recommended in this account for flood and storm damage
reduction, navigation, and other authorized project purposes
(excluding environmental infrastructure), the Corps shall
allocate not less than $35,000,000 to authorized reimbursements
for projects with executed project partnership agreements and
that have completed construction or where non-Federal sponsors
intend to use the funds for additional water resource
development activities. Of the additional funding provided in
this account for environmental restoration or compliance and
other authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate not
less than $25,000,000 for multistate ecosystem restoration
programs for which a comprehensive restoration plan is in
development or has been completed. Of the additional funding
recommended in this account for flood and storm damage
reduction and flood control, the Corps shall allocate not less
than $25,558,000 to continue construction of projects that
principally address drainage in urban areas.
When allocating the additional funding provided in this
account, the Corps is encouraged to evaluate authorized
reimbursements in the same manner as if the projects were being
evaluated for new or ongoing construction and shall consider
giving priority to the following:
--Benefits of the funded work to the national economy;
--Extent to which the work will enhance national, regional,
or local economic development;
--Number of jobs created directly by the funded activity;
--Ability to obligate the funds allocated within the calendar
year, including consideration of the ability of the
non-Federal sponsor to provide any required cost share;
--Ability to complete the project, separable element, or
project phase with the funds allocated;
--Legal requirements, including responsibilities to Tribes;
--For flood and storm damage reduction projects (including
authorized nonstructural measures and periodic beach
renourishments): Population, safety of life, economic
activity, or public infrastructure at risk, as
appropriate; the severity of risk of flooding or the
frequency with which an area has experienced flooding;
and preservation of historically significant
communities, culture, and heritage;
--For shore protection projects, projects in areas where
there is risk to life and public health and safety, and
risk of environmental contamination;
--For navigation projects, the number of jobs or level of
economic activity to be supported by completion of the
project, separable element, or project phase;
--For projects cost shared with the IWTF, the economic impact
on the local, regional, and national economy if the
project is not funded, as well as discrete elements of
work that can be completed within the funding provided
in this line item;
--For other authorized project purposes and environmental
restoration or compliance projects, the beneficial use
of dredged material; and
--For environmental infrastructure, projects in rural
communities, projects with greater economic impact,
projects in counties or parishes with high poverty
rates, projects owed past reimbursements, and projects
that provide backup raw water supply in the event of an
emergency.
The Committee recommendation includes the full use of all
estimated fiscal year 2022 annual revenues in the IWTF to
ensure ongoing construction projects proceed with an efficient
funding profile. Funds recommended herein for inland waterways
shall only be available for ongoing construction projects. The
Corps shall allocate all funds recommended in the IWTF Revenues
remaining item along with the statutory cost share from funds
provided in the Navigation line item prior to allocating the
remainder of funds in the Navigation line item.
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $380,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 269,688,000
Committee recommendation................................ 380,000,000
The Committee recommends $380,000,000 for Mississippi River
and Tributaries. Funds recommended in this account are for
planning, construction, and operation and maintenance
activities associated with water resource projects located in
the lower Mississippi River Valley from Cape Girardeau,
Missouri to the Gulf of Mexico.
The table below displays the budget request and Committee's
recommendation:
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget Committee
Item estimate recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------
INVESTIGATIONS
RUNNING REELFOOT BAYOU, TN......... 600 600
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, INVESTIGATIONS... 600 600
CONSTRUCTION
LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM 800 800
(LMRMS)...........................
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, 14,300 14,300
LA, MS, MO & TN...................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, 17,450 17,450
KY, LA, MS, MO and TN.............
MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA........... .............. 19,333
YAZOO BASIN, DELTA HEADWATERS, MS.. .............. 12,900
YAZOO BASIN, UPPER YAZOO, MS....... .............. 12,000
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, .............. 20,750
MS................................
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION..... 32,550 97,533
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM 30,922 30,922
(LMRMS)...........................
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, 77,500 77,500
LA, MS, MO & TN...................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, 11,593 11,593
KY, LA, MS, MO &TN................
BAYOU METO BASIN, AR............... .............. 24,000
GRAND PARAIRIE REGION, AR.......... .............. 13,000
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR. .............. 540 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.. .............. 252
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, 75 75
AR................................
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, 40 40
AR................................
RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, AR 87 87
&LA...............................
ST FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.......... 9,600 9,600
TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS 2,455 2,455
RIVERS, AR & LA...................
WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR.......... 1,100 1,100
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.. .............. 20
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.. .............. 35
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA. 48 48
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.. .............. 3,952
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, 140 140
LA................................
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA....... 1,940 1,940
OLD RIVER, LA...................... 52,020 52,020
TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, 2,990 2,990
LA................................
GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS.............. .............. 932 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.. .............. 202
VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS............... .............. 942 *
YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS.... 6,070 6,070
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, 224 224
MS................................
YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS......... 5,362 5,362
YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS......... 365 365
YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS...... 5,482 5,482
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS......... 900 900
YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS....... 7,632 7,632
YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS....... 450 450
YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX 290 290
CHAN, MS..........................
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, 727 727
MS................................
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS........ 450 450
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.. .............. 136
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO................ 6,863 6,863
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.. .............. 28
MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN.. .............. 2,338 *
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 225,325 271,702
MAINTENANCE...............
REMAINING ITEMS
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK .............. 3,667
DREDGING........................... .............. ..............
FLOOD CONTROL...................... .............. ..............
OTHER AUTHORIZED PURPOSES.......... .............. ..............
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. 6,498 6,498
MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION....... 90 ..............
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR, 4,625 ..............
IL, KY, LA, MS, MO AND TN.........
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS.. 11,213 10,165
--------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND 269,688 380,000
TRIBUTARIES.................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Includes funds requested in other accounts.
Includes funds requested in remaining items.
Lower Mississippi River Main Stem.--The budget request
proposes to consolidate several activities across multiple
States into one line item. The Committee rejects this change
and instead recommends continuing to fund these activities as
separate line items.
Additional Funding for Ongoing Work.--When allocating the
additional funding recommended in this account, the Corps shall
consider giving priority to completing or accelerating ongoing
work that will enhance the Nation's economic development, job
growth, and international competitiveness, or to studies or
projects located in areas that have suffered recent natural
disasters. The Corps shall use such sums as are necessary to
carry out remaining unconstructed features of projects
authorized by law, in response to recent flood disasters. While
this funding is shown under remaining items, the Corps shall
use these funds in investigations, construction, and operation
and maintenance, as applicable.
The Committee recognizes the importance of erosion control
in headwater streams and tributaries, and the environmental,
water quality, and sediment reduction benefits it provides
downstream. When allocating additional funds recommended in
this account, the Corps is directed to give adequate
consideration to cooperative projects addressing watershed
erosion, sedimentation, flooding, and environmental
degradation. Of the additional funds recommended in this
account, the Corps shall allocate not less than $3,000,000 for
dredging of ports and harbors.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $3,849,655,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 2,502,901,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,682,797,000
The Committee recommends $4,682,797,000 for Operation and
Maintenance. Funding in this account is used to fund
operations, maintenance, and related activities at water
resource projects that the Corps operates and maintains. These
activities include dredging, repair, and operation of
structures and other facilities, as authorized in the various
river and harbor, flood control, and water resources
development acts. Related activities include aquatic plant
control, monitoring of completed projects where appropriate,
removal of sunken vessels, and the collection of domestic
waterborne commerce statistics.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The table below displays the budget request and Committee's
recommendation for Operation and Maintenance:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget Committee
Item estimate recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL............ 15,252 23,632
BAYOU CODEN, AL.................... .............. 3,000
BAYOU LA BATRE, AL................. .............. 5,008 *
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, 24,652 27,852
AL................................
BON SECOUR RIVER, AL............... .............. 4,493
DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL............. .............. 3,000
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL..... 6,745 6,745
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL.. .............. 180
MOBILE HARBOR, AL.................. .............. 63,212 *
PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL........... .............. 2,000 *
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL...... .............. 150 *
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL .............. 85
TENNESSEE--TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY 1,800 1,800
WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL & MS......
TENNESSEE--TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & 28,986 32,986
MS................................
WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & 10,676 10,676
GA................................
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, .............. 90 *
AL................................
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK............... .............. 11,370 *
CHENA RIVER LAKES FLOOD CONTROL 6,921 6,921
PROJECT, NORTH POLE, AK...........
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK.............. .............. 1,055 *
ELFIN COVE, AK..................... .............. 2,660 *
HOMER HARBOR, AK................... .............. 785 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK.. .............. 200
LOWELL CREEK TUNNELL (SEWARD), AK.. 75 75
NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK............... .............. 665 *
NOME HARBOR, AK.................... .............. 2,434 *
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK...... .............. 750 *
AMERICAN SAMOA
ANUU HARBOR, AS.................... .............. 2,921 *
ARIZONA
ALAMO LAKE, AZ..................... 1,600 1,600
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ.. .............. 175
PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ............... 1,936 1,936
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ .............. 112
WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ.............. 445 445
ARKANSAS
BEAVER LAKE, AR.................... 8,956 8,956
BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR.. 7,460 7,460
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR............. 1,998 1,998
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR............... 9,525 9,525
DEGRAY LAKE, AR.................... 6,587 6,587
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR................... 1,846 1,846
DIERKS LAKE, AR.................... 1,488 1,488
GILLHAM LAKE, AR................... 1,430 1,430
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR.............. 7,947 7,947
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR. .............. 540 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.. .............. 929
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 56,136 56,136
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR.............
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR.................. 2,831 2,831
NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR...... 5,691 5,691
NIMROD LAKE, AR.................... 2,267 2,267
NORFORK LAKE, AR................... 6,572 6,572
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR................. .............. 15 *
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA. 12,065 12,065
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS.......... .............. 5 *
WHITE RIVER, AR.................... 25 25
YELLOW BEND PORT, AR............... .............. 127 *
CALIFORNIA
BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA............... 6,400 6,400
BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA.. 2,295 2,295
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA......... .............. 15,016 *
COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, 8,200 8,200
CA................................
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND 9,524 9,524
CHANNEL, CA.......................
FARMINGTON DAM, CA................. 525 525
HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA....... 7,495 7,495
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA........ .............. 4,700 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA.. .............. 3,410
ISABELLA LAKE, CA.................. 3,440 3,440
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, 20,220 20,220
CA................................
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA.......... 835 835
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA............... 1,101 1,101
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA............... .............. 3,600 *
NAPA RIVER, CA..................... .............. 4,750 *
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA................. 6,390 6,390
NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM 2,480 2,480
CHANNEL, CA.......................
OAKLAND HARBOR, CA................. .............. 25,634 *
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA............... .............. 1,790 *
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA................. 3,930 3,930
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA...... .............. 840 *
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA................ .............. 13,179 *
SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), .............. 3,875 *
CA................................
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 990 990 *
(DEBRIS CONTROL), CA..............
SACRAMENTO RIVER (SHALLOW DRAFT .............. 190 *
CHANNEL), CA......................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY DELTA MODEL 1,018 1,018 ...
STRUCTURE, CA.....................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM .............. 450 *
MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (LTMS), CA....
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA .............. 3,883 *
(DRIFT REMOVAL)...................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA........... .............. 5,275 *
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER (PORT OF .............. 7,425 *
STOCKTON), CA.....................
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND .............. 600 *
STRAIT, CA........................
SAN RAFAEL CREEK, CA............... .............. 6,750 *
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA.......... 6,572 6,572
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA........... .............. 3,640 *
SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CA.............. .............. 540 *
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA .............. 1,623
SUCCESS LAKE, CA................... 2,972 2,972
SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA............. .............. 5,880 *
TERMINUS DAM (LAKE KAWEAH), CA..... 5,750 5,750
VENTURA HARBOR, CA................. .............. 5,516 *
YUBA RIVER, CA..................... 200 1,755 *
COLORADO
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO................ 662 662
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO................. 1,937 1,937
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO.............. 1,487 1,487
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO.. .............. 314
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO.......... 9,594 9,594
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO 2,023 2,023
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO.................. .............. 530
CONNECTICUT
BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT................ 643 643
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT........... 833 833
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT............. 558 558
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT................. 1,317 1,317
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT.. .............. 970
MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT.......... 816 816
NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT............... .............. 401 *
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT.......... 585 585
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT...... .............. 1,100 *
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT..... 597 597
THOMASTON DAM, CT.................. 1,000 1,000
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT............. 890 890
WESTPORT HARBOR & SAUGATUCK RIVER, .............. 2,810
CT................................
DELAWARE
INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE..... .............. 30 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DE.. .............. 2
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE .............. 19,130 *
RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD..
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY .............. 150 *
DELAWARE BAY......................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE...... .............. 225 *
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE.............. .............. 8,950 *
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC.. .............. 39
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC .............. 1,175 *
(DRIFT REMOVAL)...................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC...... .............. 30 *
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC.............. .............. 25 *
FLORIDA
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL............... .............. 2,215 *
CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL... 22,243 23,854 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL.. .............. 1,003
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE 4,380 4,380
TO MIAMI, FL......................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............ .............. 7,155 *
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE 8,501 8,501
SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA.............
MANATEE HARBOR, FL................. .............. 680 *
MIAMI HARBOR, FL................... .............. 180 *
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL............ 1,365 3,710 *
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL.............. .............. 5,120 *
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL............... .............. 40 *
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL......... .............. 180 *
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL...... .............. 1,275 *
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL...... .............. 3,449 *
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL .............. 100
SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 8,950 8,950
(EVERGLADES), FL..................
TAMPA HARBOR, FL................... .............. 12,472 *
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, .............. 80 *
FL................................
GEORGIA
ALLATOONA LAKE, GA................. 9,164 9,164
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND 1,459 1,459
FLINT RIVERS, GA, AL & FL.........
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA. 3,739 3,739
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA............... .............. 7,778 *
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, 12,441 12,441
GA................................
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA........... 8,504 8,504
HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC............. 13,090 13,090
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA.. .............. 196
J STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC..... 11,206 11,206
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA...... .............. 76 *
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA 9,541 9,541
& SC..............................
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA................ .............. 33,053 *
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA... .............. 148 *
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL... 8,354 8,354
HAWAII
BARBERS POINT DEEP DRAFT HARBOR, 300 300
OAHU, HI..........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI.. .............. 797
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI...... .............. 709 *
IDAHO
ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID............... 1,245 1,245
DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID..... 3,063 3,063
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID.. .............. 466
LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID................ 2,366 2,366
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID .............. 750
ILLINOIS
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN.. .............. 5,009 *
CARLYLE LAKE, IL................... 14,360 14,360
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL................. .............. 16,823 *
CHICAGO RIVER, IL.................. 635 635
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL.......... 541 541
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL 64,614 64,614
& IN..............................
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL 2,183 2,183
& IN..............................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.. .............. 2,787
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL..... 4,383 4,383
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL........ .............. 1,190 *
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL............... 17,965 17,965
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 80,667 80,667 *
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR
PORTION), IL......................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 34,951 34,951
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS
PORTION), IL......................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL...... .............. 103 *
REND LAKE, IL...................... 12,797 12,797
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 398 *
WATERS, IL........................
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL................ .............. 11 *
INDIANA
BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN................ 3,157 3,157
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN.......... .............. 1,561 *
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN............... 1,335 1,335
CECIL M HARDEN LAKE, IN............ 1,467 1,467
INDIANA HARBOR, IN................. .............. 8,196 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN.. .............. 1,264
J EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN............ 2,051 2,051
MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN........... .............. 10 *
MONROE LAKE, IN.................... 1,479 1,479
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN.............. 1,915 1,915
PATOKA LAKE, IN.................... 1,446 1,446
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN...... .............. 197 *
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN................. 3,282 3,282
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 81 *
WATERS, IN........................
IOWA
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA................ 6,170 6,170
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA.. .............. 1,202
MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO THE 47,406 47,406
MOUTH, IA, KS, MO & NE............
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS.......... .............. 2 *
RATHBUN LAKE, IA................... 3,254 3,254
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA. 27,728 27,728
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA............... 19,500 19,500
KANSAS
CLINTON LAKE, KS................... 2,763 2,763
COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS............. 1,925 1,925
EL DORADO LAKE, KS................. 675 675
ELK CITY LAKE, KS.................. 1,310 1,310
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS................ 4,214 4,214
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS................. 1,089 1,089
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS.. .............. 2,132
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. 1,764 1,764
KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS................. 1,974 1,974
MARION LAKE, KS.................... 1,812 1,812
MELVERN LAKE, KS................... 2,667 2,667
MILFORD LAKE, KS................... 2,589 2,589
PEARSON--SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. 1,247 1,247
PERRY LAKE, KS..................... 3,069 3,069
POMONA LAKE, KS.................... 2,951 2,951
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS .............. 774
TORONTO LAKE, KS................... 694 694
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS.............. 12,373 13,673
WILSON LAKE, KS.................... 1,902 1,902
KENTUCKY
BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY & 19,522 19,522
TN................................
BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY.............. 3,228 3,228
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY............... .............. 1,977 *
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY.................. 2,812 2,812
CARR CREEK LAKE, KY................ 2,220 2,220
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY.................. 1,484 1,484
DEWEY LAKE, KY..................... 2,096 2,096
ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY... .............. 935 *
FALLS OF THE OHIO NATIONAL 63 63
WILDLIFE, KY & IN.................
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY.................. 2,515 2,515
GRAYSON LAKE, KY................... 1,867 1,867
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY........ 2,776 2,776
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY............... 3,643 3,643
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.. .............. 1,192
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY.............. 5,891 5,891
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY.............. 1,443 1,443
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, 291 291
KY................................
NOLIN LAKE, KY..................... 3,647 3,647
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, 55,307 55,307
IN & OH...........................
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, 7,563 7,563
IL, IN, OH, PA & WV...............
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY............... 1,919 1,919
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS.......... .............. 5 *
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY............... 4,541 4,541
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY.............. 1,503 1,503
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY 17,476 17,476
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY................ 2,503 2,503
LOUISIANA
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, .............. 16,296 *
BOEUF & BLACK, LA.................
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA......... .............. 6,200 *
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA......... 1,494 1,494
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP .............. 6,185 *
WATERWAY, LA......................
BAYOU PIERRE, LA................... 33 33
BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA........ .............. 25 *
BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA .............. 50,030 *
BAYOU TECHE, LA.................... .............. 1,150 *
CADDO LAKE, LA..................... 186 186
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA....... .............. 20,500 *
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA............... .............. 3,634 *
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA..... 70,715 70,715
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA......... .............. 12,593 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.. .............. 978
J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA.... 27,764 27,764
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA......... .............. 1,332 *
MADISON PARISH PORT, LA............ .............. 208 *
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA................ .............. 10,880 *
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT .............. 19,755 *
VENICE, LA........................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO .............. 126,000 *
THE GULF OF MEXICO, LA............
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA...... .............. 51 *
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA...... .............. 200 *
WALLACE LAKE, LA................... 318 318
WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, .............. 10 *
LA................................
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY .............. 15 *
TO BAYOU DULAC, LA................
MAINE
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME....... .............. 1,050 *
GEORGE'S RIVER, ME................. .............. 75 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME.. .............. 121
JOSIAS RIVER, ME................... .............. 150
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME...... .............. 1,100 *
SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME............... .............. 5,850 *
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 22 *
WATERS, ME........................
ISLE AU HAUT THOROUGHFARE, ME...... .............. 100
WELLS HARBOR, ME................... .............. 4,296 *
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50 .............. 20,385 *
FOOT), MD.........................
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT .............. 720 *
REMOVAL)..........................
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV.... 219 219
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD.. .............. 89
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV.... 2,488 2,488
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND .............. 510 *
SINEPUXENT BAY, MD................
POCOMOKE RIVER, MD................. .............. 8
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD...... .............. 600 *
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD .............. 123
WICOMICO RIVER, MD................. .............. 4,300 *
MASSACHUSETTS
BARRE FALLS DAM, MA................ 823 823
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA................. 1,054 1,054
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA............... 722 722
CAPE COD CANAL, MA................. 1,793 24,216 *
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY 401 401
STORAGE AREA, MA..................
CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA.............. 371 371
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA............ 758 758
GREEN HARBOR, MA................... .............. 2,749 *
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA............. 793 793
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA.. .............. 450
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA................ 887 887
LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA............... 821 821
NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET 537 537
HURRICANE BARRIER, MA.............
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA...... .............. 1,490 *
MERRIMACK SPUR JETTY, MA....... .............. (240)
PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA................ .............. 6 *
TULLY LAKE, MA..................... 984 984
WEST HILL DAM, MA.................. 934 934
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA................. 752 752
MICHIGAN
ALPENA HARBOR, MI.................. .............. 5 *
CHANNELS IN LAKE ST CLAIR, MI...... .............. 243 *
CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI............... .............. 6 *
CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI.............. .............. 570 *
DETROIT HARBOR, MI................. .............. 7,645 *
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, .............. 3,934 *
MI................................
HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI............ .............. 1,320 *
HOLLAND HARBOR, MI................. .............. 516 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI.. .............. 329
INLAND ROUTE, MI................... .............. 52 *
KAWKAWLIN DREDGING, MI............. 570 570
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI.............. 10 1,279 *
LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI............... .............. 1,007 *
MANISTEE HARBOR, MI................ .............. 4,111 *
MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI.............. .............. 1,332 *
MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI............... .............. 5 *
MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI AND WI........ .............. 5 *
MONROE HARBOR, MI.................. .............. 1,137 *
MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI................ .............. 1,711 *
ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI............... .............. 1,136 *
PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI............ .............. 1,505 *
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI...... .............. 828 *
ROUGE RIVER, MI.................... .............. 1,133 *
SAGINAW RIVER, MI.................. .............. 3,844 *
SEBEWAING RIVER, MI................ 214 214
SOUTH BEACH, MI.................... .............. 1,000
SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI............. .............. 500 *
ST CLAIR RIVER, MI................. .............. 1,653 *
ST JOSEPH HARBOR, MI............... .............. 1,068 *
ST MARYS RIVER, MI................. 2,702 58,361 *
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 2,217 *
WATERS, MI........................
WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI.............. .............. 500 *
MINNESOTA
BIGSTONE LAKE--WHETSTONE RIVER, MN 318 318
& SD..............................
DULUTH--SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI... 400 6,847 *
GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN............ .............. 25 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN.. .............. 565
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA 1,150 1,150
RIVER, MN.........................
MINNESOTA RIVER, MN................ .............. 265 *
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 104,193 104,193 *
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP
PORTION), MN......................
ORWELL LAKE, MN.................... 565 565
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN...... .............. 104 *
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN............. 206 206
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF 6,576 6,576
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN.............
ST PAUL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MN...... .............. 500
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 428 *
WATERS, MN........................
TWO HARBORS, MN.................... .............. 31 *
MISSISSIPPI
EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS..... 290 290
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS................ .............. 9,536 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.. .............. 103
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS........... .............. 32 *
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS................. 2,152 2,152
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS.............. .............. 6,287 *
PEARL RIVER, MS & LA............... 140 140
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS...... .............. 155 *
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS................ .............. 1,687 *
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, .............. 40 *
MS................................
YAZOO RIVER, MS.................... .............. 32 *
MISSOURI
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO.......... .............. 791 *
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN 11,301 11,301
LAKE, MO..........................
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO................ 4,639 4,639
HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 14,482 14,482
MO................................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.. .............. 1,563
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO........ 1,345 1,345
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO............... 948 948
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO 35,279 35,279
AND MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS),
MO & IL...........................
NEW MADRID COUNTY HARBOR, MO....... .............. 520 *
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (MILE 889)... .............. 92 *
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO............ 4,704 4,704
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO...... .............. 5 *
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO .............. 174
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO................ 2,033 2,033
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, .............. 234 *
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MO.............
STOCKTON LAKE, MO.................. 5,817 5,817
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR........... 9,693 9,693
MONTANA
FT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT........... 6,017 6,017
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT.. .............. 191
LIBBY DAM, MT...................... 1,744 1,744
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT .............. 130
NEBRASKA
GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK 10,093 10,093
LAKE, NE & SD.....................
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE............. 9,151 9,151
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE.. .............. 785
MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE 117 117
TO SIOUX CITY, IA.................
PAPILLION CREEK, NE................ 1,196 1,196
SALT CREEKS AND TRIBUTARIES, NE.... 1,337 1,337
NEVADA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV.. .............. 50
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA......... 1,435 1,435
PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV. 591 591
NEW HAMPSHIRE
BLACKWATER DAM, NH................. 865 865
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH.......... 826 826
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH............. 890 890
HOPKINTON--EVERETT LAKES, NH....... 1,933 1,933
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED, NH........ .............. 111
OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH............... 1,204 1,204
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH...... .............. 350 *
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH............ 1,253 1,253
NEW JERSEY
BARNEGAT INLET, NJ................. .............. 760 *
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ.............. .............. 300 *
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ....... .............. 15 *
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE .............. 41,823 *
SEA, NJ, PA & DE..................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ.. .............. 382
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ................ .............. 375 *
MAURICE RIVER, NJ.................. .............. 4,010 *
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, .............. 985 *
NJ................................
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC .............. 24,825 *
RIVERS, NJ........................
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING 600 600
SYSTEMS, NJ.......................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ...... .............. 2,175 *
SALEM RIVER, NJ.................... .............. 100 *
SHARK RIVER, NJ.................... .............. 1,150 *
NEW MEXICO
ABIQUIU DAM, NM.................... 6,378 6,378
COCHITI LAKE, NM................... 2,962 2,962
CONCHAS LAKE, NM................... 3,808 3,808
GALISTEO DAM, NM................... 685 685
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM.. .............. 526
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM............... 1,102 1,102
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED 1,994 1,994
SPECIES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM.
SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM........ 1,502 1,502
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM .............. 270
TWO RIVERS DAM, NM................. 937 937
UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS 1,006 1,006
MODEL STUDY, NM...................
NEW YORK
ALMOND LAKE, NY.................... 716 716
ARKPORT DAM, NY.................... 559 559
BARCELONA HARBOR, NY............... .............. 1,150
BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, NY .............. 200 *
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA .............. 10,600 *
HARBOR, NY........................
BRONX RIVER, NY.................... .............. 250 *
BUFFALO HARBOR, NY................. .............. 20,908
BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY............. .............. 19,525 *
CATTARAUGUS BREAKWATER, NY......... .............. 1,000
DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY................. .............. 5,930 *
EAST RIVER, NY..................... .............. 5 *
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY............ .............. 11,500 *
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY............... .............. 712 *
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, .............. 25
NY................................
FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY......... .............. 24,880 *
GREAT KILLS HARBOR, NY............. .............. 100 *
HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT)........... .............. 4,810 *
HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C)........... .............. 2,350 *
JONES INLET, NY.................... .............. 19,025 *
LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY........ .............. 7,900 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY.. .............. 1,464
MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY............... 5,799 5,799
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, .............. 5 *
NY & NJ...........................
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY .............. 87,980 *
& NJ..............................
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY................ .............. 7,885 *
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT .............. 12,591 *
REMOVAL)..........................
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY (PREVENTION OF .............. 2,059 *
OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS).............
OSWEGO HARBOR, NY.................. .............. 5,606 *
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY...... .............. 2,468 *
ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY............... .............. 5,010 *
ROUNDOUT HARBOR, NY................ .............. 200 *
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL 980 980
PROJECTS, NY......................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 597 *
WATERS, NY........................
WEST ARROWHEAD BREAKWATER, NY...... .............. 300
WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY............. 832 832
NORTH CAROLINA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC. 5,950 5,950
B EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.. 2,077 2,077
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, 151 480 *
NC................................
FALLS LAKE, NC..................... 3,189 3,189
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC.. .............. 209
MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC........ .............. 3,296 *
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC........... .............. 8,340 *
NEW RIVER INLET, NC................ .............. 390 *
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC...... .............. 700 *
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC.............. .............. 1,700 *
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC............. .............. 1,120 *
W KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC. 4,025 4,025
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC.............. .............. 25,260 *
NORTH DAKOTA
BOWMAN HALEY, ND................... 351 351
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND... 18,609 18,609
HOMME LAKE, ND..................... 409 409
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND.. .............. 311
LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND 1,689 1,689
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND.................. 615 615
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND .............. 128
SOURIS RIVER, ND................... 381 381
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 125 *
WATERS, ND........................
OHIO
ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH................ 5,454 5,454
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH............... .............. 457 *
BERLIN LAKE, OH.................... 3,554 3,554
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH.............. 2,928 2,928
CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH........... 1,958 1,958
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH............... .............. 10,020 *
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH................ .............. 2,764 *
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH................ 2,057 2,057
DELAWARE LAKE, OH.................. 4,364 4,364
DILLON LAKE, OH.................... 3,335 3,335
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH................ .............. 3,880 *
HURON HARBOR, OH................... .............. 8 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH.. .............. 984
LORAIN HARBOR, OH.................. .............. 2,317 *
MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, 235 235
OH................................
MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 1,805 1,805
OH................................
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH............ 4,610 4,610
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH.......... 24,813 24,813
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, 558 558
OH................................
OHIO-MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH. 1,490 1,490
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH............... 2,578 2,578
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH...... .............. 340 *
ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, 56 56
OH................................
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH................ .............. 1,163 *
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 230 *
WATERS, OH........................
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH.................. .............. 6,929 *
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH................ 984 984
VERMILION HARBOR, OH............... .............. 5,700 *
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH... 4,875 4,875
WILLIAM H HARSHA LAKE, OH.......... 2,221 2,221
OKLAHOMA
ARCADIA LAKE, OK................... 525 525
BIRCH LAKE, OK..................... 847 847
BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK................ 3,267 3,267
CANTON LAKE, OK.................... 2,207 2,207
COPAN LAKE, OK..................... 1,885 1,885
EUFAULA LAKE, OK................... 16,618 16,618
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK............... 5,195 5,195
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK............... 1,163 1,163
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK......... 454 454
HEYBURN LAKE, OK................... 817 817
HUGO LAKE, OK...................... 1,896 1,896
HULAH LAKE, OK..................... 1,908 1,908
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK.. .............. 310
KAW LAKE, OK....................... 2,833 2,833
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK.................. 4,874 4,874
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 37,629 37,629
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK.............
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK................... 5,221 5,221
OPTIMA LAKE, OK.................... 198 198
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE 163 163
CHEROKEES, OK.....................
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK................ 1,745 1,745
SARDIS LAKE, OK.................... 1,556 1,556
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK .............. 1,750
SKIATOOK LAKE, OK.................. 5,130 5,130
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK........... 11,990 11,990
WAURIKA LAKE, OK................... 2,796 2,796
WISTER LAKE, OK.................... 988 988
OREGON
APPLEGATE LAKE, OR................. 1,674 1,674
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR................ 1,385 1,385
BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA... 1,937 8,994 *
CHETCO RIVER, OR................... .............. 954 *
COLES RIVER HATCHERY, APPLEGATE & .............. 1,819
LOST CREEK, OR....................
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & .............. 41,061 *
WA................................
COOS BAY, OR....................... .............. 7,951 *
COOS BAY (MAJOR MAINTENANCE), OR... .............. 32,720
COQUILLE RIVER, OR................. .............. 619 *
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR............. 2,415 2,415
COUGAR LAKE, OR.................... 2,756 2,756
DEPOE BAY, OR...................... .............. 71 *
DETROIT LAKE, OR................... 1,720 1,720
DORENA LAKE, OR.................... 3,326 3,326
ELK CREEK LAKE, OR................. 248 248
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR................ 2,423 2,423
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR................ 2,939 2,939
GREEN PETER--FOSTER LAKES, OR...... 2,898 2,898
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR............... 1,598 1,598
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR.. .............. 425
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA..... 6,300 6,300
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR............. 3,167 3,167
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR................ 4,810 4,810
MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA....... 14,983 14,983
NEHALEM BAY, OR.................... .............. 15 *
PORT ORFORD, OR.................... .............. 459 *
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR...... .............. 477 *
ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR...... .............. 2,781 *
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR .............. 104
SIUSLAW RIVER, OR.................. .............. 1,049 *
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 10,350 *
WATERS, OR........................
TILLAMOOK BAY & BAR, OR............ .............. 172 *
UMPQUA RIVER, OR................... .............. 1,183 *
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE 80 80
FALLS, OR.........................
WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, 160 160
OR................................
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR.............. 1,189 1,189
YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR......... .............. 4,572 *
PENNSYLVANIA
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA................ 9,064 9,064
ALVIN R BUSH DAM, PA............... 782 782
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA.......... 312 312
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA................ 1,886 1,886
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA................ 4,734 4,734
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA........... 1,677 1,677
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA................ 2,244 2,244
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA............. 2,348 2,348
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA.............. 1,260 1,260
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO .............. 13,710 *
TRENTON, NJ.......................
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA. 2,013 2,013
ERIE HARBOR, PA.................... .............. 263 *
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA....... 1,837 1,837
FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA........... 1,225 1,225
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND 459 459
RESERVOIR, PA.....................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA.. .............. 601
JOHNSTOWN, PA...................... 3,288 3,288
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, 2,362 2,362
PA................................
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA................ 5,308 5,308
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA............ 2,409 2,409
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA.............. 18,807 18,807
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & 76,654 76,654
WV................................
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, 851 851
OH & WV...........................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA...... .............. 177 *
PROMPTON LAKE, PA.................. 1,049 1,049
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA................... 100 100
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA.................. 4,828 4,828
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA .............. 82
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA............... .............. 100 *
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA............ 3,675 3,675 ...
STILLWATER LAKE, PA................ 481 481
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 91 *
WATERS, PA........................
TIOGA--HAMMOND LAKES, PA........... 3,000 3,000
TIONESTA LAKE, PA.................. 3,934 3,934
UNION CITY LAKE, PA................ 626 626
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA............ 1,381 1,381
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA........... 989 989
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD... 4,345 4,345
PUERTO RICO
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PR.. .............. 150
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PR...... .............. 100 *
SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR................ .............. 3,940 *
RHODE ISLAND
BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI.. .............. 350 *
FOX POINT BARRIER, NARRANGANSETT 704 929
BAY, RI...........................
GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI.. .............. 350 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI.. .............. 49
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI...... .............. 500 *
PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI.... .............. 38,600 *
WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION 543 668
PROJECT, RI.......................
SOUTH CAROLINA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC. 4,315 4,315
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC.............. .............. 9,145 *
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC .............. 4,175 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC.. .............. 65
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC...... .............. 875 *
SOUTH DAKOTA
BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD...... 13,412 13,412
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD................ 386 386
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD........ 257 257
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS 22,264 22,264
CASE, SD..........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD.. .............. 224
LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN............. 687 687
OAHE DAM AND LAKE OAHE, SD......... 13,386 13,386
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD .............. 158
TENNESSEE
CENTER HILL LAKE, TN............... 7,806 7,806
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN.......... 15,984 15,984
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN. 8,610 8,610
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN............... 8,292 8,292
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.. 6,481 6,481
J PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, .............. 294
TN................................
NORTHWEST TENNESSEE REGIONAL .............. 540 *
HARBOR, LAKE COUNTY, TN...........
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN....... 11,870 11,870
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN...... .............. 5 *
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN................ 27,738 27,738
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN.............. .............. 655 *
TEXAS
AQUILLA LAKE, TX................... 2,169 2,169
BARDWELL LAKE, TX.................. 3,972 3,972
BELTON LAKE, TX.................... 4,455 4,455
BENBROOK LAKE, TX.................. 3,091 3,091
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX........... .............. 4,135 *
BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX.. 3,906 3,906
CANYON LAKE, TX.................... 5,614 5,614
CEDAR BAYOU, TX.................... .............. 3,150 *
CHANNEL TO HARLINGEN, TX........... .............. 1,100 *
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX........ .............. 600 *
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX.... .............. 9,600 *
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX....... 10,216 10,216
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE 3,708 3,708
PINES, TX.........................
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX................ .............. 8,015 *
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX... .............. 7,175 *
GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX...... .............. 130 *
GIWW, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX.......... .............. 50 *
GRANGER LAKE, TX................... 2,628 2,628
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX................. 2,607 2,607
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX..... 29,250 29,250
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX............... 1,712 1,712
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX........... .............. 23,750 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX.. .............. 1,573
JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX............... 2,307 2,307
JOE POOL LAKE, TX.................. 6,748 6,748
LAKE KEMP, TX...................... 261 261
LAVON LAKE, TX..................... 3,699 3,699
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX................. 4,094 4,094
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX......... .............. 4,255 *
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX............. 2,871 2,871
NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE 2,703 2,703
GEORGETOWN, TX....................
O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX........ 1,336 1,336
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX................. 1,439 1,439
PROCTOR LAKE, TX................... 3,393 3,393
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX...... .............. 325 *
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX............... 1,570 1,570
SABINE--NECHES WATERWAY, TX........ .............. 8,900 *
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX.. 7,448 7,448
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX .............. 592
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX................ 3,352 3,352
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX.......... 2,892 2,892
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX........ .............. 5,500 *
TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN 3,402 3,402
LAKE, TX..........................
WACO LAKE, TX...................... 3,961 3,961
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX............... 2,946 2,946
WHITNEY LAKE, TX................... 7,090 7,090
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX..... 5,664 5,664
UTAH
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT.. .............. 40
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT .............. 410
VERMONT
BALL MOUNTAIN, VT.................. 986 986
GORDONS LANDING, VT................ .............. 250 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT.. .............. 9
NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT............ 884 884
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT......... 949 949
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT................. 988 988
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT.............. 817 817
VIRGIN ISLANDS
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VI.. .............. 36
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VI...... .............. 50 *
VIRGINIA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY-- 3,015 3,015
ACC, VA...........................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY-- 1,754 1,754
DSC, VA...........................
BENNETTS CREEK, VA................. .............. 420 *
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA............. .............. 680 *
DAVIS CREEK, VA.................... .............. 265 *
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA.. 2,749 2,749
HAMPTON ROADS DRIFT REMOVAL, VA.... .............. 2,632 *
HAMPTON ROADS PREVENTION OF .............. 130 *
OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS, VA..........
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA.. .............. 381
JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA............ .............. 8,025 *
JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA & NC.......... 12,131 12,131
JOHN W FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 7,864 7,864
VA................................
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA................ .............. 5,425 *
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA................. .............. 26,700 *
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA. 698 698
PHILPOTT LAKE, VA.................. 4,833 4,833
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA...... .............. 1,229 *
RUDEE INLET, VA.................... .............. 580
WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL .............. 200 *
CERTIFICATIONS, VA................
YORK RIVER ENTRANCE CHANNEL, VA.... .............. 300 *
WASHINGTON
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA............... 676 676
COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE .............. 56,665 *
RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA &
PORTLAND, OR......................
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & .............. 849 *
OR................................
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND .............. 1,894 *
SAND ISLAND, WA...................
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, .............. 1,117 *
WA AND THE DALLES, OR.............
EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, .............. 2,513 *
WA................................
GRAYS HARBOR, WA................... .............. 18,851 *
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA.............. 9,065 9,065
ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA........ 5,012 5,012
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA.. .............. 1,223
LAKE RIVER, WA (PORT OF RIDGEFIELD) .............. 124
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA..... 1,314 11,199 *
LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA...... 3,133 3,133
LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA..... 3,559 3,559
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA.. 3,095 3,095
MILL CREEK LAKE, WA................ 2,849 2,849
MOUNT SAINT HELENS SEDIMENT 918 918
CONTROL, WA.......................
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA............... 13,409 13,049
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA...... .............. 810 *
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, .............. 1,276 *
WA................................
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA............... .............. 2,334 *
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA .............. 493 *
SEATTLE HARBOR, WA................. .............. 378
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA............ 299 299
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 53 *
WATERS, WA........................
SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA.............. .............. 215
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA......... 364 364
THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA & OR... 4,033 4,033
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA....... .............. 3,290 *
WEST VIRGINIA
BEECH FORK LAKE, WV................ 1,534 1,534
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV................. 2,883 2,883
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV................ 2,944 2,944
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV................. 3,098 3,098
ELKINS, WV......................... 70 70
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV.. .............. 536
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV... 17,043 23,943
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & 57,656 57,656
OH................................
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, 2,726 2,726
KY & OH...........................
R D BAILEY LAKE, WV................ 2,760 2,760
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV......... 1,832 1,832
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV.............. 2,752 2,752
SUTTON LAKE, WV.................... 3,609 3,609
TYGART LAKE, WV.................... 2,351 2,351
WISCONSIN
ASHLAND HARBOR, WI................. .............. 1,020 *
EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI........... 1,026 1,026
FOX RIVER, WI...................... 3,444 3,444
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI............... .............. 3,101 *
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI.. .............. 45
KENOSHA HARBOR, WI................. .............. 730 *
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI................ .............. 462 *
MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI............... .............. 830 *
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI............... .............. 3,112 *
PORT WING HARBOR, WI............... .............. 25 *
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI...... .............. 359 *
STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE 18 629 *
MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI...........
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY .............. 408 *
WATERS, WI........................
TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI.............. .............. 20
WYOMING
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY.. .............. 70
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY............ 1,678 1,678
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY .............. 112
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED 2,336,969 4,050,405
UNDER STATES................
