U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Taking the Fight to the Enemy: Chinese Thinking about Long-Distance and Expeditionary Operations

Authored by Dr. Larry M. Wortzel.

Brief Synopsis

View the Executive Summary

According to many analysts of China’s military, when an officer of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) suggests new forms of operations, expanded domains of warfare, or new weapons systems, American security planners can dismiss these projections as merely “aspirational” thinking. This assessment of the PLA Academy of Military Science publication Long Distance Operations and other military publications of this genre propose that suggestions for forms of future warfare capture currents of thinking among mid-grade officers and also reflect how the senior political and military leaders in China want the PLA to evolve. Among the trends identified in this Letort Paper is the requirement for a capacity to more effectively attack a distant adversary, such as the United States, and to hold that adversary’s population at risk. This analysis also shows that a number of military analysts in China perceive that the populace is at risk from attacks by stronger, distant states. In the past 5 years, the PLA has exercised to develop force projection and expeditionary capabilities. As described in brief in this analysis, in the past 6 months, the PLA has changed its own force structure and posture in ways that will facilitate expeditionary operations.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

• 
  Strategic Landscape, 2050: Preparing the U.S. Military for New Era Dynamics

• 
  The Clash of the Trinities: A New Theoretical Analysis of the General Nature of War

• 
  Building Partner Capacity in Africa: Keys to Success

• 
  Rotational Deployments vs. Forward Stationing: How Can the Army Achieve Assurance and Deterrence Eff...

• 
  What Should the U.S. Army Learn From History? Recovery From a Strategy Deficit

• 
  The Army War College Review Vol. 3, No. 1

• 
  Ends, Means, Ideology, and Pride: Why the Axis Lost and What We Can Learn from Its Defeat

• 
  U.S. Landpower in the South China Sea

Survey: Taking the Fight to the Enemy: Chinese Thinking about Long-Distance and Expeditionary Operations

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality? (5 best - 1 Worst)

12345

N/A

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

YesNoNo Opinion

Your Comments (No URLs Allowed):

If you'd like a reply to your comments, provide your email:
(optional)

Also by the Author/Editor:

The Chinese People's Liberation Army and Information Warfare
China's Nuclear Forces: Operations, Training, Doctrine, Command, Control and Campaign Planning
Shaping China's Security Environment: The Role of the People's Liberation Army
Chinese National Security: Decisionmaking Under Stress
Civil-Military Change in China: Elites, Institutes, and Ideas After the 16th Party Congress
The Lessons of History: The Chinese people's Liberation Army at 75
China's Growing Military Power: Perspectives on Security, Ballistic Missiles, and Conventional Capabilities
The Asia-Pacific in the U.S. National Security Calculus for a New Millennium

View other pubs in the following categories:

Asia Pacific
Military Change and Transformation
Military Strategy and Policy
21st Century Warfare