REMAINING ITEMS
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK .............. ..............
NAVIGATION MAINTENANCE............. .............. 40,000
DEEP-DRAFT HARBOR AND CHANNEL...... .............. 172,052
DONOR AND ENERGY TRANSFER PORTS.... .............. 50,000
INLAND WATERWAYS................... .............. 25,000
SMALL, REMOTE, OR SUBSISTENCE .............. 60,000
NAVIGATION....................
OTHER AUTHORIZED PURPOSES.......... .............. 40,000
AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH.. 100 17,500
ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND .............. 1,000
EQUIP MAINT (FEM).................
BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M .............. ..............
BUSINESS PROGRAMS.................
STEWARDSHIP SUPPORT PROGRAM........ 900 900
PERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETING SUPPORT .............. ..............
PROGRAM...........................
RECREATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,000 1,000
PROGRAM...........................
OPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR NAVIGATION.. 350 350
CIVIL WORKS WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 8,000 8,000
(CWWMS)...........................
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM..... 100 10,975
COASTAL OCEAN DATA SYSTEM (CODS)... 2,500 7,500
CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/ 900 900
CURATION).........................
CYBERSECURITY...................... 4,000 4,000
DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVE..... .............. 11,000 *
DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE....... .............. 14,000 *
DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE 1,100 4,300
MONITORING SYSTEM.................
DREDGING OPERATIONS AND 5,000 5,000
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH (DOER).....
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL 100 6,950
SUPPORT PROGRAM (DOTS)............
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION 100 300
PROGRAM...........................
ENGINEERING WITH NATURE............ .............. 12,500
ELECTRIC VEHICLE FLEET AND CHARGING 8,000 8,000
INFRASTRUCTURE....................
FACILITY PROTECTION................ 4,200 4,200
FISH & WILDLIFE OPERATING FISH 5,400 5,400
HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT............
HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA .............. 795 *
COLLECTION........................
INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS.. 4,000 4,800
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FEDERAL 18,000 18,000
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS............
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS...... 32,500 ..............
MONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION 100 12,000
PROJECTS..........................
NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM... 4,000 15,000
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM 10,000 10,000
(PORTFOLIO RISK ASSESSMENT).......
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 5,500 5,500
PROGRAM (NEPP)....................
NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY... 4,500 4,500
NATIONAL (MULTIPLE PROJECT) NATURAL 2,500 2,500
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES...
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR 600 600
REALLOCATIONS.....................
REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT 100 6,700
PROGRAM...........................
RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT CORPS 6,000 6,000
PROJECTS..........................
REVIEW OF NON-FEDERAL ALTERATIONS 10,000 10,000
OF CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS (SECTION
408)..............................
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS.... 8,500 ..............
SOIL MOISTURE AND SNOWPACK 5,000 8,000
MONITORING........................
SUSTAINABLE RIVERS PROGRAM (SRP)... 500 500
VETERAN'S CURATION PROGRAM AND 6,500 6,500
COLLECTIONS MANAGEMENT............
WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS..... 4,670 4,670
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 500 5,500
(WOTS)............................
--------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS.... 165,220 632,392
--------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATION AND 2,502,189 4,682,797
MAINTENANCE.................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Includes funds requested in other accounts.
Requested in remaining items.
Funded under projects listed under states.
Arkansas Red River Chloride Control.--The Committee reminds
the Corps of their existing obligations to continue operations
and maintenance activities for the Red River Chloride Control
project, Oklahoma and Texas, at Federal expense and encourages
the Corps to prioritize funding for these projects when
allocating additional funding recommended in this account.
Aquatic Nuisance Control Research.--Harmful Algal Blooms
[HABs] continue to threaten local communities, ecosystems,
human health, drinking water sources, and local outdoor
economies across the Nation. These algae overgrowths produce
dangerous toxins in fresh and marine waters that can sicken or
kill people and animals, create dead zones, and raise treatment
costs for drinking water. The devastating effects of HABs occur
across multiple ecoregions from large freshwater lakes like the
Finger Lakes in New York and Lake Okeechobee in Florida to
large inland waterways like the Ohio River where a 2015 HAB
event persisted for over a month involving over 700 miles of
waterway. The Committee continues to support the Corps' efforts
to address gaps in critical HAB research to avoid, detect, and
address HAB occurrences.
The additional funding recommended in the Aquatic Nuisance
Control Research remaining item is to supplement and advance
Corps activities to address HABs including: early detection,
prevention, and management techniques and procedures to reduce
the occurrence and impacts of harmful algal blooms in our
nation's water resources; work with university partners to
develop prediction, avoidance and remediation measures focused
on environmental triggers in riverine ecosystems; and to
advance state-of-the-art UAS based detection, monitoring, and
mapping of invasive aquatic plant species in conjunction with
University partners.
Asset Management/FEM.--The Committee is frustrated by the
lack of progress of the Corps in performing a review of their
inventory, in accordance with Section 6002 of the WRRDA of
2014, as has been directed in previous Committee Reports. The
Committee notes that the Corps was previously provided
$1,000,000 to carry out these activities and understands
$350,000 is needed in fiscal year 2022 which has been
recommended under Asset Management/Facilities and Equipment
Maintenance [FEM]. The Corps is directed to provide an interim
progress report that includes details on the percentage of this
work that has already been done and a timeline for completion
of the inventory to the Committee no later than 60 days after
enactment of this act.
Coastal Inlet Research Program.--The Committee understands
that communities, infrastructure, commerce, and resources that
are tied to the coastal nearshore region are all vulnerable to
damage from extreme coastal events and long-term coastal
change. Funding in addition to the budget request is
recommended for the Corps-led, multi-university effort to
identify engineering frameworks to address coastal resilience
needs; to develop adaptive pathways that lead to coastal
resilience; that measure the coastal forces that lead to
infrastructure damage and erosion during extreme storm events;
and to improve coupling of terrestrial and coastal models.
Funding in addition to the budget request is also recommended
for the Corps to continue work with the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration's National Water Center on
protecting the Nation's water resources.
Debris Removal.--The Committee reminds the Corps that
section 1164 of the WIIN Act enhanced the Corps' authority to
remove ``accumulated snags, obstructions, and other debris
located in or adjacent to a Federal channel in the interest of
navigation, flood control, or recreation.'' The Committee
encourages the Corps to complete ongoing bridge removal
projects; and when removing bridges and bridge pilings, to
consider also removing other pilings and obstructions in close
proximity to the bridge, and in or adjacent to the Federal
navigation channel pursuant to this authority.
Enhanced Options for Sand Acquisition for Beach
Renourishment Projects.--The Committee urges the Corps to
provide States with guidance and recommendations to implement
cost effective measures and planning for sand management.
Engineering With Nature.--The Committee recommendation
includes $12,500,000 as a new remaining item in this account to
support the Corps' Engineering with Nature [EWN] initiative.
The Committee is impressed with the positive impact on the
environment and the extensive cost savings this program
provides. With the funds recommended, the Corps is encouraged
to continue collaboration across research programs on nature-
based infrastructure and with university partners to develop
standards, design guidance, and testing protocols to fully
evaluate and standardize nature-based and hybrid infrastructure
solutions, including those in drought and fire-prone lands and
post-fire recovery areas. Additionally, the Corps is encouraged
to expand the EWN initiative to support science and engineering
practices that support long-term resilience and sustainability
of water infrastructure and their supporting systems. Funding
under this line item is intended for EWN activities having a
national or regional scope or which benefit the Corps' broader
execution of its mission areas. It is not intended to replace
or preclude the appropriate use of EWN practices at districts
using project-specific funding, or work performed across other
Corps programs that might involve EWN. The Committee encourages
the Corps to identify EWN efforts in future budget requests. Of
the funding recommended, $5,000,000 is included to support
ongoing research and advance work with university partners to
develop standards, design guidance, and testing protocols to
improve and standardize nature-based and hybrid infrastructure
solutions.
Flood and Earthquake Modeling.--Additional funds are
recommended in the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program to
facilitate coordination with the Levee Safety program to
develop a plan for leveraging existing knowledge related to
potential seismic concerns relevant to levees. The Corps is
encouraged to evaluate whether earthquake model would aid in
assessment and if collaboration with Universities would be
beneficial.
Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations.--The Committee is
pleased with the results of FIRO Phases 1 and 2 and is
interested in how the program can be leveraged to other areas.
Particularly if there are regions where different storm types,
in addition to Atmospheric Rivers, are key to heavy rain and
flooding (e.g., tropical storms/hurricanes, large thunderstorm
systems), and where longer forecast lead times may be required.
The Corps shall brief the Committees on Appropriations of both
Houses of Congress no later than 60 days following enactment on
the details of continuing and potentially expanding FIRO and
related efforts. The briefing shall include how FIRO could be
expanded to include assessments of at least two major systems
of dams (representing at least a dozen dams in total), for
which coordination across several dams in the larger watershed
is required and focus on the potential to predict extreme
precipitation and flood to better anticipate to what degree
FIRO might be applicable across reservoirs nationally.
Integrated Navigation Analysis and Systems Enhancements.--
The Committee recommends additional funds in the remaining item
Dredging Data and Lock Performance Monitoring System and in the
remaining item Dredging Operations Technical Support Program to
continue work laying the foundation for prototype applications
for machine learning techniques as it relates to sedimentation-
dredging patterns, dredging operations trends, and lock
operations, including enhancements to systems to provide
additional analytical capabilities and integrates data across
enterprise navigation systems.
Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects.--The
Committee is concerned about the absence of funding for the
Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects program in the
administration's budget request. The program is intended to
ensure that non-Federal sponsors operate and maintain aquatic
ecosystem restoration projects in accordance with the
Operations, Maintenance, Repair, Rehabilitation, and
Replacement manual, thereby ensuring that the Federal
investment is protected and presumably providing the benefits
intended. The Corps is encouraged to include funding in future
budget requests.
Invasive Species Mitigation.--The Committee recognizes that
the Corps is engaged in a multipronged effort to combat
invasive species in our country's waterways and protect the
Mississippi River Basin, which is one of the most valued
ecosystems in the world. The Committee recommends $500,000 for
the Corps, in partnership with other Federal partners, to begin
planning, design, initial engineering and project management
for construction of carp barriers in the Mississippi River
Basin and the Tennessee-Tombigbee waterway.
Kennebec River Long-Term Maintenance Dredging.--The
Committee continues to support the Memorandum of Agreement
signed in January 2019 denoting responsibilities between the
Department of the Army and the Department of the Navy for the
regular maintenance of the Kennebec River Federal Navigation
Channel. Maintenance dredging of the Kennebec is essential to
the safe passage of newly constructed Navy guided missile
destroyers to the Atlantic Ocean. The Committee directs the
Secretary to continue its collaboration with the Department of
the Navy to ensure regular maintenance dredging of the
Kennebec.
Levee Safety Program.--In fiscal year 2020, Congress
provided $15,000,000 to implement levee safety initiatives to
meet the requirements under section 3016 of WRRDA. The
Committee understands these funds are sufficient to complete
Phase II activities.
Low Reservoir Water Level Issues.--The Committee encourages
the Corps to ensure adequate resources to address issues at
Corps projects when low water levels occur, such as additional
terrestrial noxious weed control and sediment removal
activities.
Mobile Bay Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--The
Committee encourages the Corps to examine beneficial uses of
dredged material in Mobile Bay, Alabama.
Monitoring of Completed Navigation Projects--Fisheries.--
The Committee is concerned that a reduction in or elimination
of navigational lock operations on the Nation's inland
waterways is having a negative impact on river ecosystems,
particularly the ability of endangered, threatened, and game
fish species to migrate through waterways, particularly during
critical spawning periods. The Committee notes the success of
preliminary research which indicates reduced lock operations on
certain Corps-designated low-use waterways is directly
impacting migration and that there are effective means to
mitigate the impacts. The Committee continues to believe that
maximizing the ability of fish to use these locks to move past
the dams has the potential to restore natural and historic
long-distance river migrations that may be critical to species
survival. In fiscal year 2021, the Committee recommended
funding to continue this research on the impact of reduced lock
operations on riverine fish.
The Committee understands this research has proven valuable
and, within available funds for ongoing work, directs the Corps
to continue this research at not less than the fiscal year 2021
level. The goal of the continued funding is to support the
ongoing research and, where appropriate, expand the work to
look at ecosystem level impacts and additional waterways, lock
structures, lock operation methods, and fish species that will
more fully inform the Corps' operations.
Monitoring of Completed Navigation Projects--Structural
Health Monitoring.--Of the funding recommended, $4,000,000
shall be to support the structural health monitoring program to
facilitate research to maximize operations, enhance efficiency,
and protect asset life through catastrophic failure mitigation.
The Corps is encouraged to include funding for these activities
in future budget requests.
National Coastal Mapping Program.--Of the additional funds
recommended in the National Coastal Mapping Program remaining
item, $5,000,000 shall be for Arctic coastal mapping needs. The
Committee notes the Corps has responsibility for some mapping
but, in general, does not include shoreline. Before the Corps
obligates funds to map shoreline in Alaska, the Assistant
Secretary of the Army for Civil Works shall provide notice to
the Committee. The notice shall include certification that the
effort is coordinated with NOAA and compliments those efforts.
Recreational Boating.--The Committee encourages the Corps
to complete the ongoing inventory of all federally managed
recreational boating infrastructure and facilities. The
Committee is interested in the findings related to the
assessment of annual operation and maintenance needs associated
with such infrastructure and facilities, deferred operation and
maintenance needs for such infrastructure and facilities to
operate safely at full capacity, opportunities to expand
capacity at existing access points, and economic impact of
recreation to local and regional economies and benefits of
sustaining and improving public access at recreational
infrastructure and facilities.
Regional Sediment Management.--The Committee recommends
$5,000,000 to continue Corps research and development into
enhanced forecasting capabilities to implement proactive
strategies for flood risk management to enhance the resiliency
of coastal communities and mitigate socioeconomic and
environmental consequences of extreme coastal hazards. Funds
are also provided to support cooperative efforts between the
Corps and academia to address compound flooding issues.
Small, Remote, or Subsistence Harbors.--The Committee
emphasizes the importance of ensuring that our country's small
and low-use ports remain functional. The Committee urges the
Corps to consider expediting scheduled maintenance at small and
low-use ports that have experienced unexpected levels of
deterioration since their last dredging. The Committee is
concerned that the administration's criteria for navigation
maintenance disadvantage small, remote, or subsistence harbors
and waterways from competing for scarce navigation maintenance
funds. The Committee directs the Corps to revise the criteria
used for determining which navigation maintenance projects are
funded and to develop a reasonable and equitable allocation
under the Operation and Maintenance account. The Committee
supports including criteria to evaluate economic impact that
these projects provide to local and regional economies.
Soil Moisture and Snowpack Monitoring Program.--The
Committee recommends $8,000,000 for the continued fielding of
the Missouri River Snowpack and Soil Moisture Monitoring
System. Providing these capabilities is critical to enabling
the Corps to accurately forecast plains snowpack and soil
moisture to improve runoff forecasts that inform management
decisions on dam releases in order to protect Missouri River
Basin states from the impacts of flooding and droughts.
Tuttle Creek Lake, KS.--The additional funding provided is
for Water Injection Dredging efforts.
Water Control Manual Prioritization Report.--The Committee
is pleased to see the Corps start to budget for the update of
water control manuals. However, the Committee is perplexed and
disappointed that the prioritized list of manuals that require
updating has not been provided. This is particularly concerning
because funds were provided for this purpose and it appears the
Corps has used this information to budget for these updates.
The Corps shall provide the comprehensive list of water control
manuals at Corps-owned projects located in states where a
Reclamation project is also located, including a prioritized
list of needed updates of those manuals no later than 60 days
following enactment.
Water Control Manuals, Section 7 Dams.--Many water control
manuals are decades old and in need of updating, particularly
in light of recent dam disasters and improvements in forecast-
informed reservoir operations [FIRO]. Of the additional funds
recommended for Other Authorized Project Purposes $4,000,000
shall be for water control manual updates for a non-Corps owned
high hazard dam where: (1) the Corps has a responsibility for
flood control operations under section 7 of the Flood Control
Act of 1944; (2) the dam requires coordination of water
releases with one or more other high-hazard dams for flood
control purposes; and (3) the dam owner is actively
investigating the feasibility of applying forecast informed
reservoir operations technology.
Water Operations Technical Support.--Funding in addition to
the budget request is recommended for research into atmospheric
rivers first funded in fiscal year 2015.
Additional Funding for Ongoing Work.--The Committee cannot
support a level of funding that does not fund operation and
maintenance of our Nation's aging infrastructure sufficiently
to ensure continued competitiveness in a global marketplace.
Federal navigation channels maintained at only a fraction of
authorized dimensions and navigation locks and hydropower
facilities being used well beyond their design life results in
economic inefficiencies and risks infrastructure failure, which
can cause substantial economic losses. The Committee
recommendation includes additional funds for projects and
activities to enhance the Nation's economic growth and
international competitiveness.
Of the additional funds recommended in this account for
other authorized project purposes, not less than $2,000,000
shall be for efforts to combat invasive mussels at Corps-owned
reservoirs.
When allocating the additional funding recommended in this
account, the Corps shall consider giving priority to the
following:
--Ability to complete ongoing work maintaining authorized
depths and widths of harbors and shipping channels
(including small, remote, or subsistence harbors),
including where contaminated sediments are present;
--Ability to address critical maintenance backlog;
--Presence of the U.S. Coast Guard;
--Extent to which the work will enhance national, regional,
or local economic development;
--Extent to which the work will promote job growth or
international competitiveness;
--Number of jobs created directly by the funded activity;
--Ability to obligate the funds allocated within the fiscal
year;
--Ability to complete the project, separable element, project
phase, or useful increment of work within the funds
allocated;
--Dredging projects that would provide supplementary benefits
to tributaries and waterways in close proximity to
ongoing island replenishment projects; and
--Extent to which the work will promote recreation-based
benefits, including those created by recreational
boating; and
--For harbor maintenance activities:
--Total tonnage handled;
--Total exports;
--Total imports;
--Dollar value of cargo handled;
--Energy infrastructure and national security needs served;
--Designation as strategic seaports;
--Lack of alternative means of freight movement;
--Savings over alternative means of freight movement; and
--Improvements to dredge disposal facilities which will
result in long-term savings, including a reduction
in regular maintenance costs.
REGULATORY PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $210,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 204,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ 212,000,000
The Committee recommends $212,000,000 for the Regulatory
Program. The Committee recommends funds above the budget
request to address capacity needs across the Corps related to
staffing shortages in Corps districts. The Corps is encouraged
to budget appropriately in order to process permits in a timely
fashion.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, nothing shall
preclude a non-Federal entity from developing and operating a
pumped storage hydroelectric project in Gregory County, South
Dakota, utilizing Missouri River water pursuant to a Federal
Power Act license, subject to all otherwise applicable license
and permits, nor limit the entities to which project power can
be sold.
FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $250,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 260,000,000
The Committee recommends $260,000,000 for the Formerly
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program.
FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $35,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 35,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 35,000,000
The Committee recommends $35,000,000 for Flood Control and
Coastal Emergencies.
EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $206,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 199,290,000
Committee recommendation................................ 216,000,000
The Committee recommends $216,000,000 for Expenses. No
funding is recommended for creation of an Office of
Congressional Affairs.
The Expenses appropriation is an administrative and
operational account which supports the technical,
administrative and staff supervision functions assigned to
Corps Headquarters, the Major Subordinate Commands [MSCs/
division offices]; and the costs of those elements within four
field operating activities providing direct support to those
functions. The Expenses appropriation pays for two categories
of requirements--labor and non-labor--to support the Corps.
The most recent U.S. Army Manpower Analysis Agency [USAMAA]
staffing analysis was conducted in 2011 to determine an
efficient and effective organizational structure for the Corps,
properly staffed to perform assigned missions and accomplish
given workload under the appropriate command and control. This
analysis identified the need for 980 Full time equivalents
[FTE] based on the needs facing the Corps' Civil Works program
in 2011, which received an annual Civil Works appropriation of
$5,100,000,000. The Corps has been operating with approximately
850 FTE, with a fiscal year 2020 appropriation of $7,650,000,
not accounting for the over $20,000,000,000 in emergency
supplemental funding they have received over the past 3 years.
Thus, the Corps is working with nearly 130 fewer FTE than
recommended and being required to execute at least 50 percent
more work than the initial estimate was based on.
The additional funds recommended in this account shall be
used to support implementation of the Corps' Civil Works
program, including hiring additional FTE. This includes
developing and issuing policy guidance; managing Civil Works
program; and providing national coordination of and
participation in forums and events within headquarters, the
division offices, and meeting other enterprise requirements and
operating expenses. The Committee encourages the Corps to
pursue updating the 2011 USMAA staffing analysis based on
current Civil Works needs.
The Committee moved $8,000,000 provided in the budget
recommendation for electric vehicles and charging stations to
this account. These activities align with the replacement and
maintenance of the current fleet of vehicles which is conducted
as part of this account.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS)
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $4,500,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 5,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,000,000
The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for the Office of the
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works).
The Committee is concerned about the bureaucratic process
for renewing leases under 10 U.S.C. 2667 and 16 U.S.C. 460d.
The Committee encourages the Secretary to consider the
efficiencies that may be gained by allowing Corps districts to
authorize lease renewals under this section, including lease
applications in excess of 25 years.
The Committee counts on a timely and accessible executive
branch in the course of fulfilling its constitutional role in
the appropriations process. The requesting and receiving of
basic, factual information is vital to maintaining a
transparent and open governing process. The Committee
recognizes that some discussions internal to the executive
branch are pre-decisional in nature and, therefore, not subject
to disclosure. However, the access to facts, figures, and
statistics that inform these decisions are not subject to the
same sensitivity and are critical to the appropriations
process. The administration needs to do more to ensure timely
and complete responses to these inquiries.
WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE AND INNOVATION PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2020.................................... $14,200,000
Budget estimate, 2021...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 14,200,000
The Committee recommends $14,200,000 for the Water
Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program.
GENERAL PROVISIONS--CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL
Section 101. The bill includes a provision related to
reprogramming.
Section 102. The bill includes a provision related to
allocation of funds.
Section 103. The bill includes a provision related to
contract awards and modifications.
Section 104. The bill includes a provision related to the
Fish and Wildlife Service.
Section 105. The bill includes a provision related to open
lake disposal of dredged material.
Section 106. The bill includes a provision related to the
reorganization or transfer of the Corps of Engineers.
Section 107. The bill includes a provision related to
project eligibility for funding.
Section 108. The bill includes a provision related to water
reallocation studies.
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT COMPLETION ACCOUNT
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $21,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 20,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 21,000,000
The Committee recommends $21,000,000 for the Central Utah
Project Completion Account, which includes $5,000,000 for the
Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Account for use by
the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission,
$1,550,000 for necessary expenses of the Secretary of the
Interior, and up to $1,850,000 for the Commission's
administrative expenses. This allows the Department of the
Interior to develop water supply facilities that will continue
to sustain economic growth and an enhanced quality of life in
the western States, the fastest growing region in the United
States. The Committee remains committed to complete the Central
Utah Project, which would enable the project to initiate
repayment to the Federal Government.
Bureau of Reclamation
OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $1,986,000,000 for the Bureau of
Reclamation [Reclamation]. The Committee recommendation sets
priorities by supporting our Nation's water infrastructure.
INTRODUCTION
In addition to the traditional missions of bringing water
and power to the West, Reclamation continues to develop
programs, initiatives, and activities that will help meet new
water needs and balance the multitude of competing uses of
water in the West. Reclamation is the largest wholesaler of
water in the country, operating 338 reservoirs with a total
storage capacity of 140 million acre-feet. Reclamation projects
deliver 10 trillion gallons of water to more than 31 million
people each year, and provide 1 out of 5 western farmers with
irrigation water for 11 million acres of farmland that produce
60 percent of the Nation's vegetables and 25 percent of its
fruits and nuts. Reclamation manages, with partners, 289
recreation sites that have 90 million visits annually.
FISCAL YEAR 2022 WORK PLAN
The Committee recommends funding above the budget request
for Water and Related Resources. Reclamation is directed to
submit a work plan, not later than 60 days after the date of
enactment of this act, to the Committee proposing its
allocation of these additional funds. The work plan shall be
consistent with the following general guidance:
--None of the funds may be used for any item for which the
Committee has specifically denied funding;
--The additional funds are recommended for studies or
projects that were either not included in the budget
request or for which the budget request was inadequate;
--Funding associated with a category may be allocated to
eligible studies or projects within that category; and
--Reclamation may not withhold funding from a study or
project because it is inconsistent with administration
policy. The Committee notes that these funds are in
excess of the administration's budget request, and that
administration budget metrics shall not disqualify a
study or project from being funded.
DROUGHT RESILIENCY
The Committee remains intently focused on the need for
improving drought resiliency as well as in finding
opportunities for agencies to combine water supply benefits
with other mission priorities. The impacts of the current
severe drought in the west display there is more work to be
done. The Committee continues to invest in the drought
resiliency programs authorized in the WIIN Act and believes a
solution to these chronic droughts is a combination of
additional storage, substantial investments in desalination and
recycling, improved conveyance, and increased efficiencies in
the uses of water both for agriculture and potable purposes. As
the West has consistently been the fastest growing part of the
country, it is incumbent on Reclamation to lead the way in
increasing the water that is available from year to year and to
incentivize more efficient use of the water that is available.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING
The Committee included congressionally directed spending,
as defined in section 5(a) of rule XLIV of the Standing Rules
of the Senate. The Committee funded only projects and studies
that are authorized by law. In the interest of providing full
disclosure of funding provided in this Title, all projects
requested and funded are listed in a table accompanying this
report. All of the projects funded in this report have gone
through the same rigorous process and approvals as those
proposed by the President.
WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $1,521,125,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 1,379,050,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,832,101,000
The Committee recommends $1,832,101,000 for Water and
Related Resources.
INTRODUCTION
The Water and Related Resources account supports the
development, management, and restoration of water and related
natural resources in the 17 western States. The account
includes funds for operating and maintaining existing
facilities to obtain the greatest overall level of benefits, to
protect public safety, and to conduct studies on ways to
improve the use of water and related natural resources. Work
will be done in partnership and cooperation with non-Federal
entities and other Federal agencies.
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget estimate Committee recommendation
---------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Resources Facilities Resources Facilities
management OM&R management OM&R
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA
AK CHIN INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT .............. 19,433 .............. 19,433
PROJECT........................................
COLORADO RIVER BASIN--CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT 20,957 648 20,957 648
COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM...... 2,303 .............. 2,303 ..............
SALT RIVER PROJECT.............................. 649 364 649 364
SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT 550 .............. 550 ..............
PROJECT........................................
YUMA AREA PROJECTS.............................. 1,025 28,364 1,025 28,364
CALIFORNIA
CACHUMA PROJECT................................. 915 1,401 915 1,401
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT:.........................
AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION, FOLSOM DAM UNIT/MORMON 1,830 10,937 1,830 10,937
ISLAND.........................................
AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT........................ 35 2,564 35 2,564
DELTA DIVISION.................................. 17,586 12,145 17,586 12,145
EAST SIDE DIVISION.............................. 1,290 2,772 1,290 2,772
FRIANT DIVISION................................. 1,375 3,761 1,375 3,761
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION SETTLEMENT........ 20,500 .............. 20,500 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS.................. 21,694 370 21,694 370
REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINT .............. 29,500 .............. 29,500
PROGRAM........................................
SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION....................... 7,450 695 12,450 695
SACRAMENTO RIVER BASIN FLOOD PLAIN .............. .............. (5,000) ..............
REACTIVATION...............................
SAN FELIPE DIVISION............................. 128 68 128 68
CVP SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION........................ .............. .............. .............. ..............
SHASTA DIVISION................................. 494 11,190 494 11,190
TRINITY RIVER DIVISION.......................... 10,361 5,230 10,361 5,230
WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS...................... 2,251 10,843 2,251 10,843
WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT........ 2,604 7,075 3,104 7,075
LOS BANOS CREEK APPRAISAL STUDY............. .............. .............. (500) ..............
ORLAND PROJECT.................................. .............. 923 .............. 923
SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT..................... 2,000 .............. 2,000 ..............
SAN GABRIEL BASIN RESTORATION FUND.............. .............. .............. 10,000 ..............
SOLANO PROJECT.................................. 1,162 2,535 1,162 2,535
VENTURA RIVER PROJECT........................... 330 44 830 44
COLORADO
ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT......................... 758 4,506 758 4,506
ARMEL UNIT, P-SMBP.............................. 15 434 15 434
COLLBRAN PROJECT................................ 148 2,686 148 2,686
COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT................... 265 15,092 265 15,092
FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT........................ 67 133 67 133
FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT...................... 76 8,880 76 8,880
FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT--ARKANSAS VALLEY 10,050 .............. 10,050 ..............
CONDUIT........................................
GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II............. 64 1,755 64 1,755
GRAND VALLEY PROJECT............................ 193 155 193 155
LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY PROJECT....... .............. 24,878 .............. 24,878
MANCOS PROJECT.................................. 93 258 93 258
NARROWS UNIT, P-SMBP............................ .............. 33 .............. 33
PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II........... 771 2,967 771 2,967
PINE RIVER PROJECT.............................. 127 361 127 361
SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CLOSED BASIN........... 100 2,950 100 2,950
SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CONEJOS DIVISION....... 10 20 10 20
UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT............................. 711 169 711 169
UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM......... 3,250 .............. 3,250 ..............
IDAHO
BOISE AREA PROJECTS............................. 2,753 2,964 2,753 2,964
COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT 18,000 .............. 18,000 ..............
LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECT....................... 880 27 880 27
MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS.......................... 2,654 4,557 2,654 4,557
PRESTON BENCH PROJECT........................... 13 34 13 34
KANSAS
ALMENA UNIT, P-SMBP............................. 18 1,131 18 1,131
BOSTWICK UNIT, P-SMBP........................... 199 1,243 199 1,243
CEDAR BLUFF UNIT, P-SMBP........................ 13 452 13 452
GLEN ELDER UNIT, P-SMBP......................... 18 18,519 18 18,519
KANSAS RIVER UNIT, P-SMBP....................... .............. 100 .............. 100
KIRWIN UNIT, P-SMBP............................. 27 387 27 387
WEBSTER UNIT, P-SMBP............................ 18 5,010 18 5,010
WICHITA PROJECT--CHENEY DIVISION................ 39 398 39 398
WICHITA EQUUS BEDS DIVISION..................... 10 .............. 10 ..............
MONTANA
CANYON FERRY UNIT, P-SMBP....................... 188 8,012 188 8,012
EAST BENCH UNIT, P-SMBP......................... 162 602 162 602
FORT PECK RESERVATION / DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER 17,191 .............. 17,191 ..............
SYSTEM.........................................
HELENA VALLEY UNIT, P-SMBP...................... 52 200 52 200
HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT............................ .............. 1,673 .............. 1,673
HUNTLEY PROJECT................................. 38 24 38 24
LOWER MARIAS UNIT, P-SMBP....................... 536 1,496 536 1,496
LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT....................... 905 22 905 22
MILK RIVER PROJECT.............................. 400 1,202 400 1,202
MISSOURI BASIN O&M, P-SMBP...................... 1,015 157 1,015 157
ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MT RURAL WATER SYSTEM.. 13,504 .............. 13,504 ..............
SUN RIVER PROJECT............................... 107 373 107 373
YELLOWTAIL UNIT, P-SMBP......................... 105 9,875 105 9,875
NEBRASKA
AINSWORTH UNIT, P-SMBP.......................... 33 109 33 109
EASTERN NEW MEXICO WATER SUPPLY--UTE RESERVOIR.. 7,790 .............. 25,190 ..............
FRENCHMAN-CAMBRIDGE UNIT, P-SMBP................ 174 2,411 174 2,411
MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT............................ 24 102 24 102
NORTH LOUP UNIT, P-SMBP......................... 46 198 46 198
NEVADA
LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT.......................... 5,435 5,858 5,435 5,858
LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM......... 115 .............. 115 ..............
LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM................ 595 .............. 3,655 ..............
NEW MEXICO
CARLSBAD PROJECT................................ 2,794 6,946 2,794 6,946
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT....................... 20,100 10,530 20,100 10,530
RIO GRANDE PROJECT.............................. 2,391 6,709 2,391 6,709
RIO GRANDE PUEBLOS PROJECT...................... 1,050 .............. 1,050 ..............
TUCUMCARI PROJECT............................... 15 5 15 5
NORTH DAKOTA
DICKINSON UNIT, P-SMBP.......................... .............. 838 .............. 838
GARRISON DIVERSION UNIT, P-SMBP Rural and Non- 24,568 14,891 24,568 14,891
Rural Water....................................
HEART BUTTE UNIT, P-SMBP........................ 82 1,271 82 1,271
OKLAHOMA
ARBUCKLE PROJECT................................ 39 243 39 243
MCGEE CREEK PROJECT............................. 20 904 20 904
MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT........................... 30 681 30 681
NORMAN PROJECT.................................. 76 289 76 289
WASHITA BASIN PROJECT........................... 52 1,555 52 1,555
WC AUSTIN PROJECT............................... 37 905 37 905
OREGON
CROOKED RIVER PROJECT........................... 314 499 314 499
DESCHUTES PROJECT............................... 429 231 429 231
EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS......................... 721 256 721 256
KLAMATH PROJECT................................. 19,770 4,299 24,770 4,299
KLAMATH, SCADA ACQUISITION.................. .............. .............. (5,000) ..............
ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION...... 738 543 738 543
TUALATIN PROJECT................................ 382 1,856 1,682 1,856
SCOGGINS DAM................................ .............. .............. (1,300) ..............
UMATILLA PROJECT................................ 567 3,100 567 3,100
SOUTH DAKOTA
ANGOSTURA UNIT, P-SMBP.......................... 10 882 10 882
BELLE FOURCHE UNIT, P-SMBP...................... 130 1,507 130 1,507
KEYHOLE UNIT, P-SMBP............................ 190 586 190 586
LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM.............. 9,220 .............. 31,134 ..............
MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT.................. .............. 13 .............. 13
MNI WICONI PROJECT.............................. .............. 17,010 .............. 17,010
OAHE UNIT, P-SMBP............................... .............. 90 .............. 90
RAPID VALLEY PROJECT............................ .............. 86 .............. 86
RAPID VALLEY UNIT, P-SMBP....................... .............. 224 .............. 224
SHADEHILL UNIT, P-SMBP.......................... 119 715 119 715
TEXAS
BALMORHEA PROJECT............................... 4 .............. 4 ..............
CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT.......................... 42 82 42 82
LOWER RIO GRANDE WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM..... 911 .............. 911 ..............
NUECES RIVER PROJECT............................ 52 1,010 52 1,010
SAN ANGELO PROJECT.............................. 23 680 23 680
UTAH
HYRUM PROJECT................................... 109 260 109 260
MOON LAKE PROJECT............................... 19 159 19 159
NEWTON PROJECT.................................. 56 132 56 132
OGDEN RIVER PROJECT............................. 195 246 195 246
PROVO RIVER PROJECT............................. 3,336 532 3,336 532
SANPETE PROJECT................................. 85 18 85 18
SCOFIELD PROJECT................................ 344 153 344 153
STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT....................... 500 60 500 60
WEBER BASIN PROJECT............................. 1,273 942 1,273 942
WEBER RIVER PROJECT............................. 108 212 108 212
WASHINGTON
COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT.......................... 7,270 20,715 7,770 20,715
ODESSA SUBAREA.............................. (1,500) .............. (2,000) ..............
WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS........................ 372 160 372 160
YAKIMA PROJECT.................................. 1,887 7,040 1,887 7,040
YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.... 25,500 .............. 26,450 ..............
WAPATO IRRIGATION PROJECT................... (1,040) .............. (1,990) ..............
WYOMING
BOYSEN UNIT, P-SMBP............................. 78 2,235 78 2,235
BUFFALO BILL DAM, DAM MODIFICATION, P-SMBP...... 9 5,941 9 5,941
KENDRICK PROJECT................................ 79 3,841 79 3,841
NORTH PLATTE PROJECT............................ 93 2,487 93 2,487
NORTH PLATTE AREA, P-SMBP....................... 121 6,787 121 6,787
OWL CREEK UNIT, P-SMBP.......................... 4 102 4 102
RIVERTON UNIT, P-SMBP........................... 12 716 12 716
SHOSHONE PROJECT................................ 34 1,293 34 1,293
---------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, ITEMS UNDER STATES.............. 333,604 416,742 399,728 416,742
===============================================================
REMAINING ITEMS
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK
RURAL WATER..................................... .............. .............. 40,000 ..............
FISH PASSAGE AND FISH SCREENS................... .............. .............. 8,000 ..............
SACRAMENTO RIVER FISH SCREEN................ .............. .............. (3,900) ..............
UPPER YAKIMA BULL TROUT RESEARCH FACILITY... .............. .............. (700) ..............
WATER CONSERVATION AND DELIVERY................. .............. .............. 225,500 ..............
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND COMPLIANCE........ .............. .............. 20,000 ..............
FACILITIES OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND .............. .............. .............. 2,717
REHABILITATION.................................
AGING INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM.................... .............. 1,000 .............. 1,000
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESOTRATION PROGRAM........... 1,000 .............. 1,000 ..............
COLORADO RIVER COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES............ 21,400 .............. 21,400 ..............
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT, .............. 17,574 .............. 17,574
TITLE I........................................
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT, 7,000 .............. 7,000 ..............
TITLE II.......................................
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT (CRSP), SECTION 5 3,164 7,469 3,164 7,469
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT (CRSP), SECTION 8 3,322 .............. 3,322 ..............
COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 740 .............. 500 ..............
DAM SAFETY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DAM SAFETY PROGRAM... .............. 1,300 .............. 1,300
INITIATE SAFETY OF DAMS CORRECTIVE ACTION....... .............. 182,500 .............. 182,500
SAFETY EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS.............. .............. 23,284 .............. 23,284
EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM.. .............. 1,250 9,950 1,250
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRAM
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION 2,575 .............. 2,575 ..............
PROGRAM (Bureauwide)...........................
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION 4,950 .............. 4,950 ..............
PROGRAM (Platte River).........................
ENDANGERED SPEC RECOVERY IMPL PROG (Upper Colo & 5,700 .............. 5,700 ..............
San Juan Riv Basins)...........................
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION............ 1,711 .............. 1,711 ..............
EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES.............. .............. 12,727 .............. 12,727
GENERAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES..................... 2,195 .............. 2,195 ..............
INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENTS
AAMODT LITIGATION SETTLEMENT.................... 10,000 .............. 10,000 ..............
BLACKFEET SETTLEMENT............................ 40,000 .............. 40,000 ..............
CROW TRIBE RIGHTS............................... 12,772 .............. 12,772 ..............
NAVAJO-GALLUP................................... 51,342 5,000 51,342 5,000
LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM............... 16,190 .............. 16,190 ..............
LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM......... 45,218 .............. 45,218 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS.......... .............. 971 .............. 971
NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM................. 20,000 .............. 20,000 ..............
NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING. 2,219 .............. 2,219 ..............
OPERATION & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.................. 836 3,264 836 3,264
POWER PROGRAM SERVICES.......................... 3,121 307 3,121 307
PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM................ 610 206 610 206
RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION.................. 1,131 .............. 1,131 ..............
RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM 5,508 .............. 5,508 ..............
ADMINISTRATION.................................
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM..... 7,850 1,650 19,850 1,650
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.................. 18,000 .............. 18,000 ..............
SITE SECURITY ACTIVITIES........................ .............. 27,500 .............. 27,500
UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL 80 .............. 80 ..............
SUPPORT........................................
WATERSMART PROGRAM
WATERSMART GRANTS............................... 15,000 .............. 48,000 ..............
WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM... 2,318 .............. 2,318 ..............
COOPERATIVE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT............ 2,250 .............. 2,250 ..............
BASIN STUDIES............................... 13,500 .............. 13,500 ..............
DROUGHT RESPONSE & COMPREHENSIVE DROUGHT 16,500 .............. 25,000 ..............
PLANS......................................
TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION & REUSE PROGRAM. 4,500 .............. 32,000 ..............
---------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS................. 342,702 286,002 726,912 288,719
===============================================================
TOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES........ 676,306 702,744 1,126,640 705,461
---------------------------------------------------------------
GRAND TOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES.. .............. 1,379,050 .............. 1,832,101
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anadromous Fish Screen Program.--The Committee appreciates
Reclamation's efforts to devote additional resources to
completing work on the last two remaining priority unscreened
diversions on the Sacramento River, which have been
specifically identified as priorities in the California Natural
Resources Agency Sacramento Valley Salmon Resiliency Strategy.
Aging Infrastructure Program.--The majority of
Reclamation's infrastructure is over 50 years old, which can
result in significant operations and maintenance costs. The
Committee is interested in the benefit the Aging Infrastructure
program could provide, particularly in addressing extraordinary
maintenance projects, particularly in drought prone areas. The
Committee does not support allowing increases or decreases in
transfer amounts at this time and directs Reclamation to report
to the Committee prior to obligation of any of the funds for
this purpose a report detailing the implementation of this
program and the criteria for evaluating eligible projects.
Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Program.--The Committee
supports the budget request of $1,000,000 for the Aquatic
Ecosystem Restoration Program to the design, study, and
construction of aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection
projects in Reclamation States. Reclamation is directed to
report to the Committee within 60 days after enactment of this
act, detailing the plan to implement this program and the
criteria for evaluating eligible projects.
Aquifer Recharge.--Reclamation is directed to work closely
with project beneficiaries to identify and resolve any barriers
to aquifer recharge projects when appropriate while utilizing
full authority to prioritize funds for ongoing projects through
completion. Of the funds recommended in this account above the
budget request, $25,000,000 shall be for Aquifer Storage and
Recovery projects focused on ensuring sustainable water supply
and protecting water quality of aquifers in the Great Plains
Region with shared or multi-use aquifers for municipal,
agricultural irrigation, industrial, recreation and domestic
users.
Boulder Canyon Project, Dam Fund.--The committee is aware
of the challenges that the Hoover Dam site cleanup maintenance
costs place on the ratepayers. The Committee encourages
Reclamation to work with the ratepayers towards a solution
within applicable laws. Reclamation is directed to brief the
Committee within 60 days of enactment on the challenges, legal
obstacles, and potential solutions related to the cleanup.
CALFED Water Storage Feasibility Studies.--The Committee
strongly encourages Reclamation to expeditiously complete
financial assistance projects requested by the non-Federal
sponsors of the CALED water storage projects to help the
projects. The Committee finds it unacceptable that these
agreements have been under study for over 15 years.
Columbia Basin Project.--The Committee is aware of the
Odessa Groundwater Replacement Program within the Columbia
Basin Project to deliver surface water to the Odessa Subarea.
The Subarea groundwater is being withdrawn at a rate beyond the
aquifer's capacity to recharge, and aquifers in the Subarea are
quickly declining. The Committee supports Reclamation's
partnership in the program to provide farmlands in Central and
Eastern Washington with surface water supply through
operational changes in the storage and delivery system and
urges Reclamation to move forward to implement the program.
Drought Contingency Plans.--The Committee commends
Reclamation, the Department of the Interior, and the seven
Colorado River Basin states for completing drought contingency
plans to conserve water and reduce risks from ongoing drought
for the Upper and Lower Colorado River basins. The completion
of these plans mark a major milestone in protecting a critical
water source in the western United States. The Committee
encourages Reclamation to provide sufficient funding for
activities that support these plans.
Friant-Kern Canal.--The Committee encourages the Secretary
to include funding in future budget submissions for
construction activities related to projects found to be
feasible by the Secretary and which are ready to initiate for
the repair of critical Reclamation canals where operational
conveyance capacity has been seriously impaired by factors such
as age or land subsidence, especially those that would
imminently jeopardize Reclamation's ability to meet water
delivery obligations.
Klamath Basin Project.--The Committee encourages the Bureau
to continue to collaborate agreements with state agencies to
support groundwater monitoring efforts in the Klamath Basin.
Navajo-Galllup Water Supply Project.--The Committee remains
interested in the progress on this critical project as
Reclamation works to meet the December 2024 completion date.
Reclamation is directed to brief the Committee within 90 days
after enactment of this act, detailing the timeline and cost
for the remaining work.
Research and Development: Desalination and Water
Purification Program.--Of the funding recommended for this
program, $12,000,000 shall be for desalination projects as
authorized in section 4009(a) of Public Law 114-322.
Rural Water Projects.--Voluntary funding in excess of
legally required cost shares for rural water projects is
acceptable but shall not be used by Reclamation as a criterion
for allocating additional funding recommended by the Committee
or for budgeting in future years.
Safety of Dams Act Cost Share.--The Committee reminds
Reclamation that not more than 15 percent of dam safety
modification project costs can be allocated for reimbursement
to all project purposes and all beneficiaries consistent with
Section 4 of Public Law 95-578, as amended.
Salton Sea.--The Committee supports the Memorandum of
Understanding signed between the Department of the Interior and
the California Natural Resources Agency to support management
activities at the Salton Sea. The Committee encourages
Reclamation to partner with Federal, state, and local agencies
and coordinate use of all existing authorities and funding
sources to support the State of California's Salton Sea
Management Program and reduce the likelihood of severe health
and environmental impacts. Reclamation is directed to brief the
Committee within 90 days of the enactment of this act on
Reclamation's plan for managing the air quality impacts of the
estimated 8.75 square miles of lands it owns that will emerge
from the receding Sea over the next decade.
San Joaquin River Restoration.--Permanent appropriations,
available for the program in fiscal year 2020, shall not
supplant continued annual appropriations, and the Committee
encourages Reclamation to include adequate funding in future
budget submissions.
Scoggins Dam, Tualatin Project, Oregon.--The Committee
remains concerned about the high risk associated with Scoggins
Dam, and urges Reclamation to work with local stakeholders and
repayment contractors to prioritize this joint project and
continue to review measures to protect public safety, water
security and the economic health of the region. Within 60 days
of enactment of this act, Reclamation shall brief the Committee
on the status of the dam safety activities including a timeline
for completion and any challenges to addressing the safety
concerns in the most efficient manner.
Snow Modeling Data Processing.--Better snow modeling and
estimates of snow water equivalent may improve water resource
decision-making, specifically for water allocations and flood
control. Of the additional funding recommended in this account,
$1,500,000 shall be to support Reclamation's efforts to support
the U.S. Department of Agriculture and NOAA efforts to improve
real-time and derived snow water equivalent information such
that it can be immediately used for water resources decision-
making. Reclamation is directed to brief the Committee on its
plan for how Federal agencies will coordinate to implement
emerging snowpack modeling technologies, required by October 1,
2021 pursuant to section 1111(d)(1) of Subtitle FF of Public
Law 116-260.
St. Mary's Diversion Dam and Conveyance Works.--The
Committee recognizes the importance of stable water supply to
regional economies and communities and and urges Reclamation to
continue working with local stakeholders to complete its
ability to pay study for the rehabilitation of the St. Mary's
Diversion Dam. The Committee encourages Reclamation to find
innovative methods to rehabilitate the Milk River Project
without significant financial impacts for local stakeholders.
Upper Rio Grande Basin Study.--The Committee recognizes the
ecological, economic, cultural, and historic importance of the
Upper Rio Grande Basin and the increasing stress on its water
supply. The Committee encourages a comprehensive approach on
water and reservoir management, operation issues, and climate
resiliency within the Upper Rio Grande Basin (including the
Heron, El Vado, Abiquiu, Cochiti, Jemez Canyon, Elephant Butte,
and Caballo Dams and Reservoirs). Accordingly, Reclamation is
directed to brief the Committee within 90 days of the enactment
of this act on the work that has been done to date.
Additionally the briefing shall identify additional work that
can be done to supplement already completed work and to
identify any opportunities to partner with the National
Academies of Sciences.
WaterSMART Program.--The Committee encourages Reclamation
to prioritize eligible water conservation projects that will
provide water supplies to meet the needs of threatened and
endangered species.
WaterSMART Program: Open Evapotranspiration System.--The
Committee is intrigued by the evapotranspiration in the Central
Valley and California Delta to help measure how much water is
consumed by crops and other plants. Reclamation is encouraged
to utilize the Open Evapotranspiration system designed to
provide real-time and historical evapotranspiration
information, primarily on irrigated crop lands. Reclamation is
directed to provide to the Committee not later than 90 days
after enactment of this act a briefing on the potential
application of this system to Reclamation missions.
WaterSMART Program: Title XVI Water Reclamation & Reuse
Program.--Of the funding recommended for this program,
$20,000,000 shall be for water recycling and reuse projects as
authorized in section 4009(c) of the WIIN Act.
Yakima River Basin Integrated Water Resource Management
Plan.--The Committee supports the Yakima River Basin Integrated
Water Resource Management Plan. This innovative water
management plan represents years of collaboration in the Yakima
River Basin among stakeholders including Reclamation, the State
of Washington, the Yakama Nation, irrigators and farmers,
conservation organizations, recreationists, and local
governments to address water supply needs for agriculture, fish
and wildlife, and municipal use. The Committee encourages
Reclamation to move forward on implementing authorized
components of the plan.
Additional Funding for Water and Related Resources Work.--
The Committee recommendation includes funds in addition to the
budget request for Water and Related Resources studies,
projects, and activities. Priority in allocating these funds
shall be given to advance and complete ongoing work, including
preconstruction activities, and where environmental compliance
has been completed; improve water supply reliability; improve
water deliveries; enhance national, regional, or local economic
development; promote job growth; advance Tribal and nontribal
water settlement studies and activities; or address critical
backlog maintenance and rehabilitation activities. Reclamation
is encouraged to allocate additional funding for aquifer
recharging efforts to address the ongoing backlog of related
projects. Reclamation is reminded that activities authorized
under Indian Water Rights Settlements are eligible to compete
for the additional funding under ``Water Conservation and
Delivery''. Reclamation shall allocate additional funding
provided in this account consistent with the following
direction:
--Of the additional funding recommended under the heading
``Water Conservation and Delivery'', $134,000,000 shall
be for water storage projects as authorized in section
4007 of the WIIN Act;
--Of the additional funding recommended under the heading
``Water Conservation and Delivery,'' $40,000,000 shall
be for implementing the Drought Contingency Plan in the
Lower Colorado River Basin to create or conserve
recurring Colorado River water that contributes to
supplies in Lake Mead and other Colorado River water
reservoirs in the Lower Colorado Basin or projects to
improve the long-term efficiency of operations in the
Lower Colorado River Basin, consistent with the
Secretary's obligations under the Colorado River
Drought Contingency Plan Authorization Act of 2019
(Public Law 116-14) and related agreements. These water
conservation activities may include well construction
and irrigation-related structural or other measures;
programs and projects that result in conservation of
surface water or groundwater; or improve water system
efficiency, resiliency, reliability, delivery, and
conveyance, including canal system improvements. None
of these funds shall be used for the operation of the
Yuma Desalting Plant and nothing in this section shall
be construed as limiting existing or future
opportunities to augment the water supplies of the
Colorado River
--Of the additional funding recommended under the heading
``Water Conservation and Delivery,'' not less than
$10,000,000, shall be for construction activities
related to projects found to be feasible by the
Secretary and which are ready to initiate for the
repair of critical Reclamation canals where operational
conveyance capacity has been seriously impaired by
factors such as age or land subsidence, especially
those that would imminently jeopardize Reclamation's
ability to meet water delivery obligations;
--Of the additional funding recommended under the heading
``Environmental Restoration or Compliance'', not less
than $20,000,000 shall be for activities authorized
under sections 4001 and 4010 of the WIIN Act or as set
forth in Federal-State plans for restoring threatened
and endangered fish species affected by the operation
of Reclamation's water projects.
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $55,875,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 56,499,000
Committee recommendation................................ 56,499,000
The Committee recommends $56,499,000 for the Central Valley
Project Restoration Fund, the same as the budget request. This
appropriation is fully offset by collections, resulting in a
net appropriation of $0.
The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund was authorized
in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of
Public Law 102-575. This fund uses revenues from payments by
project beneficiaries and donations for habitat restoration,
improvement and acquisition, and other fish and wildlife
restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of
California. Payments from project beneficiaries include several
required by the act (Friant Division surcharges, higher charges
on water transferred to non-Central Valley Project users, and
tiered water prices) and, to the extent required in
appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation and
restoration payments.
CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $33,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 33,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 33,000,000
The Committee recommends $33,000,000 for California Bay-
Delta Restoration, the same as the budget request.
This account funds activities that are consistent with the
CALFED Bay-Delta Program, a collaborative effort involving 18
State and Federal agencies and representatives of California's
urban, agricultural, and environmental communities. The goals
of the program are to improve fish and wildlife habitat, water
supply reliability, and water quality in the San Francisco Bay-
San Joaquin River Delta, the principle hub of California's
water distribution system.
POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $60,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 64,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ 64,400,000
The Committee recommends $64,400,000 for Policy and
Administration, the same as the budget request.
This account funds the executive direction and management
of all Reclamation activities, as performed by the
Commissioner's offices in Washington, DC; Denver, Colorado; and
five regional offices. The Denver office and regional offices
charge individual projects or activities for direct beneficial
services and related administrative and technical costs. These
charges are covered under other appropriations.
GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Section 201. The bill includes a provision regarding
reprogramming.
Section 202. The bill includes a provision regarding the
San Luis Unit and Kesterson Reservoir.
Section 203. The bill includes a provision regarding the
Secure Water Act.
Section 204. The bill includes a provision regarding CALFED
Bay-Delta.
Section 205. The bill includes a provision regarding the
Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009.
Section 206. The bill includes a provision regarding the
Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991.
Section 207. The bill includes a provision regarding the
Cooperative Watershed Management Act.
TITLE III
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Overview of Recommendation
The Committee recommendation sets priorities by supporting
the Office of Science and the Advanced Research Projects
Agency-Energy [ARPA-E], leading the world in scientific
computing, addressing the Federal Government's responsibility
for environmental cleanup and disposal of used nuclear fuel,
keeping large construction projects on time and on budget,
effectively maintaining our nuclear weapons stockpile, and
supporting our nuclear Navy.
Introduction
The mission of the Department of Energy [Department] is to
ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its
energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges through
transformative science and technology solutions. To accomplish
this mission, the Secretary of Energy [Secretary] relies on a
world-class network of national laboratories, private industry,
universities, States, and Federal agencies, which allows our
brightest minds to solve our Nation's most important
challenges.
The Committee's recommendation for the Department includes
funding in both defense and non-defense budget categories.
Defense funding is recommended for atomic energy defense
activities, including the National Nuclear Security
Administration [NNSA], which manages our Nation's stockpile of
nuclear weapons, prevents proliferation of dangerous nuclear
materials, and supports the Navy's nuclear fleet; defense
environmental cleanup to remediate the former nuclear weapons
complex; and safeguards and security for Idaho National
Laboratory. Non-defense funding is recommended for the
Department's energy research and development programs
(including nuclear, fossil, renewable energy, energy
efficiency, grid modernization and resiliency, and the Office
of Science), power marketing administrations, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, and administrative expenses.
Reprogramming Guidelines
The Committee's recommendation includes control points to
ensure the Secretary spends taxpayer funds in accordance with
congressional direction. The Committee's recommendation also
includes reprogramming guidelines to allow the Secretary to
request permission from the Committee for certain expenditures,
as defined below, which would not otherwise be permissible. The
Secretary's execution of appropriated funds shall be fully
consistent with the direction provided under this heading and
in section 301 of the bill, unless the Committee includes
separate guidelines for specific actions in the bill or report.
Prior to obligating any funds for an action defined below
as a reprogramming, the Secretary shall notify and obtain
approval of the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of
Congress. The Secretary shall submit a detailed reprogramming
request in accordance with section 301 of the bill, which
shall, at a minimum, justify the deviation from prior
congressional direction and describe the proposed funding
adjustments with specificity. The Secretary shall not, pending
approval from the Committee, obligate any funds for the action
described in the reprogramming proposal.
The Secretary is also directed to inform the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress promptly and fully
when a change in program execution and funding is required
during the fiscal year.
Definition.--A reprogramming includes:
--the reallocation of funds from one activity to another
within an appropriation;
--any significant departure from a program, project,
activity, or organization described in the agency's
budget justification as presented to and approved by
Congress;
--for construction projects, the reallocation of funds from
one construction project identified in the agency's
budget justification to another project or a
significant change in the scope of an approved project;
--adoption of any reorganization proposal which includes
moving prior appropriations between appropriations
accounts; and
--any reallocation of new or prior year budget authority, or
prior year deobligations.
Sexual Harrassment
The Government Accountability Office [GAO] recently
released a report on sexual harassment in NNSA's nuclear
security forces. The Committee is encouraged that the
Department and NNSA stated they welcome opportunities for
continuous improvement, and that they agreed with the five
recommendations in the report. The Committee also commends NNSA
for broadening its focus to implementing the recommendations
beyond the nuclear security forces to include all Federal
employees and contractors across the NNSA enterprise. To better
understand and document the Department and NNSA progress in
implementing these recommendations, the Committee requests that
the Department and NNSA brief the Armed Services and
Appropriations Committees of both the House and Senate on the
steps taken, progress made, and relevant findings in their
efforts to implement the recommendations in the report. These
briefings shall take place within 6 months of enactment of the
act and every 6 months thereafter until GAO's recommendations
are implemented.
COVID-19 Research Delays
The Committee recognizes the potential impacts and delays
in research caused by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The
Committee notes that the Department has taken some steps to
engage scientific professional societies, universities and
colleges, and other Federal agencies to obtain up to-date
information on the impacts to institutions and research
communities to help inform an open, transparent, and equitable
response. However, the Committee is concerned that this
response has been uneven across the Department. The Department
is encouraged to consider these impacts within the resources
available. The Department is directed to provide to the
Committee not later than 60 days after enactment of this act a
report that details the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on
institutions and research communities. The report shall outline
funding and costs associated with the impacts. Further, the
Department is encouraged to include funding to address the
impacts in future budget requests.
Crosscutting Initiatives
Grid Modernization.--The Department is directed to continue
the ongoing work among the national laboratories, industry, and
universities to improve grid reliability and resiliency through
the strategic goals of the Grid Modernization Initiative [GMI].
The Committee recognizes the accomplishments of over 200
partners from industry, academia, and state governments in
these efforts. The Department shall brief the Committee not
later than 90 days after enactment of this act on the revised
GMI strategy, plans to reflect new decarbonization targets in
strategy enhancements, the funding profiles, portfolio of
funding opportunities, programmatic investments for the
Initiative, and the roles and responsibilities of each
participating program office. The Committee supports the Grid
Modernization Laboratory Consortium [GMLC] and continued
implementation of the Grid Multi-Year Program Plan [MYPP] to
ensure coordination across all applied program offices,
including the additions of the Offices of Cybersecurity, Energy
Security, and Emergency Response [CESER]; Nuclear Energy [NE];
and Fossil Energy and Carbon Management [FECM] to the MYPP. The
Committee directs the Department to continue its emphasis on
national energy systems resilience within the context of
administration goals in decarbonization of the power system and
related infrastructures, such as transportation. This shall
build on GMI/GMLC progress in advanced grid modeling and
improved grid cyber resilience to address emerging national
resilience challenges of the grid and related energy systems,
planned investments in energy storage to improve grid
flexibility and resilience, and advanced sensors and control
paradigms that promise to improve energy system resilience of
the grid of the future. The Committee recognizes the growing
importance of training and workforce development to support
grid modernization research and development, and the Committee
directs the Department to develop a plan for a pipeline of
students, graduates, and professors to sustain a robust grid
modernization research, design, and operations capability over
the long-term.
Carbon Dioxide Removal.--The fiscal year 2020 Act directed
the Department to develop an implementation plan coordinated
across FECM, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [EERE], and
the Office of Science. The Committee is still awaiting this
plan and directs the Department to provide the plan immediately
after enactment of this act. The Department is directed to
include a breakdown of the roles and responsibilities of each
participating program office in the implementation plan. The
Department is directed, pursuant to section 5001 and 5002 of
the Energy Act of 2020, to establish the Carbon Dioxide Removal
Program and Carbon Dioxide Removal Task Force to advance the
development and commercialization of carbon dioxide removal,
direct air capture, sequestration, and any other relevant
technologies on a significant scale. The Department is directed
to coordinate these activities among FECM, EERE, and the Office
of Science. The Committee supports direct air capture prize
competitions. The Department is directed to provide to the
Committee not later than 30 days after enactment of this act
the report required by section 5002 of the Energy Act of 2020.
The recommendation provides not less than $120,000,000 for
research, development, and demonstration of carbon dioxide
removal technologies, including not less than $20,000,000 from
EERE, not less than $50,000,000 from FECM, and not less than
$35,000,000 from the Office of Science. Within available funds
for carbon dioxide removal, the recommendation provides not
less than $75,000,000 for direct air capture.
Equity and Justice.--The Committee supports the
Department's continuing efforts and progress in implementing
the Justice40 Initiative, Executive Order 13985, and Executive
Order 14008. The Committee supports the Department's reforms
toward addressing equity and justice issues within the U.S.
energy system. In order to accelerate these reforms at the
Department, the Committee directs the Department to survey its
current programs, grant-making, policies, procedures, and rules
to ensure that it is adequately meeting the clean energy,
energy conservation, and energy efficiency needs of low-income,
minority, and other marginalized communities. Further, the
Department is encouraged to engage with communities impacted by
climate change, air and water pollution, systemic racism and
underinvestment, high energy costs, and economic inequality
when conducting this survey. The Department is directed to
provide to the Committee not later than 180 days after
enactment of this act a report summarizing its efforts,
including key findings, and a strategy to carry out the
direction contained herein.
Critical Minerals.--The Committee supports the Department's
coordination of critical minerals activities across the
Department through the Critical Minerals Initiative. The
recommendation provides not less than $146,000,000 for
research, development, demonstration, and commercialization
activities on the development of alternatives to, recycling of,
and efficient production and use of critical minerals,
including not less than $100,000,000 from EERE, not less than
$25,000,000 from FECM, and not less than $17,000,000 from the
Office of Science. The Department is encouraged to carry out
these activities pursuant to sections 7001 and 7002 of the
Energy Act of 2020.
Industrial Decarbonization.--Nearly 30 percent of
greenhouse gas emissions come from hard-to-reduce industrial
sources, including heavy road and rail transport, shipping,
aviation, chemical production, steel and cement production, and
heat production. To make progress on climate change, it is
necessary to reduce emissions in this sector. The Committee
supports the Department's efforts, aligned with Title VI of the
Energy Act of 2020, to foster innovations and enable scale up
of cost-competitive, low-emissions technologies. Further, the
Committee encourages the Department to establish an Office of
Industrial Emissions Reduction Technology Development Program
as required by the Energy Act of 2020 to support coordinating
research, developing and demonstrating technologies, and
providing commercial applications of technologies that achieve
significant emissions reductions in the industrial sectors.
The recommendation provides not less than $520,000,000 for
industrial decarbonization activities, including not less than
$250,000,000 from EERE, not less than $250,000,000 from FECM,
and not less than $20,000,000 from the Office of Science. The
funds provided are for research, development, and demonstration
of technologies to strengthen the competitiveness of America's
industrial sector, including low-carbon feedstocks, clean heat
alternatives, industrial carbon capture and removal, and
electrification. Not less than $25,000,000 is provided for low-
carbon feedstocks in the steel, cement, concrete, and other
heavy industrial sectors. In addition, not less than
$25,000,000 is provided for clean heat alternatives for
industrial processes.
Further, the Committee supports the continuation of the
Department's existing Cooperative Agreements to develop cost
sharing partnerships to conduct basic, fundamental, and applied
research that assist industry in developing, deploying, and
commercializing efficient, low-carbon, nonpolluting energy
technologies that could compete effectively in meeting
requirements for clean fuels, chemical feedstocks, electricity,
and water resources.
Energy Storage.--The Committee supports the Department's
ongoing efforts for the Energy Storage Grand Challenge [ESGC]
initiative, as well as cost-shared demonstrations of energy
storage technologies. The ESGC builds on the Department's prior
research and development efforts in storage and will align
Energy Storage research and development efforts to focus on
technical, regulatory, and market issues necessary to achieve
the technology goals. The Department is directed to continue to
provide the Committee periodic updates on the ESGC and make
publically available a crosscutting research and development
road-map through 2030 to illustrate the ESGC's goals. This
road-map shall be focused on reducing costs and improving the
performance of a diverse set of grid-scale storage technologies
to meet industry needs, improve reliability and environmental
performance of the electricity grid, and reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
The Committee recognizes that energy storage will play a
vital role in integrating new energy sources while
strengthening grid reliability and resilience. Energy storage
systems are fuel neutral and help generation connected to the
grid become more efficient, productive, and competitive. The
Department is directed to carry out these activities in
accordance with sections 3201 and 3202 of the Energy Act of
2020. The Department is directed to support long-duration joint
demonstration projects with the Department of Defense and
grants for rural utilities to build microgrids for resiliency.
The Department is directed to support competitive pilot
demonstration grants, as authorized in section 3201 of the
Energy Act of 2020, for energy storage projects that are wholly
U.S.-made, sourced, and supplied.
The recommendation provides not less than $460,000,000 for
energy storage, including not less than $347,000,000 from EERE,
not less than $80,000,000 from OE, not less than $5,000,000
from FECM, not less than $4,000,000 from NE, and not less than
$24,000,000 from the Office of Science.
Arctic Energy Office.--The Committee supports the promotion
of research, development, and deployment of electric power
technology that is cost-effective and well-suited to meet the
needs of rural and remote regions of the United States,
especially where permafrost is present or located nearby. The
Committee encourages the Arctic Energy Office [AEO] to continue
to bring together assets from across the Department to work
together in collaborative and innovative ways to meet the
energy, science, and national security needs of the United
States and its allies in the Arctic. Further, the AEO is
encouraged to lead cross-cutting operations in the Arctic with
a mission to tackle the energy, science, and national security
challenges of the 21st Century. Alaska is home to some of the
highest energy costs in the nation, making diverse research,
development, and deployment opportunities more cost-effective
to meet the needs of rural and remote regions of the United
States. There are also a wide variety of energy resources and
technologies, both traditional and innovative, available in
Alaska, including more than 200 microgrids.
Hydrogen Energy and Fuel Cell Coordination.--The Committee
directs that the Department coordinates its efforts in hydrogen
energy and fuel cell technologies across its various
departments and offices in order to maximize the effectiveness
of investments in hydrogen-related activities. This
coordination shall include EERE, FECM, NE, OE, the Office of
Science, and ARPA-E.
Unmanned Aircraft.--The Committee encourages the Department
to test the effectiveness of Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems
technologies to protect critical Departmental assets.
ENERGY PROGRAMS
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $2,861,760,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 4,732,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,896,971,000
The Committee recommends $3,896,971,000 for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Within available funds, the
Committee recommends $220,000,000 for program direction.
The Department is directed throughout all of its programs
to maintain a balanced portfolio of early-, mid-, and late-
stage research, development, demonstration, deployment and
other market transformation activities that will deliver
innovative energy technologies, practices, and information to
American consumers and industry. While Federal investment plays
a greater role in early stage research, the portfolio must be
balanced by being inclusive of Federal investment in mid-to-
late research activities, including field evaluation of early-
stage technology to provide testing and data collection in a
real-world setting. This includes demonstration, deployment,
and other market transformation activities, including
delineation by account and subaccounts to attract private
sector cost-share that will advance technology to market and
provide a bridge to small businesses, cities, or small
utilities with fewer resources and tools to participate in
energy infrastructure planning. The Department is further
directed to fully execute the funds appropriated in a timely
manner and to keep the Committees on Appropriations of both
Houses of Congress apprised of progress in implementing funded
programs, projects, and activities.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $3,000,000
for the Energy Transitions Initiative [ETI] to address high
energy costs, reliability, and inadequate infrastructure
challenges faced by island and remote communities. The
Committee supports ETI's efforts to develop a cross-sector
initiative alongside community-based organizations pursuing
energy transition efforts that will address energy challenges,
build capacity, accelerate the sharing of best practices and
innovations between similarly-situated regions, and leverage
specialized, local expertise into commercial opportunity. The
Committee directs the Department to continue to support
community-based initiatives by partnering with community-based
organizations, and leverage the Department's previously-
developed tool to build cost effective, resilient energy
infrastructure on island and remote communities, including in
Alaska, Hawaii, New England, the Caribbean, and elsewhere.
Workforce Development.--The Committee believes there are
significant clean energy challenges related to the inclusion of
students from underserved institutions in the technology
development programs within the Department's portfolio of
manufacturing, solar, transportation and grid/energy storage.
Clean energy programs can provide a much more inclusive talent
pipeline. Accordingly, the Committee recommends $5,000,000 to
support an expansion of these efforts through a university
which has existing partnerships with several Historically Black
Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions,
and participants in several Departmental applied energy
research programs.
Further, the development of a skilled workforce is critical
to the successful transition to a clean energy economy and
deployment and long-term sustainability of energy efficient and
renewable energy technologies. The Committee encourages EERE to
support training and workforce development programs that assist
and support workers in trades and activities required for the
continued growth of the U.S. energy efficiency and clean energy
sectors, with an emphasis on training programs focused on
building retrofit and construction industries. Furthermore, the
Committee encourages the Department to continue to work with
two-year, public community, technical colleges, and non-
governmental and industry consortia for job training programs,
including programs focused on displaced fossil fuel workers,
that lead to an industry-recognized credential in the energy
workforce.
Renewable Energy Grid Integration.--To facilitate the
oversight of grid integration activities among renewable energy
technologies, the Committee recommends $40,000,000 to be
provided from across the Solar Energy, Wind Energy, Water
Power, and Geothermal Technologies programs. Further, within
available funds, the Committee recommends $10,000,000 for
development and demonstration of an ``energyshed'' management
system that addresses a discrete geographic area in which
renewable sources currently provide a large portion of electric
energy needs, where grid capacity constraints result in
curtailment of renewable generation, and with interactive smart
meters. The ``energyshed'' design should achieve a high level
of integration, resilience and reliability among all energy
uses, including both on-demand and long-time energy scales,
transmission and distribution of electricity.
Polyethylene Plastics.--The Committee recommends up to
$5,000,000 for university-led research in order to increase
recycling rates for polyethylene plastics and develop
conversion of waste polyethylene to more recyclable and
biodegradable plastics.
The Department is directed to provide to the Committee not
later than 30 days after enactment of this act a briefing on
the status of its decarbonization roadmaps in key technology
areas to guide research and development at the Department to
achieve significant, economical greenhouse gas emission
reductions by 2050, including energy efficiency, process
electrification, industrial electrification technologies, and
carbon capture.
North American Energy Research.--Within available funds,
the Committee recommends $10,000,000 for a consortium of
universities in the United States that has established
agreements with universities in Canada and Mexico to conduct
research on a broad array of energy sources and topics.
The Department is encouraged to solicit proposals to study
the value potentially derived from construction of a large-
scale pumped storage project of at least 750 MW capacity for
grid stability, reliability, and resiliency of the bulk
electric system, and for the integration of intermittent
generation resources. Such a study is encouraged to include
consideration of impacts on the markets and transmission grids
operated by at least one Regional Transmission Organization or
Independent System Operator within which the proposed project
would be located.
Sustainable Transportation
Within available funds, the Committee recommends not less
than $40,000,000 to continue the SuperTruck III program to
further improve the energy and freight efficiency of heavy and
medium duty long- and regional-haul vehicles.
Vehicle Technologies.--The Committee recommends
$553,114,000 for Vehicle Technologies. The Committee encourages
the Department to prioritize projects in States where the
transportation sector is responsible for a higher percentage of
the State's total energy consumption and is the largest source
of greenhouse gases.
Battery and Electrification Technologies.--The Committee
recommends $248,000,000 for Battery and Electrification
Technologies. The Committee recognizes the increasing domestic
manufacturing opportunities for electric battery production for
vehicles. The Committee also encourages the Department to work
to expand domestic manufacturing opportunities for electric
vehicle batteries and to further address consumer barriers to
adoption.
Within available funding, the Committee recommends not less
than $40,000,000 is provided for Electric Drive Research and
not less than $20,000,000 for the ReCell initiative to improve
strategies to recycle and repurpose batteries, including for
use on the electrical grid. The Committee also supports efforts
to improve cost, performance and charging time of plug-in
electric vehicles, as well as further research into reducing
the size of vehicle batteries and reducing cobalt content.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends not less than
$25,000,000 for the Vehicle Technologies Office to expand its
partnership with the Advanced Manufacturing Office on efforts
to scale up the domestic battery supply chain, including
battery manufacturing demonstration projects.
The Committee directs the Department to continue to support
the Clean Cities alternative fuels deployment program focused
on vehicles that can deliver lower greenhouse gas emissions and
meet customer needs, which can include vehicles powered by
biofuels, electricity, hydrogen, natural gas, renewable natural
gas, and propane. Within available funds, the recommendation
provides not less than $60,000,000 for deployment through the
Clean Cities program, including not less than $40,000,000 for
competitive grants, to support alternative fuel,
infrastructure, new mobility, and vehicle deployment
activities. When issuing competitive grants in support of these
activities, the Department is encouraged to include some awards
that range from $500,000 to $1,000,000 each and encourage at
least one Clean Cities coalition partner. The Committee
encourages the Department to ensure balance in the award of
funds to achieve varied aims in fostering broader adoption of
clean vehicles and installation of supporting infrastructure.
The Committee further encourages the Department to prioritize
projects that can contribute the most greenhouse gases
reduction. The Committee encourages the Department to work with
the Department of Transportation and industry on coordinating
efforts to deploy electric vehicle [EV] charging
infrastructure. The Committee encourages the Department to
explore ways in which the Clean Cities Program can leverage
funding to provide greater support for electrification efforts,
including in underserved communities, recognizing the strong
emissions reduction and public health benefits delivered by
electrification.
The Committee recommends $10,000,000 to continue improving
the energy efficiency of commercial off-road vehicles,
including up to $5,000,000 for fluid power systems. These funds
shall be awarded through a competitive solicitation in which
university and industry teams are eligible to apply.
The Committee recommends up to $5,000,000 for research on
direct injection, engine technology, and the use of dimethyl
ether as fuel, and encourages continued research and
development as appropriate in advanced combustion and vehicle
engine technology efficiency in propane engines used for light
and medium-duty applications.
The Committee recommends up to $10,000,000 to address
technical barriers to the increased use of natural gas vehicles
for medium- and heavy-duty on-road natural gas engine research
and development, including energy efficiency improvements,
emission after-treatment technologies, fuel system
enhancements, and new engine development, natural gas storage,
natural gas engines, and fueling infrastructure optimizations.
The Committee recognizes novel engine designs can achieve
significant efficiency improvements and recommends within
available funds up to $10,000,000 to support research and
development of two-stroke opposed-piston engines, to be
conducted by industry-led teams.
The Committee recognizes the need for clarity regarding the
availability, affordability, and reliability of direct current
fast chargers for electric vehicles. Last year, the Committee
directed the Department to produce a report, in partnership
with the national laboratories, on the technologies and
calculation methods that meet the tentative code for EV charger
metering and testing published in the National Institute of
Standards and Technology Handbook 44, Section 3.40. The
Committee is still awaiting this report and directs the
Department to provide the report and briefing to the Committee
immediately after enactment of this act.
Bioenergy Technologies.--The Committee recommends
$284,500,000 for Bioenergy Technologies. The Committee
encourages the Department to focus on defining and meeting
technical targets that reduce cost of sustainable aviation
fuels through the conversion of low-cost waste carbon as
feedstocks. These efforts shall take into account relevant
global supply chains and shall be coordinated with other
Federal agencies, the aviation industry, National Labs, and
universities.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends up to
$5,000,000 for continued support of the development and testing
of new domestic manufactured low-emission, high-efficiency,
residential wood heaters that supply easily accessed and
affordable renewable energy and have the potential to reduce
the national costs associated with thermal energy. Further, the
Committee recommends $3,000,000 for research at commercially-
relevant processing scales into affordable wood chip
fractionation technologies and other processing improvements
relevant to thermal deoxygenation biorefineries in order to
enable economic production of cellulose nanomaterials and
economic upgrading of hemicelluloses and lignin. High-value
coproducts made from nanocellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin
can improve the cost structure for biorefineries producing
transportation fuels and thereby help the industry meet the
Department's $3 per gasoline gallon equivalent near-term price
target and move quickly towards $2 per gasoline gallon
equivalent.
The Committee directs the Department to sustain the
investment in the development of algal biofuels. Within
available funds, the Committee recommends not less than
$40,000,000 for Advanced Algal Systems to sustain the
investment in development of algal biofuels. The Committee
recommends $10,000,000 to continue research and development
activities to support carbon dioxide capture from the
atmosphere into highly alkaline solutions using algae-to-energy
technologies. The program is directed to continue collaboration
with the Office of Science and FECM in this area.
The Committee further recommends not less than $100,000,000
for Conversion Technologies. Within available funds, the
Committee recommends not less than $30,000,000 for the Agile
BioFoundry, including $10,000,000 of additional funding to
continue developing methods and technologies to advance
biological engineering, support expanded focus on Artificial
Intelligence and Machine Learning and software development to
improve the predictive design of organisms and pathways and to
build tools accessible to the wider scientific community for
the purchase of state-of-technology instrumentation that will
enable better and more expansive collaborations. Some portion
of the additional funding shall be used to support Directed
Funding Opportunities to meet the demand for collaboration by
industry partners.
Further, within available funds for Conversion
Technologies, the Committee recommends $5,000,000 to
demonstrate the use of and improve the efficiency of community-
scale digesters with priority given for projects in States and
Tribal areas that have adopted statutory requirements for the
diversion of a high percentage of food material from municipal
waste streams.
Within available funds, the Committee supports research to
develop the foundation for scalable techniques to use carbon
dioxide produced in various plants, such as in biorefineries,
to produce higher value fuels, chemicals, or materials.
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies.--The Committee
recommends $200,000,000 for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies
to maintain a diverse program which focuses on early-, mid-,
and late-stage research and development and technology
acceleration including market transformation. The Committee
encourages regular consultation with industry to avoid
duplication of private-sector activities and ensure retention
of fuel cell technology and systems development in the United
States.
The Committee recommends not less than $100,000,000 for
H2@Scale activities to support the development of hydrogen as a
clean energy resource. Of this amount, the Committee recommends
up to $60,000,000 for technologies to advance hydrogen use for
heavy-duty transportation and industrial applications. Hydrogen
can be developed to serve a broad range of applications,
including heavy-duty transportation and as a clean heat source
for industry.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends not less
than $45,000,000 for Hydrogen Technologies for efforts to
reduce the cost and improve the performance of hydrogen
generation and storage systems, hydrogen measurement devices
for fueling stations, hydrogen compressor components, and
hydrogen station dispensing components. The Department shall
continue research on novel onboard hydrogen tank systems, as
well as trailer delivery systems to reduce cost of delivered
hydrogen. Further, the Department is directed to support
research and development activities that reduce the use of
platinum group metals provide improvements in electrodes and
membranes and balance-of-plant components and systems.
The Committee further recommends $10,000,000 for Safety,
Codes, and Standards to maintain a robust program and engage
State and local regulatory and code officials to support their
technical needs relative to infrastructure and vehicle safety.
The Department is encouraged to engage on codes and standards
for developing fuel cell and hydrogen markets, such as heavy-
duty trucks. The Department is also encouraged to continue
coordination between U.S. and international standard bodies to
ensure there is one set of open non-proprietary global
standards for fuel cell and hydrogen technologies.
The Committee encourages the Secretary to work with the
Secretary of Transportation and industry on coordinating
efforts to deploy hydrogen fueling infrastructure.
Renewable Energy
Solar Energy.--The Committee recommends $300,000,000 for
Solar Energy.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends not less
than $60,000,000 for Concentrating Solar Power research,
development, and demonstration to reduce overall system costs,
better integrate subsystem components, develop higher-
temperature receivers, and improve the design of solar
collection and thermal energy storage.
The Committee recommends not less than $50,000,000 for
Balance of System Soft Costs efforts focused on reducing the
time and costs for permitting, inspecting, and interconnecting
distributed solar and storage projects installed behind the
customer's meter through standardized requirements, online
application systems, and grant awards to localities which
voluntarily adopt the Solar Automated Permit Processing
platform. Within available funds for Balance of Systems Soft
Costs, $5,000,000 is for the National Community Solar
Partnership program.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends a
competitive solicitation for reequipping, expanding, or
establishing advanced solar manufacturing facilities, including
not less than $25,000,000 for a competitive solicitation for
advanced solar power demonstration projects, including
perovskite and novel applications.
The Committee encourages the Department to expand work to
lower barriers to solar adoption for low-income households,
renters, multifamily homes, and racially diverse communities
and recommends not less than $20,000,000 for these activities.
This includes exploring and providing resources on financing
and business models that are well-suited to these households
and communities.
The Committee directs the Department to advance
demonstration, field testing, financing, and deployment of
distributed solar and energy storage technologies for
households and communities in Tribal nations that lack
connection to the electric grid. The Solar Energy Technologies
Office and OE are directed to collaborate on issuing these
funds.
The Committee encourages the Department to continue work to
improve co-siting of solar photovoltaics with ecosystem
restoration activities and to reduce the environmental impact
of solar photovoltaics.
The Committee also encourages the Department to develop
programs that support a skilled, robust, and diverse solar
energy workforce, including indirect solar workers in jobs
related to financing and permitting.
Wind Energy.--The Committee recommends $204,870,000 for
Wind Energy.
The Department is directed to give priority to stewarding
the assets and optimizing the operations of the Department-
owned wind energy research and development facilities. Within
available funds, the Committee recommends not less than
$30,000,000 for the National Wind Technology Center, and up to
$5,000,000 for research and operations of the Integrated Energy
System at Scale, a large-scale research platform using high-
performance computing, modeling and simulation, including
improved models that can be used to understand atmospheric and
wind power plant flow physics, and reliability and grid
integration efforts.
The Department is directed to support the advancement of
innovative technologies for offshore wind development including
freshwater, deep water, shallow water, and transitional depth
installations. Further, the Committee recommends not less than
$30,000,000 for the Department to prioritize early-stage
research on materials and manufacturing methods and advanced
components that will enable high quality wind resources to
compete in the marketplace without the need for subsidies, and
on activities that will accelerate fundamental offshore
specific research and development such as those that target
technology and deployment challenges unique to U.S. waters. The
Department is directed to provide to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 180
days after the enactment of this act a report that outlines
regional and national strategies to accelerate and maximize the
effectiveness, reliability, and sustainability of U.S. offshore
wind deployment and operation with partners from institutions
of higher education, research institutions, national
laboratories, the private sector, and state and local
governments. The study shall address the need for expanded work
in this area to potentially include an additional offshore wind
consortium. In addition, the Department is directed to support
innovative offshore wind demonstration projects to optimize
their development, design, construction methods, testing plans,
and economic value proposition. The Committee recommends not
less than $10,000,000 to support additional project development
and pre-construction activities for offshore wind demonstration
projects to help ensure success.
The Committee encourages the Department to prioritize
distributed wind technologies that reduce costs and improve
performance and to collaborate with industry to invest in the
development and demonstration of technologies and practices
that advance distributed wind. Within available funds, the
Committee recommends $10,000,000 for distributed wind.
Water Power.--The Committee recommends $196,560,000 for
Water Power.
The Department is encouraged to consider the use of
existing authorities to waive cost share for water power
technology research, development, demonstration, and deployment
activities as appropriate.
The Committee recommends $142,000,000 for marine energy.
The Committee recommendation includes not less than $60,000,000
for industry-led competitive solicitations to increase energy
capture, improve reliability, and to assess and monitor
environmental effects of marine energy systems and components
at a variety of scales, including full scale prototypes. The
Committee recommends not less than $24,000,000 for the Powering
the Blue Economy initiative.
Within available funds, the recommendation provides up to
$20,000,000 to address infrastructure needs at marine energy
technology testing sites.
The Committee is concerned that a lack of dedicated funding
within existing resources and uncertainty in frequency has a
unique impact on university capacity to support needed
foundational research and develop the skilled workforce to
accelerate development of the marine energy sector. The
recommendation provides up to $24,000,000 for foundational
research activities led by universities and other research
institutions affiliated with the National Marine Energy
Centers.
The Committee recommends up to $10,000,000 to address
technology testing infrastructure needs, including planning
activities for the staged development of an ocean current test
facility and upgrades to facilities that provide cost effective
open water access for prototype testing.
The Committee recommends up to $10,000,000 to continue
development and construction of an open water, fully energetic,
grid connected wave energy test facility, and up to $8,000,000
for continuation of the Testing Expertise and Access for Marine
Energy Research initiative. The Committee recommends the
Department continue to coordinate with the U.S. Navy and other
Federal agencies on marine energy technology development for
national security and other applications. Within available
funds, the Committee recommends not less than $5,000,000 to
continue operations at the Atlantic Marine Energy Center to
accelerate the transition of wave and tidal energy technologies
to market.
The Committee is aware of a growing interest from the
private sector in advancing collaborative projects between
recreational marine manufacturers and national laboratories to
support next generation marine propulsion research, and
encourages the Department to work with industry stakeholders to
address funding barriers to manufacturers who wish to engage
with the Department to advance the testing of alternative
fuels, including carbon neutral sustainable biofuels.
The Committee recognizes the challenges of decarbonizing
remote communities and the maritime sector. The Department is
encouraged to continue to focus on activities addressing the
integration of clean energy systems for remote communities and
port electrification, including the demonstration of marine,
distributed wind, solar, energy storage, improved microgrids,
and local production of zero-carbon fuels.
Within available funds recommended, $5,000,000 shall be
used for the environmental analyses and engineering of
potential run-of-river hydrokinetic facilities at two sites
with high electricity costs and diesel use, as determined by
the Secretary. Funding may be used for such related field work,
engineering, and analysis necessary for a future FERC license.
Of the funds available for conventional hydropower and
pumped storage activities, the Committee recommends $10,000,000
for the purposes of section 242 and section 243 of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005.
Geothermal Technologies.--The Committee recommends
$130,380,000 for Geothermal Technologies. The Department is
directed to focus on all stages of research and development,
market transformation activities to advance geothermal
strategies, and implementation of the recommendations outlined
in the GeoVision study.
The Committee directs the Department to continue its
efforts to identify and characterize geothermal resources in
areas with no obvious surface expressions. Awards for
geothermal exploration activities, including test drilling,
shall recognize the diversity of geologic terrains, resource
depths, and exploration costs across the United States.
The Committee recommends up to $60,380,000 for enhanced
geothermal system demonstrations and next-generation geothermal
demonstration projects in diverse geographic areas. The
Committee directs the Department to continue its efforts to
identify prospective geothermal resources in areas with no
obvious surface expressions.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Advanced Manufacturing.--The Committee recommends
$560,500,000 for Advanced Manufacturing.
The Committee recommends $25,000,000 for the Manufacturing
Demonstration Facility [MDF] and the Carbon Fiber Technology
Facility. Within available funds for MDF, $5,000,000 is
provided for the development of processes for materials
solutions.
The Committee recognizes the significant grid resilience
benefits that distributed-scale highly-efficient natural gas
engines can provide to the nation's electricity grid and notes
the need for more aggressive Federal support for research and
development of this promising technology. Therefore, the
Committee recommends $4,000,000 to be competitively awarded to
industry to develop highly efficient natural gas engines to be
used in electricity generation. Preference shall be given to
projects that prioritize fast demand response and improved
integration with building and institution-based microgrid
systems, to further the resiliency of the nation's electrical
grid.
The Committee recognizes the importance of developing
recyclable wind turbine blades and directs the Department to
support research and development in innovative approaches to
enable manufacturing of wind turbine blades with novel
thermoplastic resin systems to create brand new reversible and
recyclable thermoplastic resins for future use in blade
manufacturing. Within available funds, the Committee recommends
$5,000,000 for development of thermoplastic resin systems
research.
Within available funds for the Industrial Technical
Assistance program, the Committee recommends $12,000,000 to
provide ongoing support for the Combined Heat and Power [CHP]
Technical Assistance Partnerships [TAPs] and related CHP
Technical Partnership activities at the Department, including
$5,000,000 for the TAPs and $7,000,000 for related CHP
activities. The Committee also encourages the Department to
prioritize research, development, and demonstration of district
energy systems and work to accelerate greater deployment of
district energy systems in communities, campuses, industries,
and cities nationwide by supporting adaptive regional and local
technology, and market opportunities. The Committee further
directs the Department to collaborate with industry on the
potential energy efficiency and energy security gains to be
realized with district energy systems.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends up to
$20,000,000 for the Industrial Assessment Center [IAC] program.
The Committee further directs the Department to apply the
additional funding to support regions that are currently
designated as underserved through the IAC program. Within the
funds provided for the Industrial Assessment Centers, the
Committee recommends up to $4,000,000 for applied technical
assistance and the purchase and pilot testing of innovative
technology. This equipment and technical assistance shall be
provided to municipal or industrial entities that face
significant water treatment challenges and for which piloting
such technology would be of significant benefit.
The Committee acknowledges the contributions of the Clean
Energy Manufacturing Innovation Institutes [CEMIs] program as
an important component of efforts to combat climate change by
reducing carbon emissions from manufacturing, promoting
recycling and conservation, and creating new companies and jobs
for a greener economy. The Committee further believes that the
continuation of Federal participation in the CEMI program is
vital in order to maintain significant private investment and
allow the Institutes to realize the goals for which they were
established. Within available funds, the Committee encourages
the Department to continue work of the CEMIs.
The Committee supports additive manufacturing technologies
for wind energy applications. Within available funds,
$4,000,000 to support additive manufacturing work on large wind
blades that will allow for rapid prototyping, tooling,
fabrication, and testing; $7,000,000 for additive manufacturing
of wind turbine components; and $18,000,000 for advanced wind
turbine blade manufacturing research, including additive
composite tip technology, automation, and sustainability.
The Committee recognizes the important role large-area
additive manufacturing can play in helping to advance the
deployment of building, transportation, and clean energy
technologies. The Committee directs the Department to further
foster the partnership between the national laboratories,
universities, and industry to use bio-based thermoplastics
composites, such as micro- and nanocellulosic materials, and
large-area 3-D printing to overcome challenges to the cost and
deployment of building, transportation, and energy
technologies. In addition, the Committee recommends up to
$20,000,000 to continue the development of additive
manufacturing involving nanocellulosic feedstock materials made
from forest products to overcome challenges to the cost and
deployment of building, transportation, and energy
technologies, and encourages the Department to leverage
expertise and capabilities for large-scale additive
manufacturing through partnerships between universities and the
MDF.
The Committee notes that drying processes consume
approximately 10 percent of the process energy used in the
manufacturing sector and directs that within available funds,
up to $10,000,000 is recommended to be used to issue a
competitive solicitation for university and industry-led teams
to improve the efficiency of industrial drying processes.
The Committee recognizes that progress is occurring at the
demonstration level of extracting lithium from geothermal brine
to create lithium chloride, but further research and
development is needed to convert the extracted lithium chloride
into lithium hydroxide, one of the final components of lithium-
ion batteries. The Committee recommends $15,000,000 to continue
technology development to convert lithium chloride from
geothermal brine into lithium hydroxide that will inform the
design of a commercial-scale facility that will both extract
lithium from geothermal brine and convert the lithium in
geothermal brine into the lithium hydroxide.
The Committee recognizes the growing need for the use of
more sustainable chemistry in consumer and commercial products,
which can create significant value as an economic opportunity
for U.S. manufacturing. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 to
support sustainable chemistry research and development. The
fiscal year 2021 Act directed the Department to provide a
report exploring how incorporating sustainable chemistry in
consumer and commercial manufacturing processes fits within its
research and development portfolio and can benefit these
processes. The Committee is still awaiting this report and
directs the Department to provide the report to the Committee
not less than 30 days after enactment of this act.
The Committee recommends $5,000,000 to continue to develop
and industrialize a low-cost polymer infiltration process for
the fabrication of silicon carbide components. The Committee
recognizes the Department's expertise in developing materials
and processes for very high temperature applications. Silicon
carbide ceramic matrix composites are a proven, capable
material for high temperature applications.
The Committee recommends not less than $5,000,000 to apply
the Department the Office of Science's leadership computing
facility expertise in machine learning to increase efficiencies
in large scale, high rate, aerostructures manufacturing. The
Department is encouraged to leverage best practices from large-
scale, high-rate commercial composite aerostructure
manufacturing.
BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES
The Committee recommends $382,000,000 for Building
Technologies.
Across all of these efforts, where appropriate, the
Buildings Technologies Office is encouraged to collaborate with
OE and CESER, especially including efforts pertaining to
improved building-to-grid interactions and integration of
energy storage and renewable energy. Within available funds for
Emerging Technologies, the Committee encourages the Department
to make funding available for Heating, Ventilation, and Air
Conditioning [HVAC] and Refrigeration Research, Development and
deployment, including heat pumps, heat pump water heaters and
boilers. The Department shall focus its efforts to address
whole building energy performance and cost issues to inform
efforts to advance beneficial electrification and greenhouse
gas mitigation without compromising building energy
performance. The Committee encourages the Department to develop
strategies and activities to increase adoption of energy-saving
and emissions-saving technologies for low-income households,
multi-family buildings, and minority communities.
Within the amounts provided for the Building Technologies
Office, the recommendation includes not less than $50,000,000
for advanced HVAC and dehumidification manufacturing scale-up
projects.
Equipment and Building Standards.--The Committee recommends
$62,000,000 for Equipment and Buildings Standards.
The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for the Building
Energy Codes Program to increase training, including
certifications, and provide technical assistance to states,
local governments, regional collaboratives, workforce
development providers, homebuilders, office builders,
architects and engineers, and other organizations that develop,
adopt, or assist with the adoption or compliance with model
building energy codes and standards to improve energy
efficiency and resilience.
The Committee supports continued research to quantify the
resilience impacts of energy codes for buildings, occupants,
and communities. Recognizing that the pandemic has presented
challenges to permit processing for building departments
reliant on paper-based systems, the Committee encourages the
development of cloud-based software that can facilitate permit
processing for projects that conserve energy or promote
resilience as well as efforts to help departments modernize
systems.
The Committee directs EERE to carry out the Grid-
interactive Efficient Buildings [GEB] program to ensure that a
high level of energy efficiency is a core element of the
program and a baseline characteristic for GEBs, which are also
connected, smart, and flexible. EERE shall engage with the
public and private sectors, including the building and
manufacturing industries and state and local governments, to
share information on GEB technologies, costs, and benefits, and
to provide information to position American companies to lead
in this area. In addition, EERE is reminded to follow the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act and related
guidance in testing and applying relevant existing and emerging
standards developed by non-governmental organizations.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends
$72,000,000 for the Residential Building Integration program.
The Committee recommends this increase to advance building
upgrades and weatherization of homes, as well as to advance
work in grid-integrated efficient buildings and inclusion of
smart grid systems, demand flexibility and new initiatives in
workforce training to ensure the technology and research
findings reach practitioners. The Committee encourages funding
to be concentrated on industry teams to facilitate research,
demonstrate and test new systems, and facilitate widespread
deployment and dissemination of information and best practices
through direct engagement with builders, the construction
trades, equipment manufacturers, smart grid technology and
systems suppliers, integrators, and state and local governments
and other market transformation activities. Further, the
Committee recommends funding to facilitate deep whole-house
energy efficiency retrofits, including outreach, engagement and
training to private sector contractors, including continuing
efforts to advance smart home technology. The Committee
supports continued efforts to address property rating and
valuation in commercial and residential buildings as a way to
improve the transparency of energy utilization in buildings for
persons and companies buying or leasing property.
The Committee encourages the Department to continue to
explore research and development that can advance future
natural gas and propane gas systems and appliances to meet
consumer demand for high efficiency and environmentally
friendly products. The Committee recommends continued research,
development, and market transformation programs on energy
efficiency efforts related to the direct use of natural gas and
propane gas in residential applications, including gas heat
pump heating with power generation and water heating, on-site
combined heat and power, and gas appliance venting, and on site
(micro) combined heat and power to include cooling integration
with renewables.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends
$74,000,000 for the Commercial Building Integration program for
core research and development of more cost-effective
integration techniques and technologies that could help the
transition toward deep retrofits. In addition, the Committee
encourages the Department to increase engagement with private
sector stakeholders to develop market-transforming policies and
investments in commercial building retrofits.
The Department is encouraged to prioritize understanding of
regional differences in energy systems and their impact on
adoption of transactive energy technologies. The recommendation
provides not less than $30,000,000 for Buildings-to-Grid
integration research and development consistent with a
transactive energy system and in coordination with the OE
transactive energy systems program.
The Committee notes that the Department has missed over 30
legal deadlines related to energy efficiency standards mandated
by Congress. The Committee understands that the Department is
working to complete these rulemakings expeditiously and directs
the Department to finalize these standards as soon as
practicable. The Committee directs the Department to report
within 30 days of enactment of this act on the status of each
of these standards, and any funding or staffing barriers to
finalizing these standards.
FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The Committee recommends $60,000,000 for the Federal Energy
Management Program. The recommendation provides not less than
$20,000,000 for the Department to continue its work through the
Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation
Technologies program.
The recommendation provides not less than $2,000,000 for
work force development and the Performance Based Contract
National Resource Initiative. The fiscal year 2020 Act directed
the Department to provide a report that outlines the types of
technical and financial expertise the Department is suited to
provide and includes an analysis of the available
infrastructure work that can be accomplished through
performance-based contracts over a 10-year period and the
resources necessary to achieve this goal. The Committee is
still awaiting this report and directs the Department to
provide this report not later than 15 days after enactment of
this act.
The Committee directs the Secretary to establish an
improved process to assist in guiding infrastructure
investments through energy performance contracts management,
including, but not limited to Energy Savings Performance
Contracts and Utility Energy Savings Contracts, in order to
effectively and efficiently reduce energy costs, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, and improve facilities. The Committee
directs the Secretary to ensure the availability of sufficient
acquisition FTEs to address energy saving measures, as well as
to streamline and find efficiencies in the approval of projects
to continue to provide climate, resilience, and economic
benefits. The Committee encourages the Secretary to leverage
energy savings performance contracts so capital improvement
projects involving energy systems, energy controls, and
building envelopes awarded in fiscal year 2022 ensure maximum
return on investment to the taxpayer.
WEATHERIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAM
The Committee recommends $508,000,000 for the
Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program.
Within this amount, $398,000,000 is recommended for
Weatherization, including $375,000,000 for the Weatherization
Assistance Program [WAP] and $8,000,000 for Training and
Technical Assistance. The Committee recommends $70,000,000 for
State Energy Program [SEP] grants. The Committee encourages the
Department to work with all relevant stakeholders to identify
efficiencies for delivering weatherization services and examine
options to streamline policies and procedures when other
funding sources are utilized in conjunction with funds from the
Department.
The Committee supports WAP's continued participation in the
interagency working group on Healthy Homes and Energy with the
Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Department is
encouraged to further coordinate with the Office of Lead Hazard
Control and Healthy Homes on energy-related housing projects.
The Committee encourages the Department to begin tracking the
occurrence of window replacements, which supports the reduction
of lead-based paint hazards in homes.
The Committee recognizes the importance of providing
Federal funds under the Weatherization and Intergovernmental
Program to States and Tribes in a timely manner to avoid any
undue delay of services to eligible low-income households, and
to encourage local high-impact energy efficiency and renewable
energy initiatives and energy emergency preparedness.
Therefore, the full amount of the funds recommended for WAP and
the SEP shall be obligated to States, Tribes, and other direct
grantees not later than 60 days after enactment of this act.
The Committee is concerned with the reduction of mission-
critical staff at the Office of Weatherization and
Intergovernmental Programs and directs the office to achieve
staffing levels that will allow it to provide robust training,
technical assistance, and oversight for WAP and SEP.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends that
$1,000,000 be made available to WAP grant recipients that have
previously worked with the Department via the Weatherization
Innovation Pilot Program, for the purpose of developing and
implementing state and regional programs to treat harmful
substances, including vermiculite.
Weatherization Readiness Fund.--The Committee supports the
creation of a new Weatherization Readiness Fund to enable more
low-income households to receive WAP support by providing funds
to address structural and health and safety issues to reduce
the frequency of deferred homes that are not weatherization
ready when WAP work crews enter the home to perform retrofit
services.
Local Government Clean Energy Workforce Program.--The
Committee supports the Local Government Clean Energy Workforce
Program to provide competitive awards, on-site capacity, peer
exchanges, and technical assistance to support the development
and deployment of transformative clean energy programs that
create good paying jobs working with qualifying local
governments and Tribal Nations, with a focus on energy
communities and disadvantaged or small-to-medium jurisdictions.
The Department is encouraged to consider projects that
implement best practices to advance energy efficiency adoption,
building and vehicle electrification, grid modernization,
distributed electricity generation, and workforce development
at the local level. These activities shall include work with
and support for organizations that convene and support
municipal governments.
Corporate Support
Strategic Programs.--The Committee recommends $20,000,000
for Strategic Programs.
Facilities and Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends
$8,000,000 for the Energy Materials and Processing at Scale
research capability at the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory.
Congressionally Directed Spending.--The Committee
recommends $77,047,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy activities or programs. The
Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing
requirements may apply to these projects.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name Recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accelerating Heat Pump Adoption by Lower-Income 420
Households, AK.........................................
Asia-Pacific Microgrid Development and Training, HI..... 1,000
Blue Earth County's Energy Efficiency Project, MN....... 4,330
Built to Last Pilot Project, PA......................... 2,100
Chicago Clean Energy Retrofits Program, IL.............. 500
Cogency Power Solar Project, CO......................... 5,000
Community Ductless Heat Pump Co-Op, OR.................. 301
Community of Hope Solar Parking Structure, NM........... 200
Cully Community Solar Pilot, OR......................... 344
Derry Landfill Solar Project, NH........................ 500
Detroit/Wayne County Port Authority Hydrokinetic Energy 680
Project, MI............................................
Development of an Electric Vehicle Associate's Degree 1,000
Curriculum Standards and Educational Materials for
Automotive Educators and Technicians Nationwide, WV....
District Energy Construction, VT........................ 5,166
DWCPA Solar Energy Project, MI.......................... 200
Electric Future for America's Rural Mobility 1,500
Stakeholders (E-FARMS), OR.............................
Electrical Substation for Garrison Oak Business and 5,000
Technology Park, DE....................................
Energy Improvements for Rhode Island Schools, RI........ 5,000
Enhanced Biogas Collection and Energy Recovery Project, 2,900
RI.....................................................
Evanston Accessible Solar Program, IL................... 500
Expanding Solar Research and Generation for a Brighter 150
Energy Future, VT......................................
Fuel for Seniors: Energy Efficiency, CT................. 288
Grid Resilience and Equity in the Energy Transition, MA. 995
Hanover LED Streetlight Conversion, NH.................. 271
Heartland Green Energy and Manufacturing Valley 500
Initiative, OH.........................................
Heat Recovery System, AK................................ 659
Hybrid Solar Testing Platform for Cold Weather Climates, 4,000
VT.....................................................
Kauai North Shore Energy Resiliency Project, HI......... 1,000
Kivalina Biomass Reactor, AK............................ 100
Klickitat Valley Health Central Utility Plant 2,500
Modernization, WA......................................
Makushin Geothermal Project, AK......................... 2,500
Marquette Affordable Solar Clean Energy Planning Grant, 100
MI.....................................................
Microgrid Integration with Biomass Gasification as a 1,000
Pathway to Hydrogen Production, NY.....................
Municipal Building Upgrades, NY......................... 303
New Jersey Green Hydrogen Demonstration Project, NJ..... 3,840
Newport Town Office Energy Improvements, NH............. 250
Northeast Kingdom Home Weatherization, VT............... 500
Off-Grid residential solar project on the Navajo Nation, 1,000
NM.....................................................
Overland Industrial park Solar Community Project, OH.... 1,500
Oyster River Resiliency Project, NH..................... 1,150
Reducing Inequity in Access to Solar Power, DE.......... 2,000
Rio Arriba County Energy Efficient Vehicle & Solar 1,000
Charging Stations, NM..................................
Salisbury Square Redevelopment: Achieving Home 750
Affordability and Energy Resilience via a Microgrid, VT
San Juan College Clean Hydrogen Workforce Development 500
Program, NM............................................
San Juan College Electric Vehicle Technician 50
Certification Program, NM..............................
Solar Testbed, WV....................................... 1,900
Sustainable Energy in Schools and Public Buildings, VT.. 1,000
Tacoma Public Utilities EV charging program, WA......... 1,000
Thermal Energy Storage to Support Renewable Energy 5,000
Deployment, VT.........................................
Twin Lakes Reservoir Floating Solar Study, OH........... 500
Updated Renewable Energy Development Feasibility Study 250
by the Pueblo of Zia, NM...............................
Utility Upgrades for the Bedford Landfill Solar Project, 500
NH.....................................................
Vermont Electrification and Clean Energy Deployment, VT. 1,000
WMU Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Secure, 350
Efficient and Sustainable Energy Technology, MI........
Wood-fiber Insulated Panels for Modular Construction and 2,000
Retrofit Applications/Energy Efficient Community Cross-
Laminated Timber Demonstration Project, ME.............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $156,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 201,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 177,000,000
The Committee recommends $177,000,000 for the Office of
Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response. Within
available funds, the Committee recommends $14,000,000 for
program direction.
Additional direction related to Department-wide
crosscutting initiatives is provided under the heading
Crosscutting Initiatives in the front matter of the Department
of Energy.
CESER was established in 2018 to protect the U.S. from
emerging cyber threats and improve our energy security and
infrastructure. To date, the program has received $461,000,000
in annual appropriations and undergone several internal
reorganizations. In 2019, the Inspector General Office was
notified about several complaints about lack of internal
control policies and allegations about improper use of funds.
The Committee is alarmed about the Inspector General's findings
and directs CESER to follow through with addressing their
recommendations expeditiously. Further, the Committee is
concerned about the longstanding lack of clarity on the
Department's cyber research and development responsibilities
and directs CESER to coordinate with the OE and relevant
applied energy offices in clearly defining these program
activities. Finally, the Department is directed to include an
itemization of funding levels below the control point in future
budget submissions and provide the Committee quarterly updates
on the requests outlined above.
Risk Management Technology and Tools.--The Committee
recommends $112,000,000 for Risk Management Technology Tools.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $5,000,000 for
Consequence-driven Cyber-informed Engineering. Within available
funding, the Committee recommends research funds for
universities to develop scalable cyber-physical platforms for
resilient and secure electric power systems that are flexible,
modular, self-healing, and autonomous. This activity shall be
conducted in coordination with OE. The recommendation provides
not less than $5,000,000 to conduct a demonstration program of
innovative technologies, such as technologies for monitoring
vegetation management to improve grid resiliency from
wildfires. The Committee supports extension of cyber-risk
information sharing tools to close remaining vulnerabilities in
the distribution and transmission system. The Committee
encourages the Department to continue existing work within
ongoing programs and to invest in research addressing power
system vulnerabilities in supply chain and life cycle
management for critical power system components and advanced
adaptive defensive methods for grid control systems. The
Committee supports Departmental initiatives focused on
cybersecurity risk information-sharing and secure data
anonymization and analysis for both operational and information
technology components of equipment commonly utilized in both
the bulk power system and distribution systems. The Department
is encouraged to prioritize enrolling under-resourced electric
utilities in such programs, particularly rural electric
cooperatives and municipally-owned entities.
Response and Restoration.--The Committee recommends
$23,000,000 for Response and Restoration. The Committee places
a high priority on ensuring the protection of the electric grid
against cyberattacks and extreme weather events. The Response
and Restoration program coordinates a national effort to secure
the U.S. energy infrastructure against all hazards, reduce
impacts from disruptive events, and assist industry with
restoration efforts. The program delivers a range of
capabilities including energy sector emergency response and
recovery, including emergency response of a cyber nature; near-
real-time situational awareness and information sharing about
the status of the energy systems to improve risk management;
and analysis of evolving threats and hazards to energy
infrastructure.
Information Sharing, Partnerships, and Exercises.--The
Information Sharing, Partnerships, and Exercises program
supports energy sector security and resilience through
coordination with government and industry partners. This
program provides technical assistance that incorporates
exercises to strengthen Federal, regional, state, tribal, and
territorial abilities to work together to prepare for and
mitigate the effects of an energy sector emergency and focuses
on training the next generation workforce on energy sector
risks.
Congressionally Directed Spending.--The Committee
recommends $5,000,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration for CESER
activities or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that
statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these
projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING FOR CYBERSECURITY, ENERGY SECURITY,
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROJECTS
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name Recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emerging Threat Information Sharing and Analysis Center, 1,000
University of Arkansas Little Rock, AR.................
Oakland University Cybersecurity Center, MI............. 2,000
Virtual Cybersecurity Training Simulator, MA............ 2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTRICITY
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $211,720,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 327,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 303,000,000
The Committee recommends $303,000,000 for the Office of
Electricity. Within available funds, the Committee recommends
$20,000,000 for program direction.
The Department is directed to include an itemization of
funding levels below the control point in future budget
submissions. Additional direction related to Department-wide
crosscutting initiatives is provided under the heading
Crosscutting Initiatives in the front matter of the Department
of Energy.
TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY AND RESILIENCE
The Committee recommends $30,000,000 for Transmission
Reliability and Resilience.
The Committee supports continued investment in advanced
grid modeling algorithms and tool development to ensure
resilient grid controls and protection systems that meet the
challenges of the emerging smart grid.
In fiscal year 2021, Congress directed the Department to
conduct a case study on regional, wide-spread deployment of
dynamic line rating technologies to assess the potential
benefits and costs. The Committee is still awaiting this case
study and directs the Department to provide the report
immediately.
In fiscal year 2021, Congress directed the Department to
provide a report on ways to maximize utilization of the
existing electricity delivery system by enabling dynamic line
ratings, dynamically controlling the flow of electricity, and
optimizing electricity delivery system topology. The Committee
is still awaiting this report and directs the Department to
provide the report immediately.
In fiscal year 2021, Congress directed the Department to
provide a report summarizing the results of a 12-month non-
contact sensor monitory study. The Committee is still awaiting
this report and directs the Department to provide the report
immediately.
The Committee encourages the Department to prioritize
funding to incorporate and expand big data analytics
capabilities into the pre-operational development, assessment,
and demonstration of transmission system situational awareness
technologies.
Energy Delivery Grid Operations Technology
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $5,000,000
to support research on Silicon Carbide semiconductors.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends
$10,000,000 for the DarkNet project to explore opportunities
for getting the nation's critical infrastructure off the
Internet and shielding the nation's electricity infrastructure
from disruptive cyber penetration, including expansion of the
communications network architecture and development of cutting-
edge networking technologies.
RESILIENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
The Committee recommends $50,000,000 for Resilient
Distribution Systems.
The Committee directs that funds recommended for OE shall
focus on identifying and addressing technical and regulatory
barriers impeding grid integration of distributed energy
systems to reduce energy costs and improve the resiliency and
reliability of the electric grid.
The Committee directs the Department to focus on
identifying and addressing technical and regulatory barriers
impeding grid integration of distributed energy systems to
reduce energy costs and improve the resiliency and reliability
of the electric grid.
The Committee supports advanced control concepts and open
test beds for new distribution control tools for enhanced
distribution system resilience.
Within available funds, the Committee directs the
Department to continue efforts to support the integration of
sensors into the nation's electric distribution systems,
fundamental research and field validation of microgrid
controllers and systems, and transactive energy concepts,
including studies and evaluations of energy usage behavior in
response to price signals. The Committee places a high priority
on addressing the challenges facing the electric power grid by
developing the innovative technologies, tools, and techniques
to modernize the distribution portion of the electricity
delivery system. Resilient Distribution Systems pursue
strategic investments to improve reliability, resilience,
outage, recovery, and operational efficiency, building upon
previous and ongoing grid modernization efforts. In addition to
emerging fuel technologies for distributed grids, the Committee
directs that fuels commonly available across the United States,
such as propane and other diesel alternatives, be evaluated.
The recommendation provides not less than $10,000,000 for
demonstration projects with the Grid Sensors and Sensor
Analytics program. The demonstration activities may focus on
utilizing data from advanced sensors that are deployed on
existing transmission and distribution lines to predict or
detect vegetation contact to mitigate wildfires and wildfire
impacts. Further, the demonstration activities may focus on
measuring the condition of utility poles in terms of their
position, impacts, the presence of high temperatures, and
measuring the condition of conductors at the attachment points
to utility poles in terms of their position and impacts. Data
from the sensors shall be utilized to provide useful and
immediate analytics to improve the safety of the general public
and improve electrical distribution network performance
indices. The demonstration activities may also include a focus
on utilizing data from distribution utilities that have
deployed advanced metering infrastructure.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends up to
$10,000,000 for coordinated research and development of
microgrid-related technologies, with a focus on underserved and
Indigenous communities. The research shall focus on development
and deployment of advanced microgrid-enabling technologies,
including renewable generation and storage systems, multi-nodal
small-scale high-voltage direct current, advanced demand-side
management strategies, and microgrid control systems. The
research will aim to provide replicable microgrid solutions to
address the broad array of challenges facing underserved and
Indigenous communities in remote and islanded regions
throughout the United States.
ENERGY STORAGE
The Committee recommends $139,000,000 for Energy Storage,
including $47,000,000 for the Grid Storage Launchpad.
The Committee urges the Department to continue furthering
coordination between OE, the Office of Science, EERE and other
Department offices to achieve commercially viable grid-scale
storage with the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars.
The recommendation provides not less than $20,000,000 for a
competitive pilot demonstration grant program, as authorized in
section 3201 of the Energy Act of 2020, for energy storage
projects that are wholly U.S.-made, sourced, and supplied. The
Department is directed to include large scale commercial
development and deployment of long cycle life, lithium-grid
scale batteries and their components.
The Committee encourages the Department to allocate
resources to provide training and technical assistance to
firefighters and code inspectors on battery storage, such as
through scenario-based in-person or online training.
To continue and further advance the development and
demonstration of grid-scale battery energy storage projects
with the funds provided, the Committee directs the Secretary to
provide $5,000,000 to continue a battery storage demonstration
project that is located in areas where grid capacity
constraints result in curtailment of renewable generation;
improve grid resilience for a public utility that is regularly
affected by weather-related natural disasters; and provide rate
reduction and renewable energy benefits to businesses, farms,
and residents in an economically-stressed rural areas. Direct
storage from solar generation may also be incorporated.
CYBER R&D
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $5,000,000
for university-based research and development of scalable
cyber-physical platforms for hyper-resilient and secure
electric power systems that are flexible, modular, self-
healing, and autonomous. This activity shall be conducted in
coordination with CESER.
TRANSFORMER RESILIENCE AND ADVANCED COMPONENTS
The Committee recommends $10,000,000 for Transformer
Resilience and Advanced Components.
Within available funds, the Committee directs the
Department to continue to support research and development for
advanced components and grid materials for low-cost power flow
control devices, including both solid-state and hybrid concepts
that use power electronics to control electromagnetic devices
and enable improved controllability, flexibility, and
resiliency.
The recommendation provides up to $2,500,000 to further
assess composite utility poles in controlled and field tests.
In fiscal year 2021, Congress directed the Department to submit
to the Committee a report that assesses the performance of
composite poles. The Committee is still awaiting this report
and directs the Department to provide the report immediately.
Within available funds, the Department is encouraged to
continue to support research and development for advanced
components and grid materials for low-cost power flow control
devices, including both solid-state and hybrid concepts that
use power electronics to control electromagnetic devices and
enable improved controllability, flexibility, and resiliency.
Because there are limited viable alternatives to Sulfur
Hexafluoride [SF6] in power generation and transmission
equipment above 72kV, the Department is encouraged to support
research and development to advance safe and effective capture
and reuse technologies for the use of SF6 in components like
circuit breakers. Below 72kV power generation and distribution
equipment is fully capable of being designed and manufactured
without SF6 therefore, the Department is directed to support
research and development to advance safe and effective
alternatives to SF6, including in circuit breakers, reclosers,
sectionalizers, load break switches, switchgear and gas
insulated lines.
TRANSMISSION PERMITTING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Within available funds, the Committee directs OE to
collaborate with and provide technical assistance to interested
states to ensure state energy officials and state regulatory
officials have access to grid, economic, and emissions modeling
related to multi-state wholesale market design. In addition,
states shall be provided market governance, planning and
policy, and regulatory development assistance related to the
formation, expansion, or improvement of regional transmission
organizations. The Committee believes this effort should
include studying the benefits of interstate sharing of electric
resources to provide reliable and affordable service, planning
for significant additions of new variable electric resources,
major new grid demands presented by state or Federal
electrification and climate policies, and considering system
and fuel interdependencies that create emergency conditions
during extreme weather events.
Congressionally Directed Spending.--The Committee
recommends $2,850,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration for
Electricity activities or programs. The Committee reminds
recipients that statutory cost sharing requirements may apply
to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING FOR ELECTRICITY PROJECTS
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name Recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cuyahoga County Utility Microgrid Design Project, OH.... 300
Electrical transmission and distribution infrastructure 2,500
for PUD No 1 of Lewis County, WA.......................
Village of Old Brookville Village Hall expansion: 52 kW 50
standby backup generator, NY...........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Energy
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $1,507,600,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 1,850,500,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,590,800,000
The Committee recommends $1,590,800,000 for Nuclear Energy.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $85,000,000
for program direction. The Committee's recommendation
prioritizes funding for programs, projects, and activities that
will ensure a strong future for nuclear power in the United
States.
Nuclear Energy provides nearly one-fifth of our Nation's
electricity, and nearly 60 percent of our carbon free
electricity. Advanced nuclear technologies hold promising
potential for reliable, safe, emission-free energy. The
Department is encouraged to prioritize funds for public-private
partnerships to demonstrate advanced reactor designs and fuel
types by the late 2020s, including through the Advanced Reactor
Demonstration and Accident Tolerant Fuels Programs.
While the Committee supports nuclear energy research and
development, it recognizes that the accumulation of spent
nuclear fuel presents a challenge to communities accepting new
plants. The Committee also continues to strongly support the
recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's
Nuclear Future and believes that near-term action is needed to
address the accumulating inventory of spent nuclear fuel. The
Committee supports continued funding for consolidation of spent
nuclear fuel from around the United States to one or more
interim central storage facilities.
Nuclear Energy University Program [NEUP].--Since 2009, the
Department has allocated up to 20 percent of funds appropriated
to Nuclear Energy Research and Development programs to fund
university-led R&D and university infrastructure projects
through an open, competitive solicitation process using
formally certified peer reviewers. The Committee is concerned
that the requirements in section 954(a)(6) of the Energy Policy
Act of 2005, as amended, are unnecessarily constraining the
implementation of the budget that develops advanced nuclear
fuels and technologies. The Department is directed to provide
to the Committee, not later than 180 days after enactment of
this act, a plan to address these concerns, as well as an
implementation plan for improvements recommended by the Nuclear
Engineering Department Heads Organization. Further, the
Department is directed to provide to the Committee quarterly
briefings on the status of NEUP and the university work being
funded.
Integrated University Program.--The Committee recommends
$6,000,000 for the Integrated University Program. The Committee
notes the importance of this program in developing highly
qualified nuclear specialists to meet national needs.
NUCLEAR ENERGY ENABLING TECHNOLOGY
The Committee recommends $100,000,000 for Nuclear Energy
Enabling Technology.
Within Nuclear Energy Enabling Technology, the Committee
recommends an additional $3,000,000 to complete the preliminary
engineering and design of a secure, separate, and shielded
beamline at the NSLS II at Brookhaven National Laboratory to
examine radioactive materials. Currently, there is no U.S.
facility dedicated to the study of radioactive materials with
the high spatial and temporal resolution, superb chemical
sensitivity, and unique capabilities offered by the NSLS II.
This beamline shall complement and be compatible with
irradiation tests and infrastructure for materials
characterization and sample preparation at Idaho National
Laboratory [INL]. In conjunction with the infrastructure and
capabilities at INL, the information on materials in radiation
environments derived from this beamline will be used to improve
the reliability, sustain the safety, extend the life of current
reactors, and support development of new advanced reactors.
The Committee recommendation provides $10,000,000 for
integrated energy systems.
Joint Modeling and Simulation Program.--The Committee
understands the importance of modeling and simulation for
nuclear energy applications, and recommends $30,000,000 for the
Joint Modeling and Simulation Program. Use and application of
the codes and tools shall be funded by the end user, not by the
Joint Modeling and Simulation Program.
New Materials Development.--The Committee recommends
$5,000,000 for the New Materials Development program, a new
program to strengthen the pipeline of new materials that can
make the current fleet, as well as new advanced reactors, more
resilient and economically competitive.
FUEL CYCLE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION
The Committee recommends $288,650,000 for Fuel Cycle
Research, Development, and Demonstration.
To support availability of high-assay low-enriched uranium
[HALEU] and other advanced nuclear fuels, consistent with
section 2001 of the Energy Act of 2020, the recommendation
includes $47,000,000, including $2,000,000 for Mining,
Shipping, and Transportation; $25,000,000 for Advanced Nuclear
Fuel Availability; and not less than $20,000,000 within
Material Recovery and Waste Form Development.
Advanced Nuclear Fuel Availability.--The Committee supports
establishment of an Advanced Nuclear Fuel Availability program
to make available small quantities of HALEU in the short term
and supports the transition of these activities to the private
sector for commercial HALEU production and domestic supply
chain capabilities for the long term.
The fiscal year 2020 Act directed the Department to provide
an evaluation on the anticipated demand for HALEU, the timing
of that demand, and options for meeting that demand. The
Committee is still awaiting this report. Section 2001(b)(2) of
the Energy Act of 2020 requires the Department to submit to
Congress a report on a program to support the availability of
HALEU for civilian domestic demonstration and commercial use.
The Department is directed to submit these reports to the
Committee not later than 30 days after enactment of this act
and not less than 60 days prior to the obligation of more than
75 percent of these funds. The Department is encouraged to
disburse these funds on a competitive basis as the Department
progresses its Advanced Nuclear Fuels Availability program.
Further, the Committee encourages the Department to ensure that
all federally-funded transfers and shipments of uranium
hexafluoride and depleted uranium hexafluoride, shall to the
extent practicable, use American manufactured shipping
cylinders and transportation casks.
Material Recovery and Waste Form Development.--The
Committee recommends $20,000,000 for Material Recovery and
Waste Form Development, including $10,000,000 to continue work
on the ZIRCEX process to recover Highly Enriched Uranium from
used naval fuel or unirradiated research reactor fuel.
Accident Tolerant Fuels.--The Committee recommends
$110,150,000 for development of nuclear fuels with enhanced
accident-tolerant characteristics to significantly mitigate the
potential consequences of a nuclear accident. The Committee
continues to place a high priority on this program and urges
the Department to maintain focus and priority on achieving
results in these efforts. The recommendation provides not less
than $10,000,000 for further development of silicon carbide
ceramic matrix composite fuel cladding for light water
reactors. The Committee also remains concerned that funding for
the industry-led portions of the Accident Tolerant Fuels
program, and for the testing and development of higher-enriched
and higher-burnup fuels, is not being obligated by the
Department in a timely manner. The Department is directed to
brief its plan to allocate and obligate funds required in this
act and any negative schedule impacts caused by the delays in
allocating or obligating funding.
TRISO Fuel and Graphite Qualification.--Within the funds
recommended for Tristructural Isotropic [TRISO] fuels,
$10,000,000 is recommended to continue the transition of TRISO
fuel to a multiple-producer market, ensuring that more than one
industry source would be available to the commercial and
government markets.
REACTOR CONCEPTS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION
The Committee recommends $232,000,000 for Reactor Concepts
Research, Development, and Demonstration.
Advanced Small Modular Reactor Research, Development, and
Demonstration.--The Committee recommends $140,000,000 for
ongoing work to support regulatory development, design, and
deployment activities.
Advanced Reactor Technologies.--The Committee recommends up
to $5,000,000 for continued work on Supercritical
Transformational Electric Power Research and Development. The
Committee supports the collaboration between the national
laboratories and industry partners to develop and validate
sCO 2 power conversion, specifically for modular
micronuclear reactors by spring of 2023. This work will
continue to be coordinated with FECM.
The Committee recommends $22,000,000 for MW-scale reactor
research and development, including $9,000,000 for MARVEL. The
Department is encouraged to move expeditiously on the
solicitation and award of these funds and to streamline its
procurement process to ensure implementation is not delayed.
The fiscal year 2021 Act directed the Department to submit a
report outlining a strategy for siting a microreactor at an
institution of higher education with existing infrastructure to
support the reactor siting, perform fundamental research, test
enabling technologies and cyber security solutions for grid
integration, train the future workforce, and de-risk deployment
for future private sector applications. The Committee is still
awaiting this case study and directs the Department to provide
the report immediately.
Advanced Reactor Concepts Industry Awards.--The Advanced
Reactor Concepts [ARC] program provided a platform to support
innovative advanced reactor designs. With the award of funds by
the Department for its comprehensive Advanced Reactor
Demonstration program, ARC funding has become duplicative.
Therefore, no funds are provided for awards under ARC.
Light Water Reactor Sustainability.--The Committee
recommends $45,000,000 for Light Water Reactor Sustainability.
The most cost-effective way for the United States to maintain
low-cost, carbon-free electricity is to safely extend the lives
of our Nation's existing nuclear reactors from 60 to 80 years.
The Committee encourages the Department to maximize benefits of
the operating light water reactor fleet under the program.
ADVANCED REACTOR DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM
The Committee recommends $370,350,000 for the Advanced
Reactor Demonstration Program to demonstrate multiple advanced
reactor designs.
The primary goal of this program is to focus government and
industry resources on actual construction of real demonstration
reactors that are safe and affordable to build and operate in
the near and mid-term. The Committee continues to believe that
the only way the United States will regain its leadership in
nuclear energy is to begin to deploy advanced reactors. The
Department is directed to continue to ensure the program moves
forward expeditiously and within original scope and budget. The
Department is directed to continue to focus resources on
partners capable of project delivery in the next five to seven
years. The Committee encourages the Department to consider
including the Milestone-Based Demonstration Projects approach,
as authorized in section 9005 of the Energy Act of 2020, for
existing ARDP awards.
INFRASTRUCTURE
INL Facilities Operations and Maintenance.--The
recommendation provides $290,000,000 for INL Facilities
Operations and Maintenance to support the reliability and
sustainability of the Materials and Fuels Complex and the
Advanced Test Reactor.
ORNL Facilities Operations and Maintenance.--The Committee
recommends $19,000,000 for the continued safe operations and
maintenance of Oak Ridge National Laboratory's hot cells.
Idaho Sitewide Safeguard and Security.--The recommendation
provides $149,800,000 for Idaho Sitewide Safeguards and
Security.
FOSSIL ENERGY AND CARBON MANAGEMENT
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $750,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 890,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 850,000,000
The Committee recommends $850,000,000 for Fossil Energy
Research and Development. Within available funds, the Committee
recommends $65,800,000 for program direction.
Additional direction related to Department-wide
crosscutting initiatives is provided under the heading
Crosscutting Initiatives in the front matter of the Department
of Energy.
The Committee supports the budget request, which refocuses
funding toward industrial emission reduction and climate-
centric activities focused on decarbonization. Further, the
Committee is concerned about the cost of carbon capture,
storage, and utilization projects and encourages the Department
to prioritize Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage [CCUS]
funding on projects and research that look to reduce the cost
of these technologies for commercial deployment.
National Carbon Capture Center.--The Committee recommends
funding for the National Carbon Capture Center consistent with
the cooperative agreement.
Industrial Decarbonization.--The Committee notes the lack
of commercially viable carbon capture technology available for
industrial manufacturers to significantly reduce emissions in a
globally competitive manner. Further, the Committee
recommendation supports research and development on industrial
decarbonization and catalyzing industry-government research
partnerships, including carbon capture, utilization, and
storage with an emphasis on reuse utilization within industry
processes and materials; low-carbon fuels (e.g. hydrogen);
transformative technology that will allow deep industrial
decarbonization (including demonstration and deployment at
scale); materials efficiency and circular economy; and carbon
intensity definitions and labeling across key product groups.
The Committee supports the budget request to focus on
industrial CCUS pilot and demonstration projects.
Interagency Working Group on Coal and Power Plant
Communities and Economic Revitalization.--The Committee
supports the Administration's efforts to assist coal
communities through their Interagency Working Group on Coal and
Power Plant Communities and Economic Revitalization which is
led by the Department. The Committee directs the Department to
include an itemization of funding for these activities in
future budget submissions. Within available funds, the
Committee also encourages the Department to allocate sufficient
funds for the working group's activities in fiscal year 2022.
Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems & Hydrogen.--The
recommendation provides not less than $90,000,000 for the
research, development, and demonstration of solid oxide fuel
cell systems and hydrogen production. The committee recognizes
the importance of advancing solid oxide fuel cell systems,
especially for distributed and central power generation
electrolysis, combined heat and power, and storage
applications.
Special Recruitment Programs and HBCUs.--The Committee
supports the Department's efforts to offer undergraduate,
graduate, and post-graduate students majoring in scientific,
technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines the
opportunity to learn about programs, policies, and research,
development, demonstration, and deployment initiatives within
FECM. Further the Committee supports the budget request
increase for the University Training and Research, which
comprises funding for University Coal Research, Historically
Black Colleges and Universities [HBCUs], and other Minority
Serving Institutions.
Ethane Study.--The Committee directs the Department to
provide a status update and expected timeline for release on
their congressionally requested report on ethane production and
consumption trends no later than 30 days after the enactment of
this act.
CARBON CAPTURE UTILIZATION AND STORAGE AND POWER SYSTEMS
The Committee recommends $527,500,000 for CCUS and Power
Systems.
CCUS is a process that captures carbon dioxide emissions
from sources and either reuses or stores it so it will not
enter the atmosphere. The potential for these technologies is
considerable, and the use of these technologies will decrease
the costs for mitigating climate change, in addition to
deploying clean energy and energy efficient technologies.
The Department is directed to conduct CCUS activities,
including front-end engineering and design studies, large pilot
projects, and demonstration projects that capture and securely
store commercial volumes of carbon dioxide from fossil energy
power plants, industrial facilities, or directly from the air
consistent with the objectives of title IV of the Energy Act of
2020.
The Committee supports funding for activities that promote
the reuse of captured carbon dioxide from coal, natural gas,
industrial facilities, direct air capture, and other sources
for the production of fuels and other valuable products. The
Committee further encourages the Department to establish and
pursue a comprehensive carbon sequestration and utilization
effort to combine research and development capacity and
expertise to solve the carbon sequestration and utilization
challenge within 10 years, with the goals of improving the
economics associated with domestic energy production, achieving
optionality in carbon management, and further reducing carbon
dioxide emissions.
The Committee supports the integrated carbon and energy
management activities of the offices of NE, FECM, and EERE and
collaboration on high-efficiency electrochemical conversion of
fossil resources to monomers and chemicals utilizing nuclear
reactor thermal energy.
Carbon Capture.--The recommendation provides $200,000,000
within carbon capture. Within available funds, the Committee
recommends up to $100,000,000 to support front-end engineering
and design studies, large pilot projects, and demonstration
projects, including for the development of a first-of-its-kind
carbon capture project at an existing natural gas combined
cycle plant.
As industrial deployment of CCUS technology expands, the
demand for the transportation of captured carbon oxides is
anticipated to increase significantly. In preparation to meet
this demand, the Department, in collaboration with the
Department of Transportation, is directed to review existing
freight transportation infrastructure and the capacity of the
various modes of freight transportation to provide cost-
effective service. The Department is directed to provide to the
Committee not later than 180 days after enactment of this act a
report of the findings of the review. This report shall ensure
that anticipated short- and long-term freight transportation
demand associated with the expanded industrial deployment of
CCUS technology is met. Additionally, the report shall include
analysis of locations where CCUS projects are likely to be
located and where carbon sequestration or utilization is likely
to occur and the unique aspects of those areas for freight
transportation infrastructure. Finally, in conducting this
review, the Department shall consult with stakeholders,
including representatives from the various modes of freight
transportation.
Carbon Dioxide Removal.--Within available funds, the
Committee recommends $5,000,000 for research, development, and
demonstration activities related to the indirect sequestration
of carbon dioxide in deep ocean waters.
Within available funds, the recommendation provides
$5,000,000 for a competitive solicitation for a study for the
development of a direct air capture facility co-located with a
geothermal energy resource. Priority for such a grant shall be
given to entities that are engaged in the generation of
electricity from geothermal resources.
Carbon Utilization.--The Committee encourages research and
development activities in the Carbon Utilization Program to
support valuable and innovative uses of captured carbon,
including biological utilization by the conversion of carbon
dioxide to high-value products such as chemicals, plastics,
building materials, curing for cement, and the integration of
carbon utilization technologies with fossil fuel power plants,
such as biological conversion systems. Within available funds
for Carbon Utilization, not less than $6,000,000 for a
competitive solicitation to conduct tests of technologies for
carbon dioxide absorption integrated with algae systems for
capturing and reusing carbon dioxide to produce useful fuels
and chemicals, giving priority for teams with university
participants.
Carbon Storage.--Within available funds, the Committee
recommends $85,000,000 for Storage Infrastructure. Within
available funds, the recommendation provides not less than
$40,000,000 for CarbonSAFE. Further, the Committee recognizes
the successful work of the Regional Carbon Sequestration
Partnerships (RCSPs) and the important role they play in
supporting the research and development of carbon utilization
and storage. The Committee recommends not less than $20,000,000
for the work of RCSPs.
The Department is encouraged to facilitate development and
deployment of monitoring technologies at carbon capture
utilization and storage projects, with considerable progress
towards commercial implementation (e.g. a Class VI permit, in-
hand or pending). Currently available seismic data with respect
to carbon storage can take several-to-many months for
processing, and there are concerns about the ability to
identify low levels of carbon dioxide concentrations in
underground storage. Technologies that promise near real- time
results, and/or employ big data, machine learning, and
artificial intelligence are further encouraged to be given
particular attention to better address issues such as leak
detection, monetization of credits, and permit compliance.
In order to mitigate the detrimental effects of climate
change and to meet net-zero goals, it is necessary to
accelerate the use of methods for carbon removal and storage,
including the use and management of natural systems to
sequester carbon and to store it permanently underground via
mineralization processes. The Department is directed to
establish a program to support research and development of
novel, proof-of-principle carbon containment projects with the
goal of finding and de-risking methods and locations to remove
atmospheric carbon dioxide that are effective, safe, low cost,
and scalable. The recommendation provides up to $10,000,000 to
support work at multiple sites, including within significant
basalt formations, to pursue research, development, and
deployment of carbon containment technologies and proximate
carbon dioxide capturing systems that also meet regional
economic and ecological restoration policy goals, such as
catastrophic wildfire mitigation and job creation.
Advanced Energy and Hydrogen Systems.--The recommendation
provides up to $35,000,000 for materials research and
development. The Department is encouraged to support the
Advanced Ultrasupercritical Program to fabricate, qualify, and
develop domestic suppliers capable of producing components from
high temperature materials. Further, the Department is
encouraged to support the Extreme Environments Materials Multi-
Laboratory Consortium and the development of advanced ceramics
under the Materials that Withstand Harsh Environments and
Extend Service Lifetimes. The Department is directed to support
the development of ceramic matrix composite [CMC] materials in
accordance with the CMC Manufacturing Roadmap and section 4005
of the Energy Act of 2020.
The Committee recognizes the significant grid resilience
benefits that distributed-scale highly-efficient natural gas
engines can provide to the Nation's electricity grid. The
Committee encourages FECM to jointly issue a competitive
solicitation to industry with OE with the goal to develop
highly efficient natural gas engines to be used in electricity
generation. Further, preference is encouraged to be given to
projects that prioritize fast demand response and improved
integration with building and institution-based micro-grid
systems.
The Committee encourages the Department to continue
expanding its research and demonstration capabilities toward
production, storage, transport and utilization of hydrogen.
This work shall focus on net-negative carbon hydrogen
production from modular gasification and co-gasification of
mixed wastes, biomass, and traditional feedstocks, solid oxide
electrolysis cell technology development, carbon capture,
advanced turbines, natural gas-based hydrogen production,
hydrogen pipeline infrastructure, and subsurface hydrogen
storage.
The Committee recognizes the value in the production of
carbon-neutral chemicals in decarbonizing the industrial
sector. Therefore, the Committee recommends $10,000,000 for a
laboratory demonstration project for carbon-neutral methanol
synthesis from direct air capture and carbon-free hydrogen
production.
The Committee encourages continued work on coal and coal
biomass to both liquids and solids activities and encourages
the Department to focus on research and development to improve
cost and efficiency of coal-to-fuels technology implementation
and polygeneration.
Crosscutting Research.--The recommendation includes
$1,000,000 for research, development, and commercialization of
value-added natural gas technologies by supporting university
research and pilot projects for rural economic development
focusing on research in green fuels, solid oxide cells and
modular reactors for natural gas upgrading, especially in
smaller and more remote wells.
Minerals Sustainability.--The Mineral Sustainability
subprogram will support domestic supply chain networks required
for the economically, environmentally, and geopolitical
sustainable production of critical minerals. The Committee
remains concerned that the United States continues to import
most of its rare earth elements needs from overseas and
believes that finding near-term and future domestic sources is
a top national security priority.
Within available funds, the Committee directs the
Department to continue its external agency activities to
develop and test advanced separation technologies and
accelerate the advancement of commercially viable technologies
for the recovery of rare earth elements and minerals from
byproduct sources. The Committee expects research to support
pilot-scale and experimental activities for near-term
applications, which encompass the extraction and recovery of
rare earth elements and minerals. The Committee encourages the
Department to continue investments to accelerate the
advancement of commercially viable technologies for the
recovery of rare earth elements and critical minerals,
including from lignite. Further, the Committee encourages the
Department to fund a more detailed assessment of lignite
resources and to devise cost-effective methods of removing rare
earths from lignite.
The Committee directs the Department to continue the Carbon
Ore, Rare Earths, and Critical Minerals [CORE-CM] Program, from
within available funds.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends up to
$6,000,000 for the Department, in collaboration with the
Department of Commerce, and U.S. Geological Survey, to pilot a
research and development project to enhance the security and
stability of the rare earth element supply chain. Research
shall include approaches to mining of domestic rare earth
elements that are critical to U.S. technology development and
manufacturing, as well as emphasize environmentally responsible
mining practices. The Department is encouraged to partner with
universities in these efforts.
Supercritical Transformational Electric Power [STEP]
Generation.--Within available funds, the Committee supports
efforts, consistent with the current cooperative agreement, to
complete the necessary design and construction of the 10-MW
pilot and to conduct the necessary testing for the facility.
The Committee remains concerned about repeated cost overruns
for the project, and the Department is directed to brief the
Committee prior to any change to scope or cost profile of the
project. The recommendation provides additional funds for
competitively awarded research and development activities,
coordinated with NE and EERE to advance the use of
supercritical power cycles and related research.
NATURAL GAS TECHNOLOGIES
The Committee recommends $82,501,000 for Natural Gas
Technologies.
The Committee directs the Department to continue efforts to
support natural gas demand response pilot programs and expects
the Department to proceed with awards expeditiously.
Methane Hydrate Activities.--The Committee supports
university research and field investigations in the Gulf of
Mexico to confirm the nature, regional context, and hydrocarbon
system behavior of gas hydrate deposits and recommends
$5,000,000 for these activities.
Environmentally Prudent Development.--The Committee
recommends $28,000,000 for the Environmentally Prudent
Development subprogram.
The Committee recommends up to $5,200,000 to continue the
Risk Based Data Management System [RBDMS]. The Committee
supports continued funding of RBDMS and in particular, its
functions under FracFocus. The Committee believes FracFocus
should maintain its autonomy and not be incorporated into any
Federal agency.
The Department is encouraged to partner with university-led
consortium for research and development of biofilm-based
barrier technologies to reduce methane emissions from orphan
wells.
The Committee recommends $10,000,000 for further research
on multipronged approaches for characterizing the constituents
of and managing the cleaning of water produced during the
extraction of oil and natural gas, of which $8,000,000 is
available to partner with research universities engaged in the
study of characterizing, cleaning, treating, and managing
produced water and who are willing to engage though public
private partnerships with the energy industry to develop and
assess commercially viable technology to achieve the same. The
Committee encourages the Department to work with industry to
identify and develop commercial-scale technologies that can
characterize, clean and effectively treat produced water to
have beneficial reuse.
Emissions Mitigation from Midstream Infrastructure.--The
Committee recommends $36,000,000 for Emissions Mitigation from
the Midstream Infrastructure subprogram. The Committee
recommends funds to support natural gas infrastructure
research, including advanced materials and novel sensor
technologies.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $5,000,000
to develop and demonstrate an easily implementable,
maintainable, and low-cost integrated methane monitoring
platform to enable early detection of leaks at natural gas
production, processing and transmission sites, which may
include autonomous, real-time, low cost optical methane sensors
and imagers on unmanned aerial systems, integration of carbon
emissions data from geospatial satellites, and new
multidimensional data modeling and predictive capabilities
using machine learning tools.
Emissions Quantification from Natural Gas Infrastructure.--
The Committee recommends $12,000,000 for the Emissions
Quantification from Natural Gas Infrastructure research
subprogram.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $1,500,000
to accelerate development and deployment of high-temperature
harsh-environment sensors, sensor packaging, and wireless
sensor hardware for power generation to improve generating
efficiency, reduce emissions, and lower maintenance costs.
Natural Gas Hydrogen Research.--Within available funds, the
Committee recommends up to $5,000,000 for a demonstration
project focused on producing hydrogen from the processing of
produced water and mineral substances, and transporting
hydrogen using existing energy infrastructure.
NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY
No funds may be used to plan, develop, implement, or pursue
the consolidation or closure of any NETL sites.
The Committee recommends $83,000,000 for NETL Research and
Operations and $70,000,000 for NETL Infrastructure. Further,
within NETL Infrastructure, the Department is directed to
prioritize funds for Joule, the Computational Science and
Engineering Center, the Center for Artificial Intelligence and
Machine Learning, site-wide upgrades for safety, and addressing
and avoiding deferred maintenance. Further, the Committee
recommends $25,000,000 to establish a direct air capture
facility.
Congressionally Directed Spending.--The Committee
recommends $20,199,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration for Fossil
Energy and Carbon Management activities or programs. The
Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing
requirements may apply to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING FOR FOSSIL ENERGY AND CARBON
MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name Recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coal Communities Regional Innovation Cluster, WV........ 4,000
Coal Mine Methane Solutions, CO......................... 1,200
Emergency Backup Generator, AK.......................... 540
Enhanced Outcrop Methane Capture, CO.................... 2,500
FEED Study for the implementation of a Carbon Capture 9,000
and Sequestration System, LA...........................
Mercer County Gas Line Extension, WV.................... 2,959
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $13,006,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 13,650,000
Committee recommendation................................ 13,650,000
The Committee recommends $13,650,000 for Naval Petroleum
and Oil Shale Reserves.
Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $188,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 197,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 197,000,000
The Committee recommends $197,000,000 for the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve.
SPR Petroleum Account
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $1,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 7,350,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,350,000
The Committee recommends $7,350,000 for the SPR Petroleum
Account.
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $6,500,000
Budget estimate, 2022...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 6,500,000
The Committee recommends $6,500,000 for the Northeast Home
Heating Oil Reserve.
Energy Information Administration
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $126,800,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 126,800,000
Committee recommendation................................ 129,087,000
The Committee recommends $129,087,000 for the Energy
Information Administration.
The Committee encourages the Department to continue
important data collection, analysis, and reporting activities
on energy use and consumption, including the Commercial
Buildings Energy Consumption Survey and the Residential
Buildings Energy Consumption Survey.
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $319,200,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 338,860,000
Committee recommendation................................ 338,863,000
The Committee recommends $338,863,000 for Non-Defense
Environmental Cleanup.
Gaseous Diffusion Plants.--The Committee recommends
$121,203,000 for cleanup activities at the Gaseous Diffusion
Plants, including an additional $5,000,000 for treatment and
shipping of cylinders. The Committee recognizes that less than
10 percent of the cylinders have been treated and encourages
the Department to prioritize getting the processing lines
running at both sites.
Small Sites.--The Committee recommends $124,340,000 for
Small Sites. Within available funds, the Committee recommends
$21,340,000 for the Energy Technology Engineering Center,
$11,000,000 for Idaho National Laboratory, $67,000,000 for
Moab, $5,000,000 to continue work at Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, and $20,000,000 for excess Office of Science
facilities.
URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $841,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 831,340,000
Committee recommendation................................ 860,000,000
The Committee recommends $860,000,000 for activities funded
from the Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning
Fund. The Committee understands that cleanup at the Oak Ridge
East Tennessee Technology Park is estimated to be completed by
2027. However, cleanup at Portsmouth is estimated to be done
between 2039 and 2045. Further, Paducah cleanup is estimated to
be completed between 2065 and 2070. These date estimates are
based upon the recent funding profiles for the two sites.
Significant life-cycle cost-savings would occur with greater
funding up front. In future budget requests, the Department is
encouraged to seek funding that will bring forward the
completion dates for Portsmouth and Paducah.
The Department shall not barter, transfer, or sell uranium
during fiscal year 2022 to generate additional funding for
Portsmouth cleanup that is in excess of the amount of funding
recommended.
Science
Appropriations, 2021...................................\1\$7,026,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 7,440,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,490,000,000
\1\$2,300,000,000 of this total was designated as emergency funding in
fiscal year 2021.
The Committee recommends $7,490,000,000 for Science. The
recommendation includes $202,000,000 for program direction.
Additional direction related to Department-wide
crosscutting initiatives is provided under the heading
Crosscutting Initiatives in front matter for the Department of
Energy.
Quantum Information Science.--The Committee supports the
Office of Science's coordinated and focused research program in
quantum information science to support the Department's
science, energy, and national security missions, as authorized
in sections 401 and 402 of Public Law 115-368, the National
Quantum Initiative. This industry promises to yield
revolutionary new approaches to computing, sensing,
communication, data security, and metrology, as well as our
understanding of the universe, and accordingly, the Committee
recommends not less than $245,000,000 for quantum information
science, including not less than $120,000,000 toward activities
authorized under Section 401 of the National Quantum Initiative
and $125,000,000 towards activities authorized the National
Quantum Information Science Research Centers in Section 402 of
the National Quantum Initiative. Within available funding, the
Committee encourages the Department to support a quantum
internet and communications research program consistent with
the Department's ``America's Blueprint for the Quantum
Internet'' strategy. The Department is directed to continue its
coordination efforts with the National Science Foundation,
other Federal agencies, private sector stakeholders, and the
user community to promote researcher access to quantum systems,
enhance the U.S. quantum research enterprise, develop the U.S.
quantum computing industry, and educate the future quantum
computing workforce.
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.--The
Committee recommends not less than $120,000,000 for Artificial
Intelligence and Machine Learning across the Office of Science
Programs. As the stewards of the leadership computing
facilities, the Committee expects Advanced Scientific Computing
Research to take a lead role in the Department's artificial
intelligence and machine learning activities. The Committee
appreciates the Department's focus on the development of
foundational artificial intelligence and machine learning
capabilities, and directs the Office of Science to apply those
capabilities to the Office of Science's mission with a focus on
accelerating scientific discovery in its Scientific User
Facilities and large experiments.
Reaching a New Energy Sciences Workforce.--The Committee
supports the new Reaching a New Energy Sciences Workforce
initiative for targeted efforts to increase participation and
retention of underrepresented groups in the Office of Science's
research activities. The Committee encourages the Department to
continue funding to support research and development needs of
graduate and post-graduate science programs at HBCUs and
minority serving institutions. The Department is directed to
provide to the Committee not later than 90 days after enactment
of this act and yearly thereafter briefings on implementation
of this program.
Lawrence Awards.--Within available funding, the Department
is directed to award up to 10 Lawrence Awards with an
honorarium of no less than $20,000 per awardee.
ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH
The Committee recommends $1,040,000,000 for Advanced
Scientific Computing Research [ASCR].
The Committee strongly supports ASCR's leadership in
emerging areas relevant to the Department's mission, including
artificial intelligence and quantum information science. The
Committee commends ASCR's pursuit of machine learning tools for
scientific applications and its support for the development of
algorithms for future deployable quantum computers. The
Committee recognizes that a robust research program in applied
and computational mathematics and computer science will be
critical to continued progress in these areas and is supportive
of the Department's efforts to prioritize these programs.
The Committee recommends $129,000,000 for the Exascale
Computing Project. In addition, the Committee recommends
$250,000,000 for the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility,
$160,000,000 for the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility,
$130,000,000 for the National Energy Research Scientific
Computing Center, and $93,926,000 for ESnet.
Maintaining international leadership in high performance
computing requires a long term and sustained commitment to
basic research in computing and computational sciences,
including applied math, software development, networking
science, and computing competency among scientific fields. The
Committee recommends not less than $270,000,000 for
Mathematical, Computational, and Computer Sciences Research.
Further, the Committee supports the computational sciences
workforce programs and recommends not less than $20,000,000 for
the Computational Science Graduate Fellowship.
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES
The Committee recommends $2,323,000,000 for Basic Energy
Sciences [BES].
The Committee continues to support the EPSCoR program and
its goals of broadening participation in sustainable and
competitive basic energy research in eligible jurisdictions.
The Committee recommends $25,000,000 for EPSCoR and directs the
Department to continue annual or at minimum, biennial
implementation grant solicitations.
The Committee recommends $538,000,000 to provide for
operations at the five BES light sources and $293,000,000 for
the high-flux neutron sources. The Committee recommends not
less than $130,000,000 for the Energy Frontier Research Centers
to continue multi-disciplinary, fundamental research needed to
address scientific grand challenges. The Committee recommends
not less than $142,000,000 for operations at the five BES
Nanoscale Science Research Centers and to adequately invest in
the recapitalization of key instruments and infrastructure, and
in staff and other resources necessary to deliver critical
scientific capabilities to users. The Committee recognizes that
leveraging advances in artificial intelligence for chemistry
and materials science presents a unique opportunity to
accelerate discovery and innovation. The Department is
encouraged to explore opportunities to develop an autonomous
chemistry and materials synthesis platform as part of the
Nanoscale Science Research Centers. The capabilities will
leverage advances in artificial intelligence to enable greater
efficiencies and scientific throughput, leading to significant
reduction of the total time and cost in novel materials
discovery and innovation.
The Committee recommends $25,000,000 for the Batteries and
Energy Storage Innovation Hub, and $20,000,000 for the Fuels
from Sunlight Innovation Hub.
Within available funds, the Committee is encouraged to use
funds to support national lab-academic-industry teams for
research to identify and develop entirely solar-driven
processes for hydrogen production, adsorbents for sequestering
carbon dioxide, and catalysts needed to convert carbon dioxide
and hydrogen into fuels. To test these processes at scale,
funds may be used for laboratory scale prototypes that
integrate such systems. Further, the Committee encourages the
Office of Science to work with EERE to address the need to
quickly scale up efforts to develop cleaner production of
hydrogen at lower costs to attract industrial investment.
The recommendation provides not less than $14,300,000 for
other project costs, including $4,300,000 for Linac Coherent
Light Source-II, $5,000,000 for Advanced Photon Source Upgrade,
$3,000,000 for Linac Coherent Light Source-II-HE, and
$2,000,000 for Cryomodule Repair & Maintenance Facility. The
recommendation includes $15,000,000 for NSRC Recapitalization.
Further, the Second Target Station is supported for other
project costs and total estimated costs.
The Committee recommends not less than $15,000,000 for the
NSLS II Experimental Tools II. The Department is directed to
continue supporting the construction of additional beamlines in
future budget requests so the nation's scientists can more
fully leverage the investment that has been made in the NSLS II
while it is the most powerful X-Ray light source in the Nation.
BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
The Committee recommends $828,000,000 for Biological and
Environmental Research. The recommendation includes not less
than $406,450,000 for Biological Systems Science and not less
than $421,500,000 for Earth and Environmental Systems Sciences.
The Department is directed to give priority to optimizing
the operation of Biological and Environmental Research User
Facilities. The Committee supports the budget request for Earth
and Environmental Systems Sciences Facilities and
Infrastructure, and supports the proposal for the Environmental
Molecular Sciences Laboratory to initiate planning for a high
throughput multiomics pipeline.
The Committee directs the Department to enhance investments
in machine learning to advance the use of diverse and
increasingly autonomous datasets to understand environmental
and climate dynamics; rapidly incorporate datasets into
predictive watershed, ecosystem and climate models; and project
the onset of and track extreme events, such as atmospheric
rivers and hurricanes.
The Committee recommends not less than $100,000,000 for the
four Bioenergy Research Centers. The Committee directs the
Department to maintain Genomic Science as a top priority and
recommends not less than $109,000,000 for Foundational Genomics
Research. Further, the Committee recommends not less than
$45,000,000 for Biomolecular Characterization and Imaging
Science, including $15,000,000 to continue the development of a
multi-scale genes-to ecosystems approach that supports a
predictive understanding of gene functions and how they scale
with complex biological and environmental systems. The
Committee recommends $85,000,000 for the Joint Genome
Institute, an essential component for genomic research. The
Committee supports the Department's establishment of a national
microbiome database collaborative.
The Committee continues to support the prototyping and
establishment of fabricated ecosystems, automation, sensors,
and computational tools to enable a predictive understanding of
soil-plant-microbe interactions across molecular to ecosystem
scales. The novel tools and capabilities will accelerate
discovery and speed the delivery of solutions to climate
change, environmental sustainability, and clean energy. The
recommendation provides not less than $6,000,000 for fabricated
ecosystems and sensors. Within available funds, the
recommendation includes up to $4,000,000 for second generation
SmartSoils fabricated ecosystem testbeds, new sensors, and
computational tools to enable real-time connectivity between
lab-controlled, instrumented SmartSoil testbeds and naturally
varying field experiments. Within available funds, the
recommendation includes up to $8,000,000 to develop and test
novel sensor technologies, procure second generation EcoPOD
units, and create the computational and experimental
infrastructures necessary to dissect field observations at
atomic and molecular levels in fabricated ecosystems.
The Committee recommends the Department provide $2,000,000
in funding for academia to perform independent evaluations of
climate models using existing data sets and peer-reviewed
publications of climate-scale processes to determine various
models' ability to reproduce the actual climate.
The Committee recommends not less than $109,500,000 for
Environmental System Science.
The Committee directs the Department to continue to support
NGEE Arctic, NGEE Tropics, the SPURCE field site, the Watershed
Function and Mercury Science Focus Areas, and the AmeriFLUX
project.
The Committee supports the Department's efforts to advance
understanding of coastal ecosystems, as initiated with the
terrestrial-aquatic interfaces pilot in fiscal year 2019, and
recommends $30,000,000 to build upon the current modeling-
focused effort and to develop observational assets and
associated research to study the Nation's major land-water
interfaces, including the Great Lakes and Puget Sound, by
leveraging national laboratories' assets as well as local
infrastructure and expertise at universities and other research
institutions. The Committee encourages the Department to
continue to support the River Corridor Science Focus Area.
Within available funds, the Department is encouraged to
develop integrated mountainous hydroclimate modeling and
observational capabilities. The new effort shall leverage
activities supported by other Federal agencies active in
investigating how snow-dominated Upper Colorado mountainous
systems are responding to extreme events and gradual warming,
and the implications for water resilience in the western U.S.
The Committee continues to support the Department's
investment in observational studies, modeling, and computing to
reduce the uncertainty in understanding cloud aerosol effects
and recommends $30,000,000 to build upon this research. Of the
increase provided, $15,000,000 is made available for the
modernization and acceleration of the Energy, Exascale, and
Earth System Model program to improve earth system prediction
and climate risk management in the service of U.S. public
safety, security, and economic interests. This work shall
coordinate with DHS on the modernization and adaptation
capabilities from the National Infrastructure Simulation and
Analysis Center to support climate impacts on infrastructure
and communities.
FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES
The Committee recommends $660,000,000 for Fusion Energy
Sciences.
U.S. Contribution to the International Thermonuclear
Experimental Reactor [ITER] Project.--The Committee recommends
$211,000,000 for the U.S. contribution to the ITER Project, of
which not less than $40,000,000 is for in-cash contributions.
Operations, Research, and Development.--The Department is
encouraged to support optimal facility operations levels for
DIII-D. The Committee recommends not less than $25,000,000 for
the Material Plasma Exposure eXperiment.
The Committee recommends not less than $50,000,000 for
NSTX-U Operations, and not less than $27,000,000 for NSTX-U
Research. The Committee recommends not less than $20,000,000
for the High-Energy-Density Laboratory Plasmas program to
support initiatives in quantum information science, advance
cutting-edge research in extreme states of matter, expand the
capabilities of the LaserNetUS facilities, and provide initial
investments in new intense, ultrafast laser technologies needed
to retain U.S. leadership in these fields.
Given the recent FESAC Long-Range Plan, the Committee
recognizes the need for the initiation of design studies of
various future fusion experimental facilities in the program.
The Committee encourages that the stellarator concept be
considered as part of that program and that there be broad
community participation in these studies.
To maintain U.S. leadership in intense, ultrafast lasers,
the Committee directs the Department, within 180 days of
enactment of this act, to submit a report to the Committees on
Appropriations of Houses of Congress describing the
Department's plans to respond to the recommendations of the
Brightest Light Initiative Workshop Report, including facility
investments and improvements needed to advance laser science
technology and applications.
HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
The Committee recommends $1,079,000,000 for High Energy
Physics.
Research.--The Committee recommends $30,000,000 for the
Sanford Underground Research Facility and not less than
$40,000,000 for the HL-LHC Upgrade projects.
The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for the Cosmic
Microwave Background-Stage 4.
The Committee encourages the Department to fund facility
operations at levels for optimal operations. Further, the
Committee encourages the Department to fund facility operations
and MIEs at optimal levels.
NUCLEAR PHYSICS
The Committee recommends $744,000,000 for Nuclear Physics.
Research.--The Department is directed to give priority to
optimizing operations for all Nuclear Physics user facilities.
The Committee recommends up to $15,800,000 for the Gamma-
Ray Energy Tracking Array; completion for sPHENIX; up to
$16,200,000 for MOLLER; up to $1,400,000 for Ton-Scale
Neutrino-less Double Beta Decay; and up to $13,000,000 for the
High Rigidity Spectrometer;
ISOTOPE R&D AND PRODUCTION
Isotope R&D and Production ensures robust supply chains of
critical radioactive and stable isotopes for the Nation that no
domestic entity has the infrastructure or core competency to
produce. The Committee supports the FRIB Isotope Harvesting
projects.
ACCELERATOR R&D AND PRODUCTION
Accelerator R&D and Production supports cross-cutting
research and development in accelerator science and technology,
access to unique Office of Science accelerator research and
development infrastructure, workforce development, and public-
private partnerships to advance new technologies for use in the
Office of Science's scientific facilities and in commercial
products.
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FOR TEACHERS AND SCIENTISTS
The Committee recommends $35,000,000 for Workforce
Development for Teachers and Scientists.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends
$14,000,000 for Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships;
$2,000,000 for Community College Internships; $5,000,000 for
the Graduate Student Research Program; $2,100,000 for the
Visiting Faculty Program; $5,000,000 for Workforce Training for
Underrepresented Minorities; $1,200,000 for the Albert Einstein
Distinguished Educator Fellowship; $2,900,000 for the National
Science Bowl; $700,000 for Technology Development and Online
Application; $600,000 for Evaluation Studies; and $1,500,000
for Outreach.
Within Outreach, the Committee directs the Department to
establish a working group comprised of the Office of Science
and national laboratories and a consortium of universities to
assist universities in the development of a curriculum to
promote the next generation of scientists utilizing artificial
intelligence, quantum information science, and machine
learning.
The Department is encouraged to allocate funding to
training and workforce development programs that assist and
support workers in trades and activities required for the
continued growth of the U.S. energy efficiency and clean energy
sectors, with an emphasis on training programs focused on
building retrofit and the construction industry. The Department
is encouraged to continue to work with two-year community and
technical colleges, labor, and nongovernmental and industry
consortia to pursue job training programs, including programs
focused on displaced fossil fuel workers, that lead to an
industry-recognized credential in the energy workforce.
Further, the Department is directed to submit to the
Committee not later than 120 days after enactment of this act a
plan describing a five-year educational and workforce
development program for expanding engagement with and support
for high school, undergraduate, and graduate students, as well
as recent graduates, teachers, and faculty in STEM fields. This
plan may include paid internships, fellowships, temporary
employment, training programs, visiting student and faculty
programs, sabbaticals, and research support. The plan shall
also include an outreach strategy to more effectively
advertise, recruit, and promote educational and workforce
programs to community colleges, Minority Serving Institutions,
and non-research universities.
SCIENCE LABORATORIES INFRASTRUCTURE
The Committee recommends $295,000,000 for Science
Laboratories Infrastructure.
The fiscal year 2021 Act directed the Department to submit
to the Committee a report on the funding levels required for
operations and maintenance of Oak Ridge National Laboratory
nuclear facilities. The Committee is still awaiting this report
and directs the Department to provide the report not later than
15 days after enactment of this act.
NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $27,500,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 7,500,000
Committee recommendation................................ 27,500,000
The Committee recommends $27,500,000 for Nuclear Waste
Disposal, of which $20,000,000 is for interim storage and
$7,500,000 is for Nuclear Waste Fund oversight activities.
Funds for the Nuclear Waste Fund oversight activities are to be
derived from the Nuclear Waste Fund.
TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS
Appropriations, 2021....................................................
Budget estimate, 2022................................... $19,470,000
Committee recommendation................................ 19,470,000
The Committee supports funding the Office of Technology
Transition [OTT] through a new, separate appropriation to
increase transparency and reflect the need for multi-year
funding for programmatic activities.
CLEAN ENERGY DEMONSTRATIONS
Appropriations, 2021....................................................
Budget estimate, 2022................................... $400,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 100,000,000
The Committee supports the establishment of an Office of
Clean Energy Demonstrations. The Department is directed to
conduct these activities on a competitive basis and include
cost-share requirements pursuant to section 988 of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005. The Department is encouraged to conduct
these activities through technology neutral solicitations.
Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $427,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 500,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 500,000,000
The Committee recommends $500,000,000 for the Advanced
Research Projects Agency-Energy, equal to the budget request.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $37,000,000
for program direction.
The budget request proposes the establishment of an
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Climate [ARPA-C]. The
Committee supports the budget's approach to focus on climate
innovations and emission reduction; however, the budget request
justification notes that ARPA-C will require legislation beyond
the current ARPA-E authorization. The Committee encourages
ARPA-E to consider proposed activities under ARPA-C that are
consistent with ARPA-E's mission and authorization in addition
to its other current and proposed activities. Additionally,
ARPA-E shall coordinate funding from other Federal agencies in
support of ARPA-C, if such funds are provided.
The Committee recognizes the importance of helping
promising, early-stage energy technologies bridge the gap
between lab-scale trials and commercial viability. Further, the
Committee supports the recent activities of ARPA-E aimed to
support the scaling of high-risk and potentially disruptive
ARPA-E funded technologies across the full spectrum of energy
applications.
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $32,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 182,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 32,000,000
OFFSETTING COLLECTIONS
Appropriations, 2021.................................... -$3,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... -3,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ -3,000,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $29,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 179,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 29,000,000
The Committee recommends $29,000,000 in administrative
expenses for the Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program.
The Committee recognizes the important need to have a
domestic capacity to develop and process critical minerals.
Within existing authorities for carrying out the Title XVII
loan guarantee program, the Committee encourages the Department
to prioritize projects that expand the domestic supply of
critical minerals and rare earth elements.
The Department is reminded that it does not have authority
to redirect any appropriated loan authority for the Advanced
Fossil Energy Projects solicitation.
Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $5,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 5,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,000,000
The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for the Advanced
Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program.
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $2,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 2,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,000,000
The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for the Tribal Energy
Loan Guarantee Program.
Many American Indian and Alaska Native communities face
extremely challenging energy realities and pay some of the
Nation's highest prices for energy and electricity. Yet, Tribal
lands are known to have significant potential for energy
development. Congress recognized this challenge and authorized
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program [TELGP] in the Energy
Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-58). TELGP was authorized
with $2,000,000,000 in partial loan guarantees in support of
debt financing for tribal energy development projects. Yet, the
Department to date has not awarded any loans. The Committee
directs the Department to expedite their efforts to award loans
from the Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program.
The Department is also encouraged to take formal steps to
market this program and ensure the program's availability,
benefits, and application process are made known to potential
applicants who are ready to seek financing.
Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $22,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 122,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 122,000,000
The Committee recommends $122,000,000 for the Office of
Indian Energy Policy and Programs.
The Committee encourages the Department to use its cost
share waiver authority under section 2602 of the Energy Policy
Act of 1992, as modified by section 8013 of the Energy Act of
2020, when appropriate. The Committee encourages the Department
to coordinate with other Federal agencies to increase outreach
about the availability of the assistance of the Office of
Indian Energy Policy and Programs.
The Committee supports the budget request to provide
financing options to help provide power to tribal homes that
current lack electricity. Within available funds, the Committee
recommends not less than $45,000,000 to advance technical
assistance, demonstration, and deployment of clean energy for
households and communities in tribal nations to improve
reliability, resilience, and alleviate energy poverty. The
Department is encouraged to prioritize households and
communities that lack connection to the electric grid. The
Department is directed to collaborate with the Office of EERE,
including the Solar Energy Technologies Office, and the Office
of Electricity in issuing these funds.
The Committee supports the Office of Indian Energy's
efforts to utilize local Subject Matter Experts to assist
Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages in the development of
energy projects and providing support for energy planning. The
Committee encourages the Office of Indian Energy to design
funding opportunity announcements that do not exclude Tribes
based on local land ownership structures, consistent with
expanded authority under section 2602 of the Energy Policy Act
of 1992, as modified by section 8013 of the Energy Act of 2020.
Departmental Administration
(GROSS)
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $259,378,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 422,378,000
Committee recommendation................................ 343,578,000
(MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES)
Appropriations, 2021.................................... -$93,378,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... -100,578,000
Committee recommendation................................ -100,578,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $161,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 321,760,000
Committee recommendation................................ 243,000,000
The Committee recommends $343,578,000 in funding for
Departmental Administration. This funding is offset by
$100,578,000 in revenue for a net appropriation of
$243,000,000.
International Affairs.--Within available funds, the
Committee recommends $2,000,000 for the Israel Binational
Industrial Research and Development [BIRD] Foundation and
$4,000,000 to continue the U.S. Israel Center of Excellence in
Energy Engineering and Water Technology.
U.S. Energy Employment Report.--Within available funds for
the Office of Policy, the Committee encourages the Department
to use up to $2,000,000 to complete an annual U.S. energy
employment report that includes a comprehensive statistical
survey to collect data, publish the data, and provide a summary
report.
The Department is directed to continue to expand and drive
Department-wide implementation of the CIO Business Operations
Support Services [CBOSS] program to maximize, consolidate, and
fully meet the multiple mission requirements and support the
Department's critical cybersecurity mission. CBOSS shall be
used to support Departmental initiatives for information
technology modernization, data center optimization, and
Departmental transition to the cloud. Funding resources shall
continue to be prioritized to ensure that the CIO continues to
work closely with OE, CESER, and emergency response to ensure
coordinated protection of the Power Marketing Administrations
and unified support for cybersecurity of the energy sector. The
Committee encourages the Department to utilize the CBOSS
program to continue to enhance the stewardship of information
technology spending in accordance with the Federal Information
Technology Acquisition Reform Act [FITARA] by continuing to
demonstrate progress in implementing technology business
management, enhancing transparency in information technology
chargeback, and expanding the use of category management. The
Committee requests the Department to detail meaningful new
actions taken to achieve these outcomes in its Fiscal Year 2023
budget justifications.
Office of the Inspector General
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $57,739,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 78,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 78,000,000
The Committee recommends $78,000,000 for the Office of the
Inspector General.
The budget request increase is due to a new proposal for
independent auditing of the Department's management and
operating contractors. Prior to obligating any funds for the
new audit strategy, the Inspector General shall submit to the
Committee, within 90 days of enactment of this act, a detailed
implementation plan for the new auditing proposal.
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
The Committee recommendation for the National Nuclear
Security Administration [NNSA] continues funding for
recapitalization of our nuclear weapons infrastructure, while
modernizing and maintaining a safe, secure, and credible
nuclear deterrent without the need for underground testing.
The Committee supports continuing important efforts to
secure and permanently eliminate remaining stockpiles of
nuclear and radiological materials both here and abroad to
reduce the global danger from the proliferation of weapons of
mass destruction. The Committee also supports Naval Reactors
and the important role they play in enabling the Navy's nuclear
fleet.
A highly skilled and diverse workforce is required to
maintain and modernize the nuclear weapons stockpile and
execute the global nonproliferation initiatives of the NNSA.
The Committee commends the NNSA for considerable progress made
to recruit and retain this unique workforce, but reminds NNSA
to remain within authorized staffing levels in the coming
fiscal year.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The Committee is concerned about the NNSA's ability to
properly estimate costs and timelines for large projects. The
NNSA is encouraged to assess current performance on projects
costing more than $750,000,000, and make appropriate project
management changes. The Committee encourages the NNSA to
identify problems in cost and schedule estimates early, and
provide updated information to the Committee in a timely
manner.
Weapons Activities
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $15,345,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 15,484,295,000
Committee recommendation................................ 15,484,295,000
The Committee recommends $15,484,295,000 for Weapons
Activities to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and
effectiveness of the Nation's nuclear weapons stockpile without
the need for nuclear testing.
STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT
The Committee notes that the Administration is expected to
release its nuclear posture review and encourages the
Administration to ensure future budget requests reflect a
sustainable path forward for the NNSA in order to meet its
budget and schedule commitments.
Prior to obligating funding for the B83-1 service life
extension and the W80-4 Alteration of the Sea-Launched Cruise
Missile, the Administrator, after consultation with the
Department of Defense, is directed to certify to the committees
on appropriations that there are operational requirements
justifying these programs. If, after consultation, the
Administrator finds there are not operational requirements
justifying these programs, the Administrator is directed to
seek a reprogramming of any such funds to other projects and
programs within Weapons Activities.
The Committee continues to support the program of record
for plutonium pit production to maintain the readiness of our
aging systems. However, the Committee notes that it has not
received a comprehensive, integrated ten-year research plan for
pit and plutonium aging as requested. The Committee will be
unable to continue to support the program without this
information. The Committee further notes that the GAO
recommended that the NNSA complete an integrated master
schedule for the overall pit production effort and stated that
the GAO could not fully assess ``the extent to which the two
pit production facilities will be ready to produce pits''
without such a schedule. The Committee directs the NNSA to
complete an integrated master schedule for pit production no
later than 180 days after the enactment of this act.
The Committee encourages the NNSA to provide funding for
next-generation machining and assembly technology development
for high volume pit production.
STOCKPILE RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING
The Committee recommends $2,793,033,000 for Stockpile
Research, Technology, and Engineering.
Academic Programs.--The Committee recommends $111,912,000
for Academic Programs, recognizing the importance of the
Academic Programs in supporting fundamental science and
technology research at universities that support stockpile
stewardship, the development of the next generation of highly-
trained workforce, and the maintenance of a strong network of
independent technical peers. Of the funds provided for the
NNSA's Academic Alliances Programs, $10,000,000 is designated
for the Tribal Colleges and Universities Partnership Program
and $40,000,000 for the Minority Serving Institution
Partnership Program. The Committee directs the Department to
fully distribute the designated funding to Tribal Colleges and
Universities and Minority Serving Institution Partnership
Program.
Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High-Yield.--The
Committee recommends $580,000,000 for the Inertial Confinement
Fusion Ignition and High-Yield Campaign program. Within
available funds, not less than $82,000,000 is for the OMEGA
Laser Facility, $349,000,000 for the National Ignition
Facility, $66,900,000 for the Z Facility and $6,000,000 for the
NIKE Laser at the Naval Research Laboratory. The Committee
recognizes that a predictable and sustained availability of
targets is essential to the operations of NNSA's laser
facilities and recommends not less than $31,000,000 be provided
by the NNSA to target vendors for target research, development
and fabrication to cost-effectively operate the NIF, Z, and
OMEGA facilities.
Advanced Simulation and Computing.--The Committee
recommends $747,012,000 for Advanced Simulation and Computing.
Within funds provided, $15,000,000 is recommended for scalable
computational NVMe over fabrics for exascale computing
applications at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS
The Committee recommends $3,507,136,000 for Infrastructure
and Operations.
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $2,260,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 1,934,000,000
Committee recommendation................................\1\2,264,000,000
\1\The budget request includes a $330,000,000 rescission of prior year
funds, resulting in a net appropriation of $1,934,000,000.
The Committee recommends $2,264,000,000 for Defense Nuclear
Nonproliferation.
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation is critically important to
our national security by preventing nuclear materials and
weapons from falling into the wrong hands, including non-
weapons nations, terrorist organizations, and non-state actors.
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation helps protect our Nation from
emerging and ever evolving threats.
As the Office of Nuclear Energy works to promote delivery
of advanced reactors, NNSA will play a vital role in making
sure appropriate safeguards are considered early in the
process. The Committee directs NNSA to cooperate and support
the Office of Nuclear Energy in developing safeguards concepts,
policies, and technologies to address the proliferation
challenges unique to advanced nuclear reactors. Further, NNSA
shall cooperate with the national laboratories and industry to
support the implementation of ``safeguards-by-design'' features
in advanced nuclear reactors.
UNIVERSITY CONSORTIA FOR NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION RESEARCH
The Department of Energy's three University Consortia for
Nuclear Nonproliferation Research educate undergraduate and
graduate students in specialized fields essential to sustaining
the workforce in nonproliferation technology, while
contributing research and development to DOE's nuclear complex.
The Committee recognizes the importance of this program and
fully funds these efforts within Defense Nuclear
Nonproliferation Research and Development.
Naval Reactors
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $1,684,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 1,860,705,000
Committee recommendation................................\1\1,840,505,000
\1\The budget request requests a $6,000,000 rescission of prior year
funds, resulting in a net appropriation of $1,834,505,000.
The Committee recommends $1,840,505,000 for Naval Reactors.
COLUMBIA-CLASS REACTOR SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
The Committee recommends $55,000,000 for Columbia-Class
Reactor Systems Development. Columbia-class submarines remain
vital to maintaining our survivable deterrent.
The Committee recommends $630,684,000 for Naval Reactors
Development. Within the available funds, the Committee
recommends $89,108,000 for the Advanced Test Reactor. The
Committee remains concerned that Naval Reactors does not have a
clearly defined research and development plan for the future.
The Committee notes that Naval Reactors has not provided the
report directed last year on its research and development
program and directs Naval Reactors to provide the report within
30 days of enactment of this act.
Federal Salaries and Expenses
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $443,200,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 464,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 453,000,000
The Committee recommends $453,000,000 for Federal Salaries
and Expenses. The Committee continues to support funding for
the necessary recruitment and retention of the highly-skilled
personnel needed to meet NNSA's important mission. However, the
Committee directs NNSA to only hire within authorized personnel
numbers provided for a given fiscal year. The Committee directs
NNSA to continue providing monthly updates on the status of
hiring and retention.
Defense Environmental Cleanup
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $6,426,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 6,841,670,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,510,000,000
The Committee recommendation for Defense Environmental
Cleanup is $6,510,000,000. Within available funds, the
Department is directed to fund the hazardous waste worker
training program at $10,000,000.
Future Budget Requests.--The Committee directs the
Department to include out-year funding projections in the
annual budget request for Environmental Management, and an
estimate of the total cost and time to complete each site.
Richland.--As a signatory to the Tri-Party Agreement, the
Department is required to meet specific compliance milestones
toward the cleanup of the Hanford site. Among other things, the
Department committed to provide the funding necessary to enable
full compliance with its cleanup milestones. The Committee
recognizes that significant progress has been made at the
Hanford site, but greater funding will be necessary to meet
compliance milestones.
The Department is directed to carry out maintenance and
public safety efforts at historical sites, including the B
Reactor. This includes facility improvements needed to expand
public access and interpretive programs. Specifically, within
available funds, $10,000,000 is recommended for B Reactor roof
replacement and other work to preserve the facility. The
Department is directed to request any additional funding needed
to complete the identified work starting with the fiscal year
2023 budget. The Department of Energy Richland Operations
Office is encouraged to complete the development and
verification of plans and processes for the permanent off-site
removal of 90Sr capsules currently stored at the Waste
Encapsulation and Storage Facility.
Furthermore, the Department is reminded of its authority
under the Atomic Energy Act to make available Payment in Lieu
of Taxes [PILT] to communities that host Department of Energy
sites based on property taxes they would have received if the
property remained on their tax rolls. This funding provides a
wide variety of public services, such as emergency response,
road maintenance, and funding for public schools. It is crucial
that eligible PILT communities, such as Hanford and Savannah
River, continue to receive payments given their historical
contribution to the Federal government and continued inability
to raise adequate revenue on Federal land.
None of the Richland Operations funds shall be used to
carry out activities with the Office of River Protection's tank
farms.
Office of River Protection.--The Committee recommends
$1,645,000,000 for the Office of River Protection. Funds are
provided for full engineering, procurement, and construction
work on the High-Level Waste Treatment Facility, for design and
engineering on the Pre-Treatment Facility, to ensure compliance
with the 2016 Consent Decree and Tri-Party Agreement
milestones, and to continue tank waste retrievals.
Program Direction.--The Committee recognizes the need to
prepare the next generation of the environmental management
workforce and recommends $1,000,000 to continue its program to
mentor, train, and recruit the needed personnel.
Technology Development.--Within the funds recommended for
Technology Development, the Department is encouraged to pursue
the development and deployment of Wearable Robotic Devices for
Worker Safety. Within the amount recommended, up to $7,000,000
is recommended for work on qualification, testing, and research
to advance the state-of-the-art on containment ventilation
systems.
Further, the Department is directed to take the necessary
steps to implement and competitively award a cooperative
university-affiliated research center for that purpose.
Defense Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning
Appropriations, 2021....................................................
Budget estimate, 2022...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ $860,000,000
The Committee recommendation for Defense Uranium Enrichment
Decontamination and Decommissioning is $860,000,000.
Other Defense Activities
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $920,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 1,170,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 930,400,000
The Committee recommends $930,400,000 for Other Defense
Activities. The Committee does not support the administration's
request to move funding for formerly Utilized Sites Remedial
Action Program [FUSRAP] to the Office of Legacy Management, so
there is no funding for that purpose included within Other
Defense Activities. The recommendation includes $10,000,000
above the budget request for targeted investments to defend the
U.S. energy sector against the evolving threat of cyber and
other attacks in support of the resiliency of the Nation's
electric grid and energy infrastructure.
POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS
The Committee recognizes the important role the Power
Marketing Administrations play in delivering affordable power,
maintaining grid reliability, and supporting the Nation's
Federal multi-purpose water projects.
Operations and Maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration
Appropriations, 2021....................................................
Budget estimate, 2022...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................
Operations and Maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $10,400,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 10,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,400,000
The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $10,400,000
for the Southwestern Power Administration.
Construction, Rehabilitation, Operations and Maintenance, Western Area
Power Administration
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $89,372,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 90,772,000
Committee recommendation................................ 90,772,000
The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $90,772,000
for the Western Area Power Administration.
Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $228,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 228,000
Committee recommendation................................ 228,000
The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $228,000
for the Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $404,350,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 463,900,000
Committee recommendation................................ 466,426,000
REVENUES APPLIED
Appropriations, 2021.................................... -$404,350,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... -463,900,000
Committee recommendation................................ 466,426,000
The Committee recommendation for the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission [FERC] is $466,426,000. Additional funds
are provided for FERC to initiate an Office of Public
Participation. Revenues for FERC are established at a rate
equal to the budget authority, resulting in a net appropriation
of $0.
The Committee encourages FERC to prioritize meaningful
opportunities for public engagement and coordination with State
and local governments in the Federal permitting and review
processes of energy infrastructure proposals. Specifically,
review processes shall remain transparent and consistent, and
ensure the health, safety, and security of the environment and
each affected community.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee recommendation
compared to--
2021 Budget estimate Committee ---------------------------------
appropriations recommendation 2021
appropriations Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY PROGRAMS
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
Sustainable Transportation:
Vehicle Technologies........................................... 400,000 595,000 553,114 +153,114 -41,886
Bioenergy Technologies......................................... 255,000 340,000 284,500 +29,500 -55,500
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies............................ 150,000 197,500 200,000 +50,000 +2,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Sustainable Transportation....................... 805,000 1,132,500 1,037,614 +232,614 -94,886
Renewable Energy:
Solar Energy Technologies...................................... 280,000 386,575 300,000 +20,000 -86,575
Wind Energy Technologies....................................... 110,000 204,870 204,870 +94,870 ...............
Water Power Technologies....................................... 150,000 196,560 196,560 +46,560 ...............
Geothermal Technologies........................................ 106,000 163,760 130,380 +24,380 -33,380
Renewable Energy Grid Integration.............................. ............... ............... 40,000 +40,000 +40,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Renewable Energy................................. 646,000 951,765 871,810 +225,810 -79,955
Energy Efficiency:
Advanced Manufacturing......................................... 396,000 550,500 560,500 +164,500 +10,000
Building Technologies.......................................... 290,000 382,000 382,000 +92,000 ...............
Federal Energy Management Program.............................. 40,000 438,150 60,000 +20,000 -378,150
Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program:
Weatherization:
Weatherization Assistance Program.......................... 310,000 390,000 375,000 +65,000 -15,000
Training and Technical Assistance.......................... 5,000 10,000 8,000 +3,000 -2,000
Weatherization Readiness Fund.............................. ............... 21,000 15,000 +15,000 -6,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Weatherization............................... 315,000 421,000 398,000 +83,000 -23,000
State Energy Program Grants.................................... 62,500 62,500 70,000 +7,500 +7,500
Local Government Clean Energy Workforce Program................ ............... 25,000 20,000 +20,000 -5,000
Build Back Better Challenge Grants............................. ............... 300,000 20,000 +20,000 -280,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program..... 377,500 808,500 508,000 +130,500 -300,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Energy Efficiency................................ 1,103,500 2,179,150 1,510,500 +407,000 -668,650
Corporate Support:
Facilities and Infrastructure:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL]................ 130,000 167,000 152,000 +22,000 -15,000
21-EE-001, Energy Materials Processing at Scale (EMAPS).... ............... 8,000 8,000 +8,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Facilities and Infrastructure................ 130,000 175,000 160,000 +30,000 -15,000
Program Direction.............................................. 165,000 250,000 220,000 +55,000 -30,000
Strategic Programs............................................. 14,500 43,585 20,000 +5,500 -23,585
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Corporate Support................................ 309,500 468,585 400,000 +90,500 -68,585
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy........... 2,864,000 4,732,000 3,819,924 +955,924 -912,076
Congressionally Directed Spending.................................. ............... ............... 77,047 +77,047 +77,047
Rescission......................................................... -2,240 ............... ............... +2,240 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY............... 2,861,760 4,732,000 3,896,971 +1,035,211 -835,029
====================================================================================
CYBERSECURITY, ENERGY SECURITY, AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Risk Management Technology and Tools............................... 96,000 135,000 112,000 +16,000 -23,000
Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration..................... 48,000 ............... ............... -48,000 ...............
Response and Restoration........................................... ............... 25,000 23,000 +23,000 -2,000
Information Sharing, Partnerships and Exercises.................... ............... 25,000 23,000 +23,000 -2,000
Program Direction.................................................. 12,000 16,000 14,000 +2,000 -2,000
Floor Amendments................................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Congressionally Directed Spending.................................. ............... ............... 5,000 +5,000 +5,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CYBERSECURITY, ENERGY SECURITY, AND EMERGENCY 156,000 201,000 177,000 +21,000 -24,000
RESPONSE..................................................
====================================================================================
ELECTRICITY
Transmission Reliability and Resilience............................ 48,220 37,000 30,000 -18,220 -7,000
Energy Delivery Grid Operations Technology......................... ............... 43,500 27,150 +27,150 -16,350
Resilient Distribution Systems..................................... 50,000 50,000 50,000 ............... ...............
Energy Storage:
Research....................................................... 57,000 72,000 92,000 +35,000 +20,000
Construction: 20-OE-100 Grid Storage Launchpad................. 23,000 47,000 47,000 +24,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Energy Storage................................... 80,000 119,000 139,000 +59,000 +20,000
Cyber R&D.......................................................... ............... 25,000 14,000 +14,000 -11,000
Transformer Resilience and Advanced Components..................... 7,500 22,500 10,000 +2,500 -12,500
DCEI Energy Mission Assurance...................................... 1,000 ............... ............... -1,000 ...............
Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance................... 7,000 10,000 10,000 +3,000 ...............
Program Direction.................................................. 18,000 20,000 20,000 +2,000 ...............
Congressionally Directed Spending.................................. ............... ............... 2,850 +2,850 +2,850
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ELECTRICITY......................................... 211,720 327,000 303,000 +91,280 -24,000
====================================================================================
NUCLEAR ENERGY
Integrated University Program...................................... 5,000 6,000 6,000 +1,000 ...............
STEP R&D........................................................... 5,000 ............... ............... -5,000 ...............
Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies:
Crosscutting Technology Development............................ 28,000 47,000 37,000 +9,000 -10,000
Joint Modeling and Simulation Program.......................... 35,000 35,000 30,000 -5,000 -5,000
Nuclear Science User Facilities................................ 30,000 42,000 33,000 +3,000 -9,000
Transformational Challenger Reactor............................ 29,869 ............... ............... -29,869 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies............. 122,869 124,000 100,000 -22,869 -24,000
Fuel Cycle Research and Development:
Front End Fuel Cycle:
Mining, Conversion, and Transportation..................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 ............... ...............
Civil Nuclear Enrichment................................... 40,000 ............... ............... -40,000 ...............
Advanced Nuclear Fuel Availability......................... ............... 33,075 25,000 +25,000 -8,075
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Front End Fuel Cycle......................... 42,000 35,075 27,000 -15,000 -8,075
Material Recovery and Waste Form Development....................... 25,000 35,000 20,000 -5,000 -15,000
Advanced Fuels:
Accident Tolerant Fuels........................................ 105,800 115,000 110,150 +4,350 -4,850
Triso Fuel and Graphite Qualification.......................... 36,000 36,000 31,000 -5,000 -5,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Advanced Fuels................................... 141,800 151,000 141,150 -650 -9,850
Fuel Cycle Laboratory R&D.......................................... 20,000 46,925 20,000 ............... -26,925
Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition R&D.................................. 62,500 62,500 62,500 ............... ...............
Integrated Waste Management System................................. 18,000 38,000 18,000 ............... -20,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Fuel Cycle Research and Development.............. 309,300 368,500 288,650 -20,650 -79,850
Reactor Concepts RD&D:
Advanced Small Modular Reactor RD&D............................ 115,000 115,000 140,000 +25,000 +25,000
Light Water Reactor Sustainability............................. 47,000 60,000 45,000 -2,000 -15,000
Advanced Reactor Technologies.................................. 46,000 65,000 47,000 +1,000 -18,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Reactor Concepts RD&D............................ 208,000 240,000 232,000 +24,000 -8,000
Versatile Test Reactor Project:
Other Project Costs............................................ 43,000 55,000 ............... -43,000 -55,000
21-E-200 VTR Project........................................... 2,000 90,000 ............... -2,000 -90,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Versatile Test Reactor Project................... 45,000 145,000 ............... -45,000 -145,000
Advanced Reactors Demonstration Program:
National Reactor Innovation Center............................. 30,000 55,000 55,000 +25,000 ...............
Demonstration 1................................................ 80,000 108,700 108,700 +28,700 ...............
Demonstration 2................................................ 80,000 136,650 136,650 +56,650 ...............
Risk Reduction for Future Demonstrations....................... 40,000 50,000 50,000 +10,000 ...............
Regulatory Development......................................... 15,000 15,000 15,000 ............... ...............
Advanced Reactors Safeguards................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Advanced Reactors Demonstration Program.......... 250,000 370,350 370,350 +120,350 ...............
Infrastructure:
ORNL Nuclear Facilities O&M.................................... 20,000 ............... 19,000 -1,000 +19,000
INL Facilities Operations and Maintenance...................... 280,000 300,000 290,000 +10,000 -10,000
Research Reactor Infrastructure................................ 11,500 15,000 15,000 +3,500 ...............
Construction:
16-E-200 Sample Preparation Laboratory, INL.................... 26,000 41,850 35,000 +9,000 -6,850
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction..................................... 26,000 41,850 35,000 +9,000 -6,850
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Infrastructure................................... 337,500 356,850 359,000 +21,500 +2,150
Idaho Sitewide Safeguards and Security............................. 149,800 149,800 149,800 ............... ...............
International Nuclear Energy Cooperation........................... ............... 5,000 ............... ............... -5,000
Program Direction.................................................. 75,131 85,000 85,000 +9,869 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY...................................... 1,507,600 1,850,500 1,590,800 +83,200 -259,700
====================================================================================
FOSSIL ENERGY AND CARBON MANAGEMENT
CCUS and Power Systems:
Carbon Capture................................................. 86,300 150,000 200,000 +113,700 +50,000
Carbon Dioxide Removal......................................... 40,000 63,000 50,000 +10,000 -13,000
Carbon Utilization............................................. 23,000 38,000 35,000 +12,000 -3,000
Carbon Storage................................................. 79,000 117,000 97,000 +18,000 -20,000
Advanced Energy and Hydrogen Systems........................... 108,100 82,000 75,000 -33,100 -7,000
Crosscutting Research.......................................... 32,900 36,500 30,500 -2,400 -6,000
Mineral Sustainability......................................... 53,000 45,000 25,000 -28,000 -20,000
STEP (Supercritical CO2)....................................... 14,500 ............... 15,000 +500 +15,000
Transformational Coal Pilots................................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, CCUS and Power Systems........................... 446,800 531,500 527,500 +80,700 -4,000
Natural Gas Technologies........................................... 57,000 130,000 82,501 +25,501 -47,499
Unconventional Fossil Energy Technologies from Petroleum--Oil 46,000 ............... ............... -46,000 ...............
Technologies......................................................
Program Direction.................................................. 61,500 66,800 65,800 +4,300 -1,000
Special Recruitment Programs....................................... 700 700 1,000 +300 +300
NETL Research and Operations....................................... 83,000 83,000 83,000 ............... ...............
NETL Infrastructure................................................ 55,000 78,000 70,000 +15,000 -8,000
Congressionally Directed Spending.................................. ............... ............... 20,199 +20,199 +20,199
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FOSSIL ENERGY AND CARBON MANAGEMENT................. 750,000 890,000 850,000 +100,000 -40,000
====================================================================================
NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES............................. 13,006 13,650 13,650 +644 ...............
STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE
Strategic Petroleum Reserve........................................ 188,000 197,000 197,000 +9,000 ...............
Sale of Crude Oil.............................................. ............... -25,000 ............... ............... +25,000
Use of Sale Proceeds........................................... ............... 25,000 ............... ............... -25,000
Sale of gas reserves........................................... ............... ............... -108,000 -108,000 -108,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE......................... 188,000 197,000 89,000 -99,000 -108,000
====================================================================================
SPR PETROLEUM ACCOUNT
SPR Petroleum Reserve.............................................. 1,000 7,350 7,350 +6,350 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPR PETROLEUM ACCOUNT............................... 1,000 7,350 7,350 +6,350 ...............
====================================================================================
NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve................................. 6,500 ............... 6,500 ............... +6,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE.................. 6,500 ............... 6,500 ............... +6,500
====================================================================================
ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION.................................. 126,800 126,800 129,087 +2,287 +2,287
NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA)............................... 2,500 3,100 3,100 +600 ...............
Gaseous Diffusion Plants........................................... 115,554 116,203 121,203 +5,649 +5,000
Small Sites........................................................ 110,933 129,337 124,340 +13,407 -4,997
West Valley Demonstration Project.................................. 88,113 88,120 88,120 +7 ...............
Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury........................ 2,100 2,100 2,100 ............... ...............
US Enrichment Corporation Fund Receipts............................ ............... -116,203 ............... ............... +116,203
Use of USEC Fund Receipts.......................................... ............... 116,203 ............... ............... -116,203
Mercury Receipts........................................... 3,000 ............... ............... -3,000 ...............
Use of Mercury Receipts.................................... -3,000 ............... ............... +3,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP................... 319,200 338,860 338,863 +19,663 +3
====================================================================================
URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND
Oak Ridge.......................................................... 134,701 105,000 105,000 -29,701 ...............
Nuclear Facility D&D, Paducah...................................... 240,000 198,995 240,000 ............... +41,005
Portsmouth:
Nuclear Facility D&D, Portsmouth............................... 367,193 397,311 397,311 +30,118 ...............
Construction:
15-U-408 On-site Waste Disposal Facility, Portsmouth........... 46,639 5,000 5,000 -41,639 ...............
20-U-401 On-site Waste Disposal Facility (Cell Line 2&3)....... 16,500 65,235 65,235 +48,735 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Portsmouth....................................... 430,332 467,546 467,546 +37,214 ...............
====================================================================================
Pension and Community and Regulatory Support....................... 30,967 26,299 31,299 +332 +5,000
Title X Uranium/Thorium Reimbursement Program...................... 5,000 33,500 16,155 +11,155 -17,345
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UED&D FUND.......................................... 841,000 831,340 860,000 +19,000 +28,660
====================================================================================
SCIENCE
Advanced Scientific Computing Research:
Research....................................................... 846,055 911,000 911,000 +64,945 ...............
Construction:
17-SC-20 Office of Science Exascale Computing Project (SC-ECP). 168,945 129,000 129,000 -39,945 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Advanced Scientific Computing Research........... 1,015,000 1,040,000 1,040,000 +25,000 ...............
Basic Energy Sciences:
Research....................................................... 1,856,000 1,995,800 2,018,800 +162,800 +23,000
Construction:
13-SC-10 LINAC coherent light source II (LCLS-II), SLAC........ 33,000 28,100 28,100 -4,900 ...............
18-SC-10 Advanced Photon Source Upgrade (APS-U), ANL........... 160,000 101,000 101,000 -59,000 ...............
18-SC-11 Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power Upgrade (PPU), 52,000 17,000 17,000 -35,000 ...............
ORNL..........................................................
18-SC-12 Advanced Light Source Upgrade (ALS-U), LBNL........... 62,000 75,100 75,100 +13,100 ...............
18-SC-13 Linac Coherent Light Source-II-High Energy (LCLS-II- 52,000 50,000 50,000 -2,000 ...............
HE), SLAC.....................................................
19-SC-14 Second Target Station (STS), ORNL..................... 29,000 32,000 32,000 +3,000 ...............
21-SC-10 Cryomodule Repair and Maintenance Facility............ 1,000 1,000 1,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction..................................... 389,000 304,200 304,200 -84,800 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Basic Energy Sciences............................ 2,245,000 2,300,000 2,323,000 +78,000 +23,000
Biological and Environmental Research.............................. 753,000 828,000 828,000 +75,000 ...............
Fusion Energy Sciences:
Research....................................................... 415,000 449,000 434,000 +19,000 -15,000
Construction:
14-SC-60 US Contributions to ITER (US ITER)................ 242,000 221,000 211,000 -31,000 -10,000
20-SC-61 Matter in Extreme Conditions (MEC) Petawatt 15,000 5,000 15,000 ............... +10,000
Upgrade, SLAC.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. 257,000 226,000 226,000 -31,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Fusion Energy Sciences....................... 672,000 675,000 660,000 -12,000 -15,000
High Energy Physics
Research....................................................... 777,065 782,000 800,000 +22,935 +18,000
Construction:
11-SC-40 Long Baseline Neutrino Facility / Deep Underground 171,000 176,000 176,000 +5,000 ...............
Neutrino Experiment (LBNF/DUNE), FNAL.....................
11-SC-41 Muon to electron conversion experiment, FNAL...... 2,000 13,000 13,000 +11,000 ...............
18-SC-42 Proton Improvement Plan II (PIP-II), FNAL......... 79,000 90,000 90,000 +11,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. 252,000 279,000 279,000 +27,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, High Energy Physics.......................... 1,029,065 1,061,000 1,079,000 +49,935 +18,000
Nuclear Physics:
Research....................................................... 624,700 700,000 724,000 +99,300 +24,000
Construction:
14-SC-50 Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, MSU.............. 5,300 ............... ............... -5,300 ...............
20-SC-52 Electron Ion Collider, BNL........................ 5,000 20,000 20,000 +15,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. 10,300 20,000 20,000 +9,700 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nuclear Physics.............................. 635,000 720,000 744,000 +109,000 +24,000
Isotope R&D and Production:
Research....................................................... 66,000 78,000 78,000 +12,000 ...............
Construction:
20-SC-51 US Stable Isotope Production and Research Center, 12,000 12,000 12,000 ............... ...............
ORNL......................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. 12,000 12,000 12,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Isotope R&D and Production................... 78,000 90,000 90,000 +12,000 ...............
Accelerator R&D and Production..................................... 16,935 24,000 24,000 +7,065 ...............
Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists.................. 29,000 35,000 35,000 +6,000 ...............
Science Laboratories Infrastructure:
Infrastructure Support:
Payment in Lieu of Taxes................................... 4,650 4,820 4,820 +170 ...............
Oak Ridge Landlord......................................... 5,860 6,430 6,430 +570 ...............
Facilities and Infrastructure.............................. 29,790 17,200 17,200 -12,590 ...............
Oak Ridge Nuclear Operations............................... 26,000 20,000 20,000 -6,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Infrastructure Support....................... 66,300 48,450 48,450 -17,850 ...............
Construction:
17-SC-71 Integrated Engineering Research Center, FNAL...... 10,250 10,250 10,250 ............... ...............
18-SC-71 Energy Sciences Capability, PNNL.................. 23,000 ............... ............... -23,000 ...............
19-SC-71 Science User Support Center, BNL.................. 20,000 38,000 38,000 +18,000 ...............
19-SC-73 Translational Research Capability, ORNL........... 22,000 21,500 21,500 -500 ...............
19-SC-74 BioEPIC, LBNL..................................... 20,000 35,000 35,000 +15,000 ...............
20-SC-71 Critical Utilities Rehabilitation Project, BNL.... 20,000 26,000 26,000 +6,000 ...............
20-SC-72 Seismic and Safety Modernization, LBNL............ 5,000 27,500 27,500 +22,500 ...............
20-SC-73 CEBAF Renovation and Expansion, TJNAF............. 2,000 10,000 10,000 +8,000 ...............
20-SC-74 Craft Resources Support Facility, ORNL............ 25,000 ............... ............... -25,000 ...............
20-SC-75 Large Scale Collaboration Center, SLAC............ 11,000 12,000 21,000 +10,000 +9,000
20-SC-76 Tritium System Demolition and Disposal, PPPL...... 13,000 6,400 6,400 -6,600 ...............
20-SC-77 Argonne Utilities Upgrade, ANL.................... 500 10,000 8,500 +8,000 -1,500
20-SC-78 Linear Assets Modernization Project, LBNL......... 500 12,850 10,400 +9,900 -2,450
20-SC-79 Critical Utilities Infrastructure Revitalization, 500 10,000 8,500 +8,000 -1,500
SLAC......................................................
20-SC-80 Utilities Infrastructure Project, FNAL............ 500 13,300 10,500 +10,000 -2,800
21-SC-71 Princeton Plasma Innovation Center, PPPL.......... 150 7,750 7,000 +6,850 -750
21-SC-72 Critical Infrastructure Recovery & Renewal, PPPL.. 150 2,000 2,000 +1,850 ...............
21-SC-73 Ames Infrastructure Modernization................. 150 2,000 2,000 +1,850 ...............
22-SC-71, Critical Infrastructure Modernization Project ............... 1,000 1,000 +1,000 ...............
(CIMP), ORNL..............................................
22-SC-72, Thomas Jefferson Infrastructure Improvements ............... 1,000 1,000 +1,000 ...............
(TJII), TJNAF.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction:................................ 173,700 246,550 246,550 +72,850 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Science Laboratories Infrastructure.......... 240,000 295,000 295,000 +55,000 ...............
Safeguards and Security............................................ 121,000 170,000 170,000 +49,000 ...............
Program Direction.................................................. 192,000 202,000 202,000 +10,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SCIENCE............................................. 7,026,000 7,440,000 7,490,000 +464,000 +50,000
====================================================================================
NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL............................................. 27,500 7,500 27,500 ............... +20,000
TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS
Technology Transitions Programs.................................... ............... 11,095 11,095 +11,095 ...............
Program Direction.................................................. ............... 8,375 8,375 +8,375 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS.............................. ............... 19,470 19,470 +19,470 ...............
====================================================================================
CLEAN ENERGY DEMONSTRATIONS
Demonstrations..................................................... ............... 386,500 91,600 +91,600 -294,900
Program Direction.................................................. ............... 13,500 8,400 +8,400 -5,100
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CLEAN ENERGY DEMONSTRATIONS......................... ............... 400,000 100,000 +100,000 -300,000
====================================================================================
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY-ENERGY
ARPA-E Projects.................................................... 392,000 463,000 463,000 +71,000 ...............
Program Direction.................................................. 35,000 37,000 37,000 +2,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARPA-E.............................................. 427,000 500,000 500,000 +73,000 ...............
====================================================================================
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY--CLIMATE
ARPA-C Projects.................................................... ............... 180,000 ............... ............... -180,000
Program Direction.................................................. ............... 20,000 ............... ............... -20,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARPA-C.............................................. ............... 200,000 ............... ............... -200,000
====================================================================================
TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN GUARANTEE PGM
Administrative Expenses............................................ 32,000 32,000 32,000 ............... ...............
Title XVII Loan Guarantee Credit Subsidy........................... ............... 150,000 ............... ............... -150,000
Offsetting Collection.............................................. -3,000 -3,000 -3,000 ............... ...............
Rescission of emergency funding.................................... -392,000 ............... ............... +392,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN................ -363,000 179,000 29,000 +392,000 -150,000
====================================================================================
GUARANTEE PROGRAM
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PGM
Administrative Expenses............................................ 5,000 5,000 5,000 ............... ...............
Rescission of emergency funding.................................... -1,908,000 ............... ............... +1,908,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES........................ -1,903,000 5,000 5,000 +1,908,000 ...............
====================================================================================
MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
TRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM
Administrative Expenses............................................ 2,000 2,000 2,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM................ 2,000 2,000 2,000 ............... ...............
====================================================================================
INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND PROGRAMS
Indian Energy Program.............................................. 17,000 116,477 116,477 +99,477 ...............
Program Direction.................................................. 5,000 5,523 5,523 +523 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND PROGRAMS................... 22,000 122,000 122,000 +100,000 ...............
====================================================================================
DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION
Salaries and Expenses:
Office of the Secretary........................................ 5,582 5,582 5,582 ............... ...............
Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs.................... 5,000 6,000 6,000 +1,000 ...............
Chief Financial Officer........................................ 53,590 56,591 56,591 +3,001 ...............
Economic Impact and Diversity.................................. 10,169 20,000 20,000 +9,831 ...............
Chief Information Officer...................................... 140,200 232,258 190,000 +49,800 -42,258
Artificial Intelligence and Technology Office.................. 2,500 1,500 1,000 -1,500 -500
International Affairs.......................................... 26,825 30,500 28,000 +1,175 -2,500
Other Departmental Administration.............................. 159,301 193,617 160,115 +814 -33,502
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Salaries and Expenses............................ 403,167 546,048 467,288 +64,121 -78,760
Strategic Partnership Projects..................................... 40,000 40,000 40,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Departmental Administration...................... 443,167 586,048 507,288 +64,121 -78,760
Funding from Other Defense Activities.............................. -183,789 -163,710 -163,710 +20,079 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Departmental Administration (Gross)................. 259,378 422,338 343,578 +84,200 -78,760
====================================================================================
Miscellaneous revenues............................................. -93,378 -100,578 -100,578 -7,200 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (Net)................... 166,000 321,760 243,000 +77,000 -78,760
====================================================================================
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
Office of the Inspector General.................................... 57,739 78,000 78,000 +20,261 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL..................... 57,739 78,000 78,000 +20,261 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, ENERGY PROGRAMS..................................... 12,444,825 18,790,230 16,878,191 +4,433,366 -1,912,039
====================================================================================
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES
Stockpile Management:
Stockpile Major Modernization:
B61 Life Extension Program................................. 815,710 771,664 771,664 -44,046 ...............
W88 Alteration Program..................................... 256,922 207,157 207,157 -49,765 ...............
W80-4 Life Extension Program............................... 1,000,314 1,080,400 1,080,400 +80,086 ...............
W80-4 Alteration-SLCM...................................... ............... 10,000 10,000 +10,000 ...............
W87-1 Modification Program................................. 541,000 691,031 691,031 +150,031 ...............
W93........................................................ 53,000 72,000 72,000 +19,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Stockpile Major Modernization................ 2,666,946 2,832,252 2,832,252 +165,306 ...............
Stockpile Sustainment:
B61 Stockpile systems...................................... ............... ............... 102,679 +102,679 +102,679
W76 Stockpile systems...................................... ............... ............... 169,220 +169,220 +169,220
W78 Stockpile systems...................................... ............... ............... 94,766 +94,766 +94,766
W80 Stockpile systems...................................... ............... ............... 91,669 +91,669 +91,669
B83 Stockpile systems...................................... ............... ............... 98,456 +98,456 +98,456
W87 Stockpile systems...................................... ............... ............... 117,297 +117,297 +117,297
W88 Stockpile systems...................................... ............... ............... 142,841 +142,841 +142,841
Multi-Weapon Systems....................................... ............... ............... 363,555 +363,555 +363,555
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Stockpile Sustainment........................ ............... ............... 1,180,483 +1,180,483 +1,180,483
Stockpile Sustainment.............................................. 998,357 1,180,483 ............... -998,357 -1,180,483
Weapons Dismantlement and Disposition.............................. 56,000 51,000 51,000 -5,000 ...............
Production Operations.............................................. 568,941 568,941 568,941 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Stockpile Management............................. 4,290,244 4,632,676 4,632,676 +342,432 ...............
Production Modernization:
Primary Capability Modernization:
Plutonium Modernization:
Los Alamos Plutonium Operations........................ 610,599 660,419 660,419 +49,820 ...............
21-D-512, Plutonium Pit Production Project, LANL....... 226,000 350,000 350,000 +124,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Los Alamos Plutonium Modernization....... 836,599 1,010,419 1,010,419 +173,820 ...............
Savannah River Plutonium Operations.................... 200,000 128,000 128,000 -72,000 ...............
21-D-511, Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility, 241,896 475,000 475,000 +233,104 ...............
SRS...................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Savannah River Plutonium Modernization... 441,896 603,000 603,000 +161,104 ...............
Enterprise Plutonium Support........................... 90,782 107,098 107,098 +16,316 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Plutonium Modernization.................. 1,369,277 1,720,517 1,720,517 +351,240 ...............
High Explosives & Energetics........................... 63,620 68,785 68,785 +5,165 ...............
HESE OPCs.............................................. 3,750 ............... ............... -3,750 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, HE & Energetics.......................... 67,370 68,785 68,785 +1,415 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Primary Capability Modernization......... 1,436,647 1,789,302 1,789,302 +352,655 ...............
Secondary Capability Modernization:............................ ............... 488,097 488,097 +488,097 ...............
Uranium Sustainment............................................ 242,732 ............... ............... -242,732 ...............
Uranium Modernization.......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Process Technology Development................................. 63,957 ............... ............... -63,957 ...............
Depleted Uranium Modernization................................. 110,915 ............... ............... -110,915 ...............
Lithium Modernization.......................................... 39,400 ............... ............... -39,400 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Secondary Capability Modernization............... 457,004 488,097 488,097 +31,093 ...............
Tritium and Domestic Uranium Enrichment:....................... ............... 489,017 489,017 +489,017 ...............
Tritium Sustainment and Modernization.......................... 312,109 ............... ............... -312,109 ...............
Domestic Uranium Enrichment.................................... 70,000 ............... ............... -70,000 ...............
HEU Downblend.................................................. 90,000 ............... ............... -90,000 ...............
Uranium Reserve................................................ 75,000 ............... ............... -75,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Tritium & DUE.................................... 547,109 489,017 489,017 -58,092 ...............
Non-Nuclear Capability Modernization........................... 107,137 144,563 144,563 +37,426 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Production Modernization......................... 2,547,897 2,910,979 2,910,979 +363,082 ...............
Stockpile Research, Technology, and Engineering:
Assessment Science:............................................ ............... 689,578 ............... ............... -689,578
Primary Assessment Technologies............................ 150,000 ............... 150,000 ............... +150,000
Dynamic Materials Properties............................... 130,981 ............... 130,981 ............... +130,981
Advanced Diagnostics....................................... 35,989 ............... 35,989 ............... +35,989
Secondary Assessment Technologies.......................... 84,000 ............... 84,000 ............... +84,000
Enhanced Capabilities for Subcritical Experiments.......... 215,579 ............... 215,579 ............... +215,579
Hydrodynamic & Subcritical Execution Support............... 152,845 ............... 152,845 ............... +152,845
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Assessment Science........................... 769,394 689,578 769,394 ............... +79,816
Engineering and Integrated Assessments: ............... 336,766 ............... ............... -336,766
Archiving & Support........................................ 45,760 ............... 45,760 ............... +45,760
Delivery Environments...................................... 39,235 ............... 39,235 ............... +39,235
Weapons Survivability...................................... 59,500 ............... 59,500 ............... +59,500
Aging & Lifetimes.......................................... 62,260 ............... 77,260 +15,000 +77,260
Stockpile Responsiveness................................... 70,000 ............... 10,000 -60,000 +10,000
Advanced Certification & Qualification..................... 60,649 ............... 60,330 -319 +60,330
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Engineering and Integrated Assessments....... 337,404 336,766 292,085 -45,319 -44,681
Inertial Confinement Fusion.................................... 575,000 529,000 580,000 +5,000 +51,000
Advanced Simulation and Computing.............................. 732,014 747,012 747,012 +14,998 ...............
Weapon Technology and Manufacturing Maturation:................ ............... 292,630 292,630 +292,630 ...............
Surety Technology.......................................... 54,365 ............... ............... -54,365 ...............
Weapon Technology Development.............................. 131,692 ............... ............... -131,692 ...............
Advanced Manufacturing Development......................... 111,908 ............... ............... -111,908 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Weapon Technology and Manufacturing 297,965 292,630 292,630 -5,335 ...............
Maturation............................................
Academic Programs.............................................. 101,912 95,645 111,912 +10,000 +16,267
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Stockpile Research, Technology, and Engineering.. 2,813,689 2,690,631 2,793,033 -20,656 +102,402
Infrastructure and Operations:
Operations:
Operations of facilities................................... 1,014,000 1,014,000 1,014,000 ............... ...............
Safety and environmental operations........................ 165,354 165,354 165,354 ............... ...............
Maintenance and repair of facilities....................... 667,000 670,000 625,000 -42,000 -45,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operations................................... 1,846,354 1,849,354 1,804,354 -42,000 -45,000
Recapitalization:
Infrastructure and safety...................................... 573,717 508,664 482,664 -91,053 -26,000
Capability based investments................................... 149,117 143,066 143,066 -6,051 ...............
Planning for Programmatic Construction (Pre-CD-1).............. 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Recapitalization................................. 732,834 651,730 625,730 -107,104 -26,000
I&O Construction:
Programmatic Construction:
06-D-141 Uranium Processing Facility, Y-12................. 750,000 524,000 524,000 -226,000 ...............
07-D-220-04 TRU Liquid Waste Facility, LANL................ 36,687 ............... ............... -36,687 ...............
15-D-301 HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX............. 43,000 ............... ............... -43,000 ...............
15-D-302 TA-55 Reinvestment project III, LANL.............. 30,000 27,000 27,000 -3,000 ...............
17-D-640 U1a complex enhancements project, NNSA............ 160,600 135,000 135,000 -25,600 ...............
18-D-620 Exascale Computing Facility Modernization Project, 29,200 ............... ............... -29,200 ...............
LLNL......................................................
18-D-650 Tritium Finishing Facility, SRS................... 27,000 27,000 27,000 ............... ...............
18-D-690, Lithium processing facility, Y-12................ 109,405 167,902 167,902 +58,497 ...............
21-D-510 HE Synthesis, Formulation, and Production, PX..... 31,000 44,500 36,200 +5,200 -8,300
22-D-513, Power Sources Capability, SNL.................... ............... 13,827 13,827 +13,827 ...............
Chemistry and Metallurgy Replacement (CMRR):
404-D-125 Chemistry and metallurgy replacement project, 169,427 138,123 138,123 -31,304 ...............
LANL......................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Programmatic Construction and CMMR........... 1,386,319 1,077,352 1,069,052 -317,267 -8,300
Mission Enabling:
15-D-611 Emergency Operations Center, SNL.................. 36,000 ............... ............... -36,000 ...............
15-D-612 Emergency Operations Center, LLNL................. 27,000 ............... ............... -27,000 ...............
19-D-670 138kV Power Transmission System Replacement, NNSS. 59,000 ............... ............... -59,000 ...............
22-D-514 Digital Infrastructure Capability Expansion, LLNL. ............... 8,000 8,000 +8,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Mission Enabling............................. 122,000 8,000 8,000 -114,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, I&O Construction:............................ 1,508,319 1,085,352 1,077,052 -431,267 -8,300
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Infrastructure and Operations................ 4,087,507 3,586,436 3,507,136 -580,371 -79,300
Secure Transportation Asset:
STA Operations and Equipment................................... 225,000 213,704 213,704 -11,296 ...............
Program Direction.............................................. 123,684 117,060 117,060 -6,624 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Secure Transportation Asset...................... 348,684 330,764 330,764 -17,920 ...............
Defense Nuclear Security:
Defense Nuclear Security (DNS)................................. 763,078 824,623 801,521 +38,443 -23,102
Construction:
17-D-710 West End Protected Area Reduction Project, Y-12... 26,000 23,000 23,000 -3,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Security..................... 789,078 847,623 824,521 +35,443 -23,102
Information Technology and Cyber Security.......................... 366,233 406,530 406,530 +40,297 ...............
Legacy Contractor Pensions (WA).................................... 101,668 78,656 78,656 -23,012 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.................................. 15,345,000 15,484,295 15,484,295 +139,295 ...............
====================================================================================
DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
Material Management and Minimization:
Conversion..................................................... 110,000 100,660 100,660 -9,340 ...............
Nuclear Material Removal....................................... 40,000 42,100 42,100 +2,100 ...............
Material Disposition........................................... 190,711 200,186 200,186 +9,475 ...............
Laboratory and Partnership Support............................. 60,000 ............... ............... -60,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Material Management and Minimization............. 400,711 342,946 342,946 -57,765 ...............
Global Material Security:
International Nuclear Security................................. 78,939 79,939 79,939 +1,000 ...............
Domestic Radiological Security................................. 185,000 158,002 158,002 -26,998 ...............
International Radiological Security............................ 90,000 85,000 85,000 -5,000 ...............
Nuclear Smuggling Detection and Deterrence..................... 175,000 175,000 175,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Global Material Security......................... 528,939 497,941 497,941 -30,998 ...............
Nonproliferation and Arms Control.................................. 148,000 184,795 184,795 +36,795 ...............
National Technical Nuclear Forensics R&D........................... 40,000 ............... ............... -40,000 ...............
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D:
Proliferation Detection........................................ 255,000 269,407 269,407 +14,407 ...............
Nuclear Detonation Detection................................... 267,000 271,000 271,000 +4,000 ...............
Nonproliferation Fuels Development............................. 20,000 ............... ............... -20,000 ...............
Nonproliferation Stewardship Program........................... 59,900 87,329 87,329 +27,429 ...............
National Technical Nuclear Forensics........................... ............... 45,000 45,000 +45,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D............. 601,900 672,736 672,736 +70,836 ...............
Nonproliferation Construction:
18-D-150 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Project, SRS............ 148,589 156,000 156,000 +7,411 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nonproliferation Construction.................... 148,589 156,000 156,000 +7,411 ...............
Nuclear Counterterrorism and Incident Response:
Nuclear Counterterrorism and Incident Response................. ............... 356,185 356,185 +356,185 ...............
Emergency Operations........................................... 36,000 14,597 14,597 -21,403 ...............
Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation...................... 341,513 ............... ............... -341,513 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nuclear Counterterrorism and Incident Response... 377,513 370,782 370,782 -6,731 ...............
Legacy contractor pensions......................................... 14,348 38,800 38,800 +24,452 ...............
Rescission......................................................... ............... -330,000 ............... ............... +330,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION.................... 2,260,000 1,934,000 2,264,000 +4,000 +330,000
====================================================================================
NAVAL REACTORS
Naval Reactors Development......................................... 568,000 640,684 630,684 +62,684 -10,000
Columbia-class Reactor Systems Development......................... 64,700 55,000 55,000 -9,700 ...............
S8G Prototype Refueling............................................ 135,000 126,000 126,000 -9,000 ...............
Naval Reactors Operations and Infrastructure....................... 530,600 594,017 577,817 +47,217 -16,200
Program Direction.................................................. 51,700 55,579 55,579 +3,879 ...............
Construction:
14-D-901 Spent Fuel Handling Recapitalization project, NRF..... 330,000 348,705 348,705 +18,705 ...............
21-D-530 KL Steam and Condensate Upgrades...................... 4,000 ............... ............... -4,000 ...............
22-D-531 KL Chemistry and Radiological Health Building......... ............... 41,620 41,620 +41,620 ...............
22-D-532 KL Security Upgrades.................................. ............... 5,100 5,100 +5,100 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction..................................... 334,000 395,425 395,425 +61,425 ...............
Rescission......................................................... ............... -6,000 ............... ............... +6,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS...................................... 1,684,000 1,860,705 1,840,505 +156,505 -20,200
====================================================================================
FEDERAL SALARIES AND EXPENSES...................................... 443,200 464,000 453,000 +9,800 -11,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION............ 19,732,200 19,743,000 20,041,800 +309,600 +298,800
====================================================================================
DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Closure Sites Administration....................................... 4,987 3,987 3,987 -1,000 ...............
Richland:
River Corridor and Other Cleanup Operations.................... 232,479 196,000 211,000 -21,479 +15,000
Central Plateau Remediation.................................... 670,000 689,776 681,805 +11,805 -7,971
RL Community and Regulatory Support............................ 8,621 5,121 10,221 +1,600 +5,100
Construction:
18-D-404 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage............ 15,000 8,000 8,000 -7,000 ...............
22-D-401 L-888, 400 Area Fire Station...................... ............... 15,200 15,200 +15,200 ...............
22-D-402 L-897, 200 Area Water Treatment Facility.......... ............... 12,800 12,800 +12,800 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. 15,000 36,000 36,000 +21,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Richland..................................... 926,100 926,897 939,026 +12,926 +12,129
Office of River Protection:
Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Commissioning......... 50,000 50,000 50,000 ............... ...............
Rad Liquid Tank Waste Stabilization and Disposition............ 784,000 817,642 837,642 +53,642 +20,000
Construction:
01-D-16 D High-level Waste Facility........................ 25,000 60,000 144,358 +119,358 +84,358
01-D-16 E Pretreatment Facility............................ ............... 20,000 20,000 +20,000 ...............
18-D-16 Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant--LBL/ 786,000 586,000 586,000 -200,000 ...............
Direct Feed LAW...........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. 811,000 666,000 750,358 -60,642 +84,358
ORP Low-level Waste Offsite Disposal....................... ............... 7,000 7,000 +7,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Office of River Protection................... 1,645,000 1,540,642 1,645,000 ............... +104,358
Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho Cleanup and Waste Disposition............................ 430,000 358,925 358,925 -71,075 ...............
Idaho Community and Regulatory Support......................... 3,500 2,658 2,658 -842 ...............
Construction:
22-D-403 Idaho Spent Nuclear Fuel Staging Facility......... ............... 3,000 3,000 +3,000 ...............
22-D-404 Additional ICDF Landfill Disposal Cell and ............... 5,000 5,000 +5,000 ...............
Evaporation Ponds Project.................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. ............... 8,000 8,000 +8,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Idaho National Laboratory....................... 433,500 369,583 369,583 -63,917 ...............
NNSA Sites and Nevada Offsites:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory......................... 1,764 1,806 1,806 +42 ...............
Separations Process Research Unit.............................. 15,000 15,000 15,000 ............... ...............
Nevada......................................................... 60,737 60,737 60,737 ............... ...............
Sandia National Laboratory..................................... 4,860 4,576 4,576 -284 ...............
Los Alamos National Laboratory................................. 226,000 275,119 275,119 +49,119 ...............
Los Alamos Excess Facilities D&D............................... ............... 58,381 17,000 +17,000 -41,381
LLNL Excess Facilities D&D..................................... 35,000 35,000 35,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, NNSA Sites and Nevada Off-sites..................... 343,361 450,619 409,238 +65,877 -41,381
Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear Facility D&D........................................ 254,132 274,923 274,923 +20,791 ...............
U233 Disposition Program....................................... 55,000 55,000 55,000 ............... ...............
OR Cleanup and Disposition..................................... 112,471 73,725 73,725 -38,746 ...............
Construction:
14-D-403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility............ 20,500 ............... ............... -20,500 ...............
17-D-401 On-site Waste Disposal Facility................... 22,380 12,500 12,500 -9,880 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. 42,880 12,500 12,500 -30,380 ...............
OR Community & Regulatory Support.............................. 5,900 5,096 5,096 -804 ...............
OR Technology Development and Deployment....................... 5,000 3,000 3,000 -2,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation............................... 475,383 424,244 424,244 -51,139 ...............
Savannah River Site:
SR Site Risk Management Operations............................. 500,000 452,724 446,724 -53,276 -6,000
Construction:
18-D-402 Emergency Operations Center Replacement, SR....... 6,500 8,999 8,999 +2,499 ...............
19-D-701 SR Security System Replacement.................... 1,000 5,000 5,000 +4,000 ...............
20-D-402 Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative Facility 25,000 ............... ............... -25,000 ...............
(AMC).....................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, SR Site Risk Management Operations.............. 532,500 466,723 460,723 -71,777 -6,000
SR Community and Regulatory Support............................ 11,549 5,805 11,805 +256 +6,000
SR Radioactive Liquid Tank Waste Stabilization and Disposition 910,832 890,865 890,865 -19,967 ...............
Construction:
17-D-402 Saltstone Disposal Unit #7, SRS................... 10,716 ............... ............... -10,716 ...............
18-D-402 Saltstone Disposal unit #8/9...................... 65,500 68,000 68,000 +2,500 ...............
20-D-401 Saltstone Disposal Unit #10, 11, 12............... 562 19,500 19,500 +18,938 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................. 76,778 87,500 87,500 +10,722 ...............
Savannah River Legacy Pensions................................. ............... 130,882 130,882 +130,882 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Savannah River Site................................. 1,531,659 1,581,775 1,581,775 +50,116 ...............
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant:
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.................................... 313,260 350,424 350,424 +37,164 ...............
Construction:
15-D-411 Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System, 35,000 55,000 55,000 +20,000 ...............
WIPP......................................................
15-D-412 Exhaust Shaft, WIPP............................... 55,000 25,000 25,000 -30,000 ...............
21-D-401 Hoisting Capability Project....................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant..................... 413,260 430,424 430,424 +17,164 ...............
Program Direction.................................................. 289,000 293,106 297,000 +8,000 +3,894
Program Support.................................................... 12,979 62,979 62,979 +50,000 ...............
Safeguards and Security............................................ 320,771 316,744 316,744 -4,027 ...............
Technology Development............................................. 30,000 25,000 30,000 ............... +5,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense Environmental Cleanup.................... 6,426,000 6,426,000 6,510,000 +84,000 +84,000
Federal Contribution to the Uranium Enrichment D&D Fund............ ............... 415,670 ............... ............... -415,670
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP....................... 6,426,000 6,841,670 6,510,000 +84,000 -331,670
====================================================================================
DEFENSE UED&D...................................................... ............... ............... 860,000 +860,000 +860,000
OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
Environment, Health, Safety and Security:
Environment, Health, Safety and Security....................... 134,320 132,732 132,732 -1,588 ...............
Program Direction--Environment, Health, Safety and Security.... 72,000 73,588 71,665 -335 -1,923
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Environment, Health, Safety and Security......... 206,320 206,320 204,397 -1,923 -1,923
Enterprise Assessments............................................. 24,435 27,335 27,335 +2,900 ...............
Program Direction.............................................. 54,635 56,049 56,049 +1,414 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Enterprise Assessments........................... 79,070 83,384 83,384 +4,314 ...............
Specialized Security Activities.................................... 283,500 283,500 295,823 +12,323 +12,323
Office of Legacy Management:
Legacy Management Activities--Defense.......................... 142,797 408,797 158,797 +16,000 -250,000
Program Direction--Legacy Management........................... 20,262 19,933 19,933 -329 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Office of Legacy Management...................... 163,059 428,730 178,730 +15,671 -250,000
Defense Related Administrative Support............................. 183,789 163,710 163,710 -20,079 ...............
Office of Hearings and Appeals..................................... 4,262 4,356 4,356 +94 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES............................ 920,000 1,170,000 930,400 +10,400 -239,600
====================================================================================
TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.................... 27,078,200 27,754,670 28,342,200 +1,264,000 +587,530
====================================================================================
POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS\1\
SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Operation and Maintenance:
Purchase Power and Wheeling.................................... 66,163 88,339 88,339 +22,176 ...............
Program Direction.............................................. 11,246 7,284 7,284 -3,962 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance........................ 77,409 95,623 95,623 +18,214 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for PPW)........................... -14,163 -13,353 -13,353 +810 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for PD)............................ -4,000 -100 -100 +3,900 ...............
Offsetting Collections (for PPW)............................... -52,000 -74,986 -74,986 -22,986 ...............
Offsetting Collections (for PD)................................ -7,246 -7,184 -7,184 +62 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
====================================================================================
SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance...................................... 13,292 11,082 11,082 -2,210 ...............
Purchase Power and Wheeling.................................... 54,000 93,000 93,000 +39,000 ...............
Program Direction.............................................. 35,635 36,833 36,833 +1,198 ...............
Construction................................................... 13,267 15,901 15,901 +2,634 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance........................ 116,194 156,816 156,816 +40,622 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for O&M)........................... -5,635 -4,591 -4,591 +1,044 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for PPW)........................... -20,000 -23,000 -23,000 -3,000 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for Construction).................. -8,167 -10,901 -10,901 -2,734 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for PD)............................ -852 ............... ............... +852 ...............
Offsetting Collections (for PD)................................ -31,483 -33,529 -33,529 -2,046 ...............
Offsetting Collections (for O&M)............................... -5,657 -4,395 -4,395 +1,262 ...............
Offsetting Collections (for PPW)............................... -34,000 -70,000 -70,000 -36,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION................... 10,400 10,400 10,400 ............... ...............
====================================================================================
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
Operation and Maintenance:
Construction and Rehabilitation................................ 26,251 35,185 35,185 +8,934 ...............
Operation and Maintenance...................................... 77,874 81,983 81,983 +4,109 ...............
Purchase Power and Wheeling.................................... 485,890 589,677 589,677 +103,787 ...............
Program Direction.............................................. 253,575 267,246 267,246 +13,671 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance........................ 843,590 974,091 974,091 +130,501 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for O&M)........................... -6,297 -7,122 -7,122 -825 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for Construction).................. -20,353 -31,090 -31,090 -10,737 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for PD)............................ -48,546 -51,849 -51,849 -3,303 ...............
Less Alternative Financing (for PPW)........................... -293,890 -273,677 -273,677 +20,213 ...............
Offsetting Collections (for PD)................................ -145,010 -166,935 -166,935 -21,925 ...............
Offsetting Collections (for O&M)............................... -24,744 -27,530 -27,530 -2,786 ...............
Purchase Power & Wheeling Financed from Offsetting (Public Law -192,000 -316,000 -316,000 -124,000 ...............
108-447/109-103)..............................................
Offsetting Collections--Colorado River Dam (Public Law 98-381). -8,378 -9,116 -9,116 -738 ...............
Use of Prior-Year Balances..................................... -15,000 ............... ............... +15,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION................... 89,372 90,772 90,772 +1,400 ...............
====================================================================================
FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND
Falcon And Amistad Operation And Maintenance....................... 7,302 7,545 7,545 +243 ...............
Offsetting Collections--Falcon and Amistad Fund.................... -5,548 -5,580 -5,580 -32 ...............
Less Alternative Financing--Falcon and Amistad Fund................ -1,526 -1,737 -1,737 -211 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FALCON AND AMISTAD O&M FUND......................... 228 228 228 ............... ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS..................... 100,000 101,400 101,400 +1,400 ...............
====================================================================================
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission............................... 404,350 463,900 466,426 +62,076 +2,526
FERC Revenues...................................................... -404,350 -463,900 -466,426 -62,076 -2,526
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION................ ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
====================================================================================
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Colorado River Basin Fund (305(b))................................. 2,000 ............... ............... -2,000 ...............
Sale of Petroleum Product.......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Construction Project 99-D-143 ............... ............... -330,000 -330,000 -330,000
Rescission........................................................
Naval Reactors Rescission.......................................... ............... ............... -6,000 -6,000 -6,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, General Provisions.................................... 2,000 ............... -336,000 -338,000 -336,000
====================================================================================
GRAND TOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.......................... 39,625,025 46,646,300 44,985,791 +5,360,766 -1,660,509
(Total amount appropriated)................................ (41,927,265) (46,982,300) (45,321,791) (+3,394,526) (-1,660,509)
(Rescissions).......................................... (-2,240) (-336,000) (-336,000) (-333,760) ...............
====================================================================================
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTS
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy............................. 2,861,760 4,732,000 3,896,971 +1,035,211 -835,029
Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response............. 156,000 201,000 177,000 +21,000 -24,000
Electricity........................................................ 211,720 327,000 303,000 +91,280 -24,000
Nuclear Energy..................................................... 1,507,600 1,850,500 1,590,800 +83,200 -259,700
Fossil Energy and Carbon Management................................ 750,000 890,000 850,000 +100,000 -40,000
Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves............................... 13,006 13,650 13,650 +644 ...............
Strategic Petroleum Reserve........................................ 188,000 197,000 89,000 -99,000 -108,000
SPR Petroleum Account.............................................. 1,000 7,350 7,350 +6,350 ...............
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve................................. 6,500 ............... 6,500 ............... +6,500
Energy Information Administration.................................. 126,800 126,800 129,087 +2,287 +2,287
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup.................................. 319,200 338,860 338,863 +19,663 +3
Uranium Enrichment D&D Fund........................................ 841,000 831,340 860,000 +19,000 +28,660
Science............................................................ 7,026,000 7,440,000 7,490,000 +464,000 +50,000
Nuclear Waste Disposal............................................. 27,500 7,500 27,500 ............... +20,000
Technology Transitions............................................. ............... 19,470 19,470 +19,470 ...............
Clean Energy Demonstrations........................................ ............... 400,000 100,000 +100,000 -300,000
Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy.......................... 427,000 500,000 500,000 +73,000 ...............
Advanced Research Projects Agency--Climate......................... ............... 200,000 ............... ............... -200,000
Title 17 Innovative technology loan guarantee program.............. -363,000 179,000 29,000 +392,000 -150,000
Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program............ -1,903,000 5,000 5,000 +1,908,000 ...............
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee program............................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 ............... ...............
Indian Energy Policy and Programs.................................. 22,000 122,000 122,000 +100,000 ...............
Departmental administration........................................ 166,000 321,760 243,000 +77,000 -78,760
Office of the Inspector General.................................... 57,739 78,000 78,000 +20,261 ...............
Atomic Energy Defense Activities:
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons Activities......................................... 15,345,000 15,484,295 15,484,295 +139,295 ...............
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................... 2,260,000 1,934,000 2,264,000 +4,000 +330,000
Naval Reactors............................................. 1,684,000 1,860,705 1,840,505 +156,505 -20,200
Federal Salaries and Expenses.............................. 443,200 464,000 453,000 +9,800 -11,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Admin.............. 19,732,200 19,743,000 20,041,800 +309,600 +298,800
====================================================================================
Defense Environmental Cleanup.................................. 6,426,000 6,841,670 6,510,000 +84,000 -331,670
Defense UED&D.................................................. ............... ............... 860,000 +860,000 +860,000
Other Defense Activities....................................... 920,000 1,170,000 930,400 +10,400 -239,600
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities.................... 27,078,200 27,754,670 28,342,200 +1,264,000 +587,530
Power Marketing Administrations:\1`\
Southwestern Power Administration.............................. 10,400 10,400 10,400 ............... ...............
Western Area Power Administration.............................. 89,372 90,772 90,772 +1,400 ...............
Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund.............. 228 228 228 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Power Marketing Administrations..................... 100,000 101,400 101,400 +1,400 ...............
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and Expenses.......................................... 404,350 463,900 466,426 +62,076 +2,526
Revenues....................................................... -404,350 -463,900 -466,426 -62,076 -2,526
General Provision:
Sale of Petroleum Product...................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Colorado River Basin Fund (305 (b))............................ 2,000 ............... 2,000 ............... +2,000
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Construction Project 99-D-143 ............... ............... -330,000 -330,000 -330,000
Rescission....................................................
Naval Reactors Rescission...................................... ............... ............... -6,000 -6,000 -6,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, General Provisions............................... 2,000 ............... -334,000 -336,000 -334,000
====================================================================================
Total Summary of Accounts, Department of Energy............ 66,803,225 74,302,370 73,767,391 +6,964,166 -534,979
====================================================================================
FUNCTION RECAP:
DEFENSE........................................................ 27,228,000 27,904,470 28,156,000 +928,000 +251,530
NON-DEFENSE.................................................... 12,397,025 18,741,830 16,829,791 +4,432,766 -1,912,039
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Totals include alternative financing costs, reimbursable agreement funding, and power purchase and wheeling expenditures Offsetting collection totals
reflect funds collected for annual expenses, including power purchase and wheeling.
GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Section 301. The bill includes a provision related to
reprogramming.
Section 302. The bill includes a provision to authorize
intelligence activities pending enactment of the fiscal year
2022 Intelligence Authorization Act.
Section 303. The bill includes a provision related to high-
hazard nuclear facilities.
Section 304. The bill includes a provision regarding the
approval of critical decision-2 and critical decision-3 for
certain construction projects.
Section 305. The bill includes a provision to prohibit
certain payments.
Section 306. The bill includes a provision regarding an
experienced worker program.
Section 307. The bill includes a provision permanently
rescinding prior year funding.
Section 308. The bill includes a provision regarding a
pilot program for storage of used nuclear fuel.
TITLE IV
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $180,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 235,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 210,000,000
The Committee recommends $210,000,000 for the Appalachian
Regional Commission [ARC].
Within available funds, the Committee recommends up to
$13,000,000 to address the substance abuse crisis that
disproportionally affects Appalachia.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends up to
$16,000,000 for a program of industrial site and workforce
development in Southern and South Central Appalachia, focused
primarily on the automotive supplier sector and the aviation
sector. Up to $13,500,000 of that amount is recommended for
activities in Southern Appalachia. The funds shall be
distributed to States that have distressed counties in Southern
and South Central Appalachia using the ARC Area Development
Formula.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends up to
$16,000,000 for a program of basic infrastructure improvements
in distressed counties in Central Appalachia. Funds shall be
distributed according to ARC's distressed counties formula and
shall be in addition to the regular allocation to distressed
counties.
Within available funds, the Committee recommends up to
$15,000,000 to continue a program of high-speed broadband
deployment in economically distressed counties within the North
Central and Northern Appalachian regions.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $31,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 31,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 31,000,000
The Committee recommends $31,000,000 for the Defense
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. Congress permanently
authorized the Inspector General for the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission to serve as the Inspector General for the Defense
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. The Committee recommendation
includes $1,146,000 within the Office of Inspector General of
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to perform these services.
Delta Regional Authority
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $30,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 30,100,000
Committee recommendation................................ 30,100,000
The Committee recommends $30,100,000 for the Delta Regional
Authority.
Within available funds, not less than $15,000,000 shall be
used for flood control, basic public infrastructure development
and transportation improvements, which shall be allocated
separate from the State formula funding method.
Denali Commission
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $15,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 15,100,000
Committee recommendation................................ 15,100,000
The Committee recommends $15,100,000 for the Denali
Commission.
Northern Border Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $30,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 30,100,000
Committee recommendation................................ 35,000,000
The Committee recommends $35,000,000 for the Northern
Border Regional Commission [NBRC]. Within available funds, not
less than $4,000,000 is recommended for initiatives that seek
to address the decline in forest-based economies throughout the
region, $5,000,000 is recommended for broadband initiatives,
and $1,000,000 is recommended for the State Capacity Building
Grant Program authorized in the 2018 Farm Bill, provided that
the funds support dedicated in-state resources focused on NBRC
programs.
The Committee notes the importance of ensuring that
infrastructure assets are designed, built and operated to
account for the climate changes that may occur over their
lifetime. Therefore, the Committee directs the Commission to
develop criteria for the prioritization of projects that
demonstrate evidence of planning for climate resiliency, which
will help reduce direct losses or indirect costs of disruption
due to climate-related risks.
The Committee supports the work of the Commission to
develop rural community indicators. Once these publicly
available and community-specific resilience indicators are
fully developed, the NBRC is encouraged to use them in
informing investment opportunities.
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $1,000,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 2,500,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,500,000
The Committee recommends $2,500,000 for the Southeast
Crescent Regional Commission.
Southwest Border Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $250,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 2,500,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,500,000
The Committee recommends $2,500,000 for the Southwest
Border Regional Commission.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $830,900,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 873,901,000
Committee recommendation................................ 873,901,000
REVENUES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... -$710,293,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... -745,258,000
Committee recommendation................................ -745,258,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $120,607,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 128,643,000
Committee recommendation................................ 128,643,000
The Committee recommendation for the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission [NRC] provides the following amounts:
[Dollars in thousands]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Fiscal year
Account 2021 2022 Committee
enacted request recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Reactor Safety........... $452,849 $477,430 $477,430
Nuclear Materials and Waste 102,864 107,337 107,337
Safety..........................
Decommissioning and Low-Level 22,771 22,856 22,856
Waste...........................
Integrated University Program.... 16,000 ........... 16,000
Corporate Support................ 271,416 266,278 266,278
--------------------------------------
TOTAL, Program Level............. 865,900 873,901 889,901
Savings and Carryover............ -35,000 ........... -16,000
--------------------------------------
TOTAL............................ 830,900 873,901 873,901
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In developing this recommendation, the Committee has
consulted with the Commission to ensure it maintains its gold-
standard health and safety mission while reducing low-priority
work.
Advanced Nuclear Reactor Regulatory Infrastructure.--The
recommendation includes $23,000,000 for the development of
regulatory infrastructure for advanced nuclear technologies,
which is not subject to the Commission's general fee recovery
collection requirements. The Committee encourages the
Commission to incorporate nuclear safeguards and security
requirements into its development of the advanced reactor
regulatory infrastructure and to work with the Department of
Energy, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and other
groups in the formulation of its licensing requirements.
Budget Execution Plan.--The Commission is directed to
provide to the Committee not later than 30 days after enactment
of this act a specific budget execution plan. The plan shall
include details at the product line level within each of the
control points.
Rulemaking.--The Commission shall list all planned
rulemaking activities, including their priority, schedule, and
actions taken to adhere to the backfit rule, in the annual
budget request and the semi-annual report to Congress on
licensing and regulatory activities.
Integrated University Program.--The Commission is directed
to use $16,000,000 of prior year, unobligated balances for the
Integrated University Program, including for grants to support
research projects that do not align with programmatic missions
but are critical to maintaining the discipline of nuclear
science and engineering. Because the Commission has already
collected fees corresponding to these activities in prior
years, the Committee does not include these funds within the
fee base calculation for determining authorized revenues, and
does not provide authority to collect additional offsetting
receipts for their use.
Accident Tolerant Fuels Program.--The Committee is
encouraged by recent progress regarding lead test assemblies in
the accident tolerant fuel [ATF] program. The Commission is
directed to submit a report to the Committee on the
preparedness for ATF licensing with a focus on what steps are
being taken to ensure that licensing activities (including
higher burnup and enrichment) support projected deployment
schedules.
Re-Evaluation of Nuclear Medicine Event Reporting.--
Evidence shows that certain nuclear medicine extravasations may
exceed medical event reporting provided in 10 C.F.R. Part 35
Subpart M. These events may harm patients through unintended
radiation exposure, compromised imaging that negatively affects
care, additional interventional procedures, and repeated
imaging procedures. The Committee continues to encourage the
Commission to consider the inclusion of significant
extravasations in medical event reporting to improve safety,
quality, and transparency for patients, treating physicians,
and the Commission itself.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $13,499,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 13,799,000
Committee recommendation................................ 13,799,000
REVENUES
Appropriations, 2021.................................... -$11,106,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... -11,442,000
Committee recommendation................................ -11,442,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2021.................................... $2,393,000
Budget estimate, 2022................................... 2,357,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,357,000
The Committee recommends $13,799,000 for the Office of
Inspector General, the same as the budget request, which is
offset by revenues estimated at $11,442,000 for a net
appropriation of $2,357,000 The Office of Inspector General
serves both the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Defense
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, and the recommendation
includes $1,146,000 for that purpose, which is not available
from fee revenues.
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Appropriations, 2020.................................... $3,600,000
Budget estimate, 2021................................... 3,800,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,800,000
The Committee recommends $3,800,000 for the Nuclear Waste
Technical Review Board [Board] to be derived from the Nuclear
Waste Fund.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 401. The bill includes a provision regarding
Congressional requests for information.
Section 402. The bill includes a provision regarding
reprogramming.
TITLE V
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following list of general provisions is recommended by
the Committee:
Section 501. The bill includes a provision regarding
influencing congressional action.
Section 502. The bill includes a provision regarding
transfer authority.
Section 503. The bill includes a provision regarding
environmental justice.
Section 504. The bill includes a provision regarding
requirements for computer networks.
Section 505. The bill includes a provision regarding
drought.
PROGRAM, PROJECT, AND ACTIVITY
In fiscal year 2022, the following information provides the
definition of the term ``program, project or activity'' for
departments and agencies under the jurisdiction of the Energy
and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.
The term ``program, project or activity'' shall include the
most specific level of budget items identified in the Energy
and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2022, and the explanatory statement accompanying the bill.
If a sequestration order is necessary pursuant to the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985
(Public Law 99-177), in implementing the Presidential order,
departments and agencies shall apply any percentage reduction
required for fiscal year 2022 pursuant to the provisions of
such Public Law to all items specified in the report
accompanying the bill by the Senate Committee on Appropriations
in support of the fiscal year 2022 budget estimates as modified
by congressional action.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires Committee reports on
general appropriations bills to identify each Committee
amendment to the House bill ``which proposes an item of
appropriation which is not made to carry out the provisions of
an existing law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution
previously passed by the Senate during that session.''
The Committee is filing an original bill, which is not
covered under this rule, but reports this information in the
spirit of full disclosure.
The Committee recommends funding for the following programs
or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal
year 2022:
[In thousand of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appropriation
Last Year of Authorization in Last Year Net
Agency/Program Authorization Level of Appropriation
Authorization in this Bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps FUSRAP\1\................................. .............. .............. 250,000 260,000
Reclamation, WIIN Act, Subtitle J, Sections 2021 415,000 166,000 166,000
4007, 4009(a) and 4009(c)......................
EERE State Energy Programs...................... 2012 125,000 50,000 70,000
Nuclear Energy Infrastructure and Facilities.... 2009 145,000 245,000 290,000
Nuclear Energy Safeguards and Security.......... 2021 137,800 149,800 149,800
Energy Information Administration............... 1984 not specified 55,870 129,087
Office of Science............................... 2013 6,007,000 4,876,000 7,490,000
Departmental Administration..................... 1984 246,963 185,682 243,000
Atomic Energy Defense Activities:
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons Activities...................... 2021 15,550,428 15,345,000 15,484,295
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........ 2021 2,041,000 2,260,000 2,264,000
Naval Reactors.......................... 2021 1,684,000 1,684,000 1,840,505
Federal Salaries and Expenses........... 2021 454,000 443,200 453,000
Defense Environmental Cleanup................... 2021 5,815,767 6,426,000 6,510,000
Other Defense Activities........................ 2021 901,048 920,000 928,077
Power Marketing Administrations:
Southwestern................................ 1984 40,254 36,229 10,400
Western Area................................ 1984 259,700 194,630 90,772
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission............ 1984 not specified 29,582 ..............
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board......... 2021 28,836 31,000 31,000
Appalachian Regional Commission................. 2021 110,000 175,000 210,000
Denali Commission............................... 2021 15,000 15,000 15,100
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission.......... 2018 30,000 250 2,500
Southwest Border Regional Commission............ 2012 30,000 .............. 2,500
Nuclear Regulatory Commission................... 1985 460,000 448,200 131,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Program was initiated in 1972 and has never received a separate authorization
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on August 4, 2021,
the Committee ordered favorably reported a bill (S. 2605)
making appropriations for energy and water development and
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022,
and for other purposes, provided, that the bill be subject to
amendment and that any amendment increasing budget authority be
offset by a reduction of equal or greater budget authority, by
a recorded vote of 25-5, a quorum being present. The vote was
as follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Leahy Mr. McConnell
Ms. Murray Mr. Kennedy
Mrs. Feinstein Mr. Braun
Mr. Durbin Mr. Hagerty
Mr. Reed Mr. Rubio
Mr. Tester
Mrs. Shaheen
Mr. Merkley
Mr. Coons
Mr. Schatz
Ms. Baldwin
Mr. Murphy
Mr. Manchin
Mr. Van Hollen
Mr. Heinrich
Mr. Shelby
Ms. Collins
Ms. Murkowski
Mr. Graham
Mr. Blunt
Mr. Moran
Mr. Hoeven
Mr. Boozman
Mrs. Capito
Mrs. Hyde-Smith
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the Committee.''
In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law
proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing
law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is
printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is
proposed is shown in roman.
TITLE 42--THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
CHAPTER 109B--SECURE WATER
Sec. 10364. Water management improvement
(a) Authorization of grants and cooperative agreements
* * * * * * *
(e) Authorization of appropriations
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this
section [$610,000,000] $730,000,000, to remain available until
expended.
------
TITLE 43--PUBLIC LANDS
CHAPTER 40--RECLAMATION STATES EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF
Subchapter I--Drought Program
Sec. 2214. Applicable period of drought program
(c) Termination of authority
The authorities established under this subchapter shall
terminate on September 30, [2021] 2022.
* * * * * * *
Subchapter III--General and Miscellaneous Provisions
Sec. 2241. Authorization of appropriations
Except as otherwise provided in section 2243 of this title
(relating to temperature control devices at Shasta Dam,
California), there is authorized to be appropriated not more
than $120,000,000 in total for the period of fiscal years 2006
through [2021] 2022.
------
RECLAMATION PROJECTS AUTHORIZATION AND ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1992, PUBLIC
LAW 102-575
TITLE XI--SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT, CALIFORNIA
SEC. 1101. RESEARCH PROJECT.
(a) Research Project.--* * *
* * * * * * *
(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized
to be appropriated [$10,000,000] $13,000,000 to carry out the
purposes of this title.
------
WATER SUPPLY, RELIABILITY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ACT, 2005,
PUBLIC LAW 108-361
TITLE I--CALIFORNIA WATER SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT
SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 103. BAY DELTA PROGRAM.
(a) In General.--
* * * * * * *
(e) New and Expanded Authorizations for Federal Agencies.--
(1) In general.--The heads of the Federal agencies
described in this subsection are authorized to carry
out the activities described in subsection (f) during
each of fiscal years 2005 through [2021] 2022, in
coordination with the Governor.
* * * * * * *
(f) Description of Activities Under New and Expanded
Authorizations.--
(1) Conveyance.-- * * *
* * * * * * *
(3) Levee stability.--
(A) In general.-- * * *
(B) Report.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of the Army shall submit to the
appropriate authorizing and appropriating
committees of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report that describes the
levee stability reconstruction projects and
priorities that will be carried out under this
title during each of fiscal years 2005 through
[2021] 2022.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 107. FEDERAL SHARE OF COSTS.
(a) In General.--The Federal share of the cost of
implementing the Calfed Bay-Delta Program for fiscal years 2005
through [2021] 2022 in the aggregate, as set forth in the
Record of Decision, shall not exceed 33.3 percent.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 109. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATION.
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary
and the heads of the Federal agencies to pay the Federal share
of the cost of carrying out the new and expanded authorities
described in subsections (e) and (f) of section 103
$389,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2005 through [2021]
2022, to remain available until expended.
------
OMNIBUS PUBLIC LAND MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2009, PUBLIC LAW 111-11
TITLE IX--BUREAU OF RECLAMATION AUTHORIZATIONS
Subtitle B--Project Authorizations
SEC. 9016. RIO GRANDE PUEBLOS, NEW MEXICO.
* * * * * * *
(g) Authorization of Appropriations.
(1) Study.--* * *
(2) Projects.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to carry out subsection (d) $6,000,000 for
each of fiscal years 2010 through [2021] 2022.
------
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount in Committee Amount in
allocation\1\ bill allocation\1\ bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with the
subcommittee allocation for 2022: Subcommittee on
Energy and Water Development:
Mandatory......................................... .............. ........... .............. ...........
Discretionary..................................... .............. 53,625 .............. \2\51,120
Defense....................................... .............. 28,447 NA NA
Non-defense................................... .............. 25,178 NA NA
Projection of outlays associated with the
recommendation:
2022.............................................. .............. ........... .............. \3\28,248
2023.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 17,677
2024.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 6,499
2025.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 1,864
2026 and future years............................. .............. ........... .............. 1,475
Financial assistance to State and local governments NA 257 NA \3\234
for 2022
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\As of the date that this bill was reported, there is no section 302(a) allocation to the Committee on
Appropriations for fiscal year 2022.
\2\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\3\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
NA: Not applicable.
NOTE.--Pursuant to section 14003 of division B of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (Public
Law 116-136), as amended, $2,099,000,000 in budget authority and the resulting outlays do not count for the
purposes of estimates under the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 or the Balanced
Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. Pursuant to section 4112(b) of H. Con. Res. 71 (115th
Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018, $450,000,000 in budget authority and
the resulting outlays do not count for the purposes of section 302 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the
purse. The Committee believes strongly that Congress should
make the decisions on how to allocate the people's money.
As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the
Senate, the term ``congressionally directed spending item''
means a provision or report language included primarily at the
request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a
specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit
authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan,
loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure
with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, locality
or congressional district, other than through a statutory or
administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process.
For each item, a Member is required to provide a
certification that neither the Member nor the Member's
immediate family has a pecuniary interest in such
congressionally directed spending item. Such certifications are
available to the public on the website of the Senate Committee
on Appropriations (https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/
congressionally-directed-spending-requests).
Following is a list of congressionally directed spending
items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this
report, along with the name of each Senator who submitted a
request to the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so
identified. Neither the Committee recommendation nor this
report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff
benefits as defined in rule XLIV.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Account Project title Recipient Funding Member(s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Acequias Environmental U.S. Army Corps of 9,060 Heinrich, Lujan
Infrastructure, NM. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Calaveras County, Section 219, U.S. Army Corps of 1,300 Feinstein, Padilla
CA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC. U.S. Army Corps of 11,550 Burr, Tillis
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, U.S. Army Corps of 390 Cardin
Cumberland, MD & Ridgeley, WV. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Chesapeake Bay Environmental U.S. Army Corps of 5,750 Cardin
Restoration & Protection, MD, Engineers.
VA & PA.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... City of Norwalk, Section 219, CA U.S. Army Corps of 250 Feinstein
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Columbia River Fish Mitigation, U.S. Army Corps of 34,800 Merkley, Wyden
Willamette River, WA, OR, ID. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Dalles Tribal Village U.S. Army Corps of 1,200 Cantwell, Merkley, Murray,
Development Plan, WA. Engineers. Wyden
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Delaware Bay Coastline, Oakwood U.S. Army Corps of 5,000 Menendez
Beach, NJ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Delaware Coast Protection, DE... U.S. Army Corps of 1,200 Carper, Coons
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Delaware Coast, Cape Henlopen to U.S. Army Corps of 4,000 Carper, Coons
Fenwick Island, DE. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Delaware Coast, Rehoboth Beach U.S. Army Corps of 7,650 Carper, Coons
to Dewey Beach, DE. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Desert Hot Springs, Section 219, U.S. Army Corps of 250 Feinstein
CA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Gloucester City Seawall (Camden U.S. Army Corps of 100 Booker
County), NJ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Grand River Bank Street, City of U.S. Army Corps of 2,600 Brown
Plainesville, OH. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck U.S. Army Corps of 17,000 Menendez
Beach (Ocean City), NJ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Hamilton Airfield Wetlands U.S. Army Corps of 1,000 Feinstein, Padilla
Restoration, CA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Kanawha River Streambank U.S. Army Corps of 4,780 Manchin
Stabilization, WV. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Lake Champlain Basin, Section U.S. Army Corps of 5,500 Leahy
542, VT. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Lakes Marion and Moultrie, SC... U.S. Army Corps of 18,000 Graham
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Lower Santa Cruz River, Eloy U.S. Army Corps of 100 Kelly, Sinema
Levee, AZ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Madison and St. Clair Counties, U.S. Army Corps of 6,025 Durbin
IL. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Marrtown Sanitary Sewer U.S. Army Corps of 3,200 Capito
Extension, Section 219, WV. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... McCormick Wash, Globe, AZ....... U.S. Army Corps of 100 Kelly, Sinema
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island, MD... U.S. Army Corps of 37,500 Cardin
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Mills Memorial Park Recycled U.S. Army Corps of 3,790 Feinstein, Padilla
Water, Section 219, CA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Monarch-Chesterfield, MO........ U.S. Army Corps of 12,600 Blunt
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Morgan State University Stadium U.S. Army Corps of 100 Van Hollen
Way Slope Stabilization, MD. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... New River, Imperial County, CA.. U.S. Army Corps of 650 Feinstein, Padilla
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Ohio Riverfront, Cincinnati, OH. U.S. Army Corps of 600 Brown
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Port of Muskegon, MI............ U.S. Army Corps of 100 Peters, Stabenow
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Puget Sound and Adjacent Water U.S. Army Corps of 5,000 Cantwell
Restoration (Spencer Island), Engineers.
WA.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Resilient San Francisco Bay U.S. Army Corps of 3,600 Padilla
Pilot Project, CA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... River Road, Town of Rosendale, U.S. Army Corps of 100 Schumer
NY. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Rondout Riverport, City of U.S. Army Corps of 100 Schumer
Kingston, NY. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Rose and Palm Garden Washes U.S. Army Corps of 200 Kelly, Sinema
Flood Control Project, AZ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Rose Larisa Park, RI............ U.S. Army Corps of 50 Reed, Whitehouse
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Roseville-PCWA Cooperative Water U.S. Army Corps of 75 Feinstein, Padilla
Reliability, Section 219, CA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... San Francisco Bay, CA........... U.S. Army Corps of 3,600 Feinstein
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Section 219, Crowley County, U.S. Army Corps of 7,000 Bennet
Water Tower, CO. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Section 596, Environmental U.S. Army Corps of 2,000 Klobuchar
Infrastructure, City of Engineers.
Biwabik, MN.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Section 596, Environmental U.S. Army Corps of 2,000 Klobuchar
Infrastructure, Virginia Engineers.
Street, MN.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Shepherdstown System U.S. Army Corps of 1,668 Capito
Improvements, Section 571, WV. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Southwest Coastal Louisiana, LA. U.S. Army Corps of 10,000 Cassidy
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Sturgeon Point, Town of Evans, U.S. Army Corps of 100 Schumer
NY. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Townsends Inlet to Cape May U.S. Army Corps of 15,500 Booker, Menendez
Inlet, NJ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee U.S. Army Corps of 13,789 Inhofe
System, OK. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Upper Mississippi River-- U.S. Army Corps of 45,100 Baldwin, Blunt, Duckworth,
Illinois WW System, IL, IA, MN, Engineers. Durbin, Klobuchar
MO & WI.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Upper Ohio Navigation U.S. Army Corps of 21,500 Casey
(Montgomery Lock), PA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... URI Narragansett Erosion U.S. Army Corps of 150 Reed
Protection, RI. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Watch Hill Lighthouse, RI....... U.S. Army Corps of 50 Reed
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Wheeling Elm Run Flash Flooding, U.S. Army Corps of 546 Capito, Manchin
Section 219, WV. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Willamette River at Willamette U.S. Army Corps of 6,200 Merkley, Wyden
Falls, OR. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Construction.......... Wrightsville Beach, NC.......... U.S. Army Corps of 9,295 Burr, Tillis
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Adams & Denver, South Platte U.S. Army Corps of 400 Bennet, Hickenlooper
River, CO. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Arkansas River Navigation Study, U.S. Army Corps of 500 Inhofe
(McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Engineers.
Navigation System (MKARNS) 12
ft. Channel), AR, OK.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Columbia River Turning Basin U.S. Army Corps of 200 Cantwell, Murray
Navigation Improvements, WA & Engineers.
OR.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Deepening Study for the U.S. Army Corps of 400 Shelby
Tennessee--Tombigbee Waterway Engineers.
(TTWW), AL and MS and Black
Warrior and Tombigbee (BWT)
Rivers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Hartford and East Hartford, CT.. U.S. Army Corps of 200 Blumenthal, Murphy
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Honolulu Harbor Modifications U.S. Army Corps of 800 Hirono, Schatz
Feasibility Study, HI. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Hudson Raritan Estuary Ecosystem U.S. Army Corps of 1,200 Menendez, Schumer
Restoration, NY and NJ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ IL Rivr 519 Fox River Dams U.S. Army Corps of 250 Durbin
Restoration, IL. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Imperial Streams, Salton Sea, CA U.S. Army Corps of 200 Feinstein, Padilla
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Kanawha River Basin Feasibility, U.S. Army Corps of 500 Capito, Manchin
WV. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Little Colorado River, Winslow, U.S. Army Corps of 500 Kelly, Sinema
AZ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Lowell Creek Tunnel, AK......... U.S. Army Corps of 3,000 Murkowski
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Lower Cache Creek, CA........... U.S. Army Corps of 2,000 Feinstein, Padilla
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Lower Missouri Basin--Brunswick U.S. Army Corps of 500 Blunt
L-246, MO. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Lower Missouri Basin--Holt U.S. Army Corps of 300 Blunt
County, MO, Doniphan County, KS. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Lower Missouri Basin--Jefferson U.S. Army Corps of 300 Blunt
City L-142, MO. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Lower San Joaquin River (Lathrop U.S. Army Corps of 200 Feinstein, Padilla
& Manteca), CA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Menominee River Deepening, MI & U.S. Army Corps of 200 Baldwin, Peters, Stabenow
WI. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ New York and New Jersey Harbor, U.S. Army Corps of 1,125 Menendez
NY & NJ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Peckman River Basin, NJ......... U.S. Army Corps of 500 Menendez
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Port Fourchon Belle Pass U.S. Army Corps of 1,500 Cassidy
Channel, LA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Puget Sound Nearshore Marine U.S. Army Corps of 250 Murray
Habitat Restoration, WA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Raritan Bay & Sandy Hook Bay-- U.S. Army Corps of 750 Menendez
Highlands, NJ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Raritan River Basin, Green Brook U.S. Army Corps of 300 Menendez
Sub-Basin, NJ. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ San Diego Shoreline, Oceanside, U.S. Army Corps of 750 Feinstein
Special Shoreline Study, CA. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Santa Paula Creek, CA........... U.S. Army Corps of 200 Feinstein
Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ South San Francisco Bay U.S. Army Corps of 1,600 Feinstein, Padilla
Shoreline (Santa Clara County), Engineers.
CA.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Upper Des Plaines River Flooding U.S. Army Corps of 1,525 Durbin
and Restoration, IL. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Watertown Flood Risk Management U.S. Army Corps of 200 Rounds
Feasibility Study, SD. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Willamette River Environmental U.S. Army Corps of 732 Merkley, Wyden
Dredging, OR. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Investigations........ Wilmington Harbor Navigation U.S. Army Corps of 500 Burr, Tillis
Improvements, NC. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Mississippi River and Bayou Meto Basin, AR............ U.S. Army Corps of 24,000 Boozman
Tributaries. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Mississippi River and Grand Prairie Region, AR........ U.S. Army Corps of 13,000 Boozman
Tributaries. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Mississippi River and Morganza to the Gulf, LA........ U.S. Army Corps of 19,333 Cassidy
Tributaries. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Mississippi River and Yazoo Basin, Delta Headwaters U.S. Army Corps of 12,900 Hyde-Smith
Tributaries. Project, MS. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Mississippi River and Yazoo Basin, Upper Yazoo U.S. Army Corps of 12,000 Hyde-Smith
Tributaries. Projects, MS. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Mississippi River and Yazoo Basin, Yazoo Backwater U.S. Army Corps of 20,750 Hyde-Smith, Wicker
Tributaries. Area, MS. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Alabama River Lakes, AL......... U.S. Army Corps of 8,380 Shelby
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Barcelona Harbor, NY............ U.S. Army Corps of 1,150 Gillibrand, Schumer
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Bayou Coden, AL................. U.S. Army Corps of 3,000 Shelby
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Bayou La Batre, AL.............. U.S. Army Corps of 4,972 Shelby
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Black Warrior and Tombigbee U.S. Army Corps of 3,200 Shelby
Maintenance. (BWT) Rivers, AL. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Bon Secour River, AL............ U.S. Army Corps of 4,493 Shelby
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Cattaraugus Breakwater, NY...... U.S. Army Corps of 1,000 Gillibrand, Schumer
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Channel Islands Harbor, CA...... U.S. Army Corps of 8,696 Feinstein
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Cole Rivers Hatchery, Applegate U.S. Army Corps of 1,819 Merkley, Wyden
Maintenance. and Lost Creek, OR. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Coos Bay (Major Maintenance), OR U.S. Army Corps of 32,720 Merkley, Wyden
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Dauphin Island Bay, AL.......... U.S. Army Corps of 3,000 Shelby
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Dunkirk Harbor Breakwater and U.S. Army Corps of 5,250 Gillibrand, Schumer
Maintenance. Dredging, NY. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Fox Point Barrier, Narrangansett U.S. Army Corps of 225 Reed
Maintenance. Bay, RI. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and George's River, ME.............. U.S. Army Corps of 75 Collins
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Isle au Haut Thoroughfare, ME... U.S. Army Corps of 100 Collins, King
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Josias River, ME................ U.S. Army Corps of 150 Collins
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Kanawha River Locks and Dams, WV U.S. Army Corps of 6,900 Capito
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Lake River, WA.................. U.S. Army Corps of 124 Cantwell
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY..... U.S. Army Corps of 1,000 Schumer
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Lynnhaven Inlet, VA............. U.S. Army Corps of 4,150 Kaine, Warner
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Merrimack Spur Jetty, MA........ U.S. Army Corps of 240 Markey, Warren
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Mobile Harbor, AL............... U.S. Army Corps of 33,000 Shelby
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Perdido Pass Channel, AL........ U.S. Army Corps of 2,000 Shelby
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Pocomoke River, MD.............. U.S. Army Corps of 8 Cardin
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Rollinson Channel, NC........... U.S. Army Corps of 1,670 Burr
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Rudee Inlet, VA................. U.S. Army Corps of 580 Kaine, Warner
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Saint Paul Small Boat Harbor, MN U.S. Army Corps of 500 Klobuchar, Smith
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Santa Cruz Harbor, CA........... U.S. Army Corps of 525 Feinstein, Padilla
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Searsport Harbor, ME............ U.S. Army Corps of 1,650 Collins
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and South Beach, MI................. U.S. Army Corps of 1,000 Stabenow
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Swinomish Channel, WA........... U.S. Army Corps of 215 Cantwell, Murray
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Tennessee--Tombigbee Waterway U.S. Army Corps of 4,000 Shelby
Maintenance. (TTWW), AL and MS. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Tuttle Creek Lake, KS........... U.S. Army Corps of 1,300 Moran
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Two Rivers Harbor, WI........... U.S. Army Corps of 20 Baldwin
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Ventura Harbor, CA.............. U.S. Army Corps of 2,146 Feinstein, Padilla
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and West Arrowhead Breakwater, NY... U.S. Army Corps of 300 Schumer
Maintenance. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Westport Harbor & Sagatuck U.S. Army Corps of 2,810 Blumenthal, Murphy
Maintenance. River, CT. Engineers.
Corps of Engineers......... Operation and Woonsocket Local Protection U.S. Army Corps of 125 Reed
Maintenance. Project, RI. Engineers.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Lewis and Clark Rural Water Bureau of Reclamation. 21,914 Klobuchar, Rounds, Smith,
Water and Related System, IA, MN, SD. Thune
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Eastern New Mexico Water Supply, Bureau of Reclamation. 17,400 Heinrich
Water and Related NM.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, San Gabriel Basin Restoration Bureau of Reclamation. 10,000 Feinstein, Padilla
Water and Related Fund, CA.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Project, SCADA Bureau of Reclamation. 5,000 Merkley, Wyden
Water and Related Acquisition, OR.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento River Basin Bureau of Reclamation. 5,000 Feinstein, Padilla
Water and Related Floodplain Reactivation, CA.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento River Fish Screen Bureau of Reclamation. 3,900 Feinstein, Padilla
Water and Related Program, CA.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Lake Mead/Las Vegas Wash Bureau of Reclamation. 3,655 Cortez Masto, Rosen
Water and Related Program, NV.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Tualatin Project, Scoggins Dam, Bureau of Reclamation. 1,300 Merkley, Wyden
Water and Related OR.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Wapato Irrigation Project, WA... Bureau of Reclamation. 995 Cantwell
Water and Related
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Yakima Bull Trout Bureau of Reclamation. 700 Murray
Water and Related Facility, WA.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Los Banos Creek Appraisal Study, Bureau of Reclamation. 500 Feinstein, Padilla
Water and Related CA.
Resources.
Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation, Odessa Subarea, WA.............. Bureau of Reclamation. 500 Cantwell
Water and Related
Resources.
Department of Energy....... Cybersecurity, Energy Emerging Threat Information University of Arkansas 1,000 Boozman
Security, and Sharing and Analysis Center, at Little Rock.
Emergency Response. University of Arkansas Little
Rock.
Department of Energy....... Cybersecurity, Energy Oakland University Cybersecurity Automation Alley...... 2,000 Stabenow
Security, and Center.
Emergency Response.
Department of Energy....... Cybersecurity, Energy Virtual Cybersecurity Training Bridgewater State 2,000 Markey, Warren
Security, and Simulator. University.
Emergency Response.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Accelerating Heat Pump Adoption Alaska Heat Smart..... 420 Murkowski
Renewable Energy. by Lower-Income Households.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Asia-Pacific Microgrid Hawaii Natural Energy 1,000 Hirono
Renewable Energy. Development and Training. Institute, University
of Hawaii.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Blue Earth County's Energy Blue Earth County..... 4,330 Klobuchar, Smith
Renewable Energy. Efficiency Project.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Built to Last Pilot Project..... Philadelphia Energy 2,100 Casey
Renewable Energy. Authority.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Chicago Clean Energy Retrofits City of Chicago....... 500 Durbin
Renewable Energy. Program.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Cogency Power Solar Project..... Town of Rangely....... 5,000 Bennet, Hickenlooper
Renewable Energy.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Community of Hope Solar Parking Mesilla Valley 200 Lujan
Renewable Energy. Structure. Community of Hope.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Cully Community Solar Pilot..... Verde................. 344 Merkley, Wyden
Renewable Energy.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Derry Landfill Solar Project.... Town of Derry......... 500 Shaheen
Renewable Energy.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Development of an Electric West Virginia 1,000 Capito
Renewable Energy. Vehicle Associate's Degree University.
Curriculum Standards and
Educational Materials for
Automotive Educators and
Technicians Nationwide.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and District Energy Construction.... Burlington Electric 5,166 Leahy
Renewable Energy. Department.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Ductless Heat Pump Installation. Verde................. 301 Merkley, Wyden
Renewable Energy.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and DWCPA Hydrokinetic Energy Detroit/Wayne County 680 Peters, Stabenow
Renewable Energy. Harvester. Port Authority.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and DWCPA Solar Energy Project...... Detroit/Wayne County 200 Peters
Renewable Energy. Port Authority.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Electric Future for America's Forth................. 1,500 Merkley, Wyden
Renewable Energy. Rural Mobility Stakeholders (E-
FARMS).
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Electrical Substation for City of Dover......... 5,000 Carper, Coons
Renewable Energy. Garrison Oak Business and
Technology Park.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Energy Efficient Community Cross- University of Maine 2,000 Collins, King
Renewable Energy. Laminated Timber Demonstration System.
Project/Wood-fiber Insulated
Panels for Modular Construction
and Retrofit Applications.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Energy Improvements for Rhode Rhode Island Office of 5,000 Reed
Renewable Energy. Island Schools. Energy Resources.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Enhanced Biogas Collection and Narragansett Bay 2,900 Reed, Whitehouse
Renewable Energy. Energy Recovery Project. Commission.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Evanston Accessible Solar City of Evanston...... 500 Durbin
Renewable Energy. Program.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Expanding Solar Research and University of Vermont. 150 Sanders
Renewable Energy. Generation for a Brighter
Energy Future.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Fuel for Seniors: Energy The Towers Foundation. 288 Blumenthal, Murphy
Renewable Energy. Efficiency.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Grid Resilience and Equity in University of 995 Markey, Warren
Renewable Energy. the Energy Transition. Massachusetts at
Amherst.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Hanover LED Streetlight Town of Hanover....... 271 Shaheen
Renewable Energy. Conversion.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Heartland Green Energy and Southern Ohio 500 Brown
Renewable Energy. Manufacturing Valley Initiative. Diversification
Initiative.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery System............ City of Togiak........ 659 Murkowski
Renewable Energy.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Hybrid Solar Testing Platform University of Vermont. 4,000 Leahy
Renewable Energy. for Cold Weather Climates.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Kauai North Shore Energy Kauai Island Utility 1,000 Schatz
Renewable Energy. Resiliency Project. Cooperative.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Kivalina Biomass Reactor........ City of Kivalina...... 100 Murkowski
Renewable Energy.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Klickitat Valley Health Central Klickitat Valley 2,500 Murray
Renewable Energy. Utility Plant Modernization. Health.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Makushin Geothermal Project..... Qawalangin Tribe of 2,500 Murkowski
Renewable Energy. Unalaska.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Marquette Affordable Solar Clean Community Action Alger- 100 Stabenow
Renewable Energy. Energy Planning Grant. Marquette.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Microgrid Integration with City of Ithaca........ 1,000 Gillibrand, Schumer
Renewable Energy. Biomass Gasification as a
Pathway to Hydrogen Production.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Municipal Building Upgrades..... City of Salamanca..... 303 Gillibrand
Renewable Energy.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and New Jersey Green Hydrogen New Jersey Clean 3,840 Booker, Menendez
Renewable Energy. Demonstration Project. Cities Coalition.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Newport Town Office Energy Town of Newport....... 250 Shaheen
Renewable Energy. Improvements.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Northeast Kingdom Home Rutland West 500 Leahy, Sanders
Renewable Energy. Weatherization. Neighborhood Housing
Service, Inc..
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Off-Grid residential solar Navajo Tribal Utility 1,000 Heinrich
Renewable Energy. project on the Navajo Nation. Authority.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Overland Industrial park Solar The Greater Toledo 1,500 Brown
Renewable Energy. Community Project. Community Foundation.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Oyster River Resiliency Project. University of New 1,150 Shaheen
Renewable Energy. Hampshire.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Reducing Inequity in Access to Delaware DNREC........ 2,000 Carper, Coons
Renewable Energy. Solar Power.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Rio Arriba County Energy Rio Arriba County 1,000 Lujan
Renewable Energy. Efficient Vehicle & Solar Government.
Charging Stations.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Salisbury Square Redevelopment: Randolph Area 750 Leahy
Renewable Energy. Achieving Home Affordability Community Development
and Energy Resilience via a Corporation.
Microgrid.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and San Juan College Clean Hydrogen San Juan College...... 500 Heinrich
Renewable Energy. Workforce Development Program.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and San Juan College Electric San Juan College...... 50 Heinrich
Renewable Energy. Vehicle Technician
Certification Program.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Solar Testbed................... High Technology 1,900 Manchin
Renewable Energy. Foundation.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Energy in Schools Vermont Department of 1,000 Sanders
Renewable Energy. and Public Buildings. Public Service.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Tacoma Public Utilities EV Tacoma Public 1,000 Murray
Renewable Energy. charging program. Utilities.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Thermal Energy Storage to Vermont Energy 5,000 Leahy
Renewable Energy. Support Renewable Energy Investment
Deployment. Corporation (VEIC).
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Twin Lakes Reservoir Floating City of Lima.......... 500 Brown
Renewable Energy. Solar Study.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Updated Renewable Energy Pueblo of Zia......... 250 Heinrich
Renewable Energy. Development Feasibility Study
by the Pueblo of Zia.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Utility Upgrades for the Bedford Town of Bedford....... 500 Shaheen
Renewable Energy. Landfill Solar Project.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and Vermont Electrification and Vermont Public Power 1,000 Sanders
Renewable Energy. Clean Energy Deployment. Supply Authority.
Department of Energy....... Energy Efficiency and WMU Center for Interdisciplinary Western Michigan 350 Peters
Renewable Energy. Research on Secure, Efficient University.
and Sustainable Energy
Technology.
Department of Energy....... Office of Electricity. Cuyahoga County Utility Cuyahoga County....... 300 Brown
Microgrid Design Project.
Department of Energy....... Office of Electricity. Electrical transmission and Public Utility 2,500 Murray
distribution infrastructure for District No. 1 of
PUD No 1 of Lewis County. Lewis County.
Department of Energy....... Office of Electricity. Village of Old Brookville Incorporated Village 50 Schumer
Village Hall expansion: 52 kW of Brookville.
standby backup generator.
Department of Energy....... Office of Fossil Coal Communities Regional Region 2 Planning and 4,000 Manchin
Energy. Innovation Cluster. Development Council.
Department of Energy....... Office of Fossil Coal Mine Methane Solutions..... Community Office for 1,200 Bennet, Hickenlooper
Energy. Resource Efficiency/
Pitkin County.
Department of Energy....... Office of Fossil Emergency Backup Generator...... Melakatla Indian 540 Murkowski
Energy. Community.
Department of Energy....... Office of Fossil Enhanced Outcrop Methane Capture Southern Ute Indian 2,500 Bennet, Hickenlooper
Energy. Tribe.
Department of Energy....... Office of Fossil FEED Study for the Louisiana Department 9,000 Cassidy
Energy. implementation of a Carbon of Economic
Capture and Sequestration Development.
System.
Department of Energy....... Office of Fossil Mercer County Gas Line Extension Development Authority 2,959 Capito
Energy. of Mercer County.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2022
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Committee recommendation
compared with (+ or -)
Item 2021 Budget estimate Committee ---------------------------------
appropriation recommendation 2021
appropriation Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
Investigations..................................................... 153,000 105,837 153,000 ............... +47,163
Construction....................................................... 2,692,645 1,792,378 3,002,003 +309,358 +1,209,625
Mississippi River and Tributaries.................................. 380,000 269,688 380,000 ............... +110,312
Operation and Maintenance.......................................... 3,849,655 2,502,901 4,682,797 +833,142 +2,179,896
Regulatory Program................................................. 210,000 204,400 212,000 +2,000 +7,600
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)........... 250,000 ............... 260,000 +10,000 +260,000
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies.............................. 35,000 35,000 35,000 ............... ...............
Expenses........................................................... 206,000 199,290 216,000 +10,000 +16,710
Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)............ 5,000 5,000 5,000 ............... ...............
Rescission..................................................... -500 ............... ............... +500 ...............
Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program................ 14,200 ............... 14,200 ............... +14,200
Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund...................................... ............... 1,625,856 ............... ............... -1,625,856
Inland Waterways Trust Fund........................................ ............... 52,150 ............... ............... -52,150
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title I, Department of Defense--Civil................. 7,795,000 6,792,500 8,960,000 +1,165,000 +2,167,500
====================================================================================
TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project
Central Utah Project Completion Account............................ 21,000 20,000 21,000 ............... +1,000
Bureau of Reclamation
Water and Related Resources........................................ 1,521,125 1,379,050 1,832,101 +310,976 +453,051
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund............................ 55,875 56,499 56,499 +624 ...............
California Bay-Delta Restoration................................... 33,000 33,000 33,000 ............... ...............
Policy and Administration.......................................... 60,000 64,400 64,400 +4,400 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Bureau of Reclamation................................. 1,670,000 1,532,949 1,986,000 +316,000 +453,051
====================================================================================
Total, title II, Department of the Interior.................. 1,691,000 1,552,949 2,007,000 +316,000 +454,051
====================================================================================
TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Programs
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy............................. 2,864,000 4,732,000 3,896,971 +1,032,971 -835,029
Rescission..................................................... -2,240 ............... ............... +2,240 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 2,861,760 4,732,000 3,896,971 +1,035,211 -835,029
Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response............. 156,000 201,000 177,000 +21,000 -24,000
Electricity........................................................ 211,720 327,000 303,000 +91,280 -24,000
Nuclear Energy..................................................... 1,357,800 1,700,700 1,441,000 +83,200 -259,700
Defense function............................................... 149,800 149,800 149,800 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 1,507,600 1,850,500 1,590,800 +83,200 -259,700
Fossil Energy and Carbon Management................................ 750,000 890,000 850,000 +100,000 -40,000
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............................. 13,006 13,650 13,650 +644 ...............
Strategic Petroleum Reserve........................................ 188,000 197,000 197,000 +9,000 ...............
Sale of crude oil.............................................. ............... -25,000 -25,000 -25,000 ...............
Sale of gas reserves........................................... ............... ............... -108,000 -108,000 -108,000
Use of sale proceeds........................................... ............... 25,000 25,000 +25,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 188,000 197,000 89,000 -99,000 -108,000
SPR Petroleum Account.............................................. 1,000 7,350 7,350 +6,350 ...............
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve................................. 6,500 ............... 6,500 ............... +6,500
Energy Information Administration.................................. 126,800 126,800 129,087 +2,287 +2,287
Non-defense Environmental Cleanup.................................. 319,200 338,860 338,863 +19,663 +3
U.S. Enrichment Corporation Fund receipts...................... ............... -116,203 ............... ............... +116,203
Use of USEC Fund receipts...................................... ............... 116,203 ............... ............... -116,203
Mercury receipts............................................... -3,000 ............... ............... +3,000 ...............
Use of Mercury receipts........................................ 3,000 ............... ............... -3,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 319,200 338,860 338,863 +19,663 +3
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund........ 841,000 831,340 860,000 +19,000 +28,660
Science............................................................ 4,726,000 7,440,000 7,490,000 +2,764,000 +50,000
Emergency funding.............................................. 2,300,000 ............... ............... -2,300,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 7,026,000 7,440,000 7,490,000 +464,000 +50,000
Nuclear Waste Disposal............................................. 27,500 7,500 27,500 ............... +20,000
Technology Transitions............................................. ............... 19,470 19,470 +19,470 ...............
Clean Energy Demonstrations........................................ ............... 400,000 100,000 +100,000 -300,000
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy........................... 427,000 500,000 500,000 +73,000 ...............
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Climate.......................... ............... 200,000 ............... ............... -200,000
Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program:
Guaranteed loan subsidy........................................ ............... 150,000 ............... ............... -150,000
Administrative costs........................................... 32,000 32,000 32,000 ............... ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -3,000 -3,000 -3,000 ............... ...............
Rescission of emergency funding................................ -392,000 ............... ............... +392,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... -363,000 179,000 29,000 +392,000 -150,000
Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program............ 5,000 5,000 5,000 ............... ...............
Rescission of emergency funding................................ -1,908,000 ............... ............... +1,908,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... -1,903,000 5,000 5,000 +1,908,000 ...............
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program............................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 ............... ...............
Indian Energy Policy and Programs.................................. 22,000 122,000 122,000 +100,000 ...............
Departmental Administration........................................ 259,378 422,338 343,578 +84,200 -78,760
Miscellaneous revenues......................................... -93,378 -100,578 -100,578 -7,200 ...............
Net appropriation.......................................... 166,000 321,760 243,000 +77,000 -78,760
Office of the Inspector General.................................... 57,739 78,000 78,000 +20,261 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Energy programs....................................... 12,444,825 18,790,230 16,878,191 +4,433,366 -1,912,039
====================================================================================
Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National Nuclear Security Administration
Weapons Activities................................................. 15,345,000 15,484,295 15,484,295 +139,295 ...............
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................................... 2,260,000 2,264,000 2,264,000 +4,000 ...............
Rescission..................................................... ............... -330,000 ............... ............... +330,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 2,260,000 1,934,000 2,264,000 +4,000 +330,000
Naval Reactors..................................................... 1,684,000 1,866,705 1,840,505 +156,505 -26,200
Rescission..................................................... ............... -6,000 ............... ............... +6,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 1,684,000 1,860,705 1,840,505 +156,505 -20,200
Federal Salaries and Expenses...................................... 443,200 464,000 453,000 +9,800 -11,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, National Nuclear Security Administration.............. 19,732,200 19,743,000 20,041,800 +309,600 +298,800
====================================================================================
Environmental and Other Defense Activities
Defense Environmental Cleanup...................................... 6,426,000 6,841,670 6,510,000 +84,000 -331,670
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal....................................................... 6,426,000 6,841,670 6,510,000 +84,000 -331,670
Defense UED&D...................................................... ............... ............... 860,000 +860,000 +860,000
Other Defense Activities........................................... 920,000 1,170,000 930,400 +10,400 -239,600
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Environmental and Other Defense Activities.............. 7,346,000 8,011,670 8,300,400 +954,400 +288,730
====================================================================================
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities........................ 27,078,200 27,754,670 28,342,200 +1,264,000 +587,530
====================================================================================
Power Marketing Administrations\1\
Operation and Maintenance, Southeastern Power
Administration..................................................... 7,246 7,184 7,184 -62 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -7,246 -7,184 -7,184 +62 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Operation and Maintenance, Southwestern Power
Administration..................................................... 47,540 48,324 48,324 +784 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -37,140 -37,924 -37,924 -784 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 10,400 10,400 10,400 ............... ...............
Construction Rehabilitation, Operation and Maintenance, Western 259,126 285,237 285,237 +26,111 ...............
Area Power Administration.........................................
Offsetting collections......................................... -169,754 -194,465 -194,465 -24,711 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 89,372 90,772 90,772 +1,400 ...............
Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund.................. 5,776 5,808 5,808 +32 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -5,548 -5,580 -5,580 -32 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 228 228 228 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Power Marketing Administrations......................... 100,000 101,400 101,400 +1,400 ...............
====================================================================================
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Salaries and expenses.............................................. 404,350 463,900 466,426 +62,076 +2,526
Revenues applied................................................... -404,350 -463,900 -466,426 -62,076 -2,526
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
General Provision--Department of Energy
Colorado River Basin Fund (Sec 306(b))............................. 2,000 ............... 2,000 ............... +2,000
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Construction Project 99-D-143 ............... ............... -330,000 -330,000 -330,000
Rescission (Sec 308)..............................................
Naval Reactors Rescission (Sec 308)................................ ............... ............... -6,000 -6,000 -6,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, General Provisions...................................... 2,000 ............... -334,000 -336,000 -334,000
====================================================================================
Total, title III, Department of Energy......................... 39,625,025 46,646,300 44,987,791 +5,362,766 -1,658,509
Appropriations............................................. (39,627,265) (46,982,300) (45,323,791) (+5,696,526) (-1,658,509)
Rescissions................................................ (-2,240) (-336,000) (-336,000) (-333,760) ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian Regional Commission.................................... 180,000 235,000 210,000 +30,000 -25,000
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board............................ 31,000 31,000 31,000 ............... ...............
Delta Regional Authority........................................... 30,000 30,100 30,100 +100 ...............
Denali Commission.................................................. 15,000 15,100 15,100 +100 ...............
Northern Border Regional Commission................................ 30,000 30,100 35,000 +5,000 +4,900
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission............................. 1,000 2,500 2,500 +1,500 ...............
Southwest Border Regional Commission............................... 250 2,500 2,500 +2,250 ...............
Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and expenses.......................................... 830,900 873,901 873,901 +43,001 ...............
Revenues....................................................... -710,293 -745,258 -745,258 -34,965 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 120,607 128,643 128,643 +8,036 ...............
Office of Inspector General.................................... 13,499 13,799 13,799 +300 ...............
Revenues....................................................... -11,106 -11,442 -11,442 -336 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 2,393 2,357 2,357 -36 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Nuclear Regulatory Commission........................... 123,000 131,000 131,000 +8,000 ...............
====================================================================================
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board............................... 3,600 3,800 3,800 +200 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title IV, Independent agencies.......................... 413,850 481,100 461,000 +47,150 -20,100
====================================================================================
TITLE V--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec 505 (Additional Funds for Water) (Emergency)................... ............... ............... 450,000 +450,000 +450,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title V, General Provisions............................. ............... ............... 450,000 +450,000 +450,000
====================================================================================
Grand total........................................................ 49,524,875 55,472,849 56,865,791 +7,340,916 +1,392,942
Appropriations................................................. (49,527,615) (55,808,849) (56,751,791) (+7,224,176) (+942,942)
Emergency appropriations....................................... (2,300,000) ............... (450,000) (-1,850,000) (+450,000)
Rescissions.................................................... (-2,740) (-336,000) (-336,000) (-333,260) ...............
Rescissions of emergency appropriations........................ (-2,300,000) ............... ............... (+2,300,000) ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grand total less emergencies....................................... 49,524,875 55,472,849 56,415,791 +6,890,916 +942,942
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Totals adjusted to net out alternative financing costs, reimbursable agreement funding, and power purchase and wheeling expenditures. Offsetting
collection totals only reflect funds collected for annual expenses, excluding power purchase wheeling.
[all]